Patent Application
20120172470
This invention pertains to polyol mixtures that are useful for manufacturing rigid polyurethane foams, as well as rigid foams made from those polyols.
Rigid polyurethane foams have been widely used for several decades as insulation foam in appliances and other applications, as well as a variety of other uses. These foams are prepared in a reaction of a polyisocyanate and one or more polyol, polyamine or aminoalcohol compounds. The polyol, polyamine or aminoalcohols compounds can be characterized as having equivalent weights per isocyanate-reactive group in the range of up to about 300 and an average of more than three hydroxyl and/or amino groups per molecule. The reaction is conducted in the presence of a blowing agent which generates a gas as the reaction proceeds. The gas expands the reacting mixture and imparts a cellular structure.
Originally, the blowing agent of choice was a “hard” chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) such as trichlorofluoromethane or dichlorodifluoromethane. These CFCs processed very easily and produced foam having very good thermal insulation properties. However, the CFC blowing agents have been phased out because of environmental concerns.
CFCs have been replaced with other blowing agents such as hydrofluorocarbons, low-boiling hydrocarbons, hydrochlorofluorocarbons, ether compounds, and water (which reacts with isocyanates to generate carbon dioxide). For the most part, these alternative blowing agents are less effective thermal insulators than their CFC predecessors. The ability of a foam to provide thermal insulation is often expressed in terms of “k-factor”, which is a measure of the amount of heat that is transferred through the foam per unit area per unit time, taking into account the thickness of the foam and the applied temperature difference across the foam thickness. Foams produced using alternative blowing agents tend to have higher k-factors than those produced using “hard” CFC blowing agents. This has forced rigid foam producers to modify their foam formulations in other ways to compensate for the loss of thermal insulation values that result from the changes in blowing agent. Many of these modifications focus on reducing cell size in the foam. Smaller-sized cells tend to provide better thermal insulation properties.
It has been found that modifications to a rigid foam formulation which improve k-factor tend to affect the processing characteristics of the formulation in an undesirable way. The curing characteristics of the formulation are important, especially in pour-in-place applications such as appliance foam. Refrigerator and freezer cabinets, for example, are usually insulated by partially assembling an exterior shell and interior liner, and holding them in position such that a cavity is formed between them. The foam formulation is introduced into the cavity, where it expands to fill the cavity. The foam provides thermal insulation and imparts structural strength to the assembly. The way the foam formulation cures is important in at least two respects. First, the foam formulation must cure quickly to form a dimensionally stable foam, so that the finished cabinet can be removed from the jig. This characteristic is generally referred to as “demold” time, and directly affects the rate at which cabinets can be produced.
In addition, the curing characteristics of the system affect a property known as “flow index” or simply “flow”. A foam formulation will expand to a certain density (known as the ‘free rise density’) if permitted to expand against minimal constraints. When the formulation must fill a refrigerator or freezer cabinet, its expansion is somewhat constrained in several ways. The foam must expand mainly in a vertical (rather than horizontal) direction within a narrow cavity. As a result, the formulation must expand against a significant amount of its own weight. The foam formulation also must flow around corners and into all portions of the wall cavities. In addition, the cavity often has limited or no venting, and so the atmosphere in the cavity exerts additional pressure on the expanding foam. Because of these constraints, a greater amount of the foam formulation is needed to fill the cavity than would be predicted from the free rise density alone. The amount of foam formulation needed to minimally fill the cavity can be expressed as a minimum fill density (the weight of the formulation divided by the cavity volume). The ratio of the minimum fill density to the free rise density is the flow index. The flow index is ideally 1.0, but is on the order of 1.2 to 1.8 in commercially practical formulations. Lower flow index is preferred, all other things being equal, because raw materials costs are lower when a smaller weight of foam is needed.
Modifications to foam formulations that favor low k-factor tend to have an adverse effect on demold time, flow index or both. Therefore, although formulations have been developed which closely match conventional CFC-based formulations in k-factor, the overall cost of using these formulations is often higher due to lower productivity (because of greater demold times), higher raw materials costs (because of higher flow index) or both.
Recently, there have been developed rigid polyurethane foam formulations that contain specific amine-initiated polyols. Among these polyols are those initiated with methylene bis(cyclohexylamine), as described in PCT/US09/46373, filed 5 Jun. 2009; those initiated with 1,3- and/or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane, as described in PCT/US09/45369, filed 5 Jun. 2009; and those initiated with an ortho-cyclohexane diamine, as described in PCT/US09/52082, filed 29 Jul. 2009. These amine-initiated polyols provide a good combination of low k-factor, low flow index and short demold times. However, further improvement, especially in demold times, is still desired.
This invention is in one aspect a polyol mixture that comprises (a) at least one amine-initiated polyol having an average hydroxyl functionality of greater than 3.0 to 4.0, which is a reaction product of at least one C2-C4 alkylene oxide with a 1,3- and/or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane, and (b) at least one of (b)(i) and (b)(ii), wherein (b)(i) is at least one amine-initiated polyol having an average hydroxyl functionality of greater than 3.0 to 4.0, which is a reaction product of at least one C2-C4 alkylene oxide with a methylene bis(cyclohexylamine) initiator compound (i.e., a methylene bis(cyclohexylamine)-initiated polyol) and (b)(ii) is at least one amine-initiated polyol having an average hydroxyl functionality of greater than 3.0 to 4.0, which is the reaction product of at least one C2-C4 alkylene oxide with a 1,2-, 1,3- and/or 1,4-diaminocyclohexane compound (i.e., a cyclohexanediamine-initiated polyol), wherein each of components (a) and (b) constitutes at least 0.5 weight percent of the polyols in the polyol mixture, and components (a) and (b) together constitute at least two weight percent of the polyols in the polyol mixture.
The invention is also a process for preparing a polyurethane, comprising contacting the polyol mixture of the first aspect with at least one polyisocyanate under conditions such that the polyol mixture reacts with the polyisocyanate to form a polyurethane.
In a specific aspect, the invention is also a process for preparing a rigid polyurethane foam, comprising
a) forming a reactive mixture containing at least
1) a polyol mixture as described in the first aspect;
2) at least one hydrocarbon, hydrofluorocarbon, hydrochlorofluorocarbon, fluorocarbon, dialkyl ether or fluorine-substituted dialkyl ether physical blowing agent; and
3) at least one polyisocyanate; and
b) subjecting the reactive mixture to conditions such that the reactive mixture expands and cures to form a rigid polyurethane foam.
In another aspect, the invention is a rigid polyurethane foam made in accordance with the foregoing process.
It has been found that the presence of the 1,3- and/or 1,4-bis (aminomethyl)cyclohexane polyol together with one or both of the methylene bis(cyclohexylamine-initiated) polyol and the cyclohexanediamine-initiated polyol provides for very short demold times, better than are achieved when only one of those polyols is present, while retaining desirable curing characteristics (as indicated by a flow index of below 1.8). In addition, the reactive mixture cures to form a foam having excellent thermal insulation properties (i.e., low k-factor).
The 1,3- or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane-initiated polyol (component (a)) is a polyether that is prepared from at least one 1,3- or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane initiator compound. A 1,3- or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane initiator compound, for purposes of this invention, is a cyclohexane compound that is substituted on the cyclohexane ring with two aminomethyl groups that are in the meta or para positions with respect to each other. A 1,3- or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane-initiated polyol is, for purposes of this invention, a polyol produced in the reaction of a C2-C4 alkylene oxide with a 1,3- or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane compound as so described. The cyclohexane group may be unsubstituted or inertly substituted. The 1,3- or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane initiator compound can be represented by the structures (I) and (II):
wherein each R1 is hydrogen or an inert substituent. Structure I represents the 1,3-isomers and structure II represents the 1,4-isomers.
Each R1 in structures I and II is preferably hydrogen, but any one or more of the R1 groups may be an inert substituent. An “inert” substituent is one that (1) is not reactive with an alkylene oxide under the conditions of alkoxylation (as described more below), (2) is not reactive with isocyanate groups and (3) does not significantly affect the ability of the 1,3- or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane compound to become alkoxylated and of the resulting polyol to react with a polyisocyanate to form urethane linkages. Inert substituents include hydrocarbyl groups such as alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, aryl, aryl-substituted alkyl, cycloalkyl and the like; ether groups; tertiary amino groups; and the like. It is preferred that any substituent groups that may be present are C1-C4 alkyl. Among these are methyl, propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, and isobutyl groups, with methyl being preferred among these. If an inert substituent group is present, it is preferred that no more than one such group is present. Most preferably, all R1 groups are hydrogen, and the compound is unsubstituted.
The 1,3- and 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane compounds usually exist in two or more diastereoisomeric forms. In addition, other diastereomeric structures are possible when the R1 groups are not all the same. In such cases, any of the diastereoisomeric forms, or mixtures of any two or more of the diastereoisomeric forms, can be used. In the structures provided above, diastereoisomeric forms are not distinguished.
In addition, mixtures of two or 1,3- or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane compounds as just described can be used.
Especially preferred 1,3- or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane compounds include 1,3-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane, 1,4-bis(aminocyclohexane) and a mixture of 1,3-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane and 1,4-bis(aminocyclohexane).
The methylene bis(cyclohexylamine)-initiated polyol (component (b)(i)) is a polyether that is prepared from at least one methylene bis(cyclohexylamine) initiator compound. A “methylene bis(cyclohexylamine)” initiator compound, for purposes of this invention, is a compound that contains a methylene group which is substituted with two cyclohexylamine groups, which may contain further substituents as described more fully below. A “methylene bis(cyclohexylamine)-initiated polyol” is, for purposes of this invention, a polyol prepared by reacting a methylene bis(cyclohexylamine) initiator, as so defined, with at least one C2-C4 alkylene oxide. The cyclohexyl groups may be unsubstituted or inertly substituted. The “methylene bis(cyclohexylamine)” initiator compound can be represented by the structure (III):
wherein each R is hydrogen or an inert substituent. The NH2 groups may be in the 2, 3 or 4 positions. The two NH2 groups may be symmetrically or asymmetrically positioned with respect to the central methylene group. Preferred isomers are the 2,2′,4,4′ and 2,4′ isomers.
Each R in structure III is preferably hydrogen, but any one or more of the R groups may be an inert substituent as described before. It is preferred that any substituent groups R that may be present are C1-C4 alkyl. Among these are methyl, propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, and isobutyl groups, with methyl being preferred among these. If an inert substituent group is present, it is preferred to have no more than one such group per cyclohexane ring. Most preferably, all R groups are hydrogen, and the compound is unsubstituted.
Some specific methylene bis(cyclohexylamine) initiators include methylene bis(4-aminocyclohexane), methylene bis(2-aminocyclohexane), 2,4′-diaminomethylene bis(cyclohexane), methylene bis(4-amino-2-methyl-cyclohexane), methylene bis(2-amino-4-methyl-cyclohexane), methylene bis(4-amino-3-methyl-cyclohexane) (commercially available as Laromin® C 260) and the like. The foregoing nomenclature designates the cyclohexane carbon atom bonded to the methylene group as the “1” position.
The methylene bis(cyclohexylamine) compounds usually exist in two or more diastereoisomeric forms. In addition, other diastereomeric structures are possible when the R groups are not all the same. In such cases, any of the diastereoisomeric forms, or mixtures of any two or more of the diastereoisomeric forms, can be used.
In addition, mixtures of two or methylene bis(cyclohexylamine) compounds as just described can be used.
The cyclohexanediamine-initiated polyol (component (b)(ii)) is a polyether that can be represented by the structure IV:
wherein each R9 is independently an inert substituent, as defined before, and preferably hydrogen or C1-C4 alkyl. Each A is independently hydrogen or (CxHyO)zH where x is from 2 to 4, y is equal to 2x, and z is from 1 to 5, provided that at least two A groups are (CxHyO)zH groups. At least three A groups can be (CxHyO)zH groups, and all four A groups can be (CxHyO)zH groups. The —N(A)2 groups may be in the 1,2-, 1,3- and/or 1,4 positions, taking the position of one of the —N(A)2 groups as the 1-position.
The cyclohexanediamine-initiated polyol can be prepared from a cyclohexanediamine initiator compound represented by the structure V:
wherein each R9 is independently an inert substituent, as defined before, and preferably hydrogen or C1-C4 alkyl. Each R9 is more preferably hydrogen or methyl. Each R9 is most preferably hydrogen, such that the initiator compound is 1,2-, 1,3- or 1,4-diaminocyclohexane. Mixtures of two or initiator compounds corresponding to the foregoing structure can be used.
Initiators of structure V exist in two or more diastereoisomeric forms, as the amino groups may be in the cis-configuration (wherein they reside on the same side of the ring) or trans-configuration (wherein they reside on the opposite side of the ring). In addition, other diastereomeric structures are possible when the R9 groups are not all the same. In such cases, any of the diastereoisomeric forms, or mixtures of any two or more of the diastereoisomeric forms, can be used.
The 1,3- or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane, methylene bis(cyclohexylamine) and cyclohexanediamine initiator compounds may contain small amounts (typically less than 3% by weight) of impurities, which tend to be mainly other amine or diamine compounds. 1,3- or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane, ethylene bis(cyclohexylamine) compounds and cyclohexanediamine initiator compounds containing such quantities of impurities of those types are suitable as initiators in the present invention.
Amine-initiated polyols are prepared from these initiator compounds by causing them to react, individually or in admixture, with at least one C2-C4 alkylene oxide. The alkylene oxide may be ethylene oxide, 1,2-propylene oxide, 1,2- or 2,3-butylene oxide, tetramethylene oxide or a combination of two or more thereof. If two or more alkylene oxides are used, they may be added to the initiator compound simultaneously (to form a random copolymer) or sequentially (to form a block copolymer). Butylene oxide and tetramethylene oxide are generally less preferred. Ethylene oxide, propylene oxide and mixtures thereof are more preferred. Mixtures of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide may contain the oxides in any proportion. For example, a mixture of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide may contain from 10 to 90 weight percent of ethylene oxide, preferably from 30 to 70 weight percent ethylene oxide or from 40 to 60 weight percent ethylene oxide.
Enough of the alkylene oxide(s) are added to the respective initiator compounds to produce in each case a polyol having an average hydroxyl functionality of greater than 3.0, up to as many as 4.0, hydroxyl groups/molecule. When the polyols are to be used in preparing a rigid polyurethane foam, as is preferred, the average hydroxyl functionality for each of the polyols is preferably from 3.3 to 4.0, and a more preferred average hydroxyl functionality in such a case is from 3.7 to 4.0. The hydroxyl equivalent weight of the 1,3- and/or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane-initiated polyol, methylene bis(cyclohexylamine)-initiated polyol and cyclohexanediamine-initiated polyol may range from as little as about 75 to 3000 or more, depending on the intended application. For the preferred rigid polyurethane foam applications, a useful hydroxyl equivalent weight for each of these polyols is from 75 to 560. A preferred hydroxyl equivalent weight for rigid foam production is from 90 to 175 and a more preferred hydroxyl equivalent weight for rigid foam production is from 100 to 130.
The alkoxylation reaction is conveniently performed by forming a mixture of the alkylene oxide(s) and the initiator compound (or compounds, if two or more of the amine initiators are alkoxylated together), and subjecting the mixture to conditions of elevated temperature and superatmospheric pressure. Polymerization temperatures may be, for example, from 110 to 170° C., and pressures may be, for example, from 2 to 10 bar (200 to 1000 kPa). A catalyst may be used, particularly if more than one mole of alkylene oxide(s) is to be added per equivalent of amine hydrogen on the initiator compound(s). Suitable alkoxylation catalysts include strong bases such as alkali metal hydroxides (sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, cesium hydroxide, for example), as well as the so-called double metal cyanide catalysts (of which zinc hexacyanocobaltate complexes are most notable). The reaction can be performed in two or more stages, in which no catalyst is used in the first stage, and from 0.5 to 1.0 mole of alkylene oxide is added to the initiator per equivalent of amine hydrogens, followed by one or more subsequent stages in which additional alkylene oxide is added in the presence of a catalyst as described. After the reaction is completed, the catalyst may be deactivated and/or removed. Alkali metal hydroxide catalysts may be removed, left in the product, or neutralized with an acid and the residues left in the product. Residues of double metal cyanide catalysts may be left in the product, but can be removed instead if desired.
A polyol mixture which contains the 1,3- and/or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane-initiated polyol together with one or both of the methylene bis(cyclohexylamine)-initiated polyol and the cyclohexanediamine-initiated polyol is useful for making a wide variety of polyurethanes. Each of these polyols should constitute at least 0.5 percent of the total weight of all polyols in the polyol mixture, and components (a) and (b) together should constitute at least two percent of the total weight of all polyols in the polyol mixture. It is preferred that the 1,3- and/or 1,4-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane-initiated polyol constitutes at least 3 percent, more preferably at least 5 percent, of the total weight of all polyols in the polyol mixture, and that the methylene bis(cyclohexylamine)-initiated polyol and cyclohexanediamine-initiated polyols singly or together constitute at least 3 percent, more preferably at least 5 percent, of the total weight of all polyols in the polyol mixture. It is preferred that components (a) and (b) together constitute at least 10, more preferably at least 15 percent of the total weight of all polyols in the polyol mixture. Components (a) and (b) preferably are present in weight ratios of from 0.25:1 to 1:0.25 with respect to each other, in the polyol mixture.
Components (a) and (b) may be the only polyols in the polyol mixture of the invention. However, the polyol mixture will more typically contain one or more additional polyols. Components (a) and (b) may, for example, together constitute up to 80%, up to 60%, up to 50%, up to 40% or up to 30% of the total weight of the polyols in the polyol mixture.
Polyurethanes of various types can be prepared from the polyol mixture of the invention by causing the polyol mixture to react with one or more organic polyisocyanates. Reactions of this type are well-known and can be used to produce, for example, non-cellular elastomeric polymers; microcellular elastomeric polymers, flexible and semi-flexible polyurethane foams, including both molded and slabstock types; so-called viscoelastic foams; polyurethane dispersions which are useful, for example, in coating applications; polyurethane sealants; hard polyurethane plastic materials, and the like.
However, the polyol mixture according to the invention is especially useful in preparing rigid polyurethane foam, particularly when its hydroxyl equivalent weight is from 75 to 560. The rigid polyurethane foam is prepared from a polyurethane-forming composition that contains at least (1) a polyol mixture according to the invention, (2) at least one organic polyisocyanate, and (3) at least one physical blowing agent as described more fully below.
When making a rigid polyurethane foam, the polyol mixture preferably has an average of 3.5 to about 7 hydroxyl groups/molecule and an average hydroxyl equivalent weight of about 90 to about 175. Any individual polyol within the mixture may have a functionality and/or equivalent weight outside of those ranges, if the mixture meets these parameters. Water is not considered in determining the functionality or equivalent weight of a polyol mixture, for purposes of this invention.
A more preferred average hydroxyl functionality for a polyol mixture for making rigid polyurethane foam is from about 3.8 to about 6 hydroxyl groups/molecule. An even more preferred average hydroxyl functionality for a polyol mixture is from about 3.8 to about 5 hydroxyl groups/molecule. A more preferred average hydroxyl equivalent weight for a polyol mixture is from about 110 to about 130.
Suitable polyols that can be used in conjunction with components (a) and (b) are polyether polyols, which are conveniently made by polymerizing an alkylene oxide onto an initiator compound (or mixture of initiator compounds) that has multiple active hydrogen atoms. The initiator compound(s) may include alkylene glycols (e.g., ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, 1,4-butane diol, 1,6-hexanediol and the like), glycol ethers (such as diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, tripropylene glycol and the like), glycerin, trimethylolpropane, pentaerythritol, sorbitol, sucrose, glucose, fructose or other sugars, and the like. A portion of the initiator compound may be one containing primary and/or secondary amino groups, such as ethylene diamine, hexamethylene diamine, diethanolamine, monoethanolamine, N-methyldiethanolamine, piperazine, aminoethylpiperazine, diisopropanolamine, monoisopropanolamine, methanolamine, dimethanolamine, toluene diamine (all isomers) and the like. Amine-initiated polyols of these types tend to be somewhat autocatalytic. The alkylene oxide used to make the additional polyol(s) are as described before with respect to components (a) and (b). The alkylene oxide of choice is propylene oxide, or a mixture of propylene oxide and ethylene oxide.
Polyester polyols may also be used as an additional polyol, but are generally less preferred as they tend to have lower functionalities. The polyester polyols include reaction products of polyols, preferably diols, with polycarboxylic acids or their anhydrides, preferably dicarboxylic acids or dicarboxylic acid anhydrides. The polycarboxylic acids or anhydrides may be aliphatic, cycloaliphatic, aromatic and/or heterocyclic and may be substituted, such as with halogen atoms. The polycarboxylic acids may be unsaturated. Examples of these polycarboxylic acids include succinic acid, adipic acid, terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, trimellitic anhydride, phthalic anhydride, maleic acid, maleic acid anhydride and fumaric acid. The polyols used in making the polyester polyols include ethylene glycol, 1,2- and 1,3-propylene glycol, 1,4- and 2,3-butane diol, 1,6-hexane diol, 1,8-octane diol, neopentyl glycol, cyclohexane dimethanol, 2-methyl-1,3-propane diol, glycerin, trimethylol propane, 1,2,6-hexane triol, 1,2,4-butane triol, trimethylol ethane, pentaerythritol, quinitol, mannitol, sorbitol, methyl glycoside, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, tetraethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, dibutylene glycol and the like.
In some embodiments of the invention, the polyol mixture contains at least one renewable-resource polyol having from 2 to 6 hydroxyl groups per molecule and a hydroxyl equivalent weight of from 75 to 1000. The renewable-resource polyol in those embodiments constitutes at least 1% by weight of the polyol mixture, and preferably constitutes from 1 to 15% weight percent thereof.
A “renewable-resource polyol”, for purposes of this invention, is a polyol that is, or is produced from, a renewable biological resource, such as an animal fat, a vegetable fat, a lignocellulosic material or a carbohydrate such as starch. At least 50% of the mass of the renewable-resource polyol should come from the renewable biological resource. Various types of renewable-resource polyols are useful, including those described in Ionescu, Chemistry and Technology of Polyols for Polyurethanes, Rapra Publishers 2005. These include:
1. Castor oil;
2. A hydroxymethyl group-containing polyol as described in WO 2004/096882 and WO 2004/096883. Such polyols are prepared by reacting a hydroxymethyl group-containing fatty acid having from 12-26 carbon atoms, or an ester of such a hydroxymethyl group containing fatty acid, with a polyol or polyamine initiator compound having an average of at least 2 hydroxyl, primary amine and/or secondary amine groups, such that the hydroxymethyl-containing polyester polyol contains an average of at least 1.3 repeating units derived from the hydroxymethyl-group-containing fatty acid or ester per total number of hydroxyl, primary amine and secondary amine groups on the initiator compound, and the hydroxymethyl-containing polyester polyol has an equivalent weight of at least 400 up to 15,000. Preferred such polyols have the following average structure:
[H—X](n-p)—R—[X—Z]p (VI)
wherein R is the residue of an initiator compound having n hydroxyl and/or primary or secondary amine groups, where n is at least two; each X is independently —O—, —NH— or —NR′— in which R′ is an inertly substituted alkyl, aryl, cycloalkyl, or aralkyl group, p is a number from 1 to n representing the average number of [X—Z] groups per hydroxymethyl-containing polyester polyol molecule, Z is a linear or branched chain containing one or more A groups, provided that the average number of A groups per molecule is ≧1.3 times n, and each A is independently selected from the group consisting of A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5, provided that at least some A groups are A1, A2 or A3, wherein A1 is:
wherein B is H or a covalent bond to a carbonyl carbon atom of another A group; m is number greater than 3, n is greater than or equal to zero and m+n is from 11 to 19; A2 is:
wherein B is as before, v is a number greater than 3, r and s are each numbers greater than or equal to zero with v+r+s being from 10 to 18, A3 is:
wherein B, v, each r and s are as defined before, t is a number greater than or equal to zero, and the sum of v, r, s and t is from 10 to 18; A4 is
where w is from 10-24, and A5 is
where R′ is a linear or branched alkyl group that is substituted with at least one cyclic ether group and optionally one or more hydroxyl groups or other ether groups.
3. An amide group-containing polyol as described in WO 2007/019063. Among these are amide compounds having hydroxymethyl groups, which are conveniently described as an amide of (1) a primary or secondary amine compound that contains at least one hydroxyl group with (2) a fatty acid that contains at least one hydroxymethyl group. This type of amide has at least one hydroxyl-substituted organic group bonded to the amide nitrogen. A C7-23 hydrocarbon group is bonded to the carbonyl carbon of the amide group. The C7-23 hydrocarbon group is itself substituted with at least one hydroxymethyl group. Other amide group-containing polyols are conveniently described as an amide of a fatty acid (or ester) and a hydroxyl-containing primary or secondary amine, in which the fatty acid group has been modified to introduce one or more (N-hydroxyalkyl) aminoalkyl groups.
4. A hydroxyl ester-substituted fatty acid ester as described in WO 2007/019051. The materials contain at least two different types of ester groups. One type of ester group corresponds to the reaction product of the carboxylic acid group of a fatty acid with a compound having two or more hydroxyl groups. The second type of ester group is pendant from the fatty acid chain, being bonded to the fatty acid chain through the —O— atom of the ester group. The pendant ester group is conveniently formed by epoxidizing the fatty acid (at the site of carbon-carbon unsaturation in the fatty acid chain), followed by reaction with a hydroxy acid or hydroxy acid precursor. The pendant ester group includes at least one free hydroxyl group. These materials can be represented by the structure
[HO](p-x)—R—[O—C(O)—R1]x (XI)
wherein R represents the residue, after removal of hydroxyl groups, of a compound having p hydroxyl groups, R1 represents the hydrocarbon portion of a fatty acid, and x is a number from 1 to p. p is 2 or more, as discussed before. Each —R—O—C(O)— linkage represents an ester group of the first type discussed above. At least a portion of the R1 chains are substituted with at least one hydroxyl-containing ester group, which can be represented as
—O—C(O)—R2—OHy (XII)
wherein R2 is a hydrocarbyl group that may be inertly substituted, and y is 1 or more, preferably 1 or 2. The bond shown at the left of the structure attaches to a carbon atom of the fatty acid chain. Inert substituents in this context are those which do not interfere with the formation of the material or its use in making a polyurethane.
5. A “blown” soybean oil as described in US Published Patent Applications 2002/0121328, 2002/0119321 and 2002/0090488.
6. An oligomerized vegetable oil or animal fat as described in WO 06/116456. The oil or fat is oligomerized by epoxidizing some or all of the carbon-carbon double bonds in the starting material, and then conducting a ring-opening reaction under conditions which promote oligomerization. Some residual epoxide groups often remain in these materials. A material of this type having a hydroxyl functionality of about 4.4 and a molecular weight of about 1100 is available from Cargill Inc. under the trade name BiOH.
7. Hydroxyl-containing cellulose-lignin materials.
8. Hydroxyl-containing modified starches.
In a preferred embodiment, the polyol mixture contains at least one other polyether polyol (i.e., in addition to components (a) and (b)) that has an average functionality of from 4.5 to 7 hydroxyl groups per molecule and a hydroxyl equivalent weight of 100 to 175. The other polyether polyol may be, for example, a sorbitol- or sucrose/initiated-initiated polyether. Examples of suitable sorbitol- or sucrose/initiated-initiated polyethers that can be used include Voranol® 360, Voranol® RN411, Voranol®RN490, Voranol® 370, Voranol® 446, Voranol® 520, Voranol® 550 and Voranol® 482 polyols, all available from Dow Chemical.
In another preferred embodiment, the polyol mixture also contains, in addition to components (a) and (b), at least one other polyether polyol that has an average functionality of from 4.5 to 7 hydroxyl groups per molecule and a hydroxyl equivalent weight of 100 to 175, and which is not amine-initiated, and at least one other amine-initiated polyol having an average functionality of from 2.0 to 4.0 (preferably 3.0 to 4.0) and a hydroxyl equivalent weight of from 100 to 225. The other amine-initiated polyol may be initiated with, for example, ammonia, ethylene diamine, hexamethylenediamine, diethanolamine, monoethanolamine, N-methyldiethanolamine, piperazine, aminoethylpiperazine, diisopropanolamine, monoisopropanolamine, methanolamine, dimethanolamine, toluene diamine (all isomers) and the like. Ethylene diamine- and toluene diamine-initiated polyols are preferred in this case. The polyol mixture may contain from 2 to 50% by weight combined of components (a) and (b), from 20 to 80% by weight of the non-amine-initiated polyol and from 2 to 20% by weight of the other amine-initiated polyol. The polyol mixture may contain up to 15% by weight of still another polyol, which is not amine-initiated and which has a hydroxyl functionality of 2.0 to 3.0 and a hydroxyl equivalent weight of from 90 to 500, preferably from 200 to 500. Specific examples of polyol mixtures as just described include a mixture of from 10 to 50% by combined weight of the components (a) and (b), from 20 to 70% of a sorbitol or sucrose/glycerin initiated polyether polyol having an average functionality of from 4.5 to 7 hydroxyl groups per molecule and a hydroxyl equivalent weight of 100 to 175, from 2 to 20% by weight of an ethylenediamine-initiated polyol having an equivalent weight of from 100 to 225, and from 0 to 15% by weight of a non-amine-initiated polyol having a functionality of from 2.0 to 3.0 and hydroxyl equivalent weight of from 200 to 500.
Polyol mixtures as described herein can be prepared by making the constituent polyols individually, and then blending them together. Alternatively, polyol mixtures can be prepared by forming a mixture of the respective initiator compounds, and then alkoxylating the initiator mixture to form the polyol mixture directly. Combinations of these approaches can also be used.
The polyurethane-forming composition contains at least one organic polyisocyanate. The organic polyisocyanate or mixture thereof advantageously contains an average of at least 2.5 isocyanate groups per molecule, when the preferred rigid foam is to be prepared. A preferred isocyanate functionality is from about 2.5 to about 3.6 or from about 2.6 to about 3.3 isocyanate groups/molecule. The polyisocyanate or mixture thereof advantageously has an isocyanate equivalent weight of from about 130 to 200. This is preferably from 130 to 185 and more preferably from 130 to 170. These functionality and equivalent weight values need not apply with respect to any single polyisocyanate in a mixture, provided that the mixture as a whole meets these values.
Suitable polyisocyanates include aromatic, aliphatic and cycloaliphatic polyisocyanates. Aromatic polyisocyanates are generally preferred. Exemplary polyisocyanates include, for example, m-phenylene diisocyanate, 2,4- and/or 2,6-toluene diisocyanate (TDI), the various isomers of diphenylmethanediisocyanate (MDI), hexamethylene-1,6-diisocyanate, tetramethylene-1,4-diisocyanate, cyclohexane-1,4-diisocyanate, hexahydrotoluene diisocyanate, hydrogenated MDI (H12 MDI), naphthylene-1,5-diisocyanate, methoxyphenyl-2,4-diisocyanate, 4,4′-biphenylene diisocyanate, 3,3′-dimethyoxy-4,4′-biphenyl diisocyanate, 3,3′-dimethyldiphenylmethane-4,4′-diisocyanate, 4,4′,4″-triphenylmethane diisocyanate, polymethylene polyphenylisocyanates, hydrogenated polymethylene polyphenyl polyisocyanates, toluene-2,4,6-triisocyanate and 4,4′-dimethyldiphenylmethane-2,2′,5,5′-tetraisocyanate. Preferred polyisocyanates are the so-called polymeric MDI products, which are a mixture of polymethylene polyphenylene polyisocyanates in monomeric MDI. Especially suitable polymeric MDI products have a free MDI content of from 5 to 50% by weight, more preferably 10 to 40% by weight. Such polymeric MDI products are available from The Dow Chemical Company under the trade names PAPI® and Voranate®.
An especially preferred polyisocyanate is a polymeric MDI product having an average isocyanate functionality of from 2.6 to 3.3 isocyanate groups/molecule and an isocyanate equivalent weight of from 130 to 170. Suitable commercially available products of that type include PAPI™ 27, Voranate™ M229, Voranate™ 220, Voranate™ 290, Voranate™ M595 and Voranate™ M600, all from Dow Chemical.
Isocyanate-terminated prepolymers and quasi-prepolymers (mixtures of prepolymers with unreacted polyisocyanate compounds) can also be used. These are prepared by reacting a stoichiometric excess of an organic polyisocyanate with a polyol, such as the polyols described above. Suitable methods for preparing these prepolymers are well known. Such a prepolymer or quasi-prepolymer preferably has an isocyanate functionality of from 2.5 to 3.6 and an isocyanate equivalent weight of from 130 to 200, when used to make the preferred rigid foam.
The polyisocyanate is used in an amount sufficient to provide an isocyanate index of from 80 to 600. Isocyanate index is calculated as the number of reactive isocyanate groups provided by the polyisocyanate component divided by the number of isocyanate-reactive groups in the polyurethane-forming composition (including those contained by isocyanate-reactive blowing agents such as water) and multiplying by 100. Water is considered to have two isocyanate-reactive groups per molecule for purposes of calculating isocyanate index. A preferred isocyanate index is from 90 to 400 and a more preferred isocyanate index is from 100 to 150.
The blowing agent used in the polyurethane-forming composition includes at least one physical blowing agent which is a hydrocarbon, hydrofluorocarbon, hydrochlorofluorocarbon, fluorocarbon, dialkyl ether or a fluorine-substituted dialkyl ether, or a mixture of two or more thereof. Blowing agents of these types include propane, isopentane, n-pentane, n-butane, isobutane, isobutene, cyclopentane, dimethyl ether, 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane (HCFC-141b), chlorodifluoromethane (HCFC-22), 1-chloro-1,1-difluoroethane (HCFC-142b), 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a), 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (HFC-365mfc), 1,1-difluoroethane (HFC-152a), 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (HFC-227ea) and 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa). The hydrocarbon and hydrofluorocarbon blowing agents are preferred. It is generally preferred to further include water in the formulation, in addition to the physical blowing agent.
Blowing agent(s) are preferably used in an amount sufficient such that the formulation cures to form a foam having a molded density of from 16 to 160 kg/m3, preferably from 16 to 64 kg/m3 and especially from 20 to 48 kg/m3. To achieve these densities, the hydrocarbon or hydrofluorocarbon blowing agent conveniently is used in an amount ranging from about 10 to about 40, preferably from about 12 to about 35, parts by weight per 100 parts by weight polyol(s). Water reacts with isocyanate groups to produce carbon dioxide, which acts as an expanding gas. Water is suitably used in an amount within the range of 0.5 to 3.5, preferably from 1.5 to 3.0 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of polyol(s).
The polyurethane-forming composition typically will include at least one catalyst for the reaction of the polyol(s) and/or water with the polyisocyanate. Suitable urethane-forming catalysts include those described by U.S. Pat. No. 4,390,645 and in WO 02/079340, both incorporated herein by reference. Representative catalysts include tertiary amine and phosphine compounds, chelates of various metals, acidic metal salts of strong acids; strong bases, alcoholates and phenolates of various metals, salts of organic acids with a variety of metals, organometallic derivatives of tetravalent tin, trivalent and pentavalent As, Sb and Bi and metal carbonyls of iron and cobalt.
Tertiary amine catalysts are generally preferred. Among the tertiary amine catalysts are dimethylbenzylamine (such as Desmorapid® DB from Rhine Chemie), 1,8-diaza (5,4,0)undecane-7 (such as Polycat® SA-1 from Air Products), pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (such as Polycat® 5 from Air Products), dimethylcyclohexylamine (such as Polycat® 8 from Air Products), triethylene diamine (such as Dabco® 33LV from Air Products), dimethyl ethyl amine, n-ethyl morpholine, N-alkyl dimethylamine compounds such as N-ethyl N,N-dimethyl amine and N-cetyl N,N-dimethylamine, N-alkyl morpholine compounds such as N-ethyl morpholine and N-coco morpholine, and the like. Other tertiary amine catalysts that are useful include those sold by Air Products under the trade names Dabco® NE1060, Dabco® NE1070, Dabco® NE500, Dabco® TMR-2, Dabco® TMR 30, Polycat® 1058, Polycat® 11, Polycat 15, Polycat® 33 Polycat® 41 and Dabco® MD45, and those sold by Huntsman under the trade names ZR 50 and ZR 70. In addition, certain amine-initiated polyols can be used herein as catalyst materials, including those described in WO 01/58976A. Mixtures of two or more of the foregoing can be used.
The catalyst is used in catalytically sufficient amounts. For the preferred tertiary amine catalysts, a suitable amount of the catalysts is from about 1 to about 4 parts, especially from about 1.5 to about 3 parts, of tertiary amine catalyst(s) per 100 parts by weight of the polyol(s).
The polyurethane-forming composition also preferably contains at least one surfactant, which helps to stabilize the cells of the composition as gas evolves to form bubbles and expand the foam. Examples of suitable surfactants include alkali metal and amine salts of fatty acids such as sodium oleate, sodium stearate sodium ricinolates, diethanolamine oleate, diethanolamine stearate, diethanolamine ricinoleate, and the like: alkali metal and amine salts of sulfonic acids such as dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid and dinaphthylmethanedisulfonic acid; ricinoleic acid; siloxane-oxalkylene polymers or copolymers and other organopolysiloxanes; oxyethylated alkylphenols (such as Tergitol NP9 and Triton X100, from The Dow Chemical Company); oxyethylated fatty alcohols such as Tergitol 15-S-9, from The Dow Chemical Company; paraffin oils; castor oil; ricinoleic acid esters; turkey red oil; peanut oil; paraffins; fatty alcohols; dimethyl polysiloxanes and oligomeric acrylates with polyoxyalkylene and fluoroalkane side groups. These surfactants are generally used in amount of 0.01 to 6 parts by weight based on 100 parts by weight of the polyol.
Organosilicone surfactants are generally preferred types. A wide variety of these organosilicone surfactants are commercially available, including those sold by Goldschmidt under the Tegostab® name (such as Tegostab B-8462, B8427, B8433 and B-8404 surfactants), those sold by OSi Specialties under the Niax® name (such as Niax® L6900 and L6988 surfactants) as well as various surfactant products commercially available from Air Products and Chemicals, such as DC-193, DC-198, DC-5000, DC-5043 and DC-5098 surfactants.
In addition to the foregoing ingredients, the polyurethane-forming composition may include various auxiliary components such as fillers, colorants, odor masks, flame retardants, biocides, antioxidants, UV stabilizers, antistatic agents, viscosity modifiers and the like.
Examples of suitable flame retardants include phosphorus compounds, halogen-containing compounds and melamine.
Examples of fillers and pigments include calcium carbonate, titanium dioxide, iron oxide, chromium oxide, azo/diazo dyes, phthalocyanines, dioxazines, recycled rigid polyurethane foam and carbon black.
Examples of UV stabilizers include hydroxybenzotriazoles, zinc dibutyl thiocarbamate, 2,6-ditertiarybutyl catechol, hydroxybenzophenones, hindered amines and phosphites.
Except for fillers, the foregoing additives are generally used in small amounts. Each may constitute from 0.01 percent to 3 percent of the total weight of the polyurethane formulation. Fillers may be used in quantities as high as 50% of the total weight of the polyurethane formulation.
The polyurethane-forming composition is prepared by bringing the various components together under conditions such that the polyol(s) and isocyanate(s) react, the blowing agent generates a gas, and the composition expands and cures. All components (or any sub-combination thereof) except the polyisocyanate can be pre-blended into a formulated polyol composition if desired, which is then mixed with the polyisocyanate when the foam is to be prepared. The components may be preheated if desired, but this is usually not necessary, and the components can be brought together at about room temperature (˜22° C.) to conduct the reaction. It is usually not necessary to apply heat to the composition to drive the cure, but this may be done if desired, too.
The invention is particularly useful in so-called “pour-in-place” applications, in which the polyurethane-forming composition is dispensed into a cavity and foams within the cavity to fill it and provide structural and/or thermal insulative attributes to an assembly. The nomenclature “pour-in-place” refers to the fact that the foam is created at the location where it is needed, rather than being created in one step and later assembled into place in a separate manufacturing step. Pour-in-place processes are commonly used to make appliance products such as refrigerators, freezers, and coolers and similar products which have walls that contain thermal insulation foam. The presence of the amine-initiated polyol in the polyurethane-forming composition tends to provide the formulation with good flow and short demold times, while at the same time producing a low k-factor foam.
The walls of appliances such as refrigerators, freezers and coolers are most conveniently insulated in accordance with the invention by first assembling an outer shell and an interior liner together, such that a cavity is formed between the shell and liner. The cavity defines the space to be insulated as well as the dimensions and shape of the foam that is produced. Typically, the shell and liner are bonded together in some way, such as by welding, melt-bonding or through use of some adhesive (or some combination of these) prior to introduction of the foam formulation. The shell and liner may be supported or held in the correct relative positions using a jig or other apparatus. One or more inlets to the cavity are provided, through which the foam formulation can be introduced. Usually, one or more outlets are provided to allow air in the cavity to escape as the cavity is filled with the foam formulation and the foam formulation expands.
The materials of construction of the shell and liner are not particularly critical, provided that they can withstand the conditions of the curing and expansion reactions of the foam formulation. In most cases, the materials of construction will be selected with regard to specific performance attributes that are desired in the final product. Metals such as steel are commonly used as the shell, particularly in larger appliances such as freezers or refrigerators. Plastics such as polycarbonates, polypropylene, polyethylene styrene-acrylonitrile resins, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene resins or high-impact polystyrene are used more often in smaller appliances (such as coolers) or those in which low weight is important. The liner may be a metal, but is more typically a plastic as just described.
The foam formulation is then introduced into the cavity. The various components of the foam formulation are mixed together and the mixture introduced quickly into the cavity, where the components react and expand. It is common to pre-mix the polyol(s) together with the water and blowing agent (and often catalyst and/or surfactant as well) to produce a formulated polyol. The formulated polyol can be stored until it is time to prepare the foam, at which time it is mixed with the polyisocyanate and introduced into the cavity. It is usually not required to heat the components prior to introducing them into the cavity, nor it is usually required to heat the formulation within the cavity to drive the cure, although either or both of these steps may be taken if desired. The shell and liner may act as a heat sink in some cases, and remove heat from the reacting foam formulation. If necessary, the shell and/or liner can be heated somewhat (such as up to 50° C. and more typically 35-40° C.) to reduce this heat sink effect, or to drive the cure.
Enough of the foam formulation is introduced such that, after it has expanded, the resulting foam fills those portions of the cavity where foam is desired. Most typically, essentially the entire cavity is filled with foam. It is generally preferred to “overpack” the cavity slightly, by introducing more of the foam formulation than is minimally needed to fill the cavity, thereby increasing the foam density slightly. The overpacking provides benefits such as better dimensional stability of the foam, especially in the period following demold. Generally, the cavity is overpacked by from 4 to 20% by weight. The final foam density for most appliance applications is preferably in the range of from 28 to 40 kg/m3.
After the foam formulation has expanded and cured enough to be dimensionally stable, the resulting assembly can be “demolded” by removing it from the jig or other support that is used to maintain the shell and liner in their correct relative positions. Short demold times are important to the appliance industry, as shorter demold times allow more parts to be made per unit time on a given piece of manufacturing equipment.
Demold times can be evaluated as follows: A 28-liter “jumbo” Brett mold coated with release agent is conditioned to a temperature of 45° C. 896 g±4 g of a foam formulation is injected into the mold in order to obtain a 32 kg/m3 density foam. After a period of 6 minutes, the foam is removed from the mold and the thickness of the foam is measured. After a further 24 hours, the foam thickness is re-measured. The difference between the thickness after 24 hours and the initial thickness is an indication of the post-demold expansion of the foam, which in turn is an indication of whether the foam is adequately cured at the time it was demolded. A post-demold expansion of no more than 4 mm on this test generally indicates that the foam has cured adequately. The test can be repeated if necessary using different cure times to determine, for a specific formulation, the demold time that is necessary to obtain adequate cure. A demold time of no more than 6 minutes is often obtained with this invention, and demold times of less than 4 minutes can be attained.
As mentioned, flow is another important attribute of the foam formulation. For purposes of this invention, flow is evaluated using a rectangular “Brett” mold, having dimensions of 200 cm×20 cm×5 cm (˜6′6″×8″×2″). The polyurethane-forming composition is formed, and immediately injected into the Brett mold, which is oriented vertically (i.e., 200 cm direction oriented vertically) and preheated to 45±5° C. The composition is permitted to expand against its own weight and cure inside the mold. The amount of polyurethane-forming composition is selected such that the resulting foam just fills the mold. The density of the resulting foam is then measured and compared with the density of a free-rise foam made from the same formulation (by injecting the formulation into a plastic bag or open cardboard box where it can expand freely vertically and horizontally against atmospheric pressure). The ratio of the Brett mold foam density to the free rise density is considered to represent the “flow index” of the formulation. With this invention, flow index values are typically below 1.8, and are preferably from 1.2 to 1.5.
The polyurethane foam advantageously exhibits a low k-factor. The k-factor of a foam may depend on several variables, of which density is an important one. For many applications, a rigid polyurethane foam having a density of from 28.8 to 40 kg/m3 (1.8 to 2.5 pounds/cubic foot) exhibits a good combination of physical properties, dimensional stability, and cost. Foam in accordance with the invention, having a density within that range, preferably exhibits a 10° C. k-factor of no greater than 22, preferably no greater than 20, and more preferably no greater than 19.5 mW/m-° K. Higher density foam may exhibit a somewhat higher k-factor.
In addition to the appliance and thermal insulation foams described above, the invention is also useful to produce vehicle noise dampening foams, one or more layers of a laminated board, pipe insulation and other foam products. The invention is of special interest when a rapid cure is wanted, and/or good thermal insulating properties are wanted in the foam.
If desired, the process of the invention can be practiced in conjunction with the vacuum assisted injection (VAI) methods described, for example, in WO 07/058,793, in which the reaction mixture is injected into a closed mold cavity which is at a reduced pressure. In the VAI process, the mold pressure is reduced to 300 to 950 mbar (30-95 kPa), preferably from 400 to 900 mbar (40-90 kPa) and even more preferably from 500 to 850 mbar (50-85 kPa), before or immediately after the foam forming composition is charged to the mold. Furthermore, the packing factor (ratio of the density of the molded foam divided by its free rise density) should be from 1.03 to 1.9.
A higher formulation viscosity is often beneficial in the VAI process, as the higher viscosity helps to prevent cells from rupturing and collapsing until the foam formulation has cured. Therefore, a methylene bis(cyclohexylamine)-initiated polyol in accordance with the invention that has a viscosity of at least 10,000 cps at 50° C. is preferred. The methylene bis(cyclohexylamine)-initiated polyol more preferably has a viscosity of at least 25,000 or at least 40,000 at 50° C. The viscosity of the methylene bis(cyclohexylamine)-initiated polyol may be as high as 100,000 cps at 50° C. The viscosity of the cyclohexanediamine-initiated polyol may be from 5,000 to 25,000 at 50° C.
The following examples are provided to illustrate the invention, but are not intended to limit the scope thereof. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
28 moles of methylene bis(cyclohexylamine) are added to a reaction vessel under nitrogen. The vessel and its contents are heated to 125° C., and 85 moles of propylene oxide are fed in. The reaction mixture is allowed to digest at 125° C. for 4 hours, at which time 82 g of a 45% by weight potassium hydroxide solution is added. The water is then removed under vacuum and 72 moles of propylene oxide are fed into the reactor. The reaction mixture is again allowed to digest for 4 hours at 125° C., after which time an acetic acid solution is added. The product methylene bis(cyclohexylamine)-initiated polyol has a hydroxyl number of 415 mg KOH/g and a viscosity of 73,000 cps at 50° C.
12.8 moles of a mixture of the 1,3- and 1,4-isomers of bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane are added to a reaction vessel under nitrogen. The vessel and its contents are heated to 140° C., and 38.9 moles of propylene oxide are fed in. The reaction mixture is allowed to digest at 140° C. for 30 minutes, at which time the temperature is reduced to 135° C. and 33.3 g of a 45% by weight potassium hydroxide solution is added. The water is then removed under vacuum and 32.6 moles of propylene oxide are fed into the reactor. The reaction mixture is allowed to digest again for 1 hour at 135° C., after which time an acetic acid solution is added. The product polyol has a hydroxyl number of 433 mg KOH/g and a viscosity of 11,800 cps at 50° C.
38 moles of a mixture of the 1,2-cyclohexanediamine are added to a reaction vessel under nitrogen. The vessel and its contents are heated to 125° C., and 113 moles of propylene oxide are fed in. The reaction mixture is allowed to digest at 125° C. for 2 hours, at which time 89.4 g of a 45% by weight potassium hydroxide solution is added. The water is then removed under vacuum, the temperature reduced to 115° C. and 95 moles of propylene oxide are fed into the reactor. The reaction mixture is allowed to digest again for 2 hours at 115° C., after which time an acetic acid solution is added. The product polyol has a hydroxyl number of 478 mg KOH/g and a viscosity of 7,170 cps at 50° C.
Rigid polyurethane foams are produced from the components described in Table 1. Foam processing is performed using a Hi Tech CS-50 high-pressure machine operated at a throughput of 175-225 g/s. The foam formulation is injected into a bag (to measure free rise density) and into a vertical Brett mold which is preheated to 45° C. Component temperatures prior to mixing are ˜21° C.
The cream, gel and tack-free times are measured for each of the reaction mixtures. Free rise density and the minimum fill density are measured and flow index is calculated from these values. Compressive strength is also measured on the foam samples.
10° C. K-factor is measured on 8″×1″×1″ (20×2.5×2.5 cm) samples using a Laser Comp Fox 200 device, with an upper cold plate temperature of −3° C. and a lower warm plate temperature of 23° C. 24° C. K factor is measured the same way, with an upper cold plate temperature of 10° C. and a lower warm plate temperature of 38° C. Post demold expansion is measured on jumbo Brett mold foams at demold times of 4, 6 and 7 minutes. Results are as reported in Table 1.
1A 6.0 functional poly(propylene oxide) having a hydroxyl number of 482, commercially available as Voranol ® RN 482 polyol from Dow Chemical.
2An adduct of toluene diamine and propylene oxide having a hydroxyl number of 440 and a hydroxyl functionality of about 4.0.
3,4See the preparation of polyols section.
5An ethylene diamine-initiated poly(propylene oxide) having a hydroxyl number of 500.
6A poly(propylene oxide) diol having a molecular weight of about 400.
7Voranate ™ M229 polymeric MDI, available from Dow Chemical.
The results in Table 1 show that all three foam formulations have comparable cream, gel and tack-free times, and produce foams that are very similar in density, flow index and k-factor. However, foam example 1 shows significantly better post demold expansion than does either of the comparatives, indicating that this formulation cures more rapidly than the others and thus produces a more dimensionally stable foam. At a four minute demold time, Comparative Sample A is too dimensionally unstable, and Comparative Sample B is borderline, so longer demold times are necessary for those foam formulations. Example 1 shows very little dimensional instability and can be demolded easily after only four minutes.
Rigid polyurethane foams are produced from the components described in Table 2, in the same manner as described in Example 1, and tested as described for the previous example. Results are as reported in Table 2. Data for Comparative Sample A are repeated in Table 2 for comparison.
1A 6.0 functional poly(propylene oxide) having a hydroxyl number of 482, commercially available as Voranol ® RN 482 polyol from Dow Chemical.
2 An adduct of toluene diamine and propylene oxide having a hydroxyl number of 440 and a hydroxyl functionality of about 4.0.
3,4See the preparation of polyols section.
5An ethylene diamine-initiated poly(propylene oxide) having a hydroxyl number of 500.
6A poly(propylene oxide) diol having a molecular weight of about 400.
7Voranate ™ M229 polymeric MDI, available from Dow Chemical.
The results in Table 2 show similar trends to the data in Example 1. All three foam formulations have comparable cream, gel and tack-free times, and produce foams that are very similar in density, flow index and k-factor. However, foam example 2 shows significantly better post demold expansion than does either of the comparatives, indicating that this formulation cures more rapidly than the others and thus produces a more dimensionally stable foam.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/246,742, filed 29 Sep. 2009.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US10/49571 | 9/21/2010 | WO | 00 | 3/8/2012 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61246742 | Sep 2009 | US |
