A suspension of a soluble polymer, such as amorphous fluoropolymer, in solvent with fine carbon particles and/or fibers is applied directly onto the surfaces of the outward face and the first few layers of carbon/catalyst particles of a catalyst layer of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell.
A traditional PEM fuel cell employs a current collector/gas diffusion layer to mechanically support the fragile membrane-electrode assembly (MEA) and to lower internal resistance of the PEM fuel cell. The current collector/gas diffusion layer is often composed of a macroporous layer also referred to variously as a support layer, a gas diffusion backing, or a gas diffusion layer, typically consisting of a substrate, such as fibrous carbon paper, typically one of the TORAY® papers. This macroporous layer is usually coated on one side with a microporous layer which is hydrophobic or partially hydrophobic, referred to sometimes as a bi-layer. The microporous layer is pressed against the MEA and held in place mechanically by the compressive force of stack loading pressure. The hydrophobicity is required in order to ensure (at the cathode) that product water moves away from the cathode surface, and (at both electrodes) that the internal pores of the microporous layer remain empty of water so that the reactant gases can pass through the support to reach the catalyst layer for electrochemical activity.
Because the spacing between fibers in the macroporous layer (defining the pores) is between about 20 and 40 microns, and because the microporous layer (bi-layer) has a pore size between 0.1 and ten microns, the microporous layers must be on the order of 25 microns thick for structural integrity. Alternatively, the microporous layer may penetrate to a similar depth into the macroporous layer for mechanical support. Attempts to minimize the thickness of the microporous layer (to minimize gas diffusion losses) are limited because they would compromise mechanical strength. If the microporous layer is of insufficient strength, hydraulic pressure from product water will cause the microporous layer to distort and allow water to accumulate between the MEA and microporous layer, preventing reactant gases from reaching the catalyst layer. Additionally, considering several hundred fuel cells in a stack, a thick microporous layer can add length and weight to the fuel cell, both of which should be minimized, particularly in vehicular applications.
The microporous layers are normally fabricated as a sintered mixture of PFE dispersion and fine carbon particles. If the mixture is not uniform or sintering is insufficient, bare carbon surface may be left exposed to wetting and thereby block access of reactant gas to the catalyst layer. The interface between the microporous layer and the catalyst layer is abrupt, and chemically active, which can oxidize the carbon in the microporous layer; that in turn will cause pooling of the product water at the interface and blockage of reactant gas.
An interesting approach to these and other problems is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 6,880,238, which refers to the macroporous support layer as a gas diffusion backing layer. In two examples, TEFLON ARD copolymer is mixed with catalyst, NAFION® and a solvent into a paste which is applied to the gas diffusion backing layer, such as one of the known TORAY® papers; the gas diffusion backing is thereafter pressed onto a wet proton exchange membrane. In three additional examples, the gas diffusion backing layer is immersed in a solution of amorphous fluoropolymer so as to render the entire gas diffusion backing layer hydrophobic. As a variant, the amorphous fluoropolymer may be sprayed on the TORAY® paper.
The foregoing solves a problem of having to sinter the substrate and microporous layer at temperatures in excess of those which can be tolerated by the PEM. However, other problematic characteristics of such an arrangement, described hereinbefore, are not improved.
In all of the prior art described hereinbefore, the hydrophobic microporous layer is held in contact with the catalyst only as the result of the compressive force applied to the fuel cell stack by its tie rods. The physical contact with the hydrophobic microporous layer does not cause the surface porosity and internal porosity of the catalyst to be hydrophobic. If the hydraulic pressure of liquid water over the cathode exceeds the loading force that presses the microporous layer against the catalyst, liquid water will pool on the catalyst layer surface and impede fluid transport.
The present arrangement utilizes a soluble, hydrophobic polymer to coat the surfaces of the outward face of the catalyst layer as well as the surfaces of the outermost carbon/catalyst particles of the structure, thereby forming a microporous layer on the catalyst layer. The polymer suspension penetrates the electrode porosity to some extent and coats the pore walls with polymer whereby pores of ionomer on carbon which are normally hydrophilic, are rendered hydrophobic. The soluble hydrophobic polymer may be any polymer which is soluble in a solvent that evaporates at relatively low temperatures (preferably below 200° C.), and is stable in a fuel cell environment.
One exemplary coating is an amorphous perfluorinated copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene with 2,2-bistrifluoromethyl-4,5-difluoro-1,3-dioxole, available under the trade name TEFLON AF®, together with small carbon particles (added to enhance conductivity of the coating), such as those available under the trade name VULCAN®, in a volatile solvent, such as FC 40, FC 75, FC 3283 or PF 5080. The TEFLON ARD coats the NAFION® surrounding the carbon/catalyst particles. Because there is a good penetration of TEFLON AF® into the catalyst layer, and because of the similarities in the chemical structures of NAFION® and TEFLON AF®, there is a good bond, which is either or both a chemical bond or mechanical interference, between the hydrophobic coating and the NAFION® surrounding the carbon/catalyst particles in the catalyst layer. This bond reduces the ability of water to pool between the catalyst layer and the microporous layer formed by the coating of this arrangement. In some circumstances, the coating may form a similar bond between a catalyst layer and a support layer. Other polymers, soluble in acetone, include those available under the trade names KYNAR®, KYNAR-FLEX® and ARCHEMA®. Certain soluble terpolymers may also be suitable.
Despite it being counterintuitive to add resistive layers in order to reduce resistance, the present microporous layer lowers the resistive voltage drop across the fuel cells by between about 15% and about 30%, due to better electrical contact. Although this is not fully understood, it is believed that the carbon fibers in the macroporous layer deform the microporous layer and increase the interfacial contact area. Alternatively, the fine carbon particles (VULCAN®) may distort to better contact the fibers of the macroporous layer.
The amorphous polymer is non-crystalline and provides higher gas permeability than traditional supports. The present arrangement improves fuel cell performance, particularly at high current densities, due to improved mass transport of the reaction gases because of the non-crystalline polymer, the lower polymer content, reduced flooding, and the lower IR drop. In addition, the microporous layer is less than two micrometers thick, compared with 20 micrometers or more in the prior art.
While partially crystalline KYNAR®'s also work in this regard, the amorphous TEFLON AF® may be more effective because it is able to distort to improve interfacial contact.
Other variations will become more apparent in the light of the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
Adjacent the support 14 on the anode side, a fuel reactant gas flow field plate 17 includes passageways 18 for fuel. Similarly, the cathode side has an oxidant reactant gas flow field plate 21 including passageways 22 for the flow of oxidant reactant gas, typically air. The plates 17, 21 may be solid or may be porous and at least somewhat hydrophilic, depending upon the design of the fuel cell power plant in which the present arrangement may be utilized. The coating 19 of this arrangement is juxtaposed to cathode catalyst layer 9 and support 15; a similar coating 20 may or may not be juxtaposed to anode catalyst layer 8 and support 14, depending on the fuel cell design.
Referring to
The carbon/fluoropolymer coating 19 of this arrangement contains carbon particles 26 of diameter between about 20 nm and about 1000 nm and/or carbon fibers with diameters between about 5 nm and about 600 nm and lengths between about 1 micrometer and about 100 micrometers. Only particulates are depicted in
The coating 19 abuts against the support layer 15, which is depicted as being carbon fiber paper as is typically used in the art, such as one of the TORAY® papers. As depicted, the outermost film of the soluble fluorocarbon coating 29 is deformed by the fibers of the macroporous support layer 15, shown to the right of the heavy line 31, and some of the coating 19 will become intermixed with the carbon fibers of the support layer 15 when the fuel cell is compressed in a stack, improving electrical contact over that obtained without the microporous layer 19.
In the present arrangement, a suitable soluble polymer, such as TEFLON AF® is mixed in a low vapor pressure, low surface energy solvent, such as FC 40, FC 77, FC 3283 or PF 5080, along with some fine carbon particles, such as that sold under the trade name VULCAN® XC72, although acetylene blacks, graphite particles or carbon fibers may be used as alternative carbons. An exemplary mix is about 20 wt % (of solids) soluble polymer and 80 wt % of carbon. This is much less polymer than traditionally used. However, the soluble polymer, in various different utilizations of this arrangement, may vary between about 5 wt % and almost 100 wt %. The choice of a proper solvent ensures that the mixture penetrates well into the catalyst layer structure so that the soluble polymer coats and bonds with the NAFION® surrounding the catalyst particles. Because of this bond, there is no opportunity for liquid to pool at the outer surface of the catalyst layer; this is a principal feature of this arrangement.
Soluble polymers which may be employed in this arrangement include known soluble polymers and soluble copolymers, such as KYNAR® and KYNAR-FLEX®, in a solvent such as acetone or tetrahydrofuran, or TEFLON AF® in FC75 or FC40 or mixtures of similar solvents. TEFLON AF® is a copolymer of (i) tetrafluoro ethylene and (ii) 2,2-bistrifluoromethyl-4,5-difluoro-1,3 dioxole. Other copolymers and terpolymers suitable for this microporous layer soluble in inert solvents may be comprised of other monomers in addition to (i) and (ii) above, such as (iii) hexafluropropylene, (iv) pentafluoroethoxytrifluoroethene, and (v) trifluoromethoxytrifluoroethene. Carbon fillers include the common carbon blacks such as BLACK PEARLS® and VULCAN®, heat treated carbon blacks such as VULCITE®, acetylene blacks such as SHAWINIGAN® black, and carbon fibers such as single wall or multiwall carbon nanotubes.
In one example, 20 grams of a suspension of TEFLON AF® 2400 (1 wt % in FC75) was ultrasonically mixed with 0.8 grams Of VULCAN® XC72 pellets and 32 grams of FC 3283 then diluted with 60 more grams of FC 3283. The resultant suspension was sprayed onto a commercial MEA at a loading of about 70 μg/cm2 with a common air brush and nitrogen propellant at 10 psig. The thickness of the coating was about 2 microns.
It is believed that when pressure is applied in the stack between the support layer 15 and the cathode catalyst layer 9, the carbon fibers and the catalyst layer structure “bite through” the soluble polymer of the film and catalyst layer coating, creating greater ionic and electric conductivity between the carbon of the support layer and the catalyst layer.
The suspension may be applied by spraying or rolling the suspension or by dipping the catalyst into the suspension.
The advantages of the present arrangement may be achieved by an alternative method in which a small amount of the suspension of soluble polymer and small carbon particles is applied through an outward face of the support substrate 14, 15 rendering the support substrate less hydrophilic than it had been, the spray reaching the outward surface of the catalyst layer creating the microporous layer and causing a bond between the catalyst layer and the support substrate.
In this case, the MEA 12 (
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/005161 | 4/22/2008 | WO | 00 | 9/14/2010 |