Polyethylene terephthalate blends

FIELD
Thermoplastic compositions comprising polyethylene terephthalate and a copolymer of a vinyl aromatic compound and an .alpha.,.beta.-unsaturated cyclic anhydride are disclosed.
BACKGROUND
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) has become an important raw material for production of moldings, film and fibers. Preparation of PET is described inter alia in Whinfield et al, U.S. Pat. No. 2,465,319 and in Pengilly, U.S. Pat. No. 3,047,539, and in Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Second Edition, Vol. 16, pp. 159 et seq. (1968), all disclosures being incorporated herein by reference.
Many applications for injection and extrusion molded parts require heat resistance, and it is in such applications that PET manifests certain undesirable properties. Unreinforced PET has been of limited interest for making such parts due to its low HDT (Heat Deflection Temperature)--about 75.degree. C. at 264 psi. HDT is a measure of an important thermal property of a thermoplastic material wherein a bar of the material, held in flexure under constant load (usually at 264 or 66 psi), deforms a specified amount and the temperature at which this specified deformation occurs is the HDT--see Billmeyer, Textbook of Polymer Science, p. 112, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1962).
U.S. Pat. No. 3,644,574 discloses blends of 1,4-butanediol polyesters with from about 1 to about 40 weight percent of a vinyl aromatic polymer (e.g., a styrenic polymer) which polymer may be inter alia, a copolymer with maleic anhydride. The blends of this patent exhibit increased HDT over the unblended polyester. However, that patent discloses at Column 1, lines 42-47 that the improvements observed with polybutylene terephthalate are not obtained when the polyester is poly(ethylene terephthalate).
A welcome contribution to the art would be a thermoplastic composition comprising PET that has improved HDT and good surface appearance. These highly desirable compositions are provided by this invention.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a thermoplastic composition which comprises an intimate admixture of: (a) a polyethylene terephthalate, (b) a copolymer of a vinyl aromatic compound and an .alpha.,.beta.-unsaturated cyclic anhydride, said copolymer being a rubber-modified graft copolymer or a rubber-free copolymer, (c) a fibrous modifier, and (d) a nucleating agent. The invention also provides a process for producing injection molded articles having good surface appearance as well as providing the articles themselves.
Articles molded from the compositions of this invention have a good balance of physical properties--e.g. HDT @ 264 psi and good surface appearance. Preferable compositions of this invention provides articles having an HDT @ 264 psi (as measured by ASTM procedure D 648-72) of at least about 80.degree. C. Injection molded objects having a Gardner 60.degree. Gloss of at least 60% can readily be provided by means of this invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The polyethylene terephthalate used herein is crystalline and is preferably homopolymeric PET. Halogenated crystalline PET can also be used and is normally formed by condensation of a mixture of a halogenated, preferably brominated, terephthalic acid (e.g., 2,5-dibromoterephthalic acid and 2,3,5,6-tetrabromoterephthalic acid) and terephthalic acid with ethylene glycol. Additionally, providing the resulting copolymer is crystallizable, the polyethylene terephthalate used herein can also contain radicals of other aromatic dicarboxylic acids such as, for example, phthalic acid, isophthalic acid, naphthalene-2,6-dicarboxylic acid, diphenyl-4,4'-dicarboxylic acid and the like as well as their halogenated counterparts. The copolymers, provided the copolymer remains crystallizable, can also contain radicals of other glycols such as, for example, propylene glycol, butylene glycol, dibromoneopentyl glycol, bis(2-hydroxyethyl) ether of tetrabromobisphenol A and tetrabromo-p-xylylene glycol. See for example Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Second Edition, Vol. 16, pp. 161-172 (1968).
The polyethylene terephthalates used herein may be virgin or recycled PET's and should be moldable (i.e., injection moldable or moldable by extrusion), and thus generally will have an intrinsic viscosity (I.V.) falling between about 0.25 and 1.5, and more usually between about 0.5 and 1.2, as measured at 25.degree. C. using a solvent consisting of 60 percent by weight phenol and 40 percent by weight of tetrachloroethane. For best results the polyethylene terephthalate should have an I.V. (measured in the foregoing manner) in the range of 0.4 to 1.2, more preferably between 0.5 and 1.1, and for most injection molding applications polyethylene terephthalates in which the I.V. is in the range of 0.5 to 0.9 are deemed most desirable.
Copolymers of a vinyl aromatic compound and an .alpha.,.beta.-unsaturated cyclic anhydride are well known in the art and are described in the literature. In general, they are prepared by conventional bulk or solution techniques using free-radical initiation. For example, styrene-maleic anhydride copolymers can be obtained by simply reacting the two monomers, i.e., styrene and maleic anhydride, at 50.degree. C. in the presence of benzol peroxide. The rate of polymerization may be better controlled if a solvent such as acetone, benzene or xylene is used.
Vinyl aromatic compounds of component (b) can be derived from compounds of the formula: ##STR1## where R.sup.1 and R.sup.2 are selected from the group consisting of (lower) alkyl groups of from 1 to 6 carbon atoms and hydrogen; R.sup.3 and R.sup.4 are selected from the group consisting of chloro, bromo, hydrogen and alkyl of from 1 to 6 carbon atoms; R.sup.5 and R.sup.6 are selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and (lower) alkyl groups of from 1 to 6 carbon atoms or R.sup.5 and R.sup.6 may be concatenated together with hydrocarbyl groups to form a naphthyl group. These compounds are free of any substituent that has a tertiary carbon atom. Styrene is the preferred vinyl aromatic compound.
The cyclic anhydride compounds of component (b) are preferably, .beta.-unsaturated dicarboxylic anhydrides. For example, the term cyclic anhydride identifies anhydrides having the formula: ##STR2## wherein the dotted lines represent a single or a double carbon-to-carbon bond, R.sup.7 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl or aryl radicals containing up to 8 carbon atoms, R.sup.8 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, vinyl, alkyl, alkenyl, alkylcarboxylic or alkenyl carboxylic of from 1 to 12 carbon atoms and n is an integer of from 0 to about 10. Examples include maleic anhydride, methyl maleic anhydride (also known as citraconic anhydride), dimethyl maleic anhydride, itaconic anhydride, phenylmaleic anhydride, aconitic anhydride, and mixtures thereof. Maleic anhydride is preferred.
Copolymers of vinyl aromatic compounds and .alpha.,.beta.-unsaturated cyclic anhydrides which can be used are described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,769,804; 2,971,939 and 3,336,267, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The rubber-modified copolymers may be graft rubber modified or the rubber component may be both blended and grafted in the copolymer. In preparing the rubber-modified copolymers, use of such rubbers as polybutadiene, an isobutylene-isoprene copolymer, a styrene-butadiene copolymer, a butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer, an ethylene-propylene copolymer, a polyisoprene, ethylene-propylene diene monomer terpolymers (EPDM) and the like can be employed. For a description of a typical method of preparing the rubber-modified graft copolymers see U.S. Pat. No. 3,919,354 which is incorporated herein by reference.
Component (b) copolymers can comprise from about 40 to about 5 percent by weight of the .alpha.,.beta.-unsaturated cyclic anhydride and from about 60 to about 95 percent by weight of a vinyl aromatic compound in the resin phase and, when rubber is present, up to about 50 percent by weight of rubber in the total graft copolymer. Preferred rubber-modified copolymers used herein contain from about 5 to about 35 and more preferably about 10 to about 30 percent by weight of the .alpha.,.beta.-unsaturated cyclic anhydride and about 95 to about 65 percent by weight and more preferably about 90 to about 70 by weight of the vinyl aromatic compound in the resin phase and from about 4 to about 30 percent by weight of rubber in the total graft copolymer. Preferred rubber-free copolymers used herein contain from about 5 to about 35 and more preferably about 10 to about 30 percent by weight of the .alpha.,.beta. -unsaturated cyclic anhydride and from about 95 to about 65 percent and more preferably about 90 to about 70 percent by weight of a vinyl aromatic compound.
Rubber-modified graft vinyl aromatic .alpha.,.beta.-unsaturated cyclic anhydride copolymers utilizable in the composition of this invention were supplied by, for example, ARCO Polymers, Inc. (ARCO). Examples of styrene-maleic anhydride copolymers (SMA copolymers) from ARCO include: DYLARK DKB 218, reported to comprise about 10 percent by weight of rubber in the total graft copolymer, 17 percent by weight of maleic anhydride and 83 percent by weight of styrene in the resin phase; DYLARK 338S, reported to comprise 4 percent by weight of rubber in the total graft copolymer, 14 percent by weight of maleic anhydride and 86 percent by weight of styrene in the resin phase; DYLARK 350, reported to comprise 15 percent by weight of rubber in the total graft copolymer, 13 percent by weight of maleic anhydride and 87 percent by weight of styrene in the resin phase; DYLARK 378, believed to have the same proportions of styrene, maleic anhydride and rubber as DYLARK 350; and DYLARK DKB 1117, reported to comprise 15 percent by weight of rubber in the total graft copolymer, 20 percent by weight of maleic anhydride and 85 percent by weight of styrene in the resin phase. Another useful SMA copolymer is Dow Experimental Resin XP-5272.08 made by Dow Chemical Company. This is a high impact SMA copolymer believed to contain about 23 percent by weight of maleic anhydride and about 77 percent by weight of styrene in the resin phase and about 15 percent by weight of polybutadiene in the total graft copolymer.
Examples of rubber-free copolymers of (b) include SMA copolymers, supplied by, for example, ARCO. Examples include: DYLARK DKB 290, reported to comprise about 18 percent by weight maleic anhydride and about 82 percent by weight styrene; DYLARK 332, reported to comprise about 14 percent by weight maleic anhydride and 86 percent by weight styrene and DYLARK 134 reported to comprise about 17 percent by weight maleic anhydride, the balance being styrene.
The modifier of (c) must have an aspect ratio significantly greater than one and is either glass fibers or processed mineral fibers (PMF) or may be a combination of the two but preferably glass fibers. The glass fibers are either chopped strands or milled with chopped strands being preferred. It is contemplated that other mineral fillers having an aspect ratio significantly greater than one, either alone or in combination with any of the aforementioned modifiers, may function as the modifier of (c).
It is most preferred to use fibrous glass filaments of lime-aluminum borosilicate glass that are relatively soda free. This is known as "E" glass. The length of the glass filaments and whether they are bundled into fibers and the fibers bundled in turn to roving, etc., is not critical to this invention. However, it has been found convenient to use glass strands of at least 1/16 inch in length, with at least 1/8 inch being preferred. It is to be understood that during compounding considerable fragmentation of the strands will occur and that even further reduction of length occurs in the final injection molded article.
Examples of glass fibers utilizable in the compositions of this invention include those supplied by Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Corp. such as OCF 419 AA (3/16 inch chopped strands), OCF 431 CA (1/16 inch milled glass fiber), OCF 731 CA (1/16 inch milled glass fiber), OCF 739 BA (1/16 inch milled glass fiber); and OCF 885 EB (1/4 inch chopped strands); those supplied by PPG Industries, Inc. such as PPG 3540 (1/8 inch chopped strands), PPG X 3012 (1/8 inch chopped strands) and PPG 3541 (1/4 inch chopped strands); and those supplied by Certainteed Corporation, Valley Forge, Pa. such as Certainteed 931-A1 (1/8 inch chopped strands) and Certainteed 963-A4 (3/16 inch chopped strands).
Alkali metal salts of monocarboxylic acids, such as alkali metal salts of aliphatic monocarboxylic acids and alkali metal salts of aromatic carboxylic acids, are useful as nucleating agents in the compositions of the invention. Examples include but are not limited to: sodium acetate, sodium propionate, sodium-n-butyrate, sodium caprylate, sodium myristate, potassium stearate, sodium stearate, sodium montanate, sodium benzoate and the like. Additional useful alkali metal salts of carboxylic acids may include, for example, the potassium salts of aliphatic monocarboxylic acids, such as, for example, acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric and caprylic acid, myristic acid, montanic acid benzoic acid and the like; the sodium or potassium salts of aliphatic monocarboxylic acids, such as, for example, formic acid, valeric acid, caproic acid, enanthic acid, pelargonic acid, capric acid, undecanoic acid, lauric acid, tridecanoic acid, pentadecanoic acid, palmitic acid, margaric acid, nonadecanoic acid, arachidic acid, heneicosanoic acid, behenic acid, triconanic acid, tetracosanic acid, pentacosanic acid, cerotic acid and the like; the sodium or potassium salts of unsaturated aliphatic monocarboxylic acids, such as, for example, methacrylic acid, acrylic acid and the like; the sodium or potassium salts of aromatic carboxylic acids, such as, for example, toluic and, p-tert-butylbenzoic acid, salicylic acid, vanillic acid, protocatechuic acid, veratric acid, gallic acid, phthalic acid, isophthalic acid, terephthalic acid, homophthalic acid, and the like, the sodium or potassium salts of mildly unsaturated aliphatic monocarboxylic acids, such as, for example, the fatty acids oleic acid, ricinoleic acid, linoleic acid, palmitoleic acid, vaccenic acid, erucic acid and the like; the sodium or potassium salts of aliphatic dicarboxylic acids, such as, for example, oxalic acid, malonic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, pimelic acid, suberic acid, azelaic acid, sebacic acid, brassylic acid and the like; the sodium or potassium salt of unsaturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acids, such as, for example, maleic acid, fumaric acid, glutaconic acid and the like; the sodium or potassium salts of aliphatic tricarboxylic acids, such as, for example, tricarballyic acid, citric acid and the like; and the sodium or potassium salts of dimers or trimers of saturated or unsaturated carboxylic acids, such as, for example, dimers and trimers of C.sub.18 fatty acids, such as, for example oleic and linoleic acids.
Alkali metal salts of aromatic carboxylic acids substituted with halogen and/or nitro groups are useful as nucleating agents, such as, for example sodium 2-chloro-4-nitrobenzoate. Other substituted aromatic monocarboxylic acids may also be effective. Examples include, but are not limited to the sodium and potassium salts of 2-, 3-, or 4-chlorobenzoic acid, 2- or 4-chloro-3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid, 2-chloro-6-fluorobenzoic acid, 2-chloro-3-nitro-benzoic acid, 2-chloro-5-nitrobenzoic acid, 2-chloro-5-nitrobenzoic acid, 3-chloro-2-nitrobenzoic acid, 4-chloro-2-nitrobenzoic acid, 4-chloro-3-nitrobenzoic acid, 5-chloro-2-nitrobenzoic acid, and the like.
Still other useful nucleating agents include but are not limited to: inorganic compounds, such as, for example, boron nitride and the like; the alkali metal salts of carbonic acid, such as, for example, sodium carbonate, and the like; minerals, such as, for example, talc (available as MICROTALC CP-10-40 from Pfizer Inc.), mica and the like; commercially available soaps, such as, for example, IVORY SNOW (manufactured by The Proctor and Gamble Company of Cincinnati, Ohio and believed to comprise the sodium salts of tallow fatty acids and the sodium salts of coconut fatty acids) and the like; ionomer resins (sodium salt), preferably those having a melt flow index of from about 1.0 to about 2.8 g/10 min. as measured by ASTM procedure D 1236, such as, for example, SURLYN 8940 having a melt flow index of 2.5 g/10 min., SURLYN 8020 having a melt flow index of 1.0 g/10 min., SURLYN 8528 having a melt flow index of 1.0 g/10 min. and SURLYN 1605 having a melt flow index of 2.8 g/10 min. (manufactured by E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company) and the like.
It is contemplated that other substances which will prove to be effective nucleating agents for use in this invention include metal salts of carboxylic acids such as zinc, lead, calcium, barium and cupric laurates and stearates, and potassium benzoate; metal salts of inorganic acids such as silver nitrate and stannous chloride; highly polar organic compounds such as m-hydroxybenzoic acid, tetrachlorophthalic anhydride, inositol and phthalimide; sodium and potassium salts of organic polymers containing pendant carboxyl groups such as copolymers of olefins and acrylic or methacrylic acids and copolymers of aromatic olefins and maleic anhydride; and the like. Note in this connection French Pat. No. 2,129,162; British Pat. No. 2,015,013; and The British Polymer Journal, Volume 11, pages 146-150 (September 1979).
Preferred nucleating agents are sodium stearate, sodium 2-chloro-4-nitrobenzoate, sodium montanate, potassium stearate, sodium propionate, sodium acetate, sodium n-butyrate, sodium caprylate, sodium myristate, boron nitride, a mixture comprising the sodium salts of tallow fatty acids and the sodium salts of coconut fatty acids (e.g., IVORY SNOW), talc, sodium carbonate and ionomer resins (sodium salt) having melt flow indexes of 2.5, 1.0, and 2.8 g/10 min. based on ASTM procedure D 1236 (e.g., SURLYN 8940, SURLYN 8020, SURLYN 8528 and SURLYN 1605.
Sodium stearate is a preferred nucleating agent. Any standard commercial grade or any heat stable grade of sodium stearate is utilizable in the compositions of this invention provided that the sodium stearate utilized is of a particle size so that at least 30% will pass through a 100 mesh, U.S. Standard Sieve. For example, such sodium stearate can be purchased as "Sodium Stearate T-1" or "Sodium Stearate, Heat-Stable" from Witco Chemical Corporation, Organic Division, New York, N.Y. 10017.
In the compositions of this invention the amount of fibrous modifier is within the range of from about 1 to about 15 percent by weight, based on the weight of components (a) plus (b) plus (c), with from about 1 to about 10 percent by weight being preferred and from about 3 to about 10 percent by weight being more preferred; the amount of PET is preferably within the range of from about 10 to about 90 percent by weight, based on the weight of (a) plus (b) only, with from about 20 to about 80 percent by weight being more preferred, and from about 70 to about 30 percent by weight being most preferred; and the amount of nucleating agent is preferably within the range of from about 0.1 to about 5 parts per 100 parts of PET, with about 0.5 to about 3 parts being more preferred and with about 0.5 to about 2 parts being even more preferred and with about 1 part being most preferred.
It is contemplated that compositions of this invention can also include other ingredients, such as flame retardants, impact modifiers, extenders, processing aids, pigments, stabilizers and the like, for their conventionally employed purposes. Reinforcing fillers, in amounts sufficient to impart reinforcement, can be used, such as carbon filaments, silicates, e.g., acicular calcium silicate, asbestos, titanium dioxide, potassium titanate, titanate whiskers, and glass flakes and fibers.
The compositions of this invention may include impact modifiers, such as, for example, a styrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymer with polycaprolactone end blocks (such as PD0071-81 supplied by Phillips Petroleum Company), a bisphenol A polycarbonate (such as MERLON M40 available from Mobay Chemical Company), and a polyetherester segmented block copolymer (such as HYTREL 4056 available from E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company). Amounts of impact modifiers will generally fall within the range of from about 5 to about 40 percent by weight based on the weight of the total blend. The results obtained in any given situation will, of course, depend upon a variety of factors such as the impact modifier selected, the manner by which it is compounded into the blends, the concentration in which it is employed, and indeed upon the criteria used in measuring or judging the toughness of the resultant blend.
For protection against thermo-oxidative degradation, the customary amounts of stabilizers, preferably 0.001 to 0.5 percent by weight, relative to components (a) plus (b) can be added to the composition according to the invention. Examples of suitable stabilizers are phenols and phenol derivatives, preferably sterically hindered phenols which contain alkyl substituents with 1-6 carbon atoms in the two positions ortho to the phenolic hydroxyl groups, amines, preferably secondary arylamines and their derivatives, phosphates and phosphites, preferably the aryl derivatives thereof and quinones. Non-limiting examples include
4,4'-bis(2,6-di-tert-butylphenol);
1,3,5-trimethyl-2,4,6-tris(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzyl)benzene;
4,4'-butylidene-bis(6-tert-butyl-m-cresol);
3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzyl-phosphonic acid diethyl ester;
N,N'-bis(.beta.-naphthyl)-p-phenylenediamine;
N,N'-bis(1-methyl-heptyl)-p-phenylenediamine;
phenyl-.beta.-naphthylamine;
4,4'-bis(.alpha.,.alpha.-dimethylbenzyl)diphenylamine;
hydroquinone;
p-benzoquinone;
toluhydroquinone;
p-tert-butylpyrocatechol;
chloranil; and
naphthoquinone.
Flame-retarding additives which can be used for the compositions according to the invention comprise a large number of chemical compounds which are well known to those skilled in the art. In general, they contain chemical elements which are used because of their flame-retarding capacity, for example bromine, chlorine, antimony, phosphorus and nitrogen. Preferably, the flame-retarding additives are halogenated organic compounds (brominated or chlorinated), optionally used together with auxiliary compounds sometimes referred to as synergists, such as antimony trioxide, zinc borate, or the like, Elementary phosphorus or phosphorus compounds such as ammonium polyphosphate are also preferred flame retardants. Other examples include bromine or chlorine containing organic phosphate esters, hexaphenoxyphosphazene, and the like.
Compositions of this invention may be prepared by blending the components in a mixer (e.g., a Henschel mixer) and compounding the mixture on an extruder (e.g., a twin-screw compounding extruder such as a 28 mm Werner-Pfleiderer extruder or the like). Thereafter, the extrudate is chopped into pellets and molded on an injection molding machine. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the PET and SMA copolymer components and the PET/SMA copolymer blends should be dried prior to melt processing.
When injection molded, the compositions of this invention yield articles having good surface appearance. These articles can have a Gardner 60.degree. Gloss of at least about 60% as measured, for example, by a portable Gardner Gloss Unit. Thus, articles having good balance of surface appearance and physical properties--e.g., HDT @ 264 psi are provided for by this invention.
Surface appearance is a term that describes both the molded articles surface gloss and the extent of any surface markings present as a result of the glass fibers or other fibrous modifiers used. The extent of the markings is determined by comparing the molded article to one molded from only PET/SMA copolymer. An article having a good surface appearance will have a good surface gloss and little or no surface markings from the fiberous modifiers used.
A process for producing injection molded articles, as well as the articles themselves, having good surface appearance when injection molded from the compositions of this invention is also provided for. Thus, another embodiment of this invention is a process for producing articles having good surface appearance by injection molding at a hold pressure of about 5,000 psi to about 20,000 psi, with preferred hold pressures being about 5,000 to about 10,000 psi, from a thermoplastic composition comprising:
(a) a polyethylene terephthalate,
(b) a copolymer of a vinyl aromatic compound and an .alpha.,.beta.-unsaturated anhydride said copolymer being a rubber-modified graft copolymer or a rubber-free copolymer,
(c) a fibrous modifier,
(d) a nucleating agent.
Still another embodiment of this invention provides for the articles injection molded from the compositions of this invention.
The thermoplastic compositions of this invention used to produce the articles of this invention, can be prepared by mixing the components to form a premix, compounding the premix and injection molding the compositions at mold temperatures from about 120.degree. F. to about 200.degree. F., preferably from about 120.degree. F. to about 150.degree. F.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the exact compounding and molding condition may vary depending on the equipment used (e.g., the size of the extruder, the screw configuration or other physical or mechanical properties). Articles having a desirable balance of surface appearance and physical properties--e.g. HDT @ 264 psi--have been obtained using a 11/2" NRM extruder with barrel zone temperatures (rear and front) within the range of about 480.degree. F. to about 550.degree. F. Preferred temperatures for this extruder were found to be a rear zone temperature of about 500.degree. F. and a front zone temperature of about 540.degree. F.
The compositions of this invention may be compounded in single pass or double pass steps. In the single pass method all of the components are extrusion compounded in a one step. In the double pass method the compounding is done in two steps. In the first step of the double pass method components (b) and (c) are compounded together. In the second step components (a) and (d) are compounded with the composition compounded in the first step of the double pass method.
Additional components, such as, for example, impact modifiers, flame retardants, anti-oxidants and the like can be added during the single pass extrusion process or during either of the two extrusion compounding steps of the double pass compounding.
The extrusion compounding is accomplished, for example, by using a non-vacuum-vented extruder such as a 11/2 inch NRM Model 55 Plastics Extruder or a vacuum-vented 11/4 inch Killion extruder or a vacuum-vented 31/2 inch extruder. The extrusion process may also be carried out under an inert atmosphere, such as, for example, nitrogen.
The present invention is further illustrated in the following examples, which are not to be construed as limiting.

EXAMPLES
Prior to melt processing the PET and SMA copolymer components and blends were dried, for example, either overnight at 110.degree. C. or at least for a minimum of 31/2 to about 6 hours or for about 4 hours at 125.degree. C. such that the residual moisture content was low, e.g., .ltoreq.0.05% by weight.
Compositions of the following examples were prepared by mixing the components to form a premix, compounding the premix in a 11/2 inch NRM Model 55 Plastics Extruder, except where it is indicated otherwise and molding the pellets into test bars in a Cincinnati-Milacron Model No. 250-12 injection molding machine unless indicated otherwise.
Under the heading "PET/SMA Ratio" in the tables that follow the ratio of PET to SMA in the PET/SMA composition is given in weight percent. The amount of PET plus SMA in the PET/SMA composition is given in weight percent in these tables under the heading "Composition". Thus, by way of example, a composition may comprise 95 weight percent PET/SMA with this amount of PET plus SMA being in a PET/SMA weight percent ratio of 70/30.
The designation "phr" in the tables stands for parts per hundred parts by weight of polyethylene terephthalate.
The materials used in these compositions were as follows:
Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)
VITUF 5900, from Goodyear Chemical Company, having an intrinsic viscosity of 0.59 as measured at 25.degree. C. using a solvent consisting of 60 percent by weight of phenol and 40 percent by weight of tetrachloroethane
VITUF 5901, from Goodyear Chemical Company, having an intrinsic viscosity of 0.59 measured by the same procedure as stated for VITUF 5900.
ENKA T-740, from America Enka Co. (Enka, N.C.), having an intrinsic viscosity of 0.60 measured by the same procedure as stated for VITUF 5900
DuPont Grade E, a recycle PET, obtained from clear bottles, from E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company having an intrinsic viscosity of 0.63 to 0.66 measured by the same procedure as for VITUF 5900.
DuPont Grade A, a recycle PET containing a small amount of green bottle material, from E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company having an intrinsic viscosity of 0.63 to 0.66 measured by the same procedure as stated for VITUF 5900
Pure Tech Recycle PET from Pure-Tech Industries (Pinebrook, N.J.) having an intrinsic viscosity of about 0.68 measured by the same procedure as stated for VITUF 5900
Styrene/Maleic Anhydride Copolymer (SMA copolymer)
DYLARK 332
DYLARK 338S
DYLARK DKB 290
DYLARK 350
DYLARK 378
DYLARK DKB 1117
DYLARK DKB 218
Modifiers
Glass Fiber Modifiers
OCF 419 AA
OCF 431 CA
OCF 731 CA
OCF 739 BA
OCF 885 EB
PPG X3012
PPG 3540
PPG 3540M
Certainteed 931-A1
Certainteed 963-A4
Mineral Modifiers
BURGESS B2211, a calcined clay of aspect ratio of about 1.2
WOLLASTONITE P-4, calcium silicate fibers of aspect ratio of about 15
PMF, processed mineral fiber
Nucleating Agents
sodium stearate
sodium 2-chloro-4-nitrobenzoate, the acid was obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co. and neutralized with sodium hydroxide
boron nitride
sodium montanate
potassium stearate
IVORY SNOW
sodium benzoate
SURLYN 8940
MICROTALC CP-10-40
SURLYN 8020
SURLYN 8528
sodium propionate
sodium acetate
sodium carbonate
sodium n-butyrate
sodium caprylate and
sodium myristate
Impact Modifiers
HYTREL 4056, a poly[poly(tetramethylene oxide)glycol-co-1,4-butanediol terephthalate] from E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company
PD0071-81, a styrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymer with polycaprolacetone end blocks from Phillips Petroleum Company
MERLON M40, A Bisphenol A polycarbonate from Mobay Chemical Company
PETG 6763, a copolyester from Eastman Chemical Products, Inc.
KODAR A150, a copolyester from Eastman Chemical Products, Inc.
In the tables that follow, physical properties were determined by the following ASTM procedures: Flexural Strength and Flexural Elastic Modulus--D 790-71 (1978); Izod Impact--D 256-78; and Heat Deflection Temperature--D 648-72 (1978).
EXAMPLES 1-4
Table I reports the physical properties of PET/SMA compositions that contain various amounts of glass fiber. The samples were injection molded on a New Britain Injection Molder. The extruder barrel temperature was 500/505 (Rear .degree.F./Front .degree.F.), the hold pressure was 13,000 psi and the mold temperature was 135.degree. F.
TABLE I______________________________________Properties of PET/SMA Compositions Containing Glass FibersBut No Nucleating Agent EXAMPLES 1 2 3 4______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5900, Wt. % 70 70 70 70DYLARK 332, Wt. % 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 100 90 85 80OCF 419 AA, Wt. % -- 10 15 20PropertiesSpecific Gravity 1.266 1.321 1.358 1.397Flexural Strength, 10.sup.3 psi 14.4 12.3 19.6 23.3Flexural Elastic Modulus, 452 663 856 103010.sup.5 psiIzod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.3 1.0 1.1 1.4ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" unnotched 6.1 3.3 4.5 6.4bar, ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 88 72 80 78HDT @ 66 psi, .degree.C. 115 101 117 126______________________________________
The data in Table I demonstrate that the HDT @ 264 psi of glass modified alloys having no nucleating agent were substantially lower than unmodified alloy--i.e., alloy containing no glass fiber.
EXAMPLES 5-8
Table II reports physical properties of PET/SMA compositions containing different levels of sodium stearate. The extruder barrel temperature was 500/540 (rear .degree.F./front .degree.F.), the hold pressure was 5,000 psi and the mold temperature was 150.degree. F.
TABLE II______________________________________Effects of Sodium Stearate Level On Physical Properties ofPET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 5 6 7 8______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95 95PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, phr 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0PropertiesFlexural Strength, 10.sup.3 psi 14.4 12.8 12.2 10.3Flexural Elastic Modulus, 5.75 5.72 5.73 5.8010.sup.5 psiIzod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 100 107 104 106HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 102 107 102 108(duplicate)______________________________________
The data in Table II demonstrate that about 1 part of sodium stearate per 100 parts PET gives the best balance in HDT (@ 264 psi), Izod Impact and Flexural Strength properties.
EXAMPLES 9-20
Table III reports the physical properties of PET/SMA compositions containing sodium stearate and various modifiers. The extruder barrel temperature was 500/510 (rear .degree.F./front .degree.F.), the hold pressure was 5,000 psi and the mold temperature was 150.degree. F.
TABLE III__________________________________________________________________________Effects of Various Modifiers on PET/SMA Composition Properties Examples 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20__________________________________________________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 100 100 90 90 90 90 90 90 95 90 90 95BURGESS B2211, Wt. % -- -- 10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --WOLLASTONITE P-4, Wt. % -- -- -- 10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --OCF 419 AA, Wt. % -- -- -- -- 10 -- -- -- -- -- -- 5PMF, Wt. % -- -- -- -- -- 10 -- -- -- -- -- --PMF.sup.a, Wt. % -- -- -- -- -- -- 10 -- -- -- -- --WOLLASTONITE P-4.sup.a, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10 -- -- -- --Wt. %OCF 731 CA, Wt. % -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 10 -- --OCF 739B A, WT. % -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10 --Sodium Stearate, phr -- 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0PropertiesSpecific Gravity 1.275 1.278 1.341 1.348 1.342 1.350 1.351 1.343 -- -- -- 1.309Flexural Strength, 14.3 13.1 9.3 9.1 13.0 12.5 12.0 10.1 -- -- -- 13.510.sup.3 psiFlexural Elastic 4.2 4.4 5.1 5.0 7.1 5.5 5.6 5.1 -- -- -- 5.6Modulus, 10.sup.5 psiIzod Impact, 1/4" 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4bar, ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4bar, ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 78 85 85 85 172 94 94 85 89 93 92 148HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 114 117 120 111 225 121 200 125 118 146 132 224__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Coated with 1.25 percent by weight DowCorning Z6020
The data in Table III demonstrate that OCF 419 AA glass fiber was extremely effective in upgrading PET/SMA composition HDT @ 264 psi. Observation showed that, as compared to unmodified PET/SMA composition, the surface appearance was reduced in these examples. It is believed that this reduced surface appearance is due to inadequate hold pressure during the injection molding process.
EXAMPLES 21-30
Table IV reports physical properties of PET/SMA Alloy compositions containing various glass fibers. The extruder barrel temperature (rear .degree.F./front .degree.F.), hold pressure (psi) and mold temperature (.degree.F.) for examples 21-23 were 500/510, 8,000 and 150, respectively; and for examples 24-30 they were 500/540, 5,000 and 150, respectively.
TABLE IV__________________________________________________________________________Effects of Various Glass Fibers on PET/SMA Compositions Examples 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30__________________________________________________________________________PET/SMA RatioENKA T-740, Wt. % 70 70 70 -- -- -- -- -- -- --VITUF 5901, Wt. % -- -- -- 70 70 80 80 70 70 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 30 30 30 30 20 20 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95OCF 419 AA, Wt. % 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --PPG3540, Wt. % -- 5 -- 5 -- 5 -- 5 -- --PPG X3012, Wt. % -- -- 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- --OCF 885 EB, Wt. % -- -- -- -- 5 -- 5 -- -- --Certainteed 931-Al, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 --Wt. %Certainteed 963-A4, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5Wt. %Sodium Stearate, phr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1PropertiesFlexural Strength, -- -- -- 13.1 12.9 11.1 12.1 13.5 12.0 11.710.sup.3 psiFlexural Elastic -- -- -- 5.68 5.81 5.99 5.80 5.72 5.84 5.75Modulus, 10.sup.5 psiIzod Impact, 1/4" 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5bar, ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4bar, ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 98 101 97 94 114 97 113 101 112 100HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 92 102 94 97 111 108 98 105 108 101(duplicate)HDT @ 66 psi, .degree.C. 140 169 226 -- -- -- -- -- -- --__________________________________________________________________________
The data in Table IV demonstrate that PPG 3540, PPG X3012, OCF 419 AA, Certainteed 931-A1 and Certainteed 963-A4 yield comparable results in terms of the physical properties of the molded article. The data also demonstrate that even though the foregoing tested glass fibers are suitable for use in the compositions of this invention, OCF 885 EB is a preferred glass fiber as its use yields HDT (@ 264 psi) properties that are higher. Observation of Examples 24-27 shows that those examples with OCF 885 EB had slightly better surface appearance of the molded parts and much better glass dispersion into the polymer matrix.
EXAMPLES 31-45
Table V reports physical properties of PET/SMA compositions which contain various nucleating agents and different glass fiber loading level. The extruder barrel temperature (rear .degree.F./front .degree.F.), hold pressure (psi) and mold temperature (.degree.F.) were 500/510, 5,000 and 150, respectively.
TABLE V__________________________________________________________________________Effects of Nucleating Agents and Glass Loading On Properties of PET/SMACompositions Examples 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42* 43* 44* 45*__________________________________________________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 85 70 70 70 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 15 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 100 100 95 95 90 90 100 100 95 90 90 100 99 97.5 95OCF 419 AA, Wt. % -- -- 5 5 10 10 -- -- 5 10 10 -- 1 2.5 5Sodium Stearate, 1 -- 1 -- 1 -- 1 -- -- -- -- 1 1 1 1phrSodium 2-Chloro- -- 1 -- 1 -- 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --4-nitrobenzoate,phrBoron Nitride, phr -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 1 1 1 -- -- -- --PropertiesSpecific Gravity 1.278 1.288 1.309 1.318 1.342 1.351 1.278 1.272 1.305 1.337 1.382 1.274 1.280 1.289 1.305Flexural Strength, 13.1 7.4 13.5 7.9 13.0 9.4 12.4 14.0 15.5 19.0 19.7 -- -- -- --10.sup.3 psiFlexural Elastic 4.4 4.7 5.6 5.8 7.1 7.2 4.6 4.4 5.6 7.1 6.8 -- -- -- --Modulus, 10.sup.5 psiIzod Impact, 1/4" 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.2 1.1 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.6bar, ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.3 0.5 0.6 1.0 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5bar, ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 85 87 148 152 172 187 87 80 91 113 106 78 90 97 105HDT @ 66 psi, .degree.C. 117 124 224 229 225 244 119 99 197 245 245 115 116 145 221__________________________________________________________________________ *Examples 42-45 utilized heat stable sodium stearate.
The data in Table V demonstrate that as little as 1 percent by weight glass fiber loading level is sufficient to yield a HDT @ 264 psi of 90.degree. C. A glass fiber loading level of 2.5 to 5 percent by weight is preferable, as these levels of glass fiber provide better Izod Impact and substantially better HDT @ 66 psi over the 1 percent by weight glass fiber loading level.
The data also show that sodium stearate, boron nitride and sodium 2-chloro-4-nitrobenzoate increase HDT @ 264 psi--compare Examples 1-4, Table I, which do not contain a nucleating agent.
Observation shows that surface appearance at 5 percent by weight glass fiber loading was slightly better than at 10 percent by weight.
EXAMPLES 46-63
Table VI (Examples 46-57) and Table VII (Examples 58-63) report the properties of PET/SMA compositions containing various SMA and glass fiber components. The barrel extruder temperature (rear .degree.F./front .degree.F.), for example 46, 47, 58 and 59 was 500/500, for example 49 it was 540/550 and for examples 48, 50, 51-57 and 60-63 it was 500/540; the hold pressure (psi) and mold temperature (.degree.F.) for examples 46-63 were 5,000 and 150, respectively.
TABLE VI__________________________________________________________________________Physical Properties of various PET/SMA CompositionsExamples 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57__________________________________________________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70DYLARK DKB 338S, Wt. % 30 -- 30 -- -- 30 30 30 -- -- -- --DYLARK DKB 290, Wt. % -- 30 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --DYLARK DKB 218, Wt. % -- -- -- 30 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --DYLARK DKB 1117, Wt. % -- -- -- -- 30 -- -- -- -- -- -- --DYLARK 350, Wt. % -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 30 30 -- --DYLARK 378, Wt. % -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, phr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1PropertiesFlexural Strength -- -- 13.1 9.9 14.4 12.5 12.5 13.5 15.3 15.2 11.2 15.810.sup.3 psiFlexural Elastic -- -- 5.68 5.71 5.44 5.62 5.76 5.72 5.22 5.33 5.30 5.44Modulus, 10.sup.5 psiIzod Impact, 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.81/4" bar, ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.71/8" bar, ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 103 112 95 104 114 90 101 101 98 104 99 112HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 100 117 97 109 100 95 108 105 106 96 99 97(duplicate)HDT @ 66 psi, .degree.C. 195 182 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE VII______________________________________Physical Properties of Various PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 58 59 60 61 62 63______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70 70 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 -- 30 -- -- --DYLARK DKB 290, -- 30 -- -- -- --WT. %DYLARK 350, Wt. % -- -- -- 30 -- --DYLARK 378, Wt. % -- -- -- -- 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95 95 95 95OCF 419 AA, Wt. % 5 5 -- -- -- --OCF 885 EB, Wt. % -- -- 5 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, phr 1 1 1 1 1 1PropertiesFlexural Strength, -- -- 12.9 15.1 14.9 16.210.sup.3 psiFlexural Elastic -- -- 5.65 5.43 5.40 5.33Modulus, 10.sup.5 psiIzod Impact, 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.71/4" bar,ft.-lb./in.Izod Impact, 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.4 0.51/8" bar,ft.-lb /in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 106 97 94 97 94 108HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 110 116 96 98 97 92(duplicate)HDT @ 66 psi, .degree.C. 127 184 -- -- -- --______________________________________
The data in Tables VI and VII demonstrate the good physical properties obtained with these SMA and glass fiber components.
EXAMPLES 64-66
Table VIII reports physical properties for PET/SMA compositions derived from recycled PET. The barrel extruder temperature was 500/540 (rear .degree.F./front .degree.F.), the hold pressure was 5,000 psi and the mold temperature was 150.degree. F.
TABLE VIII______________________________________Properties of PET/SMA Compositions Derived from Recycle PET EXAMPLES 64 65 66______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 -- --DuPont Grade A, Wt. % -- 70 --DuPont Grade E, Wt. % -- -- 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, phr 1 1 2PropertiesFlexural Strength, 12.0 11.3 8.310.sup.3 psiFlexural Elastic 5.76 5.56 5.80Modulus, 10.sup.5 psiIzod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.5 0.4 0.5ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.4 0.4 0.4ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 92 99 105HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 99 100 106(duplicate)______________________________________
The data in Table VIII demonstrate that the du Pont recycle PET grades are essentially similar to VITUF 5901 PET with respect to composition HDT (@ 264 psi) and Izod Impact properties. Observation showed that the du Pont recycle PET grades gave darker (amber) colored compounds than the VITUF 5901. A possible explanation for this observation is contamination from the labels from the recycled bottles.
EXAMPLES 67-74
Table IX reports the reproducibility of HDT @ 264 psi of PET/SMA compositions. The extrusion barrel temperature (rear .degree.F./front .degree.F.) was 500/510, the holding pressure was 5,000 psi and the mold temperature was 150.degree. F.
TABLE IX______________________________________Reproducibility of HDT @ 264 psi of PET/SMA CompositionsEXAMPLES 67 68 69 70* 71* 72 73 74______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70Wt. %DYLARK 338S, 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30Wt. %CompositionPET/SMA, 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95Wt. %OCF 419 AA, 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5Wt. %Sodium Stearate, 1 1 1 -- 1 1 1 1phrSodium 2-Chloro- -- -- -- 1 -- -- -- --4-Nitrobenzoate,phrPropertiesHDT @ 264 psi, 105 93 148 152 112 96 100 104.degree.C.HDT @ 264 psi, -- 87 110 116 -- -- -- 110.degree.C.(Duplicate)______________________________________ *Same as examples 33 and 34, respectively.
The data in Table IX demonstrate that the HDT @ 264 psi tend to fall within the range of about 100.degree. to 110.degree. C. There is no apparent explanation for the anomalously high HDT properties obtained in Examples 69 and 70 (148.degree. and 152.degree. C., respectively).
EXAMPLES 75-78
Table X reports physical properties for PET/SMA compositions that were extrusion compounded by double passing. In the second-pass the remaining components needed to form the finished PET/SMA composition were extrusion compounded with the composition that was extrusion compounded in the first-pass. For example, in Example 77, glass fiber (GF) and PET were extrusion compounded in the first-pass and in the second-pass SMA and sodium stearate were extrusion compounded with the first-pass composition to form the PET/SMA composition comprising 5 weight percent glass, 95 weight percent of PET/SMA (where the ratio of PET to SMA is 70 weight percent PET and 30 weight percent SMA), and 1 part sodium stearate per 100 parts PET. In a similar fashion, in Example 78, glass fiber (GF) and SMA were extrusion compounded in the first-pass and in the second-pass PET and sodium stearate were extrusion compounded with the composition of the first-pass to form the PET/SMA composition.
The compositions comprised 5% OCF 419 AA glass fiber, 1 phr sodium stearate and 95 parts of a 70% VITUF 5901/30% DYLARK 338S PET/SMA blend. The barrel temperature (rear .degree.F./front .degree.F.) was 500/510 for both extrusion passes, the hold pressure was 5,000 psi and the mold temperature was 150.degree. F.
TABLE X______________________________________Physical Properties of Single-Pass vs. Double-PassCompounding of PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 75 76 77 78______________________________________Composition Compoundedin First PassVITUF 5901, Wt. % 66.5 70 93 --DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 28.5 30 -- 85OCF 419 AA, Wt. % 5 -- 7 15Sodium Stearate, phr 1 -- -- --Composition Compoundedin Second PassVITUF 5901/DYLARK 338S -- 95 -- --blend*, Wt. %OCF 419 AA/VITUF 5901 -- -- 71.5 --blend*, Wt. %OCF 419 AA/DYLARK 338S -- -- -- 33.5blend*, Wt. %VITUF 5901, Wt. % -- -- -- 66.5DYLARK 338S, Wt. % -- -- 28.5 --OCF 419 AA, Wt. % -- 5 -- --Sodium Stearate, phr -- 1 1 1PropertiesSpecific Gravity 1.313 1.311 1.324 1.312Izod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8 " bar, 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 94 95 89 93HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 93 102 87 95(duplicate)HDT @ 66 psi, .degree.C. 183 185 218 182______________________________________ *Composition compounded in first pass.
The lowest HDT (@ 264 psi) properties were obtained in Example 77 in which PET and glass fiber were compounded in the first pass.
EXAMPLES 79-91
Table XI reports physical properties for PET/SMA compositions that were extrusion compounded under different conditions of temperature.
TABLE XI__________________________________________________________________________Properties of PET/SMA Composition Extrusions Compounded Under VariousConditions Examples 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91__________________________________________________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70 70 90 90 80 80 70 70 70 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 30 30 30 30 10 10 20 20 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95OCF 419 AA, Wt. % 5 5 5 5 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --PPG 3540, Wt. % -- -- -- -- -- 5 5 5 5 5 5 -- --PPG 3541, Wt. % -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 5Sodium Stearate, phr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Compounding ConditionsNRM Rear Zone Temp., .degree.F. 490 500 500 500 510 540 500 540 500 540 500 500 500NRM Front Zone Temp., .degree.F. 490 510 510 540 540 550 540 550 540 550 540 540 510Molding ConditionsMold Temp., .degree.F. 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150Screw, rpm 70 70 70 70 70 90 70 80 70 70 70 70 70Back Pressure, psi 25 25 25 25 25 0 0 0 0 25 0 25 25Cooling time, seconds 35 35 35 35 35 35 45 35 45 35 45 45 45Hold Pressure, 10.sup.3 psi 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0PropertiesFlexural Strength, 10.sup.3 psi -- -- -- -- -- 8.9 9.8 10.0 11.1 11.7 12.4 11.9 --Flexural Elastic Modulus, -- -- -- -- -- 5.98 6.09 5.92 5.99 5.83 5.74 5.78 --10.sup.5 psiIzod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 92 92 96 108 103 88 93 95 97 103 103 93 109HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 94 100 98 104 106 87 91 100 108 105 108 102 105(duplicate)HDT @ 66 psi, .degree.C. 155 -- 130 147 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --__________________________________________________________________________
The data in Table XI demonstrate that higher barrel temperatures--e.g., Example 82--yield optimum composition HDT @ 264 psi, while increasing barrel temperatures as high as 540.degree. F. (282.degree. C.) rear and 550.degree. F. (288.degree. C.) front did not give any corresponding improvements in HDT (@ 264 psi) properties.
The data also demonstrate that approximately 10 weight percent of SMA based on the weight of the PET/SMA blend component is sufficient to obtain HDT (@ 264 psi) of at least 90.degree. C.
EXAMPLES 92-94
Table XII reports physical properties of PET/SMA compositions injection molded at different mold temperatures.
TABLE XII______________________________________Effects of Injection Mold Temperature on Properties ofPET/SMA Composition EXAMPLES 92 93 94______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95OCF 419 AA, Wt. % 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, phr 1 1 1Compounding ConditionsBarrel Temperature, 500/510 500/510 500/510(rear .degree.F./front .degree.F.)Molding ConditionsMold Temp., .degree.F. 200 175 150Hold Pressure, 10.sup.3 psi 5.0 5.0 5.0PropertiesIzod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.4 0.4 0.4ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.4 0.4 0.4ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 102 103 109(first determination)HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 104 98 100(second determination)HDT @ 66 psi, .degree.C. 158 157 183______________________________________
The data in Table XII demonstrate that the mold temperatures tested had no significant effect on HDT (@ 264 psi) and Izod Impact properties. It was observed that the lowest mold temperature yielded slightly better surface appearance.
EXAMPLES 95-102
Table XIII reports the effects of sodium stearate grade, glass fiber grade and injection molding conditions on HDT properties of PET/SMA compositions.
TABLE XIII__________________________________________________________________________Effects Of Sodium Stearate Grade, Glass Grade, and InjectionMolding Conditions on HDT Properties of PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102__________________________________________________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95 95 95 95 90 90OCF 419 AA, Wt. % 5 5 5 5 -- -- -- --Sodium Stearate.sup.a, 1 1 -- -- -- -- -- --phrSodium Stearate.sup.b, -- -- 1 1 1 1 1 1phrOCF 731 CA -- -- -- -- 5 5 10 10Compounding ConditionsBarrel temperature 500/510 500/510 500/510 500/510 500/510 500/510 500/510 500/510rear .degree.F./front .degree.F.Molding conditionsMold Temp. .degree.F. 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150Hold Pressure, 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 1010.sup.3 psiShot Size, in. 1.98 2.08 1.98 2.08 1.98 2.08 1.98 2.08PropertiesHDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 112 97 96 89 91 90 98 92HDT @ 66 psi, .degree.C. 218 222 218 215 220 200 209 192__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Heat stable grade .sup.b Technical grade
The data in Table XIII demonstrate that heat stable sodium stearate may yield slightly higher HDT (@ 264 psi) properties, although the advantage is relatively small.
The data also show that a hold pressure of 5,000 psi yields a higher HDT @ 264 psi than a hold pressure of 10,000 psi.
Table XIV reports the Gardner Gloss data for PET/SMA compositions. In Examples 103-109 the PET/SMA ratio in the PET/SMA compositions was 70 Wt. % VITUF 5901 and 30 Wt. % DYLARK 338. The amount of PET/SMA and the amount of glass fiber in the PET/SMA composition are given in Wt. % in parenthesis. The compositions also contained 1 part of sodium stearate per hundred parts PET.
TABLE XIV______________________________________Effects of Glass Fiber and Molding Conditions onSurface Glass of PET/SMA CompositionsEx- Mold Hold 60.degree. Gloss (%).sup.aam- Pressure Spruce Rearple Composition (10.sup.3 psi) Side Side______________________________________103 PET/SMA (100 Wt. %) 5 86 84 no glass fiber104 PET/SMA (95 Wt. %) with 5 60 51 OCF 419 AA (5%)105 PET/SMA (95 Wt. %) with 10 80 78 OCF 419 AA (5%)106 PET/SMA (95 Wt. %) with 5 58 53 OCF 731 CA (5%)107 PET/SMA (95 Wt. %) with 10 79 78 OCF 731 CA (5%)108 PET/SMA (90 Wt. %) with 5 30 30 OCF 731 CA (10%)109 PET/SMA (90 Wt. %) with 10 73 72 OCF 731 CA (10%)______________________________________ .sup.a Measured with portable Gardner Gloss Unit; measurement at central area of 23/4" .times. 4" .times. 1/8" plaque specimens
The data in Table XIV demonstrate that PET/SMA compositions comprising 5 to 10 percent glass fiber and injection molded with 10,000 psi hold pressure have good gloss ratings. Moreover, these data demonstrate the excellent surface gloss achieved with up to 10% glass fiber loading level; and that there is very little loss of surface gloss, in comparison with PET/SMA composition without glass fiber, with up to 10% glass fiber when the hold pressure is high enough.
EXAMPLES 110-119
Table XV reports physical properties of PET/SMA compositions containing impact modifiers. For examples 110 to 119 the extruder barrel temperature (rear .degree.F./front .degree.F.) was 500/540 (except 500/510 and 510/540 for Examples 118 and 119, respectively), the hold pressure was 5,000 psi and the mold temperature was 150.degree. F.
TABLE XV__________________________________________________________________________Properties of PET/SMA Compositions Containing Nucleant,Glass Fiber and Impact Modifiers Examples 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119__________________________________________________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 85 85 80 85 85 85 85 85 85OCF 419 AA, Wt. % 5 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, phr 1 1 -- 1 -- -- 1 1 1 1Boron Nitride, phr -- -- 1 -- 1 1 -- -- -- --HYTREL 4056, Wt. % -- 10 10 10 -- -- -- -- 10 10PD0071-81, Wt. % -- -- -- -- 10 5 -- -- -- --MERLON M 40, Wt. % -- -- -- -- -- 5 -- -- -- --PETG 6763, Wt. % -- -- -- -- -- -- 10 -- -- --KODAR A150, Wt. % -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10 -- --PropertiesIzod Impact, 1/4" 0.5 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.7bar, ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" 0.4 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.6bar, ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 100 86 80 107 84 91 84 98 91.sup.a 91.sup.bHDT @ 66 psi, .degree.C. 142 140 134 188 174 111 165 140 -- --__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Duplicate measurement yielded 93.degree. C. .sup.b Duplicate measurement yielded 95.degree. C.
The majority of the data in Table XV demonstrate that the incorporation of impact modifiers resulted in blends having HDT values (@ 264 psi) greater than 80.degree. C. and improved Izod Impact. Furthermore, good HDT @ 66 psi was obtained with HYTREL 4056.
EXAMPLES 120-125
Table XVI reports the HDT properties of PET/SMA compositions and PET compositions. The tests were done in triplicate, thus Examples 120 and 121 form one group of tests; Examples 122 and 123 form another group of tests; and Examples 124 and 125 form still another group of tests. A different batch compound was used for each run. The extruder barrel temperature (rear .degree.F./front .degree.F.) was 500/540, the hold pressure was 5,000 psi and the mold temperature was 150.degree. F.
TABLE XVI______________________________________Composition of HDT Properties of PET/SMA CompositionsWith PET Compositions EXAMPLES 120 121 122 123 124 125______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 -- 70 -- 70 --DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 -- 30 -- 30 --CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 -- 95 -- 95 --OCF 419 AA, Wt. % 5 -- 5 -- 5 --Sodium Stearate, phr 1 -- 1 -- 1 --PET CompositionVITUF 5901, Wt. % -- 95 -- 95 -- 95OCF 419 AA, Wt. % -- 5 -- 5 -- 5Sodium Stearate, phr -- 1 -- 1 -- 1PropertiesHDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 105 85 93 86 87* 84HDT @ 66 psi, .degree.C. 221 249 -- -- 223 243______________________________________ *This HDT value is suspiciously low.
The data in Table XVI demonstrate that the HDT for the PET/SMA compositions @ 264 psi is higher than for the PET compositions. Observation showed that the PET/SMA compositions gave better surface appearance on injection molded parts. Specifically, use of 10,000 psi hold pressure gave surfaces virtually free of glass marks for the PET/SMA compositions, while the PET compositions yielded parts with numerous glass marks. The conclusion is that glass-reinforced, nucleated PET/SMA compositions are superior to glass-reinforced, nucleated PET compositions in surface appearance and HDT (@ 264 psi) properties.
Tables XVII-XXII report the physical properties of diffferent nucleating agents in PET/SMA compositions in comparison with sodium stearate. The extruder barrel temperature (rear .degree.F./front .degree.F.) for Examples 126-128 was 510/540, for Examples 129-147 it was 500/540. For examples 126-147 the mold temperature was 150 .degree. F. and the hold pressure was 5,000 psi.
TABLE XVII______________________________________Effects of Different Nucleating Agents in PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 126 127 128______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, phr 1 -- --Sodium Montanate, phr -- 1 --Potassium Stearate, phr -- -- 1PropertiesFlexural Strength, 10.sup.3 psi 12.7 13.5 12.3Flexural Modulus, 10.sup.5 psi 5.66 5.38 5.62Izod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.60 0.40 0.60ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.50 0.40 0.50ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 110 89 101HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 101.6 87 101(duplicate)______________________________________
TABLE XVIII______________________________________Effects of Different Nucleating Agents in PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 129 130 131 132______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95 95PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, phr 1 -- -- --Ivory Snow, phr -- 1 -- --Sodium Benzoate, phr -- -- 1 --SURLYN 8940, phr -- -- -- 1PropertiesFlexural Strength, 10.sup.3 psi 12.6 11.8 12.9 14.1Flexural Modulus, 10.sup.5 psi 5.70 5.65 5.64 5.40Izod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.40 0.40 0.50 0.40ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.40ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 102 98.8 97 93.8HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 93 95 97 96(duplicate)______________________________________
TABLE XIX______________________________________Effects of Different Nucleating Agents in PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 133 134 135______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, phr 1 -- --MICROTALC CP-10-40, phr -- 1 --SURLYN 8020, phr 5.0 5.0 5.0PropertiesFlexural Strength, 10.sup.3 psi 12.9 14.0 13.9Flexural Modulus, 10.sup.5 psi 5.66 5.52 5.38Izod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.50 0.40 0.40ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.30 0.40 0.40ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 96 90 96HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 87 91 97(duplicate)______________________________________
TABLE XX______________________________________Effects of Different Nucleating Agents in PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 136 137 138______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, phr 1 -- --SURLYN 8528, phr -- 1 --Sodium Propionate, phr -- -- 1PropertiesFlexural Strength, 10.sup.3 psi 12.7 14.4 9.99Flexural Modulus, 10.sup.5 psi 5.56 5.34 5.79Izod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.40 0.50 0.50ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.40 0.40 0.40ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 89.2 90 116HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 106 91 117(duplicate)______________________________________
TABLE XXI______________________________________Effects of Different Nucleating Agents in PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 139 140 141 142PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70DYLARK 378, Wt. % 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95 95PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, phr 1 -- -- --Sodium Propionate, phr -- 1 -- --Sodium Acetate, phr -- -- 1 --Sodium Carbonate, phr -- -- 1PropertiesFlexural Strength, 10.sup.3 psi 13.8 10.9 14.7 15.0Flexural Modulus, 10.sup.5 psi 5.11 5.18 5.11 5.14Izod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.7ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 94 116 95 96HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 102 115 94 99(duplicate)______________________________________
TABLE XXII______________________________________Effects of Different Nucleating Agents in PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 143 144 145 146 147______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70 70DYLARK 378, Wt. % 30 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95 95 95PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 5 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, phr 1 -- -- -- --Sodium Propionate, phr -- 1 -- -- --Sodium n-butyrate*, phr -- -- -- -- --Sodium Caprylate, phr -- -- -- 1 --Sodium Myristate, phr -- -- -- -- 1PropertiesFlexural Strength, 14.2 13.1 12.6 14.3 14.510.sup.3 psiFlexural Modulus, 4.91 5.07 5.41 5.36 5.3610.sup.5 psiIzod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 91 102 106 98 95HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 93 105 111 108 95(duplicate)______________________________________ *Large amounts of irritating fumes were generated during compounding, but the molding parts retained only a faint trace of odor.
Surface appearance with sodium caprylate and sodium myristate is at least as good as with sodium stearate, but with sodium propionate and sodium n-butyrate the parts are not as glossy as with sodium stearate.
Tables XVII-XXII demonstrate the good physical properties obtained with different nucleating agents in compositions of this invention.
EXAMPLES 148-153
Table XXIII reports physical properties for compositions of this invention in which the nucleating agent level was varied. The mold temperature was 150.degree. F., the extruder barrel temperature (rear .degree.F./front .degree.F.) was 500/540 and the hold pressure was 5,000 psi.
TABLE XXIII______________________________________Effects of Varying Nucleating Agent LevelIn PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 148 149 150 151 152 153______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70 70 70DYLARK 378, Wt. % 30 30 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95 95 95 95PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 5 5 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, 0.5 1.0 1.5 -- -- --phrSodium Propionate, -- -- -- 0.5 1.0 1.5phrPropertiesFlexural Strength, 14.2 14.6 14.5 14.7 11.3 7.910.sup.3 psiFlexural Modulus, 4.91 5.07 5.10 5.25 5.37 5.1710.sup.5 psiIzod Impact, 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.51/4" bar,ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.41/8" bar,ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 91 91 98 112 122 124HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 93 102 95 114 116 114(duplicate)______________________________________
The data in Table XXIII show that a preferred nucleating agent range is 0.5 to 1.0 phr. When the level of sodium stearate is increased from 0.5 to 1.5 phr there is a relatively small increase in HDT @ 264 psi. Further, when the level of sodium propionate is decreased from 1.5 to 0.5 phr the flexural strength and Izod Impact approach the values routinely obtainable with 1.0 phr sodium stearate while maintaining a 10.degree. C. or larger advantage in HDT @ 264 psi.
EXAMPLES 154-159
Table XXIV reports physical properties of compositions of the invention in which the nucleating agent was either sodium stearate or sodium propionate and in which the level of glass fibers was varied. The mold temperature, barrel extruder temperature and hold pressure were the same as for Examples 148-153.
TABLE XXIV______________________________________Effects of Different Levels of Glass Fibers InPET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 154 155 156 157 158 159______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70 70 70DYLARK 378, Wt. % 30 30 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 93 90 95 93 90PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 7 10 5 7 10Sodium Stearate, 1.0 1.0 1.0 -- -- --phrSodium Propionate, -- -- -- 1.0 1.0 1.0phrPropertiesFlexural Strength, 9.95 11.1 13.3 14.3 15.3 16.810.sup.3 psiFlexural Modulus, 5.20 5.96 6.73 5.12 8.25 6.7110.sup.5 psiIzod Impact, 0.6 0.8 1.1 0.8 0.9 1.31/4" bar,ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.11/8" bar,ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 114 127 130 103 114 131HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 110 125 131 97 115 130(duplicate)______________________________________
The data in Table XXIV demonstrate the good physical properties with various levels of glass fibers in the compositions of this invention.
In the above experiments some parts were molded at 10,000 psi hold pressures and the surfaces inspected. The compositions containing sodium stearate retained good gloss as the glass loading increased to 10% with a small increase in the amount of glass marks. The surfaces of the alloys containing sodium propionate were substantially less glossy and deteriorated as the glass concentration was increased.
EXAMPLES 160-167
Table XXV reports the physical properties of composition of this invention containing processed mineral fiber (Jim Walter Resources PMF 604) milled glass fibers (OCF 739 BA) or PPG 3540. As indicated in Table XXV, in some of the examples the glass fiber was treated with 1 phr (parts per hundred parts glass fiber) Union Carbide A187 epoxy silane. The mold temperature, barrel extruder temperature and hold pressure were the same as for Examples 148-153.
TABLE XXV__________________________________________________________________________Effects of Different Fiber Modifiers On PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167__________________________________________________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70DYLARK 378, Wt. % 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 90 95 90 95 95 95 90PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 10 -- -- 5 -- -- --PMF 604, Wt. % -- -- 5 10 -- -- -- --OCF 739 BA, Wt. % -- -- -- -- -- 5 5 10A187, epoxy silane, phr* -- -- 1 1 -- -- 1 1Sodium Stearate, phr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1PropertiesFlexural Strength, 10.sup.3 psi 14.1 17.1 10.3 10.6 14.5 10.4 9.74 9.95Flexural Modulus, 10.sup.5 psi 4.63 6.65 4.24 5.14 5.30 4.20 4.27 4.32Izod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.8 1.2 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.4ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.7 1.2 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.5ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 95 132 85 93 94 79 79 85HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 96 139 87 90 97 79 79 86(duplicate)__________________________________________________________________________ *Parts per hundred parts glass fiber.
The data in Table XXV demonstrate the good physical properties obtained with the various fiber modifiers. Examples 160-167 show that PPG 3540 is a preferred modifier. Thus, at the 5% loading level with PPG 3540, the physical properties obtained showed more improvement than with a 10% loading of PM 604 or OCF 739 BA and the surface of the molded article was more desirable with the PPG 3540. Example 165, OCF 739 BA without A 187, showed a glossier surface than Example 166, OCF 739 BA with A 187.
EXAMPLES 168-170
Table XXVI reports physical properties of blends of this invention containing various amounts of sodium propionate as the nucleating agent. The mold temperature, barrel extruder temperature and hold pressure were the same as for Examples 148-153.
TABLE XXVI______________________________________Effects of Various Sodium Propionate LevelsOn PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 168 169 170______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70DYLARK 378, Wt. % 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 5 5Sodium Propionate, phr 0.1 0.3 0.5PropertiesFlexural Strength, 10.sup.3 psi 15.0 14.1 13.3Flexural Modulus, 10.sup.5 psi 5.13 4.90 5.14Izod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.7 0.6 0.6ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.7 0.7 0.5ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 88 101 108HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 94 104 110(duplicate)______________________________________
The data in Table XXVI demonstrate that sodium propionate is effective at a concentration as low as about 0.1 phr in the compositions of this invention.
EXAMPLES 171-174
Table XXVII reports physical properties of PET/SMA compositions having various glass fiber loading levels. The mold temperature, barrel extruder temperature and hold pressure are the same as for Examples 148-153.
TABLE XXVII______________________________________Effect of Glass Fiber Loading Level on PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 171 172 173 174______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70DYLARK 378, Wt. % 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 85 80 70PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 15 20 30Sodium Stearate, phr 1 1 1 1PropertiesFlexural Strength, 10.sup.3 psi 14.1 19.6 20.3 19.6Flexural Modulus, 10.sup.5 psi 5.12 7.94 8.59 10.4Izod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.7 1.3 1.4 1.5ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.6 1.4 1.6 1.8ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 94 138 137 127HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 93 143 130 129(duplicate)______________________________________
The data in Table XXVII demonstrate the good physical properties obtained with the various loading levels of glass fibers. Visual inspection of plaques injection molded at 10,000 psi hold pressure showed that excellent surface appearance was maintained with these compositions up to a 15% glass fiber loading level.
EXAMPLES 175-178
Table XXVIII reports physical properties of a PET/SMA composition with a different glass fiber (PPG 3540M) in comparison with previously available glass fibers (PPG 3540, OCF 419 AA and OCF 885 EB). PPG 3540M is reportedly a new version of PPG 3540. The compositions were compounded on a vacuum vented 11/4" Killion extruder at a vacuum level of about 25 inches of Hg (21-28 range) with zone temperatures (rear .degree.F./middle .degree.F./front .degree.F.) of 525/525/525, a melt temperature of about 530.degree. F. (526-531 range), a feeder speed of 12 ppm, a machine residence time of 35 seconds, a screw speed of 100 ppm and a die temperature of 550.degree. F. The mold temperature was 150.degree. F. and the hold pressure was 5,000 psi.
TABLE XXVIII______________________________________Comparison of The Effect of Different Glass Fiberson PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 175 176 177 178PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 85 85 85 85DYLARK 378, Wt. % 15 15 15 15CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95 95PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 -- -- --PPG 3540M, Wt. % -- 5 -- --OCF 419, Wt. % -- -- 5 --OCF 885, Wt. % -- -- -- 5Sodium Stearate, phr 1 1 1 1PropertiesFlexural Strength, 10.sup.3 psi 16.3 17.1 14.1 14.4Flexural Modulus, 10.sup.5 psi 5.56 5.62 6.64 5.65Izod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 94 102 100 94HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 101 106 96 94(duplicate)______________________________________
The data in Table XXVIII demonstrate that PPG 3540M is as effective as PPG 3540.
EXAMPLES 179-184
Table XXIX reports physical properties of PET/SMA compositions that were compounded at various temperatures using a vacuum-vented 11/4" Killion extruder. The screw speed was 100 rpm, the feeder speed was 11-12 rpm, the melt temperature was 529.degree.-531.degree. F. (Examples 181 and 182), 506.degree.-509.degree. F. (Examples 179 and 180) and 545.degree.-550.degree. F. (Examples 183 and 184), the vacuum pressure was 24-28 inches Hg and the machine residence time was about 37 seconds (Examples 181-184) and about 34 seconds (Examples 179-181). The mold temperature was 150.degree. F.
TABLE XXIX______________________________________Effects of Melt Compounding ConditionsOn PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 179 180 181 182 183 184______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 85 85 85 85 85 85DYLARK 378, Wt. % 15 15 15 15 15 15CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95 95 95 95PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 5 5 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, 1 1 1 1 1 1phrCompounding ConditionsZone Temperatures, 490 490 525 525 550 550.degree.F.*Die Temperature 510 510 525 525 550 550Molding ConditionsHold Pressure, 5 10 5 10 5 1010.sup.3 psiPropertiesFlexural Strength, 15.9 15.1 16.4 17.3 15.1 15.310.sup.3 psiFlexural Modulus, 5.57 5.60 5.53 5.73 5.62 5.6410.sup.5 psiIzod Impact, 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.71/4" bar,ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.71/8" bar,ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 100 100 93 102 112 101HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 111 107 110 102 113 106(duplicate)______________________________________ *Rear .degree.F./middle .degree.F./front .degree.F.
The data in Table XXIX show the good physical results obtained under the various compounding conditions with excellent plaque surfaces at 10,000 psi hold pressure.
EXAMPLES 185-192
Table XXX reports physical properties for PET/SMA compositions compounded on a vacuum-vented 11/4" Killion Extruder at a vacuum level of about 15 to about 20 inches of mercury. The mold temperature was 150.degree. F.
TABLE XXX__________________________________________________________________________Effects of Vacuum-Vented Compounding Conditions On PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192__________________________________________________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70DYLARK 378, Wt. % 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95PPG 3540, Wt. % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5Sodium Stearate, phr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Extrusion Conditions*Screw Speed, rpm 70 70 80 80 120 120 120 120Feeder speed, rpm 8 8 11 11 11 11 18 18Melt temperature, .degree.F. 520-523 520-523 525-528 525-528 532-534 532-534 530-533 530-533Machine Residence Time, 60 60 50 50 35 35 28 28SecondsMolding ConditionsHold Pressure 10.sup.3 psi 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 10Screw Recovery Time, Seconds 11-12 11-12 11-12 11-12 15-16 15-16 14-15 14-15PropertiesFlexural Strength, 10.sup.3 psi 15.1 15.5 15.2 15.4 15.5 15.1 15.2 15.4Flexural Modulus, 10.sup.5 psi 5.12 5.33 5.03 5.17 5.08 5.16 4.99 5.05Izod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 95 94 98 94 96 99 98 99HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 95 92 94 96 104 104 89 95HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 91 96 -- -- -- -- -- --HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 98 98 -- -- -- -- -- --__________________________________________________________________________ *Zone/Die Temperatures were 525.degree. F. on all compounding runs.
The data in Table XXX demonstrate the good physical properties obtained with various compounding conditions. The vacuum-venting resulted in solid pellets which yielded rapid and consistent screw recovery times when injection molded.
EXAMPLES 163-196
Table XXXI reports physical properties of another series of tests utilizing recycle PET in the composition of this invention. The mold temperature, barrel extruder temperature and hold pressure were the same as for Examples 148-153.
TABLE XXXI______________________________________Use of Recycle PET In PET/SMA Compositions EXAMPLES 193 194 195 196______________________________________PET/SMA RatioVITUF 5901, Wt. % 70 -- 70 --Pure Tech PET, Wt. % -- 70 -- 70DYLARK 338S, Wt. % 30 30 30 30CompositionPET/SMA, Wt. % 100 100 95 95OCF 419 AA, Wt. % -- -- 5.0 5.0Sodium Stearate*, phr -- -- 1.0 1.0PropertiesIzod Impact, 1/4" bar, 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5ft.-lb/in.Izod Impact, 1/8" bar, 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4ft.-lb/in.HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 84 79 106 96HDT @ 264 psi, .degree.C. 82 80 110 102(duplicate)HDT @ 66 psi, .degree.C. 102 108 127 133______________________________________ *Witco heatstable grade.

Number	Name	Date
3644574	Jackson et al.	Feb 1972
3919354	Moore et al.	Nov 1975
4038342	Schwartz	Jul 1977
4100229	Schwartz	Jul 1978
4131594	Nakamura et al.	Dec 1978
4280948	Dieck	Jul 1981
4346195	Hornbaker et al.	Aug 1982

Polyethylene terephthalate blends

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

US Referenced Citations (7)