This disclosure relates to cushioning structures suitable for use in a gymnasium.
An example gymnasium 10 is shown in
A pit 18 is provided in the floor 12 of some gymnasiums and filled with loose blocks 20, which are constructed from bare, uncovered polyurethane foam. The pit 18 is arranged beneath equipment to cushion the fall of a gymnast. As a result, the foam blocks come into contact with the gymnasts, absorbing sweat and odors. However, the foam blocks cannot be easily cleaned. Additionally, the foam blocks break down over time and must be replaced since polyurethane foam is generally not recyclable, and typically land filled.
Flammability issues also make polyurethane foam undesirable. The Upholstered Furniture Action Council (UFAC) has developed a voluntary industry standard for many years but growing consumer activism and concerns about flammability has prompted more research and use of flame retardants and combustion modifiers. Typically, the combustion modifiers that are compatible with foam processing tend to produce undesirable softening and some degradation in performance requirements. New federal standards being proposed will further challenge existing standards. Although alternatives are being researched, dominant technology for combustion modifiers involves the use of halogenated compounds which are again not acceptable to regulatory and consumer activists. There is also a cost penalty associated with the use of flame retardants/combustion modifiers.
With the advent of regulatory pressure and standards like California Furniture Standards (Cal TB 117, Cal TB 133), Boston Fire Code, NY Port Authority code, Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) standards there is ongoing pressure to better conform to smoldering resistance and resistance to small open flame ignition. This requirement has substantially increased the use of combustion modifiers by the polyurethane foam industry. Alternatives to achieving desired results or passing certain specifications, such as UL 1975, have revolved around use of special fabrics or inter-liners and are limited to certain applications.
Other concerns regarding polyurethane foams and combustion modifiers remain that the new alternatives not present environmental problems equal or worse than the current situation. Polyurethane foams include additives as a combustion modifier, for example, which act as a fire retardant. The fire retardant additives only serve to raise the ignition point of the polyurethane foam. However, once the polyurethane foam is ignited, it burns with a very hot and intense flame. As a result, it is desirable to eliminate the use of polyurethane foams from spaces occupied by people. Furthermore, flame retardant additives are considered environmentally undesirable to some since it is a chemical that is absorbed into the human body. What is needed is a padding alternative to polyurethane foam for use in gymnasiums that is also hypoallergenic, washable, possibly anti-microbial and recyclable.
A method is disclosed for equipping a gymnasium with padded articles. The padded articles include non-woven, randomly oriented polyester fiber core blocks, floor mats and wall mats. In one example, the blocks are coated in a flexible material, such as flocking, rubber or a non-rubber elastomer, to prevent an exterior of the blocks from fraying. The mats also include a core of non-woven, randomly oriented polyester fibers that are wrapped in a durable, aesthetic covering. A scrim can be used to provide desired flammability characteristics, eliminating the need for bromine. The blocks can be washed and reused, and are fully recyclable.
These and other features of the disclosure can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
The polyester material is provide by polyester fibers that may include a staple or matrix fiber along with some low and high melt binder fibers, which also may have elastomeric properties. The polyester fibers are randomly oriented, non-woven fibers that are melted with binder fibers during a manufacturing process to interlink the fibers. The interlinked fibers provide some structural rigidity and cushioning, as opposed to loose fibers, which do not retain their cushioning properties over time. The fibers and manufacturing process can be selected to provide cushioning properties similar to polyester foam, if desired.
Referring to
In one example shown in
Referring to
The tumble and wall mats 14, 16, for example, can be manufactured in accordance with the apparatuses and methods set forth in Applicant's pending applications, for example, (U.S. Ser. No. 11/244,785, “Machine Having Variable Fiber Filling System for Forming Fiber Parts”; Ser. No. 11/246,609, “Cushion with Aesthetic Exterior”; Ser. No. 11/260,756, “Machine for Forming Fiber Parts”; Ser. No. 11/259,769, “Cushion with Aesthetic Exterior”; Ser. No. 11/261,354, “Machine for Forming Dual Density Fiber Parts”; Ser. No. 11/261,855, “Polyester Fiber Cushion Applications”; and Ser. No. 11/404,263, “Linear Process for Manufacture of Fiber Batts”), all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Of course, the blocks and mats can be constructed from other suitable methods as well. The blocks 120, 220 and 320 can be constructed from a polyester fiber batt that is cut into cubes using a hot wire, for example.
The non-woven, randomly oriented polyester fibers are bromine-free, which eliminates this undesired chemical from the padding while offering excellent flame resistance. The blocks do not require a covering so that the polyester can be exposed to the environment. However, the blocks 120, 220 and 320 are made more durable by incorporating a coating, which also provides an aesthetic covering with a desired feel.
The blocks can be washed periodically by the gymnasium or shredded and reformed into desired shapes by the manufacturer. Unlike polyurethane foam, the polyester cushions are completely recyclable and reusable.
Although example embodiments have been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of the claims. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine their true scope and content.
This patent application claims priority to provisional application No. 60/969,741 filed Sep. 4, 2007.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60969741 | Sep 2007 | US |