Patent Grant
11473216
Currently, many different carpet designs are available. However, it is difficult, using traditional manufacturing processes, to cost-effectively produce small, customized runs of broadloom carpet because doing so typically requires small amounts of BCF yarns to be produced in dedicated colors. Producing small amounts of BCF yarns in dedicated colors is typically expensive because changing a traditional BCF production line from one color to another may require shutting down the line and/or running the line to produce an undesired color (which may ultimately be discarded as waste) while the line is transitioning from one color to the next.
It is also currently difficult to produce a substantially uniform-looking “tonal” effect in broadloom carpets in which the individual strands of BCF include multiple different tones of the same color or colors, and in which the various tones of the same color(s) are maintained in the same or similar approximate proportions over the length of the individual strands of BCF (e.g., so that the resulting carpet includes an overall, uniform-appearing coloring comprising different tones of the same color(s)).
Accordingly, there is currently a need for improved processes for producing small, customized runs of broadloom carpet, especially where the individual strands of BCF are colored to produce a tonal effect. There is a further need for processes that allow for creating different tonal effects (which may, for example, be customized according to customer requests) and for manufacturing BCF for such carpet from recycled material, such as recycled plastic bottles.
In various embodiments, a method of manufacturing bulked continuous carpet filament having a tonal color effect from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) using an extruder is provided. According to the method, an extruder (e.g., a multi-screw extruder, such as an MRS machine) at least partially melts the PET into a polymer melt and at least partially purifies the polymer melt to create a polymer stream. The polymer stream enters a static mixing assembly having one or more individual static mixing elements (e.g., at least thirty individual static mixing elements) at an upstream end and exits at a downstream end. One or more colorant ports positioned along a length of the static mixing assembly provide colorant to the polymer stream at any of a plurality of different locations along the length of the static mixing assembly. In a particular embodiment, a plurality of colorant ports are provided—each at different lengths from the downstream end of the static mixing assembly, and a user may select which colorant port to inject colorant through. After mixing the polymer stream with the colorant within the static mixing assembly, the polymer stream is formed into bulked continuous carpet filament having a tonal color effect. In particular embodiments, the tonal color effect varies based on which colorant port is selected to deliver the colorant into the polymer stream (e.g., because the colorant will generally mix with the polymer stream to a different extent based on the number of static mixing elements that the colorant/polymer mixture passes through).
So, according to a first embodiment of the invention, a method of manufacturing a bulked continuous carpet filament from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) having a tonal color effect is provided, the method comprising the steps of:
According to some embodiments, the method may further comprise the steps of:
According to some embodiments, the colorant port may be positioned to inject colorant into the static mixing assembly two to four static mixing elements from the downstream end of the static mixing assembly.
According to some embodiments, the colorant port may comprise a first colorant port, and the tonal color effect of the polymer stream received at the spinning machine resulting from the colorant injected into the first colorant port may comprise a first tonal color effect, and the method may further comprise:
According to some embodiments, the colorant port may comprise a first colorant port, and the method may further comprise:
According to some embodiments, the method may further comprise:
According to some embodiments, the plurality of colorant ports each may comprise quick-disconnect coupling mechanisms configured to allow for the installation and de-installation of a colorant container while the polymer stream traverses through the static mixing assembly.
According to some embodiments, the method further may comprise splitting the polymer stream into a plurality of individual polymer streams downstream from the extruder and the static mixing assembly may comprise a static mixing assembly for each of the plurality of individual polymer streams such that each of the plurality of individual polymer streams forms into bulked continuous carpet filament having a tonal color effect.
According to some embodiments, the extruder may be a multi-screw extruder.
According to some embodiments, the static mixing assembly may comprise a substantially cylindrical housing encompassing the one or more individual static mixing elements.
According to some embodiments, the one or more individual static mixing elements may comprise at least thirty individual static mixing elements.
According to some embodiments, the one or more individual static mixing elements may comprise thirty-six to forty individual static mixing elements.
According to some embodiments, the one or more individual static mixing elements may comprise at least five individual static mixing elements arranged consecutively in series, and the plurality of colorant ports may comprise at least one colorant port corresponding to each of the at least five individual static mixing elements.
According to some embodiments, the one or more individual static mixing elements may comprise at least ten individual static mixing elements, and the plurality of colorant ports may comprise at least one respective colorant port corresponding to each respective one of the at least ten individual static mixing elements.
According to some embodiments, the one or more individual static mixing elements may comprise at least two individual static mixing elements arranged in series, wherein each of the at least two individual static mixing elements comprise:
According to a second embodiment of the invention, a system for manufacturing a bulked continuous carpet filament from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) having a tonal color is provided. In this embodiment, the system comprises:
According to some embodiments, the plurality of colorant ports may comprise:
According to some embodiments, the system further may comprise one or more colorant containers coupled to the one or more colorant ports.
According to some embodiments, the one or more colorant containers are coupled to the one or more colorant ports via quick-disconnect coupling mechanisms configured to allow for the installation and de-installation of a colorant container while the polymer stream traverses through the static mixing assembly.
According to some embodiments, the static mixing assembly may comprise a plurality of static mixing assemblies, each static mixing assembly receiving an individual polymer stream of a plurality of individual polymer streams split from the polymer stream downstream of the extruder.
According to some embodiments, one or more colorant ports may be positioned to inject colorant into the static mixing assembly two to four static mixing elements from the downstream end of the static mixing assembly.
According to some embodiments, one or more colorant ports may be positioned to inject colorant into the static mixing assembly at different positions around a circumference of the static mixing assembly.
The system according the second aspect of the invention may be fit for, and hence may be used to execute a method according to the first aspect of the invention.
The methods and systems according to various embodiments of the invention may provide the advantage of enabling unique carpet designs to be made (e.g., at a reasonable cost). The methods and systems may have the further advantage of allowing for the efficient production of tonally-colored BCF in small batches (which may be customized, for example, according to a particular customer's preferences), which may allow for the production of small quantities of carpet to be produced having unique, potentially customized, tonal coloring.
Accordingly, methods and systems according to various embodiments of the invention may have the further advantage of producing BCF for use in broadloom carpets that results in a substantially uniform-looking “tonal” effect in the carpets. In various embodiments, the individual strands of BCF include multiple different tones of the same color or colors, and the various tones of the same color or colors may be maintained in the same or similar approximate proportions over the length of the individual strands of BCF (e.g., so that the resulting carpet includes an overall, uniform-appearing coloring comprising different tones of the same color or colors). Various embodiments allow for the production of BCF for use in such carpets from recycled material, such as recycled plastic bottles and/or virgin material.
The independent and dependent claims below set out particular and preferred features of the invention. Features from the dependent claims may be combined with features of the independent or other dependent claims, and/or with features set out in the description above and/or hereinafter as appropriate.
The above and other characteristics, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of various embodiments of the invention. This description is given for the purposes of example only, without limiting the scope of the invention. The reference figures numbers referenced below refer to the attached drawings.
Having described various embodiments in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
Within the figures, the same reference signs refer to the same, similar or analogous elements within the various figures.
Various embodiments will now be described in greater detail. It should be understood that the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
It is noted that the term “comprising”, as used in the claims, should not be interpreted as being restricted to the means listed thereafter; this term does not exclude other elements or steps. The term “comprising” is thus to be interpreted as specifying the presence of the stated features, steps or components as referred to, but does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, steps or components, or groups thereof.
Throughout this specification, references to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” are made. Such references indicate that a particular feature, described in relation to the embodiment, is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, though they could.
Furthermore, the particular features or characteristics described herein may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments, as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art.
Overview
New processes for producing and coloring fiber from recycled polymer (e.g., recycled PET polymer) and virgin polymer (e.g., virgin PET polymer) are described below. In various embodiments, these new processes may include, for example: (1) extruding a polymer (e.g., such as PET) using a primary extruder; (2) adding a colorant to the extruded polymer downstream from the primary extruder; (3) using one or more static mixing elements (e.g., up to thirty six static mixing elements or more) to substantially uniformly mix the extruded polymer and the added colorant; and (4) using a spinning machine to spin the uniformly-mixed extruded polymer and added colorant into bulked continuous filament (e.g., carpet yarn) that has a color that is based on the added colorant. The process described herein may, for example, reduce an amount of waste related to changing a color of bulked continuous filament produced using a particular extruder when switching to a different colorant.
In various embodiments, the primary extruder comprises a multi-rotating screw extruder (MRS extruder). In particular embodiments, the process further comprises: (1) splitting the molten polymer stream extruded from the primary extruder into a plurality of polymer streams (e.g., up to six polymer streams), each of the plurality of polymer streams having an associated spinning machine; (2) adding a colorant to each split polymer stream; (3) using one or more static mixing assemblies for each split polymer stream to substantially uniformly mix each split polymer stream and its respective colorant; and (4) spinning each polymer stream with its substantially uniformly mixed colorant into bulked continuous filament using the respective spinning machine. In such embodiments, a process for producing and coloring bulked continuous filament may utilize a single primary extruder to produce a plurality of different colored filaments (e.g., carpet yarn).
In various embodiments, this new process may, for example: (1) produce less waste than other processes when producing or changing a color of bulked continuous filament produced using a particular extruder; (2) facilitate the production of small batches of particular colors of filament (e.g., for use in rugs or less popular colors of carpet) at a relatively low cost; (3) increase a number of simultaneous filament colors that a single extruder can produce; and (4) etc. In at least one embodiment, the improved process results in reduction of waste of up to about 4,000 pounds of fiber when switching from a first color to a second color (e.g., by adding the colorant downstream from the primary extruder rather than upstream).
In particular embodiments, a smaller number of static mixing elements than described above (e.g., any suitable number between 5 and 20 static mixing elements) may be used to produce a tonal coloring effect within the BCF. This tonal coloring effect may reflect a non-uniform mixing of colorant into the polymer stream.
The tonal effect may be produced due to the fact that the liquid colorant would only be partially further mixed into the polymer stream each time it passes through a single static mixing element. So each time a segment of the colorant/polymer stream mixture passes through another static mixing element, the mixture will become slightly more uniform. After passing through a certain number of static mixing elements (e.g., 30), the colorant/polymer mixture will be substantially uniform. As noted above, the colorant/polymer stream mixture is passed through a number of static mixing elements that is selected to produce a substantially uniform, partial mixture of colorant and polymer. The result is a fiber with a consistent, tonal coloring effect. In various embodiments, the system is adapted to be easily reconfigured (e.g., through the use of quick-release connectors spaced at different points along the length of a series of static mixing elements) to inject colorant so that it passes through the desired number of static mixing elements before exiting the series of static mixing elements. This may allow a user to easily reconfigure the machine to produce BCF with different types of tonal coloring.
More Detailed Discussion
Step 1: Using an Extrusion System to Melt and Purify PET
In various embodiments, the step of using an extrusion system to melt and purify PET (e.g., PET flakes and/or pellets) comprises: (A) preparing the PET for extrusion; and (B) using a suitable extruder to melt and purify the PET.
Preparing the PET for Extrusion
In particular embodiments, the step of preparing the PET for extrusion may vary based on a source of the PET. For example, in various embodiments, the process may utilize: (1) virgin PET (e.g., virgin PET pellets); (2) recycled PET (e.g., recycled PET flakes ground from recycled PET bottles and other suitable sources); and/or (3) a combination of virgin and recycled PET. In various embodiments in which the process utilizes recycled PET, the step of preparing the PET for extrusion may include sorting, grinding, washing and other steps designed to remove any impurities from the recycled PET prior to extrusion. These other PET preparation steps may, for example, be unnecessary in embodiments of the process that utilize virgin PET. Because using recycled PET in the process described herein may contribute to even further costs savings to those associated with a reduction in waste due to colorant changing, the process will be described below particularly with respect to recycled PET.
In a particular embodiment, preparing the PET for extrusion may include preparing flakes of PET polymer from post-consumer bottles or other sources of recycled PET. An exemplary process for preparing post-consumer bottles for use in the production of bulked continuous filament is described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,597,553 B1, entitled “Systems and Methods for Manufacturing Bulked Continuous Filament” and published on Dec. 3, 2013, which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety. Generally speaking, the step of preparing flakes of PET polymer from post-consumer bottles may comprise, for example: (A) sorting post-consumer PET bottles and grinding the bottles into flakes; (B) washing the flakes; and (C) identifying and removing any impurities or impure flakes.
Sorting Post-Consumer PET Bottles and Grinding the Bottles into Flakes
In particular embodiments, bales of clear and mixed colored recycled post-consumer (e.g., “curbside”) PET bottles (or other containers) obtained from various recycling facilities make-up the post-consumer PET containers for use in the process. In other embodiments, the source of the post-consumer PET containers may be returned ‘deposit’ bottles (e.g., PET bottles whose price includes a deposit that is returned to a customer when the customer returns the bottle after consuming the bottle's contents). The curbside or returned “post-consumer” or “recycled” containers may contain a small level of non-PET contaminates. The contaminants in the containers may include, for example, non-PET polymeric contaminants (e.g., PVC, PLA, PP, PE, PS, PA, etc.), metal (e.g., ferrous and non-ferrous metal), paper, cardboard, sand, glass or other unwanted materials that may find their way into the collection of recycled PET. The non-PET contaminants may be removed from the desired PET components, for example, through one or more of the various processes described below.
In particular embodiments, smaller components and debris (e.g., components and debris greater than 2 inches in size) are removed from the whole bottles via a rotating trammel. Various metal removal magnets and eddy current systems may be incorporated into the process to remove any metal contaminants. Near Infra-Red optical sorting equipment such as the NRT Multi Sort IR machine from Bulk Handling Systems Company of Eugene, Oreg., or the Spyder IR machine from National Recovery Technologies of Nashville, Tenn., may be utilized to remove any loose polymeric contaminants that may be mixed in with the PET flakes (e.g., PVC, PLA, PP, PE, PS, and PA). Additionally, automated X-ray sorting equipment such as a VINYLCYCLE machine from National Recovery Technologies of Nashville, Tenn. may be utilized to remove remaining PVC contaminants.
In particular embodiments, the sorted material is taken through a granulation step (e.g., using a 50B Granulator machine from Cumberland Engineering Corporation of New Berlin, Wis.) to size reduce (e.g., grind) the bottles down to a size of less than one half of an inch. In various embodiments, the bottle labels are removed from the resultant “dirty flake” (e.g., the PET flakes formed during the granulation step) via an air separation system prior to entering the wash process.
Washing the Flakes
In particular embodiments, the “dirty flake” is then mixed into a series of wash tanks. As part of the wash process, in various embodiments, an aqueous density separation is utilized to separate the olefin bottle caps (which may, for example, be present in the “dirty flake” as remnants from recycled PET bottles) from the higher specific gravity PET flakes. In particular embodiments, the flakes are washed in a heated caustic bath to about 190 degrees Fahrenheit. In particular embodiments, the caustic bath is maintained at a concentration of between about 0.6% and about 1.2% sodium hydroxide. In various embodiments, soap surfactants as well as defoaming agents are added to the caustic bath, for example, to further increase the separation and cleaning of the flakes. A double rinse system then washes the caustic from the flakes.
In various embodiments, the flake is centrifugally dewatered and then dried with hot air to at least substantially remove any surface moisture. The resultant “clean flake” is then processed through an electrostatic separation system (e.g., an electrostatic separator from Carpco, Inc. of Jacksonville, Fla.) and a flake metal detection system (e.g., an MSS Metal Sorting System) to further remove any metal contaminants that remain in the flake. In particular embodiments, an air separation step removes any remaining label from the clean flake. In various embodiments, an electro-optical flake sorter based at least in part on Raman technology (e.g., a Powersort 200 from Unisensor Sensorsysteme GmbH of Karlsruhe, Germany) performs the final polymer separation to remove any non-PET polymers remaining in the flake. This step may also further remove any remaining metal contaminants and color contaminants.
In various embodiments, the combination of these steps delivers substantially clean (e.g., clean) PET bottle flake comprising less than about 50 parts per million PVC (e.g., 25 ppm PVC) and less than about 15 parts per million metals for use in the downstream extrusion process described below.
Identifying and Removing Impurities and Impure Flakes
In particular embodiments, after the flakes are washed, they are fed down a conveyor and scanned with a high-speed laser system 300. In various embodiments, particular lasers that make up the high-speed laser system 300 are configured to detect the presence of particular contaminates (e.g., PVC or Aluminum). Flakes that are identified as not consisting essentially of PET may be blown from the main stream of flakes with air jets. In various embodiments, the resulting level of non-PET flakes is less than 25 ppm.
In various embodiments, the system is adapted to ensure that the PET polymer being processed into filament is substantially free of water (e.g., entirely free of water). In a particular embodiment, the flakes are placed into a pre-conditioner for between about 20 and about 40 minutes (e.g., about 30 minutes) during which the pre-conditioner blows the surface water off of the flakes. In particular embodiments, interstitial water remains within the flakes. In various embodiments, these “wet” flakes (e.g., flakes comprising interstitial water) may then be fed into an extruder (e.g., as described below), which includes a vacuum setup designed to remove—among other things—the interstitial water that remains present in the flakes following the quick-drying process described above.
Using an Extrusion System to Melt and Purify PET Flakes
As may be understood from
As may be understood from
The resultant polymer melt (e.g., comprising the melted PET), in various embodiments, is then fed into the extruder's MRS section 420, in which the extruder separates the melt flow into a plurality of different streams (e.g., 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or more streams) through a plurality of open chambers.
As shown in
In various embodiments, as may be understood from
In various embodiments, the MRS extruder's MRS Section 420 is fitted with a vacuum pump that is attached to a vacuum attachment portion 422 of the MRS section 420 so that the vacuum pump is in communication with the interior of the MRS section via a suitable opening 424 in the MRS section's housing. In still other embodiments, the MRS Section 420 is fitted with a series of vacuum pumps. In particular embodiments, the vacuum pump is configured to reduce the pressure within the interior of the MRS Section 420 to a pressure that is between about 0.5 millibars and about 25 millibars. In particular embodiments, the vacuum pump is configured to reduce the pressure in the MRS Section 420 to less than about 5 millibars (e.g., about 1.8 millibars or less). The low-pressure vacuum created by the vacuum pump in the MRS Section 420 may remove, for example: (1) volatile organics present in the melted polymer as the melted polymer passes through the MRS Section 420; and/or (2) at least a portion of any interstitial water that was present in the wet flakes when the wet flakes entered the MRS Extruder 400. In various embodiments, the low-pressure vacuum removes substantially all (e.g., all) of the water and contaminants from the polymer stream.
In some embodiments, after the molten polymer is run the through the multi-stream MRS Section 420, the streams of molten polymer are recombined and flow into the MRS extruder's second single screw section 440. In particular embodiments, passage through the low pressure MRS Section 420 purifies the recycled polymer melt (e.g., by removing the contaminants and interstitial water) and makes the recycled polymer substantially structurally similar to (e.g., structurally the same as) pure virgin PET polymer. In particular embodiments, the resulting polymer is a recycled PET polymer (e.g., obtained 100% from post-consumer PET products, such as PET bottles or containers) having a polymer quality that is suitable for use in producing PET carpet filament using substantially only (e.g., only) PET from recycled PET products.
Step 2: Add a Colorant to the Polymer Melt Downstream from the Primary Extruder
In particular embodiments, after the recycled PET polymer (e.g., or virgin PET) has been extruded and purified by the above-described extrusion process, a colorant is added to the resultant polymer melt. As shown in
In particular embodiments, Colorant A 204 may comprise pelletized color concentrate which the secondary extruder 206 is configured to at least partially melt prior to adding Colorant A 204 to the polymer melt. In various other embodiments, Colorant A 204 may comprise other additives such as, for example, a carrier resin which may aid in binding the colorant to the polymer. In other embodiments, Colorant A 204 may include any suitable liquid colorant which may be pumped into the polymer melt using any suitable pump (e.g., in lieu of using a secondary extruder 206 and pelletized color concentrate).
In various embodiments, the process may further include monitoring an amount of throughput (e.g., polymer output) from the primary extruder 202 in order to determine an appropriate amount of letdown (e.g., an appropriate let down ratio) such that a proper amount of Colorant A 204 is added to the polymer melt downstream from the primary extruder 202. In various embodiments, a desirable letdown ratio may include a letdown ratio of between about two percent and about eight percent. In other embodiments, the letdown ratio may include any other suitable letdown ratio (e.g., one percent, two percent, three percent, four percent, five percent, six percent, seven percent, etc.). In particular embodiments, the letdown ratio may vary based on a desired color of bulked continuous filament ultimately produced using the process (e.g., up to about twenty percent).
In various embodiments, adding the colorant 204 downstream of the primary extruder 202 may save on waste during color changeover. For example, when switching between producing bulked continuous filament of a first color to producing bulked continuous filament of a second color, it is necessary to change the colorant 204 added to the polymer melt (e.g., from a first colorant that would result in bulked continuous filament of the first color to a second colorant that would result in bulked continuous filament of the second color). As may be understood by one skilled in the art, after switching from adding the first colorant to the polymer melt to adding the second colorant to the polymer melt, residual first colorant may remain in in the system between the point in the process at which the colorant is added and the spinning machine 212. For example, residual first colorant may remain in the secondary extruder 206, the one or more static mixing assemblies 208, or any other physical mechanism used in the process (such as any mechanism shown in
As may be understood by one skilled in the art, after running the process with the second colorant for a suitable amount of time, the bulked continuous filament produced by the process will eventually be of the second, desired color (e.g., because the first colorant will eventually be substantially flushed out the system). Between the point at which there is a changeover in adding the second colorant to the process rather than the first colorant and the point at which the process begins to produce the desired color of bulked continuous filament, the process will produce some waste bulked continuous filament that is of an undesired color (e.g., due at least in part to the residual first colorant).
In various embodiments, the waste bulked continuous filament produced using the process described herein may be considerably lower than waste bulked continuous filament produced during color changeovers using other processes (e.g., such as other processes in which colorant is added to PET prior to extrusion in a primary extruder such as an MRS extruder). For example, in various embodiment, the process described herein may limit waste bulked continuous filament to an amount of bulked continuous filament produced when running a single package of colorant (e.g., of the second colorant), which may, for example, result in less than about 100 pounds of waste. In particular embodiments, reducing waste may lead to cost savings in the production of bulked continuous filament.
Step 3: Use One or More Static Mixing Assemblies to Mix Polymer Melt with Added Colorant
In particular embodiments, following the addition of Colorant A 204 to the stream of molten polymer, the process includes the use of one or more static mixing assemblies 208 (e.g., one or more static mixing elements) to mix and disperse Colorant A 204 throughout the polymer stream. As may be understood by one skilled in the art, due in part to the viscosity of the polymer stream (e.g., polymer melt), when a dye or other colorant is added to the polymer stream, the dye and the stream may not mix. In various embodiments, the flow of the polymer melt is substantially laminar (e.g., laminar) which may, for example, further lead to a lack of mixing.
In particular embodiments, the static mixing assemblies 208 shown in
In various other embodiments, the static mixing assemblies 208 may comprise a suitable number of static mixing elements comprising one or more suitable helical mixing elements.
As may be further understood from
It should be understood that for the purposes of this disclosure, a static mixing assembly 208 may be configured in any desired arrangement to provide a desired number of one or more individual mixing elements to a polymer stream. For example, a static mixing assembly 208 may include a single mixing element within a single housing with one or more mixing bars 704 and/or one or more helical mixing elements 904 disposed within the housing. Alternatively, the static mixing assembly 208 may include multiple static mixing elements positioned in series within a single housing. According to yet another alternative embodiment, the static mixing assembly 208 may include a plurality of static mixing elements, each having their own respective housing positioned in series adjacent to one another. In this embodiment, the plurality of static mixing elements are collectively considered the static mixing assembly 208. For example, in particular embodiments, the static mixing assembly 208 comprises up to thirty-six individual static mixing elements (e.g., thirty-six static mixing elements, thirty-four static mixing elements, etc.). In still other embodiments, the static mixing assembly 208 comprises any other suitable number of static mixing elements sufficient to substantially uniformly (e.g., homogeneously) mix the molten polymer with the added colorant (e.g., to substantially uniformly mix the molten polymer and the added colorant into a colored melt stream 530 as shown in
In particular embodiments, the one or more static mixing assemblies 208 may comprise any suitable combination of static mixing elements such as, for example, any suitable break down of the static mixing element 700 shown in
Creating a Tonal Color in Polymer Melt
According to various embodiments, it may be desirable to create BCF for use in the production of carpet and other products that is not uniform in color. Specifically, it may be desirable to create BCF that has a tonal color effect. For the purposes of this disclosure, BCF having a tonal color effect may include BCF having any color that is not uniform, such as BCF that includes different shades of the same color (e.g., with gradual changes between one shade to another). Conventionally, tonal color effects may be created using one or more yarns or filaments having one dark end and one light end, which are twisted together to create a tonal yarn. However, using the concepts and technologies described herein, a tonal color effect may be created using a single yarn, without utilizing the conventional twisting process.
According to one embodiment, the tonal effect characteristic of the polymer stream and resulting BCF product may be created using a smaller number of static mixing elements (individual static mixing elements 700 or helical mixing elements 904) as compared to the at least thirty individual static mixing elements utilized to create the uniformly mixed and uniformly colored polymer streams described above. For example, according to one implementation, a smaller number of individual static mixing elements 700 or helical static mixing elements 904 (e.g., any discrete number less than thirty) may be used to create the static mixing assemblies 208 of
While, in various embodiments, providing a static mixing assembly 208 with fewer individual static mixing elements (i.e., static mixing elements 700 or helical static mixing elements 904) may create a tonal color characteristic in the resulting polymer stream, various embodiments described herein may produce tonal color effects, while allowing for the same BCF manufacturing system to be utilized to create both uniformly-colored BCF and BCF having tonal color effects with, in various embodiments, minimal time and effort in changing the system set up between manufacturing runs of the two products.
Turning to
According to various embodiments, the static mixing assembly 208 has one or more colorant ports 1302a-n (collectively referred to as colorant ports 1302), and/or liquid injection nozzles, positioned along a length of the static mixing assembly 208. The one or more colorant ports 1302 may include any type of port suitable for facilitating the injection of colorant from one or more colorant container 1304 into the polymer stream within the static mixing assembly 208. According to one embodiment, the one or more colorant ports 1302 include threads for receiving the one or more colorant containers 1304 and/or one or more mechanisms coupled to the one or more colorant containers 1304. In other embodiments, the one or more colorant ports 1302 and the one or more colorant containers 1304 are coupled together via a quick-disconnect connection 1306 that allows for easy and rapid connection of the one or more colorant containers 1304 to/from the colorant ports 1302.
Once a colorant container 1304 is connected to a respective colorant port 1302, colorant may be injected from the container, through the port and into: (1) a location that is adjacent the center of the polymer stream within the static mixing assembly 208; (2) a location proximate to an inside wall of the housing 702 of the static mixing assembly 208; and/or (3) any other suitable location. Injecting the colorant into the center of the polymer stream may result in more uniform or predictable mixing, while injecting the colorant into the polymer stream proximate to a wall of the static mixing assembly's housing 702 may yield more distinct tonal color effects in the resulting colored polymer stream and corresponding BCF product.
For example, while the one or more colorant ports 1302 are shown in pairs at each location, various embodiments may utilize only a single colorant port 1302 at each location, or may alternatively utilize more than two colorant ports 1302 at each location along the length of the static mixing assembly 208. According to an alternative embodiment, the positioning of the one or more colorant ports 1302 around the circumference of the static mixing assembly 208 may differ. For example, a first colorant port 1302a may be positioned on a top side (i.e., at the zero degree location when viewing the circular cross-section) of the static mixing assembly 208, while a second colorant port 1302b that is located downstream along the length of the static mixing assembly 208 may be positioned on the right side (i.e., at the 90 degree location when viewing the circular cross-section) of the static mixing assembly 208. The various radial positioning around the circumference of the static mixing assembly 208 may yield different tonal color effects in the colored polymer stream exiting the static mixing assembly 208 if the colorant is injected within the polymer stream at a location other than centrally (i.e., proximate to the wall of the housing 702).
The static mixing assembly 208 shown in
According to one embodiment, multiple colorant containers 1304 (e.g., that are configured to selectively deliver liquid colorant under pressure—e.g., via a suitable pump arrangement, such as any suitable pump arrangement described below) may be utilized simultaneously with multiple corresponding colorant ports 1302 at different locations along the length of the static mixing assembly 208 to create tonal color effects with multiple colors. For example, a first one or more colorant containers 1304 having a first color may be coupled to the one or more colorant ports 1302b, while a second one or more colorant containers 1304 having a second color may be coupled to the one or more colorant ports 1302n. The resulting colored polymer stream may contain tonal color effects with respect to the first color that are more subtle than the tonal color effects associated with the second color that are present in the same colored polymer stream since the polymer stream and the first color mix for a longer period of time than the colored polymer stream (containing a mix with the first color) and the second color.
Alternatively, according to another embodiment, a first one or more colorant containers 1304 having a first color may be coupled to the one or more colorant ports 1302n shown on the top side of the static mixing assembly 208, while a second one or more colorant containers 1304 having a second color may be coupled to the one or more colorant ports 1302n shown on the bottom side of the static mixing assembly 208. In this embodiment, two different colorants are injected into the polymer stream at different radial locations around the circumference of the static mixing assembly 208. Doing so may allow the polymer stream, the first colorant, and the second colorant to mix for a short length prior to exiting the downstream end 1310 of the static mixing assembly 208 with a unique tonal color effect.
The process 1400 begins as described above with respect to steps 1 and 2 of
Step 4: Use of a Spinning Machine to Turn the Colored Polymer into Filament
Referring back to
In particular embodiments, the spinning machine 212 used in the process described above is the Sytec One spinning machine manufactured by Oerlikon Neumag of Neumuenster, Germany. The Sytec One machine may be especially adapted for hard-to-run fibers, such as nylon or solution-dyed fibers, where the filaments are prone to breakage during processing. In various embodiments, the Sytec One machine keeps the runs downstream of the spinneret as straight as possible, uses only one threadline, and is designed to be quick to rethread when there are filament breaks.
Although the example described above describes using the Sytec One spinning machine to produce carpet yarn filament from the polymer, it should be understood that any other suitable spinning machine may be used. Such spinning machines may include, for example, any suitable one-threadline or three-threadline spinning machine made by Oerlikon Neumag of Neumuenster, Germany or any other company.
In various embodiments, prior to using the spinning machine 212 to spin the colored melt into filament, the process may utilize one or more color sensors 210 to determine a color of the colored melt. In various embodiments, the one or more color sensors 210 comprises one or more spectrographs configured to separate light shone through the polymer melt into a frequency spectrum to determine the color of the polymer melt. In still other embodiments, the one or more color sensors 210 comprises one or more cameras or other suitable imaging devices configured to determine a color of the resultant polymer melt. In particular embodiments, in response to determining that the color of the polymer melt is a color other than a desired color (e.g., the polymer melt is lighter than desired, darker than desired, a color other than the desired color, etc.) the system may: (1) discard the portion of the stream with the incorrect color; and/or (2) adjust an amount of colorant 204 that is added to the flake and/or the polymer melt upstream in order to adjust a color of the resultant polymer melt. In particular embodiments, adjusting the amount of colorant 204 is executed in a substantially automated manner (e.g., automatically) using the one or more color sensors 210 in a computer-controlled feedback control loop.
Producing a Plurality of Different Colored Fibers Using a Single Primary Extruder
In addition to the single colorant added to a single polymer stream from a primary extruder 202 described above with respect to
As shown in this Figure, a colorant (e.g., Colorant A-D 204a-d wherein Colorant A is indicated as 204a, Colorant B is indicated as 204b, Colorant C is indicated as 204c and Colorant D is indicated as 204d) is added to each individual polymer stream, for example, using a respective extruder 206a-d as described above. For example, Colorant C 204 is added to individual polymer stream 203c using extruder 206c.
Once the respective Colorant A-D 204a-d has been added to the respective individual polymer stream 203a-d, each individual polymer stream 203a-d with added Colorant A-D 204a-d is substantially uniformly mixed using respective one or more static mixing assemblies 208a-d. For example, once Colorant D 204d has been added to individual polymer stream 203d, the resultant colorant/polymer mixture passes through the one or more static mixing assemblies 208d to mix the Colorant D 204d and individual polymer stream 203d (e.g., to substantial homogeneity). Following mixture by the one or more static mixing assemblies 208a-d, the resultant respective colored melt streams are spun into filament using respective spinning machines 212a-d.
In various embodiments, it may be important to monitor the output of the extruder to determine a throughput of each individual polymer stream 203a-d. In such embodiments, monitoring throughput may ensure that each individual polymer stream 203a-d has the proper color letdown ratio in order to add a proper amount of Colorant A-D 204a-d to achieve a desired color of bulked continuous filament.
As may be understood from
Various embodiments of a process for producing various colored bulked continuous filament may include features that vary from or are in addition to those described above. Exemplary alternative embodiments are described below.
Addition of Liquid Colorant to Melt Stream Using Pump
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which this invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Also, while various embodiments are discussed above in regard to producing carpet filament from PET, similar techniques may be used to produce carpet filament from other polymers. Similarly, while various embodiments are discussed above in regard to producing carpet filament from PET, similar techniques may be used to produce other products from PET or other polymers.
In addition, it should be understood that various embodiments may omit any of the steps described above or add additional steps. Furthermore, any numerical ranges described herein are intended to capture every integer and fractional value within the described range (e.g., every rational number value within the described range). For example, it should be understood that a range describing a letdown ratio of between about two percent and about eight percent is intended to capture and disclose every rational number value percentage between two percent and eight percent (e.g., 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 2.1%, 2.01%, 2.001% . . . 7.999% and so on). Additionally, terms such as ‘about’, ‘substantially’, etc., when used to modify structural descriptions or numerical values are intended to capture the stated shape, value, etc. as well as account for slight variations as a result of, for example, manufacturing tolerances. For example, the term ‘substantially rectangular’ is intended to describe shapes that are both exactly rectangular (e.g., have four sides that meet at ninety degree angles) as well as shapes that are not quite exactly rectangular (e.g., shapes having four sides that meet at an angle in an acceptable tolerance of ninety degrees, such as 90°+/−4°)
In light of the above, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for the purposes of limitation.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/559,443, filed Sep. 15, 2017, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1490918 | Gaede | Apr 1924 | A |
| 2146532 | Paul | Feb 1939 | A |
| 3217783 | Rodenacker | Nov 1965 | A |
| 3310837 | Wittrock | Mar 1967 | A |
| 3357049 | Spindler | Dec 1967 | A |
| 3608001 | Kowalski et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3825236 | Hussmann et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
| 3865528 | Roess | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3938924 | Abella et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
| 4057376 | Berger | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4057607 | Soehngen et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4128386 | Wissinger et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4172477 | Reich | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4192617 | Spielhoff | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4268176 | Muller | May 1981 | A |
| 4269798 | Ives | May 1981 | A |
| 4272475 | Chi | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4289409 | Brand | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4370302 | Suzuoka et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4564349 | Brown | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4591487 | Fritsch | May 1986 | A |
| 4675378 | Gibbon et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4919872 | Fintel | Apr 1990 | A |
| 5102594 | Burlet et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108711 | Chszaniecki | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5143308 | Hally et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5224383 | Pinto et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5225130 | Deiringer | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5266601 | Kyber et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5306803 | Arlt et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5339255 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5393140 | Blach | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5424013 | Lieberman | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5427881 | Sacripante et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5459168 | Nasr et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5497562 | Pikus | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5503788 | Lazareck et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5510073 | Kaegi et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5532035 | Corbin et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5549957 | Negola et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5554657 | Brownscombe et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5613285 | Chester et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5623012 | Hwo | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5715584 | Coons, III et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5804115 | Burton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5836682 | Blach | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5886058 | Van Erden et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5893702 | Conrad et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5932691 | Khanin et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5945215 | Bersted et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5951159 | Schobert-Csongor et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5958548 | Negola et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5961054 | Nishibori | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6007892 | Harwood et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6074084 | Kolossow | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6113825 | Chuah | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6265533 | Regel et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6281278 | Takase et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6394644 | Streiff | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6492485 | Gohr et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6620354 | Bessemer et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6627127 | Piovoso et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6722117 | Belcher, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6773718 | Seth et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6784214 | Bacher et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6852256 | Borer et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6866171 | Ickinger | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6984694 | Blasius, Jr. et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7025491 | Blach et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7192545 | Ekart et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7198400 | Unterlander et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7204945 | Bonner | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7262380 | Ulrichsen et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7320589 | Babin et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7354988 | Charati et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7380973 | Goedicke et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7485685 | Mihan et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7513677 | Gneuss et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7594453 | Blach | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7628892 | Fini | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7647886 | Kubista et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7654725 | Sturm et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7700015 | Kern et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7744788 | Portier et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7799835 | Smith et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7828538 | Fellinger | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7902262 | Armstrong et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7928150 | Kannan et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7935737 | Gopal et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7980834 | Maguire | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8080190 | Ichikawa et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8147738 | Boczon et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8187512 | Eloo et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8398752 | Brownstein et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8404755 | Sequeira | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8444886 | Herve | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8471972 | Tsubata | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8557155 | Deiss et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8597553 | Clark | Dec 2013 | B1 |
| 8735457 | Booth et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8741972 | Booth et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8795811 | Cloutier et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 9061442 | Gneuss et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9149955 | Bower et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9168718 | Westwood et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9409363 | Clark | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9550338 | Clark | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9630353 | Clark | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9630354 | Clark | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9636845 | Clark | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9636860 | Clark | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9908263 | Pichler et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9975278 | Rabiser et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10532495 | Clark | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 20020086077 | Noller et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020123576 | Studholme | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20040053047 | Jackson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040063860 | Marston et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040082672 | Zeng et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040140248 | Dauzvardis et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040155374 | Hutchinson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20050047267 | Gneuss et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050263941 | Reutter | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060012074 | Booth et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060076705 | Fowler et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060284334 | Christel | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070000947 | Lewis | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070009750 | Ito et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070052131 | Fujimaki et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070261777 | Steckelberg et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080004202 | Wolfgang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080069916 | Regalia | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080139700 | Roden et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080157425 | Rodgers et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080214701 | Wilms et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080272508 | Culbert et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080274320 | Yokoyama et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080292831 | Juriga et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090004325 | Bacher et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090039542 | Morton-Finger | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090270564 | Gorlier et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090286919 | Moeller et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100102475 | Moon et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100113626 | Liu | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20110177283 | Juriga | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110257345 | Hoover, Jr. et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120070615 | Shi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120279023 | Burout et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130133697 | Stockman et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20150069652 | Clark | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150069655 | Clark | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150076725 | Clark | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150076744 | Clark | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20160318225 | Clark | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170136761 | Sieradzki et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170152611 | Clark | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170275785 | Williams et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20180126595 | Clark | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180127893 | Clark | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180362723 | Gneuss et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20200055213 | Clark | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2013267847 | Mar 2014 | AU |
| 2014215998 | Sep 2014 | AU |
| 170967 | Aug 1934 | CH |
| 1391511 | Jan 2003 | CN |
| 101444954 | Jun 2009 | CN |
| 101778705 | Jul 2010 | CN |
| 201872322 | Jun 2011 | CN |
| 202072825 | Dec 2011 | CN |
| 102990903 | Mar 2013 | CN |
| 202986059 | Jun 2013 | CN |
| 104040040 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 204265905 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 204265905 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 2243024 | Mar 1973 | DE |
| 3801574 | Aug 1989 | DE |
| 4433593 | Jun 1995 | DE |
| 19722278 | Dec 1998 | DE |
| 102006033089 | Oct 2007 | DE |
| 102008018686 | Oct 2009 | DE |
| 102011082769 | Mar 2013 | DE |
| 102013000316 | Jul 2014 | DE |
| 102017111275 | Nov 2018 | DE |
| 0336520 | Oct 1989 | EP |
| 0846860 | Jun 1998 | EP |
| 0881054 | Dec 1998 | EP |
| 1054083 | Nov 2000 | EP |
| 1400332 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1434680 | Jul 2006 | EP |
| 2748358 | Jul 2014 | EP |
| 3375916 | Sep 2018 | EP |
| 2059864 | Apr 1981 | GB |
| 1601699 | Nov 1981 | GB |
| 2141844 | Jan 1985 | GB |
| 63191823 | Aug 1988 | JP |
| 2003530478 | Oct 2003 | JP |
| 2007186830 | Jul 2007 | JP |
| 2001021373 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| 2002038276 | May 2002 | WO |
| 2003033240 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| 2004026557 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| 2008017843 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| 2008083035 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2008083820 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2010133531 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| 2011088437 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| 2011095361 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| 2012119165 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| 2013180941 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| 2016081474 | May 2016 | WO |
| 2016081495 | May 2016 | WO |
| 2016081508 | May 2016 | WO |
| 2016081568 | May 2016 | WO |
| 2018089346 | May 2018 | WO |
| 2018140884 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| 2018161021 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Austrian Patent Application No. A 330/2011, filed Mar. 10, 2011, entitled “Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Entfernen von Verunreinigungen aus einer Kunststoffschmelze”. |
| International Search Report, dated Jul. 5, 2012, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/AT2012/000052. |
| International Search Report, dated Oct. 30, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2019/042456. |
| Invitation to Pay Additional Fees, dated Oct. 18, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2019/042458. |
| Office Action, dated Dec. 2, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/664,730. |
| Office Action, dated Nov. 25, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/804,501. |
| Office Action, dated Nov. 29, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,076. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 30, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2019/042456. |
| Restriction Requirement, dated Feb. 5, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/220,733. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Mar. 26, 2020, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/051043. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 9, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/684,490. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 12, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/220,905. |
| Office Action, dated Feb. 21, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/910,853. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 28, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/664,730. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 3, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/213,694. |
| Ex Parte Quayle Action, dated Mar. 11, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/220,733. |
| Final Office Action, dated May 22, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,143. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 17, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/220,733. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated May 1, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/419,955. |
| Office Action, dated May 6, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,591. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Sep. 12, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/020746. |
| Office Action, dated Sep. 12, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/432,579. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 10, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/432,579. |
| Office Action, dated Aug. 8, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/409,599. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Aug. 8, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/015751. |
| Office Action, dated Aug. 13, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/213,694. |
| Botos, J., et al., “Color Measurement of Plastics—from Compounding via Pelletizing, up to Injection Molding and Extrusion,” AIP Conference Proceedings 1593, 16 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4873725, Feb. 17, 2015. |
| Machado, Almir De Souza, “Fundamentals of Cast Film Extrusion Technology,” https://www.slideshare.net/ASMachado/fundamentals-of-cast-film-extrusion-technology, Dec. 2, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 19, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/402,583. |
| Office Action, dated Aug. 26, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/220,905. |
| Office Action, dated Jun. 18, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/402,583. |
| Restriction Requirement, dated Jul. 15, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/432,579. |
| Office Action, dated Jul. 23, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/041,442. |
| Office Action, dated Oct. 9, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/419,955. |
| International Search Report, dated Nov. 19, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/051043. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Nov. 19, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/051043. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 13, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/473,385. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 24, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/473,402. |
| “MRS extrusion technology offers new options in PET”, Plastics Additives and Compounding, Elsevier Science, Oxofrd, GB, vol. 11, No. 2, Mar. 1, 2009 (Mar. 1, 2009), pp. 24-26, XP026067788, ISSN: 1464-391X. DOI:10.1016/S1464-391X(09)70050-9 [retrieved on Mar. 1, 2009] the whole document. |
| “Processing Technology: Processing of Polymer Melts,” Oct. 31, 2007, Gneuss Kunststofftechnik GmbH, Dusseldorf, Germany. |
| Australian Office Action, dated Aug. 26, 2015, from corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2014215998. |
| Australian Office Action, dated Dec. 5, 2016, from corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2016234917. |
| Australian Office Action, dated May 9, 2014, from corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2013267847. |
| Chinese Office Action, dated May 12, 2016, from corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201380003461.8. |
| Chinese Office Action, dated Sep. 14, 2015, from corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201380003461.8. |
| Decision of Patent Grant, dated Dec. 12, 2014, from corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2014-7016621. |
| European Office Action, dated Dec. 12, 2016, from corresponding European Patent Application No. 15158377.0. |
| Extended European Search Report, dated Aug. 26, 2015, from corresponding European Application No. 15158377.0. |
| Extended European Search Report, dated Jul. 24, 2018, from corresponding European Patent Application No. 181701129. |
| Final Office Action, dated Dec. 24, 2015, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/256,261. |
| Final Office Action, dated Oct. 19, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,819. |
| Final Office Action, dated Oct. 19, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,837. |
| Final Office Action, dated Oct. 19, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,847. |
| Final Office Action, dated Oct. 20, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,796. |
| Gneuss M: “Multi Rotation System Extruder Leads To Breakthrough in Polymer Evacuation”, International Fiber Journal, International Media Group, Charlotte, NC, US, vol. 23, No. 1, Feb. 1, 2008 (Feb. 1, 2008), pp. 40-41, XP001514827, ISSN: 1049-801X the whole document. |
| Hannemann, Innovative Aufbereitungslosung für PET mit uneingeschrankter FDA—Lebensmittelzulassung, Presentation, Mar. 15, 2012, 37 pages total, Gneuss Kunststofftechnik GmbH, Germany. |
| International Search Report, dated Apr. 12, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/015751. |
| International Search Report, dated Feb. 2, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061116. |
| International Search Report, dated Feb. 2, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061145. |
| International Search Report, dated Feb. 5, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061174. |
| International Search Report, dated Jan. 20, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061288. |
| International Search Report, dated Mar. 1, 2018, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US201 7/060359. |
| International Search Report, dated Sep. 2, 2013, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2013/040753. |
| Invitation to Pay Additional Search Fees, dated Jan. 5, 2018, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/060359. |
| Jaecker M: “The Conceptual Concept of the Future // Advantages of the Negative-Conical Gangti Efe on Double-Screw Extruders”, Kunststoffe, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munchen, DE, vol. 99, No. 12, Dec. 1, 2000 (Dec. 91, 2000), p. 64,66, XP990976191, ISSN: 9923-5563, figure 1. |
| Korean Office Action, dated Aug. 18, 2014, from corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2014-7016621. |
| Notice of Acceptance, dated Jun. 21, 2016, from corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2014215998. |
| Notice of Acceptance, dated Nov. 10, 2014, from corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2013267847. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 13, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/256,261. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 2, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,819. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 2, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,837. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 2, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,847. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 3, 2017, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,796. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 5, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/204,645. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 28, 2013, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/721,955. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 12, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,713. |
| Notice of Opposition, dated Dec. 17, 2015, from corresponding European Application No. 13728264.6. |
| Office Action, dated Apr. 9, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/204,645. |
| Office Action, dated Aug. 21, 2015, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/256,261. |
| Office Action, dated Aug. 27, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/473,385. |
| Office Action, dated Aug. 27, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/473,402. |
| Office Action, dated Jun. 1, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,837. |
| Office Action, dated Jun. 10, 2013, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/721,955. |
| Office Action, dated Jun. 13, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,847. |
| Office Action, dated Jun. 22, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,796. |
| Office Action, dated Jun. 30, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,740. |
| Office Action, dated Mar. 24, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/892,713. |
| Office Action, dated May 26, 2016, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/546,819. |
| Final Office Action, dated Jan. 9, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,591. |
| International Search Report, dated Dec. 10, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2019/042458. |
| Office Action, dated Jan. 29, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/684,490. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 10, 2019, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2019/042458. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 3, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/041,442. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 1, 2019, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,143. |
| Final Office Action, dated Jul. 8, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/910,853. |
| Restriction Requirement, dated Jul. 1, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/041,586. |
| Final Office Action, dated Jun. 11, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/804,501. |
| Final Office Action, dated Jun. 11, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/409,599. |
| Gneuss website, https://www.gneuss.com/en/polymer-technologies/extrusion/mrs-extruder/, dated Jun. 5, 2020, pp. 1-4. |
| Final Office Action, dated Jun. 15, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,076. |
| Office Action, dated Jun. 24, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/348,117. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 29, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/348,591. |
| Office Action, dated Sep. 1, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/537,844. |
| Office Action, dated Feb. 12, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/480,302. |
| Final Office Action, dated Dec. 31, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/348,117. |
| Office Action, dated Jan. 8, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,076. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 13, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/537,844. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Feb. 4, 2021, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2019/042456. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Feb. 4, 2021, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2019/042458. |
| European Search Report, dated Apr. 28, 2020, from corresponding European Application No. 17869117.6. |
| Office Action, dated Oct. 27, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/409,599. |
| Restriction Requirement, dated Oct. 20, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/480,302. |
| Office Action, dated Nov. 2, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/804,501. |
| Office Action, dated Nov. 18, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/664,724. |
| International Search Report, dated Sep. 3, 2020, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2020/036094. |
| Office Action, dated Dec. 17, 2020, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/910,853. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Sep. 3, 2020, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2020/036094. |
| Advisory Action, dated Apr. 9, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/348,117. |
| Final Office Action, dated Apr. 27, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/910,853. |
| Office Action, dated May 4, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/409,599. |
| Restriction Requirement, dated May 17, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/514,898. |
| Final Office Action, dated May 25, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/480,302. |
| Office Action, dated Jun. 2, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/514,903. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 25, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/664,724. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 23, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/557,076. |
| Office Action, dated Jun. 18, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/348,117. |
| Office Action, dated Jun. 25, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/489,875. |
| Office Action, dated Jun. 25, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/816,409. |
| Final Office Action, dated Jul. 30, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/910,853. |
| Office Action, dated Aug. 6, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/518,261. |
| Final Office Action, dated Sep. 14, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/409,599. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 22, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/514,903. |
| Office Action, dated Sep. 2, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/645,137. |
| Final Office Action, dated Oct. 4, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/480,302. |
| Office Action, dated Oct. 6, 2021, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/489,875. |
| Office Action, dated Sep. 7, 2018, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,143. |
| Restriction Requirement, dated Apr. 30, 2013, from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/721,955. |
| Schiefer,Process Engineering, Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH, Aug. 1972. |
| Vietnamese Office Action, dated Jul. 13, 2016, from corresponding Vietnamese Patent Application No. 1-2014-01079. |
| Wikipedia, Polyethylene terephthalate, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Polyethylene_terephthalate&oldid=491494734. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Apr. 12, 2018, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2018/015751. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Feb. 2, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061116. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Feb. 2, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061145. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Feb. 5, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061174. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jan. 20, 2016, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/061288. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Mar. 1, 2018, from corresponding International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/060359. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Sep. 2, 2013, from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2013/040753. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190085483 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62559443 | Sep 2017 | US |
