The present invention relates to tubes used in heat exchangers and more particularly, the invention relates to a heat exchanger tube having an internal surface that is capable of enhancing the heat transfer performance of the tube.
The heat transfer performance of a tube having surface enhancements is known by those skilled in the art to be superior to a plain walled tube. Surface enhancements have been applied to both internal and external tube surfaces, including ribs, fins, coatings, and inserts, and the like. All enhancement designs attempt to increase the heat transfer surface area of the tube. Most designs also attempt to encourage turbulence in the fluid flowing through or over the tube in order to promote fluid mixing and break up the boundary layer at the surface of the tube.
A large percentage of air conditioning and refrigeration, as well as engine cooling, heat exchangers are of the plate fin and tube type. In such heat exchangers, the tubes are externally enhanced by use of plate fins affixed to the exterior of the tubes. The heat exchanger tubes also frequently have internal heat transfer enhancements in the form of modifications to the interior surface of the tube.
In a significant proportion of the total length of the tubing in a typical plate fin and tube air conditioning and refrigeration heat exchanger, the refrigerant exists in both liquid and vapor states. Below certain flow rates and because of the variation in density, the liquid refrigerant flows along the bottom of the tube and the vaporous refrigerant flows along the top. Heat transfer performance of the tube is improved if there is improved intermixing between the fluids in the two states, e.g., by promoting drainage of liquid from the upper region of the tube in a condensing application or encouraging liquid to flow up the tube in a wall by capillary action in evaporating application.
In order to reduce the manufacturing costs of the heat exchangers, it is also desirable to reduce the weight of the heat transfer tube while maintaining performance.
Internal enhancement of the tube increases the heat transfer coefficient of the heat exchanger. Increasing this coefficient increases the amount of heat exchanged if the heat exchanger remains at the original size and volume or creates the possibility of reducing the size of the heat exchanger while maintaining performance.
Accordingly, what is needed is a heat transfer tube that provides superior performance for condensing and/or evaporating applications and that offers practical and economical features to end users.
The present invention meets the above-described need by providing a heat exchanger tube that comprises a tubular member having a longitudinal axis and having an inner surface that is divided into at least two regions along the circumferential direction. A first plurality of polyhedrons are formed on the inner surface along at least one polyhedral axis. Each of the polyhedrons have four opposite sides. The polyhedrons have first and second faces disposed parallel to the polyhedral axis and have third and fourth faces disposed oblique to the polyhedral axis. The polyhedral axis is disposed at a first helical angle with respect to the longitudinal axis of the tube. A second plurality of polyhedrons is formed on the inner surface adjacent to the first plurality of polyhedrons. The second plurality of polyhedrons is disposed along at least one polyhedral axis. Each of the polyhedrons has four opposite sides. The polyhedrons have first and second faces disposed parallel to the polyhedral axis and have third and fourth faces disposed oblique to the polyhedral axis. The polyhedral axis is disposed at a second helical angle with respect to the longitudinal axis of the tube. The orientation of the second helical angle is opposite to the orientation of the first helical angle. For a typical round tube there may be four equal sized regions. However as will be described below, the regions may have different sizes and there may be multiple regions totaling more than four.
The invention is illustrated in the drawings in which like reference characters designate the same or similar parts throughout the figures of which:
Throughout this specification the term polyhedron is used and it is to be defined as a solid formed by substantially planar faces.
The tube of the present invention is preferably formed out of copper, copper alloy, or other metallic or non-metallic material. The tube may be round, oval, or even flat in cross-section. The tube may be cylindrical with an outside diameter, inside diameter and corresponding wall thickness. The internal surface of the tube is formed with the internal surface enhancement of the present invention.
The heat exchanger tube of the present invention may be formed by roll embossing the enhancement pattern on one surface on a strip of material before roll forming and seam welding the strip into a tube.
In
A first planar face 25 and a second planar face 28 are disposed parallel to the axis 22. A third planar face 31 and a fourth planar face 34 are disposed at an angle oblique to the axis 22. The polyhedrons 19 are disposed on the wall 16 at a distance d between center lines of the adjacent rows. Distance d can be in the range of 0.011 inches to 0.037 inches. The faces 31 and 34 form an apex angle l1 that is between 5-50 degrees. The faces 31 and 34 extend downward toward the inner wall 16 of the tube 10 and may extend from twenty to one hundred percent of the height of the polyhedron 19. The length of the polyhedrons 19 is l. The length l may be from 0.005 to 0.025 inches. The third and fourth faces 31 and 34 make an angle 75 with respect to the axis 22 of the rows of polyhedrons 19. The polyhedrons have height H and have a maximum width w. The width w is in the range of 0.004 to 0.01 inches. The polyhedrons 19 have an angle l2 between faces 25 and 28. Angle l2 is in the range of 5 to 50 degrees. For all sizes of tubing the number of polyhedrons per 360 degree arc is determined by the pitch or d defined above. The surface enhancement 13 typically provides between 500 to 10,000 polyhedrons per square inch.
For the present invention, the ratio of polyhedron height to outside diameter is in the range of 0.005 to 0.05.
Turning to
Portion 44 is disposed adjacent to portion 11. The polyhedrons 19 are constructed in the same manner as described above. The difference between portion 11 and portion 44 is the orientation of the axis 46 of the rows of polyhedrons 19 relative to the axis 50 of tube 10. In the embodiment shown, the axis 46 is disposed at an angle 200 that is between 5 and 40 degrees and is usually disposed at an angle that is equal and opposite to angle 100. In one embodiment, the angle 200 is 15 degrees. While the adjacent portions 11 and 44 may have symmetrical helical angles 100 and 200, an asymmetrical angle is also suitable. Also, portions 11 and 44 are shown in
Faces 31 and 34 of portion 11 are disposed along an axis 150 that makes an angle 300 with respect to the axis 50. Faces 31 and 34 of portion 44 are disposed along an axis 250 that makes an angle 400 with respect to the axis 50. Angles 300 and 400 are less than 10 degrees and are equal. It has been found that the angles 300 and 400 may be 0 degrees (axial). Also, the angles 300 and 400 can be 7 degrees. This arrangement reduces the pressure drop of the tube 10.
Enhancement 13 may be formed on the interior of tube wall 16 by any suitable process. In the manufacture of seam welded metal tubing using automated high-speed processes an effective method is to apply the enhancement pattern 13 by roll embossing on one surface of a metal strip before the strip is roll formed into a circular cross section and seam welded into tube 10. This may be accomplished by positioning two roll embossing stations in sequence in a production line for roll forming and seam welding metal strips into tubing. The stations would be positioned between the source of supply of unworked metal strip and the portion of the production line where the strip is roll formed into a tubular shape. Each embossing station has a pattern enhancement roller respectively and a backing roller. The backing and pattern rollers in each station are pressed together with sufficient force by suitable means (not shown), to cause the pattern surface on one of the rollers to be impressed into the surface on one side of the strip thus forming the longitudinal sides of the polyhedrons. The third and fourth faces 31 and 34 will be formed by a second roller having a series of raised projections that press into the polyhedrons 19.
If the tube is manufactured by roll embossing, roll forming, and seam welding, it is likely that there will be a region along the line of the weld in the finished tube 10 that either lacks the enhancement configuration that is present around the remainder of the tube 10 in a circumference, due to the nature of the manufacturing process, or has a different enhancement configuration. This region of different configuration will not adversely affect the thermal or fluid flow performance of the tube 10 in a significant way.
Turning to
Turning to
The polyhedral array of the present invention creates added turbulence by directing fluid streams flowing over the surface to impact each other. If the flow is vapor-liquid two phase, it generates enough turbulence so that the vapor and liquid interfacial tear is much stronger which results in near perfect vapor-liquid mixing. The tube 10 of the present invention performs very well in condensation heat transfer, which requires strong vapor-liquid interfacial mixing.
While the invention has been described in connection with certain embodiments, it is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular forms set forth, but, on the contrary, it is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation application claiming priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/304,668 filed Nov. 25, 2002 entitled “Polyhedral Array Heat Transfer Tube.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3088494 | Koch et al. | May 1963 | A |
3750709 | French | Aug 1973 | A |
3786653 | Blomberg | Jan 1974 | A |
3861462 | McLain | Jan 1975 | A |
3885622 | McLain | May 1975 | A |
3902552 | McLain | Sep 1975 | A |
3906605 | McLain | Sep 1975 | A |
4470452 | Rhodes | Sep 1984 | A |
4480684 | Onishi et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4658892 | Shinohara et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4690211 | Kuwahara et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4705103 | Zogg et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
5010643 | Zohler | Apr 1991 | A |
5259448 | Masukawa et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5586598 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5682946 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5791405 | Takiura et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5975196 | Gaffaney et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5992512 | Tsuri et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6164370 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6182743 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6298909 | Fukatami et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308775 | Naumann | Oct 2001 | B1 |
20030111215 | Walther et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
58-18092 | Feb 1983 | JP |
61-6595 | Sep 1987 | JP |
63-172893 | Jul 1988 | JP |
02161267 | Jun 1990 | JP |
9318288 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-200279 | Nov 1998 | JP |
10-300379 | Nov 1998 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090008075 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11599219 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 12231439 | US | |
Parent | 10304668 | Nov 2002 | US |
Child | 11599219 | US |