The subject matter described herein relates to congestion control in mobile communications networks. More particularly, the subject matter described herein relates to PCRF and PIC based congestion control.
Service providers are facing radio access network (RAN) congestion challenges as a result of the explosive growth in mobile data traffic. Current growth is being driven by increasing 3G and 4G penetration, widespread adoption of new smart phone devices, and increasing use of bandwidth intensive applications. Such growth has resulted in service degradation for mobile subscribers attached to congested cell sites and has created challenges in implementing fair usage policies to manage network congestion in the core network and in the RAN.
The congestion in a cell is primarily caused by one or more of the following types of traffic:
The subject matter described herein includes methods, systems, and computer readable media for PCRF and PIC based congestion control. According to one aspect, the subject matter described herein includes a system for congestion control in a mobile communications network. The system includes a monitoring module configured to monitor message traffic associated with a cell in a mobile communications network. The message traffic includes control plane and user plane messages. The monitoring module determines based on the message traffic, whether a predetermined congestion threshold associated with the cell in the mobile communications network has been crossed. In response to determining that the congestion threshold associated with the cell has been crossed, the monitoring module generates a cell congestion notification message that includes the identity of one or more subscribers that are contributing to the congestion. The system includes a policy server configured to receive the cell congestion notification message and to generate a policy and charging control (PCC) rule that modifies the policy of the one or more identified subscribers and for communicating the PCC rule to a policy and charging enforcement function (PCEF).
As used herein, the term “cell” refers to a definable part of the access portion of a mobile communications network. For example, a cell may be an area served by a radio tower in a 3G, 4G, or subsequent generation mobile communications network. A cell may also be an area served by a wireless access point where Wi-Fi is used to access a mobile communications network.
The subject matter described herein can be implemented using a non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon executable instructions that when executed by the processor of a computer control the computer to perform steps. Exemplary computer readable media suitable for implementing the subject matter described herein include chip memory devices, disk memory devices, programmable logic devices, and application specific integrated circuits. In addition, a computer readable medium that implements the subject matter described herein may be located on a single device or computing platform or maybe distributed across plural devices or computing platforms.
The subject matter described herein will now be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings of which:
According to one aspect, the subject matter described herein includes a RAN congestion mitigation solution. The RAN congestion mitigation solution detects congestion in radio cells in near real-time by monitoring, measuring and interpreting signaling and data messages exchanged between network elements in a 3G, 4G, or NG network, where N is an integer greater than 4. On cells that are congested, the solution attempts to mitigate the effects of the congestion on the packet switched data traffic by applying bandwidth management policies. Examples of such policies include:
The solution also analyzes the collected data to produce reports that help the service provider plan and tune their radio network resources.
One exemplary implementation of the subject matter described herein integrates two network elements:
1. Performance Intelligence Center (PIC), generically referred to herein as the monitoring module.
2. Policy and Charging Rules Function (PCRF), generically referred to herein as the policy server.
The function of the PIC or monitoring module is to detect cell congestion and the severity of the congestion using control and/or user plane link probes that monitor, from the wireline side, communications to and from network elements that connect to a radio access network (e.g., GRAN, GERAN, UTRAN, Long Term Evolution, E-UTRAN, Wi-Fi access network, WiMax access network, etc.) and to notify the PCRF when congestion/decongestion conditions occur. The PIC or monitoring module may alternatively monitor messages on the wireless side of the RNC, i.e., between the RNC and the eNode B, without departing from the scope of the subject matter described herein.
The function of the PCRF or policy server is to act on the cell congestion data provided by PIC and apply appropriate policies to mitigate the congestion. According to one aspect of the subject matter described herein, a PIC monitoring module and a PCRF work together to detect and mitigate cell congestion in a wireless or radio access network and exemplary architectures and operational scenarios are described in detail below.
A new set of policies relating to RAN congestion is added in the PCRF. The policies can be provisioned by the service provider to define rules that are to be applied when congestion occurs. Exemplary rules include adjusting the quality of service (QoS) for subscribers in the congested cells and/or denying new context activations from mobile subscribers. A new messaging infrastructure is implemented for the PIC—PCRF communication.
Theory of Operation
High Level Functional Description
As mentioned in the previous section, one exemplary implementation of the subject matter described herein includes a PIC and a PCRF, as shown in
In the illustrated example, probes 200 are co-located with RNCs 202. In an alternate example, probes 200 may be integrated within RNCs 202. The function of PIC 100 is to monitor the Iu packet switched (Iu-PS), Iu circuit switched (Iu-CS) interfaces and general packet radio service tunneling protocol (GTP) direct tunnels between RNC 202 and gateway GPRS support nodes (GGSNs) 204, servicing GPRS support nodes (SGSNs) 206, and mobile switching centers (MSCs) 208, measure network performance and detect congestion of cells. Probes 200 tap the above-mentioned interfaces and acquire all the PDUs being exchanged between RNCs 202 and SGSNs 206 and between RNCs 202 and GGSNs 204 (direct tunnel). PIC 100 uses the collected protocol data untis (PDUs) to compute bandwidth usage per cell site as well as other indications of congestion. PIC 100 notifies PCRF 104 when there is a change in the congestion level.
PCRF 104 system receives congestion/decongestion notification messages from the PIC monitoring module (IXP) and applies appropriate subscriber policy control actions. The subscriber policies may be communicated to GGSNs 204 using Diameter messages on the Gx interface. GGSNs 204 enforce the policy rules provisioned by PCRF 104. PCRF 104 may also access/utilize subscriber profile information (e.g., subscriber service level [e.g., Platinum, Gold, Silver], etc.) in the process of making policy decisions. Subscriber profile data may be stored, for example, in a subscriber profile repository (SPR), subscriber data management (SDM) module, a home location register (HLR), or a home subscriber server (HSS). In this example, PCRF 104 supports standard 3GPP-specified interfaces for retrieving subscriber information from HSS 210. In one embodiment, where PCRF 104 is configured to use HSS 210, HSS 210 can be provisioned as the subscriber data source. If HSS 210 is integrated with PCRF 104, PCRF 104 automatically merges information from HSS 210 when a Gx session for a particular IMSI or hardware ID is bound to the PCRF. In one embodiment, PCRF 104 automatically queries HSS 210 at the time of Gx attachment in order to retrieve information regarding the subscriber.
In the example illustrated in
PIC 100 may monitor message traffic on a wired interface of a radio network control device. For example, PIC 100 may monitor the Iu interface of an RNC. However, all the data needed to compute data usage and detect congestion may not be available from the Iu interface. PIC 100 may not monitor the Iu-b interface (interface between the node B and the RNC) and therefore may not have a view into the radio resource control messages being exchanged between the node Bs and the RNC. Monitoring Iu-b messages in order to determine congestion requires too many probes and is not considered to be a viable approach by most service providers. The lack of Iu-b monitoring is compensated for by employing an approximation-based detection algorithm for identifying RAN congestion. In an exemplary LTE embodiment, a PIC monitoring module may monitor traffic associated with mobile subscribers on communication links associated with an S1-C and/or and S1-U interface between an eNode B and a Mobility Management Entity (MME). In another exemplary embodiment, in order to obtain mobile subscriber identifying information, a PIC monitoring module may monitor control plane traffic (e.g., Update Location Request/Answer, Cancel Location Request/Answer, etc.) associated with mobile subscribers on communication links associated with an S6 interface between an MME and an HSS. In another exemplary embodiment, in order to obtain mobile subscriber identifying information, a PIC monitoring module may monitor control plane traffic (e.g., MAP Update Location, MAP Insert Subscriber Data, MAP Cancel Location, etc.) associated with mobile subscribers on communication links associated with an MAP interface between an mobile switching center (MSC) and a home location register (HLR), and/or between a SGSN and HLR.
In one implementation, a RAN congestion application residing in IXP 203 utilizes the following metrics per cell to assist in the identification of RAN congestion. This approach is the simplest to implement, and the solution scales up very well.
When a congestion condition is detected, the information is communicated to the PCRF by providing the location, congestion level and other useful information. In one exemplary implementation, PIC 100 supports the following three congestion levels:
To avoid jittery notifications, a hysteresis value is applied to the NCV. The value is configurable and has a default value of 2%. This value is used to temper the notification mechanism so that PCRF 104 does not receive notification messages when a threshold is crossed by a small factor.
PCRF Functional Description
PCRF actions and algorithms will now be described. Initially, a new IP-CAN setup initializes a Gx session at the PCRF between PCRF and the PCEF. In one embodiment, the PCRF will, using any number of configured data sources, and procure the information for the attached session (using IMSI as a key, for example). In another embodiment, the PCRF receives a message from the PIC over an interface between the PIC and the PCRF listing the following information:
(1) Cell global identifier (CGI)
(2) Load indicator: WARNING or SEVERE
(3) List of IMSIs in cell site
A number of configurables on the PCRF may be needed for triggering action by the PCRF. Exemplary configurables are detailed below:
This section describes exemplary messaging interface between PIC 100 and PCRF 104. As mentioned in the previous section, PIC 100 sends a notification message to PCRF 104 when a congestion level is exceeded. In one embodiment, this is the only message that is exchanged between the two network elements, although other embodiments may involve additional messages. The following section describes a congestion notification message as well as the other messages that may be exchanged between PIC 100 and PCRF 104 according to an embodiment of the subject matter described herein.
Congestion notification messages may be exchanged using a SOAP/HTTP/TCP/IP transport over an agreed upon port. The SOAP service may be served by the PCRF, and the PIC acts as the SOAP client. The message may be encrypted and there may be a BASIC authentication mechanism at the server end (PCRF) to authenticate the sender (PIC).
The request message may be encoded as per SOAP rules. As with any SOAP message, the message consists of a request-response pair with a response timeout set to 30 seconds at the client level.
Congestion Notification Message
This message may be sent by PIC 100 to notify PCRF 104 of changes to the congestion level. As mentioned earlier, the message may be sent to PCRF 104 if there is a change in the congestion level. The request message may include, but is not limited to, the following elements:
In step 406, a policy server receives the congestion notification message. For example, PCRF 104 may receive the congestion notification message from PIC 100. In step 408, the policy server generates a policy and charging control (PCC) rule that modifies the policy of the one or more identified subscribers. For example, PCRF 104 may generate a PCC rule to reduce the QoS for the subscribers identified in the congestion notification message. In step 408, the policy server communicates the PCC rule to a policy and charging enforcement function. For example, PCRF 104 may communicate the PCC rule to a PDN gateway, a DPI, a gateway GPRS support node, or other node capable of enforcing the policy for the identified subscribers.
It will be understood that various details of the subject matter described herein may be changed without departing from the scope of the subject matter described herein. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation, as the subject matter described herein is defined by the claims as set forth hereinafter.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/424,603 filed Dec. 17, 2010; the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3917915 | Karras | Nov 1975 | A |
4162377 | Mearns | Jul 1979 | A |
4191860 | Weber | Mar 1980 | A |
4310727 | Lawser | Jan 1982 | A |
4313035 | Jordan et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4385206 | Bradshaw et al. | May 1983 | A |
4754479 | Bicknell et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4756020 | Fodale | Jul 1988 | A |
4769834 | Billinger et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4788718 | McNabb et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4897835 | Gaskill et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897870 | Golden | Jan 1990 | A |
4959849 | Bhusri | Sep 1990 | A |
4972461 | Brown et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5008929 | Olsen et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5150357 | Hopner et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5291481 | Doshi et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5315580 | Phaal | May 1994 | A |
5341680 | Smart et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5402474 | Miller et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5426688 | Anand | Jun 1995 | A |
5430709 | Galloway | Jul 1995 | A |
5438570 | Karras et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5457692 | Ishinabe et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5457729 | Hamann et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5473596 | Garafola et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5475732 | Pester, III | Dec 1995 | A |
5506893 | Buscher et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5521902 | Ferguson | May 1996 | A |
5539804 | Hong et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546398 | Tucker et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550914 | Clarke et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5572579 | Orriss et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579371 | Aridas et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5583926 | Venier et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586177 | Farris et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592530 | Brockman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598464 | Hess et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602909 | Carkner et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606600 | Elliott et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5610969 | McHenry et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5610977 | Williams et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5625681 | Butler, II | Apr 1997 | A |
5689555 | Sonnenberg | Nov 1997 | A |
5696816 | Sonnenberg | Dec 1997 | A |
5712908 | Brinkman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5740239 | Bhagat et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5757895 | Aridas et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764745 | Chan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768352 | Elliott et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768358 | Venier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771284 | Sonnenberg | Jun 1998 | A |
5774532 | Gottlieb et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784443 | Chapman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796813 | Sonnenberg | Aug 1998 | A |
5802145 | Farris et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812639 | Bartholomew et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5867558 | Swanson | Feb 1999 | A |
5903726 | Donovan et al. | May 1999 | A |
5949871 | Kabay et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5999525 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009160 | Sonnenberg | Dec 1999 | A |
6021126 | White et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028914 | Lin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6091957 | Larkins et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091959 | Souissi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094573 | Heinonen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097719 | Benash et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108332 | Kasiviswanathan | Aug 2000 | A |
6108782 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111946 | O'Brien | Aug 2000 | A |
6115754 | Landgren | Sep 2000 | A |
6119014 | Alperovich et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128304 | Gardell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128377 | Sonnenberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6134307 | Broukman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134314 | Dougherty et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134316 | Kallioniemi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134432 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138023 | Agarwal et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144636 | Aimoto et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6181937 | Joensuu | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182086 | Lomet et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188752 | Lesley | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208872 | Schmidt | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215790 | Voit et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219551 | Hentilä et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6249572 | Brockman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252952 | Kung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6272136 | Lin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301609 | Aravamudan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304565 | Ramamurthy | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321268 | Dillon et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324183 | Miller et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6333931 | LaPier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6363411 | Dugan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373930 | McConnell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393269 | Hartmaier et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6424621 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430176 | Christie, IV | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438223 | Eskafi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446127 | Schuster et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453034 | Donovan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453158 | Donovan et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6456708 | Copley et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466796 | Jacobson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470179 | Chow et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480588 | Donovan | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496690 | Cobo et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510164 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515997 | Feltner et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516194 | Hanson | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535727 | Abbasi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6564261 | Gudjonsson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571094 | Begeja et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6584183 | Manto | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6611516 | Pirkola et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6633764 | Garcia | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6718178 | Sladek et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6747970 | Lamb et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760343 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6801781 | Provost et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6856676 | Pirot et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6963583 | Foti | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968052 | Wullert, II | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7058036 | Yu et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072651 | Jiang et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
8305922 | Cuervo | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8331229 | Hu et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
20010031641 | Ung et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034224 | McDowell et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020029189 | Titus et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020058507 | Valentine et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020111153 | Hartmaier et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020150079 | Zabawskyj et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030003928 | Marjelund et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026289 | Mukherjee et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031160 | Gibson Ang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037108 | Peiffer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030177281 | McQuillan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030203740 | Bahl et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040003037 | Fujimoto et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040153506 | Ito et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166878 | Erskine et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040213393 | Bedingfield et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233840 | Bye | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240638 | Donovan | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027867 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070310 | Caspi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050107091 | Vannithamby et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050202836 | Schaedler et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060291488 | Naqvi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070185809 | Duan | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195788 | Vasamsetti et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080043689 | Walter | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080142599 | Benillouche et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090109845 | Andreasen et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090207730 | Stamoulis et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225762 | Davidson et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228956 | He et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090325574 | Izawa et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327112 | Li et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100048161 | He et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100080171 | Rune et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100137002 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161802 | Tofighbakhsh et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100184403 | Cai et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100241496 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246500 | Rydnell et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100287121 | Li et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100291924 | Antrim et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100297985 | Van Erlach | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110003579 | Cai et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110103261 | Duan | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116382 | McCann et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110158090 | Riley et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170412 | Ramadas et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110188457 | Shu et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208853 | Castro-Castro et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110217979 | Nas | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231540 | Tai et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246586 | Steele | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110307790 | Pandya et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110317557 | Siddam et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120026947 | Miller et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120028626 | Marocchi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120034900 | Agarwal | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039175 | Sridhar et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120052866 | Froehlich et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084371 | Rajagopalan et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120094685 | Marsico | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120096139 | Cackowski et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120099529 | Williams | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120099715 | Ravishankar et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120100849 | Marsico | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120129488 | Patterson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140632 | Norp et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163297 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120176894 | Cai et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120220330 | Goldner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130017803 | Li et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036215 | Kupinsky et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 088 639 | Sep 1983 | EP |
0 212 654 | May 1987 | EP |
0 258 654 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0 264 023 | Apr 1988 | EP |
1 100 279 | May 2001 | EP |
1 988 680 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2 093 931 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2 382 267 | May 2003 | GB |
58-215164 | Dec 1983 | JP |
62-200859 | Sep 1987 | JP |
1020030025024 | Mar 2003 | KR |
WO 8401073 | Mar 1984 | WO |
WO 8603915 | Jul 1986 | WO |
WO 8800419 | Jan 1988 | WO |
WO 9733441 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9914910 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0016583 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0035155 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0120920 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0156308 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 2006031678 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2009058067 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2011082035 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2012021344 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO 2013126057 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,784 (Oct. 10, 2013). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/402,756 (Sep. 19, 2013). |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,784 (Sep. 6, 2013). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/276,916 (Sep. 3, 2013). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/277,626 (Aug. 20, 2013). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending International Applicaton No. PCT/US13/51447 for “Methods, Systems and Computer Readable Media for Distributing Policy Rules to the Mobile Edge,” (Unpublished, filed Jul. 22, 2013). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/947,314 for “Methods, Systems and Computer Readable Media for Distributing Policy Rules to the Mobile Edge,” (Unpublished, filed Jul. 22, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/040,020 (Jul. 18, 2013). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/942,323 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Dynamically Controlling Congestion in a Radio Access Network,” (Unpublished, filed Jul. 15, 2013). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending International Applicaton No. PCT/US13/50512 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Dynamically Controlling Congestion in a Radio Access Network,” (Unpublished, filed Jul. 15, 2013). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,784 (Jun. 26, 2013). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,228 (Jun. 21, 2013). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Access to the 3GPP Evolved Packet Core (EPC) via non-3GPP access networks; Stage 3 (Release 12),” 3GPP TS 24.302, V12.1.0, pp. 1-68 (Jun. 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/276,916 (Apr. 11, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,228 (Feb. 1, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,784 (Dec. 19, 2012). |
Communication of European Publication Number and Information on the Application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 10841576.1 (Oct. 10, 2012). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 61/671,691 for “Methods and System for Dynamically Controlling Signaling Costs in a Mobile Network,” (Unpublished, filed Jul. 14, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/061586 (Sep. 26, 2011). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Universal Geographical Area Description (GAD) (Release 10),” 3GPP TS 23.032 V10.0.0, pp. 1-29 (Mar. 2011). |
“Smart Cards; Card Application Toolkit (CAT) (Release 9),” ETSI TS 102 223 V9.2.0, pp. 1-209 (Oct. 2010). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group GSM/EDGE Radio Access Network; Mobile Radio Interface Layer 3 Specification; Radio Resource Control (RRC) Protocol (Release 10),” 3GPP TS 44.018 V10.0.0, pp. 1-429 (Sep. 2010). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol Specification (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 36.331 V9.4.0, pp. 1-252 (Sep. 2010). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Radio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol Specification (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 25.331, V9.4.0, pp. 1-1789 (Sep. 2010). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; UICC-terminal Interface; Physical and Logical Characteristics (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 31.101, V9.1.0, pp. 1-35 (Jun. 2010). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Non-Access-Stratum (NAS) Functions Related to Mobile Station (MS) in Idle Mode (Release 10),” 3GPP TS 23.122 v10.0.0, pp. 1-41 (Jun. 2010). |
3GPP, “Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; 3GPP Evolved Packet System(EPS); Evolved General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) Tunnelling Protocol for Control Plane (GTPv2-C); Stage 3 (3GPP TS 29.274 version 9.3.0 Release 9),” ETSI TS 129 274 V9.3.0, pp. 1-162 (Jun. 2010). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Charging management; Diameter charging applications (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 32.299 V9.4.0, pp. 1-149 (Jun. 2010). |
Znaty, “Diameter, GPRS, (LTE + ePC = EPS), IMS, PCC and SDM,” Effort, pp. 1-229 (Part 1 of 2) (May 2010). |
Znaty, “Diameter, GPRS, (LTE + ePC = EPS), IMS, PCC and SDM,” Efort pp. 230-461 (Part 2 of 2) (May 2010). |
“Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Policy and Charging Control over Gx Reference Point (3GPP TS 29.212 version 9.2.0 Release 9),” ETSI TS 129 212 V9.2.0, pp. 1-115 (Apr. 2010). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Policy and Charging Control over Gx Reference Point (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 29.212 V9.2.0, pp. 1-111 (Mar. 2010). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Network Identity and Timezone (NITZ); Service Description, Stage 1 (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 22.042, V9.0.0, pp. 1-8 (Dec. 2009). |
3GPP, “Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Universal Subscriber Identity Module (USIM) Application Toolkit (USAT) (3GPP TS 31.111 version 8.3.0 Release 8),” ETSI TS 131 111 V8.3.0, pp. 1-102 (Oct. 2008). |
International Standard, “Maritime Navigation and Radiocommunication Equipment and Systems—Digital Interfaces—Part 1: Single Talker and Multiple Listeners,” IEC 61162-1, Second edition, pp. 1-86 (Jul. 2000). |
“Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Policy and charging control architecture (3GPP TS 23.203 version 8.14.0 Release 8),” ETSI TS 123 203, pp. 1-118 (Jul. 2012). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/402,756 (May 10, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,936 (May 1, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/277,626 (Feb. 27, 2013). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2012/026178 (Jul. 30, 2012). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending International Application No. PCT/US12/26178 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Network Metadata Based Policy Control,” (Unpublished, filed Feb. 22, 2012). |
“About 3GPP: What is the difference between a SIM and a USIM? What is a UICC?,” About http://www.3gpp.org/FAQ#outil—sommaire—58, pp. 1-11 (Copyright 2012). |
“Smart Cards; Card Application Toolkit (CAT) (Release 10),” ETSI TS 102 223 V10.5.0, pp. 1-224 (Sep. 2011). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Universal Geographical Area Description (GAD) (Release 10),” 3GPP TS 23.032, pp. 1-29 (Mar. 2011). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Charging management; Diameter charging applications (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 32.299 V9.4.0, pp. 1-148 (Jun. 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Policy and Charging Control over Rx reference point (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 29.214 V9.3.0, pp. 1-44 (Mar. 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Policy and Charging Control over Gx reference point (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 29.212 V9.2.0, pp. 1-111 (Mar. 2010). |
“BICC Architecture and BICC Protocol Details,” Tekelec, p. 28-41 (2008). |
“BICC Signaling Router (BSR) Reference Architecture (WP005274),” Tekelec, p. 2-91 (2008). |
Jennings et al., “Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) URIs for Application such as Voicemail and Interactive Voice.Response (IVR),” The Internet Society, RFC 4458 (Apr. 2006). |
“Interworking Between Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol or ISDN User Part,” ITU-T Q.1912.5, p. 1-101 (Mar. 2004). |
“Prepaid vs. Number Portability,” Power Point presentation (publication date unknown; electronic file creation date Jul. 29, 2003.). |
“Bearer Independent Call Bearer Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1950, p. 1-96 (Dec. 2002). |
Chang, “BICC Extension of SIP in Inter-Network Configuration,” Internet Engineering Task Force, draft-chang-sipping-bicc-network-00.txt, pp. 1-17 (Mar. 2002). |
Marshall et al., “SIP Extensions for Supporting Distributed Call State,” SIP Working Group, Internet Draft, pp. 1-12 (Aug. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2) and Signalling System No. 7 ISDN User Part: Formats and Codes,” ITU-T Q.1902.3, p. 1-141 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2) and Signaling System No. 7 ISDN user part: General Functions of Messages and Parameters,” ITU-T Q.1902.2 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2): Functional Description,” ITU-T Q.1902.1, p. 1-23 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1901 (Jun. 2000). |
Sugano et al., “Presence Information Data Format for IMPP,” Internet draft, draft-ietf-impp-pidf-01.text, Network Working Group, pp. 1-17 (Mar. 10, 2000). |
Liao et al., “SS7-TCAP/IP Interworking,” Internet Engineering Task Force, pp. 1-14 (Mar. 1999). |
De Ment, “The Evolution of Signaling,” NMS Communications, p. 1-28 (Publication Date Unknown). |
“Mobile Wireless Overview,” Cisco IOS Mobile Wireless Configuration Guide, pp. MWC-1-MWC-8 (Publication Date Unknown). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120257499 A1 | Oct 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61424603 | Dec 2010 | US |