Poles are set in the ground for many purposes, including to support outdoor lighting and to support utility lines, such as for electricity service, telephone service, and cable television/Internet service. While at times these poles may be securely set in the ground using concrete or another type of anchoring agent, at other times these poles may be simply set in the ground by the digging of a post hole and then insertion of the pole into the hole. Less work may be performed in setting particularly light poles, such as the decorative hollow fiberglass poles often used for outdoor lighting along streets and sidewalks. These poles may be set in the ground at a quite shallow depth in order to reduce the cost of installation. Poles set at such a shallow depth may begin to lean over time. Even poles that are set more deeply may develop a lean over time, or due to extreme weather events such as tornadoes or hurricanes.
It would be desirable to have a device that would serve to straighten leaning poles, without incurring the cost of re-setting the post. It would further be desirable if such a device were adaptable to be used when setting a new post, such that a pole would never develop a lean at all.
Any references mentioned in this background section are not admitted to be prior art with respect to the present invention.
The present invention is directed to a pole stabilizer. In various embodiments, the stabilizer may be set into the ground with the installation of a new pole, or may be retrofitted to existing poles, either while the pole is still straight or after the pole has begun to lean. The stabilizer is fitted to the pole to provide support, and is adapted to be inserted into the ground around the pole. The stabilizer in certain embodiments has wings that extend outwardly to engage the ground around the perimeter of the pole, far enough from the pole to engage ground that was not disturbed when the pole was set.
These and other features, objects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood from a consideration of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and appended claims in conjunction with the drawings as described following:
Before the present invention is described in further detail, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described, and that the terms used in describing the particular embodiments are for the purpose of describing those particular embodiments only, and are not intended to be limiting, since the scope of the present invention will be limited only by the claims.
A pole stabilizer according to an embodiment of the invention is shown in
First wing 12 and second wing 14 extend radially outward from center body 10. First wing 12 and second wing 14 extend in opposite directions and lie in the same plane along their faces. In alternative embodiments, first wing 12 and second wing 14 may form an angle other than 180 degrees with respect to each other and thus may not lie in the same plane along their faces. In this case, for example, the shape of center body 10 may be less than or more than a semicircle in the case of a pole that is circular in cross-section.
Center body 10 includes a center body top edge 16 and center body bottom edge 18. A thickness at both of center body top edge 16 and center body top edge 18 may be the same, and if the thickness across center body 10 remains the same between center body top edge 16 and center body bottom edge 18, then center body 10 will be entirely flat. Further, the distance from center body top edge 16 to center body bottom edge 18 may be greater than the thickness at either center body top edge 16 or center bottom edge 18. This distance may be of sufficient length that the stabilizer, when placed into the ground snugly with a pole, will provide support for the pole's weight even in high winds. Movement of the pole due to wind may cause a rotational motion at center body 10, such that center body top edge 16 is moved in an opposite direction from center body bottom edge 18 simultaneously. The purpose of first wing 12 and second wing 14 is to engage the ground and resist this movement, as further explained following.
Center body 10 further comprises a center body inner face 20 and a center body outer face 22. Center body inner face 20 is configured to conform to and engage with the pole when the stabilizer is in use. The length of center body inner face 20 between center body top edge 18 and center body bottom edge 18 is sufficient to provide positive engagement with the pole in order to prevent movement of the pole without a corresponding movement of the stabilizer. Because the stabilizer is locked into the ground by first wing 12 and second wing 14, and with center body inner face 20 positively engaged with the pole, movement of the pole due to wind is prevented. Center body outer face 22 lies on the opposite side of center body 10 from center body inner face 20, and engages with the ground when the stabilizer is in use with respect to a pole fitted into the ground, as shown in
The center body 10 is further defined by first center body side edge 24 and second center body side edge 26. First center body side edge 24 and second center body side edge 26 may, for example, be simply bends in the material that form the division between center body 10 and first wing 12, and center body 10 and second wing 14, respectively. First center body side edge 24 and second center body side edge 26 may be parallel with respect to each other, such as in the case when center body 10 is adapted to fit to a straight-sided, non-tapered pole, or in other cases may not be parallel when, for example, a tapered pole is to be fitted within center body 10. First center body side edge 24 and second center body side edge 26 may connect center body top edge 16 to center body bottom edge 18.
First wing 12 includes a first wing proximal end 28 that connects to center body 10 at first center body side edge 24. Likewise, second wing 14 includes a second wing proximal end 30 that connects to center body 10 at second center body side edge 26. First wing 12 extends radially outward from center body 10, while second wing 14 extends radially outward from center body 10 in an opposite direction and co-planarly with first wing 12. First wing 12 includes first wing top edge 32, which may be in line with center body top edge 16. Likewise, second wing 12 includes second wing top edge 34, which may be in line with body center body top edge 16 and first wing top edge 32. In this way, the entire stabilizer may present a top edge that is uninterrupted and of even height when deployed. First wing distal end 36 and second wing distal end 38 are positioned at radially opposite ends of the stabilizer, although as noted above, alternative geometric configurations are possible.
First wing 12 and second wing 14 are also characterized by first wing lower edge 40 and second wing lower edge 42, respectively. First wing lower edge 40 and second wing lower edge 42 may be characterized by teeth or serrations, as shown in
A feature of the illustrated embodiment is that first wing distal end 36 and second wing distal end 38 extend radially far enough from center body 10 that the serrations at the outer part of first wing lower edge 40 and second wing lower edge 42 reach into a portion of ground 102 that was not disturbed when setting the pole 100. As shown in
Two embodiments of the stabilizer are shown in the illustrations, one with a bracket 44 and one without. The bracket 44 embodiment is shown in
It is envisioned that bracket 44 may be best suited for the fitting of the stabilizer to previously set poles 100 that have begun to lean. The process is to first straighten the pole within its hole in ground 102, then set center body 10 into position against pole 100, attach bracket 44 around pole 100 with bolts 50, then slide the stabilizer downward and drive it into the ground so that pole 100 is secured in a straight, upright position. When the stabilizer is used in connection with the setting of a new pole, stabilizer 44 may not be required; however, it should be understood that stabilizer 44 could be used or not used in connection with either a new pole 100 being set or an existing but leaning pole 100 retrofit, as desired given the application conditions.
An engineering analysis has been performed with respect to proposed use of the stabilizer 44 as described herein. Resistance to single pole deflection is dependent upon soil parameters, such as cohesion, angle of internal friction, and unit weight (whether submerged, saturated, or dry). These soil parameters are site specific and are impacted by weather factors, flooding, disturbance from pole installation procedures, and properties of backfill soils. Notwithstanding the variable nature of in situ and remolded soils at a pole site, a pole stabilizer of the form of stabilizer 44 was found to effectively mobilize resistance of soils outside the pole installation zone. Without stabilizer 44, the pole resistance to deflection is largely dependent on properties of the disturbed soil backfill zone. The configuration and properties of the disturbed soil zone are controlled by installation methods and backfill materials selection.
By mobilizing undisturbed soil, a pole stabilizer such as stabilizer 44 was found to reduce the directional deflection potential of a pole. Stabilizer 44 was found to be especially effective in cohesive soil types including fat and lean clays, sandy clays, and clay-sand-gravel blends. Although the enhanced resistance was found to be soil and site specific, analysis of a range of soil properties indicate that for a pole stabilizer such as stabilizer 44, an increase in directional resistance to lateral forces of two hundred to five hundred percent may be obtained in cohesive soils. In certain applications, multiple stabilizers 44 were found to create an improved resistance in multiple directions.
Resistance increase in non-cohesive soils was determined to be sensitive to the embedment depth of a stabilizer such as stabilizer 44. Review of a range of non-cohesive soil properties indicated that stabilizer 44 could improve directional resistance potential by seventy-five to one hundred and fifty percent. Resistance potential can be increased by greater embedment depth in various applications.
Unless otherwise stated, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can also be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, a limited number of the exemplary methods and materials are described herein. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein.
All terms used herein should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. When a grouping is used herein, all individual members of the group and all combinations and subcombinations possible of the group are intended to be individually included. When a range is stated herein, the range is intended to include all subranges and individual points within the range. All references cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the extent that there is no inconsistency with the disclosure of this specification.
The present invention has been described with reference to certain preferred and alternative embodiments that are intended to be exemplary only and not limiting to the full scope of the present invention, as set forth in the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application No. 63/218,806, filed on Jul. 6, 2021. Such application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
277708 | Gorla | May 1883 | A |
278220 | Carson | May 1883 | A |
492520 | Hedges | Feb 1893 | A |
925940 | McClintock | Jun 1909 | A |
1952789 | Butts | Mar 1934 | A |
3896596 | Berger | Jul 1975 | A |
4882891 | Sero et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5730555 | Stoner | Mar 1998 | A |
5899030 | Barefield | May 1999 | A |
7484336 | Stone | Feb 2009 | B2 |
10676887 | Reinert | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20020067959 | Thornton | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20140373461 | Rodriguez | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10-1132807 | Apr 2012 | KR |
101334279 | Nov 2013 | KR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63218806 | Jul 2021 | US |