Polycrystalline diamond compacts

Abstract
In an embodiment, a polycrystalline diamond compact includes a substrate, and a polycrystalline diamond (“PCD”) table bonded to the substrate and including an exterior working surface, at least one lateral surface, and a chamfer extending between the exterior working surface and the at least one lateral surface. The PCD table includes bonded diamond grains defining interstitial regions. The PCD table includes a first region adjacent to the substrate and a second leached region adjacent to the first region and extending inwardly from the exterior working surface to a selected depth. At least a portion of the interstitial regions of the first region include an infiltrant disposed therein. The interstitial regions of the second leached region are substantially free of metal-solvent catalyst. The second region is defined by the exterior working surface, the lateral surface, the chamfer, and a generally horizontal boundary located below the chamfer.
Description
BACKGROUND

Wear-resistant, polycrystalline diamond compacts (“PDCs”) are utilized in a variety of mechanical applications. For example, PDCs are used in drilling tools (e.g., cutting elements, gage trimmers, etc.), machining equipment, bearing apparatuses, wire-drawing machinery, and in other mechanical apparatuses.


PDCs have found particular utility as superabrasive cutting elements in rotary drill bits, such as roller-cone drill bits and fixed-cutter drill bits. A PDC cutting element typically includes a superabrasive diamond layer commonly known as a diamond table. The diamond table is formed and bonded to a substrate using a high-pressure/high-temperature (“HPHT”) process. The PDC cutting element may be brazed directly into a preformed pocket, socket, or other receptacle formed in a bit body. The substrate may often be brazed or otherwise joined to an attachment member, such as a cylindrical backing. A rotary drill bit typically includes a number of PDC cutting elements affixed to the bit body. It is also known that a stud carrying the PDC may be used as a PDC cutting element when mounted to a bit body of a rotary drill bit by press-fitting, brazing, or otherwise securing the stud into a receptacle formed in the bit body.


Conventional PDCs are normally fabricated by placing a cemented carbide substrate into a container or cartridge with a volume of diamond particles positioned on a surface of the cemented carbide substrate. A number of such cartridges may be loaded into an HPHT press. The substrate(s) and volume(s) of diamond particles are then processed under HPHT conditions in the presence of a catalyst material that causes the diamond particles to bond to one another to form a matrix of bonded diamond grains defining a polycrystalline diamond (“PCD”) table. The catalyst material is often a metal-solvent catalyst (e.g., cobalt, nickel, iron, or alloys thereof) that is used for promoting intergrowth of the diamond particles.


In one conventional approach, a constituent of the cemented carbide substrate, such as cobalt from a cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate, liquefies and sweeps from a region adjacent to the volume of diamond particles into interstitial regions between the diamond particles during the HPHT process. The cobalt acts as a catalyst to promote intergrowth between the diamond particles, which results in formation of a matrix of bonded diamond grains having diamond-to-diamond bonding therebetween, with interstitial regions between the bonded diamond grains being occupied by the solvent catalyst.


The presence of the solvent catalyst in the PCD table is believed to reduce the thermal stability of the PCD table at elevated temperatures. For example, the difference in thermal expansion coefficient between the diamond grains and the solvent catalyst is believed to lead to chipping or cracking of the PCD table during drilling or cutting operations, which consequently can degrade the mechanical properties of the PCD table or cause failure. Additionally, some of the diamond grains can undergo a chemical breakdown or back-conversion to graphite via interaction with the solvent catalyst. At elevated high temperatures, portions of the diamond grains may transform to carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, graphite, or combinations thereof, causing degradation of the mechanical properties of the PCD table.


One conventional approach for improving the thermal stability of PDCs is to at least partially remove the solvent catalyst from the PCD table of the PDC by acid leaching.


In another conventional approach for forming a PDC, a sintered PCD table may be separately formed and then leached to remove the solvent catalyst from interstitial regions between bonded diamond grains. The leached PCD table may be simultaneously HPHT bonded to a cemented carbide substrate and infiltrated with silicon and cobalt from the substrate in a separate HPHT process. The silicon may infiltrate the interstitial regions of the leached PCD table from which the solvent catalyst has been leached and react with the diamond grains to form silicon carbide. The cobalt may also infiltrate the interstitial regions of the leached PCD table from which the solvent catalyst has been leached to form a bond with the cemented carbide substrate. PDCs sold under the trade name Terracut were fabricated by the foregoing process.


Despite the availability of a number of different PDCs, manufacturers and users of PDCs continue to seek PDCs that exhibit improved toughness, wear resistance, thermal stability, or combinations thereof.


SUMMARY

Embodiments of the invention relate to methods of manufacturing PDCs by infiltrating an at least partially leached PCD table in a controlled manner in an HPHT process, and resultant PDCs. The temperature, pressure, and HPHT process time are chosen to control a depth to which an infiltrant partially infiltrates into the at least partially leached PCD table in the HPHT process.


In an embodiment, a method of fabricating a PDC includes forming a PCD table in the presence of a metal-solvent catalyst in a first HPHT process. The PCD table so formed includes a plurality of bonded diamond grains defining a plurality of interstitial regions, with at least a portion of the plurality of interstitial regions including the metal-solvent catalyst disposed therein. The plurality of bonded diamond grains exhibits an average grain size of about 40 μm or less. The method further includes at least partially leaching the PCD table to remove at least a portion of the metal-solvent catalyst therefrom. The method additionally includes subjecting the at least partially leached PCD table and a substrate to a second HPHT process under diamond-stable temperature-pressure conditions to partially infiltrate the at least partially leached PCD table with an infiltrant and attach the partially infiltrated PCD table to the substrate. A maximum temperature (T), a total process time (t), and a maximum internal cell pressure (P) of the second HPHT process are chosen so that 0 is about 2 to about 325° Celsius·hours/gigapascals (“° C.·h/GPa”), with β represented as β=T·t/P. The infiltrated polycrystalline diamond table includes a first region adjacent to the substrate including the infiltrant disposed in at least a portion of the interstitial regions thereof and a second region extending inwardly from an exterior working surface to a selected depth of at least about 700 μm. The second region is substantially free of the infiltrant.


In an embodiment, a PDC includes a substrate, and a pre-sintered PCD table bonded to the substrate. The pre-sintered PCD table includes an exterior working surface, at least one lateral surface, and a chamfer extending between the exterior working surface and the at least one lateral surface. The pre-sintered PCD table includes a plurality of bonded diamond grains defining a plurality of interstitial regions. The plurality of bonded diamond grains exhibits an average grain size of about 40 μm or less. The pre-sintered PCD table further includes a first region and a second region. The first region is adjacent to the substrate, and at least a portion of the interstitial regions of the first region include an infiltrant disposed therein. The second region is adjacent to the first region and extends inwardly from the exterior working surface to a selected depth of at least about 700 μm. The interstitial regions of the second region are substantially free of the infiltrant. A nonplanar interface is located between the first and second regions.


Other embodiments include applications utilizing the disclosed PDCs in various articles and apparatuses, such as, rotary drill bits, bearing apparatuses, machining equipment, and other articles and apparatuses.


Features from any of the disclosed embodiments may be used in combination with one another, without limitation. In addition, other features and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art through consideration of the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The drawings illustrate several embodiments of the invention, wherein identical reference numerals refer to identical elements or features in different views or embodiments shown in the drawings.



FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of a PDC including a partially infiltrated PCD table attached to a cemented carbide substrate;



FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of an embodiment of a method for fabricating the PDC shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a photomicrograph of a PCD table of a PDC formed according to working example 1 of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a photomicrograph of a PCD table of a PDC formed according to working example 2 of the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a photomicrograph of a PCD table of a PDC formed according to working example 3 of the present invention;



FIG. 6 is a photomicrograph of a PCD table of a PDC formed according to working example 4 of the present invention;



FIG. 7 is a graph showing the measured temperature versus linear distance cut during a vertical turret lathe test on some conventional PDCs and several unleached PDCs according to working examples 1-4 of the present invention;



FIG. 8 is a graph showing the wear flat volume characteristics of some conventional PDCs and several unleached PDCs according to working examples 1-4 of the present invention;



FIG. 9 is a graph illustrating the measured temperature versus linear distance cut during a vertical turret lathe test on some conventional PDCs and several PDCs according to additional working examples 5-7 of the present invention that were leached after reattachment;



FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating the wear flat volume characteristics of some conventional PDCs and several PDCs according to additional working examples 5-7 of the present invention that were leached after reattachment;



FIG. 11 is an isometric view of an embodiment of a rotary drill bit that may employ one or more of the disclosed PDC embodiments; and



FIG. 12 is a top elevation view of the rotary drill bit shown in FIG. 11.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the invention relate to methods of manufacturing PDCs by infiltrating an at least partially leached PCD table in a controlled manner in an HPHT process, and resultant PDCs. The temperature, pressure, and HPHT process time are chosen to control a depth to which an infiltrant partially infiltrates into the at least partially leached PCD table in the HPHT process. The disclosed PDCs may be used in a variety of applications, such as rotary drill bits, machining equipment, and other articles and apparatuses.



FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of a PDC 100 including a partially infiltrated pre-sintered PCD table 102 attached to a cemented carbide substrate 108 along an interfacial surface 109 thereof. The PCD table 102 includes a plurality of directly bonded-together diamond grains exhibiting diamond-to-diamond bonding (e.g., sp3 bonding) therebetween, which define a plurality of interstitial regions. The PCD table 102 includes at least one lateral surface 104, an upper exterior working surface 106, and an optional chamfer 107 extending therebetween. It is noted that at least a portion of the at least one lateral surface 104 and/or the chamfer 107 may also function as a working surface that contacts a subterranean formation during drilling operations. Additionally, although the interfacial surface 109 is illustrated as being substantially planar, in other embodiments, the interfacial surface 109 may exhibit a selected nonplanar topography, with the PCD table 102 exhibiting a correspondingly configured nonplanar interfacing topography.


The diamond grains of the PCD table 102 may exhibit an average grain size of about 40 μm or less, such as about 30 μm or less, about 25 μm or less, or about 20 μm or less. For example, the average grain size of the diamond grains may be about 10 μm to about 18 μm, about 8 μm to about 15 μm, about 9 μm to about 12 μm, or about 15 μm to about 18 μm. In some embodiments, the average grain size of the diamond grains may be about 10 μm or less, such as about 2 μm to about 5 μm or submicron. The diamond grain size distribution of the diamond grains may exhibit a single mode, or may be a bimodal or greater grain size distribution.


The PCD table 102 exhibits a thickness “t” of at least about 0.040 inch, such as about 0.045 inch to about 0.100 inch, about 0.050 inch to about 0.090 inch, about 0.065 inch to about 0.080 inch, or about 0.070 inch to about 0.080 inch. The infiltrated polycrystalline diamond table 102 includes a first region 110 adjacent to the substrate 108 that extends from the interfacial surface 109 an average selected infiltration distance “h” and includes an infiltrant disposed in at least a portion of the interstitial regions thereof. The infiltrant may be chosen from iron, nickel, cobalt, and alloys of the foregoing metals. For example, the infiltrant may be provided from the substrate 108 (e.g., a cobalt from a cobalt-cemented carbide substrate) or provided from another source such as a metallic foil and/or powder. The PCD table 102 includes a second region 112 that extends inwardly from the working surface 106 to an average selected depth “d.” The depth “d” may be at least about 700 μm, about 700 μm to about 2100 μm, about 750 μm to about 2100 μm, about 750 μm to about 1500 μm, about 1000 μm to about 1750 μm, about 1000 μm to about 2000 μm, about 1500 μm to about 2000 μm, about a third of the thickness of the PCD table 102, about half of the thickness of the PCD table 102, or about more than half of the thickness of the PCD table 102. The interstitial regions of the second region 112 are substantially free of the infiltrant.


As the PCD table 102 was fabricated from an at least partially leached PCD table that was subsequently partially infiltrated with the infiltrant, the second region 112 may still include some residual metal-solvent catalyst used to initially form the diamond-to-diamond bonds in the PCD table 112 that was not removed in the leaching process. For example, the residual metal-solvent catalyst in the interstitial regions of the second region 112 may be about 0.5% to about 2% by weight, such as about 0.9% to about 1% by weight. Even with the residual amount of the metal-solvent catalyst in the second region 112, the interstitial regions of the second region 112 may be considered to be substantially void of material.


The substrate 108 comprises a plurality of tungsten carbide or other carbide grains (e.g., tantalum carbide, vanadium carbide, niobium carbide, chromium carbide, and/or titanium carbide) cemented together with a metallic cementing constituent, such as cobalt, iron, nickel, or alloys thereof. For example, in an embodiment, the cemented carbide substrate is a cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. In some embodiments, the substrate 108 may include two or more different carbides (e.g., tungsten carbide and titanium carbide).


The inventors currently believe that the infiltration depth “h” is primarily governed by capillary action, which depends heavily on the viscosity, surface energy, and contact angle of the infiltrant (e.g., cobalt), as well as the time period over which the HPHT conditions are maintained. For example, according to one theory, the infiltration depth “h” is approximated by the mathematical expression below:






h
=



2
π



[

rt





γ



Cos





ϑ


2

υ



]



1
2






where:


h=infiltration depth;


r=radius of the interstitial regions of the PCD table 102;


t=time;


θ=contact angle of the infiltrant with the at least partially leached PCD table 102;


γ=surface energy of the infiltrant; and


ν=viscosity (which depends on temperature and pressure) of the infiltrant.


According to one theory, the porosity of the PCD table 102 draws the infiltrant further into the PCD table 102 as a result of capillary action. The infiltration depth “h” is not simply a function of pressure, as increased pressure would be expected to drive more complete penetration of the infiltrant through the PCD table 102. Rather, as shown by working examples 1-4 below, infiltration depth “h” appears to be governed by capillary action so that at a given pressure for which substantially full infiltration occurs, higher pressures (and the same temperature and HPHT process time) will result in less infiltration. According to one theory, infiltration occurs through capillary action rather than a pressure differential. The viscosity of the infiltrant increases at increased pressures, causing less infiltration to occur than at lower pressures, all else being equal. Viscosity is also affected by temperature, i.e., as temperature increases, viscosity decreases, so that at higher temperatures, increased infiltration results. Infiltration may also be affected by process time. Increased processing times result in increased depth of infiltration.


The temperature, pressure, and time period during the HPHT process used for attachment of the PCD table 102 to the substrate 108 may be controlled so as to provide for a desired infiltration depth “h.” Partial infiltration of the PCD table 102 may provide the same or better wear resistance and/or thermal stability characteristics of a leached PCD table integrally formed on a substrate (i.e., a one-step PDC) without actual leaching having to be performed, as the infiltrant does not fully infiltrate to the working surface 106 of the PCD table 102. Examples of such an embodiment are described in working examples 3 and 4, below. In some embodiments, the PCD table 102 may be leached to remove a portion of the infiltrant from the first region 110 to improve the uniformity of infiltrant in the first region 110, thermal stability, wear resistance, or combinations of the foregoing. Examples of such embodiments are described in working examples 5-7, below.


It is noted that an irregular nonplanar interface 114 is present between the first region 110 and the second region 112. One effect of this characteristic is that this nonplanar interface 114 between the first region 110 and the second region 112 differs from an otherwise similarly appearing PDC, but in which a region similar to second region 112 (in that it is substantially void of infiltrant) is formed by leaching, particularly if the PCD table 102 includes a chamfer formed therein. In such instances, the leaching profile advances from the outer surfaces exposed to the leaching acid. For example, leaching typically progresses from the exterior surfaces downward and/or inward so that any chamfer or end exposed to the acid affects the leaching profile. The incomplete infiltration operates by a different mechanism in which infiltration occurs from the “bottom up,” so that the presence of the chamfer 107 in the PCD table 102 does not affect the infiltration profile of the infiltrant. Additionally, if the infiltrant had infiltrated the entire PCD table 102 so that the interstitial regions of the second region 112 were also occupied by the infiltrant and subsequently removed in a leaching process to the depth “d,” a boundary between the first region 110 and the second region 112 would be indicative of being defined by a leaching process as opposed to being relatively irregular.


As will be discussed in more detail below, the PCD table 102 is formed separately from the substrate 108, and the PCD table 102 is subsequently attached to the substrate 108. For example, in an embodiment, the PCD table 102 may be integrally formed with a first cemented carbide substrate, after which the first substrate is removed, the separated PCD table is at least partially leached, and the at least partially leached PCD table is then attached to the substrate 108 in a second HPHT process. In another embodiment, the PCD table 102 may be formed without using a cemented carbide substrate (e.g., by subjecting diamond particles and a metal-solvent catalyst to a HPHT process), after which the formed PCD table is at least partially leached and attached to the substrate 108.


When attaching the PCD table 102 to substrate 108 in a second HPHT process, the HPHT process conditions (e.g., maximum temperature, maximum pressure, and total process time) are specifically chosen to result in only partial infiltration of the PCD table 102. As a result of this second HPHT process, the infiltrant within the substrate 108 (e.g., cobalt from a cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide) infiltrates from the substrate 108 into at least some of the interstitial regions of PCD table 102 in the first region 110.



FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of an embodiment of a method for fabricating the PDC 100 shown in FIG. 1. The plurality of diamond particles of the one or more layers of diamond particles 150 may be positioned adjacent to an interfacial surface 107 of a first cemented carbide substrate 105.


In an embodiment, the diamond particles of the one or more layers of diamond particles 150 may exhibit an average particle size of about 40 μm or less, such as about 30 μm or less, about 25 μm or less, or about 20 μm or less. For example, the average particle size of the diamond particles may be about 10 μm to about 18 μm, about 8 μm to about 15 μm, about 9 μm to about 12 μm, or about 15 μm to about 18 μm. In some embodiments, the average particle size of the diamond particles may be about 10 μm or less, such as about 2 μm to about 5 μm or submicron.


The diamond particle size distribution of the diamond particle may exhibit a single mode, or may be a bimodal or greater grain size distribution. In an embodiment, the diamond particles of the one or more layers of diamond particles 150 may comprise a relatively larger size and at least one relatively smaller size. As used herein, the phrases “relatively larger” and “relatively smaller” refer to particle sizes (by any suitable method) that differ by at least a factor of two (e.g., 30 μm and 15 μm). According to various embodiments, the diamond particles may include a portion exhibiting a relatively larger average particle size (e.g., 50 μm, 40 μm, 30 μm, 20 μm, 15 μm, 12 μm, 10 μm, 8 μm) and another portion exhibiting at least one relatively smaller average particle size (e.g., 6 μm, 5 μm, 4 μm, 3 μm, 2 μm, 1 μm, 0.5 μm, less than 0.5 μm, 0.1 μm, less than 0.1 μm). In an embodiment, the diamond particles may include a portion exhibiting a relatively larger average particle size between about 10 μm and about 40 μm and another portion exhibiting a relatively smaller average particle size between about 1 μm and 4 μm. In some embodiments, the diamond particles may comprise three or more different average particle sizes (e.g., one relatively larger average particle size and two or more relatively smaller average particle sizes), without limitation.


It is noted that the as-sintered diamond grain size may differ from the average particle size of the diamond particles prior to sintering due to a variety of different physical processes, such as grain growth, diamond particles fracturing, carbon provided from another carbon source (e.g., dissolved carbon in the metal-solvent catalyst), or combinations of the foregoing.


The first cemented carbide substrate 105 and the one or more layers of diamond particles 150 may be placed in a pressure transmitting medium, such as a refractory metal can embedded in pyrophyllite or other pressure transmitting medium. The pressure transmitting medium, including the first cemented carbide substrate 105 and the one or more layers of diamond particles 150 therein, may be subjected to a first HPHT process using an ultra-high pressure press to create temperature and pressure conditions at which diamond is stable. The temperature of the first HPHT process may be at least about 1000° C. (e.g., about 1200° C. to about 1600° C.) and the pressure of the first HPHT process may be at least 4.0 GPa (e.g., about 5.0 GPa to about 12.0 GPa) for a time sufficient to sinter the diamond particles to form the PCD table 150′. For example, the pressure of the first HPHT process may be about 5 GPa to about 7 GPa and the temperature of the first HPHT process may be about 1150° C. to about 1450° C. (e.g., about 1200° C. to about 1400° C.).


During the first HPHT process, the metal-solvent catalyst cementing constituent from the first cemented carbide substrate 105 may be liquefied and may infiltrate into the diamond particles of the one or more layers of diamond particles 150. The infiltrated metal-solvent catalyst cementing constituent functions as a catalyst that catalyzes initial formation of directly bonded-together diamond grains to form the PCD table 150′.


In an alternative to using the first cemented carbide substrate 105 during sintering of the diamond particles, the PCD table 150′ may be formed by placing the diamond particles along with a metal-solvent catalyst (e.g., cobalt powder and/or a cobalt disc) in a pressure transmitting medium, such as a refractory metal can embedded in pyrophyllite or other pressure transmitting medium. The pressure transmitting medium, including the diamond particles and metal-solvent catalyst therein, may be subjected to a first HPHT process using an ultra-high pressure press to create temperature and pressure conditions at which diamond is stable. Such a process will result in the formation of a PCD table 150′ separate from any cemented carbide substrate 105.


In embodiments in which the PCD table 150′ is formed so as to be metallurgically bonded to a cemented carbide substrate, the PCD table 150′ may then be separated from the first cemented carbide substrate 105, as shown in FIG. 2. For example, the PCD table 150′ may be separated from the first cemented carbide substrate 105 by grinding and/or lapping away the first cemented carbide substrate 105, electro-discharge machining, or combinations of the foregoing material removal processes.


Whether the first cemented carbide substrate 105 is employed during formation of the PCD table 150′ or not, the metal-solvent catalyst may be at least partially removed from the PCD table 150′ by immersing the PCD table 150′ in an acid, such as aqua regia, nitric acid, hydrofluoric acid, mixtures thereof, or other suitable acid, to form a porous at least partially leached PCD table 150″ that allows fluid to flow therethrough (e.g., from one side to another side). For example, the PCD table 150′ may be immersed in the acid for about 2 to about 7 days (e.g., about 3, 5, or 7 days) or for a few weeks (e.g., about 4-6 weeks) depending on the process employed. In some embodiments, a residual amount of the metal-solvent catalyst used to catalyze formation of the diamond-to-diamond bonds of the PCD table 150′ may still remain even after leaching. For example, the residual metal-solvent catalyst in the interstitial regions may be about 0.5% to about 2% by weight, such as about 0.9% to about 1% by weight.


In embodiments employing the cemented carbide substrate 105, it is noted that because the metal-solvent catalyst is infiltrated into the diamond particles from the cemented carbide substrate 105 including tungsten carbide or other carbide grains cemented with a metal-solvent catalyst (e.g., cobalt, nickel, iron, or alloys thereof), the infiltrated metal-solvent catalyst may carry tungsten therewith, tungsten carbide therewith, another metal therewith, another metal carbide therewith, or combinations of the foregoing. In such embodiments, the PCD table 150′ and the at least partially leached PCD table 150″ may include such material(s) disposed interstitially between the bonded diamond grains. The tungsten therewith, tungsten carbide therewith, another metal therewith, another metal carbide therewith, or combinations of the foregoing may be at least partially removed by the selected leaching process or may be relatively unaffected by the selected leaching process.


As shown in FIG. 2, the PCD table 150″ is placed with the substrate 108 to which the PCD table 150″ is to be attached to form an assembly 200. The assembly 200 may be placed in a pressure transmitting medium, such as a refractory metal can embedded in pyrophyllite or other pressure transmitting medium. The pressure transmitting medium, including the assembly 200, may be subjected to a second HPHT process using an ultra-high pressure press to create temperature and pressure conditions at which diamond is stable. The temperature of the second HPHT process may be at least about 1000° C. (e.g., about 1200° C. to about 1600° C.) and the pressure of the second HPHT process may be at least 5.0 GPa (e.g., about 5.0 GPa to about 12.0 GPa) so that the infiltrant (e.g., the metallic cementing constituent) in the cemented carbide substrate 108 is liquefied and infiltrates into the PCD table 150″. Upon cooling from the second HPHT process, the partially infiltrated PCD table 102 is bonded to the cemented carbide substrate 108.


As an alternative to using the cemented carbide substrate 108 as an infiltrant source, an infiltrant layer (e.g., a cobalt disc) may be disposed between the cemented carbide substrate 108 and the PCD table 150″. In such an embodiment, the infiltrant layer may liquefy and infiltrate into the PCD table 150″ during the second HPHT process.


The infiltration depth “h” may be controlled by selection of the maximum temperature, maximum pressure, and total process time of the second HPHT process during which the PCD table 150″ attaches to substrate 108. As used herein, total process time includes the time to ramp-up to the maximum temperature, the soak time at the maximum temperature, and the cool down time from the maximum temperature. The second HPHT process conditions are controlled so that the infiltrant from the substrate 108 only partially infiltrates the PCD table 150″ to form the PCD table 102 having the first region 110 and the second region 112, respectively in which the interstitial regions of the second region 112 remain unfilled by the infiltrant infiltrated from the substrate 108.


An HPHT process parameter β may be defined to characterize the second HPHT process during which the PCD table 150″ attaches to substrate 108. β is defined as β=T·t/P, where:


T is a maximum temperature of the second HPHT process;


t is the total process time (t) of the second HPHT process; and


P is a maximum internal cell pressure in the pressure transmitting medium used in the second HPHT process.


β may be about 2° C.·h/GPa to about 325° C.·h/GPa, about 5° C.·h/GPa to about 100° C.·h/GPa, about 5° C.·h/GPa to about 35° C.·h/GPa, about 7.5° C.·h/GPa to about 25° C.·h/GPa, about 10° C.·h/GPa to about 20° C.·h/GPa, about 20° C.·h/GPa to about 30° C.·h/GPa (e.g., 24-26° C.·h/GPa), about greater than 28° C.·h/GPa, about 30° C.·h/GPa to about 100° C.·h/GPa, about 50° C.·h/GPa to about 75° C.·h/GPa, about 75° C.·h/GPa to about 150° C.·h/GPa, or about 100° C.·h/GPa to about 200° C.·h/GPa. By controlling T, t, and P of the second HPHT process, the infiltration depth “h” may be controlled so that the PCD table 150″ is only partially infiltrated. For a given thickness of the PCD table 150″, the infiltration depth “h” may be decreased by increasing P, decreasing T, decreasing t, or combinations thereof. Thus, for a given thickness of the PCD table 150″, the infiltration depth “h” may be decreased by decreasing β and increased by increasing β.


In the second HPHT process, in some embodiments, P is about 6 GPa to about 10 GPa, T is about 1250° C. to about 3250° C., and t is about 60 seconds to about 1 hour. In other more specific embodiments for the second HPHT process that will result in partial infiltration of a 3.5-5 mm thick PCD table 150″, P is about 6 GPa to about 8 GPa (e.g., about 6.1 GPa to about 7.0 GPa), T is about 1250° C. to about 1500° C., and t is about 60 seconds to about 7 minutes (e.g., about 200-450 seconds) that results in the depth “d” of the second region 112 of the PCD table 102 being at least about a third of the PCD table thickness, about half of the PCD table thickness, or more than half of the PCD table thickness. The time (t) for the second HPHT process is typically longer when a high-pressure belt press is used to apply pressure as opposed to a high-pressure cubic press. Typical times used with a high-pressure cubic pressure are about 200-450 seconds, such as about 300-400 seconds of total process time.


The inventors have unexpectedly found that increasing the pressure (P) during the second HPHT process results in decreased infiltration. As explained above, one theory is infiltration occurs through capillary action, and that the increased pressure (P) increases the viscosity of the infiltrant, allowing the infiltrant to infiltrate into the PCD table 150″ a relatively less extent than if a higher pressure (P) is employed. For example, in an embodiment the first HPHT process may be carried out at a pressure of about 6 GPa, while in order to achieve partial infiltration, the second HPHT process may be carried out at a pressure between about 6.2 GPa and about 10 GPa (e.g., about 6.3 GPa to about 8.5 GPa, or about 6.3 GPa to about 7 GPa). The temperature and time period of the first and second processes may otherwise be the same (e.g., 1400° C. for about 400 seconds). Higher pressures may be employed to further decrease the infiltration depth “h” for a given temperature (T), time (t), and thickness of the PCD table 150″. In other words, as the pressure (P) increases, the infiltration will be less complete.


In a similar manner, the temperature (T) may be altered from the first process to the second process to achieve a similar result. For example, a decrease in temperature (T) provides a similar effect relative to infiltration depth “h” as an increase in pressure (P). Processing time (t) may also be altered from the first process to the second process to achieve a desired infiltration depth “h”. For example, increasing processing time (t) provides a similar effect relative to infiltration depth “h” as a decrease in pressure (P). More than one of the temperature (T), pressure (P), or processing time (t) variables may be changed to achieve a desired infiltration depth “h” and any of the resultant selected depths “d” disclosed herein.


In some embodiments, at least one of the P, T, or t in the second HPHT process are different than an associated P, T, or t used in the first HPHT process used to initially sinter the diamond particles that forms the PCD table 150′.


In some embodiments, the infiltrant that occupies the interstitial regions of the first region 110 of the PCD table 102 may be at least partially removed in a subsequent leaching process using an acid, such as aqua regia, nitric acid, hydrofluoric acid, mixtures thereof, or other suitable acid. Even though the second region 112 is already substantially free of the infiltrant, the inventors have found that leaching may improve the uniformity of the interface 114 between the first region 110 and the second region 112, which may improve thermal stability and/or wear resistance in the finished PDC 100.


The following working examples provide further detail in connection with the specific PDC embodiments described above.


COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE A

A PDC was formed according to the following process. A layer of diamond particles was placed adjacent to a cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The diamond particles and the substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 370 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to sinter the diamond particles and attach the resulting PCD table to the substrate. The thickness of the PCD table of the PDC was about 0.083 inch and an about 0.012 inch chamfer was machined in the PCD table.


The thermal stability of the conventional unleached PDC so-formed was evaluated by measuring the distance cut in a Sierra White granite workpiece prior to failure without using coolant in a vertical turret lathe test. The distance cut is considered representative of the thermal stability of the PDC. The conventional unleached PDC was able to cut a distance of only about 1000 linear feet in the workpiece prior to failure. The test parameters were a depth of cut for the PDC of about 1.27 mm, a back rake angle for the PDC of about 20 degrees, an in-feed for the PDC of about 1.524 mm/rev, and a cutting speed of the workpiece to be cut of about 1.78 m/sec. Evidence of failure of the conventional unleached PDC is best shown in FIG. 7 where the measured temperature of the conventional unleached PDC during cutting increased dramatically at about 1000 linear feet.


COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE B

A PDC was formed according to the following process. A layer of diamond particles having the same particle size distribution as comparative example A was placed adjacent to a cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The diamond particles and the substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 370 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to sinter the diamond particles and attach the resulting PCD table to the substrate. The PCD table was subsequently leached to remove cobalt from the interstitial regions between diamond grains within the PCD table to a depth of about 94 μm. The thickness of the PCD table of the PDC was about 0.088 inches and an about 0.012 inch chamfer was machined in the PCD table.


The thermal stability of the conventional leached PDC so-formed was evaluated by measuring the distance cut in the same Sierra White granite workpiece as Comparative Example A prior to failure without using coolant in a vertical turret lathe test and using the same test parameters. The distance cut is considered representative of the thermal stability of the PDC. The conventional leached PDC was able to cut a distance of about 3500 linear feet in the workpiece prior to failure. Evidence of failure of the conventional PDC is best shown in FIG. 7 where the measured temperature of the conventional PDC during cutting increased dramatically at about 3500 linear feet.


WORKING EXAMPLE 1

Two PDCs were formed according to the following process. A layer of diamond particles having the same particle size distribution as comparative example A was placed adjacent to a first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The diamond particles and the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 370 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to sinter the diamond particles and attach the resulting PCD table to the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table was then separated from the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate by grinding away the first cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table was subsequently leached to remove substantially all of the cobalt from the interstitial regions between diamond grains within the PCD table. The leached PCD table was then placed adjacent to a second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table and the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 5.1 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 400 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. in a high-pressure cubic press to attach the PCD table to the second tungsten carbide substrate. A scanning electron microscope image (FIG. 3) of the PDC so-formed showed substantially complete infiltration of cobalt from the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate into the PCD table.


The thickness of the PCD table of one PDC was about 0.079 inch and an about 0.012 inch chamfer was machined in the PCD table. The thickness of the PCD table of the other PDC was about 0.080 inch and an about 0.013 inch chamfer was machined in the PCD table.


The thermal stability of the unleached PDCs so-formed was evaluated by measuring the distance cut in the same Sierra White granite workpiece as Comparative Example A prior to failure without using coolant in a vertical turret lathe test using the same test parameters. The distance cut is considered representative of the thermal stability of the PDC. One of the unleached PDCs was able to cut a distance of about 2000 linear feet in the workpiece prior to failure. The other unleached PDC was able to cut a distance of about 2500 linear feet in the workpiece prior to failure. Evidence of failure of each PDC is best shown in FIG. 7 where the measured temperature of each PDC during cutting increased dramatically at about 2000 and 2500 linear feet for the two PDCs, respectively.


WORKING EXAMPLE 2

Two PDCs were formed according to the following process. A layer of diamond particles having the same particle size distribution as comparative example A was placed adjacent to a first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The diamond particles and the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 370 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to sinter the diamond particles and attach the resulting PCD table to the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table was then separated from the first tungsten carbide substrate by grinding away the first cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table was leached to remove substantially all of the cobalt from the interstitial regions between diamond grains within the PCD table. The leached PCD table was then placed adjacent to a second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table and the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 5.7 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 400 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to attach the PCD table to the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. A scanning electron microscope image (FIG. 4) of the PDC so-formed showed substantially complete infiltration of cobalt from the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate into the PCD table.


The thickness of the PCD table of the first PDC was about 0.081 inch and an about 0.012 inch chamfer was machined in the PCD table. The thickness of the PCD table of the second PDC was about 0.079 inch and an about 0.012 inch chamfer was machined in the PCD table.


The thermal stability of the unleached PDC so-formed was evaluated by measuring the distance cut in the same Sierra White granite workpiece as Comparative Example A prior to failure without using coolant in a vertical turret lathe test and using the same test parameters. The distance cut is considered representative of the thermal stability of the PDC. One of the unleached PDCs was able to cut a distance of about 1000 linear feet in the workpiece prior to failure. The other was able to cut a distance of about 2000 linear feet in the workpiece prior to failure. Evidence of failure of each PDC is best shown in FIG. 7 where the measured temperature of each PDC during cutting increased dramatically at about 1000 and 2000 linear feet for the two PDCs, respectively.


WORKING EXAMPLE 3

Two PDCs were formed according to the following process. A layer of diamond particles having the same particle size distribution as comparative example A was placed adjacent to a first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The diamond particles and the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 370 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to sinter the diamond particles and attach the resulting PCD table to the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table was then separated from the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate by grinding away the first cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table was leached to remove substantially all of the cobalt from the interstitial regions between diamond grains within the PCD table. The leached PCD table was then placed adjacent to a second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table and the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6.3 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 400 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to attach the PCD table to the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. A scanning electron microscope image (FIG. 5) of one of the PDCs so-formed showed incomplete infiltration of cobalt from the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate into the PCD table. Infiltration was only achieved through about half the thickness of the PCD table. Infiltration was less than working example 2, perhaps through only about half of the thickness of the PCD table because the pressure of the second HPHT process was higher, with temperature, time, and PCD table thickness being about the same. The dark region of the PCD table is the un-infiltrated region and the light region of the PCD table is the region infiltrated with cobalt.


The thickness of the PCD table of the first PDC was about 0.081 inch and an about 0.013 inch chamfer was machined in the PCD table. The thickness of the PCD table of the second PDC was about 0.082 inch and an about 0.013 inch chamfer was machined in the PCD table.


The thermal stability of the unleached PDC so-formed was evaluated by measuring the distance cut in the same Sierra White granite workpiece as Comparative Example A prior to failure without using coolant in a vertical turret lathe test and using the same test parameters. The distance cut is considered representative of the thermal stability of the PDC. One of the unleached PDCs was able to cut a distance of about 5500 linear feet in the workpiece without failing and without using coolant. The other was able to cut a distance of about 9000 linear feet in the workpiece without failing and without using coolant. This is best shown in FIG. 7 where the distance cut prior to failure of the PDCs of example 3 during cutting of the workpiece is greater than that of the conventional PDC of comparative examples A and B during cutting. Therefore, thermal stability tests indicate that the PDCs of example 3 exhibited a significantly improved thermal stability compared to the conventional unleached PDC of comparative example A, as well as compared to the conventional leached PDC of comparative example B.


WORKING EXAMPLE 4

Two PDCs were formed according to the following process. A layer of diamond particles having the same particle size distribution as comparative example A was placed adjacent to a first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The diamond particles and the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 370 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to sinter the diamond particles and attach the resulting PCD table to the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table was then separated from the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate by grinding away the first cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table was subsequently leached to remove substantially all of the cobalt from the interstitial regions between diamond grains within the PCD table. The leached PCD table was then placed adjacent to a second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table and the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 7 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 400 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to attach the PCD table to the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. A scanning electron microscope image (FIG. 6) of one of the PDCs so-formed showed incomplete infiltration of cobalt from the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate into the PCD table. Infiltration was less than working example 3, perhaps through only about one-third the thickness of the PCD table because the pressure of the second HPHT process was higher, with temperature, time and PCD table thickness being about the same. The dark region of the PCD table is the un-infiltrated region and the light region of the PCD table is the region infiltrated with cobalt.


The thickness of the PCD table of the first PDC was about 0.075 inch and an about 0.013 inch chamfer was machined in the PCD table. The thickness of the PCD table of the second PDC was about 0.077 inch and an about 0.013 inch chamfer was machined in the PCD table.


The thermal stability of the unleached PDC so-formed was evaluated by measuring the distance cut in the same Sierra White granite workpiece as Comparative Example A prior to failure without using coolant in a vertical turret lathe test and using the same test parameters. The distance cut is considered representative of the thermal stability of the PDC. Both of the unleached PDCs were able to cut a distance of about 13500 linear feet in the workpiece without failing and without using coolant. This is best shown in FIG. 7 where the distance cut prior to failure of the PDCs of example 4 during cutting of the workpiece is greater than that of the conventional PDCs of comparative examples A and B. Therefore, thermal stability tests indicate that the PDCs of example 4 exhibited a significantly improved thermal stability compared to the conventional unleached PDC of comparative example A, as well as the conventional leached PDC of comparative example B.


Thermal stability tests as shown in FIG. 7 indicate that the PDCs of working examples 3 and 4, particularly example 4, exhibited a significantly improved thermal stability compared to what might be expected even relative to conventional leached PDCs. In particular, because infiltration into the PCD table of examples 3 and 4 is incomplete, leaching after infiltration is not required in order to achieve results similar to or even far superior to a conventional leached PDC.


Wear Resistance of Comparative Examples a and B and Working Examples 1-4

The wear resistance of the PDCs formed according to comparative examples A and B, as well as working examples 1-4 were evaluated by measuring the volume of the PDC removed versus the volume of a Sierra White granite workpiece removed in a vertical turret lathe with water used as a coolant. The test parameters were a depth of cut for the PDC of about 0.254 mm, a back rake angle for the PDC of about 20 degrees, an in-feed for the PDC of about 6.35 mm/rev, and a rotary speed of the workpiece to be cut of about 101 RPM.


As shown in FIG. 8, the wearflat volume tests indicated that the PDCs of unleached examples 1-4 generally exhibited better wear resistance compared to the wear resistance of the unleached PDC of comparative example A. In particular, the unleached PDC of comparative example A exhibited the worst wear resistance, followed by both samples of working example 1. Working examples 1 and 2, which were fully infiltrated and not subsequently leached showed better wear resistance than the unleached PDC of comparative example A. Working examples 3 and 4 were only partially infiltrated and provided even better wear resistance. The wear resistance of working examples 3 and 4 was similar, and in some cases even better, than the leached PDC of comparative example B.


COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE C

A PDC was formed according to the following process. A layer of diamond particles having the same particle size distribution as comparative example A was placed adjacent to a cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The diamond particles and the substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 370 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to sinter the diamond particles and attach the resulting PCD table to the substrate.


The thickness of the polycrystalline diamond table of the PDC was about 0.086 inches and an about 0.012 inch chamfer was machined in the polycrystalline diamond table. The thermal stability of the conventional unleached PDC so-formed was evaluated by measuring the distance cut in a Sierra White granite workpiece prior to failure without using coolant in a vertical turret lathe test using the same test parameters as comparative example A. The distance cut is considered representative of the thermal stability of the PDC. The conventional unleached PDC was able to cut a distance of only about 1000 linear feet in the workpiece prior to failure. Evidence of failure of the conventional unleached PDC is best shown in FIG. 9 where the measured temperature of the conventional unleached PDC during cutting increased dramatically at about 1000 linear feet.


COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE D

A PDC was formed according to the following process. A layer of diamond particles having the same particle size distribution as comparative example A was placed adjacent to a cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The diamond particles and the substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 370 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to sinter the diamond particles and attach the resulting PCD table to the substrate. The PCD table was subsequently leached to remove the cobalt from the interstitial regions between diamond grains within the PCD table to a depth of 78 μm.


The thickness of the PCD table of the PDC was about 0.092 inches and an about 0.013 inch chamfer was machined in the polycrystalline diamond table. The thermal stability of the conventional PDC so-formed was evaluated by measuring the distance cut in the same Sierra White granite workpiece as Comparative Example C prior to failure without using coolant in a vertical turret lathe test. The distance cut is considered representative of the thermal stability of the PDC. The conventional leached PDC was able to cut a distance of about 2000 linear feet in the workpiece prior to failure. Evidence of failure of the conventional PDC is best shown in FIG. 9 where the measured temperature of the conventional PDC during cutting increased dramatically at about 2000 linear feet.


WORKING EXAMPLE 5

A PDC was formed according to the following process. A layer of diamond particles having the same particle size distribution as comparative example A was placed adjacent to a first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The diamond particles and the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 370 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to sinter the diamond particles and attach the resulting PCD table to the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table was then separated from the first tungsten carbide substrate by grinding away the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table was then placed adjacent to a second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table and the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6.1 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 400 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to attach the PCD table to the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. Scanning electron microscope images of the PDC so-formed showed incomplete infiltration of cobalt from the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate into the PCD table. The PCD was electrically non-conductive prior to leaching. The PCD table was subsequently leached for about 2 hours in nitric acid so as to remove cobalt from the interstitial regions between diamond grains within the PCD table.


The thickness of the PCD table of the PDC was about 0.078 inch and an about 0.012 inch chamfer was machined in the PCD table. The thermal stability of the unleached PDC so-formed was evaluated by measuring the distance cut in the same Sierra White granite workpiece as Comparative Example C prior to failure without using coolant in a vertical turret lathe test. The distance cut is considered representative of the thermal stability of the PDC. The PDC was able to cut a distance of about 24000 linear feet in the workpiece without failing and without using coolant. This is best shown in FIG. 9 where the distance cut prior to failure of the PDC of example 5 during cutting of the workpiece is greater than that of the conventional PDC of comparative examples C and D during cutting. Therefore, thermal stability tests indicate that the PDC of example 5 exhibited a significantly improved thermal stability compared to the conventional PDCs of comparative examples C and D.


WORKING EXAMPLE 6

A PDC was formed according to the following process. A layer of diamond particles having the same particle size distribution as comparative example A was placed adjacent to a first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The diamond particles and the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 370 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to sinter the diamond particles and attach the resulting PCD table to the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table was then separated from the first tungsten carbide substrate by grinding away the first cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table was then placed adjacent to a second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table and the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6.1 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 400 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to attach the PCD table to the second tungsten carbide substrate. Scanning electron microscope images of the PDC so-formed showed incomplete infiltration of cobalt from the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate into the PCD table. The PCD was electrically non-conductive prior to leaching. The PCD table was subsequently leached for about 2 hours in nitric acid to remove cobalt from the interstitial regions between diamond grains within the PCD table.


The thickness of the polycrystalline diamond table of the PDC was about 0.081 inch and an about 0.012 inch chamfer was machined in the polycrystalline diamond table. The thermal stability of the unleached PDC so-formed was evaluated by measuring the distance cut in the same Sierra White granite workpiece as comparative example C prior to failure without using coolant in a vertical turret lathe test. The distance cut is considered representative of the thermal stability of the PDC. The PDC was able to cut a distance of about 30000 linear feet in the workpiece without failing and without using coolant. This is best shown in FIG. 9 where the distance cut prior to failure of the PDC of example 6 during cutting of the workpiece is greater than that of the conventional PDC of comparative examples C and D during cutting. Therefore, thermal stability tests indicate that the PDC of example 6 exhibited a significantly improved thermal stability compared to the conventional PDCs of comparative examples C and D.


WORKING EXAMPLE 7

A PDC was formed according to the following process. A layer of diamond particles having the same particle size distribution as comparative example A was placed adjacent to a first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The diamond particles and the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 370 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to sinter the diamond particles and attach the resulting PCD table to the first tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table was then separated from the first cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate by grinding away the first cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table was then placed adjacent to a second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. The PCD table and the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate were positioned within a pyrophyllite cube, and HPHT processed at a temperature of about 1400° C. and a pressure of about 6.1 GPa for about 250 seconds of soak time (about 400 seconds total process time) at the 1400° C. temperature in a high-pressure cubic press to attach the PCD table to the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide substrate. Scanning electron microscope images of the PDC so-formed showed incomplete infiltration of cobalt from the second cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide into the PCD table. The PCD was electrically non-conductive prior to leaching. The PCD table was subsequently leached for about 2 hours in nitric acid so as to remove cobalt from the interstitial regions between diamond grains within the PCD table.


The thickness of the polycrystalline diamond table of the PDC was about 0.082 inch and an about 0.012 inch chamfer was machined in the polycrystalline diamond table. The thermal stability of the unleached PDC so-formed was evaluated by measuring the distance cut in the same Sierra White granite workpiece as comparative example C prior to failure without using coolant in a vertical turret lathe test. The distance cut is considered representative of the thermal stability of the PDC. The PDC was able to cut a distance of about 22000 linear feet in the workpiece without using coolant prior to failing. This is best shown in FIG. 9 where the measured temperature of the PDC of example 7 during cutting of the workpiece increases dramatically at about 22000 linear feet. Therefore, thermal stability tests indicate that the PDC of example 7 exhibited a significantly improved thermal stability compared to the conventional PDCs of comparative examples C and D.


Wear Resistance of Comparative Examples C and D and Working Examples 5-7

The wear resistance of PDCs formed according to comparative examples C and D, as well as working examples 5-7 was evaluated by measuring the volume of the PDC removed versus the volume of a Sierra White granite workpiece removed in a vertical turret lathe with water used as a coolant. The test parameters were a depth of cut for the PDC of about 0.254 mm, a back rake angle for the PDC of about 20 degrees, an in-feed for the PDC of about 6.35 mm/rev, and a rotary speed of the workpiece to be cut of about 101 RPM.


As shown in FIG. 10, the wearflat volume tests indicated that the PDCs of examples 5-7 generally exhibited better wear resistance compared to the wear resistance of the PDC of unleached comparative example C, as well as leached comparative example D. In particular, unleached comparative example C exhibited the lowest wear resistance, followed by comparative example D. Working examples 5 through 7, which were only partially infiltrated and then also subsequently leached, showed better wear resistance than either comparative example C or D. The partial infiltration is believed to result in a more uniform leaching profile during leaching of the PCD table, which may at least partially contributes to the better wear resistance exhibited by working examples 5-7.


The PDCs formed according to the various embodiments disclosed herein may be used as PDC cutting elements on a rotary drill bit. For example, in a method according to an embodiment of the invention, one or more PDCs may be received that were fabricated according to any of the disclosed manufacturing methods and attached to a bit body of a rotary drill bit.



FIG. 11 is an isometric view and FIG. 12 is a top elevation view of an embodiment of a rotary drill bit 300 that includes at least one PDC configured and/or fabricated according to any of the disclosed PDC embodiments. The rotary drill bit 300 comprises a bit body 302 that includes radially and longitudinally extending blades 304 having leading faces 306, and a threaded pin connection 308 for connecting the bit body 302 to a drilling string. The bit body 302 defines a leading end structure for drilling into a subterranean formation by rotation about a longitudinal axis 310 and application of weight-on-bit. At least one PDC, configured according to any of the previously described PDC embodiments, may be affixed to the bit body 302. With reference to FIG. 12, each of a plurality of PDCs 312 is secured to the blades 304 of the bit body 302 (FIG. 11). For example, each PDC 312 may include a PCD table 314 bonded to a substrate 316. More generally, the PDCs 312 may comprise any PDC disclosed herein, without limitation. For example, in one embodiment, the PCD table 314 may include first and second regions where the region adjacent the upper exterior surface of PCD table 314 was not infiltrated during attachment of the PCD table 314 to the substrate 316. In one such embodiment, the PCD table 314 has not been subjected to a leaching process after attachment of PCD table 314 to substrate 316, although the region adjacent the upper exterior surface may still be substantially void of infiltrant. For example, the region adjacent the upper exterior surface may be essentially free of an infiltrant, such as silicon, a reaction product of silicon such as silicon carbide, nickel, nickel alloys, or combinations of the foregoing. Such an embodiment may provide the same or better wear resistance and/or thermal stability performance of a leached PCD table integrally formed on a substrate (i.e., a one-step PDC) without leaching.


In addition, if desired, in some embodiments, a number of the PDCs 312 may be conventional in construction. Also, circumferentially adjacent blades 304 define so-called junk slots 320 therebetween. Additionally, the rotary drill bit 300 includes a plurality of nozzle cavities 318 for communicating drilling fluid from the interior of the rotary drill bit 300 to the PDCs 312.



FIGS. 11 and 12 merely depict one embodiment of a rotary drill bit that employs at least one PDC fabricated and structured in accordance with the disclosed embodiments, without limitation. The rotary drill bit 300 is used to represent any number of earth-boring tools or drilling tools, including, for example, core bits, roller-cone bits, fixed-cutter bits, eccentric bits, bi-center bits, reamers, reamer wings, or any other downhole tool including superabrasive compacts, without limitation.


The PDCs disclosed herein (e.g., PDC 100 of FIG. 1) may also be utilized in applications other than cutting technology. For example, the disclosed PDC embodiments may be used in wire dies, bearings, artificial joints, inserts, cutting elements, and heat sinks. Thus, any of the PDCs disclosed herein may be employed in an article of manufacture including at least one superabrasive element or compact.


Thus, the embodiments of PDCs disclosed herein may be used in any apparatus or structure in which at least one conventional PDC is typically used. In one embodiment, a rotor and a stator, assembled to form a thrust-bearing apparatus, may each include one or more PDCs (e.g., PDC 100 of FIG. 1) configured according to any of the embodiments disclosed herein and may be operably assembled to a downhole drilling assembly. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,410,054; 4,560,014; 5,364,192; 5,368,398; 5,480,233; 7,552,782; and 7,559,695, the disclosure of each of which is incorporated herein, in its entirety, by this reference, disclose subterranean drilling systems within which bearing apparatuses utilizing superabrasive compacts disclosed herein may be incorporated. The embodiments of PDCs disclosed herein may also form all or part of heat sinks, wire dies, bearing elements, cutting elements, cutting inserts (e.g., on a roller-cone-type drill bit), machining inserts, or any other article of manufacture as known in the art. Other examples of articles of manufacture that may use any of the PDCs disclosed herein are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,811,801; 4,268,276; 4,468,138; 4,738,322; 4,913,247; 5,016,718; 5,092,687; 5,120,327; 5,135,061; 5,154,245; 5,460,233; 5,544,713; and 6,793,681, the disclosure of each of which is incorporated herein, in its entirety, by this reference.


While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other aspects and embodiments are contemplated. The various aspects and embodiments disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting. Additionally, the words “including,” “having,” and variants thereof (e.g., “includes” and “has”) as used herein, including the claims, shall be open ended and have the same meaning as the word “comprising” and variants thereof (e.g., “comprise” and “comprises”).

Claims
  • 1. A polycrystalline diamond compact, comprising: a substrate; anda polycrystalline diamond table bonded to the substrate and including an upper exterior working surface, at least one lateral surface, and a chamfer extending between the upper exterior working surface and the at least one lateral surface, the polycrystalline diamond table including a plurality of bonded diamond grains defining a plurality of interstitial regions, the plurality of bonded diamond grains exhibiting an average grain size of about 40 μm or less, the polycrystalline diamond table further including: a first region adjacent to the substrate, at least a portion of the interstitial regions of the first region including cobalt disposed therein; anda second leached region adjacent to the first region and extending inwardly from the upper exterior working surface to a selected depth of at least about 700 μm, the interstitial regions of the second leached region being substantially free of metal-solvent catalyst, the second leached region being partially defined by a boundary that terminates at the at least one lateral surface at a location that is spaced from the chamfer, wherein the boundary partially defining the second leached region is generally horizontal and terminates at the at least one lateral surface;wherein a cross-section of the second leached region exhibits: a first depth measured from and substantially perpendicularly to the upper exterior working surface at an intersection of the chamfer and the upper exterior working surface; anda second depth measured from and substantially perpendicularly to the upper exterior working surface at a generally central location on the upper exterior working surface;wherein the first depth and the second depth are substantially equal.
  • 2. The polycrystalline diamond compact of claim 1 wherein the average grain size of the polycrystalline diamond table is about 30 μm or less.
  • 3. The polycrystalline diamond compact of claim 1 wherein the interstitial regions the second region are substantially void of material.
  • 4. The polycrystalline diamond compact of claim 1 wherein the selected depth is about 750 μm to about 2100 μm.
  • 5. The polycrystalline diamond compact of claim 1 wherein the selected depth is about 1000 μm to about 2000 μm.
  • 6. The polycrystalline diamond compact of claim 1 wherein the average grain size of the polycrystalline diamond table is about 30 μm or less, a thickness of the polycrystalline diamond table is about 0.065 inch to about 0.080 inch, the second leached region of the polycrystalline diamond table is essentially free of silicon, nickel, or combinations thereof.
  • 7. A rotary drill bit, comprising: a bit body configured to engage a subterranean formation; anda plurality of polycrystalline diamond cutting elements affixed to the bit body, at least one of the polycrystalline diamond cutting elements including:a substrate; anda polycrystalline diamond table bonded to the substrate and including an upper exterior working surface, at least one lateral surface, and a chamfer extending between the upper exterior working surface and the at least one lateral surface, the polycrystalline diamond table including a plurality of bonded diamond grains defining a plurality of interstitial regions, the plurality of bonded diamond grains exhibiting an average grain size of about 40 μm or less, the polycrystalline diamond table further including:a first region adjacent to the substrate, at least a portion of the interstitial regions of the first region including cobalt disposed therein; anda second leached region adjacent to the first region and extending inwardly from the upper exterior working surface to a selected depth of at least about 700 μm, the interstitial regions of the second leached region being substantially free of metal-solvent catalyst, the second leached region being partially defined by a boundary that terminates at the at least one lateral surface at a location that is spaced from the chamfer;wherein a cross-section of the second leached region exhibits: a first depth measured from and substantially perpendicularly to the upper exterior working surface at an intersection of the chamfer and the upper exterior working surface; anda second depth measured from and substantially perpendicularly to the upper exterior working surface at a generally central location on the upper exterior working surface;wherein the first depth and the second depth are substantially equal.
  • 8. A rotary drill bit, comprising: a bit body configured to engage a subterranean formation; anda plurality of polycrystalline diamond cutting elements affixed to the bit body, at least one of the polycrystalline diamond cutting elements including:a substrate; anda polycrystalline diamond table bonded to the substrate and including an upper exterior working surface, at least one lateral surface, and a chamfer extending between the upper exterior working surface and the at least one lateral surface, the polycrystalline diamond table including a plurality of bonded diamond grains defining a plurality of interstitial regions, the polycrystalline diamond table further including:a first region adjacent to the substrate, at least a portion of the interstitial regions of the first region including an infiltrant disposed therein; anda second leached region adjacent to the first region and extending inwardly from the upper exterior working surface to a selected depth, the interstitial regions of the second leached region being substantially free of metal-solvent catalyst, the second region being defined by the upper exterior working surface, the at least one lateral surface, the chamfer, and a generally horizontal boundary that terminates at the at least one lateral surface at a location that is spaced from the chamfer;wherein a cross-section of the second leached region exhibits:a first depth measured from and substantially perpendicularly to the upper exterior working surface at an intersection of the chamfer and the upper exterior working surface; anda second depth measured from and substantially perpendicularly to the upper exterior working surface at a generally central location on the upper exterior working surface;wherein the first depth and the second depth are substantially equal.
  • 9. The polycrystalline diamond compact of claim 1 wherein the boundary partially defining the second leached region is an irregular boundary.
  • 10. A polycrystalline diamond compact, comprising: a substrate; anda polycrystalline diamond table bonded to the substrate and including an upper exterior working surface, at least one lateral surface, and a chamfer extending between the upper exterior working surface and the at least one lateral surface, the polycrystalline diamond table including a plurality of bonded diamond grains defining a plurality of interstitial regions, the plurality of bonded diamond grains exhibiting an average grain size of about 40 μm or less, the polycrystalline diamond table further including:a first region adjacent to the substrate, at least a portion of the interstitial regions of the first region including cobalt disposed therein; anda second leached region adjacent to the first region and extending inwardly from the upper exterior working surface to a selected depth of at least about 700 μm, the interstitial regions of the second leached region being substantially free of metal-solvent catalyst, the second leached region being partially defined by a boundary that terminates at the at least one lateral surface at a location that is spaced from the chamfer;wherein a cross-section of the second leached region exhibits: a first depth measured from and substantially perpendicularly to the upper exterior working surface at an intersection of the chamfer and the upper exterior working surface; anda second depth measured from and substantially perpendicularly to the upper exterior working surface at a generally central location on the upper exterior working surface;wherein the first depth and the second depth are substantially equal.
  • 11. A polycrystalline diamond compact formed by a process comprising: forming a polycrystalline diamond table in the presence of a metal-solvent catalyst including one of cobalt, iron, nickel, or alloys thereof in a first high-pressure/high-temperature process, the polycrystalline diamond table including a plurality of bonded diamond grains defining a plurality of interstitial regions, at least a portion of the plurality of interstitial regions including the metal-solvent catalyst disposed therein, the plurality of bonded diamond grains exhibiting an average grain size of about 40 μm or less;at least partially leaching the polycrystalline diamond table to remove at least a portion of the metal-solvent catalyst therefrom;subjecting the at least partially leached polycrystalline diamond table and a substrate to a second high-pressure/high-temperature process under diamond-stable temperature-pressure conditions to partially infiltrate the at least partially leached polycrystalline table with an infiltrant including one of iron, nickel, cobalt, or alloys of the foregoing metals and attach the partially infiltrated polycrystalline diamond table to the substrate;wherein subjecting the at least partially leached polycrystalline diamond table and a substrate to a second high-pressure/high-temperature process forms a first region adjacent to the substrate including the infiltrant disposed in at least a portion of the interstitial regions thereof and a second region extending inwardly from an exterior working surface, the second region being substantially free of the infiltrant without having been leached of the infiltrant, the second leached region being partially defined by a boundary proximate to the chamfer, wherein the boundary partially defining the second leached region is generally horizontal and terminates at the at least one lateral surface;wherein a cross-section of the second leached region exhibits: a first depth measured from and substantially perpendicularly to the upper exterior working surface at an intersection of the chamfer and the upper exterior working surface;and a second depth measured from and substantially perpendicularly to the upper exterior working surface at a generally central location on the upper exterior working surface;wherein the first depth and the second depth are substantially equal.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/961,787 filed on 7 Dec. 2010, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein, in its entirety, by this reference.

US Referenced Citations (240)
Number Name Date Kind
2349577 Dean May 1944 A
3743489 Wentorf, Jr. et al. Jul 1973 A
3745623 Wentorf, Jr. et al. Jul 1973 A
3767371 Wentorf, Jr. et al. Oct 1973 A
3786552 Saito et al. Jan 1974 A
3918219 Wentorf, Jr. et al. Nov 1975 A
4009027 Naidich et al. Feb 1977 A
4016736 Carrison et al. Apr 1977 A
4063909 Mitchell Dec 1977 A
4084942 Villalobos Apr 1978 A
4191735 Nelson et al. Mar 1980 A
4224380 Bovenkerk et al. Sep 1980 A
4268276 Bovenkerk May 1981 A
4274900 Mueller et al. Jun 1981 A
4288248 Bovenkerk et al. Sep 1981 A
4333902 Hara Jun 1982 A
4410054 Nagal et al. Oct 1983 A
4440573 Ishizuka Apr 1984 A
4460382 Ohno Jul 1984 A
4468138 Nagel Aug 1984 A
4525179 Gigl Jun 1985 A
4560014 Geczy Dec 1985 A
4676124 Fischer Jun 1987 A
4692418 Boecker et al. Sep 1987 A
4738322 Hall et al. Apr 1988 A
4766027 Burn et al. Aug 1988 A
4778486 Csillag et al. Oct 1988 A
4783245 Nakamura et al. Nov 1988 A
4797326 Csillag Jan 1989 A
4811801 Salesky et al. Mar 1989 A
4871377 Frushour Oct 1989 A
4913247 Jones Apr 1990 A
4940180 Martell Jul 1990 A
4944772 Cho Jul 1990 A
4985051 Ringwood Jan 1991 A
4992082 Drawl et al. Feb 1991 A
5000273 Horton et al. Mar 1991 A
5011514 Cho et al. Apr 1991 A
5016718 Tandberg May 1991 A
5032147 Frushour Jul 1991 A
5049164 Horton et al. Sep 1991 A
5057124 Cerceau Oct 1991 A
5092687 Hall Mar 1992 A
5116568 Sung et al. May 1992 A
5120327 Dennis Jun 1992 A
5127923 Bunting et al. Jul 1992 A
5135061 Newton, Jr. Aug 1992 A
5151107 Cho et al. Sep 1992 A
5154245 Walderstrom et al. Oct 1992 A
5173091 Marek Dec 1992 A
5180022 Brady Jan 1993 A
5217154 Elwood et al. Jun 1993 A
5304342 Hall et al. Apr 1994 A
5326380 Yao et al. Jul 1994 A
5348109 Griffin et al. Sep 1994 A
5355969 Hardy et al. Oct 1994 A
5364192 Damm et al. Nov 1994 A
5368398 Damm et al. Nov 1994 A
5370195 Keshavan et al. Dec 1994 A
5460233 Meany et al. Oct 1995 A
5480233 Cunningham Jan 1996 A
5544713 Dennis Aug 1996 A
5617997 Kobayashi et al. Apr 1997 A
5645617 Frushour Jul 1997 A
5660075 Johnson et al. Aug 1997 A
5722499 Nguyen et al. Mar 1998 A
5740874 Matthias Apr 1998 A
5819862 Matthias et al. Oct 1998 A
5876859 Saxelby, Jr. et al. Mar 1999 A
5954147 Overstreet et al. Sep 1999 A
5976707 Grab Nov 1999 A
6054693 Barmatz et al. Apr 2000 A
6165616 Lemelson et al. Dec 2000 A
6196340 Jensen et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202770 Jurewicz et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202772 Eyre et al. Mar 2001 B1
6209429 Urso, III et al. Apr 2001 B1
6220375 Butcher et al. Apr 2001 B1
6258139 Jensen Jul 2001 B1
6270548 Campbell et al. Aug 2001 B1
6272753 Packer Aug 2001 B2
6302225 Yoshida et al. Oct 2001 B1
6338754 Cannon et al. Jan 2002 B1
6344149 Oles Feb 2002 B1
6390181 Hall et al. May 2002 B1
6405814 Eyre et al. Jun 2002 B1
6410085 Griffin et al. Jun 2002 B1
6435058 Matthias et al. Aug 2002 B1
6481511 Matthias et al. Nov 2002 B2
6544308 Griffin et al. Apr 2003 B2
6562462 Griffin et al. May 2003 B2
6585064 Griffin et al. Jul 2003 B2
6589640 Griffin et al. Jul 2003 B2
6592985 Griffin et al. Jul 2003 B2
6601662 Matthias et al. Aug 2003 B2
6739214 Griffin et al. May 2004 B2
6749033 Griffin et al. Jun 2004 B2
6793681 Pope et al. Sep 2004 B1
6797326 Griffin et al. Sep 2004 B2
6861098 Griffin et al. Mar 2005 B2
6861137 Griffin et al. Mar 2005 B2
6878447 Griffin et al. Apr 2005 B2
6892836 Eyre et al. May 2005 B1
6991049 Eyre et al. Jan 2006 B2
7060641 Qian et al. Jun 2006 B2
7377341 Middlemiss et al. May 2008 B2
7384821 Sung Jun 2008 B2
7473287 Belnap et al. Jan 2009 B2
7516804 Vail Apr 2009 B2
7552782 Sexton et al. Jun 2009 B1
7559695 Sexton et al. Jul 2009 B2
7559965 Oh Jul 2009 B2
7569176 Pope et al. Aug 2009 B2
7608333 Eyre et al. Oct 2009 B2
7635035 Bertagnolli et al. Dec 2009 B1
7647933 Middlemiss Jan 2010 B2
7694757 Keshavan et al. Apr 2010 B2
7726421 Middlemiss Jun 2010 B2
7740673 Eyre et al. Jun 2010 B2
7753143 Miess et al. Jul 2010 B1
7754333 Eyre et al. Jul 2010 B2
7828088 Middlemiss et al. Nov 2010 B2
7841428 Bertagnolli Nov 2010 B2
7845438 Vail et al. Dec 2010 B1
7866418 Bertagnolli et al. Jan 2011 B2
7942219 Keshavan et al. Mar 2011 B2
7980334 Voronin et al. Jul 2011 B2
8002859 Griffo et al. Aug 2011 B2
8028771 Keshavan et al. Oct 2011 B2
8034136 Sani Oct 2011 B2
8056650 Middlemiss et al. Nov 2011 B2
8066087 Griffo et al. Nov 2011 B2
8069937 Mukhopadhyay Dec 2011 B2
8071173 Sani Dec 2011 B1
8080071 Vail et al. Dec 2011 B1
8080074 Sani Dec 2011 B2
8147572 Eyre et al. Apr 2012 B2
8202335 Cooley et al. Jun 2012 B2
8236074 Bertagnolli Aug 2012 B1
8297382 Bertagnolli et al. Oct 2012 B2
8323367 Bertagnolli Dec 2012 B1
8328891 Zhang et al. Dec 2012 B2
8353371 Cooley et al. Jan 2013 B2
8415033 Matsuzawa et al. Apr 2013 B2
8529649 Sani Sep 2013 B2
8616306 Bertagnolli et al. Dec 2013 B2
8784517 Gonzalez et al. Jul 2014 B1
8911521 Miess et al. Dec 2014 B1
8979956 Sani Mar 2015 B2
20010004946 Jensen Jun 2001 A1
20010040053 Beuershausen Nov 2001 A1
20020029909 Griffo et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020079140 Eyre et al. Jun 2002 A1
20030019333 Scott Jan 2003 A1
20030037964 Sinor et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030079918 Eyre et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030191533 Dixon et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040111159 Pope et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040112650 Moseley Jun 2004 A1
20040155096 Zimmerman et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050044800 Hall et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050050801 Cho et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050117984 Eason Jun 2005 A1
20050189443 Taylor et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050210755 Cho et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050211475 Mirchandani et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050247492 Shen et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060042172 Sung Mar 2006 A1
20060054363 Eyre et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060060391 Eyre et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060060392 Eyre Mar 2006 A1
20060157884 Ludtke et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060165993 Keshavan Jul 2006 A1
20060180354 Belnap et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060207802 Zhang et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060254830 Radtke Nov 2006 A1
20060263233 Gardinier Nov 2006 A1
20060266558 Middlemiss et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060266559 Keshavan et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070023206 Keshavan et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070034416 Cho et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070056778 Webb et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070079994 Middlemiss Apr 2007 A1
20070102202 Choe et al. May 2007 A1
20070187155 Middlemiss Aug 2007 A1
20080019098 Sung Jan 2008 A1
20080099250 Hall et al. May 2008 A1
20080206576 Qian et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080223575 Oldham et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080223621 Middlemiss et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080223623 Keshavan et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080230279 Bitler et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080230280 Keshavan et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080247899 Cho et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090120009 Sung May 2009 A1
20090152015 Sani et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090166094 Keshavan et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090173015 Keshavan et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090173547 Voronin et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090313908 Zhang et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100012389 Zhang et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100038148 King Feb 2010 A1
20100095602 Belnap Apr 2010 A1
20100104874 Yong et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100122852 Russell et al. May 2010 A1
20100155149 Keshavan et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100181117 Scott Jul 2010 A1
20100186303 Ras et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100196717 Liversage et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100212971 Mukhopadhyay Aug 2010 A1
20100236836 Voronin Sep 2010 A1
20100243336 Dourfaye et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100281782 Keshavan et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100287845 Montross et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100294571 Belnap et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110023375 Sani et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110031031 Vemptai et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110036643 Belnap et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110042149 Scott et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110056753 Middlemiss et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110067929 Mukhopadhyay et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110083908 Shen et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110088950 Scott Apr 2011 A1
20110120782 Cooley et al. May 2011 A1
20110259648 Sani Oct 2011 A1
20110283628 Saridikmen et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110284294 Cox et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120037429 Davies et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120047815 Sani Mar 2012 A1
20120080239 Lyons et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120103701 Cho et al. May 2012 A1
20120138370 Mukhopadhyay et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120228037 Cooley et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120241224 Qian et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130205677 Bertagnolli et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130291443 Naidoo et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130313027 Sani Nov 2013 A1
20140223835 Thigpen et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140283457 Cariveau et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150114726 Shen et al. Apr 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number Date Country
0 297 071 Dec 1988 EP
0 352 811 Jan 1990 EP
0 374 424 Jun 1990 EP
0 699 642 Mar 1996 EP
2572011 Mar 2013 EP
2300424 Nov 1996 GB
2 461 198 Dec 2009 GB
S59219500 Dec 1984 JP
WO 08063568 May 2008 WO
2009125355 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2010039346 Apr 2010 WO
WO 2010098978 Sep 2010 WO
WO 2010100629 Sep 2010 WO
WO 2010100630 Sep 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (226)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,359, filed Jun. 5, 2014, Miess et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/100,388, Jun. 17, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/027,954, Jun. 3, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,952, Jun. 11, 2014, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,971, Jun. 19, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/953,453, Jun. 24, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/327,264, filed Jul. 9, 2014, Sani.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/330,851, filed Jul. 14, 2014, Sani.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,759, filed Sep. 24, 2014, Sani.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/504,253, filed Oct. 1, 2014, Bertagnolli et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,584, Jun. 25, 2014, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/032,350, Aug. 13, 2014, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/100,388, Aug. 4, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/285,198, Jul. 30, 2014, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,491, Aug. 8, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/027,954, Sep. 12, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/690,397, Jul. 9, 2014, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/323,138, Jul. 29, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/512,007, filed Oct. 10, 2014, Bertagnolli et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,735, Aug. 6, 2014, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/264,932, filed Apr. 29, 2014, Vail.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,735, May 7, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,900, May 28, 2014, Issue Notification.
Decker, et al., “High-Pressure Calibration: A Critical Review,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1, 3 (1972).
Rousse, et al. “Structure of the Intermediate Phase of PbTe at High Pressure,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 71, 224116 (2005).
U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,584, Mar. 6, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/032,350, Apr. 15, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/285,198, Apr. 11, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,491, Mar. 21, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/027,954, Mar. 10, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/690,397, Mar. 12, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,952, Feb. 26, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,787, Apr. 11, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/323,138, Mar. 12, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/953,453, Mar. 18, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/850,969, filed Oct. 10, 2006, Cooley, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/860,098, filed Nov. 20, 2006, Sani.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/876,701, filed Dec. 21, 2006, Sani.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/068,120, filed Mar. 3, 2008, Vail.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,584, filed Aug. 27, 2009, Bertagnolli.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/027,954, filed Feb. 15, 2011, Miess et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/100,388, filed May 4, 2011, Jones et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,735, filed Jun. 29, 2011, Bertagnolli.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/285,198, filed Oct. 31, 2011, Sani.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,900, filed Nov. 9, 2011, Vail.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/323,138, filed Dec. 12, 2011, Miess et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/690,397, filed Nov. 30, 2012, Miess et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,971, filed Feb. 16, 2012, Miess et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,831, filed Oct. 30, 2013, Bertagnolli et al.
Akaishi, Minoru, “Synthesis of polycrystalline diamond compact with magnesium carbonate and its physical properties,” Diamond and Related Materials, 1996 (pp. 2-7).
Declaration of Prior Sales of Terracut PDCS executed by Kenneth E. Bertagnolli Feb. 3, 2011.
Declaration of Prior Sales of Terracut PDCS executed by Paul D. Jones Feb. 3, 2011.
Ekimov, E.A., et al. “Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Diamond-SiC Nanocomposites” Inorganic Materials, vol. 38, No. 11, 2002, pp. 1117-1122.
Glowka, D.A. & Stone, C.M., “Effects of Termal and Mechanical Loading on PDC Bit Life”, SPE Drilling Engineering, Jun. 1986 (pp. 201-214).
Hosomi, Satoru, et al., “Diamond Formation by a Solid State Reaction”, Science and Technology of New Diamond, pp. 239-243 (1990).
Hsueh, C.H. & Evans, A.G., “Residual Stresses in Metal/Ceramic Bonded Strips”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 68 [5] (1985) pp. 241-248.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2007/024090; dated Apr. 15, 2008.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2011/060380 dated Mar. 12, 2012.
Ledbetter, H.M., et al. “Elastic Properties of Metals and Alloys. II. Copper”, Journal of Physics and Chemical Reference Data, vol. 3, No. 4, 1974. pp. 897-935.
Lin, Tze-Pin; Hood, Michael & Cooper George A., “Residual Stresses in Polycrystalline Diamond Compacts”, J. Am. Ceram Soc., 77 [6] (1994) pp. 1562-1568.
Liu, Xueran, et al., “Fabrication of the supersaturated solid solution of carbon in copper by mechanical alloying”, Materials Characterization, vol. 58, Issue 8 (Jun. 2007), pp. 504-508.
Orwa, J.O., et al., “Diamond nanocrystals formed by direct implantation of fused silica with carbon,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 90, No. 6, 2001, pp. 3007-3018.
Radtke, Robert, “Faster Drilling, Longer Life: Thermally Stable Diamond Drill Bit Cutters,” Drilling Systems, Summer 2004 (pp. 5-9).
Saji, S., et al., Solid Solubility of Carbon in Copper during Mechanical Alloying, Materials Transactions, vol. 39, No. 7 (1998), pp. 778-781.
Suryanarayana, C., “Novel Methods of BRAZING Dissimilar Materials,” Advanced Materials & Processes, Mar. 2001 (3 pgs).
Tanaka, T., et al., “Formation of Metastable Phases of Ni—C and Co—C Systems by Mechanical Alloying”, Metallurgical Transactions, vol. 23A, Sep. 1992, pp. 2431-2435.
Timoshenko, S.P. & Goodler, J.N., “Theory of Elasticity”, McGraw-Hill Classic Textbook Reissue 1934, pp. 8-11, 456-458.
Tomlinson, P.N. et al. “Syndax3 Pins—New Concepts in PCD Drilling,” Rock Drilling, IDR 3/92, 1992 (pp. 109-114).
Ueda, Fumihiro, “Cutting performance of sintered diamond with MgCO3 as a sintering agent,” Materials Science and Engineering, 1996 (pp. 260-263).
Yamane, T., et al., “Solid solubility of carbon in copper mechanically alloyed”, Journal of Materials Science Letters 20 (2001), pp. 259-260.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/983,619, May 26, 2010, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/545,929, Aug. 13, 2008, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/545,929, Jan. 21, 2009, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/545,929, Aug. 27, 2009, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/545,929, Apr. 15, 2010, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/545,929, Jul. 21, 2010, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/545,929, Mar. 20, 2012, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/545,929, Jul. 18, 2012, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/983,619, Aug. 9, 2010, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/983,619, Mar. 28, 2011, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/983,619, Jun. 16, 2011, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/983,619, Sep. 21, 2011, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/271,081, Dec. 22, 2010, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/271,081, Mar. 31, 2011, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/271,081, Aug. 8, 2011, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/271,081, Oct. 5, 2011, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/363,104, Oct. 14, 2010, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/363,104, Apr. 12, 2011, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/363,104, Aug. 25, 2011, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/394,356, Sep. 1, 2011, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/394,356, Nov. 30, 2011, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,969, May 25, 2012, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,969, Nov. 14, 2012, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,584, May 18, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,584, Oct. 24, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,584, Jan. 3, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,584, Jun. 14, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,584, Sep. 26, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/032,350, Nov. 26, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/032,350, Mar. 14, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/032,350, Sep. 30, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/100,388, Oct. 18, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/100,388, Jan. 15, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,735, Aug. 17, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,735, Jan. 24, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,735, Jul. 12, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,735, Jan. 10, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,125, May 23, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,125, Jul. 11, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,125, Jan. 18, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,125, May 1, 2013, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/230,125, Aug. 21, 2013, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/285,198, Apr. 3, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/285,198, Jul. 11, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/285,198, Feb. 5, 2013, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/285,198, Jul. 22, 2013, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/285,198, Nov. 22, 2013, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,491, Aug. 8, 2012, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,491, Feb. 11, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,491, Jul. 18, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,491, Oct. 29, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/027,954, Jul. 18, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/027,954, Nov. 13, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/690,397, Feb. 14, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/690,397, May 29, 2013, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/690,397, Aug. 9, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/690,397, Nov. 25, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,952, Jul. 31, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,952, Nov. 13, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,900, May 23, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,900, Oct. 22, 2013, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,900, Nov. 25, 2013, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,900, Jan. 30, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,787, May 29, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,787, Aug. 30, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/323,138, Oct. 1, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/323,138, Nov. 29, 2013, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/953,453, Sep. 19, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/953,453, Oct. 10, 2013, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,787, Dec. 3, 2015, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/570,506, Sep. 15, 2015, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,831, Jul. 15, 2015, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,831, Oct. 26, 2015, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,359, Oct. 30, 2015, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/327,264, Nov. 6, 2015, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/330,851, Nov. 12, 2015, Office Action.
Clegg et al., “Faster, Longer, and More-Reliable Bit Runs With New-Generation PDC Cutter” SPE 102067, pp. 1-9, 2006.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,787, Jun. 17, 2016, Non-Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/570,506, Dec. 16, 2015, Interview Summary.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/570,506, Mar. 1, 2016, Non-Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/570,506, May 25, 2016, Interview Summary.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/570,506, Aug. 10, 2016, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,831, Apr. 7, 2016, Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,831, Aug. 25, 2016, Advisory Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,359, Mar. 14, 2016, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,359, Jun. 15, 2016, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/327,264, Feb. 2, 2016, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/327,264, May 26, 2016, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/327,264, Jun. 8, 2016, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/330,851, Jul. 14, 2016, Non-Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,759, Jan. 20, 2016, Rrestriction Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,759, May 25, 2016, Non-Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/512,007, Feb. 2, 2016, Non-Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/633,041, Apr. 11, 2016, Non-Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,332, Jul. 1, 2016, Non-Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/634,395, Jul. 29, 2016, Non-Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/504,253, Aug. 25, 2016, Non-Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/570,506, Nov. 22, 2016, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/330,851, Dec. 29, 2016, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,759, Oct. 3, 2016, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,787, Jan. 17, 2017, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,831, Jan. 20, 2017, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,759, Feb. 8, 2017, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,332, Jan. 13, 2017, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/634,395, Jan. 11, 2017, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/634,395, Jan. 26, 2017, Supplemental Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/661,993, Oct. 26, 2016, Restriction Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/661,993, Feb. 16, 2017, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/570,506, filed Dec. 15, 2014, Miess et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,332, filed Feb. 8, 2015, Bertagnolli et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/621,019, filed Feb. 12, 2015, Jones et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/633,041, filed Feb. 26, 2015, Miess et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/634,395, filed Feb. 27, 2015, Miess et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/661,993, filed Mar. 18, 2015, Sani.
ASTM B887-03 (2008) “Standard Test Method for Determination of Coercivity (Hcs) of Cemented Carbides”.
ASTM B886-03 (2008), “Standard Test Method for Determination of Magnetic Saturation (Ms) of Cemented Carbides”.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/100,388, Nov. 7, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/100,388, Dec. 24, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/100,388, Mar. 4, 2015, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/100,388, Apr. 13, 2015, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/100,388, Apr. 22, 2015, Issue Notiification.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,491, Nov. 3, 2014, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,491, Dec. 19, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,491, Apr. 15, 2015, Issue Notiification.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/027,954, Dec. 26, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/027,954, Apr. 8, 2015, Issue Notiification.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,787, May 21, 2015, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/323,138, Nov. 25, 2014, Issue Notiification.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,971, Nov. 26, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,971, Mar. 19, 2015, Issue Notiification.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/953,453, Feb. 12, 2015, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/953,453, Feb. 25, 2015, Issue Notiification.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,787, Jun. 1, 2017, Advisory Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/570,506, Mar. 17, 2017, Corrected Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/570,506, Mar. 29, 2017, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,831, Jun. 14, 2017, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/330,851, Aug. 10, 2017, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,759, May 10, 2017, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,332, Aug. 15, 2017, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/634,395, Apr. 19, 2017, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/661,993, Jun. 21, 2017, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/621,019, Mar. 30, 2017, Restriction Requirement.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/621,019, May 19, 2017, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,787, Oct. 5, 2017, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,831, Dec. 19, 2017, Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,332, Jan. 18, 2018, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/661,993, Oct. 18, 2017, Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/621,019, Dec. 26, 2017, Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,787, dated Apr. 26, 2018 Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,787, dated Sep. 28, 2018 Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,831, Apr. 4, 2018 Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,332, June 6, 2018 Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/621,019, dated Aug. 10, 2018 Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/621,019, dated Nov. 28, 2018 Issue Notification.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,787, dated Jan. 14, 2019 Notice of Allowance.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,332, dated Jan. 25, 2019 Office Action.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140158437 A1 Jun 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12961787 Dec 2010 US
Child 14178118 US