The technical field generally relates to training projectiles used in connection with rifled weapons, and more particularly relates to non-lethal, polymer marking projectiles.
Non-lethal, low-energy marking projectiles are often used in connection with small-caliber rifled weapons (e.g., pistols, rifles, submachine guns, and the like) to provide a realistic training experience. Such projectiles typically include a polymeric frontmost shell portion enclosing a semi-viscous color marking compound and a rear base portion that engages the shell portion. Engagement between the shell and base is typically provided via an interference fit or snap-fit. The shell portion is configured such that, during impact, the marking compound is expelled from the shell in a controlled manner, typically along pre-defined break lines.
Known polymer marking projectiles may be unsatisfactory in a number of respects. For example, sub-optimal storage of such projectiles—particularly projectiles utilizing water-based marking compounds—can result in significant moisture evaporation through the shell/base interface and consequently a reduction in viscosity and mass of the marking compound. This aging effect, which is exacerbated by high temperature and humidity conditions, is due in part to the difficulty in achieving an airtight seal between polymeric components, which are notoriously subject to high dimensional tolerances and various assembly constraints.
Premature aging in the form of moisture loss and marking compound phase change may result in a diminished marking effect and/or a non-uniform mass distribution, which itself can lead to a reduction in gyroscopic stability at the weapon muzzle. Furthermore, within any particular batch of marking projectiles, the moisture-loss may vary widely between individual projectiles. This results in an increased variation in projectile muzzle velocity and increased impact dispersion.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide improved polymer marking projectiles with improved shelf life and flight stability. Other desirable features and characteristics of the present invention will become apparent from the subsequent detailed description and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and the foregoing technical field and background.
A marking projectile in accordance with one embodiment is configured to be fired through the barrel of a firearm having rifling formed therein. The marking projectile includes a polymeric base portion configured to engage the rifling of the barrel and a polymeric front shell portion coupled to the base portion. The polymeric front shell portion has a cavity formed therein for housing a marking compound and a structure configured to deform on impact and thereby release the marking compound. The marking projectile also includes a metallic annular sealing component configured to seal the polymeric front shell portion to the polymeric base portion.
In accordance with one embodiment, a method is provided for forming a marking projectile configured to be fired through the barrel of a firearm having rifling formed therein. The method includes: forming a polymeric base portion configured to engage the rifling of the barrel; forming a polymeric front shell portion having a cavity formed therein and having a structure configured to deform on impact to expose the cavity; inserting a marking compound in the cavity; coupling the polymeric base portion to the polymeric front shell portion; and sealing the polymeric front shell portion to the polymeric base portion with a metallic annular sealing component.
In accordance with one embodiment, a marking projectile is configured to be fired through the barrel of a firearm having rifling formed therein. The marking projectile includes polymeric base portion configured to engage the rifling of the barrel, and a polymeric front shell portion coupled to the base portion such that the base portion and the front shell portion partially overlap axially. The polymeric front shell portion has a cavity formed therein for housing a marking compound and a structure configured to deform on impact and thereby release the marking compound. The marking projectile also includes a crimped metal ring configured to seal the polymeric front shell portion to the polymeric base portion by applying a radial compressive force thereto. The crimped metal ring has an uncrimped portion co-molded to the polymeric base portion, and a crimped portion applying radial compression to the outer surface of the polymeric front shell portion.
The exemplary embodiments will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the following drawing figures, wherein like numerals denote like elements, and wherein:
In general, the subject matter described herein relates to an improved, non-lethal, polymeric marking projectile that incorporates a metallic annular seal (e.g., via a crimped ring) that significantly improves shelf-life while at the same time increasing projectile stability. In that regard, the following detailed description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the application and uses. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any expressed or implied theory presented in the preceding technical field, background, brief summary or the following detailed description. It will be understood that the drawing figures are not necessarily drawn to scale and may be referred to herein, without loss of generality, as “isometric” (as opposed to “perspective”) drawings even when such drawings are not strictly isometric, but are otherwise axonometric as is known in the art. The nature and operation of conventional ammunition and firearms, particularly rifled firearms, are well known and need not be described in detail herein.
Referring now to the isometric exterior view of
As a threshold matter, the term “marking projectile” as used herein refers to the class of non-lethal practice ammunition characterized by its relatively low mass (and thus low energy), and its ability to provide some visual indication of its point of impact, typically through the release of some form of marking compound through a frangible frontmost portion. The various embodiments described herein relate to a “polymer” or “polymeric” marking projectile—i.e., a projectile that is at least partially fabricated using a polymeric plastic material.
Referring now to
As shown in
Marking projectile 100 further includes a rearward cavity 304 configured to, inter alia, receive an expulsion force produced via ignition of a propellant. That is, marking projectile 100 is configured to be incorporated into a cartridge of the type commonly used in connection with firearms, as is known in the art. In the interest in clarity, such cartridge components are not illustrated in the drawings.
Annular seal 103 may be implemented using a variety of structures and materials configured to secure shell portion 102 to base portion 101. For example, a ring like structure (region 203 in
The axial length of sealing component 103 may be selected to achieve the desired level of projectile stability in light of other trade-offs. In one embodiment, for example, sealing component 103 has an axial length (as seen in
Sealing component 103 may be fabricated from a variety of materials, but is generally a sufficiently malleable metallic that provides the desired level of radial crimping force, which may vary depending upon the size and shape of the marking projectile. As used herein, the term “malleable” refers to the extent to which a material deforms plastically in response to compressive stress without fracture. In one embodiment, sealing component 103 comprises a copper alloy having at least about a 50% copper content, for example, at least about a 65% copper content, and as a further example, at least about an 85% copper content. In addition, other metallic alloys may be used, including without limitation, steel, iron, tin, aluminum, gold, silver, platinum, tungsten, titanium, zinc, sintered metal, and the like.
One advantage of including sealing component 103, in addition to its ability to seal together base portion 101 and shell portion 102, is that its relatively high-mass annular shape increases the gyroscopic stability of marking projectile 100. In one embodiment, for example, the gyroscopic stability of marking projectile 100 at the weapon muzzle is greater than about 1.3 times (preferably about 2.0 times in a 5.56 caliber projectile embodiment) that of a reference marking projectile—i.e., a projectile that only includes base portion 101, shell portion 102, and marking compound 302.
As crimped, sealing component 103 generally has an outer diameter (region 203) that is lower than the outer diameter of both shell portion 102 and base portion 101. This prevents potentially scratching targets, such as protective mask lenses, car paint, and the like. It also prevents sealing component 103 from engaging the rifling of the barrel.
In the illustrated embodiment, base portion 101 includes a stepped circumferential driving band region (region 202 in
Front shell portion 102 includes at least one circumferential guiding band region (regions 204 and 206 in
As mentioned previously, shell portion 102 includes one or more structural details configured to allow marking projectile 100 to deform on impact and thereby release the marking compound held within. In some embodiments, shell portion 102 includes a number of longitudinal grooves 112 and 110 (regions 205 and 207 of
A variety of polymeric materials and manufacturing techniques may be used for forming the base portion 101 and shell portion 102. As base portion 101 will generally not deform significantly during impact, it may be fabricated with a polymeric material that is different from (and heavier than) that used for fabrication of shell portion 102. Suitable polymeric materials include, without limitation, Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), acetal, Nylon, polycarbonate, polyethylene, polypropylene, Polyvinylchloride (PVC), and Teflon. The selected polymer preferably exhibits a low permeability to aide in minimizing moisture transfer through the thin-walled projectile shell body.
The various structural details of shell portion 102 generally allow shell portion 102 to “mushroom” (e.g., deform to form a generally mushroom shape) and thereby absorb impact energy and releases the marking compound in a particularly desirable pattern. In this regard,
More particularly,
A variety of manufacturing and assembly methods may be employed to produce a marking projectile 100 as described above. In that regard,
In some embodiments, sealing component 103 and base portion 101 are manufactured as separate components. In other embodiments, however, sealing component 103 may be “co-molded” with base portion 101, thereby simplifying assembly.
In one embodiment, base portion 101, shell portion 102, marking compound 302, and sealing component 103 together form a 5.56 mm projectile having a mass between about 0.25 and about 0.50 grams. Other projectile calibers that could benefit from the disclosed subject matter include, without limitation, 0.380 Auto, 0.40 caliber S&W, 7.62 mm NATO, and 9 mm Para. Such projectiles might have mass values of up to 0.75 g.
While at least one exemplary embodiment has been presented in the foregoing detailed description, it should be appreciated that a vast number of variations exist. It should also be appreciated that the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments are only examples, and are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the disclosure in any way. Rather, the foregoing detailed description will provide those skilled in the art with a convenient road map for implementing the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments. It should be understood that various changes can be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the scope of the disclosure as set forth in the appended claims and the legal equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3645208 | Weinssen et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3732821 | Royer | May 1973 | A |
3983817 | Tucker | Oct 1976 | A |
H000114 | Quintavalle | Aug 1986 | H |
4603637 | Snide et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4873416 | Boeder | Oct 1989 | A |
5035183 | Luxton | Jul 1991 | A |
5081931 | Frye et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5359937 | Dittrich | Nov 1994 | A |
6401622 | Brinkmann | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412419 | Brinkmann | Jul 2002 | B1 |
7331293 | Saxby | Feb 2008 | B2 |
8286557 | Endicott et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8327767 | Lafortune | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8485102 | Carlson et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20050284325 | Saxby | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060032393 | Haeselich | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070289475 | Kapeles | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080053330 | Haeselich | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20110048270 | Gustavsson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110079164 | Broden et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110155016 | Marx | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110259232 | Marx | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120067242 | Shin et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120192751 | Lafortune | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140026778 | Saxby | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140318402 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2013082557 | Jun 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Canadian International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CA2015/050302, mailed Jul. 8, 2015. |