Polymer bound fischer-tropsch catalysts

TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to polymer supported or polymer bound metal complexes which exhibit activity as Fischer-Tropsch catalysts. Specifically, this invention relates to gas phase Fischer-Tropsch reactions wherein a resin metal complex catalyst is used in the conversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbons.
BACKGROUND ART
There is a general belief by those skilled in the art of polymer supported catalysis that all types of polystyrene resins (macroreticular or gel) are inherently thermally unstable both in the presence or absence of oxygen. The upper temperature limit often cited for use of these catalyst-resin systems is quoted at approximately 150.degree. C. See Sherrington "Polymer Supported Reactions in Organic Synthesis"; Chap.1 p.27; Wiley: New York, 1980; See also: International Workshop on Heterophase Attached Homogeneous Catalysis, Grenoble, France, 1977 (CNRS and NSF) and Chauvin et al, "Polymer Supported Catalysts" Prog. Polymer Sci., Vol. 5, p. 100, Pergamon Press, (1977). The present innovation is concerned with functionalized macroreticular polystyrene that has utility as a catalyst for vapor phase Fischer-Tropsch reactions at temperatures in excess of 200.degree. C.
The use of a catalytic complex containing an anthranilic acid ligand for catalytic hydrogenation is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,755,194 to Avilov et al, issued Aug. 28, 1973. The Avilov patent relates to a homogeneous catalytic system for the hydrogenation of unsaturated compounds at room temperature and one atmosphere of hydrogen pressure. In this procedure a rhenium (I) complex of N-phenylanthranilic acid is employed. However, this procedure like other homogeneous catalytic systems has the disadvantage that it is difficult to separate the hydrogenation product from the catalyst itself with the result that the catalyst is a contaminant or an impurity in the final product.
Substituted phosphines have been used to chemically link a catalyst metal to a polymer support. Examples of this are found in Grubbs et al, "Polymer Preprints," American Chemical Society, Division Polymer Chemistry, 1972, Vol. 13, No. 2, pages 828-832 [Chem. Abs. Vol. 81, 6555d (1974)] and also Grubbs et al, "J. Macromol. Sci Chem.," 1973, Vol. 7, No. 5, Pages 1047-1063, [Chem. Abs. Vol. 78, 164622r (1973)].
U.S. Pat. No. 4,230,633 discloses polymer supported metal complexes wherein the ligand is a cycloalkadienyl radical with metals from Group VIII of the Periodic Table. This patent is concerned with the conversion of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to hydrocarbons in a liquid reaction medium.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,292,415 discloses a crosslinked polystyrene with cycloalkadienyl ligands and Group VIII metal carbonyls having utility as a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst in liquid phase reactions. This patent does not suggest the critical relationships that the present invention is concerned with, nor the specific ligands and vapor phase reactions.
Fischer-Tropsch catalysis by polystyrene supported cyclopentadienyldicarbonyl cobalt (CpCo(CO).sub.2) has been reported by Benner et al, (American Chemical Society Symposium Series 152 (1981) p. 165. The reaction was conducted in a medium pressure glass and stainless steel reactor. Benner et al suspended ##STR1## in purified n-octane to swell the resin and allow access to catalyst sites in the interior of the beads; no detectable reaction took place if the solvent was excluded. This is in contrast to the present invention in which the reaction takes place in the vapor phase without the requirement that the polymer be swollen.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,323,698 discloses a weak base anion exchange resin which has been contacted with a solution of a coordination compound having at least two ligands connected to at least one central metal atom, to chemically bond the resin to the metal atom by replacement of at least one of the ligands of the coordination compound by a functional group of the weak base anion exchange resin. The complex can be used as a catalyst for hydrogenation, carbon monoxide insertion, polymerization, isomerization, vinyl ester exchange and ethylene oxidation reactions among others.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,144,191 discloses amine resins loaded with bimetallic clusters as novel hydroformylation catalysts. This patent is directed to the conversion of liquid olefins to alcohols in a one-step hydroformylation process which consists of contacting an olefin, such as 1-hexene in the liquid phase, with a gaseous mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen and the presence of a catalyst prepared by loading a bimetallic cluster onto an amine resin.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,238,358 discloses the use of anthranilic acid as a ligand for rhodium, palladium, platinum and ruthenium complexes. These catalysts are disclosed as reduction catalysts for liquid phase reactions, i.e. the hydrogenation of olefinic and aromatic hydrocarbons.
The prior art does not disclose or suggest the use of resin metal complex catalysts in vapor phase Fischer-Tropsch reactions. One skilled in this art would readily realize or assume that resins, particularly polystyrene resins would not hold up at the temperatures at which vapor phase Fischer-Tropsch reactions are conducted. See Catalysis, J. R. Anderson and M. Boudant, Eds. Chapter 4; Springer Verlag (1981). Specifically, the catalyst of the present invention operates in a temperature range from 175.degree. to 275.degree. C.
Synthesis gas is a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen and can be produced by the gasification of coal with steam and oxygen. A description of conventional methods of coal gasification is provided in McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science & Technology, 1977 Edition, Vol. 3, pages 248-249 (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York).
Production of methane and higher hydrocarbons from coal by the Fischer-Tropsch reaction typically employs a group VIII catalyst (e.g. Fe, Co and Ni) at temperatures in the range of about 200.degree.-350.degree. C. and pressures in the range of about 2100-3500 kPa (300-500 psi).
While these processes are successful in making synthetic natural gas or oxygenated hydrocarbons, the operating conditions leave considerable room for improvement. The relatively severe operating conditions require high capital investment and power or energy consumption. In addition, the severe conditions present many operating problems. Accordingly, a catalyst which overcomes these disadvantages of the prior art processes is to be highly commended.
The present invention provides complexes useful as catalysts which enable Fischer-Tropsch synthesis to be achieved at mild operating temperatures and pressures.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
There are three broad aspects to the present invention:
(1) novel polymer-metal complexes;
(2) a process for making the complexes, their activation, and
(3) the complexes as catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch reactions at relatively mild conditions.
Thus, there is disclosed novel polymer-supported metal complexes of the formula: ##STR2## wherein .circle.P represents a crosslinked macroreticular polystyrene resin which has a crosslink density of at least 5%;
x is 0 or 1;
L represents a ligand selected from the group consisting of bipyridyl, 2-aminopyridine, 2-amino phenol, 2-imino pyridine, sodium anthranilate, and potassium anthranilate;
y is an integer from 1 through 8;
when y equals 1, M represents a Group VIII metal from the Periodic Table and when y is from 2 through 8, M represents one or more metals selected from the group consisting of Group VIII metals from the Periodic Table, manganese, potassium and sodium with the proviso that at least one M is a Group VIII metal;
R represents a hydrogen carbonyl or a halogen radical; and
n represents an integer from 3 through 24.
Further, there is disclosed a heterogeneous catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch reactions conducted in the vapor phase at a temperature from 175.degree. C. to 300.degree. C., said catalyst comprising;
a ligand selected from the group consisting of, 2-amino phenol, 2-amino pyridine, bipyridyl and sodium or potassium anthranilate, which is complexed with a metal compound selected from the group consisting of H.sub.2 FeRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.13, H.sub.2 FeOs.sub.3 (CO).sub.13, MnCo(CO).sub.9, RuCl.sub.3, Co.sub.4 (CO).sub.12, H.sub.4 Ru.sub.4 (CO).sub.12, K.sub.2 Ru.sub.6 (CO).sub.16, Ru.sub.3 (CO).sub.12, and Fe.sub.3 (CO).sub.12 ;
said ligand being chemically linked to a polymeric support, said polymeric support comprising from 0 to 20 weight percent chloromethylstyrene, 40 to 70 weight percent styrene and 20 to 40 weight percent divinylbenzene.
Some of the complexes of this invention are compositions based upon divinylbenzene crosslinked polystyrenes in which the divinylbenzene crosslinking is greater than 4 percent but less than 50 percent. This means that the divinylbenzene crosslinked polystyrenes are prepared with from 4-50% divinylbenzene based on monomer charge with the remainder being styrene and other monomers (i.e. chloromethylated vinyl benzene). Also, polystyrene may be halogenated and then further reacted. Thus, the polystyrene resins useful in this invention have pendant halomethyl functionally. The polymer may be a terpolymer in that other comonomers may be present in minor amounts.
The crosslinked chloromethylated polystyrene polymer is preferably macroporous or macroreticular in character (i.e. pore size of about 100 to 900 .ANG.). Those skilled in the art are familiar with the manner of obtaining a macroporous polymer rather than a microporous polymer. See Sherrington supra.

EXPERIMENTAL
To these macroreticular divinylbenzene crosslinked chloromethylated polystyrene polymers are attached ligands. Conventionally, a ligand is a molecule, ion, or atom that is attached to the central atom of a coordination compound, a chelate, or other complex. For example, the ammonia molecules in [Co(NH.sub.3).sub.6 ].sup.+++, and the chlorine atoms in [PtCl.sub.6 ].sup.-- are ligands. Ligands are also called complexing agents, as for example EDTA, ammonia, etc. In the present invention the ligands are molecules that are attached to the polystyrene polymer and are capable of complexing with metal carbonyls or halides. Ligands such as anthranilic acid or other amines, i.e. 2-aminophenol, are anchored to the halomethylated polymer by known procedures such as stirring the polymer with excess anthranilic acid or other amines such as dipyridyl in a reaction medium such as ethyl ether, toluene, acetone, or dimethylformamide. As used herein, the term "dipyridyl" refers to the 2,2' isomer, which is also known as "bipyridyl".
The polymer is recovered and then washed with appropriate solvents such as ethanol. The polymer is then slurried in a reaction medium and there is added thereto the metal or metal cluster carbonyl or halide compound. Representative of the single metal carbonyls useful in the present invention are Ru.sub.3 (CO).sub.12, Fe.sub.3 (CO).sub.12, and H.sub.4 Ru.sub.4 (CO).sub.12. Mixed metal carbonyls such as H.sub.2 FeRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.13, K.sub.2 Ru.sub.6 (CO).sub.16, H.sub.2 FeOs.sub.3 (CO).sub.12, and MnCo(CO).sub.9 are also contemplated by the present invention. After stirring of this slurry for a suitable length of time, the polymer is recovered, e.g. by filtration, and washed and finally extracted to remove unreacted chemicals.
PREPARATION OF CATALYST FROM BOUND LIGAND AND METAL CARBONYLS
Anthranilic acid and 2-aminophenol were previously bound to polystyrene as described above. Both the polymer bound ligand (5 gm) and 0.73 gm of Ru.sub.3 (CO).sub.12 were weighed into a 250 ml 3 neck flask; then 100 ml of toluene was added. The flask was equipped with mechanical stirrer, thermometer, condenser, and nitrogen inlet/exit. The flask was flushed with nitrogen and heated to the 60.degree. C. reaction temperature. During the overnight reaction, a nitrogen filled balloon maintained the reaction flask atmosphere. When the reaction was complete, the mixture was cooled and filtered through a polypropylene cloth to isolate the resin. The resin was washed with 500-1000 ml toluene and 200 ml hexane to remove most unreacted metal carbonyl. A 24 hour soxhlet extraction with hexane or 1:1 THF/CH.sub.3 OH removed residual extractables. The extracted resin was vacuum dried at 50.degree. C. for 3-4 hours. Synthesis of the metal complex was confirmed by elemental analysis, IR, weight gain, and color change.
Finally, the metal complex may be subjected to a treatment with a reducing agent, e.g. sodium borohydride, while suspended in a reaction medium. The reducing agent is used to selectively reduce the higher valence state of the metal to the lower catalytic state without affecting or reducing the anthranilic acid or amine ligand present in the catalytic complex.
Such reducing agents include, for example, sodium borohydride, metallic sodium (in ethanol), sodium hydride, and lithium aluminum hydride.
Polymeric supports in the form of beads, blocks, fibers, spheres, filaments, etc. may be used in the present invention. The use of polymers in the form of beads has been found to be advantageous since the ligand can be incorporated into such beads quite easily merely by stirring a mixture thereof in a suitable organic solvent or, if desired, with heating to a temperature as high as the reflux temperature of the system. The latter expedient may be employed for a better and faster incorporation of the ligand onto the beads. Polymeric beads having a size of about 1 to 10 mm can be suitably employed, although beads having a size as large as 2-5 cm. can also be used with advantage.
Particularly suitable, commercially available polymeric supports for use in the invention are polystyrene polymers (for example, Rohm and Haas XAD-4 Amberlite, or Dow Chemical XFS4022 resin), because of the ease of attaching different chemical groups. Also, chloromethylated polystyrene beads can be advantageously used as a polymeric support.
Other polymers having a reactive group can be provided with pendant functionality wherein, for example, anthranilic acid can be anchored to the polymer by a condensation reaction. Examples of such polymers include chlorinated polystyrene in which chlorine atoms can serve as reactive groups and copolymers of styrene with other copolymerizable monomers. In addition, they may be prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,597,437.
Further, in functional terms, the polymer support may additionally contain reactive functionalities such as sulfonate, methanesulfonate, tosylate, carboxylate, cyanomethyl and the like, which can be readily reacted so as to effect a condensation between the amino group of the ligand and the reactive groups of the polymeric chain. Thus, within this context, it is apparent that a wide variety of polymer supports can be used successfully in connection with the preparation of the heterogeneous catalytic systems of the invention.
Macroreticular resins can be synthesized by the polymerization of styrene, divinylbenzene and chloromethylstyrene using known procedures. The polymer crosslinks during the polymerization. Useful polymers contain 0-15 weight percent chloromethylstyrene, 40-70 weight percent styrene and 20-40 weight percent divinylbenzene.
Isoporous resins can be synthesized by polymerization of styrene and chloromethylstyrene. The polymer is crosslinked after polymerization with a SnCl.sub.4 reaction. Chloromethylstyrene content can vary between 10 percent and 90 percent in the uncrosslinked polymer. For more information see, Regas and Papadoyannis, Polymer Bulletin 3, 279-284 (1980) and Peppas, Bussing and Slight, Polymer Bulletin 4, 193-198 (1981).
Macroporous and isoporous resins have different pore structures, swelling properties and physical properties because of the different crosslinking procedures. For this reason different catalytic properties might be expected.
The feedstock advantageously used by the catalysts of this invention is known as syngas or synthesis gas. Synthesis gas can be any of several gaseous mixtures used for synthesizing a wide range of compounds. Such mixtures result from reacting carbon-rich substances (ie. coal) with steam (steam reforming) or steam and oxygen (partial oxidation); they contain chiefly carbon monoxide and hydrogen, plus low percentages of carbon dioxide or nitrogen (less than 2.0%). The organic source materials may be natural gas, methane, naphtha, heavy petroleum oils, or coke (coal). The reactions are nickel-catalyzed steam-cracking (reforming) of methane or natural gas (CH.sub.4 +H.sub.2 O.fwdarw.CO+3H.sub.2); partial oxidation of methane, naphtha, or heavy oils; and especially in view of the petroleum shortage the water-gas reaction with coke (C+H.sub.2 O.fwdarw.CO+H.sub.2).
Synthesis gas with ratios of H.sub.2 to CO of from 1:1 to 2:1 have been found useful in the present invention. Other ratios would be appropriate, however, those skilled in this art will realize that changes in the ratio will affect the reaction in numerous ways.
REACTION SYSTEM USED FOR TESTS
Catalysts were utilized in a fixed bed reactor system. The reactor is a 1.4 cm ID.times.38.1 cm (0.56.times.15 inch) 316 stainless steel tube. During catalyst tests the reactor contained about 10 cc of catalyst. Reactors were equipped with axial thermowells and a heating system capable of maintaining temperatures within 5.degree. C. along the catalyst bed at 250.degree. C. Each reactor was piped so that any of three gases could be passed through the bed.
1. Hydrogen (for catalyst reduction).
2. Helium (for purging).
3. Syngas (H.sub.2 /CO=2/1).
The Fischer-Tropsch tests were conducted under the following conditions unless specified otherwise:
Synthesis gas molar ratio--2/1 H.sub.2 /CO
Pressure--1034 kPa (150 psig)
Temperature--250.degree. C.
Gas hourly space velocity--200 hr.sup.-1
CATALYST ACTIVATION
Activation procedures for polymer bound catalysts are the sodium borohydride process or vacuum with hydrogen reduction.
The sodium borohydride activation procedure consists of adding unactivated catalyst to absolute ethanol in a reaction flask. After adding a stirring bar, sodium borohydride was added in small batches. A 30 minute room temperature reaction was enough to complete the reduction. After isolation by filtration, the resin was washed with alcohol, petroleum ether and pentane. The pentane washed resin was charged to the reactor and dried with a helium stream.
Vacuum and hydrogen reduction activation consists of heating catalysts to a temperature between 225.degree.-275.degree. C. in a helium flow. The catalyst was then placed under vacuum for 1 hour. Thereafter, a 2 hour hydrogen flow reduced the evacuated catalyst. After activation the temperature was brought to 250.degree. C. and the Fischer-Tropsch reaction was initiated by adding syngas.
The catalysts may be used without activation, wherein the catalyst is placed in the reactor, the temperature is raised to the reaction temperature and then syngas is introduced into the reactor. It has been unexpectedly discovered that non-activated catalyst will slowly activate in syngas with time until a steady state is achieved.
TEST DATA
Polymer bound amine ligated metal chloride and metal carbonyl complexes were tested for Fischer-Tropsch activity. Table I sets out the results of the screening test which utilized different metal complexes, different supporting resins or polymers and different ligands. The reaction conditions and reaction vessel were as previously described. All catalysts listed were not activated prior to testing unless otherwise noted. These catalysts were initially screened to determine whether or not they would exhibit any Fischer-Tropsch activity. More complete data on activity is presented infra.
TABLE I__________________________________________________________________________Polymer Bound Fischer-Tropsch Screening Metal Cluster Intended Metal Fischer-TropschCatalyst # or Complex Ligand Resin ++ Loading % by wt. Activity__________________________________________________________________________1 H.sub.2 FeRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.13 Anthranilic A 5 Yes Acid2 K.sub.2 Ru.sub.6 (CO).sub.16 Anthranilic A 5 Yes Acid3 Ru.sub.3 (CO).sub.12 Anthranilic A 5 Yes Acid4 RuCl.sub.3 * Potassium A 5 Yes Anthranilate5 Ru.sub.3 (CO).sub.12 2-amino phenol A 5 Yes6 H.sub.2 FeOs.sub.3 (CO).sub.13 2-amino pyridine A 5.5 Yes7 Ru.sub.3 (CO).sub.12 2-amino pyridine A 5 Yes8 RuCl.sub.3 * 2-amino pyridine A 5 Yes9 Ru.sub.3 (CO).sub.12 2-imino pyridine B 5 Yes10 HFeCo.sub.3 (CO).sub.12 Benzyl Iodide C 3 No11 Fe.sub.3 (CO).sub.12 Dipyridyl B 3 Yes12 H.sub.2 FeRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.13 Dipyridyl B 6 Yes13 H.sub.4 Ru.sub.4 (CO).sub.12 Dipyridyl B 5 Yes14 MnCo(CO).sub.9 Dipyridyl B 6 Yes15 RhCl.sub.3 * Dipyridyl B 5 Yes16 Ru.sub.3 (CO).sub.12 Dipyridyl B 5.2.sup.a Yes17 RuCl.sub.3 * Dipyridyl B 5 Yes18 IrCl.sub.3 Double Porphyrin A N.A. No19 RuCl.sub.3 Double Porphyrin A 10 No20 Co.sub.4 (CO).sub.12 Triphenyl B 3 No Phosphine21 Fe.sub.3 (CO).sub.12 Triphenyl B 3 No Phosphine22 Ru.sub.3 (CO).sub.12 Triphenyl B 5 No Phosphine__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a actually analyzed *sodium borohydride activated prior to testing ++ Resin A is a 70/30 styrene/divinylbenzene macroreticular resin Resin B is a Dow Chemical XFS4022 20% Divinylbenzene 80% styrene macroreticular resin Resin C is vinyl benzyl chloride resin obtained from Ionac Inc.
All the active catalysts in Table I produced broad hydrocarbon product distributions in conjunction with very minor amounts of oxygenates such as methanol, ethanol and others. From Table I it is evident that benzyl iodide, double porphyrins and triphenyl phosphines are unacceptable ligands.
Catalyst Nos. 3, 7 and 9 after screening were subjected to an activation procedure which consisted of one hour under vacuum at 250.degree. C. and then one hour under hydrogen at 250.degree. C.
Tables II, III and IV set out CO conversion and light product selectivities for Catalyst Nos. 3, 7 and 9 respectively.
TABLE II__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.12.Anthranilic Acid - Catalyst #3Reaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 1.0 200 250 22.94 22.94 22.56 2.71 0.00 74.732 2.0 200 250 60.02 59.64 24.20 4.56 0.04 71.203 2.5 200 250 65.87 65.43 23.41 3.60 0.00 72.994 3.0 200 250 71.19 70.63 22.38 3.51 0.00 74.115 4.0 200 250 77.66 76.99 21.44 3.18 0.00 75.386 4.5 400 250 74.85 74.33 21.70 2.99 0.00 75.317 5.0 400 250 69.10 68.69 22.09 2.95 0.00 74.96OVERNIGHT SHUTDOWN:CATALYST STORED UNDER HELIUM AT ROOM TEMPERATURE8 1.0 200 250 26.25 26.25 35.09 3.80 0.00 61.119 1.5 200 250 39.38 39.27 34.19 5.73 0.00 60.0810 5.0 200 225 52.07 51.99 20.71 2.31 0.00 76.9811 5.5 200 225 51.24 51.15 19.12 2.46 0.00 78.42__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE III__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.12.2-amino pyridine - Catalyst #7Reaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 1.5 200 250 54.27 53.56 30.19 3.98 0.00 65.832 3.0 200 250 63.37 62.31 29.51 3.61 0.00 66.883 3.5 200 250 62.60 61.64 29.96 3.52 0.00 66.524 4.0 400 250 42.27 41.79 34.07 3.80 0.00 62.13OVERNIGHT SHUTDOWN:CATALYST STORED UNDER HELIUM AT ROOM TEMPERATURE5 1.0 200 250 44.55 44.21 48.61 4.65 0.00 46.746 1.75 200 250 45.49 45.16 46.42 4.71 0.00 48.877 3.0 200 225 27.19 27.05 34.14 3.22 0.00 62.648 3.33 200 225 23.38 23.32 30.52 2.77 0.00 66.719 5.66 200 250 40.87 40.58 43.50 4.11 0.00 52.39__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE IV__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.12.2-imino pyridine - Catalyst #9Reaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 1.25 200 250 5.88 5.88 30.07 0.00 0.00 69.932 2.33 200 250 5.32 5.32 27.73 0.00 0.00 72.273 4.50 200 250 5.40 5.40 24.68 0.00 0.00 75.324 6.00 200 275 9.14 9.15 52.28 0.00 0.00 47.72__________________________________________________________________________
The data contained in Tables II, III, and IV demonstrates that catalysts according to the present invention have acceptable Fischer-Tropsch activity. To further demonstrate the activity of the catalysts of the instant invention 11 active catalysts from Table I were activated and then subjected to extensive testing for Fischer-Tropsch activity. This data is set out in the following Tables V through XVI.
TABLE V__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forH.sub.2 FeRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.13.Anthranilic Acid - Catalyst #1Activated by three hours under vacuum at 250.degree. C. and one hourunder H.sub.2 at 250.degree. C.Reaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 1.00 200 250 31.54 31.44 22.15 4.05 0.00 73.802 17.50 200 250 48.97 58.55 22.12 2.84 0.00 75.043 25.00 200 250 53.72 53.20 23.53 3.10 0.00 73.374 41.00 200 250 50.47 49.76 25.88 3.39 0.00 70.735 47.00 200 250 49.82 49.06 25.67 3.39 0.00 70.946 114.75 200 250 44.33 43.25 26.91 3.85 0.00 69.247 120.50 200 250 44.49 43.40 26.55 3.69 0.00 69.76__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE VI__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forK.sub.2 Ru.sub.6 (CO).sub.16.Anthranilic Acid at - Catalyst #2Activated one hour under vacuum at 250.degree. C. and one hour underH.sub.2 at 250.degree. C.Reaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 2.00 200 250 42.83 41.98 19.22 2.87 0.00 77.912 4.50 200 250 45.54 44.71 21.01 2.77 0.00 76.223 23.00 200 250 34.63 22.74 22.74 3.26 0.00 74.004 24.00 200 250 37.20 37.20 20.84 2.56 0.00 76.605 27.00 200 250 35.53 35.53 22.60 2.65 0.00 74.756 47.25 200 250 33.33 33.33 22.94 2.63 0.00 74.437 53.00 200 .sup. 275.sup.a 51.06 50.73 37.55 4.77 0.00 57.688 70.50 200 .sup. 275.sup.a 59.97 59.45 42.01 5.54 0.00 52.459 75.00 200 .sup. 275.sup.a 59.68 59.18 42.05 5.53 0.00 52.42__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Pressure Rose to 180 psig
TABLE VII__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forRuCl.sub.3.Potassium Anthranilate - Catalyst #4Activated one hour under vacuum at 250.degree. C. and one hour underH.sub.2 at 250.degree. C.Reaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 2.80 150 250 71.15 69.66 17.59 2.81 0.00 79.602 4.08 150 250 76.90 75.26 16.51 2.59 0.00 80.903 23.25 400 250 42.08 42.01 17.84 2.04 0.00 80.124 27.50 400 250 40.87 40.78 17.94 2.17 0.00 79.895 45.50 400 250 40.08 39.98 17.37 2.17 0.00 80.466 116.75 400 250 40.12 39.98 14.69 2.00 0.00 83.30__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE VIII__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.12.2-amino phenol - Catalyst #5Activated one hour under vacuum at 250.degree. C. and one hour underH.sub.2 at 250.degree. C.Reaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 0.75 200 250 16.37 16.37 43.37 5.35 0.00 51.282 2.00 200 250 47.99 47.99 40.41 4.91 0.00 54.683 3.00 200 250 39.05 39.05 41.05 4.66 0.00 54.294 4.00 200 250 33.94 33.94 41.73 4.32 0.00 53.955 5.00 200 250 37.57 37.47 43.00 4.32 0.00 52.686 20.72 200 250 37.97 37.97 47.32 3.88 0.00 48.807 24.72 200 250 38.10 38.10 47.15 4.07 0.00 48.798 27.00 200 275 56.21 55.92 71.23 6.09 0.00 22.689 29.00 400 275 49.07 48.96 75.47 5.76 0.00 18.7610 45.50 400 275 44.45 44.38 74.75 5.42 0.00 19.8311 46.50 400 275 44.78 44.70 73.95 5.33 0.00 20.7212 50.00 400 250 28.67 28.67 45.17 3.89 0.00 50.9413 51.00 400 250 26.40 26.40 49.62 4.30 0.00 46.08__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE IX__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forH.sub.2 FeOs.sub.3 (CO).sub.13.2-amino pyridine - Catalyst #6Activated one hour under vacuum and 1.25 hours under H.sub.2 at250.degree. C.Reaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 1.00 200 250 16.82 16.82 17.01 6.19 1.41 75.392 2.00 200 250 7.88 7.77 31.05 10.82 2.68 55.453 19.00 200 250 13.42 13.42 23.54 6.13 2.13 68.204 27.50 200 250 13.22 13.22 25.14 5.32 2.97 66.575 44.50 200 250 14.66 14.53 26.82 5.27 4.19 63.726 48.25 200 275 32.18 31.18 32.00 7.16 2.92 57.927 117.50 200 275 40.15 33.74 43.71 10.64 0.69 44.968 123.00 200 275 42.27 35.37 43.48 10.75 0.71 45.06__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE X__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forRuCl.sub.3.2-amino pyridine - Catalyst #8Activated one hour under vacuum and one hour under H.sub.2 at 250.degree.C.Reaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 0.72 200 250 20.29 20.05 18.79 2.56 0.00 78.652 1.67 200 250 28.30 27.82 19.74 2.32 0.00 77.943 2.66 200 250 26.54 26.22 20.16 1.99 0.00 77.854 19.70 200 250 15.81 15.81 23.07 0.00.sup.a 0.00 76.935 23.95 200 250 16.48 16.48 21.63 2.54 0.00 75.836 43.95 200 250 16.07 16.07 20.44 1.88 0.00 77.687 45.45 200 275 30.54 30.41 41.55 3.63 0.00 54.828 47.45 200 275 33.40 33.28 41.29 4.52 0.00 54.199 48.45 200 275 33.07 32.95 42.63 4.76 0.00 52.61__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Trace ethane formed missed by integrator
TABLE XI__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forH.sub.2 FeRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.12.Dipyridyl - Catalyst #12Activated one hour under vacuum and one hour under H.sub.2 at 250.degree.C.Reaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 2.25 200 250 18.08 16.67 27.21 4.46 0.00 68.332 4.00 200 250 20.93 19.98 26.95 3.96 0.00 69.093 5.00 200 250 23.66 22.73 19.83 4.47 0.00 75.704 21.17 200 250 20.93 20.59 24.19 2.75 0.00 73.065 26.50 200 250 18.54 18.17 28.19 3.40 0.00 68.416 45.50 200 250 18.06 17.82 28.81 3.77 0.00 67.427 51.00 200 250 18.26 18.01 28.17 3.37 0.00 68.368 117.50 200 250 17.82 17.71 29.25 2.94 0.00 67.819 122.50 200 275 49.66 48.28 35.78 5.22 0.00 59.0010.sup. 125.00 200 275 51.03 49.57 35.86 4.77 0.00 59.3711.sup. 144.00 200 275 51.92 50.62 33.83 4.60 0.00 61.5712.sup.a 149.00 200 250 18.58 18.31 29.63 4.74 0.00 65.6313.sup.a 165.50 200 250 39.12 38.89 22.41 2.26 0.00 75.3314.sup.a 167.50 200 250 38.70 38.47 22.47 2.30 0.00 75.2315.sup.b 171.50 200 250 15.48 15.41 26.37 3.12 0.00 70.4916.sup.b 189.50 200 250 16.06 16.00 26.15 2.68 0.00 71.17__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a 350 psig (2413 kPa) .sup.b 80 psig (552 kPa)
TABLE XII__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forH.sub.4 Ru.sub.4 (CO).sub.12.Dipyridyl - Catalyst #13Activated one hour under vacuum and one hour under H.sub.2 at 250.degree.C.Reaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 1.50 200 250 22.19 22.19 52.61 5.59 0.00 41.802 3.50 200 250 22.64 22.64 50.10 5.31 0.00 44.593 20.50 200 250 24.05 25.05 45.41 4.18 0.00 50.414 28.00 200 250 23.58 23.58 45.63 4.39 0.00 49.985 45.50 200 250 22.64 22.64 46.30 4.34 0.00 49.366 51.00 200 250 23.04 23.04 44.81 4.41 0.00 50.787 69.50 200 250 23.43 23.43 43.99 3.92 0.00 52.098 73.50 200 275 32.26 32.26 67.45 5.39 0.00 27.16__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE XIII__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forMnCo(CO).sub.9.Dipyridyl - Catalyst #14Activated one hour under vacuum and one hour under H.sub.2 at 250.degree.C.Reaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 3.00 200 250 8.82 8.82 10.32 0.00.sup.a 0.00.sup.a 89.682 4.50 200 250 9.91 9.91 10.71 0.00.sup.a 0.00.sup.a 89.293 21.50 200 250 8.89 8.89 7.03 0.98 9.17.sup.b 82.814 24.50 200 275 26.57 25.53 12.01 3.97 2.54 81.485 28.50 200 275 27.65 26.64 11.72 4.09 1.97 82.226 46.50 200 275 21.78 21.02 13.09 4.56 1.56 80.797 52.50 200 275 20.12 19.52 16.18 4.84 1.33 77.658 70.50 200 275 16.68 16.27 17.58 4.05 0.83 77.54__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Trace peaks present could not be distinguished from noise by integrator .sup.b Overestimated due to noise
TABLE XIV__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forRuCl.sub.3.Dipyridyl - Catalyst #15Activated one hour under vacuum and one hour under H.sub.2 at 250.degree.C.Reaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 1.00 200 250 7.24 7.24 24.67 2.95 0.00 72.382 4.00 200 250 5.92 5.92 31.94 0.00 0.00 68.063 20.25 200 250 3.42 3.42 26.69 0.00 0.00 73.314 22.50 200 275 6.45 6.45 50.24 0.00 0.00 49.765 26.50 200 275 6.85 6.85 47.24 6.59 0.00 46.176 28.00 200 275 6.72 6.72 46.89 6.37 0.00 46.747 93.00 200 275 5.59 5.59 41.96 11.07 0.00 46.97.sup. 8.sup.a 98.00 200 275 5.30 5.30 41.19 9.22 0.00 49.59.sup. 9.sup.a 100.00 200 275 6.67 6.67 49.04 7.68 0.00 43.28__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Reactor Pressure = 250 psig (1724 kPa)
TABLE XV__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.12.Dipyridyl - Catalyst #16Activated one hour under vacuum and 1.5 hours under H.sub.2 at250.degree. C.Reaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 3.33 200 250 38.95 38.95 42.73 4.97 0.00 52.302 6.67 200 250 39.36 39.36 40.09 4.64 0.00 55.273 24.50 200 250 38.77 38.77 39.04 4.33 0.00 56.634 28.00 200 275 50.10 50.02 56.24 6.25 0.00 37.515 30.33 200 275 53.38 53.37 58.75 6.66 0.00 34.576 118.91 400 275 56.73 56.67 61.87 6.07 0.00 32.067 120.64 400 275 56.90 56.86 61.41 6.03 0.00 32.568 124.39 400 250 47.78 47.78 32.78 3.49 0.00 63.739 125.74 400 250 50.51 50.51 31.46 3.29 0.00 65.2510 142.92 400 250 56.53 56.53 28.30 2.96 0.00 68.7411 149.85 400 250 57.05 57.05 28.00 2.88 0.00 69.1212 172.93 400 225 43.84 43.84 12.38 0.74 0.00 86.8813 191.13 400 225 50.23 50.23 11.24 0.72 0.00 88.0414 193.35 400 225 50.29 50.29 11.27 0.69 0.00 88.0415 196.35 400 175 13.58 13.58 1.32 0.00 0.00 98.6816 214.93 400 175 11.60 11.60 1.63 0.00 0.00 98.37__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE XVI__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forRuCl.sub.3.Dipyridyl - Catalyst #17No activation other than that noted on Table IReaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 2.75 200 250 6.04 6.04 20.95 0.00 0.00 79.052 6.83 200 250 6.11 6.11 20.45 0.00 0.00 79.553 27.16 200 250 5.99 5.99 18.35 0.00 0.00 81.654 29.33 200 275 12.73 12.73 39.62 5.41 0.00 54.975 120.25 200 275 20.11 20.11 39.23 3.96 0.00 56.806 144.21 200 275 21.67 21.67 37.14 3.84 0.00 59.027 168.23 200 275 22.55 22.55 37.62 4.05 0.00 58.33HYDROGEN TREATMENT: 250.degree. C., 50 PSIG, 40 SCCM*, ONE HOUR8 17.75 200 250 19.69 19.69 18.41 2.12 0.00 79.739 20.02 200 250 19.64 19.64 18.22 0.00.sup.a 0.00 81.7810 24.27 200 275 28.98 28.98 42.17 4.64 0.00 53.1911 41.60 200 275 29.55 29.46 40.93 4.25 0.00 54.82__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Trace Ethane formed, missed by integrator *Standard Cubic Centimeters per Minute
TABLE XVII__________________________________________________________________________CO Conversion and Light Product Selectivities forRu on Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 - ComparativeReaction Conditions CO Conversion (%)On-Stream GHSV Temp. To Product Selectivity (%)Sample # Time (hr) (hr.sup.-1) (.degree.C.) Total Hydrocarbon C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.2.sup.= C.sub.3.sup.+__________________________________________________________________________1 0.50 200 250 54.80 47.07 70.94 3.14 0.00 25.922 1.00 200 250 58.61 50.71 66.41 3.40 0.00 30.193 18.50 200 250 95.39 91.58 7.75 1.71 0.00 90.544 21.00 400 250 87.87 85.73 9.22 1.86 0.00 88.925 24.50 400 225 70.65 69.85 8.75 1.55 0.15 89.556 42.00 400 225 57.97 57.86 8.60 0.86 0.00 90.547 45.00 400 225 53.25 53.23 9.70 1.03 0.00 89.278 48.25 400 225 53.28 53.27 9.63 0.92 0.00 89.45__________________________________________________________________________
For a comparison with a conventional Fischer-Tropsch catalyst, Ru on Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was prepared by a conventional literature procedure and tested in the reactor system. From Table XVII it can be seen that the conventional Ru/Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 catalyst was more active at 250.degree. C. than any polymer bound catalyst. However, at 225.degree. C. (53% conversion), the Ru.sub.3 (CO).sub.12 catalyst #16 was nearly as active (.apprxeq.50% conversion). Thus polymer bound catalysts can achieve acceptable Fischer-Tropsch activity at lower temperatures, thus saving energy. Tables XVIII through XXVI set out product selectivities for selected catalysts at different times during a run and at different GHSV, temperatures and pressures. It is evident from the data that Catalyst #14 (MnCo(CO).sub.9 -Dipyridyl) and Catalyst #6 (H.sub.2 FeOs.sub.3 (CO).sub.13 -2Amino Phenol) produced a substantial amount of olefins.
TABLE XVIII______________________________________C.sub.1 -C.sub.9 + Product Selectivities and Olefin Fractions forRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.12.Anthranilic Acid at 250.degree. C., 1034 kPa (150psig)200 hr.sup.-1 - Catalyst #3Carbon Number1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9+______________________________________Carbon % 24.20 4.56 6.33 6.09 3.84 0.67 54.31Olefin % -- 0.00 10.18 24.72 12.50 NA NA______________________________________
TABLE XIX______________________________________C.sub.1 -C.sub.9 + Product Selectivities and Olefin Fractions forH.sub.2 FeRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.13.Anthranilic Acid at 250.degree. C.1034 kPa (150 psig), 200 hr.sup.-1,After 23 hours on stream - Catalyst #1Carbon Number1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9+______________________________________Carbon % 22.7 3.05 3.08 3.08 2.12 0.59 65.38Olefin % -- 17.56 36.02 38.48 37.39 NA NA______________________________________
TABLE XX______________________________________C.sub.1 -C.sub.9 + Product Selectivities and Olefin Fractions forK.sub.2 Ru.sub.6 (CO).sub.16.Anthranilic Acid at 250.degree. C., 1034 kPa(150 psig)200 hr.sup.-1 After 25 hours on stream - Catalyst #2Carbon Number1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9+______________________________________Carbon % 20.84 2.56 1.71 2.04 1.91 0.96 69.98Olefin % -- 0.00 40.38 43.94 47.61 NA NA______________________________________
TABLE XXI______________________________________C.sub.1 -C.sub.9 + Product Selectivities and Olefin Fractions forH.sub.2 FeOs.sub.3 (CO).sub.13.2Aminopyridineat 1034 kPa (150 psig) - Catalyst #6Carbon Number1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9+______________________________________Carbon % 26.82 9.46 13.54 8.32 3.05 0.42 38.39Olefin % -- 51.47 63.05 58.85 40.30 NA NA______________________________________
TABLE XXII______________________________________C.sub.1 -C.sub.9 + Product Selectivities and Olefin Fractions forH.sub.4 Ru.sub.4 (CO).sub.12.Dipyridyl at 250.degree. C. - Catalyst #13Carbon Number1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9+______________________________________Carbon % 43.99 3.92 4.56 4.08 3.16 2.96 37.33Olefin % -- 0.00 12.63 24.65 13.53 NA NA______________________________________
TABLE XXIII______________________________________C.sub.1 -C.sub.9 + Product Selectivities and Olefin Fractions forMnCo(CO).sub.9.Dipyridyl at 275.degree. C. - Catalyst #14Carbon Number1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9+______________________________________Carbon % 11.72 6.06 7.33 4.87 3.28 1.48 65.26Olefin % -- 35.12 82.12 78.56 77.17 NA NA______________________________________
TABLE XXIV______________________________________C.sub.1 -C.sub.9 + Product Selectivities and Olefin Fractions forRuCl.sub.3.Dipyridyl at 275.degree. C. - Catalyst #15Carbon Number1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9+______________________________________Carbon % 37.62 4.05 4.07 3.47 3.11 [52.68].sup.aOlefin % -- 25.88 47.75 56.31 60.07 NA______________________________________ .sup.a C.sub.6-8 and C.sub.9+ peaks combined
TABLE XXV______________________________________C.sub.1 -C.sub.9 + Product Selectivities and Olefin Fractions forRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.12.Dipyridyl at 250.degree. C. - Catalyst #16Carbon Number1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9+______________________________________Carbon % 28.00 2.88 5.13 4.91 2.83 2.54 53.71Olefin % -- 0.00 38.02 44.82 24.02 NA NA______________________________________
TABLE XXVI______________________________________C.sub.1 -C.sub.9 + Product Selectivities and Olefin Fractions forRuCl.sub.3.Dipyridyl at 225.degree. C. (25 hours on stream) Catalyst #17Carbon Number1 2 3 4 5 6-8 9+______________________________________Carbon % 9.63 1.16 9.65 11.08 5.45 1.28 61.75Olefin % -- 20.07 68.37 63.90 59.20 NA NA______________________________________
The discovery of the instant invention can be more fully appreciated when one realizes that modification of the polymer bound catalyst can be made to achieve certain desired results from the vapor phase Fisher-Tropsch reaction. Tables XXVII and XXVIII demonstrate that the metal affects selectivity.
TABLE XXVII______________________________________Methane Selectivity Comparison forThree Ru.Dipyridyl Catalysts at 250.degree. C. On-Stream Methane# Catalyst Time (hr) Selectivity (%)______________________________________17 RuCl.sub.3 -- 27.16 18.3516 Ru.sub.3 (CO).sub.12 -- 24.50 39.0413 H.sub.4 Ru.sub.4 (CO).sub.12 -- 28.00 45.63______________________________________
TABLE XXVIII______________________________________C.sub.2 -C.sub.5 Olefin Fraction Comparison forFive Dipyridyl Catalysts On Stream Olefin Percent (%) Time Temp Carbon Number# Catalyst (hr) (.degree.C.) 2 3 4 5______________________________________16 Ru.sub.3 (CO).sub.12 148.00 250 0.00 38.02 44.82 24.0217 RuCl.sub.3 169.45 275 25.88 47.75 56.31 60.0713 H.sub.4 Ru.sub.4 (CO).sub.12 72.38 250 0.00 12.63 24.65 13.5312 H.sub.2 FeRu.sub.3 (CO).sub.13 28.32 250 0.00 16.76 26.85 14.3914 MnCo(CO).sub.9 24.80 275 35.12 82.18 78.56 77.17______________________________________
Table XXIX sets out data on MnCo catalysts polymer supported vs. conventionally supported. The conventional catalyst data is from the literature.
TABLE XXIX__________________________________________________________________________Comparison of Polymer Bound and Conventional MnCo Catalysts forLight Olefins Production from Synthesis Gas ResultsCatalyst Reaction C.sub.2 -C.sub.4 Total Mn/Co Temp. Press Space Velocity CO Conv. Olefin# Components Metal Wt % Ratio (.degree.C.) (psig) (cm.sup.3 /sec/gm cat.) (%) Percent__________________________________________________________________________14 MnCo(CO).sub.9 -- 6.sup.a .sup. 1/1.sup.a 275 150 7.4 20 65.57 Dipyridyl MnCo--Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 27 1/2 242 100 0.42 36.0 0 MnCo--Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 27 1/2 279 100 0.42 3.0 80.77 with K.sub.2 O__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.a Estimated
DEACTIVATION OF CATALYST
The novel catalysts of the invention have demonstrated Fischer-Tropsch activity for extended periods of time (in excess of 200 hours) without significant deactivation. Most significantly, one polymer bound catalyst (Catalyst #6, Table IX) demonstrated increasing activity with time on stream.
Catalyst #16 was submitted for elemental analysis prior and subsequent to the run set out in Table XV. It was determined that ruthenium was not lost during the Fischer-Tropsch reaction. This is very important since the catalyst still contained all of the valuable ruthenium metal. The metal may be recovered by burning the resin.
In the past, only conventional catalysts were used for the vapor phase Fischer-Tropsch reaction. Conventional catalysts generally are supported on either silica or alumina if they are supported at all. They are synthesized by precipitation or fusion techniques and contain no ligand bridges thus making it difficult to obtain small metal clusters which are desired for the Fischer-Tropsch reaction.
It is clear from these results that the catalytic system of the invention is sensitive and that the exact constitution thereof is critical in obtaining the desired results. The instant invention provides a significant advance in the Fischer-Tropsch reaction since the reaction conditions are mild and the resultant products are not contaminated with catalyst. This invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the scope of the invention, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.

Number	Name	Date
4179402	Kim et al.	Dec 1979
4179403	Kim et al.	Dec 1979
4230633	Vollhardt et al.	Oct 1980

Polymer bound fischer-tropsch catalysts

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Parent Case Info

US Referenced Citations (3)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)

Divisions (1)