1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to polymer and metal composite implantable medical devices, such as stents.
2. Description of the State of the Art
This invention relates to radially expandable endoprostheses which are adapted to be implanted in a bodily lumen. An “endoprosthesis” corresponds to an artificial device that is placed inside the body. A “lumen” refers to a cavity of a tubular organ such as a blood vessel. A stent is an example of an endoprosthesis. Stents are generally cylindrically shaped devices which function to hold open and sometimes expand a segment of a blood vessel or other anatomical lumen such as urinary tracts and bile ducts. Stents are often used in the treatment of atherosclerotic stenosis in blood vessels. “Stenosis” refers to a narrowing or constriction of the diameter of a bodily passage or orifice. In such treatments, stents reinforce body vessels and prevent restenosis following angioplasty in the vascular system. “Restenosis” refers to the reoccurrence of stenosis in a blood vessel or heart valve after it has been treated (as by balloon angioplasty or valvuloplasty) with apparent success.
Stents have been made of many materials including metals and polymers. Polymer materials include both biostable and biodegradable polymer materials. Metallic stents are typically formed from biostable metals. However, bioerodable metal stents have been described. U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,332 B1 to Bolz et al., U.S. Pat. Appl. Pub. No. 2002/0004060 A1 to Heublein et. al. The cylindrical structure of stents is typically composed of a scaffolding that includes a pattern or network of interconnecting structural elements or struts. The scaffolding can be formed from wires, tubes, or planar films or sheets of material rolled into a cylindrical shape. In addition, a medicated stent may be fabricated by coating the surface of either a metallic or polymeric scaffolding with a polymeric carrier. The polymeric carrier can include an active agent or drug. Furthermore, the pattern that makes up the stent allows the stent to be radially expandable and longitudinally flexible. Longitudinal flexibility facilitates delivery of the stent and radial rigidity is needed to hold open a bodily lumen. The pattern should be designed to maintain the longitudinal flexibility and radial rigidity required of the stent.
A number of techniques have been suggested for the fabrication of stents from tubes and planar films or sheets. One such technique involves laser cutting or etching a pattern onto a material. A pattern may be formed on a planar film or sheet of a material which is then rolled into a tube. Alternatively, a desired pattern may be formed directly onto a tube. Other techniques involve forming a desired pattern into a sheet or a tube via chemical etching or electrical discharge machining. Laser cutting of stents has been described in a number of publications including U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,807 to Saunders, U.S. Pat. No. 5,922,005 to Richter and U.S. Pat. No. 5,906,759 to Richter.
The first step in treatment of a diseased site with a stent is locating a region that may require treatment such as a suspected lesion in a vessel, typically by obtaining an X-Ray image of the vessel. To obtain an image, a contrast agent which contains a radio-opaque substance such as iodine is injected into a vessel. Radio-opaque refers to the ability of a substance to absorb X-Rays. The X-ray image depicts a profile of the vessel from which a physican can identify a potential treatment region. The treatment then involves both delivery and deployment of the stent. “Delivery” refers to introducing and transporting the stent through a bodily lumen to a region in a vessel that requires treatment. “Deployment” corresponds to the expanding of the stent within the lumen at the treatment region. Delivery and deployment of a stent are accomplished by positioning the stent about one end of a catheter, inserting the end of the catheter through the skin into a bodily lumen, advancing the catheter in the bodily lumen to a desired treatment location, expanding the stent at the treatment location, and removing the catheter from the lumen. In the case of a balloon expandable stent, the stent is mounted about a balloon disposed on the catheter. Mounting the stent typically involved compressing or crimping the stent onto the balloon. The stent is then expanded by inflating the balloon. The balloon may then be deflated and the catheter withdrawn. In the case of a self-expanding stent, the stent may secured to the catheter via a retractable sheath or a sock. When the stent is in a desired bodily location, the sheath may be withdrawn allowing the stent to self-expand. The stent may be visualized during delivery and deployment using X-Ray imaging if it contains radio-opaque materials. By looking at the position of stent with respect to the treatment region, the stent may be advanced with the catheter to a location. After implantation of the stent additional contrast agent may be injected to obtain an image of the treated vessel. There are several desirable properties for a stent to have that greatly facilitate the delivery, deployment, and treatment of a diseased vessel.
Longitudinal flexibility is important for successful delivery of the stent. In addition, radial strength is vital for holding open a vessel. Also, as the profile of a stent decreases, the easier is its delivery, and the smaller the disruption of blood flow. Additionally, in order to visualize a stent during deployment it is also important for a stent to include at least some radio-opaque materials. Furthermore, it is also desirable for a stent to be bioeroable. Many treatments utilizing stents require the presence of a stent in the vessel for between about six and twelve months. Stents fabricated from biodegradable polymers may be configured to completely erode after the clinical need for them has ended.
Although current biodegradable polymer-fabricated stents, biostable metal stents, bierodable metal stents, and polymer-coated metal stents each have certain advantages, they also possess potential shortcomings. Biodegradable polymer-fabricated stents may be configured to degrade after they are no longer needed and also possess a desired degree of flexibility. However, in order to have adequate mechanical strength, such stents require significantly thicker struts than a metallic stent, which results in a larger profile. Inadequete radial strength may contribute to relatively high incidence of recoil of polymer stents after implantation into vessels. In addition, biodegradable polymers, unlike metals, are not radio-opaque which makes visualization of a stent difficult during delivery and after deployment. Moreover, although biostable metallic stents possess favorable mechanical properties, are radio-opaque, and have smaller profiles than polymer-fabricated stents, they are not bioerodable. Bioerodable metallic stents tend to erode too fast, resulting in complete or nearly complete bioerosion before the end of a treatment time. Therefore, there is a present need for stents that possess more of the favorable properties of polymers and metals.
The present invention is directed to implantable medical devices, such as stents, and methods of manufacturing such devices that include a metallic region composed of a bioerodable metal and a polymer region composed of a biodegradable polymer contacting the metallic region. The metallic region may erode at a different rate when exposed to bodily fluids than the polymer region when exposed to bodily fluids. In certain embodiments, the polymer region is an outer layer and the metallic region is an inner layer of the device. In some embodiments, the metallic region erodes at a faster rate than the polymer region when exposed to bodily fluids.
Further aspects of the invention are directed to implantable medical devices and methods of manufacturing such devices that include a mixture of a biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles. In some embodiments, the metallic particles are metallic nanoparticles. In some embodiments, the mixture may be used to coat an implantable medical device. In other embodiments, an implantable medical device may be fabricated from the mixture.
The term “implantable medical device” is intended to include self-expandable stents, balloon-expandable stents, stent-grafts, and grafts. The structural pattern of the device can be of virtually any design. A stent, for example, may include a pattern or network of interconnecting structural elements or struts.
Various embodiments of the present invention relate to implantable medical devices and methods of manufacturing such devices that possess desired combinations and degrees of properties such as radial strength, flexibility, radio-opacity, low profile or form factor, biodegradability, and drug delivery capability. Implantable medical devices that possess certain desired combinations and degrees of properties may not be fabricated either from polymeric or metallic materials alone. As indicated above, polymeric materials typically are flexible. Also, many biodegradable polymers have erosion rates that make them suitable for treatments that require the presence of a device in a vessel only for a six to twelve month time frame. In addition, metals are radio-opaque and have favorable mechanical properties such as relatively high tensile strength. The embodiments of the present invention involve composite devices and methods of making composite devices that possess desirable properties of polymers and metals to a greater extent than previous composite devices.
For stents made from a biodegradable polymer, the stent may be intended to remain in the body for a duration of time until its intended function of, for example, maintaining vascular patency and/or drug delivery is accomplished. For biodegradable polymers used in coating applications, after the process of degradation, erosion, absorption, and/or resorption has been completed, no polymer will remain on the stent. In some embodiments, very negligible traces or residue may be left behind. The duration is typically in the range of six to twelve months. It is desirable for the stent to provide mechanical support to a vessel for approximately this duration.
Therefore, a preferred erosion profile in such treatments may be slow or minimal degradation for as long as mechanical support for the vessel may be desired. This preferred erosion profile may then include a rapid degradation occurring approximately after the stent is no longer required. A stent configuration that may achieve such a profile may include a slow eroding, flexible outer region and a fast eroding, stiff, strong inner region that provides mechanical support as long as support is desired.
Additionally, it would be also be desirable for such a stent to have a small form factor and radio-opacity. Although biodegradable polymer-fabricated stents are configured to erode, they are not radio-opaque. In addition, in order to have adequate strength, the struts may be significantly thicker than struts in metal stents. For example, a polymer-fabricated stent composed of poly(L-lactic acid) may require struts more than 50% thicker struts than a metallic stent. On the other hand, a metallic stent fabricated from a bioerodable metal, such as magnesium, erodes too quickly to remain intact for the typical treatment time of six to twelve months.
Polymers can be biostable, bioabsorbable, biodegradable, or bioerodable. Biostable refers to polymers that are not biodegradable. The terms biodegradable, bioabsorbable, and bioerodable, as well as degraded, eroded, and absorbed, are used interchangeably and refer to polymers that are capable of being completely eroded or absorbed when exposed to bodily fluids such as blood and can be gradually resorbed, absorbed and/or eliminated by the body.
Biodegradation refers generally to changes in physical and chemical properties that occur in a polymer upon exposure to bodily fluids as in a vascular environment. The changes in properties may include a decrease in molecular weight, deterioration of mechanical properties, and decrease in mass due to erosion or absorption. Mechanical properties may correspond to strength and modulus of the polymer. Deterioration of the mechanical properties of the polymer decreases the ability of a stent, for example, to provide mechanical support in a vessel. The decrease in molecular weight may be caused by, for example, hydrolysis and/or metabolic processes. Hydrolysis is a chemical process in which a molecule is cleaved into two parts by the addition of a molecule of water. Consequently, the degree of degradation of a polymer is strongly dependent on the diffusivity of water in the polymer. A decrease in molecular weight of the polymer can result in deterioration of mechanical properties and contributes to erosion or absorption of the polymer into the bodily fluids. Therefore, the time frame of degradation of a polymer part is dependent on water diffusion, hydrolysis, decrease in molecular weight, and erosion.
Furthermore, polymer erosion spans a continuum from bulk eroding to surface eroding. Bulk eroding refers to degradation of a polymer throughout the bulk of a polymer part exposed to bodily fluids. Alternatively, a polymer may be surface eroding. A surface eroding polymer typically has relatively low water diffusivity. As a result, surface erosion is a heterogeneous process in which degradation and erosion tend to occur at or near a surface of the polymer exposed to the bodily fluids.
Furthermore, the time frame of the degradation of various properties depends on such properties as the diffusivity of water in the polymer and whether the polymer is bulk eroding or surface eroding. For example, for a bulk eroding polymer, the molecular weight loss, deterioration of mechanical properties, and erosion tend to occur sequentially over different time frames.
Alternatively, for a surface eroding polymer, changes in the various properties may occur over similar time frames since the degradation is limited to a region at or near an exposed surface. In
Representative examples of polymers that may be used to fabricate an implantable medical device using the methods disclosed herein include, but are not limited to, poly(N-acetylglucosamine) (Chitin), Chitoson, poly(hydroxyvalerate), poly(lactide-co-glycolide), poly(hydroxybutyrate), poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate), polyorthoester, polyanhydride, poly(glycolic acid), poly(glycolide), poly(L-lactic acid), poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactic acid), poly(D,L-lactide), poly(caprolactone), poly(trimethylene carbonate), polyester amide, poly(glycolic acid-co-trimethylene carbonate), co-poly(ether-esters) (e.g. PEO/PLA), polyphosphazenes, biomolecules (such as fibrin, fibrinogen, cellulose, starch, collagen and hyaluronic acid), polyurethanes, silicones, polyesters, polyolefins, polyisobutylene and ethylene-alphaolefin copolymers, acrylic polymers and copolymers other than polyacrylates, vinyl halide polymers and copolymers (such as polyvinyl chloride), polyvinyl ethers (such as polyvinyl methyl ether), polyvinylidene halides (such as polyvinylidene chloride), polyacrylonitrile, polyvinyl ketones, polyvinyl aromatics (such as polystyrene), polyvinyl esters (such as polyvinyl acetate), acrylonitrile-styrene copolymers, ABS resins, polyamides (such as Nylon 66 and polycaprolactam), polycarbonates, polyoxymethylenes, polyimides, polyethers, polyurethanes, rayon, rayon-triacetate, cellulose, cellulose acetate, cellulose butyrate, cellulose acetate butyrate, cellophane, cellulose nitrate, cellulose propionate, cellulose ethers, and carboxymethyl cellulose. Additional representative examples of polymers that may be especially well suited for use in fabricating an implantable medical device according to the methods disclosed herein include ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (commonly known by the generic name EVOH or by the trade name EVAL), poly(butyl methacrylate), poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluororpropene) (e.g., SOLEF 21508, available from Solvay Solexis PVDF, Thorofare, N.J.), polyvinylidene fluoride (otherwise known as KYNAR, available from ATOFINA Chemicals, Philadelphia, Pa.), ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, and polyethylene glycol.
Additionally, some metals are considered bioerodable since they tend to erode or corrode relatively rapidly when exposed to bodily fluids. Biostable metals refer to metals that are not bioerodable. Biostable metals have negligible erosion or corrosion rates when exposed to bodily fluids. In general, metal erosion or corrosion involves a chemical reaction between a metal surface and its environment. Erosion or corrosion in a wet environment, such as a vascular environment, results in removal of metal atoms from the metal surface. The metal atoms at the surface lose electrons and become actively charged ions that leave the metal to form salts in solution. A bioerodable stent suitable for use as a stent material forms erosion products that do not negatively impact bodily functions. Representative examples of biodegradable metals that may be used to fabricate an implantable medical device may include, but are not limited to, magnesium, zinc, and iron. In one embodiment, a bioerodable metal stent may be completely eroded when exposed to bodily fluids, such as blood, between about a week and about three months, or more narrowly, between about one month and about two months.
In general, it may be desirable to manufacture an implantable medical that includes relatively distinct regions that have different erosion profiles when exposed to bodily fluids. In this way the erosion profile of the stent may be customized to various treatments. Various embodiments of an implantable medical device with such erosion profiles may include a metallic region composed of a bioerodable metal and a polymer region composed of a biodegradable polymer. The metallic region may erode at a different rate when exposed to bodily fluids than the polymer region when exposed to bodily fluids. In some embodiments, the polymer region may be an outer region or layer of the device and the metallic region may be an inner region or layer of the device. An outer region or layer may refer to a region or layer that is exposed first to a vascular environment. Direct contact or exposure of the inner region or layer to a vascular environment may be inhibited or prevented by an outer region or a region that is closer to the vascular environment. For example, a strut of a stent may include an inner region or core with an outer region or coating that inhibits or prevents direct contact or exposure of the inner region or core to a vascular environment. The metallic region may be configured to provide mechanical support for at least some of the time the device is implanted in a bodily lumen.
In certain embodiments, the implantable medical device may include a metallic region that includes a cylindrical or substantially cylindrical cross-sectional pattern of struts. The strut pattern can also be square, rectangular, oval, or another cross-sectional shape. For example, the metallic region may be a cylindrical or substantially cylindrical coil or mesh of metallic wire. In addition, a metallic region may be a pattern of struts formed on a metallic tube by cutting or etching. The polymer region may be a biodegradable polymer coating on the metallic region. In some embodiments, the polymer region may include an active agent. The polymer region may be configured to release the active agent for a selected amount of time. The release may occur through the brake-up of the polymer and/or via migration of the active agent out of the polymer. The selected amount of time may correspond approximately to a desired treatment time of a stent. Additionally, the metallic region may have pores that are configured to include an active agent. For example, the metallic region can be formed by sintering particles, fibers, and wires of material.
In some embodiments, the metallic region may erode at a faster rate when exposed to bodily fluids than the polymer region when exposed to bodily fluids. In some embodiments, the polymer region may be configured to delay, inhibit, or prevent erosion of the metallic region in a manner that allows the metallic region to provide mechanical support to a bodily lumen. For example, the polymer region may be configured to delay, inhibit, or prevent erosion of the metallic region for a selected time period. The selected time period may be at least a portion of the time period that the metallic region is desired to provide mechanical support. It may be desirable for a metallic region to provide mechanical support for a majority of, all of, or longer than a desired treatment time of the stent.
Some embodiments may include a metallic region that is configured to erode when the metallic region is exposed to bodily fluids due to degradation of the polymer region. The metallic region may be exposed to bodily fluids by erosion of the polymer region and/or diffusion of bodily fluids through the polymer region. In some embodiments, a metal region may start to erode when the polymer region is only partially degraded and/or eroded. Partially means less than 50% of the polymer, or alternatively less than 40%, 30%, 20%, 10%, or 5%. In other embodiments, the metal region may start to erode when the polymer region is completely (greater than 99%) degraded and/or eroded or when a majority of the polymer is degraded and/or eroded. Majority includes over 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, or alternatively, over 95% of the polymer.
In some embodiments, an outer polymer region may be a bulk eroding polymer. Representative examples of bulk eroding polymers include, but are not limited to, poly(L-lactide), poly(glycolide), poly(D,L-lactide), poly(trimethylene carbonate), polycaprolactone, and copolymers thereof. During a treatment time, the polymer degrades resulting in a decrease in the molecular weight of the polymer region and deterioration of mechanical properties. A polymer may be selected that has a relatively low water diffusivity. In some embodiments, the polymer may be capable of absorbing less than about 3% by volume, or more narrowly, less than about 1% of its volume. However, water diffusivity in the polymer increases as the polymer region degrades. The increased diffusivity of water may result in erosion of the metallic region prior to complete erosion of the polymer region. In an embodiment, the metallic region may be configured to completely or almost completely erode before the polymer region is completely eroded. In other embodiments, the polymer region may be configured to completely or almost completely erode before the metallic region is completely eroded.
In other embodiments, an outer polymer region may be a surface eroding polymer. Representative examples of surface eroding polymers include, but are not limited to, polyorthoesters, polyanhydrides and copolymers thereof. A surface eroding polymer may be selected that has a water diffusivity that inhibits or prevents erosion of the metallic region for a selected time period. The metallic region may be configured to erode when erosion of the polymer region exposes a portion of the metallic region to bodily fluids. Due to higher water diffusivity in a bulk eroding polymer, it is expected that the erosion of the metallic region will occur later and over a smaller time frame with a surface eroding polymer as an outer region than with a bulk eroding polymer as an outer region.
In certain embodiments, the device may have more desirable properties than a polymer-fabricated device; a biostable or bioerodable metal device; or a polymer-coated biostable metal device. For instance, the device may have a greater radial strength than an equivalent device fabricated from the biodegradable polymer in which the equivalent device has the same structure and dimensions as the device. Dimensions may include the length and radius of a stent and cross-sectional dimensions of struts of the stent. Structure may include the structure of a pattern of a stent. In addition, the device may have greater flexibility than an equivalent device fabricated from the metal in which the equivalent device has the same dimensions and structure as the device. Additionally, the device may include a stent with a smaller profile than an equivalent device fabricated from the biodegradable polymer. An equivalent device is an equivalent stent with the same radial strength and same dimensions and structure as the device. A smaller profile may correspond to thinner struts. Also, the device may have sufficient radio-opacity to be imaged by X-Ray radiation, unlike a polymer-fabricated device. Also, as discussed above, the device may also be capable of completely eroding away when it is no longer required for treatment.
In certain embodiments, the metallic region and the polymer region may be configured to have certain desired properties such as erosion rate and mechanical properties. Desired properties may be obtained by forming the polymer region and/or the metallic region from polymers and/or metals, respectively, to obtain the desired properties. The polymer may have a uniform or substantially uniform composition and uniform or substantially uniform properties such as erosion rate and mechanical properties. The polymer region may be a pure or a substantially pure biodegradable polymer. Alternatively, the polymer may be a uniform or substantially uniform mixture of at least two types of polymers. Similarly, the metallic region may have a uniform or substantially, uniform composition and uniform or substantially uniform properties such as erosion rate and mechanical properties. The metal may a pure or substantially pure metal. Also, the metal region may be a uniform or substantially uniform alloy that includes at least two types of metals. In addition, the metal region may be a uniform or substantially uniform mixture that includes at least two types of metals. The properties such as erosion rate may be uniform or substantially uniform.
Alternatively, it may be desirable in other embodiments to have a polymer region and/or metallic region that have nonuniform composition with nonuniform properties. In some embodiments, the polymer region may be a nonuniform mixture of at least two types of polymers. Similarly, the metallic region may be a nonuniform mixture of at least two types of metals. In other embodiments, the polymer region may include at least two uniform or substantially uniform layers in which at least two layers have different erosion rates. Different layers may correspond to different pure or substantially pure polymers or polymer mixtures. In some embodiments, one layer may be a bulk eroding polymer and another layer may be a surface eroding polymer. In one embodiment, the surface eroding polymer can be disposed over the bulk eroding polymer. Alternatively, the bulk eroding polymer can be disposed over the surface eroding polymer. In a similar manner, the metallic region may include at least two layers in which at least two layers have different erosion rates. Thus, the erosion and erosion rate may be customized to any number of treatment applications. For example,
In other embodiments, the properties such as the erosion rate of a stent may be further customized by forming a stent with at least three alternating polymer and metallic regions. In one embodiment, a second metallic region may be formed that contacts the polymer region in which the polymer region is between the metallic region and the second metallic region. Additionally, another embodiment may include forming a second polymer region that contacts the metallic region in which metallic region is between the polymer region and the second polymer region. In some embodiments, one or more of the polymer regions may include an active agent. In other embodiments, one or more of the metallic regions may include an active agent. For example, strut 220 in
Further embodiments of incorporating desirable properties into implantable medical devices may include a device that is at least partially composed of a material that is a mixture of a biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic material. In some embodiments, an implantable medical device may be composed of a mixture having a biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles. In an embodiment, a method of manufacturing the device may include mixing a biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles to form the mixture. In certain embodiments, the biodegradable polymer and the bioerodable metallic particles may be mixed in a mixing apparatus such as an extruder. Certain embodiments may further include mixing a biostable polymer and/or biostable metallic particles with the biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles. Other embodiments may further include mixing the biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles with metallic particles that include at least one particle composed of a mixture or alloy of at least of one bioerodable metal and at least one biostable metal. Some embodiments of the method may further include using the mixture to fabricate an implantable medical device or to coat an implantable medical device.
In certain embodiments, the metallic particles may be metallic nanoparticles. A “nanoparticle” refers to a particle with a dimension in the range of about 1 nm to about 10,000 nm. A significant advantage of nanoparticles over larger particles is that nanoparticles may form a more uniform mixture in a polymer matrix. A resulting mixture may then have a more uniform improvement of properties such a radial strength and flexibility. Additionally, nanoparticles may be absorbed by bodily fluids such as blood without negative impact to bodily functions. Representative examples of metallic particles may include magnesium, zinc, aluminum, and oxides of such metals. In some embodiments, the mixture may also include an active agent. In other embodiments, the nanoparticles can include an active agent or a drug.
The biodegradable polymer may be a pure or substantially pure biodegradable polymer. Alternatively, the biodegradable polymer may be a mixture of at least two types of biodegradable polymers. A metallic particle may be a pure or substantially pure bioerodable metal or bieoerodable metal compound. Alternatively, a metallic particle may be a mixture of at least two types of bioerodable metals or bioerodable metallic compounds. A metallic particle may also be an alloy composed of at least two types of bioerodable metals. The metallic particles may be a mixture of at least two types of metallic particles.
In certain embodiments, an implantable medical device manufactured from the mixture including a biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles may be configured to have desired properties. A desired property may include, but is not limited to, a desired erosion rate, a desired degree of radio-opacity, or desired mechanical performance, for example, a desired radial strength. In some embodiments, desired properties of a device may be obtained by modifying the composition of the mixture of the biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles. In one embodiment, the composition of the biodegradable polymer may be modified. Differences in erosion rates and/or mechanical performance of different biodegradable polymers may be used to obtain desired properties of the mixture.
Similarly, the composition of the mixture may be modified by modifying the composition of the metallic particles. For example, the ratio or concentration of different types of metallic particles in the mixture or the composition of individual particles may be altered to obtain desired properties.
In other embodiments, the ratio of polymer to metallic particles or metal may also be modified. Since a polymer and metallic particles may have different erosion rates, the ratio of polymer to metallic particles may be modified to obtain a desired erosion rate. For example, if a bioerodable metal has a faster erosion rate than the biodegradable polymer, decreasing the ratio of polymer to metallic particles may increase the erosion rate of a device. Additionally, the radial strength of a device may be increased by decreasing the ratio of polymer to metallic particles.
Several embodiments may include various ways of using the mixture to fabricate or to coat an implantable medical device. In an embodiment, fabricating a device may include forming a tube from the mixture. A tube may be formed from the mixture using an extruder. Alternatively, a planar film or sheet may be formed from the mixture, also through extrusion. A tube may then be formed from the planar film or sheet by rolling and bonding the film or sheet. In an embodiment, a stent pattern of struts, such as the one pictured in
In other embodiments, the mixture may be used to coat an implantable medical device with the mixture. The device to be coated may be a polymer-fabricated stent; a metallic stent; or a stent fabricated from polymer and metallic particles. In some embodiments, a stent coated by the mixture may be completely or almost completely bioerodable. The mixture for use as a coating may be composed of a biodegradable polymer and a bioerodable metal. In one embodiment, the substrate stent may be a polymer-fabricated stent composed of a biodegradable polymer. In another embodiment, the substrate stent may be a metallic stent that is composed of a bioerodable metal. Other embodiments may include coating a stent fabricated from a mixture of biodegradable polymer and bioerodable metallic particles.
In certain embodiments, a device fabricated or coated with a polymer and metallic particle mixture may have more desirable properties than a polymer-fabricated device, a metallic device, or a polymer-coated metal device. A device fabricated from the mixture of polymer and metallic particles may have greater radial strength and greater flexibility than an equivalent device fabricated from the polymer. An equivalent device is the same dimensions and structure as the device. Moreover, a device manufactured with a polymer and metallic particle mixture may be a stent with a smaller profile than an equivalent stent fabricated from the polymer. A smaller profile may include thinner struts. The equivalent device is an equivalent stent with the same radial strength and the same dimensions and structure as the device. Furthermore, due to the metallic particles, the device may have sufficient radio-opacity to be imaged by X-Ray radiation.
In addition, the composition of metallic particles in the mixture may be modified to obtain desired properties of the device. For example, the composition may be modified to obtain a desired degree of radio-opacity and mechanical behavior such as radial strength and/or flexibility.
Additionally, cutting stent patterns on polymer parts can be difficult since many polymers absorb little or no energy from laser light emitted by lasers conventionally used for cutting patterns. However, the metallic particles in the polymer and metallic particle mixture may help to overcome this difficulty by increasing the absorption of energy from the laser light.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications can be made without departing from this invention in its broader aspects. Therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention.
This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/767,296 filed on Jan. 28, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,699,890 which is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 10/235,033, which was filed on Sep. 3, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,723,120 which is a continuation of the application Ser. No. 09/797,313, filed on Mar. 1, 2001, now abandoned, which is a division of application Ser. No. 08/837,993, filed on Apr. 15, 1997, and issued Jun. 5, 2001 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,240,616.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3687135 | Stroganov et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3839743 | Schwarcz | Oct 1974 | A |
3855638 | Pilliar | Dec 1974 | A |
3900632 | Robinson | Aug 1975 | A |
4101984 | MacGregor | Jul 1978 | A |
4104410 | Malecki | Aug 1978 | A |
4110497 | Hoel | Aug 1978 | A |
4321711 | Mano | Mar 1982 | A |
4346028 | Griffith | Aug 1982 | A |
4355426 | MacGregor | Oct 1982 | A |
4374669 | MacGregor | Feb 1983 | A |
4405319 | Cosentino | Sep 1983 | A |
4458366 | MacGregor | Jul 1984 | A |
4596574 | Urist | Jun 1986 | A |
4599085 | Riess et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4612009 | Drobnik et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4633873 | Dumican et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4656083 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4693721 | Ducheyne | Sep 1987 | A |
4718907 | Karwoski et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4722335 | Vilasi | Feb 1988 | A |
4723549 | Wholey et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4729871 | Morimoto | Mar 1988 | A |
4732152 | Wallstén et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4739762 | Palmaz | Apr 1988 | A |
4740207 | Kreamer | Apr 1988 | A |
4743252 | Martin, Jr. et al. | May 1988 | A |
4768507 | Fischell et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4776337 | Palmaz | Oct 1988 | A |
4800882 | Gianturco | Jan 1989 | A |
4816339 | Tu et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4818559 | Hama et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4850999 | Planck | Jul 1989 | A |
4877030 | Beck et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4878906 | Lindemann et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4879135 | Greco et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4886062 | Wiktor | Dec 1989 | A |
4902289 | Yannas | Feb 1990 | A |
4977901 | Ofstead | Dec 1990 | A |
4994298 | Yasuda | Feb 1991 | A |
5019090 | Pinchuk | May 1991 | A |
5028597 | Kodama et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5059211 | Stack et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062829 | Pryor et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5078736 | Behl | Jan 1992 | A |
5084065 | Weldon et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5085629 | Goldberg et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5100429 | Sinofsky et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5104410 | Chowdhary | Apr 1992 | A |
5108417 | Sawyer | Apr 1992 | A |
5108755 | Daniels et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5112457 | Marchant | May 1992 | A |
5123917 | Lee | Jun 1992 | A |
5156623 | Hakamatsuka et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163951 | Pinchuk et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5163952 | Froix | Nov 1992 | A |
5163958 | Pinchuk | Nov 1992 | A |
5167614 | Tessmann et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171262 | MacGregor | Dec 1992 | A |
5192311 | King et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197977 | Hoffman, Jr. et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5234456 | Silvestrini | Aug 1993 | A |
5234457 | Andersen | Aug 1993 | A |
5236447 | Kubo et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5279594 | Jackson | Jan 1994 | A |
5282860 | Matsuno et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5289831 | Bosley | Mar 1994 | A |
5290271 | Jernberg | Mar 1994 | A |
5306286 | Stack et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306294 | Winston et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5328471 | Slepian | Jul 1994 | A |
5330500 | Song | Jul 1994 | A |
5342348 | Kaplan | Aug 1994 | A |
5342395 | Jarrett et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342621 | Eury | Aug 1994 | A |
5356433 | Rowland et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5370682 | Schmitt | Dec 1994 | A |
5370684 | Vallana et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5383925 | Schmitt | Jan 1995 | A |
5385580 | Schmitt | Jan 1995 | A |
5389106 | Tower | Feb 1995 | A |
5399666 | Ford | Mar 1995 | A |
5419760 | Narciso, Jr. | May 1995 | A |
5423885 | Williams | Jun 1995 | A |
5433909 | Marakos et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437834 | Okimatsu et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5441515 | Khosravi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443458 | Eury et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443500 | Sigwart | Aug 1995 | A |
5455040 | Marchant | Oct 1995 | A |
5464650 | Berg et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477864 | Davidson | Dec 1995 | A |
5492768 | Okimatsu et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5502158 | Sinclair et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5514379 | Weissleder et al. | May 1996 | A |
5518730 | Fuisz | May 1996 | A |
5522894 | Draenert | Jun 1996 | A |
5527337 | Stack et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5540712 | Kleshinski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545408 | Trigg et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554120 | Chen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556413 | Lam | Sep 1996 | A |
5571187 | Devanathan | Nov 1996 | A |
5578046 | Liu et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578073 | Haimovich et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591199 | Porter et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5591607 | Gryaznov et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5593403 | Buscemi | Jan 1997 | A |
5593434 | Williams | Jan 1997 | A |
5599301 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5599922 | Gryaznov et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5605693 | Seare, Jr. | Feb 1997 | A |
5605696 | Eury et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607442 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5607463 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5607467 | Froix | Mar 1997 | A |
5618299 | Khosravi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624411 | Tuch | Apr 1997 | A |
5629077 | Turnlund et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630840 | Mayer | May 1997 | A |
5631135 | Gryaznov et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632771 | Boatman et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632779 | Davidson | May 1997 | A |
5632840 | Campbell | May 1997 | A |
5637113 | Tartaglia et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5641443 | Calcote et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649977 | Campbell | Jul 1997 | A |
5667767 | Greff et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5667796 | Otten | Sep 1997 | A |
5670558 | Onishi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5693085 | Buirge et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697967 | Dinh et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700286 | Tartaglia et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707385 | Williams | Jan 1998 | A |
5711763 | Nonami et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713949 | Jayaraman | Feb 1998 | A |
5716981 | Hunter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725549 | Lam | Mar 1998 | A |
5725567 | Wolff et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5726297 | Gryaznov et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728751 | Patnaik | Mar 1998 | A |
5733326 | Tomonto et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733330 | Cox | Mar 1998 | A |
5733564 | Lehtinen | Mar 1998 | A |
5733925 | Kunz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741881 | Patnaik | Apr 1998 | A |
5746691 | Frantzen | May 1998 | A |
5755771 | Penn et al. | May 1998 | A |
5756457 | Wang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5756476 | Epstein et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759192 | Saunders | Jun 1998 | A |
5765682 | Bley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766204 | Porter et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766239 | Cox | Jun 1998 | A |
5766710 | Turnlund et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769883 | Buscemi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769884 | Solovay | Jun 1998 | A |
5780807 | Saunders | Jul 1998 | A |
5788558 | Klein | Aug 1998 | A |
5800512 | Lentz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800516 | Fine et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811447 | Kunz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824049 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830178 | Jones et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5830461 | Billiar | Nov 1998 | A |
5830879 | Isner | Nov 1998 | A |
5833651 | Donovan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5834582 | Sinclair et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836962 | Gianotti | Nov 1998 | A |
5837313 | Ding et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837835 | Gryaznov et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840083 | Braach-Maksvytis | Nov 1998 | A |
5843172 | Yan | Dec 1998 | A |
5851508 | Greff et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853408 | Muni | Dec 1998 | A |
5854207 | Lee et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855612 | Ohthuki et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5855618 | Patnaik et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5856814 | Yagyu | Jan 1999 | A |
5858746 | Hubbell et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865814 | Tuch | Feb 1999 | A |
5868781 | Killion | Feb 1999 | A |
5873904 | Ragheb et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874101 | Zhong et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874109 | Ducheyne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874165 | Drumheller | Feb 1999 | A |
5876743 | Ibsen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5877263 | Patnaik et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879398 | Swarts et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879713 | Roth et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888533 | Dunn | Mar 1999 | A |
5891192 | Murayama et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897955 | Drumheller | Apr 1999 | A |
5906759 | Richter | May 1999 | A |
5914182 | Drumheller | Jun 1999 | A |
5916584 | O'Donoghue | Jun 1999 | A |
5916870 | Lee et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922005 | Richter et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928279 | Shannon et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942209 | Leavitt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945029 | Scholz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948428 | Lee et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954744 | Phan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957975 | Lafont et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965720 | Gryaznov et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971954 | Conway et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972027 | Johnson | Oct 1999 | A |
5976182 | Cox | Nov 1999 | A |
5980564 | Stinson | Nov 1999 | A |
5980928 | Terry | Nov 1999 | A |
5980972 | Ding | Nov 1999 | A |
5981568 | Kunz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986169 | Gjunter | Nov 1999 | A |
5997468 | Wolff et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010445 | Armini et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6010529 | Herweck et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015541 | Greff et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6027779 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033582 | Lee et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042875 | Ding et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048964 | Lee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051648 | Rhee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056993 | Leidner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060451 | DiMaio et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066156 | Yan | May 2000 | A |
6071266 | Kelley | Jun 2000 | A |
6074659 | Kunz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080177 | Igaki et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080488 | Hostettler et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083258 | Yadav | Jul 2000 | A |
6093463 | Thakrar | Jul 2000 | A |
6095817 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6096070 | Ragheb et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6096525 | Patnaik | Aug 2000 | A |
6099562 | Ding et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103230 | Billiar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107416 | Patnaik et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110188 | Narciso, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113629 | Ken | Sep 2000 | A |
6117979 | Hendriks et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120536 | Ding et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120904 | Hostettler et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121027 | Clapper et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125523 | Brown et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6127173 | Eckstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129761 | Hubbell | Oct 2000 | A |
6129928 | Sarangapani et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143370 | Panagiotou et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6150630 | Perry et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6153252 | Hossainy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
4776337 | Palmaz | Dec 2000 | A |
6159951 | Karpeisky et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160084 | Langer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165210 | Lau et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165212 | Dereume et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166130 | Rhee et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169170 | Gryaznov et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171609 | Kunz | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174330 | Stinson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177523 | Reich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183505 | Mohn, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187045 | Fehring et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210715 | Starling et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224626 | Steinke | May 2001 | B1 |
6228845 | Donovan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240616 | Yan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245076 | Yan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245103 | Stinson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248344 | Ylanen et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251135 | Stinson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251142 | Bernacca et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6273913 | Wright et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281262 | Shikinami | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284333 | Wang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287332 | Bolz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287337 | Martakos et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290721 | Heath | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293966 | Frantzen | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303901 | Perry et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312459 | Huang et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327772 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338739 | Datta et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6375826 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379381 | Hossainy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387121 | Alt | May 2002 | B1 |
6388043 | Langer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395326 | Castro et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409761 | Jang | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423092 | Datta et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6461632 | Gogolewski | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464720 | Boatman et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6479565 | Stanley | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485512 | Cheng | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492615 | Flanagan | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494908 | Huxel et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6495156 | Wenz et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6511748 | Barrows | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517888 | Weber | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527801 | Dutta | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537589 | Chae et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539607 | Fehring et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6540777 | Stenzel | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554854 | Flanagan | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565599 | Hong et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569191 | Hogan | May 2003 | B1 |
6569193 | Cox et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572672 | Yadav et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6574851 | Mirizzi | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585755 | Jackson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6589286 | Litner | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592614 | Lenker et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592617 | Thompson | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6610087 | Zarbatany et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6613072 | Lau et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626939 | Burnside et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635269 | Jennissen | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6645243 | Vallana et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656162 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664335 | Krishnan | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6666214 | Canham | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667049 | Janas et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669723 | Killion et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676697 | Richter | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6679980 | Andreacchi | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6689375 | Wahlig et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6695920 | Pacetti et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706273 | Roessler | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709379 | Brandau et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719934 | Stinson | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719989 | Matsushima et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6720402 | Langer et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723120 | Yan | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6746773 | Llanos et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752826 | Holloway et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6753007 | Haggard et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764505 | Hossainy et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6818063 | Kerrigan | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6846323 | Yip et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6867248 | Martin et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6981987 | Huxel et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7011678 | Tenerz et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7163562 | Datta et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166134 | Datta et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20010044652 | Moore | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002399 | Huxel et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004060 | Heublein et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004101 | Ding et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020038145 | Jang | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020062148 | Hart | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065553 | Weber | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082679 | Sirhan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020111590 | Davila et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116050 | Kocur | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138133 | Lenz et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161114 | Gunatillake et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165601 | Clerc | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030033001 | Igaki | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030093107 | Parsonage et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100865 | Santini, Jr. et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105518 | Dutta | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105530 | Pirhonen | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030153972 | Helmus | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171053 | Sanders | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187495 | Cully et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208259 | Penhasi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030209835 | Chun et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030226833 | Shapovalov et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236563 | Fifer | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040034409 | Heublein et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040088038 | Dehnad et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093077 | White et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098095 | Burnside et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111149 | Stinson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127970 | Saunders et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143317 | Stinson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167610 | Fleming, III | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050209680 | Gale et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050261760 | Weber | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060229711 | Yan et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060271168 | Kleine et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
44 07 079 | Sep 1994 | DE |
197 31 021 | Jan 1999 | DE |
198 56 983 | Dec 1999 | DE |
103 57 747 | Jan 2005 | DE |
0 108 171 | May 1984 | EP |
0 144 534 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0 364 787 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 397 500 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0 464 755 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 493 788 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0 554 082 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0 578 998 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0 604 022 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0 621 017 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0 623 354 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0 665 023 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 687 008 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0 709 068 | May 1996 | EP |
0 970 711 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1 362 603 | Nov 2003 | EP |
2 247 696 | Mar 1992 | GB |
63-160645 | Jul 1988 | JP |
3-14516 | Jan 1991 | JP |
4-215768 | Aug 1992 | JP |
8-33718 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8-213026 | Aug 1996 | JP |
9-85028 | Mar 1997 | JP |
WO 8903232 | Apr 1989 | WO |
WO 9001969 | Mar 1990 | WO |
WO 9004982 | May 1990 | WO |
WO 9006094 | Jun 1990 | WO |
WO 9117744 | Nov 1991 | WO |
WO 9117789 | Nov 1991 | WO |
WO 9210218 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO 9306792 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9413268 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO 9421196 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9511817 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9529647 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9628115 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9804415 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9818408 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9823228 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9856312 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9903515 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9916386 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9942147 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 0012147 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0064506 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0101890 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0363733 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 2004023985 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050209680 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10235033 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 10767296 | US | |
Parent | 08837993 | Apr 1997 | US |
Child | 09797313 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09797313 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 10235033 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10767296 | Jan 2004 | US |
Child | 10880025 | US |