Patent Application
20240018145
Influenza viruses, members of the Orthomyxoviridae family, are categorized by type: Influenza A, B, C or D. Seasonal epidemic disease caused by Influenza A and Influenza B, which co-circulate throughout the world, is the biggest concern for human public health. Influenza A viruses are characterized by the combination of surface proteins, hemagglutinin (HA, H) and neuraminidase (NA, N), present on the virion. Both H1N1 and H3N2 viruses are capable of infecting and causing disease in humans. Influenza B viruses fall into one of two lineages, Victoria-like or Yamagata-like, both of which cause human disease.
Influenza A and B virus particles consist of a cell-derived lipid membrane lined with the viral M1 matrix protein. This envelope encompasses 8 segments of negative strand RNA genome, each encoding one or more viral proteins. Surface-exposed hemagglutinin, M2 and neuraminidase proteins mediate host cell entry, uncoating and release of nascent virus particles from infected cells, respectively. The segmented genome is packaged as a ribonucleoprotein complex made up of nucleoprotein-coated RNA associated with the heterotrimeric polymerase. The polymerase, made up of PA, PB1 and PB2 subunits, is critical for both viral genome replication and mRNA transcription. The PB1 subunit harbors the polymerase active site, while the PB2 and PA subunits, in addition to their role in genome replication, work together to capture (PB2) and remove the cap (PA) from host cell pre-mRNAs, facilitating transcription of viral mRNA.
Seasonal influenza is a respiratory disease characterized by sudden onset fever, cough, sore throat, headache, myalgia, and malaise. Symptoms range from mild to severe and may lead to death of the infected person. Worldwide, 3-5 million people each year suffer from severe influenza disease and approximately 0.5 million die. Those who are immune-compromised, including the very young and those over the age of 65, are at highest risk for influenza-related morbidity and mortality.
Vaccines for prevention of influenza disease are available; however, the effectiveness of such vaccines varies from year to year with an estimated pooled effectiveness of 59% for healthy adults (Osterholm et al, CIDRAP report (2012)). Influenza virus strains capable of escaping host immunity are selectively transmitted; thus, to provide protection against currently circulating virus, seasonal influenza vaccines must be reformulated and readministered annually. Vaccines that provide durable, multi-season or broad-spectrum protection, are not currently available.
Several small molecules targeting influenza virus have been approved for therapeutic and/or limited prophylactic use in one or more countries, including M2 ion channel inhibitors, NA inhibitors, a nucleoside analog and a recently approved inhibitor targeting the endonuclease activity of the PA protein. As therapy, small molecule inhibitors of influenza must be administered within 48 hours of symptom onset to be effective, and shorten the duration of virus shedding and respiratory symptoms. Currently circulating influenza virus strains are resistant to approved M2 inhibitors, such that use of M2 inhibitors is no longer recommended. The purine analog favipiravir is approved for use only in Japan, and safety concerns restrict its use. In the past, increasing levels of circulating drug-resistant virus variants had limited the effectiveness of several neuraminidase inhibitors; however, since the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, the level of drug resistance has been low. Resistance to the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor baloxavir marboxil was high in late stage clinical trials wherein virus harboring a mutation at amino acid 38 of the PA protein was isolated from 9.7% of adult and 23.4% of pediatric trial participants (Hayden et al, N Engl J Med., 379(10):913-923 (2018); Hirotsu et al, Clin Infect Dis., ciz908 (2019)). Whether these mutant viruses, which significantly reduce the in vitro antiviral potency, can efficiently transmit from human to human is not known (Omoto et al, Sci Rep., 8(1):9633 (2018); Noshi et al, Antiviral Res., 160:109-117 (2018)).
Currently, there are limited options for the treatment and prevention of influenza disease and significant concerns about drug resistance with approved therapies. Furthermore, the inability of seasonal vaccines to provide consistent, robust, durable, broad spectrum protection against influenza disease, combined with the threat of emergence of novel zoonotic influenza viruses with pandemic potential, necessitate continued development of both prophylactic and therapeutic agents targeting the influenza virus.
The present invention relates to compounds of Formula I:
and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. The compounds of Formula I are cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitors, and as such may be useful in the treatment, inhibition or amelioration of one or more disease states that could benefit from inhibition of a virus having a cap-dependent endonuclease, including influenza. The compounds of this invention could further be used in combination with other therapeutically effective agents, including but not limited to, other drugs useful for the treatment of influenza. The invention furthermore relates to processes for preparing compounds of Formula I, and pharmaceutical compositions which comprise compounds of Formula I and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.
The present invention relates to compounds of Formula I.
In an embodiment of the invention, X is N. In another embodiment of the invention, X is CH.
In an embodiment of the invention, Y is absent. In another embodiment of the invention, Y is CHR5. In a class of the embodiment, Y is CH2. In another embodiment of the invention, Y is —CH2—CHR5—. In a class of the embodiment, Y is —CH2—CH2—. In another embodiment of the invention, Y is —CH2—CHR5—CH2—. In a class of the embodiment, Y is —CH2—CH2—CH2—. In another embodiment of the invention, Y is S. In another embodiment of the invention, Y is SO. In another embodiment of the invention, Y is SO2.
In an embodiment of the invention, R1 is methyl.
In an embodiment of the invention, R2 is phenyl, which is optionally substituted with one or two substituents independently selected from the group consisting of halo, CH3, CF3, OCHF2, and OCH3.
In an embodiment of the invention, R3 is hydrogen, methyl, ethyl or hydroxy.
In an embodiment of the invention, R4 is hydrogen, methyl, ethyl, propyl, trifluoroethyl, CH2CH2OH, CH2CH2OCH3 or cycloproylmethyl.
In an embodiment of the invention, R5 is hydrogen. In another embodiment of the invention, R5 is methyl.
In an embodiment of the invention, R6 is hydrogen.
In an embodiment of the invention, R4 and R6 can be taken with the carbon atoms to which they are attached to form a C4-6 cycloalkyl group.
In an embodiment of the invention, R7 is hydrogen. In another embodiment of the invention, R7 is methyl.
Reference to the preferred classes and subclasses set forth above is meant to include all combinations of particular and preferred groups unless stated otherwise.
Specific embodiments of the present invention include, but are not limited to compounds 1A to 167 identified herein as Examples 1 to 40, or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.
Also included within the scope of the present invention is a pharmaceutical composition which is comprised of a compound of Formula I as described above and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The invention is also contemplated to encompass a pharmaceutical composition which is comprised of a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier and any of the compounds specifically disclosed in the present application. These and other aspects of the invention will be apparent from the teachings contained herein.
The invention also includes compositions for inhibiting cap-dependent endonuclease in a virus, treating a disease caused by a virus having a cap-dependent endonuclease, treating influenza and preventing influenza, in a mammal, comprising a compound of the invention in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. These compositions may optionally include other antiviral agents. The compositions can be added to blood, blood products, or mammalian organs in order to affect the desired inhibitions.
The compounds of the present invention may be administered in the form of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt. The term “pharmaceutically acceptable salt” refers to salts prepared from pharmaceutically acceptable non-toxic bases or acids including inorganic or organic bases and inorganic or organic acids. Salts of basic compounds encompassed within the term “pharmaceutically acceptable salt” refer to non-toxic salts of the compounds of this invention which are generally prepared by reacting the free base with a suitable organic or inorganic acid. Representative salts of basic compounds of the present invention include, but are not limited to, the following: acetate, ascorbate, adipate, alginate, aspirate, benzenesulfonate, benzoate, bicarbonate, bisulfate, bitartrate, borate, bromide, butyrate, camphorate, camphorsulfonate, camsylate, carbonate, chloride, clavulanate, citrate, cyclopentane propionate, diethylacetic, digluconate, dihydrochloride, dodecylsulfanate, edetate, edisylate, estolate, esylate, ethanesulfonate, formic, fumarate, gluceptate, glucoheptanoate, gluconate, glutamate, glycerophosphate, glycollylarsanilate, hemisulfate, heptanoate, hexanoate, hexylresorcinate, hydrabamine, hydrobromide, hydrochloride, 2-hydroxyethanesulfonate, hydroxynaphthoate, iodide, isonicotinic, isothionate, lactate, lactobionate, laurate, malate, maleate, mandelate, mesylate, methylbromide, methylnitrate, methylsulfate, methanesulfonate, mucate, 2-naphthalenesulfonate, napsylate, nicotinate, nitrate, N-methylglucamine ammonium salt, oleate, oxalate, pamoate (embonate), palmitate, pantothenate, pectinate, persulfate, phosphate/diphosphate, pimelic, phenylpropionic, polygalacturonate, propionate, salicylate, stearate, sulfate, subacetate, succinate, tannate, tartrate, teoclate, thiocyanate, tosylate, triethiodide, trifluoroacetate, undeconate, valerate and the like. Furthermore, where the compounds of the invention carry an acidic moiety, suitable pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof include, but are not limited to, salts derived from inorganic bases including aluminum, ammonium, calcium, copper, ferric, ferrous, lithium, magnesium, manganic, mangamous, potassium, sodium, zinc, and the like. Also included are the ammonium, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium salts. Salts derived from pharmaceutically acceptable organic non-toxic bases include salts of primary, secondary, and tertiary amines, cyclic amines, dicyclohexyl amines and basic ion-exchange resins, such as arginine, betaine, caffeine, choline, N,N-dibenzylethylenediamine, diethylamine, 2-diethylaminoethanol, 2-dimethylaminoethanol, ethanolamine, ethylamine, ethylenediamine, N-ethylmorpholine, N-ethylpiperidine, glucamine, glucosamine, histidine, hydrabamine, isopropylamine, lysine, methylglucamine, morpholine, piperazine, piperidine, polyamine resins, procaine, purines, theobromine, triethylamine, trimethylamine, tripropylamine, tromethamine, and the like. Also, included are the basic nitrogen-containing groups that may be quaternized with such agents as lower alkyl halides, such as methyl, ethyl, propyl, and butyl chloride, bromides and iodides; dialkyl sulfates like dimethyl, diethyl, dibutyl; and diamyl sulfates, long chain halides such as decyl, lauryl, myristyl and stearyl chlorides, bromides and iodides, aralkyl halides like benzyl and phenethyl bromides and others.
These salts can be obtained by known methods, for example, by mixing a compound of the present invention with an equivalent amount and a solution containing a desired acid, base, or the like, and then collecting the desired salt by filtering the salt or distilling off the solvent. The compounds of the present invention and salts thereof may form solvates with a solvent such as water, ethanol, or glycerol. The compounds of the present invention may form an acid addition salt and a salt with a base at the same time according to the type of substituent of the side chain.
If the compounds of Formula I simultaneously contain acidic and basic groups in the molecule the invention also includes, in addition to the salt forms mentioned, inner salts or betaines (zwitterions).
The present invention encompasses all stereoisomeric forms of the compounds of Formula I. Unless a specific stereochemistry is indicated, the present invention is meant to comprehend all such isomeric forms of these compounds. Centers of asymmetry that are present in the compounds of Formula I can all independently of one another have (R) configuration or (S) configuration. When bonds to the chiral carbon are depicted as straight lines in the structural Formulas of the invention, it is understood that both the (R) and (S) configurations of the chiral carbon, and hence both each individual enantiomer and mixtures thereof, are embraced within the Formula. When a particular configuration is depicted, that entantiomer (either (R) or (S), at that center) is intended. Similarly, when a compound name is recited without a chiral designation for a chiral carbon, it is understood that both the (R) and (S) configurations of the chiral carbon, and hence individual enantiomers and mixtures thereof, are embraced by the name. The production of specific stereoisomers or mixtures thereof may be identified in the Examples where such stereoisomers or mixtures were obtained, but this in no way limits the inclusion of all stereoisomers and mixtures thereof from being within the scope of this invention.
Unless a specific enantiomer or diastereomer is indicated, the invention includes all possible enantiomers and diastereomers and mixtures of two or more stereoisomers, for example mixtures of enantiomers and/or diastereomers, in all ratios. Thus, enantiomers are a subject of the invention in enantiomerically pure form, both as levorotatory and as dextrorotatory antipodes, in the form of racemates and in the form of mixtures of the two enantiomers in all ratios. In the case of a cis/trans isomerism the invention includes both the cis form and the transform as well as mixtures of these forms in all ratios. The preparation of individual stereoisomers can be carried out, if desired, by separation of a mixture by customary methods, for example by chromatography or crystallization, by the use of stereochemically uniform starting materials for the synthesis or by stereoselective synthesis. Optionally a derivatization can be carried out before a separation of stereoisomers. The separation of a mixture of stereoisomers can be carried out at an intermediate step during the synthesis of a compound of Formula I or it can be done on a final racemic product. Absolute stereochemistry may be determined by X-ray crystallography of crystalline products or crystalline intermediates which are derivatized, if necessary, with a reagent containing a stereogenic center of known configuration. Where compounds of this invention are capable of tautomerization, all individual tautomers as well as mixtures thereof are included in the scope of this invention. The present invention includes all such isomers, as well as salts, solvates (including hydrates) and solvated salts of such racemates, enantiomers, diastereomers and tautomers and mixtures thereof.
In the compounds of the invention, the atoms may exhibit their natural isotopic abundances, or one or more of the atoms may be artificially enriched in a particular isotope having the same atomic number, but an atomic mass or mass number different from the atomic mass or mass number predominantly found in nature. The present invention is meant to include all suitable isotopic variations of the specifically and generically described compounds. For example, different isotopic forms of hydrogen (H) include protium (1H) and deuterium (2H). Protium is the predominant hydrogen isotope found in nature. Enriching for deuterium may afford certain therapeutic advantages, such as increasing in vivo half-life or reducing dosage requirements, or may provide a compound useful as a standard for characterization of biological samples. Isotopically-enriched compounds can be prepared without undue experimentation by conventional techniques well known to those skilled in the art or by processes analogous to those described in the general process schemes and examples herein using appropriate isotopically-enriched reagents and/or intermediates.
When any variable occurs more than one time in any constituent, its definition on each occurrence is independent at every other occurrence. Also, combinations of substituents and variables are permissible only if such combinations result in stable compounds. Lines drawn into the ring systems from substituents represent that the indicated bond may be attached to any of the substitutable ring atoms. If the ring system is bicyclic, it is intended that the bond be attached to any of the suitable atoms on either ring of the bicyclic moiety.
It is understood that one or more silicon (Si) atoms can be incorporated into the compounds of the instant invention in place of one or more carbon atoms by one of ordinary skill in the art to provide compounds that are chemically stable and that can be readily synthesized by techniques known in the art from readily available starting materials. Carbon and silicon differ in their covalent radius leading to differences in bond distance and the steric arrangement when comparing analogous C-element and Si-element bonds. These differences lead to subtle changes in the size and shape of silicon-containing compounds when compared to carbon. One of ordinary skill in the art would understand that size and shape differences can lead to subtle or dramatic changes in potency, solubility, lack of off-target activity, packaging properties, and so on. (Diass, J. O. et al. Organometallics (2006) 5:1188-1198; Showell, G. A. et al. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2006) 16:2555-2558).
It is understood that substituents and substitution patterns on the compounds of the instant invention can be selected by one of ordinary skill in the art to provide compounds that are chemically stable and that can be readily synthesized by techniques known in the art, as well as those methods set forth below, from readily available starting materials. If a substituent is itself substituted with more than one group, it is understood that these multiple groups may be on the same carbon or on different carbons, so long as a stable structure results. The phrase “optionally substituted” (with one or more substituents) should be understood as meaning that the group in question is either unsubstituted or may be substituted with one or more substituents.
Furthermore, compounds of the present invention may exist in amorphous form and/or one or more crystalline forms, and as such all amorphous and crystalline forms and mixtures thereof of the compounds of Formula I are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention. In addition, some of the compounds of the instant invention may form solvates with water (i.e., a hydrate) or common organic solvents. Such solvates and hydrates, particularly the pharmaceutically acceptable solvates and hydrates, of the instant compounds are likewise encompassed within the scope of this invention, along with un-solvated and anhydrous forms.
Also, in the case of a carboxylic acid (—COOH) or alcohol group being present in the compounds of the present invention, pharmaceutically acceptable esters of carboxylic acid derivatives, such as methyl, ethyl, or pivaloyloxymethyl, or acyl derivatives of alcohols, such as O-acetyl, O-pivaloyl, O-benzoyl, and O-aminoacyl, can be employed. Included are those esters and acyl groups known in the art for modifying the solubility or hydrolysis characteristics for use as sustained-release or prodrug formulations.
Any pharmaceutically acceptable pro-drug modification of a compound of this invention which results in conversion in vivo to a compound within the scope of this invention is also within the scope of this invention. For example, esters can optionally be made by esterification of an available carboxylic acid group or by formation of an ester on an available hydroxy group in a compound. Similarly, labile amides can be made. Pharmaceutically acceptable esters or amides of the compounds of this invention may be prepared to act as pro-drugs which can be hydrolyzed back to an acid (or —COO— depending on the pH of the fluid or tissue where conversion takes place) or hydroxy form particularly in vivo and as such are encompassed within the scope of this invention. Examples of pharmaceutically acceptable pro-drug modifications include, but are not limited to, —C1-6alkyl esters and —C1-6alkyl substituted with phenyl esters.
Accordingly, the compounds within the generic structural formulas, embodiments and specific compounds described and claimed herein encompass salts, all possible stereoisomers and tautomers, physical forms (e.g., amorphous and crystalline forms), solvate and hydrate forms thereof and any combination of these forms, as well as the salts thereof, pro-drug forms thereof, and salts of pro-drug forms thereof, where such forms are possible unless specified otherwise.
The terms used herein have their ordinary meaning and the meaning of such terms is independent at each occurrence thereof. That notwithstanding and except where stated otherwise, the following definitions apply throughout the specification and claims. Chemical names, common names, and chemical structures may be used interchangeably to describe the same structure. These definitions apply regardless of whether a term is used by itself or in combination with other terms, unless otherwise indicated. Hence, the definition of “alkyl” applies to “alkyl” as well as the “alkyl” portions of “hydroxyalkyl,” “haloalkyl,” “—O-alkyl,” etc.
As used herein, and throughout this disclosure, the following terms, unless otherwise indicated, shall be understood to have the following meanings:
A “subject” is a human or non-human mammal. In one embodiment, a subject is a human. In another embodiment, a subject is a primate. In another embodiment, a subject is a monkey. In another embodiment, a subject is a chimpanzee. In still another embodiment, a subject is a rhesus monkey.
As used herein, the terms “treatment” and “treating” refer to all processes in which there may be a slowing, interrupting, arresting, controlling, or stopping of the progression of a disease or disorder described herein. The terms do not necessarily indicate a total elimination of all disease or disorder symptoms.
The terms “preventing,” or “prophylaxis,” as used herein, refers to reducing the likelihood of contracting disease or disorder described herein, or reducing the severity of a disease or disorder described herein.
The term “alkyl,” as used herein, refers to an aliphatic hydrocarbon group having one of its hydrogen atoms replaced with a bond. An alkyl group may be straight or branched and contain from about 1 to about 20 carbon atoms. In one embodiment, an alkyl group contains from about 1 to about 12 carbon atoms. In different embodiments, an alkyl group contains from 1 to 6 carbon atoms (C1-C6 alkyl) or from about 1 to about 4 carbon atoms (C1-C4 alkyl). Non-limiting examples of alkyl groups include methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, sec-butyl, isobutyl, tert-butyl, n-pentyl, neopentyl, isopentyl, n-hexyl, isohexyl and neohexyl. In one embodiment, an alkyl group is linear. In another embodiment, an alkyl group is branched. Unless otherwise indicated, an alkyl group is unsubstituted.
The term “haloalkyl,” as used herein refers to an alkyl group as defined above, wherein one or more of the alkyl group's hydrogen atoms has been replaced with a halogen. In one embodiment, a haloalkyl group has from 1 to 6 carbon atoms. In another embodiment, a haloalkyl group is substituted with from 1 to 3 F atoms. Non-limiting examples of haloalkyl groups include —CH2F, —CHF2, —CF3, —CH2Cl and —CCl3. The term “C1-C6 haloalkyl” refers to a haloalkyl group having from 1 to 6 carbon atoms.
The term “halo,” as used herein, means —F, —Cl, —Br or —I.
The term “cycloalkyl” means a monocyclic or bicyclic saturated aliphatic hydrocarbon group having the specified number of carbon atoms. For example, “cycloalkyl” includes cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, and so on. Bicyclic cycloalkyl ring systems include fused ring systems, where two rings share two atoms, and spiro ring systems, where two rings share one atom.
The term “aryl”, as used herein, represents a stable bicyclic or tricyclic ring system of up to 10 atoms in each ring, wherein at least one ring is aromatic, and all of the ring atoms are carbon. Bicyclic and tricyclic ring systems include fused ring systems, where two rings share two atoms, and spiro ring systems, where two rings share one atom.
The term “heteroaryl”, as used herein, represents a stable monocyclic or bicyclic ring system of up to 10 atoms in each ring, wherein at least one ring is aromatic, and at least one ring contains from 1 to 4 heteroatoms selected from the group consisting of O, N and S. Bicyclic heteroaryl ring systems include fused ring systems, where two rings share two atoms, and spiro ring systems, where two rings share one atom. Heteroaryl groups within the scope of this definition include but are not limited to: azaindolyl, benzoimidazolyl, benzisoxazolyl, benzofuranyl, benzofurazanyl, benzopyrazolyl, benzotriazolyl, benzothiophenyl, benzoxazolyl, carbazolyl, carbolinyl, cinnolinyl, dihydroindenyl, furanyl, indolinyl, indolyl, indolazinyl, indazolyl, isobenzofuranyl, isoindolyl, isoquinolyl, isothiazolyl, isoxazolyl, naphthalenyl, naphthpyridinyl, oxadiazolyl, oxazolyl, oxazoline, isoxazoline, pyranyl, pyrazinyl, pyrazolyl, pyrazolopyrimidinyl, pyridazinyl, pyridopyridinyl, pyridyl, pyrimidinyl, pyrrolyl, quinazolinyl, quinolyl, quinoxalinyl, tetrazolyl, tetrazolopyridyl, thiadiazolyl, thiazolyl, thienyl, triazolyl, dihydrobenzoimidazolyl, dihydrobenzofuranyl, dihydrobenzothiophenyl, dihydrobenzoxazolyl, dihydroindolyl, dihydroquinolinyl, dihydrobenzodioxinyl, dihydropyrazoloxazinyl, dihydropyrazolyothiazinedioxidyl, methylenedioxybenzene, benzothiazolyl, benzothienyl, quinolinyl, isoquinolinyl, oxazolyl, tetra-hydroquinoline and 3-oxo-3,4dihydro-2N-benzo[b][1,4]thiazine. If the heteroaryl contains nitrogen atoms, it is understood that the corresponding N-oxides thereof are also encompassed by this definition.
The term “heterocycle,” “heterocycloalkyl” gor “heterocyclyl” as used herein is intended to mean a stable nonaromatic monocyclic or bicyclic ring system of up to 10 atoms in each ring, unless otherwise specified, containing from 1 to 4 heteroatoms selected from the group consisting of O, N, S, SO, or SO2. Bicyclic heterocyclic ring systems include fused ring systems, where two rings share two atoms, and spiro ring systems, where two rings share one atom. “Heterocyclyl” therefore includes, but is not limited to the following: azaspirononanyl, azaspirooctanyl, azetidinyl, dioxanyl, oxadiazaspirodecenyl, oxaspirooctanyl, oxazolidinonyl, piperazinyl, piperidinyl, pyrrolidinyl, morpholinyl, thiomorpholinyl, tetrahydrofuranyl, tetrahydropyranyl, dihydropiperidinyl, tetrahydrothiophenyl and the like. If the heterocycle contains a nitrogen, it is understood that the corresponding N-oxides thereof are also encompassed by this definition.
“Celite®” (Fluka) diatomite is diatomaceous earth, and can be referred to as “celite”.
The term “substituted” means that one or more hydrogens on the designated atom is replaced with a selection from the indicated group, provided that the designated atom's normal valency under the existing circumstances is not exceeded, and that the substitution results in a stable compound. Combinations of substituents and/or variables are permissible only if such combinations result in stable compounds. By “stable compound’ or “stable structure” is meant a compound that is sufficiently robust to survive isolation to a useful degree of purity from a reaction mixture, and formulation into an efficacious therapeutic agent.
The term “in substantially purified form,” as used herein, refers to the physical state of a compound after the compound is isolated from a synthetic process (e.g., from a reaction mixture), a natural source, or a combination thereof. The term “in substantially purified form,” also refers to the physical state of a compound after the compound is obtained from a purification process or processes described herein or well-known to the skilled artisan (e.g., chromatography, recrystallization and the like), in sufficient purity to be characterizable by standard analytical techniques described herein or well-known to the skilled artisan.
It should also be noted that any carbon as well as heteroatom with unsatisfied valences in the text, schemes, examples and tables herein is assumed to have the sufficient number of hydrogen atom(s) to satisfy the valences.
When a functional group in a compound is termed “protected”, this means that the group is in modified form to preclude undesired side reactions at the protected site when the compound is subjected to a reaction. Suitable protecting groups will be recognized by those with ordinary skill in the art as well as by reference to standard textbooks such as, for example, T. W. Greene et al, Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis (1991), Wiley, New York.
When any substituent or variable (e.g., Rx) occurs more than one time in any constituent or in Formula I, its definition on each occurrence is independent of its definition at every other occurrence, unless otherwise indicated.
As used herein, the term “composition” is intended to encompass a product comprising the specified ingredients in the specified amounts, as well as any product which results from combination of the specified ingredients in the specified amounts.
The invention also relates to medicaments containing at least one compound of the Formula I and/or of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of the compound of the Formula I and/or an optionally stereoisomeric form of the compound of the Formula I or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of the stereoisomeric form of the compound of Formula I, together with a pharmaceutically suitable and pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle, additive and/or other active substances and auxiliaries.
The term “patient” used herein is taken to mean mammals such as primates, humans, sheep, horses, cattle, pigs, dogs, cats, rats, and mice.
The term “influenza” includes seasonal influenza, pandemic influenza, avian influenza, swine influenza and influenza disease in humans or animals. Seasonal influenza is caused by Influenza A and/or Influenza B viruses.
The medicaments according to the invention can be administered by oral, inhalative, rectal or transdermal administration or by subcutaneous, intraarticular, intraperitoneal or intravenous injection. Oral administration is preferred. Coating of stents with compounds of the Formula (I) and other surfaces which come into contact with blood in the body is possible.
The invention also relates to a process for the production of a medicament, which comprises bringing at least one compound of the Formula (I) into a suitable administration form using a pharmaceutically suitable and pharmaceutically acceptable carrier and optionally further suitable active substances, additives or auxiliaries.
Suitable solid or galenical preparation forms are, for example, granules, powders, coated tablets, tablets, (micro)capsules, suppositories, syrups, juices, suspensions, emulsions, drops or injectable solutions and preparations having prolonged release of active substance, in whose preparation customary excipients such as vehicles, disintegrants, binders, coating agents, swelling agents, glidants or lubricants, flavorings, sweeteners and solubilizers are used. Frequently used auxiliaries which may be mentioned are magnesium carbonate, titanium dioxide, lactose, mannitol and other sugars, talc, lactose, gelatin, starch, cellulose and its derivatives, animal and plant oils such as cod liver oil, sunflower, peanut or sesame oil, polyethylene glycol and solvents such as, for example, sterile water and mono- or polyhydric alcohols such as glycerol.
The dosage regimen utilizing the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitors of the instant invention is selected in accordance with a variety of factors including type, species, age, weight, sex and medical condition of the patient; the severity of the condition to be treated; the route of administration; the renal and hepatic function of the patient; and the particular compound or salt thereof employed. An ordinarily skilled physician or veterinarian can readily determine and prescribe the effective amount of the drug required to prevent, counter, or arrest the progress of the condition.
Oral dosages of the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitors, when used for the indicated effects, will range between about 0.01 mg per kg of body weight per day (mg/kg/day) to about 30 mg/kg/day, preferably 0.025-7.5 mg/kg/day, more preferably 0.1-2.5 mg/kg/day, and most preferably 0.1-0.5 mg/kg/day (unless specified otherwise, amounts of active ingredients are on free base basis). For example, an 80 kg patient would receive between about 0.8 mg/day and 2.4 g/day, preferably 2-600 mg/day, more preferably 8-200 mg/day, and most preferably 8-40 mg/kg/day. A suitably prepared medicament for once a day administration would thus contain between 0.8 mg and 2.4 g, preferably between 2 mg and 600 mg, more preferably between 8 mg and 200 mg, and most preferably 8 mg and 40 mg, e.g., 8 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg and 40 mg. Advantageously, the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitors may be administered in divided doses of two, three, or four times daily. For administration twice a day, a suitably prepared medicament would contain between 0.4 mg and 4 g, preferably between 1 mg and 300 mg, more preferably between 4 mg and 100 mg, and most preferably 4 mg and 20 mg, e.g., 4 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg and 20 mg.
Intravenously, the patient would receive the active ingredient in quantities sufficient to deliver between 0.025-7.5 mg/kg/day, preferably 0.1-2.5 mg/kg/day, and more preferably 0.1-0.5 mg/kg/day. Such quantities may be administered in a number of suitable ways, e.g. large volumes of low concentrations of active ingredient during one extended period of time or several times a day, low volumes of high concentrations of active ingredient during a short period of time, e.g. once a day. Typically, a conventional intravenous formulation may be prepared which contains a concentration of active ingredient of between about 0.01-1.0 mg/mL, e.g. 0.1 mg/mL, 0.3 mg/mL, and 0.6 mg/mL, and administered in amounts per day of between 0.01 mL/kg patient weight and 10.0 mL/kg patient weight, e.g. 0.1 mL/kg, 0.2 mL/kg, 0.5 mL/kg. In one example, an 80 kg patient, receiving 8 mL twice a day of an intravenous formulation having a concentration of active ingredient of 0.5 mg/mL, receives 8 mg of active ingredient per day. Glucuronic acid, L-lactic acid, acetic acid, citric acid or any pharmaceutically acceptable acid/conjugate base with reasonable buffering capacity in the pH range acceptable for intravenous administration may be used as buffers. The choice of appropriate buffer and pH of a formulation, depending on solubility of the drug to be administered, is readily made by a person having ordinary skill in the art.
Compounds of Formula I can be administered both as a monotherapy and in combination with other therapeutic agents, including other antivirals or treatments of influenza.
The cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitors can also be co-administered with suitable antivirals, including, but not limited to, M2 ion channel inhibitors, neuraminidase inhibitors, nucleoside analogs and inhibitors targeting the endonuclease activity of the PA protein.
Alternatively or additionally, one or more additional pharmacologically active agents may be administered in combination with a compound of the invention. The additional active agent (or agents) is intended to mean a pharmaceutically active agent (or agents) that is active in the body, including pro-drugs that convert to pharmaceutically active form after administration, which is different from the compound of the invention, and also includes free-acid, free-base and pharmaceutically acceptable salts of said additional active agents when such forms are sold commercially or are otherwise chemically possible. Generally, any suitable additional active agent or agents, including but not limited to M2 ion channel inhibitors, neuraminidase inhibitors, nucleoside analogs and inhibitors targeting the endonuclease activity of the PA protein may be used in any combination with the compound of the invention in a single dosage formulation (a fixed dose drug combination), or may be administered to the patient in one or more separate dosage formulations which allows for concurrent or sequential administration of the active agents (co-administration of the separate active agents).
Typical doses of the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitors of the invention in combination with other suitable M2 ion channel inhibitors, neuraminidase inhibitors, nucleoside analogs and inhibitors targeting the endonuclease activity of the PA protein may be the same as those doses of the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitors administered without coadministration of additional M2 ion channel inhibitors, neuraminidase inhibitors, nucleoside analogs and inhibitors targeting the endonuclease activity of the PA protein, or may be substantially less that those doses of thrombin inhibitors administered without coadministration of M2 ion channel inhibitors, neuraminidase inhibitors, nucleoside analogs and inhibitors targeting the endonuclease activity of the PA protein, depending on a patient's therapeutic needs.
The compounds are administered to a mammal in a therapeutically effective amount. By “therapeutically effective amount” it is meant an amount of a compound of the present invention that, when administered alone or in combination with an additional therapeutic agent to a mammal, is effective to treat (i.e., prevent, inhibit or ameliorate) the viral condition or treat the progression of the disease in a host.
The compounds of the invention are preferably administered alone to a mammal in a therapeutically effective amount. However, the compounds of the invention can also be administered in combination with an additional therapeutic agent, as defined below, to a mammal in a therapeutically effective amount. When administered in a combination, the combination of compounds is preferably, but not necessarily, a synergistic combination. Synergy, as described for example by Chou and Talalay, Adv. Enzyme Regul. 1984, 22, 27-55, occurs when the effect (in this case, inhibition of the desired target) of the compounds when administered in combination is greater than the additive effect of each of the compounds when administered individually as a single agent. In general, a synergistic effect is most clearly demonstrated at suboptimal concentrations of the compounds. Synergy can be in terms of lower cytotoxicity, increased anticoagulant effect, or some other beneficial effect of the combination compared with the individual components.
By “administered in combination” or “combination therapy” it is meant that the compound of the present invention and one or more additional therapeutic agents are administered concurrently to the mammal being treated. When administered in combination each component may be administered at the same time or sequentially in any order at different points in time. Thus, each component may be administered separately but sufficiently closely in time so as to provide the desired therapeutic effect.
The present invention is not limited in scope by the specific embodiments disclosed in the examples which are intended as illustrations of a few aspects of the invention and any embodiments that are functionally equivalent are within the scope of this invention.
Indeed, various modifications of the invention in addition to those shown and described herein will become apparent to those skilled in the relevant art and are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Several methods for preparing the compounds of this invention are illustrated in the following Schemes and Examples. Starting materials and the requisite intermediates are in some cases commercially available, or can be prepared according to literature procedures or as illustrated herein. The compounds of this invention may be prepared by employing reactions as shown in the following schemes, in addition to other standard manipulations that are known in the literature or exemplified in the experimental procedures. Substituent numbering as shown in the schemes does not necessarily correlate to that used in the claims and often, for clarity, a single substituent is shown attached to the compound where multiple substituents are allowed under the definitions hereinabove. Reactions used to generate the compounds of this invention are carried out by employing reactions as shown in the schemes and examples herein, in addition to other standard manipulations such as ester hydrolysis, cleavage of protecting groups, etc., as may be known in the literature or exemplified in the experimental procedures. Starting materials are made according to procedures known in the art or as illustrated herein.
The compounds of the present invention can be prepared in a variety of fashions. In some cases, the final product may be further modified, for example, by manipulation of substituents. These manipulations may include, but are not limited to, reduction, oxidation, alkylation, acylation, and hydrolysis reactions which are commonly known to those skilled in the art. In some cases, the order of carrying out the foregoing reaction schemes may be varied to facilitate the reaction or to avoid unwanted reaction products. Because the schemes are an illustration, the invention should not be construed as being limited by the chemical reactions and conditions expressed. The preparation of the various starting materials used herein is well within the skill of a person versed in the art. The following examples are provided so that the invention might be more fully understood. These examples are illustrative only and should not be construed as limiting the invention in any way. Absolute stereochemistry of separate stereoisomers in the examples and intermediates are not determined unless stated otherwise in an example or explicitly in the nomenclature.
When chiral resolution was achieved by chromatography using chiral columns, the chiral columns used for SFC chiral resolutions are listed in tables. Some of the chiral columns used were CHIRALPAK AD, CHIRALCEL OJ, CHIRALPAK AS, CHIRALPAK AY, CHIRALPAK IA, CHIRALPAK AD-H, and CHIRALPAK AS-H. Henceforth, they will be referred by their two or three letter abbreviations. As a convention, the fast-eluting isomer from a chiral resolution is always listed first in this table followed immediately by the slower-eluting isomer from the same resolution. If more than two isomers were separated, they will be always listed in the tables in order they were eluted, such as Peak 1 followed by Peak 2, Peak 3 and so on.
Catalysts are used in the following procedures. “Grubbs II” is also known as “Grubbs catalyst 2nd generation” and (1,3-Bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-2-imidazolidinylidene)dichloro(phenylmethylene)(tricyclohexylphosphine)ruthenium; Carbonyltris(triphenylphosphine)rhodium(I) hydride; Wilkinson's catalyst is also known as chloridotris(triphenylphosphine)rhodium(I); all of which are available from Millipore Sigma.
The Compounds of Formula (I) may be prepared from known or readily prepared starting materials, following methods known to one skilled in the art of organic synthesis. Methods useful for making the Compounds of Formula (I) are set forth in the Examples below and generalized in Schemes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 below. Alternative synthetic pathways and analogous structures will be apparent to those skilled in the art of organic synthesis.
Diol iii was prepared from multiple-steps syntheses, either from commercially available i, aldehyde iv or ketone vii. It was then oxidized via Dess-Martin periodinane to provide aldehyde ix. The aldehyde may be reacted with a compound of formula x to provide a compound of formula xi. Direct reduction of compound xi followed by cyclization affords a compound of formula xiii. Alternatively, protection of compound xi followed by a two-step sequence also allows the formation of a compound of formula xiii. Chiral resolution to separate the diastereomers of a compound of formula xiii, followed by deprotection provides a compound of formula xiiii which correspond to the compounds of formula (I).
The hydrazone compound of formula ii may be formed by condensation of a compound of formula i and an appropriate ketone or aldehyde which, in turn, may subsequently be reacted with an organometallic reagent to provide a compound of formula iii. Hydroformylation of the compound of formula iii followed by cyclization to provide a compound of formula v. Chiral resolution to separate the diastereomers of a compound of formula v, followed by deprotection provides compound of formula vi which correspond to the compounds of formula (I).
A compound of formula iii may be made following essentially the method employed in Scheme 2. Two-, three- or four-carbon extensions of compound iii through cross-metathesis provides a compound of formula iv. Sequentially reduction and oxidation of compound iv affords aldehyde compound of formula v which allows further cyclization to provide compound vi. Chiral resolution to separate the diastereomers of a compound of formula vi, followed by deprotection provides a compound of formula vii which correspond to the compounds of formula (I).
A compound of formula iii may be made following essentially the method employed in Scheme 2. It was then reacted with the corresponding aldehyde to form aminal iv which allows ring-closing metathesis to provide a compound of formula v. Reduction of the carbon-carbon double bond and subsequent chiral resolution to separate the diastereomers followed by deprotection provides a compound of formula vi which corresponds to the compounds of formula (I).
A compound of formula iii may be made following essentially the method employed in Scheme 2. It was then reacted with the corresponding organometallic reagent to form aminal iv which allows oxidation to provide compound of formula v. Cyclization and subsequent chiral resolution to separate the diastereomers followed by deprotection provides a compound of formula vii which correspond to the compounds of formula (I).
A compound of formula xiii described in Scheme 1 may be made from a compound of formula xi through reductive cyclization. Chiral resolution to separate the diastereomers of a compound of formula xiii, followed by deprotection provides compound of formula xiiii which corresponds to the compounds of formula (I).
In the methods for preparing compounds of the present invention set forth in the foregoing schemes, functional groups in various moieties and substituents (in addition to those already explicitly noted in the foregoing schemes) may be sensitive or reactive under the reaction conditions employed and/or in the presence of the reagents employed. Such sensitivity/reactivity can interfere with the progress of the desired reaction to reduce the yield of the desired product, or possibly even preclude its formation. Accordingly, it may be necessary or desirable to protect sensitive or reactive groups on any of the molecules concerned. Protection may be achieved by means of conventional protecting groups, such as those described in Protective Groups in Organic Chemistry, ed. J. F. W. McOmie, Plenum Press, 1973 and in T. W. Greene & P. G. M. Wuts, Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, John Wiley & Sons, 3rd edition, 1999, and 2nd edition, 1991. The protecting groups may be removed at a convenient subsequent stage using methods known in the art. Alternatively, the interfering group may be introduced into the molecule subsequent to the reaction Step of concern.
One skilled in the art of organic synthesis will recognize that the synthesis of compounds with multiple reactive functional groups, such as —OH and NH2, may require protection of certain functional groups (i.e., derivatization for the purpose of chemical compatibility with a reaction condition). Suitable protecting groups for the various functional groups of these compounds and methods for their installation and removal are well-known in the art of organic chemistry. A summary of many of these methods may be found in Greene & Wuts, Protecting Groups in Organic Synthesis, John Wiley & Sons, 3rd edition (1999).
One skilled in the art of organic synthesis will also recognize that one route for the synthesis of the Compounds of Formula (I) may be more desirable depending on the choice of appendage substituents. Additionally, one skilled in the relevant art will recognize that in some cases the order of reactions may differ from that presented herein to avoid functional group A incompatibilities and thus adjust the synthetic route accordingly.
Compounds of formula vii, x, xv and xvii may be further elaborated using methods that would be well-known to those skilled in the art of organic synthesis or, for example, the methods described in the Examples below, to make the full scope of the Compounds of Formula (I).
The starting materials used, and the intermediates prepared using the methods set forth in Schemes 1 to 6 may be isolated and purified if desired using conventional techniques, including but not limited to filtration, distillation, crystallization, chromatography and alike. Such materials may be characterized using conventional means, including physical constants and spectral data.
The following abbreviations may be used in the following experimentals:
The following examples serve only to illustrate the invention and its practice. The examples are not to be construed as limitations on the scope or spirit of the invention. In these examples, all temperatures are degrees Celsius unless otherwise noted, and “room temperature” refers to a temperature in a range of from about 20° C. to about 25° C. Reactions sensitive to moisture or air were performed under nitrogen using anhydrous solvents and reagents. The progress of reactions was determined by either analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC) performed with E. Merck precoated TLC plates, silica gel 60F-254, layer thickness 0.25 mm or liquid chromatography-mass spectrum (LC-MS). For HPLC/MS data, the two HPLC conditions used were as follows: 1) LC2 (Waters C18 XTerra™ 3.5 μm 2.1×20 mm column with gradient 10:90-98:2 v/v CH3CN/H2O+v 0.05% TFA over 1.25 min then hold at 98:2 v/v CH3CN/H2O+v 0.05% TFA for 0.75 min; flow rate 1.5 mL/min, UV wavelength 254 nm); and 2) LC4 (Waters C18 XTerra 3.5 μm 2.1×20 mm column with gradient 10:90-98:2 v/v CH3CN/H2O+v 0.05% TFA over 3.25 min then hold at 98:2 v/v CH3CN/H2O+v 0.05% TFA for 0.75 min; flow rate 1.5 mL/min, UV wavelength 254 nm).
Mass analysis was performed with electrospray ionization in positive ion detection mode. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on Varian or Bruker instruments at 400-500 MHz. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm downfield and up field from tetramethylsilane (TMS) and referenced to either internal TMS or solvent resonances (1H NMR: δ 7.27 for CDCl3, δ 2.50 for (CD3)(CHD2)SO, and 13C NMR: δ 77.02 for CDCl3, δ 39.51 for (CD3)2SO. Coupling constants (J) are expressed in hertz (Hz), and spin multiplicities are given as s (singlet), d (doublet), dd (double doublet), t (triplet), m (multiplet), and br (broad). Chiral resolutions were performed on either Waters Thar 80 SFC or Berger MG II preparative SFC systems.
Concentration of solutions was carried out on a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure or by lyophilization. Flash chromatography was performed on pre-packed silica gel columns using a commercial MPLC system. Compounds described herein were synthesized as racemic mixtures unless otherwise stated in the experimental procedures.
To a solution of benzaldehyde (10 g, 94 mmol) in THF (100 mL) at 0° C. was added pent-4-en-1-ylmagnesium bromide (23.23 g, 134 mmol) under N2 atmosphere. The mixture was slowly warmed up to RT for 4 h. Upon completion, to above mixture was added 100 mL aqueous NH4Cl solution. The mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3×60 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with brine (100 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by a 120 g flash silica gel column with 0-100% EtOAc in hexane as eluting solvent to afford Int-1a. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.34-7.38 (m, 4H), 7.27-7.31 (m, 1H), 5.79 (tdd, J=6.68, 10.22, 17.01 Hz, 1H), 5.74-5.84 (m, 1H), 4.93-5.03 (m, 2H), 4.69 (br t, J=6.56 Hz, 1H), 2.09 (q, J=7.12 Hz, 2H), 1.70-1.87 (m, 3H), 1.49-1.59 (m, 1H), 1.34-1.45 (m, 1H).
To a solution of Int-1a (8 g, 45.4 mmol) in DCM (50 mL) was added acetyl chloride (5.34 g, 68.1 mmol) and TEA (18.98 mL, 136 mmol) at 0° C. The mixture was slowly warmed up to room temperature for 16 h. Upon completion, to above reaction was added 50 mL aqueous NH4Cl solution. The mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3×50 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with brine (100 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by an 80 g flash silica gel Column with 0˜5% EtOAc/PE as eluting solvent to afford Int-1b. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.27-7.38 (m, 5H), 5.72-5.81 (m, 2H), 4.93-5.04 (m, 2H), 2.06-2.10 (m, 5H), 1.88-1.97 (m, 1H), 1.75-1.84 (m, 1H), 1.45 (ttd, J=5.23, 7.51, 18.18 Hz, 1H), 1.30-1.39 (m, 1H).
To a solution of Int-1b (6 g, 27.5 mmol) in t-BuOH (120 mL) and water (30 mL) was added NaHCO3 (23.09 g, 275 mmol) and sodium periodate (35.3 g, 165 mmol) at 20° C. Then osmium tetroxide (6.99 ml, 0.275 mmol) was added at 20° C. The reaction mixture was stirred at 20° C. for 3 h. Upon completion, 200 mL EtOAc was added to the reaction. The mixture was filtered. The filtrate was washed with water (3×50 mL), brine (100 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by an 80 g flash silica gel column with 0-10% EtOAc/PE as eluting solvent to afford Int-1c. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.63 (t, J=1.37 Hz, 1H), 7.26-7.39 (m, 5H), 5.65 (dd, J=5.87, 7.83 Hz, 1H), 2.42-2.48 (m, 2H), 2.05 (s, 3H), 1.67-1.89 (m, 2H), 1.36-1.59 (m, 2H).
To a solution of Int-1d (1 g, 3.66 mmol) in DMF (10 mL) and AcOH (1 mL) was added Int-1c (1.3 g, 5.90 mmol) at 25° C. in a 40 mL sealed tube. The reaction mixture was stirred at 120° C. for 5 h. Upon completion, the reaction was concentrated and purified by an 80 g flash silica gel column with 1-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-1e. LCMS anal. calcd. for C27H29N3O5: 475.21; Found: 476.2 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-1e (1.11 g, 2.334 mmol) in DCM (10 mL) was added SEMCl (0.828 mL, 4.67 mmol) and TEA (0.976 mL, 7.00 mmol) at 25° C. The reaction was stirred at 40° C. for 16 h. Upon completion, the reaction was purified directly by an 80 g silica gel column with 0-5% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-1f LCMS anal. calcd. for C33H43N3O6Si: 605.3; Found: 606.4 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-1f (110 mg, 0.182 mmol) in MeOH (5 mL) was added K2CO3 (25.10 mg, 0.182 mmol) at 25° C. The reaction was stirred at 25° C. for 3 h. Upon completion, it was concentrated and purified by prep silica gel TLC plate with 6% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-1g. LCMS anal. calcd. for C31H41N3O5Si: 563.3; Found: 564.2 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-1g (100 mg, 0.177 mmol) in DCM (5 mL) was added methanesulfonyl chloride (0.429 mL, 5.50 mmol) and triethylamine (0.099 mL, 0.710 mmol) at 25° C. The reaction was stirred at 25° C. for 16 h. Upon completion, the reaction was concentrated to afford the crude product.
To a solution of above crude (103 mg, 0.177 mmol) in THF (1 mL) was added TBAF (1 mL, 1.000 mmol) at 25° C. The reaction was stirred at 50° C. for 16 h. Upon completion, the reaction was concentrated. The residue was purified by prep silica gel TLC plate with 6% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-1h. LCMS anal. calcd. for C25H25N3O3: 415.2; Found: 416.3 (M+H)+.
Int-1h (150 mg, 0.361 mmol) was resolved with SFC to provide the first eluting peak Int-1i and the second eluting peak Int-1j. SFC condition: Daicel@ chiralpak AS column (250*30 mm, 10 μm); 45% EtOH with 0.1% NH3H2O; 70 mL/min. LCMS anal. calcd. for C25H25N3O3: 415.2; Found: 416.3 (M+H)+.
To a stirred mixture of Int-1i (15 mg, 0.036 mmol) in ACN (1 mL) was added magnesium bromide (6.65 mg, 0.036 mmol) at 20° C. The mixture was stirred at 20° C. for 2 h under N2 atmosphere. Upon completion, it was purified by HPLC with a C18 column (YMC-Actus Triart 150*30 mm*5 um) using 0-100% ACN in water (with 0.1% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide compound 1A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C18H19N3O3: 325.1; Found: 326.0 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, methanol-d4) δ 7.08-7.73 (m, 5H), 7.03 (d, J=7.32 Hz, 1H), 5.84 (d, J=7.32 Hz, 1H), 5.30 (t, J=2.90 Hz, 1H), 4.22 (dd, J=2.75, 11.60 Hz, 1H), 3.24 (s, 3H), 2.53 (td, J=2.75, 15.26 Hz, 1H), 2.16-2.33 (m, 2H), 1.85-2.01 (m, 2H), 1.66-1.79 (m, 1H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 1A of example 1, compound 1B was prepared from Int-1j. LCMS anal. calcd. for C18H19N3O3: 325.1; Found: 326.0 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, methanol-d4) δ 7.29 (br s, 5H), 6.96 (d, J=7.53 Hz, 1H), 5.73 (d, J=7.53 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (s, 1H), 4.20 (dd, J=2.76, 11.80 Hz, 1H), 3.23 (s, 3H), 2.49-2.54 (m, 1H), 2.17-2.27 (m, 2H), 1.86-1.97 (m, 2H), 1.74 (br t, J=13.55 Hz, 1H).
The solution of 5-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-oxopentanoic acid (8 g, 38.1 mmol) in DCM (140 mL) and MeOH (50 mL) was added to (diazomethyl)trimethylsilane (34.3 ml, 68.5 mmol) dropwise. The resulting reaction was concentrated. To the residue was added 200 mL DCM at 0° C., followed by adding diisobutylaluminum hydride (133 mL, 133 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at this temperature for 1 hour followed by the addition of 10 mL MeOH and 5 mL water at 0° C. It was further stirred at room temperature for 30 minutes and filtered through celite. The filtrate was concentrated to provide Int-2a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C11H15FO2: 198.1; Found: 181.3 (M—OH)+.
The solution of Int-2a (2 g, 10.09 mmol) in DCM (50 mL) was added to Dess Martin periodinane (8.56 g, 20.18 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. It was concentrated to remove most of the DCM. To the above residue was added 20 mL DCM and the mixture was filtered. The filtrate was loaded onto an 80 g silica gel column with 0-100% EtOAc in hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-2b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C11H11FO2: 194.1; Found: 195.3 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-2b (1.8 g, 6.59 mmol) in DMF (5 mL) and AcOH (0.5 mL) was added Int-1d (1.4 g, 7.21 mmol) at 25° C. The reaction was stirred at 120° C. for 2 h. Upon completion, it was concentrated. The residue was purified by an 80 g silica gel column with 1-5% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-2c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C25H24FN3O4: 449.2; Found: 450.4 (M+H)+.
To a stirred solution of Int-2c (500 mg, 1.112 mmol) in DCM (8 mL) and MeOH (40 mL) was added sodium borohydride (42.1 mg, 1.112 mmol) at room temperature. It was stirred at this temperature for 30 minutes. Upon completion, the reaction was quenched with 1 mL 1 N HCl aqueous solution and concentrated. The residue was loaded onto an 80 g silica gel column with 0-100% 30% EtOH in EtOAc/hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-2d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C25H26FN3O4: 451.5; Found: 452.4 (M+H)+.
The mixture of Int-2d (410 mg, 0.908 mmol) and 2-(tributyl-15-phosphaneylidene)acetonitrile (438 mg, 1.816 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) was heated at 120° C. for 4 h. Upon completion, it was cooled down, and the resulting reaction was loaded onto an 80 g silica gel column with 0-100% 30% EtOH in EtOAc/hexane as eluent to remove phosphine impurity. The mixture was then loaded onto a C18 column (100 g) with 0-100% ACN in water as eluent to provide minor isomer Int-2e and major isomer Int-2f LCMS anal. calcd. for C25H24FN3O3: 433.2; Found: 434.4 (M+H)+.
Int-2h (185 mg, 0.427 mmol) was resolved with SFC to provide the first eluting peak Int-2g and the second eluting peak Int-2h. SFC condition: Daicel@ chiralpak AS-H column (250*21 mm, 10 μm); 45% EtOH with 0.2% DIPA; 70 mL/min. LCMS anal. calcd. for C25H24FN3O3: 433.2; Found: 434.4 (M+H)+.
The solution of Int-2g (52 mg, 0.120 mmol) in MeOH (3 mL) was added palladium on carbon (25.5 mg, 0.024 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred under hydrogen balloon at room temperature for 30 minutes. Upon completion, it was filtered through celite and the filtrate was loaded onto a 50 g ISCO@ C18 column with 0-100% ACN in water (with 0.01% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide compound 2A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C18H18FN3O3: 343.1; Found: 344.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.19 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (broad, 5H), 6.14 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 5.35 (s, 1H), 4.30 (dd, J=11.7, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 3.27 (s, 3H), 2.59-2.52 (m, 1H), 2.32-2.19 (m, 2H), 1.96 (dd, J=22.6, 14.9 Hz, 2H), 1.90 (s, 1H), 1.82-1.70 (m, 1H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 2A of example 2, compound 2B was prepared from Int-2h. LCMS anal. calcd. for C18H18FN3O3: 343.1; Found: 344.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.20 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (broad, 5H), 6.15 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 5.36 (s, 1H), 4.29 (dd, J=11.7, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.26 (s, 2H), 2.56 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 2.31-2.19 (m, 1H), 2.01-1.94 (m, 1H), 1.91 (d, J=13.9 Hz, 1H), 1.81-1.69 (m, 1H).
The examples in Table 1 were prepared using procedures similar to those described in Example 2, from the appropriate starting material.
To a stirred solution of Int-1c (500 mg, 1.830 mmol) and 2-(difluromethoxy)-5-fluorobenzaldehyde (417 mg, 2.195 mmol) in dry dioxane (8 mL) at room temperature was added TFA (141 μL, 1.830 mmol). The mixture was stirred at RT for 4 h. Upon completion, the mixture was concentrated. The residue was re-dissolved in DCM, and TEA (306 μL, 2.195 mmol) was added. The mixture was purified by a 120 g silica gel column using Isco system with 0-20% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-17a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H18F3N3O4: 445.1; found 446.3 (M+H)+
To a stirred solution of Int-17a (500 mg, 1.123 mmol) in dry THF (18 mL) was added 4-pentene-1-magnesium bromide (0.5 M in 2-Me-THF) (6736 μL, 3.37 mmol) at 0° C. The mixture was stirred at this temperature for 14 min. Upon completion, the reaction was quenched with the addition of water (˜30 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3×60 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by an 80 g silica gel column using Isco system with 0-100% EtOH-EtOAc (3:1)/hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-17b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C27H28F3N3O4: 515.2; found 516.4 (M+H)+.
To a 40 mL-vial with a stirred solution of Int-17b (210 mg, 0.407 mmol) in THF (3 mL) and water (1 mL) was added osmium tetroxide (2.5% in t-BuOH) (102 μL, 8.15 μmol) at room temperature, followed by the addition of sodium periodate (261 mg, 1.222 mmol). The vial was sealed with a pressure relief cap and stirred at room temperature for 7 h. Upon completion, the mixture was diluted with EtOAc (˜100 mL), the solid was filtered and washed with EtOAc (˜20 mL). The filtrate was washed with 10% Na2S2O3 aqueous solution twice (30 mL×2). The organic phase was separated, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to provide Int-17c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C26H26F3N3O5: 517.2; found 518.4 (M+H)+.
To a 40-ml vial with a stirred solution of Int-17c (184 mg, 0.356 mmol) in DMF (5 mL) was added AcOH (539 μL) at room temperature. The vial was sealed with a pressure relief cap and stirred at 120° C. for 8 h. The mixture was cooled to room temperature, then purified by a reverse phase 100 g Gold C18 column on Isco system with 0-100% acetonitrile-water (with 0.05% TFA buffer) as eluting solvent. The fractions with desired mass were combined and lyophilized, then redissolved in DCM (˜15 mL), TEA (49.6 μL, 0.356 mmol) was added, and the mixture was put through a 40 g silica gel column using Isco system with EtOH/EtOAc (3:1)/hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-17d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C26H24F3N3O4: 499.2; found 500.3 (M+H)+.
Compound Int-17d (48.5 mg, 0.097 mmol) was resolved by chiral SFC to provide the first eluting peak Int-17e (21.5 mg, 0.043 mmol) and the second eluting peak Int-17f (21.8 mg, 0.044 mmol). SFC condition: Daicel@ chiralpak AD-H column (250*21 mm, 10 μm); 20% IPA with 0.2% DIPA; 70 mL/min. LCMS anal. calcd. for C26H24F3N3O4: 499.2; Found: 500.3 (M+H)+.
To the round bottom flask (50 mL) was added Pd on carbon (22.37 mg, 0.021 mmol), followed by addition of Int-17f (21 mg, 0.042 mmol) in EtOH (12 mL) The flask was equipped with a hydrogen balloon. The system was degassed and refilled with H2 twice. The mixture was then stirred at room temperature under H2 for 45 min. Upon completion, the catalyst was filtered off. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by a 30 g Isco C18 gold column with 0-100% acetonitrile/water (buffered with 0.05% TFA) as eluent to afford compound 17A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H18F3N3O4: 409.1; found 410.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.61 (d, J=9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (d, J=7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (d, J=4.2 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (t, J=73.2 Hz, 1H), 6.05 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.33 (s, 1H), 4.84 (s, 1H), 3.26 (s, 3H), 2.55 (d, J=15.4 Hz, 1H), 2.24 (t, J=14.6 Hz, 2H), 1.95-1.93 (m, 2H), 1.77-1.74 (m, 1H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 17B of example 3, compound 17A was prepared from Int-17e. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H18F3N3O4: 409.1; found 410.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.61 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.31-6.96 (m, 3H), 6.57 (t, J=73.2 Hz, 1H), 6.03 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.33 (s, 1H), 4.84 (s, 1H), 3.26 (s, 3H), 2.55 (d, J=15.7 Hz, 1H), 2.24 (t, J=14.1 Hz, 2H), 2.0-1.9 (m, 2H), 1.77-1.74 (m, 1H).
To the stirred suspension of Int-1c (5670 mg, 20.75 mmol) and acetophenone (5 mL, 41.5 mmol) in dry dioxane (40 mL) at RT was added TFA (1758 μL, 22.82 mmol). The mixture was stirred at 80° C. overnight. Upon completion, the mixture was concentrated. The residue was redissolved in 40 mL DCM, followed by the addition of TEA (3181 μL, 22.82 mmol). The mixture was loaded onto a 330 g silica gel flash column with 0-20% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to afford Int-18a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H21N3O3: 375.2; Found: 376.2 (M+H)+.
To a rigorously stirred solution of Int-18a (5380 mg, 14.33 mmol) in dry THF (18 mL) was added allylmagnesium bromide (1.0 M in diethyl ether) (4.01E+04 μL, 40.1 mmol) at 0° C. The mixture was stirred at this temperature for 15 min. Upon completion, the reaction was quenched with the addition of saturated NH4Cl (˜50 mL) and partitioned between EtOAc (100 mL) and water (˜50 mL). The aqueous was extracted with EtOAc two more times (2×80 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by a 220 g silica gel flash column with 0-100% EtOH-EtOAc (3:1)/hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-18b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C25H27N3O3: 417.2; Found: 418.2 (M+H)+.
To a 350 mL high pressure vessel with dicyclohexyl(2′,6′-dimethoxy-[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-yl)phosphane (S-phos) (703 mg, 1.731 mmol), chloro(1,5-cyclooctadiene)iridium(I) dimer [Ir(cod)Cl]2 (240 mg, 0.357 mmol) and DCC (3682 mg, 17.84 mmol) was added Int-18b (2980 mg, 7.14 mmol) and formic acid (1.1 mL, 28.6 mmol) in dry acetonitrile (70 mL) under N2 at room temperature. The vial was sealed with a pressure relief cap. The mixture was warmed up to 75° C. overnight and then 90° C. for three days. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, diluted with EtOAc (˜60 mL), then filtered. The solid was washed with EtOAc/DCM (20 mL/20 mL). The combined filtrate was concentrated. The residue was purified by a 120 g silica gel flash column with 0-100% EtOH-EtOAc (3:1)/hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-18c and Int-18d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C26H27N3O3: 429.2; Found: 430.2 (M+H)+.
To a 40-mL vial with stirred solution of Int-18c (230 mg, 0.535 mmol) in DMF (6 mL) was added AcOH (609 μL) at room temperature. The vial was sealed with a pressure relief cap. The mixture was stirred at 120° C. for 3 days. Upon completion, the mixture was cooled to RT, then purified by a 100 g reverse phase C18 column with 0-100% acetonitrile-water (with 0.05% TFA buffer) to Int-18d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C26H27N3O3: 429.2; Found: 430.3 (M+H)+.
Int-18d (974 mg, 2.268 mmol) was resolved with SFC to provide the first eluting peak Int-18e and the second eluting peak Int-18f SFC condition: Chiral OD-H column (250*21 mm, 10 μm); 45% EtOH; 70 mL/min. LCMS anal. calcd. for C26H27N3O3: 429.2; Found: 430.3 (M+H)+.
To a round bottom flask (150 mL) with Int-18e (420 mg, 0.978 mmol) was added palladium on carbon (10%) (312 mg, 0.293 mmol), followed by addition of EtOH (80 mL) under N2. The flask was equipped with a hydrogen balloon. The system was degassed and refilled with H2 twice. Then the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 50 min. Upon completion, the catalyst was filtered off. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by a 150 g C18 reverse phase column with 0-100% ACN in water as eluting solvent to provide 18A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H21N3O3: 339.2; Found: 340.6 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.58 (d, J=5.7 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 3H), 6.52 (d, J=7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.73 (d, J=7.1 Hz, 1H), 5.30 (s, 1H), 3.23 (s, 3H), 2.60 (d, J=13.3 Hz, 2H), 2.30 (t, J=13.0 Hz, 1H), 1.89 (dd, J=24.2, 13.9 Hz, 3H), 1.65 (s, 3H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 18A of example 4, compound 18B was prepared from Int-18f LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H21N3O3: 339.2; Found: 340.6 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.59 (d, J=5.7 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 3H), 6.71 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 1H), 6.13 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 5.36 (s, 1H), 3.33 (s, 3H), 3.26 (s, 2H), 2.67-2.59 (m, 1H), 2.34 (t, J=14.0 Hz, 1H), 1.99-1.87 (m, 3H), 1.65 (s, 3H).
The examples in Table 2 were prepared using procedures similar to those described in Example 4, from the appropriate starting material.
A solution of methyl 3-(benzyloxy)-1-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-4-oxo-1,4-dihydropyridine-2-carboxylate (5 g, 13.36 mmol) in EtOH (50 mL) was added to cyclopropylmethanamine (4.70 g, 40.1 mmol). The resulting reaction was stirred at 80° C. for 8 h. Upon completion, the mixture was concentrated. The residue was purified by a 220 g silica gel flash column with 0-5% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to afford Boc-protected intermediate (5.5 g, 11.97 mmol).
The above intermediate (5 g, 12.09 mmol) in DCM (50 mL) was added to TFA (12 mL) at 0° C. The reaction solution was stirred at 30° C. for 1 h. Upon completion, the mixture was concentrated and purified by a 220 g silica gel flash column eluting with 0-10% MeOH in DCM to provide Int-56a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C17H19N3O3: 313.1; Found: 314.1 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-56a (200 mg, 0.638 mmol) in DMF (2.0 mL) and AcOH (0.2 mL) was added Int-1c (211 mg, 0.957 mmol) at 20° C. in a 40 mL sealed tube. The reaction was stirred at 120° C. for 4 h. Upon completion, it was concentrated and purified by a 50 g silica gel flash column with 0-10% MeOH in DCM to provide Int-56b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C30H33N3O5: 515.2; Found: 515.3 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-56b (600 mg, 1.164 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was added NaHMDS (2.327 mL, 2.327 mmol) at −78° C. under N2. The resulting mixture was stirred at this temperature for 30 minutes followed by adding SEMCl (0.248 mL, 1.396 mmol). The resulting reaction was slowly warmed up RT for 2 h. Upon completion, it was quenched with NH4Cl (1 N, 20 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (3×30 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by an 80 g silica gel flash column with 100% EtOAc as eluting solvent to provide Int-56c and Int-56d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C36H47N3O6Si: 645.3; Found: 646.4 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-56c (160 mg, 0.248 mmol) in MeOH (3 mL) was added K2CO3 (41.1 mg, 0.297 mmol) at 20° C. The resulting mixture was stirred at this temperature for 3 h. Upon completion, water (10 mL) was added. The mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3×10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated to afford Int-56d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C34H45N3O5Si: 603.3; Found: 604.3 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-56d (145 mg, 0.240 mmol) in DCM (3 mL) was added triethylamine (0.1 mL, 0.720 mmol) and methanesulfonyl chloride (0.054 g, 0.480 mmol) at 0° C. The resulting reaction was stirred at RT for 30 min. Upon completion, 10 mL DCM was added, and the mixture was washed with 15 mL 0.5 N HCl solution and brine. The organic was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated to provide crude product. The crude was used next reaction without purification.
The above crude (210 mg, 0.337 mmol) in THF (2 mL) was added to TBAF (2.70 mL, 2.70 mmol) at 25° C. The reaction was stirred at 50° C. for 16 h. Upon completion, it was concentrated and purified by a C18 column (YMC-Actus Triart C18 150*30 mm*5 um) with 10%-100% ACN in water (with 0.5% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide Int-56e. LCMS anal. calcd. for C28H29N3O3: 455.2; Found: 456.2 M+H)+.
Int-23e (20 mg, 0.044 mmol) was resolved with SFC to provide the first eluting peak Int-56f and the second eluting peak Int-56g. SFC condition: Regis@ Whelk O1 column (250*21 mm, 5 μm); 50% EtOH with 0.1% NH3H2O as modifier; 70 mL/min. LCMS anal. calcd. for C28H29N3O3: 455.2; Found: 456.2 (M+H)+.
To a stirred mixture of Int-56f (7 mg, 0.015 mmol) in acetonitrile (1 mL) was added magnesium bromide (2.83 mg, 0.015 mmol) at 20° C. The mixture was stirred at 20° C. for 2 h under N2 atmosphere. Upon completion, it was purified by a C18 column (YMC-Actus Triart C18 150*30 mm*5 um) with 10%-100% ACN in water (with 0.5% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide 23A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H23N3O3: 365.2; Found: 366.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (400 MHz, methanol-d4) δ 7.30 (br s, 5H), 7.10 (d, J=7.34 Hz, 1H), 5.95 (d, J=7.34 Hz, 1H), 5.53 (br s, 1H), 4.22 (dd, J=2.69, 11.74 Hz, 1H), 4.15 (dd, J=8.07, 14.67 Hz, 1H), 3.25-3.29 (m, 1H), 2.58 (br d, J=15.41 Hz, 1H), 2.24-2.32 (m, 2H), 1.97 (br d, J=13.69 Hz, 1H), 1.85-1.92 (m, 1H), 1.72-1.81 (m, 1H), 1.14-1.21 (m, 1H), 0.54-0.62 (m, 2H), 0.41-0.46 (m, 2H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 56A of example 5, compound 56B was prepared from Int-56g. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H23N3O3: 365.2; Found: 366.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (400 MHz, methanol-d4) δ 7.30 (br s, 5H), 7.07 (d, J=7.58 Hz, 1H), 5.89 (d, J=7.58 Hz, 1H), 5.52 (br s, 1H), 4.12-4.23 (m, 2H), 3.24-3.30 (m, 1H), 2.57 (br d, J=15.41 Hz, 1H), 2.24-2.32 (m, 2H), 1.96 (br d, J=13.69 Hz, 1H), 1.88 (br d, J=13.69 Hz, 1H), 1.74 (q, J=13.78 Hz, 1H), 1.12-1.21 (m, 1H), 0.53-0.63 (m, 2H), 0.41-0.46 (m, 2H).
To a solution of Int-56b (350 mg, 0.679 mmol) in MeOH (5 mL) was added K2CO3 (113 mg, 0.815 mmol) and it was stirred at 20° C. for 3 h. Upon completion of the reaction, water (10 mL) was added. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×20 mL). The combined organic was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by an 80 g silica gel flash column with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-56h. LCMS anal. calcd. for C28H31N3O4: 473.2; Found: 474.2 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-56h (295 mg, 0.623 mmol) in T3P (1586 mg, 2.492 mmol) was added methanesulfonic acid (59.9 mg, 0.623 mmol) under N2. The mixture was stirred at 50° C. for 16 h. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was purified by a C18 column (YMC-Actus Triart C18 150*30 mm*5 um) with 10%-100% ACN in water (with 0.5% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide Int-56i. LCMS anal. calcd. for C28H29N3O3: 455.2; Found: 456.2 (M+H)+.
Int-56i (80 mg, 0.176 mmol) was resolved by SFC to provide the first eluting peak Int-56j and the second eluting peak Int-56k. SFC condition: Daicel@ chiralpak AD-H column (250*30 mm, 10 μm); 30% EtOH with 0.1% NH3H2O as modifier; 70 mL/min. LCMS anal. calcd. for C28H29N3O3: 455.2; Found: 456.2 (M+H)+.
To a stirred mixture of Int-56j (30 mg, 0.066 mmol) in acetonitrile (1 mL) was added magnesium bromide (12.12 mg, 0.066 mmol) at 20° C. and it was stirred at 20° C. for 2 h under N2 atmosphere. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was purified by a C18 column (YMC-Actus Triart C18 150*30 mm*5 um) with 10%-100% ACN in water (with 0.5% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide 56C. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H23N3O3: 365.2; Found: 366.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (400 MHz, methanol-d4) δ 8.29 (d, J=7.09 Hz, 1H), 7.20-7.27 (m, 1H), 7.15 (br t, J=7.46 Hz, 2H), 7.05 (br d, J=7.58 Hz, 2H), 6.89 (d, J=7.09 Hz, 1H), 5.39-5.44 (m, 1H), 4.71 (br d, J=6.36 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (dd, J=7.58, 14.43 Hz, 1H), 3.28 (br d, J=6.85 Hz, 1H), 2.67 (br d, J=13.45 Hz, 1H), 2.46-2.59 (m, 1H), 2.19-2.43 (m, 3H), 1.87-1.97 (m, 1H), 1.06-1.17 (m, 1H), 0.49-0.62 (m, 2H), 0.38 (br d, J=2.93 Hz, 2H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 56C of example 5, compound 56D was prepared from Int-56k. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H23N3O3: 365.2; Found: 366.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (400 MHz, methanol-d4) δ 8.31 (d, J=7.34 Hz, 1H), 7.20-7.27 (m, 1H), 7.15 (br t, J=7.46 Hz, 2H), 7.04 (br d, J=7.58 Hz, 2H), 6.92 (d, J=7.34 Hz, 1H), 5.40-5.44 (m, 1H), 4.71 (br d, J=6.36 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (dd, J=7.58, 14.67 Hz, 1H), 3.26-3.30 (m, 1H), 2.67 (br d, J=13.45 Hz, 1H), 2.47-2.59 (m, 1H), 2.19-2.43 (m, 3H), 1.87-1.97 (m, 1H), 1.05-1.17 (m, 1H), 0.48-0.63 (m, 2H), 0.33-0.43 (m, 2H).
To a solution of magnesium (3.35 g, 138 mmol) in anhydrous THF (15 mL) was added 12 (2.335 g, 9.20 mmol) and 6-bromohex-1-ene (2.5 mL, 18.40 mmol). The resulting mixture was refluxed at 80° C. for 10 min. It was cooled down to room temperature. Another 4 equiv of 6-bromohex-1-ene (10.0 mL, 73.6 mmol) in anhydrous THF (15 mL) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at 80° C. for 1 h. The reaction was cooled down to room temperature and it was used directly in next step (28.33 mL in THF about 2.165 M).
To a solution of Int-1c (1 g, 3.66 mmol) in EtOH (10 mL) was added benzaldehyde (0.777 g, 7.32 mmol) under N2. The reaction was stirred at 80° C. for 10 h. Upon completion, it was concentrated. The residue was purified by an 80 g silica gel flash column with 0-100% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-57b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H19N3O3: 361.1; Found: 362.2 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-57b (100 mg, 0.277 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was added Int-57a (1 mL, 2.147 mmol, 2.147 M in THF) at 0° C. and stirred at this temperature for 1 h. Upon completion, it was quenched with aq. NH4Cl (10 mL). The mixture was extracted with 2×50 mL EtOAc. The combined organic was dried over MgSO4 and concentrated. The residue was purified by an 80 g silica gel flash column with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-57c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C27H31N3O3: 445.2; Found: 446.3 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-57c (630 mg, 1.414 mmol) in water (15 mL) and t-BuOH (15 mL) was added sodium periodate (1512 mg, 7.07 mmol), then potassium osmate (VI) dihydrate (130 mg, 0.353 mmol) at 25° C. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. Upon completion, it was quenched with aq. Na2SO3 (50 mL) and extracted with DCM (3×50 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by a 120 g silica gel flash column with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-57d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C26H29N3O4: 447.2; Found: 448.1 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-57d (400 mg, 0.894 mmol) in ACN (30 mL) was added MsOH (0.174 mL, 2.68 mmol). The resulting reaction was stirred at 70° C. for 2.5 h. Upon completion, the mixture was concentrated and purified with preparative HPLC using Boston Green ODS (150*30 mm*5 um) column with water ACN in water (0.1% TFA modifier) to provide Int-57e (150 mg, 0.349 mmol). LCMS anal. calcd. for C26H27N3O3: 447.2; Found: 430.2 (M+H)+.
Int-57e (250 mg, 0.582 mmol) was resolved by SFC to provide the first eluting peak Int-57f and the second eluting peak Int-57g. SFC condition: Daicel@ chiralpak IG column (250*30 mm, 10 μm); 55% EtOH with 0.1% NH3H2O; 80 mL/min. LCMS anal. calcd. for C26H27N3O3: 447.2; Found: 430.2 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-57f (80 mg, 0.186 mmol) in ACN (5 mL) was added MgBr2 (171 mg, 0.931 mmol) at 25° C. and the mixture was stirred for 4 h. Upon completion, MeOH (1 mL) was added. The mixture was purified by preparative HPLC with a Phenomenex Synergi C18 column (150*30 mm*4 um) using 0-100% ACN in water (with 0.1% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide 57A (55.57 mg, 0.164 mmol). LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H21N3O3: 339.1; Found: 340.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (400 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.85 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (br s, 5H), 6.29 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 5.33 (dd, J=7.6, 9.05 Hz, 1H), 4.79 (br d, J=10.8 Hz, 1H), 3.28 (s, 3H), 2.53-2.67 (m, 2H), 2.10-2.27 (m, 2H), 2.05 (br dd, J=3.67, 13.94 Hz, 1H), 1.90-1.99 (m, 2H), 1.59-1.72 (m, 1H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 57A of example 6, compound 57B was prepared from Int-57g. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H21N3O3: 339.1; Found: 340.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (400 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.85 (d, J=7.34 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (br s, 5H), 6.27 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 5.33 (dd, J=7.5, 9.2 Hz, 1H), 4.79 (br d, J=10.5 Hz, 1H), 3.28 (s, 3H), 2.51-2.67 (m, 2H), 2.09-2.25 (m, 2H), 2.05 (br dd, J=3.8, 13.8 Hz, 1H), 1.89-2.00 (m, 2H), 1.60-1.73 (m, 1H).
To a solution of benzaldehyde (5 g, 47.1 mmol) in THF (50 mL) was added allylmagnesium bromide (141 mL, 141 mmol, 1 M in Et2O) at 0° C. The mixture was stirred at 25° C. for 4 h. Upon completion, the mixture was quenched with aq. NH4Cl (25 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (2×50 mL). The combined the organic layers were washed with brine (30 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel column with 0 to 10% EtOAc in petroether to provide Int-58a. 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ: 7.26˜7.35 (m, 5H), 5.77-5.85 (m, 1H), 5.12-5.18 (m, 2H), 4.72 (d, J=8 Hz, 1H), 2.48-2.52 (m, 2H), 2.16 (brs, 1H).
To a solution of 1-phenylbut-3-en-1-ol (500 mg, 3.37 mmol) in DCM (10 mL) was added TEA (0.940 mL, 6.75 mmol) and methanesulfonyl chloride (0.394 mL, 5.06 mmol) at 0° C., and the mixture was stirred at 0° C. for 1 h. Upon completion, the mixture was quenched with water (10 mL) and extracted with MTBE (3×10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated to afford 1-phenylbut-3-en-1-yl methanesulfonate, which was used to the next step without further purification.
To a solution of Int-1d (350 mg, 0.859 mmol) in DMF (1 mL) and AcOH (0.1 mL) was added pent-4-enal (38.7 mg, 1.288 mmol) at 25° C. The solution was stirred at 120° C. for 4 h. Upon completion, the mixture was filtered and concentrated. The crude product was purified by a 12 g flash silica gel column with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-58c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H21N3O3: 339.2; Found: 340.2 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-58c (750 mg, 2.210 mmol) in DMF (10 mL) was added NaH (265 mg, 6.63 mmol) and 1-phenylbut-3-en-1-yl methanesulfonate (750 mg, 3.31 mmol) at 0° C. The solution was stirred at 0° C. for 1 h. Upon completion, the reaction was quenched with aqueous NH4Cl (5 mL) and diluted with water (20 mL). The mixture was extracted with DCM (3×30 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by a 40 g flash silica gel column with 0˜10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-58d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C29H31N3O3: 469.2; Found: 470.2 (M+H)+.
Step E—synthesis of Compounds Int-58d-P1, Int-58d-P2, Int-58d-P3 and Int-58d-P4
The mixture Int-58d (200 mg, 0.426 mmol) was resolved to provide a mixture of Int-58d-P1 and Int-58d-P2 (110 mg, 0.223 mmol) as first eluting isomers and a mixture of Int-58d-P3 and Int-58d-P4 (90 mg, 0.168 mmol) as second eluting isomers. SFC condition: REGIS (s, s) WHELK-O1 column (250 mm*30 mm, 5 μm); 55% EtOH with 0.1% NH3H2O; 60 mL/min.
The mixture of Int-58d-P1 and Int-58d-P2 (110 mg, 0.234 mmol) was further separated by SFC to provide the first eluting peak Int-25d-P1 and the second eluting peak Int-58d-P2. SFC condition: DAICEL CHIRALPAK AD-H (250 mm*30 mm, 5 μm); 55% EtOH with 0.1% NH3H2O; 65 mL/min. LCMS anal. calcd. for C29H31N3O3: 469.2; Found: 470.2 (M+H)+.
The mixture of Int-58d-P3 and Int-58d-P4 (90 mg, 0.192 mmol) was further separated by SFC to provide the first eluting peak Int-58d-P3 and the second eluting peak Int-58d-P4. SFC condition: Phenomenex-Amylose-1 (250 mm*30 mm, 5 μm); 55% EtOH with 0.1% NH3H2O; 50 mL/min. LCMS anal. calcd. for C29H31N3O3: 469.2; Found: 470.2 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-58d-P2 (50 mg, 0.106 mmol) in DCE (8 mL) was added (1,3-dimesitylimidazolidin-2-ylidene)(2-isopropoxybenzylidene)ruthenium(VI) chloride (13.34 mg, 0.021 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 45° C. for 16 h. Upon completion, the reaction was quenched with water and extracted with DCM (3×10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by pre-TLC eluting with 0 to 10% MeOH in DCM to provide (Z)-4-(benzyloxy)-6-methyl-12-phenyl-6,6a,7,8,11,12-hexahydropyrido[1′,2′:1,6][1,2,4]triazino[2,3-a]azocine-3,5-dione as a mixture.
The above mixture, combined with another batch (150 mg), was purified by a YMC-Actus Pro C18 (150 mm*30 mm 5 μm) with ACN in water (with 0.1% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide a mixture which was further purified by pre-TLC eluting with 0 to 10% MeOH in DCM to afford Int-58e-P1 as the first peak and Int-58e-P2 as the second peak. LCMS anal. calcd. for C27H27N3O3: 441.2; Found: 442.4 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds Int-58e-P1 and Int-58e-P2 of example 7, compounds Int-58e-P3 and Int-58e-P4 were prepared from Int-58d-P3. LCMS anal. calcd. for C27H27N3O3: 441.2; Found: 442.4 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-58e-P4 (25 mg, 0.057 mmol) in MeOH (2 mL) was added Pd on carbon (24.10 mg, 0.011 mmol). The reaction mixture was degassed under vacuum and purged with H2 for 3 times. The reaction mixture was stirred at 20° C. for 1 h under H2 balloon. Upon completion, the reaction was filtered and purified by preparative HPLC using YMC-Actus Pro C18 (150 mm*30 mm 5 μm) column with ACN in water (with 0.1% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide 58D. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H23N3O3: 353.2; Found: 354.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHZ, Methanol-d4) δ 7.96 (dd, J=7.2, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 6.78-7.61 (m, 5H), 6.64 (br t, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.15 (br d, J=11.6 Hz, 1H), 4.57-4.66 (m, 1H), 3.00 (s, 3H), 2.32-2.48 (m, 1H), 1.55-2.09 (m, 8H), 1.23-1.39 (m, 1H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 58D of example 7, compounds 58A, 58B and 58C were prepared from Int-58e-P1, Int-58e-P2 and Int-58e-P3.
58A: LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H23N3O3: 353.2; Found: 354.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.83-8.06 (m, 1H), 7.02-7.36 (m, 5H), 6.37-6.66 (m, 1H), 5.13 (br d, J=9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.39-4.65 (m, 1H), 2.97-3.13 (m, 3H), 2.24-2.48 (m, 1H), 1.51-2.07 (m, 9H),
58B: LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H23N3O3: 353.2; Found: 354.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.84-7.99 (m, 1H), 6.98-7.54 (m, 5H), 6.49-6.75 (m, 1H), 5.15 (br dd, J=11.4, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 4.43-4.64 (m, 1H), 2.98-3.10 (m, 3H), 2.30-2.46 (m, 1H), 1.54-2.10 (m, 8H), 1.31 (br d, J=10.7 Hz, 1H),
58C: LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H23N3O3: 353.2; Found: 354.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.65-7.87 (m, 1H), 6.87-7.27 (m, 5H), 6.29-6.55 (m, 1H), 4.90-5.11 (m, 1H), 4.20-4.49 (m, 1H), 2.83-3.01 (m, 3H), 2.12-2.32 (m, 1H), 1.38-1.92 (m, 9H),
To a solution of Int-59b (1.2g, 4.21 mmol) in THF (130 mL) was added allylmagnesium bromide (12.62 mL, 12.62 mmol) at 0° C. The reaction was warmed to 0° C. and stirred for 2 h. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was quenched with aq. NH4Cl then diluted with water (2 mL) and extracted with DCM (2×10 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified using a 40 g silica gel flash column on ISCO® with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-59b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C18H21N3O3: 327.2; Found: 328.2 (M+H)+.
To a mixture of Int-59b (200 mg, 0.611 mmol) in DCE (10 mL) was added ethyl acrylate (0.455 ml, 4.28 mmol) and Grubbs 11(207 mg, 0.244 mmol) under N2. The mixture was stirred at 58° C. for 15 h. Upon completion, the mixture was concentrated. The residue was purified by a 12 g silica gel column on ISCO® with 0˜10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to afford Int-59c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H25N3O5: 399.2; Found: 400.2 (M+H)+.
To a mixture of Int-59c (200 mg, 0.501 mmol) in MeOH (4 mL) was added palladium on carbon (53.3 mg, 0.501 mmol). The mixture was degassed and refilled with H2 and stirred at 20° C. for 2 h. Upon completion, the mixture was filtered through celite. The filtrate was concentrated. The residue was purified by a 24 g silica gel column on ISCO® with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to Int-59d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H27N3O5: 401.2; Found: 402.2 (M+H)+.
To a mixture of Int-59d (200 mg, 0.498 mmol) in THF (4 mL) was added methylmagnesium bromide (1.495 mL, 1.495 mmol, 3M in Et2O) under N2. The mixture was stirred at 20° C. for 0.5 h. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was quenched with aqueous NH4Cl (10 mL). It was extracted with DCM (2×10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated to afford Int-59e. The crude product was used for next step without further purification. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H24N3O4: 371.2; Found: 372.2 (M+H)+.
To a mixture of Int-59e (7 mg, 0.019 mmol) in acetonitrile (1 mL) was added methanesulfonic acid (20 mg, 0.208 mmol) under N2. The mixture was stirred at 70° C. for 1.5 h. Upon completion, the mixture was concentrated. The residue was purified by prep HPLC using Phenomenex Synergi C18 column (150 mm*30 mm*4 μm) with 0-100% ACN in water (with 0.1% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide Int-59f LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H23N3O3: 353.2; Found: 354.2 (M+H)+.
Int-59f(33.5 mg, 0.095 mmol) was resolved by SFC to provide the first eluting peak Int-59f-P1 and the second eluting peak Int-59f-P2. SFC condition: Daicel@ chiralpak AD column (250*30 mm, 10 μm); 40% IPA with 0.1% NH3H2O as modifier; 60 mL/min. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H23N3O3: 353.2; Found: 354.2 (M+H)+.
To a stirred mixture of Int-59f-P1 (15 mg, 0.042 mmol) in ACN (3 mL) was added magnesium bromide (23.44 mg, 0.127 mmol) at 20° C. The mixture was stirred at 20° C. for 2 h under N2 atmosphere. Upon completion, the reaction was quenched with MeOH (0.2 mL). It was purified using prep HPLC on Phenomenex Synergi C18 column (150 mm*30 mm*4 μm) with 0-100% ACN in water (with 0.1% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide 59A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H21N3O3: 339.2; Found: 340.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.01-7.50 (m, 5H), 6.01 (d, J=7.32 Hz, 1H), 4.12 (dd, J=2.90, 11.75 Hz, 1H), 3.26 (s, 3H), 2.59 (br dd, J=2.52, 15.34 Hz, 1H), 2.17-2.30 (m, 1H), 2.03-2.15 (m, 1H), 1.98 (br d, J=13.73 Hz, 1H), 1.86-1.94 (m, 1H), 1.72 (tq, J=3.47, 13.61 Hz, 1H), 1.43 (s, 3H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 59A of example 8, compound 59B was prepared from Int-59f-P2. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H21N3O3: 339.2; Found: 340.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.07-7.46 (m, 5H), 6.01 (d, J=7.32 Hz, 1H), 4.12 (dd, J=2.82, 11.83 Hz, 1H), 3.20-3.29 (m, 3H), 2.59 (dd, J=2.67, 15.34 Hz, 1H), 2.25 (dq, J=4.04, 12.84 Hz, 1H), 2.05-2.16 (m, 1H), 1.98 (td, J=2.86, 13.66 Hz, 1H), 1.85-1.93 (m, 1H), 1.66-1.78 (m, 1H), 1.40-1.46 (m, 3H).
Step A—Synthesis of Compound Int-60a
To a solution of Int-1c (1 g, 3.66 mmol) in EtOH (10 mL) was added benzaldehyde (0.777 g, 7.32 mmol) under N2. The reaction was stirred at 80° C. for 10 h. Upon completion, the reaction was concentrated and purified by a 40 g silica gel flash column with 0˜10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-60a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H19N3O3: 361.1; Found: 362.2 (M+H)+.
The solution of 10-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-9-mesityl-1,3,6,8-tetramethoxyacridin-10-ium tetrafluoroborate (8.87 mg, 0.014 mmol), Na2CO3 (73.3 mg, 0.692 mmol) and Int-60a (50 mg, 0.138 mmol) in dioxane (1384 μL) was bubbled with N2 for 2 mins, followed by the addition of 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyl-2-(trimethylsilyl)trisilan-2-ol (36.6 mg, 0.138 mmol) and 3-bromo-1,1-dimethoxypropane (101 mg, 0.553 mmol). The resulting mixture was irradiated with Kessil Lamps (Kessil KSH150B Grow Light Blue (34w) 7 cm away from the reaction vessels for 15 h at 20° C.) for 16 h. Upon completion, the crude product was purified by a C18 reverse phase column (YMC-Actus Triart C18 150*30 mm*5 um) with 30-100% ACN in water (with 0.1% TFA modifier) to provide Int-60b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C26H31N3O5: 465.2; Found: 466.2 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-60b (10 mg, 0.021 mmol) in ACN (1 mL) and H2O (0.2 mL) was added MsOH (4.18 μL, 0.064 mmol). The mixture was stirred at 60° C. for 2 h. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was directly purified by preparative HPLC (Column: YMC-Actus Triart C18 150*30 mm*5 um) with 30-100% ACN in water (with 0.1% TFA modifier) to provide Int-60c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C24H23N3O3: 401.2; Found: 402.0 (M+H)+.
Int-27c (35 mg, 0.087 mmol) was resolved by SFC to provide the first eluting peak Int-60d and the second eluting peak Int-60e. SFC condition: Daicel@ chiralpak AD-H column (250*30 mm, 5 μm); 30% EtOH with 0.1% NH3H2O; 60 mL/min. LCMS anal. calcd. for C24H23N3O3: 401.2; Found: 402.0 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-60d (17 mg, 0.042 mmol) in ACN (2 mL) was added magnesium bromide (39.0 mg, 0.212 mmol) at 25° C. and it was stirred for 16 h. Upon completion, the mixture was diluted with MeOH (0.2 mL) and purified by reverse phase HPLC (Agela DuraShell C18 150 mm*25 mm*5 μm) with 0-100% ACN in water (with 0.1% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide 60A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C17H17N3O3: 311.2; Found: 312.1 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, methanol-d4) δ 7.34-7.46 (m, 1H), 7.38 (br d, J=8.24 Hz, 4H), 7.07 (d, J=7.32 Hz, 1H), 6.23 (d, J=7.32 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (d, J=3.97 Hz, 1H), 4.30-4.52 (m, 1H), 2.50-2.72 (m, 3H), 2.12-2.19 (m, 1H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 60A of example 9, compound 60B was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C17H17N3O3: 311.2; Found: 312.1 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, methanol-d4) δ 7.33-7.49 (m, 5H), 7.09 (d, J=7.48 Hz, 1H), 6.27 (d, J=7.32 Hz, 1H), 5.42 (d, J=4.12 Hz, 1H), 4.36-4.51 (m, 1H), 2.50-2.74 (m, 3H), 2.05-2.25 (m, 1H).
To the stirred solution of Int-17b (420 mg, 1.006 mmol) in anhydrous THF (12 mL) at 0° C. was added 9-borabicyco[3.3.1]nonane (0.5 M in THF) (8.05 mL, 4.02 mmol) dropwise. The resulting solution was stirred at 0° C. for 0.5 h, then stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Additional 9-BBN (0.5 M in THF) (4.02 mL, 2.012 mmol) was added to the reaction. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for another 2 h. Upon completion, to the cooled mixture, a solution of sodium acetate (825 mg, 10.06 mmol) was added dropwise in water (5 mL) and hydrogen peroxide (35% in water) (1.321 mL, 15.09 mmol) at 0° C. The resulting mixture was stirred at 0° C. for 30 min, then at room temperature for 5 h. The resulting reaction was then partitioned between EtOAc (100 mL) and water (25 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc two more times (2×50 mL). The combined organic phase was washed with 10% Na2S2O3 in water (˜50 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by a 100 g silica gel flash column with 0-100% EtOAc in EtOH (3:1)/hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-61a. LCMS m/z calcd for C25H29N3O4: 435.2; found 436.4 (M+H)+.
To the stirred suspension of Int-61a (240 mg, 0.551 mmol) in DCM (9184 μL) was added Dess-Martin periodinane (280 mg, 0.661 mmol) at 0° C. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was diluted with DCM (200 mL) and washed with satd. NaHCO3 (˜50 mL), and then with 10% Na2S2O3 in water (˜50 mL). The organic phase was separated, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to provide Int-61b. LCMS m/z calcd for C25H27N3O4: 433.2; found 434.4 (M+H)+.
To the stirred solution of Int-61b (100 mg, 0.231 mmol) in DMF (3 mL) was added AcOH (262 μL) at room temperature. The mixture was then stirred at 120° C. for 2 h. Upon completion, the mixture was cooled to room temperature, then purified by reverse phase HPLC using Isco system (RediSepRf Gold C18 column 100 g) with 0-100% acetonitrile-water (buffered with 0.05% TFA) as eluting solvent to afford TFA salt form of Int-61c (88 mg, 0.166 mmol). The above product was then redissolved in DCM, neutralized with the addition of TEA (32 ul, 0.23 mmol), and re-purified by flash chromatography using Isco system (40 g silica gel gold column) with 0-100% EtOAc-EtOH (3:1)/hexane as eluting solvent to afford free base form of Int-61c. LCMS m/z calcd for C25H25N3O3: 415.2; found 416.3 (M+H)+.
Int-28c (32 mg, 0.077 mmol) was resolved by SFC to provide the first eluting peak Int-61d and the second eluting peak Int-61e. SFC condition: Daicel@ chiralpak OJ-H column (250*21 mm, 5 μm); 30% IPA with 0.2% DIPA; 50 mL/min. LCMS m/z calcd for C25H25N3O3: 415.2; found 416.3 (M+H)+.
To the round bottom flask was added palladium (10% on carbon) (17.93 mg, 0.017 mmol), followed by addition of Int-61d (14 mg, 0.034 mmol) in EtOH (12 mL). The flask was equipped with a hydrogen balloon. The system was degassed and flushed with H2 twice. The mixture was stirred at room temperature under H2 for 40 min. Upon completion, the catalyst was filtered off, and the filtrate was concentrated. The residue was purified by reverse phase HPLC using Gilson System (Sunfire Prep 30×150 mm column) with 5-100% acetonitrile-water (buffered with 0.05% TFA) as eluting solvent to provide 61A. LCMS m/z calcd for C18H19N3O3: 325.1; found 326.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.65 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.45 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.35 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.47 (d, J=3.7 Hz, 1H), 3.17 (s, 3H), 2.59 (dd, J=14.0, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.51-2.41 (m, 1H), 2.40-2.30 (m, 1H), 2.23 (dd, J=12.5, 7.8 Hz, 1H), 1.44 (s, 3H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 61A of example 10, compound 61B was prepared from Int-61e. LCMS m/z calcd for C18H19N3O3: 325.1; found 326.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.65 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.48 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 5.49 (d, J=3.7 Hz, 1H), 3.33 (s, 9H), 3.18 (s, 3H), 2.60 (dd, J=14.2, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 2.53-2.41 (m, 1H), 2.41-2.31 (m, 1H), 2.24 (dd, J=12.6, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 1.44 (s, 3H).
The examples in Table 3 were prepared using procedures similar to those described in Example 10, from the appropriate starting material.
Under nitrogen, TMS-Diazomethane (16.68 ml, 33.4 mmol, 2M) was added to a solution of 5-(2-chlorophenyl)-5-oxopentanoic acid (5.04 g, 22.24 mmol) in a mixture of DCM (50 mL) and methanol (16.6 mL) at 0° C. The mixture was stirred at 0° C. for 1 h, then concentrated. The residue was purified by an 80 g silica gel flash column with 0-50% EtOAc in hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-64a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C12H13ClO3: 240.1; Found: 241.2 (M+H)+
To a solution of Int-64a (4.64 g, 19.28 mmol) in THF (20 mL) under N2 was added potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (19.33 mL, 19.33 mmol, 1M) at room temperature, followed by 3-bromoprop-1-ene (3.50 g, 28.9 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. Upon completion, methanol (10 mL) was added. The mixture was concentrated and saturated aqueous ammonium chloride solution (50 mL) was added. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (2×100 mL). The combined organic fractions were dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified on an 80g silica gel flash column with 0-100% EtOAc in hexane as eluting solvent to provide methyl 4-(2-chlorobenzoyl)hept-6-enoate. The material was then resolved on chiral AD-H column (50×250 mm, 5 um) with 10% MeOH as eluting solvent to provide Int-64b-peak1 and Int-64b-peak2. LCMS anal. calcd. for C15H17ClO3: 280.1; Found: 281.2 (M+H)+.
Step C—Synthesis of Compound Int-64c-peak 1
To a solution of Int-64b-peak1 (993 mg, 3.54 mmol) in THF (35.4 mL) was added LAH (189 mg, 4.98 mmol) portionwise at 0° C. and stirred for 1 h. Upon completion, to the above reaction was sequentially added water (0.38 mL), 15% NaOH (0.19 mL), and water (0.95 mL). It was then diluted with EtOAc (10 mL) and anhydrous MgSO4 (4 g) was added. The mixture was stirred at RT for 0.5 h, filtered and concentrated to provide Int-64c-peak 1. LCMS anal. calcd. for C14H19ClO2: 254.1; Found: 277.3 (M+Na)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound Int-64c-peak 1 of example 11, compound Int-64c-peak 2 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C14H19ClO2: 254.1; Found: 277.2 (M+Na)+.
Step D—Synthesis of Compound Int-64d-peak1
Dess-Martin periodinane (3090 mg, 7.29 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-64c-peak1 (928 mg, 3.64 mmol) in dichloromethane (36.40 mL) at 0° C. The mixture was stirred at RT for 3 h. Upon completion, the reaction was filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by a 120 g silica gel flash column with 0-100% EtOAc in hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-64d-peak1. LCMS anal. calcd. for C14H15ClO2: 250.08; Found: 251.15 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound Int-64d-peak 1 of example 11, compound Int-64d-peak 2 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C14H15ClO2: 250.0; Found: 250.9 (M+H)+.
Step E—Synthesis of Compound Int-64e-peak 1
In a sealed tube, Int-64d-peak1 (710 mg, 2.83 mmol) was added to 1-amino-3-(benzyloxy)-N-methyl-4-oxo-1,4-dihydropyridine-2-carboxamide (774 mg, 2.83 mmol) in DMF (5.5 mL) and AcOH (0.550 mL). The resulting reaction was stirred at 120° C. for 1.5 h. Upon completion, the reaction was cooled down and concentrated. The residue was purified by an 80 g silica gel flash column with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-64e-peak 1 (1902 mg, 2.158 mmol). LCMS anal. calcd. for C28H28C1N3O4: 505.18; Found: 506.26 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound Int-64e-peak 1 of example 11, compound Int-64e-peak 2 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C28H28C1N3O4: 505.2; Found: 506.3 (M+H)+.
Step F—Synthesis of Compound Int-64f-peak 1
To a stirred solution of Int-64e-peak 1 (199 mg, 0.393 mmol) in DCM (10 mL) was added DIEA (0.137 mL, 0.787 mmol), followed by SEMCl (0.070 mL, 0.393 mmol) at 0° C. The resulting reaction was stirred at RT for 16 h. Upon completion, it was concentrated. The residue was purified by a 40 g silica gel flash column with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-64f-peak 1. LCMS anal. calcd. for C34H42C1N3O5Si: 635.26; Found: 636.52 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound Int-64f-peak 1 of example 11, compound Int-64f-peak 2 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for: C34H42C1N3O5Si: 635.3; Found: 636.4 (M+H)+.
Step G—Synthesis of Compound Int-64g-peak 1
Under N2, Int-64f-peak 1 (193 mg, 0.303 mmol) in a mixture of dichloromethane (4 mL) and methanol (2 mL) was cooled to −5° C. then NaBH4 (9.18 mg, 0.243 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred for 1.5 h. Upon completion, the reaction was quenched with 0.4 mL 1N HCl and concentrated. The residue was purified by a 40 g silica gel flash column with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-64g-peak 1. LCMS anal. calcd. for C34H44ClN3O5Si: 637.27; Found: 638.54 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound Int-64g-peak 1 of example 11, compound Int-64g-peak 2 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C34H44ClN3O5Si: 637.3; Found: 638.4 (M+H)+.
Step H—Synthesis of Compound Int-64h-peak 1
A solution of Int-64g-peak 1 (166 mg, 0.260 mmol) in 5.0 mL DCM was cooled to 0° C. and triethylamine (0.181 mL, 1.30 mmol) was added, followed by methanesulfonyl chloride (0.07 mL, 0.898 mmol). The reaction was stirred at RT for 1.5 h. Upon completion, the reaction was diluted with dichloromethane (20 mL) and washed with water. The organic layer was separated, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated to provide Int-64h-peak1. LCMS anal. calcd. for C25H46ClN3O7SSi: 715.25; Found: 716.36 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound Int-64h-peak 1 of example 11, compound Int-64h-peak 2 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C35H46ClN3O7SSi: 715.3; Found: 716.4 (M+H)+.
Step I—Synthesis of Compound Int-64i-peak1a
Tetrabutylammonium fluoride (1.577 mL, 1.577 mmol, 1M) was added to a solution of Int-64h-peak 1 (226 mg, 0.315 mmol) in 5 mL THF. The resulting reaction was heated at 60° C. for 2 h. Additional tetrabutylammonium fluoride (1.577 mL, 1.577 mmol, 1M) was added and the mixture was heated for 1.5 h. Upon completion, the resulting reaction was concentrated. The residue was purified by a 24 g silica gel flash column with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide racemic material. The material was resolved using chiral AS-H column (21×250 mm, 5 μM) with 40% IPA as eluting solvent to provide Int-64i-peak1a and Int-64i-peak1b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C28H28C1N3O3: 489.18; Found: 490.35 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound Int-31i-peak 1 of example 11, compound Int-64i-peak 2a and Int-64i-peak2b were prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C28H28C1N3O3: 489.2; Found: 490.3 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-64i-peak 1a (20 mg, 0.041 mmol) in 1 mL DMF was added lithium chloride (17.30 mg, 0.408 mmol) and it was stirred at 100° C. for 2.5 h. Upon completion, the reaction was concentrated. The residue was purified by preparative HPLC using reverse phase C18 column with 0-100% acetonitrile in water (0.05% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide compound 64A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H22ClN3O3: 399.1; Found: 400.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.83 (dd, J=7.9, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (td, J=7.5, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.41-7.25 (m, 2H), 7.06 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.95 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.65 (dddd, J=16.8, 10.2, 7.9, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.33 (t, J=3.0 Hz, 1H), 5.02-4.95 (m, 1H), 4.95-4.87 (m, 1H), 4.79 (d, J=10.6 Hz, 1H), 3.26 (s, 3H), 2.58 (dq, J=15.4, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 2.44-2.22 (m, 2H), 2.07-1.93 (m, 1H), 1.89-1.72 (m, 2H), 1.48 (qd, J=14.1, 3.4 Hz, 1H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 64A of example 11, compound 64B was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H22ClN3O3: 399.13; Found: 400.34 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.84 (dd, J=7.8, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (td, J=7.6, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.39-7.25 (m, 2H), 7.10 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.02 (dd, J=7.4, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 5.65 (dddd, J=16.8, 10.2, 7.9, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.35 (t, J=3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.98 (ddd, J=10.1, 2.1, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (dd, J=17.0, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 4.79 (d, J=10.6 Hz, 1H), 3.27 (s, 3H), 2.59 (dq, J=15.6, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 2.33 (dddt, J=48.0, 15.4, 14.0, 4.0 Hz, 2H), 2.07-1.93 (m, 1H), 1.89-1.73 (m, 2H), 1.48 (tdd, J=14.0, 11.9, 3.5 Hz, 1H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 64A of example 11, compound 64C was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H22ClN3O3: 399.1; Found: 400.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.84 (dd, J=7.9, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (td, J=7.5, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (ddd, J=8.8, 7.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (dd, J=8.1, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (dd, J=7.4, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.08 (dd, J=7.4, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 5.65 (dddd, J=16.8, 10.2, 7.9, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.36 (t, J=3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.98 (ddt, J=10.1, 2.0, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (dd, J=16.8, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (d, J=10.6 Hz, 1H), 3.27 (s, 3H), 2.59 (dq, J=15.6, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 2.38 (dtt, J=10.5, 8.1, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 2.29 (ddt, J=17.3, 15.5, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 2.08-1.93 (m, 1H), 1.89-1.79 (m, 1H), 1.84-1.73 (m, 1H), 1.49 (tdd, J=14.1, 11.9, 3.5 Hz, 1H).).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 64C of example 11, Compound 64D was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H22ClN3O3: 399.1; Found: 400.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.84 (dd, J=7.9, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (td, J=7.6, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (ddd, J=8.8, 7.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (dd, J=8.2, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.09 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.65 (dddd, J=16.8, 10.2, 7.9, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.36 (t, J=3.1 Hz, 1H), 5.02-4.94 (m, 1H), 4.99-4.87 (m, 1H), 4.80 (d, J=10.6 Hz, 1H), 3.27 (s, 3H), 2.60 (dq, J=15.5, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 2.39 (dtt, J=10.5, 8.1, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 2.29 (ddt, J=15.5, 14.0, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 2.08-1.93 (m, 1H), 1.89-1.79 (m, 1H), 1.84-1.73 (m, 1H), 1.49 (tdd, J=14.1, 11.9, 3.5 Hz, 1H).
To a solution of Int 64i-peak1a (33 mg, 0.067 mmol) in 5 mL ethyl acetate was added Pd on C (7.17 mg, 0.067 mmol). The mixture was degassed, flushed with H2 and stirred under a balloon of H2 for 5 h. The reaction was filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by preparative reverse phase HPLC using C18 column with acetonitrile in water (with 0.05% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide Compound 65A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H24ClN3O3: 401.2; Found: 402.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.81 (dd, J=7.9, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (td, J=7.6, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.37-7.25 (m, 2H), 7.13 (dd, J=7.4, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 6.09-6.02 (m, 1H), 5.35 (t, J=3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.77 (d, J=10.5 Hz, 1H), 3.28 (s, 3H), 2.60 (dq, J=15.5, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 2.35-2.22 (m, 2H), 2.08 (dq, J=14.0, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 1.50-1.29 (m, 2H), 1.23-1.09 (m, 1H), 1.05 (dtd, J=14.4, 9.6, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 0.95 (dddd, J=13.6, 10.0, 6.2, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 0.76 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 3H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 65A of example 12, compound 65B was prepared from Int-64i-peak1b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H24ClN3O3: 401.2; Found: 402.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.82 (dd, J=7.9, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (td, J=7.5, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (ddd, J=8.7, 7.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (dd, J=8.1, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.09 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.36 (t, J=3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.77 (d, J=10.5 Hz, 1H), 3.28 (s, 3H), 2.60 (dq, J=15.5, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 2.35-2.23 (m, 2H), 2.08 (dq, J=13.9, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 1.51-1.29 (m, 2H), 1.16 (dddd, J=13.2, 10.0, 7.4, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 1.05 (dtd, J=14.4, 9.6, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 0.95 (dddd, J=13.7, 10.0, 6.2, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 0.76 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 3H).
To a solution of Int 64i-peak1a (33.7 mg, 0.069 mmol) in mixture of acetone (0.5 mL) and water (0.5 mL) under N2 at 0° C. was added sodium periodate (58.8 mg, 0.275 mmol), followed by potassium osmate dihydrate (1.014 mg, 2.75 μmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at RT for 2 h. Upon completion, the reaction was filtered and concentrated. The residue was taken up with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed with sodium thiosulfate solution, dried over sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated to provide Int-66a1. LCMS anal. calcd. for C27H26C1N3O4: 491.2; Found: 492.2 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound Int-66a1 of example 13, Int-66a2 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C27H26ClN3O4: 491.2; Found: 492.1 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-66a1 (30 mg, 0.061 mmol) in a mixture of DCM (4 mL) and MeOH (2 mL) was added sodium borohydride (2.307 mg, 0.061 mmol) at 0° C. and stirred for 1.5 h. Upon completion, the reaction was quenched with 1N HCl (0.06 mL) and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel flash chromatography with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-66b1. LCMS anal. calcd. for C27H28C1N3O4: 493.2; Found: 494.4 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound Int-66b1 of example 13, Int-66b2 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C27H28C1N3O4: 493.2; Found: 494.1 (M+H)+.
Lithium chloride (45.3 mg, 1.06 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-66b1 (26.4 mg, 0.053 mmol) in 2 mL DMF. The reaction was stirred at 100° C. for 4.5 h. Upon completion, the mixture was cooled and purified by preparative reverse phase HPLC on C18 column with acetonitrile in water (with 0.05% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide compound 66A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H22ClN3O4: 403.1; Found 404.2: (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.82 (t, J=7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.41-7.25 (m, 2H), 7.12 (dd, J=9.5, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.02 (dd, J=20.0, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.36 (d, J=2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.82 (dd, J=14.9, 10.7 Hz, 1H), 4.34-4.24 (m, 1H), 3.47 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 1H), 3.28 (s, 3H), 2.61 (ddd, J=15.4, 7.0, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 2.44 (dt, J=10.5, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 2.36-2.22 (m, 1H), 2.12 (dq, J=10.1, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 1.68-1.38 (m, 2H), 1.25 (q, J=6.6 Hz, 1H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 66A of example 13, compound 66B was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H22ClN3O4: 403.1; Found: 404.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.85-7.78 (m, 1H), 7.52-7.42 (m, 1H), 7.42-7.26 (m, 2H), 7.13 (dd, J=10.0, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.08-5.99 (m, 1H), 5.36 (q, J=2.8 Hz, 1H), 4.82 (dd, J=14.8, 10.6 Hz, 1H), 4.29 (dd, J=7.5, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.50-3.42 (m, 1H), 3.28 (s, 3H), 2.61 (ddq, J=13.7, 6.4, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 2.44 (qt, J=9.9, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 2.36-2.24 (m, 1H), 2.12 (ddq, J=13.8, 7.1, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 1.62-1.39 (m, 2H), 1.33-1.21 (m, 1H).
To a solution of compound 66A (3.6 mg, 6.95 μmol) in DMF (1 mL) under N2 was added sodium hydride (1.668 mg, 0.042 mmol), followed by iodomethane (1.912 μL, 0.03 mmol) and it was stirred at RT for 16 h. Upon completion, the resulting reaction was filtered and purified by preparative reverse phase HPLC on C18 column with 0-100% acetonitrile in water (with 0.05% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide Int-67a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H26C1N3O4:431.2; Found: 432.2 (M+H)+.
Lithium chloride (4.658 mg, 0.110 mmol) was added to solution of Int-67a (2 mg, 0.0037 mmol) in 2 mL DMF and it was heated to 100° C. for 2.5 h. Upon completion, the mixture was concentrated. The residue was purified by preparative reverse phase HPLC on C18 column with 0-100% acetonitrile in water (with 0.05% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide Compound 67. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H24ClN3O4: 417.2; Found: 418.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.80 (dd, J=7.8, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (td, J=7.4, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (td, J=7.7, 7.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (dd, J=8.1, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.87 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.32 (t, J=3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (d, J=10.7 Hz, 1H), 3.28-3.18 (m, 4H), 2.58 (dd, J=15.4, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 2.40 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 2.33-2.21 (m, 1H), 2.08 (dd, J=13.8, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 1.54-1.42 (m, 1H), 1.31 (s, 2H), 1.31-1.20 (m, 1H).
To a solution of 3,3-difluorocyclopentane-1-carboxylic acid (10 g, 66.6 mmol) in 250 mL DCM at 0° C. was added HATU (25.3 g, 66.6 mmol) and N-ethyl-N-isopropylpropan-2-amine (25.8 g, 200 mmol). The solution was stirred at RT overnight. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was washed with water (˜100 mL), brine (100 mL), dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by a 220 g silica gel column with 0-80% EtOAc in hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-68a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C8H13F2NO2: 193.19; Found: 194.4 (M+H)+
Under N2, Int-68a (10.5 g, 54.3 mmol) was dissolved in 200 mL THF, then phenylmagnesium bromide (70.7 mL, 1 M, 70.7 mmol) was added at 0° C. The reaction was stirred at RT for 24 hrs. Upon completion, sat'd NH4Cl (˜100 mL) was added and the organic layer was extracted with EtOAc (200 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine (50 mL), dried (NaSO4), filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by a 220 g silica gel column, with 0-80% EtOAc/hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-68b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C12H12F2O: 210.22; Found: 211.1 (M+H)+
Under N2, to a solution of Int-68b (2.508 g, 11.93 mmol) in THF (100 mL) at 0° C. was added tert-butyl acrylate (1.77g, 13.50 mmol), followed by sodium t-butoxide (6.75 mL, 2 M, 13.50 mmol). The resulting reaction was stirred for 2 hrs. Upon completion, the mixture was poured into aq. NH4Cl solution and extracted with EtOAc (30 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine (15 mL), dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by an 80 g silica gel column with 0-50% EtOAc in hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-68c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H24F2O3: 338.39; Found: 361.01 (M+Na)+.
To a solution of Int-68c (1.705 g, 5.04 mmol) in THF (45 mL) at 0° C. was added LAH (0.269 g, 7.09 mmol). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 90 mins. Upon completion, it was quenched with 0.54 mL H2O, 0.27 mL 15% NaOH, 1.35 mL H2O, then diluted with EtOAc (25 mL) and stirred with MgSO4 (5 g) at RT for 1 h. It was filtered and concentrated to provide Int-68d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C15H20F2O2: 270.32; Found: 253.2 (M-OH)+
Dess-Martin periodinane (4971 mg, 11.72 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-68d (1440 mg, 5.33 mmol) in dichloromethane (50 mL) at 0° C. The mixture was stirred at RT for 2 h. Upon completion, the reaction was filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by an 80 g silica gel flash column with 0-100% EtOAc in hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-68e. LCMS anal. calcd. for C15H16F2O2: 266.11; Found: 267.2 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-68e (528 mg, 1.98 mmol) in DMF (8.5 mL) was added acetic acid (0.9 mL) followed by 1-amino-3-methoxy-N-methyl-4-oxo-1,4-dihydropyridine-2-carboxamide (391 mg, 1.983 mmol) and heated at 120° C. for 2.5 h. Upon completion, the mixture was concentrated. The residue was purified by an 80 g silica gel column with 0-10% MeOH in CH2Cl2 to provide Int-1f LCMS anal. calcd. for C23H25F2N3O4: 445.18; Found: 446.2 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-68f (633 mg, 1.42 mmol) in trifluoroethanol (15 mL) was added triethyl silane (1.362 mL, 8.53 mmol) and triflic acid (0.757 mL, 8.53 mmol) then the mixture was stirred at 35° C. for 16 h. The reaction was cooled and neutralized with sat'd aqueous NaHCO3(16 mL). The mixture was extracted with DCM. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was first purified by a 120 g silica gel column with 0-10% MeOH in CH2C12 then preparative HPLC using SunFire C18 OBD Prep Column (19×100 mm, 5 μm) with ACN in water (with 0.05% TFA modifier) to provide racemic Int-68g. The material was resolved using AS-H (21×250 mm, 5 μm) chiral column with 70 mL/min of 25% EtOH (with 0.2% DIPA) as eluting solvent to provide Int-68g-peak1, Int-68g-peak2, Int-68g-peak3 and Int-68g-peak4. LCMS anal. calcd. for C23H25F2N3O3: 429.19; Found: 430.2 (M+H)+.
Lithium chloride (47 mg, 1.1 mmol) was added to a stirred mixture of Int-68g-peak1 (4 mg, 9.31 μmol) in DMF (1 mL) at room temperature. The mixture was stirred at 100° C. for 5 hrs. Upon completion, the mixture was cooled down. The residue was purified by preparative HPLC on SunFire C18 OBD Prep Column (19×100 mm, 5 μm) with ACN in water (with 0.05% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide compound 68A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H23F2N3O3: 415.17; Found: 416.17 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.93 (d, J=7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.02 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.37 (t, J=2.8 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (s, 1H), 3.26 (s, 3H), 2.91 (ddd, J=13.6, 9.0, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 2.50-2.34 (m, 2H), 2.09 (t, J=13.0 Hz, 1H), 2.00-1.88 (m, 3H), 1.88-1.68 (m, 3H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce 68A of example 15, 68B was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H23F2N3O3: 415.17; Found: 416.17 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.95-7.79 (m, 2H), 7.41 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.06 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.37 (t, J=2.9 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (s, 1H), 3.26 (s, 3H), 3.22-2.97 (m, 1H), 2.51 (dq, J=15.8, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 2.44-2.22 (m, 2H), 1.97-1.71 (m, 3H), 1.60 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.11 (tdd, J=21.0, 13.0, 8.6 Hz, 1H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce 68A of example 15, 68C was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H23F2N3O3: 415.17; Found: 416.17 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.93 (d, J=7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.01 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.37 (t, J=2.8 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (s, 1H), 3.25 (s, 3H), 2.91 (ddd, J=13.6, 9.1, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 2.52-2.32 (m, 2H), 2.18-2.03 (m, 1H), 2.01-1.90 (m, 2H), 1.90-1.64 (m, 4H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce 68A of example 15, 68D was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H23F2N3O3: 415.17; Found: 416.19 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.86 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.41 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.07 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.37 (t, J=2.8 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (s, 1H), 3.27 (s, 3H), 3.18-3.06 (m, 1H), 2.51 (dq, J=15.9, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 2.39-2.25 (m, 2H), 1.91-1.74 (m, 3H), 1.60 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.11 (tdd, J=21.1, 13.3, 8.7 Hz, 1H).
The examples in Table 4 were prepared using procedures similar to those described in Example 15, from the appropriate starting material.
A solution of 4-isobutyldihydro-2h-pyran-2,6(3h)-dione (0.8 g, 4.70 mmol) in toluene (25 mL) was added to a mixture of (−)-sparteine (1.404 mL, 6.11 mmol) and phenylmagnesium chloride (3.06 mL, 6.11 mmol) in toluene (15 mL) under N2 at −78° C. The mixture was stirred for 7 h before it was quenched with saturated ammonium chloride solution (12 mL) and 2 N NaOH (47 mL). The mixture was extracted with 50 mL ether. The aqueous layer was acidified with 6 N HCl to pH 2. It was extracted with EtOAc (2×50 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated to provide Int-130a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C15H20O3 248.1; Found: 249.4 (M+H)+.
TMS-Diazomethane (3.56 mL, 7.13 mmol) was added to Int-130a (885 mg, 3.56 mmol) in a mixture of DCM (9.0 mL) and MeOH (3.0 mL) at 0° C. The resulting reaction was stirred for 1 hour. Upon completion, it was concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel flash chromatography with 0-100% EtOAc in hexane as eluting solvent to provide 510 mg racemic material. The racemic compound was resolved on a chiral AD-H (21×250 mm, 5 μm) column with 5% IPA (0.1% DIPA) as eluting solvent to provide Int-130b-peak1 and Int-130b-peak2. LCMS anal. calcd. for C16H22O3: 262.2; Found: 263.3 (M+H)+.
Lithium aluminum hydride (39 mg, 1.028 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-130b-peak1 (181.4 mg, 0.691 mmol) in THF (10 mL) under N2 at 0° C. The mixture was stirred at this temperature for 1 h. Upon completion, water (0.08 mL), 15% NaOH solution (0.04 mL) and water (0.2 mL) were added sequentially. It was diluted with ethyl acetate (50 mL) and MgSO4 (2 g) was added. The mixture was stirred at RT for 0.5 h. It was filtered and concentrated to provide Int-130c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C15H24O2: 236.2; Found: 260.2 (M+Na)+.
Dess-Martin periodinane (607 mg, 1.430 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-130c (169 mg, 0.715 mmol) in DCM (10 mL) at 0° C. The resulting reaction was stirred at RT for 1 h. Upon completion, the reaction was filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel flash chromatography with 0-100% EtOAc in hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-130d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C15H20O2: 232.2; Found: 233.3 (M+H)+.
A solution of Int-130d (0.0536 g, 0.231 mmol) and 1-amino-3-(benzyloxy)-N-methyl-4-oxo-1,4-dihydropyridine-2-carboxamide (0.063 g, 0.231 mmol) in DMF (2.5 mL) with acetic acid (0.25 mL) was heated in a sealed tube at 120° C. for 2 h. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel flash chromatography with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-130e. LCMS anal. calcd. for C29H33N3O4: 487.3; Found: 488.4 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-130e (41 mg, 0.084 mmol) in DCM (5.0 mL) was added DIEA (0.032 mL, 0.185 mmol), followed by SEMCl (0.016 mL, 0.092 mmol) at 0° C. The reaction was stirred at RT for 1.5 h. Upon completion, the reaction was concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel flash chromatography with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-130f LCMS anal. calcd. for C35H47N3O5Si: 617.3; Found: 618.5 (M+H)+.
Int-130f(39.5 mg, 0.064 mmol) in a mixture of DCM (2 mL) and MeOH (1 mL) was at 0° C. and NaBH4 (4.84 mg, 0.128 mmol) was added. The resulting mixture was stirred at this temperature for 2 h. Upon completion, the reaction was concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel flash chromatography with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-130g. LCMS anal. calcd. for C35H49N3O5Si: 619.3; Found: 620.3 (M+H)+.
Int-130g (37.2 mg, 0.060 mmol) in DCM (3.0 mL) was cooled to 0° C., followed by adding triethylamine (0.042 mL, 0.300 mmol) and methanesulfonyl chloride (0.014 mL, 0.180 mmol). The reaction was stirred at RT for 1.5 h. Upon completion, the reaction was diluted with DCM (15 mL) and washed with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated to provide Int-130h. LCMS anal. calcd. for C35H48ClN3O4Si: 437.3; Found: 638.3 (M+H)+.
Tetrabutylammonium fluoride (0.501 mL, 0.501 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-130h (64 mg, 0.100 mmol) in THF (5 mL) at RT. The resulting mixture was heated at 60° C. for 16 h. Upon completion, the reaction was concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel flash chromatography with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-130i (20 mg, 0.057 mmol). Int-130i was resolved using chiral AD-H column (21×250 mm, 5 μm) with 30% IPA (0.2% DIPA) as eluting solvent to provide Int-130i-peak1 and Int-130i-peak2. LCMS anal. calcd. for C29H33N3O3: 471.2; Found: 472.3 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-130i-peak 1 (3 mg, 0.0064 mmol) in DMF (1 mL) was added lithium chloride (8.08 mg, 0.19 mmol) and the mixture was stirred at 100° C. for 3 h. Upon completion, the reaction was concentrated. The residue was purified by preparative reverse phase HPLC on C18 column with ACN in water (0.05% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide Compound 130A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H27N3O3: 381.2; Found: 382.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.30 (s, b, 5H), 7.13 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.86 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.35-5.25 (m, 1H), 4.40 (dd, J=11.6, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.20 (s, 3H), 2.59-2.41 (m, 3H), 2.21 (s, b, 1H), 1.95-1.85 (m, 1H), 1.70 (dt, J=13.6, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 1.61 (ddd, J=15.2, 9.2, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 1.49 (dt, J=13.9, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 0.98 (dd, J=19.8, 6.5 Hz, 6H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce Compound 130A of example 16, compound 130B was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H27N3O3: 381.2 Found: 382.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.72 (s, 1H), 7.46 (s, 1H), 7.32 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (s, 1H), 7.07 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (s, 1H), 5.92 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 5.34 (s, 1H), 4.31 (d, J=10.5 Hz, 1H), 3.26 (s, 3H), 2.54 (d, J=12.6 Hz, 1H), 2.07-1.86 (m, 4H), 1.76 (tt, J=13.7, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.31 (t, J=6.4 Hz, 2H), 0.98 (t, J=6.3 Hz, 6H).
Under N2, 3-(benzyloxy)-4-oxo-6-(((tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl)oxy)methyl)-4H-pyran-2-carboxylic acid (5 g, 13.87 mmol) was dissolved in 100 mL 1:1 MeOH/CH2C12 and then cooled to 0° C. (Trimetjulsilyl)dizaomethane (6.94 ml, 13.87 mmol) was added dropwise. The resulting mixture was stirred at for 0° C. Upon completion, it was concentrated to provide Int-131a. The crude was used without further purification. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H22O7: 374.3; Found: 375.2 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-131a (5.1 g, 13.62 mmol) in MeOH (15 mL) at RT under N2 was added hydrogen chloride in dioxane (10.22 mL, 40.9 mmol). The reaction was stirred at this temperature for 1 hour. Upon completion, it was concentrated. The residue was diluted with 100 mL EtOAc, followed by washing with 100 mL sat. NaHCO3 aqueous solution. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and concentrated to provide Int-131b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C15H14O6: 290.2; Found: 291.0 (M+H)+.
To a stirred solution of Int-131b (5 g, 17.23 mmol) in DMF (150 mL) at 0° C. was added iodomethane (2.93 g, 20.67 mmol), followed by sodium hydride (0.827 g, 20.67 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at this temperature for 1 hour. Upon completion, it was slowly quenched with 100 mL water. The mixture was extracted with 2×100 mL EtOAc. The combined organic was dried over MgSO4 and concentrated. The residue was purified by a 120 g silica gel column with 0-10% MeOH in DCM as eluting solvent to provide Int-131c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C16H16O6: 304.3; Found: 305.0 (M+H)+.
A solution of pyridinium-p-toluenesulfonate (4.68 g, 18.63 mmol) and Int-131d (2.1 g, 6.90 mmol) in DMA (40 mL) was heated up to 60° C. Thereafter, a solution of tert-butyl carbazate (1.277 g, 9.66 mmol) in DMA (10 mL) was slowly added to the reaction solution over 10 min. The reaction solution was stirred at 60° C. for 48 hrs. Upon completion, the mixture was added 50 mL water. It was extracted with 2×50 mL EtOAc. The combined organic layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified with a 120 g silica gel column using 0-100% EtOAc/hexane as eluding solvent to provide Int-131d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H26N2O7: 418.4; Found: 419.2 (M+H)+.
The mixture of Int-131d (1.2 g, 2.87 mmol) and ethanamine in THF (14.34 mL, 28.7 mmol) was heated at 80° C. overnight. Upon completion, it was concentrated. To above residue, 5 mL DCM and 5 mL TFA was added. It was stirred at room temperature for 2 hrs before it was concentrated. The resulting residue was loaded onto a 100 g C18 reverse phase column with 0-40% ACN in water (0.05% TFA modifier) to provide Int-131e. LCMS anal. calcd. for C17H21N3O4:331.4 Found: 332.1 (M+H)+.
Int-131e (240 mg, 0.724 mmol) and 4-benzoyl-6,6,6-trifluorohexanal was mixed in a 20 mL sealed microwave tube. The reaction was stirred at 120° C. for 2.5 hrs. Upon completion, the reaction was cooled down and concentrated. The residue was purified by MPLC ISCO Combi-flash on ISCO Redi-Sep 24 column, eluting with 0-10% CH2Cl2/MeOH to provide Int-131f LCMS anal. calcd. for C30H32F3N3O5: 571.6; Found: 572.4 (M+H)+.
Under N2, to a solution of Int-131f(590 mg, 1.032 mmol) in DCM (20 mL) was added DIEA (0.397 mL, 2.271 mmol) and SEM-Cl (0.201 mL, 1.135 mmol) at 0° C. The reaction was stirred at 25° C. overnight before it was concentrated. The residue was purified by MPLC ISCO Combi-flash on ISCO Redi-Sep 40 g column, eluting with 0-10% CH2Cl2/MeOH, to provide Int-131g. LCMS anal. calcd. for C36H46F3N3O6Si: 304; Found: 305.0 (M+H)+.
Under N2, to a solution of Int-131g (680 mg, 0.969 mmol) in DCM (10 mL)/MeOH (5 mL) was added NaBH4 (36.7 mg, 0.969 mmol) at 0° C. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 1.5 hours. Upon completion, the reaction was cooled back to 0° C. and quenched with 1N HCl (0.5 mL) then concentrated. The residue was purified by MPLC ISCO Combi-flash on ISCO Redi-Sep 40 g column, eluting with 0-10% CH2Cl2/MeOH to provide Int-131h. LCMS anal. calcd. for C36H48F3N3O6Si: 703.8; Found: 704.6 (M+H)+.
Under N2, to a solution of Int-131h (605 mg, 0.860 mmol) in DCM (10 mL) was added TEA (599 μL, 4.30 mmol), followed by Ms-Cl (201 μL, 2.58 mmol) at 0° C. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 1.0 h. Upon completion, the reaction was diluted with DCM (15 mL) and then washed water, brine, dried over sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated to yield Int-131i which was used for next step without purification. LCMS anal. calcd. for C37H50F3N3O8SSi: 781.9 Found: 782.4 (M+H)*.
Under N2, to a solution of Int-131i (712 mg, 0.911 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was added TBAF in THF (3.821 μL, 3.821 mmol) at 60° C. The reaction was stirred at this temperature for 4.0 hrs, cooled and concentrated. The residue was purified by MPLC ISCO Combi-flash on ISCO Redi-Sep 40 g column, eluting with 0-20% CH2Cl2/MeOH to afford 2 fractions. Both fractions were subject to SFC resolution. The less polar fraction yielded 2 peaks from SFC resolution Int-131j-peak1 and Int-131j-peak2. The more polar fraction yielded 4 peaks from SFC resolution Int-131j-peak3, Int-131j-peak4, Int-131j-peak5 and Int-131j-peak6. (SFC conditions: Daicel@ chiralpak OD-H column (250*21 mm, 5 μm); 35% EtOH with 0.1% DIEA; 70 mL/min). LCMS anal. calcd. for C30H32F3N3O4: 555.6 Found: 556.5 (M+H)+.
Int-131j-peak1 (7 mg, 0.013 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (1 mL). The flask was purged with nitrogen twice, followed by the addition of Pd/C (9.39 mg, 8.82 μmol). It was purged with hydrogen 3 times and was allowed to stir under H2 balloon for 1 hour. The resulting reaction mixture was filtered through a syringe filter before concentrated. The residue was purified by preparative HPLC Reverse phase (C-18 column), eluting with 0-90% Acetonitrile/Water (with 0.1% TFA modifier) to afford 131A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C23H26F3N3O4: 465.4; Found: 466.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.34-6.85 (m, 6H), 5.27 (s, 1H), 4.93 (d, J=13.2 Hz, 1H), 4.63 (d, J=13.2 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (s, 1H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 2.93-2.81 (m, 2H), 2.51 (s, 3H), 1.97 (d, J=9.7 Hz, 1H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce Compound 131A of example 17, compound 131B was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C23H26F3N3O4: 465.4; Found: 466.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.33-6.92 (m, 6H), 5.29 (s, 1H), 4.95 (d, J=13.4 Hz, 1H), 4.68 (d, J=13.4 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (s, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 2.93-2.68 (m, 3H), 2.52 (s, 3H), 1.98 (d, J=9.2 Hz, 1H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce Compound 131A of example 17, compound 131C was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C23H26F3N3O4: 465.4; Found: 466.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.84-6.57 (m, 6H), 6.18 (s, 1H), 5.36 (s, 1H), 4.52 (d, J=14.6 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (d, J=14.6 Hz, 1H), 3.26 (s, 3H), 2.86 (q, J=10.4 Hz, 1H), 2.64-1.52 (m, 7H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce Compound 131A of example 17, compound 131D was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C23H26F3N3O4: 465.4; Found: 466.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.53-7.22 (m, 7H), 6.29 (s, 1H), 5.42 (s, 1H), 4.76-4.64 (m, 2H), 4.22 (d, J=14.3 Hz, 1H), 3.38 (s, 4H), 3.33 (s, 5H), 2.84-2.67 (m, 2H), 2.68-2.44 (m, 4H), 2.10-1.96 (m, 2H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce Compound 131A of example 17, compound 131E was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C23H26F3N3O4: 465.4; Found: 466.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.30 (tt, J=15.8, 6.8 Hz, 5H), 6.24 (s, 1H), 5.41 (s, 1H), 4.76-4.64 (m, 2H), 4.22 (d, J=14.2 Hz, 1H), 3.50-3.34 (m, 5H), 2.83-2.66 (m, 2 H), 2.65-2.43 (m, 3H), 2.10-1.92 (m, 2H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce Compound 131A of example 17, compound 131F was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C23H26F3N3O4: 465.4; Found: 466.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.79 (d, J=7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.42 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (d, J=7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.29 (d, J=15.0 Hz, 1H), 5.42 (s, 1H), 4.63-4.38 (m, 2H), 4.19 (t, J=12.5 Hz, 1H), 3.96 (t, J=14.8 Hz, 1H), 3.36-3.26 (m, 6H), 2.92 (d, J=10.1 Hz, 1H), 2.61 (d, J=15.0 Hz, 1H), 2.48-1.48 (m, 5H).
The examples in Table 5 were prepared using procedures similar to those described in Example 17, from the appropriate starting material.
In a flame-dried flask under an atmosphere of N2, 118B (320 mg, 0.785 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous DCM (10 mL) and anhydrous MeOH (3 mL). TMS-Diazomethane (2M in ether) (707 μL, 1.414 mmol) was added dropwise over 15 minutes and the reaction was stirred at RT. After 2 hours, TMS-Diazomethane (2M in ether) (450 μL) was added and stirred at RT for another hour. More TMS-Diazomethane (2M in ether) (500 ptL) was added and the reaction was stirred for another hour at RT. The reaction was quenched with acetic acid (180 μL, 3.14 mmol) and stirred for several minutes before diluting with water and DCM. It was extracted with DCM (3×) and the combined organics were washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in DCM and purified on normal phase silica gel (24 g ISCO gold column) eluting under gradient conditions 0-100% (26% EtOH-EtOAc/EtOAc). The appropriate fractions were collected and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was dried by concentrating under reduced pressure with toluene/ACN and then dried under high vacuum to provide Int-133a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H22F3N3O3: 421.4; Found: 422.2 (M+H)+.
Int-133a (255 mg, 0.605 mmol) under an atmosphere of N2 was dissolved in anhydrous DCM (10 mL). To this solution was added N-Bromosuccinimide (162 mg, 0.908 mmol) and the reaction was stirred at RT for 90 minutes. More N-Bromosuccinimide (115 mg) was added and the reaction was stirred at RT for another 45 minutes. Upon completion, the reaction volume was reduced under reduced pressure and loaded directly onto normal phase silica gel (24g ISCO gold column) eluting under gradient conditions 0-40% (26% EtOH-EtOAc/EtOAc). The appropriate fractions were collected and concentrated under reduced pressure and then dried under high vacuum to provide Int-133b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H21BrF3N3O3: 499.1; Found: 500.0 (M+H)+.
To a microwave reaction vial under an atmosphere of N2, Int-133b (175 mg, 0.350 mmol) and zinc cyanide (205 mg, 1.749 mmol) were mixed in anhydrous DMF (4 mL) and purged with a stream of N2 gas. Bis(tri-t-butylphosphine)palladium(0) (89 mg, 0.175 mmol) was added and the reaction was sealed and heated at 100° C. in preheated block for 3 hours. The reaction was cooled and partitioned between DCM and water. The mixture was extracted with DCM (4×) and the combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in DCM/EtOAc and purified on normal phase silica gel (12 g ISCO gold column) eluting under gradient conditions 0-20% (26% EtOH-EtOAc/EtOAc). The appropriate fractions were collected and concentrated under reduced pressure and then dried under high vacuum to provide Int-133c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H21F3N4O3: 446.4; Found: 447.2 (M+H)+.
Int-133c (9 mg, 0.020 mmol) and magnesium bromide (12 mg, 0.065 mmol) was mixed in anhydrous THF (3 mL) and stirred at RT for 2 hours. The reaction was then concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was redissolved in 5:1 DMF/water, and purified by gradient elution on reverse-phase (25-75% CH3CN/water (0.1% TFA modifier) on Sunfire Prep column (C18, 30×150 mm) over 12 min. The appropriate fractions were lyophilized to provide 133. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H19F3N4O3: 432.4; Found: 433.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Acetonitrile-d3) δ 12.36 (s, 1H), 7.67 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (s, 1H), 6.81 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (s, 1H), 4.00 (d, J=10.6 Hz, 1H), 3.14 (s, 3H), 2.63-2.54 (m, 1H), 2.50-2.43 (m, 1H), 2.23-2.14 (m, 1H), 2.13-2.07 (m, 1H), 2.04-1.96 (m, 1H), 1.78-1.66 (m, 1H), 1.57-1.47 (m, 1H).
In a vial, Int-133c (11 mg, 0.025 mmol), sodium azide (3.20 mg, 0.049 mmol), and zinc chloride (3.36 mg, 0.025 mmol) were mixed in DMF (1 mL). The vial was sealed and heated at 100° C. in a preheated block for 3 hours. The reaction was then recharged with sodium azide (16 mg) and zinc chloride (2 mg) and stirred overnight at 100° C. Upon completion, the reaction was diluted with water and purified by gradient elution on reverse-phase (15-65% CH3CN/water (0.1% TFA) on Sunfire Prep C18 column (30×150 mm) over 12 min. The appropriate fractions were lyophilized to provide the title compound. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H20F3N7O3: 475.4; Found: 476.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Acetonitrile-d3) δ 12.30 (s, 1H), 7.77 (d, J=7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (s, 1H), 7.46 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.27 (s, 1H), 4.06 (d, J=10.7 Hz, 1H), 3.17 (s, 3H), 2.67-2.57 (m, 1H), 2.53-2.46 (m, 1H), 2.29-2.21 (m, 1H), 2.19-2.10 (m, 1H), 2.06-1.97 (m, 1H), 1.79-1.67 (m, 1H), 1.62-1.52 (m, 1H).
A mixture of 3-methoxy-N-methyl-4-oxo-1-((1-phenylbut-3-en-1-yl)amino)-1,4-dihydropyridine-2-carboxamide (154.00 g, 471.553 mmol,), cinnamal (124.50 g, 943.106 mmol) and trifluoroacetic acid (80.64 g, 707.3301 mmol,) in DCE (1.00 L) was stirred at 120° C. for 3 days. After cooling, the reaction mixture was concentrated. The residue was applied onto a silica gel column and eluted with (30% EtOH/EA)/PE=0-60% to provide Int-135a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C27H27N3O3: 441.2; Found: 442.2 (M+H)+.
A mixture of Int-135a (10.00 g, 22.648 mmol), TFA (2.59 g, 22.715 mmol) and Hoveyda-Grubbs 2nd generation catalyst (5.79 g, 6.820 mmol) was stirred for 4 hrs at 80° C. After cooling, the reaction mixture was concentrated. The residue was applied onto a silica gel column with 0-15% dichloromethane/methanol to afford a mixture (110 g) which was further purified by Sunfire Prep C18 column with 30-80% ACN in water (0.05% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to provide a 40 g mixture. The mixture was further purified by Prep-SFC with CHIRAL ART Cellulose-SB column (S-5 um 50*250 mm, 50 mm*250 mm, 5 um; mobile phase, CO2 (50%) and MeOH) to afford Int-1b (22.52 g, 5.562 mmol) and Int-1c (3.17 g, 0.783 mmol). LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H19N3O3: 337.2; Found: 338.3 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-135c (0.300 g, 0.89 mmol) in dioxane (9 mL) was added selenium dioxide (0.197 g, 1.78 mmol). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 95° C. overnight.
After cooling, the mixture was concentrated and purified by ISCO reverse phase C18 column chromatography using 0-50% H2O/ACN with 0.05% TFA modifier as eluting solvent to afford Int-135d (0.09 g, 0.276 mmol). LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H19N3O4: 353.1; Found: 354.1 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-135d (0.142 g, 0.40 mmol) in MeOH (5 mL) was added 10% Pd—C (0.070 g) at 25° C. with stirring. The resulting black suspension was placed under an atmosphere of hydrogen (balloon) for 3 hrs. The reaction mixture was filtered through a pad of celite and the solid thoroughly washed with MeOH. The combined filtrate was concentrated to provide Int-135e. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H21N3O4: 355.2; Found: 356.3 (M+H)+.
Int-135e (0.57 g) was separated by SFC using an AD-H column (50×250 mm) and 40% MeOH as co-solvent to afford Int-135f(Peak 1) and Int-135g (Peak 2). LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H21N3O4: 355.2; Found: 356.3 (M+H)+.
Step F—Syntheses of compounds 135A and 135B
To a solution of Int-135f(10.0 mg, 0.04 mmol) in ACN (1 mL) was added MgBr2 (36.8 mg, 0.20 mmol) at 25° C. The reaction was stirred at 25° C. for 3 hrs. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by HPLC (Sunfire Prep C18 column) using 0.05% TFA as modifier to give 135A (10.6 mg). LCMS anal. calcd. for C18H19N3O4: 341.2; Found: 342.6 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce Compound 135A of Step F, compound 135B was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C18H19N3O4: 341.2; Found: 342.6 (M+H)+.
Step A—Synthesis of Compound Int-136a
A solution of DEAD (0.20 mL of a 40% solution in toluene, 0.458 mmol) was added dropwise to a mixture of Int-135d (54 mg, 0.153 mmol), 4-nitrobenzoic acid (77 mg, 0.453 mmol) and triphenylphosphine (120 mg, 0.453 mmol) in anhydrous THF (3 mL) at room temperature under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (ISCO 4 g column) using 0 to 5% MeOH in DCM as eluent to provide Int-136a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C26H22N4O7: 502.2; Found: 503.2 (M+1)+.
To a solution of Int-136a (48.8 mg, 0.097 mmol) in MeOH (1 mL) was added potassium carbonate (1 mg) at room temperature. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (ISCO 12g column) using 0 to 10% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to afford Int-136b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H19N3O4: 353.1; Found: 354.3 (M+H)+.
Step C, D, E—Preparation of compounds 136A and 136B
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compounds 136A and 136B were prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C18H19N3O4: 341.1; Found: 342.3 (M+1)+.
A solution of 3-methoxy-N-methyl-4-oxo-1-((2-phenylpent-4-en-2-yl)amino)-1,4-dihydropyridine-2-carboxamide (97.00 g, 284.115 mmol), SeO2 (157.63 g, 1420.58 mmol), tert-Butyl hydroperoxide (285 mL in decane, 5 equiv) in DCM (2.91 L) was stirred for 32 hrs at 40 degrees ° C. under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The reaction mixture was cooled to −10° C. with an ice/salt bath. It was then quenched by the addition of 2 L of Na2S2O3 aqueous solution. The solids were filtered out. The resulting solution was extracted with dichloromethane three times and the combine organic layer was concentrated. The residue was applied onto a 330 g silica gel column with dichloromethane/methanol (20:1) as eluting solvent to provide Int-137a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H23N3O4: 357.4; Found: 358.3 (M+H)+.
To a 2-L high pressure tank reactor, was placed ACN (680.00 mL), Int-137a (34.00 g, 95.129 mmol), BiPhePhos (1.50 g, 1.906 mmol), Carbonyltris(triphenylphosphine)rhodium(I) hydride (1.75 g, 1.903 mmol), CO (0.5 Mpa). To the above reactor, H2(g) (0.5 MPa) was introduced at 80° C. The resulting mixture was stirred at 80° C. for 20 hrs. Upon completion, it was cooled down. The reaction mixture was concentrated to 10 V and used to next step directly.
To a 1-L 4-necked round-bottom flask was placed the reaction mixture from the previous step and AcOH (68 g). The resulting solution was stirred at 80° C. for 3 days. Upon completion, the resulting mixture was concentrated. The residue was diluted with ACN and purified by Flash-Prep-HPLC using reverse phase C18 (220 g) with 10-100% ACN in H2O as eluting solvent to provide Int-137c and Int-137d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H23N3O4: 369.2; Found: 370.2 (M+H)+.
Int-137c (1.0g) was resolved by SFC using an OD-H column (21×250 mm) with 35% MeOH as co-solvent to provide Int-137e (Peak 1: 0.433g) and Int-137f(Peak 2: 0.423g). LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H23N3O4: 369.2; Found: 370.2 (M+H)+.
Int-137d (1.0g) was resolved by SFC using an OJ-H column (21×250 mm) and 30% MeOH and 0.2% DIPA as co-solvent to provide Int-137g (Peak 1) and Int-137f(Peak 2). LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H23N3O4: 369.2; Found: 370.3 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compounds 137A, 137B, 137C and 137D were prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H21N3O4: 355.2; Found: 356.2 (M+H)+.
Step A— Synthesis of Compound Int-138a
Dess-Martin periodinane (0.230 g, 0.541 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-137c (0.100 g, 0.271 mmol) in dichloromethane (5 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 hrs. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 5% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-138a (0.083 g, 0.228 mmol). LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H21N3O4: 367.2; Found: 368.3 (M+H)+.
Int-138a (0.083 g) was resolved by SFC using an AD-H column (21×250 mm) and 30% IPA and 0.2% DIPA as co-solvent to provide Int-138b (Peak 1) and Int-138c (Peak 2). LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H21N3O4: 367.2; Found: 368.3 (M+1)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compounds 138A and 138B were prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H19N3O4: 355.2; Found: 354.2 (M+H)+.
Triethylamine (0.197 mL, 1.42 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-137d (0.250 g, 0.707 mmol) and methylsulfonyl chloride (0.082 mL, 1.05 mmol) in anhydrous dichloromethane (1 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h, and additional portions of triethylamine (0.197 mL) and methane sulfonyl chloride (0.082 mL) were added. After stirring for another 1 h., the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 5% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-139a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H21N3O6S: 432.1; Found: 432.3 (M+H)+.
Sodium azide (0.113 g, 1.74 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-139a (0.250 g, 0.579 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (1 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 40° C. overnight. After cooling, the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 5% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to give Int-139b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H18N6O3: 378.2; Found: 379.3 (M+H)+.
Wilkinson's catalyst (0.012 g, 1.74 mmol,) was added to a solution of Int-139b (0.024 g, 0.063 mmol) in a mixture of THF (1 mL) and methanol (1 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature under an atmosphere of hydrogen overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 5% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-139c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H20N6O3: 380.3; Found: 381.3 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compound 139 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C18H18N6O3: 366.2; Found: 367.3 (M+H)+.
Pd—C(10%, 10 mg) was added to a solution of Int-139b (19.5 mg, 0.052 mmol) in methanol (3 mL). The resulting black suspension was placed under an atmosphere of hydrogen (balloon) overnight. The reaction was filtered through a pad of celite. The solid was thoroughly washed with methanol. The combined filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to provide Int-140a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H22N4O3: 354.2; Found: 355.3 (M+H)+.
Trifluoroacetic anhydride (0.007 mL, 0.053 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-140a (12.5 mg, 0.035 mmol) and triethylamine (0.009 mL, 0.07 mmol) in anhydrous dichloromethane (1 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-140b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H21F3N4O4: 450.2; Found: 451.3 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compound 140 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H19F3N4O4: 436.2; Found: 437.3 (M+H)+.
A mixture of copper (II) sulfate (264 mg, 1.05 mmol) and sodium (R)-2-((S)-1,2-dihydroxyethyl)-4-hydroxy-5-oxo-2,5-dihydrofuran-3-olate (2.094 mg, 10.57 μmol) in water (1 mL) was added to a mixture of Int-5b (40.0 mg, 0.106 mmol) and propargyl alcohol (6.79 mL, 0.116 mmol) in tBuOH (1 mL) at room temperature. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred overnight. Additional portions of copper (II) sulfate (264 mg, 1.05 mmol) and sodium (R)-2-((S)-1,2-dihydroxyethyl)-4-hydroxy-5-oxo-2,5-dihydrofuran-3-olate (2.094 mg, 10.57 μmol) were added in water (1 mL) and stirring was continued for a further 24 hrs. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-141a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H22N6O4: 434.2; Found: 435.3 (M+H)+.
Pd—C(10%, 10 mg) was added to a solution of Int-141a (20 mg, 0.046 mmol) in methanol (3 mL). The resulting suspension was placed under an atmosphere of hydrogen (balloon) overnight. The reaction was filtered through a pad of celite and was thoroughly washed with methanol. The combined filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to provide Int-141b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H24N6O4: 436.2; Found: 437.3 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compound 141 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H22N6O4: 422.2; Found: 423.3 (M+H)+.
Wilkinson's catalyst (12 mg, 0.013 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-139b (24 mg, 0.063 mmol) in methanol (1 mL) and THF (1 mL). The resulting mixture was placed under an atmosphere of hydrogen (balloon) overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by reverse phase HPLC using 0-100% ACN in water as eluent (0.05% TFA as the modifier). The combined fractions were concentrated under reduced pressure to provide Int-142a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H20N6O3: 380.2; Found: 381.3 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compound 142 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C18H18N6O3: 366.1; Found: 367.3 (M+1)+.
Potassium thioacetate (338 mg, 2.96 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-139a (426 mg, 0.987 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (25 mL) and THF (1 mL). The resulting mixture was heated to 40° C. under an atmosphere of nitrogen for 4 hrs. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-143a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H21N3O4S: 411.1; Found: 411.2 (M+H)+.
Wilkinson's catalyst (112 mg, 0.122 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-143a (50 mg, 0.122 mmol) in methanol (4 mL) and THF (4 mL). The resulting mixture was placed under an atmosphere of hydrogen (balloon) overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 5% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-143b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H23N3O4S: 413.1; Found: 414.2 (M+H)+.
Int-143b (0.016 g) was resolved by SFC using an AD-H column (21×250 mm) and 30% EtOH as co-solvent to provide Int-9c (Peak 1) and Int-9d (Peak 2). LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H23N3O4S: 413.1; Found: 414.2 (M+H)+.
Aqueous 1 M sodium hydroxide (0.034 ml, 0.034 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-143c (7 mg, 0.017 mmol) in THF (1 mL). The resulting mixture was heated to 40° C. overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure to provide Int-143e. The residue was used in the next step without purification. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H27N3O3S: 413.2; Found: 414.2 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound Int-143e, compound Int-143f was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H27N3O3S: 413.2; Found: 414.2 (M+1)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compounds 143A and 143B were prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H25N3O3S: 399.1; Found: 400.1 (M+H)+.
Triethylamine (0.059 mL, 0.424 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-136b (0.250 g, 0.707 mmol) and methylsulfonyl chloride (0.022 mL, 0.283 mmol) in anhydrous dichloromethane (2 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 hrs. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-144a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H21N3O6S: 431.2; Found: 432.6 (M+H)+.
Sodium azide (25.8 mg, 0.396 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-144a (57 mg, 0.707 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (2 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 40° C. overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by reverse phase HPLC using 0-100% ACN in water as eluent (0.05% TFA as the modifier) to provide Int-144b and Int-144c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H18N6O3: 378.1; Found: 379.2 (M+H)+.
Pd—C(10%, 5 mg) was added to a solution of Int-144b (14 mg, 0.037 mmol) in methanol (3 mL). The resulting suspension was placed under an atmosphere of hydrogen (balloon) overnight. The reaction was filtered through a pad of celite and the solid was thoroughly washed with methanol. The combined filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to give a mixture of Int-144d and Int-145a. It was used in the next step without purification.
Acetic anhydride (1 drop from a pipette) was added to a mixture of Int-144d and 145a (13 mg) and triethylamine (0.05 mL) in anhydrous dichloromethane (1 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by reverse phase HPLC using 0-100% ACN in water as eluent (0.05% TFA as modifier) to provide Int-144e, LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H24N4O4: 386.2; Found: 397.2 (M+H)+, and Int-145b, LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H26N4O4: 410.2; Found: 411.3 (M+H)+, respectively.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compounds 144 and 145 were prepared. 144: LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H22N4O4: 382.2; Found: 383.3 (M+1)+. 145: LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H24N4O4: 396.2; Found: 397.3 (M+H)+.
Potassium thioacetate (144 mg, 1.259 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-144a (181 mg, 0.420 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (8 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 40° C. for 4 hrs. After cooling, the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-146a and Int-146b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H21N3O4S: 411.2; Found: 412.3 (M+H)+.
Wilkinson's catalyst (117 mg, 0.126 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-146b (52 mg, 0.126 mmol) in methanol (4 mL) and THF (4 mL). The resulting mixture was placed under an atmosphere of hydrogen (balloon) overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-146c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H23N3O4S: 413.2; Found: 414.3 (M+H)+.
Int-146c (0.048 g) was resolved by SFC using an OD column (21×250 mm) and 35% EtOH as co-solvent to provide Int-146d (Peak 1) and Int-146e (Peak 2). LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H23N3O4S: 413.2; Found: 414.3 (M+H)+.
Aqueous 1 M sodium hydroxide (0.076 mL, 0.076 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-146d (15.7 mg, 0.038 mmol) and isopropyl iodide (4 mL, 0.038 mmol) in THF (1 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred for overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure to provide Int-146f. The residue was used in the next step without purification. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H22N3O3S: 413.2; Found: 414.3 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound Int-146f, compound Int-146g was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H22N3O3S: 413.2; Found: 414.3 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compounds 146A and 146B were prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H25N3O3S: 399.2; Found: 400.2 (M+H)+.
Aqueous 1 M sodium hydroxide (0.170 mL, 0.170 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-146a (35 mg, 0.085 mmol) and iodomethane (11 mL, 0.170 mmol) in THF (2 mL). The resulting mixture was heated at 40° C. overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was used in the next step without purification. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H21N3O3S: 383.1; Found: 384.7 (M+H)+.
Wilkinson's catalyst (74.8 mg, 0.081 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-147a (Crude product from Step A) in methanol (3 mL) and THF (3 mL). The resulting mixture was placed under an atmosphere of hydrogen (balloon) overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by reverse phase HPLC using 0-100% ACN in water as eluent (0.05% TFA as modifier) to provide Int-147b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H23N3O3S: 385.2; Found: 386.2 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compound 147 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H21N3O3S: 371.2; Found: 372.3 (M+H)+.
Zinc Chloride (29.5 mg, 0.217 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-137d (20 mg, 0.054 mmol) and MOMCl (0.107 mL, 1.41 mmol) in anhydrous dichloromethane (1 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-148a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H23N3O4: 381.2; Found: 382.3 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compound 148 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C18H19N3O3S: 367.2; Found: 368.3 (M+H)+.
p-TsOH (5.15 mg, 0.03 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-137d (20 mg, 0.054 mmol) and benzaldehyde (0.100 mL, 0.987 mmol) in anhydrous 1,2-dichloroethane (1 mL) in a 5 mL microwave vial. The vial was capped and placed in a microwave reactor at 120° C. for 2 hrs.
After cooling, the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-149a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C27H27N3O4: 457.2; Found: 458.4 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compound 148 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C26H25N3O4: 443.2; Found: 444.3 (M+H)+.
Tetralone (2.66 mL, 20.0 mmol) in anhydrous THF (20 mL) was added to sodium hydride (2.48g, 60% suspension in mineral oil, 62.0 mmol) under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. A solution of dimethyl carbonate (4.25 mL, 50.0 mmol) in anhydrous THF (20 mL) was added dropwise while the reaction was being heated to 80° C. When the addition was complete, the reaction was maintained at the temperature for 2 hrs. After cooling, the mixture was partitioned between dichloromethane and aq. 1N HCl. The aqueous phase was separated and further extracted with dichloromethane (2×). The combined organic phases were dried (MgSO4). The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% EtOAc in hexanes as eluent to provide Int-150a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C12H12O3: 204.1; Found: 205.1 (M+H)+.
Int-150a (1.60g, 7.83 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (10 mL) was added to sodium hydride (0.94 g, 60% suspension in mineral oil, 23.5 mmol) under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The resulting mixture stirred at room temperature for 1 h, and 4-bromobut-1-ene was added in one portion. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 40° C. overnight. After cooling, the mixture was partitioned between dichloromethane and sat. aq. ammonium chloride. The aqueous phase was separated and further extracted with dichloromethane (2×). The combined organic phases were dried (MgSO4), filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography with 0-100% EtOAc in hexane as eluent to provide Int-150b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C16H18O3: 258.1; Found: 259.2 (M+H)+.
Aqueous 1.0 M sodium hydroxide (9.68 ml, 9.68 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-150b (0.500g, 1.94 mmol) in THF (15 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was heated at 100° C. overnight. After cooling, the mixture was partitioned between dichloromethane and aq. 1N HCl. The aqueous phase was separated and further extracted with dichloromethane (2×). The combined organic phases were dried (MgSO4) and the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% EtOAc in hexanes as eluent to give Int-150c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C14H16O: 200.1; Found: 201.2 (M+H)+.
Triflic acid (0.141 mL, 1.59 mmol) was added to a solution of 1-amino-3-methoxy-N-methyl-4-oxo-1,4-dihydropyridine-2-carboxamide (0.157 g, 0.80 mmol), Int-150c (0.159 g, 0.80 mmol) and palladium diacetate (0.65 mg, 2.89 mmol) in anhydrous dioxane (5 mL) under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-150d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H25N3O3: 379.2; Found: 380.3 (M+H)+.
Sodium borohydride (61.8 mg, 1.63 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-150d (0.062 g, 0.334 mmol) in methanol (1 mL) under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-150e. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H27N3O3: 381.2; Found: 382.4 (M+H)+.
Osmium tetroxide (9 mL, 4% solution in tBuOH, 1.41 mmol) followed by sodium periodate (45.4 mg, 0.212 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-150e (27 mg, 0.07 mmol) in a mixture of THF (1 mL) and water (0.3 mL) at room temperature under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred overnight then quenched by the addition of aq. 10% sodium thiosulfate and stirred for 1 h. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was thoroughly extracted with 20% MeOH in dichloromethane (50 mL). The combined extract was dried (sodium sulfate). The volatiles removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-150f LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H25N3O4: 383.2; Found: 384.4 (M+H)+.
Int-150f(13 mg, 0.034 mmol) in a mixture of DMF (1 mL) and AcOH (0.1 mL) was heated at 120° C. for 1 h. After cooling, the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-150g. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H23N3O3: 365.2; Found: 366.1 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compound 150 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H21N3O3: 351.2; Found: 352.1 (M+1)+.
Int-137c (20 mg, 0.054 mmol) was added to a suspension of sodium hydride (6.5 mg, 60% suspension in mineral oil, 0.162 mmol) in anhydrous THF under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. 3-Bromo-3,3-difluoroprop-1-ene (8.5 mg (0.054 mmol) in anhydrous THF (0.5 ml) was added to above reaction. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred overnight. Upon completion, it was quenched by the addition of sat. aq. ammonium chloride (0.5 ml). The volatiles removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by reverse phase HPLC to provide Int-151a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C23H25F2N3O4: 445.2; Found: 446.4 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compounds 135A and 135B, compound 151 was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H23F2N3O4: 431.2; Found: 432.3 (M+1)+.
Sodium hydride (5.7 mg, 60% suspension in mineral oil, 0.143 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-134d (50 mg, 0.142 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (2.4 mL) cooled in an ice bath under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 10 min. Iodoethane (0.024 mL, 0.297 mmol) was added. The resulting reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature for 3 hrs. The mixture was partitioned between EtOAc and water. The organic phase was separated, washed with brine, dried (sodium sulfate). The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 0 to 10% MeOH in dichloromethane as eluent to provide Int-151a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H23N3O4: 381.2; Found: 382.2 (M+H)+.
Pd—C(10%, 12.6 mg) was added to a solution of Int-151a (45 mg, 0.118 mmol) in MeOH (2.4 mL). The resulting suspension was placed under an atmosphere of hydrogen (balloon) for 5 hrs. The mixture was filtered and washed with MeOH (1 mL). The filtrate was concentrated to provide Int-151b which was used in the next step without further purification.
Int-151b (crude from step B) was separated by SFC using an AD-H column (21×250 mm) and 20% MeOH as co-solvent to provide Int-151c and Int-151d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C21H25N3O4: 383.2; Found: 384.3 (M+H)+.
Lithium chloride (1.66 mg, 0.039 mmol) was added to a solution of Int-151c (3 mg, 7.82 mmol) in DMF (0.16 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was heated at 100° C. for 3 hrs. After cooling, the solution was directly purified by reverse phase HPLC using 0-100% ACN in water as eluent (0.05% TFA as modifier) to provide 152A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H23N3O4: 369.2; Found: 370.3 (M+H)+.
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 152A, compound 152B was prepared. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H23N3O4: 369.2; Found: 370.3 (M+H)+.
The examples in Table 6 were prepared using procedures similar to those described in Example 36, from the appropriate starting material.
Sodium borohydride (52.7 mg, 1.394 mmol) was added to a solution of 5,6-dihydro-[1,1′-biphenyl]-3(4H)-one (400 mg, 2.323 mmol) in MeOH (4.0 mL) at 0° C. in two equal portions over a 5 min period. After the mixture was stirred for 30 min at ambient temperature, it was diluted with 20 ml EtOAc, washed with 1 N HCl (2 mL), water (2×3 mL), brine and dried over sodium sulfate, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated. The resulting residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel column with 0-15% EtOAc in hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-165a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C12H4O: 174.2; Found: 175.2 (M+H)+.
DIAD (603 μl, 3.10 mmol) was added to a stirred mixture of N-methyl-2-nitrobenzenesulfonamide (447 mg, 2.066 mmol), Int-165a (360 mg, 2.066 mmol) and 2-(diphenylphosphaneyl)pyridine (816 mg, 3.10 mmol) in DCM (20 mL). The mixture was stirred at RT for 4 h. Without workup, the mixture was loaded onto a 100 g silica gel column with 0-90% EtOAc in hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-165b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H2O N2O4S: 372.4; Found: 395.2 (M+Na)+.
Benzenethiol (1302 mg, 11.81 mmol) was added to a mixture of Int-165b (2.2 g, 5.89 mmol) and potassium carbonate (3266 mg, 23.63 mmol) in acetonitrile (100 mL) at RT. The mixture was stirred at RT overnight. Upon completion, it was concentrated. The residue was re-dissolved in DCM (100 mL), filtered, concentrated and purified by a 100 g silica gel column with 0-5% EtOAc in MeOH as eluting solvent to provide Int-165c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C13H17N: 187.3; Found: 188.2 (M+H)+.
To a stirred solution of Int-165c (300 mg, 1.6 mmol) and 4-(benzyloxy)-5-bromo-3-methoxypicolinic acid (650 mg, 1.922 mmol) in DMF (16 mL) was added N-ethyl-N-isopropylpropan-2-amine (621 mg, 4.81 mmol), followed by HATU (914 mg, 2.403 mmol) at room temperature. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. Upon completion, the reaction was loaded onto a 100 g silica gel column with 0-100% 30% EtOH in EtOAc/hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-165d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C27H27BrN2O3: 507.4; Found: 507.3, 509.3 (M+H)+.
To a stirred solution of Int-165d (670 mg, 1.320 mmol) in THF (11 mL) and water (2.2 mL) was added 4-methylmorpholine 4-oxide (309 mg, 2.64 mmol), osmium(VIII) oxide (839 μL, 0.132 mmol). The resulting solution was heated at 50° C. for 24 h. Upon completion, it was cooled down, and 0.5 g sodium metabisulfite was added and the mixture was stirred for 1 h before it was filtered. The filtrate was concentrated. The residue was loaded onto a 120 g silica gel column with 0-100% 30% EtOH in EtOAc/hexane as eluting solvent to provide Int-165e. LCMS anal. calcd. for C27H29BrN2O5: 541.4; Found: 541.3, 543.3 (M+H)+.
To a stirred solution of Int-165e (650 mg, 1.20 mmol) in MeOH (12 mL) was added palladium on carbon (128 mg, 0.120 mmol). The resulting mixture was flushed with N2 and connected with H2 balloon for 1 h. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was filtered through a pad of celite. The filtrate was concentrated to provide Int-165f LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H24N2O5: 372.4; Found: 373.4 (M+H)+.
To a stirred solution of Int-165f(410 mg, 1.101 mmol) in DCM (11 mL) was added triethylamine (334 mg, 3.30 mmol) and methanesulfonyl chloride (277 mg, 2.422 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 hrs. Upon completion, it was concentrated to remove most of the DCM. To the residue, 20 mL EtOAc and 5 mL 0.2 N HCl aqueous solution was added. The organic layer was separated, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated to provide the crude product.
To the crude product was added 10 mL DMF and potassium carbonate (761 mg, 5.50 mmol). The mixture was stirred at 100° C. for 4 hrs. Upon completion, it was filtered. The filtrate was loaded onto a C18 column (220 g) with 0-100% ACN in water (with 0.05% TFA modifier) as eluting solvent to racemic material (82 mg, 0.231 mmol). The racemic material was further resolved using SFC on an AD-H (4.6×250 mm, 5 μm) column with 30% MeOH as eluting solvent to provide the earlier eluting peak Int-165g and later eluting peak Int-165h. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H22N2O4: 354.4; Found: 355.4 (M+H)+.
Lithium chloride (11.96 mg, 0.282 mmol) was added to a stirred mixture of Int-165g (10 mg, 0.028 mmol) in DMF (1 mL) at room temperature. The mixture was stirred at 100° C. overnight. Upon completion, the mixture was cooled down. It was purified by reverse phase preparative HPLC with a 40 g C18 column with ACN in water (with 0.1% TFA modifier) to provide compound 165A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H20N2O4: 340.4; Found: 341.4 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 8.3-8.1 (br, 1H), 7.3-6.95 (m, 6H), 4.85 (s, 1H), 4.37 (s, 1H), 2.98 (s, 3H), 2.75-2.62 (br, 1H), 2.62-2.39 (br, 1H), 2.27-2.02 (m, 4H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 165A, compound 165B was prepared from Int-165h. LCMS anal. calcd. for C19H20N2O4: 340.4; Found: 341.3 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 8.27-8.07 (br, 1H), 7.3-6.9 (m, 6H), 4.83 (s, 1H), 4.36 (s, 1H), 2.97 (s, 3H), 2.73-2.62 (br, 1H), 2.62-2.39 (br, 1H), 2.26-2.04 (m, 4H).
A mixture of 3-ethoxycyclohex-2-en-1-one (5 g, 35.7 mmol), hexamethylphosphoramide (12.78 g, 71.3 mmol) and 1-iodopropane (7.28 g, 42.8 mmol) in THF (178 mL) was added lithium diisopropylamide (35.7 mL, 71.3 mmol) dropwise at −78° C. under N2. The mixture was slowly warmed to room temperature for 2 hrs. The reaction was quenched with aqueous ammonium chloride solution at 0° C., and warmed to room temperature, with stirring. The mixture was extracted with ether. The combined organic layer was washed with brine, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel (10:3 hexane-ethyl acetate) to provide Int-166a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C11H18O2: 182.2; Found: 183.2 (M+H)+.
To a solution of Int-166a (3.3 g, 18.11 mmol) in THF (91 mL) was added phenylmagnesium bromide (23.54 mL, 23.54 mmol) at −78° C. The resulting mixture was stirred at this temperature for 10 min before being warmed to 0° C. for 30 minutes. Upon completion, it was quenched with 100 mL NH4Cl aqueous solution. The mixture was extracted with 3×100 mL EtOAc. The combined organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and concentrated to provide 5 g crude product.
The above crude was added to 100 mL MeOH and 50 mL water, followed by the addition of 2 mL TFA. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 hours. Upon completion, it was concentrated to remove most of MeOH. The residue was added to 100 mL EtOAc. The organic layer was separated and dried over MgSO4 and concentrated. The residue was loaded onto a 220 g silica gel column with 20% EtOAc in hexane as eluent to provide Int-166b. LCMS anal. calcd. for C15H18O: 214.3; Found: 215.6 (M+H)+.
The mixture of Int-166b (3.5 g, 16.33 mmol), methanamine in MeOH (40.8 ml, 82 mmol) was added to 0.2 mL TFA and 5 g anhydrous MgSO4. The resulting reaction was stirred at room temperature for 4 hours. It was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated. To the above residue was added 100 mL DCM and 10 mL MeOH, followed by sodium borohydride (0.989 g, 26.1 mmol) portionwise. Upon completion, it was quenched with 10 mL 2 N HCl aqueous solution. The reaction mixture was dried over MgSO4 and concentrated. The residue was purified by a 120 g silica gel column with 0-20% MeOH in DCM as eluent to provide Int-166c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C16H23N: 229.4 Found: 230.4 (M+H)+.
A mixture of Int-166c (1700 mg, 7.41 mmol), 4-(benzyloxy)-5-bromo-3-methoxypicolinic acid (2506 mg, 7.41 mmol), triethylamine (1500 mg, 14.82 mmol) and HATU (3382 mg, 8.89 mmol) in DCM (100 mL) was stirred at room temperature 5 hours. Upon completion, 100 mL 0.2 HCl aqueous solution was added. The organic layer was separated, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated. The residue was loaded onto a 120 g silica gel column with 0-100% EtOAc in hexane to provide Int-166d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C30H33BrN2O3: 549.5 Found: 550.4 (M+H)+.
To a stirred solution of Int-166d (2.3 g, 4.19 mmol) in THF (35.9 mL)/Water (5.98 mL) was added 4-methylmorpholine 4-oxide (0.981 g, 8.37 mmol) and osmium (VIII) oxide (2.66 mL, 0.419 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at 50° C. overnight. Upon completion, 5 g solid sodium metabisulfite and 5 g MgSO4 was added. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 hour. It was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated. The residue was purified by a 120 g C18 column with 0-100% ACN in water with 0.05% TFA modifier to provide Int-166e. LCMS anal. calcd. for C30H35BrN2O5: 583.5; Found: 584.4 (M+H)+.
To a stirred solution of Int-166e (1.1 g, 1.885 mmol) in methanol (20 mL)/DCM (2 mL) was added palladium on carbon (0.201 g, 0.189 mmol). The resulting mixture was hydrogenated under H2 balloon at room temperature for 1 hour. Upon completion, it was filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated to provide Int-166f LCMS anal. calcd. for C23H30N2O5: 414.5; Found: 415.4 (M+H)+.
To a stirred solution of Int-166f(760 mg, 1.834 mmol) in 20 mL THF was added triethylamine (649 mg, 6.42 mmol) and methanesulfonyl chloride (462 mg, 4.03 mmol) at 0° C. The resulting mixture was stirred at this temperature for 1 hour. At completion, it was filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated and 50 mL EtOAc was added. It was washed with 0.1 N aqueous HCl solution and dried over MgSO4. It was concentrated to afford crude product.
To the above crude product was added DMF (20 mL) and potassium carbonate (1267 mg, 9.17 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at 100° C. overnight. Upon completion, it was cooled down and 100 mL water and 100 mL EtOAc was added. The organic layer was separated and dried over MgSO4. It was concentrated and the residue was loaded onto a 100 g C18 column with 0-100% ACN in water (0.05% TFA modifier) as eluent to provide Int-166g (320 mg, 0.807 mmol), which was subjected to SFC resolution (AD-H, 4.6×250 mm, EtOH) to provide Int-166g-peak1 and Int-166g-peak2. LCMS anal. calcd. for C23H28N2O4: 396.5; Found: 397.4 (M+H)+.
Int-166g-peak1 (15 mg, 0.038 mmol) was dissolved in the suspension of LiCl (16.04 mg, 0.378 mmol) in DMF (1000 μL) and the mixture was stirred at 100° C. for 1 hour. The suspension was filtered. The filtrate was purified by preparative HPLC Reverse phase (on SunFire C18 OBD Prep Column), eluting with 10-90% Acetonitrile/Water with 0.1% TFA modifier to provide 166A. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H26N2O4: 382.5; Found: 383.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 8.14 (s, 1H), 7.26-6.94 (m, 5H), 4.68 (s, 1H), 4.38 (s, 1H), 3.06 (s, 3H), 2.67 (d, J=12.4 Hz, 1H), 2.30-2.00 (m, 5H), 1.68-1.26 (m, 5H).
Following essentially the method employed to produce compound 166A, compound 166B was prepared from Int-166g-peak2. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H26N2O4: 382.5; Found: 383.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 8.14 (s, 1H), 7.26-6.94 (m, 5H), 4.68 (s, 1H), 4.38 (s, 1H), 3.06 (s, 3H), 2.67 (d, J=12.4 Hz, 1H), 2.30-2.00 (m, 5H), 1.68-1.28 (m, 5H).
To a stirred solution of dibenzyl (3-hydroxycyclohexane-1,2-diyl)dicarbamate (2 g, 5.02 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (50.2 mL) was added Dess-Martin periodinane (3.19 g, 7.53 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 hours. A drop of water was added and the precipitate was filtered through a pad of celite. The filtrate was concentrated. The residue was loaded onto a 120 g silica gel column with 0-100% 30% EtOH in EtOAc/hexane as eluent to provide Int-167a. LCMS anal. calcd. for C22H24N2O5: 396.4; Found: 397.2 (M+H)+.
To a stirred solution of Int-167a (1800 mg, 4.54 mmol) in THF (50 mL) was added phenyllithium (9559 μL, 18.16 mmol) at −78° C. The resulting mixture was slowly warmed up to 0° C. for 1 hour. Upon completion, it was quenched with 20 mL NH4Cl aqueous solution. The mixture was extracted with 2×30 mL EtOAc. The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated. The residue was purified by a 100 g silica gel column with 0-100% 30% EtOH in EtOAc/hexane to provide Int-167b. It was moved to next step without further purification. LCMS anal. calcd. for C28H30N2O5: 474.5; Found: 475.3 (M+H)+.
To a stirred solution of Int-167b (700 mg, 1.475 mmol) in MeOH (20 mL) was added palladium on carbon (157 mg, 0.148 mmol). The resulting mixture was hydrogenated under H2 balloon for 3 hours. It was filtered through a pad of celite. The filtrate was concentrated to provide Int-167c. LCMS anal. calcd. for C12H18N2O: 206.3; Found 207.3 (M+H)+.
A stirred solution of Int-167c (399 mg, 1.454 mmol), 2,3-diamino-1-phenylcyclohexan-1-ol (300 mg, 1.454 mmol) in n-methylimidazole (5 mL) was heated at 80° C. overnight. Upon completion, it was cooled down. The reaction was loaded onto a 100 g C18 column with 0-100% ACN in water as eluent to provide crude product. The crude product was then loaded onto Gilson using SunFire C18 OBD Prep Column with 0-100% ACN in water (0.1% TFA modifier) as eluent to provide Int-167d. LCMS anal. calcd. for C25H24N2O4: 416.5; Found 417.2 (M+H)+.
To a stirred solution of Int-167d (40 mg, 0.096 mmol) in DMF (960 μL) was added iodomethane (40.9 mg, 0.288 mmol) and sodium hydride (11.52 mg, 0.288 mmol) at 0° C. The resulting mixture was stirred at this temperature for 1 hour. Upon completion, it was quenched with 2 drops of 1 N ammonium chloride aqueous solution. The mixture was loaded onto a 50 g C18 column with 0-100% ACN in water (0.05% TFA as modifier) as eluent to provide Int-167e. LCMS anal. calcd. for C27H28N2O4: 444.5; Found 445.2 (M+H)+.
Pd/C (5.75 mg, 5.40 μmol) was added to a stirred, cooled room temperature mixture of Int-167e (24 mg, 0.054 mmol) in methanol. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 hrs. The reaction mixture was then filtered. The filtrate was loaded onto a 50 g C18 column eluting with 0-100% acetonitrile/water (0.05% TFA) to provide 167. LCMS anal. calcd. for C20H22N2O4: 354.4; Found: 355.2 (M+H)+. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Methanol-d4) δ 7.38 (s, 2H), 4.73 (s, 1H), 4.41 (s, 1H), 3.33 (s, 13H), 3.25 (s, 3H), 3.13 (s, 3H), 2.05 (s, 2H).
A fluorescent assay monitoring the activity of influenza-derived neuraminidase (NA) enzyme in infected cells was developed to evaluate antiviral compounds against Flu A. NA activity enables the release of influenza virions from infected cells but is also functional in cell culture systems that retain infectious virus at the cell surface like Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) epithelial cells which require chemical intervention for release of virus. NA activity can be monitored by the increase in fluorescence of MUNAN (4-methylumbelliferone) released as product from enzymatic substrate cleavage of 2′-(4-methylumbelliferyl)-α-D-N-acetylneuraminic acid (MUNANA). The amount of fluorescence is directly proportional to the amount of NA enzyme activity which increases with viral replication.
MDCK (Sigma) cells are incubated at 37° C. in an atmosphere of 5% CO2, and >85% humidity in growth medium of DMEM with Glutamax and pyruvate (Thermo Fisher) with 5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher), and 1% Pen-Strep (Thermo-Fisher). On the day of assay, cells are washed with 15-20 ml PBS (Thermo Fisher) followed by the addition of 1.5 ml 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA (Thermo Fisher) solution and incubation at 37° C. for 2-5 min. After the cells have dislodged from the plate, 6-8 mL of growth medium is added to resuspend cells. Cells are counted in a ViCell Counter (Beckman), and the cell density is adjusted to 80,000 cells/mL by adding growth medium. FLU A (PR/8/34) at 3.4E+08 pfu/ml is diluted 1:25,000 in to the MDCK cell suspension.
Compounds diluted in DMSO are titrated (10-point, 3-fold dilution) and added by acoustic dispense (200 nL, Labcyte Echo) into a 384-well black polystyrene tissue-culture treated microplate (Corning). The cell and virus suspension (25 μL) is dispensed into each well of the assay plate. Plates are briefly centrifuged to (300 rpm×30 s) and incubated at 37° C. in an atmosphere of 5% CO2, and >85% humidity for 48 h. For detection of NA activity, the MUNANA substrate (MP Biomedical) is diluted in dH2O at a concentration of 2.5 mM. The substrate is further diluted in assay buffer (66.6 mM MES, 8 mM CaCl2), pH 6.5) to a concentration of 200 μM. A volume of 6 μl of the substrate dilution is added to each well of the assay plate, shaken for 1 min to mix and returned to the incubator for 1 h at 37° C. Then, 25 μL of MUNANA Stop Solution (0.2 M sodium carbonate, Fisher) in dH2O was added to each well followed by shaking for 1 min. An Envision plate reader (Perkin Elmer) was used to measure the fluorescence intensity (Ex=355 nm, Em=460 nm) of each well.
Raw data from each test well is normalized to the average signal of 100% inhibited wells (Max Effect; 100% inhibition) and virus infected cells only (Min Effect; 0% inhibition) to calculate % inhibition using the following formula: % inhibition=100*(Test Cmpd−Max Effect)/(Min Effect−Max Effect). Data are analyzed using ActivityBase (IDBS), and dose-response curves were generated by plotting percent inhibition (Y-axis) vs. Log10 compound concentrations (X-axis). IC50 values are calculated using a non-linear regression, four-parameters sigmoidal dose-response model.
The compounds of the instant invention were tested in the assay described and the results appear in the table below.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2021/042711 | 7/22/2021 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63056861 | Jul 2020 | US |
