This disclosure relates to a projection system for projecting images for a three-dimensional viewing experience, and more in particular to a polarization conversion system utilizing polarized light for encoding stereoscopic images.
Three-dimensional (3D) imagery can be synthesized using polarization control following the projector and polarization controlling eyewear (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,792,850 to Lipton, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein).
A conventional implementation of polarization control at the projector is shown in
This conventional system has been used in theatres. However, the conventional system requires that greater than 50% of the light is absorbed by the polarizer, and the resulting image is greater than 50% dimmer than that of a typical 2D theatre. The dimmer image can limit the size of theatre used for 3D applications and/or provides a less desirable viewing experience for the audience.
Addressing the aforementioned problems, various embodiments of polarization conversion systems that receive light from a projector are described. The polarization conversion systems present a brighter screen image in cinematic applications utilizing polarized light for three-dimensional viewing.
In an embodiment, a polarization conversion system includes a polarization beam splitter (PBS), a polarization rotator, and a polarization switch. The PBS is operable to receive randomly-polarized light bundles from a projector lens, and direct first light bundles having a first state of polarization (SOP) along a first light path. The PBS is also operable to direct second light bundles having a second SOP along a second light path. The polarization rotator is located on the second light path, and is operable to translate the second SOP to the first SOP. The polarization switch is operable to receive first and second light bundles from the first and second light paths respectively, and to selectively translate the polarization states of the first and second light bundles to one of a first output SOP and a second output SOP. First light bundles are transmitted toward a projection screen. A reflecting element may be located in the second light path to direct second light bundles toward a projection screen such that the first and second light bundles substantially overlap to form a brighter screen image.
In accordance with another aspect of the disclosure, a method for stereoscopic image projection includes receiving randomly-polarized light from a projector, directing first state of polarization (SOP) light on a first light path, and directing second SOP light on a second light path. The method also includes transforming the second SOP light on the second light path to first SOP light, and selectively translating the first SOP light on both light paths to one of a first output SOP and a second output SOP.
Other aspects and embodiments are described below in the detailed description.
Various embodiments of polarization conversion systems that receive light from a projector are described. The polarization conversion systems present a brighter screen image in cinematic applications utilizing polarized light for three-dimensional viewing.
In operation, ray bundles A, B, and C emerge randomly polarized from the lens 122 and are projected toward a screen 130 to form an image. In this embodiment, a PBS 112 is inserted in place of the polarizer 22 shown in
The S-polarized light 126 reflected by the PBS 112 passes through a polarization rotator 114 (e.g., a half-wave plate, preferably achromatic in some embodiments) and is rotated to p-polarized light 128. The new p-polarized light 128 passes to a fold mirror 116. The fold mirror 116 reflects the new p-polarized light 128 and passes it to polarization switch 120. The polarization switch 120, acting on p-polarized ray bundles A′, B′, and C′, rotates the polarization of the ray bundles in alternating frames, in synchronization with the rotation of bundles A, B, and C. The position of bundles A′, B′, and C′ at the screen may be adjusted (e.g., by adjusting the tilt of the fold mirror 116) to closely or exactly coincide with the positions of bundles A, B, and C at the screen. Since nearly all of the randomly polarized light 106 from the projection lens 122 is imaged at the screen 130 with a single polarization state, the resulting image of the system in
In this exemplary embodiment, the PBS 112 in
In some embodiments, the polarization rotator 114 in
In some embodiments, the fold mirror 116 may be replaced with a PBS element (e.g., wire grid plate). In this case, a purer polarization may be maintained after the PBS element.
Polarization switch 120 may be a switch as taught by U.S. Pat. No. 4,792,850; a switch as taught by any of the switches of commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/424,087 entitled “Achromatic Polarization Switches”, filed Jun. 14, 2006; both of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes, or any other polarization switch known in the art that selectively transforms an incoming state of polarization. In some embodiments, the polarization switch 120 can be split (i.e., to increase yield of the device). If the polarization switch 120 is split, it is desirable that the two devices are located such that there is no overlap of bundles A′ and C in
In the polarization conversion system 100 of
Although as described, p-polarized light is transmitted toward the polarization switch 120, while s-polarized light is directed toward half-wave plate 114, it should be apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art that an alternative configuration may be employed in which s-polarized light is transmitted toward the polarization switch 120, while p-polarized light is directed toward the half-wave plate 114.
With reference to
Optical transmission and stray light control may be optimized on optically transmissive elements by providing an anti-reflection coat thereon for high transmission and low reflection. Reflections from transmissive elements can cause stray light in the system which degrades contrast and/or produces disturbing artifacts in the final image. In some embodiments, additional absorptive polarizers may be placed after the half-wave plate 114 in the A′, B′, C′ path and/or after the PBS 112 in either path to control polarization leakage and improve the final image contrast.
In this exemplary embodiment, a telephoto lens pair 340 may be implemented in the optical path where light transmits through the PBS 312. Here, telephoto lens pair 340 is located along an optical path and with the field of view centered on the optical axis. Typically, telephoto lens 340 allows control of magnification, distortion, and imaging properties with two elements such that the two images overlay relatively close, i.e., within 1-4 pixels of each other, while maintaining spots sizes on the order of a fraction of a pixel and lateral color on the order of a pixel. Alternatively, a reverse telephoto lens (not shown) may be implemented in the optical path where light reflects from the PBS 312 (located between the polarization switch 320 and fold mirror 316, or after the fold mirror 316). If a telephoto or reverse telephoto lens is used for controlling magnification in one optical path, the radial distortion and keystone distortion of the final image can be tuned by laterally displacing the individual elements or pair of elements from the optical axis.
In operation, light exits projection lens 722 toward PBS 712. P-polarized light passes through PBS 712 toward telephoto lens pair 740, then toward polarization switch 720. An optional cleanup polarizer 746 may be located between telephoto lens pair 740 and polarization switch 720 to further enhance contrast. The s-polarized light reflected by PBS 712 is directed toward fold mirror 716, where it reflects toward an achromatic rotator 714 that transforms the s-polarized light into p-polarized light, then it passes through an optional cleanup polarizer 746. Next, the p-polarized light from achromatic rotator 714 passes through polarization switch 720. In this configuration, the s-polarized light reflected by the PBS 716 is efficiently reflected, with polarization maintained by the fold mirror 716. This relaxes any want for polarization preservation from the fold path and maximizes brightness. An achromatic 90° rotator 714 (probably retarder stack based) can be used to convert light from the fold mirror to the orthogonal state. In order to eliminate P-reflection from the PBS 712, a clean up polarizer 746 is likely desirable. This preferably follows the achromatic rotator 714, thereby reducing polarization conversion efficiency as a factor in system level contrast.
PCS 700 provides a high contrast image on the screen. In this exemplary embodiment, the final screen image has a center located on the optical axis of the projection lens. In some other embodiments, the final screen image may be located off-center from the optical axis—for example, a half screen height below the optical axis of the projection lens. In such embodiments, the polarizing beamsplitter 712 may be relocated to intercept the full illumination from the projection lens 722, and the fold mirror 716 may be tilted to properly overlay the two images on the screen. The polarization switch 720 in this embodiment has been split into two elements (one for each path) to increase fabrication yield; although, as previously discussed, it could alternatively be a single unit.
As used herein, the term “cinematic projection” refers to the projection of images using front and/or rear projection techniques, and includes, but is not limited to, applications for cinema, home theatre, simulators, instrumentation, head-up displays, and other projection environments where stereoscopic images are displayed.
While several embodiments and variations of polarization conversion systems for stereoscopic projection have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of the invention(s) should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with any claims and their equivalents issuing from this disclosure. Furthermore, the above advantages and features are provided in described embodiments, but shall not limit the application of such issued claims to processes and structures accomplishing any or all of the above advantages.
Additionally, the section headings herein are provided for consistency with the suggestions under 37 CFR 1.77 or otherwise to provide organizational cues. These headings shall not limit or characterize the invention(s) set out in any claims that may issue from this disclosure. Specifically and by way of example, although the headings refer to a “Technical Field,” such claims should not be limited by the language chosen under this heading to describe the so-called technical field. Further, a description of a technology in the “Background” is not to be construed as an admission that technology is prior art to any invention(s) in this disclosure. Neither is the “Brief Summary” to be considered as a characterization of the invention(s) set forth in issued claims. Furthermore, any reference in this disclosure to “invention” in the singular should not be used to argue that there is only a single point of novelty in this disclosure. Multiple inventions may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims issuing from this disclosure, and such claims accordingly define the invention(s), and their equivalents, that are protected thereby. In all instances, the scope of such claims shall be considered on their own merits in light of this disclosure, but should not be constrained by the headings set forth herein.
This patent application is a continuation application of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/047,763, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,220,934, entitled “Polarization conversion system for stereoscopic projection”, filed Mar. 14, 2011, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/864,198, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,905,602, entitled “Polarization conversion system for stereoscopic projection”, filed Sep. 28, 2007, which relates and claims benefit of: (a) U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/827,657, entitled “Polarization Conversion System for Cinematic Projection,” filed Sep. 29, 2006; (b) U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/911,043, entitled “Polarization conversion system for 3-D projection,” filed Apr. 10, 2007; and (c) U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/950,652, entitled “Polarization conversion system for 3-D projection,” filed Jul. 19, 2007. All applications referenced above are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2403731 | MacNeille | Jul 1946 | A |
3208337 | Appledorn | Sep 1965 | A |
3704997 | Smith | Dec 1972 | A |
4515441 | Wentz et al. | May 1985 | A |
4719507 | Bos | Jan 1988 | A |
4792850 | Liptoh | Dec 1988 | A |
5164854 | Takanashi | Nov 1992 | A |
5225861 | Marks | Jul 1993 | A |
5278680 | Karasawa | Jan 1994 | A |
5283600 | Isai | Feb 1994 | A |
5359455 | Oishi | Oct 1994 | A |
5381278 | Shingaki | Jan 1995 | A |
5435859 | Torii | Jul 1995 | A |
5453859 | Sannohe et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5481321 | Lipton | Jan 1996 | A |
5497270 | Rud | Mar 1996 | A |
5566367 | Mitsutake | Oct 1996 | A |
5691785 | Usui | Nov 1997 | A |
5729306 | Miyake et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5772299 | Koo et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5822128 | Sekine | Oct 1998 | A |
5822129 | Sekine | Oct 1998 | A |
5917562 | Woodgate et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917568 | Johnson | Jun 1999 | A |
5982538 | Shikama et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993004 | Moseley | Nov 1999 | A |
6067193 | Sekine | May 2000 | A |
6094240 | Hiyama et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6122103 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6147802 | Itoh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154320 | Itoh | Nov 2000 | A |
6190013 | Tani et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206532 | Hawes | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6243199 | Hansen et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252624 | Yuasa | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6280034 | Brennesholz | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288840 | Perkins | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6375327 | Holman | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6437915 | Moseley et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6454416 | Aoto | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6508557 | Brennesholtz | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6547396 | Svardal | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6582080 | Gibbon et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6631992 | Brennesholtz | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6636276 | Rosenbluth | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6704065 | Sharp et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6761459 | Arsenich | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6801263 | Sato et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6839095 | Bierhuizen et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6912074 | Son et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6976759 | Magarill | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7008070 | Nishida | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7131737 | Silverstein et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7193765 | Christensen | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198373 | Silverstein | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7204592 | O'Donnell | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7224411 | Gibbon et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7261453 | Morejon | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7270416 | Yamanaka | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7295371 | Sedlmayr | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7364303 | Inoko | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7387388 | Newell | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7528906 | Robinson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7559653 | Silverstein et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7635187 | Sonehara | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7753531 | Fujita | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7857455 | Cowan et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7887193 | Kanayama | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7905602 | Schuck et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7959296 | Cowan et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8134109 | Tang | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8220934 | Schuck et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8632185 | Ianchulev | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8727536 | Schuck | May 2014 | B2 |
8833943 | Schuck | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20010013971 | Kleinberger | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20030128320 | Mi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040090601 | Nakanishi | May 2004 | A1 |
20040246586 | Cho | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263806 | Silverstein | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050017938 | O'Donnell | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050030749 | Nishida | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050157233 | Wu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050185139 | Yamanaka | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060007537 | Sedlmayr | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060044516 | Inoko | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060092380 | Salsman | May 2006 | A1 |
20060215118 | Sonehara | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221429 | Christensen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060250581 | Silverstein | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291053 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070279595 | Magarill | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080143964 | Cowan | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143965 | Cowan | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080225236 | Schuck et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090128780 | Schuck et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100141856 | Schuck et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100328561 | Schuck et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110096295 | Cowan | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110205496 | Schuck et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120057134 | Huang | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130088688 | Read et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130169935 | Schuck | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20150002819 | Schuck | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150109539 | Li et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160041460 | Schuck | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
672012 | May 1952 | BR |
2020130172753 | Apr 2013 | BR |
101021674 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101408675 | Apr 2009 | CN |
101688940 | Mar 2010 | CN |
103383494 | Nov 2013 | CN |
203433207 | Feb 2014 | CN |
103827745 | May 2014 | CN |
20023883 | Mar 2007 | DE |
102008043153 | Apr 2010 | DE |
349692 | Oct 1990 | EP |
961237 | Jun 2007 | EP |
2145215 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2067066 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2469336 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2732335 | May 2014 | EP |
2851735 | Mar 2015 | EP |
S62-011823 | Jan 1987 | JP |
H04-63305 | Feb 1992 | JP |
H05-073116 | Mar 1993 | JP |
H05-127120 | May 1993 | JP |
H05-203894 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H05-241103 | Sep 1993 | JP |
H06-289387 | Oct 1994 | JP |
H06-317760 | Nov 1994 | JP |
H07-056167 | Mar 1995 | JP |
H07-064075 | Mar 1995 | JP |
H07-072428 | Mar 1995 | JP |
H07-146474 | Jun 1995 | JP |
H07-239473 | Sep 1995 | JP |
H07-333557 | Dec 1995 | JP |
2538127 | Sep 1996 | JP |
H08-317428 | Nov 1996 | JP |
H09-026555 | Jan 1997 | JP |
H09-120047 | May 1997 | JP |
H11-260141 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2002-287092 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2004-138433 | May 2004 | JP |
2005-512118 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-241870 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-133601 | May 2006 | JP |
2006-227361 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2074479 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2010-506199 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2010-507130 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010-072138 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2010-122589 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2010-164802 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2010-528323 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2010-276710 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2013-003327 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2013-020199 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2014-052930 | Mar 2014 | JP |
5635773 | Dec 2014 | JP |
5641424 | Dec 2014 | JP |
2015-072479 | Apr 2015 | JP |
5878967 | Mar 2016 | JP |
10-2009-008932 | Aug 2009 | KR |
10-2012-009141 | Sep 2009 | KR |
20090094224 | Sep 2009 | KR |
2010-0023858 | Mar 2010 | KR |
10-2013-129256 | Nov 2013 | KR |
20140054072 | May 2014 | KR |
20140102775 | Aug 2014 | KR |
20150072457 | Jun 2015 | KR |
20150104222 | Sep 2015 | KR |
101594630 | Feb 2016 | KR |
1182471 | Sep 1985 | SU |
2000078056 | Dec 2000 | WO |
2005-069058 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2006038744 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2008042798 | Apr 2008 | WO |
201301016 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2014-163322 | Oct 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Foster; “A Polarizing Vertical Illuminator”; Journal Optical Soc. New York, vol. 28, (1938), pp. 124-127. |
Jones, R. Clark. “Ultimate Performance of Polarizers for Visible Light,” JOSA vol. 52 No. 7, Jul. 1962. |
King et al.; “Varifocal Mirror Technique for Video Transmission of Three-Dimensional Images”; Applied Optics, vol. 9, No. 9 (1970). |
Kingslake, R.; “Optical System Design”; Academic Press; (1983). |
Muirhead; “Variable Focal Length Mirrors”; Phys. and Meteorology Section, Suffield Experimental Station, Ralston, Alberta, Canada; Rev. Sci. Instrum. vol. 32, No. 210 (1961). |
Pan, Jui-Wen, et al., “Homogenized LED-illumination using microlens arrays for a pocket-sized projector,” Optics Express, Aug. 20, 2007, vol. 15, No. 17. |
Pastoor et al., “3-D Displays: A Review of Current Technologies”, Display Devices, Dempa Publications, Tokyo, JP, vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 100-110 (1997). |
Pastoor et al., “3-D Displays: A Review of Current Technologies”, Display Devices, vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 100-110 (1997). |
Pate; “Polarization Conversion Systems for Digital Projectors”, Published Apr. 21, 2006. |
Robinson et al., “Polarization Engineering for LCD Projection”, John Wiley & Sons, (2005). |
Shao et al., “MEMS Three-Dimensional Scan Mirror”, Dept. of Elec. and Computer Engr., Montana State Univ.—Bozeman, (2004). |
Shurcliff, “Polarized Light”; Harvard University Press, (1962). |
Stupp et al, “Projection Displays”, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., (1999), pp. 143-145. |
Yang et al., “Fundamentals of Liquid Crystal Devices”; John Wiley & Sons Ltd., (2006). |
Yip et al., “Efficient polarization converter for projection displays”, Applied Optics, vol. 36, No. 25, (1997). |
Yoder, “Opto-mechanical Systems Design”, Optical Engineering, vol. 9, Marcel Dekker Inc. (1986). |
Examination Report and Supplemental European Search Report for European application 07852705.8, dated Sep. 4, 2009. |
Examination Report for European application 07843526.0, dated Jul. 17, 2012. |
Examination Report for European application 07852708.8, dated Jul. 17, 2012. |
Extended European search report for European application 078843526, dated Nov. 3, 2011. |
International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US 07/21823, dated May 14, 2009. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US 07/79958, dated Apr. 9, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US 07/21823, dated Apr. 2, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US 07/79958, dated Jul. 28, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US 07/79958, dated Jul. 28, 2008.Notice of Preliminary Rejection in co-pending Korean patent application No. 10-2016-7013674, dated Aug. 17, 2016. |
Notice of Preliminary Rejection in co-pending Korean patent application No. 10-2014-7021821, dated May 19, 2016. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection in Japanese application No. 2009-530647, dated Dec. 4, 2013. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection in Japanese application No. 2009-530647, dated Jul. 2, 2013. |
Notification concerning transmittal of international preliminary report on patentability and international preliminary report on patentability in corresponding PCT application No. PCT/US08/63340 dated Nov. 10, 2009. |
Supplemental European Search Report and Examination Report in European application No. 07843526.0 dated Oct. 4, 2011. |
Supplemental European search report for European application 07852708.8, dated Sep. 4, 2009. |
Decision—Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review, entered Apr. 22, 2015. Master Image 3D, Inc. and Master Image 3D Asia, LLC, v. Reald Inc., Case No. IPR2015-00036, U.S. Pat. No. 7,959,296 filed Oct. 7, 2014. |
Decision—Institution of Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455, entered Apr. 23, 2015. Master Image 3D, LLC and Master Image 3D Asia, LLC, v. Reald Inc. Case No. IPR2015-00035, U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455 filed Oct. 7, 2014. |
Exhibit 1003 “Declaration of Matthew S. Brennescholtz” entered Oct. 7, 2014. Master Image 3D, Inc. and Master Image 3D Asia, LLC, v. Reald Inc. Case No. IPR2015-00035, U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455 filed Oct. 7, J014. |
Exhibit 2005, “Declaration of Ying-Moh Liu,” Patent Owners Response Regarding Inter Partes Review, entered Jul. 14, 2015. Master Image 3D, Inc. and Master Image 3D Asia, LLC, v. Reald Inc. Case No. IPR2015-00035, U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455 filed Oct. 7, 2014. |
Exhibit 2006, “Declaration of Mall Cowan,” Patent Owners Response Regarding Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455, entered Jul. 14, 2015. Master Image 3D, Inc. and Master Image 3D Asia, LLC, v. Reald Inc. Case No. IPR2015-00035, U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455 filed Oct. 7, 2014. |
Exhibit 2008, “Declaration of Robert R. Mcleod,” Patent Owners Response Regarding Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455, entered Jul. 14, 2015. Master Image 3D, Inc. and Master Image 3D Asia, LLC, v. Reald Inc. Case No. IPR2015-00035, U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455 filed Oct. 7, 2014. |
Exhibit 2190, “Public Transcript of M. Brennescholtz” entered Nov. 11, 2015. Master Image 3D, Inc. and Master Image 3D Asia, LLC, v. Reald Inc. Case No. IPR2015-00035, U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455 filed Oct. 7, 2014. |
Patent Owners Response Regarding Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455, entered Jul. 14, 2015. Master Image 3D, Inc. and Master Image 3D Asia, LLC, v. Reald Inc. Case No. IPR2015-00035, U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455 filed Oct. 7, 2014. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455 entered Oct. 7, 2014. Master Image 3D, Inc. and Master Image 3D Asia, LLC, v. Reald Inc. Case No. IPR2015-00035, U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455 filed Oct. 7, 2014. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,959,296 entered Oct. 7, 2014. Master Image 3D, Inc. and Master Image 3D Asia, LLC, v. Reald Inc., Case No. IPR2015-00036, U.S. Pat. No. 7,959,296 filed Oct. 7, 2014. |
Petitioner Response to Motion for Observation on Cross Examination of Matthew Brennescholtz, entered Nov. 25, 2015. Master Image 3D, Inc. and Master Image 3D Asia, LLC, v. Reald Inc. Case No. IPR2015-00035, U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455 filed Oct. 7, 2014. |
Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455 entered Feb. 2, 2015. Master Image 3D, Inc. and Master Image 3D Asia, LLC, v. Reald Inc. Case No. IPR2015-00035, U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455 filed Oct. 7, 2014. |
Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,959,296 entered Jan. 29, 2015. Master Image 3D, Inc. and Master Image 3D Asia, LLC, v. Reald Inc., Case No. IPR2015-00036, U.S. Pat. No. 7,959,296 filed Oct. 7, 2014. |
PTAB Final Written Decision, entered Apr. 14, 2016. Masterimage 3D, Inc and Masterimage 3D Asia, LLC v. Reald Inc. Case No. IPR2015-00040, U.S. Pat. No. 8,220,934 filed Oct. 7, 2014. |
USPTO Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455, IPR2015-00033 (not instituted). |
USPTO Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455, IPR2015-00035 (instituted in part & currently pending). |
USPTO Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,455, IPR2015-00876 (awaiting institution decision). |
USPTO Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,905,602, IPR2015-00038 (not instituted). |
USPTO Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,220,934, IPR2015-00040 (instituted in part & currently pending). |
USPTO Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,220,934, IPR2015-00877 (awaiting institution decision). |
Respondents' Notice of Prior Art (4)_Redacted, Apr. 24, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190011825 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60950652 | Jul 2007 | US | |
60911043 | Apr 2007 | US | |
60827657 | Sep 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14621836 | Feb 2015 | US |
Child | 15933639 | US | |
Parent | 13550182 | Jul 2012 | US |
Child | 14621836 | US | |
Parent | 13047763 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 13550182 | US | |
Parent | 11864198 | Sep 2007 | US |
Child | 13047763 | US | |
Parent | 14485256 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 11864198 | US |