The invention relates to surfactants for suspensions, emulsions, latexes, and/or colloids that have at least two phases, a continuous aqueous or aqueous-organic phase and a dispersed hydrophobic phase (e.g., a latex binder system used in coatings formulations.)
The formulation of many aqueous and aqueous-organic coatings starts with a binder component. The binder component in water based systems is generally a latex resin consisting of but not limited to polymers of acrylics, vinyl acrylics, and/or styrene acrylics. The dispersion of the less polar substantially insoluble monomer and/or polymer particles in the more polar aqueous solvent system is accomplished by the addition of stabilizing surfactants.
Additionally, some grades of plastics are also produced initially from an emulsion polymerization process followed by isolation of the solid e.g. polyvinylidene fluoride, polyvinyl fluoride, and PTFE. The final polymeric product is formed by destabilizing or breaking the emulsion so that the small polymer particles separate from the aqueous phase and are isolated.
These stabilizing surfactants generally contain polar and non-polar domains that effectively reduce the surface tension present at the interface of polar and non-polar components. The polar component of these stabilizing surfactants may consist of positively charged cationic groups, negatively charged anionic groups, and/or non-ionic polar groups.
For example, latex paints comprise an emulsion of polymer particles dispersed in water. The emulsions commonly found in latex paint are inherently unstable and phase-separate, so surfactants are added to reduce interfacial tension and stabilize polymer particles to prevent demulsification. The following are examples of a cationic, an anionic, and a nonionic surfactant that may be used to stabilize the emulsion.
Anionic surfactants such as sodium dodecyl sulfate are most commonly used for stabilizing emulsions because of their affinity tier hydrogen bonding through the anionic sulfate head with the aqueous medium while anchored to the non-polar monomer/polymer particle through the aliphatic tail. The particle is stabilized through electrostatic repulsion.
Nonionic surfactants are rarely used alone due to their inferior efficiency in creating stable emulsions in comparison to anionic surfactants. Ionic surfactants are, however, sensitive to changes in ionic strength of the compositions they stabilize. Because of this, non-ionic surfactants are usually used in tandem with anionic and cationic surfactants and impart a second method of colloidal stabilization through steric interference of the van der Waals forces amid polymer and pigment particles. Latexes that require stability over large pH ranges use larger nonionic to anionic surfactant ratios.
Cationic surfactants are not commonly used due mainly to their higher costs. Cationic surfactants are frequently made up of quaternized ammonium compounds. Cationic surfactants frequently require the addition of nonionic surfactants to increase the stability of the latex. They are used in cases where their properties justify the additional cost. One example is in those cases where the resulting polymer emulsion is “broken” and the solid polymer is isolated.
Quaternary ammonium compounds are not typically added to already formed coating compositions that consist of a continuous aqueous or aqueous-organic phase containing a dispersed hydrophobic phase commonly stabilized by an anionic surfactant such as that used in a latex binder system. This is due to a negative effect on the quality and stability of the latex suspension. Quaternary ammonium compounds when added to latex-paint formulations have caused an undesirable increase in viscosity as well as permitting the dispersed polymer and pigments to agglomerate, flocculate, and settle. The emulsion is said to be “broken” in this case. Without being limited to any particular theory, it is believed that the cationic nature of the quaternary ammonium compounds is not compatible with the commonly anionic nature of latex paint formulations. In some cases, insoluble complexes of the quaternary ammonium compound and the latex stabilizing surfactant form, resulting in the effective reduction of surfactant concentration. This reduction of surfactant concentration causes the latex dispersion to destabilize, allowing the agglomeration of the various components of the composition. This results in a shorter shelf life and an undesirable appearance as the agglomerated particles cause the dry paint film to have a grainy appearance or texture.
This is particularly true where the quaternary ammonium compounds are polymers themselves. Polymers containing quaternary amines as part of their structure do not typically possess ionic and/or polar domains in high enough concentration to form stable micelles needed for construction of suspensions, emulsions, latexes, or colloids. Because of this lack of amphiphilicity or polarity, it is particularly difficult to prevent particles of hydrophobic organic polymers in aqueous or aqueous-organic carriers from precipitating and agglomerating. The hydrophobicity of an organic polymer causes the particles to rapidly separate from water and agglomerate into larger sized aggregates which may then irreversibly segregate yielding a non-homogeneous suspension. The polymeric particles have a much greater affinity for one another than the aqueous or aqueous-organic carriers and often clump together in the bottom of the container. Their relatively large surface area and affinity for one another virtually assures that, once the polymeric particles have clumped together and entangled, it is impossible to re-suspend the polymeric particles. This entanglement of polymer chains is often referred to as “pseudo cross-linking” due to the inhibition of solvation similar to that observed in covalently cross-linked polymers. The addition of nonionic surfactants may be required to enhance the stability of the suspension.
Additionally, quaternary ammonium compounds are known to be toxic above certain concentrations and irritants even at low concentrations, indicating a significant lack of biocompatibility. Quaternary ammonium compounds can display a range of health effects, amongst which are mild skin and respiratory irritation up to severe caustic burns on skin and gastrointestinal lining (depending on concentration), gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., nausea and vomiting), coma, convulsions, hypotension and death. One example is Quaternium-15 which is the single most often found cause of allergic contact dermatitis of the hands.
Among other embodiments, the invention provides a suspension-stabilizing surfactant, latex-stabilizing surfactant, emulsion-stabilizing surfactant and/or colloid-stabilizing surfactant that is also antimicrobial and biocompatible. The invention in one instance provides aqueous coating compositions that contain a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant such as a polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant and (a) a lipophilic phase and/or (b) a phase having otherwise insufficient inherent water dispersibility. The invention also provides antimicrobial coatings formed by drying the aqueous coating compositions. This polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant can, in one instance, be part of a stable aqueous binder/carrier system in which this surfactant (a) aids in dispersing a latex binder that is hydrophobic or otherwise has insufficient inherent water dispersibility and/or (b) imparts antimicrobial properties to the binder/carrier system and/or binder as applied to an object. The invention also provides methods of dispersing a hydrophobic phase and/or hydrophobic particles in an aqueous phase, further, the invention provides methods of making the polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant and polymeric product that contains the surfactant. The invention also provides new methods of using existing polymers as a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant in such compositions.
The invention in one instance provides a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant and a polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant that is soluble in an aqueous carrier such as water or water-based solution that aids in the formation and stability of a dispersed hydrophobic phase. The dispersed hydrophobic phase may consist of hydrophobic inorganic materials, small molecules, preformed polymers, or monomers that may be subsequently polymerized. The polymeric antimicrobial surfactant can form part of a stable aqueous dispersion that can be applied to a surface to form a coating.
Additionally the polymer prepared in the stable aqueous dispersion described above can be isolated by either removal of solvent, breaking of the emulsion or any other suitable means to give a solid polymer with intrinsic antimicrobial properties due to inclusion of the biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant in the solid polymer.
The polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant is a polymer that can be represented as the polymerization product of at least two components introduced as monomers. The first component is a hydrophilic monomer that gives the resulting polymer its nonionic surfactant/biocompatibility properties. The second component is a quaternized or quaternizable monomer (referred to as the “cationic monomer” herein) such as a nitrogen-containing monomer or a phosphorous-containing monomer that gives the polymer its cationic surfactant antimicrobial properties. The combination of these two monomers followed by polymerization using techniques commonly used by those familiar with the art and with subsequent quaternization of the quaternizable atoms present using a quaternizing agent such as an appropriate activated alkyl compound if necessary yields the desired polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant. The polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant may have a molecular weight of at least about 1000 Daltons, for instance.
The surfactant properties of the polymer provides an interface between the dispersed hydrophobic phase and the continuous aqueous phase. In many instances, the aliphatic hydrophobic domain portion of the polymeric antimicrobial resides within the dispersed hydrophobic phase due to its low polarity. The hydrophilic domain portion of the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant may have sufficient solvating ability in water that it can facilitate the polymer's dissolution in water. The cationic domain assists in both the surfactant properties of the polymer as well as supplying the cationic center required for the antimicrobial properties. Consequently, the cationic polymeric antimicrobial portion is not limited to being present in the disperse phase. Thus the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant has a chemical structure that provides a lipophilic portion and a hydrophilic portion as well as a cationic portion. The polymer is therefore adapted to interface with both the dispersed phase and the continuous phase. The polymer therefore typically resides as an interface layer between the disperse and continuous phases of a dispersion, thus stabilizing the dispersion through electrostatic and steric effects. The polymer combines the properties of a cationic surfactant and a nonionic surfactant into a single polymeric species. The following illustrates a simplified non-limiting example of the domains discussed.
The cationic domain of a conventional polymer may cause the polymer to be antimicrobial. However, the cationic domain of a conventional polymer may be a relatively nonpolar cation or a cation that possesses polar portions but in a number insufficient to enable the cationic polymeric antimicrobial portion to be sufficiently soluble in the aqueous carrier, making the polymer potentially antimicrobial but not effective as a surfactant. The addition of a significant polar domain through the addition of one or more polar monomers enables a controlled adjustment of the overall amphiphilicity of the modified polymer in an aqueous solution. For instance, the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant may be a copolymer of a vinyl pyridine such as 4-vinylpyridine and e.g. (2-hydroxyethyl) methacrylate (HEMA), poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (PEGMA), and/or poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (PEGMEMA) that has been quaternized with e.g. an alkyl from a halide compound such as butyl bromide as is disclosed in e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 8,343,473 issued Jan. 1, 2013 entitled “Hydrophilized Antimicrobial Polymers”, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety for all that it teaches and for all purposes herein (this patent is therefore to be treated as if this patent is repeated in full below). The polymeric antimicrobial due to the presence of the hydrophilic monomer may be non-toxic and biocompatible so that the coating composition and the resultant coating or solid polymer may also be biocompatible.
The hydrophilic domain of the surfactant polymer is provided by a monomer or monomers that have a polar portion or portions in addition to e.g. a vinylic center or other reactive moiety that reacts with the latent cationic monomer of the antimicrobial portion to provide a copolymer. The hydrophilic monomer(s) may have one or more electronegative and/or electropositive atoms functioning as a nonionic surfactant domain to aid in dispersing the resulting polymeric antimicrobial surfactant particles within the coating solution (mixture) and in the vicinity of the disperse phase. The antimicrobial portion may also have a hydrophobic domain that is compatible with the disperse phase and/or the continuous phase. The hydrophobic domain may also contain a portion of the hydrophilic monomer, such as a vinylic portion of the monomer (e.g. a vinyl or vinyl portion of an ester). The hydrophilic domain of the surfactant imparts water solubility to the polymeric antimicrobial surfactant and thus does not destabilize the disperse phase. The hydrophilic surfactant portion also surprisingly does not interfere substantially and in fact may augment the antimicrobial activity of the cationic polymeric antimicrobial portion.
The amount of each monomer and their respective molecular weights are selected so that the copolymer has (a) sufficient hydrophilicity from the hydrophilic surfactant domain and (b) sufficient hydrophobicity from the hydrophobic domain and (c) antimicrobial activity from the cationic domain of the of the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant that a sufficient amount of the copolymer in the solution resides as an interface between the disperse phase and the continuous phase selected for the particular dispersion.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,343,473 generally discloses copolymers that may be adapted for use as a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant in forming compositions according to one aspect of the invention. One or more cationic monomers (e.g. nitrogen-containing monomers) may be copolymerized with one or more hydrophilic monomers to form the polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant. Examples of nitrogen-containing monomers may include a variety of vinyl monomers capable of free radical polymerization and/or quaternization. Accordingly, these monomers may include, but are not limited to, vinyl amines, such as N,N-dimethylvinylamine; N,N-dialkyl allyl amines; and/or tertiary amines in which at least one of the three substituents of nitrogen contains an unsaturation capable of participating in free radical polymerization and when quaternized is rendered antimicrobial.
A polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant has multiple cations in its structure. For instance, a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant may contain three or more cationic sites by copolymerizing one or more hydrophilic monomers with 3 or more monomers that each have a single cationic site. Alternatively, a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant may be formed by copolymerizing one or more hydrophilic monomers with two or more monomers that each have two or more cationic sites. While a polycationic polymer can easily destabilize a dispersion in the form of a suspension or colloid such as a latex or an emulsion by complexing or otherwise interfering with a surfactant already present in the dispersion, a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant as provided herein can be formulated to augment and/or provide stability to a dispersion that includes an antimicrobial polymer containing multiple cationic sites. Preferably, the cations of the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant are quaternized nitrogen and/or phosphorous atoms. Also preferably, the hydrophilic monomer is selected to provide biocompatibility to the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant. A polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant may contain PEGMA, PEGMEMA, and/or HEMA for instance that aid in providing a biocompatible copolymer.
In a preferred embodiment, a pyridinium-type monomer, such as vinyl pyridine or 4-vinylpyridine, is quaternized after polymerization to a hydrophilic monomer.
A nitrogen-containing monomer may be inherently bactericidal or antimicrobial, or it may be rendered bactericidal or antimicrobial after polymerization with a hydrophilic monomer to form a copolymer. Where the copolymer undergoes a chemical modification, such as quaternization, preferably, the resultant copolymer is more hydrophilic and/or bactericidal or antimicrobial than a similarly modified (by e.g., quaternization) nitrogen-containing comonomer alone or copolymer containing the same number of nitrogen containing monomers as the copolymer.
A nitrogen-containing monomer may include or be chemically linked to a suitable bactericidal or antimicrobial moiety, including, but not limited to polycationic species, polycationic derivatives or combinations therefrom. Polycationic species may contain two or more quaternary ammonium groups with a molecular weight ranging from several hundred Daltons to a few hundred thousand Daltons. The quaternary ammonium groups may be part of a ring or they may be acyclic. Examples include but are not limited to: polyionenes, poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), dimethylamine-epichlorohydrin copolymers and imidazole-epichlorohydrin copolymers. Suitable nitrogen-containing monomers for use in the present invention may include the quaternary ammonium group-containing polymers disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,482,680, which are incorporated by reference herein.
Polycationic species may contain two or more cationic groups. The cationic groups (e.g. amines) can be primary, secondary, tertiary, or mixtures thereof. The cationic groups may be part of a ring or they may be acyclic. Examples include but are not limited to: polyethyleneimines, polypropyleneimines, polyvinylamines, polyallylamines, polydiallylamines, polyamidoamines, polyaminoalkylmethacrylates, polylysines, and mixtures thereof.
The polycationic species may also be a modified polyamine with at least one amine group substituted with at least one other functional group. Examples include ethoxylated and alkoxylated polyamines and alkylated polyamines. Other suitable nitrogen-containing monomers or those that may be rendered bactericidal or antimicrobial may be identified and/or used in accordance with the applications and objectives set forth in the specification and any claims.
Quaternization may be carried out using alkylating agents, including but not limited to alkyl halides (such as hexyl bromide), alkyl sulfonates, alkyl mesylates, alkyl tosylates, or other alkylating agents possessing a suitable leaving group. Quaternization reduces self-polymerization of the bactericidal or antimicrobial comonomer upon polymerization with the hydrophilic monomer. Quaternization may confer increased bactericidal or antimicrobial activity and may be carried out after polymerization. The alkyl group of the alkylating agent and therefore the quaternized nitrogen-containing monomer may have from 4 to 12 carbon atoms, for instance, and preferably, the alkyl group has from 5 to 10 carbon atoms or 6 to 8 carbon atoms. The alkyl group may be linear or branched.
Alkyl groups at a quaternized site, and/or other cationic chains may be attracted to and/or promote interaction and penetration negatively charged bacterial cell walls on account of their lipophilic nature. Alkyl chain lengths of quaternizing agents and overall hydrophilic/lipophilic balance may affect bactericidal or antimicrobial activity of the polymeric compositions of the present invention. Accordingly, these variables may be modified to optimize or improve bactericidal or antimicrobial activity of the polymeric compositions.
Suitable hydrophilic monomers may include, but are not limited to, ethylene glycol (ethylene oxide); polyethylene glycol derivatives, including poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (PEGMA), including poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate, poly(ethylene glycol) acrylate, and vinyl polyethylene glycol; vinyl acetate; poly(vinyl alcohol); vinyl pyrrolidone and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone); vinyl pyrrolidinone and polyivinyl pyrrolidinone); vinyl oxazoline and poly(vinyl oxazoline); vinyl formamide and poly(vinyl formamide); hydroxyalkyl acrylates and hydroxyalkyl methacrylates, such as hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and hydroxyethyl acrylate; methacrylamide; acrylamide and methacrylamide based monomers, such as acrylamide, N,N-dimethyl acrylamide, N-ethyl acrylamide, N-isopropyl acrylamide, and hydroxymethyl acrylamide; monomers containing one or more of the following functional groups: hydroxy, amino, ammonium, ether, carboxylate, amide, and sulfonamide groups; and combinations or copolymers thereof, polyvinyloxazolines
Preferably, a hydrophilic monomer is biocompatible or imparts biocompatibility to the surfactant in which it is incorporated. Standard assays may be utilized to evaluate biocompatibility, including but not limited to viability/cytotoxicity mammalian cell assays and the like. Preferred hydrophilic monomers may include hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA), poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (PEGMA), and poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (PEGMEMA).
HEMA is widely used in biomedical applications and devices, most prominently soft contact lenses. HEMA, with 37.8% water per weight, is typical of hydrogels. Preferably, the molar ratio of cationic monomer such as 4-vinyl pyridine to HEMA comonomer in the copolymer is between 30:70 and 95:5, and preferably the molar percentage of HEMA comonomer is at least 90%, with 90-95% being preferred.
Poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (PEGMA) and poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (PEGMEMA) are monomers which provide several important properties, such as good solubility in both organic and aqueous media, low toxicity, immunogenicity and biocompatibility to copolymers they are present in.
Preferably, the molar molecular weight of PEGMA and/or poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate monomer used in forming the surfactant is equal to or greater than 300, more preferably between about 300 and about 2000, including but not limited to 1000. Preferably, the molar ratio of cationic monomer such as 4-vinyl pyridine to PEGMA and/or PEGMEMA is between about 10:90 and 99:1, and more preferably is between 30:70 and 95:5.
The polymeric antimicrobial surfactant may be formed by free radical polymerization or by other methods. Any of the surfactants as discussed herein may be a block or random copolymer, for instance.
For example, a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant may be represented as the polymerization product of monomers of (a) poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate as the surfactant's hydrophilic surfactant portion and (b) monomers of vinyl pyridine as the surfactant's hydrophobic and cationic polymeric antimicrobial portion. If the molecular weight of the poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate is about 1000, preferably the copolymer has between about 8-72 mol % of monomer (a) and between about 92-28 mol % of monomer (b). More preferably, the copolymer has between about 8-40% of monomer (a) and between about 92-60% of monomer (b). These percentages are provided as guidelines to aid in selecting the types and amounts of monomers for the polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant for various disperse phases and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.
The polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant (including the polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant) is formulated to significantly reduce the growth, number, viability and/or metabolic activity of bacteria or microorganisms. The surfactant may be formulated to significantly reduce bacterial or microbial growth from a treated medium by a factor of at least 50%. Further, a bactericidal or antimicrobial composition may be formulated to significantly reduce bacterial or microbial growth from a treated medium by at least 60%, by at least 70%, by at least 80%, by at least 90%, by at least 95%, by at least 99%, or by at least 99.9%. This reduction may occur within a 30 minute period, for example.
The polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant alone (without other surfactants) may be all that is needed to disperse e.g. a binder (such as polymeric particles) in a liquid. The hydrophobic domain of the polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant can associate with polymeric particles to disperse them in e.g. an aqueous carrier liquid with which the hydrophilic domain of the polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant associates. The cationic domain can also associate with the aqueous carrier liquid where ionic charge predominates the structure of the cationic domain and the dispersed hydrophobic phase where the structure of the cationic domain is hydrophobic overall despite the cationic charge.
A second surfactant may also be present with the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant in the carrier liquid. A second surfactant can be provided to e.g. stabilize binder (polymeric particles that form a solid coating upon solvent removal or destabilization of the dispersion) or other components dispersed in the carrier liquid. The second surfactant may be cationic, anionic, or nonionic.
If the second surfactant is cationic, preferably the cationic portion of that second surfactant has greater binding strength to a corresponding anion than the cationic domain of the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant has to that corresponding anion. Preferably the cationic portion of the second surfactant also has greater binding strength to its corresponding anion than it has to any anions present in the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant.
If the second surfactant is anionic, preferably the anionic portion of that second surfactant has greater binding strength to a corresponding cation than to the cationic domain of the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant. Preferably the anionic portion of that second surfactant also has greater binding strength to that corresponding cation than any anions present in the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant.
An example of a coating composition may be e.g. a latex paint formulation containing, in addition to the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant, any one or more of the following components:
The coating solution may have a pH of about neutral pH to acidic pH. The pH is preferably between e.g. 2 and 9, more preferably between 5.5 and 6.5.
Other coating solutions into which the dispersible polymeric antimicrobial particles may be incorporated include, but are not limited to, floor wax binders, adhesives, sealants, caulks, furniture polish, synthetic rubber compositions, and plastic compositions.
Floor wax is typically a surfactant stabilized dispersion of a polymer or polymers that impart the floor wax's finish, a polymeric binder, as well as various coalescents and plasticizers and other components in an aqueous or aqueous-organic continuous phase. An example of such a floor wax is one that has a styrene-ethyl acrylate-methyl methacrylate copolymer binder emulsion, polyethylene emulsion, tricresyl phosphate plasticizer, and styrene-maleic copolymer as disclosed in e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 3,328,328, which patent is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
There is a surprising array of modern adhesives having a broad range of components to optimize their use in the particular situation for which they are intended. Most water born adhesives have as one of the components a dispersed polymer in an aqueous continuous phase. The dispersed polymer may be made up of any of a wide array of polymers e.g. polyvinyl acetate, vinyl acetate copolymer, polyacrylate, polyvinylidene chloride, styrene-butadiene copolymer, polyurethane, polyester, polychloroprene, and/or rubber latex. White glue or carpenter's glue are the best known examples of water born adhesives.
A sealant or caulk may typically have a silicone polymer dispersed in an aqueous phase or such polymers as butyl rubbers and polybutene dispersed in aqueous phase. Sealants and caulks are similar in composition to adhesives in that many contain one or more water dispersed polymer latexes as one of their components. The dispersions are formed using an emulsifying surfactant in an emulsion polymerization scenario.
A furniture polish may contain one or more of the following hydrophobic materials dispersed in an aqueous phase by use of a surfactant: carnauba wax, candelilla wax, sugar cane wax, cotton wax, beeswax, shellac, lanolin fractions from sheep, ozokerite, paraffin waxes, microcrystalline waxes, oxidized microcrystalline waxes, Fischer-Tropsch waxes, montan waxes, polymers such as methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, vinyl acetate, styrene, vinyl chloride, acrylonitrile, and oils such as those derived from vegetable, petroleum, or silicone sources to enhance shine.
Synthetic rubber compositions are sometimes prepared through a polymerization process carried out as a surfactant stabilized dispersion. A particularly important example of such a synthetic process is the preparation of Neoprene. Neoprene is produced by free-radical polymerization of chloroprene. In commercial production, this polymer is prepared by free radical emulsion polymerization. Polymerization is initiated using potassium persulfate. Bifunctional nucleophiles, metal oxides (e.g. zinc oxide), and thioureas are used to crosslink individual polymer strands.
Plastic compositions are also prepared in some instances through a surfactant stabilized polymerization phase. An excellent example where a plastic is prepared through a surfactant stabilized emulsion process would be the production of polytetrafluoroethylene) (Teflon, PTFE). Because PTFE is poorly soluble in almost all solvents, and the polymerization is sensitive to temperature fluctuations it is conducted as an emulsion in water. This process gives a suspension of polymer particles which are then isolated as solid particles.
An ink composition can also be formulated using a surfactant of the invention. The pigment particles (typically 0.005 to 15 micron in size) and/or dye of an ink formulation can associate with the hydrophobic portion of the surfactant, thereby suspending the ink's pigment particles and dyes in aqueous carrier liquid more readily to provide a more homogeneous ink formulation. Ink compositions such as those used in inkjet printers and in the commercial print industry must also meet certain toxicity requirements that a polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant as disclosed herein can help to satisfy. Pigment particles and dyes in ink compositions include sulfated polyazo black dye and various pigment particles available from commercial suppliers such as Hoechst, Ciba-Geigy, Mobay, and BASF, for instance. In addition to pigment particles and dyes that can be dispersed using a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant, ink formulations may contain optical brighteners such as stilbenes (e.g, bis(benzoxazolyl)-cis-stilbene or 4,4′-diamino-2,2′-stilbenedisulfonic acid) and/or thiophenes (e.g. 2,5-bis(benzoxazol-2-yl)thiophene) that can be dispersed using a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant as discussed herein.
Other products that may utilize a surfactant as provided herein include detergents such as laundry detergent and/or softening agents such as fabric softeners. Brighteners such as the stilbenes and thiophenes discussed above can be dispersed in liquid or dry laundry detergents, and the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant as discussed herein can aid in dispersing the brighteners and/or other laundry detergent components or other fabric softeners throughout the wash water to better contact clothing while optionally providing antimicrobial properties to the laundered clothing. Clothes can therefore remain fresher for longer periods of time. A polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant may be provided alone or as one of a number of other softener components in a clothes softening composition, and other such softeners include mono- and di-ester quats and derivatives that are typically used in such clothes softening compositions.
Cosmetics may incorporate a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant as discussed herein. These surfactants can disperse brighteners, oils or oily compounds such as coconut oil, castor oil, shea butter, and derivatives in e.g. foundation, eye shadow, lipstick, blush, makeup, and other cosmetics. The antimicrobial properties of a polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant may aid in keeping skin healthy as well as preserve the cosmetic itself, increasing shelf life.
Herbicides and insecticides can also benefit from incorporation of a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant into them. The polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant can disperse common herbicides such as atrazine and common insecticides such as organophosphates, carbamates, pyrethroids, and other compounds as well as prevent potential microbial induced degradation thus increasing shelf life.
It was quite surprising that a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial compound or a biocompatible antimicrobial polymer could be configured as a surfactant. Typically, antimicrobial polymers do not possess both sufficient lipophilicity and sufficient hydrophilicity to satisfy the requirements for a surfactant, and the cations of the antimicrobial polymer often disrupt stable dispersions present in a carrier liquid. We have determined, however, that antimicrobial polymers can in fact be configured to be biocompatible as well as lipophilic and hydrophilic without sacrificing antimicrobial properties. Consequently, a wide array of suspensions, emulsions, latexes, and/or colloids useful in the preparation of coatings, adhesives, sealants, and caulks as disclosed herein can be formulated using a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or a polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant as disclosed herein.
A general method for preparation of a stable suspension of a hydrophobic monomer solution in an aqueous continuous phase is conducted as follows. The surfactant, derived from this invention, is dissolved in the aqueous/aqueous-organic continuous phase in sufficient quantity concentration to support the formation of micelles that will contain the monomers. An initiator that is soluble in the aqueous continuous phase and insoluble in the monomer phase is added. The monomer(s) are then added to the aqueous phase with agitation forming droplets. Monomer(s) diffuse to the nascent micelles where they come in contact with a free radical originating from decomposition of the initiator. While some initiation may occur in the aqueous phase as well as the droplet phase the majority occurs in the micelles. The monomer solution is added to the reaction mixture over time in order to reduce the incidence of initiation occurring in the droplet phase. Monomer(s) continues to diffuse from the droplets to the micelles growing the size of the polymer particle as well as to nascent micelles depending on the quantity of surfactant added. This process results in a polymer suspension/emulsion latex or colloid that contains a surfactant that is antimicrobial. Additional antimicrobial surfactant can be added upon completion of polymerization if additional efficacy is required.
Alternatively a stable suspension of a hydrophobic monomer(s) solution in an aqueous or aqueous/organic continuous phase may be formed and polymerized using the following methodology. A polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant of this invention is dissolved in the aqueous or aqueous/organic continuous phase at a concentration that will be sufficient to give the level of antimicrobial activity desired (e.g. 1% by weight in solution). The monomer(s) are added as a single aliquot. The heterogeneous mixture is then agitated such that sufficient energy is input to give the desired particle size of the dispersed phase. A high shear mixer may be used to supply the necessary agitation. After the suspension of monomers is formed and stabilized by the added surfactant, agitation may be reduced substantially to the point where the suspension remains homogeneous. A free radical initiator that is soluble in the continuous phase but not in the dispersed phase is then added and the suspension is heated to conduct the polymerization reaction. The resultant polymer or polymer/oil phase is consequently dispersed through the continuous phase by the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant.
Polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant possessing suitable bactericidal properties and a suitable hydrophilicity biocompatibility profile was obtained using a quaternized polymeric composition synthesized from 4-vinylpyridine and poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate. The copolymer was synthesized by radical copolymerization using 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH) as the initiator in a water-isopropanol solvent system. The reactants were stirred at 70° C. for 24 hours under flowing N2 to exclude oxygen. The resulting copolymer was quaternized by the addition of one equivalent (relative to 4-vinylpyridine) of 1-bromohexane (HB) in a followed by heating at 70° C. for 48 hr. The progress of the quaternization reaction was followed by infrared spectroscopy. The solid polymer was obtained placing the polymer/solvent mixture in trays and heating to 70° C. overnight.
Following are other examples of the invention. Table 1 lists various monomers used to form polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant and various polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactants, as recognized from the copolymerization and quaternization products formed using the specified compounds. The quaternizing agent is 1-butyl chloride and/or fluoride in certain instances not listed, and in other instances the quaternizing agent is 1-chlorooctane and/or 1-fluorooctane.
Table 2 provides a list of other components that may be dispersed using a polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant of Table 1 as well as products in which the particular component and polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant or polymeric biocompatible antimicrobial surfactant are dispersed. Table 2 provides examples of the dispersed materials and is, of course, a nonexhaustive list. Each of the surfactants of Table 1 is individually combined with each of the dispersed polymers or compounds below in a carrier liquid (e.g. water or an oil) and other compounds as appropriate to form the products listed in Table 2.
Table 3 lists other surfactants that may be present with polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant and typical commercial uses.
Table 4 provides a list of various microbes against which the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant, dispersed in an aqueous carrier, may be effective. Kill tests have been performed against these microbes for certain polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactants as disclosed, and the polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactants have reduced levels of these microbes substantially. Data was generated using the methodology set out in ASTM E 2315-03 (2008) for a period of exposure of microbe to polycationic polymeric antimicrobial surfactant ranging from 1 minute to 30 minutes.
Bacillus
cereus
Clostridium
Difficile (spore)
Enterococcus
faecalis
Staphylococcus
aureus
Staphylococcus
aureus
Staphylococcus
epidermidis
Enterobacter
aerogenes
Escherichia
coli
Escherichia
coli
Klebsiella
pneumoniae
Salmonella
enterica
Pseudomottas
aeruginosa
Candida
albicans
Aspergillus
brasiliensis niger
Levivirus
bacteriophage MS2
Consequently, in addition to the inventions described above, the following are examples of the invention:
The phrases “significantly reducing the growth of” microorganisms such as bacteria and/or viruses and “significantly reducing growth” are used interchangeably to denote one or more of the following conditions, including (i) a condition in which the metabolic, activity of at least 50% of the microorganisms of a particular type exposed to a treated medium is terminated or reduced compared to microorganisms of that particular type exposed to an untreated medium over a fixed period of time; a condition where there is 50% or less of one or more types of microorganism present in and/or on a treated medium compared to the number of microorganisms exposed to an untreated medium; and/or (iii) a condition resulting when one or more types of microorganisms adhere 50% less to a treated medium compared to an untreated medium. The degree of growth reduction with respective to conditions (i)-(iii) may range from 50% to greater 99.9%.
The term “biocompatible” refers to a material that is substantially non-toxic in the in vivo environment of its intended use, and that is not substantially rejected by the patient's physiological system (i.e., is non-antigenic). This can be gauged by the ability of a material to pass the biocompatibility tests set forth in International Standards Organization (ISO) Standard No. 10993 and/or the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) 23 and/or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) blue book memorandum No. G95-1, entitled “Use of international Standard ISO-10993, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part-1: Evaluation and Testing.” Typically, these tests measure a material's toxicity, infectivity, pyrogenicity, irritation potential, reactivity, hemolytic activity, carcinogenicity and/or immunogenicity. A biocompatible structure or material, when introduced into a majority of patients, will not cause a significantly adverse, long-lived or escalating biological reaction or response, and is distinguished from a mild, transient inflammation which typically accompanies surgery or implantation of foreign objects into a living organism.
The term “stable dispersion” refers to a dispersion such as a suspension or colloid (e.g. a latex or emulsion) that has a shelf life of at least seven days, as measured by light scattering instruments or other instruments employed for the particular classification of suspension or colloid formulated (e.g. paint, cosmetic, coating, wax, adhesive, or other end-use as discussed above). Preferably the shelf life is at least one month, more preferably at least three months, and more preferably still at least six months and at least a year, respectively.
All publications listed herein are incorporated by reference for all that they teach, as if put forth in full below.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/011,579, filed Jun. 18, 2018, and entitled “Polymeric Antimicrobial Surfactant,” and claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/521,313, filed Jun. 16, 2017, and entitled “Polymeric Antimicrobial Surfactant,” the entire contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein as if put forth in full below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2717887 | Saner | Sep 1955 | A |
2732350 | Clarke | Jan 1956 | A |
2882157 | Thompson et al. | Apr 1959 | A |
2972535 | Laakso et al. | Feb 1961 | A |
3140227 | Roth et al. | Jul 1964 | A |
3227672 | Fertig et al. | Jan 1966 | A |
3262807 | Sterman et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
3296167 | Turner et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3296196 | Lamoreaux | Jan 1967 | A |
3328328 | Scanley | Jun 1967 | A |
3450794 | Ebneth et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
3592805 | Szabo et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3597313 | Coscia et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3619200 | Ferguson et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3753716 | Ishihara et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3871376 | Kozak | Mar 1975 | A |
3872128 | Byck | Mar 1975 | A |
3898188 | Rembaum et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3929741 | Laskey | Dec 1975 | A |
3975350 | Hudgin et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4011178 | Muse | Mar 1977 | A |
4017440 | Killam | Apr 1977 | A |
4026941 | Login et al. | May 1977 | A |
4029694 | Weipert et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4069365 | Rembaum | Jan 1978 | A |
4070189 | Kelley et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4080315 | Login | Mar 1978 | A |
4081419 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4093676 | Weipert et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4098842 | Login | Jul 1978 | A |
4104443 | Latta et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4119094 | Micklus et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4125110 | Hymes | Nov 1978 | A |
4147550 | Campbell et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4152307 | Shibahara et al. | May 1979 | A |
4181752 | Martens et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4191743 | Klemm et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4226232 | Spence | Oct 1980 | A |
4226748 | Matsunaga et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4229554 | Newkirk et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4234381 | Killam | Nov 1980 | A |
4256800 | Stockhausen et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4259411 | Windhager et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4304703 | Das | Dec 1981 | A |
4306996 | Windhager | Dec 1981 | A |
4318947 | Joung | Mar 1982 | A |
4332919 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4361623 | Newkirk et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4366238 | Yokoyama et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4373009 | Winn | Feb 1983 | A |
4377667 | Sakurai et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4384078 | Ohya et al. | May 1983 | A |
4391278 | Cahalan et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4393048 | Mason, Jr. et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4414353 | Maslanka et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4416668 | Thompson | Nov 1983 | A |
RE31454 | Hymes | Dec 1983 | E |
4459289 | Maltz | Jul 1984 | A |
4480075 | Willis | Oct 1984 | A |
4482680 | Sheldon et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4500517 | Luss | Feb 1985 | A |
4506070 | Ben | Mar 1985 | A |
4515162 | Yamamoto et al. | May 1985 | A |
4515593 | Norton | May 1985 | A |
4539996 | Engel | Sep 1985 | A |
4543390 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4546140 | Shih | Oct 1985 | A |
4563184 | Korol | Jan 1986 | A |
4570629 | Widra | Feb 1986 | A |
4581821 | Cahalan et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4617343 | Walker et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4632881 | Trotz et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4657006 | Rawlings et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4659785 | Nagano et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4668748 | Hardam et al. | May 1987 | A |
4674512 | Rolf | Jun 1987 | A |
4699146 | Sieverding | Oct 1987 | A |
4705709 | Vailancourt | Nov 1987 | A |
4722965 | Wong et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4728323 | Matson | Mar 1988 | A |
4735991 | Guioth et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4740546 | Masuda et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4762862 | Yada et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4768523 | Cahalan et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4769013 | Lorenz et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4777954 | Keusch et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4791063 | Hou et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4810567 | Calcaterra et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4816508 | Chen | Mar 1989 | A |
4831098 | Watanabe et al. | May 1989 | A |
4841021 | Katritzky et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4842768 | Nakao et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4848353 | Engel | Jul 1989 | A |
4857585 | Leising | Aug 1989 | A |
4857590 | Gaggar et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4859727 | Sasaki et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4876278 | Taylor et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4877687 | Azegami et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4891306 | Yokoyama et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4898908 | Lahalih et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4900543 | Ritter et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4900544 | Ritter et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4920166 | Buysch et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4931506 | Yu | Jun 1990 | A |
4931522 | Catena | Jun 1990 | A |
4943612 | Morita et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4947847 | Nakao et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4948720 | Chen et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4954636 | Merianos et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4957908 | Nelson | Sep 1990 | A |
4981936 | Good et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4997697 | Malhotra | Mar 1991 | A |
4999249 | Deschler et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5004760 | Patton et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5006267 | Vaughn et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5010139 | Yu | Apr 1991 | A |
5019096 | Fox, Jr. et al. | May 1991 | A |
5024840 | Blakely et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5043195 | Skrivseth | Aug 1991 | A |
5049383 | Huth et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5055171 | Peck | Oct 1991 | A |
5057560 | Mueller | Oct 1991 | A |
5059629 | Patton et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5061752 | Buysch et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5069907 | Mixon et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5080097 | Eisenberg | Jan 1992 | A |
5081182 | Robinson et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5082697 | Patton et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5124076 | Smuckler | Jun 1992 | A |
5142010 | Olstein | Aug 1992 | A |
5153321 | Finter et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5175059 | Yamamoto et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5183576 | Wood et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5194539 | Charmot et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5205297 | Montecalvo et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5247008 | Michels et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5255979 | Ferrari | Oct 1993 | A |
5263481 | Axelgaard | Nov 1993 | A |
5264249 | Perrault et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269770 | Conway et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5271943 | Bogart et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5290894 | Melrose et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5312863 | Van Rheenen et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314924 | Lee | May 1994 | A |
5317063 | Komatsu et al. | May 1994 | A |
5330527 | Montecalvo et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336717 | Rolando et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5346956 | Gnanou | Sep 1994 | A |
5354790 | Keusch et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5358688 | Robertson | Oct 1994 | A |
5369179 | Havens | Nov 1994 | A |
5370981 | Krafft et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5402884 | Gilman et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5403587 | McCue et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5403640 | Krishnan et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5403883 | Messner et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5420197 | Lorenz et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421982 | Ikeda et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429590 | Saito et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432000 | Young, Sr. et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5447643 | Kelkenberg et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5466256 | McAdams et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5470916 | Righetti et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474065 | Meathrel et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5480717 | Kundel | Jan 1996 | A |
5489437 | Marra | Feb 1996 | A |
5494987 | Imazato et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5498478 | Hansen et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5509899 | Fan et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512329 | Guire et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515117 | Dziabo et al. | May 1996 | A |
5518788 | Invie | May 1996 | A |
5520180 | Uy et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520910 | Hashimoto et al. | May 1996 | A |
5525356 | Jevne et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533971 | Phipps | Jul 1996 | A |
5536446 | Uy et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536494 | Park | Jul 1996 | A |
5536861 | Robertson | Jul 1996 | A |
5563056 | Swan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5591799 | Bott et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5597661 | Takeuchi et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5599321 | Conway et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608021 | Uchiyama et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614538 | Nelson, Jr. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614586 | Tang et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618586 | Swarup et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5622168 | Keusch et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624704 | Darouiche et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5645968 | Sacripante et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646197 | Martin | Jul 1997 | A |
5654369 | Tsubaki et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665477 | Meathrel et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5667913 | Chen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670557 | Dietz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674275 | Tang et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5674561 | Dietz et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5688855 | Stoy et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5700742 | Payne | Dec 1997 | A |
5725789 | Huber et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5773507 | Incorvia et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779632 | Dietz et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5798048 | Ries | Aug 1998 | A |
5798096 | Pavlyk | Aug 1998 | A |
5800685 | Perrault | Sep 1998 | A |
5821280 | Suda et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830934 | Krishnan | Nov 1998 | A |
5830983 | Alex et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5834561 | Fukumoto et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849045 | Chen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849822 | Kido et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5874184 | Takeuchi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5886098 | Ueda et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5907017 | Ober et al. | May 1999 | A |
5916917 | Suh et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5967714 | Ottersbach et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5984102 | Tay | Nov 1999 | A |
5985990 | Kantner et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997815 | Anders et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013275 | Konagaya et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015836 | Martin | Jan 2000 | A |
6022553 | Anders et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024895 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038464 | Axelgaard et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039940 | Perrault et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045919 | Alex et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050979 | Haemmerle et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6090459 | Jadamus et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096800 | Ottersbach et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103368 | Fukuda et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114467 | Ober et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127105 | Vandenabeele | Oct 2000 | A |
6187856 | Incorvia et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194530 | Klesse et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197322 | Dutkiewicz et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203856 | Ottersbach et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207361 | Greener et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6218492 | Hill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221425 | Michal et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6242526 | Siddiqui et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248811 | Ottersbach et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251967 | Perichaud et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266490 | Mukai et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280509 | Mallow | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6319883 | Graham et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6358557 | Wang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368587 | Anders et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6410040 | Melrose et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6428866 | Jadamus et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6482781 | Graham et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6497868 | Tanahashi | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500981 | Weipert | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511669 | Garnier et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6525134 | Lacroix et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537663 | Chang et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6559116 | Godfroid et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6583228 | Nkansah et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6689856 | L'alloret | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6750296 | Ober et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6767647 | Swofford et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6797743 | McDonald | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800278 | Perrault et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6815074 | Aguado et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6815502 | Lang et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6821943 | Avery et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6852353 | Qiu et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7112559 | Mayhall et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
8343473 | Youngblood | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8349300 | Wells et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
9131683 | Gisser et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9289378 | Karandikar et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
11134684 | Youngblood et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11421084 | Hopkins et al. | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11459415 | Youngblood et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
20010007694 | Ottersbach et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010044482 | Hu et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010050478 | Schmitz | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020037955 | Baumann et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020081923 | Artley et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086160 | Qiu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020139583 | Masui et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168473 | Ottersbach et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177828 | Batich et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030013624 | Graham et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030017194 | Joerger et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030019813 | Ottersbach et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022576 | Ottersbach et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030049437 | Devaney et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030068440 | Ottersbach et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030091641 | Tiller et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108507 | Clipson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030161804 | Perron et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030229185 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236376 | Kindt-Larsen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040009136 | Dubief et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040052746 | Tamareselvy | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040135967 | Carney et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040202639 | DeGrado et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050003163 | Krishnan | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050008676 | Qiu et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050008839 | Cramer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013842 | Qiu et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050032931 | Naisby et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050053569 | Bavouzet | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058844 | Rubner et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065284 | Krishnan | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050101740 | Mougin | May 2005 | A1 |
20060057209 | Chapman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060083854 | Ober et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060189710 | Hayashi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070048249 | Youngblood et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070053867 | Ober et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070106040 | Ober et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070149694 | Krishnan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080226584 | Krishnan | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090081367 | Makuta et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090311302 | Youngblood et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20120046378 | Sloan | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130079481 | Youngblood et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130109794 | Polzin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130115185 | Tamareselvy et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130136783 | Youngblood et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140080977 | Youngblood et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140127320 | Salamone et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150093424 | Lapitsky et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160053038 | Youngblood et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160262392 | Youngblood et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170043197 | Olsen et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170360688 | Fevola et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180237686 | Schnoor et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180340046 | Hopkins et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180362678 | Hopkins et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20200354527 | Hopkins et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210084898 | Youngblood et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20220356309 | Hopkins et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220363841 | Hopkins et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3339662 | May 1984 | DE |
19833062 | Feb 2000 | DE |
19910811 | Sep 2000 | DE |
0000426 | Jan 1979 | EP |
0085327 | Aug 1983 | EP |
0099209 | Jan 1984 | EP |
0141628 | May 1985 | EP |
0239213 | Sep 1987 | EP |
0286009 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0337474 | Oct 1989 | EP |
375350 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0204312 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0469196 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0604369 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0290676 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0747456 | Dec 1996 | EP |
1109845 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1299012 | Dec 1972 | GB |
1350400 | Apr 1974 | GB |
2091277 | Jul 1982 | GB |
H05286811 | Nov 1993 | JP |
2002-105152 | Apr 2002 | JP |
WO 9112282 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO 9206694 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO 9527530 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 9714448 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9715603 | May 1997 | WO |
WO9735542 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9745468 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9819311 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9829463 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9851720 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9909837 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0005283 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0008077 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0071591 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO03028767 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO2004045755 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO2013185058 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO2016127387 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO2017003923 | Jan 2017 | WO |
WO2018222622 | Dec 2018 | WO |
WO2018232417 | Dec 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Aug. 9, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated May 12, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Sep. 12, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Advisory Action dated Sep. 29, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Request for Continued Examination dated Oct. 11, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Office Action dated May 4, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Interview Summary dated Aug. 23, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Interview Summary dated Sep. 11, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Amendment dated Sep. 13, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,004 Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 19, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,159 Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,159 Amendment dated Jun. 28, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/682,159 Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/748,290 Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Nov. 13, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Response dated Sep. 8, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Amendment dated Dec. 8, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,915 Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,188 Pre-Appeal Conference Request dated May 6, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Amendment dated Apr. 21, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,900 Notice of Appeal dated Dec. 8, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Amendment dated Mar. 21, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated May 9, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Amendment dated Feb. 9, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated May 15, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Amendment dated Aug. 15, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Notice of Appeal dated Jan. 22, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Appeal Brief dated Jun. 20, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Examiners Answer dated Aug. 14, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Reply Brief dated Oct. 14, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/992,033 Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/011,579 Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2020. |
PCT/US2018/034954 PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 12, 2018. |
PCT/US2018/038126 PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 24, 2018. |
PCT/US2018/034954 Chapter II Demand and Response to Written Opinion dated Mar. 26, 2019. |
PCT/US2018/034954 Second Written Opinion dated Apr. 30, 2019. |
PCT/US2018/034954 Chapter II International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 3, 2019. |
EP18731331.7 Response and amendment dated Jul. 24, 2020. |
Abel, et al., “Preparation and Investigation of Antibacterial Carbohydrate-Based Surfaces”, Carbohydrate Research, vol. 337, No. 24; pp. 2495-2499; Nov. 29, 2002. |
Allison, et al., “Hemocompatibility of Hydrophilic Antimicrobial Copolymers of Alkylated 4-Vinylpyridine” Biomacromolecules; 2007, 8; pp. 2995-2999. |
Borman, “Surfaces Designed to Kill Bacteria”, Chemical & Engineering News; vol. 80, No. 22; pp. 36-38; Jun. 10, 2002. |
Docherty, K., et al., “Toxicity and Antimicrobial Activity of Imidazolium and Pyridinium Ionic Liquids”, Green Chemistry, vol. 7, pp. 185-189, Mar. 14, 2005, DOI: 10.1039/b419172b. |
Kawabata, et al., “Antibacterial Activity of Soluble Pyridinium-Type Polymers”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology; vol. 54, No. 10; pp. 2532-2535; Oct. 1988. |
Krishnan, et al., “Antibacterial Coatings Based on Quatemized Poly(4-Vinylpyridine) Block Copolymers”, Polymeric Materials: Science and Engineering; vol. 91; pp. 814-815; 2004. |
Kugler, R., et al., “Evidence of a Charge-Density Threshold for Optimum Efficiency of Biocidal Cationic Surfaces”, Microbiology, 151, 2005, pp. 1341-1348, DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.27526-0. |
Li, et al., “Bactericidal Ability of a Soluble Pyridinium-Type Polymer Under Different Conditions”; pp. 177-178; National American Chemical Society Meeting, Anaheim, CA; Mar. 21-25, 1999. |
Li, et al., “Effect of the Macromolecular Chain Structure of a Soluble Pyridinium-Type Polymer on Antimicrobial Activity”; pp. 175-176; National American Chemical Society Meeting, Anaheim, CA; Mar. 21-25, 1999. |
Lin, et al., “Insights Into Bactericidal Action of Surface-Attached Poly(vinyl-N-hexylpyridinium) Chains”, Biotechnology Letters, vol. 24, No. 10; pp. 801-805; May 2002. |
Lin, et al., “Mechanism of Bactericidal and Fungicidal Activities of Textiles Covalently Modified With Alkylated Polyethylenimine”, Biotech. Bioeng.; vol. 83, No. 2; pp. 168-172; Jul. 20, 2003. |
Napper, D.H., “Steric Stabilization”, Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Sydney, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 58, No. 2, Feb. 1977, ISSN 0021-9797, pp. 390-407. |
Sellenet, et al., “Hydrophilized Pyridinium Bactericidal Polymers”, Fall National American Chemical Society Meeting, Washington, DC; Aug. 28-Sep. 1, 2005; pp. 2. |
Sellenet, et al., “Synergistic Activity of Hydrophilic Modification in Antibiotic Polymers” Biomacromolecules; 2007, vol. 8, No. 1; pp. 19-23. |
Sellenet, “Hydrophilized Bactericidal Polymers”, Thesis, Purdue University, MSE, Dec. 2004; pp. 83. |
Tadros, Tharwat F., “Emulsion Formation, Stability, and Rheology”, pp. 1-75, 2013. |
Tiller, et al., “Designing Surfaces That Kill Bacteria on Contact”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; vol. 98, No. 11; pp. 5981-5985; May 22, 2001. |
Tiller, et al., “Polymer Surfaces Derivatized With Poly(Vinyl-N-Hexylpyridinium) Kill Airborne and Waterborne Bacteria”; Biotechnology and Bioengineering;vol. 79, No. 4; pp. 465-471; Aug. 20, 2002. |
Waschinski, C., et al., “poly(oxazoline)s with Telechelic Antimicrobial Functions”, Biomacromolecules 2005, vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 235-243. |
Wynne, et al., “Novel Polymer Bound Bactericidal Surfaces”; vol. 45, No. 2; pp. 521-522; Fall National American Chemical Society Meeting, Philadelphia, PA; Aug. 22-27, 2004. |
Alternative Medicine Review, Undecylenic Acid Monograph, vol. 7, No. 1, 2002, pp. 68-70. |
Selected Abstracts; Dec. 2004-Mar. 2005; pp. 3. |
Surface Industry, Detergent Raw Material, Sodium Tripolyphosphate 94.0% (STPP Industrial Grade), pp. 1-2, XP055579364. |
XP002783622, Database WPI, Week 199349, Thomson Scientific, London, GB, AN 1993-389137, pp. 4. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 30, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/115,709 Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/115,709 Amendment dated Mar. 30, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Amendment dated Apr. 4, 2022. |
EP18731331.7 OA dated Apr. 11, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/115,709 Notice of Allowability dated May 19, 2022. |
Beta Merriam Webster; Definition of Derivative by Merriam-Webster Dictionary; Dec. 9, 2015; http://beta.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dervative; 10pp. |
Cpolymer, “Polyquaternium-6”, CAS No. 26062-79-3, www.cpolymerchem.com, Apr. 10, 2020, pp. 1. |
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc., Toxicology & Microbiology Studies, TOX-010, “Carbopol Aqua SF-1 Polymer”, Jan. 2000, pp. 1. |
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc., Technical Data Sheet, TDS-294, “Carbopol Aqua SF-1 Polymer”, Acrylates Copolymer, Feb. 7, 2013, pp. 9. |
PubChem, “Polyquatemium-10”, C25H50CINO16, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Polyquaternium-10, Jan. 9, 2022, pp. 17. |
PubChem, “Polyquatemium-6”, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/#query=“Polyquaternium 6”, Jan. 9, 2022, pp. 2. |
PubChem, “Methacrylamidopropyltrimethylammonium Chloride”, C10H21CIN2O, pp. 1. |
PolyCare133, UPI Chem, item No. 460034, CAS No. 68039-13-4, www.upichem.com, pp. 1. |
Solvay, PolyCare133, Ross Organic an Azelis Company, pp. 1. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Amendment dated Jun. 27, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 7, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/115,709 Amendment after Allowance dated Aug. 10, 2022. |
EP18731331.7 Response and amendment dated Aug. 10, 2022. |
EP18740003.1 Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2022. |
EP18740003.1 Response and amendment dated Oct. 28, 2020. |
Oxford Dictionary of Chemistry, 6th Edition, 2008, pp. 134-135 and 203. |
“Sodium Dodecylbenzene Sulfonate (SDBS)”, USDA Technical Evaluation Report, May 26, 2017, pp. 1-21. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,285 RCE and amendment dated Dec. 10, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,680 Preliminary amendment dated Dec. 17, 2020. |
EP18740003.1 Amendment dated Nov. 9, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/865,886 Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2023. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/865,938 Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2023. |
Strauss, et al., “The Transition from Typical Polyelectrolyte to PolySoap.II. Viscosity Studies of Poly-4-Vinylpyridine Derivatives in Aqueous KBr Solutions”, J. Phys.Chem., vol. 60, pp. 577-584, May 1956. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/865,886 Amendment dated Apr. 29, 2023. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200369800 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62521313 | Jun 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16011579 | Jun 2018 | US |
Child | 16993761 | US |