This disclosure relates to electrolysis systems and, more particularly, to electrolysis systems incorporated into point of use discharge nozzles.
Disinfection and detoxification of fresh water for human consumption and waste water for discharge to environment are topics of increasing importance as the population continues to grow and sources of sanitary water diminish. In view of these demands, municipalities and private users already routinely treat potable water and waste water with chlorine or other oxidants to deactivate biological activity in the water. Treating the water with such chemicals can kill bacteria and viruses, decolor and deodorize the water, and otherwise sanitize the water for subsequent use. In the case of fresh water production, source water is typically extracted from an aquifer or other body, processed in a fresh water treatment plant, and then discharged into a municipal water system. By contrast, waste water treated in a waste water plant is often discharged into an outdoor environment, such as a river or lake, after being processed.
While these existing technologies can provide effective water sterilization upon treatment, the effectiveness of the treatment can diminish over time. For example, if treated water subsequently comes into contact with bacteria-carrying and/or virus-carrying air or surfaces, the treated water can act as a breeding ground for various pathogens. Over time, the sterility of the treated water can diminish to the point where the water is no longer fit for consumption, bathing, or direct use. As one example, a faucet may retain water between the shutoff valve and the outlet when not in use. This retained water is generally not protected from invasion of airborne pathogens, potentially allowing pathogens to accumulate and grow within the retained water. Purging the retained water from the faucet prior to use can help ameliorate the problems of pathogenic penetration into the unprotected water column. Yet users often do not know to purge a faucet prior to use and, in the case of “smart” or touchless faucets, cannot purge the faucet without being in direct contact with the discharging contents. As a result, retained water within plumbing structures can be a health and safety risk.
In general, this disclosure relates to electrolysis systems incorporated into plumbing components, such as point of use discharge nozzles. Example point of use discharge nozzles include, but are not limited to, sink faucet nozzles, drinking fountain nozzles, shower nozzles, refrigerator dispensing nozzles, and soda fountain nozzles. In some examples, the electrolysis system includes electrodes that are incorporated into the point of use discharge nozzle. The electrodes can be positioned between a shutoff valve of the point of use discharge nozzle and an outlet through which water discharges into the ambient environment. Upon closing the shutoff valve, water will cease flowing through the point of use discharge nozzle but will not completely evacuate from the nozzle. Instead, a small portion of water may be retained within the point of use discharge nozzle, for example, between the shutoff valve and the nozzle outlet. To help prevent pathogenic contamination of this retained water and also biofouling growth on the inside walls of the nozzle, the electrodes are positioned to generate an oxidizing species within the water. For example, the electrodes may operate continuously to generate oxidizing species within the retained water until there is an equilibrium concentration of the oxidizing species in the water (e.g., the rate at which the oxidizing species are consumed equals the rate at which new oxidizing species are generated). This may prevent contamination of the water retained in the discharge nozzle and also prevent biofouling on the inside of the discharge nozzle.
The oxidizing species electrolytically generated in the static water present within the point of use discharge nozzle can inhibit the growth of pathogens within the water and, correspondingly, on the walls of the discharge nozzle. For example, the concentration of oxidizing species generated by the electrolysis system in the static water may be sufficient to maintain bacteriostatic conditions, e.g., whereby any bacteria in the water cannot grow or multiply. When so implemented, the electrolysis system can help protect the otherwise unprotected water retained within the point of use discharge nozzle, e.g., when water is not flowing through the nozzle. Further, by inhibiting pathogenic growth and multiplication within the retained water, the oxidizing species can inhibit the formation of a pathogen-rich biofilm on the inside surfaces of the discharge nozzle. Were such a biofilm allowed to form, sterilized water subsequently passing through the discharge nozzle during operation can become contaminated with pathogens from the biofilm. Thus, the oxidizing species may significantly reduce or eliminate contamination of both the static water retained by the discharge nozzle when not in use and also sterilized water flowing from a source when the nozzle is in use.
In some applications, the electrolysis system can be implemented to create a barrier layer of water rich in oxidizing species. The barrier layer can be positioned adjacent the outlet of the fluid nozzle such that any air entering the fluid nozzle (e.g., air containing pathogens) must flow through the oxidizing species-rich barrier layer. In this way, the electrolysis system can guard against invasive airborne pathogens. While the electrolysis system may also generate oxidizing species when water is flowing through the point of use discharge nozzle, the volume of water flowing through the nozzle may dilute any generated oxidizing species to a concentration below that required to kill or inhibit the growth of pathogens. In such applications, the electrolysis system may generate higher concentrations of oxidizing species in static (e.g., non-flowing) volumes of water.
In one example, a point of use electrolysis system is described that includes a point of use discharge nozzle and electrodes. The point of use discharge nozzle has an inlet configured to receive liquid from a liquid source and an outlet configured to discharge the liquid into an ambient environment. The electrodes include an anode and a cathode configured to electrochemically generate an oxidizing species within the point of use discharge nozzle. According to the example, the point of use discharge nozzle is configured to trap liquid from the liquid source, when liquid is not flowing through the point of use discharge nozzle, thereby providing a trapped liquid, and the electrodes are configured to generate the oxidizing species within the trapped liquid.
In another example, a method is described that includes retaining liquid received from a liquid source in a point of use discharge nozzle, when liquid is not flowing through the point of use discharge nozzle, to thereby provide a trapped liquid. The point of use discharge nozzle has an inlet configured to receive the liquid from the liquid source and an outlet configured to discharge the liquid into an ambient environment. The example method also includes electrochemically generating an oxidizing species within the trapped liquid in the point of use discharge nozzle via electrodes that comprise an anode and a cathode.
In another example, an electrolysis system is described that includes a plumbing component in fluid communication with a liquid source and electrodes. The example specifies that when liquid is flowing from the liquid source the liquid flows through the plumbing component, and when liquid ceases flowing from the liquid source the plumbing component retains a trapped volume of the liquid, the trapped volume of liquid being in contact with air from an ambient environment. The example further specifies that the electrodes include an anode and a cathode configured to electrochemically generate an oxidizing species within the trapped volume of liquid retained by the plumbing component.
The details of one or more examples are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
In general, the disclosure relates to devices, systems, and techniques for electrolytically generating oxidizing species within a static fluid exposed to a gaseous environment, such as ambient air. In some examples, electrodes are installed within a plumbing component, such as a point of use discharge nozzle, and configured to electrolytically generate the oxidizing species within the plumbing component. In accordance with these examples, the plumbing component may have a fluid pathway through which fluid intermittently flows during operation. When fluid is not flowing through the plumbing component, however, a portion of the fluid may be retained within the fluid pathway, creating a static volume of fluid. This static (e.g., non-flowing) volume of fluid may be exposed to air and, if left untreated, prone to contamination, e.g., as pathogens on the walls of the fluid pathway or from the air enter the fluid and begin to multiply within the fluid. This process can result in the contamination of the static volume of fluid and, in turn, the formation of pathogen-containing biofouling inside the plumbing component.
To help prevent contamination of the static volume of fluid and the formation of biofouling, an electrolysis system can be provided with electrodes positioned within the static volume of fluid. The electrodes can electrolytically generate oxidizing species within the static volume of fluid. These oxidizing species can inhibit the infiltration and/or growth of any pathogens in the static volume of fluid, helping to maintain the sterility of the fluid and prevent a biofoulant from growing on the walls of the plumbing component. Accordingly, if a user were to subsequently ingest or come into physical contact with the static volume of fluid, for example by opening a faucet valve that pushes the previously static volume of fluid out of the faucet, the user can avoid being exposed to pathogen-rich fluid. In addition, by inhibiting biofouling from forming inside the plumbing component, the user can help avoid being exposed to pathogens that may otherwise transfer into a sanitary fluid as the fluid flows through the plumbing component and in contact with the biofouling.
While avoiding exposure to unsanitary fluid is consistent with good practice for most individuals, the benefits may be of particular importance for those with compromised immune systems. For example, patients in hospitals, cancer wards, burn centers, and other medical environments often have greater susceptibility to infection due to their inhibited immune systems. For these individuals, exposure to even relatively low levels of pathogens can have significant consequences. By electrolytically generating chemical species within static fluid exposed to an ambient environment, pathological invasion and growth in the static fluid can be inhibited.
Although fluid does not flow through discharge nozzle 12 when shutoff valve 24 is closed, residual fluid may nevertheless be retained in the discharge nozzle. For example, as will be described in greater detail, residual fluid may be retained in discharge nozzle 12 between shutoff valve 24 and ambient environment 18. The retained fluid may be fluid originating from fluid source 14 that traveled past and/or through shutoff valve 24 prior to completely closing the valve but that does not exit discharge nozzle 12. This retained fluid may be a static (e.g., non-flowing) volume of fluid that is in communication with air from ambient environment 18.
To help inhibit pathogenic growth and multiplication within the static fluid retained by discharge nozzle 12 and biofouling accumulation inside the discharge nozzle, among other uses, fluid system 10 includes electrodes 26. Electrodes 26 are positioned in contact with the static fluid in discharge nozzle 12. Electrodes 26 include at least one anode and at least one cathode. In operation, electrodes 26 electrolytically generate oxidizing chemical species within the retained fluid. These oxidizing species may attack bacteria, viruses, and/or other impurities attempting to grow and/or invade the static fluid, e.g., from ambient environment 18. In this manner, fluid system 10 can help protect against pathogenic contamination of any fluid stored in discharge nozzle 12 when fluid is not flowing through the nozzle.
The concentration of the oxidizing species in the retained fluid may be comparatively low or nonexistent immediately upon closing shutoff valve 24 and trapping the fluid in discharge nozzle 12. Over time, however, the concentration of the oxidizing species in the retained fluid may increase as electrodes 26 continue to generate additional oxidizing species within the fluid. The concentration may continue increasing until equilibrium conditions are reached in which the rate at which new oxidizing species are generated equals the rate at which existing oxidizing species are destroyed. In such applications, the ability of the static fluid to resist pathogenic invasion and growth can increase the longer the fluid is left unpurged in discharge nozzle 12.
As will be described in greater detail below (
Independent of the source of the power driving electrodes 26, the electrodes may be configured to generate an oxidizing species within the static fluid retained by the discharge nozzle. The type or types of oxidizing species generated by the electrodes can vary, e.g., based on the configuration of the electrodes and the chemical composition of the fluid within discharge nozzle 12. Example oxidizing species that can be generated by electrodes 26 include, but are not limited to, hypochlorite, hypochlorous acid, chlorine dioxide, ozone, hydrogen peroxide, hypobromite, hypobromous acid, and hypofluorous acid. In one example, electrodes 26 are configured to generate hydrogen peroxide. Main reactions for generating hydrogen peroxide include:
1. Cathode: 2e-+O2+H2O→HO2-+OH—
2. Anode: H2O→½O2+2H++2e-
3. Overall: ½O2+2H2O→2HO2-+OH—+2H+
The type of oxidizing species generated by electrodes 26 may be selected based on the types of pathogens prone to invade discharge nozzle 12 and, correspondingly, the effectiveness of different types of oxidizing species at inhibiting those pathogens. Hydrogen peroxide has a comparatively high solubility in water, allowing residual water in discharge nozzle 12 to be infused with comparatively high concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. Further, the decomposition products of hydrogen peroxide are environmentally benign, comprising water and oxygen. By contrast, ozone has a comparatively low solubility in water. This can result in a lower concentration of the oxidizing species being present in the residual water in discharge nozzle 12 as compared to if hydrogen peroxide were generated in the residual water. This can also necessitate a longer residence time to reach a concentration sufficient to inhibit pathogen activity in the residual fluid. Further, halogen based oxidizing species may require that a halide source be added to the fluid retained by the discharge nozzle, increasing the complexity of the electrolysis system. Notwithstanding these distinctions, electrodes 26 can be configured to generate any suitable oxidizing species, and an electrolysis system in accordance with the disclosure is not limited to generating any particular type of oxidizing species.
During operation, electrodes 26 generate oxidizing species within a volume of fluid contained in discharge nozzle 12. The concentration of the oxidizing species in the fluid will vary, e.g., based on the oxidizing species production rate of electrodes 26, the volume of fluid in the nozzle, and the amount of time the fluid has been present within the nozzle. To help avoid pathogenic contamination of the residual fluid in the nozzle and, correspondingly, growth of a biofilm inside the nozzle, electrodes 26 can generate an amount of oxidizing species sufficient to substantially inhibit (and, in other examples, entirely inhibit) growth and/or multiplication of pathogens in the residual fluid. Such pathogens may enter the fluid in the form of airborne contaminates carried by air within the ambient environment 18 surrounding an outlet opening of discharge nozzle 12. In addition, in applications where pathogens are already present on the wall surfaces of discharge nozzle 12 and/or in the fluid entering the nozzle, such pathogens may be prone to multiply within the static fluid held in the nozzle, were oxidizing species not generated by electrodes 26.
As one example, electrodes 26 may be configured to generate oxidizing species at a rate sufficient such that the pathogenic count in the fluid retained in discharge nozzle 12 does not exceed (and, in other examples, substantially exceed) the pathogenic count of the fluid entering the discharge nozzle from fluid source 14. For example, electrodes 26 may generate oxidizing species at a rate and/or an amount of oxidizing species sufficient to establish bacteriostatic conditions in the water retained by discharge nozzle 12. In accordance with these examples, if the fluid entering discharge nozzle 12 when shutoff valve 24 is open has a certain virus count and a certain bacteria count, the fluid retained in the nozzle after the shutoff valve is closed can have a virus count and bacteria count less than or equal to those of the entering fluid. Such a virus count and bacteria count can be measured after the fluid retained by discharge nozzle 12 has been held by the nozzle for a given period of time, such as greater than 5 minutes, greater than 30 minutes, greater than 1 hour, greater than 6 hours, greater than 24 hours, or greater than 48 hours.
Where fluid that enters discharge nozzle 12 and is subsequently retained in the nozzle contains pathogens, the oxidizing species generated by electrodes 26 may or may not kill the pathogens in the incoming fluid. That is, in addition to inhibiting the growth or multiplication of new pathogens in the retained fluid, the electrolytically generated oxidizing species may or may not also kill pathogens present in the incoming fluid. The efficacy of the electrolytically generated oxidizing species to kill pathogens entering the nozzle with the incoming fluid may depend, e.g., on the residence time of the fluid in the nozzle before it is purged and the rate at which electrodes 26 generate oxidizing species.
Although electrodes 26 can generate oxidizing species at any suitable rate and to any suitable concentration in the fluid retained within discharge nozzle 12, in some examples, the electrodes generate an amount of oxidizing species sufficient to provide an oxidizing species concentration greater than 0.5 parts per million (ppm) in the retained fluid. For example, the electrodes may generate an amount of oxidizing species sufficient to provide an oxidizing species concentration greater than 2 ppm, greater than 5 ppm, greater than 10 ppm, greater than 50 ppm, greater than 200 ppm, or greater than 1000 ppm. In other examples, the electrodes generate an amount of oxidizing species sufficient to provide an oxidizing species concentration less than a certain concentration, such as less than 2500 ppm, less than 1000 ppm, less than 500, less than 200 ppm, less than 100 ppm, less than 50 ppm, or less than 25 ppm. For example, the electrodes may generate an amount of oxidizing species sufficient to provide an oxidizing species concentration ranging from approximately 0.5 ppm to approximately 2000 ppm, such as from approximately 1 ppm to approximately 750 ppm, from approximately 2 ppm to approximately 200 ppm, from approximately 10 ppm to approximately 50 ppm, from approximately 25 ppm to approximately 75 ppm, or from approximately 30 ppm to approximately 150 ppm. The oxidizing species concentration provided by electrodes 26 may be measured when the concentration in the retained fluid reaches equilibrium conditions, where the rate at which new oxidizing species are generated equals the rate at which existing oxidizing species are destroyed.
Although increasing the amount of oxidizing species generated by electrodes 26 can increase the anti-pathogenic efficacy of fluid system 10, increasing the production rates of the oxidizing species can increase the power demands of the electrolysis system. In applications where electrodes 26 are connected to line power, additional power demand by the electrodes may not be a significant design consideration. By contrast, in applications where electrodes 26 are powered by a battery, minimizing power demand can be useful to extend the service life of the battery. By designing the electrolysis system to produce a sufficient amount of oxidizing species to inhibit pathological contamination of the residual fluid but not produce excess oxidizing species, the service life of the battery may be maximized.
With further reference to
In
Fluid system 10 and point of use discharge nozzle 12 can be used in any applications in which it is desired to intermittently deliver liquid to a dispensing location in which the liquid will be used. As examples, point of use discharge nozzle 12 can be implemented as a sink faucet nozzle, a drinking fountain nozzle, a shower nozzle, a refrigerator water dispensing nozzle, a soda fountain nozzle, a garden hose nozzle, or any other suitable type of fluid outlet.
Fluid source 14 will vary depending on the application in which discharge nozzle 12 is implemented. In one example, fluid source 14 is a pressurized water main that delivers pressurized water having passed through a municipal water treatment plant. Water from such a source may have a bacteria count less than 0.01 milligrams/liter (e.g., less than 0.0001 mg/L) and a virus count less than 0.01 milligrams/liter (e.g., less than 0.0001 mg/L). For example, water from such a source may have a count of less than 0.01 mg/L (e.g., less than 0.0001 mg/L) for each of Cryptosporidium, Giardia lamblia, Heterotrophic plate count (HPC), Legionella, Total Coliforms (including fecal coliform and E. Coli), and viruses. When water with these bacteria and virus concentrations is retained in discharge nozzle 12, oxidizing species generated by electrodes 26 may prevent the bacteria and virus concentrations from exceeding those of the incoming water. In other examples, fluid source 14 may include a container, tank, tote, or other reservoir containing a fixed volume of fluid to be delivered through discharge nozzle 12.
In some additional examples, point of use discharge nozzle 12 can be used in a system that includes a touchless sensor configured to control the supply of liquid from fluid source 14 to the discharge nozzle. The touchless sensor can include an infrared sensor, magnetic sensor, optical sensor, or other sensor capable of detecting motion and/or the proximity of an individual to the sensor. In response to detecting an individual's presence, the touchless sensor can send an electric control signal that causes shutoff valve 24 to open and allows fluid to flow through discharge nozzle 12. Touchless faucets that may utilize a touchless sensor and point of use discharge nozzle include those commonly found in public restrooms, on public drinking fountains, in commercial kitchens, in hospital facilities, and the like. Because these types of touchless faucets often cannot be activated without an individual being in contact with the discharging contents, it is difficult to purge the faucets of residual contaminated water.
Shutoff valve 24 functions to control liquid flow from fluid source 14 to and/or through discharge nozzle 12. In general, shutoff valve 24 may be any device that regulates the flow of fluid by opening or closing fluid communication through a fluid conduit. In various examples, shutoff valve 24 may be a diaphragm valve, ball valve, check valve, gate valve, slide valve, piston valve, rotary valve, shuttle valve, and/or combinations thereof. In some examples, shutoff valve 24 is integrated into a housing that also contains discharge nozzle 12, such as a sink faucet that contains a faucet valve and an integrated discharge nozzle. In other examples, shutoff valve 24 is physically separate from a housing containing discharge nozzle 12. For example, shutoff valve 24 can be physically separate from discharge nozzle 12 and connected to the discharge nozzle with a conduit or other intermediate structure separating the shutoff valve from the discharge nozzle. In still other examples, fluid system 10 does not include shutoff valve 24. In these examples, fluid flow to discharge nozzle 12 may be controlled by starting or stopping a pump, attaching or detaching a fluid source to a conduit containing the discharge nozzle, or similar fluid control techniques.
In the example of
An electrolysis system implemented in a point of use discharge nozzle (
With reference to
Electrolytic species generator 54 is configured to electrolytically generate oxidizing species within liquid in housing 52. Electrolytic species generator 54 includes an anode 62, a cathode 64, and a trap 66. Anode 62 is spaced from cathode 64 such that, when fluid is retained within housing 52, the anode and cathode are both in contact with the retained fluid and the retained fluid bridges the separation gap between the anode and the cathode. Trap 66 is positioned between inlet 58 of the discharge nozzle and outlet 60. Trap 66 may be a physical structure that fluid passing through housing 52 must flow around in order to travel from the inlet to the outlet. For example, trap 66 may be a structure that prevents fluid entering inlet 58 from flowing in a linear pathway though housing 52 by requiring the fluid to flow around the trap in order to discharge through outlet 60. In some examples, trap 66 defines a reservoir that holds liquid fluid in discharge nozzle 50, thereby generating a trapped pool of liquid in which anode 62 and cathode 64 can generate oxidizing species. In some additional examples, trap 66 defines a housing that houses a battery powering electrolytic species generator 54. Although electrolytic species generator 54 is illustrated as a module structure in which anode 62, cathode 64, and trap 66 are held together to define a unitary structure, in other examples, the electrolytic species generator may be formed of separate components that, in combination, function to provide the features attributed to electrolytic species generator 54 in this disclosure.
Point of use discharge nozzle 50 can be used in a variety of applications in which it is desired to deliver liquid to a dispensing location in which the liquid will be used, such as those described above with respect to discharge nozzle 12 in
During operation of discharge nozzle 50 in which fluid is flowing through the nozzle, fluid enters housing 52 via inlet 58. Upon entering housing 52, the fluid impinges upon trap 66 and is diverted laterally around the sides of the trap. The fluid travels down the sides of the trap (e.g., in the direction of gravity and/or in the negative Z-direction indicated on
Configuring discharge nozzle 50 with a trap, such as trap 66, may be useful to help provide a trapped volume of liquid in the nozzle, when fluid is not flowing through the nozzle, in which to generate oxidizing species. As discussed above with respect to
By configuring discharge nozzle 50 with a trapped volume of fluid in which electrodes generate oxidizing species, the trapped volume of fluid can filter and deactivate contaminants carried into the nozzle. For example, as airborne contaminants carried by the ambient environment surrounding discharge nozzle 50 enter the nozzle, the airborne contaminants may be directed through the trapped volume of fluid. The fluid may function to filter the contaminants from the air. Further, oxidizing species generated by the electrodes may react with the contaminants to render the contaminants harmless. Such an arrangement can help protect the sterility of any fluid retained within discharge nozzle 50 and/or an otherwise unprotected column of fluid extending behind the discharge nozzle.
With further reference to
In some examples, discharge nozzle 50 provides a trapped volume of liquid that is positioned such that substantially all (and, in other examples, all) gas that enters the nozzle from the ambient environment via outlet 60 passes through the trapped volume of liquid. For example, the trapped volume of liquid may be positioned so that substantially all (and, in other examples, all) air attempting to travel through discharge nozzle 50 from outlet 60 to inlet 58 must travel through the trapped volume of liquid. Preventing air from the ambient environment, and any contaminants contained therein, from bypassing the trapped volume of liquid may be useful to help prevent contaminants from bypassing the oxidizing species generated by the electrodes.
Independent of the specific technique used to provide the trapped volume of liquid within discharge nozzle 50, the amount of liquid trapped within the nozzle may vary, e.g., based on the size of the nozzle and the rate of oxidizing species production by the electrodes. In some examples, discharge nozzle 50 is configured to provide a trapped volume of liquid ranging from approximately 0.1 milliliters (ml) to approximately 1000 ml, such as from approximately 0.5 ml to approximately 500 ml, or from approximately 5 ml to approximately 50. In other examples, the trapped volume of liquid is less than a given value, such as less than 2500 ml, less than 1000 ml, less than 500 ml, less than 250 ml, less than 100 ml, or less than 50 ml. The trapped volume of liquid may be the volume of liquid in which the electrodes generate oxidizing species, when fluid is not flowing through the nozzle. In general, as the volume of liquid trapped by discharge nozzle 50 increases, the current and/or time needed to generate an oxidizing species concentration sufficient to effectively eliminate pathogen growth also increases. The electrodes may generate an amount of oxidizing species within the trapped volume of fluid sufficient to provide any suitable oxidizing species concentration, including those discussed above with respect to
Electrolytic species generator 54 in the example of
In the example of
With further reference to
During operation, discharge nozzle 50 (
Different fluid and electrolysis systems and techniques for generating an oxidizing species within a static volume of fluid have been described in relation to
To help prevent odors, pathogen growth and multiplication, and/or other unsanitary conditions from developing in the trapped liquid retained in plumping trap 21, an electrolysis system can be installed with electrodes 26 positioned within the trapped liquid. Electrodes 26 can generate oxidizing species within the trapped liquid during operation as described above (
The trapped volume of liquid may form a barrier layer extending across an entire cross-section of the plumbing component. The barrier layer may be positioned such that any air entering the plumbing component must contact and pass through the barrier layer to travel from the fluid outlet to the fluid inlet. Although the volume of the trapped liquid can vary, e.g., based on the size of the plumbing component, in some examples, the volume of liquid is less than 1 liter, such as less than 500 milliliters, or less than 100 milliliters. The trapped volume of liquid may be substantially static in that the liquid does not exit through a fluid outlet of the plumbing component (except, in some examples, via evaporation) and fresh liquid does not enter the trapped volume of liquid through a fluid inlet.
The example technique of
After oxidizing species have been generated in the trapped volume of fluid, the trapped volume of fluid is discharged from the plumbing component (104). The trapped volume of fluid retained in the plumbing component can be discharged by opening fluid communication between a fluid source and the plumbing component. As new fluid enters the plumbing component, the entering fluid can flush the trapped volume of fluid out of the component. The length of time the trapped volume of fluid will remain trapped in the component before being discharged will vary, e.g., based on how frequently the plumbing component is used. In some examples, the trapped volume of fluid is retained for a period greater than 5 minutes, such as greater than 30 minutes, greater than 1 hour, greater than 4 hours, greater than 8 hours, greater than 12 hours, or greater than 24 hours. By electrolytically generating an oxidizing species within the trapped volume of liquid, pathogen growth and multiplication within the liquid can be inhibited. Accordingly, a user coming in contact with the trapped volume of liquid when the liquid is subsequently discharged can avoid being exposed to high levels of pathogens and other contaminants.
The details of one or more examples are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/863,133 filed Aug. 7, 2013, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61863133 | Aug 2013 | US |