This disclosure relates to an optical measurement or instrument, and more particularly relates to a reflector arrangement which can effectively eliminate unwanted polarization in reflection
Reflecting light with a certain angle of incidence can change the polarization state of the reflected light relative to the incident light, and the total reflectance is dependent on the polarization state. As shown in
The plane of incidence is determined by the incident light and the normal to the reflecting surface. A beam of incident light can be divided into two perpendicular-polarized waves, i.e. s- and p-wave, wherein the oscillation direction of s-wave is perpendicular to the incident plane and the oscillation direction of p-wave is parallel to the incident plane. After reflection, the light intensity is
I
m
=I
p·ρp(θ)+IS·ρS(θ)
As shown in
The total reflectance is the ratio of the reflected light intensity to the incident light intensity. Because the natural light intensity of s-wave or p-wave is half of the total light intensity, the total reflectance of the natural light is the arithmetic mean value of the s-wave reflectance and p-wave reflectance. For polarized incident light, the total reflectance is more complicated to determine due to the polarization dependence. Under a certain angle of incidence, the total reflectance is dependent on the polarization state of the incident light. When the angle of incidence is relatively big, this dependence can result in an inevitable principal error in accurate optical measurement.
In addition, according to
Reflector is a very important optical element, and it is widely used in varieties of fields of optics. Although polarization is an unnegligible problem in many fields, there is no convenience, economical, and effective way to eliminate unwanted polarization in reflection.
At present, the ordinary method to solve this problem is to coat on reflector surface, but this method is expensive and the effect is limited. This method can reduce the unwanted polarization at some degree. However, the difference between p-wave reflectance and s-wave reflectance still exists in the. Furthermore, the coating method can only be applied to the reflection with a narrow wave band and with limited angle of incidence. The angle of incidence can not be freely changed. Otherwise, the effect of reducing polarization will be affected.
This invention can conveniently and effectively eliminate the polarization by reflection, and can be applied in a microscope or a goniophotometer or other optical systems with reflection in the light path.
A polarization-maintaining reflector arrangement disclosed herein helps conveniently and effectively eliminate the unwanted polarization in reflection. The total reflectance of the polarization-maintaining reflector arrangement is independent of the polarization state of the incident light, and the polarization state of the reflected light remains the same as the polarization state of the incident light.
In one embodiment, a polarization-maintaining reflector arrangement comprises at least one reflector group. The at least one reflector group includes at least one polarizing reflector and at least one compensating reflector. An incident plane of the polarizing reflector is perpendicular to an incident plane of the compensating reflector in the reflector group. A product of s-wave reflectance of the polarizing reflector and p-wave reflectance of the compensating reflector is equal to a product of s-wave reflectance of the compensating reflector and p-wave reflectance of the polarizing reflector in the reflector group.
In another embodiment, a polarization-maintaining reflector arrangement comprises at least one reflector group. The at least one reflector group including m polarizing reflector(s) and n compensating reflector(s). Incident plane(s) of all the polarizing reflector(s) being parallel to each other or in a same plane. Incident plane(s) of all the compensating reflector(s) being parallel to each other or in a same plane. The incident plane(s) of the polarizing reflector(s) being perpendicular to the incident plane(s) of the compensating reflector(s) in the reflector group.
being satisfied, wherein ρqis(θqi) is s-wave reflectance of the ith polarizing reflector when the angle of incidence is θqi, ρqip (θqi) is p-wave reflectance ofthe ith polarizing reflector when the angle of incidence is θqi, m is the number of total polarizing reflectors in one reflector group, and m is in the range of 1-∞, ρbjs(θbj) is s-wave reflectance of the jth compensating reflector when the angle of incidence is θbj, ρbjp(θbj) is p-wave reflectance of thejth compensating reflector when the angle of incidence is θbj, n is the number of total compensating reflectors in one reflector group and n is in the range of 1-∞.
The present invention can conveniently and effectively eliminate the unwanted polarization caused by reflection. The total reflectance of the polarization-maintaining reflector arrangement is independent of the polarization state of the initial incident light, and the polarization state of the final reflected light is as same as the polarization state of the initial incident light.
The disclosure will be explained in more detail in the following text using exemplary embodiments and with reference to the drawings, in which:
A beam of incident light with intensity I can be divided into p-wave with intensity Ip and s-wave with intensity Is, wherein the oscillation direction of p-wave is parallel to the incident plane and the oscillation direction of s-wave is perpendicular to the incident plane:
I
m
=I
p
+I
s (1)
Accordingly, p-wave amplitude is Ap and s-wave amplitude is As and I ∞A2. After the first reflection, the light intensity becomes
I
m
=I
pρ1p(θ1)+Isρ1s(θ1) (2)
wherein ρ1p(θ1) is p-wave reflectance of the first polarizing reflector when the angle of incidence is θ1 and ρ1s(θ1) is s-wave reflectance of the first polarizing reflector when the angle of incidence is θ1.
After the first polarizing reflection, the p-wave amplitude is AP√{square root over (ρ1p(θ1))} and the s-wave amplitude is As √{square root over (ρ1s(θ1))}. If Θp(1) is used to represent √{square root over (ρ1p(θ1))} and Θs(1) is used to represent √{square root over (ρ1s(θ1))}, the p-wave amplitude after first reflection will be expressed as ApΘp(1) and the s-wave amplitude after first reflection will be expressed as AsΘs(1), wherein Θp(1) is p-wave amplitude attenuation coefficient and Θs(1) is s-wave amplitude attenuation coefficient.
The reflected light from the first polarizing reflector is the incident light for the second reflector, which may be polarizing or compensating reflector. After the second reflection, the p-wave and s-wave amplitudes are respectively
A
p2
=A
pΘp(1)[√{square root over (ρ2p(θ2))} cosε2+√{square root over (ρ2s(θ2))}sinε2] (3)
A
s2=AsΘs(1)[√{square root over (ρ2s(θ2))} cosε2+√{square root over (ρ2p(θ2))}sinε2] (4)
wherein ρ2p(θ2) is p-wave reflectance of the second reflector when the angle of incidence is θ2 and ρ2s(θ2) is s-wave reflectance ofthe second reflector when the angle of incidence is θ2. ε2 is the angle between the incident plane for the first polarizing reflector and incident plane for the second reflector. Use Θp(2) to represent [√{square root over (ρ2p(θ2))} cos ε2+√{square root over (ρ2s(θ2))} sin ε2] and use Θs(2) to represent [√{square root over (ρ2s(θ2))} cos ε2+√{square root over (ρ2p(θ2))} sin ε2], wherein Θp(2) is p-wave amplitude attenuation coefficient and Θs(2) is s-wave amplitude attenuation coefficient. If there are m+n reflectors (m polarizing reflectors and n compensating reflectors) in one group of polarization-maintaining reflector arrangement, the final amplitudes of p- and s-wave are
A
p(m+n)
=A
PΘp(1)·Θp(2)·... ·Θp(i)·...·Θp(m+n) (5)
A
s(m+n)
=A
sΘs(1)·Θs(2)·... ·Θs(i)·...·Θs(m+n) (6)
wherein Θp(i) is p-wave amplitude attenuation coefficient caused by the ith reflector and Θs(i) is s-wave amplitude attenuation coefficient caused by the ith reflector.
If equations (5) and (6) satisfy the relation
Θp(1)·Θp(2)·...·Θp(i)·...·Θp(m+n)=Θs(1)·Θs(2)·...·Θs(i)·...·Θs(m+n) (7)
there is no unwanted polarization caused by reflection and the final reflected light intensity is independent of the polarization state of the initial incident light.
In order to satisfy equation (7), the present invention should satisfy two general conditions. At first, in a reflector group, the incident plane for the polarizing reflector is perpendicular to the incident plane for the compensating reflector. In addition, the product of all ratios of s-wave reflectance of the polarizing reflector to the p-wave reflectance of the polarizing reflector is equal to the product of all ratios of s-wave reflectance of the compensating reflector to the p-wave reflectance of the compensating reflector, that is, the product of s-wave reflectance of the polarizing reflector and p-wave reflectance of the compensating reflector is equal to the product of s-wave reflectance of the compensating reflector and p-wave reflectance of the polarizing reflector:
wherein ρqis(θqi) is s-wave reflectance of the ith polarizing reflector when the angle of incidence is θqi, ρqip(θqi) is p-wave reflectance of the ith polarizing reflector when the angle of incidence is θqi, m is the number of total polarizing reflectors in one reflector group, and m is in the range of 1-∞, ρbjs(θbj) is s-wave reflectance of thejth compensating reflector when the angle of incidence is θbj, ρbjp(θbj)is p-wave reflectance ofthejth compensating reflector when the angle of incidence is θbj, n is the number oftotal compensating reflectors in one reflector group and n is in the range of 1-∞. According to the first condition, because the incident plane for the polarizing reflector is perpendicular to the incident plane for the compensating reflector in a reflector group, cosine and sine terms in equations (5) and (6) become 0 and 1 respectively. Therefore, the p-wave amplitude attenuation coefficient becomes the product of the square roots of the p-wave reflectance of m polarizing reflectors and the square roots of the s-wave reflectance of n compensating reflectors, as shown in equation (5′). The s-wave amplitude attenuation coefficient becomes the product of the square roots of the s-wave reflectance of m polarizing reflectors and the square roots of the p-wave reflectance of n compensating reflectors, as shown in equation (6′).
According to the second condition, because the product of all ratios of s-wave reflectance of the polarizing reflector to the p-wave reflectance of the polarizing reflector is equal to the product of all ratios of s-wave reflectance of the compensating reflector to the p-wave reflectance of the compensating reflector, shown in equation (7′), equation (7) is satisfied. Therefore, the reflector arrangement does not polarize the reflected light, and the final light intensity is independent of the polarization state of the initial incident light.
The following technology scheme is one of the embodiments of the invention.
As a special example, there are only one polarizing reflector and one compensating reflector in the polarization-maintaining reflector arrangement. The incident plane for the polarizing reflector is perpendicular to the incident plane for the compensating reflector. If the two reflectors have the same optical property (i.e. two reflectors have the same reflectance for the same angle of incidence), the incident angle for the polarizing reflector is equal to the incident angle for the compensating reflector.
Now use this arrangement as an example to explain how the embodiment can achieve the purpose. In this arrangement, the reflected light of the polarizing reflector is the incident light of the compensating reflector.
In this example, after the light is incident to a reflector with an angle of θ1, the intensity of light reflected from the first polarizing reflector is
I
mq
=I
p·ρqp(θ1)+Is·ρqs(θ1) (8)
wherein ρqp(θ1) is the p-wave reflectance when the angle of incidence is θ1, and ρqs(θ1) is the s-wave reflectance when the angle of incidence is θ1.
Because the incident plane for polarizing reflector is perpendicular to the incident plane for compensating reflector, the reflected s-wave for the polarizing reflector becomes the p-wave for the compensating reflector and the reflected p-wave for the polarizing reflector becomes the s-wave for the compensating reflector. Therefore, the intensity of light reflected from the compensating reflector with incident angle θ2 is
I
mb
=I
p·ρqp(θ1)ρbs(θ2)+Is·ρqs(θ1)ρbp(θ2) (9)
where ρbp(θ2) is the p-wave reflectance of the compensating reflector and ρbs(θ2) is the s-wave reflectance of the compensating reflector.
In this example, if the polarizing reflector and the compensating reflector have the same optical property, i.e. for any angle of incidence, we have
ρqp(θ)=ρbp(θ)=ρp(θ) ρqs(θ) ρbs(θ)=ρs(θ) (10)
Furthermore, if the incident angle for polarizing reflector is equal to the incident angle for compensating reflector,
that is
ρqp(θ1)ρbs(θ2)=ρqs(θ1)ρbp(θ2)=C (11)
wherein C is a constant. Then the final reflected light intensity is
I
mb
=(I
p
+I
s)·C (12)
Therefore, the final light intensity is independent of the polarization state of the initial incident light, and the reflector arrangement does not cause unwanted polarization to the light. In this special example, the angle of incident is arbitrarily adjustable, and therefore, the angle-dependent problem of the surface-coated reflector can be overcome.
The above process can be explained that although the incident light is polarized by the polarizing reflector, the polarization is compensated and eliminated by the compensating reflector.
When there are m polarizing reflectors and n compensating reflectors in one group of the arrangement, according to the second condition stated above, the product of all ratios of s-wave reflectance of the polarizing reflector to the p-wave reflectance of the polarizing reflector is equal to the product of all ratios of s-wave reflectance of the compensating reflector to the p-wave reflectance of the compensating reflector, that is,
wherein ρqs is the product of m polarizing reflectors' s-wave reflectance and ρqp is the product of m polarizing reflectors' p-wave reflectance. ρbs is the product of n compensating reflectors' s-wave reflectance and ρbp is the product of n compensating reflectors' p-wave reflectance. And C is a constant.
According to the first condition stated above, the incident plane for polarizing reflector is perpendicular to the incident plane for compensating reflector. Because of this condition, the reflected s-wave for the polarizing reflectors becomes the p-wave for the compensating reflector and the reflected p-wave for the polarizing reflector becomes the s-wave for the compensating reflector. Therefore, the final light intensity is
I
mb
=I
p·ρqpρbs+Is·ρqsρbp=(Is+Ip)C (14)
According to equation (14), Imb is independent ofthe polarization state of the initial incident light, and the reflection does not cause unwanted polarization to the final light.
In one group of reflector arrangement which includes polarizing reflectors and compensating reflectors, as long as the relation between the incident plane for polarizing reflector and the incident plane for compensating reflector is complied with the first condition stated above, the polarizing reflectors can be continuously set in the light path, that is, every polarizing reflectors are set aside each other in the light path; the compensating reflectors can be continuously set in the light path, that is, every polarizing reflectors are set aside each other in the light path; or the polarizing reflectors and the compensating reflectors are alternately set in the light path, that is, in the light path of one reflector, there are at least one polarizing reflector or/and at least one compensating reflector of the other reflector group.
The reflector arrangement can comprise many groups and these groups can be continuously set in the light path. Except for the last group, the reflected light of the last reflector of each group becomes the incident light of the first reflector of the next group. The first reflector of the subsequent group is set next to the last reflector of a preceding reflector group in the light path. If the reflector arrangement comprises e groups of reflectors, the final light intensity is
I
me
=I·ρ
1sρ1p·...·ρisρip·...·ρesρep (15)
wherein
Furthermore, the groups of the reflector arrangement can be alternately set. For example, one polarizing reflector of the first group can be set beside the compensating reflector of the second group. This setting can be obtained by equation (15). According to equation (15), Ime is not changed if the coefficients in equation (15) are exchanged. When many groups are arranged in light path, every polarizing reflector and compensating reflector reflects at least once. If the reflectors are suitably arranged, some reflectors can reflect more than once. As long as the two conditions stated above are complied, the final light intensity is independent of the polarization state of the initial incident light, and the multiple reflections do not cause unwanted polarization to the light.
The technology scheme can be further defined.
The polarization-maintaining reflector arrangement comprises at least one reflector group. In the light path, optical element such as light source and detectors can be set ahead of the first reflector or/and behind the last reflector or/and between the reflectors. In the reflector arrangement, the first reflector is specified as a polarizing reflector, and the other reflectors can be functioned as polarizing reflectors or compensating reflectors. The unwanted polarization caused by the polarizing reflectors can be compensated or eliminated by the compensating reflectors, but the unwanted polarization caused by the other optical elements in the light path can not be eliminated by the reflector arrangement.
As an embodiment of the reflector arrangement, a group of one polarizing reflector and one compensating reflector is set in the light path. The reflected light from the polarizing reflector becomes the incident light for the compensating reflector. The incident angle for the first polarizing reflectors is 45°. To satisfy the conditions stated above, the plane angle between the plane of polarizing reflector and the plane of compensating reflector should be 60° or 120°. In the group, the polarizing reflector can be set at angle of 45° to the plane of the horizon. The incident light comes down upright, reflected by the polarizing reflector and is then horizontally incident to the compensating reflector which is perpendicular to the plane of horizon. The projection of normal of the polarizing reflector on the plane of horizon is at an angle of 45° to the normal of the compensating reflector. Therefore, the incident angle for the polarizing reflector is equal to the incident angle for the compensating reflector. The reflected light from the compensating reflector comes out at angle of 90° to the reflected light from the polarizing reflector.
When using the polarization-maintaining reflector arrangement, all the polarizing reflectors and compensating reflectors can be set at fixed position.
When using the polarization-maintaining reflector arrangement, part or all of the reflectors can also be moving as long as the relative position between the polarizing and compensating reflectors satisfies the above condition. As a special example, the polarizing and compensating reflectors can rotate synchronously and coaxially (or on a same axis).
The polarizing reflectors and compensating reflectors can be plane optical mirror or spectroscope or other optical elements with reflection function.
The polarizing reflectors and compensating reflectors comprise of a glass base, on which a layer of reflecting film is coated for reflection, and a protection layer is outside the reflecting film. The surface-coated vitreous base can effectively reduce the light absorption of the glass, increase the average reflectance, and diminish the difference between the p- and s-wave reflectance.
The polarizing reflectors and compensating reflectors can also include a reflecting film which is imbedded between two glasses. The reflectors then comprises of surface glass, reflecting film and glass base in order, wherein the surface glass, the reflecting film and glass base are stick together.
The polarizing reflectors and compensating reflector can also comprise surface glass and a reflecting film, wherein the reflecting film is stick behind the surface glass.
Other existing technology for manufacturing reflector can also be used in the invention. In order to effectively eliminate the polarization, the quality of the polarizing reflectors and compensating reflectors should be advanced, the average reflectance of the polarizing reflectors and compensating reflectors should be increased, and the difference between p-wave reflectance and s-wave reflectance of the polarizing reflectors and compensating reflectors should be reduced.
For each group of the reflector arrangement in the invention, the product of all polarizing reflectors' ratio of s-wave reflectance to p-wave reflectance is equal to the product of all compensating reflectors' ratio of s-wave reflectance to p-wave reflectance. Furthermore, the incident plane for the polarizing reflectors is perpendicular to the incident plane for the compensating reflectors. Therefore, the final reflected light intensity is independent of the polarization state of the initial incident light, and no unwanted polarization is caused by the reflectors.
For the special example in which two reflectors with the same optical property are used as one polarizing reflector and one compensating reflector respectively, if only the incident angle for polarizing reflector is equal to the incident angle for the compensating reflector, the unwanted polarization caused by the polarizing reflector and compensating reflector can be eliminated by each other, and the final reflected light intensity is independent of the initial angle of incidence. One or more groups of reflector arrangement can be used in the light path, if only every polarization caused by polarizing reflectors is compensated by the compensating reflectors, unwanted polarization of the final light is eliminated.
Embodiment 1:
And the final light intensity is Imb=Ip·ρqp(θ1)ρbs(θ2)+Is·ρqs(θ1)ρbp(θ2)=(Ip+I)·C
where C is a constant. The polarization state of this final light is not changed relative to the initial incident light.
Embodiment 2:
is satisfied.
Embodiment 3:
For reflector i (i=1, 2, 3), when the incident angle is θi, the p-wave reflectance is ρip(θi) and the s-wave reflectance is ρis (θi). They satisfy the relation:
In addition, according to the path-reversal principle, if the light path direction is reversed in
Embodiment 4:
The first polarizing incident plane formed by the incident light 5 and the normal line 6 is perpendicular to the first compensating incident plane formed by the incident light 7 and the normal line 8, and the incident angle θ1 for the first polarizing reflector 1 is equal to the incident angle θ2 for the first compensating reflector 2. The second polarizing incident plane formed by the incident light 9 and the normal line 10 is perpendicular to the second compensating incident plane formed by the incident light 11 and the normal line 12, and the incident angle θ3 for the second polarizing reflector 3 is equal to the incident angle θ4 for the second compensating reflector 4. But θ1 need not be equal to θ3.
Embodiment 5:
The first polarizing incident plane formed by the incident light 5 and the normal line 6 is perpendicular to the first compensating incident plane formed by the incident light 7 and the normal line 8, and the incident angle (θ1) for the first polarizing reflector 1 is equal to the incident angle (θ2) for the first compensating reflector 2. The second polarizing incident plane formed by the incident light 9 and the normal line 10 is perpendicular to the second compensating incident plane formed by the incident light 11 and the normal line 12, and the incident angle (θ3) for the second polarizing reflector 3 is equal to the incident angle (θ4) for the second compensating reflector 4. But θ1 need not be equal to θ3. The four reflectors 1,2,3,4 can rotate synchronically and coaxially while the values of the incident angles θ1 and θ3 are not changed and the relative position of the reflectors is maintained.
Embodiment 6
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
200810063060.2 | Jul 2008 | CN | national |