Polymeric antimicrobial surfactant

Abstract
Polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant and polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant compositions are useful in dispersing various compounds in a carrier liquid. The polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant and polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant compositions employ polymers having both hydrophilic domains and hydrophobic domains so that the compositions can disperse particles such as polymer particles or droplets in a continuous phase as well as provide stable dispersions that have not been provided before. The antimicrobial properties of the compositions provide much-needed capabilities of fighting infectious agents such as bacteria and viruses in a wide spectrum of products such as paint, adhesives, and coatings. Methods of using these compositions as well as methods of making products using the compositions are disclosed.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to surfactants for suspensions, emulsions, latexes, and/or colloids that have at least two phases, a continuous aqueous or aqueous-organic phase and a dispersed hydrophobic phase (e.g., a latex binder system used in coatings formulations.)


BACKGROUND

The formulation of many aqueous and aqueous-organic coatings starts with a binder component. The binder component in water based systems is generally a latex resin consisting of but not limited to polymers of acrylics, vinyl acrylics, and/or styrene acrylics. The dispersion of the less polar substantially insoluble monomer and/or polymer particles in the more polar aqueous solvent system is accomplished by the addition of stabilizing surfactants.


Additionally, some grades of plastics are also produced initially from an emulsion polymerization process followed by isolation of the solid e.g. polyvinylidene fluoride, polyvinyl fluoride, and PTFE. The final polymeric product is formed by destabilizing or breaking the emulsion so that the small polymer particles separate from the aqueous phase and are isolated.


These stabilizing surfactants generally contain polar and non-polar domains that effectively reduce the surface tension present at the interface of polar and non-polar components. The polar component of these stabilizing surfactants may consist of positively charged cationic groups, negatively charged anionic groups, and/or non-ionic polar groups.


For example, latex paints comprise an emulsion of polymer particles dispersed in water. The emulsions commonly found in latex paint are inherently unstable and phase-separate, so surfactants are added to reduce interfacial tension and stabilize polymer particles to prevent demulsification. The following are examples of a cationic, an anionic, and a nonionic surfactant that may be used to stabilize the emulsion.




embedded image


Anionic surfactants such as sodium dodecyl sulfate are most commonly used for stabilizing emulsions because of their affinity tier hydrogen bonding through the anionic sulfate head with the aqueous medium while anchored to the non-polar monomer/polymer particle through the aliphatic tail. The particle is stabilized through electrostatic repulsion.


Nonionic surfactants are rarely used alone due to their inferior efficiency in creating stable emulsions in comparison to anionic surfactants. Ionic surfactants are, however, sensitive to changes in ionic strength of the compositions they stabilize. Because of this, non-ionic surfactants are usually used in tandem with anionic and cationic surfactants and impart a second method of colloidal stabilization through steric interference of the van der Waals forces amid polymer and pigment particles. Latexes that require stability over large pH ranges use larger nonionic to anionic surfactant ratios.


Cationic surfactants are not commonly used due mainly to their higher costs. Cationic surfactants are frequently made up of quaternized ammonium compounds. Cationic surfactants frequently require the addition of nonionic surfactants to increase the stability of the latex. They are used in cases where their properties justify the additional cost. One example is in those cases where the resulting polymer emulsion is “broken” and the solid polymer is isolated.


Quaternary ammonium compounds are not typically added to already formed coating compositions that consist of a continuous aqueous or aqueous-organic phase containing a dispersed hydrophobic phase commonly stabilized by an anionic surfactant such as that used in a latex binder system. This is due to a negative effect on the quality and stability of the latex suspension. Quaternary ammonium compounds when added to latex-paint formulations have caused an undesirable increase in viscosity as well as permitting the dispersed polymer and pigments to agglomerate, flocculate, and settle. The emulsion is said to be “broken” in this case. Without being limited to any particular theory, it is believed that the cationic nature of the quaternary ammonium compounds is not compatible with the commonly anionic nature of latex paint formulations. In some cases, insoluble complexes of the quaternary ammonium compound and the latex stabilizing surfactant form, resulting in the effective reduction of surfactant concentration. This reduction of surfactant concentration causes the latex dispersion to destabilize, allowing the agglomeration of the various components of the composition. This results in a shorter shelf life and an undesirable appearance as the agglomerated particles cause the dry paint film to have a grainy appearance or texture.


This is particularly true where the quaternary ammonium compounds are polymers themselves. Polymers containing quaternary amines as part of their structure do not typically possess ionic and/or polar domains in high enough concentration to form stable micelles needed for construction of suspensions, emulsions, latexes, or colloids. Because of this lack of amphiphilicity or polarity, it is particularly difficult to prevent particles of hydrophobic organic polymers in aqueous or aqueous-organic carriers from precipitating and agglomerating. The hydrophobicity of an organic polymer causes the particles to rapidly separate from water and agglomerate into larger sized aggregates which may then irreversibly segregate yielding a non-homogeneous suspension. The polymeric particles have a much greater affinity for one another than the aqueous or aqueous-organic carriers and often clump together in the bottom of the container. Their relatively large surface area and affinity for one another virtually assures that, once the polymeric particles have clumped together and entangled, it is impossible to re-suspend the polymeric particles. This entanglement of polymer chains is often referred to as “pseudo cross-linking” due to the inhibition of solvation similar to that observed in covalently cross-linked polymers. The addition of nonionic surfactants may be required to enhance the stability of the suspension.


Additionally, quaternary ammonium compounds are known to be toxic above certain concentrations and irritants even at low concentrations, indicating a significant lack of biocompatibility. Quaternary ammonium compounds can display a range of health effects, amongst which are mild skin and respiratory irritation up to severe caustic burns on skin and gastrointestinal lining (depending on concentration), gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., nausea and vomiting), coma, convulsions, hypotension and death. One example is Quaternium-15 which is the single most often found cause of allergic contact dermatitis of the hands.




embedded image


BRIEF SUMMARY OF ASPECTS OF THE INVENTION

Among other embodiments, the invention provides a suspension-stabilizing surfactant, latex-stabilizing surfactant, emulsion-stabilizing surfactant and/or colloid-stabilizing surfactant that is also antimicrobial and biocompatible. The invention in one instance provides aqueous coating compositions that contain a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant such as a polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant and (a) a lipophilic phase and/or (b) a phase having otherwise insufficient inherent water dispersibility. The invention also provides antimicrobial coatings formed by drying the aqueous coating compositions. This polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant can, in one instance, be part of a stable aqueous binder/carrier system in which this surfactant (a) aids in dispersing a latex binder that is hydrophobic or otherwise has insufficient inherent water dispersibility and/or (b) imparts antimicrobial properties to the binder/carrier system and/or binder as applied to an object. The invention also provides methods of dispersing a hydrophobic phase and/or hydrophobic particles in an aqueous phase, further, the invention provides methods of making the polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant and polymeric product that contains the surfactant. The invention also provides new methods of using existing polymers as a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant in such compositions.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention in one instance provides a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant and a polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant that is soluble in an aqueous carrier such as water or water-based solution that aids in the formation and stability of a dispersed hydrophobic phase. The dispersed hydrophobic phase may consist of hydrophobic inorganic materials, small molecules, preformed polymers, or monomers that may be subsequently polymerized. The polymeric antimicrobial surfactant can form part of a stable aqueous dispersion that can be applied to a surface to form a coating.


Additionally the polymer prepared in the stable aqueous dispersion described above can be isolated by either removal of solvent, breaking of the emulsion or any other suitable means to give a solid polymer with intrinsic antimicrobial properties due to inclusion of the biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant in the solid polymer.


The polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant is a polymer that can be represented as the polymerization product of at least two components introduced as monomers. The first component is a hydrophilic monomer that gives the resulting polymer its nonionic surfactant/biocompatibility properties. The second component is a quaternized or quaternizable monomer (referred to as the “cationic monomer” herein) such as a nitrogen-containing monomer or a phosphorous-containing monomer that gives the polymer its cationic surfactant antimicrobial properties. The combination of these two monomers followed by polymerization using techniques commonly used by those familiar with the art and with subsequent quaternization of the quaternizable atoms present using a quaternizing agent such as an appropriate activated alkyl compound if necessary yields the desired polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant. The polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant may have a molecular weight of at least about 1000 Daltons, for instance.


The surfactant properties of the polymer provides an interface between the dispersed hydrophobic phase and the continuous aqueous phase. In many instances, the aliphatic hydrophobic domain portion of the polymeric antimicrobial resides within the dispersed hydrophobic phase due to its low polarity. The hydrophilic domain portion of the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant may have sufficient solvating ability in water that it can facilitate the polymer's dissolution in water. The cationic domain assists in both the surfactant properties of the polymer as well as supplying the cationic center required for the antimicrobial properties. Consequently, the cationic polymeric antimicrobial portion is not limited to being present in the disperse phase. Thus the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant has a chemical structure that provides a lipophilic portion and a hydrophilic portion as well as a cationic portion. The polymer is therefore adapted to interface with both the dispersed phase and the continuous phase. The polymer therefore typically resides as an interface layer between the disperse and continuous phases of a dispersion, thus stabilizing the dispersion through electrostatic and steric effects. The polymer combines the properties of a cationic surfactant and a nonionic surfactant into a single polymeric species. The following illustrates a simplified non-limiting example of the domains discussed.




embedded image


Simplified Illustration of the Domains Present in the Invention

The cationic domain of a conventional polymer may cause the polymer to be antimicrobial. However, the cationic domain of a conventional polymer may be a relatively nonpolar cation or a cation that possesses polar portions but in a number insufficient to enable the cationic polymeric antimicrobial portion to be sufficiently soluble in the aqueous carrier, making the polymer potentially antimicrobial but not effective as a surfactant. The addition of a significant polar domain through the addition of one or more polar monomers enables a controlled adjustment of the overall amphiphilicity of the modified polymer in an aqueous solution. For instance, the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant may be a copolymer of a vinyl pyridine such as 4-vinylpyridine and e.g. (2-hydroxyethyl) methacrylate (HEMA), poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (PEGMA), and/or poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (PEGMEMA) that has been quaternized with e.g. an alkyl from a halide compound such as butyl bromide as is disclosed in e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 8,343,473 issued Jan. 1, 2013 entitled “Hydrophilized Antimicrobial Polymers”, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety for all that it teaches and for all purposes herein (this patent is therefore to be treated as if this patent is repeated in full below). The polymeric antimicrobial due to the presence of the hydrophilic monomer may be non-toxic and biocompatible so that the coating composition and the resultant coating or solid polymer may also be biocompatible.


The hydrophilic domain of the surfactant polymer is provided by a monomer or monomers that have a polar portion or portions in addition to e.g. a vinylic center or other reactive moiety that reacts with the latent cationic monomer of the antimicrobial portion to provide a copolymer. The hydrophilic monomer(s) may have one or more electronegative and/or electropositive atoms functioning as a nonionic surfactant domain to aid in dispersing the resulting polymeric antimicrobial surfactant particles within the coating solution (mixture) and in the vicinity of the disperse phase. The antimicrobial portion may also have a hydrophobic domain that is compatible with the disperse phase and/or the continuous phase. The hydrophobic domain may also contain a portion of the hydrophilic monomer, such as a vinylic portion of the monomer (e.g. a vinyl or vinyl portion of an ester). The hydrophilic domain of the surfactant imparts water solubility to the polymeric antimicrobial surfactant and thus does not destabilize the disperse phase. The hydrophilic surfactant portion also surprisingly does not interfere substantially and in fact may augment the antimicrobial activity of the cationic polymeric antimicrobial portion.


The amount of each monomer and their respective molecular weights are selected so that the copolymer has (a) sufficient hydrophilicity from the hydrophilic surfactant domain and (b) sufficient hydrophobicity from the hydrophobic domain and (c) antimicrobial activity from the cationic domain of the of the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant that a sufficient amount of the copolymer in the solution resides as an interface between the disperse phase and the continuous phase selected for the particular dispersion.


U.S. Pat. No. 8,343,473 generally discloses copolymers that may be adapted for use as a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant in forming compositions according to one aspect of the invention. One or more cationic monomers (e.g. nitrogen-containing monomers) may be copolymerized with one or more hydrophilic monomers to form the polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant. Examples of nitrogen-containing monomers may include a variety of vinyl monomers capable of free radical polymerization and/or quaternization. Accordingly, these monomers may include, but are not limited to, vinyl amines, such as N,N-dimethylvinylamine; N,N-dialkyl allyl amines; and/or tertiary amines in which at least one of the three substituents of nitrogen contains an unsaturation capable of participating in free radical polymerization and when quaternized is rendered antimicrobial.


A polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant has multiple cations in its structure. For instance, a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant may contain three or more cationic sites by copolymerizing one or more hydrophilic monomers with 3 or more monomers that each have a single cationic site. Alternatively, a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant may be formed by copolymerizing one or more hydrophilic monomers with two or more monomers that each have two or more cationic sites. While a polycationic polymer can easily destabilize a dispersion in the form of a suspension or colloid such as a latex or an emulsion by complexing or otherwise interfering with a surfactant already present in the dispersion, a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant as provided herein can be formulated to augment and/or provide stability to a dispersion that includes an antimicrobial polymer containing multiple cationic sites. Preferably, the cations of the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant are quaternized nitrogen and/or phosphorous atoms. Also preferably, the hydrophilic monomer is selected to provide biocompatibility to the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant. A polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant may contain PEGMA, PEGMEMA, and/or HEMA for instance that aid in providing a biocompatible copolymer.


In a preferred embodiment, a pyridinium-type monomer, such as vinyl pyridine or 4-vinylpyridine, is quaternized after polymerization to a hydrophilic monomer.


A nitrogen-containing monomer may be inherently bactericidal or antimicrobial, or it may be rendered bactericidal or antimicrobial after polymerization with a hydrophilic monomer to form a copolymer. Where the copolymer undergoes a chemical modification, such as quaternization, preferably, the resultant copolymer is more hydrophilic and/or bactericidal or antimicrobial than a similarly modified (by e.g., quaternization) nitrogen-containing comonomer alone or copolymer containing the same number of nitrogen containing monomers as the copolymer.


A nitrogen-containing monomer may include or be chemically linked to a suitable bactericidal or antimicrobial moiety, including, but not limited to polycationic species, polycationic derivatives or combinations therefrom. Polycationic species may contain two or more quaternary ammonium groups with a molecular weight ranging from several hundred Daltons to a few hundred thousand Daltons. The quaternary ammonium groups may be part of a ring or they may be acyclic. Examples include but are not limited to: polyionenes, poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), dimethylamine-epichlorohydrin copolymers and imidazole-epichlorohydrin copolymers. Suitable nitrogen-containing monomers for use in the present invention may include the quaternary ammonium group-containing polymers disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,482,680, which are incorporated by reference herein.


Polycationic species may contain two or more cationic groups. The cationic groups (e.g. amines) can be primary, secondary, tertiary, or mixtures thereof. The cationic groups may be part of a ring or they may be acyclic. Examples include but are not limited to: polyethyleneimines, polypropyleneimines, polyvinylamines, polyallylamines, polydiallylamines, polyamidoamines, polyaminoalkylmethacrylates, polylysines, and mixtures thereof.


The polycationic species may also be a modified polyamine with at least one amine group substituted with at least one other functional group. Examples include ethoxylated and alkoxylated polyamines and alkylated polyamines. Other suitable nitrogen-containing monomers or those that may be rendered bactericidal or antimicrobial may be identified and/or used in accordance with the applications and objectives set forth in the specification and any claims.


Quaternization may be carried out using alkylating agents, including but not limited to alkyl halides (such as hexyl bromide), alkyl sulfonates, alkyl mesylates, alkyl tosylates, or other alkylating agents possessing a suitable leaving group. Quaternization reduces self-polymerization of the bactericidal or antimicrobial comonomer upon polymerization with the hydrophilic monomer. Quaternization may confer increased bactericidal or antimicrobial activity and may be carried out after polymerization. The alkyl group of the alkylating agent and therefore the quaternized nitrogen-containing monomer may have from 4 to 12 carbon atoms, for instance, and preferably, the alkyl group has from 5 to 10 carbon atoms or 6 to 8 carbon atoms. The alkyl group may be linear or branched.


Alkyl groups at a quaternized site, and/or other cationic chains may be attracted to and/or promote interaction and penetration negatively charged bacterial cell walls on account of their lipophilic nature. Alkyl chain lengths of quaternizing agents and overall hydrophilic/lipophilic balance may affect bactericidal or antimicrobial activity of the polymeric compositions of the present invention. Accordingly, these variables may be modified to optimize or improve bactericidal or antimicrobial activity of the polymeric compositions.


Suitable hydrophilic monomers may include, but are not limited to, ethylene glycol (ethylene oxide); polyethylene glycol derivatives, including poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (PEGMA), including poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate, poly(ethylene glycol) acrylate, and vinyl polyethylene glycol; vinyl acetate; poly(vinyl alcohol); vinyl pyrrolidone and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone); vinyl pyrrolidinone and polyivinyl pyrrolidinone); vinyl oxazoline and poly(vinyl oxazoline); vinyl formamide and poly(vinyl formamide); hydroxyalkyl acrylates and hydroxyalkyl methacrylates, such as hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and hydroxyethyl acrylate; methacrylamide; acrylamide and methacrylamide based monomers, such as acrylamide, N,N-dimethyl acrylamide, N-ethyl acrylamide, N-isopropyl acrylamide, and hydroxymethyl acrylamide; monomers containing one or more of the following functional groups: hydroxy, amino, ammonium, ether, carboxylate, amide, and sulfonamide groups; and combinations or copolymers thereof, polyvinyloxazolines


Preferably, a hydrophilic monomer is biocompatible or imparts biocompatibility to the surfactant in which it is incorporated. Standard assays may be utilized to evaluate biocompatibility, including but not limited to viability/cytotoxicity mammalian cell assays and the like. Preferred hydrophilic monomers may include hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA), poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (PEGMA), and poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (PEGMEMA).


HEMA is widely used in biomedical applications and devices, most prominently soft contact lenses. HEMA, with 37.8% water per weight, is typical of hydrogels. Preferably, the molar ratio of cationic monomer such as 4-vinyl pyridine to HEMA comonomer in the copolymer is between 30:70 and 95:5, and preferably the molar percentage of HEMA comonomer is at least 90%, with 90-95% being preferred.


Poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (PEGMA) and poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (PEGMEMA) are monomers which provide several important properties, such as good solubility in both organic and aqueous media, low toxicity, immunogenicity and biocompatibility to copolymers they are present in.


Preferably, the molar molecular weight of PEGMA and/or poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate monomer used in forming the surfactant is equal to or greater than 300, more preferably between about 300 and about 2000, including but not limited to 1000. Preferably, the molar ratio of cationic monomer such as 4-vinyl pyridine to PEGMA and/or PEGMEMA is between about 10:90 and 99:1, and more preferably is between 30:70 and 95:5.


The polymeric antimicrobial surfactant may be formed by free radical polymerization or by other methods. Any of the surfactants as discussed herein may be a block or random copolymer, for instance.


For example, a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant may be represented as the polymerization product of monomers of (a) poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate as the surfactant's hydrophilic surfactant portion and (b) monomers of vinyl pyridine as the surfactant's hydrophobic and cationic polymeric antimicrobial portion. If the molecular weight of the poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate is about 1000, preferably the copolymer has between about 8-72 mol % of monomer (a) and between about 92-28 mol % of monomer (b). More preferably, the copolymer has between about 8-40% of monomer (a) and between about 92-60% of monomer (b). These percentages are provided as guidelines to aid in selecting the types and amounts of monomers for the polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant for various disperse phases and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.


The polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant (including the polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant) is formulated to significantly reduce the growth, number, viability and/or metabolic activity of bacteria or microorganisms. The surfactant may be formulated to significantly reduce bacterial or microbial growth from a treated medium by a factor of at least 50%. Further, a bactericidal or antimicrobial composition may be formulated to significantly reduce bacterial or microbial growth from a treated medium by at least 60%, by at least 70%, by at least 80%, by at least 90%, by at least 95%, by at least 99%, or by at least 99.9%. This reduction may occur within a 30 minute period, for example.


The polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant alone (without other surfactants) may be all that is needed to disperse e.g. a binder (such as polymeric particles) in a liquid. The hydrophobic domain of the polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant can associate with polymeric particles to disperse them in e.g. an aqueous carrier liquid with which the hydrophilic domain of the polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant associates. The cationic domain can also associate with the aqueous carrier liquid where ionic charge predominates the structure of the cationic domain and the dispersed hydrophobic phase where the structure of the cationic domain is hydrophobic overall despite the cationic charge.


A second surfactant may also be present with the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant in the carrier liquid. A second surfactant can be provided to e.g. stabilize binder (polymeric particles that form a solid coating upon solvent removal or destabilization of the dispersion) or other components dispersed in the carrier liquid. The second surfactant may be cationic, anionic, or nonionic.


If the second surfactant is cationic, preferably the cationic portion of that second surfactant has greater binding strength to a corresponding anion than the cationic domain of the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant has to that corresponding anion. Preferably the cationic portion of the second surfactant also has greater binding strength to its corresponding anion than it has to any anions present in the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant.


If the second surfactant is anionic, preferably the anionic portion of that second surfactant has greater binding strength to a corresponding cation than to the cationic domain of the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant. Preferably the anionic portion of that second surfactant also has greater binding strength to that corresponding cation than any anions present in the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant.


An example of a coating composition may be e.g. a latex paint formulation containing, in addition to the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant, any one or more of the following components:

    • a. A second surfactant that disperses one or more of the following components.
    • b. Latex polymer (e.g. acrylic, vinyl acrylic, or styrene acrylic polymer) that has been prepared using an appropriate polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant as described in this invention.
    • c. Pigment and/or dye such as TiO2, calcium carbonate, talc, clay, silicates, aluminum silicates, calcium metasilicates, aluminum potassium silicates, magnesium silicates, barium sulfates, nepheline syenite, feldspar, zinc oxides and/or sulfides, functional fillers such as intumescent ingredients, such as ammonium polyphosphates, melamines, pentaerythritol and/or similar compounds.
    • d. Thickeners such as urethane thickeners and/or acrylic thickeners.
    • e. Synthetic organic materials might also be incorporated; these include plastic beads, hollow spheres or other similar materials.
    • f. Other optional components include glycols such as ethylene and/or propylene glycol in amounts up to about 7% and other solvents such as diethylene glycol dibenzoate and dipropylene glycol dibenzoate in amounts up to about 3%. The coating composition may also contain pigment dispersing agents which can be solvents; wet paint preservatives; dry film preservatives; foam control agents such as oils, and silicones; slip and mar additives; adhesion promoters, and/or other known paint additives.
    • g. The paint composition of the present invention may also comprise other biocides including but not limited to metal ion containing compounds, other polymeric biocides, heterocyclic compounds, phenols, organometallics, aldehydes, proteins, peroxygens, alcohols, enzymes, polypeptides, and halogen releasing compounds.


The coating solution may have a pH of about neutral pH to acidic pH. The pH is preferably between e.g. 2 and 9, more preferably between 5.5 and 6.5.


Other coating solutions into which the dispersible polymeric antimicrobial particles may be incorporated include, but are not limited to, floor wax binders, adhesives, sealants, caulks, furniture polish, synthetic rubber compositions, and plastic compositions.


Floor wax is typically a surfactant stabilized dispersion of a polymer or polymers that impart the floor wax's finish, a polymeric binder, as well as various coalescents and plasticizers and other components in an aqueous or aqueous-organic continuous phase. An example of such a floor wax is one that has a styrene-ethyl acrylate-methyl methacrylate copolymer binder emulsion, polyethylene emulsion, tricresyl phosphate plasticizer, and styrene-maleic copolymer as disclosed in e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 3,328,328, which patent is incorporated by reference in its entirety.


There is a surprising array of modern adhesives having a broad range of components to optimize their use in the particular situation for which they are intended. Most water born adhesives have as one of the components a dispersed polymer in an aqueous continuous phase. The dispersed polymer may be made up of any of a wide array of polymers e.g. polyvinyl acetate, vinyl acetate copolymer, polyacrylate, polyvinylidene chloride, styrene-butadiene copolymer, polyurethane, polyester, polychloroprene, and/or rubber latex. White glue or carpenter's glue are the best known examples of water born adhesives.


A sealant or caulk may typically have a silicone polymer dispersed in an aqueous phase or such polymers as butyl rubbers and polybutene dispersed in aqueous phase. Sealants and caulks are similar in composition to adhesives in that many contain one or more water dispersed polymer latexes as one of their components. The dispersions are formed using an emulsifying surfactant in an emulsion polymerization scenario.


A furniture polish may contain one or more of the following hydrophobic materials dispersed in an aqueous phase by use of a surfactant: carnauba wax, candelilla wax, sugar cane wax, cotton wax, beeswax, shellac, lanolin fractions from sheep, ozokerite, paraffin waxes, microcrystalline waxes, oxidized microcrystalline waxes, Fischer-Tropsch waxes, montan waxes, polymers such as methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, vinyl acetate, styrene, vinyl chloride, acrylonitrile, and oils such as those derived from vegetable, petroleum, or silicone sources to enhance shine.


Synthetic rubber compositions are sometimes prepared through a polymerization process carried out as a surfactant stabilized dispersion. A particularly important example of such a synthetic process is the preparation of Neoprene. Neoprene is produced by free-radical polymerization of chloroprene. In commercial production, this polymer is prepared by free radical emulsion polymerization. Polymerization is initiated using potassium persulfate. Bifunctional nucleophiles, metal oxides (e.g. zinc oxide), and thioureas are used to crosslink individual polymer strands.


Plastic compositions are also prepared in some instances through a surfactant stabilized polymerization phase. An excellent example where a plastic is prepared through a surfactant stabilized emulsion process would be the production of polytetrafluoroethylene) (Teflon, PTFE). Because PTFE is poorly soluble in almost all solvents, and the polymerization is sensitive to temperature fluctuations it is conducted as an emulsion in water. This process gives a suspension of polymer particles which are then isolated as solid particles.


An ink composition can also be formulated using a surfactant of the invention. The pigment particles (typically 0.005 to 15 micron in size) and/or dye of an ink formulation can associate with the hydrophobic portion of the surfactant, thereby suspending the ink's pigment particles and dyes in aqueous carrier liquid more readily to provide a more homogeneous ink formulation. Ink compositions such as those used in inkjet printers and in the commercial print industry must also meet certain toxicity requirements that a polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant as disclosed herein can help to satisfy. Pigment particles and dyes in ink compositions include sulfated polyazo black dye and various pigment particles available from commercial suppliers such as Hoechst, Ciba-Geigy, Mobay, and BASF, for instance. In addition to pigment particles and dyes that can be dispersed using a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant, ink formulations may contain optical brighteners such as stilbenes (e.g, bis(benzoxazolyl)-cis-stilbene or 4,4′-diamino-2,2′-stilbenedisulfonic acid) and/or thiophenes (e.g. 2,5-bis(benzoxazol-2-yl)thiophene) that can be dispersed using a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant as discussed herein.


Other products that may utilize a surfactant as provided herein include detergents such as laundry detergent and/or softening agents such as fabric softeners. Brighteners such as the stilbenes and thiophenes discussed above can be dispersed in liquid or dry laundry detergents, and the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant as discussed herein can aid in dispersing the brighteners and/or other laundry detergent components or other fabric softeners throughout the wash water to better contact clothing while optionally providing antimicrobial properties to the laundered clothing. Clothes can therefore remain fresher for longer periods of time. A polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant may be provided alone or as one of a number of other softener components in a clothes softening composition, and other such softeners include mono- and di-ester quats and derivatives that are typically used in such clothes softening compositions.


Cosmetics may incorporate a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant as discussed herein. These surfactants can disperse brighteners, oils or oily compounds such as coconut oil, castor oil, shea butter, and derivatives in e.g. foundation, eye shadow, lipstick, blush, makeup, and other cosmetics. The antimicrobial properties of a polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant may aid in keeping skin healthy as well as preserve the cosmetic itself, increasing shelf life.


Herbicides and insecticides can also benefit from incorporation of a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant into them. The polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant can disperse common herbicides such as atrazine and common insecticides such as organophosphates, carbamates, pyrethroids, and other compounds as well as prevent potential microbial induced degradation thus increasing shelf life.


It was quite surprising that a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial compound or a biocompatible antimicrobial polymer could be configured as a surfactant. Typically, antimicrobial polymers do not possess both sufficient lipophilicity and sufficient hydrophilicity to satisfy the requirements for a surfactant, and the cations of the antimicrobial polymer often disrupt stable dispersions present in a carrier liquid. We have determined, however, that antimicrobial polymers can in fact be configured to be biocompatible as well as lipophilic and hydrophilic without sacrificing antimicrobial properties. Consequently, a wide array of suspensions, emulsions, latexes, and/or colloids useful in the preparation of coatings, adhesives, sealants, and caulks as disclosed herein can be formulated using a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or a polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant as disclosed herein.


A general method for preparation of a stable suspension of a hydrophobic monomer solution in an aqueous continuous phase is conducted as follows. The surfactant, derived from this invention, is dissolved in the aqueous/aqueous-organic continuous phase in sufficient quantity concentration to support the formation of micelles that will contain the monomers. An initiator that is soluble in the aqueous continuous phase and insoluble in the monomer phase is added. The monomer(s) are then added to the aqueous phase with agitation forming droplets. Monomer(s) diffuse to the nascent micelles where they come in contact with a free radical originating from decomposition of the initiator. While some initiation may occur in the aqueous phase as well as the droplet phase the majority occurs in the micelles. The monomer solution is added to the reaction mixture over time in order to reduce the incidence of initiation occurring in the droplet phase. Monomer(s) continues to diffuse from the droplets to the micelles growing the size of the polymer particle as well as to nascent micelles depending on the quantity of surfactant added. This process results in a polymer suspension/emulsion latex or colloid that contains a surfactant that is antimicrobial. Additional antimicrobial surfactant can be added upon completion of polymerization if additional efficacy is required.


Alternatively a stable suspension of a hydrophobic monomer(s) solution in an aqueous or aqueous/organic continuous phase may be formed and polymerized using the following methodology. A polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant of this invention is dissolved in the aqueous or aqueous/organic continuous phase at a concentration that will be sufficient to give the level of antimicrobial activity desired (e.g. 1% by weight in solution). The monomer(s) are added as a single aliquot. The heterogeneous mixture is then agitated such that sufficient energy is input to give the desired particle size of the dispersed phase. A high shear mixer may be used to supply the necessary agitation. After the suspension of monomers is formed and stabilized by the added surfactant, agitation may be reduced substantially to the point where the suspension remains homogeneous. A free radical initiator that is soluble in the continuous phase but not in the dispersed phase is then added and the suspension is heated to conduct the polymerization reaction. The resultant polymer or polymer/oil phase is consequently dispersed through the continuous phase by the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant.


Polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant possessing suitable bactericidal properties and a suitable hydrophilicity biocompatibility profile was obtained using a quaternized polymeric composition synthesized from 4-vinylpyridine and poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate. The copolymer was synthesized by radical copolymerization using 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH) as the initiator in a water-isopropanol solvent system. The reactants were stirred at 70° C. for 24 hours under flowing N2 to exclude oxygen. The resulting copolymer was quaternized by the addition of one equivalent (relative to 4-vinylpyridine) of 1-bromohexane (HB) in a followed by heating at 70° C. for 48 hr. The progress of the quaternization reaction was followed by infrared spectroscopy. The solid polymer was obtained placing the polymer/solvent mixture in trays and heating to 70° C. overnight.


Following are other examples of the invention. Table 1 lists various monomers used to form polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant and various polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactants, as recognized from the copolymerization and quaternization products formed using the specified compounds. The quaternizing agent is 1-butyl chloride and/or fluoride in certain instances not listed, and in other instances the quaternizing agent is 1-chlorooctane and/or 1-fluorooctane.









TABLE 1







Examples of polymeric cationic antimicrobial


compounds for use in the invention
















Moles
Moles






Mono-
Mono-


No.
Monomer 1
Monomer 2
Quaternizer
mer 1
mer 2















 1
4-VP
HEMA
1-bromohexane
0.9
0.1


 2
4-VP
PEGMEMA 300
1-bromohexane
0.9
0.1


 3
4-VP
PEGMEMA 1000
1-bromohexane
0.9
0.1


 4
4-VP
PEGMA 300
1-bromohexane
0.9
0.1


 5
4-VP
PEGMA 1100
1-bromohexane
0.9
0.1


 6
4-VP
HEA
1-bromohexane
0.9
0.1


 7
4-VP
HEMA
1-bromohexane
0.6
0.4


 8
4-VP
PEGMEMA 300
1-bromohexane
0.6
0.4


 9
4-VP
PEGMEMA 1000
1-bromohexane
0.6
0.4


10
4-VP
PEGMA 300
1-bromohexane
0.6
0.4


11
4-VP
PEGMA 1100
1-bromohexane
0.6
0.4


12
4-VP
HEA
1-bromohexane
0.6
0.4


13
4-VP
H EMA
1-bromohexane
0.3
0.7


14
4-VP
PEGMEMA 300
1-bromohexane
0.3
0.7


15
4-VP
PEGMEMA 1000
1-bromohexane
0.3
0.7


16
4-VIP
PEGMA 300
1-bromohexane
0.3
0.7


17
4-VP
PEGMA 1100
1-bromohexane
0.3
0.7


18
4-VP
HEA
1-bromohexane
0.3
0.7


19
N,N-DMAA
HEA
Hexyl Tosylate
0.9
0.1


20
4-VP
HEMA
1-Chlorohexane
0.9
0.1


21
4-VP
PEGMEMA 300
1-Chlorohexane
0.9
0.1


22
4-VP
PEGMEMA 1000
1-Chlorohexane
0.9
0.1


23
4-VP
PEGMA 300
1-Chlorohexane
0.9
0.1


24
4-VP
PEGMA 1100
1-Chlorohexane
0.9
0.1


25
4-VP
HEA
1-Chlorohexane
0.9
0.1


26
4-VP
HEMA
1-Chlorohexane
0.6
0.4


27
4-VP
PEGMEMA 300
1-Chlorohexane
0.6
0.4


28
4-VP
PEGMEMA 1000
1-Chlorohexane
0.6
0.4


29
4-VP
PEGMA 300
1-Chlorohexane
0.6
0.4


30
4-VP
PEG MA 1100
1-Chlorohexane
0.6
0.4


31
4-VP
HEA
1-Chlorohexane
0.6
0.4


32
4-VP
HEMA
1-Chlorohexane
0.3
0.7


33
4-VP
PEGMEMA 300
1-Chlorohexane
0.3
0.7


34
4-VP
PEGMEMA 1000
1-Chlorohexane
0.3
0.7


35
4-VP
PEGMA 300
1-Chlorohexane
0.3
0.7


36
4-VP
PEGMA 1100
1-Chlorohexane
0.3
0.7


37
4-VP
HEA
1-Chlorohexane
0.3
0.7





HEM: 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate


PEGMA: poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate, number indicates the average molecular weight of the monomer


PEGMEMA: poly(ethylene glycol)methylether methacrylate, number indicates the average molecular weight of the monomer


HEA: 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate


DMAA: 1,3-dimethylallylamine






Table 2 provides a list of other components that may be dispersed using a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant of Table 1 as well as products in which the particular component and polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant are dispersed. Table 2 provides examples of the dispersed materials and is, of course, a nonexhaustive list. Each of the surfactants of Table 1 is individually combined with each of the dispersed polymers or compounds below in a carrier liquid (e.g. water or an oil) and other compounds as appropriate to form the products listed in Table 2.









TABLE 2







Examples of dispersed materials and products incorporating same











Product incorporating


Example
Dispersed polymer or compound
the dispersed material





A
Castor Oil
Cosmetics


B
Triglycerides
Cosmetics


C
Cocoa Butter
Cosmetics


D
Vitamin E Esters
Cosmetics


E
Polyisobutylene
Cosmetics


F
Various Natural and Synthetic Waxes
Cosmetics


G
Borax
Cosmetics


H
Mineral Oil
Cosmetics


I
Jojoba Oil
Cosmetics


J
Alkyds
Coating components


K
Polyurethanes
Coating components


L
Polyesters
Coating components


M
Melamine Resins
Coating components


N
Epoxy Resins
Coating components


O
Silanes
Coating components


P
Siloxanes
Coating components


Q
Various Oils
Coating components


R
Pigments
Coating components


S
Cutting Fluid Lubricants for Metal
Industrial components



Working



T
Petrolatum (creams)
Pharmaceuticals


U
Lanoline (creams)
Pharmaceuticals


V
Actives in Oil (lotions)
Pharmaceuticals









Table 3 lists other surfactants that may be present with polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant and typical commercial uses.









TABLE 3







Additional surfactants present in some dispersions










Surfactant



Surfactant
Type
Use





Behentrimonium Chloride
Cationic
Cosmetics


Benzalkonium Chloride
Cationic
Laundry Detergent


Benzethonium Chloride
Cationic
Cosmetics/Mouthwash


Benzododecinium Bromide
Cationic
General


Bronidox
Cationic
Cosmetics


Carbethopendecinium Bromide
Cationic
General


Cetalkonium Chloride
Cationic
Excipient


Cetrimonium Bromide
Cationic
Cosmetics


Cetrimonium Chloride
Cationic
Hair Conditioner/




Shampoos


Cetylpyridinium Chloride
Cationic
Mouthwash/Toothpaste


Didecyldimethylammonium
Cationic
Linen Disinfectant


Chloride

Cleaner


Dimethyldioctadecylammonium
Cationic
Cosmetics


Bromide




Dimethyldioctadecylammonium
Cationic
Cosmetics


Chloride




Domiphen Bromide
Cationic
Cosmetics


Octenidine Dihydrochloride
Cationic
Antiseptic Detergent


Olaflur
Cationic
Dental


N-Oleyl-1,3-propanediamine
Cationic
Paint


Stearalkonium Chloride
Cationic
Cosmetics/




Conditioners


Thonzonium Bromide
Cationic
Pharmaceutical




Detergent


Ethoxylates:
Nonionic
All of the uses above


Fatty Alcohol Ethoxylates
Nonionic



Alkylphenol Ethoxylates
Nonionic



Fatty Acid Ethoxylates
Nonionic



Special Ethoxylated Fatty
Nonionic



Esters and Oils




Ethoxylated Amines and/or
Nonionic



Fatty Acid Amides




Terminally Blocked Ethoxylates
Nonionic



Fatty Esters of Polyhydroxy
Nonionic
All of the uses above


Compounds:




Fatty Acid Esters of Glycerol
Nonionic



Fatty Acid Esters of Sorbitol
Nonionic



Fatty Acid Esters of Sucrose
Nonionic



Alkyl Polyglucosides
Nonionic



Other:

All of the uses above


Amine Oxides
Nonionic



Sulfoxides
Nonionic



Phosphine oxides
Nonionic









Table 4 provides a list of various microbes against which the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant, dispersed in an aqueous carrier, may be effective. Kill tests have been performed against these microbes for certain polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactants as disclosed, and the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactants have reduced levels of these microbes substantially. Data was generated using the methodology set out in ASTM E 2315-03 (2008) for a period of exposure of microbe to polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant ranging from 1 minute to 30 minutes.









TABLE 4







Microbes reduced or eliminated by selected polycationic polymeric


antimicrobial surfactants















Kingdom
Family
Genus
Species
ATCC
Gram
% Kill

















1
Bacteria
Bacillaceae

Bacillus


cereus


Pos
99.94


2
Bacteria
Clostridiaceae

Clostridium


Difficile (spore)

43598
Pos
80.19


3
Bacteria
Enterococcaccae

Enterococcus


faecalis

51799
Pos
99.998


4
Bacteria
Staphylococcaceae

Staphylococcus


aureus

33597
Pos
99.947


5
Bacteria
Staphylococcaceae

Staphylococcus


aureus

6538
Pos
99.9989


6
Bacteria
Staphylococcaceae

Staphylococcus


epidermidis


Pos
99.999


8
Bacteria
Enterobacteriaceae

Enterobacter


aerogenes


Neg
99.998


9
Bacteria
atterobacteriaceac

Escherichia


coli

11229
Neg
87.44


10
Bacteria
Enterobacteriaceae

Escherichia


coli

8739
Neg
90.15


11
Bacteria
Enterococeaceae

Klebsiella


pneumoniae


Neg
99.9991


12
Bacteria
Enterococcaceae

Salmonella


enterica

4352
Neg
99.9991


13
Bacteria
Pseudonionadaceac

Pseudomottas


aeruginosa

15442
Neg
99.9995


14
Fungi
Saccharomycetaceae

Candida


albicans

10231
N/A
90.05


15
Fungi
Trichocomaccae

Aspergillus


brasiliensis niger


N/A
24.53


16
Virus
Leviviridae

Levivirus


bacteriophage MS2


N/A
99.996









Consequently, in addition to the inventions described above, the following are examples of the invention:

    • 1. A polycationic polymeric antimicrobial compound for use as a surfactant, wherein the compound comprises a polymer having a hydrophilic monomer and a cationic antimicrobial monomer, wherein the polymer has a sufficient number of hydrophilic monomers present to provide a hydrophilic domain, a sufficient number of cationic antimicrobial monomers and vinylic groups from the hydrophilic monomers to provide a hydrophobic domain, and the number of cationic antimicrobial monomers present is sufficient to provide at least three cations in the polymer.
    • 2. A compound according to paragraph 1, wherein the hydrophilic, monomer is nonionic.
    • 3. A compound according to paragraph 1 or paragraph 2, wherein the nonionic hydrophilic monomer comprises at least one of HEMA, PEGMA, and PEGMEMA.
    • 4. A compound according to any of paragraphs 1-3, wherein the nonionic hydrophilic monomer renders the compound biocompatible.
    • 5. A compound according to any of paragraphs 1-4, wherein the cationic antimicrobial monomer contains a quaternized amine.
    • 6. A compound according to paragraph 5, wherein the quaternized amine is a portion of a quaternized pyridine.
    • 7. A compound according to paragraph 6, wherein the quaternized pyridine is 4-vinyl pyridine.
    • 8. A compound according to any of paragraphs 5-7, wherein the amine is quaternized with an alkyl group.
    • 9. A compound according to paragraph 8, wherein the alkyl group has alkyl group has from 4 to 12 carbon atoms.
    • 10. A compound according to paragraph 9, wherein the alkyl group has alkyl group has from 5 to 10 carbon atoms.
    • 11. A compound according to paragraph 10, wherein the alkyl group has alkyl group has from 6 to 8 carbon atoms.
    • 12. A compound according to any of paragraphs 8-11, wherein the alkyl group is a linear alkyl.
    • 13. A compound according to any paragraph above, wherein the polymer consists essentially of the nonionic hydrophilic monomer and the cationic antimicrobial monomer.
    • 14. A dispersion comprising a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant, a continuous liquid phase, and particles of a second compound dispersed by the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant, wherein the dispersion comprises a suspension or a colloid and wherein the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant comprises a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial compound of any of paragraphs 1-13.
    • 15. A dispersion according to paragraph 14, wherein the particles of the second compound comprise droplets or particulate of a compound selected from Table 2.
    • 16. A dispersion according to paragraph 14 or paragraph 15, wherein the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant comprises particles of the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial compound.
    • 17. A dispersion according to any of paragraphs 14-16, wherein the particles of the second polymer comprise a binder polymer of a coating.
    • 18. A dispersion according to any of paragraphs 14-17, wherein the dispersion is a latex or an emulsion.
    • 19. A dispersion according to any of paragraphs 14-18, wherein the continuous liquid phase is aqueous.
    • 20. A dispersion according to any of paragraphs 14-18, wherein the continuous liquid phase is an oil.
    • 21. A dispersion according to paragraph 20, wherein the dispersion comprises an aqueous phase.
    • 22. A dispersion according to paragraph 19, wherein the dispersion comprises an oil phase.
    • 23. A dispersion according to any of paragraphs 14-22, wherein the dispersion further comprises a second nonionic or cationic surfactant different from the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant.
    • 24. A dispersion according to paragraph 23, wherein the second nonionic or cationic surfactant comprises a surfactant selected from Table 3 above.
    • 25. A dispersion according to paragraph 24, wherein the second nonionic or cationic surfactant provides a stable dispersion of droplets or particulate of a compound selected from Table 2.
    • 26. A dispersion according to any of paragraphs 14-22, wherein the dispersion contains no other surfactant besides the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant.
    • 27. A dispersion according to any of paragraphs 14-26, wherein the dispersion comprises a stable suspension.
    • 28. A dispersion according to any of paragraphs 14-26, wherein the dispersion comprises a stable colloid.
    • 29. A dispersion according to paragraph 28, wherein the stable colloid comprises a latex.
    • 30. A dispersion according to paragraph 28, wherein the stable colloid comprises an emulsion.
    • 31. A method of using a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant comprising mixing a hydrophilic or a hydrophobic compound with the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant in a carrier liquid to form a stable dispersion.
    • 32. A method according to paragraph 31, wherein the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant is a compound of any of paragraphs 1-13.
    • 33. A method according to paragraph 31, wherein the stable dispersion specified in paragraph 31 is a dispersion as set forth in any of paragraphs 14-30.
    • 34. A method of making a suspension or a colloid comprising incorporating a compound of any of paragraphs 1-13 into a first stable suspension or a first stable colloid containing a second surfactant to form a second stable suspension or a second stable colloid.
    • 35. A method according to paragraph 34 wherein the first stable suspension or the first stable colloid is a stable dispersion of droplets or particulate of a compound selected from Table 2.
    • 36. A method according to paragraph 34 or paragraph 35, wherein the second surfactant comprises a surfactant selected from Table 3 above.
    • 37. A method of creating a dispersion, wherein the method comprises dispersing an insoluble compound in a continuous phase with a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant, wherein the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant comprises a polymer having a number of nonionic hydrophilic monomers and a number of cationic antimicrobial monomers, each comprising a vinyl pyridine quaternized with an alkyl group, and wherein the surfactant has a sufficient number of the nonionic hydrophilic monomers present in the polymer to provide a hydrophilic domain, a sufficient number of the cationic antimicrobial monomers and vinylic groups from the nonionic hydrophilic monomers present in the polymer to provide a hydrophobic domain, and the number of the cationic antimicrobial monomers present is sufficient to provide at least three cations in the polymer.
    • 38. A method according to paragraph 37, wherein the nonionic hydrophilic monomer renders the surfactant biocompatible.
    • 39. A method according to paragraph 37 or paragraph 38, wherein the nonionic hydrophilic monomer comprises at least one of HEMA, PEGMA, and PEGMEMA.
    • 40. A method according to, any of paragraphs 37-39, wherein the vinyl pyridine comprises 4-vinyl pyridine.
    • 41. A method according to paragraph 40, wherein the alkyl group has from 4 to 12 carbon atoms.
    • 42. A method according to paragraph 41, wherein the alkyl group has from 5 to 10 carbon atoms.
    • 43. A method according to paragraph 42, wherein the alkyl group has from 6 to 8 carbon atoms.
    • 44. A method according to any of paragraphs 37-43, wherein the alkyl group is a linear alkyl group.
    • 45. A method according to any of paragraphs 37-44, wherein the polymer consists essentially of the nonionic hydrophilic monomer and the cationic antimicrobial monomer.
    • 46. A dispersion comprising a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant, a continuous liquid phase, and particles of a second polymer associated with the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant, wherein the dispersion comprises a suspension or a colloid and wherein the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant comprises a polymer having a nonionic hydrophilic monomer and a cationic antimicrobial monomer comprising a vinyl pyridine quaternized with an alkyl group and having a sufficient number of nonionic hydrophilic monomers present in the polymer to provide a hydrophilic domain, a sufficient number of cationic antimicrobial monomers and vinylic groups from nonionic hydrophilic monomers present in the polymer to provide a hydrophobic domain, and the number of cationic monomers present is sufficient to provide at least three cations in the polymer.
    • 47. A dispersion according to paragraph 46, wherein the particles of the second polymer comprise a binder polymer of a coating.
    • 48. A dispersion according to paragraph 46 or paragraph 47, wherein the dispersion is a latex or an emulsion.
    • 49. A dispersion according to any of paragraphs 46-48, wherein the continuous liquid phase is aqueous.
    • 50. A dispersion according to any of paragraphs 46-48, wherein the continuous liquid phase is an oil.
    • 51. A dispersion according to paragraph 50, wherein the dispersion comprises an aqueous phase.
    • 52. A dispersion according to paragraph 49, wherein the dispersion comprises an oil phase.
    • 53. A dispersion according to any of paragraphs 46-52, wherein the dispersion further comprises a second surfactant different from the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant.
    • 54. A dispersion according to any of paragraphs 46-52, wherein the dispersion contains no other surfactant besides the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant.


The phrases “significantly reducing the growth of” microorganisms such as bacteria and/or viruses and “significantly reducing growth” are used interchangeably to denote one or more of the following conditions, including (i) a condition in which the metabolic, activity of at least 50% of the microorganisms of a particular type exposed to a treated medium is terminated or reduced compared to microorganisms of that particular type exposed to an untreated medium over a fixed period of time; a condition where there is 50% or less of one or more types of microorganism present in and/or on a treated medium compared to the number of microorganisms exposed to an untreated medium; and/or (iii) a condition resulting when one or more types of microorganisms adhere 50% less to a treated medium compared to an untreated medium. The degree of growth reduction with respective to conditions (i)-(iii) may range from 50% to greater 99.9%.


The term “biocompatible” refers to a material that is substantially non-toxic in the in vivo environment of its intended use, and that is not substantially rejected by the patient's physiological system (i.e., is non-antigenic). This can be gauged by the ability of a material to pass the biocompatibility tests set forth in International Standards Organization (ISO) Standard No. 10993 and/or the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) 23 and/or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) blue book memorandum No. G95-1, entitled “Use of international Standard ISO-10993, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part-1: Evaluation and Testing.” Typically, these tests measure a material's toxicity, infectivity, pyrogenicity, irritation potential, reactivity, hemolytic activity, carcinogenicity and/or immunogenicity. A biocompatible structure or material, when introduced into a majority of patients, will not cause a significantly adverse, long-lived or escalating biological reaction or response, and is distinguished from a mild, transient inflammation which typically accompanies surgery or implantation of foreign objects into a living organism.


The term “stable dispersion” refers to a dispersion such as a suspension or colloid (e.g. a latex or emulsion) that has a shelf life of at least seven days, as measured by light scattering instruments or other instruments employed for the particular classification of suspension or colloid formulated (e.g. paint, cosmetic, coating, wax, adhesive, or other end-use as discussed above). Preferably the shelf life is at least one month, more preferably at least three months, and more preferably still at least six months and at least a year, respectively.


All publications listed herein are incorporated by reference for all that they teach, as if put forth in full below.

Claims
  • 1. A dispersion comprising an emulsion in a continuous liquid phase, wherein the emulsion consists essentially of a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant, andparticles of a second polymer associated with the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant,wherein the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant comprises a polymer consisting essentially of a nonionic hydrophilic monomer anda cationic antimicrobial monomer comprising a vinyl pyridine quaternized with an alkyl groupand havinga sufficient number of nonionic hydrophilic monomers present in the polymer to provide a hydrophilic domain,a sufficient number of cationic antimicrobial monomers and vinylic groups from nonionic hydrophilic monomers present in the polymer to provide a hydrophobic domain, andthe number of cationic antimicrobial monomers present is sufficient to provide at least three cations in the polymer, and whereinthe nonionic hydrophilic monomer comprises at least one of poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (poly(ethyleneglycol methacrylate)) and poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (poly(ethyleneglycol methylether methacrylate)), andthe vinyl pyridine comprises 4-vinyl pyridine.
  • 2. A dispersion according to claim 1, wherein the alkyl group has from 4 to 12 carbon atoms.
  • 3. A dispersion according to claim 2, wherein the alkyl group has from 5 to 10 carbon atoms.
  • 4. A dispersion according to claim 2, wherein the alkyl group has from 6 to 8 carbon atoms.
  • 5. A dispersion according to claim 2, wherein the alkyl group is a linear alkyl group.
  • 6. A dispersion according to claim 2, wherein the particles of the second polymer comprise a binder polymer of a coating.
  • 7. A dispersion according to claim 6, wherein the emulsion has a continuous liquid phase that is aqueous.
  • 8. A dispersion according to claim 7, wherein the emulsion has a disperse oil phase.
  • 9. A dispersion according to claim 8, wherein the alkyl group is a linear alkyl group.
  • 10. A dispersion according to claim 9, wherein the alkyl group has from 6 to 8 carbon atoms.
  • 11. A dispersion according to claim 10, wherein the dispersion further comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of a pigment and a dye.
  • 12. A dispersion according to claim 10, wherein the dispersion further comprises a second surfactant different from the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant.
  • 13. A dispersion according to claim 12, wherein the second surfactant is a cationic surfactant different from the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant.
  • 14. A dispersion according to claim 12, wherein the second surfactant is one having the property of stabilizing the binder polymer.
  • 15. A dispersion according to claim 14, wherein the dispersion further comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of a pigment and a dye.
  • 16. A dispersion according to claim 1, wherein the dispersion further comprises a second surfactant different from the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant.
  • 17. A dispersion according to claim 1, wherein the dispersion contains no other surfactant besides the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant.
  • 18. A dispersion according to claim 2, wherein the emulsion has a continuous liquid phase that is an oil.
  • 19. A dispersion according to claim 18, wherein the emulsion has a disperse aqueous phase.
  • 20. A dispersion according to claim 1, wherein the emulsion consists of said polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant and said particles of the second polymer.
  • 21. A dispersion according to claim 1, wherein the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant consists of said nonionic hydrophilic monomer and said cationic antimicrobial monomer.
  • 22. A dispersion according to claim 20, wherein the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant consists of said nonionic hydrophilic monomer and said cationic antimicrobial monomer.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/011,579, filed Jun. 18, 2018, and entitled “Polymeric Antimicrobial Surfactant,” and claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/521,313, filed Jun. 16, 2017, and entitled “Polymeric Antimicrobial Surfactant,” the entire contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein as if put forth in full below.

US Referenced Citations (336)
Number Name Date Kind
2717887 Saner Sep 1955 A
2732350 Clarke Jan 1956 A
2882157 Thompson et al. Apr 1959 A
2972535 Laakso et al. Feb 1961 A
3140227 Roth et al. Jul 1964 A
3227672 Fertig et al. Jan 1966 A
3262807 Sterman et al. Jul 1966 A
3296167 Turner et al. Jan 1967 A
3296196 Lamoreaux Jan 1967 A
3328328 Scanley Jun 1967 A
3450794 Ebneth et al. Jun 1969 A
3592805 Szabo et al. Jul 1971 A
3597313 Coscia et al. Aug 1971 A
3619200 Ferguson et al. Nov 1971 A
3753716 Ishihara et al. Aug 1973 A
3871376 Kozak Mar 1975 A
3872128 Byck Mar 1975 A
3898188 Rembaum et al. Aug 1975 A
3929741 Laskey Dec 1975 A
3975350 Hudgin et al. Aug 1976 A
4011178 Muse Mar 1977 A
4017440 Killam Apr 1977 A
4026941 Login et al. May 1977 A
4029694 Weipert et al. Jun 1977 A
4069365 Rembaum Jan 1978 A
4070189 Kelley et al. Jan 1978 A
4080315 Login Mar 1978 A
4081419 Shimizu et al. Mar 1978 A
4093676 Weipert et al. Jun 1978 A
4098842 Login Jul 1978 A
4104443 Latta et al. Aug 1978 A
4119094 Micklus et al. Oct 1978 A
4125110 Hymes Nov 1978 A
4147550 Campbell et al. Apr 1979 A
4152307 Shibahara et al. May 1979 A
4181752 Martens et al. Jan 1980 A
4191743 Klemm et al. Mar 1980 A
4226232 Spence Oct 1980 A
4226748 Matsunaga et al. Oct 1980 A
4229554 Newkirk et al. Oct 1980 A
4234381 Killam Nov 1980 A
4256800 Stockhausen et al. Mar 1981 A
4259411 Windhager et al. Mar 1981 A
4304703 Das Dec 1981 A
4306996 Windhager Dec 1981 A
4318947 Joung Mar 1982 A
4332919 Kobayashi et al. Jun 1982 A
4361623 Newkirk et al. Nov 1982 A
4366238 Yokoyama et al. Dec 1982 A
4373009 Winn Feb 1983 A
4377667 Sakurai et al. Mar 1983 A
4384078 Ohya et al. May 1983 A
4391278 Cahalan et al. Jul 1983 A
4393048 Mason, Jr. et al. Jul 1983 A
4414353 Maslanka et al. Nov 1983 A
4416668 Thompson Nov 1983 A
RE31454 Hymes Dec 1983 E
4459289 Maltz Jul 1984 A
4480075 Willis Oct 1984 A
4482680 Sheldon et al. Nov 1984 A
4500517 Luss Feb 1985 A
4506070 Ben Mar 1985 A
4515162 Yamamoto et al. May 1985 A
4515593 Norton May 1985 A
4539996 Engel Sep 1985 A
4543390 Tanaka et al. Sep 1985 A
4546140 Shih Oct 1985 A
4563184 Korol Jan 1986 A
4570629 Widra Feb 1986 A
4581821 Cahalan et al. Apr 1986 A
4617343 Walker et al. Oct 1986 A
4632881 Trotz et al. Dec 1986 A
4657006 Rawlings et al. Apr 1987 A
4659785 Nagano et al. Apr 1987 A
4668748 Hardam et al. May 1987 A
4674512 Rolf Jun 1987 A
4699146 Sieverding Oct 1987 A
4705709 Vailancourt Nov 1987 A
4722965 Wong et al. Feb 1988 A
4728323 Matson Mar 1988 A
4735991 Guioth et al. Apr 1988 A
4740546 Masuda et al. Apr 1988 A
4762862 Yada et al. Aug 1988 A
4768523 Cahalan et al. Sep 1988 A
4769013 Lorenz et al. Sep 1988 A
4777954 Keusch et al. Oct 1988 A
4791063 Hou et al. Dec 1988 A
4810567 Calcaterra et al. Mar 1989 A
4816508 Chen Mar 1989 A
4831098 Watanabe et al. May 1989 A
4841021 Katritzky et al. Jun 1989 A
4842768 Nakao et al. Jun 1989 A
4848353 Engel Jul 1989 A
4857585 Leising Aug 1989 A
4857590 Gaggar et al. Aug 1989 A
4859727 Sasaki et al. Aug 1989 A
4876278 Taylor et al. Oct 1989 A
4877687 Azegami et al. Oct 1989 A
4891306 Yokoyama et al. Jan 1990 A
4898908 Lahalih et al. Feb 1990 A
4900543 Ritter et al. Feb 1990 A
4900544 Ritter et al. Feb 1990 A
4920166 Buysch et al. Apr 1990 A
4931506 Yu Jun 1990 A
4931522 Catena Jun 1990 A
4943612 Morita et al. Jul 1990 A
4947847 Nakao et al. Aug 1990 A
4948720 Chen et al. Aug 1990 A
4954636 Merianos et al. Sep 1990 A
4957908 Nelson Sep 1990 A
4981936 Good et al. Jan 1991 A
4997697 Malhotra Mar 1991 A
4999249 Deschler et al. Mar 1991 A
5004760 Patton et al. Apr 1991 A
5006267 Vaughn et al. Apr 1991 A
5010139 Yu Apr 1991 A
5019096 Fox, Jr. et al. May 1991 A
5024840 Blakely et al. Jun 1991 A
5043195 Skrivseth Aug 1991 A
5049383 Huth et al. Sep 1991 A
5055171 Peck Oct 1991 A
5057560 Mueller Oct 1991 A
5059629 Patton et al. Oct 1991 A
5061752 Buysch et al. Oct 1991 A
5069907 Mixon et al. Dec 1991 A
5080097 Eisenberg Jan 1992 A
5081182 Robinson et al. Jan 1992 A
5082697 Patton et al. Jan 1992 A
5124076 Smuckler Jun 1992 A
5142010 Olstein Aug 1992 A
5153321 Finter et al. Oct 1992 A
5175059 Yamamoto et al. Dec 1992 A
5183576 Wood et al. Feb 1993 A
5194539 Charmot et al. Mar 1993 A
5205297 Montecalvo et al. Apr 1993 A
5247008 Michels et al. Sep 1993 A
5255979 Ferrari Oct 1993 A
5263481 Axelgaard Nov 1993 A
5264249 Perrault et al. Nov 1993 A
5269770 Conway et al. Dec 1993 A
5271943 Bogart et al. Dec 1993 A
5290894 Melrose et al. Mar 1994 A
5312863 Van Rheenen et al. May 1994 A
5314924 Lee May 1994 A
5317063 Komatsu et al. May 1994 A
5330527 Montecalvo et al. Jul 1994 A
5336717 Rolando et al. Aug 1994 A
5346956 Gnanou Sep 1994 A
5354790 Keusch et al. Oct 1994 A
5358688 Robertson Oct 1994 A
5369179 Havens Nov 1994 A
5370981 Krafft et al. Dec 1994 A
5402884 Gilman et al. Apr 1995 A
5403587 McCue et al. Apr 1995 A
5403640 Krishnan et al. Apr 1995 A
5403883 Messner et al. Apr 1995 A
5420197 Lorenz et al. May 1995 A
5421982 Ikeda et al. Jun 1995 A
5429590 Saito et al. Jul 1995 A
5432000 Young, Sr. et al. Jul 1995 A
5447643 Kelkenberg et al. Sep 1995 A
5466256 McAdams et al. Nov 1995 A
5470916 Righetti et al. Nov 1995 A
5474065 Meathrel et al. Dec 1995 A
5480717 Kundel Jan 1996 A
5489437 Marra Feb 1996 A
5494987 Imazato et al. Feb 1996 A
5498478 Hansen et al. Mar 1996 A
5509899 Fan et al. Apr 1996 A
5512329 Guire et al. Apr 1996 A
5515117 Dziabo et al. May 1996 A
5518788 Invie May 1996 A
5520180 Uy et al. May 1996 A
5520910 Hashimoto et al. May 1996 A
5525356 Jevne et al. Jun 1996 A
5533971 Phipps Jul 1996 A
5536446 Uy et al. Jul 1996 A
5536494 Park Jul 1996 A
5536861 Robertson Jul 1996 A
5563056 Swan et al. Oct 1996 A
5591799 Bott et al. Jan 1997 A
5597661 Takeuchi et al. Jan 1997 A
5599321 Conway et al. Feb 1997 A
5608021 Uchiyama et al. Mar 1997 A
5614538 Nelson, Jr. Mar 1997 A
5614586 Tang et al. Mar 1997 A
5618586 Swarup et al. Apr 1997 A
5622168 Keusch et al. Apr 1997 A
5624704 Darouiche et al. Apr 1997 A
5645968 Sacripante et al. Jul 1997 A
5646197 Martin Jul 1997 A
5654369 Tsubaki et al. Aug 1997 A
5665477 Meathrel et al. Sep 1997 A
5667913 Chen et al. Sep 1997 A
5670557 Dietz et al. Sep 1997 A
5674275 Tang et al. Oct 1997 A
5674561 Dietz et al. Oct 1997 A
5688855 Stoy et al. Nov 1997 A
5700742 Payne Dec 1997 A
5725789 Huber et al. Mar 1998 A
5773507 Incorvia et al. Jun 1998 A
5779632 Dietz et al. Jul 1998 A
5798048 Ries Aug 1998 A
5798096 Pavlyk Aug 1998 A
5800685 Perrault Sep 1998 A
5821280 Suda et al. Oct 1998 A
5830934 Krishnan Nov 1998 A
5830983 Alex et al. Nov 1998 A
5834561 Fukumoto et al. Nov 1998 A
5849045 Chen et al. Dec 1998 A
5849822 Kido et al. Dec 1998 A
5874184 Takeuchi et al. Feb 1999 A
5886098 Ueda et al. Mar 1999 A
5907017 Ober et al. May 1999 A
5916917 Suh et al. Jun 1999 A
5967714 Ottersbach et al. Oct 1999 A
5984102 Tay Nov 1999 A
5985990 Kantner et al. Nov 1999 A
5997815 Anders et al. Dec 1999 A
6013275 Konagaya et al. Jan 2000 A
6015836 Martin Jan 2000 A
6022553 Anders et al. Feb 2000 A
6024895 Shimizu et al. Feb 2000 A
6038464 Axelgaard et al. Mar 2000 A
6039940 Perrault et al. Mar 2000 A
6045919 Alex et al. Apr 2000 A
6050979 Haemmerle et al. Apr 2000 A
6090459 Jadamus et al. Jul 2000 A
6096800 Ottersbach et al. Aug 2000 A
6103368 Fukuda et al. Aug 2000 A
6114467 Ober et al. Sep 2000 A
6127105 Vandenabeele Oct 2000 A
6187856 Incorvia et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194530 Klesse et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197322 Dutkiewicz et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203856 Ottersbach et al. Mar 2001 B1
6207361 Greener et al. Mar 2001 B1
6218492 Hill et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221425 Michal et al. Apr 2001 B1
6242526 Siddiqui et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248811 Ottersbach et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251967 Perichaud et al. Jun 2001 B1
6266490 Mukai et al. Jul 2001 B1
6280509 Mallow Aug 2001 B1
6319883 Graham et al. Nov 2001 B1
6358557 Wang et al. Mar 2002 B1
6368587 Anders et al. Apr 2002 B1
6410040 Melrose et al. Jun 2002 B1
6428866 Jadamus et al. Aug 2002 B1
6482781 Graham et al. Nov 2002 B2
6497868 Tanahashi Dec 2002 B1
6500981 Weipert Dec 2002 B1
6511669 Garnier et al. Jan 2003 B1
6525134 Lacroix et al. Feb 2003 B1
6537663 Chang et al. Mar 2003 B1
6559116 Godfroid et al. May 2003 B1
6583228 Nkansah et al. Jun 2003 B2
6689856 L'alloret Feb 2004 B2
6750296 Ober et al. Jun 2004 B2
6767647 Swofford et al. Jul 2004 B2
6797743 McDonald Sep 2004 B2
6800278 Perrault et al. Oct 2004 B1
6815074 Aguado et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815502 Lang et al. Nov 2004 B1
6821943 Avery et al. Nov 2004 B2
6852353 Qiu et al. Feb 2005 B2
7112559 Mayhall et al. Sep 2006 B1
8343473 Youngblood Jan 2013 B2
8349300 Wells et al. Jan 2013 B2
9131683 Gisser et al. Sep 2015 B2
9289378 Karandikar et al. Mar 2016 B2
11134684 Youngblood et al. Oct 2021 B2
11421084 Hopkins et al. Aug 2022 B2
11459415 Youngblood et al. Oct 2022 B2
20010007694 Ottersbach et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010044482 Hu et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010050478 Schmitz Dec 2001 A1
20020037955 Baumann et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020081923 Artley et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020086160 Qiu et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020139583 Masui et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020168473 Ottersbach et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020177828 Batich et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030013624 Graham et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030017194 Joerger et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030019813 Ottersbach et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030022576 Ottersbach et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030049437 Devaney et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030068440 Ottersbach et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030091641 Tiller et al. May 2003 A1
20030108507 Clipson et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030161804 Perron et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030229185 Chen et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236376 Kindt-Larsen et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040009136 Dubief et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040052746 Tamareselvy Mar 2004 A1
20040135967 Carney et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040202639 DeGrado et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050003163 Krishnan Jan 2005 A1
20050008676 Qiu et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050008839 Cramer et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050013842 Qiu et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050032931 Naisby et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050053569 Bavouzet Mar 2005 A1
20050058844 Rubner et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065284 Krishnan Mar 2005 A1
20050101740 Mougin May 2005 A1
20060057209 Chapman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060083854 Ober et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060189710 Hayashi et al. Aug 2006 A1
20070048249 Youngblood et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070053867 Ober et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070106040 Ober et al. May 2007 A1
20070149694 Krishnan Jun 2007 A1
20080226584 Krishnan Sep 2008 A1
20090081367 Makuta et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090311302 Youngblood et al. Dec 2009 A1
20120046378 Sloan Feb 2012 A1
20130079481 Youngblood et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130109794 Polzin et al. May 2013 A1
20130115185 Tamareselvy et al. May 2013 A1
20130136783 Youngblood et al. May 2013 A1
20140080977 Youngblood et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140127320 Salamone et al. May 2014 A1
20150093424 Lapitsky et al. Apr 2015 A1
20160053038 Youngblood et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160262392 Youngblood et al. Sep 2016 A1
20170043197 Olsen et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170360688 Fevola et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180237686 Schnoor et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180340046 Hopkins et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180362678 Hopkins et al. Dec 2018 A1
20200354527 Hopkins et al. Nov 2020 A1
20210084898 Youngblood et al. Mar 2021 A1
20220356309 Hopkins et al. Nov 2022 A1
20220363841 Hopkins et al. Nov 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (43)
Number Date Country
3339662 May 1984 DE
19833062 Feb 2000 DE
19910811 Sep 2000 DE
0000426 Jan 1979 EP
0085327 Aug 1983 EP
0099209 Jan 1984 EP
0141628 May 1985 EP
0239213 Sep 1987 EP
0286009 Oct 1988 EP
0337474 Oct 1989 EP
375350 Jun 1990 EP
0204312 Aug 1990 EP
0469196 Feb 1992 EP
0604369 Jun 1994 EP
0290676 Aug 1994 EP
0747456 Dec 1996 EP
1109845 Oct 2005 EP
1299012 Dec 1972 GB
1350400 Apr 1974 GB
2091277 Jul 1982 GB
H05286811 Nov 1993 JP
2002-105152 Apr 2002 JP
WO 9112282 Aug 1991 WO
WO 9206694 Apr 1992 WO
WO 9527530 Oct 1995 WO
WO 9714448 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9715603 May 1997 WO
WO9735542 Oct 1997 WO
WO 9745468 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9819311 May 1998 WO
WO 9829463 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9851720 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9909837 Mar 1999 WO
WO 0005283 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0008077 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0071591 Nov 2000 WO
WO03028767 Apr 2003 WO
WO2004045755 Jun 2004 WO
WO2013185058 Dec 2013 WO
WO2016127387 Aug 2016 WO
WO2017003923 Jan 2017 WO
WO2018222622 Dec 2018 WO
WO2018232417 Dec 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (104)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Aug. 9, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated May 12, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Sep. 12, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Advisory Action dated Sep. 29, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Request for Continued Examination dated Oct. 11, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Office Action dated May 4, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Interview Summary dated Aug. 23, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Interview Summary dated Sep. 11, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Amendment dated Sep. 13, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 19, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,159 Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,159 Amendment dated Jun. 28, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,159 Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/748,290 Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Nov. 13, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Response dated Sep. 8, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Dec. 8, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Pre-Appeal Conference Request dated May 6, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Amendment dated Apr. 21, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Notice of Appeal dated Dec. 8, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Amendment dated Mar. 21, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated May 9, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Amendment dated Feb. 9, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated May 15, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Amendment dated Aug. 15, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Notice of Appeal dated Jan. 22, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Appeal Brief dated Jun. 20, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Examiners Answer dated Aug. 14, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Reply Brief dated Oct. 14, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/992,033 Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/011,579 Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2020.
PCT/US2018/034954 PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 12, 2018.
PCT/US2018/038126 PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 24, 2018.
PCT/US2018/034954 Chapter II Demand and Response to Written Opinion dated Mar. 26, 2019.
PCT/US2018/034954 Second Written Opinion dated Apr. 30, 2019.
PCT/US2018/034954 Chapter II International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 3, 2019.
EP18731331.7 Response and amendment dated Jul. 24, 2020.
Abel, et al., “Preparation and Investigation of Antibacterial Carbohydrate-Based Surfaces”, Carbohydrate Research, vol. 337, No. 24; pp. 2495-2499; Nov. 29, 2002.
Allison, et al., “Hemocompatibility of Hydrophilic Antimicrobial Copolymers of Alkylated 4-Vinylpyridine” Biomacromolecules; 2007, 8; pp. 2995-2999.
Borman, “Surfaces Designed to Kill Bacteria”, Chemical & Engineering News; vol. 80, No. 22; pp. 36-38; Jun. 10, 2002.
Docherty, K., et al., “Toxicity and Antimicrobial Activity of Imidazolium and Pyridinium Ionic Liquids”, Green Chemistry, vol. 7, pp. 185-189, Mar. 14, 2005, DOI: 10.1039/b419172b.
Kawabata, et al., “Antibacterial Activity of Soluble Pyridinium-Type Polymers”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology; vol. 54, No. 10; pp. 2532-2535; Oct. 1988.
Krishnan, et al., “Antibacterial Coatings Based on Quatemized Poly(4-Vinylpyridine) Block Copolymers”, Polymeric Materials: Science and Engineering; vol. 91; pp. 814-815; 2004.
Kugler, R., et al., “Evidence of a Charge-Density Threshold for Optimum Efficiency of Biocidal Cationic Surfaces”, Microbiology, 151, 2005, pp. 1341-1348, DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.27526-0.
Li, et al., “Bactericidal Ability of a Soluble Pyridinium-Type Polymer Under Different Conditions”; pp. 177-178; National American Chemical Society Meeting, Anaheim, CA; Mar. 21-25, 1999.
Li, et al., “Effect of the Macromolecular Chain Structure of a Soluble Pyridinium-Type Polymer on Antimicrobial Activity”; pp. 175-176; National American Chemical Society Meeting, Anaheim, CA; Mar. 21-25, 1999.
Lin, et al., “Insights Into Bactericidal Action of Surface-Attached Poly(vinyl-N-hexylpyridinium) Chains”, Biotechnology Letters, vol. 24, No. 10; pp. 801-805; May 2002.
Lin, et al., “Mechanism of Bactericidal and Fungicidal Activities of Textiles Covalently Modified With Alkylated Polyethylenimine”, Biotech. Bioeng.; vol. 83, No. 2; pp. 168-172; Jul. 20, 2003.
Napper, D.H., “Steric Stabilization”, Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Sydney, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 58, No. 2, Feb. 1977, ISSN 0021-9797, pp. 390-407.
Sellenet, et al., “Hydrophilized Pyridinium Bactericidal Polymers”, Fall National American Chemical Society Meeting, Washington, DC; Aug. 28-Sep. 1, 2005; pp. 2.
Sellenet, et al., “Synergistic Activity of Hydrophilic Modification in Antibiotic Polymers” Biomacromolecules; 2007, vol. 8, No. 1; pp. 19-23.
Sellenet, “Hydrophilized Bactericidal Polymers”, Thesis, Purdue University, MSE, Dec. 2004; pp. 83.
Tadros, Tharwat F., “Emulsion Formation, Stability, and Rheology”, pp. 1-75, 2013.
Tiller, et al., “Designing Surfaces That Kill Bacteria on Contact”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; vol. 98, No. 11; pp. 5981-5985; May 22, 2001.
Tiller, et al., “Polymer Surfaces Derivatized With Poly(Vinyl-N-Hexylpyridinium) Kill Airborne and Waterborne Bacteria”; Biotechnology and Bioengineering;vol. 79, No. 4; pp. 465-471; Aug. 20, 2002.
Waschinski, C., et al., “poly(oxazoline)s with Telechelic Antimicrobial Functions”, Biomacromolecules 2005, vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 235-243.
Wynne, et al., “Novel Polymer Bound Bactericidal Surfaces”; vol. 45, No. 2; pp. 521-522; Fall National American Chemical Society Meeting, Philadelphia, PA; Aug. 22-27, 2004.
Alternative Medicine Review, Undecylenic Acid Monograph, vol. 7, No. 1, 2002, pp. 68-70.
Selected Abstracts; Dec. 2004-Mar. 2005; pp. 3.
Surface Industry, Detergent Raw Material, Sodium Tripolyphosphate 94.0% (STPP Industrial Grade), pp. 1-2, XP055579364.
XP002783622, Database WPI, Week 199349, Thomson Scientific, London, GB, AN 1993-389137, pp. 4.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2021.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 30, 2021.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2022.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/115,709 Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2022.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/115,709 Amendment dated Mar. 30, 2022.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Amendment dated Apr. 4, 2022.
EP18731331.7 OA dated Apr. 11, 2022.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/115,709 Notice of Allowability dated May 19, 2022.
Beta Merriam Webster; Definition of Derivative by Merriam-Webster Dictionary; Dec. 9, 2015; http://beta.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dervative; 10pp.
Cpolymer, “Polyquaternium-6”, CAS No. 26062-79-3, www.cpolymerchem.com, Apr. 10, 2020, pp. 1.
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc., Toxicology & Microbiology Studies, TOX-010, “Carbopol Aqua SF-1 Polymer”, Jan. 2000, pp. 1.
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc., Technical Data Sheet, TDS-294, “Carbopol Aqua SF-1 Polymer”, Acrylates Copolymer, Feb. 7, 2013, pp. 9.
PubChem, “Polyquatemium-10”, C25H50CINO16, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Polyquaternium-10, Jan. 9, 2022, pp. 17.
PubChem, “Polyquatemium-6”, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/#query=“Polyquaternium 6”, Jan. 9, 2022, pp. 2.
PubChem, “Methacrylamidopropyltrimethylammonium Chloride”, C10H21CIN2O, pp. 1.
PolyCare133, UPI Chem, item No. 460034, CAS No. 68039-13-4, www.upichem.com, pp. 1.
Solvay, PolyCare133, Ross Organic an Azelis Company, pp. 1.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2022.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Amendment dated Jun. 27, 2022.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 7, 2022.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/115,709 Amendment after Allowance dated Aug. 10, 2022.
EP18731331.7 Response and amendment dated Aug. 10, 2022.
EP18740003.1 Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2022.
EP18740003.1 Response and amendment dated Oct. 28, 2020.
Oxford Dictionary of Chemistry, 6th Edition, 2008, pp. 134-135 and 203.
“Sodium Dodecylbenzene Sulfonate (SDBS)”, USDA Technical Evaluation Report, May 26, 2017, pp. 1-21.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 RCE and amendment dated Dec. 10, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Preliminary amendment dated Dec. 17, 2020.
EP18740003.1 Amendment dated Nov. 9, 2022.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/865,886 Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2023.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/865,938 Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2023.
Strauss, et al., “The Transition from Typical Polyelectrolyte to PolySoap.II. Viscosity Studies of Poly-4-Vinylpyridine Derivatives in Aqueous KBr Solutions”, J. Phys.Chem., vol. 60, pp. 577-584, May 1956.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/865,886 Amendment dated Apr. 29, 2023.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200369800 A1 Nov 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62521313 Jun 2017 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16011579 Jun 2018 US
Child 16993761 US