POLYESTER POLYOL AND POLYURETHANE PREPARED THEREFROM

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20240026060
  • Publication Number
    20240026060
  • Date Filed
    November 30, 2021
    2 years ago
  • Date Published
    January 25, 2024
    3 months ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to polyester polyol and polyurethane prepared from the polyester polyol, the polyester polyol being prepared from an acid component containing at least one type of pure isophthalic acid (PIA) and phthalic anhydride (PA) and an alcohol component represented by chemical formula 1:
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a polyester polyol for preparing a semi-incombustible rigid polyurethane and a polyurethane prepared therefrom.


BACKGROUND ART

As energy saving policies for greenhouse gas reduction are strengthened globally, the role of heat insulation materials among building materials is becoming more important. In addition, due to a series of building fires, interest in materials that can satisfy not only heat insulation properties but also flame retardancy is increasing. Polyurethane foam has excellent heat insulation properties compared to other materials (EPS, XPS, Rockwool) and has recently attracted a lot of attention as a heat insulation material, but its use has slowed down due to flame retardancy issues.


Among polyols that are an essential component of polyurethane, a polyether polyol and a polyester polyol are known as the most common polyols. These polyols have a significant effect on the properties of the polyurethane or polyurethane foam to be prepared.


In general, a polyol having a high molecular weight and low functionality is used to prepare a soft urethane foam, and a polyol having a small molecular weight and high functionality is used to prepare a rigid urethane foam.


Meanwhile, since the polyurethane foam, especially the rigid polyurethane foam, is used in various fields, there is a difference in required physical properties depending on the application field. When used as a heat insulation material for interior and exterior building materials, it particularly requires flame retardancy, dimensional stability, formability, heat insulation, and eco-friendliness.


A polyester polyol with a phthalic anhydride (PA)-based backbone structure was used as the main resin of the universally used rigid polyurethane foam (PUR/PIR), but due to its poor flame retardancy, the polyol was recently developed with a high-purity terephthalic acid (PTA)-based backbone. However, when the polyester polyol having a PTA structure alone is used, the flame retardancy of the polyurethane produced from this raw material is secured, but the crystallinity of the polyester polyol is high, and solidification problems occur at room temperature, resulting in poor storability.


Although it was developed with a PTA/PA base to compensate for these disadvantages, difficulties in market application are likely to occur when flame retardancy regulations are strengthened. Meanwhile, when high-purity isophthalic acid (PIA: Purified Isophthalic Acid) is used as a base, flame retardancy is excellent, but there are problems of compatibility and an increase in viscosity.


RELATED ART DOCUMENT
Patent Document



  • (Patent Document 1) Korean Patent Publication No. 2012-0027422



DISCLOSURE
Technical Problem

In order to solve the above problems, the present invention is directed to providing a polyester polyol with low viscosity, excellent storage stability and compatibility, and a polyurethane with excellent flame retardancy prepared using the polyester polyol.


Technical Solution

The present invention provides a polyester polyol prepared from:

    • an acid component including at least one of purified isophthalic acid (PIA) or phthalic anhydride (PA); and
    • an alcohol component represented by Chemical Formula 1:





HO-L3-OH  [Chemical Formula 1]

    • wherein L3 is a straight or branched chain alkylene group having 2 to 6 carbon atoms and unsubstituted or substituted with a hydroxyl group; or a straight or branched chain ether group having 2 to 6 carbon atoms and unsubstituted or substituted with a hydroxyl group.


The present invention also provides a polyurethane prepared by reacting the polyester polyol with one or more compounds including two or more isocyanate groups.


Advantageous Effects

The present invention can provide a polyester polyol having excellent storage stability, low viscosity, and excellent reactivity with isocyanate. In addition, a polyurethane prepared using the polyester polyol according to the present invention has excellent flame retardancy and dimensional stability.







BEST MODE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INVENTION

In the present invention, for preparation of a polyester polyol, an acid component selected from the group consisting of purified isophthalic acid (PIA) and phthalic anhydride (PA), and an alcohol component represented by Chemical Formula 1 below are used:





HO-L3-OH  [Chemical Formula 1]

    • wherein L3 is a straight or branched chain alkylene group having 2 to 6 carbon atoms and unsubstituted or substituted with a hydroxyl group; or a straight or branched chain ether group having 2 to 6 carbon atoms and unsubstituted or substituted with a hydroxyl group.


To prepare an aromatic polyester polyol with compatibility, low viscosity, and excellent storage stability, the present invention suggests the type and mixing ratio of an acid component, uses a specific alcohol component, and has an optimal OH value and an acid value therefrom to provide an aromatic polyester polyol having excellent reactivity with isocyanate by lowering crystallinity and controlling low viscosity (low molecular weight distribution increase). Furthermore, the present invention provides a flame-retardant polyurethane prepared therefrom.


In the present invention, purified isophthalic acid (PIA) or phthalic anhydride (PA) may be used as the acid component, which may be used alone or in combination. In particular, the present invention provides a polyol including PIA as the acid component, wherein PIA may be included in an amount of 80 to 100 mol %.


As in one embodiment of the present specification, a polyester polyol represented by Chemical Formula 1 is composed of a phthalic anhydride (PA)-based and a purified isophthalic acid (PIA)-based backbone instead of a high-purity terephthalic acid (PTA)-based backbone. PIA has a low steric hindrance compared to the PTA-based backbone, so that it has excellent reactivity with isocyanate and can increase the flame retardancy of the prepared polyurethane. Therefore, in the present invention, PIA is included as an acid component of the polyester polyol, and the PIA is included in an amount of 80 to 100 mol % in the acid component to obtain desired effects.


In addition, when a certain amount of PA is mixed and used as the acid component, it is possible to provide a semi-incombustible aromatic polyester polyol having excellent reactivity with isocyanate by lowering crystallinity and controlling low viscosity (low molecular weight distribution increase).


Meanwhile, an alcohol component represented by Chemical Formula 1 in the present invention may include monoethyl glycol, diethylene glycol, neopentyl glycol, methyl propanediol, and trimethylol propane, and in particular, neopentyl glycol (NPG) or diethylene glycol (DEG).


NPG has an effect of increasing solubility due to its bulky structure, and has a methyl group (short chain), so that NPG has an effect of improving flame retardancy and compatibility compared to DEG due to the van der Waals interaction effect. In addition, since NPG includes tertiary carbon atoms, it has relatively high thermal stability and has an effect of lowering crystallinity. Therefore, in one embodiment of the present invention, NPG is used as the alcohol component of the polyester polyol, and at this time, it is proposed to use it together with DEG.


When NPG and DEG are used together as the alcohol component, a mixing ratio is preferably in a range of 1:2 to 1:20 in terms of a molar ratio in order to obtain an effect of using NPG.


The polyester polyol of the present invention is prepared using the acid component and the alcohol component in a mixing ratio of 1.0:1.4 to 2.0 mol. In addition, for a reaction of the acid component and the alcohol component, the reaction is carried out at a temperature of 170 to 240° C. at atmospheric pressure in the presence of a catalyst such as butylstannonic acid, butyltin tris-2-ethylhexanoate, tertabutyl titanate, or the like for 7 to 12 hours.


The polyester polyol of the present invention preferably has a weight average molecular weight of 300 g/mol to 3,000 g/mol in terms of storage stability and flame retardancy of polyurethane prepared using the same. Specifically, when the weight average molecular weight of the polyester polyol is less than 300 g/mol, preparation is difficult, and when the weight average molecular weight exceeds 3,000 g/mol, the storage properties and urethane reactivity of the polyester polyol are lowered, so that the flame retardancy of the polyurethane may be reduced.


As the polyester polyol of the present invention uses PIA or PA as the acid component, especially includes PIA, and uses DEG or a mixture of DEG and NPG as the alcohol component, low viscosity is controlled to increase a low molecular weight distribution, and reactivity with isocyanate is excellent. Therefore, it is advantageous in terms of preparation of the polyurethane.


The present invention provides a polyurethane prepared by reacting the polyester polyol with one or more compounds including two or more isocyanate groups. The preparation of the polyurethane may be made by generally known techniques. It usually involves a reaction between an isocyanate component and a polyol component in the presence of a catalyst and a foaming agent.


The one or more compounds including two or more isocyanate groups are compounds including two or more isocyanate groups (—N═C═O), and may include, for example, 1,12-dodecane diisocyanate, 2-ethyltetramethylene 1,4-diisocyanate, 2-methylpentamethylene 1,5-diisocyanate, tetramethylene 1,4-diisocyanate, hexamethylene 1,6-diisocyanate; cyclohexane 1,3-diisocyanate, cyclohexane 1,4-diisocyanate, 1-isocyanato-3,3,5-trimethyl-5-isocyanatomethylcyclohexane (IPDI), 2,4-hexahydrotolylene diisocyanate, 2,6-hexahydrotolylene diisocyanate, 4,4′-dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate, 2,2′-dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate, 2,4′-dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate, 2,4-tolylene diisocyanate, 2,6-tolylene diisocyanate, 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI), 2,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, 2,2′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, polyphenylpolymethylene polyisocyanate, 1,5-naphthylene diisocyanate (NDI), 3,3′-dimethylbiphenyl diisocyanate, 1,2-diphenylethane diisocyanate, p-phenylene diisocyanate (PPDI), trimethylene diisocyanate, tetramethylene diisocyanate, pentamethylene diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate, heptamethylene diisocyanate, octamethylene diisocyanate, 2-methylpentamethylene 1,5-diisocyanate, 2-ethylbutylene 1,4-diisocyanate, pentamethylene 1,5-diisocyanate, butylene 1,4-diisocyanate, 1-isocyanato-3,3,5-trimethyl-5-isocyanatomethyl-cyclohexane (isophorone diisocyanate, IPDI), 1,4-bis (isocyanatomethyl) cyclohexane, 1,3-bis (isocyanatomethyl) cyclohexane (HXDI), 1,4-cyclohexane diisocyanate, isomers thereof, or mixtures thereof, but are not limited thereto.


In one embodiment of the present invention, additional additives may be further included as needed during the preparation of the polyurethane. For example, the additives may include, but are not limited to, commonly used additives such as foaming agents, flame retardants, foam stabilizers, catalysts, surface active materials, cell control agents, fillers, dyes, pigments, and hydrolysis control agents.


In the present specification, the foaming agent includes water, a carboxylic acid, a fluorocarbon-based foaming agent, carbon dioxide, and a hydrocarbon foaming agent such as a linear or branched chain alkane hydrocarbon, but is not limited thereto.


In the present specification, as the flame retardant, a commonly used flame retardant may be used, and the flame retardant may include, for example, brominated ester, brominated ether (Ixol) or brominated alcohol, such as dibromoneopentyl alcohol, tribromoneopentyl alcohol and PHT-4-diol, and also chlorinated phosphates, such as tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate, tris(2-chloropropyl)phosphate (TCPP), tris(1,3-dichloropropyl)phosphate, tricresyl phosphate, tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate, tetrakis(2-chloroethyl) ethylenediphosphate, dimethyl methanephosphonate, diethyl diethanolaminomethylphosphonate, and also commercially available halogenated flame retardant polyols. With additional phosphates or phosphonates, a liquid flame retardant includes, but is not limited to, diethyl ethanephosphonate (DEEP), triethyl phosphate (TEP), dimethyl propylphosphonate (DMPP), or diphenyl cresyl phosphate (DPK).


In the present specification, the foam stabilizer includes, but is not limited to, a silicone foam stabilizer, a non-ionic foam stabilizer, a non-silicone foam stabilizer, and the like, and specifically includes dinonyl phenol, methyl glucoside, methyl propanediol, vinyl ether maleic acid, an Si-copolymer series, and the like.


In the present specification, as the catalyst, a commonly used catalyst may be used, and the catalyst may include, but is not limited to, triethylamine, tributylamine, dimethylbenzylamine, dicyclohexylmethylamine, dimethylcyclohexylamine, N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyldiaminodiethyl ether, bis(dimethylaminopropyl) urea, N-methylmorpholine, N-ethylmorpholine, N-cyclohexylmorpholine, N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine, N,N,N,N-tetramethylbutanediamine, N,N,N,N-tetramethylhexane-1,6-diamine, pentamethyldiethylenetriamine, bis(2-dimethylaminoethyl) ether, dimethyl piperazine, N-dimethylaminoethylpiperidine, 1,2-dimethylimidazole, 1-azabicyclo[2.2.0]octane, 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (Dabco), triethanol amine, triisopropanolamine, N-methyldiethanolamine, N-ethyldiethanolamine, dimethylaminoethanol, 2-(N,N-dimethylaminoethoxy) ethanol, N,N′,N″-tris(dialkyl aminoalkyl) hexahydrotriazine, N,N′,N″-tris(dimethylaminopropyl)-s-hexahydrotriazine, triethylenediamine, iron(II) chloride, zinc chloride, lead octoate, tin dioctoate, tin diethylhexoate, dibutyltin dilaurate, tetraisopropyl titanate, butylstanonic acid, butylcrotin dihydroxide, tetrabutyl titanate, and mixtures thereof.


The polyurethane prepared using the polyester polyol according to one embodiment of the present invention has excellent flame retardancy and dimensional stability.


Hereinafter, examples will be given to describe the present invention in detail. However, the examples according to the present invention may be modified into various other forms, and the scope of the present invention is not to be construed as being limited to the examples described below. The examples of the present specification are provided to more completely explain the present invention to those of ordinary skill in the art.


Comparative Example 1

4.6 mol of phthalic anhydride (PA, SigmaAldrich), 8.38 mol of diethylene glycol (DEG, Lotte Chemical Co., Ltd.), and 0.0008 mol of butylstannoic acid (Fascat 4100, Arkema) were added to a 2 L reactor equipped with a stirrer, a packing column, and a stirring bar, and the temperature was primarily raised to 170° C. (2 hours). A stirring speed during the temperature increase process was 200 rpm, and an ES reaction was performed for 2 hours. The temperature was secondarily raised to 230° C. for 3 hours. After holding for 1 hour, a vacuum was set at 200 mmHg, and then a reaction was performed for 2 hours to prepare a resin having an acid value (mg KOH/g resin) of 0.4 and a hydroxyl value (mg KOH/g resin) of 276.


Comparative Examples 2 to 5

A resin was prepared in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1, except for changing some of the conditions described in Table 1 below.


Example 1

4.6 mol of purified isophthalic acid (PIA, Lotte Chemical Co., Ltd.), 7.58 mol of diethylene glycol (DEG, Lotte Chemical Co., Ltd.), 0.84 mol of neopentyl glycol (NPG, LG Chem Co., Ltd.), and 0.0008 mol of butylstannoic acid (Fascat 4100, Arkema) were added to a 2 L reactor equipped with a stirrer, a packing column, and a stirring bar, and the temperature was primarily raised to 170° C. (2 hours). A stirring speed during the temperature increase process was 200 rpm, and an ES reaction was performed for 2 hours. The temperature was secondarily raised to 230° C. for 3 hours. After holding for 1 hour, a vacuum was set at 200 mmHg, and then a reaction was performed for 2 hours to prepare a resin having an acid value (mg KOH/g resin) of 0.5 and a hydroxyl value (mg KOH/g resin) of 281.


Examples 2 and 3

A resin was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1, except for changing some of the conditions described in Table 1 below.


















TABLE 1










Comparative
Comparative
Comparative
Comparative
Comparative


Component
Compound
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Example 5
























Acid
PA

0.46
0.92
4.6


1.84
1.84


(mol)
PTA




4.6

2.76



PIA
4.6
4.14
3.68


4.6

2.76


Alcohol
DEG
7.58
7.58
8.38
8.38
8.38
8.38
8.38
8.38


(mol)
NPG
0.84
0.84



Catalyst
Fascat
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008


(mol)
4100


Physical
OH
281
276
276
276
273
275
273
276


properties
value



Acid
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.5



value



Storage
6 months
6 months
6 months
6 months
1 day
3 months
3 months
6 months



stability
(⊚)
(⊚)
(⊚)
(⊚)
(X)
(◯)
(◯)
(⊚)



(15° C.)



Viscosity
16,500
14,200
10,600
5,600
12,500
12,800
8,900
8,100



(cps)



Compatibility
3 months
3 months
3 months
3 months
1 day
1 month
2 months
3 months




(⊚)
(⊚)
(⊚)
(⊚)
(X, solid
(Δ, solid
(◯, cloudiness)
(⊚)








phase)
phase)



TGA 50%
425
419
408
375
416
415
396
398



(° C.)





PTA (purified terephthalic acid, Lotte Chemical Co., Ltd.)


Storage stability: A liquid state of samples in a 15° C. warm storage room was evaluated for 3 months as follows.


X: Gelation or solidification within 2 weeks or within 30% increase compared to an initial viscosity


Δ: Gelation or solidification within 2 months or within 30% increase compared to an initial viscosity


◯: Gelation or solidification within 4 months or within 30% increase compared to an initial viscosity


⊚: Gelation or solidification within 6 months or within 30% increase compared to an initial viscosity


Viscosity: Samples at 25° C. were evaluated with a spindle 64 using a Brookfield viscometer.


Compatibility: After blending polyol/water/foaming agent (cyclopentane)/foam stabilizer at room temperature, a liquid state was evaluated for 3 months.


X: Gelation or solidification within 2 weeks,


Δ: Gelation or solidification within 1 month,


◯: Gelation within 2 months,


⊚: Within 30% increase compared to an initial viscosity for 3 or more months


TGA_50% (° C.) is a temperature at the 50% weight reduction point in the TGA N2 atmosphere.






Next, polyurethanes were prepared from the polyols. 100 g of resin, 10 g of tris(1-chloro-2-propyl)phosphate (TCPP, flame retardant, SigmaAldrich), 1 g of TEGOSTAB®B8462 (foam stabilizer, silicone surfactant, Evonik), 12 g of cyclopentane (foaming agent, SigmaAldrich), 3.5 g of Dabco k-15 (Catalyst, Evonik), and 1.0 g of N,N-dimethylcyclohexylamine (DMCHA, catalyst, Huntsman), were put into a 2 liter can and then mixed using a high-speed stirrer to prepare a system polyol.



















TABLE 2








Experi-
Experi-
Experi-
Experi-
Experi-
Experi-
Experi-
Experi-





mental
mental
mental
mental
mental
mental
mental
mental


Component
POLYOL
Units
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Example 5
Example 6
Example 7
Example 8







Resin
Example 1
g
100










Example 2
g

100



Example 3
g


100



Comparative
g



100



Example 1



Comparative
g




100



Example 2



Comparative
g





100



Example 3



Comparative
g






100



Example 4



Comparative
g







100



Example 5










Flame
TCPP
g
10


retardant


Foam
TEGOSTAB ®
g
1


stabilizer


Foaming
Cyclopentane
g
12


agent
Water
g
1


Catalyst
Dabco k-15
g
3.5



DMCHA
g
1


Curing
COSMONATE
g
200


agent
SR-500



NCO Index

300











    • An NCO index is obtained in the following way.










Index
=


Isocyanate


equivalents


Polyol


equivalents







Isocycnatae


equivalents

=


Input


amount


4201
/

NOC
(
%
)








Polyol


equivalents

=


Polyol


input


amount


56100
/
OH


value







The physical properties of the prepared polyurethanes are shown in Table 3 below.


















TABLE 3







Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental


Compound

Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Example 5
Example 6
Example 7
Example 8







Foam
Total heat
7.8
8.2
9.0
17.5
9.1
8.5
13.8



physical
release







12.4


properties
(MJ/m2)



Total smoke
58
72
91
320
90
70
150
130



generation
(⊚)
(⊚)
(⊚)
(X)
(◯)
(⊚)
(Δ)
(Δ)



(m2/m2)



Water



X
Δ

Δ
Δ



absorption
(0.1)
(0.3)
(0.9)
(5.5)
(1.9)
(0.1)
(2.9)
(1.5)



(g/100 cm2)





Total heat release and total smoke generation: they are measured using a CONE calorimeter (KS F ISO 5660-1). Total smoke generation was evaluated as X: 150 m2/m2 or more, Δ: 100 to 150 m2m2, ◯: 80 to 100 m2/m2, ⊚: less than 80 m2/m2.


Water absorption: A 100 × 100 × 25 mm test piece was immersed in water at 25° C., taken out after 10 seconds, left for 30 seconds, weighed as a standard weight, immersed again in clear water, and absorbed water for 96 hours and finally weighted. A water absorption amount was obtained according to the following equation.


Absorption amount (g/100 cm2) = (final weight after absorption − standard weight)/surface area × 100


Evaluations were expressed as X: 3 g or more, Δ: 1 to 3 g, ◯: 0.2 to 1.0 g, and ⊚: 0.1 g or less.






The polyols of Examples 1 to 3 had excellent storage stability and compatibility, and flame retardancy of the polyurethane prepared therefrom was also excellent. On the other hand, the polyol of Comparative Example 2 had significantly poor storage stability and compatibility, and Comparative Examples 1, 4 and 5 showed poor results in terms of flame retardancy. In addition, the PIA/DEG polyol of Comparative Example 3 had good physical properties such as flame retardancy and water absorption, but was difficult to use due to poor compatibility with raw materials used in the system polyol.


More specifically, since the polyols of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 are results of using DEG as an alcohol component and the same amount of other acid components, it was possible to compare effects depending on the type of acid component. When PA was used (Comparative Example 1), storage stability and compatibility were maintained excellently, but flame retardancy was greatly reduced. When PTA was used (Comparative Example 2), storage stability and compatibility were greatly reduced. When PIA was used (Comparative Example 3), compatibility was slightly reduced. However, compared to Example 1 in which NPG was mixed as the alcohol component under the same conditions, storage stability and compatibility were reduced, and the total heat release and total smoke generation increased, indicating poor physical properties. That is, when PIA was used alone as the acid component, a much better polyol was obtained when NPG was mixed and used as the alcohol component. In addition, when Comparative Example 3 was compared with Example 3 in which PIA and PA were mixed as acid components, it was confirmed that storage stability and compatibility were significantly improved. That is, when only DEG was used as the alcohol component, polyols having excellent physical properties were obtained when PIA and PA were used together.


Next, the polyols of Example 1 and Comparative Example 3 show different results by using NPG as the alcohol component when PIA was used alone as the acid component, and when NPG was used in combination, storage stability and compatibility were better than when DEG was used alone.


On the other hand, the polyols of Example 3 and Comparative Example 5 are cases in which the mixing ratio was changed when PA and PIA were used as acid components, and flame retardancy was poor in Comparative Example 5 in which the amount of PA was increased.


Therefore, like polyester polyols according to the practice of the present invention, by using PIA alone as the acid component or using PA and PIA in a certain mixing ratio, and using DEG or a mixture of DEG and NPG as the alcohol component, it was confirmed that the storage stability and the compatibility of the polyol were improved, and the flame retardancy and the dimensional stability of the polyurethane prepared using the same could be improved.

Claims
  • 1. A polyester polyol prepared from: an acid component including at least one of purified isophthalic acid (PIA) and phthalic anhydride (PA); andan alcohol component represented by Chemical Formula 1 below: HO-L3-OH  [Chemical Formula 1]wherein L3 is a straight or branched chain alkylene group having 2 to 6 carbon atoms and unsubstituted or substituted with a hydroxyl group; or a straight or branched chain ether group having 2 to 6 carbon atoms and unsubstituted or substituted with a hydroxyl group.
  • 2. The polyester polyol of claim 1, wherein the acid component includes 80 to 100 mol % of PIA.
  • 3. The polyester polyol of claim 1, wherein the alcohol component includes at least one of neopentyl glycol (NPG) and diethylene glycol (DEG).
  • 4. The polyester polyol of claim 1, wherein NPG and DEG are included as the alcohol component, and a mixing molar ratio of NPG:DEG is 1:2 to 1:20.
  • 5. A polyurethane prepared from the polyester polyol of claim 1.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
10-2020-0165222 Nov 2020 KR national
10-2021-0068094 May 2021 KR national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/KR2021/017881 11/30/2021 WO