This application is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/983,281 for EFFICIENT STORAGE TIERING and filed concurrently herewith, which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes; and to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/983,282 for STORAGE TIERING WITH SIMILAR SEGMENTS and filed concurrently herewith, which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
The present invention relates generally to data systems, and more particularly, to systems and methods of storing data.
A typical data system may have multiple tiers of storage. Higher tier storage devices may include high performance disks that provide faster access times and other benefits. Lower tier storage devices may include generic disks that are able to store data cheaply.
Tieiring storage generally enhances the efficiency of data systems. For example, not all files are accessed frequently. Files that are accessed frequently may be stored on higher tier storage to allow for quick access. Files that are accessed infrequently may be stored on lower tier storage for economic reasons.
Deduplication may further enhance the efficiency of data systems. Deduplication generally involves storing only a single instance of data, or a segment of data. Since many files may share common data segments, performing deduplication on one or more tiers of storage may potentially result in substantial disk savings.
Files typically do not stay in the same tier for prolonged periods of time. Some files may lose importance, causing them to be moved to a lower tier storage. Similarly, some files may gain importance, causing them to be moved to a higher tier storage. Unfortunately, moving files, or data, between different tiers involves moving the whole file or data. This results in the loss of efficiency provided by deduplication.
There is a need, therefore, for an improved method, article of manufacture, and apparatus for protecting and accessing data in data systems.
The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements, and in which:
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the invention is provided below along with accompanying figures that illustrate the principles of the invention. While the invention is described in conjunction with such embodiment(s), it should be understood that the invention is not limited to any one embodiment. On the contrary, the scope of the invention is limited only by the claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications, and equivalents. For the purpose of example, numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. These details are provided for the purpose of example, and the present invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the present invention is not unnecessarily obscured.
It should be appreciated that the present invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process, an apparatus, a system, a device, a method, or a computer readable medium such as a computer readable storage medium containing computer readable instructions or computer program code, or as a computer program product, comprising a computer usable medium having a computer readable program code embodied therein. In the context of this disclosure, a computer usable medium or computer readable medium may be any medium that can contain or store the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus or device. For example, the computer readable storage medium or computer usable medium may be, but is not limited to, a random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), or a persistent store, such as a mass storage device, hard drives, CDROM, DVDROM, tape, erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), or any magnetic, electromagnetic, infrared, optical, or electrical means system, apparatus or device for storing information. Alternatively or additionally, the computer readable storage medium or computer usable medium may be any combination of these devices or even paper or another suitable medium upon which the program code is printed, as the program code can be electronically captured, via, for instance, optical scanning of the paper or other medium, then compiled, interpreted, or otherwise processed in a suitable manner, if necessary, and then stored in a computer memory. Applications, software programs or computer readable instructions may be referred to as components or modules. Applications may be hardwired or hard coded in hardware or take the form of software executing on a general purpose computer or be hardwired or hard coded in hardware such that when the software is loaded into and/or executed by the computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. Applications may also be downloaded in whole or in part through the use of a software development kit or toolkit that enables the creation and implementation of the present invention. In this specification, these implementations, or any other form that the invention may take, may be referred to as techniques. In general, the order of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within the scope of the invention.
An embodiment of the invention will be described with reference to a data system configured to store files, but it should be understood that the principles of the invention are not limited to data systems. Rather, they are applicable to any system capable of storing and handling various types of objects, in analog, digital, or other form. Although terms such as document, file, object, etc. may be used by way of example, the principles of the invention are not limited to any particular form of representing and storing data or other information; rather, they are equally applicable to any object capable of representing information.
Conventional data systems typically use tiering to differentiate data based on storage requirements, such as performance and availability, among others. Data is stored on a tier that is appropriate and least expensive. Storage costs are typically reduced by using space reduction, such as deduplication and compression, among others. Moving files in conventional data systems typically is an expensive operation. This typically involves reading data from a first tier, and writing the file on a second tier. These moves typically lose the benefit of space reduction techniques, and depending on the size of the file, may take a considerable amount of resources, such as network bandwidth and server processing capacity, among others. The enhanced techniques described herein allow for data to be moved from one tier to another while maintaining the benefits of space reduction techniques.
Though
Performance Tier 104 and Archive Tier 106 may each be deduplicated in some embodiments. To illustrate, suppose File A is made up of Segments 1, 2, and 3, File B is made up of Segments 3, 4 and 5, and File C is made up of Segments 1, 3, and 5. Further suppose that Files A and B were stored on Performance Tier 104, and File C was stored on Archive Tier 106. Performance Tier 104 would only have one copy of Segments 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, instead of Segments 1, 2, 3, 3 (duplicate), 4 and 5, while Archive Tier 106 would have Segments 1, 3 and 5. If File A were to be moved to Archive Tier 106 (may be due to losing importance, inactivity, etc.), it could be determined that Archive Tier 106 already has Segments 1 and 3. In this way, only Segment 2 needs to be transferred from Performance Tier 104 to Archive Tier 106, instead of Segments 1, 2, 3. The benefits of deduplication are maintained while moving File A to Archive Tier 106.
A segment index may be used to determine whether a segment already exists in a target. For example, if Archive Tier 106 had File C, its segment index would indicate Segments 1, 3 and 5. When moving files to Archive Tier 106, the index would be compared to the segments needed to move the files. If a segment needed to move the files appeared on the segment index, the transfer of the segment could be skipped.
In some embodiments, an identifier, or fingerprint, may be assigned to a segment based on the content of the segment (e.g. a hash value). A segment index may also use the fingerprint to index the fingerprint's associated segment. In some embodiments, checking whether the target tier already contains a segment may be accomplished by sending the fingerprints of the segments to the target tier, and looking up the segment index of the target tier for each of the fingerprints.
In some embodiments, it may be preferable to verify that the file was properly written to the target tier. For example, verification may include reading the file, computing the checksum, and comparing it with the checksum of the file stored in the source tier. Once the file has been verified, the file may be deleted from the source tier.
Policies may be used to select which files need to be moved to a different tier, and which tier to move the files to if such a move is required. For example, a policy may dictate that files of a certain type that have not been modified or accessed for an amount of time should be moved to a lower tier. Similarly, a policy may dictate that files of a certain user accessed frequently should be moved to a higher tier.
Files may be segmented in a variety of ways. For example, in some embodiments, a file may be divided into segments based on the content of the file by applying a hash function to the file.
In some embodiments, a segment similar to a segment in a source tier may reside in a target tier. Determining whether the target tier contains the segment in the source tier may include identifying the similar segment in the target tier, adding a reference to the similar segment, and storing the difference between the segment and the similar segment in the target tier.
In some embodiments, the source tier and the target tier may utilize different deduplication techniques or compression methods. For example, the source tier may divide files into 1 MB segments, while the target tier may divide files into 2 MB segments. In these cases, a file in the source tier may be re-segmented using the technique utilized by the target tier. The source tier may then be compared to the target tier, and if any of the segments on the source tier (segments created by the technique utilized by the target tier) are not in the target tier, those segments are transferred to the target tier. The source tier need not store the segments created by the technique utilized by the target tier.
In some embodiments, segments may be stored compressed in the source tier, and may be sent to the target tier in the compressed format. Various compression algorithms may be used, such as Lempel-Ziv algorithm, among others. Similar to the above, the source tier and the target tier may utilize different compression algorithms. In such cases, sending a segment to the target tier may include decompressing the segment using the source tier compression algorithm, and recompressing the segment using the target tier compression algorithm.
For the sake of clarity, the processes and methods herein have been illustrated with a specific flow, but it should be understood that other sequences may be possible and that some may be performed in parallel, without departing from the spirit of the invention. Additionally, steps may be subdivided or combined. As disclosed herein, software written in accordance with the present invention may be stored in some form of computer-readable medium, such as memory or CD-ROM, or transmitted over a network, and executed by a processor.
All references cited herein are intended to be incorporated by reference. Although the present invention has been described above in terms of specific embodiments, it is anticipated that alterations and modifications to this invention will no doubt become apparent to those skilled in the art and may be practiced within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims. More than one computer may be used, such as by using multiple computers in a parallel or load-sharing arrangement or distributing tasks across multiple computers such that, as a whole, they perform the functions of the components identified herein; i.e. they take the place of a single computer. Various functions described above may be performed by a single process or groups of processes, on a single computer or distributed over several computers. Processes may invoke other processes to handle certain tasks. A single storage device may be used, or several may be used to take the place of a single storage device. The present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein. It is therefore intended that the disclosure and following claims be interpreted as covering all such alterations and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5649196 | Woodhill et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
6574657 | Dickinson | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6928526 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7567188 | Anglin et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7584338 | Bricker et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7995759 | Tolfmans | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8126852 | Patterson | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8396839 | Huang | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8412848 | Therrien et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20030097359 | Ruediger | May 2003 | A1 |
20050004954 | Soule, III | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050097150 | McKeon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20070055583 | Davis | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080037587 | Roesch et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040503 | Kleks et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082770 | Ahal et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080155192 | Iitsuka | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080256143 | Reddy et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256326 | Patterson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090083563 | Murase | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090204649 | Wong et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204650 | Wong et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090276647 | Boyd | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292746 | Bricker et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090313248 | Balachandran et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100088349 | Parab | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094817 | Ben-Shaul et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100125553 | Huang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100161608 | Jain et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100199065 | Kaneda | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205158 | Dybas | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223441 | Lillibridge et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100299311 | Anglin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306176 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332401 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332452 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100333116 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110016095 | Anglin et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110071980 | Patterson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078112 | Takata et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110145207 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153965 | Haustein et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110218969 | Anglin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246431 | Iitsuka | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110307456 | Jayaraman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307659 | Hans et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120023292 | Saito et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120036327 | Jennas et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059994 | Montgomery et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084527 | Jayaraman et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120089578 | Lam | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095968 | Gold | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120143832 | Aronovich et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151169 | Mori et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120221783 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120239864 | Montgomery et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254546 | Montgomery et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272026 | Montgomery | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130007401 | Asaki et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |