Polymeric strands including a propylene polymer composition and nonwoven fabric and articles made therewith

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6500538
  • Patent Number
    6,500,538
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 16, 1995
    29 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 31, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
Single and multicomponent polymeric strands including a blend of a melt-extrudable polyolefin and a heterophasic polypropylene composition. The heterophasic polypropylene composition includes three polymers and is normally not melt-spinable into strands by itself. In the multicomponent strands, the blend is in one side or the sheath. Fabric made with such strands is also disclosed and has improved combinations of strength, abrasion resistance, and softness properties. Composite materials including the foregoing fabric bonded to both sides of an inner meltblown layer are also disclosed. In addition, garments made with the fabric are disclosed.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




This invention generally relates to polymeric fibers and filaments and products such as nonwoven fabrics made with polymeric fibers and filaments. More particularly, this invention relates to single component and multicomponent polymeric fibers and filaments which include propylene polymer compositions, and nonwoven fabrics and garments made with such fibers and filaments.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Polymeric fibers and filaments are used to make a variety of products including yarns, carpets, woven fabrics, and nonwoven fabrics. As used herein, polymeric fibers and filaments are referred to generically as polymeric strands. Filaments mean continuous strands of material and fibers mean cut or discontinuous strands having a definite length.




It is often desirable that polymeric strands and articles made with polymeric strands be soft and strong. This is particularly true for nonwoven fabric and articles made with nonwoven fabric. Nonwoven fabrics are typically used to make garments such as work wear, medical apparel, and absorbent articles. Absorbent products made with nonwoven fabric include infant care items such as diapers, child care items such as training pants, feminine care items such as sanitary napkins, and adult care items such as incontinence products.




Nonwoven fabrics are commonly made by meltspinning thermoplastic materials. Meltspun fabrics are called spunbond materials and methods for making spunbond materials are well-known. U.S. Pat. No. 4,692,618 to Dorschner et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 4,340,563 to Appel et al. both disclose methods for making spunbond nonwoven webs from thermoplastic materials by extruding the thermoplastic material through a spinneret and drawing the extruded material into filaments with a stream of high velocity air to form a random web on a collecting surface. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,692,618 to Dorschner et al. discloses a process wherein bundles of polymeric filaments are drawn with a plurality of eductive guns by very high speed air. U.S. Pat. No. 4,340,563 to Appel et al. discloses a process wherein thermoplastic filaments are drawn through a single wide nozzle by a stream of high velocity air. The following patents also disclose typical meltspinning processes: U.S. Pat. No. 3,338,992 to Kinney; U.S. Pat. No. 3,341,394 to Kinney; U.S. Pat. No. 3,502,538 to Levy; U.S. Pat. No. 3,502,763 to Hartmann, U.S. Pat. No. 3,909,009 to Hartmann; U.S. Pat. No. 3,542,615 to Dobo et al.; and Canadian Patent Number 803,714 to Harmon.




Spunbond materials with desirable combinations of physical properties, especially combinations of strength, durability, and softness have been produced, but limitations have been encountered. For example, in some applications, polymeric materials such as polypropylene may have a desirable level of strength but not a desirable level of softness. On the other hand, materials such as polyethylene may, in some cases, have a desirable level of softness but a not a desirable level of strength.




In an effort to produce nonwoven materials having desirable combinations of physical properties, nonwoven fabrics comprising multicomponent strands such as bicomponent strands or multiconstituent strands such as biconstituent strands have been developed.




Methods for making bicomponent nonwoven materials are well-known and are disclosed in patents such as U.S. Pat. No. Reissue 30,955 of U.S. Pat. No. 4,068,036 to Stanistreet, U.S. Pat. No. 3,423,266 to Davies et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 3,595,731 to Davies et al. A bicomponent nonwoven fabric is made from polymeric fibers or filaments including first and second polymeric components which remain distinct. The first and second components of multicomponent strands are arranged in substantially distinct zones across the cross-section of the strands and extend continuously along the length of the strands. Typically, one component exhibits different properties than the other so that the strands exhibit properties of the two components. For example, one component may be polypropylene which is relatively strong and the other component may be polyethylene which is relatively soft. The end result is a strong yet soft nonwoven fabric.




Multiconstituent strands are similar to multicomponent strands except that one component does not extend continuously along the length of the strands. The noncontinuous component is typically present as a multitude of discrete polymer segments connected by the other polymeric component.




Although conventional bicomponent and biconstituent nonwoven fabrics have desirable levels of strength, durability, and softness, there is still a need for nonwoven materials which are made with polymeric strands and have particular combinations of strength, durability, and softness. Furthermore, there is a need for garments made with nonwoven materials having particular combinations of strength, durability, and softness.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide improved polymeric strands and products made therewith such as nonwovens and garments.




Another object of the present invention is to provide polymeric strands, nonwoven fabrics made with polymeric strands, and articles such as garments made with nonwoven fabrics, each having desirable levels of strength, durability, and softness.




A further object of the present invention is to provide soft yet strong and durable garments such as medical apparel, workwear, and absorbent articles.




Thus, the present invention provides a polymeric strand including a first polymeric component comprising a blend of:




(a) a melt-extrudable polyolefin; and




(b) a polypropylene composition comprising:




(i) a first polymer which is a propylene polymer comprising 85% by weight of propylene and having an isotactic index greater than 85;




(ii) a second polymer which is a polymer comprising ethylene and being insoluble in xylene at about 23° C.; and




(iii) a third polymer which is an amorphous copolymer of ethylene and propylene, the amorphous copolymer being soluble in xylene at about 23° C.




The polypropylene composition is preferably present in the first polymeric component in an amount up to about 40% by weight. In addition, the first polymer is preferably present in the polypropylene composition in an amount from about 10 to about 60 parts by weight, the second polymer is preferably present in the polypropylene composition in an amount from about 10 to about 40 parts by weight, and the third polymer is preferably present in the polypropylene composition in an amount from about 30 to about 60 parts by weight. Still more particularly, the third polymer preferably includes ethylene in an amount from about 40 to about 70% by weight. The polypropylene composition, by itself, is heterophasic and normally not melt-spinable into strands, and particularly not into spunbond strands.




Suitable melt-extrudable polyolefins for the first polymeric component include crystalline polyolefins, and more particularly, include polypropylene, random copolymers of propylene and ethylene, and poly(4-methyl-1-pentene).




According to another aspect of the present invention, the polymeric strand is a multicomponent strand and further includes a second melt-extrudable polymeric component. The first and second components of the multicomponent strand are arranged in substantially distinct zones across the cross-section of the multicomponent strand and extend continuously along the length of the multicomponent strand. The first component of the multicomponent strand constitutes at least a portion of the peripheral surface of the strand continuously along the length of the strand.




More particularly, the second component of the multicomponent strand includes a crystalline polyolefin. Suitable polyolefins for the second component of the multicomponent strand include polypropylene, random copolymers of propylene and ethylene and poly(4-methyl-1-pentene). Suitable configurations for the first and second components of the multicomponent strand include a side-by-side configuration and a sheath/core configuration.




The present invention also comprehends a nonwoven fabric made with the above described polymeric strands and further comprehends garment materials made with such nonwoven fabric. The addition of the heterophasic polypropylene composition enhances the strength of the polymeric strands and the nonwoven fabric and garments made therewith while maintaining, and sometimes enhancing, acceptable levels of durability and softness.




Still further objects and the broad scope of the applicability of the present invention will become apparent to those of skill in the art from the details given hereafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention is only given by way of illustration because various changes and modifications well within the spirit and scope of the invention should become apparent to those of skill in the art in view of the following detailed description.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic drawing of a process line for making a preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 2A

is a schematic drawing illustrating the cross-section of a filament made according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention with the polymer components A and B in a side-by-side arrangement.





FIG. 2B

is a schematic drawing illustrating the cross-section of a filament made according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention with the polymeric components A and B in an eccentric sheath/core arrangement.





FIG. 2C

is a schematic drawing illustrating the cross-section of a filament made according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention with the polymeric components A and B in a concentric sheath/core arrangement.





FIG. 3

is a fragmentary perspective view, with sections thereof broken away, of a point-bonded sample of multilayer fabric made according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view of the multilayer fabric of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 5

is a perspective view of a medical garment made with nonwoven fabric according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 6

is a partial plan view of an absorbent diaper type article made according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Portions of some layers of the articles have been removed to expose the interior of the article.





FIG. 7

is a partial perspective view of a shaped nonwoven fabric made according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




As discussed above, the present invention provides polymeric strands useful for making articles such as nonwoven fabrics. Nonwoven fabrics made with the polymeric strands of the present invention are strong and durable, yet soft. The nonwoven fabrics of the present invention can be used to make other useful articles.




Generally described, the polymeric strand of the present invention includes a first polymeric component comprising a blend of: (a) a melt-extrudable polyolefin; and




(b) a polypropylene composition comprising:




(i) a first polymer which is a propylene polymer comprising 85% by weight of propylene and having an isotactic index greater than 85:




(ii) a second polymer which is a polymer comprising ethylene and being insoluble in xylene at about 23° C.; and




(iii) a third polymer which is an amorphous copolymer of ethylene and propylene, the amorphous copolymer being soluble in xylene at about 23° C.




The term “strands” as used herein refers to an elongated extrudate formed by passing a polymer through a forming orifice such as a die. Strands include fibers, which are discontinuous strands having a definite length, and filaments, which are continuous strands of material. The polymeric strands of the present invention can be single component, multicomponent, or multiconstituent polymeric strands although bicomponent polymeric strands are preferred. Single component polymeric strands of the present invention are preferably made only with the above-described blend. Multicomponent strands, however, further include a second melt-extrudable polymeric component. The first and second components of the multicomponent strand are arranged in substantially distinct zones across the cross-section of the multicomponent strand and extend continuously along the length of the multicomponent strand. The first component of the multicomponent strand constitutes at least a portion of the peripheral surface of the strand continuously along the length of the strand. The multicomponent strands are particularly suited for making loftier, through-air bonded nonwovens.




As used herein, the terms “nonwoven web” and “nonwoven fabric” are used interchangeable to mean a web of material which is formed without the use of weaving processes. Weaving processes produce a structure of individual strands which are interwoven and identifiable repeating manner. Nonwoven webs may be formed by a variety of processes such as meltblowing, spunbonding, film aperturing, and staple fiber carding. The nonwoven fabric of the present invention may be formed from staple single component or multicomponent fibers or both. Such staple fibers may be carded and bonded to form the nonwoven fabric. Preferably, however, the nonwoven fabric of the present invention is made with continuous spunbond multicomponent filaments which are extruded, drawn, and laid on a traveling forming surface. A preferred process for making the nonwoven fabrics of the present invention is disclosed in detail below.




The nonwoven fabrics of the present invention can be used to make garments such as workwear, medical apparel and wrapping material, and absorbent articles. Absorbent articles which can be made with the nonwoven fabric of the present invention include infant care items such as diapers, child care items such as training pants, feminine care items such as sanitary napkins and adult care items such as incontinence products. The nonwoven fabric of the present invention can also be used to make absorbent products such as wipes.




Suitable melt-extrudable polymers for the first component of the polymeric strands include crystalline polyolefins, and more particularly, include polypropylene, random copolymers of propylene and ethylene, and poly(4-methyl-1-pentene). The melt-extrudable polyolefin should be compatible with the polypropylene composition which makes up the remainder of the first component so that a uniform and stable blend of the melt extrudable polyolefin and the polypropylene composition is achieved.




Suitable polypropylene compositions for the first component of the polymeric strands include polypropylene compositions such as that disclosed in European Patent Application Publication No. 0,400,333, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. European Patent Application Publication Number 0,400,333 is owned by Himont Inc. of New Castle County, Del. Such polypropylene compositions are known as heterophasic polypropylene compositions or catalloys. Catalloy stands for “catalyst-alloy, of various monomers or structures polymerized together.” More specifically, the polypropylene composition of the first component of the polymeric strands of the present invention are, before blending with the melt-extrudable polyolefin, in the form of spheroidal particles with an average diameter between 500 and 7000 um. In addition, the first polymer is preferably present in the polypropylene composition in an amount from about 10 to about 60 parts by weight, the second polymer is preferably present in the polypropylene composition in an amount of from about 10 to about 40 parts by weight, and the third polymer is preferably present in the polypropylene composition in an amount from about 30 to about 60 parts by weight. Still more particularly, the third polymer preferably includes ethylene in an amount of from about 40 to about 70% by weight. A suitable commercially available polypropylene composition for the polymeric strands is KS-057P catalloy polymer available from Himont Inc.




As described in the above-referenced European publications, the heterophasic polypropylene compositions used to make the polymeric strands of the present invention are prepared through sequential polymerization in two or more stages, using highly stereo specific Ziegler-Natta catalysts. The first polymer, which is a propylene polymer comprising 85% by weight of propylene and having an isotactic index greater than 85, is formed during the first stage of polymerization, preferably in liquid monomer. The second and third polymers are formed during the subsequent polymerization stages in the presence of the first polymer formed in the first stage.




The sequential polymerization stages can be performed in an autoclave, the gas phase being continuously analyzed with a processing gas chromatograph. In the first stage, liquid polypropylene and a catalyst, described in more detail below, are introduced into the autoclave at 20° C. The temperature is brought to between 50° and 80° C. in about 10 minutes and the pressure is brought to about 30 atmospheres. That temperature and pressure are maintained for 20-30 minutes. Then, essentially all of the unreacted monomers are eliminated by way of degassing at 60° C. and atmospheric pressure. The polymerization of the first polymer may be done in the presence of ethylene or an alpha-olefin such as butene-1, pentene-1, 4-methylpentene-1, in such quantities that the isotactic index of the resulting process is greater than 85%.




The polypropylene from the first stage is then brought to a temperature between 50° and 70° C. and a pressure of 5-30 atmospheres by feeding, in order, propylene and ethylene at the ratio and in the quantity desired for achieving the desired composition. The temperature and pressure are maintained for 30 minutes-8 hours. Known traditional transfer agents such as hydrogen and ZnEt


2


can be used as molecular weight regulators. Copolymerization can also occur in the presence of another alpha-olefin or a diene, conjugated or not, such as butadiene, 1-4,hexadiene, 1,5-hexadiene and ethylidenenorbornene-1.




At the end of polymerization, the particulate polymer is discharged and stabilized and dried in an oven under nitrogen current at 60° C. More detailed process parameters are disclosed in European Patent Application Publication No. 0 400 333.




The catalyst used in the foregoing reaction includes the reaction products of:




1. A solid compound containing (a) a titanium compound, and (b) an electron donor compound (internal donor) supported on magnesium chloride; and




2. Al-trialkyl compound and an electron donor compound (external donor).




The catalyst typically has the following properties: (a) a surface area less than 100 meter square per gram, and preferably between 50 and 80 meter square per gram; (b) a porocity between 0.25 and 0.4 cc per gram; (c) a pore volume distribution such that more than 50% of the pores have a radius greater than 100 A.; and (d) and an x-ray spectrum presenting a halo with maximum intensity at 2θ angles from 33.5° and 35° and where there is no reflection at 2θ equals 14.95°.




A suitable titanium compound for the catalyst is titanium chloride and suitable internal electron donors for addition to the magnesium chloride include alkyl, cycloalkyl, or aryl phthalates such as diisobutyl, di-n-butyl, and di-n-octylphthalate.




Suitable Al-trialkyl compounds include Al-triethyl and Al-triisobutyl. Suitable external electron donor compounds include xylene compounds of the formula R′R″Si(OR)


2


where R′ and R″, equal or different, are alkyl, cycloalkyl or aryl radicals containing 1-18 carbon atoms, and R is a 1-4 carbon alkyl radical. Typical xylenes are diphenyldimethoxysilane, dicyclohexyldimethoxysilane, methyl-tert-butyldimethoxysilane, diisopropyldimethoxysilane, and phenyltriethoxysilane.




The catalyst is made by the following procedure:




A molten adduct of magnesium chloride and an alcohol such as C2H5OH, is emulsified in an inert hydrocarbon liquid immiscible with the adduct, and then cooling the emulsion very quickly in order to cause a solidification of the adduct in the form of a spheroidal particles containing three moles of alcohol per mole of magnesium chloride. The spheroidal particles are dealcoholized by heating the particles to between 50°-130° C. to reduce the alcohol content from 3 to 1-1.5 moles per mole of magnesium chloride. The adduct is suspended in titanium chloride cold, in a concentration of 40-50 grams per liter and brought to 80°-135° C. where the mixture is maintained for 1-2 hours. The internal electron donor compound is then added to the titanium chloride. The excess titanium chloride is separated while hot through filtration or sedimentation. The treatment with titanium chloride is then repeated one or two more times. The resulting solid is washed with hepatane or hexane and dried.




The solid titanium containing compound is then mixed with an Al-trialkyl compound and the external electron donor compound. The Al/Ti ratio is between 10 and 200 and the xylene/Al moler ratio is between 1/5 and 1/50. The catalyst may be then precontacted with small quantities of olefin which is then polymerized. Further details on production of the catalyst are disclosed in European Patent Application Publication No. 0 400 333.




When the polymer strand of the present invention is a multi-component strand, a suitable second component polymer includes melt-extrudable crystal and polyolefins. Particularly preferred second component polymers include polyolefins such as polypropylene, random copolymers of propylene and ethylene, and poly(4-methyl-1-pentene). A particularly suitable polymer for the second component is 3495 polypropylene available from Exxon Chemical of Houston, Tex.




The first component of the polymeric strands of the present invention preferably include the heterophasic polypropylene composition in an amount up to about 40% by weight of the first polymeric component. More preferably, the heterophasic polypropylene composition is present in the first polymeric component in an amount from about 5 to about 30% by weight. The remainder of the first component is preferably the melt-extrudable polyolefin.




When the polymeric strand of the present invention is a multi-component strand, the strand is preferably in a bicomponent configuration with either a sheeth/core arrangement or a side-by-side arrangement. The weight ratio of the first polymeric component to the second polymeric component may vary from 20/80 to 80/20, but preferably is about 50/50.




A preferred embodiment of the present invention is a bicomponent polymeric strand comprising a first polymeric component A and a second polymeric component B. The first and second components A and B may be arranged in a side-by-side arrangement as shown in

FIG. 2A

, and eccentric sheeth/core arrangement as shown in

FIG. 2B

, or a concentric sheeth/core arrangement as shown in FIG.


2


C. Polymer component A is the sheet of the strand and polymer component B is the core of the strand in the sheet/core arrangement. When arranged in the side-by-side arrangement or the eccentric sheeth/core arrangement, the resulting strands tend to exhibit natural helical crimp. Methods for extruding bicomponent polymeric strands into such arrangements are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Although the embodiments disclosed herein include bicomponent filaments, it should be understood that the strands of the present invention may have more than two components.




A preferred combination of polymers for a bicomponent strand of the present invention is a blend of a random copolymer of propylene and ethylene, with 3% by weight ethylene, and a heterophasic polypropylene composition. The second component is preferably polypropylene. While the principal components of the polymeric strands of the present invention have been described above, such polymeric components can also include other material which do not adversely affect the objectives of the present invention. For example, the first and second polymeric components A and B can also include, without limitation, pigments, anti-oxidants, stabilizers, surfactants, waxes, float promoters, solid solvents, particulates and materials added to enhance processability of the composition.




Turning to

FIG. 1

, a process line


10


for preparing a preferred embodiment of the present invention is disclosed. The process line


10


is arranged to produce bicomponent continuous filaments, but it should be understood that the present invention comprehends nonwoven fabrics made with multicomponent filaments having more than two components. For example, the fabric of the present invention can be made with filaments having three or four components. It should be further understood that fabric of the present invention can also be made with single component filaments.




The process line


10


includes a pair of extruders


12




a


and


12




b


for separately extruding a polymer component A and a polymer component B. Polymer component A is fed into the respective extruder


12




a


from a first hopper


14




a


and polymer component B is fed into the respective extruder


12




b


from a second hopper


14




b


. Polymer components A and B are fed from the extruders


12




a


and


12




b


through respective polymer conduits


16




a


and


16




b


to a spinneret


18


. Spinnerets for extruding bicomponent filaments are well-known to those of ordinary skill in the art and thus are not described here in detail. Generally described, the spinneret


18


includes a housing containing a spin pack which includes a plurality of plates stacked one on top of the other with a pattern of openings arranged to create flow paths for directing polymer components A and B separately through the spinneret. The spinneret


18


has openings arranged in one or more rows. The spinneret openings form a downwardly extending curtain of filaments when the polymers are extruded through the spinneret. Preferably, spinneret


18


is arranged to form side-by-side or eccentric sheath/core bicomponent filaments. Such configurations are shown in

FIG. 2A and 2B

respectively. The spinneret may also be arranged to form concentric sheath/core filaments as shown in FIG.


2


C.




The process line


10


also includes a quench blower


20


positioned adjacent the curtain of filaments extending from the spinneret


18


. Air from the quench air blower


20


quenches the filaments extending from the spinneret


18


. The quench air can be directed from one side of the filament curtain as shown in

FIG. 1

, or both sides of the filament curtain.




A fiber draw unit or aspirator


22


is positioned below the spinneret


18


and receives the quenched filaments. Fiber draw units or aspirators for use in melt spinning polymers are well-known as discussed above. For example, suitable fiber draw units for use in the process of the present invention include a linear fiber aspirator of the type shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,802,817, eductive guns of the type shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,692,618 and 3,423,266, and a linear draw system such as that shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,340,563, the disclosures of which patents are hereby incorporated herein by reference.




Generally described, the fiber draw unit


22


includes an elongated vertical passage through which the filaments are drawn by aspirating air entering from the sides of the passage and flowing downwardly through the passage. The aspirating air draws the filaments and ambient air through the fiber draw unit. The aspirating air can be heated by a heater


24


when a high degree of natural helical crimp in the filaments is desired.




An endless foraminous forming surface


26


is positioned below the fiber draw unit


22


and receives the continuous filaments from the outlet opening of the fiber draw unit. The forming surface


26


travels around guide rollers


28


. A vacuum


30


positioned below the forming surface


26


where the filaments are deposited draws the filaments against the forming surface.




The process line


10


further includes a compression roller


32


which can be heated. The compression roller


32


along with the forward most of the guide rollers


28


, receive the web as the web is drawn off of the forming surface


26


. In addition, the process line includes a pair of thermal point bonding rollers


34


for bonding the bicomponent filaments together and integrating the web to form a finished fabric. Lastly, the process line


10


includes a winding roll


42


for taking up the finished fabric.




To operate the process line


10


, the hopper


14




a


and


14




b


are filled with the respective polymer components A and B. Polymer components A and B are melted and extruded by the respected extruders


12




a


and


12




b


through polymer conduits


16




a


and


16




b


and the spinneret


18


. Although the temperatures of the molten polymers vary depending on the polymers used, when random copolymer of ethylene and propylene and polypropylene are used as components A and B respectively, the preferred temperatures of the polymers range from about 370 to about 530° F. and preferably range from 390 to about 450° F.




As the extruded filaments extend below the spinneret


18


, a stream of air from the quench blower


20


at least partially quenches the filaments. The partial quenching may be used to develop a latent helical crimp in the filaments. The quench air preferably flows in a direction substantially perpendicular to the length of the filaments at a temperature of about 45 to about 90° F. and a velocity from about 100 to about 400 feet per minute.




After quenching, the filaments are drawn into the vertical passage of the fiber draw unit


22


by a flow of air through the fiber draw unit. The fiber draw unit is preferably positioned 30 to 60 inches below the bottom of the spinneret


18


. When filaments having minimal natural helical crimp are desired, the aspirating air is at ambient temperature. When filaments having a high degree of crimp are desired, heated air from the heater


24


is supplied to the fiber draw unit


22


. For high crimp, the temperature of the air supplied from the heater


24


is sufficient that, after some cooling due to mixing with cooler ambient air aspirated with the filaments, the air heats the filaments to a temperature required to activate the latent crimp. The temperature required to activate the latent crimp of the filaments ranges from about 110° F. to a maximum temperature less than the melting point of the second component B. The temperature of the air from the heater


24


and thus the temperature to which the filaments are heated can be varied to achieve different levels of crimp. It should be further understood that the temperature of the air contacting the filaments to achieve the desired crimp will depend on factors such as the type of polymers in the filaments and the denier of the filaments.




Generally, a higher air temperature produces a higher number of crimps. The degree of crimp of the filaments may be controlled by controlling the temperature of the mixed air in the fiber draw unit


22


contacting the filaments. This allows one to change the resulting density, pore size distribution and drape of the fabric by simply adjusting the temperature of the air in the fiber draw unit.




The drawn filaments are deposited through the outer opening of the fiber draw unit


22


onto the traveling forming surface


26


. The vacuum


30


draws the filaments against the forming surface


26


to form an unbonded, nonwoven web of continuous filaments. The web is then lightly compressed by the compression roller


32


and thermal point bonded by bonding rollers


34


. Thermal point bonding techniques are well known to those skilled in the art and are not discussed here in detail. Thermal point bonding in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 3,855,046 is preferred and such reference is incorporated herein by reference. The type of bond pattern may vary based on the degree of strength desired. The bonding temperature also may vary depending on factors such as the polymers in the filaments but is preferably between about 240 and 255° F. As explained below, thermal point bonding is preferred when making cloth-like materials for garments such as medical apparel, work wear, and the outer cover of absorbent personal care items like baby diapers. A thermal point bonded material is shown in

FIGS. 3 and 4

. Lastly, the finished web is wound onto the winding roller


42


and is ready for further treatment or use.




When used to make liquid handling layers of liquid absorbent articles, the fabric of the present invention may be treated with conventional surface treatments or contain conventional polymer additives to enhance the wettability of the fabric. For example, the fabric of the present invention may be treated with polyalkalene-oxide modified siloxane and silanes such as polyalkaline-dioxide modified polydimethyl-siloxane as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,057,361. Such a surface treatment enhances the wettability of the fabric so that the nonwoven fabric is suitable as a liner or surge management material for feminine care, infant care, child care, and adult incontinence products. The fabric of the present invention may also be treated with other treatments such as antistatic agents, alcohol repellents, and the like, as known to those skilled in the art.




The resulting material is strong, yet durable and soft. The addition of the heterophasic polypropylene composition which, by itself is normally not melt-spinable into strands, tends to enhance the strength of the fabric while maintaining, and sometimes improving, the softness and durability of the fabric.




When used as a garment material, the nonwoven fabric of the present invention preferably has a denier from about 1 to about 12 dpf and more preferably has a denier from about 2 to about 3.5 dpf. The lower denier imparts improved cloth-like tactile properties to the fabric. The basis weight of such materials may vary but preferably ranges from about 0.4 to about 3.0 osy.




Although the method of bonding shown in

FIG. 1

is thermal point bonding, it should be understood that the fabric of the present invention may be bonded by other means such as oven bonding, ultrasonic bonding, hydroentangling or combinations thereof to make cloth-like fabric. Such bonding techniques are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art and are not discussed here in detail. If a loftier material is desired, a fabric of the present invention may be bonded by non-compressive means such as through-air bonding. Methods of through-air bonding are well known to those of skill in the art. Generally described, the fabric of the present invention may be through-air bonded by forcing air having a temperature above the melting temperature of the first component A of the filaments through the fabric as the fabric passes over a perforated roller. The hot air melts the lower melting polymer component A and thereby forms bonds between the bicomponent filaments to integrate the web. Such a high loft material is useful as a fluid management layer of personal care absorbent articles such as liner or surge materials in a baby diaper.




According to another aspect of the present invention, the above described nonwoven fabric may be laminated to one or more polymeric layers to form a composite material. For example, an outer cover material may be formed by laminating the spunbond, nonwoven, thermal point bonded fabric described above to a polymeric film. The polymeric film can act as a liquid barrier and preferably comprises a polyolefin such as polypropylene or polyethylene and preferably has a thickness less than about 1 mil. Low density polyethylene and relatively soft polypropylene are particularly preferred. The polymeric film can also be a coextruded film including, for example, an adhesive polymer such as ethylene methyl acrylate copolymer in the layer adjacent the nonwoven material and a polyolefin such as low density polyethylene or polypropylene in the outer layer. The adhesive layer preferably is about 20% by weight of the coextruded film and the outer layer preferably is about 80% by weight of the coextruded film.




According to another embodiment of the present invention, a first web of extruded multicomponent polymeric strands made as described above is bonded to a second web of extruded polymeric strands, the first and second webs being positioned in laminar surface-to-surface relationship. The second web may be a spunbond material, but for applications such as garment material for medical apparel or for sterile medical wrap, the second layer can be made by well known meltblowing techniques. The meltblown layer can act as a liquid barrier. Such laminates can be made in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 4,041,203, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. U.S. Pat. No. 4,041,203 references the following publications on meltblowing techniques which are also incorporated herein by reference: An article entitled “Superfine Thermoplastic Fibers” appearing in INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, Vol. 48, No. 8, pp. 1342-1346 which describes work done at the Naval Research Laboratories in Washington, D.C.; Naval Research Laboratory Report 111437, dated Apr. 15, 1954; U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,715,251; 3,704,198; 3,676,242; and 3,595,245; and British Specification No. 1,217,892.




A third layer of nonwoven fabric comprising multicomponent polymeric strands, as in the first web, can be bonded to the side of the second web opposite from the first web. When the second web is a meltblown layer, the meltblown layer is sandwiched between two layers of multicomponent material. Such material


50


is illustrated in

FIGS. 3 and 4

and is advantageous as a medical garment material because it contains a liquid penetration resistant middle layer


52


with relatively soft layers of fabric


54


and


56


on each side for better softness and feel. The material


50


is preferably thermal point bonded. When thermal point bonded, the individual layers


52


,


54


, and


56


are fused together at bond points


58


.




Such composite materials may be formed separately and then bonded together or may be formed in a continuous process wherein one web is formed on top of the other. Both of such processes are well known to those skilled in the art and are not discussed here in further detail. U.S. Pat. No. 4,041,203, which is incorporated herein by reference above, discloses both a continuous process and the use of preferred webs for making such composite materials.




A medical garment


70


made according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG.


5


. The construction of such garments of nonwoven fabric is well-known to those skilled the art and thus is not discussed here in detail. For example, process for making medical garments is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,523,336, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.




Turning to

FIG. 6

, a disposable diaper-type article


100


made according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown. The diaper


100


includes a front waistband panel section


112


, a rear waistband panel section


114


, and an intermediate section


116


which interconnects the front and rear waistband sections. The diaper comprises a substantially liquid impermeable outer cover layer


120


, a liquid permeable liner layer


130


, and an absorbent body


140


located between the outer cover layer and the liner layer. Fastening means, such as adhesive tapes


136


are employed to secure the diaper


100


on a wearer. The liner


130


and outer cover


120


are bonded to each other and to absorbent body


140


with lines and patterns of adhesive, such as a hot-melt, pressure-sensitive adhesive. Elastic members


160


,


162


,


164


and


166


can be configured about the edges of the diaper for a close fit about the wearer.




The outer cover layer


120


can be composed of the fabric of the present invention bonded to a polymer film comprising polyethylene, polypropylene or the like.




The liner layer


130


and absorbent body


140


can also be made of the nonwoven fabric of the present invention. It is desirable that both the liner layer


130


and the absorbent body


140


be hydrophilic to absorb and retain aqueous fluids such as urine. Although not shown in

FIG. 6

, the disposable diaper


100


may include additional fluid handling layers such as a surge layer, a transfer layer or a distribution layer. These layers may be separate layers or may be integral with the liner layer


120


or the absorbent pad


14


.




Although the absorbent article


100


shown in

FIG. 6

is a disposable diaper, it should be understood that the nonwoven fabric of the present invention may be used to make a variety of absorbent articles such as those identified above.




According to yet another embodiment of the present invention, the filaments from the fiber draw unit


22


can be formed on a textured forming surface so that the resulting nonwoven web assumes the textured pattern of the forming surface. The strands of the present invention are very soft and conformable when exiting the fiber draw unit


22


, but become set quickly on the forming surface and take the shape of the forming surface. The resulting material becomes very resilient without becoming stiff or hard. Suitable textured forming surfaces are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,741,941, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference. A textured nonwoven web


200


made according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG.


7


. The web


200


has a surface


202


with projected portions


204


extending from the surface and an array of apertures


206


separated by land areas


208


.




The following Examples 1-6 are designed to illustrate particular embodiments of the present invention and to teach one of ordinary skill in the art in the manner of carrying out the present invention. Comparative Examples 1-3 are designed to illustrate the advantages of the present invention. All of the examples illustrate actual products that were made, except for Example 6 which is a prophetic example. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that the parameters of the present invention will vary somewhat from those provided in the following Examples depending on the particular processing equipment that is used and the ambient conditions.




Comparative Example 1




A nonwoven fabric web comprising continuous bicomponent filaments was made with the process illustrated in FIG.


1


and described above. The configuration of the filaments was concentric sheath/core, the weight ratio of sheath to core being 1:1. The spinhole geometry was 0.6 mm D with an L/D ratio of 4:1 and the spinneret had 525 openings arranged with 50 openings per inch in the machine direction. The core composition was 100% by weight PD-3495 polypropylene from Exxon Chemical Company of Houston, Tex., and the sheath composition was 100% by weight 9355 random copolymer of ethylene and propylene from Exxon. The random copolymer comprised 3% by weight ethylene. The melt temperature in the spin pack was 430° F. and the spinhole throughput was 0.7 GHM. The quench air flow rate was 22 scfm and the quench air temperature was 55° F. The aspirator feed temperature was 55° F. and the manifold pressure was 5 psi. The resulting nonwoven web was thermal point bonded at a bond temperature of 280° F. The bond pattern had regularly spaced bond areas with 270 bond points per square inch and a total bond area of about 18%. The filaments had a denier of 3.




EXAMPLE 1




A nonwoven fabric web comprising continuous bicomponent filaments was made with the process illustrated in FIG.


1


and described above. The configuration of the filaments was concentric sheath/core, the weight ratio of sheath to core being 1:1. The spinhole geometry was 0.6 mm D with an L/D ratio of 4:1 and the spinneret had 525 openings arranged with 50 openings per inch in the machine direction. The core composition was 100% by weight 3495 polypropylene from Exxon Chemical Company of Houston, Tex., and the sheath composition was 90% by weight 9355 random copolymer of ethylene and propylene (3% ethylene) from Exxon and 10% by weight KS-057P heterophasic polypropylene composition from Himont Incorporated of New Castle County, Del. The melt temperature in the spin pack was 430° F. and the spinhole throughput was 0.7 GHM. The quench air flow rate was 22 scfm and the quench air temperature was 55° F. The aspirator feed temperature was 55° F. and the manifold pressure was 5 psi. The resulting nonwoven web was thermal point bonded at a bond temperature of 275° F. The bond pattern had regularly spaced bond areas with 270 bond points per square inch and a total bond area of about 18%. The strands had a denier of 3.




EXAMPLE 2




A nonwoven fabric was made according to the process described in Example 1 except that the sheath component was 80% by weight 9355 random copolymer of ethylene and propylene from Exxon and 20% by weight of KS-057P heterophasic polypropylene composition.




EXAMPLE 3




A nonwoven fabric was made according to the process described in Example 1 except that the sheath component was 70% by weight 9355 random copolymer of ethylene and propylene from Dow and 30% by weight of KS-057P heterophasic polypropylene composition.




Fabric samples from Comparative Example 1 and Examples 1-3 were tested to determine their physical properties. The data from these tests are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The numbers not enclosed by parentheses or brackets represent actual data, the numbers in parentheses represent normalized data, and the numbers in brackets represent the percentage increase or decrease of the actual data relative to the data from the comparative example.




The grab tensile (peak energy, peak load, and peak elongation) was measured according to ASTM D 1682.




The trapezoid tear is a measurement of the tearing strength of fabrics when a constantly increasing load is applied parallel to the length of the specimen. The trapezoid tear was measured according to ASTM D 1117-14 except that the tearing load was calculated as the average of the first and highest peaks recorded rather than of the lowest and highest peaks.




The abrasion resistance was measured according to two tests, the first being the Martindale Abrasion test which measures the resistance to the formation of pills and other related surface changes on textile fabrics under light pressure using a Martindale tester. The Martindale Abrasion was measured according to ASTM 04970-89 except that the value obtained was the number of cycles required by the Martindale tester to create a 0.5 inch hole in the fabric sample.




The second abrasion resistance test was the double head rotary platform (Tabor) test. The Tabor test was performed according to ASTM D-1175 using a 125 gram rubber wheel. The abrasion resistance was measured in cycles to a 0.5 inch hole.




The drape stiffness was measured according to ASTM D 1388.

















TABLE 1











COMPARATIVE




EXAM-




EXAM-




EXAM-







EXAMPLE 1




PLE 1




PLE 2




PLE 3






























Basis Weight




1.07




1.28




1.1




1.16







(ounce/yd


2


)




(1.1)




(1.1)




(1.1)




(1.1)







MD Peak




18.1




33.6




22.8




22.8







Energy




(18.6)




(28.5)




(22.8)




(21.6)

















(in-lb)





[153%]




[122%]




[116%]

















MD Peak Load




17.6




26.4




19.3




17.6







(lb)




(18.1)




(22.7)




(19.3)




(16.7)



















[125%]




[107%]




 [92%]

















MD Peak




55.4




67.1




64.3




71.1







Elongation




(55.4)




(67.1)




(64.3)




(71.1)

















(%)





[121%]




[116%]




[128%]

















CD Peak




12.8




26.6




27.3




17.1







Energy




(13.1)




(22.8)




(27.3)




(16.2)

















(in-lb)





[174%]




[208%]




[124%]

















CD Peak Load




11.8




19.3




16.1




13.1







(lb)




(12.1)




(16.6)




(16.1)




(12.4)



















[137%]




[133%]




[102%]

















CD Peak




62.9




82




96.8




80.3







Elongation




(62.9)




(82)




(96.8)




(80.3)

















(in)





[130%]




[154%]




[128]

















MD/CD




15.4




29.9




25.1




20.0







Average




(15.9)




(25.7)




(25.1)




(18.9)

















Peak Energy





[162%]




[158%]




[119%]







(in-lb)

















MD/CD




14.7




22.8




17.7




15.3







Average Peak




(15.1)




(19.6)




(17.7)




(14.6)

















Load (lb)





[130%]




[117%]




 [96%]







Trap Tear (lb)

















MD




7.25




11.27




8.29




8.66



















[155%]




[114%]




[119%]

















CD




6.43




7.97




7.08




6.46



















[124%]




[110%]




[100%]




























TABLE 2











COMPARATIVE




EXAM-




EXAM-




EXAM-







EXAMPLE 1




PLE 1




PLE 2




PLE 3






























Martindale




616




1262




1518




1122

















Abrasion





[205%]




[246%]




[182%]







Cycles to







0.5 in hole

















Martindale




5




5




5




5

















Abrasion,





[100%]




[100%]




[100%]







Cycles to







Rating Photo







(1-5)

















Taber




76




150




84




49

















Abrasion,





[197%]




[110%]




 [64%]







1-CS10 Wheel

















Drape MD




2.73




3.90




2.86




2.68

















(in)





[143%]




[105%]




 [98%]

















Drape CD




2.21




2.54




1.91




1.97

















(in)





[115%]




 [86%]




 [89%]















As can be seen from the data in Tables 1 and 2, the addition of the KS-057P heterophasic polypropylene composition substantially increased the strength properties of the fabric samples from Examples 1-3 over the sample fabric from Comparative Example 1. The lower loadings of KS-057P produced the stronger fabrics. The abrasion resistance test results were mixed, but the overall results indicate that abrasion resistance was improved, especially at lower loadings of KS-057P. The Drape stiffness test results were also mixed, but indicate that the softness of the fabrics from Examples 1-3 was comparable to the softness of the fabric sample from Comparative Example 1. The softness was enhanced at higher loadings of KS-057P.




Comparative Example 2




A nonwoven fabric web comprising continuous bicomponent filaments was made with the process illustrated in FIG.


1


and described above. The configuration of the filaments was concentric sheath/core, the weight ratio of sheath to core being 1:1. The spinhole geometry was 0.6 mm D with an L/D ratio of 4:1 and the spinneret had 525 openings arranged with 50 openings per inch in the machine direction. The core composition was 100% by weight PD-3495 polypropylene from Exxon Chemical Company of Houston, Tex., and the sheath composition was 100% by weight 9355 random copolymer of ethylene and propylene from Exxon. The random copolymer comprised 3% by weight ethylene. The melt temperature in the spin pack was 430° F. and the spinhole throughput was 0.7 GHM. The quench air flow rate was 22 scfm and the quench air temperature was 55° F. The aspirator feed temperature was 55° F. and the manifold pressure was 5 psi. The resulting nonwoven web was thermal point bonded at a bond temperature of 260° F. The bond pattern had regularly spaced bond areas with 270 bond points per square inch and a total bond area of about 18%. The filaments had a denier of 3.4.




EXAMPLE 4




A nonwoven fabric web comprising continuous bicomponent filaments was made with the process illustrated in FIG.


1


and described above. The configuration of the filaments was concentric sheath/core, the weight ratio of sheath to core being 1:1. The spinhole geometry was 0.6 mm D with an L/D ratio of 4:1 and the spinneret had 525 openings arranged with 50 openings per inch in the machine direction. The core composition was 100% by weight 3495 polypropylene from Exxon Chemical Company of Houston, Tex., and the sheath composition was 80% by weight 9355 random copolymer of ethylene and propylene (3% ethylene) from Exxon and 20% by weight KS-057P heterophasic polypropylene composition from Himont Incorporated of New Castle County, Del. The melt temperature in the spin pack was 430° F. and the spinhole throughput was 0.7 GHM. The quench air flow rate was 22 scfm and the quench air temperature was 55° F. The aspirator feed temperature was 55° F. and the manifold pressure was 5 psi. The resulting nonwoven web was thermal point bonded at a bond temperature of 260° F. The bond pattern had regularly spaced bond areas with 270 bond points per square inch and a total bond area of about 18%. The filaments had a denier of 3.4.




Fabric samples from Comparative Example 2 and Example 4 were tested to determine their physical properties using the same test methods used to test the samples of fabric from Examples 1-3 and an additional test method described below. The data from these tests are shown in Tables 3 and 4. Again, the numbers not enclosed by parentheses or brackets represent actual data, the numbers in parentheses represent normalized data, and the numbers in brackets represent the percentage increase or decrease of the actual data relative to the data from the comparative example.




The cup crush test evaluates fabric stiffness by measuring the peak load required for a 4.5 cm diameter hemispherically shaped foot to crush a 9″×9″ piece of fabric shaped into an approximately 6.5 cm diameter by 6.5 cm tall inverted cup while the cup shaped fabric is surrounded by an approximately 6.5 cm diameter cylinder to maintain a uniform deformation of the cup shaped fabric. The foot and the cup are aligned to avoid contact between the cup walls and the foot which might affect the peak load. The peak load is measured while the foot descends at a rate of about 0.25 inches per second (15 inches per minute) utilizing a Model FTD-G-500 load cell (500 gram range) available from the Schaevitz Company, Tennsauken, N.J.















TABLE 3











COMPARATIVE








EXAMPLE 2




EXAMPLE 4




























Basis Weight




1.07




1.14







(ounce/yd


2


)




(1.1)




(1.1)







MD Peak




22.3




28.2







Energy




(23.0)




(27.2)















(in-lb)





[118%]















MD Peak Load




21.0




23.2







(lb)




(21.6)




(22.4)

















[103%]















MD Peak




56.9




71.1







Elongation




(56.8)




(71.1)















%





[125%]















CD Peak




13.3




28.1







Energy




(13.7)




(27.2)















(in-lb)





[198%]















CD Peak Load




12.3




19.8







(lb)




(13.3)




(19.1)

















[144%]















CD Peak




60.0




85.0







Elongation




(60.0)




(85.0)















(in)





[142%]















MD/CD




17.8




28.2







Average Peak




(18.3)




(27.2)















Energy (in-lb)





[149%]















MD/CD




16.9




21.5







Average Peak




(17.4)




(20.7)















Load (lb)





[119%]







Trap Tear (lb)















MD




10.9




13.3

















[122%]















CD




4.0




9.0

















[225%]


























TABLE 4











COMPARATIVE








EXAMPLE 2




EXAMPLE 4




























Martindale




734




699















Abrasion





 [95.2%]







Cycles to







0.5 in hole















Martindale




5




5















Abrasion,





[100%]  







Cycles to







Rating Photo







(1-5)















Taber




80




182















Abrasion,





[227%]  







1-CS10 Wheel















Drape MD




3.46




2.96















(in)





 [85.5%]















Drape CD




2.54




2.41















(in)





 [94.8%]















Cup Crush




114




123















Peak Load (g)





[108%]  















Cup Crush




2030




2311















Total Energy





[114%]  







(g/mm)















The addition of KS-057P to the composite fabric in Example 4 produced results very similar to those shown in Tables 1 and 2 for Examples 1-3. The strength was increased significantly and the abrasion resistance and softness were at least comparable. The abrasion resistance test results were mixed, the Martindale abrasion showing a decrease in abrasion resistance and the Tabor abrasion showing a increase in abrasion resistance. The softness test results were also mixed with the drape test showing a softer fabric and the cup crush showing a stiffer fabric.




Comparative Example 3




A nonwoven fabric web comprising continuous bicomponent filaments was made with the process illustrated in FIG.


1


and described above. The configuration of the filaments was concentric sheath/core, the weight ratio of sheath to core being 1:1. The spinhole geometry was 0.6 mm D with an L/D ratio of 4:1 and the spinneret had 525 openings arranged with 50 openings per inch in the machine direction. The core composition was 100% by weight PD-3495 polypropylene from Exxon Chemical Company of Houston, Tex., and the sheath composition was 100% by weight 9355 random copolymer of ethylene and propylene from Exxon. The random copolymer comprised 3% by weight ethylene. The melt temperature in the spin pack was 430° F. and the spinhole throughput was 0.7 GHM. The quench air flow rate was 22 scfm and the quench air temperature was 55° F. The aspirator feed temperature was 55° F. and the manifold pressure was 7 psi. The resulting nonwoven web was thermal point bonded at a bond temperature of 280° F. The bond pattern had regularly spaced bond areas with 270 bond points per square inch and a total bond area of about 18%. The filaments had a denier of 2.1.




EXAMPLE 5




A nonwoven fabric web comprising continuous bicomponent filaments was made with the process illustrated in FIG.


1


and described above. The configuration of the filaments was concentric sheath/core, the weight ratio of sheath to core being 1:1. The spinhole geometry was 0.6 mm D with an L/D ratio of 4:1 and the spinneret had 525 openings arranged with 50 openings per inch in the machine direction. The core composition was 100% by weight 3495 polypropylene from Exxon Chemical Company of Houston, Tex., and the sheath composition was 80% by weight 9355 random copolymer of ethylene and propylene (3% ethylene) from Exxon and 20% by weight KS-057P heterophasic polypropylene composition from Himont Incorporated of New Castle County, Del. The melt temperature in the spin pack was 430° F. and the spinhole throughput was 0.7 GHM. The quench air flow rate was 22 scfm and the quench air temperature was 55° F. The aspirator feed temperature was 55° F. and the manifold pressure was 7 psi. The resulting nonwoven web was thermal point bonded at a bond temperature of 280° F. The bond pattern had regularly spaced bond areas with 270 bond points per square inch and a total bond area of about 18%. The filaments had a denier of 2.1.




Fabric samples from Comparative Example 3 and Example 5 were tested to determine their physical properties using the same test methods used to test the samples of fabric from Examples 1-4 and an additional test method described below. The data from these tests are shown in Tables 5 and 6. Again, the numbers not enclosed by parentheses or brackets represent. actual data, the numbers in parentheses represent normalized data, and the numbers in brackets represent the percentage increase or decrease of the actual data relative to the data from the comparative example.




For Comparative Example 3 and Example 5, the softness of the fabric samples was also tested using the Cusick drape method.




The Cusick drape test was performed with the Rotrakote-Cusick drape tester available from Rotrakote Converting Limited, New York, N.Y. First, a sheet of drawing paper is placed flat on the base of the tester with the pin in the base projecting through the paper. A weight is placed on one corner of the paper. The support disc is placed in its lower position and a 36 cm diameter, circular piece of fabric is placed flat on the platform with the pin in the support disc through the center of the sample. The sample is oriented with the machine direction running front to back and the disc cover is placed on the support disc. The support disc is raised to its upper position and locked at that position. The exact outline of the shadow cast by the sample is then marked on the drawing paper. The drawing paper is removed from the tester and the area within the shadow outline is measured using a K&E Planimeter Model Number 620015.




The area of the shadow cast by the sample is measured by placing the pole weight of the planimeter over the center hole in the drawing with the pole arm pointing toward the operator, the tracer arm pointing to the right, and the tracer at the starting point. The wheel and dial scales are set to zero. The shadow outline is then traced in a clockwise direction until the tracer returns to the starting point. The scales are then read, the dial numbers being 1000 vernier units each, the wheel numbers 100 verniers each, and the small divisions on the wheel 10 each. If the dial makes less than 1 revolution per trace then the draped area in square inches equals (vernier units)/100+100. If the dial makes more than 1 revolution per trace then the draped area in square inches equals (vernier units)/100. The drape coefficient then equals 100×(area of draped sample—area of support disc)/(area of template—area of support disc).

















TABLE 5











COMPARATIVE




EXAM-




COMPARATIVE




EXAM-







EXAMPLE 3




PLE 5




EXAMPLE 4




PLE 6




























Basis Weight




1.00




1.02




1.54




1.48






(ounce/yd


2


)






(1.50)




(1.50)






MD Peak




26.3




26.9




14.4




21.2















Energy





[102%]




(14.0)




(21.5)















(in-lb)







[153%]















MD Peak Load




20.1




17.6




17.8




18.8















(lb)





 [88%]




(17.3)




(19.0)



















[110%]















MD Peak




75.9




88.1




39.7




56.0















Elongation (%)





[116%]




(39.7)




(56.0)



















[141%]















CD Peak




20.7




27.5




15.0




18.1















Energy





[133%]




(14.5)




(18.3)















(in-lb)







[126%]















CD Peak Load




14.2




14.2




12.2




13.0


















[100%]




[110%]















CD Peak




92




117.4




67.9




80.6















Elongation (in)





[128%]




(67.9)




(80.6)



















[139%]















MD/CD




23.5




27.2




14.7




19.6















Average Peak





[115%]




(14.3)




(19.9)















Energy (in-lb)







[139%]















MD/CD




17.1




15.9




15.0




15.9















Average Peak





 [92%]




(14.6)




(16.1)















Load (lb)







[110%]






Trap Tear (lb)















MD




9.6




9.5




7.13




8.86

















 [99%]





[124%]















CD




6.7




6.1




4.13




6.92

















 [91%]





[168%]



























TABLE 6











COMPARATIVE




EXAM-




COMPARATIVE




EXAM-







EXAMPLE 3




PLE 5




EXAMPLE 4




PLE 6




























Martindale




616




3654




1213




2089















Abrasion





[593%)]





[172%]






Cycles to






0.5 in hole















Martindale




3




4




4.8




5















Abrasion,





[133%]





[105%]






Cycles to






Rating Photo






(1-5)















Taber














59




46















Abrasion,







[78%]






1-CS10 Wheel















Drape MD




3.35




3.59




3.57




4.16















(in)





[107%]





[116%]















Drape CD




2.4




2.72




2.52




2.56















(in)





[113%]





[102%]















Cup Crush




79




68




233




193















Peak Load (g)





[86%]





[83%]















Cup Crush




1448




1324




4229




3726















Total Energy





[91%]





[88%]






(g/mm)















Cusick Drape




51.2




48.9
















(%)





[96%]














As can be seen from the data in Tables 5 and 6, the addition of KS-057P in Example 5 significantly increased the abrasion resistance of the fabric as compared to the fabric sample of Comparative Example 3; however, the results of the strength and softness tests were mixed. The peak elongation and peak energy were increased, but the peak load was decreased. Meanwhile, the drape stiffness indicated a slight stiffening of the fabric, but the cup crush and cusick drape indicated a slight softening. The KS-057P used in Example 5 came from a different gaylord than the KS-057P used in Examples 1-3 and it is believed that the gaylord of KS-057P used in Example 5 was atypical. Nevertheless, the addition of the KS-057P in Example 5 still enhanced the overall properties of the fabric. The durability of the fabric was increased while the strength and softness remained comparable to the comparative sample.




Comparative Example 4




A first nonwoven fabric web comprising continuous bicomponent filaments was made with the process illustrated in FIG.


1


and described above. The configuration of the filaments was concentric sheath/core, the weight ratio of sheath to core being 1:1. The spinhole geometry was 0.6 mm D with an L/D ratio of 4:1 and the spinneret had 525 openings arranged with 50 openings per inch in the machine direction. The core composition was 100% by weight PD-3495 polypropylene from Exxon Chemical Company of Houston, Tex., and the sheath composition was 100% by weight 9355 random copolymer of ethylene and propylene from Exxon. The melt temperature in the spin pack was 430° F. and the spinhole throughput was 0.7 GHM. The quench air flow rate was 22 scfm and the quench air temperature was 55° F. The aspirator feed temperature was 55° F. and the manifold pressure was 7 psi. The web was thermal point bonded to opposite sides of a middle meltblown nonwoven fabric web comprising 100% by weight 3495G polypropylene available from Exxon. The composite was made in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 4,041,203. The resulting composite was thermal point bonded at a bond temperature of 280° F. The bond pattern had regularly spaced bond areas with 270 bond points per square inch and a total bond area of about 18%.




EXAMPLE 6




A first nonwoven fabric web comprising continuous bicomponent filaments was made with the process illustrated in FIG.


1


and described above. The configuration of the filaments was concentric sheath/core, the weight ratio of sheath to core being 1:1. The spinhole geometry was 0.6 mm D with an L/D ratio of 4:1 and the spinneret had 525 openings arranged with 50 openings per inch in the machine direction. The core composition was 100% by weight 3495 polypropylene from Exxon Chemical Company of Houston, Tex., and the sheath composition was 70% by weight 9355 random copolymer of ethylene and propylene from Exxon and 30% by weight KS-057P heterophasic polypropylene composition available from Himont Inc. The melt temperature in the spin pack was 430° F. and the spinhole throughput was 0.7 GHM. The quench air flow rate was 22 scfm and the quench air temperature was 55° F. The aspirator feed temperature was 55° F. and the manifold pressure was 7 psi. The first web was thermal point bonded to opposite sides of a middle meltblown nonwoven fabric web comprising 100% by weight 3495G polypropylene available from Exxon. The composite was made in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 4,041,203. The resulting composite was thermal point bonded at a bond temperature of 275° F. The bond pattern had regularly spaced bond areas with 270 bond points per square inch and a total bond area of about 18%.




Fabric samples from Comparative Example 4 and Example 6 were tested to determine their physical properties using the same test methods used to test the samples of fabric from the foregoing examples. The data from these tests are shown in Tables 5 and 6. Again, the numbers not enclosed by parentheses or brackets represent actual data, the numbers in parentheses represent normalized data, and the numbers in brackets represent the percentage increase or decrease of the actual data relative to the data from the comparative example.




The addition of KS-057P to the composite fabric in Example 6 produced results very similar to those shown in Tables 1 and 2 for Examples 1-3. The strength was increased significantly and the abrasion resistance and softness were at least comparable if not enhanced. The abrasion resistance test results were mixed, the Martindale abrasion showing an increase in abrasion resistance and the Tabor abrasion showing a decrease in abrasion resistance. The softness test results were also mixed with the drape test showing a stiffer fabric and the cup crush showing a softer fabric.




EXAMPLE 7




This Example was not actually carried out, but is included to demonstrate to those skilled in the art the manner of making an embodiment of the present invention with single component filaments instead of bicomponent filaments. Here, a nonwoven fabric web comprising continuous bicomponent filaments is made with the process illustrated in FIG.


1


and described above except that the spinneret is designed for forming single component filaments. The spinhole geometry is 0.6 mm D with an L/D ratio of 4:1 and the spinneret has 525 openings arranged with 50 openings per inch in the machine direction. The filament composition is 90% by weight 9355 random copolymer of ethylene and propylene (3% ethylene) from Exxon Chemical Company of Houston, Tex. and 10% by weight KS-057P heterophasic polypropylene composition from Himont Incorporated of New Castle County, Del. The melt temperature in the spin pack is 430° F. and the spinhole throughput is 0.7 GHM. The quench air flow rate is 22 scfm and the quench air temperature was 55° F. The aspirator feed temperature was 55° F. and the manifold pressure is 5 psi. The resulting nonwoven web is thermal point bonded at a bond temperature of 280° F. The bond pattern has regularly spaced bond areas with 270 bond points per square inch and a total bond area of about 18%. The strands have a denier of 3.




While the invention has been described in detail with respect to specific embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art, upon attaining an understanding of the foregoing, may readily conceive of alterations to, variations of and equivalents to these embodiments. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention should be assessed as that of the appended claims and any equivalents thereto.



Claims
  • 1. A garment comprising a layer of nonwoven fabric comprising polymeric strands including a first polymeric component comprising a blend of:a) a melt-extrudable polyolefin, and b) up to about 40% by weight of a polypropylene composition comprising: (i) a first polymer which is a propylene polymer comprising greater than 85% by weight of propylene and having an isotactic index greater than 85; (ii) a second polymer which is a polymer comprising ethylene and being insoluble in xylene at about 23° C.; and (iii) a third polymer which is an amorphous copolymer of ethylene and propylene, the amorphous copolymer being soluble in xylene at about 23° C.
  • 2. A garment as in claim 1 wherein the first polymer is present in the polypropylene composition in an amount from about 10 to about 60 parts by weight, the second polymer is present in the polypropylene composition in an amount from about 10 to about 40 parts by weight, and the third polymer is present in the polypropylene composition in an amount from about 30 to about 60 parts by weight.
  • 3. A garment as in claim 1 wherein the third polymer comprises ethylene in an amount from about 40 to about 70% by weight.
  • 4. A garment as in claim 1 wherein the melt-extrudable polyolefin of the first polymeric component is selected from the group consisting of polypropylene, random copolymers of propylene and ethylene, and poly(4-methyl-1-pentene).
  • 5. A garment as in claim 1 wherein the strands are multicomponent strands and further include a second melt-extrudable polymeric component, the strands having a cross-section, a length, and a peripheral surface, the first and second components being arranged in substantially distinct zones across the cross-section of the strands and extending continuously along the length of the strands, the first component constituting at least a portion of the peripheral surface of the strands continuously along the length of the strands.
  • 6. A garment as in claim 5 wherein the first polymer is present in the polypropylene composition in an amount from about 10 to about 60 parts by weight, the second polymer is present in the polypropylene composition in an amount from about 10 to about 40 parts by weight, and the third polymer is present in the polypropylene composition in an amount from about 30 to about 60 parts by weight.
  • 7. A garment as in claim 5 wherein the third polymer comprises ethylene in an amount from about 40 to about 70% by weight.
  • 8. A garment as in claim 5 wherein the melt-extrudable polyolefin of the first component is selected from the group consisting of polypropylene, random copolymers of propylene and ethylene, and poly(4-methyl-1-pentene).
  • 9. A garment as in claim 5 wherein the second component comprises a crystalline polyolefin.
  • 10. A garment as in claim 5 wherein the second component comprises a polyolefin selected from the group consisting of polypropylene, random copolymers of propylene and ethylene, and poly(4-methyl-1-pentene).
  • 11. A garment as in claim 5 wherein the first and second components are arranged in a side-by-side configuration.
  • 12. A garment as in claim 5 wherein the first and second components are arranged in a sheath/core configuration.
  • 13. A garment as in claim 1 wherein the garment is one of the group of medical apparel articles.
  • 14. A garment as in claim 1 wherein the garment is an absorbent article.
  • 15. A garment as in claim 14 wherein the absorbent article is an adult incontinence product.
  • 16. A garment as in claim 14 wherein the absorbent article is an infant diaper.
  • 17. A garment as in claim 14 wherein the absorbent article is a training pant.
  • 18. A garment as in claim 14 wherein the absorbent article is a feminine care absorbent product.
  • 19. A garment as in claim 5 wherein the garment is one of the group of medical apparel articles.
  • 20. A garment as in claim 5 wherein the garment is an absorbent article.
  • 21. A garment as in claim 20 wherein the absorbent article is an adult incontinence product.
  • 22. A garment as in claim 20 wherein the absorbent article is an infant diaper.
  • 23. A garment as in claim 20 wherein the absorbent article is a training pant.
  • 24. A garment as in claim 20 wherein the absorbent article is a feminine care absorbent product.
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 07/997,406 entitled “POLYMERIC STRANDS INCLUDING A PROPYLENE POLYMER COMPOSITION AND NONWOVEN FABRIC AND ARTICLES MADE THEREWITH” and filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Dec. 28, 1992 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,482,772.

US Referenced Citations (141)
Number Name Date Kind
2931091 Breen Apr 1960 A
2987797 Breen Jun 1961 A
3038235 Zimmerman Jun 1962 A
3038236 Breen Jun 1962 A
3038237 Taylor, Jr. Jun 1962 A
3377232 Maecock et al. Apr 1968 A
3423266 Davies et al. Jan 1969 A
3551271 Thomas et al. Dec 1970 A
3589956 Kranz et al. Jun 1971 A
3595731 Davies et al. Jul 1971 A
3616160 Wincklhofer Oct 1971 A
3692618 Dorschner et al. Sep 1972 A
3725192 Ando et al. Apr 1973 A
3760046 Schwartz et al. Sep 1973 A
3802817 Matsuki et al. Apr 1974 A
3824146 Ellis Jul 1974 A
3855045 Brock Dec 1974 A
3895151 Matthews et al. Jul 1975 A
3900678 Aishima et al. Aug 1975 A
3940302 Matthews et al. Feb 1976 A
3992499 Lee Nov 1976 A
4005169 Cumbers Jan 1977 A
4041203 Brock et al. Aug 1977 A
4068036 Stanistreet Jan 1978 A
4076698 Anderson et al. Feb 1978 A
4086112 Porter Apr 1978 A
4088726 Cumbers May 1978 A
4119447 Ellis et al. Oct 1978 A
4154357 Sheard et al. May 1979 A
4170680 Cumbers Oct 1979 A
4181762 Benedyk Jan 1980 A
4188436 Ellis et al. Feb 1980 A
4189338 Ejima et al. Feb 1980 A
4195112 Sheard et al. Mar 1980 A
4211816 Booker et al. Jul 1980 A
4211819 Kunimune et al. Jul 1980 A
4216772 Tsuchiya et al. Aug 1980 A
4234655 Kunimune et al. Nov 1980 A
4258097 Benedyk Mar 1981 A
4269888 Ejima et al. May 1981 A
4285748 Booker et al. Aug 1981 A
4306929 Menikheim et al. Dec 1981 A
4315881 Nakajima et al. Feb 1982 A
4323626 Kunimune et al. Apr 1982 A
RE30955 Stanistreet Jun 1982 E
4340263 Appel et al. Jul 1982 A
4356220 Bendeyk Oct 1982 A
4362717 Miller Dec 1982 A
4369156 Mathes et al. Jan 1983 A
4373000 Knoke et al. Feb 1983 A
4381326 Kelly Apr 1983 A
4396562 Menikheim et al. Aug 1983 A
4419160 Wang et al. Dec 1983 A
4434204 Hartman et al. Feb 1984 A
4451520 Tecl et al. May 1984 A
4469540 Furukawa et al. Sep 1984 A
4477516 Sugihara et al. Oct 1984 A
4480000 Watanabe et al. Oct 1984 A
4483897 Fujimura et al. Nov 1984 A
4485141 Fujimura et al. Nov 1984 A
4496508 Hartman et al. Jan 1985 A
RE31825 Mason et al. Feb 1985 E
4500384 Tomioka et al. Feb 1985 A
4504539 Petracek et al. Mar 1985 A
4511615 Ohta Apr 1985 A
4520066 Athey May 1985 A
4523336 Iruman Jun 1985 A
4530353 Lauritzen Jul 1985 A
4546040 Knotek et al. Oct 1985 A
4547420 Krueger et al. Oct 1985 A
4551378 Carey, Jr. Nov 1985 A
4552603 Harris, Jr. et al. Nov 1985 A
4555430 Mays Nov 1985 A
4555811 Shimalla Dec 1985 A
4557972 Okamoto et al. Dec 1985 A
4588630 Shimalla May 1986 A
4595629 Mays Jun 1986 A
4632585 Knoke et al. Dec 1986 A
4644045 Fowells Feb 1987 A
4656075 Mudge Apr 1987 A
4657804 Mays et al. Apr 1987 A
4663220 Wisneski et al. May 1987 A
4681801 Eian et al. Jul 1987 A
4684570 Malaney Aug 1987 A
4691081 Gupta et al. Sep 1987 A
4713134 Mays et al. Dec 1987 A
4713291 Sasaki et al. Dec 1987 A
4722857 Tomioka et al. Feb 1988 A
4731277 Groitzsch et al. Mar 1988 A
4737404 Jackson Apr 1988 A
4741941 Englebert et al. May 1988 A
4749423 Vaalburg et al. Jun 1988 A
4755179 Shiba et al. Jul 1988 A
4756786 Malaney Jul 1988 A
4759984 Hwo Jul 1988 A
4770656 Proxmine et al. Sep 1988 A
4770925 Uchikawa et al. Sep 1988 A
4774124 Shimalla et al. Sep 1988 A
4774277 Janac et al. Sep 1988 A
4787947 Mays Nov 1988 A
4789699 Kieffer et al. Dec 1988 A
4795559 Shinjou et al. Jan 1989 A
4795668 Krueger et al. Jan 1989 A
4804577 Hazelton et al. Feb 1989 A
4808176 Kielpikowski Feb 1989 A
4808202 Nishikawa et al. Feb 1989 A
4808662 Hwo Feb 1989 A
4814032 Taniguchi et al. Mar 1989 A
4818587 Ejima et al. Apr 1989 A
4830904 Gessner et al. May 1989 A
4834738 Kielpikowski May 1989 A
4839228 Jezic et al. Jun 1989 A
4840846 Ejima et al. Jun 1989 A
4840847 Ohmae et al. Jun 1989 A
4842596 Kielpikowski Jun 1989 A
4851284 Yamanoi et al. Jul 1989 A
4872870 Jackson Oct 1989 A
4874447 Hazelton et al. Oct 1989 A
4874666 Kubo et al. Oct 1989 A
4880691 Sawyer et al. Nov 1989 A
4883707 Newkirk Nov 1989 A
4909975 Sawyer et al. Mar 1990 A
4966808 Kawano Oct 1990 A
4981749 Kubo et al. Jan 1991 A
4997611 Hartmann Mar 1991 A
5001813 Rodini Mar 1991 A
5002815 Yamanaka et al. Mar 1991 A
5057361 Sayouitz et al. Oct 1991 A
5068141 Kubo et al. Nov 1991 A
5069970 Largman et al. Dec 1991 A
5082720 Hayes Jan 1992 A
5108276 Hartmann Apr 1992 A
5108820 Kaneko et al. Apr 1992 A
5108827 Gessner Apr 1992 A
5125818 Yeh Jun 1992 A
5126201 Shiba et al. Jun 1992 A
5319031 Hamiiton et al. Jun 1994 A
5346756 Ogale et al. Sep 1994 A
5368927 Lesca et al. Nov 1994 A
5405682 Shawyer et al. Apr 1995 A
5425987 Shawyer et al. Jun 1995 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (128)
Number Date Country
612156 Jan 1961 CA
618040 Apr 1961 CA
769644 Oct 1967 CA
792651 Aug 1968 CA
829845 Dec 1969 CA
846761 Jul 1970 CA
847771 Jul 1970 CA
852100 Sep 1970 CA
854076 Oct 1970 CA
896216 Mar 1972 CA
903582 Jun 1972 CA
959221 Dec 1974 CA
959225 Dec 1974 CA
989720 May 1976 CA
1051161 Mar 1979 CA
1058818 Jul 1979 CA
1060173 Aug 1979 CA
1071943 Feb 1980 CA
1081905 Jul 1980 CA
1103869 Jun 1981 CA
1109202 Sep 1981 CA
1128411 Jul 1982 CA
1133771 Oct 1982 CA
1140406 Feb 1983 CA
1143930 Apr 1983 CA
1145213 Apr 1983 CA
1145515 May 1983 CA
1148302 Jun 1983 CA
1172814 Aug 1984 CA
1174039 Sep 1984 CA
1175219 Oct 1984 CA
1178524 Nov 1984 CA
1182692 Feb 1985 CA
1204641 May 1986 CA
1208098 Jul 1986 CA
1218225 Feb 1987 CA
1226486 Sep 1987 CA
1230720 Dec 1987 CA
1230810 Dec 1987 CA
1234535 Mar 1988 CA
1305293 Mar 1988 CA
1235292 Apr 1988 CA
1237884 Jun 1988 CA
1307923 Jun 1988 CA
1250412 Feb 1989 CA
1257768 Jul 1989 CA
1259175 Sep 1989 CA
1286464 Mar 1990 CA
1267273 Apr 1990 CA
2001091 Apr 1990 CA
1272945 Aug 1990 CA
1273188 Aug 1990 CA
2011599 Sep 1990 CA
1284424 May 1991 CA
1285130 Jun 1991 CA
2067398 Feb 1992 CA
2060702 Mar 1992 CA
1560661 Oct 1969 DE
1922089 Nov 1970 DE
1946648 Mar 1971 DE
2156990 Feb 1973 DE
2644961 Apr 1978 DE
3007343 Sep 1981 DE
3544523 Jun 1986 DE
3941824 Jun 1991 DE
0 013 127 Jul 1980 EP
0 029 666 Jun 1981 EP
0 070 163 Jan 1983 EP
0 070 164 Jan 1983 EP
0 078 869 May 1983 EP
0 127 483 Dec 1984 EP
0 132 110 Jan 1985 EP
0 134 141 Mar 1985 EP
0 171 806 Feb 1986 EP
0 171 807 Feb 1986 EP
0 233 767 Aug 1987 EP
0 264 112 Apr 1988 EP
0 275 047 Jul 1988 EP
0 290 945 Nov 1988 EP
0 334 579 Sep 1989 EP
0 337 296 Oct 1989 EP
0 340 763 Nov 1989 EP
0 340 982 Nov 1989 EP
0 351 318 Jan 1990 EP
0 366 379 May 1990 EP
0 372 572 Jun 1990 EP
0 391 260 Oct 1990 EP
0 394 954 Oct 1990 EP
0 395 336 Oct 1990 EP
0 404 032 Dec 1990 EP
0 409 581 Jan 1991 EP
0 413 280 Feb 1991 EP
0 421 734 Apr 1991 EP
0 423 395 Apr 1991 EP
0 444 671 Sep 1991 EP
2171172 Sep 1973 FR
1035908 Jul 1966 GB
1045047 Oct 1966 GB
1073182 Jun 1967 GB
1073183 Jun 1967 GB
1092372 Nov 1967 GB
1092373 Nov 1967 GB
1130996 Oct 1968 GB
1149270 Apr 1969 GB
1196586 Jul 1970 GB
1197966 Jul 1970 GB
1209635 Oct 1970 GB
1234506 Jun 1971 GB
1245088 Sep 1971 GB
1300813 Dec 1972 GB
1328634 Aug 1973 GB
1406252 Sep 1975 GB
1408392 Oct 1975 GB
1452654 Oct 1976 GB
1453701 Oct 1976 GB
1534736 Dec 1978 GB
1543905 Apr 1979 GB
1564550 Apr 1980 GB
2139227 Nov 1984 GB
2143867 Feb 1985 GB
1-246413 Oct 1989 JP
2-234967 Sep 1990 JP
WO 8403833 Oct 1984 WO
WO 8702719 May 1987 WO
WO 8910394 Feb 1989 WO
9409193 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9504182 Feb 1995 WO
903666 Feb 1991 ZA
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
“Thermobonding Fibers for Nonwovens” by S. Tomioka, Nonwovens Industry, May 1981, pp. 23-31.