The present invention relates to substrate-guided optical devices, and more particularly, to devices which include a plurality of reflecting surfaces carried by a common light-transmissive substrate, also referred to as a light-guide.
The invention can be implemented to advantage in a large number of imaging applications, such as, for example, head-mounted and head-up displays, cellular phones, compact displays, 3-D displays, compact beam expanders as well as non-imaging applications such as flat-panel indicators, compact illuminators and scanners.
One of the important applications for compact optical elements is in head-mounted displays, wherein an optical module serves both as an imaging lens and a combiner, in which a two-dimensional display is imaged to infinity and reflected into the eye of an observer. The display can be obtained directly from either a spatial light modulator (SLM), such as a cathode ray tube (CRT), a liquid crystal display (LCD), an organic light emitting diode array (OLED), or a scanning source and similar devices, or indirectly, by means of a relay lens or an optical fiber bundle. The display comprises an array of elements (pixels) imaged to infinity by a collimating lens and transmitted into the eye of the viewer by means of a reflecting or partially reflecting surface acting as a combiner for non-see-through and see-through applications, respectively. Typically, a conventional, free-space optical module is used for these purposes. As the desired field-of-view (FOV) of the system increases, such a conventional optical module becomes larger, heavier, bulkier and therefore, even for a moderate performance device, impractical. This is a major drawback for all kinds of displays, but especially in head-mounted applications, where the system must necessarily be as light and as compact, as possible.
The strive for compactness has led to several different complex optical solutions, all of which, on the one hand, are still not sufficiently compact for most practical applications, and, on the other hand, suffer major drawbacks in terms of manufacturability. Furthermore, the eye-motion-box (EMB) of the optical viewing angles resulting from these designs is usually very small—typically less than 8 mm. Hence, the performance of the optical system is very sensitive, even to small movements of the optical system relative to the eye of the viewer, and does not allow sufficient pupil motion for convenient reading of text from such displays.
The present invention facilitates the design and fabrication of very compact light-guide optical elements (LOE) for, amongst other applications, head-mounted displays. The invention allows relatively wide POVs together with relatively large EMB values. The resulting optical system offers a large, high-quality image, which also accommodates large movements of the eye. The optical system offered by the present invention is particularly advantageous because it is substantially more compact than state-of-the-art implementations and yet it can be readily incorporated even into optical systems having specialized configurations.
The invention also enables the construction of improved head-up displays (HUDs). Since the inception of such displays more than three decades ago, there has been significant progress in the field. Indeed, HUDs have become popular and they now play an important role, not only in most modern combat aircraft, but also in civilian aircraft, in which HUD systems have become a key component for low visibility landing operation. Furthermore, there have recently been numerous proposals and designs for HUDs in automotive applications where they can potentially assist the driver in driving and navigation tasks. Nevertheless, state-of-the-art I-IUDs suffer several significant drawbacks. All HUDs of the current designs require a display source that must be offset a significant distance from the combiner to ensure that the source illuminates the entire combiner surface. As a result, the combiner-projector HUD system is necessarily bulky and large, and requires a considerable installation space, which makes it inconvenient for installation and at times even unsafe to use. The large optical aperture of conventional I-IUDs also poses a significant optical design challenge, rendering the HUDs with either compromised performance, or leading to high cost wherever high-performance is required. The chromatic dispersion of high-quality holographic HUDs is of particular concern.
An important application of the present invention relates to its implementation in a compact HUD, which alleviates the aforementioned drawbacks. In the HUD design of the current invention, the combiner is illuminated with a compact display source that can be attached to the substrate. Hence, the overall system is very compact and can readily be installed in a variety of configurations for a wide range of applications. In addition, the chromatic dispersion of the display is negligible and, as such, can operate with wide spectral sources, including a conventional white-light source. In addition, the present invention expands the image so that the active area of the combiner can be much larger than the area that is actually illuminated by the light source.
A further application of the present invention is to provide a compact display with a wide FOV for mobile, hand-held application such as cellular phones. In today's wireless internet-access market, sufficient bandwidth is available for full video transmission. The limiting factor remains the quality of the display within the device of the end-user. The mobility requirement restricts the physical size of the displays, and the result is a direct-display with a poor image viewing quality. The present invention enables a physically very compact display with a very large virtual image. This is a key feature in mobile communications, and especially for mobile internet access, solving one of the main limitations for its practical implementation. The present invention thereby enables the viewing of the digital content of a full format internet page within a small, hand-held device, such as a cellular phone.
The broad object of the present invention, therefore, is to alleviate the drawbacks of state-of-the-art compact optical display devices and to provide other optical components and systems having improved performance, according to specific requirements.
The invention therefore provides an optical system, comprising a light-transmitting substrate having at least two major surfaces parallel to each other and edges, and an optical device for coupling light into said substrate by total internal reflection, characterized in that said device for coupling light includes a polarization sensitive reflecting surface.
Many of the attendant advantages of this invention will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numeral designate like parts throughout the figures thereof and wherein:
wherein T is the substrate thickness;
deye is the desired exit-pupil diameter, and
l is the distance between reflecting surfaces 8 and 12.
With angles higher than αmax the rays are reflected from the substrate surface before arriving at the reflecting surface 12. Hence, the reflecting surface 12 will be illuminated at an undesired direction and ghost images appear.
Therefore, the maximum achievable FOV with this configuration is:
FOVmax≈2vαmax, (2)
wherein v is the refractive index of the substrate. Typically the refractive index values lie in the range of 1.5-1.6.
Commonly, the diameter of the eye pupil is 2 to 6 mm. To accommodate movement or misalignment of the display, a larger exit-pupil diameter is necessary. Taking the minimum desirable value at approximately 8 to 10 mm, the distance between the optical axis of the eye and the side of the head, l, is, typically, between 40 and 80 mm. Consequently, even for a small POV of 8°, the desired substrate thickness would be of the order of 12 mm.
Methods have been proposed to overcome the above problem, including utilizing a magnifying telescope inside the substrate and non-parallel coupling directions. Even with these solutions, however, and even if only one reflecting surface is considered, the system's thickness remains limited by a similar value. The FOV is limited by the diameter of the projection of the reflective surface 12 on the substrate plane. Mathematically, the maximum achievable FOV, due to this limitation, is expressed as:
wherein αsur is the angle between the reflecting surface and the normal to the substrate plane, and
Reye is the distance between the eye of the viewer and the substrate (typically, about 30-40 mm).
Practically tan αsur cannot be much larger than 1; hence, for the same parameters described above for a FOV of 8°, the required substrate thickness here is in the order of 7 mm, which is an improvement on the previous limit. Nevertheless, as the desired FOV is increased, the substrate thickness increases rapidly. For instance, for desired FOVs of 15° and 30° the substrate limiting thickness is 18 mm or 25 mm, respectively.
To alleviate the above limitations, it is possible to utilize an array of at least one parallel selectively reflecting surface, fabricated within a LOE comprising a flat light-transmitting substrate having at least two major surfaces and edges.
As can be seen in
The trapped rays arrive at the reflecting surface from the second direction 30 after an odd number of reflections from the lower substrate surfaces 26, where the off-axis angle is α′in=180°−αin and the incident angle between the trapped ray and the normal to the reflecting surface is:
In order to prevent undesired reflections and ghost images, it is important that the reflectance be negligible for one of these two directions. The desired discrimination between the two incident directions can be achieved if one angle is significantly smaller than the other one. It is possible to design a coating with very low reflectance at high incident angles and a high reflectance for low incident angles. This property can be exploited to prevent undesired reflections and ghost images by eliminating the reflectance in one of the two directions. For example choosing β′ref=25° from Equations (5) and (6) it can be calculated that:
β′ref=105°;αin=50°;α′in=130°;αsur2=25°
Now, if a reflecting surface is determined for which β′ref not reflected but βref is, the desired condition is achieved.
Hence, as long as it can be ensured that β′ref, where very low reflections are desired, will have negligible reflection, similar to that at β′ref˜75°, over its angular spectrum, while βref, will have higher reflections, over its angular spectrum, for a given POV, the reflection of only one substrate mode into the eye of the viewer and a ghost-free image, can be ensured.
It is important not only to couple the image out of the substrate without any distortion or ghost image, but also to couple the light properly into the substrate.
The embodiment described above with regard to
As illustrated in
It is important that the fabrication process of the LOE will be as simple and inexpensive as possible. Although this is true for all the potential applications, it is especially critical for applications wherein the price of the final product must be appropriate for the consumer market.
For LOEs having the internal structures of
There are some disadvantages to the fabrication process illustrated in
Hence, an LOE having an internal structure as illustrated in
There are some issues that must be considered when using the coupling-in method described herein. One issue is the actual realization of the required polarizer beamsplitter 86. One method to realize this is by exploiting polarization sensitivity of thin film coatings. The main drawback of this method is that, as explained above in reference to
A possible candidate for the required anisotropic partially reflecting element can be a wire grid polarizer, generally in the form of an array of thin parallel conductors supported by a transparent substrate. The key factor that determines the performance of a wire grid polarizer is the relationship between the center-to-center spacing or period of the parallel grid elements, and the wavelength of the incident radiation. When the grid spacing or period is much shorter than the wavelength, the grid functions as a polarizer that reflects electromagnetic radiation polarized parallel to the grid elements, and transmits radiation of the orthogonal polarization. In this case, the major axis of a wire grid polarizer is defined as parallel to the array of conductors. Usually, in order to obtain the best transmission and contrast, the wire grid polarizer beamsplitter should be used to transmit the p-polarization and reflect the s-polarization, as illustrated in
Another issue that should be considered is the required entrance aperture of the LOE.
A modified method is illustrated in
In the embodiment illustrated in
There are optical systems wherein the display source is unpolarized and where maximal possible efficiency is important.
For each instance where we have followed a particular polarized wave path in the examples described above, the polarizations are interchangeable. That is, on altering the orientation of the polarizing beamsplitters, each mention of p-polarized light could be replaced by s-polarized light, and vice-versa.
It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrated embodiments and that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
171820 | Nov 2005 | IL | national |
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 16/013,983 filed Jun. 21, 2018 for POLARIZING OPTICAL SYSTEM, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,598,937, granted Mar. 24, 2020, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 15/289,774 filed Oct. 10, 2016 for POLARIZING OPTICAL SYSTEM, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,048,499, granted Aug. 14, 2018, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 12/092,818 filed May 6, 2008 for POLARIZING OPTICAL SYSTEM, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,551,880, granted Jan. 24, 2017.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5430505 | Katz | Jul 1995 | A |
5712694 | Taira et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
6154321 | Melville et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6231992 | Niebauer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239092 | Papasso et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6404550 | Yajima | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6542307 | Gleckman et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6671100 | McRuer | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7778508 | Hirayama | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8187481 | Hobbs | May 2012 | B1 |
8718437 | Coe-Sullivan et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
9523852 | Brown et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9551880 | Amitai | Jan 2017 | B2 |
10048499 | Amitai | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10222535 | Remhof et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10466479 | Shih et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10598937 | Amitai | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20050024849 | Parker et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20070165192 | Prior | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080106775 | Amitai et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080151375 | Lin | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151379 | Amitai | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080186604 | Amitai | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080198471 | Amitai | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080278812 | Amitai | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285140 | Amitai | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090052046 | Amitai | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052047 | Amitai | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090097127 | Amitai | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090122414 | Amitai | May 2009 | A1 |
20090153437 | Aharoni | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100027289 | Aiki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100171680 | Lapidot et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100214635 | Sasaki et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110096566 | Tsai et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110109880 | Nummela | May 2011 | A1 |
20120179369 | Lapidot et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130135749 | Akutsu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130208362 | Bohn et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130229717 | Amitai | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130250430 | Robbuns et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130276960 | Amitai | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130279017 | Amitai | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140118813 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140118836 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140118837 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140126051 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140126052 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140126056 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140126057 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140126175 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140160577 | Dominici et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140019801 | Lamb et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140272329 | Mccollum et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140334777 | Dubroca et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150138451 | Amitai | May 2015 | A1 |
20150182348 | Siegal et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150198805 | Mansharof et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150205140 | Mansharof et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150205141 | Mansharof et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150277127 | Amitai | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150289762 | Popovich et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150293360 | Amitai | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160116743 | Amitai | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160170212 | Amitai | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160170213 | Amitai | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160170214 | Amitai | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187656 | Amitai | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160313567 | Kurashige | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160314564 | Jones | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160341964 | Amitai | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160349518 | Amitai et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170003504 | Vallius et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170045744 | Amitai | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170052376 | Amitai | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170052377 | Amitai | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170122725 | Yeoh | May 2017 | A1 |
20170276947 | Yokoyama | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170336636 | Amitai et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170353714 | Poulad et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170357095 | Amitai | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170363799 | Ofir et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180039082 | Amitai | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180067315 | Amitai et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180157057 | Gelberg et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180210202 | Danziger | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180267317 | Amitai | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180275384 | Danziger et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180275409 | Gao et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180292592 | Danziger | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180292599 | Ofir et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180373039 | Amitai | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190011710 | Amitai | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190056600 | Danziger | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190064518 | Danziger | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190155035 | Amitai | May 2019 | A1 |
20190170327 | Eisenfeld et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190208187 | Danziger | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190212487 | Danziger et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190227215 | Danziger | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190278086 | Ofir | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190285900 | Amitai | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190293856 | Danziger | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190339530 | Amitai | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190346609 | Eisenfeld | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190361240 | Gelberg | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190361241 | Amitai | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190377187 | Rubin et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190391408 | Mansharof | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200033572 | Danziger et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200041713 | Danziger | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200089001 | Amitai et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200110211 | Danziger et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200120329 | Danziger | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200133008 | Amitai | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200150330 | Danziger et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200183159 | Danziger | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200183170 | Amitai et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200192089 | Haddick et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200200963 | Eisenfeld et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200209667 | Sharlin et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200241308 | Danziger et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200249481 | Danziger et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200278557 | Greenstein et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200285060 | Amitai | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200292417 | Lobachinsky et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200292744 | Danziger | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200292819 | Danziger et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200310024 | Danziger et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200326545 | Amitai et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200371311 | Lobachinsky et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210003849 | Amitai et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210018755 | Amitai | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210033773 | Danziger et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210033862 | Danziger et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210033872 | Rubin et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210055218 | Aldaag et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210055466 | Eisenfeld | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210055561 | Danziger et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210063733 | Ronen | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210072553 | Danziger et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210099691 | Danziger | Apr 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1996313843 | Nov 1996 | JP |
2012-037761 | Feb 2012 | JP |
WO2015012280 | Mar 2017 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200285060 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15289774 | Oct 2016 | US |
Child | 16013983 | US | |
Parent | 12092818 | US | |
Child | 15289774 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16013983 | Jun 2018 | US |
Child | 16823454 | US |