Polymer and metal composite implantable medical devices

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8172897
  • Patent Number
    8,172,897
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 28, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 8, 2012
    13 years ago
Abstract
A device and a method of manufacturing an implantable medical device, such as a stent, are described herein. The device includes a metallic region composed of a bioerodable metal and a polymer region composed of a biodegradable polymer contacting the metallic region. The metallic region may erode at a different rate when exposed to bodily fluids than the polymer region when exposed to bodily fluids. In certain embodiments, the polymer region is an outer layer and the metallic region is an inner layer of the device. A further aspect of the invention includes device and a method of manufacturing the device that includes a mixture of a biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles. The mixture may be used to fabricate an implantable medical device or to coat an implantable medical device. In some embodiments, the metallic particles are metallic nanoparticles.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates to polymer and metal composite implantable medical devices, such as stents.


2. Description of the State of the Art


This invention relates to radially expandable endoprostheses which are adapted to be implanted in a bodily lumen. An “endoprosthesis” corresponds to an artificial device that is placed inside the body. A “lumen” refers to a cavity of a tubular organ such as a blood vessel. A stent is an example of an endoprosthesis. Stents are generally cylindrically shaped devices which function to hold open and sometimes expand a segment of a blood vessel or other anatomical lumen such as urinary tracts and bile ducts. Stents are often used in the treatment of atherosclerotic stenosis in blood vessels. “Stenosis” refers to a narrowing or constriction of the diameter of a bodily passage or orifice. In such treatments, stents reinforce body vessels and prevent restenosis following angioplasty in the vascular system. “Restenosis” refers to the reoccurrence of stenosis in a blood vessel or heart valve after it has been treated (as by balloon angioplasty or valvuloplasty) with apparent success.


Stents have been made of many materials including metals and polymers. Polymer materials include both biostable and biodegradable polymer materials. Metallic stents are typically formed from biostable metals. However, bioerodable metal stents have been described. U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,332 B1 to Bolz et al., U.S. Pat. Appl. Pub. No. 2002/0004060 A1 to Heublein et. al. The cylindrical structure of stents is typically composed of a scaffolding that includes a pattern or network of interconnecting structural elements or struts. The scaffolding can be formed from wires, tubes, or planar films or sheets of material rolled into a cylindrical shape. In addition, a medicated stent may be fabricated by coating the surface of either a metallic or polymeric scaffolding with a polymeric carrier. The polymeric carrier can include an active agent or drug. Furthermore, the pattern that makes up the stent allows the stent to be radially expandable and longitudinally flexible. Longitudinal flexibility facilitates delivery of the stent and radial rigidity is needed to hold open a bodily lumen. The pattern should be designed to maintain the longitudinal flexibility and radial rigidity required of the stent.


A number of techniques have been suggested for the fabrication of stents from tubes and planar films or sheets. One such technique involves laser cutting or etching a pattern onto a material. A pattern may be formed on a planar film or sheet of a material which is then rolled into a tube. Alternatively, a desired pattern may be formed directly onto a tube. Other techniques involve forming a desired pattern into a sheet or a tube via chemical etching or electrical discharge machining. Laser cutting of stents has been described in a number of publications including U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,807 to Saunders, U.S. Pat. No. 5,922,005 to Richter and U.S. Pat. No. 5,906,759 to Richter.


The first step in treatment of a diseased site with a stent is locating a region that may require treatment such as a suspected lesion in a vessel, typically by obtaining an X-Ray image of the vessel. To obtain an image, a contrast agent which contains a radio-opaque substance such as iodine is injected into a vessel. Radio-opaque refers to the ability of a substance to absorb X-Rays. The X-ray image depicts a profile of the vessel from which a physican can identify a potential treatment region. The treatment then involves both delivery and deployment of the stent. “Delivery” refers to introducing and transporting the stent through a bodily lumen to a region in a vessel that requires treatment. “Deployment” corresponds to the expanding of the stent within the lumen at the treatment region. Delivery and deployment of a stent are accomplished by positioning the stent about one end of a catheter, inserting the end of the catheter through the skin into a bodily lumen, advancing the catheter in the bodily lumen to a desired treatment location, expanding the stent at the treatment location, and removing the catheter from the lumen. In the case of a balloon expandable stent, the stent is mounted about a balloon disposed on the catheter. Mounting the stent typically involved compressing or crimping the stent onto the balloon. The stent is then expanded by inflating the balloon. The balloon may then be deflated and the catheter withdrawn. In the case of a self-expanding stent, the stent may secured to the catheter via a retractable sheath or a sock. When the stent is in a desired bodily location, the sheath may be withdrawn allowing the stent to self-expand. The stent may be visualized during delivery and deployment using X-Ray imaging if it contains radio-opaque materials. By looking at the position of stent with respect to the treatment region, the stent may be advanced with the catheter to a location. After implantation of the stent additional contrast agent may be injected to obtain an image of the treated vessel. There are several desirable properties for a stent to have that greatly facilitate the delivery, deployment, and treatment of a diseased vessel.


Longitudinal flexibility is important for successful delivery of the stent. In addition, radial strength is vital for holding open a vessel. Also, as the profile of a stent decreases, the easier is its delivery, and the smaller the disruption of blood flow. Additionally, in order to visualize a stent during deployment it is also important for a stent to include at least some radio-opaque materials. Furthermore, it is also desirable for a stent to be bioeroable. Many treatments utilizing stents require the presence of a stent in the vessel for between about six and twelve months. Stents fabricated from biodegradable polymers may be configured to completely erode after the clinical need for them has ended.


Although current biodegradable polymer-fabricated stents, biostable metal stents, bierodable metal stents, and polymer-coated metal stents each have certain advantages, they also possess potential shortcomings. Biodegradable polymer-fabricated stents may be configured to degrade after they are no longer needed and also possess a desired degree of flexibility. However, in order to have adequate mechanical strength, such stents require significantly thicker struts than a metallic stent, which results in a larger profile. Inadequete radial strength may contribute to relatively high incidence of recoil of polymer stents after implantation into vessels. In addition, biodegradable polymers, unlike metals, are not radio-opaque which makes visualization of a stent difficult during delivery and after deployment. Moreover, although biostable metallic stents possess favorable mechanical properties, are radio-opaque, and have smaller profiles than polymer-fabricated stents, they are not bioerodable. Bioerodable metallic stents tend to erode too fast, resulting in complete or nearly complete bioerosion before the end of a treatment time. Therefore, there is a present need for stents that possess more of the favorable properties of polymers and metals.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to implantable medical devices, such as stents, and methods of manufacturing such devices that include a metallic region composed of a bioerodable metal and a polymer region composed of a biodegradable polymer contacting the metallic region. The metallic region may erode at a different rate when exposed to bodily fluids than the polymer region when exposed to bodily fluids. In certain embodiments, the polymer region is an outer layer and the metallic region is an inner layer of the device. In some embodiments, the metallic region erodes at a faster rate than the polymer region when exposed to bodily fluids.


Further aspects of the invention are directed to implantable medical devices and methods of manufacturing such devices that include a mixture of a biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles. In some embodiments, the metallic particles are metallic nanoparticles. In some embodiments, the mixture may be used to coat an implantable medical device. In other embodiments, an implantable medical device may be fabricated from the mixture.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 depicts an example of a stent.



FIGS. 2 and 3 depict degradation as a function of time for a polymer.



FIG. 4 depicts a schematic illustration of a cross-section of a strut.



FIGS. 5A and 5B depict erosion profiles of a stent.



FIG. 6 depicts a schematic illustration of a cross-section of a strut.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The term “implantable medical device” is intended to include self-expandable stents, balloon-expandable stents, stent-grafts, and grafts. The structural pattern of the device can be of virtually any design. A stent, for example, may include a pattern or network of interconnecting structural elements or struts. FIG. 1 depicts a three-dimensional view of a stent 100 which shows struts 105. The implantable medical device has a cylindrical axis 110. The pattern shown in FIG. 1 should not be limited to what has been illustrated as other stent patterns are easily applicable with the method of the invention. A stent such as stent 100 may be fabricated from a tube by forming a pattern with a technique such as laser cutting or chemical etching.


Various embodiments of the present invention relate to implantable medical devices and methods of manufacturing such devices that possess desired combinations and degrees of properties such as radial strength, flexibility, radio-opacity, low profile or form factor, biodegradability, and drug delivery capability. Implantable medical devices that possess certain desired combinations and degrees of properties may not be fabricated either from polymeric or metallic materials alone. As indicated above, polymeric materials typically are flexible. Also, many biodegradable polymers have erosion rates that make them suitable for treatments that require the presence of a device in a vessel only for a six to twelve month time frame. In addition, metals are radio-opaque and have favorable mechanical properties such as relatively high tensile strength. The embodiments of the present invention involve composite devices and methods of making composite devices that possess desirable properties of polymers and metals to a greater extent than previous composite devices.


For stents made from a biodegradable polymer, the stent may be intended to remain in the body for a duration of time until its intended function of, for example, maintaining vascular patency and/or drug delivery is accomplished. For biodegradable polymers used in coating applications, after the process of degradation, erosion, absorption, and/or resorption has been completed, no polymer will remain on the stent. In some embodiments, very negligible traces or residue may be left behind. The duration is typically in the range of six to twelve months. It is desirable for the stent to provide mechanical support to a vessel for approximately this duration.


Therefore, a preferred erosion profile in such treatments may be slow or minimal degradation for as long as mechanical support for the vessel may be desired. This preferred erosion profile may then include a rapid degradation occurring approximately after the stent is no longer required. A stent configuration that may achieve such a profile may include a slow eroding, flexible outer region and a fast eroding, stiff, strong inner region that provides mechanical support as long as support is desired.


Additionally, it would be also be desirable for such a stent to have a small form factor and radio-opacity. Although biodegradable polymer-fabricated stents are configured to erode, they are not radio-opaque. In addition, in order to have adequate strength, the struts may be significantly thicker than struts in metal stents. For example, a polymer-fabricated stent composed of poly(L-lactic acid) may require struts more than 50% thicker struts than a metallic stent. On the other hand, a metallic stent fabricated from a bioerodable metal, such as magnesium, erodes too quickly to remain intact for the typical treatment time of six to twelve months.


Polymers can be biostable, bioabsorbable, biodegradable, or bioerodable. Biostable refers to polymers that are not biodegradable. The terms biodegradable, bioabsorbable, and bioerodable, as well as degraded, eroded, and absorbed, are used interchangeably and refer to polymers that are capable of being completely eroded or absorbed when exposed to bodily fluids such as blood and can be gradually resorbed, absorbed and/or eliminated by the body.


Biodegradation refers generally to changes in physical and chemical properties that occur in a polymer upon exposure to bodily fluids as in a vascular environment. The changes in properties may include a decrease in molecular weight, deterioration of mechanical properties, and decrease in mass due to erosion or absorption. Mechanical properties may correspond to strength and modulus of the polymer. Deterioration of the mechanical properties of the polymer decreases the ability of a stent, for example, to provide mechanical support in a vessel. The decrease in molecular weight may be caused by, for example, hydrolysis and/or metabolic processes. Hydrolysis is a chemical process in which a molecule is cleaved into two parts by the addition of a molecule of water. Consequently, the degree of degradation of a polymer is strongly dependent on the diffusivity of water in the polymer. A decrease in molecular weight of the polymer can result in deterioration of mechanical properties and contributes to erosion or absorption of the polymer into the bodily fluids. Therefore, the time frame of degradation of a polymer part is dependent on water diffusion, hydrolysis, decrease in molecular weight, and erosion.


Furthermore, polymer erosion spans a continuum from bulk eroding to surface eroding. Bulk eroding refers to degradation of a polymer throughout the bulk of a polymer part exposed to bodily fluids. Alternatively, a polymer may be surface eroding. A surface eroding polymer typically has relatively low water diffusivity. As a result, surface erosion is a heterogeneous process in which degradation and erosion tend to occur at or near a surface of the polymer exposed to the bodily fluids.


Furthermore, the time frame of the degradation of various properties depends on such properties as the diffusivity of water in the polymer and whether the polymer is bulk eroding or surface eroding. For example, for a bulk eroding polymer, the molecular weight loss, deterioration of mechanical properties, and erosion tend to occur sequentially over different time frames. FIG. 2 illustrates degradation as a function of time for a bulk eroding polymer part. A curve 120 represents the decrease in molecular weight that occurs within the bulk of the polymer material. The decrease in molecular weight causes deterioration in mechanical properties of the polymer, which is shown by a curve 125. A curve 130 represents the total erosion of the polymer. Some bulk eroding polymers, may exhibit relatively little erosion even with a substantial loss of molecular weight and deterioration of mechanical properties, as depicted in FIG. 2. For such polymers, much of the erosion may occur over a relatively short time frame, as in a time period 135. Additionally, the water diffusivity in the polymer increases as a bulk-eroding polymer degrades.


Alternatively, for a surface eroding polymer, changes in the various properties may occur over similar time frames since the degradation is limited to a region at or near an exposed surface. In FIG. 3, a curve 140 depicts the total erosion as a function of time for a surface-eroding polymer part. The erosion rate is substantially dependent on the surface area of a part. Since degradation is heterogeneous, the decrease in molecular weight and deterioration of the mechanical properties occur at or near the surface of a surface-eroding polymer part. In the bulk or away from the surface of a surface-eroding polymer part, the molecular weight and mechanical properties are unchanged or substantially unchanged.


Representative examples of polymers that may be used to fabricate an implantable medical device using the methods disclosed herein include, but are not limited to, poly(N-acetylglucosamine) (Chitin), Chitoson, poly(hydroxyvalerate), poly(lactide-co-glycolide), poly(hydroxybutyrate), poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate), polyorthoester, polyanhydride, poly(glycolic acid), poly(glycolide), poly(L-lactic acid), poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactic acid), poly(D,L-lactide), poly(caprolactone), poly(trimethylene carbonate), polyester amide, poly(glycolic acid-co-trimethylene carbonate), co-poly(ether-esters) (e.g. PEO/PLA), polyphosphazenes, biomolecules (such as fibrin, fibrinogen, cellulose, starch, collagen and hyaluronic acid), polyurethanes, silicones, polyesters, polyolefins, polyisobutylene and ethylene-alphaolefin copolymers, acrylic polymers and copolymers other than polyacrylates, vinyl halide polymers and copolymers (such as polyvinyl chloride), polyvinyl ethers (such as polyvinyl methyl ether), polyvinylidene halides (such as polyvinylidene chloride), polyacrylonitrile, polyvinyl ketones, polyvinyl aromatics (such as polystyrene), polyvinyl esters (such as polyvinyl acetate), acrylonitrile-styrene copolymers, ABS resins, polyamides (such as Nylon 66 and polycaprolactam), polycarbonates, polyoxymethylenes, polyimides, polyethers, polyurethanes, rayon, rayon-triacetate, cellulose, cellulose acetate, cellulose butyrate, cellulose acetate butyrate, cellophane, cellulose nitrate, cellulose propionate, cellulose ethers, and carboxymethyl cellulose. Additional representative examples of polymers that may be especially well suited for use in fabricating an implantable medical device according to the methods disclosed herein include ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (commonly known by the generic name EVOH or by the trade name EVAL), poly(butyl methacrylate), poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluororpropene) (e.g., SOLEF 21508, available from Solvay Solexis PVDF, Thorofare, N.J.), polyvinylidene fluoride (otherwise known as KYNAR, available from ATOFINA Chemicals, Philadelphia, Pa.), ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, and polyethylene glycol.


Additionally, some metals are considered bioerodable since they tend to erode or corrode relatively rapidly when exposed to bodily fluids. Biostable metals refer to metals that are not bioerodable. Biostable metals have negligible erosion or corrosion rates when exposed to bodily fluids. In general, metal erosion or corrosion involves a chemical reaction between a metal surface and its environment. Erosion or corrosion in a wet environment, such as a vascular environment, results in removal of metal atoms from the metal surface. The metal atoms at the surface lose electrons and become actively charged ions that leave the metal to form salts in solution. A bioerodable stent suitable for use as a stent material forms erosion products that do not negatively impact bodily functions. Representative examples of biodegradable metals that may be used to fabricate an implantable medical device may include, but are not limited to, magnesium, zinc, and iron. In one embodiment, a bioerodable metal stent may be completely eroded when exposed to bodily fluids, such as blood, between about a week and about three months, or more narrowly, between about one month and about two months.


In general, it may be desirable to manufacture an implantable medical that includes relatively distinct regions that have different erosion profiles when exposed to bodily fluids. In this way the erosion profile of the stent may be customized to various treatments. Various embodiments of an implantable medical device with such erosion profiles may include a metallic region composed of a bioerodable metal and a polymer region composed of a biodegradable polymer. The metallic region may erode at a different rate when exposed to bodily fluids than the polymer region when exposed to bodily fluids. In some embodiments, the polymer region may be an outer region or layer of the device and the metallic region may be an inner region or layer of the device. An outer region or layer may refer to a region or layer that is exposed first to a vascular environment. Direct contact or exposure of the inner region or layer to a vascular environment may be inhibited or prevented by an outer region or a region that is closer to the vascular environment. For example, a strut of a stent may include an inner region or core with an outer region or coating that inhibits or prevents direct contact or exposure of the inner region or core to a vascular environment. The metallic region may be configured to provide mechanical support for at least some of the time the device is implanted in a bodily lumen.


In certain embodiments, the implantable medical device may include a metallic region that includes a cylindrical or substantially cylindrical cross-sectional pattern of struts. The strut pattern can also be square, rectangular, oval, or another cross-sectional shape. For example, the metallic region may be a cylindrical or substantially cylindrical coil or mesh of metallic wire. In addition, a metallic region may be a pattern of struts formed on a metallic tube by cutting or etching. The polymer region may be a biodegradable polymer coating on the metallic region. In some embodiments, the polymer region may include an active agent. The polymer region may be configured to release the active agent for a selected amount of time. The release may occur through the brake-up of the polymer and/or via migration of the active agent out of the polymer. The selected amount of time may correspond approximately to a desired treatment time of a stent. Additionally, the metallic region may have pores that are configured to include an active agent. For example, the metallic region can be formed by sintering particles, fibers, and wires of material.


In some embodiments, the metallic region may erode at a faster rate when exposed to bodily fluids than the polymer region when exposed to bodily fluids. In some embodiments, the polymer region may be configured to delay, inhibit, or prevent erosion of the metallic region in a manner that allows the metallic region to provide mechanical support to a bodily lumen. For example, the polymer region may be configured to delay, inhibit, or prevent erosion of the metallic region for a selected time period. The selected time period may be at least a portion of the time period that the metallic region is desired to provide mechanical support. It may be desirable for a metallic region to provide mechanical support for a majority of, all of, or longer than a desired treatment time of the stent.


Some embodiments may include a metallic region that is configured to erode when the metallic region is exposed to bodily fluids due to degradation of the polymer region. The metallic region may be exposed to bodily fluids by erosion of the polymer region and/or diffusion of bodily fluids through the polymer region. In some embodiments, a metal region may start to erode when the polymer region is only partially degraded and/or eroded. Partially means less than 50% of the polymer, or alternatively less than 40%, 30%, 20%, 10%, or 5%. In other embodiments, the metal region may start to erode when the polymer region is completely (greater than 99%) degraded and/or eroded or when a majority of the polymer is degraded and/or eroded. Majority includes over 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, or alternatively, over 95% of the polymer.


In some embodiments, an outer polymer region may be a bulk eroding polymer. Representative examples of bulk eroding polymers include, but are not limited to, poly(L-lactide), poly(glycolide), poly(D,L-lactide), poly(trimethylene carbonate), polycaprolactone, and copolymers thereof. During a treatment time, the polymer degrades resulting in a decrease in the molecular weight of the polymer region and deterioration of mechanical properties. A polymer may be selected that has a relatively low water diffusivity. In some embodiments, the polymer may be capable of absorbing less than about 3% by volume, or more narrowly, less than about 1% of its volume. However, water diffusivity in the polymer increases as the polymer region degrades. The increased diffusivity of water may result in erosion of the metallic region prior to complete erosion of the polymer region. In an embodiment, the metallic region may be configured to completely or almost completely erode before the polymer region is completely eroded. In other embodiments, the polymer region may be configured to completely or almost completely erode before the metallic region is completely eroded.


In other embodiments, an outer polymer region may be a surface eroding polymer. Representative examples of surface eroding polymers include, but are not limited to, polyorthoesters, polyanhydrides and copolymers thereof. A surface eroding polymer may be selected that has a water diffusivity that inhibits or prevents erosion of the metallic region for a selected time period. The metallic region may be configured to erode when erosion of the polymer region exposes a portion of the metallic region to bodily fluids. Due to higher water diffusivity in a bulk eroding polymer, it is expected that the erosion of the metallic region will occur later and over a smaller time frame with a surface eroding polymer as an outer region than with a bulk eroding polymer as an outer region.



FIG. 4 depicts a schematic illustration of an embodiment of a cross-section of a strut 150 of a stent that includes an outer region 155 and an inner region 160. Outer region 155 is a relatively slow eroding polymer region and inner region 160 is a relatively fast eroding metallic region. FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate examples of erosion as a function of time for such a stent with an outer biodegradable polymer region and an inner bioerodable metallic inner region. FIG. 5A depicts erosion for a stent with a bulk eroding polymer region and FIG. 5B depicts erosion for a stent with a surface eroding polymer region. In FIG. 5A, a curve 170 represents the total erosion of the polymer region and curve 175 represents the total erosion of the inner metallic region. In FIG. 5B, a curve 180 represents the total erosion of the polymer region a curve 185 represents the total erosion of the metallic region. A time 190 corresponds to an approximate time of implantation of the stent in a vessel. From time 190 to approximately a time 195 in FIG. 5A and between time 190 and approximately time 200 in FIG. 5B, there is minimal erosion of the metallic region. At some time during a time period 205 in FIG. 5A and a time period 210 in FIG. 5B, the stent may be no longer required for treatment. During time periods 205 and 210, the polymer and metallic regions may be completely or almost completely eroded and the metallic regions may no longer provide mechanical support. The erosion of the metallic region rises sharply during time periods 205 and 210 due to degradation and/or erosion of the polymer regions. A comparison of curve 175 to curve 185 illustrates the sharper erosion profile of the metallic region when a surface eroding polymer is used rather than bulk eroding polymer for the polymer region.


In certain embodiments, the device may have more desirable properties than a polymer-fabricated device; a biostable or bioerodable metal device; or a polymer-coated biostable metal device. For instance, the device may have a greater radial strength than an equivalent device fabricated from the biodegradable polymer in which the equivalent device has the same structure and dimensions as the device. Dimensions may include the length and radius of a stent and cross-sectional dimensions of struts of the stent. Structure may include the structure of a pattern of a stent. In addition, the device may have greater flexibility than an equivalent device fabricated from the metal in which the equivalent device has the same dimensions and structure as the device. Additionally, the device may include a stent with a smaller profile than an equivalent device fabricated from the biodegradable polymer. An equivalent device is an equivalent stent with the same radial strength and same dimensions and structure as the device. A smaller profile may correspond to thinner struts. Also, the device may have sufficient radio-opacity to be imaged by X-Ray radiation, unlike a polymer-fabricated device. Also, as discussed above, the device may also be capable of completely eroding away when it is no longer required for treatment.


In certain embodiments, the metallic region and the polymer region may be configured to have certain desired properties such as erosion rate and mechanical properties. Desired properties may be obtained by forming the polymer region and/or the metallic region from polymers and/or metals, respectively, to obtain the desired properties. The polymer may have a uniform or substantially uniform composition and uniform or substantially uniform properties such as erosion rate and mechanical properties. The polymer region may be a pure or a substantially pure biodegradable polymer. Alternatively, the polymer may be a uniform or substantially uniform mixture of at least two types of polymers. Similarly, the metallic region may have a uniform or substantially, uniform composition and uniform or substantially uniform properties such as erosion rate and mechanical properties. The metal may a pure or substantially pure metal. Also, the metal region may be a uniform or substantially uniform alloy that includes at least two types of metals. In addition, the metal region may be a uniform or substantially uniform mixture that includes at least two types of metals. The properties such as erosion rate may be uniform or substantially uniform.


Alternatively, it may be desirable in other embodiments to have a polymer region and/or metallic region that have nonuniform composition with nonuniform properties. In some embodiments, the polymer region may be a nonuniform mixture of at least two types of polymers. Similarly, the metallic region may be a nonuniform mixture of at least two types of metals. In other embodiments, the polymer region may include at least two uniform or substantially uniform layers in which at least two layers have different erosion rates. Different layers may correspond to different pure or substantially pure polymers or polymer mixtures. In some embodiments, one layer may be a bulk eroding polymer and another layer may be a surface eroding polymer. In one embodiment, the surface eroding polymer can be disposed over the bulk eroding polymer. Alternatively, the bulk eroding polymer can be disposed over the surface eroding polymer. In a similar manner, the metallic region may include at least two layers in which at least two layers have different erosion rates. Thus, the erosion and erosion rate may be customized to any number of treatment applications. For example, FIG. 6 depicts a schematic illustration of a cross-section of strut 220. Strut 220 in FIG. 6 may have a polymer region that includes a polymer layer 225, a polymer layer 230, and a metallic region 235. In addition, strut 220 in FIG. 6 may have a metallic region that includes a metallic layer 230, a metallic layer 235, and a polymer region 225.


In other embodiments, the properties such as the erosion rate of a stent may be further customized by forming a stent with at least three alternating polymer and metallic regions. In one embodiment, a second metallic region may be formed that contacts the polymer region in which the polymer region is between the metallic region and the second metallic region. Additionally, another embodiment may include forming a second polymer region that contacts the metallic region in which metallic region is between the polymer region and the second polymer region. In some embodiments, one or more of the polymer regions may include an active agent. In other embodiments, one or more of the metallic regions may include an active agent. For example, strut 220 in FIG. 6 may have a polymer region 225, a polymer region 235, and a metallic region 230 between the polymer regions. In addition, strut 220 in FIG. 6 may have a polymer region 230, a metallic region 235, and a metallic region 225. A polymer region may be biostable or biodegradable. Similarly, a metallic region may be biostable or biodegradable. Preferably, one or all of the polymeric regions are biodegradable and one or all of the metallic regions are degradable as well.


Further embodiments of incorporating desirable properties into implantable medical devices may include a device that is at least partially composed of a material that is a mixture of a biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic material. In some embodiments, an implantable medical device may be composed of a mixture having a biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles. In an embodiment, a method of manufacturing the device may include mixing a biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles to form the mixture. In certain embodiments, the biodegradable polymer and the bioerodable metallic particles may be mixed in a mixing apparatus such as an extruder. Certain embodiments may further include mixing a biostable polymer and/or biostable metallic particles with the biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles. Other embodiments may further include mixing the biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles with metallic particles that include at least one particle composed of a mixture or alloy of at least of one bioerodable metal and at least one biostable metal. Some embodiments of the method may further include using the mixture to fabricate an implantable medical device or to coat an implantable medical device.


In certain embodiments, the metallic particles may be metallic nanoparticles. A “nanoparticle” refers to a particle with a dimension in the range of about 1 nm to about 10,000 nm. A significant advantage of nanoparticles over larger particles is that nanoparticles may form a more uniform mixture in a polymer matrix. A resulting mixture may then have a more uniform improvement of properties such a radial strength and flexibility. Additionally, nanoparticles may be absorbed by bodily fluids such as blood without negative impact to bodily functions. Representative examples of metallic particles may include magnesium, zinc, aluminum, and oxides of such metals. In some embodiments, the mixture may also include an active agent. In other embodiments, the nanoparticles can include an active agent or a drug.


The biodegradable polymer may be a pure or substantially pure biodegradable polymer. Alternatively, the biodegradable polymer may be a mixture of at least two types of biodegradable polymers. A metallic particle may be a pure or substantially pure bioerodable metal or bieoerodable metal compound. Alternatively, a metallic particle may be a mixture of at least two types of bioerodable metals or bioerodable metallic compounds. A metallic particle may also be an alloy composed of at least two types of bioerodable metals. The metallic particles may be a mixture of at least two types of metallic particles.


In certain embodiments, an implantable medical device manufactured from the mixture including a biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles may be configured to have desired properties. A desired property may include, but is not limited to, a desired erosion rate, a desired degree of radio-opacity, or desired mechanical performance, for example, a desired radial strength. In some embodiments, desired properties of a device may be obtained by modifying the composition of the mixture of the biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles. In one embodiment, the composition of the biodegradable polymer may be modified. Differences in erosion rates and/or mechanical performance of different biodegradable polymers may be used to obtain desired properties of the mixture.


Similarly, the composition of the mixture may be modified by modifying the composition of the metallic particles. For example, the ratio or concentration of different types of metallic particles in the mixture or the composition of individual particles may be altered to obtain desired properties.


In other embodiments, the ratio of polymer to metallic particles or metal may also be modified. Since a polymer and metallic particles may have different erosion rates, the ratio of polymer to metallic particles may be modified to obtain a desired erosion rate. For example, if a bioerodable metal has a faster erosion rate than the biodegradable polymer, decreasing the ratio of polymer to metallic particles may increase the erosion rate of a device. Additionally, the radial strength of a device may be increased by decreasing the ratio of polymer to metallic particles.


Several embodiments may include various ways of using the mixture to fabricate or to coat an implantable medical device. In an embodiment, fabricating a device may include forming a tube from the mixture. A tube may be formed from the mixture using an extruder. Alternatively, a planar film or sheet may be formed from the mixture, also through extrusion. A tube may then be formed from the planar film or sheet by rolling and bonding the film or sheet. In an embodiment, a stent pattern of struts, such as the one pictured in FIG. 1, may be formed on the tube. The pattern may be formed by a technique such as laser cutting or chemical etching. Examples of lasers that may be used for cutting stent patterns include, but are not limited to, excimer, CO2, or YAG. In another embodiment, fibers may be formed from the polymer and metallic particle mixture and formed into a stent.


In other embodiments, the mixture may be used to coat an implantable medical device with the mixture. The device to be coated may be a polymer-fabricated stent; a metallic stent; or a stent fabricated from polymer and metallic particles. In some embodiments, a stent coated by the mixture may be completely or almost completely bioerodable. The mixture for use as a coating may be composed of a biodegradable polymer and a bioerodable metal. In one embodiment, the substrate stent may be a polymer-fabricated stent composed of a biodegradable polymer. In another embodiment, the substrate stent may be a metallic stent that is composed of a bioerodable metal. Other embodiments may include coating a stent fabricated from a mixture of biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles.


In certain embodiments, a device fabricated or coated with a polymer and metallic particle mixture may have more desirable properties than a polymer-fabricated device, a metallic device, or a polymer-coated metal device. A device fabricated from the mixture of polymer and metallic particles may have greater radial strength and greater flexibility than an equivalent device fabricated from the polymer. An equivalent device is the same dimensions and structure as the device. Moreover, a device manufactured with a polymer and metallic particle mixture may be a stent with a smaller profile than an equivalent stent fabricated from the polymer. A smaller profile may include thinner struts. The equivalent device is an equivalent stent with the same radial strength and the same dimensions and structure as the device. Furthermore, due to the metallic particles, the device may have sufficient radio-opacity to be imaged by X-Ray radiation.


In addition, the composition of metallic particles in the mixture may be modified to obtain desired properties of the device. For example, the composition may be modified to obtain a desired degree of radio-opacity and mechanical behavior such as radial strength and/or flexibility.


Additionally, cutting stent patterns on polymer parts can be difficult since many polymers absorb little or no energy from laser light emitted by lasers conventionally used for cutting patterns. However, the metallic particles in the polymer and metallic particle mixture may help to overcome this difficulty by increasing the absorption of energy from the laser light.


While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications can be made without departing from this invention in its broader aspects. Therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention.

Claims
  • 1. A stent for implanting in a vascular lumen, comprising a stent body that is expandable from a pre-implant configuration to a post-implant configuration inside the vascular lumen, the stent body including a strut having a cross-section, wherein the cross-section of the strut including: a metallic region comprising a bioerodable metal; wherein the bioerodable metal comprises a pure or substantially pure bioerodable metal; anda polymer region comprising a biodegradable polymer contacting and disposed over the metallic region, wherein the metallic region erodes at a different rate when exposed to bodily fluids than the polymer region when exposed to bodily fluids, and wherein the metallic region starts to erode when the polymer region is at least partially degraded after the stent body has been expanded to the post-implant configuration inside the vascular lumen, wherein the bioerodable metal erodes at a faster rate when exposed to bodily fluids than the biodegradable polymer when exposed to bodily fluids, wherein the metallic region is configured to completely or almost completely erode before the polymer region is completely or almost completely eroded.
  • 2. The stent of claim 1, wherein the polymer comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of poly(hydroxyvalerate), poly(lactide-co-glycolide), poly(hydroxybutyrate), poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate), polyorthoester, polyanhydride, poly(glycolic acid), poly(glycolide), poly(L-lactic acid), poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactic acid), poly(D,L-lactide), poly(caprolactone), poly(trimethylene carbonate), and polyester amide.
  • 3. The stent of claim 1, wherein the bioerodable metal is selected from the group consisting of magnesium, zinc, and iron.
  • 4. The stent of claim 1, wherein the biodegradable polymer comprises a pure or substantially pure biodegradable polymer.
  • 5. The stent of claim 1, wherein the biodegradable polymer comprises a mixture of at least two types of biodegradable polymers.
  • 6. The stent of claim 1, wherein the biodegradable polymer comprises a bulk eroding polymer.
  • 7. The stent of claim 1, wherein the biodegradable polymer comprises a surface eroding polymer.
  • 8. The stent of claim 1, wherein the bioerodable metal comprises a mixture comprising at least two types of metals.
  • 9. The stent of claim 1, wherein the bioerodable metal comprises an alloy comprising at least two types of metals.
  • 10. The stent of claim 1, wherein the polymer region comprises an active agent.
  • 11. The stent of claim 1, wherein the metallic region comprises pores comprising an active agent.
  • 12. The stent of claim 1, wherein the polymer region is configured to release an active agent.
  • 13. The stent of claim 1, wherein the polymer region is configured to delay, inhibit, or prevent erosion of the metallic region.
  • 14. The stent of claim 1, wherein the polymer region is configured to inhibit or prevent erosion of the metallic region in a manner that allows the metallic region to provide mechanical support to a bodily lumen.
  • 15. The stent of claim 1, wherein the polymer region is configured to inhibit or prevent erosion of the metallic region for at least a portion of, all of, or longer than the time period that the metallic region is desired to provide mechanical support of a bodily lumen.
  • 16. The stent of claim 1, wherein the stent comprises sufficient radio-opacity to be imaged by X-Ray radiation.
  • 17. The stent of claim 1, wherein the metallic region comprises a cylindrical or substantially cylindrical coil or mesh of metallic wire.
  • 18. The stent of claim 1, wherein the metallic region comprises a cylindrical pattern of struts.
  • 19. The stent of claim 1, wherein the polymer region comprises a coating comprising the biodegradable polymer on the metallic region.
  • 20. The stent of claim 1, wherein the polymer region comprises uniform or substantially uniform erosion rate.
  • 21. The stent of claim 1, wherein the metallic region comprises a uniform or substantially uniform composition and uniform or substantially uniform erosion rate.
  • 22. The stent of claim 1, wherein the polymer region comprises at least two layers, wherein at least two layers comprise different erosion rates.
  • 23. The stent of claim 1, wherein the metallic region comprises at least two layers, wherein at least two layers comprise different erosion rates.
  • 24. The stent of claim 1, further comprising a second metallic region contacting the polymer region, wherein the polymer region is between the metallic region and the second metallic region.
  • 25. The stent of claim 1, wherein the polymer region inhibits or prevents direct contact or exposure of the metallic region to a vascular environment.
  • 26. The stent of claim 1, wherein the polymer region completely covers inward-facing surfaces and outward-facing surfaces of the stent.
  • 27. The stent of claim 1, wherein the bioerodable metal is magnesium.
CROSS-REFERENCE

This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/767,296 filed on Jan. 28, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,699,890 which is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 10/235,033, which was filed on Sep. 3, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,723,120 which is a continuation of the application Ser. No. 09/797,313, filed on Mar. 1, 2001, now abandoned, which is a division of application Ser. No. 08/837,993, filed on Apr. 15, 1997, and issued Jun. 5, 2001 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,240,616.

US Referenced Citations (381)
Number Name Date Kind
3687135 Stroganov et al. Aug 1972 A
3839743 Schwarcz Oct 1974 A
3855638 Pilliar Dec 1974 A
3900632 Robinson Aug 1975 A
4101984 MacGregor Jul 1978 A
4104410 Malecki Aug 1978 A
4110497 Hoel Aug 1978 A
4321711 Mano Mar 1982 A
4346028 Griffith Aug 1982 A
4355426 MacGregor Oct 1982 A
4374669 MacGregor Feb 1983 A
4405319 Cosentino Sep 1983 A
4458366 MacGregor Jul 1984 A
4596574 Urist Jun 1986 A
4599085 Riess et al. Jul 1986 A
4612009 Drobnik et al. Sep 1986 A
4633873 Dumican et al. Jan 1987 A
4656083 Hoffman et al. Apr 1987 A
4693721 Ducheyne Sep 1987 A
4718907 Karwoski et al. Jan 1988 A
4722335 Vilasi Feb 1988 A
4723549 Wholey et al. Feb 1988 A
4729871 Morimoto Mar 1988 A
4732152 Wallstén et al. Mar 1988 A
4733665 Palmaz Mar 1988 A
4739762 Palmaz Apr 1988 A
4740207 Kreamer Apr 1988 A
4743252 Martin, Jr. et al. May 1988 A
4768507 Fischell et al. Sep 1988 A
4776337 Palmaz Oct 1988 A
4800882 Gianturco Jan 1989 A
4816339 Tu et al. Mar 1989 A
4818559 Hama et al. Apr 1989 A
4850999 Planck Jul 1989 A
4877030 Beck et al. Oct 1989 A
4878906 Lindemann et al. Nov 1989 A
4879135 Greco et al. Nov 1989 A
4886062 Wiktor Dec 1989 A
4902289 Yannas Feb 1990 A
4977901 Ofstead Dec 1990 A
4994298 Yasuda Feb 1991 A
5019090 Pinchuk May 1991 A
5028597 Kodama et al. Jul 1991 A
5059211 Stack et al. Oct 1991 A
5062829 Pryor et al. Nov 1991 A
5078736 Behl Jan 1992 A
5084065 Weldon et al. Jan 1992 A
5085629 Goldberg et al. Feb 1992 A
5100429 Sinofsky et al. Mar 1992 A
5104410 Chowdhary Apr 1992 A
5108417 Sawyer Apr 1992 A
5108755 Daniels et al. Apr 1992 A
5112457 Marchant May 1992 A
5123917 Lee Jun 1992 A
5156623 Hakamatsuka et al. Oct 1992 A
5163951 Pinchuk et al. Nov 1992 A
5163952 Froix Nov 1992 A
5163958 Pinchuk Nov 1992 A
5167614 Tessmann et al. Dec 1992 A
5171262 MacGregor Dec 1992 A
5192311 King et al. Mar 1993 A
5197977 Hoffman, Jr. et al. Mar 1993 A
5234456 Silvestrini Aug 1993 A
5234457 Andersen Aug 1993 A
5236447 Kubo et al. Aug 1993 A
5279594 Jackson Jan 1994 A
5282860 Matsuno et al. Feb 1994 A
5289831 Bosley Mar 1994 A
5290271 Jernberg Mar 1994 A
5306286 Stack et al. Apr 1994 A
5306294 Winston et al. Apr 1994 A
5328471 Slepian Jul 1994 A
5330500 Song Jul 1994 A
5342348 Kaplan Aug 1994 A
5342395 Jarrett et al. Aug 1994 A
5342621 Eury Aug 1994 A
5356433 Rowland et al. Oct 1994 A
5370682 Schmitt Dec 1994 A
5370684 Vallana et al. Dec 1994 A
5383925 Schmitt Jan 1995 A
5385580 Schmitt Jan 1995 A
5389106 Tower Feb 1995 A
5399666 Ford Mar 1995 A
5419760 Narciso, Jr. May 1995 A
5423885 Williams Jun 1995 A
5433909 Marakos et al. Jul 1995 A
5437834 Okimatsu et al. Aug 1995 A
5441515 Khosravi et al. Aug 1995 A
5443458 Eury et al. Aug 1995 A
5443500 Sigwart Aug 1995 A
5455040 Marchant Oct 1995 A
5464650 Berg et al. Nov 1995 A
5477864 Davidson Dec 1995 A
5492768 Okimatsu et al. Feb 1996 A
5502158 Sinclair et al. Mar 1996 A
5514379 Weissleder et al. May 1996 A
5518730 Fuisz May 1996 A
5522894 Draenert Jun 1996 A
5527337 Stack et al. Jun 1996 A
5540712 Kleshinski et al. Jul 1996 A
5545408 Trigg et al. Aug 1996 A
5554120 Chen et al. Sep 1996 A
5556413 Lam Sep 1996 A
5571187 Devanathan Nov 1996 A
5578046 Liu et al. Nov 1996 A
5578073 Haimovich et al. Nov 1996 A
5591199 Porter et al. Jan 1997 A
5591607 Gryaznov et al. Jan 1997 A
5593403 Buscemi Jan 1997 A
5593434 Williams Jan 1997 A
5599301 Jacobs et al. Feb 1997 A
5599922 Gryaznov et al. Feb 1997 A
5605693 Seare, Jr. Feb 1997 A
5605696 Eury et al. Feb 1997 A
5607442 Fischell et al. Mar 1997 A
5607463 Schwartz et al. Mar 1997 A
5607467 Froix Mar 1997 A
5618299 Khosravi et al. Apr 1997 A
5624411 Tuch Apr 1997 A
5629077 Turnlund et al. May 1997 A
5630840 Mayer May 1997 A
5631135 Gryaznov et al. May 1997 A
5632771 Boatman et al. May 1997 A
5632779 Davidson May 1997 A
5632840 Campbell May 1997 A
5637113 Tartaglia et al. Jun 1997 A
5641443 Calcote et al. Jun 1997 A
5649977 Campbell Jul 1997 A
5667767 Greff et al. Sep 1997 A
5667796 Otten Sep 1997 A
5670558 Onishi et al. Sep 1997 A
5693085 Buirge et al. Dec 1997 A
5697967 Dinh et al. Dec 1997 A
5700286 Tartaglia et al. Dec 1997 A
5707385 Williams Jan 1998 A
5711763 Nonami et al. Jan 1998 A
5713949 Jayaraman Feb 1998 A
5716981 Hunter et al. Feb 1998 A
5725549 Lam Mar 1998 A
5725567 Wolff et al. Mar 1998 A
5726297 Gryaznov et al. Mar 1998 A
5728751 Patnaik Mar 1998 A
5733326 Tomonto et al. Mar 1998 A
5733330 Cox Mar 1998 A
5733564 Lehtinen Mar 1998 A
5733925 Kunz et al. Mar 1998 A
5741881 Patnaik Apr 1998 A
5746691 Frantzen May 1998 A
5755771 Penn et al. May 1998 A
5756457 Wang et al. May 1998 A
5756476 Epstein et al. May 1998 A
5759192 Saunders Jun 1998 A
5765682 Bley et al. Jun 1998 A
5766204 Porter et al. Jun 1998 A
5766239 Cox Jun 1998 A
5766710 Turnlund et al. Jun 1998 A
5769883 Buscemi et al. Jun 1998 A
5769884 Solovay Jun 1998 A
5780807 Saunders Jul 1998 A
5788558 Klein Aug 1998 A
5800512 Lentz et al. Sep 1998 A
5800516 Fine et al. Sep 1998 A
5811447 Kunz et al. Sep 1998 A
5824049 Ragheb et al. Oct 1998 A
5830178 Jones et al. Nov 1998 A
5830461 Billiar Nov 1998 A
5830879 Isner Nov 1998 A
5833651 Donovan et al. Nov 1998 A
5834582 Sinclair et al. Nov 1998 A
5836962 Gianotti Nov 1998 A
5837313 Ding et al. Nov 1998 A
5837835 Gryaznov et al. Nov 1998 A
5840083 Braach-Maksvytis Nov 1998 A
5843172 Yan Dec 1998 A
5851508 Greff et al. Dec 1998 A
5853408 Muni Dec 1998 A
5854207 Lee et al. Dec 1998 A
5855612 Ohthuki et al. Jan 1999 A
5855618 Patnaik et al. Jan 1999 A
5856814 Yagyu Jan 1999 A
5858746 Hubbell et al. Jan 1999 A
5865814 Tuch Feb 1999 A
5868781 Killion Feb 1999 A
5873904 Ragheb et al. Feb 1999 A
5874101 Zhong et al. Feb 1999 A
5874109 Ducheyne et al. Feb 1999 A
5874165 Drumheller Feb 1999 A
5876743 Ibsen et al. Mar 1999 A
5877263 Patnaik et al. Mar 1999 A
5879398 Swarts et al. Mar 1999 A
5879713 Roth et al. Mar 1999 A
5888533 Dunn Mar 1999 A
5891192 Murayama et al. Apr 1999 A
5897955 Drumheller Apr 1999 A
5906759 Richter May 1999 A
5914182 Drumheller Jun 1999 A
5916584 O'Donoghue Jun 1999 A
5916870 Lee et al. Jun 1999 A
5922005 Richter et al. Jul 1999 A
5928279 Shannon et al. Jul 1999 A
5942209 Leavitt et al. Aug 1999 A
5945029 Scholz et al. Aug 1999 A
5948428 Lee et al. Sep 1999 A
5954744 Phan et al. Sep 1999 A
5957975 Lafont et al. Sep 1999 A
5965720 Gryaznov et al. Oct 1999 A
5971954 Conway et al. Oct 1999 A
5972027 Johnson Oct 1999 A
5976182 Cox Nov 1999 A
5980564 Stinson Nov 1999 A
5980928 Terry Nov 1999 A
5980972 Ding Nov 1999 A
5981568 Kunz et al. Nov 1999 A
5986169 Gjunter Nov 1999 A
5997468 Wolff et al. Dec 1999 A
6010445 Armini et al. Jan 2000 A
6010529 Herweck et al. Jan 2000 A
6015541 Greff et al. Jan 2000 A
6027779 Campbell et al. Feb 2000 A
6033582 Lee et al. Mar 2000 A
6042875 Ding et al. Mar 2000 A
6048964 Lee et al. Apr 2000 A
6051648 Rhee et al. Apr 2000 A
6056993 Leidner et al. May 2000 A
6060451 DiMaio et al. May 2000 A
6066156 Yan May 2000 A
6071266 Kelley Jun 2000 A
6074659 Kunz et al. Jun 2000 A
6080177 Igaki et al. Jun 2000 A
6080488 Hostettler et al. Jun 2000 A
6083258 Yadav Jul 2000 A
6093463 Thakrar Jul 2000 A
6095817 Wagner et al. Aug 2000 A
6096070 Ragheb et al. Aug 2000 A
6096525 Patnaik Aug 2000 A
6099562 Ding et al. Aug 2000 A
6103230 Billiar et al. Aug 2000 A
6107416 Patnaik et al. Aug 2000 A
6110188 Narciso, Jr. Aug 2000 A
6113629 Ken Sep 2000 A
6117979 Hendriks et al. Sep 2000 A
6120536 Ding et al. Sep 2000 A
6120904 Hostettler et al. Sep 2000 A
6121027 Clapper et al. Sep 2000 A
6125523 Brown et al. Oct 2000 A
6127173 Eckstein et al. Oct 2000 A
6129761 Hubbell Oct 2000 A
6129928 Sarangapani et al. Oct 2000 A
6143370 Panagiotou et al. Nov 2000 A
6150630 Perry et al. Nov 2000 A
6153252 Hossainy et al. Nov 2000 A
4776337 Palmaz Dec 2000 A
6159951 Karpeisky et al. Dec 2000 A
6160084 Langer et al. Dec 2000 A
6165210 Lau et al. Dec 2000 A
6165212 Dereume et al. Dec 2000 A
6166130 Rhee et al. Dec 2000 A
6169170 Gryaznov et al. Jan 2001 B1
6171609 Kunz Jan 2001 B1
6174330 Stinson Jan 2001 B1
6177523 Reich et al. Jan 2001 B1
6183505 Mohn, Jr. et al. Feb 2001 B1
6187045 Fehring et al. Feb 2001 B1
6210715 Starling et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224626 Steinke May 2001 B1
6228845 Donovan et al. May 2001 B1
6240616 Yan Jun 2001 B1
6245076 Yan Jun 2001 B1
6245103 Stinson Jun 2001 B1
6248344 Ylanen et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251135 Stinson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251142 Bernacca et al. Jun 2001 B1
6273913 Wright et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281262 Shikinami Aug 2001 B1
6284333 Wang et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287332 Bolz et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287337 Martakos et al. Sep 2001 B1
6290721 Heath Sep 2001 B1
6293966 Frantzen Sep 2001 B1
6303901 Perry et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312459 Huang et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327772 Zadno-Azizi et al. Dec 2001 B1
6338739 Datta et al. Jan 2002 B1
6375826 Wang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379381 Hossainy et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387121 Alt May 2002 B1
6388043 Langer et al. May 2002 B1
6395326 Castro et al. May 2002 B1
6409761 Jang Jun 2002 B1
6423092 Datta et al. Jul 2002 B2
6461632 Gogolewski Oct 2002 B1
6464720 Boatman et al. Oct 2002 B2
6479565 Stanley Nov 2002 B1
6485512 Cheng Nov 2002 B1
6492615 Flanagan Dec 2002 B1
6494908 Huxel et al. Dec 2002 B1
6495156 Wenz et al. Dec 2002 B2
6511748 Barrows Jan 2003 B1
6517888 Weber Feb 2003 B1
6527801 Dutta Mar 2003 B1
6537589 Chae et al. Mar 2003 B1
6539607 Fehring et al. Apr 2003 B1
6540777 Stenzel Apr 2003 B2
6554854 Flanagan Apr 2003 B1
6565599 Hong et al. May 2003 B1
6569191 Hogan May 2003 B1
6569193 Cox et al. May 2003 B1
6572672 Yadav et al. Jun 2003 B2
6574851 Mirizzi Jun 2003 B1
6585755 Jackson et al. Jul 2003 B2
6589286 Litner Jul 2003 B1
6592614 Lenker et al. Jul 2003 B2
6592617 Thompson Jul 2003 B2
6610087 Zarbatany et al. Aug 2003 B1
6613072 Lau et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626939 Burnside et al. Sep 2003 B1
6635269 Jennissen Oct 2003 B1
6645243 Vallana et al. Nov 2003 B2
6656162 Santini, Jr. et al. Dec 2003 B2
6664335 Krishnan Dec 2003 B2
6666214 Canham Dec 2003 B2
6667049 Janas et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669723 Killion et al. Dec 2003 B2
6676697 Richter Jan 2004 B1
6679980 Andreacchi Jan 2004 B1
6689375 Wahlig et al. Feb 2004 B1
6695920 Pacetti et al. Feb 2004 B1
6706273 Roessler Mar 2004 B1
6709379 Brandau et al. Mar 2004 B1
6719934 Stinson Apr 2004 B2
6719989 Matsushima et al. Apr 2004 B1
6720402 Langer et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723120 Yan Apr 2004 B2
6746773 Llanos et al. Jun 2004 B2
6752826 Holloway et al. Jun 2004 B2
6753007 Haggard et al. Jun 2004 B2
6764505 Hossainy et al. Jul 2004 B1
6818063 Kerrigan Nov 2004 B1
6846323 Yip et al. Jan 2005 B2
6867248 Martin et al. Mar 2005 B1
6981987 Huxel et al. Jan 2006 B2
7011678 Tenerz et al. Mar 2006 B2
7163562 Datta et al. Jan 2007 B2
7166134 Datta et al. Jan 2007 B2
20010044652 Moore Nov 2001 A1
20020002399 Huxel et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020004060 Heublein et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020004101 Ding et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020038145 Jang Mar 2002 A1
20020062148 Hart May 2002 A1
20020065553 Weber May 2002 A1
20020082679 Sirhan et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020111590 Davila et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116050 Kocur Aug 2002 A1
20020138133 Lenz et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020161114 Gunatillake et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165601 Clerc Nov 2002 A1
20030033001 Igaki Feb 2003 A1
20030093107 Parsonage et al. May 2003 A1
20030100865 Santini, Jr. et al. May 2003 A1
20030105518 Dutta Jun 2003 A1
20030105530 Pirhonen Jun 2003 A1
20030153972 Helmus Aug 2003 A1
20030171053 Sanders Sep 2003 A1
20030187495 Cully et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030208259 Penhasi Nov 2003 A1
20030209835 Chun et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030226833 Shapovalov et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236563 Fifer Dec 2003 A1
20040034409 Heublein et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040088038 Dehnad et al. May 2004 A1
20040093077 White et al. May 2004 A1
20040098095 Burnside et al. May 2004 A1
20040111149 Stinson Jun 2004 A1
20040127970 Saunders et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143317 Stinson et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040167610 Fleming, III Aug 2004 A1
20050209680 Gale et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050261760 Weber Nov 2005 A1
20060229711 Yan et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060271168 Kleine et al. Nov 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (52)
Number Date Country
44 07 079 Sep 1994 DE
197 31 021 Jan 1999 DE
198 56 983 Dec 1999 DE
103 57 747 Jan 2005 DE
0 108 171 May 1984 EP
0 144 534 Jun 1985 EP
0 364 787 Apr 1990 EP
0 397 500 Nov 1990 EP
0 464 755 Jan 1992 EP
0 493 788 Jul 1992 EP
0 554 082 Aug 1993 EP
0 578 998 Jan 1994 EP
0 604 022 Jun 1994 EP
0 621 017 Oct 1994 EP
0 623 354 Nov 1994 EP
0 665 023 Aug 1995 EP
0 687 008 Dec 1995 EP
0 709 068 May 1996 EP
0 970 711 Jan 2000 EP
1 362 603 Nov 2003 EP
2 247 696 Mar 1992 GB
63-160645 Jul 1988 JP
3-14516 Jan 1991 JP
4-215768 Aug 1992 JP
8-33718 Feb 1996 JP
8-213026 Aug 1996 JP
9-85028 Mar 1997 JP
WO 8903232 Apr 1989 WO
WO 9001969 Mar 1990 WO
WO 9004982 May 1990 WO
WO 9006094 Jun 1990 WO
WO 9117744 Nov 1991 WO
WO 9117789 Nov 1991 WO
WO 9210218 Jun 1992 WO
WO 9306792 Apr 1993 WO
WO 9413268 Jun 1994 WO
WO 9421196 Sep 1994 WO
WO 9511817 May 1995 WO
WO 9529647 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9628115 Sep 1996 WO
WO 9804415 Feb 1998 WO
WO 9818408 May 1998 WO
WO 9823228 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9856312 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9903515 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9916386 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9942147 Aug 1999 WO
WO 0012147 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0064506 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0101890 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0363733 Aug 2003 WO
WO 2004023985 Mar 2004 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20050209680 A1 Sep 2005 US
Divisions (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 10235033 Sep 2002 US
Child 10767296 US
Parent 08837993 Apr 1997 US
Child 09797313 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09797313 Mar 2001 US
Child 10235033 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10767296 Jan 2004 US
Child 10880025 US