Patent Grant
12145303
The present disclosure relates to polymeric materials that can be formed to produce a container, and in particular, polymeric materials that insulate. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to polymer-based formulations that can produce an insulated non-aromatic polymeric material.
According to the present disclosure, a polymeric material includes a polymeric resin and at least one cell-forming agent. In illustrative embodiments, a blend of polymeric resins and cell-forming agents is mixed and extruded or otherwise formed to produce an insulated cellular non-aromatic polymeric material. The insulated cellular non-aromatic polymeric material has a low density but is resistant to and/or can withstand impact forces. The low density, insulated cellular non-aromatic polymeric material can be used for improved containers.
In illustrative embodiments, an insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material comprises a cell-forming agent and at least one high-density polyethylene-based base resin. The cell-forming agent can include a chemical nucleating agent and a physical blowing agent. In an embodiment, a base resin can be HDPE, which can be virgin HDPE, regrind, or mixtures thereof.
In illustrative embodiments, the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material has a density of less than about 0.9 grams per cubic centimeter. In illustrative embodiments, the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material has a density in a range of about 0.1 grams per cubic centimeter to about 0.5 grams per cubic centimeter. In illustrative embodiments, the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material has a density in a range of about 0.15 grams per cubic centimeter to about 0.4 grams per cubic centimeter. In illustrative embodiments, the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material has a density of about 0.2 grams per cubic centimeter.
Additional features of the present disclosure will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of illustrative embodiments exemplifying the best mode of carrying out the disclosure as presently perceived.
The detailed description particularly refers to the accompanying figures in which:
A polymeric material 10 according to the present disclosure can be used to form insulative multi-layer containers 14, 214, 314 as shown for example, in
Co-extrusion process 100 can be used to form multi-layer tubes 12, sometimes called a parison, that include an inner layer 12A, a core layer 12B, and an outer layer 12C, each formed of a polymeric material 10A, 10B, 10C, as shown in
Multi-layer tube 12 can be blow molded to form multi-layer containers 14, 214, 314 as shown in
In one exemplary embodiment, polymeric material 10 comprises a formulation that includes at least one polymeric resin. The polymeric material 10 may include one or more base resins. As an example, core polymeric material 10B comprises at least one polyethylene base resin and one or more cell-forming agents. As described herein, the core polymeric material 10B may be called an insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material. Reference is hereby made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/331,066, filed Jul. 14, 2014 and titled POLYMERIC MATERIAL FOR CONTAINER for disclosure relating to possible formulation options, which application is hereby incorporated in its entirety.
Cell-forming agents provide a means for decreasing the density of the polymeric material while maintaining advantageous physical properties. Cell-forming agents can be chemical agents, physical agents, or combinations of both. Cell-forming agents can be physical blowing agents, chemical blowing agents, or combinations of both. Cell-forming agents can include nucleating agents.
Insulative cellular material can be co-extruded with additional layers that have advantageous properties. For example, inner layer polymeric material 10A and outer-layer polymeric material 10C can contain a reinforcing fiber, a hardener, a color, or a combination thereof.
In one example, the base resin is high-density polyethylene (HDPE). A HDPE base resin can be a HDPE homopolymer or a HDPE copolymer. In another example, the base resin is a unimodal HDPE. In yet another example, the base resin is unimodal, high-melt strength HDPE. In still yet another example, the base resin is unimodal, high-melt strength HDPE such as DOW® DOWLEX™ IP 41 HDPE (available from The Dow Chemical Company) that has been electron-beam modified to provide long-chain branching and a melt index of about 0.25 g/10 min. Another example of a unimodal, high-melt strength HDPE is EQUISTAR® ALATHON® H5520 HDPE copolymer (available from Lyondell Chemical Company) that has been electron-beam modified to have long-chain branching and a melt index of about 0.25 g/10 min. Another example of a suitable unimodal HDPE is FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE hexene copolymer (available from Formosa Plastics Corporation). In another suitable embodiment of a HDPE hexene copolymer, the HDPE is Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE hexene copolymer (Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, The Woodlands, TX). In some embodiments, the HDPE has a melt index from about 0.1 g/10 min to about 0.4 g/10 min. In an example the HDPE has a melt index between 0.7 g/10 min and 0.9 g/10 min. In another example, the HDPE resin is DOW DMDA 6400 NT7.
Long-chain branching refers to the presence of polymer side chains (branches) that have a length that is comparable or greater than a length of the backbone which is coupled to the polymer side chains. Long-chain branching creates viscoelastic chain entanglements (polymer entanglements) that hamper flow during extensional or oriented stretching and provide for a strain hardening phenomenon.
The strain hardening phenomenon may be observed through two analytical methods. The first analytical method used to observe the presence of strain hardening on an extensional rheometer. During extensional or oriented flow on an extensional rheometer, strain hardening will occur when polymer entanglements do not allow the polymer to flow under Linear Viscoelastic (LVE) conditions. As a result, these polymer entanglements hamper flow and create a deviation from the LVE conditions as observed as a hook formation. The strain hardening phenomenon becomes more severe as strain and strain rate increase due to faster and more severe polymer chain entanglement motion. Virgin polymers without long-chain branching will exhibit LVE flow characteristics. In comparison, long-chain branched polymers will exhibit strain hardening and which causes a deviation from the LVE flow characteristics of the virgin polymer providing the hook formation under the same test conditions.
The second analytical method used to observe the presence of long-chain branching is evaluating melt strength data as tested per ISO 16790 which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. An amount of melt strength is known to be directly related to the presence of long-chain branching when compared to similar virgin polymers lacking long-chain branching. By way of example, Borealis DAPLOY™ WB140HMS Polypropylene (PP) (available from Borealis AG) is compared to other polymers having similar molecular weight, polydispersity index, and other physical characteristics. The DAPLOY™ WB140HMS PP has a melt strength which exceeds about 36 cN while other similar PP resins lacking long-chain branching have a melt strength of less than about 10 cN.
Melt flow index (MFI) is an indirect measure of the viscosity of a polymer when molten. The index is defined as the mass of polymer melt that will flow through a capillary of a specific diameter and length by a pressure applied in 10 minutes, as described in ASTM D1238. For example, the Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE hexene copolymer (Chevron Phillips) has a melt flow index of 0.35 g/10 min per ASTM D1238. A larger melt index value indicates a lower viscosity. Higher molecular weight polymers will be more viscous and less will flow under the same conditions so the melt index will be a smaller number.
In certain exemplary embodiments, the formulation may include two base resins that are HDPE. In some embodiments the HDPE base resin may include multiple HDPE resins. One illustrative example of the formulation includes a first base resin of FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE hexene copolymer (available from Formosa Plastics Corporation) and a second base resin of EQUISTAR® ALATHON® H5520 HDPE copolymer (available from Lyondell Chemical Company). In embodiments with more than one HDPE copolymer, different HDPE copolymers can be used depending on the attributes desired in the formulation. For example, a formulation may include both electron-beam modified EQUISTAR® ALATHON® H5520 and FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE. In such an embodiment, the EQUISTAR® ALATHON® H5520 provides higher melt strength which increases foaming potential, and has less flexural modulus or brittleness. The FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE provides wide unimodal polydispersity index of the molecular weight distribution and maximizes economic advantage.
In another example, a formulation includes about 50% electron-beam modified EQUISTAR® ALATHON® H5520 and about 50% FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE. The combination provides a material having drop resistance capability associated with a non-modified HDPE resin and increased melt strength of an electron-beam modified long-chain branched HDPE. Depending on the desired characteristics, the percentage of the HDPE base resin between the two HDPE base resins may be varied, e.g., 25%/75%, 30%/70%, 35%/65%, 40%/60%, 45%/55%, 50%/50%, etc., by weight of the base resins. In an embodiment, a formulation includes three HDPE base resins. Again, depending on the desired characteristics, the percentage of three HDPE copolymers can be varied, 33%/33%/33%, 30%/30%/40%, 25%/25%/50%, etc., by weight of the base resins.
In certain exemplary embodiments, the formulation may include two base resins wherein the first base resin is an HDPE resin and the second base resin is a Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE). In an example the LDPE resin has a melt index between 0.7 g/10 min and 0.9 g/10 min as measured by ASTM D1238. In another example, the LDPE resin is DOW™ LDPE 692 LDPE HEALTH+™ available from The Dow Chemical Company®.
In certain exemplary embodiments, the formulation may include two base resins wherein the first base resin is an HDPE resin and the second base resin is a Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE) resin. Without being bound by theory, LDPE may be added to improve the compression resistance of the core layer during container-molding process 100. In an example the HDPE has a melt index between 0.7 g/10 min and 0.9 g/10 min. In another example, the HDPE resin is DOW DMDA 6400 NT7. In an example the LDPE resin has a melt index between 0.7 g/10 min and 0.9 g/10 min as measured by ASTM D1238. In another example, the LDPE resin is DOW™ LDPE 692 LDPE HEALTH+™ available from The Dow Chemical Company®.
In an illustrative example, the formulation comprises a blend of a certain percentage by weight of an HDPE resin and the remainder of the blend is an LDPE resin. In embodiments described herein, the percentage amount of HDPE in the blend may be 100%, 90%, 80%, 70%, 60%, 50%, 40%, 30%, 20%, 10% or 0 and the remainder of the blend is LDPE. It is within the present disclosure for the amount of HDPE in the blend to fall within one of many different ranges. In a set of ranges, the amount of HDPE in the blend can be about 0% to about 100%, about 20% to about 100%, about 40% to about 100%, about 60% to about 100%, about 70% to about 100%, about 80% to about 100%, about 80% to about 95%, and about 85% to about 95% of the blend. Polymeric material as disclosed herein includes at least one base resin. In illustrative embodiments, the at least one base resin can be HDPE. The amount of a base resin may be one of several different values or fall within one of several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure to select an amount of base resin to be one of the following values: about 20%, about 25%, about 30%, about 35%, about 40%, about 45%, about 50%, about 55%, about 60%, about 65%, about 70%, about 75%, about 80%, about 85%, about 86%, about 87%, about 88%, about 89%, about 90%, about 91%, about 92%, about 93%, about 94%, about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98%, about 99%, about 99.5%, about 99.9%, and about 100% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. It is within the present disclosure for the amount of base resin in the formulation to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the range of base resin is one of the following ranges: about 20% to about 99.9%, about 25% to about 99.9%, about 50% to about 99.9%, about 85% to about 99.9%, about 90% to about 99.9%, about 95% to about 99.9%, about 98% to about 99.9%, and about 99% to about 99.9% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. In a second set of ranges, the range of base resin is one of the following ranges: about 85% to about 99%, about 85% to about 98%, about 85% to about 95%, and about 85% to about 90% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. In a third set of ranges, the range of base resin is one of the following ranges: about 90% to about 99%, and about 95% to about 98% of the total formulation by weight percentage. Each of these values and ranges is embodied in Examples 1 to 33.
In some embodiments, the core-layer formulation comprises an impact modifier to improve the performance of the container. In an embodiment the core-layer formulation comprises about 5% of an impact modifier. In some embodiments, the core-layer formulation comprises Vistamaxx™ available from the ExxonMobil™ Corporation.
In an embodiment, the base resin can be 100% virgin base resin. In an embodiment, the base resin can be a mixture of virgin base resin and regrind base resin. For example, the base resin can be about 100%, about 90%, about 80%, about 75%, about 70%, about 60%, about 50%, about 40%, about 30%, about 25%, about 20%, or about 10% virgin base resin with the remainder being a regrind. In an exemplary embodiment, the base resin is about 50% virgin HDPE and about 50% regrind.
In some embodiments, the HDPE base resin comprises up to about 90% regrind, up to about 80% regrind, up to about 60% regrind, up to about 40% regrind, up to about 20% regrind, about 20% to about 90% regrind, about 30% to about 90% regrind, about 40% to about 90% regrind, about 50% to about 90% regrind, about 20% to about 75% regrind, about 30% to about 75% regrind, about 40% to about 75% regrind, about 50% to about 75% regrind, about 20% to about 60% regrind, about 30% to about 60% regrind, about 40% to about 60% regrind, or about 50% to about 60% regrind. The regrind may be first pass regrind, second pass regrind, third pass regrind, and the like.
The term polymeric layer refers to a polymeric monolayer, a polymeric core layer in a multi-layer material, or a non-core polymeric layer in a multi-layer material.
The formulation used to produce the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material may further include one or more cell-forming agents. Cell-forming agents include nucleating agents and blowing agents. A nucleating agent is used to provide and control nucleation sites within a molten formulation to promote formation of cells, bubbles, or voids in the molten formulation during extrusion. A blowing agent is used to grow cells in the molten material at nucleation sites. Blowing agents may be used alone in the formulation or with nucleating agents.
Nucleating agent means a chemical or physical agent that provides sites for cells to form in a molten material. Nucleating agents may include chemical nucleating agents and physical nucleating agents. The nucleating agent may be blended with the formulation that is introduced into the hopper of the extruder. Alternatively, the nucleating agent may be added to the molten resin mixture in the extruder.
Formulations used to produce insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric materials may include one or more cell-forming agents. The amount of a nucleating agent may be one of several different values or fall within one of several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure to select an amount of a nucleating agent to be one of the following values: about 0%, about 0.05%, about 0.1%, about 0.2%, about 0.3%, about 0.5%, about 1%, about 1.5%, about 2%, about 3%, about 4%, about 5%, about 6%, about 7%, about 8%, about 9%, about 10%, about 11%, about 12%, about 13%, about 14%, and about 15%, of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the amount of a nucleating agent in the formulation to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the percentage (w/w) range of a nucleating agent is one of the following ranges: about 0% to about 15%, about 0.05% to about 15%, about 0.1% to about 15%, about 0.25% to about 15%, about 0.5% to about 15%, about 0.75% to about 15%, about 1% to about 15%, about 2% to about 15%, about 3% to about 15%, about 4% to about 15%, and about 5% to about 15% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. In a second set of ranges, the percentage (w/w) range of a nucleating agent is one of the following ranges: about 0.05% to about 10%, about 0.1% to about 10%, about 0.25% to about 10%, about 0.5% to about 10%, about 0.75% to about 10%, about 1% to about 10%, about 2% to about 10%, about 3% to about 10%, about 4% to about 10%, and about 5% to about 10% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. In a third set of ranges, the percentage (w/w) range of a nucleating agent is one of the following ranges: about 0.05% to about 5%, about 0.1% to about 5%, about 0.25% to about 5%, about 0.5% to about 5%, about 0.75% to about 5%, about 1% to about 5%, about 1.5% to about 5%, about 2% to about 5%, about 2.5% to about 5%, about 3% to about 5%, about 3.5% to about 5%, about 4% to about 5%, and about 4.5% to about 5% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage.
Suitable physical nucleating agents have desirable particle size, aspect ratio, and top-cut properties. Examples include, but are not limited to, talc, CaCO3, mica, and mixtures of at least two of the foregoing. One representative example is Heritage Plastics HT6000 Linear Low Density Polyethylene (LLDPE) Based Talc Concentrate.
Formulations used to produce insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric materials may include one or more cell-forming agents. The amount of a physical nucleating agent may be one of several different values or fall within one of several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure to select an amount of physical nucleating agent, such as talc, to be one of the following values: about 0%, about 0.05%, about 0.1%, about 0.3%, about 0.5%, about 1%, about 2%, about 3%, about 4%, about 5%, about 6%, and about 7% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the amount of a physical nucleating agent in the formulation to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the range of a physical nucleating agent is one of the following ranges: about 0% to about 7% (w/w), about 0.1% to about 7%, about 0.25% to about 7%, about 0.5% to about 7%, about 0.75% to about 7%, about 1.0% to about 7%, about 1.25% to about 7%, about 1.5% to about 7%, about 1.75% to about 7%, about 2.0% to about 7%, about 2.25% to about 7%, about 2.5% to about 7%, about 3% to about 7%, about 4% to about 7%, about 5% to about 7%, and about 6% to about 7% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer. In a second set of ranges, the range of a physical nucleating agent is one of the following ranges: about 0% to about 6%, about 0% to about 5%, about 0% to about 4%, about 0% to about 3%, about 0% to about 2.5%, about 0% to about 2.25%, about 0% to about 2%, about 0% to about 1.75%, about 0% to about 1.5%, about 0% to about 1.25%, about 0% to about 1%, about 0% to about 0.75%, and about 0% to about 0.5% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer. In a third set of ranges, the range of a physical nucleating agent is one of the following ranges: about 0.1% to about 6%, about 0.5% to about 5%, about 1% to about 4%, and about 2% to about 3% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer. In an embodiment, the formulation lacks talc.
Suitable chemical nucleating agents decompose to create cells in the molten formulation when a chemical reaction temperature is reached. These small cells act as nucleation sites for larger cell growth from a physical or other type of blowing agent. In one example, the chemical nucleating agent is citric acid or a citric acid-based material. One representative example is HYDROCEROL™ CF-40E (available from Clariant Corporation), which contains citric acid and a crystal nucleating agent.
Formulations used to produce insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric materials can include a chemical nucleating agent. The amount of a chemical nucleating agent may be one of several different values or fall within one of several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure to select an amount of a chemical nucleating agent and be one of the following values: about 0.1%, about 0.25%, about 0.5%, about 0.75%, about 1%, about 1.5%, about 2%, about 2.5%, about 3%, about 3.5%, about 4%, about 5%, 1 about 0%, and about 15% of the total formulation by weight percentage. It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the amount of a chemical nucleating agent in the formulation to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the range of a chemical nucleating agent is one of the following ranges: about 0.1% to about 15%, about 0.25% to about 15%, about 0.5% to about 15%, about 1% to about 15%, about 1.5% to about 15%, about 2% to 1 about 5%, about 2.5% to about 15%, about 3% to about 15%, about 3.5% to about 15%, about 4% to about 15%, about 4.5% to about 15%, and about 5% to about 15% of the total formulation by weight percentage. In a second set of ranges, the range of a chemical nucleating agent is one of the following ranges: about 0.1% to about 10%, about 0.25% to about 10%, about 0.5% to about 10%, about 0.75% to about 10%, about 1% to about 10%, about 1.5% to about 10%, about 2% to about 10%, about 2.5% to about 10%, about 3% to about 10%, about 3.5% to about 10%, about 4% to about 10%, about 4.5% to about 10%, and about 5% to about 10% of the total formulation by weight percentage. In a third set of ranges, the range of a chemical nucleating agent is one of the following ranges: about 0.1% to about 5%, about 0.25% to about 5%, about 0.5% to about 5%, about 0.75% to about 5%, about 1% to about 5%, about 1.5% to about 5%, about 2% to about 5%, about 2.5% to about 5%, about 3% to about 5%, about 3.5% to about 5%, about 4% to about 5%, and about 4.5% to about 5% of the total formulation by weight percentage. Each of these values and ranges is embodied in the Examples.
A blowing agent refers to a physical or a chemical material (or combination of materials) that acts to expand nucleation sites. Blowing agents may include only chemical blowing agents, only physical blowing agents, combinations thereof, or several types of chemical and physical blowing agents. The blowing agent acts to reduce density by forming cells in the molten formulation at the nucleation sites. The blowing agent may be added to the molten resin mixture in the extruder.
Chemical blowing agents are materials that degrade or react to produce a gas. Chemical blowing agents may be endothermic or exothermic. Chemical blowing agents typically degrade at a certain temperature to decompose and release gas. One example of a chemical blowing agent is citric acid or citric-based material. One representative example is HYDROCEROL™ CF-40E (available from Clariant Corporation), which contains citric acid and a crystal nucleating agent. Here, the citric acid decomposes at the appropriate temperature in the molten formulation and forms a gas which migrates toward the nucleation sites and grows cells in the molten formulation. If sufficient chemical blowing agent is present, the chemical blowing agent may act as both the nucleating agent and the blowing agent. However, a chemical blowing agent does not always act as a nucleating agent.
In another example, chemical blowing agents may be selected from the group consisting of azodicarbonamide; azodiisobutyro-nitrile; benzenesulfonhydrazide; 4,4-oxybenzene sulfonylsemicarbazide; citric acid; citric-based material; p-toluene sulfonyl semi-carbazide; barium azodicarboxylate; N,N′-dimethyl-N,N′-dinitrosoterephthalamide; trihydrazino triazine; methane; ethane; propane; n-butane; isobutane; n-pentane; isopentane; neopentane; methyl fluoride; perfluoromethane; ethyl fluoride; 1,1-difluoroethane; 1,1,1-trifluoroethane; 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane; pentafluoroethane; perfluoroethane; 2,2-difluoropropane; 1,1,1-trifluoropropane; perfluoropropane; perfluorobutane; perfluorocyclobutane; methyl chloride; methylene chloride; ethyl chloride; 1,1,1-trichloroethane; 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane; 1-chloro-1,1-difluoroethane; 1,1-dichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane; 1-chloro-1,2,2,2-tetrafluoroethane; trichloromonofluoromethane; dichlorodifluoromethane; trichlorotrifluoroethane; dichlorotetrafluoroethane; chloroheptafluoropropane; dichlorohexafluoropropane; methanol; ethanol; n-propanol; isopropanol; sodium bicarbonate; sodium carbonate; ammonium bicarbonate; ammonium carbonate; ammonium nitrite; N,N′-dimethyl-N,N′-dinitrosoterephthalamide; N,N′-dinitrosopentamethylene tetramine; azodicarbonamide; azobisisobutylonitrile; azocyclohexylnitrile; azodiaminobenzene; bariumazodicarboxylate; benzene sulfonyl hydrazide; toluene sulfonyl hydrazide; p,p′-oxybis(benzene sulfonyl hydrazide); diphenyl sulfone-3,3′-disulfonyl hydrazide; calcium azide; 4,4′-diphenyl disulfonyl azide; p-toluene sulfonyl azide, and combinations thereof.
In one aspect of the present disclosure, where a chemical blowing agent is used, the chemical blowing agent may be introduced into the material formulation that is added to the hopper.
Formulations used to produce insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric materials may include one or more chemical blowing agents. The amount of a chemical blowing agent may be one of several different values or fall within one of several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure to select an amount of a chemical blowing agent to be one of the following values: about 0%, about 0.05%, about 0.1%, about 0.5%, about 0.75%, about 1%, about 1.5%, about 2%, about 3%, about 4%, and about 5%, of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the amount of a chemical blowing agent in the formulation to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the range of a chemical blowing agent is one of the following ranges: about 0.1% to about 5% (w/w), about 0.25% to about 5%, about 0.5% to about 5%, about 0.75% to about 5%, about 1% to about 5%, about 1.5% to about 5%, and about 2% to 5 about % of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. In a second set of ranges, the range of a chemical blowing agent is one of the following ranges: about 0.1% to about 2%, about 0.1% to about 3%, about 0.25% to about 2%, about 0.5% to about 2%, about 0.75% to about 2%, about 1% to about 2%, and about 1.5% to about 2% of the total formulation by weight percentage. In a third set of ranges, the range of a chemical blowing agent is one of the following ranges: about 0.1% to about 1%, about 0.25% to about 1%, about 0.5% to about 1%, and about 0.75% to about 1%, of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage.
One example of a physical blowing agent is nitrogen (N2). The N2 is pumped into the molten formulation via a port in the extruder as a supercritical fluid. The molten material with the N2 in suspension then exits the extruder via a die where a pressure drop occurs. As the pressure drop happens, N2 moves out of suspension toward the nucleation sites where cells grow. Excess gas blows off after extrusion with the remaining gas trapped in the cells formed in the extrudate. Other suitable examples of physical blowing agents include, but are not limited to, carbon dioxide (CO2), helium, argon, air, pentane, butane, or other alkane mixtures of the foregoing and the like.
In an illustrative example, a physical blowing agent may be introduced at a rate of about 0.02 pounds per hour (lbs/h) to about 1.3 (lbs/h). In another illustrative example, the physical blowing agent may be introduced at a rate of about 0.03 (lbs/h) to about 1.25 (lbs/h). In another illustrative example, the physical blowing agent may be introduced at a rate of about 0.02 (lbs/h) to about 0.15 (lbs/h). In another illustrative example, the physical blowing agent may be introduced at a rate of about 0 (lbs/h) to about 0.15 (lbs/h). In another illustrative example, the physical blowing agent may be introduced at a rate of about 0.02 (lbs/h) to about 0.22 (lbs/h). In another illustrative example, the physical blowing agent may be introduced at a rate of about 0.02 (lbs/h) to about 0.25 (lbs/h). In still yet another illustrative example the physical blowing agent may be introduced at a rate of about 0.07 (lbs/h) to about 0.27 (lbs/h). In some embodiments, the physical blowing agent is used between about 0.01 lbs/h to about 0.2 lbs/h, about 0.01 lbs/h to about 0.17 lbs/h, about 0.01 lbs/h to about 0.15 lbs/h, about 0.01 lbs/h to about 0.1 lbs/h, about 0.05 lbs/h to about 0.2 lbs/h, about 0.05 lbs/h to about 0.17 lbs/h, about 0.05 lbs/h to about 0.15 lbs/h, about 0.05 lbs/h to about 0.1 lbs/h, about 0.1 lbs/h to about 0.2 lbs/h, about 0.1 lbs/h to about 0.17 lbs/h, or about 0.1 lbs/h to about 0.15 lbs/h.
In further embodiments, the physical blowing agent is measured in saturation percentage (%). In exemplary embodiments, physical blowing agent saturation can have a range that is about 0.1% to about 0.4%, about 0.1% to about 0.35%, about 0.1% to about 0.3%, about 0.1% to about 0.25%, 0.15% to about 0.4%, about 0.15% to about 0.35%, about 0.15% to about 0.3%, about 0.15% to about 0.25%, 0.2% to about 0.4%, about 0.2% to about 0.35%, about 0.2% to about 0.3%, or about 0.2% to about 0.25%.
In one aspect of the present disclosure, at least one slip agent may be incorporated into the formulation to aid in increasing production rates. Slip agent (also known as a process aid) is a term used to describe a general class of materials that is added to a formulation to provide surface lubrication to the polymer during and after conversion. Slip agents may also reduce or eliminate die drool. Representative examples of slip agents include amides of fats or fatty acids, such as, but not limited to, erucamide and oleamide. In one exemplary aspect, amides from oleyl (single unsaturated C-18) through erucyl (C-22 single unsaturated) may be used. Other representative examples of a slip agent include low molecular weight amides and fluoroelastomers. Combinations of two or more slip agents can be used. Slip agents may be provided in a master batch pellet form and blended with the resin formulation. One example of a suitable slip agent is Ampacet 102823 Process Aid PE MB LLDPE.
Formulations used to produce insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric materials may include one or more slip agents. The amount of a slip agent may be one of several different values or fall within one of several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure to select an amount of a slip agent to be one of the following values: about 0%, about 0.1%, about 0.25%, about 0.5%, about 0.75%, about 1%, about 1.25%, about 1.5%, about 1.75%, about 2%, about 2.25%, about 2.5%, about 2.75%, about 3%, and about 4% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the amount of a slip agent in the formulation to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the range of a slip agent is one of the following ranges: about 0% to about 4% (w/w), about 0.1% to about 4%, about 0.25% to about 4%, about 0.5% to about 4%, about 0.75% to about 4%, about 1% to about 4%, about 1.25% to about 4%, about 1.5% to about 4%, about 1.75% to about 4%, about 2% to about 4%, about 2.25% to about 4%, and about 2.5% to about 4% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. In a second set of ranges, the range of a slip agent is one of the following ranges: about 0% to about 3%, about 0% to about 2.5%, about 0% to about 2.25%, about 0% to about 2%, about 0% to about 1.75%, about 0% to about 1.5%, about 0% to about 1.25%, about 0% to about 1%, about 0% to about 0.75%, and about 0% to about 0.5% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. In a third set of ranges, the range of a slip agent is one of the following ranges: about 0.1% to about 2.5%, about 0.25% to about 2.25%, about 0.5% to about 2%, about 0.75%, to about 1.75%, and 1 about % to about 1.5% of the total formulation by weight percentage. In an embodiment, the formulation lacks a slip agent.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, an impact modifier may be incorporated into a formulation to minimize fracturing of the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material when subjected to an impact such as a drop test. One representative example of a suitable impact modifier is DOW® AFFINITY™ PL 1880G polyolefin plastomer.
Formulations used to produce insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric materials may include one or more colorants. The colorants can be supplied in a masterbatch mixture and combined via blending with the formulation. In an example, Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch is used as a colorant. The amount of a colorant may be one of several different values or fall within one of several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure to select an amount of a colorant to be one of the following values: about 0%, about 0.1%, about 0.25%, about 0.5%, about 0.75%, about 1%, about 2%, about 3%, about 4% about 5%, about 6%, and about 7% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the amount of a colorant in the formulation to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the range of a colorant is one of the following ranges: about 0% to about 5% (w/w), about 0.1% to about 5%, about 0.25% to about 5%, about 0.5% to about 5%, about 0.75% to about 5%, about 1% to about 5%, about 1.25% to about 5%, about 1.5% to about 5%, about 1.75% to about 5%, about 2% to about 5%, about 2.25% to about 5%, about 2.5% to about 5%, about 3% to about 5%, and about 4% to about 5% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. In a second set of ranges, the range of a colorant is one of the following ranges: about 0% to about 3%, about 0% to about 2.5%, about 0% to about 2.25%, about 0% to about 2%, about 0% to about 1.75%, about 0% to about 1.5%, about 0% to about 1.25%, about 0% to about 1%, about 0% to about 0.75%, and about 0% to about 0.5% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. In a third set of ranges, the range of a colorant is one of the following ranges: about 0.1% to about 3.5%, about 0.5% to about 3%, about 0.75% to about 2.5%, and about 1% to about 2% of the total formulation by weight percentage. In an embodiment, the formulation lacks a colorant.
A material-formulation process in accordance with the present disclosure uses a polyethylene-based formulation to produce a strip of insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material. Raw material according to the polyethylene-based material is gravity fed into the barrel of an extruder where it is heated to produce a molten material. A cell-forming agent is then introduced into the molten material prior to extrusion. As the molten materials exit the extruder, cells nucleate in the molten material, and the molten material expands and cools to form a sheet of insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material.
An insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material produced in accordance with the present disclosure can be formed to produce an insulative cup or an insulative container. In another illustrative example, the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material produces a monolayer tube or monolayer parison that is blow molded to form an insulative container (e.g., bottle). In an embodiment, a monolayer foamed bottle further includes an extruded second layer (i.e., skin layer). In illustrative embodiments, a second layer can be linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE), medium density polyethylene (MDPE), high density polyethylene (HDPE), polypropylene homopolymer, polypropylene impact copolymer, polypropylene random polymer, polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), or polyvinyl chloride (PVC).
In an example, multi-layer container 14, 214, 314 includes a core layer 14B and at least one non-core layer. In an illustrative example, a core layer 14B is sandwiched between an inner polymeric layer 14A and an outer polymeric layer 14C. In an example, each layer (core and non-core layers) of multi-layer container 14, 214, 314 includes at least one HDPE base resin. In an embodiment, a non-core layer can include fiber. A suitable fiber can be a synthetic fiber that reinforces polyolefin formulations to provide, e.g., higher stiffness to the material and better feeding and handling during extrusion or blow molding process. A suitable fiber for a polymeric layer includes a synthetic, mineral based fiber, such as Hyperform® HPR-803i (Milliken & Co., Spartanburg, SC). Another suitable fiber blend contains about 15% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical) and about 85% Braskem F020HC High Crystallinity Polypropylene (available from Braskem). In an embodiment, one or more non-core polymeric layers includes fiber. In an illustrative embodiment, a multi-layer container has fiber in an outer polymeric layer but an inner polymeric layer does not include fiber.
The amount of fiber may be one of several different values or fall within one of several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure to select an amount of fiber to be one of the following values: about 5%, about 10%, about 15%, about 20%, and about 25% of the layer by weight percentage. It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the amount of fiber in the layer to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the range of fiber is one of the following ranges: about 0% to about 25% (w/w), about 5% to about 25%, about 10% to about 25%, about 15% to about 25%, and about 20% to about 25 of the total layer by weight percentage. In a second set of ranges, the range of fiber is one of the following ranges: about 0% to about 25%, about 0% to about 20%, about 0% to about 15%, about 0% to about 10%, and about 0% to about 5% of the total layer by weight percentage. In a third set of ranges, the range of a colorant is one of the following ranges: about 5% to about 20%, about 5% to about 15%, and about 5% to about 10%. In a fourth set of ranges, the range of fiber is one of the following ranges: about 10% to about 20%, and about 10% to about 15% of the total layer by weight percentage. In an embodiment, non-core layers lack fiber.
In an embodiment, one of the non-core layers can include a colorant. The colorants can be supplied in a masterbatch mixture and combined via blending with the formulation. In an example, Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch is used as a colorant. The amount of a colorant may be one of several different values or fall within one of several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure to select an amount of a colorant to be one of the following values: about 0%, about 0.1%, about 0.25%, about 0.5%, about 0.75%, about 1%, about 2%, about 3%, about 4% about 5%, about 6%, and about 7% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage.
It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the amount of a colorant in the formulation to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the range of a colorant is one of the following ranges: about 0% to about 7% (w/w), about 0.1% to about 7%, about 0.25% to about 7%, about 0.5% to about 7%, about 0.75% to about 7%, about 1% to about 7%, about 1.25% to about 7%, about 1.5% to about 7%, about 1.5% to about 6%, about 1.5% to about 5%, about 1.75% to about 5%, about 2% to about 5%, about 2.25% to about 5%, about 2.5% to about 5%, about 3% to about 5%, and about 4% to about 5% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. In a second set of ranges, the range of a colorant is one of the following ranges: about 0% to about 3%, about 0% to about 2.5%, about 0% to about 2.25%, about 0% to about 2%, about 0% to about 1.75%, about 0% to about 1.5%, about 0% to about 1.25%, about 0% to about 1%, about 0% to about 0.75%, and about 0% to about 0.5% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage. In a third set of ranges, the range of a colorant is one of the following ranges: about 0.1% to about 3.5%, about 0.5% to about 3%, about 0.75% to about 2.5%, and about 1% to about 2% of the total formulation by weight percentage. In an embodiment, the formulation lacks a colorant.
In an illustrative example, multi-layer container 14, 214, 314 is a bottle having a) a core layer comprising HDPE, a chemical blowing agent, and talc; b) an outer polymeric layer comprising HDPE, a colorant, and fiber; and c) an inner polymeric layer comprising HDPE and fiber. In one example, the density of multi-layer container 14 is less than about 0.75 g/cm3. In one example, the density of multi-layer container 14 is less than about 0.7 g/cm3. In one example, the density of multi-layer container 14 is less than about 0.75 g/cm3. In one example, the density of multi-layer container 14 is less than about 0.7 g/cm3. In one example, the density of multi-layer container 14 is less than about 0.65 g/cm3. In one example, the density of multi-layer container 14 is less than about 0.6 g/cm3. In another example, the density of multi-layer container 14 is less than about 0.55 g/cm3. In another example, the density of multi-layer container 14 is less than about 0.5 g/cm3. In another example, the density of multi-layer container 14 is less than about 0.45 g/cm3. In another example, the density of multi-layer container 14 is less than about 0.4 g/cm3. In one example, the density of multi-layer container 14 is one of the following ranges: about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.7 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.55 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.5 g/cm3, or about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.45 g/cm3.
In an embodiment, the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material is located between and coupled to an inner polymeric layer and an outer polymeric layer to produce a multi-layer tube 12. The density of the multi-layer tube 12 may be one of several different values or fall within one several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the density of the multi-layer tube 12 to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the density is one of the following ranges: about 0.5 g/cm3 to about 0.92 g/cm3, about 0.6 g/cm3 to about 0.92 g/cm3, about 0.65 g/cm3 to about 0.92 g/cm3, about 0.7 g/cm3 to about 0.92 g/cm3, about 0.75 g/cm3 to about 0.92 g/cm3, about 0.8 g/cm3 to about 0.92 g/cm3, about 0.85 g/cm3 to about 0.92 g/cm3, and about 0.9 g/cm3 to about 0.92 g/cm3. In a second set of ranges, the density is one of the following ranges: about 0.5 g/cm3 to about 0.9 g/cm3, about 0.6 g/cm3 to about 0.9 g/cm3, about 0.65 g/cm3 to about 0.9 g/cm3, about 0.7 g/cm3 to about 0.9 g/cm3, about 0.75 g/cm3 to about 0.9 g/cm3, about 0.8 g/cm3 to about 0.9 g/cm3, and about 0.85 g/cm3 to about 0.9 g/cm3. In a third set of ranges, the density is one of the following ranges: about 0.6 g/cm3 to about 0.85 g/cm3, about 0.65 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, and about 0.7 g/cm3 to about 0.75 g/cm3.
In an embodiment, the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material is located between and coupled to an inner polymeric layer 12A and an outer polymeric 12C layer to produce a multi-layer parison. The density of the multi-layer parison 12 may be one of several different values or fall within one several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the density of the multi-layer parison 10 to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the density is one of the following ranges: about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.45 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.5 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.55 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.6 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.65 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.7 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, and about 0.75 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3. In a second set of ranges, the density of a multi-layer parison is one of the following ranges: about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.75 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.7 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.65 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.6 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.55 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.5 g/cm3, and about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.45 g/cm3. In a third set of ranges, the density of a multi-layer parison is one of the following ranges: about 0.45 g/cm3 to about 0.7 g/cm3, about 0.5 g/cm3 to about 0.65 g/cm3, and about 0.55 g/cm3 to about 0.6 g/cm3. Density was determined according to the density test procedure outlined in Example 14 using the apparatus in
In an embodiment, the density of multi-layer tube 12 may be one of several different values or fall within one of several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure to select a density and be one of the following values: about 0.1 g/cm3, about 0.15 g/cm3, about 0.2 g/cm3, about 0.25 g/cm3, about 0.3 g/cm3, about 0.35 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 about 0.45 g/cm3, about 0.5 g/cm3, about 0.55 g/cm3, about 0.6 g/cm3, about 0.65 g/cm3, about 0.7 g/cm3, about 0.75 g/cm3, about 0.785 g/cm3, and about 0.8 g/cm3. It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the density of the formulation to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the range of density is one of the following ranges: about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.15 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.2 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.25 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.3 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.35 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.45 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.5 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.55 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.6 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.65 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.7 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, and about 0.75 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3. In a second set of ranges, the range of density is one of the following ranges: about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.75 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.7 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.65 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.6 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.55 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.5 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.45 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.4 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.35 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.3 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.25 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.2 g/cm3, and about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.15 g/cm3. In a third set of ranges, the range of density is one of the following ranges: about 0.3 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.35 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.35 g/cm3 to about 0.75 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.75 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.7 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.65 g/cm3, and about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.6 g/cm3. Each of these values and ranges is embodied in the Examples. Density was determined according to the density test procedure outlined in Example 14 using the apparatus in
In an embodiment, the density of the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material may be one of several different values or fall within one of several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure to select a density and be one of the following values: about 0.1 g/cm3, about 0.15 g/cm3, about 0.2 g/cm3, about 0.25 g/cm3, about 0.3 g/cm3, about 0.35 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 about 0.45 g/cm3, about 0.5 g/cm3, about 0.55 g/cm3, about 0.6 g/cm3, about 0.65 g/cm3, about 0.7 g/cm3, about 0.75 g/cm3, about 0.785 g/cm3, and about 0.8 g/cm3. It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the density of the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the range of density is one of the following ranges: about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.15 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.2 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.25 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.3 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.35 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.4 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.45 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.5 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.55 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.6 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.65 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.7 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, and about 0.75 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3. In a second set of ranges, the range of density is one of the following ranges: about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.75 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.7 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.65 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.6 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.55 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.5 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.45 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.4 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.35 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.3 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.25 g/cm3, about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.2 g/cm3, and about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.15 g/cm3. In a third set of ranges, the range of density is one of the following ranges: about 0.1 g/cm3 to about 0.8 g/cm3, about 0.15 g/cm3 to about 0.75 g/cm3, about 0.2 g/cm3 to about 0.6 g/cm3, about 0.2 g/cm3 to about 0.5 g/cm3, about 0.2 g/cm3 to about 0.45 g/cm3, about 0.25 g/cm3 to about 0.45 g/cm3, and about 0.25 g/cm3 to about 0.4 g/cm3. Each of these values and ranges is embodied in the Examples. Density of the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material may be determined by any suitable method. One example of determining density includes measuring a density of the multi-layer tube or multi-layer container, determining relative thicknesses of each layer, and calculating the density of the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material using the relative thicknesses of the layers, the known density of the other layers, and the known density of the multi-layer tube or container.
In an embodiment, the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material is located between and coupled to an inner polymeric layer and an outer polymeric layer to produce a multi-layer parison. The outer layer thickness of the multi-layer parison may be one of several different values or fall within one several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the thickness of the outer layer of the multi-layer parison to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the thickness of the outer layer is one of the following ranges: about 5 mils to about 26 mils, about 6 mils to about 24 mils, about 8 mils to about 24 mils, and about 10 mils to about 24 mils. In a second set of ranges, the thickness of the outer layer of a multi-layer parison is one of the following ranges: about 5 mils to about 26 mils, about 6 mils to about 24 mils, about 8 mils to about 24 mils, and about 10 mils to about 24 mils. In another set of ranges, the outer layer thickness can be a percentage of the overall thickness of the multi-layer parison. In a set of ranges, the percentage thickness of the outer layer can be about 4% to about 9%, about 5% to about 9%, about 5% to about 8%, about 5.5% to about 8%, and about 5.5% to about 7% of the overall thickness of the multi-layer parison.
In an embodiment, the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material is located between and coupled to an inner polymeric layer and an outer polymeric layer to produce a multi-layer parison. The core layer thickness of the multi-layer parison may be one of several different values or fall within one several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the thickness of the core layer of the multi-layer parison to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the thickness is one of the following ranges: about 14 mils to 130 mils, about 20 mils to about 130 mils, about 40 mils to about 130 mils, and about 50 mils to about 130 mils. In a second set of ranges, the thickness of the core layer is one of the following ranges: about 60 mils to about 130 mils, about 70 mils to about 130 mils, about 80 mils to about 130 mils, about 90 mils to about 130 mils, and about 100 mils to about 130 mils, and about 6.5 mils to about 8 mils. In another set of ranges, the core layer thickness can be a percentage of the overall thickness of the multi-layer parison. In a first set of ranges, the percentage thickness of the outer layer can be about 4% to about 9%, about 5% to about 9%, about 5% to about 8%, about 5.5% to about 8%, and about 5.5% to about 7% of the overall thickness of the multi-layer parison.
In an embodiment, the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material is located between and coupled to an inner polymeric layer and an outer polymeric layer to produce a multi-layer parison. The inner layer thickness of the multi-layer parison may be one of several different values or fall within one several different ranges. It is within the scope of the present disclosure for the thickness of the inner layer of the multi-layer parison to fall within one of many different ranges. In a first set of ranges, the thickness is one of the following ranges: about 3.0 mils to about 15.5 mils.
In an embodiment, a throughput system includes a multi-parison drop. For example, an extrusion line starts as a single line and then splits into 2, 3, 4, 5, or more lines for multiple parison drops. In an embodiment, the RPMs for the extrusion stream start at a particular level (e.g., 48 RPM) and splits evenly into 2 (e.g., 24 RPM each), 3 (e.g., 16 RPM each), 4 (12 RPM each), or more multi-parison drops splitting the RPMs. A more efficient output can be achieved by splitting the extrusion stream into multiple parison drop streams. Thereby, an embodiment includes a system comprising an extrusion stream that splits into multiple parison streams. In an embodiment, the system provides multiple foamed parison drops. Such a system that splits the extrusion line into multiple parison drops can produce foamed bottle. In an embodiment, the foamed bottles have densities as described herein.
Containers (e.g., bottles) can be subjected to a drop test, which is a test to determine a container's ability to withstand free-fall impact forces. Containers that do not pass the drop test are not suitable for commercial applications. In an illustrative embodiment, the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material is coupled and located between two polymeric layers to form a multi-layer parison. The multi-layer parison is then formed, for example, via blow molding into container 14, 214, 314. The container is then filled with water and closed off with, for example, a lid. The sample container is then held at about 73 degrees Fahrenheit (22.8 degrees Celsius) and about 50% relative humidity. The filled, capped containers are then subjected to the following drop test procedure: (a) the filled, capped container is located at about five feet above a hard surface such as concrete or tile; (b) the filled, capped container is then oriented such that a bottom of the filled, capped container is arranged to lie in substantially parallel relation to the hard surface; (c) each of ten capped, filled containers are dropped; (d) upon impact, each filled, capped container is examined for any break or shattering of the wall that causes water to leak out of the bottle; and (e) the total number of bottles showing any sign of leakage after the drop test are counted as failures.
A method of producing a container or parison as described herein includes extruding or blow-molding any of the formulations described herein. An illustrative embodiment of a blow molded container 14 is
In an illustrative embodiment, a formulation for producing an insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material includes about 98% HDPE, about 0.5% chemical blowing agent (CBA), and about 1.5% nucleating agent (e.g., talc). The formulation can be used to produce a material that is a) a monolayer forming a container or parison or b) the core layer in a multi-layer container or parison. In an illustrative multi-layer embodiment, a core layer of about 98% HDPE, about 0.5% CBA, and about 1.5% nucleating agent can be sandwiched between at least one inner polymeric layer and at least one outer polymeric layer. An illustrative outer polymeric layer includes i) about 80% HDPE, ii) 5 about % colorant, and iii) about 15% fiber. An illustrative inner polymeric layer includes about 85% HDPE and about 15% fiber.
In an illustrative embodiment, a formulation for producing an insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material includes about 98.75% HDPE, about 0.75% chemical blowing agent (CBA), and about 0.2% nucleating agent (e.g., talc).
In an illustrative embodiment, a formulation for producing an insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material includes about 98% HDPE and about 2.0% chemical blowing agent (CBA).
In an illustrative embodiment, a formulation for producing an insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material includes about 96.5% HDPE, about 0.5% chemical blowing agent (CBA), about 2% slip agent, and about 1% colorant.
In an illustrative embodiment, a formulation for producing an insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material includes about 95% HDPE, about 1.5% chemical blowing agent (CBA), about 2% slip agent, about 0.5% nucleating agent (e.g., talc) and about 1% colorant, wherein the about 95% is about a 50%/50% blend of two separate HDPE resins. Thus, each HDPE resin is about 47.5% of the total formulation of the polymeric layer by weight percentage.
In an illustrative embodiment, a formulation for producing an insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material includes about 82.54% HDPE, about. 62% chemical blowing agent (CBA), about 2.49% slip agent, about 11.16% nucleating agent (e.g., talc) and 3.19% colorant.
In illustrative embodiments the formulation may be used to form a multi-layer container 314, as shown in
The following numbered paragraphs define particular embodiments of the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material formulation of the invention:
In any of the numbered paragraphs (1)-(20) above, the one or more HDPE polymeric resin may be selected from HDPE homopolymer or HDPE copolymer. Suitably, the one or more HDPE polymeric resin is selected from DOW® DOWLEX™ IP 41 HDPE (available from The Dow Chemical Company) that has been electron-beam modified to provide long-chain branching and a melt index of about 0.25 g/10 min, EQUISTAR® ALATHON® H5520 HDPE copolymer (available from Lyondell Chemical Company) that has been electron-beam modified to have long-chain branching and a melt index of about 0.25 g/10 min, FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE hexene copolymer (available from Formosa Plastics Corporation), and Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE hexene copolymer. In one embodiment, the one or more HDPE polymeric resin is DOW® DOWLEX™ IP 41 HDPE. In another embodiment, the one or more HDPE polymeric resin is DOW® DOWLEX™ IP 41 HDPE and FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE hexene copolymer. In another embodiment, the one or more HDPE polymeric resin is FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE hexene copolymer and EQUISTAR® ALATHON® H5520 HDPE copolymer. In one embodiment, the one or more HDPE polymeric resin is DOW® DOWLEX™ IP 41 HDPE and Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE hexene copolymer.
In any of the numbered paragraphs (1)-(20) above, the at least one nucleating agent may be a physical nucleating agent selected from talc, CaCO3 and/or mica, and/or a chemical nucleating agent selected from citric acid or a citric acid-based material (e.g. HYDROCEROL™ CF-40E, available from Clariant Corporation). In one embodiment, the at least one nucleating agent is a mixture of talc and HYDROCEROL™ CF-40E. In another embodiment, the at least one nucleating agent is talc. In another embodiment, the at least one nucleating agent is HYDROCEROL™ CF-40E.
In any of the numbered paragraphs (1)-(20) above, the at least one slip agent may be selected from amides, fluoroelastomers, amides of fats or fatty acids, such as erucamide and oleamide, and amides from oleyl (single unsaturated C-18) through erucyl (C-22 single unsaturated). In one embodiment, the at least one slip agent is Ampacet 102823 Process Aid PE MB LLDPE.
In any of the numbered paragraphs (1)-(20) above, the colorant(s) may be selected from any suitable colorant. In one embodiment, the colorant is COLORTECH® 11933-19 Titanium Oxide Colorant.
In any of the numbered paragraphs (1)-(20) above, the impact modifier(s) may be selected from any suitable impact modifier. In one embodiment, the impact modifier is DOW® AFFINITY™ PL 1880G polyolefin plastomer.
The following numbered paragraphs define particular embodiments of the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material formulation of the invention:
In any of the numbered paragraphs (21)-(40) above, the at least one slip agent may be selected from amides, fluoroelastomers, amides of fats or fatty acids, such as erucamide and oleamide, and amides from oleyl (single unsaturated C-18) through erucyl (C-22 single unsaturated). In one embodiment, the at least one slip agent is Ampacet 102823 Process Aid PE MB LLDPE.
In any of the numbered paragraphs (21)-(40) above, the colorant(s) may be selected from any suitable colorant. In one embodiment, the colorant is COLORTECH® 11933-19 Titanium Oxide Colorant.
In any of the numbered paragraphs (21)-(40) above, the impact modifier(s) may be selected from any suitable impact modifier. In one embodiment, the impact modifier is DOW® AFFINITY™ PL 1880G polyolefin plastomer.
One or more additional components and additives optionally may be incorporated, such as, but not limited to, colorants (such as, but not limited to, titanium dioxide), and compound regrind.
Formulation and Extrusion
DOW® DOWLEX™ IP 41 HDPE was used as the polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a nucleating agent and N2 as a blowing agent. Ampacet 102823 Process Aid PE MB LLDPE was added as a slip agent and COLORTECH® 11933-19 was added as a colorant. The percentages were about:
The HDPE, nucleating agents, slip agent, and colorant were added to an extruder hopper and blended to provide a formulation. The formulation was then heated in the extruder to form a molten material. The blowing agent was then added to the molten material at a rate of about:
The N2 was injected into the molten material to expand the molten material and reduce density of the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material. The resulting mixture was then extruded through a die head to establish a parison. Inner and outer polymeric layers were also extruded to locate the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material therebetween to form a multi-layer parison which was then blow molded to form the insulative container.
Test Results
The insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material was mated to inner and outer polymeric layers to form a multi-layer parison having a density of about 0.480 grams per cubic centimeter. The multi-layer parison was then blow molded to establish an insulative container having a density of about 0.695 grams per cubic centimeter.
Formulation and Extrusion
DOW® DOWLEX™ IP 41 HDPE was used as the polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as a nucleating agent, HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as another nucleating agent, and N2 as a blowing agent. Ampacet 102823 Process Aid PE MB LLDPE was added as a slip agent and COLORTECH® 11933-19 was added as a colorant. The percentages were about:
The HDPE, nucleating agents, slip agent, and colorant were added to an extruder hopper and blended to provide a formulation. The formulation was then heated in the extruder to form a molten material. The blowing agent was then added to the molten material at a rate of about:
The N2 was injected into the molten material to expand the molten material and reduce density of the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material. The resulting mixture was then extruded through a die head to establish a parison. Inner and outer polymeric layers were also extruded to locate the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material therebetween to form a multi-layer parison which is then blow molded to form the insulative container.
Test Results
The insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material was mated to inner and outer polymeric layers and blow molded to establish an insulative container. The insulative container has a density of about 0.770 grams per cubic centimeter.
Formulation and Extrusion
DOW® DOWLEX™ IP 41 HDPE was used as the polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as a nucleating agent, HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as another nucleating agent, and N2 as a blowing agent. Ampacet 102823 Process Aid PE MB LLDPE was added as a slip agent and COLORTECH® 11933-19 was added as a colorant. The percentages were about:
The HDPE, nucleating agents, slip agent, and colorant were added to an extruder hopper and blended to provide a formulation. The formulation was then heated in the extruder to form a molten material. The blowing agent was then added to the molten material at a rate of about:
The N2 was injected into the molten material to expand the molten material and reduce density of the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material. The resulting mixture was then extruded through a die head to establish a parison. Inner and outer polymeric layers were also extruded to locate the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material therebetween to form a multi-layer parison which is then blow molded to form the insulative container.
Test Results
The insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material was mated to inner and outer polymeric layers and blow molded to establish an insulative container. The insulative container has a density of about 0.750 grams per cubic centimeter.
Formulation and Extrusion
DOW® DOWLEX™ IP 41 HDPE was used as the polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a nucleating agent and CO2 as a blowing agent. Ampacet 102823 Process Aid PE MB LLDPE was added as a slip agent and COLORTECH® 11933-19 was added as a colorant. The percentages were about:
The HDPE, nucleating agent, slip agent, and colorant were added to an extruder hopper and blended to provide a formulation. The formulation was then heated in the extruder to form a molten material. The blowing agent was then added to the molten material at a rate of about:
The CO2 was injected into the molten material to expand the molten material and reduce density of the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material. The resulting mixture was then extruded through a die head to establish a parison. Inner and outer polymeric layers were also extruded to locate the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material therebetween to form a multi-layer parison which is then blow molded to form the insulative container.
Test Results
The insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material was mated to inner and outer polymeric layers and blow molded to establish an insulative container. The insulative container has a density of about 0.794 grams per cubic centimeter.
Formulation and Extrusion
FORMOSA PLASTICS® FORMOLENE™ HB5502F HDPE hexene copolymer was used as the polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a nucleating agent, Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent, and N2 as a blowing agent. The percentages were about:
The HDPE and nucleating agents were added to an extruder hopper and blended to provide a formulation. The formulation was then heated in the extruder to form a molten material. The blowing agent was then added to the molten material at a rate of about:
The N2 was injected into the molten material to expand the molten material and reduce density of the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material. The resulting mixture was then extruded through a die head to establish a parison. Inner and outer polymeric layers were also extruded to locate the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material therebetween to form a multi-layer parison which is then blow molded to form the insulative container.
Test Results
The insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material was mated to inner and outer polymeric layers to form a multi-layer parison having a density of about 0.399 grams per cubic centimeter. The multi-layer parison was then blow molded to establish an insulative container having a density of about 0.610 grams per cubic centimeter.
Formulations and Test Results
FORMOSA PLASTICS® FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE hexene copolymer was used as the polyethylene base resin. To that polyethylene base resin, one or more nucleating agents such as HYDROCEROL® CF 40E, Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc, or Heritage Plastics HT4HP were added. In addition, N2 or CO2 were added as a blowing agent. Furthermore, in some examples, Ampacet 102823 Process Aid PE MB LLDPE was added as a slip agent and COLORTECH® 11933-19 was added as a colorant. The various formulations and resulting multi-layer parison and insulative container densities are shown below in Table 1.
Formulations and Test Results
FORMOSA PLASTICS® FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE hexene copolymer was used as the polyethylene base resin. To that polyethylene base resin, HYDROCEROL® CF 40E and Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as nucleating agents were added. In addition, N2 was added as a blowing agent. The percentages were about:
The HDPE and nucleating agents were added to an extruder hopper and blended to provide a formulation. The formulation was then heated in the extruder to form a molten material. A blowing agent was then added to the molten material at a rate of about:
The N2 was injected into the molten material to expand the molten material and reduce density of the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material. The resulting mixture was then extruded through a die head to establish a parison. Inner and outer polymeric layers were also extruded to locate the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material therebetween to form a multi-layer parison which is then blow molded to form the insulative container.
Test Results
The insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material was mated to inner and outer polymeric layers to form a multi-layer parison having a density of about 0.407 grams per cubic centimeter. The multi-layer parison was then blow molded to establish an insulative container having a density of about 0.577 grams per cubic centimeter.
Formulation and Extrusion
FORMOSA PLASTICS® FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE hexene copolymer and EQUISTAR® ALATHON® H5520 HDPE copolymer were used as polyethylene base resins. The polyethylene base resins were blended with HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a nucleating agent and Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent, and N2 as a blowing agent. Ampacet 102823 Process Aid PE MB LLDPE was added as a slip agent and COLORTECH® 11933-19 was added as a colorant. The percentages were about:
The HDPE, nucleating agents, slip agents, and colorants were added to an extruder hopper and blended to provide a formulation. The formulation was then heated in the extruder to form a molten material. The blowing agent was then added to the molten material at a rate of about:
The N2 was injected into the molten material to expand the molten material and reduce density of the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material. The resulting mixture was then extruded through a die head to establish a parison. Inner and outer polymeric layers were also extruded to locate the insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material therebetween to form a multi-layer parison which is then blow molded to form the insulative container.
Test Results
The insulative cellular non-aromatic polymeric material was mated to inner and outer polymeric layers to form a multi-layer parison having a density of about 0.396 grams per cubic centimeter. The multi-layer parison was then blow molded to establish an insulative container having a density of about 0.519 grams per cubic centimeter.
Formulations and Test Results
FORMOSA PLASTICS® FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE hexene copolymer and EQUISTAR® ALATHON® H5520 HDPE copolymer were used as polyethylene base resins. The polyethylene base resins were used in various percentages from about 23.875% to about 74.925% of the formulation. The polyethylene base resins were blended with HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a nucleating agent and Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent, and CO2 or N2 as a blowing agent. The blowing agent was used at levels between about 0.3 lbs/hr to about 1.25 lbs/hour. Ampacet 102823 Process Aid PE MB LLDPE was added as a slip agent and COLORTECH® 11933-19 was added as a colorant. In some examples, DOW® AFFINITY™ PL 1880G polyolefin elastomer was added as an impact modifier to the formulation. The various formulations and resulting multi-layer parison and insulative container densities are shown below in Table 2.
Formulations and Test Results
FORMOSA PLASTICS® FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE hexene copolymer was used as polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was used in various percentages from about 97.95% to about 100% of the formulation. In some examples, the polyethylene base resin was blended with HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a nucleating agent and Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent, and N2 as a blowing agent. The blowing agent was used at levels between about 0.05 lbs/hr to about 0.15 lbs/hour. COLORTECH® 11933-19 was added as a colorant in some examples. The various formulations and resulting multi-layer parison and insulative container densities are shown below in Table 3.
Formulations and Test Results
Bottles were formed from 99.4 wt % FORMOSA PLASTICS® FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE hexene copolymer as the polyethylene base resin blended with 0.1 wt % HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a nucleating agent and 0.5 wt % Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent with 0.04 lbs/hr of N2 blowing agent. The resulting bottles and parisons were a single layer (i.e., monolayer). The resulting monolayer parison and monolayer container densities are shown under the various process conditions.
Formulations and Test Results
FORMOSA PLASTICS® FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE hexene copolymer was used as polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was used in 99.4 wt % of the formulation. The polyethylene base resin was either 100% virgin HDPE (i.e., the control) or a combination of virgin HDPE and regrind. The regrind was a foam bottle produced according to Example 11, ground up, and then put back into the system. The polyethylene base resin was blended with 0.1 wt % HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a nucleating agent and 0.5 wt % Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent, and N2 as a blowing agent. The blowing agent was used at about 0.04 lbs/hr. The various formulations and resulting monolayer parison and insulative container densities are shown below in Table 5.
The bottles produced with regrind as part of the base polyethylene maintained densities of about 80%.
Another set of bottles was produced as described immediately above except that the regrind was a 2nd pass regrind.
Even with 2nd pass regrind, bottle characteristics were very similar to the characteristics of bottles produced with virgin HDPE.
Effect of RPM on Bottle Formation
FORMOSA PLASTICS® FORMOLENE® HB5502F HDPE hexene copolymer was used as polyethylene base resin, at about 99.4%. The polyethylene base resin was blended with 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a nucleating agent and Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent, and N2 as a blowing agent. The blowing agent was used at about 0.04 lbs/hr. This formulation was processed at various RPMs to produce bottles. Thus, the only variable in the bottle formation of these different runs was the RPMs of the throughput system.
Changing the RPM in the throughput system produced changes to bottle and parison characteristics. For example, higher RPMs produced a higher density parison and higher density bottle. Thereby, using a lower RPM in the throughput system produced lower density bottles. Although these systems utilized a single drop, this shows that a multi-parison drop system is possible. For example, a throughput system can start at a particular RPM (e.g., 48 RPM) for the extrusion stream and then and then split into multiple parison streams at lower RPMs. In an illustrative example, one extrusion stream can start at 48 RPM and split into 4 parison drop streams running at 12 RPM. This would produce a more efficient foaming system to produce bottles.
Density Measurements
This Example demonstrates the test used to measure the density of filled and unfilled polymer parts.
Procedure
The density was determined by the apparatus shown, unassembled, in
The density of a limestone-filled HDPE bottle was measured. After taring the balance to zero, the dry solid sample was weighed after placing it in the cup of the Mettler balance. The dry weight was 0.3833 g. After weighing the dry sample and before removing the sample from the cup, the balance was tared again. The sample was removed from the cup and placed on the gem holder in the suspension fluid. The sample was weighed providing the weight with a negative number (−0.3287 g). The number was converted to its absolute value (0.3287 g); the positive value is the sample buoyancy. The sample density was calculated by multiplying the dry weight (0.3833 g) by the sample buoyancy (0.3287 g) by the suspension fluid density (0.8808 g/cc), which equaled 1.0272 g/cc.
Formulations and Test Results
Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE hexene copolymer (Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, The Woodlands, TX) was used as polyethylene base resin in the core layer. The polyethylene base resin was used in various percentages from about 98% to about 100% of the formulation. In some examples, the polyethylene base resin was blended with HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent in all non-control samples and Heritage Plastics HT4HP talc as another nucleating agent, and N2 as a blowing agent. The blowing agent was used at about 11 kg/hr. The various formulations and resulting multi-layer parison and insulative container densities are shown below in Table 3.
The extruded material was a multi-layer material where the core layer was sandwiched between an outer and inner polymeric layer. The outer and inner layer were comprised of various amounts of Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE hexene copolymer (Chevron Phillips). The outer polymeric layer also included 5 wt % colorant (COLORTECH® 11933-19 titanium oxide). The inner polymeric layer did not include a colorant. Some embodiments of the formulations included inner and/or outer polymeric layers comprising a reinforcing fiber (Hyperform® HPR-803i, Milliken & Co., Spartanburg, SC).
Multi-Layer Tubes Comprising Various Amounts of Chemical Blowing Agent and Formed at Various Temperatures
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 85% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, and about 10% of a reinforcing fiber blend of about 15% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical) and about 85% Braskem F020HC High Crystallinity Polypropylene (available from Braskem). Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company). Core-layer formulation 48 comprised between about 99.2% and about 99.6% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), as shown in Table 10, which was used as a polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with between about 0.1% and about 0.5% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent (CBA) and nucleating agent, as shown in Table 10, and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at a level of about 0.044 kg/h.
The extruder head temperature was varied between about 180° C. and about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was varied between about 180° C. and about 190° C., as shown in Table 10. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The layers were extruded such that the inner layer provided about 6% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 6% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 88% of the thickness of the entire tube. For each formulation, density was measured for six tubes according to the procedure of Example 2, as shown in Table 11 as Density. The average of the six densities for each formulation is shown as Average Density in Table 11. The melt temperature for each formulation was also determined and is reported in Table 11 as Melt Temp.
Multi-Layer Tubes Formed at Various N2 Flow Rates
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 85% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, and about 10% of a reinforcing fiber blend of about 15% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical) and about 85% Braskem F020HC High Crystallinity Polypropylene (available from Braskem). Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company).
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised about 99.6% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), which was used as a polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with about 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at a level between about 0.034 kg/h and about 0.104 kg/h, as shown in Table 12.
The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The layers were extruded such that the inner layer provided about 6% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 6% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 88% of the thickness of the entire tube. In one embodiment, the inner layer provided about 5.8% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 6.1% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 88.2% of the thickness of the entire tube. In another embodiment, the inner layer provided about 5.9% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 6.1% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 88.0% of the thickness of the entire tube. The thicknesses for two tubes formed at each N2 flow rate were measured and are described in Table 13 as Outer Layer Thickness, Core Layer Thickness, Inner Layer Thickness, and Total Thickness. For each N2 flow rate, density was measured for four tubes according to the procedure of Example 14, as shown in Table 14 as Parison Density. The average of the four densities for each N2 flow rate is shown as Average Density in Table 14. The melt temperature for each formulation was also determined and is reported in Table 14 as Melt Temp.
Formulations and Test Results for Tubes with about 6% Inner/Outer Layer Thickness and Bottles Formed Therefrom
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 85% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, and about 10% of a reinforcing fiber blend of about 15% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical) and about 85% Braskem F020HC High Crystallinity Polypropylene (available from Braskem). Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company).
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised about 99.6% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), which was used as a polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with about 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at levels between about 0.034 kg/h and about 0.104 kg/h as shown in Table 15.
The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The layers were extruded such that the inner layer provided about 6% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 6% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 88% of the thickness of the entire tube. In one embodiment, the inner layer provided about 6.1% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 5.8% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 88.2% of the thickness of the entire tube. For each N2 flow rate, the mean density of several tubes was measured according to the procedure of Example 14 and is shown below in Table 15 as Average Tube Density.
For tubes where tube density was not measured, a mold was closed around the tube and a blow needle was inserted into a space formed in the tube and a container was blow molded. For each N2 flow rate, the mean density of several bottles was measured according to the procedure of Example 14 and is shown below in Table 15 as Average Bottle Density.
Formulations and Test Results for Tubes with about 12% Inner/Outer Skin Thickness
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 85% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, and about 10% of a reinforcing fiber blend of about 15% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical) and about 85% Braskem F020HC High Crystallinity Polypropylene (available from Braskem). Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company).
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised about 99.6% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), which was used as a polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with about 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at levels between about 0.044 kg/h and about 0.114 kg/h as shown in Table 16.
The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The layers were extruded such that the inner layer provided about 12% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 12% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 76% of the thickness of the entire tube. In one embodiment, the inner layer provided about 10.9% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 11.1% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 78.0% of the thickness of the entire tube. For each N2 flow rate, average outer, core, and inner layer thicknesses of the tubes were measured and are shown in Table 16. Also, for each of N2 flow rate, density was measured for four tubes according to the procedure of Example 14 and is shown in Table 17 as Density. The average of the four densities for each N2 flow rate is shown as Average Density in Table 17.
Formulations and Test Results for Bottles with about 12% Inner/Outer Skin Thickness
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 85% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, and about 10% of a reinforcing fiber blend of about 15% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical) and about 85% Braskem F020HC High Crystallinity Polypropylene (available from Braskem). Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company).
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised about 99.6% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), which was used as a polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with about 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at levels between about 0.044 kg/h and about 0.114 kg/h as shown in Table 18.
The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The layers were extruded such that the inner layer provided about 12% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 12% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 76% of the thickness of the entire tube.
A mold was closed around the tube and a blow needle was inserted into a space formed in the tube and a container was blow molded. After molding, the inner layer of the bottle provided about 15% of the thickness of the entire bottle, the outer layer of the bottle provided about 15% of the thickness of the entire bottle, and the core layer of the bottle provided about 70% of the thickness of the entire bottle. In one embodiment, the inner layer of the bottle provided about 13.2% of the thickness of the entire bottle, the outer layer of the bottle provided about 17.5% of the thickness of the entire bottle, and the core layer of the bottle provided about 69.3% of the thickness of the entire bottle. In this embodiment, blow molding caused the inner layer's contribution to bottle thickness to increase by 20.9%, the outer layer's contribution to bottle thickness to increase by 57.4%, and the core layer's contribution to bottle thickness to decrease by 11.1%. The thicknesses for two tubes formed at each N2 flow rate were measured and are described in Table 18 as Outer Layer Thickness, Core Layer Thickness, Inner Layer Thickness, and Total Thickness. Also, for each of N2 flow rate, density was measured for three bottles according to the procedure of Example 14 and is shown in Table 19 as Bottle Density. The average of the four densities for each N2 flow rate is shown as Average Bottle Density in Table 19. Mean weight of several bottles was measured and is shown in Table 19.
Formulations and Test Results for Tubes with about 18% Inner/Outer Skin Thickness
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 85% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, and about 10% of a reinforcing fiber blend of about 15% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical) and about 85% Braskem F020HC High Crystallinity Polypropylene (available from Braskem). Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company).
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised about 99.6% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), which was used as a polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with about 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at levels between about 0.044 kg/h and about 0.124 kg/h as shown in Table 20.
The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The layers were extruded such that the inner layer provided about 18% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 18% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 64% of the thickness of the entire tube. In one embodiment, the inner layer provided about 15.1% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 17.1% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 67.8% of the thickness of the entire tube. For each N2 flow rate, average outer, core, and inner layer thicknesses of the tubes were measured and are shown in Table 20. Also, for each of N2 flow rate, density was measured for four tubes according to the procedure of Example 14 and is shown in Table 21 as Density. The average of the four densities for each N2 flow rate is shown as Average Density in Table 21.
Formulations and Test Results for Bottles with about 18% Inner/Outer Skin Thickness
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 85% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, and about 10% of a reinforcing fiber blend of about 15% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical) and about 85% Braskem F020HC High Crystallinity Polypropylene (available from Braskem). Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company).
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised about 99.6% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), which was used as a polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with about 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at levels between about 0.044 kg/h and about 0.124 kg/h as shown in Table 22.
The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The layers were extruded such that the inner layer provided about 18% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 18% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 64% of the thickness of the entire tube.
A mold was closed around the tube and a blow needle was inserted into a space formed in the tube and a container was blow molded. After molding, the inner layer of the bottle provided about 22% of the thickness of the entire bottle, the outer layer of the bottle provided about 22% of the thickness of the entire bottle, and the core layer of the bottle provided about 56% of the thickness of the entire bottle. In one embodiment, the inner layer of the bottle provided about 20.1% of the thickness of the entire bottle, the outer layer of the bottle provided about 24.2% of the thickness of the entire bottle, and the core layer of the bottle provided about 55.7% of the thickness of the entire bottle. In this embodiment, blow molding caused the inner layer's contribution to bottle thickness to increase by 32.7%, the outer layer's contribution to bottle thickness to increase by 41.7%, and the core layer's contribution to bottle thickness to decrease by 17.8%. The thicknesses for two tubes formed at each N2 flow rate were measured and are described in Table 21 as Outer Layer Thickness, Core Layer Thickness, Inner Layer Thickness, and Total Thickness. Also, for each of N2 flow rate, density was measured for three bottles according to the procedure of Example 14 and is shown in Table 23 as Bottle density. The average of the four densities for each N2 flow rate is shown as Average Bottle Density in Table 23. Mean weight of several bottles was measured and is shown in Table 46.
Formulations and Test Results for Tubes with Varying N2 Saturation
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 75% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, and about 20% of a reinforcing fiber blend of about 15% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical) and about 85% Braskem F020HC High Crystallinity Polypropylene (available from Braskem). Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company).
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised about 99.6% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), which was used as a polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with about 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at a level between about 0.045 kg/h and about 0.070 kg/h, corresponding to between about 0.20% and about 0.30% as shown in Table 24.
The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. The core layer extruder was operated at 13 RPM. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The layers were extruded such that the inner layer provided about 11% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 14% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 75% of the thickness of the entire tube. The layer thicknesses for several tubes of flow rate were measured and the mean values of these thicknesses for each tube are described in Table 24 as Inner Layer Thickness and Outer Layer Thickness.
Formulations and Test Results for Bottles with Varying N2 Saturation
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 75% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, and about 20% of a reinforcing fiber blend of about 15% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical) and about 85% Braskem F020HC High Crystallinity Polypropylene (available from Braskem). Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company).
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised about 99.6% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), which was used as a polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with about 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at a level between about 0.045 kg/h and about 0.070 kg/h as shown in Table 25.
The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. The core layer extruder was operated at 13 RPM. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The layers were extruded such that the inner layer provided about 11% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 14% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 75% of the thickness of the entire tube.
A mold was closed around the tube and a blow needle was inserted into a space formed in the tube and a container was blow molded. For each N2 flow rate, the weight of three bottles was measured and is shown in Table 25 as Bottle Weight. The average of the three weights for each N2 flow rate is shown as Average Bottle Weight in Table 25. Also, for each N2 flow rate, density was measured for three bottles according to the procedure of Example 14 and is shown in Table 25 as Bottle Density. The mean of the three densities for each N2 flow rate is shown as Average Bottle Density in Table 25.
Formulations and Test Results for Tubes with Varying N2 Saturation
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 75% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, and about 20% of a reinforcing fiber blend of about 15% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical) and about 85% Braskem F020HC High Crystallinity Polypropylene (available from Braskem). Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company). In some embodiments, the inner-layer formulation 40 comprises about 3% to about 7.5% reinforcing fiber.
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised about 99.6% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), which was used as a polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with about 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at a level between about 0.045 kg/h and about 0.070 kg/h, corresponding to between about 0.20% and about 0.30% as shown in Table 26.
The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. The core layer extruder was operated at 13 RPM. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The inner layer extruder was operated at 20 rpm and the outer layer extruded was operated at 34 rpm such that the inner layer provided about 8% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 14% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 78% of the thickness of the entire tube. The layer thicknesses for several tubes of flow rate were measured and the mean values of these thicknesses for each tube are described in Table 26 as Inner Layer Thickness and Outer Layer Thickness.
Formulations and Test Results for Bottles with Varying N2 Saturation
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 75% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, and about 20% of a reinforcing fiber blend of about 15% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical) and about 85% Braskem F020HC High Crystallinity Polypropylene (available from Braskem). Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company).
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised about 99.6% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), which was used as a polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with about 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at a level between about 0.045 kg/h and about 0.070 kg/h as shown in Table 27.
The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. The core layer extruder was operated at 13 RPM. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The inner layer extruder was operated at 20 rpm and the outer layer extruded was operated at 34 rpm such that the inner layer provided about 8% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 14% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 78% of the thickness of the entire tube.
A mold was closed around the tube and a blow needle was inserted into a space formed in the tube and a container was blow molded. For each N2 flow rate, the weight of three bottles was measured and is shown in Table 27 as Bottle Weight. The average of the three weights for each N2 flow rate is shown as Average Bottle Weight in Table 27. Also, for each N2 flow rate, density was measured for three bottles according to the procedure of Example 14 and is shown in Table 27 as Bottle Density. The mean of the three densities for each N2 flow rate is shown as Average Bottle Density in Table 27.
Formulations and Test Results for Bottles with Varying Process Aid
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised between about 72% and about 75% of a base resin blend of 50% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company) and 50% DOW LLDPE 50041 Polyethylene, Low Density (available from the Dow Chemical Company) about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, about 20% of a reinforcing fiber blend of about 15% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical) and about 85% Braskem F020HC High Crystallinity Polypropylene (available from Braskem), and between about 0% and about 3% of an Ampacet 102823 as a process aid. Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company). The outer-layer formulation is further described in Table 28.
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised between about 99.6% and about 99.9% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), which was used as a polyethylene base resin. The polyethylene base resin was blended with between about 0.1% and about 0.3% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent and between about 0.1% and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at a level between of about 0.060 kg/h. The core-layer formulation is further described in Table 28.
The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. The core layer extruder was operated at 13 RPM. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The inner layer extruder was operated at 20 rpm and the outer layer extruded was operated at 34 rpm such that the inner layer provided about 8% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 14% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 78% of the thickness of the entire tube.
A mold was closed around the tube and a blow needle was inserted into a space formed in the tube and a container was blow molded. For each N2 flow rate, the weight of ten bottles was measured. The average of the ten weights for each N2 flow rate is shown as Average Bottle Weight in Table 29. Also, for each N2 flow rate, density was measured for three bottles according to the procedure of Example 14 and is shown in Table 29 as Bottle Density. The mean of the three densities for each N2 flow rate is shown as Average Bottle Density in Table 29.
Formulation and Test Results for Bottles with 50% Regrind
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 75% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, and about 20% of a reinforcing fiber blend of about 15% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical) and about 85% Braskem F020HC High Crystallinity Polypropylene (available from Braskem). Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company).
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised about 50% first-pass regrind material and about 50% of a formulation comprising about 99.6% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), which was used as a polyethylene base resin, blended with about 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent, and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at a level between that led to 0.22% N2 saturation.
The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The layers were extruded such that the inner layer provided about 11% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 14% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 75% of the thickness of the entire tube.
A mold was closed around the tube and a blow needle was inserted into a space formed in the tube and a container was blow molded. The weights of three bottles were measured to be 17.25 g, 17.16 g, and 17.39 g leading to an average weight of 17.3 g. Also, density was measured for three bottles according to the procedure of Example 14 to be 0.689 g/cm3, 0.676 g/cm3, and 0.680 g/cm3 leading to an average density of 0.682 g/cm3.
Formulations and Test Results for Bottles with Various Amounts of Regrind
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 75% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), about 12.5% Braskem Polypropylene Inspire 6025N (available from Braskem), about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, and about 7.5% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical). Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company).
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised between about 0% and about 50% first-pass regrind material, as shown in Table 28, and between about 0% and about 50% of a formulation comprising about 99.6% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), which was used as a polyethylene base resin, blended with about 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent, and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at a level that led to 0.22% N2 saturation.
The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The layers were extruded such that the inner layer provided about 11% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 14% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 75% of the thickness of the entire tube.
A mold was closed around the tube and a blow needle was inserted into a space formed in the tube and a container was blow molded. The average of the weights for each N2 flow rate is shown as Average Bottle Weight in Table 30. Also, for each formulation, density was measured for several bottles according to the procedure of Example 14. The mean of the densities for each formulation is shown as Average Bottle Density in Table 30.
Formulations and Test Results for Bottles with Various Amounts of Regrind
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 75% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), about 12.5% Braskem Polypropylene Inspire 6025N (available from Braskem), about 5% Ampacet 112761 White Polyethylene Masterbatch (available from Ampacet Corporation) as a coloring agent, and about 7.5% Hyperform® HPR-803i (available from Milliken Chemical). Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company).
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised between about 0% and about 50% regrind material, as shown in Table 31, and between about 0% and about 50% of a formulation comprising about 99.6% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company), which was used as a polyethylene base resin, blended with about 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent, and about 0.3% Heritage Plastics HT6000 LLDPE talc as another nucleating agent. Several stages of bottles production were performed using different amounts of multiple-pass regrind, as shown in Table 31. First pass regrind was obtained from bottles made of virgin material (stage 0), second pass regrind was obtained from bottles made of material from stage 1, third pass regrind was obtained from bottles made of material from stage 2, fourth pass regrind was obtained from bottles made of material from stage 3, fifth pass regrind was obtained from bottles made of material from stage 4, and sixth pass regrind was obtained from bottles made of material from stage 5. N2 was used as a blowing agent and was injected into the rest of the molten core-layer formulation 48 at a level between that led to 0.22% N2 saturation.
The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The layers were extruded such that the inner layer provided about 14% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 14% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 72% of the thickness of the entire tube.
A mold was closed around the tube and a blow needle was inserted into a space formed in the tube and a container was blow molded.
Top Load Measurement Method
Top Load Measurements
General Procedure
Top load testing determines how much force a container can withstand before the container fails or necks in to form an hourglass shape. Various containers 10 were subjected to top load testing. An Instron tester, such as and generally consistent with an Instron Series 5500 Load Frame, may be used to determine top load performance
The top load test was generally performed according to the following procedure. A container was placed on a flat surface such that the floor of the container was arranged to lie in a substantially parallel relation to the flat surface. A crosshead of the Instron tester applied a compressive force to the top of the neck of the container. A load transducer, mounted in series with the container, measured the applied load. Containers 10 were tested until they failed or necked in to form an hourglass shape. Once failure or necking was observed, the value shown on Instron tester was recorded.
Parison Cell Counting Method
General Procedure
Parison cell counting is a measurement of the quality of the foam of the extruded material. The extruded material, for example a parison, is cut in cross sections and viewed with microscopy. The number of cells are counted in a given unit volume, for example cubic inches.
A square of the sample to be subjected to the parison cell counting method is cut out from the center of the parison. The excised square of the parison is then divided by cutting across the diagonal exposing the underlying cell structure. The cells are then visualized and counted using microscopy.
Formulations and Test Results for Tubes with Varying LDPE
Outer-layer formulation 44 comprised about 95% Dow DMDA 6400 NT7 and about 5% Ampacet 11078 as a white colorant. Inner-layer formulation 40 comprised about 100% Marlex® HHM 5502BN HDPE (available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company).
Core-layer formulation 48 comprised a percentage of DOW DMDA 6400 NT7 as shown in Table 32, a percentage of DOW™ LDPE 692 LDPE HEALTH+™ as shown in Table 32 to form a core masterbatch that was about 98.9% of the overall formulation, about 0.1% HYDROCEROL® CF 40E as a chemical blowing agent and nucleating agent, and about 1% Heritage Plastics HT4HP talc as another nucleating agent. The N2 was introduced at about 0.032 kg/h. The extruder head temperature was about 190° C., and the core layer extruder barrel temperature was about 180° C. The inner and outer layer extruder barrel temperatures were both 190° C. The resulting expanded core-layer formulation 48 was extruded through a die head to establish a core-layer parison. The core layer extruder was operated at 13 RPM. Inner and outer layers were extruded through the die head, locating the expanded formulation therebetween, to form a multi-layer tube. The inner layer extruder was operated at 20 rpm and the outer layer extruded was operated at 34 rpm such that the inner layer provided about 15% of the thickness of the entire tube, the outer layer provided about 15% of the thickness of the entire tube, and the core layer provided about 70% of the thickness of the entire tube. The multi-layer tube was blow molded to form a container, as shown for example in
This application is a continuation of U.S. Non-provisional application Ser. No. 15/902,489, filed Feb. 22, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. Non-provisional application Ser. No. 15/059,995, filed Mar. 3, 2016, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/128,195, filed Mar. 4, 2015, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/279,177, filed Jan. 15, 2016, each of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1396282 | Penn | Nov 1921 | A |
| 1435120 | Holman | Nov 1922 | A |
| 1920529 | Sidebotham | Aug 1933 | A |
| 1969030 | Page | Aug 1934 | A |
| 2097899 | Smith | Nov 1937 | A |
| 2103831 | Sidon | Dec 1937 | A |
| 2809776 | Barrington | Mar 1956 | A |
| 3182882 | Aellen, Jr. | May 1965 | A |
| 3221954 | Lux | Dec 1965 | A |
| 3227784 | Blades | Jan 1966 | A |
| 3252387 | Schur | May 1966 | A |
| 3290198 | Lux | Dec 1966 | A |
| 3312383 | Shapiro | Apr 1967 | A |
| 3327038 | Fox | Jun 1967 | A |
| 3327103 | Bonnet | Jun 1967 | A |
| 3344222 | Shapiro | Sep 1967 | A |
| 3381880 | Lewallen et al. | May 1968 | A |
| 3409204 | Carle | Nov 1968 | A |
| 3431163 | Harold | Mar 1969 | A |
| 3443715 | Bryant | May 1969 | A |
| 3468467 | Amberg | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3547012 | Amberg | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3583624 | Peacock | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3658615 | Amberg | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3661282 | Buhayar | May 1972 | A |
| 3703255 | Wade | Nov 1972 | A |
| 3733381 | Willette | May 1973 | A |
| 3793283 | Frailey | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3846349 | Harada | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3892828 | Weatherly | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3907193 | Heller | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3919368 | Seto | Nov 1975 | A |
| RE28658 | MacDaniel | Dec 1975 | E |
| 3967991 | Shimano | Jul 1976 | A |
| 3969173 | Amberg | Jul 1976 | A |
| 3971696 | Manfredi | Jul 1976 | A |
| 3973721 | Nakane | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3981412 | Asmus | Sep 1976 | A |
| 4026458 | Morris | May 1977 | A |
| 4036675 | Amberg | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4047868 | Kudo | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4049122 | Maxwell | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4070513 | Rhoads | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4106397 | Amberg | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4171085 | Doty | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4197948 | Amberg | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4206166 | Hayashi | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4220730 | Coyne | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4240568 | Pool | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4264672 | Taylor-Brown | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4284226 | Herbst | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4288026 | Wilhelm | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4298331 | Mueller | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4299349 | Gilden | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4300891 | Bemiss | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4306849 | Cress | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4310369 | Miller | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4349400 | Gilden | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4365460 | Cress | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4391666 | Mueller | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4409045 | Busse | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4435344 | Tioka | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4468435 | Shimba et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4479989 | Mahal | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4490130 | Konzal | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4550046 | Miller | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4553999 | Ziegler | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4579275 | Peelman | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4604324 | Nahmias | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4621763 | Brauner | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4706873 | Schulz | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4720023 | Jeff | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4856989 | Siebert | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4867664 | Fukuhara | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4878970 | Schubert | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4911978 | Tsubone | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4918112 | Roox | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4940736 | Alteepping | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4990382 | Weissenstein | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5037285 | Kudert | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5037684 | Dundas | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5055022 | Hirschberger | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5078817 | Takagaki | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5116881 | Park | May 1992 | A |
| 5149579 | Park | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5158986 | Cha | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5160674 | Colton | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5180751 | Park | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5236963 | Jacoby | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5256462 | Callahan | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5286428 | Hayashi | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5308568 | Lipp | May 1994 | A |
| 5328651 | Gallagher | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5332121 | Schmidt | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5348795 | Park | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5366791 | Carr | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5385260 | Gatcomb | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5405667 | Heider | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5443769 | Karabedian | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5445315 | Shelby | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5462794 | Lindemann | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5490631 | Iioka | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5507640 | Gilmer | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5547124 | Mueller | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549864 | Greene | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5574074 | Zushi | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5575965 | Caronia | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5598940 | Finkelstein | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5601200 | Finkelstein | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5605936 | DeNicola, Jr. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5622308 | Ito | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5628453 | MacLaughlin | May 1997 | A |
| 5629076 | Fukasawa | May 1997 | A |
| 5669553 | Smith | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5688572 | Slat | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5713512 | Barrett | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5759624 | Neale | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5765710 | Bergerioux | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766709 | Geddes | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5769311 | Morita | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5819507 | Kaneko | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5840139 | Geddes | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5857572 | Bird | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5866053 | Park | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5868309 | Sandstrom | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5895614 | Rivera | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5916926 | Cooper | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5925450 | Karabedian | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5927525 | Darr | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928741 | Andersen | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5929127 | Raetzsch | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5944225 | Kawolics | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5948839 | Chatterjee | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5952423 | Shang | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6001439 | Kawakami | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6007437 | Schickert | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6010062 | Shimono | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6030476 | Geddes | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6034144 | Shioya | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6051174 | Park | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6053214 | Sjoberg et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6071580 | Bland | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6077878 | Okura | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6083611 | Eichbauer | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6103153 | Park | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6109518 | Mueller | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6129653 | Fredricks | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6136396 | Gilmer | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139665 | Schmelzer | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6142331 | Breining | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6169122 | Blizard | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174930 | Agarwal | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6193098 | Mochizuki | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6218023 | Denicola | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221925 | Constant | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6225366 | Raetzsch | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6231942 | Blizard | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235380 | Tupil | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6251319 | Tusim | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6257485 | Sadlier | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6258862 | Matz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267837 | Mitchell | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6284810 | Burnham | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6294115 | Blizard | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6306973 | Takaoka | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6308883 | Schmelzer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6319590 | Geddes | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6323251 | Perez | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6328916 | Nishikawa | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6376059 | Anderson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6378733 | Boonzaier | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6379802 | Ito | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6383425 | Wu | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6417240 | Park | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6420024 | Perez | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6432525 | Gokuraku | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6444073 | Reeves | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6444149 | Valentinsson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6455150 | Sheppard | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6468451 | Perez | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6472473 | Ansems | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| RE37932 | Baldwin | Dec 2002 | E |
| 6512019 | Agarwal | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6521675 | Wu | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6541105 | Park | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6562447 | Wu | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6565934 | Fredricks | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6586532 | Gauthy | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6593005 | Tau | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6593384 | Anderson | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6613811 | Pallaver | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6616434 | Burnham | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6646019 | Perez | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6649666 | Read | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6706223 | Anderson | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6713139 | Usui | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6720362 | Park | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6749913 | Watanabe | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6779662 | Dorsey | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6811843 | DeBraal | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6814253 | Wong | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6875484 | Kogure | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6875826 | Huovinen | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6883677 | Goeking | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6884377 | Burnham | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6884851 | Gauthy | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6908651 | Watanabe | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6921571 | Funakoshi | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6926507 | Cardona | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6926512 | Wu | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6982107 | Hennen | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6986922 | Hesse | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7014801 | Imanari | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7056563 | Halabisky | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7070852 | Reiners | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7074466 | Debraal | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7094463 | Haas | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7121991 | Mannlein | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7144532 | Kim | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7169338 | Imanari | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7173069 | Swennen | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7183005 | Poloso | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7234629 | Ho | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7281650 | Milan | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7311243 | Konzal | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7355089 | Chang | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7361720 | Pierini | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7365136 | Huovinen | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7423071 | Mogami | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7458504 | Robertson | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7462307 | Hesse | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7504347 | Poon | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7510098 | Hartjes | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7513386 | Hartjes | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7514517 | Hoenig | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7524911 | Karjala | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7546932 | Smith | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7557147 | Martinez | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7579408 | Walton | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7582716 | Liang | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7585557 | Aylward | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7588808 | Hutchinson | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7588810 | Semersky | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7592397 | Markovich | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7608668 | Shan | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7622179 | Patel | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7622529 | Walton | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7629416 | Li | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7655296 | Haas | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7662881 | Walton | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7666918 | Prieto | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7671106 | Markovich | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7671131 | Hughes | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7673564 | Wolf | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7687442 | Walton | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7695812 | Peng | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7704440 | Brandner | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7714071 | Hoenig | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7732052 | Chang | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7737061 | Chang | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7737215 | Chang | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7741397 | Liang | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7754814 | Barcus | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7759267 | Conover | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7759404 | Burgun | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7786216 | Soediono | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7795321 | Cheung | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7803728 | Poon | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7811644 | Debraal | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7818866 | Hollis | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7820282 | Haas | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7825166 | Sasaki | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7841974 | Hartjes | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7842770 | Liang | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7858706 | Arriola | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7863379 | Kapur | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7871558 | Merical | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7883769 | Seth | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7893166 | Shan | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7897689 | Harris | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7906587 | Poon | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7910658 | Chang | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7915192 | Arriola | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7918005 | Hollis | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7918016 | Hollis | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7922071 | Robertson | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7928162 | Kiss | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7935740 | Dang | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7947367 | Poon | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7951882 | Arriola | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7973100 | Wada | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7977397 | Cheung | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7989543 | Karjala | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7993254 | Robertson | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7998579 | Lin | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7998728 | Rhoads | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8003176 | Ylitalo | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8003744 | Okamoto | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8012550 | Ylitalo | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8026291 | Handa | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8043695 | Ballard | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8061540 | Toyoda | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8061541 | Trumpp | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8067319 | Poon | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8076381 | Miyagawa | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8076416 | Ellul | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8084537 | Walton | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8087147 | Hollis | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8105459 | Alvarez | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8119237 | Peng | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8124203 | Semersky | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8124234 | Weaver | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8137600 | Pierick | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8173233 | Rogers | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8198374 | Arriola | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8211982 | Harris | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8227075 | Matsushita | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8263198 | Carvell | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8273068 | Chang | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8273826 | Walton | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8273838 | Shan | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8288470 | Ansems | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8304496 | Weaver | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8342420 | RobertsJr | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8397932 | Ichikawa | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8404780 | Weaver | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8414823 | Rudiger | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8435615 | Tsuchida | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8444905 | Li | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8535598 | Imanari | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8679620 | Matsushita | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8715449 | Leser | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8721823 | Vaideeswaran | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8795827 | Siche | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8883280 | Leser | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 9067705 | Leser | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9102461 | Leser | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9180995 | Iyori | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9346605 | Leser | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9358772 | Leser | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9447248 | Sun | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9688456 | Euler | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9758292 | Leser | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9758293 | Leser | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9937652 | Sun | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9993098 | Leser | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10011696 | Leser | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10059037 | Li | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10266664 | Sun | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10899532 | Leser | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 10906725 | Leser | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 11091311 | Euler | Aug 2021 | B2 |
| 11214429 | Euler | Jan 2022 | B2 |
| 20010010848 | Usui | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010010849 | Blizard | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010036520 | Hall | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010038893 | Mohan | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010039299 | Park | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010041236 | Usui | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010048988 | Forte | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020006975 | Welsh | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020030296 | Geddes | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035164 | Wu | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020041046 | Hartjes | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020058126 | Kannankeril | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020122905 | Andersson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020135088 | Harfmann | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020137851 | Kim | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020144769 | Debraal | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020172739 | Anderson | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020172818 | Debraal | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030003251 | Debraal | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030017284 | Watanabe | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030021921 | Debraal | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030021927 | Boenig | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030029876 | Giraud | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065097 | DeGroot | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069362 | Ramanathan | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030108695 | Freek | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114594 | Starita | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030127765 | Weiland | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030138515 | Harfmann | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030151172 | Floyd | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030186039 | Hanada | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211310 | Haas | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211350 | Migliorini | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228336 | Gervasio | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030232210 | Haas | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040013830 | Nonomura | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040031714 | Hanson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040037980 | Debraal | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038018 | Anderson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040062885 | Imanari | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040086703 | Semersky | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040115418 | Anderson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040147625 | Dostal | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162358 | Yamamoto | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162363 | Mochizuki | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040170814 | Vanhandel | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050003122 | Debraal | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050006449 | Damato | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050009973 | Lee | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050040218 | Hinchey | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101926 | Ausen | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050104365 | Haas | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050115975 | Smith | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050121457 | Wilson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050124709 | Krueger | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050145317 | Yamamoto | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050147807 | Haas | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159496 | Bambara | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050165165 | Zwynenburg | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050184136 | Baynum | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050236294 | Herbert | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256215 | Burnham | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050272858 | Pierini | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288383 | Haas | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060000882 | Darzinskas | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060073298 | Hutchinson | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060091576 | Takase | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060094577 | Mannlein | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095151 | Mannlein | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100296 | Wilkes | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060108409 | Pyper | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135679 | Winowiecki | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135699 | Li | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060142495 | Lalho | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060148920 | Musgrave | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060151584 | Wonnacott | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178478 | Ellul | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060198983 | Patel | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199006 | Poon | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199030 | Liang | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199744 | Walton | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199872 | Prieto | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199884 | Hoenig | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199887 | Liang | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199896 | Walton | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199897 | Karjala | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199905 | Hughes | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199906 | Walton | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199907 | Chang | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199908 | Cheung | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199910 | Walton | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199911 | Markovich | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199912 | Fuchs | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199914 | Harris | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199930 | Shan | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199931 | Poon | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060199933 | Okamoto | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060205833 | Martinez | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060211819 | Hoenig | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060234033 | Nishikawa | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060255049 | McCarthy | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060286325 | Swoboda | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060289609 | Fritz | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060289610 | Kling | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070000983 | Spurrell | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070010616 | Kapur | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070013110 | Safian | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070032600 | Mogami | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070056964 | Holcomb | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070065615 | Odle | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070066756 | Poon | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078222 | Chang | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070095837 | Meier | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112127 | Soediono | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070141188 | Kim | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070155900 | Chang | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167315 | Arriola | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167575 | Weaver | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167578 | Arriola | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070202330 | Peng | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070219334 | Lipishan | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080020162 | Fackler | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080044617 | Schmitz | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080045638 | Chapman | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080095960 | Schell | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080114131 | Harris | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080118738 | Boyer | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080121681 | Wiedmeyer | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080125547 | Swogger | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080138593 | Martinez | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080156857 | Johnston | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177242 | Chang | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080185301 | Merical | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080187694 | Alvarez | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080227877 | Stadlbauer | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080234435 | Chang | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080246193 | Smits | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080260996 | Heilman | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080261016 | Tamada | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080269388 | Markovich | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080280517 | Chang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080281037 | Karjala | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080302800 | Chou | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311812 | Arriola | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090041965 | Kochem | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090042472 | Poon | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090068402 | Yoshida | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090069523 | Itakura | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090076216 | Kiss | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090096130 | Jones | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090105417 | Walton | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090110855 | McCarthy | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090110944 | Aguirre | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090170679 | Hartjes | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090220711 | Chang | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090247033 | Peng | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090263645 | Barger | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090269566 | Eichbauer | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090275690 | Weaver | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090324914 | Lieng | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100000183 | Nantin | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025073 | Fagrell | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100028568 | Weaver | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100029827 | Ansems | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100040818 | Farha | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100055358 | Weaver | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100069574 | Shan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100093942 | Silvis | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100108695 | Zhang | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100112247 | Jari | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100116422 | Vaideeswaran | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137118 | Chang | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100147447 | Mazzarolo | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100168267 | Dang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100181328 | Cook | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100181370 | Berbert | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100196610 | Chang | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100196641 | DeVos | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100215879 | Dooley | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100215934 | Fabian Mariezkurrena | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100227092 | Semersky | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100240818 | Walton | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100247830 | Hernandez | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100279046 | Ashman | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100279571 | Poon | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100282759 | Eckhardt | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100324202 | Bafna | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110003929 | Soediono | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110008570 | Seth | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110009513 | Chaudhary | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110014835 | Sieradzki | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110091688 | Maurer | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110104414 | Onodera | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110111150 | Matsuzaki | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110118370 | Jiang | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110118416 | Arriola | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110124818 | Arriola | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110129656 | Zur | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110136959 | Brandstetter | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110144240 | Harris | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110172363 | Share | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110180509 | Hutchinson | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110192750 | Kokin | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110217492 | Stamatiou | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110229693 | Maurer | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110230108 | Arriola | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110250384 | Sumi | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110285048 | Barger | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293914 | Maurer | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110318560 | Yun | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120004087 | Tharayil | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120024459 | Igarashi | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120024873 | Roseblade | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120028065 | Bafna | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120041148 | Bafna | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120043374 | Lemon | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120045603 | Zerafati | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120061886 | Sumi | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120076965 | Silvers | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120103858 | Schmidt | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120108714 | Wittner | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120108741 | Wu | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120108743 | Krishnaswamy | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120125926 | Iyori | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120132699 | Mann | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120178896 | Bastioli | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120184657 | Lake | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120193365 | Humphries | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120199278 | Lee | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120199279 | Lee | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120199641 | Hsieh | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120214890 | Senda | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120220730 | Li | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120225961 | Vanhorn | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120237734 | Maurer | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120267368 | Wu | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120270039 | Tynys | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120295994 | Bernreitner | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120318805 | Leser | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120318807 | Leser | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120318859 | Leser | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130023598 | Song | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130026128 | Beck | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130032963 | Tokiwa | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130052358 | Alessandro | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130052385 | Leser | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130059102 | Torchio | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130085244 | Zhao | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130140320 | Nadella | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130143975 | Cassidy | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130216744 | Liao | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130280517 | Buehring | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130303645 | Dix | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140037880 | Siddhamalli | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140116977 | Minnette | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140131430 | Leser | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140166738 | Euler | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140167311 | Leser | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140228498 | Prince | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140262916 | Minnette | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140263367 | Robertson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140272229 | Sep 2014 | A1 | |
| 20140309320 | Prince | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140361013 | Perick | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140377512 | Rogers | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150014879 | Sun | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150051302 | Leser | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150061194 | Sun | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150250342 | Euler | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150258771 | Leser | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150284521 | Abubakar | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150307679 | Lee | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160082692 | Li | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160082693 | Li | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160089852 | Lindenfelzer | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160137804 | Van Der Ven | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160257030 | Sun | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160257052 | Sun | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160257799 | Sun | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160355659 | Sun | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170002117 | Layman | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170174865 | Dhaliwal | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170232715 | Fehr | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20180099798 | Lehrter | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180201752 | Lin | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180354237 | De Jonge | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190045954 | Euler | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190047265 | Euler | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20200361184 | Saniei | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2013334155 | Feb 2017 | AU |
| 898053 | Apr 1984 | BE |
| 2078123 | Sep 1991 | CA |
| 2291607 | Jun 2000 | CA |
| 2765489 | Dec 2010 | CA |
| 2752335 | Mar 2012 | CA |
| 1118239 | Mar 1996 | CN |
| 1288427 | Mar 2001 | CN |
| 1484602 | Mar 2004 | CN |
| 1495100 | May 2004 | CN |
| 1523051 | Aug 2004 | CN |
| 1942370 | Apr 2007 | CN |
| 1984763 | Jun 2007 | CN |
| 101044195 | Sep 2007 | CN |
| 101098918 | Jan 2008 | CN |
| 101104716 | Jan 2008 | CN |
| 101352923 | Jan 2009 | CN |
| 101370873 | Feb 2009 | CN |
| 101429309 | May 2009 | CN |
| 101456927 | Jun 2009 | CN |
| 101531260 | Sep 2009 | CN |
| 101538387 | Sep 2009 | CN |
| 101560307 | Oct 2009 | CN |
| 201347706 | Nov 2009 | CN |
| 102030960 | Apr 2011 | CN |
| 102070841 | May 2011 | CN |
| 102089370 | Jun 2011 | CN |
| 102115561 | Jul 2011 | CN |
| 102245368 | Nov 2011 | CN |
| 102313084 | Jan 2012 | CN |
| 102391570 | Mar 2012 | CN |
| 102762350 | Oct 2012 | CN |
| 102892678 | Jan 2013 | CN |
| 2831240 | Jan 1980 | DE |
| 2831240 | Mar 1988 | DE |
| 102006025612 | Nov 2007 | DE |
| 102008031812 | Dec 2009 | DE |
| 0001791 | May 1979 | EP |
| 0086869 | Aug 1983 | EP |
| 0161597 | Nov 1985 | EP |
| 0318167 | May 1989 | EP |
| 0329490 | Aug 1989 | EP |
| 0520028 | Dec 1992 | EP |
| 0570221 | Nov 1993 | EP |
| 0588321 | Mar 1994 | EP |
| 0659647 | Jun 1995 | EP |
| 713481 | May 1996 | EP |
| 0851805 | Jul 1998 | EP |
| 0879844 | Nov 1998 | EP |
| 0851805 | Dec 1998 | EP |
| 960826 | Jan 1999 | EP |
| 0972727 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 1040158 | Oct 2000 | EP |
| 1057608 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 1072389 | Jan 2001 | EP |
| 0796199 | Feb 2001 | EP |
| 1057608 | Apr 2002 | EP |
| 0940240 | Oct 2002 | EP |
| 1308263 | May 2003 | EP |
| 1323779 | Jul 2003 | EP |
| 1449634 | Aug 2004 | EP |
| 1479716 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 1472087 | Apr 2006 | EP |
| 1666530 | Jun 2006 | EP |
| 1704047 | Sep 2006 | EP |
| 1741744 | Jan 2007 | EP |
| 1749634 | Feb 2007 | EP |
| 1754744 | Feb 2007 | EP |
| 1921023 | May 2008 | EP |
| 1939099 | Jul 2008 | EP |
| 0851805 | Dec 2008 | EP |
| 2141000 | Jan 2010 | EP |
| 2266894 | Dec 2010 | EP |
| 2386584 | Nov 2011 | EP |
| 2386601 | Nov 2011 | EP |
| 1040158 | Apr 2012 | EP |
| 1749635 | Sep 2012 | EP |
| 2323829 | Oct 2012 | EP |
| 2554374 | Feb 2013 | EP |
| 2141000 | Feb 2014 | EP |
| 2720954 | Apr 2014 | EP |
| 2912142 | Mar 2016 | EP |
| 1078326 | Aug 1967 | GB |
| 2322100 | Aug 1998 | GB |
| 2485077 | May 2012 | GB |
| 2504166 | Jan 2014 | GB |
| 2506796 | Apr 2014 | GB |
| 52123043 | Oct 1977 | JP |
| S5641146 | Apr 1981 | JP |
| 58029618 | Feb 1983 | JP |
| H02129040 | May 1990 | JP |
| H02269683 | Nov 1990 | JP |
| 4278340 | Oct 1992 | JP |
| 4278340 | Oct 1992 | JP |
| 404278340 | Oct 1992 | JP |
| H0543967 | Feb 1993 | JP |
| 0615751 | Jan 1994 | JP |
| 06192460 | Jul 1994 | JP |
| H06322167 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| H08067758 | Mar 1996 | JP |
| 410000748 | Jan 1998 | JP |
| 2001139717 | May 1999 | JP |
| 2000128255 | May 2000 | JP |
| P310847 | Dec 2000 | JP |
| 2001138378 | May 2001 | JP |
| 2001310429 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2001315277 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2001329099 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2001348454 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2003292663 | Oct 2003 | JP |
| 2003321566 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 200418101 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2004018101 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2004067820 | Mar 2004 | JP |
| 2004137377 | May 2004 | JP |
| 2004168421 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2004330464 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2005053494 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 2005138508 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005272542 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| 2005290329 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| 2006008988 | Jan 2006 | JP |
| 2006096390 | Apr 2006 | JP |
| 2006130814 | May 2006 | JP |
| 2006142008 | Jun 2006 | JP |
| 200791323 | Apr 2007 | JP |
| 2007154172 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 3140847 | Apr 2008 | JP |
| 2008162700 | Jul 2008 | JP |
| 2008213491 | Sep 2008 | JP |
| 2009504858 | Feb 2009 | JP |
| 2009066856 | Apr 2009 | JP |
| 2009126922 | Jun 2009 | JP |
| 2009138029 | Jun 2009 | JP |
| 2009190756 | Aug 2009 | JP |
| 2010173258 | Aug 2010 | JP |
| 2011104890 | Jun 2011 | JP |
| 2011132420 | Jul 2011 | JP |
| 2011207958 | Oct 2011 | JP |
| 2011212968 | Oct 2011 | JP |
| 2012526006 | Oct 2012 | JP |
| 2013203886 | Oct 2013 | JP |
| 2018002213 | Jan 2018 | JP |
| 100306320 | Oct 2001 | KR |
| 2003036558 | May 2003 | KR |
| 2004017234 | Feb 2004 | KR |
| 101196666 | Nov 2012 | KR |
| 2004008491 | Jul 2005 | MX |
| 347519 | Apr 2014 | MX |
| 2232781 | Jul 2004 | RU |
| 2254347 | Jun 2005 | RU |
| 393427 | Jun 2000 | TW |
| 200404848 | Apr 2004 | TW |
| M362648 | Aug 2009 | TW |
| 201021747 | Jun 2010 | TW |
| 201309757 | Mar 2013 | TW |
| 1991013933 | Sep 1991 | WO |
| 9413460 | Jun 1994 | WO |
| 1994013460 | Jun 1994 | WO |
| 9504709 | Feb 1995 | WO |
| 9729150 | Aug 1997 | WO |
| 1998016575 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO-9932544 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| 0002800 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| 0119733 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| 0132758 | May 2001 | WO |
| 0140374 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| 0153079 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| 0170859 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| 0234824 | May 2002 | WO |
| 2003066320 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| 03076497 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| 03099913 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| 2004104075 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| 2005097878 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| 2006042908 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| 2006124369 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2007003523 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2007020074 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| 2007068766 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| 2007090845 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| 2008030953 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| 2008038750 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| 2008045944 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| 2008057878 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2008080111 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2008145267 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2009035580 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| 2010006272 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 2010015673 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| 2010019146 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| 2010076701 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| 2010111869 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2010151724 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2011005856 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| 2011036272 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| 2011038081 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| 2011076637 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| 2011141044 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| 2011144705 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| 2012020106 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| 2012025584 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| 2012044730 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2012055797 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2012099682 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| 2012173873 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2012174422 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2012174567 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2012174567 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2012174567 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2012174568 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2012174568 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2013032552 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| 2012174567 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2013101301 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| 20140066761 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014099335 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| 2015024018 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Dec. 23, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/135,048, BP-432 US-CON1 | , (pp. 1-14). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Jun. 20, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/410,386 , BP-527 US-U | (pp. 1-18). |
| Second Mexican Office action for Mexican Patent App. No. MX/a/2016/002374 dated Aug. 2, 2021, 9 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action for Canadian Patent App. No. 2918306 dated Jul. 28, 2021, BP-423 CA | , 3 pages. |
| Dow (TM) HDPE DMDA-8007 NT7 Technical Information, Dow Chemical Company, 2011. (Year: 2011). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Jul. 11, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/410,386 (pp. 1-12). |
| Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Jan. 10, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/410,386, BP-527 US-U | (pp. 1-12). |
| Mexican Office action for Mexican Patent App. No. MX/a/2016/002374 dated Mar. 3, 2021, 7 pages. |
| Office Action (Final Rejection) dated May 31, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/135,048 (pp. 1-15). |
| Mexican Office Action for MX/a/2016/002490 dated Jun. 22, 21, BP-423 MX | , 8 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Application Serial No. 201480021009.9, dated Aug. 7, 2017 including English language summary, BP-405 CN || , 12 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201480047976.2, BP-423 Cn | , 15 pages. |
| Australian First Patent Examination Report for Australian App. No. 2014311991 dated Oct. 4, 2017, BP-424 AU || , 4 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Application Serial No. 201480021009.9, dated Jan. 2, 2018 including English language summary, BP-405 CN | , 6 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Application Serial No. 201480021009.9, dated Apr. 20, 2018 including English language summary, BP-405 CN | , 6 pages. |
| First Substantive Examination Report for European App. No. 14768125.8 dated Mar. 21, 2019, BP-405 EP | , 6 pages. |
| First Examination Report for Indiana Patent App. No. 9302/DELNP/2015 dated May 6, 2019, BP-405 IN || , 7 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 20180039581.8 sent Feb. 23, 2018, BP-422 CN | , 13 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 20180039581.8 sent Jan. 14, 2019, BP-422 CN | , 10 pages. |
| Chinese Final Rejection for Chinese App. No. 201480047976.2, BP-423 CN || , 8 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201480047978.1, BP-425 CN | , 11 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 20180042446.9 sent on Feb. 3, 2018, BP-432 CN | , 9 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 20180042446.9 sent on Oct. 31, 2018, BP-432 CN | , 5 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201480047578.0 sent on Jan. 24, 2018, BP-424 CN || , 10 pages. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/061,070, BP-475 US-U | , (pp. 1-13). |
| Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/239,894, BP-422 US-CON1 | , (pp. 1-13). |
| Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/491,443, BP-432 US-U | , pp. 1-6. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201480047578.0 sent on Aug. 29, 2018, BP-424 CN | , 4 pages. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/239,894, BP422 US-CON | , (pp. 1-9). |
| Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/902,489, BP-473 US-CON || , (pp. 1-16). |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 20180039581.8 sent May 31, 2019, BP-422 CN | , 7 pages. |
| Chinese Reexamination Notification for Chinese App. No. 201480047976.2, BP-423 CN | , 12 pages. |
| Dingyi Hong, “Handbook of Plastic Industry: Polyolefin” Beijing Chemical Industry Press, First Edition, Mar. 1999, 17 pages, English translation included. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 15, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/902,489, BP-473 US-CON || , (pp. 1-24). |
| Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/149,351, BP-405 US-CON || , (pp. 1-6). |
| Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/713,799, BP-432 US-CON | , (pp. 1-5). |
| Indian First Examination Report for Indian Patent App. No. 2016/17003143 dated 11 Sep. 2020, BP-423 IN | , 5 pages. |
| First Examination Report for Indiana App. No. 201617007243 dated Dec. 16, 2019, BP-425 IN | , 6 pages. |
| Indian First Examination Report for Indian App. No. 201317001026, dated Mar. 20, 2020, BP-432 IN | , 6 pages. |
| First Examination Report for Indian App. No. 201617005271, sent Feb. 11, 2020, BP-424 IN ||. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/902,489, BP-473 US-CON || , 22 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 16, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/902,489, BP-473 US-CON | (pp. 1-20). |
| Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/356,423, BP-422 US-CON | (pp. 1-14). |
| Indian First Examination Report for Indian Patent App. No. 201617000386, dated Oct. 16, 2020, BP-422 IN | , 7 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action for Canadian Patent App. No. 2918306 dated Oct. 30, 2020, BP-423 CA || , 4 pages. |
| Mexican Office Action for MX/a/2016/002490 dated Oct. 22, 2020, BP-423 MX | , 7 pages. |
| First Mexican Office Action for Mexican Patent App. No. MX/a/2015/012702 dated Jun. 23, 2021, BP-405 MX || , 17 pages, No English translation available. |
| Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Nov. 15, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/410,386, BP-527 US-U || (pp. 1-19). |
| English machine translation for JP2001-018943 (2001). (Year: 2001). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Sep. 27, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/135,048 (pp. 1-13). |
| Jan-Erik Wegner, Affidavit regarding Hydrocerol, available at least by May 28, 2018, 22 pages. |
| Borealis HC600TF, 2008, 3 pages. |
| Borealis HC205TF, 2007, 3 pages. |
| Isplen codes, available at least by May 28, 2018, 1 page. |
| Quimica Chemicals—Isplen Polypropylene Compounds, brochure Apr. 2010, 20 pages. |
| Rychly, J. et al., “The effect of physical parameters of isotactic polypropylene on its oxidisability measured by chemiluminescence method. Contribution to the spreading phenomenon” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 71, No. 2, 2001, 8 pages. |
| Tiemblo, P et al., “The autoacceleration of polypropylene thermo-oxidation in reduced coordinates: effect of the oxidation temperature and of polyolefin structure” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 72, No. 1, 2001, 8 pages. |
| Bezati, F et al., “Addition of tracers into the polypropylene in view of automatic sorting of plastic wastes using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry” Waste Management, vol. 30, No. 4, May 2010, 6 pages. |
| Translation of CN101560307A, 19 pages. |
| Gotsis, A. D. et al., “The Effect of Long Chain Branching on the Processability of Polypropylene in Thermoforming” Polymer Engineering and Science, vol. 44, No. 5, May 2004, 10 pages. |
| “Product News” Daploy WB135HMS—High Melt Strength Polyproyplene for Foam Extrusion, 2004, 2 pages. |
| Naguib, Hani E. et al., “Effects of Blending of Branched and Linear Polypropylene Materials on the Foamability” Technical Papers of the Annual Technical Conference-Society of Plastics Engineers Incorporated, 2001, 8 pages. |
| Antunes, Marcelo et al., “Heat Transfer in Polypropylene-Based Foams Produced Using Different Foaming Processes” Advanced Engineering Materials, vol. 11, No. 1 0, May 2009, 7 pages. |
| ROhne Gunhild. Foaming of Soft Polyproyplene Blends. Conference Proceedings: Zlin Czech Republic, Aug. 16-18, 2000, 4 pages. |
| Mikell Knights, “Theres Plenty of Fizz in Foam Blow Molding” Plastics Technology, available from https:Ilwww.ptonline.com/articles/there%27s-plenty-of-fizz-in-foam-blow-molding, 1999, 4 pages. |
| Crodamide brochure 02/00, 4 pages. |
| Tabatabaei, Seyed H et al., “Rheological and thermal properties of blends of a long-chain branched polypropylene and different linear polypropylenes” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 64, No. 22, 2009, 13 pages. |
| Stange, Jens et al., “Rheological properties and foaming behavior of polypropylenes with different molecular structures” Journal of Rheology, vol. 50, No. 6, 2006, 18 pages. |
| Clariant, Cesa Slip, Sep. 2000, 6 pages. |
| Antunes, Marcelo et al., “Study of the cellular structure heterogeneity and anisotropy of polypropylene and polypropylene nanocomposite foams” Polymer Engineering and Science, vol. 49, No. 12, May 2009, 14 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/004,263 (pp. 1-20). |
| Shutov, Fyodor, “Foamed Polymers. Cellular Structure and Properties”, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Industrial Developments vol. 51, Jun. 2005, p. 176-182, 8 pages. |
| Canadian office action for Canadian App. no. 2842325 dated Oct. 26, 2018, BP-362 CA || , 4 pages. |
| First Examination Report for Indian Patent App. No. 111/DELNP/2014 dated Apr. 22, 2019, BP-352 IN || , 7 pages. |
| First Examination Report for Indian Patent App. No. 110/DELNP/2014 sent on Dec. 26, 2019, BP-354 IN || , 8 pages. |
| Taiwan Office Action for Taiwan App. No. 102146298 sent Oct. 26, 2016, BP-374 TW || , 9 pages. |
| Canadian Examiner's Report for Canadian App. No. 2845225 dated Mar. 1, 2019, BP-356 CA || , 3 pages. |
| Canadian Examiner's Report for Canadian App. No. 2845225 dated Nov. 18, 2019, BP-356 CA || , 4 pages. |
| Canadian Examiner's Report for Canadian App. No. 2845225 dated Dec. 2, 2020, BP-356 CA || , 4 pages. |
| Borealis Product Brochure, “DaployTM HMS Polypropylene for Foam Extrusion”, 20 pages, 2010. |
| Canadian Examiner's Reprot for Canadian App. No. 2845225 dated Jun. 23, 2021, BP-356 CA || , 4 pages. |
| Re-examination Notification for Chinese Patent App. No. 201280051426.9 received on Feb. 11, 2019, BP-356 CN || , 19 pages. |
| Second Re-examination Notification for Chinese Patent App. No. 201280051426.9 received on Oct. 8, 2019, BP-356 CN || , 21 pages. |
| German Office Action for German App. No. 11 2012 00 070.2 dated Oct. 20, 2020, BP-356 DE || , 23 pages. |
| German Office Action for German App. No. 11 2012 00 070.2 dated Sep. 30, 2021, BP-356 DE || , 7pages, (No English Translation Available). |
| Borealis: Product Data Sheet: Polypropylene DaployTM WB 140 HMS (Mar. 16, 2021), 2 pages. |
| English Translations of German Office Action for German App. No. 11 2012 00 070.2 dated Sep. 30, 2021, BP-356 DE || , 6 pages. |
| German Office Action for German App. No. 11 2012 00 070.2 dated Dec. 23, 2022, BP-356 DE || , 12 pages, (No English Translation Available). |
| Zweifel, Hans, “Plastics Additives Handbook” Carl Hanser Verlag, 2001, 6 pages. |
| Examination Report for GB1405600.6 dated Oct. 15, 2019, BP-356 GB || , 4 pages. |
| Indian First Examination Report for Indian Pat. App. No. 2179/DELNP/2014 date May 24, 2019, BP-356 In || , 6 pages. |
| Chinese Rejection Decision for Chinese App. No. 201380065781.6 dated Jul. 12, 2018, BP-395 CN || , 15 pages, (No English Translation available). |
| English Summary of Chinese Rejection Decision for Chinese App. No. 201380065781.6 dated Jul. 12, 2018, BP-395 CN || , 4 pages. |
| Indian Examination Report for Indian App. No. 3919/DELNP/2015, sent Aug. 21, 2018, BP-395 IN || , 5 pages. |
| Markus Gahleitner et al., “Heterophasic Copolymers of Polypropylene: Development, Design, Principles, and Future Challenges,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2013, Wiley Periodicals, 10 pages. |
| Sadiqali Cheruthazhekatt et al., “Multidimensional Analysis of the Complex Composition of Impact Polypropylene Copolymers: Combination of TREF, SEC-FTIR-HPer DSC, and High Temperature 2D-LC,” Macromolecules 2012, 45, 2025-2305, ACS Publications, American Chemcial Society, 10 pages. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/651,284, BP-354 US-CON1 || , (pp. 1-10). |
| Substantive Examination Report for European App. No. 17182869.2 sent on Nov. 12, 2018, BP-356 EP-DIV1 | , 5 pages. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/388,319, BP-428 US-CON1 || (pp. 1-10). |
| Office Action dateed Dec. 13, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/672,668, BP-352 US-Con || , (pp. 1-13). |
| Office Action dated May 19, 2015 for Chinese Application No. 201280035667.4. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,212. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,358. |
| Third Party Observations filed with respect to European Patent Application No. 12727994.1, Aug. 17, 2015 (22 pages). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/498,455, filed Jun. 17, 2011, related to PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/041395, 46 pages. |
| “Slip Agents”, Polypropylene Handbook, 2nd edition, 2005, pp. 285-286. |
| Certified English translation of JP2003292663. |
| Second Chinese Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2015 for Chinese Application Serial No. 201280034350.9. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,504. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,073. |
| English translation of Russian Office Action for Application Serial No. 2015127677, dated Sep. 16, 2015. |
| Inter Partes Review Petition for US. Pat. No. 8,883,280 (712 pages). |
| Gibson and Ashby, Cellular solids: structure and properties, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press (1997) (7 pages). |
| C. Maier and T. Calafut, Polypropylene: the Definitive User's Guide and Databook, Plastics Design Library, William Andrew Inc. (1998) (19 pages). |
| Grant & Hackh's Chemical Dictionary, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, Inc. (1987) (3 pages). |
| Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 11th ed. (2003), p. 70 (3 pages). |
| Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 11th ed. (2003), p. 1237 (3 pages). |
| Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 14th Ed. (2001) (5 pages). |
| Reichelt et al., Abstract of PP-Blends with Tailored Foamability and Mechanical Properties, Cellular Polymers, (2003) available from http://www.polymerjournals.com/journals.asp?Page=111&JournalType=cp&Journallssue=cp22-5&JIP=, listing (4 pages). |
| Ratzsch et al., Abstract of Radical Reactions on Polypropylene in the Solid State, Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 27, Issue 7, (Sep. 2002), available from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079670002000060 (3 pages). |
| “Borealis Dapoly™ HMS Polypropylene for Foam Extrusion” obtained from Borealis webpage obtained from the Internet Archive's “Wayback Machine” as of Nov. 16, 2008 (https://web.archive.org/web/20081116085125/http://www.borealisgroup.com/pdf/literature/borealis-borouge/brochure/K_IN0020_GB_FF_2007_10_BB.pdf)(“Brochure '08”) (20 pages). |
| Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/755,546. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/161,328. |
| Singapore Notice of Eligibility for Grant, Search Report, and Examination Report transmitted Dec. 10, 2015 for Singapore Application No. 11201503336V. |
| English translation of First Office Action for Taiwanese Application No. 101121656, Nov. 13, 2015. |
| English summary of Spanish Office Action for Application Serial No. P201490025, Feb. 9, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13849152.7-1303/2912142 PCT/US2013/066811, dated Feb. 12, 2016. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/108,142. |
| United Kingdom Examination Report for Patent Application No. GB1400762.9 dated Feb. 11, 2016. |
| English Summary of Russian Office Action for Application Serial No. 2014111340, dated Feb. 25, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Supplemental European Search Report for European Application No. 12727994.-1302, dated Feb. 17, 2016. |
| Australian First Patent Examination Report for Application No. 2012271047, dated Feb. 29, 2016. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13827981.5-1708/2888092 PCT/US2013/053935, dated Feb. 19, 2016. |
| N.N. Najib, N.M. Manan, A.A. Bakar, and C.S. Sipaut, Effect of Blowing Agent Concentration on Cell Morphology and Impact Properties of Natural Rubber Foam, Journal of Physical Science, vol. 20(1), 13-25, 2009 (13 pages). |
| Nigel Mills, Polymer Foams Handbook, Fig. 2.2, 1st ed. 2007 (2 pages). |
| University of Massachusetts, Advanced Plastics Processing Lecture, Lecture 11: Foam Processes, Slide 4 (Nov. 11, 2012) (2 pages). |
| English Summary of Chinese Office Action for Application Serial No. 201380041896.1, dated Mar. 18, 2016, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 16, 2016, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/051508. |
| Australian Second Patent Examination Report for Application No. 2012302251, dated Feb. 26, 2016. |
| Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-528384, dated Mar. 1, 2016. |
| English summary of Mexican Office Action for Application Serial No. MX/a/2013/014993, Apr. 27, 2016, 5 pages. |
| English summary of Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application Serial No. 201380065781.6, Apr. 19, 2016, 14 pages. |
| Doerpinghaus et al., 'Separating the effects of sparse long-chain branching on rheology from those due to molecular weight in polyethylenes', Journal of Rheology, 47, 717 (2003). |
| English Summary of Chinese Office Action for Application Serial No. 201280051426.9, Apr. 29, 2016, 5 pages. |
| Affidavit of Christopher Butler of Internet Archive, Borealis webpage dated Jan. 20, 2010 (https://web.archive.org/web/20100120102738/http://www.borealisgroup.com/industry-solutions/advancedpackaging/rigid-packaging/polyolefin-foam/daploy-hmspp-extruded-foam/). |
| Reichelt et al., 'PP-Blends with Tailored Foamability and Mechanical Properties', Cellular Polymers, vol. 22, No. 5, 2003, 14 pages. |
| Ratzsch et al., 'Radical reactions on polypropylene in the solid state', Prog. Polym. Sci. 27 (2002) 1195-1282, 88 pages. |
| Excerpts from Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology: Plastics, Resins, Rubbers, and Fibers, 'Blowing Agents', vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1965), 37 pages. |
| Excerpts from Polymer Foams: Science and Technology, Lee et al., 'Introduction to Polymeric Foams', CRC Press (2007) 51 pages. |
| Excerpts from Gibson and Ashby, Cellular solids: Structure and properties—Second edition, Cambridge University Press, 1997, 66 pages. |
| Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Apr. 12, 2024 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/135,048 (pp. 1-13). |
| International Search Report dated Jul. 29, 2013, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2012/043016, 25 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 17, 2013, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2012/041395. |
| Daploy HMS Polypropylene for Foam Extrusion, 20 pages, BOREALIS Borouge Shaping the Future with Plastics, Published 2010, www.borealisgroup.com, www.borouge.com, Vienna, Austria. |
| Certified English translation of EP0086869. |
| English translation of Spanish Search Report of Application No. 201490025, dated Apr. 20, 2015. |
| European Search Report of Application No. 12861450.0, dated Nov. 21, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 16, 2014, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2013/075013. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 21, 2014, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2013/074923. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 22, 2014, relating to PCT/US2013/074965. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 25, 2014, relating to PCT/US2013/075052. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 19, 2015, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/059312. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 3, 2014, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/025697. |
| International Search Report dated Feb. 26, 2013, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2012/043018. |
| International Search Report dated Jan. 19, 2015, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/059216. |
| International Search Report dated Jan. 29, 2013, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2012/043017. |
| International Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2013, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2012/042737. |
| International Search Report dated Jul. 30, 2012, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2012/041397. |
| International Search Report dated Mar. 11, 2014, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2013/66811. |
| International Search Report dated Nov. 19, 2012, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2012/041395. |
| International Search Report dated Nov. 7, 2014, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/51508. |
| Jaakko I. Raukola, A New Technology to Manufacture Polypropylene Foam Sheet and Biaxially Oriented Foam Film, VTT Publications 361, Technical Research Centre of Finland, Apr. 1998, 100 pages. |
| Machine English translation of EP0086869. |
| Machine English translation of JP 2006-130814. |
| Naguib et al., “Fundamental Foaming Mechanisms Governing the vol. Expansion of Extruded Polypropylene Foams,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 91, pp. 2661-2668, 2004 (10 pages). |
| New Zealand First Examination Report for Application No. 619616 dated Oct. 10, 2014. |
| New Zealand First Examination Report for Application No. 621219 dated Nov. 17, 2014. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,358. |
| Office action dated Apr. 11, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/526,417. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,212. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,073. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2014 for Chinese Application No. 201280035667.4. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/526,454. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,114. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2015 for Chinese Application No. 201280034350.9 (11 pages). |
| Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2015 for Chinese Application No. 201280035667.4 (22 pages). |
| Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,640. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,640. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,358. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,212. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/526,417. |
| Singapore Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2014 for Singapore Application No. 2014002273. |
| Spanish Search Report for Application No. 201490025, dated Apr. 20, 2015. |
| Spanish Search Report of Application No. 201390099, dated Feb. 9, 2015. |
| Third-Party Submission Under 37 CFR 1.290 filed on Dec. 9, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/063,252. |
| Third-Party Submission Under 37 CFR 1.290 filed on Feb. 26, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/491,007. |
| Third Party Submission Under 37 CFR 1.290 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,504 submitted May 11, 2015 and May 27, 2015 (43 pages). |
| Wang et al., “Extending PP's Foamability Through Tailored Melt Strength and Crystallization Kinetics,” paper 19 from the Conference Proceedings of the 8th International Conferences of Blowing Agents and Foaming Processes, May 16-17, 2006 in Munich, Germany Smithers Rapra Ltd, 2006 (14 pages). |
| Australian First Patent Examination Report for Application No. 2012302251 dated Jul. 9, 2015. |
| Office Action Chinese Patent Application No. 201280051426.9 dated Jul. 23, 2015. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/862,552 || (pp. 1-14). |
| “All You Need to Know About Polypropylene, Part 1,” Creative Mechanisms Blog. (Year: 2016). |
| Rejection Decions for Chinese Patent App. No. 201280051426.9 received on Nov. 14, 2017, BP-356 CN || , 8 pages. |
| ASTM D883-17, an American Society for Testing and Materials “Standard Terminology Relating to Plastics,” 2017, 16 pages. |
| ASTM D4101-14, an American Society for Testing and Materials “Standard Standard Specification for Polypropylene Injection and Extrusion Materials,” 2014, 17 pages. |
| Lyondellbasell, Polypropylene, Impact Copolymer, https://www.lyondellbasell.com/en/products-technology/polymers/resin-type/polypropylene-impact-copolymer/, accessed on Nov. 29, 2017, 5 pages. |
| ASTM D883-12e1, an American Society for Testing and Materials “Standard Terminology Relating to Plastics,” 2012, 16 pages. |
| Astm D4101-11, an American Society for Testing and Materials “Standard Standard Specification for Polypropylene Injection and Extrusion Materials,” 2011, 17 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201380065781.6 dated Nov. 28, 2017, BP-395 CN || , 10 pages. |
| European Examination Report for European App. No. 13849152.7 sent Jan. 4, 2018, BP-395 EP || , 3 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/388,319; || (BP-428) (pp. 1-13). |
| Office Action dated Jan. 19, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/004,263; || (pp. 1-18). |
| Extended European Search Report for European App. No. 14836418.5 mailed Jan. 30, 2018, BP-428 EP || , 4 pages. |
| Canadian office action for Canadian App. No. 2,842,325 dated Jan. 24, 2018, BP-352 CA || , 4 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action for Japanese App. No. 2016-501945 sent Jan. 23, 2018, BP-392 JP || , 17 pages. |
| Canadian Examiner's Report for Canadian App. No. 2845225 datedFeb. 6, 2018, BP-356 CA || , 5 pages. |
| Taiwan Office Action for Taiwan App. No. 103128338 received on Feb. 21, 2018, BP-428 TW || , 9 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent App. No. 2015-539838 sent Feb. 27, 2018, BP-395 JP || , 10 pages. |
| Taiwan Office Action for Taiwan App. No. 102138786 received on Mar. 1, 2018, BP-395 TW || , 20 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action mailed Mar. 22, 18 for Chinese Patent Application 201480007369.3, BP-392 || 237578, 5 pages. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/862,552, BP-450 || (pp. 1-10). |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380065127.5, sent on Jul. 26, 2016, 11 pages. |
| Taiwan Office Action for Taiwan App. No. 101121655 received Apr. 25, 2018, BP-354 TW || , 6 pages, (No English translation available). |
| “All you need to know about Polypropylene, Part 1,” Creative Mechanisms. (Year: 2017), 6 pages. |
| “Polypropylene, Impact Copolymer,” Lyondell Basell. (Year: 2017). |
| Australian Notice of Acceptance for Australian App. No. 2016204692 received on Apr. 3, 2018, BP-356 AU-DIV1 || , 3 pages. |
| First Substantive Examiantion Report for European App. No. 14775300.8 sent Apr. 6, 2018, BP-392 EP || , 4 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/388,319 (pp. 1-19). |
| Notice of Opposition for EP2751194 submitted May 28, 2018, BP-356 EP || , 11 pages. |
| Grounds of Opposition for EP2751194 submitted May 28, 2018, BP-356 EP || , 40 pages. |
| Pasquini, Nello, “Polypropylene Handbook,” Carl Hanser Verlag, 2005, 7 pages. |
| Himont, Pro-fay PF814 brochure, 1992, 1 page. |
| Maier et al., “Polypropylene: The Definitive User's Guide and Databook” Plastics Design Library, 1998, 19 pages. |
| Gachter et al., “Taschenbuch der Kunststoff-Additive” Carl Hanser Verlag, 1983, 17 pages, (no English translation available). |
| Wypych, “Handbook of Antiblocking, Release, and Slip Additives” ChemTec Publishing, 2011, 10 pages. |
| Wiesner et al. “The Right Chemical Foaming Agent for Your Application” The Sixth International Conference “Blowing Agents and Foaming Processes 2004”, 11 pages. |
| Hydrocerol—Chemical Foaming and Nucleating Agents, 2007, 8 pages. |
| Montell at K98—presentation of extrusion line, 1998, 2 pages. |
| Montell Polyolefins “PP meets foam in sheet—Pro-fax PF-814 paves the way to PP foam growth”, available at least by May 28, 2018, 4 pages. |
| Glossary of Terms for the chemical Fabrics & Film Industry, available at least by May 28, 2018, 5 pages. |
| ASTM D 883-08, Standard Terminology Relating to Plastics, 2008, 15 pages. |
| ASTM D 1922-93, Standard Test Method for Propagation Tear Resistance of Plastic Film and Thin Sheeting by Pendulum Method, 1993, 5 pages. |
| ASTM D3763-02, Standard Test Method for High Speed Puncture Properties of Plastics Using Load and Displacement SEnsors, 2002, 10 pages. |
| Tolinski, “Additives for Polyolefins: Getting the Most Out of Polypropylene, Polyethylene, and TPO” Elsevier, 2009, 25 pages. |
| Borealis, DaployTM HMS Polypropylene for Foam Extrusion, 2007, 20 pages. |
| Borealis, DaployTM HMS Polypropylene for Foam Extrusion, 2010, 20 pages. |
| Documents from Inter Parte Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,883,280, entered Jan. 26, 2016, 26 pages. |
| Clarian, Technical Product Information “Hydrocerol CF40E”, 2004, 1 page. |
| Clariant, Technical Product Information “Hydrocerol CF20E”, 2004, 6 pages. |
| Clariant, Data sheet Hydrocerol CT516, 2004, 5 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/004,263, BP-472 US-U || , (pp. 1-15). |
| Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/023,218, BP-356 US-CON5 || , (pp. 1-5). |
| Rogers, “All you Need to Know About Polypropylene, Part 1,” Creative Mechanisms Blog. (Year: 2014), 6 pages. |
| Office Action dated Aril 2, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/388,319, BP-428 US-CON || (pp. 1-17). |
| Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/004,263 (pp. 1-10). |
| Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/651,284, BP-354 US-CON1 || 2020, pp. 1-5. |
| Notice to Attend Hearing for Indian Patent App. No. 2179/DELNP/2014 dated Aug. 17, 2020, BP-356 IN || , 2 pages. |
| Mexican Office Action for Mexican App. No. MX/a/2014/002373 issued Jul. 1, 2019, BP-356 MX || , 7 pages. |
| ISO, “Plastics—Determination of drawing characteristics of thermoplastics in the molten state”, ISO, First edition, Jun. 15, 2005, 22 pages. |
| Mexican Office Action for Mexican App. No. MX/a/2014/002373 issued Mar. 6, 2020, BP-356 MX || , 10 pages. |
| Third Mexican Office Action for Mexican App. No. MX/a/2014/002373 issued Jan. 8, 2021, BP-356 MX || , 9 pages. |
| Fourth Mexican Office Action for Mexican App. No. MX/a/2014/002373 received Nov. 2, 2021, BP-356 MX || , 5 pages. |
| Canadian Examiner's Report and Examination Search Report for Canadian App. No. 2,889,280, dated Apr. 14, 2020, BP-395 CA || , 5 pages. |
| Canadian Examiner's Report and Examination Search Report for Canadian App. No. 2,889,280, dated Oct. 27, 2020, BP-395 CA || , 4 pages. |
| Mexican Office Action for Mexican Patent App. No. MX/a/2015005207 dated Jul. 22, 2020, BP-395 MX || , 5 pages. |
| Examination Report for Indian Patent App. No. 5758/DELNP/2015 dated Aug. 28, 2019, BP-445 IN || , 7 pages. |
| First Examination Report for Indian App. No. 5756/DELNP/2015 dated Dec. 12, 2019, BP-374 IN || , 5 pages. |
| First Examination Report for Indian App. No. 5804/DELNP/2015, sent Aug. 5, 2019, BP-391 IN || , 7 pages. |
| Indian First Examination Report for Indian Application No. 8947/DELNP/2015 dated Jul. 18, 2019, BP-392 IN || , 7 pages. |
| Office ACtion dated Oct. 18, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/546,723, BP-356 US-CON || , (pp. 1-6). |
| Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/651,284, BP-354 US-CON || (pp. 1-6). |
| Lyondellbasell Technical Data Sheet for Pro-fax SC204 dated Mar. 17, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Canadian Examiner's Report for Canadian App. No. 2896256, dated Feb. 6, 2020, BP-392 CA || , 4 pages. |
| Canadian Examiner's Second Report for Canadian App. No. 2896256, dated Dec. 2, 2020, BP-392 CA || , 4 pages. |
| Canadian Examiner's Third Report for Canadian App. No. 2896256, dated Aug. 5, 2021, BP-392 CA || , 4 pages. |
| Hearing Notice for Indian Application No. 8947/DELNP/2015 dated Jul. 23, 2020, BP-392 IN || , 3 pages. |
| Notice of Appeal Decision for Japanese App. No. 2016-501945 sent Aug. 18, 2020, BP-392 JP || , 15 pages. |
| First Mexican Office Action for Mexican Patent App. No. MX/a/2015/008525 dated Nov. 5, 2020, BP-392 MX || , 17 pages. |
| First Mexican Office Action for Mexican Patent App. No. MX/a/2015/008525 dated May 3, 21, BP-392 MX || , 11 pages. |
| Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection for Korean Pat. App. No. 10-2015-7021888 dated Apr. 21, 20, BP-392 KR || , 11 pages. |
| Korean Second Notice of Preliminary Rejection for Korean Pat. App. No. 10-2015-7021888 dated Dec. 29, 20, BP-392 KR || , 16 pages. |
| Korean Notice of Last Preliminary Rejection for Korean Pat. App. No. 10-2015-7021888 dated Sep. 5, 2021, BP-392 KR || , 9 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 12, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/651,284, BP-354 U-CON || (pp. 1-8). |
| Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent App. No. 2019-045572 date Jan. 14, 2020, BP-392 JP || , 6 pages. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2020 for US App. No. 16/058, 126, BP-512A US-U || , (pp. 1-12). |
| Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2020 for US App. No. 16/058, 131 , BP-512B US-U || (pp. 1-8). |
| Office Action dated Sep. 3, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/858,778 (pp. 1-10). |
| Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2020 for US App. No. 16/058, 126, BP-512A US-U || , (pp. 1-11). |
| Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/531,530, BP-354 US-CON1 || , (pp. 1-10). |
| Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent App. No. 2019-045572 dated Oct. 30, 2020, BP-392 JP || , 6 pages. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2020 for US App. No. 16/058,131, BP-512B US-U || (pp. 1-17). |
| Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2021 for US App. No. 16/058,126, BP-512A US-U || (pp. 1-13). |
| Combined Search and Examination Report for Great Britain App. No. GB2010642.3 dated Mar. 31, 2021, BP-356 GB-DIV1 || , 3 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent App. No. 2019-045572 dated Apr. 13, 2021, BP-392 JP || , 6 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2021 for US App. No. 16/058,126, BP-512A US-U (pp. 1-16). |
| Indian First Examination Report for Indian App. No. 201918021005 dated Dec. 24, 2021, BP-354 IN || , 7 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 202010558511.0 dated Jul. 20, 2022, BP-356 CN-DIV1 || , 11 pages. |
| Chinese Rejection Decision Action for Chinese App. No. 202010558511.0 dated Feb. 16, 2023, BP-356 CN-DIV1 || , 7 pages. |
| Canadian Examiner's Report for Canadian App. No. CA3170958 dated (Oct. 27, 2023), BP-356 CA-DIV1 || , 4 pages. |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Oct. 27, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/528,650, BP-512A US-CON || (pp. 1-19). |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13863308.6 mailed Jul. 19, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/108,110. |
| Chinese Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2016 for Chinese Patent Application 201480007369.3, 13 pages. |
| M. Antunes et al., 'Heat Transfer in Polyolefin Foams,' Heat Transfer in Multi-Phase Materials, A. Ochsner and G. E. Murch, Eds. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, 131-161. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,212. |
| Australian First Patent Examination Report for Application No. 2013359097 sent Aug. 26, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/108,142. |
| Jacoby, Philip, “Recent Insights on the Use of Beta Nucleation to Improve the Thermoforming Characteristics of Polypropylene,” Society of Plastics Engineers, Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, ANTEC 2012, Apr. 2012, pp. 2292-2296. |
| Singapore Written Opinion for Singapore Patent Application No. 11201504756T established Jul. 19, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/725,319. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/739,510. |
| Japanese Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2014-515882, dispatched Aug. 30, 2016, 6 pages. |
| Mexican Office Action for Mexican Application MX/a/2013/014993 received on Sep. 27 2016, 6 pages. |
| New Zealand Examination Report for New Zealand Application No. 708463 received Oct. 3, 2016, 3 pages. |
| New Zealand Examination Report for New Zealand Application No. 708552 received on Oct. 7, 2016, 4 pages. |
| New Zealand First Examination Report for New Zealand Application 708546 received Sep. 26, 2016, 4 pages. |
| Russian Office Action for Russian Application No. 2014101298 received Sep. 30, 2016, 6 pages. |
| European Examination Report for European App. No. 12727994.1 received on Sep. 23, 2016, 4 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201380065089.3 received Sep. 30, 2016, 12 pages. |
| European Search Report for European App. No. 13849152.7 received Sep. 16, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Australian Patent Examination Report for Australian App. No. 2013334155 issued on Oct. 24, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Taiwan Office Action for Taiwan Pat. App. No. 102146299 received on Oct. 21, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Third Party Observation filed in European Patent App. No. 12727994.1 received on Nov. 4, 2016, 11 pages. |
| International Standard ISO 16790:2005(E), 20 pages. |
| S. Muke et al., The Melt Extensibility of Polypropylene, Polym. Int. 2001,515-523, 9 pages. |
| P. Spitael and C.W. Macosko, Strain Hardening in Polypropylenes and its Role in Extrusion Foaming, Polym. Eng. Sci. 2004, 2090-2100. |
| Combined Search and Examination Report for Great Britain App. No. GB1616321.4 received Oct. 12, 2016, 4 pages. |
| British Examination Report for GB App. No. 1400762.9 received Oct. 12, 2016, 2 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese Applicaiton 201380065781.6 received Oct. 18, 2016, 33 pages. |
| Research Progress of Polypropylene Foamed Material, Baiquan Chen et al., Plastics Manufacture, No. 12, pp. 55-58. |
| Modification and Formulation of Polypropylene, Mingshan Yang edits, Chemical Industry Press, p. 43, the second paragraph from the bottom, Jan. 31, 2009, 17 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European App. No. 13863649.3 received Sep. 27, 2016, 9 pages. |
| Office Action dated November4, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/961,411. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201280051426.9 received Nov. 1, 2016, 9 pages. |
| English Summary of Chinese Office Action for Application Serial No. 201380041896.1, dated Nov. 11, 2016, 11 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European App. No. 14775300.8 sent Oct. 24, 2016, 9 pages. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/718,836. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,158. |
| Gulf Cooperation Council Examination Report for GCC Patent App. No. GC2012-21529 received on Nov. 14, 2016, 6 pages. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,276. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/108,110. |
| Spanish Search Report for Spanish App. No. 201490025 received Dec. 23, 2016, 5 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent App. 2014-516089 sent Dec. 20, 2016, 6 pages. |
| European Examination Report for European App. No. 12727994.1 received on Jan. 25, 2016, 4 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action for Japanese App. No. 2014-528384 received Dec. 6, 2016, 15 pages. |
| Singapore Office Action and Written Opinion received Feb. 6, 2017 for Singapore Application No. 11201504330U, 6 pages. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/491,007. |
| Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201380064860.5, dated Jan. 25, 2017, 12 pages. |
| European Examination Report for European App. No. 13849152.7 sent Jan. 30, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2017 for US Appl. No. 14/858,193. |
| Singapore Office Action and Written Opinion dated Feb. 14, 2017 for Singapore Application No. 11201504327V, 6 pages. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,504. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/004,263. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/108,142. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201480052411.3 mailed Feb. 28, 2017, 16 pages. |
| New Zealand First Examination Report for New Zealand Application 708546 received Feb. 23, 2017, 2 pages. |
| Singapore Office Action and Written Opinion dated Dec. 13, 2016 and received on Feb. 28, 2017 for Singapore Application No. 11201504333Y, 6 pages. |
| Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201380065116.7, dated Mar. 1, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,212. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,276. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,504. |
| Chinese Office Action mailed Mar. 10, 2017 for Chinese Patent Application 201480007369.3, 11 pages. |
| New Zealand Examination Report for New Zealand Application No. 708463 received Mar. 16, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/506,906. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/137,657. |
| Supplemental European Search Report for European Appl. No. 14836418 mailed Feb. 23, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/063,252. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380065127.5 sent on Apr. 1, 2017, 14 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2014-515882, dispatched Apr. 4, 2017, 6 pages. |
| New Zealand Examination Report for New Zealand Application No. 708552 received on Mar. 29, 2017, 2 pages. |
| Australian Search Report for Australian App. No. 2013359028, dated Apr. 10, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Australian Search Report for Australian App. No. 20133358988 dated Apr. 11, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Chinse Office Action for Chinese Patent App. No. 201511030247.9 mailed Apr. 5, 2017, 12 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201380065089.3 received Apr. 21, 2017, 10 pages. |
| Applied Plastics Engineering Handbook, 1st edition, edited by Myer Kutz, published Jul. 20, 2011, 2 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201380065781.6 dated May 10, 2017, 11 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/388,319, (pp. 1-21). |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201280051426.9 received May 15, 2017, 12 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201380041896.1 mailed May 22, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Taiwan Office Action for Taiwan App. No. 101121655 received Jun. 14, 2017, 29 pages. |
| Australian Examiner's Report for Australian App. No. 2014244210 received Jun. 16, 2017, 4 pages. |
| European Examination Report for European App. No. 13863308.6 sent May 17, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European App. No. 14836418.5 mailed Jun. 6, 2017, 14 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/858,193; (pp. 1-21). |
| Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent App. No. 2015-539838 sent Jun. 6, 2017, 19 pages. |
| New Zealand Examination Report for New Zealand Application 708546 received Jul. 11, 2017, 2 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/004,263; (pp. 1-17). |
| European Examination Report for European App. No. 13849152.7 sent Jun. 29, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Taiwan Office Action for Taiwan App. No. 102138786 received on Aug. 9, 2017, 25 pages. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,504; (pp. 1-9). |
| Australian Examination REport for Australian App. No. 2016204692 received Aug. 15, 2017, 3 pages. |
| German Office Action for German App. No. 11 2012 002 042.1 received on Sep. 8, 2017, 20 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 21, 2017 for Chinese Patent Application 201480007369.3, 4 pages. |
| Taiwan Office Action for Taiwan Pat. App. No. 101121656 mailed Aug. 1, 2017, 16 pages. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/063,252; (pp. 1-17). |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380065127.5 sent on Sep. 27, 2017, 19 pages. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/139,573; (pp. 1-8). |
| Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/650,424; (pp. 1-6). |
| Extended European Search Report for European App. No. 17182869.2 sent on Oct. 19, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European App. No. 17181231.6 sent on Nov. 7, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Dec. 8, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/136,628, (pp. 1-20). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Dec. 8, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/363,551, (pp. 1-19). |
| Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/136,628, (pp. 1-23). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Apr. 27, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/136,628 (pp. 1-22). |
| Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Apr. 21, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/528,650, (pp. 1-20). |
| Office Action (Final Rejection) dated May 4, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/363,551 (pp. 1-19). |
| Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Sep. 7, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/136,628 (pp. 1-24). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Sep. 13, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/363,551 (pp. 1-16). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Sep. 20, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/366,728 (pp. 1-12). |
| Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Jan. 8, 2024 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/366,728, (pp. 1-16). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Feb. 20, 2024 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/136,628, (pp. 1-13). |
| Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2024 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/363,551 (pp. 1-17). |
| Inter Partes Review Petition for US. Pat. 8,883,280 (712 pages) [Submitted in multiple parts]. |
| Supplemental European Search Report for European Application No. 12727994.1-1302, dated Feb. 17, 2016. |
| Excerpts from Maier and Calafut, Polypropylene: the Definitive User's Guild and Databook, Plastics Design Library, William Andrew Inc. (1998), 35 pages. |
| ASTM D3763-86, an American Society for Testing of Materials (ASTM), 'Standard Method for High-Speed Puncture Properties of Plastics Using Load and Displacement Sensors' (1986 Edition), 5 pages. |
| ASTM D1922-93, an American Society for Testing of Materials (ASTM), “Standard Method for Propagation Tear Resistance of Plastic Film And Thin Sheeting by Pendulum Method” (1993 Edition), 5 pages. |
| Naguib et al., “Effect of Supercritical Gas on Crystallization of Linear and Branched Polypropylene Resins with Foaming Additives”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44 (2005), 6685-6691. |
| Tabatabaei et al., “Rheological and thermal properties of blends of a long-chain branched polypropylene and different linear polypropylenes”, Chemical Engineering Science, 64 (2009), 4719-4731. |
| Almanza et al., 'Applicability of the Transient Plane Source Method To Measure the Thermal Conductivity of Low- Density Polyethylene Foams', Journal of Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer Physics, vol. 42 (2004), 1226-1234. |
| The Burn Foundation, 'Scald Burns', available at https://web.archive.org/web/20080926114057/http:/wwwvii.burnfoundation.org/programs/resource.cfm?c=1&a=3, dated Sep. 26, 2008, accessed on Feb. 5, 2016. |
| AntiScald Inc. available at https://web.archive.org/web/20080517041952/http:/www.antiscald.com/prevention/general_info/table.php, dated May 17, 2008, accessed on Feb. 5, 2016. |
| “Fire Dynamics”, available at http://www.nist.gov/fire/fire_behavior.cfm, accessed on Feb. 5, 2016. |
| 'Power of a Microwave Oven', available at https://web.archive.org/web/20071010183358/http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2007/TatyanaNektalova.shtml, dated Oct. 10, 2007, accessed on Feb. 5, 2016. |
| Health Physics Society, 'Microwave Oven Q & A', available at https://web.archive.org/web/20090302090144/http://www.hps.org/publicinformation/ate/faqs/microwaveovenq&a.html, dated Mar. 2, 2009, accessed on Feb. 5, 2016. |
| Cook's Info, “Microwave Ovens”, available at http://www.cooksinfo.com/microwave-ovens, accessed on Feb. 5, 2016. |
| Antunes et al., 'Heat Transfer in Polypropylene-Based Foams Produced Using Different Foaming Processes', Advanced Engineering Materials, 11, No. 10 (2009), 811-817. |
| Excerpts from Frank Kreith, Principles of Heat Transfer, 3rd ed., Intext Educational Publishers (1973). |
| Excerpts from James M. Gere, Mechanics of Materials, 5th ed., Brooks/Cole (2001). |
| Technical data sheet of Hifax Ca 60 A, obtained from https://www.lyondellbasell.com/en/polymers/p/Hifax-CA-60-A/d372c484-8f5a-4b2c-8674-8b7b781a1796, accessed on Feb. 4, 2016, 2 pages. |
| Michel Biron, “Chapter 4—Detailed Accounts of Thermoplastic Resins,” Thermoplastics and Thermoplastic Composites, Technical Information for Plastics Users, Elsevier Ltd. (2007), 217-714. |
| Excerpts from Cornelia Vasile, “Mechanical Properties and Parameters of Polyolefins”, Handbook of Polyolefins, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker, Inc. (2000). |
| Williams et al., “Thermal Connectivity of Plastic Foams”, Polymer Engineering and Science, Apr. 1983, vol. 23, No. 6., 293-298. |
| Excerpts from M.C. McCrum et al., Principles of Polymer Engineering, 2nd ed., Oxford Science Publications (1997). |
| Excerpts from Robert H. Perry, Perry's Chemical Engineers Handbook, 7th ed., The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (1997). |
| Martinez-Diez et al., “The Thermal Conductivity of a Polyethylene Foam Block Produced by a Compression Molding Process”, Journal of Cellular Plastics, vol. 37 (2001), 21-42. |
| R. Coquard and D. Baillis, Journal of Heat Transfer, 2006, 128(6): 538-549. |
| A. R. Katritzky et al., “Correlation and Prediction of the Refractive Indices of Polymers by Qspr,” J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38 (1998), 1171-1176. |
| Inter Partes Review Petition for U.S. Pat. No. 8,883,280 (2101 pages). |
| Third Party Submission Under 37 CFR 1.290 filed on May 12, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/739,510. |
| Lugao, A.B et al., HMSPP—New Developments, Chemical and Environmental Technology Center, IPEN—Progress Report, 2002-2004 (1 page). |
| Davesh Tripathi, Practical Guide to Polypropylene, 2002 (5 pages). |
| Jinghua Tian et al., The Preparation and Rheology Characterization of Long Chain Branching Polypropylene, Polymer, 2006 (9 pages). |
| Bc. Lukas Kovar, High Pressure Crystallization of Long Chain Branched Polypropylene, Master Thesis, Thomas Bata University in Zlin, 2010 (83 pages). |
| English translation of Japanese Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2014-516089, dated May 10, 2016. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,073. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,504. |
| Singapore Office Action and Written Opinion dated May 27, 2016 for Singapore Application No. 11201504327V. |
| Singapore Office Action and Written Opinion dated May 27, 2016 for Singapore Application No. 11201504330U. |
| Notice of Acceptance dated Jun. 10, 2016 for Australian Application No. 2012302251. |
| Singapore Office Action and Written Opinion dated May 26, 2016 for Singapore Application No. 11201504333Y. |
| Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201380064860.5, dated Jun. 2, 2016 including English language summary, 13 pages. |
| Australian First Patent Examination Report for Application No. 2012363114, dated Jun. 15, 2016, 4 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,276. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13862331.9-1708/2931627 PCT/US2013/074923, dated Jul. 7, 2016. |
| English translation of Russian Office Action for Application Serial No. 2014101298, dated Jul. 22, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Australian First Patent Examination Report for Application No. 2013334155, dated May 23, 2016, 4 pages. |
| Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201380065116.7, dated Jun. 28, 2016, including English language summary, 12 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/211,553. |
| British Examination Report for GB Application No. GB1400762.9, sent on Aug. 8, 2016, 2 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13863546.1 established Jul. 12, 2016, 7 pages. |
| International (PCT) Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US21/47516 dated Jan. 24, 2022, 22 pages. |
| Unilever Says It Will Use Less Plastic Per Bottle, Yahoo News (Apr. 22, 2014, 10:20 AM), http://news.yahoo.com/unilever-says-less-plastic-per-bottle-142039401-finance.html (3 pages). |
| Chinese Office Action for Application Serial No. 201480021009.9, dated Aug. 7, 2017 including English language summary, 12 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201480047976.2 received on Aug. 22, 2017, 15 pages. |
| Dongwu Yang, Plastic Material Selection Technology, Light Industry Press, Jan. 2008, 1 page. |
| Australian First Patent Examination Report for Australian App. No. 2014311991 dated Oct. 4, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/491,443; (pp. 1-6). |
| Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/383, 115; (pp. 1-5). |
| Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/239,894; (pp. 1-7). |
| Chinese Office Action for Application Serial No. 201480021009.9, dated Jan. 2, 2018 including English language summary, 6 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/591,355; (pp. 1-5). |
| Chinese Office Action for Application Serial No. 201480021009.9, dated Apr. 20, 2018 including English language summary, 6 pages. |
| First Substantive Examination Report for European App. No. 14768125.8 dated Mar. 21, 2019, 6 pages. |
| First Examination Report for Indiana Patent App. No. 9302/DELNP/2015 dated May 6, 2019, 7 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 20180039581.8 sent Feb. 18, 2023, 13 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 20180039581.8 sent Jan. 14, 2019, 10 pages. |
| Chinese Final Rejection for Chinese App. No. 201480047976.2 received on Mar. 7, 2018, 8 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201480047978.1 received Feb. 24, 2018, 11 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 20180042446.9 sent on Feb. 3, 2018, 9 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 20180042446.9 sent on Oct. 31, 2018, 5 bages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201480047578.0 sent on Jan. 18, 2024, 10 pages. |
| Vasile et al., Practical Guide to Polyethylene, published by Smithers Rapra Press, 2008, p. 119, 3 pages. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/061,005 (pp. 1-7). |
| Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/061,070, (pp. 1-13). |
| Definition of “Base,” Dictionary.com, available at http://www.dictionary.com/browse/base, retrieved on Apr. 16, 2018. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2018 for .S. Appl. No. 15/239,894, (pp. 1-13). |
| Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/491,443, pp. 1-6. |
| Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc., Extrusion Guide, 2014, 16 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201480047578.0 sent on Aug. 29, 2018, 4 pages. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/239,894, (pp. 1-9). |
| Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/902,489, (pp. 1-16). |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 20180039581.8 sent May 31, 2019, 7 pages. |
| Chinese Reexamination Notification for Chinese App. No. 201480047976.2 received on Jul. 15, 2019, 12 pages. |
| Shunying Wu et al., “Foam Molding” Beijing Chemical Industry Press, Second Edition, Feb. 1999, 16 pages, English translation included. |
| Dingyi Hong, “Handbook of Plastic Industry: Polyolefin” Beijing Chemical Industry Press, First Edition, Mar. 1999, 17 bages, English translation included. |
| Shunyang Deng, “Chemical Formulation and Process Manual” Shanghai Science and Technology Press, First Edition, Jan. 2013, 11 pages, English translation included. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 15, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/902,489, (pp. 1-24). |
| Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/149,351, (pp. 1-6). |
| Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/713,799, (pp. 1-5). |
| Indian First Examination Report for Indian Patent App. No. 2016/17003143 dated Sep. 11, 2020, 5 pages. |
| First Examination Report for Indiana App. No. 201617007243 dated Dec. 16, 2019, 6 pages. |
| Indian First Examination Report for Indian App. No. 201317001026, dated Mar. 20, 2020, 6 pages. |
| First Examination Report for Indian App. No. 201617005271, sent Feb. 11, 2020. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/902,489, 22 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 16, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/902,489, (pp. 1-20). |
| Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/356,423, (pp. 1-14). |
| Indian First Examination Report for Indian Patent App. No. 201617000386, dated Oct. 16, 2020, 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2016/020844, search completed Apr. 14, 2016. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2016/020674, search completed Apr. 18, 2016. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/787,901. |
| International (PCT) Search Report for PCT/US16/20871, 20 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 21, 2015, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/053665. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 27, 2015, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/53667. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 18, 2014, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/027551. |
| International Search Report dated Nov. 2, 2014, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/53666. |
| International Search Report dated Nov. 24, 2014, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/52606. |
| International Search Report dated Nov. 7, 2014, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/046518. |
| Office Action dated May 11, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/331,066. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 1, 2016, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/053666. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 1, 2016, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/053665. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Mar. 1, 2016, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/052606. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Mar. 1, 2016, relating to International Application No. PCT/US2014/053667. |
| English summary of Russian Office Action for Russian Patent Application Serial No. 2016104363, dated Jul. 5, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Application Serial No. 201480021009.9, dated Jul. 5, 2016 including English language summary, 17 pages. |
| English Translation of JP404278340A which originally published Oct. 2, 1992, 23 pages. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 15, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/468,789. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,096. |
| Cheng et al., “Improving processability of polyethylenes by radiation-induced long-chain branching,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 78 (2009) pp. 563-566. |
| European Search Report for European Application No. 14768125.8 sent Jul. 15, 2016, 8 pages. |
| US Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/239,894, 8 pages. |
| Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene information sheet, Ineos Olefins and Polymers USA, archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20160501000000*/http://www.ineos.com/globalassets/ineos-group/businesses/ineos- olefins-and-polymers-USA/products/technical-information—patents/ineos-engineering-properties-of-p.pdf, Mar. 2016, p. 1. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/211,553. |
| Australian Patent Examination Report for Australian App. No. 2014239318 issued on Nov. 25, 2016, 4 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201480047976.2 received on Dec. 9, 2016, 11 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201480047578.0 sent on Nov. 30, 2016, 10 pages. |
| Australian First Examination Report for Australian App. No. 2014311414 mailed Feb. 7, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European App. No. 14823298.6 dated Jan. 25, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/239,894. |
| Chinese Office Action for Application Serial No. 201480021009.9, dated Jan. 22, 2017 including English language summary, 22 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201480047978.1 received Feb. 20, 2017, 14 pages. |
| Office Action dated May 1, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/211,533. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,266. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,411. |
| Extended European Search Report for European App. No. 14840353.8 mailed Mar. 17, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European App. No. 14838960.4 sent Mar. 17, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European App. No. 14840262 sent on Mar. 23, 2017, 8 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European App. No. 14840734.9 mailed Apr. 4, 2017, 10 pages. |
| New Zealand Examination Report for New Zealand Patent App. No. 712687 mailed Mar. 30, 2017, 10 pages. |
| Office Action dated Apr. 21, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,411. |
| Taiwan Search Report for Taiwan Application No. 103109790 completed Apr. 20, 2017, 9 pages. |
| Australian Examination Report for Australian App. No. 2014286957 sent May 2, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Advisory Action dated Jun. 1, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/239,894; (pp. 1-6). |
| Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/239,894; (pp. 1-10). |
| Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/059,995; (pp. 1-10). |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201480047578.0 sent on Jul. 4, 2017, 5 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese App. No. 201480047978.1 received Jul. 21, 2017, 11 pages. |
| Unilever Launches Breakthrough Packaging Technology That Uses 15% Less Plastic, Unilever (Apr. 24, 2014), http:// www.unilever.com/mediacentre/pressreleases/2014/Unileverlaunchesbreakthroughpackagingtechnologythatuses15lessplastic.aspx (2 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report for European Patent App. No. EP21862640.6 received on Jul. 24, 2024, 6 pages. |
| Canadian Examiner's Report for Canadian App. No. 3013576 dated Aug. 15, 2024, 5 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210053270 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62279177 | Jan 2016 | US | |
| 62128195 | Mar 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15902489 | Feb 2018 | US |
| Child | 17075183 | US | |
| Parent | 15059995 | Mar 2016 | US |
| Child | 15902489 | US |
