The invention relates to a transducer comprising a laminate with a film of a dielectric polymer material arranged between first and second layers of an electrically conductive material. A conductor facilitates application of an electrical potential between the first and second layers, and due to the electrical field which may arise, the polymer material is deformed by the first and second layers when they are moved to or from each other.
An electrical potential difference between two electrodes located on opposite surfaces of an elastomeric body generates an electric field leading to a force of attraction. As a result, the distance between the electrodes changes and the change leads to compression of the elastomeric material which is thereby deformed. Such structures can be used for making transducers for various purposes. When implemented as actuators they are sometimes referred to as “artificial muscles” due to certain similarities with a muscle. They can also be used as sensors for sensing strain, deflection, temperature variation, pressure etc., or they can be used as generators for converting mechanical energy to electrical, sometimes referred to as energy harvesting. Herein we will generally refer to these structures as transducers or polymer transducers.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,376,971 discloses a compliant electrode which is positioned in contact with a polymer in such a way, that when applying a potential difference across the electrodes, the electric field arising between the electrodes contracts the electrodes against each other, thereby deflecting the polymer.
Due to the deformation of the polymer, the electrodes move, and the connector which connects the electrode to a power source must constantly follow the movement of the electrode. Typically, the connector is made sufficiently long to avoid that the electrode constitutes a constraint for the free movement of the polymer and thus reduces the efficiency of the device. Evidently, the long connectors may get entangled or be in the way. Furthermore, fatigue may be experienced over time whereby the conductance of the connector is reduced or the connector may fail completely. Finally, it is generally difficult to provide an even distribution of an electrical field in a very thin electrode. Normally, the resistance in the electrode is high, and the resistance may increase depending on the degree of expansion of the polymer.
Additionally, traditional connectors are typically only attached to the electrode at an end point of the connector, i.e. at a single point of attachment, since otherwise the connector would again limit the movement of the electrode and thus the elastic deformation of the polymer. Due to this single-point attachment, it may be difficult to obtain an even distribution of the electrical field in the typically very thin electrodes.
It is an object of embodiments of the invention to provide a transducer, a connector for a transducer, and a method of making a transducer to potentially improve the performance and reduce the above mentioned drawbacks of the existing connectors. Particularly, it may be seen as objects of embodiments to improve the conductivity to and from the electrodes, to improve the distribution in the electrodes and to improve the lifetime of transducers.
According to a first aspect, the invention provides a transducer comprising conductors and a laminate, the laminate comprising a film of a dielectric polymer material arranged between first and second electrodes, and each electrode being in electrically conductive communication with at least one of the conductors to facilitate an electrical potential between the electrodes and thereby enable deflection of the polymer material in response to an electrical field, wherein at least one of the conductors is an elastically deformable conductor comprising a compliant core which is electrically conductive, the core being enclosed in a containment having elastomeric properties.
Since the core is made from a compliant and conductive material, the invention provides connectivity with a connector which can be elastically deformable to match the elastic deformability of the film, and the risk of fatigue is reduced or completely avoided at least with regard to the conductive core. Accordingly, the connector may follow the movement of the electrode without limiting the movement of the film.
By conductive is herein meant that it can conduct an electrical current, e.g. having an ohmic resistivity below 10−4 Ω·cm, such as a resistivity in the range of that of aluminum, copper, silver, or alloys containing such metals.
The dielectric material of the film may be a polymer, e.g. an elastomer, such as a silicone elastomer, such as a weak adhesive silicone. A suitable elastomer is Elastosil RT 625, manufactured by Wacker-Chemie. Alternatively, Elastosil RT 622 or Elastosil RT 601, also manufactured by Wacker-Chemie may be used. As an alternative, other kinds of polymers may be chosen.
In the case that a dielectric material which is not an elastomer is used, it should be noted that the dielectric material should have elastomer-like properties, e.g. in terms of elasticity. Thus, the dielectric material should be deformable to such an extent that the composite is capable of deflecting and thereby pushing and/or pulling due to deformations of the dielectric material. The electrodes may have a thickness in the range of 0.01-0.1 μm, and the film may have a thickness between 10 μm and 200 μm, such as between 20 μm and 150 μm, such as between 30 μm and 100 μm, such as between 40 μm and 80 μm.
The electrodes may have a resistivity which is less than 10−4 Ω·cm. By providing an electrode having a very low resistivity the total resistance of the electrodes will not become excessive, even if very long electrodes are used.
The electrodes may be made from a metal or an electrically conductive alloy, e.g. from a metal selected from a group consisting of metals, such as silver, gold, and nickel. Alternatively other suitable metals or electrically conductive alloys may be chosen. The electrodes may be applied to the dielectric film using standard commercial physical vapour deposition (PVD) techniques.
The dielectric material of the film may have a resistivity which is larger than 1010 Ω·cm. Preferably, the resistivity of the dielectric material is much higher than the resistivity of the electrodes, preferably at least 1014-1018 times higher.
The containment may be made from an elastomer, or from a material having elastomeric properties, i.e. a material having characteristics similar to an elastomer with regard to electrical conductivity and elasticity.
The compliant core may comprise fluid, grease, gel, elastomer, powder, pasta, or mixtures hereof, such as a metal powder in a gel.
The laminate may comprise a film of a dielectric material having a first surface and second surface, at least the first surface comprising a surface pattern of raised and depressed surface portions. A first electrically conductive layer is deposited onto the surface pattern and forms an electrode thereon. To enable elongation of the composite in one well defined direction, i.e. to provide compliance, the electrode has a corrugated shape which renders the length of the electrically conductive layer in a lengthwise direction, longer than the length of the laminate as such in the lengthwise direction. The corrugated shape of the electrode thereby facilitates that the laminate can be stretched in the lengthwise direction without having to stretch the electrode in that direction, but merely by evening out the corrugated shape of the electrode. The corrugated shape of the electrode may be a replica of the surface pattern of the film.
Since the electrode is deposited onto the surface pattern of the film and is formed by the shape thereof, a very precise shape of the corrugation of the electrode can be defined, and an improved compliance towards deformation in a specific direction can be provided by a suitable design of the surface pattern on the film. Accordingly, the laminate can facilitate increased actuation forces, or in general an increased rate of conversion between mechanical and electrical energies, increased lifetime and improved reaction time when the laminate is used in a transducer.
The compliance of the laminate in the compliant direction may be at least 50 times larger than its compliance in the non-compliant direction, i.e. perpendicularly to the compliant direction.
In one embodiment, the laminate may comprise a multilayer composite e.g. by arranging films each with at least one electrode in a stack and by applying an electrical potential difference between each adjacent electrodes in the stack so that the layers are biased towards each other while they are simultaneously flattened out. Due to the properties of the film, this may bond the layers together. As an alternative or in addition, the layers may be bonded by an adhesive arranged between each layer. The adhesive should preferably be selected not to dampen the compliance of the multilayer structure. Accordingly, it may be preferred to select the same material for the film and adhesive, or at least to select an adhesive with a modulus of elasticity being less than the modulus of elasticity of the film.
The composite layers in the multilayer composite should preferably be identical to ensure a homogeneous deformation of the multilayer composite throughout all layers, when an electrical field is applied. Furthermore, it may be an advantage to provide the corrugated pattern of each layer either in such a way that wave crests of one layer are adjacent to wave crests of the adjacent layer or in such a way that wave crests of one layer are adjacent to troughs of the adjacent layer.
The containment may be conductive and may separate the compliant core from the electrode to enable conduction from the core through the containment to the electrode, whereby the containment may be able to protect and retain the core, while at the same time enabling conduction from the core to the electrode.
The conductor may be formed as an elongated body like a tradition wire. In another embodiment, the conductor may be formed as a pouch being circular, oval, or of another shape suitable for establishing the electrically communication with one of the electrodes.
In one embodiment, the laminate may be arranged in a spiral configuration and may thereby form a roll with a body extending axially between two end faces. Thus, a very long length of the laminate may thereby be in a more compressed form, while at the same time having a multi-layer composite.
The electrodes may have anisotropic stretchability, or anisotropic compliance. The anisotropic compliance/stretchability may be caused by the electrodes which may be formed at a wave shaped surface pattern. This surface pattern may create an electrode with a length in one direction being substantially longer than the length of the laminate as such, and the laminate can therefore be stretched in one direction without stretching the electrode. This provides the compliance in this direction, i.e. the anisotropic stretchability. Conversely, the lack of compliance in other directions can also be provided by the same electrode because it is substantially less elastically deformable than the film. The ratio between a modulus of elasticity of the electrode and a modulus of elasticity of the film may be larger than 200.
A laminate may in one embodiment be rolled relative to the anisotropic stretchability such that an electrical field causes radial expansion or contraction of the roll.
To facilitate conductive communication between the conductor and the electrode, the containment may be formed about a contacted one of the end faces. In one embodiment, the first and second electrodes may each contact a containment at an end face of the roll thereby enabling radial expansion or contraction of the roll in response to an electrical field, i.e. an electrical potential between the two end faces of the roll.
The laminate may be formed so that the one of the electrodes is formed to an edge of the film such that the electrode extends to the contacted end face, such that an outer surface of the containment may be located in plane with the end face and be in electrical contact with the electrode which is terminated at that end face.
The other electrode may on the contrary be formed to an edge of the film in the opposite direction such that this electrode extends to the other contacted end face, thereby facilitating contact between the other electrode and the other conductor. Thereby the two electrodes do only extend to one edge of the film, i.e. to opposite edges so that each of the electrodes is contact with only one conductor. At a middle portion of the film, an overlapping portion of the electrodes exist where the film can be deformed between the electrodes.
To facilitate contact between an electrode and a conductor, the compliant core may be in direct contact with a surface of one of the first and second electrodes. This may be facilitated by providing an aperture in the containment, the aperture being arranged at the contacted end face of the roll.
In another embodiment, the laminate may be rolled perpendicular to the anisotropic stretchability, whereby an electrical field causes a lengthwise expansion or contraction of the roll.
In yet another embodiment, a laminate may be folded along the length of the laminate to have a multi-layer composite with a reduced length.
The conductance, G (I/V), of the containment may be in the range of 1-50 pct. of the conductance, G, of the compliant core.
The elastic elongation of the containment may be in the range of 10-200 pct. of the elastic elongation of the film. By ‘elastic elongation’ is herein meant, the percentage elongation which can be reached without permanently deforming the polymer material.
In one embodiment, the containment and the film may comprise an identical polymer material.
The compliant core may comprise a metal which is liquid at room temperature. The conductor may thus be manufactured at a lower temperature where the metal is solid to facilitate positioning of the containment so that it encloses the core. Subsequently, the conductor may be arranged at room temperature, whereby the core becomes liquid.
Additionally, the compliant core may comprise a material selected from the group consisting of: aluminum, copper, nickel, silver, carbon, mercury, and combinations hereof. As mentioned above, the core may comprise fluid, grease, gel, elastomer, powder, pasta, or mixtures hereof, such as a metal powder in a gel, or a conductive carbon powder.
Furthermore, the compliant core may comprise an amorphous alloy, i.e. a non-crystalline alloy. These alloys may contain atoms of significantly different sizes, leading to low free volume in liquid state. Furthermore, these alloys soften and flow upon heating.
In one embodiment, the containment may be tubular with an inner lumen extending in an axial direction.
The cross-section of the containment may change along the axial direction. As an example, the cross-section may be substantially circular with an increasing and decreasing area, the outer surface being wave shaped. This may have the advantage, that the containment can be elongated without reducing the cross-sectional area of the inner lumen at the positions it is thinnest. When the conductor is stretched, the containment deforms by reduction of the cross-sectional area at the positions where the containment is thickest so that the cross-sectional area at these positions may be decreased.
It should be understood, that the cross-sectional area may be of any shape, i.e. the containment may have a non-circular cross-section perpendicular to the axial direction.
To reduce the risk of leakage from the containment, if the containment should break or in any other way be damaged, the containment may form a plurality of compartments, each compartment enclosing a compliant core. Thereby it may be ensured, that only the compliant core or parts hereof from a single compartment is leaked in case of damage of the containment.
To facilitate that the deformable conductor is current-carrying through out the total length, each compliant core may be in electrical communication with an adjacent compliant core by the conductivity of the containment.
Furthermore, the containment may contain only the compliant core, e.g. by ensuring that the containment does not contain air bubbles or the like, as such bubbles may hinder or reduce current-carrying along the length of the conductor. Bubbles may especially be a problem during expansion of the conductor, as the cross-sectional area hereof may be decreased during the expansion.
Electrical communication through out the length of the conductor may also be facilitated by choosing a compliant core which comprises an incompressible medium, such as a liquid or a powder, as the incompressible medium may extend along the full length of the conductor also during expansion hereof.
The transducer may furthermore comprise a control system which is capable of determining an electrical characteristic of the conductor and to determine therefrom, a degree of elongation of the conductor. The electrical characteristic may as an example be resistance, capacitance, inductance, or a combination hereof.
In one embodiment of a transducer, at least one of the conductors may be in electrically conductive communication with one of the electrodes substantially along a compliant direction to enable deflection of the polymer material in response to an electrical field. Thus, the conductor itself may be expanded and contracted together with the laminate. The conductor may be in electrically conductive communication along the compliant direction when being positioned parallel to the compliant direction and being positioned within +/−45 degrees to compliant direction.
The laminate may be rolled along the compliant direction to form a roll such that an electrical field causes radial expansion or contraction of the roll. If the transducer comprises at least one of the conductors in electrically conductive communication with one of the electrodes substantially along a compliant direction, it may thereby be ensured that the conductor does not restrict the movement of the roll, as the elastically deformable conductor may expand and contract together with the laminate.
To enable an electrical potential between the electrodes, the conductor may be connected to a traditional wire. As such a traditional wire is stiff compared to the elastically deformable conductor, stress may occur about the joint due to the concentration of tension. Such stress may weaken the joint.
The conductor may comprise at least two different portions facilitating functions and having different elastic properties. Herein these two portions are referred to as a primary portion and a transition portion. The transition portion may facilitate connection of the elastically deformable conductor to a traditional non-elastically deformable wire, and the transition zone may be less elastically deformable than the primary portion. The primary portion of the conductor should be understood as the portion of the conductor being adhesively and/or electrically coupled to one of the electrodes. It should further be understood, that primary is not related to size, as the primary portion of the conductor in some embodiments may be larger than the transition zone and in other embodiments may be smaller than the transition zone.
If the conductor is formed as an elongated body, the transition zone may be formed as an extension hereto. Furthermore, a conductor being pouch formed, e.g. having a circular shape, may comprise a transition zone formed as a flange along the circumference or a part hereof of the conductor.
According to a second aspect, the invention provides a conductor comprising a conductive compliant core enclosed in an elongated containment made from an elastomer, wherein the elastomer is conductive.
It should be understood, that the conductor according to the second embodiment of the invention may comprise any of the features mention above in connection with the first embodiment of the invention, as these features may also be applicable to the conductor of the second aspect of the invention.
According to a third aspect, the invention provides a method of making a conductor for an electroactive polymer transducer, the method comprising the steps of:
It should be understood, that the features of the first and second aspect of the invention may also be applicable to the method according the third aspect of the invention.
Embodiments of the invention will now be further described with reference to the drawings, in which:
a and 1b illustrate an example of a laminate,
a and 2b illustrate an example of a conductor connected to a laminate,
a and 3b illustrate an example of a conductor connected to a laminate,
a and 4b illustrate a transducer comprising a conductor connected to a laminate according to the invention,
a and 5b illustrate two different configurations of a rolled laminate,
a-6d illustrate different embodiments of transducer,
a-7d illustrate the transducers of
a and 8b illustrate a transducer comprising a conductor connected to a rolled laminate,
a-14c illustrate a conductor.
It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the detailed description.
a and 1b illustrate a laminate 1 comprising a film 2 of a dielectric polymer material arranged between first and second electrodes 3, 4. In
The laminate 1 comprises a film 2 made of a dielectric material having an upper and lower surface provided with a pattern of raised and depressed surface portions, thereby forming a designed corrugated profile of the surface. An electrically conductive layer has been applied to the upper and lower surface, the electrically conductive material being deposited so that the electrically conductive layer is formed according to the pattern of raised and depressed surface portions, thereby forming a first and second electrode 3, 4 on opposite sides of the film 2. In terms of everyday physical things, the film 2 resembles in some aspects household wrapping film. It has a similar thickness and is comparably pliable and soft. However, it is more elastic than such a film, and has a marked mechanical anisotropy as will be explained in the following.
The dielectric material may be an elastomer or another material having similar characteristics.
Due to the pattern of raised and depressed surface portions, the electrodes 3, 4 may even out as the film 2 expands, and recover its original shape as the film 2 contracts along the direction defined by the arrow 5 without causing damage to the electrodes 3, 4, this direction thereby defining a direction of compliance. Accordingly, the laminate 1 is adapted to form part of a compliant structure capable of withstanding large strains.
As described above, the corrugated surface profile is directly impressed or moulded into the dielectric film 2, before the electrically conductive layer is deposited. The corrugation allows the manufacturing of a compliant composite using electrode materials of high elastic modulii, e.g. metal electrode. This can be obtained without having to apply pre-stretch or pre-strain to the dielectric film 2 while applying the electrically conductive layer, i.e. the electrodes 3, 4, and the corrugated profile of the finished composite 1 does not depend on strain in the dielectric film 2, nor on the elasticity or other characteristics of the electrodes 3, 4. Accordingly, the corrugation profile is replicated over substantially the entire upper and lower surfaces of the film 2 in a consistent manner, and it is possible to control this replication. Furthermore, this approach provides the possibility of using standard replication and reel-to-reel coating, thereby making the process suitable for large-scale production. For instance, the electrodes 3, 4 may be applied to the upper and lower surfaces of the dielectric film 2 using standard commercial physical vapour deposition (PVD) techniques. An advantage of this approach is that the anisotropy is determined by design, and that the actual anisotropy is obtained as a consequence of characteristics of the corrugated profile which is provided on the surfaces of the film 2 and the electrodes 3, 4 which follow the corrugated profile.
The laminate 1 shown in
a and 2b illustrate conductors 7a, 7b connected to a laminate 1, the conductors 7 being in electrically conductive communication with the electrodes 3, 4 to facilitate an electrical potential between the electrodes and thereby enable deflection of the film 2 in response to an electrical field. The conductors 7 are connected to the film in the direction where the laminate is constraint, i.e. perpendicular to the compliant direction illustrated by the arrow 5. Consequently, the conductors 7 are typically made of a stiff material, such as aluminum alloys, cupper foils, and the like. However, a drawback of this connection is that the resistance along the compliance direction may become too high, especially when the laminate it long.
a and 3b illustrate conductors 7a, 7b connected to a laminate 1, the conductors 7 being in electrically conductive communication with the electrodes 3, 4 to facilitate an electrical potential between the electrodes and thereby enable deflection of the film 2 in response to an electrical field. The conductors 7 are connected to the laminate 1 in the direction where the laminate is compliant (indicated by the arrow 5). Consequently, the conductors 7 have to be stretchable to be able to follow the deflection of the film 2 in the lengthwise direction, i.e. along the compliance length, when an electrical potential between the electrodes 3, 4 causes the deflection. Typically, the conductors 7 are made from a soft, stretchable conductive polymer having a resistance, resulting in a high resistance of the system even though the resistance of the electrodes is very low.
a and 4b illustrate a transducer 8 comprising conductors 7a, 7b connected to a laminate 1 according to the invention. The conductors 7 are in electrically conductive communication with the electrodes 3, 4 to facilitate an electrical potential between the electrodes and thereby enable deflection of the film 2 in response to an electrical field. The conductors 7 are connected to the laminate 1 in the direction where the laminate is compliant (indicated by arrow 5). In order to obtain stretchable conductors 7 being able to carry the current into the electrode along the length of the laminate, the conductors 7 comprise a conductive compliant core 9 enclosed in a containment 10 having elastomeric properties. Even though the containment 10 is made from an elastomer with a high resistance, the resulting resistance of the conductors 7 are low due to the low thickness of the containment 10 in combination with the conductive core 9 having a low resistance. The core may be made of a fluid or powder, e.g. of carbon powder or a metal powder in a gel. Thus, the containment 10 may encapsulate the compliant core 9.
Thus, the system may be designed to have a substantially constant resistance during stretching of the laminate, as the resistance of the core increases due to the stretching and as the resistance of the containment is reduced when the containment is stretched.
a and 5b illustrate two different configurations of a rolled laminate 1. In
a-6d illustrate different embodiments of transducer 8, in which the transducer 8a is the most simple one. The transducers 8a-8d all comprise a rolled laminate 1 and conductors 7. Only one conductor 7 is illustrated in the figures, as the other conductor is in electrical conductive communication with an electrode at the other end of the rolled laminate. Only one of the electrodes 3, 4 is illustrated in the figures as only the first electrode 3 is formed to an edge of the film 2 such that the electrode 3 extends to the contacted end face of the rolled laminate, such that an outer surface of the containment 10 (not shown) is located in plane with the end face and is in electrical contact with the electrode 3 being terminated at that end face.
The other electrode 4 (not shown) is on the contrary formed to an edge of the film 2 in the opposite direction such that this electrode extends to the other contacted end face, thereby facilitating contact between the other electrode 4 and the other conductor (not shown). Thereby the two electrodes 3, 4 do only extend to one edge of the film, i.e. to opposite edges so that each of the electrodes 3, 4 is contact with only one conductor 7. At a middle portion of the film 2, an overlapping portion of the electrodes exists where the film 2 can be deformed between the electrodes 3, 4.
The transducer 8a comprises a conductive core 9 with conductance G, and a rolled laminate 1 comprising a film 2 and an electrode 3.
In
In
a-7d illustrate the transducers 8a-8b of
b illustrates a transducer 8 comprising a conductor 7 connected to a rolled laminate 1.
As illustrated, the laminate is rolled relative to the anisotropic stretchability illustrated by the thin lines such that an electrical field causes radial expansion or contraction of the roll as indicated by the arrows 5. Due to the elastically deformable the conductor 7, it can be ensured that the conductor 7 does not restrict the movement of the roll, as the conductor 7 expands and contracts together with the rolled laminate 1.
In order to enable an electrical potential between the electrodes, the conductor 7 is connected to a traditional wire 14 via a joint 15.
In order to enable an electrical potential between the electrodes, the conductor 7 is connected to a traditional wire 14 via a joint 15.
As such a traditional wire 14 is stiff compared to the elastically deformable conductor 7, stress may occur about the joint due to the concentration of tension. Such stress may weaken the joint.
The conductor 7 therefore comprises two different portions, a primary portion 7′ and a transition portion 16. The transition portion 16 facilitates connection of the elastically deformable conductor 7 to the traditional non-elastically deformable wire 14. The transition zone 16 is less elastically deformable than the primary portion 7′. The primary portion 7′ of the conductor is the portion of the conductor 7 being adhesively and/or electrically coupled to one of the electrodes (not shown).
In
a-14c illustrate a conductor 7.
In
While the present invention has been illustrated and described with respect to a particular embodiment thereof, it should be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that various modifications to this invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2130532 | Bailey | Sep 1938 | A |
2716708 | Bradfield | Aug 1955 | A |
3109202 | Beckadolph et al. | Nov 1963 | A |
3138962 | Haines, Jr. et al. | Jun 1964 | A |
3544733 | Reylek et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3565195 | Miller et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3753294 | Attali et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3831629 | Mackal et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3875481 | Miller et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3898585 | Heidrich et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3898722 | Foote | Aug 1975 | A |
3912830 | Murayama et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4259607 | Noguchi et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4266263 | Haberl et al. | May 1981 | A |
4322877 | Taylor | Apr 1982 | A |
4330730 | Kurz et al. | May 1982 | A |
4370697 | Haberl et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4376302 | Miller | Mar 1983 | A |
4384394 | Lemonon et al. | May 1983 | A |
4386386 | Akita | May 1983 | A |
4431882 | Frame | Feb 1984 | A |
4494409 | Kondo et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4549093 | Severwright | Oct 1985 | A |
4584625 | Kellogg | Apr 1986 | A |
4634917 | Dvorsky et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4640137 | Trull et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4654546 | Kirjavainen | Mar 1987 | A |
4654834 | Dorr | Mar 1987 | A |
4731694 | Grabner et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4786837 | Kalnin et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4825116 | Itoh et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4829812 | Parks et al. | May 1989 | A |
4836033 | Seitz | Jun 1989 | A |
4852443 | Duncan et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4866412 | Rzepczynski | Sep 1989 | A |
4879698 | Langberg | Nov 1989 | A |
4986136 | Brunner et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5016008 | Gruaz et al. | May 1991 | A |
5028876 | Cadwell | Jul 1991 | A |
5048536 | McEwen | Sep 1991 | A |
5060527 | Burgess | Oct 1991 | A |
5090246 | Colla et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5090248 | Cimmino et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5115680 | Lew | May 1992 | A |
5172024 | Broussoux et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5173162 | Hagimura et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5225959 | Stearns | Jul 1993 | A |
5255972 | Shirasu | Oct 1993 | A |
5259099 | Banno et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5300813 | Joshi et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5319153 | Fishman | Jun 1994 | A |
5321332 | Toda | Jun 1994 | A |
5325012 | Sato et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5341062 | Cero, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5410210 | Sato et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5425275 | Lockshaw | Jun 1995 | A |
5447076 | Ziegler | Sep 1995 | A |
5449002 | Goldman | Sep 1995 | A |
5494090 | Kejha | Feb 1996 | A |
5515341 | Toda et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520630 | Daneshvar | May 1996 | A |
5528452 | Ko | Jun 1996 | A |
5547508 | Affinito | Aug 1996 | A |
5548564 | Smith | Aug 1996 | A |
5556700 | Kaneto et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559387 | Beurrier | Sep 1996 | A |
5642015 | Whitehead et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5755090 | Hu | May 1998 | A |
5755909 | Gailus | May 1998 | A |
5760530 | Kolesar | Jun 1998 | A |
5817099 | Skolik et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841143 | Tuma et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5888646 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891065 | Cariapa et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5977685 | Kurita et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997465 | Savage et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008580 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008582 | Asano et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008583 | Breuer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6108175 | Hawwa et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123681 | Brown, III | Sep 2000 | A |
RE37065 | Grahn | Feb 2001 | E |
6208065 | Ueyama | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210514 | Cheung et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216495 | Couzan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6255758 | Cabuz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282956 | Okada | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6343129 | Pelrine et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6362559 | Boyd | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6376971 | Pelrine et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411015 | Toda | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6437489 | Shinke et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6511709 | Barnes et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6543110 | Pelrine et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6545384 | Pelrine et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6545395 | Matsui et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558577 | Niihara et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6581481 | Perusek | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583533 | Pelrine et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6586859 | Kornbluh et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6628040 | Pelrine et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6662658 | Foote | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664718 | Pelrine et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6700304 | Fuller et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6700312 | Iizuka et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6707236 | Pelrine et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6759769 | Kirjavainen | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768246 | Pelrine et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6781284 | Pelrine et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6806621 | Heim et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809462 | Pelrine et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812624 | Pei et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6876135 | Pelrine et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882086 | Kornbluh et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891317 | Pei et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6911764 | Pelrine et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6940211 | Pelrine et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7034432 | Pelrine et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7049732 | Pei et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7064472 | Pelrine et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7104146 | Benslimane et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7198832 | Burrows et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7211937 | Kornbluh et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7518284 | Benslimane et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7548015 | Benslimane et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7573064 | Benslimane et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7732999 | Clausen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7808163 | Benslimane et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7843111 | Benslimane et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7880371 | Benslimane et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8421316 | Tryson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20010026165 | Pelrine et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010035723 | Pelrine et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020008445 | Pelrine et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020041017 | Hauser et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020050768 | Beck et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020130673 | Pelrine et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020175594 | Kornbluh et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175598 | Heim et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020185937 | Heim et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006669 | Pei et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030066741 | Burgess et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067245 | Pelrine et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030125781 | Dohno et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141473 | Pelrine et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141787 | Pelrine et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030213960 | Kitagawa et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214199 | Heim et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008853 | Pelrine et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012301 | Benslimane et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040056567 | Menzel | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068220 | Couvillon, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040124738 | Pelrine et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040217671 | Rosenthal et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232807 | Pelrine et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040263028 | Pei et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050040736 | Topliss et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046313 | Basheer et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050089673 | Fleming et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050104145 | Benslimane et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113892 | Sproul | May 2005 | A1 |
20050157893 | Pelrine et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060016275 | Gravesen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060066183 | Benslimand et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079824 | Munch-Fals et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060113878 | Pei et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060113880 | Pei et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060119225 | Heim et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155197 | Kishimoto et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060158065 | Pelrine et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070114885 | Benslimane et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116858 | Benslimane et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070128059 | Bagwell | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070269585 | Benslimane et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277356 | Benslimand et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080038860 | Benslimane et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080093954 | Benslimand et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080226878 | Benslimane et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080238258 | Ishiguro et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080265709 | Clausen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090000597 | Kronberger | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090064476 | Cross et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090072658 | Benslimane et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090130423 | Keady | May 2009 | A1 |
20090154053 | Biggs et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090169829 | Benslimane et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090239039 | Benslimane et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090273483 | Tompkins et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20110018400 | Kato et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110116858 | Burrowes | May 2011 | A1 |
20110210344 | Han et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110232744 | Larsen et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120003427 | Kuroda et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130207510 | Poole et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130208397 | Benslimane | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
30 23 218 | Feb 1982 | DE |
38 41 243 | Jun 1990 | DE |
198 26 391 | Dec 1999 | DE |
200 04 248 | Jul 2000 | DE |
100 54 247 | May 2002 | DE |
0 387 180 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0 421 368 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0 468 796 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 761 188 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0 855 307 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1 323 925 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1 324 403 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1 481 738 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 748 190 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1 919 072 | May 2008 | EP |
2 136 419 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2 309 833 | Nov 1976 | FR |
2 042 256 | Sep 1980 | GB |
55-42474 | Mar 1980 | JP |
55-91299 | Jul 1980 | JP |
61-138651 | Jun 1986 | JP |
1-273372 | Nov 1989 | JP |
04-014448 | Jan 1992 | JP |
2001286162 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002237625 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2005-117103 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2007-11206 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2008-205180 | Sep 2008 | JP |
90-1465 | Mar 1990 | KR |
9634701 | Nov 1996 | WO |
9727822 | Aug 1997 | WO |
0066970 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0106575 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0106579 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0158973 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0159852 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0163738 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0165615 | Sep 2001 | WO |
02037660 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2004079832 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005079187 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005081676 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006012826 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2008052559 | May 2008 | WO |
2008063590 | May 2008 | WO |
2008 156166 | Dec 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Shankar et al., “Mechanical and actuation behavior of electroactive nanostructured polymers”, Sensors and Actuators A (2009) pp. 46-52, vol. 151, nr. 1. |
Danish Search Report for PA 2012 00118 dated Sep. 14, 2012. |
International Search Report for PCT Serial No. PCT/DK2013/000014 dated May 14, 2013. |
Soo-Lim Chua et al. “Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNT) as Compliant Electrodes for Dielectric Elastomer Actuators” vol. 7976, Mar. 24, 2011 p. 79760V, XP055062885; ISSN: 0277-786X, DOI 10.1117/12.880486. |
PCT Search Report for Serial No. PCT/DK03/00603 dated Feb. 5, 2004. |
PCT Search Report for Serial No. PCT/DK03/00848 dated Mar. 25, 2004. |
PCT Search Report for Serial No. PCT/DK2009/000098 dated Jul. 3, 2009. |
PCT Search Report for Serial No. PCT/DK2009/000097 dated Aug. 7, 2009. |
PCT Search Report for Serial No. PCT/DK2009/000131 dated Oct. 7, 2009. |
Danish Search Report for Serial No. PA 2008 00757 dated Jan. 14, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/990,333, filed Apr. 26, 2011 and entitled A Power Actuated Valve. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/990,300, filed Apr. 26, 2011 and entitled A Pump Powered by a Polymer Transducer. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/996,711, filed Apr. 27, 2011 and entitled A Transducer Compromising a Composite Material and Method of Making Such a Composite Material. |
Article entitled “Electrostrictive Polymer Artificial Muscle Actuators” by R. Kornbluh, et al., SRI International, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Belgium, May 1998; pp. 2147-2154. |
Article entitled “Spontaneous formation of ordered structures in thin films of metals supported on an elastomeric polymer” by N. Bowden, et al., Nature, vol. 393 dated May 14, 1998; pp. 146-148. |
Article “Silicone Elastomers with Controlled Surface Composition Using Argon or Hydrogen Plasma Treatment” by B. Olander, et al., Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 90, 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.; pp. 1378-1383. |
Pelrine R. et al., Applications of Dielectric Elastomer Actuators,Proceedings of the Spie—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Spie, PO Box 10 Bellingham WA 98277-0010 USA, vol. 4329, Jan. 1, 2001, pp. 335-349, XP002381626 ISSN:0277-786X. |
Publication “High-field electrostriction of elastomeric polymer dielectrics for actuation” by Roy Kornbluh et al., SRI International; SPIE vol. 3669, pp. 149-161; Mar. 1999. |
Publication Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS)—2000—; by R. Trujillo, et al;; Presented at 2000 ASIME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Nov. 5-10, 2000, Orlando, FL; pp. 709-716. |
Keyes, Robert W.: “Microstructure Fabrication”, May 27, 1977, Science, vol. 196, No. 4293, pp. 945-949. |
Ul-Haq S. et al, Breakdown pattern identification in high temperature dielectric films using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), 2003 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, 265-268, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, N9B 3P4. |
Jean-Mistral C. et al, Dielectric polymer: scavenging energy from human motion, Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 2008, edited by Yoseph Bar-Cohen Proc. of SPIE vol. 6927, 692716, (2008). |
Yu M, et al, Nonlinear analysis of sensor diaphragm under initial tension, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, Smart structures and Materials 2005: Modeling, Signal Processing, and Control, edited by Ralph C. Smith, Proc. of SPIE vol. 5757 (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2005). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130207510 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |