Polyorganosiloxane series thermoplastic resin and composition thereof

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a polyorganosiloxane series thermoplastic resin containing efficiently graft polymerized vinyl monomer(s) and having remarkably excellent slidability, abrasion resistance, weather resistance, cold resistance, and impact resistance.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Hitherto, for improving the impact strength of a thermoplastic resin, a technique of modifying the resin by rubber has been established.
For example, there are an ABS resin obtained by reinforcing a styrene-acrylonitrile resin (AS resin) with a butadiene rubber and an AAS resin obtained by reinforcing as AS resin with an acrylic rubber.
As such a base rubber component, a silicone rubber is considered but when polyorganosiloxane is simply compounded with a thermoplastic resin, the compounded product is insufficient in impact resistance since these components are inferior in compatibility with each other. Thus, a technique of grafting a vinyl monomer on a rubber as in an ABS resin is required, but a polyorganosiloxane is generally poor in a reactivity with a vinyl monomer and hence it is not easy to form a graft polymer of a polyorganosiloxane. Thus, for forming the graft copolymers of this kind, several methods are proposed.
For example, it is proposed in JP-A-50-109282 (the term "JP-A" as used herein means an "unexamined published Japanese patent application") that a graft copolymer having an improved impact strength is obtained by polymerizing a vinyl monomer in the presence of a polyorganosiloxane having a vinyl group or an allyl group.
A method of improving the impact strength of a vinyl polymer by using a polyorganosiloxane having a mercapto group in place of the polyorganosiloxane having a vinyl group or an allyl group is also proposed in JP-A-52-130885.
Furthermore, it is proposed in JP-A-60-252613, JP-A-61-106614, and JP-A-61-136510 that a graft copolymer having an excellent impact strength is obtained with a high graft efficiency by polymerizing a vinyl monomer in an emulsion of a polyorganosiloxane having an acryl group or a methacryl group.
However, when the polyorganosiloxane having a vinyl group or an allyl group or the polyorganosiloxane having a mercapto group is used, the polyorganosiloxane is poor in a reactivity with a vinyl monomer. Accordingly, an apparent graft ratio calculated from an amount of a gel formed, that is, a ratio of the grafted vinyl polymer to the amount of the polyorganosiloxane, is small.
Therefore, an interface adhesive strength between such a polyorganosiloxane and a vinyl polymer is low, thereby causing a remarkable delamination, whereby there is a problem that a graft copolymer having good appearance and a sufficient impact strength cannot be obtained.
Also, when the polyorganosiloxane having an acryl group or a methacryl group is used, a graft copolymer having an improved impact strength is obtained but the heat stability thereof is poor and the graft ratio is greatly lowered by the high-temperature molding and the retention during molding. Consequently, the impact strength, appearance, and luster of the moldings are greatly reduced.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention has been made under such circumstances of the conventional techniques.
Accordingly, one object of this invention is to provide a polyorganosiloxane series thermoplastic resin having excellent weather resistance, cold resistance, slidability, and abrasion resistance with an excellent graft reactivity.
Another object of this invention is to provide a thermoplastic resin composition comprising the polyorganosiloxane series thermoplastic resin and other thermoplastic resin(s).
The polyorganosiloxane series thermoplastic resin according to this invention (hereinafter sometimes referred to as simply "the thermoplastic resin") comprises a graft copolymer (V) (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "component (V)") obtained by grafting at least one kind of vinyl monomer (IV) (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "component (IV)") onto a modified polyorganosiloxane (III) (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "component (III)"), the component (III) being obtained by condensing from 90 to 99.8% by weight of organosiloxane (I) (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "component (I)") having a structural unit represented by the formula (A)
R.sup.1.sub.n SiO.sub.(4-n)/2 ( A)
wherein R.sup.1 represents a substituted or unsubstituted monovalent hydrocarbon group and n represents 0 or an integer of from 1 to 3, and from 10 to 0.2% by weight of a graft crosslinking agent (II) (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "component (II)") having both an unsaturated group represented by the following formula (B) ##STR1## wherein R.sup.2 represents a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group having from 1 to 6 carbon atoms, and an alkoxysilyl group, the sum of component (I) and component (II) being 100% by weight.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The organosiloxane (I) used in this invention has the structural unit shown by the above-described formula (A) and has a straight chain, branched or cyclic structure, and is preferably the organosiloxane having a cyclic structure.
In formula (A) described above, R.sup.1 represents a substituted or unsubstituted monovalent hydrocarbon group as described above, and examples of the monovalent hydrocarbon group are a methyl group, an ethyl group, a propyl group, a vinyl group, a phenyl group and those groups each substituted with a halogen atom or a cyano group.
Further, in the formula (A), n is 0 or an integer of from 1 to 3.
Specific examples of the organosiloxane (I) are cyclic organosiloxanes such as hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane, octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, decamethylcyclopentasiloxane, dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane, trimethyltriphenylcyclotrisiloxane, etc., and straight chain and branched organosiloxanes.
In addition, the organosiloxane (I) may be a previously condensed polyorganosiloxane having a weight average molecular weight of from about 500 to 10,000 calculated as a polystyrene.
When the organosiloxane (I) is a polyorganosiloxane, the terminal of the molecular chain may be blocked by, e.g., a hydroxy group, an alkoxy group, a trimethylsilyl group, a dimethylvinylsilyl group, a methylphenylvinylsilyl group, a methyldiphenylsilyl group, etc.
The graft crosslinking agent (II) used in this invention is a compound having the unsaturated group shown by the formula (B) described above and an alkoxysilyl group.
In the formula (B), R.sup.2 is a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group having from 1 to 6 carbon atoms. Preferred of those is a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group having from 1 or 2 carbon atoms, and more preferred is a hydrogen atom or a methyl group.
Specific examples of the graft crosslinking agent are p-vinylphenylmethyldimethoxysilane, 1-(m-vinylphenyl)methyldimethylisopropoxysilane, 2-(p-vinylphenyl)ethylmethyldimethoxysilane, 3-(p vinylphenoxy)propylmethyldiethoxysilane, 3-(p-vinylbenzoyloxy)propylmethyldimethoxysilane, 1-(o-vinylphenyl)-1,1,2-trimethyl-2,2-dimethoxydisilane, 1-(p-vinylphenyl)-1,1-diphenyl-3-ethyl-3,3-diethoxydisiloxane, m-vinylphenyl[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]diphenylsilane, [3-(p-isopropenylbenzoylamino)propyl]phenyldipropoxysilane and mixtures thereof.
Of those, p-vinylphenylmethyldimethoxysilane, 2-(p-vinylphenyl)ethylmethyldimethoxysilane, and 3-(p-vinylbenzoyloxy)propylmethyldimethoxysilane are preferred, and p-vinylphenylmethyldimethoxysilane is more preferred.
The amount of the graft crosslinking agent, component (II), used is from 0.2 to 10% by weight, and preferably from 0.2 to 5% by weight, based on the sum of component (I) and component (II). If the amount thereof is less than 0.2% by weight of the sum, a high graft ratio is not obtained in the graft polymerization of the modified polyorganosiloxane (III) and the vinyl monomer (IV). As a result, the interface adhesive strength between the modified polyorganosiloxane (III) and the vinyl polymer grafted thereto is decreased, thereby causing delamination, and the graft copolymer (V) having a sufficient impact strength cannot be obtained.
On the other hand, if the amount of the graft crosslinking agent (II) is more than 10% by weight of the sum, the graft ratio is increased, but the degree of polymerzation of the grafted vinyl polymer is reduced with the increase of the graft crosslinking agent (II) to reduce the molecular weight of the vinyl polymer, and as a result, a sufficient impact strength cannot be obtained.
On the other hand, the graft copolymer to a silicone polymer tends to deteriorate by light oxidation up to a deep portion of the grafted vinyl polymer due to the high light transmittance and high gas permeability (oxygen) of silicone.
To overcome these problems, a function as a UV absorbing layer may be imparted to the silicone by adding an ultraviolet (UV) absorber.
However, if the UV absorber is simply added, the existence of the UV absorber is predominated in the side of the vinyl polymer having a high compatibility with the UV absorber since there is a difference in compatibility of the UV absorber for the siloxane and the vinyl polymer, and a sufficient effect as the UV absorbing layer for the silicone cannot be obtained.
To overcome this problem, it is preferred to chemically combine a UV absorber with the siloxane and in this case, it is preferred to introduce a group containing a UV absorbing group into the siloxane as R.sup.1 in the formula (A) described above.
The group having the UV absorbing group includes a group represented by the following formula ##STR2## wherein X represents ##STR3## represents H or OH; Z represents H, OH, or OR.sup.2 ; and n represents an integer of from 1 to 5 (R.sup.2 described above is an alkyl group having 1 to 18 carbon atoms); with proviso that when Y is H, at least one Z is OH.
More practically, the group shown by the following formula is preferred. ##STR4##
The content of the group having the UV absorbing group is from 0.02 to 10% by weight, and preferably form 0.1 to 5% by weight, based on the total amount of the organic groups bonded to the silicon atom. If the content is less than 0.02% by weight, the effect in ultraviolet resistance is insufficient, while if the content is more than 10% by weight, the heat resistance is reduced in the case of using as a composite material by blending the thermoplastic resin with other organic polymer.
Specific examples of the organic silicon compound (VI) (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "component (VI)") having such a UV absorbing group are ##STR5## and the following organic silicon compound is preferred ##STR6##
In the case of forming the polyorganosiloxane as component (III) by polycondensing the organosiloxane (an organosiloxane (I') having the structural unit represented by the following formula (A')
R.sup.3.sub.n SiO.sub.(4-n)/2 (A')
wherein R.sup.3 represents a substituted or unsubstituted monovalent hydrocarbon group and n represents O or an integer of from 1 to 3 (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "component (I')"), the organosilicon compound (component (II)) and the UV absorbing group-containing organosilicon compound (component (VI)), component (II) and component (VI) are compounded with component (I') such that the contents of the reactive unsaturated group in component (II) and the UV absorbing group in component (VI) become from 0.02% to 10% of the total amount of the organic groups bonded to the silicon atom of component (III).
The compounding of these components is conducted, for example, such that they are compounded in the amounts of from 80 to 99,6% by weight of the organosiloxane as component (I'), from 10 to 0.2% by weight, preferably from 7 to 0.5% by weight, and more preferably from 5 to 1% by weight, of the organic silicon compound as component (II), and from 10 to 0.2% by weight, preferably from 7 to 0.5% by weight, and more preferably from 5 to 1% by weight, of the UV absorbing group-having organic silicon compound as component (VI), the sum of component (I'), component (II) and component (VI) being 100% by weight.
By polycondensing the above components, the desired polyorganosiloxane can be obtained.
In this invention, the modified organosiloxane (III) can be produced by mixing under shearing the organosiloxane (I) and the graft crosslinking agent (II) in the presence of an emulsifying agent such as an alkylbenzenesulfonic acid, etc., using a homomixer, and condensing them. The emulsifying agent functions as an emulsifying agent for the organosiloxane (I) and also as a condensation initiator.
Examples of the emulsifying agent are an aliphatic substituted naphtalenesulfonic acid, an aliphatic sulfonic acid, a silylalkylsulfonic acid, and aliphatic substituted diphenyl ether sulfonic acid each aliphatic group having a carbon length of from 6 to 18 carbon atoms.
Further, nonionic emulsifying agnets such as polyoxyethylene alkyl ester, polyoxyethylene alkylaryl ether, etc., can be added.
The amount of the emulsifying agent used is usually from 0.1 to 5% by weight, and preferably from about 0.3 to 3% by weight, based on the sum of component (I) and component (II).
In addition, water is used in the production of the organosiloxane, and the amount of water is usually from 100 to 500 parts by weight, and preferably from 200 to 400 parts by weight, per 100 parts by weight of the sum of component (I) and component (II).
The condensation temperature is usually from 5.degree. to 100.degree. C.
In addition, in the case of producing the modified polyorganosiloxane (III), a crosslinking agent can be added to the system as the third component for improving the impact resistance of the resin obtained. Examples of the crosslinking agent are trifunctional crosslinking agents such as methyltrimethoxysilane, phenyltrimethoxysilane, ethyltriethoxysilane, etc., and tetrafunctional crosslinking agents such a tetraethoxysilane, etc. The amount of the crosslinking agent added is usually about 10% by weight or less, and preferably about 5% by weight or less, based on the sum of the organosiloxane (I) and the graft crosslinking agent (II).
In addition, the weight average molecular weight (calculated as a polystyrene) of the modified polyorganosiloxane (III) thus obtained is usually from 10,000 to 5,000,000, preferably from 30,000 to 1,000,000, and more preferably from 50,000 to 300,000.
By graft polymerizing the vinyl monomer (IV) onto the modified polyorganosiloxane (III) thus obtained, the polyorganosiloxane series thermoplastic resin of this invention containing the graft copolymer (V) is obtained.
Examples of the vinyl monomer (IV) which is used to obtain the thermoplastic resin of this invention are aromatic alkenyl compounds such as styrene, .alpha.-methylstyrene, sodium styrenesulfonate, etc.; methacrylic acid esters such as methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate, butyl methacrylate, allyl methacrylate, hydroxyethyl methacrylate, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, etc.; acrylic acid esters such as methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, etc.; vinyl cyanide compounds such as acrylonitrile, methacrylonitrile, etc.; olefins such as ethylene, propylene, etc.; conjugated diolefins such as butadiene, isoprene, chloroprene, etc.; and vinyl acetate, vinyl chloride, vinylidene chloride, triallyl isocyanurate, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid N-phenylmaleimide, N-cyclohexylmaleimide, maleic anhydride, etc. Those may be used alone or as mixture thereof.
The graft copolymer (V) containing from 65 to 75% by weight styrene and from 35 to 25% by weight acrylonitrile as the vinyl monomers (IV) is preferred for improving the impact resistance of the polyorganosiloxane series thermoplastic resin of this invention.
In addition, in the case of graft polymerizing the vinyl monomer (IV) onto the modified polyorganosiloxane (III), the proportion of the component (III) is from 5 to 80% by weight, and preferably from 10 to 60% by weight, and the proportion of the component (IV) is from 95 to 20% by weight, and preferably from 90 to 40% by weight, the sum of the component (III) and the component (IV) being 100% by weight.
If the proportion of the component (III) is less than 5% by weight, a sufficient impact strength cannot be obtained, while if the proportion of the component (III) is more than 80% by weight, the proportion of the vinyl polymer to be graft bonded is reduced, thereby a sufficient interlayer adhesive strength cannot be obtained between the modified polyorganosiloxane (III) and the vinyl polymer, and as a result, the thermoplastic resin obtained is inferior in appearance and impact strength.
The graft ratio of the graft copolymer (V) thus obtained is usually about 20% by weight or more, preferably about 80% by weight or more, and more preferably about 100% by weight or more.
When the graft ratio of the graft copolymer (V) is high as described above, the interface adhesive strength between the graft copolymer and the vinyl polymer which was not directly grafted thereto is increased, and the modified polyorganosiloxane (III) is uniformly dispersed in the vinyl polymer to provide the thermoplastic resin having good appearance and an excellent impact strength.
The thermoplastic resin of this invention further contains, in addition to the graft copolymer (V) thus obtained, a vinyl polymer which is an ungrafted polymer of the vinyl monomer (IV), and the content of the graft copolymer (V) in the thermoplastic resin is usually 5% by weight or more and preferably 10% by weight or more.
In the production of the thermoplastic resin of this invention, the vinyl monomer (IV) is graft-polymerized to the modified polyorganosiloxane (III) by a conventional radical polymerization to provide a composition containing the graft copolymer (V).
In this case, according to the kind of a radical polymerization initiator used, it is necessary to neutralize with alkali a latex of the modified polyorganosiloxane which is acidic by the alkylbenzenesulfonic acid as described above. Examples of the alkali for neutralizing the acid latex are sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, sodium hydrogencarbonate, triethanolamine, triethylamine, etc.
Examples of the radical polymerization initiator used are redox series initiators composed of a combination of an oxidizing agent such as cumene hydroperoxide, diisopropylbenzene hydroperoxide, p-menthane hydroperoxide, etc., and a reducing agent such as a saccharose-containing iron pyrophosphate composition, a sulfoxylate composition, a mixed composition of a saccharose-containing iron pyrophosphate composition and a sulfoxylate composition, etc.; persulfates such as potassium persulfate, ammonium persulfate, etc.; azo compounds such as azobisisobutyronitrile, dimethyl-2,2'-azobisisobutyrate, 2-carbamoylazoisobutyronitrile, etc.; and organic peroxides such as benzoyl peroxide, lauroyl peroxide, etc. Of these initiators, the redox series initiators are preferred.
The amount of the radical polymerization initiator used is usually from 0.05 to 5 parts by weight, and preferably from 0.1 to 3 parts by weight, per 100 parts by weight of the vinyl monomer (IV).
In this case, the radical polymerization is preferably carried out by an emulsion polymerization or a solution polymerization.
In conducting the emulsion polymerization, a conventional emulsifying agent, the above-described radical polymerization initiator, a chain transfer agent, etc., are used.
Examples of the emulsifying agent are anionic emulsifying agents such as sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, sodium laurylsulfate, sodium diphenyl ether disolfonate, succinic acid dialkali ester sodium sulfonate, etc.; and nonionic emulsifying agents such as polyoxyethylene alkyl ester, polyoxyethylene alkylaryl ether, etc. They can be used alone or as a combination thereof.
The amount of the emulsifying agent is usually from about 0.5 to 5% by weight based on the weight of the vinyl monomer (IV).
Examples of the chain transfer agent are mercaptans such as t-dodecylmercaptan, octhylmercaptan, n-tetradecylmercaptan, n-hexylmercaptan, etc., and halogen compounds such as carbon tetrachloride, ethylene bromide, etc.
The amount of the chain trasfer agent is usually from 0.02 to 1% by weight based on the weight of the vinyl monomer (IV).
The emulsion polymerization is carried out at a polymerization temperature of from 5.degree. C. to 100.degree. C., and preferably from 50.degree. C. to 90.degree. C., for a polymerization time of from 0.1 hour to 10 hours using the radical polymerization initiator, the emulsifying agent and the chain transfer agent in the amounts defined above together with water in an amount of usually from 100 to 500 parts by weight to 100 parts by weight of the vinyl monomer (IV) and, if necessary, an electrolyte, a pH controlling agent, etc.
In addition, the emulsion polymerization can be practiced by adding the vinyl monomer (IV) and the radical polymerization initiator to the latex containing the modified polyorganosiloxane (III) obtained by the condensation of the organosiloxane (I) and the graft crosslinking agent (II).
On the other hand, in the case of the solution polymerization, the modified polyorganosiloxane (III) and the vinyl monomer (IV) are dissolved in an organic solvent and the radical polymerization is conducted by adding thereto the radical polymerization initiator and, if necessary, the chain transfer agent, etc,
Examples of the organic solvent which is used for the solution polymerization are toluene, n-hexane, cyclohexane, chloroform, tetrahydrofuran, etc.
The solution polymerization is carried out at a polymerization temperature of from 5.degree. C. to 150.degree. C., and preferably from 50.degree. C. to 130.degree. C., for a polymerization time of from 1 hour to 10 hours using the radical polymerization initiator and, if necessary, the chain transfer agent, etc., in the amounts as defined above together with, usually, an organic solvent in an amount of from 80 to 500 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the vinyl monomer (IV).
In the case of the solution polymerization, the formation of impurities is greatly reduced as compared to the case of the emulsion polymerization.
In the case of producing the polyorganosiloxane series thermoplastic resin of this invention by the emulsion polymerization, the product is usually coagulated by a salting out method and the powdery product thus obtained is purified by washing with water, followed by drying.
In the case of the solution polymerization, unreacted monomers and the solvent are removed from the reaction mixture by a steam distillation and the massive resin obtained is finely ground and dried for purification of the product.
The thermoplastic resin of this invention containing the graft copolymer (IV) obtained by each method described above can be formed into pellets by a kneading machine such as an extruder, etc.
In this case, according to the required performance, other conventional polymer can be properly blended with the thermoplastic resin obtained in an amount of about 99% by weight or less, and preferably about 90% by weight or less, to provide a polyorganosiloxane series thermoplastic resin composition (this blend is also referred to as "thermoplastic resin composition").
Examples of the conventional polymer which can be used with the thermoplastic resin of this invention are diene series rubbers such as polybutadiene, a butadiene-styrene copolymer, an acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer, polyisoprene, natural rubbers, etc.; olefinic rubbers such as acrylic rubber, a ethylenepropylene copolymer, an ethylene-propylene-diene copolymer, chlorinated butyl rubber, chlorinated polyethylene, etc.; aromatic vinyl conjugated diene series block copolymers such as a styrene-butadiene block copolymer, a styrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymer, a styrene-butadiene-styrene radial tereblock copolymer, etc.; hydrogenated products of those block copolymers; polypropylene, polyethylene, polystyrene, a styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer, rubber-reinforced polystyrene (HIPS), an acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene resin (ABS resin), an acrylonitrile-ethylenepropylenestyrene resin (AES resin), a methyl methacrylatebutadiene-styrene resin (MBS resin), an acrylonitrilebutadiene-methyl methacrylate-styrene resin, an acrylonitrile-n-butyl acrylate-styrene resin (AAS resin), polyvinyl chloride, polycarbonate, polyethylene terephthalate, polybutylene terephthalate, polyacetal, polyamide, an epoxy resin, polyvinylidene fluoride, polysulfone, and ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, a PPS resin, polyether ether ketone, a PPO resin, polyacrylate, a styrene-methyl methacrylate copolymer, a styrene-maleic anhydride copolymer, a rubber-modified PPO resin, a styrene-maleimide series copolymer, a rubber-modified styrene-maleimide copolymer, a polyamide series elastomer, and a polyester series elastomer.
The pellets of the thermoplastic resin (composition) are molded by a conventional means such as compression molding, injection molding, etc.
In the thermoplastic resin composition comprising the thermoplastic resin containing the graft copolymer (V) and other polymer as described above, by using the vinyl monomer having a carboxyl group or an epoxy group and other vinyl monomer as the graft monomers to the graft copolymer (V), the thermoplastic resin shows an excellent compatibility with other polymer used.
In particular, when the thermoplastic resin composition is formed using a polymer having a polarity, such as polyamide and polyester, as the polymer, the thermoplastic resin and the polymer are excellent in compatibility with each other and the composition having excellent physical properties can be obtained.
Examples of the carboxyl group-containing unsaturated vinyl monomer are acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, crotonic acid, cinnamic acid, itaconic acid, maleic acid, and acid anhydrides such as maleic anhydride, etc. Of those, acrylic acid and methacrylic acid are preferred.
Examples of the epoxy group-containing vinyl monomer are glycidyl methacrylate, glycidyl acrylate, vinyl glycidyl ether, allyl glycidyl ether, a glycidyl ether of hydroxyalkyl (meth)acrylate, a glycidyl ether of polyalkyleneglycol (meth)acrylate, and glycidyl itaconate.
Examples of the other vinyl monomer which is used together with the carboxyl group- or epoxy group-containing vinyl monomer as the graft monomers to the graft copolymer (V) are aromatic alkenyl compounds such as styrene, o-methylstyrene, vinylxylene, monochlorostyrene, dichlorostyrene, monobromostyrene, dibromostyrene, p-butylstyrene, ethylstyrene, vinylnaphthalene, o-methylstyrene, p-methylstyrene, dimethylstyrene, sodium styrenesulfonate, etc.; methacrylic acid esters such as methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate, butyl methacrylate, allyl methacrylate, hydroxyethyl methacrylate, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, etc.; acrylic acid esters such as methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, etc.; vinyl cyanide compounds such as acrylonitrile, methacrylonitrile, etc.; olefins such as ethylene, propylene, etc.; conjugated diolefins such as butadiene, isoprene, chloro prene, etc.; vinyl acetate, vinyl chloride, vinylidene chloride, triallyl isocyanurate, and maleimides such as N phenylmaleimide, N-methylmaleimide, N-ethylmaleimide, N-o-chlorophenylmaleimide, N-cyclohexylmaleimide, etc. They may be used alone or as a mixture thereof.
In the case of graft polymerizing the carboxyl group-containing or epoxy group-containing vinyl monomer and other vinyl monomer to the polyorganosiloxane series polymer, the proportion of the polyorganosiloxane series polymer is from 5 to 90% by weight, preferably from 10 to 70% by weight, and more preferably from 20 to 60% by weight, and the sum of the proportions of the vinyl monomers is from 95 to 10% by weight, preferably from 90 to 30% by weight, and more preferably from 80 to 40% by weight.
If the proportion of the polyorganosiloxane series polymer is less than 5% by weight, a sufficient impact strength is not obtained, while if the proportion thereof is more than 90% by weight, a preferred powder of the graft copolymer is not obtained and the powder is not dispersed at blending the copolymer.
In addition, the content of the polyorganosiloxane in the whole composition is preferably from 5 to 30% by weight. If the content is less than 5% by weight, a sufficient impact strength is not obtained, while if the content is more than 30% by weight, the heat resistance is sometimes reduced.
The content of the carboxyl group-containing vinyl monomer and/or the epoxy group-containing vinyl monomer in the graft copolymer is preferably from 0.05 to 30% by weight, and more preferably from 0.1 to 20% by weight. If the content is less than 0.05% by weight, the compatibility increasing effect for the graft copolymer with a resin such as polyphenylene sulfide, etc., is decreased, while if the content is more than 30% by weight, the degree of gelation is increased and the extrusion moldability of the thermoplastic resin (composition) obtained becomes sometimes difficult. Other vinyl monomer described above is not an essential component in this invention, but from the relationship between the amount of the organosiloxane series copolymer in the graft polymer and the amount of the carboxyl group-containing or epoxy-containing vinyl monomer, it is preferred to use other vinyl monomer in the amount of giving the above-described proportion of the carboxyl group-containing or epoxy group-containing vinyl monomer in the graft polymer.
In particular, the weight ratio of the carboxyl group-containing vinyl monomer/other vinyl monomer is preferably from 0.5/99.5 to 95/5 and more preferably from 1/99 to 90/10.
Furthermore, the content of the carboxyl group-containing vinyl monomer and/or the epoxy group-containing vinyl monomer in the whole component is preferably from 0.01 to 5% by weight, more preferably from 0.02 to 4% by weight, and particularly preferably from 0.1 to 3% by weight. If the content thereof is less than 0.01% by weight, the compatibility increasing effect for the graft copolymer with, for example, a polyphenylene sulfide series resin is reduced, while if the content is more than 5% by weight, the degree of gelation is increased and extrusion molding becomes sometimes unapplicable.
Furthermore, the graft ratio of the vinyl monomer to the polyorganosiloxane series copolymer in the graft copolymer is preferably 10% by weight or more. If the graft ratio is less than 10% by weight, the appearance of the molded product is sometimes undesirably reduced.
The proportion of the graft copolymer (A) in the thermoplastic resin composition of this invention is from 5 to 90% by weight, preferably from 10 to 80% by weight, and more preferably from 15 to 70% by weight. If the proportion thereof is less than 5% by weight, the impact resistance of the thermoplastic resin composition obtained is reduced, while if the proportion is more than 90% by weight, the heat resistance and the chemical resistance of the composition are reduced.
When the graft copolymer obtained by graft polymerizing carboxyl group- or epoxy group-containing vinyl monomer to the polyorganosiloxane series polymer is used, the preferred thermoplastic resin compositions containing the graft copolymer and other polymer are as follows.
A thermoplastic resin composition comprising
(A) from 5 to 90% by weight, and preferably from 10 to 80% by weight, of the graft copolymer obtained by graft copolymerizing from 95 to 10% by weight of sum of the epoxy group-containing vinyl monomer and the other vinyl monomer to from 5 to 90% by weight of the modified polyorganosiloxane (III) and
(B) from 10 to 95% by weight, and preferably from 20 to 90% by weight, of at least one kind of a thermoplastic resin selected from a polyphenylene sulfide series resin, a polyamide series resin, a polyester series resin, a polycarbonate series resin, a vinyl chloride series resin, an olefinic resin, a polyacetal series resin, a polyarylate series resin, and a polyphenylene ether series resin;
A thermoplastic resin composition comprising
(A) from 5 to 90% by weight, and preferably from 10 to 80% by weight, of the graft polymer obtained by graft polymerizing from 95 to 10% by weight of sum of the carboxyl group-containing vinyl monomer and the other vinylic monomer to from 5 to 90% by weight of the modified polyorganosiloxane (III),
(B) from 0 to 80% by weight, and preferably from 5 to 60% by weight, of the graft copolymer obtained by graft polymerizing from 95 to 10% by weight of the vinyl monomer excluding the carboxyl group-containing vinyl monomer to from 5 to 90% by weight of the polyorganosiloxane series polymer,
(C) from 0 to 80% by weight, and preferably from 3 to 70% by weight, of a styrene series resin, and
(D) from 10 to 90% by weight, and preferably from 20 to 80% by weight, of at least one kind of a thermoplastic resin selected from a polyamide series resin, a polyester series resin, a polycarbonate series resin, a vinyl chloride series resin, an olefin series resin, a polyacetal series resin, a polyphenylene sulfide series resin, a polyarylate series resin, and a polyphenylene ether series resin.
The styrene series resin (C) may be a composition composed of a resin obtained by polymerizing a monomer as a resin component in the presence of a rubbery polymer and a resin obtained by polymerizing a monomer as a resin component in the absence of the rubbery polymer.
Specific examples of the styrene series resin (C) are an acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber-styrene resin (ABS resin), an acrylonitrile-ethylenepropylene series rubber-styrene resin (AES resin), an acrylonitrilebutadiene-methyl methacrylate styrene resin (ABSM resin), an acrylonitrile-styrene copolymer (AS resin), a methyl methacrylate-styrene copolymer (MS resin), high impact polystyrene (HIPS), an acrylonitrile-n-butyl acrylate rubber-styrene resin (AAS resin), etc.
For obtaining the thermoplastic resin composition of this invention described above, the above-described components (A), (B), etc., are mixed by, for example, a mixer and the mixture is melt-kneaded by an extruder at a temperature of from 200.degree. C. to 320.degree. C. and is formed into pellets. Furthermore, in a simple procedure, the above-described components can be directly melt-kneaded in a mold and molded into pellets.
The thermoplastic resin composition of this invention may, if necessary, contain an antioxidant such as 2,6-di-t-butyl-4-methylphenol, 2-(1-methylcyclohexyl)-4,6-dimethylphenol, 2,2-methylenebis-(4-ethyl-6-t-butylphenol), tris(di-nonylphenyl) phosphite, etc.; an ultraviolet absorber such as p-t-butylphenyl salicylate, 2,2'-dihydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone, 2-(2'-hydroxy-4-m-octoxyphenyl)benzotriazole, etc.; a lubricant such as paraffin wax, stearic acid, hardened oil, stearoamide, methylenebis-stearoamide, n-butyl stearate, ketone wax, octyl alcohol, hydroxystearic acid triglyceride, etc.; a flame retarder such as antimony oxide, chloroplatinic acid, aluminum hydroxide, zinc borate, tricresyl phosphate, tris(dichloropropyl) phosphate, chlorinated paraffin, tetrabromobutane, hexabromobenzene, tetrabrombisphenol A, etc.; an antistatic agent such as stearoamide propyldimethyl-.beta.-hydroxyethyl ammonium nitrate, etc.; a coloring inhibitor such as titanium oxide, carbon black, etc.; a filler such as calcium carbonate, clay, silica, glass fibers, glass balls, carbon fibers, etc.; a pigment, etc.
The pellets of the thermoplastic resin composition thus formed are molded by a conventional means such as compression molding, injection molding, etc.
As described above, the thermoplastic resin of this invention contains the graft copolymer formed by graft polymerizing a vinyl monomer to the modified polyorganosiloxane having bonded thereto a specific graft crosslinking agent, so that the graft polymerization of the vinyl monomer tends to occur as compared with the case of using a conventional polyorganosiloxane and the graft copolymer contained therein is formed with very high graft ratio and graft efficiency. Therefore, the thermoplastic resin of this invention containing the graft copolymer or the thermoplastic resin composition of this invention composed of the thermoplastic resin and other polymer resin is excellent in the balance of physical properties.
In particular, the thermoplastic resin or the thermoplastic resin composition has excellent cold resistance, weather resistance, slidability, abrasion resistance, impact resistance, moldability, weld strength and flame retardant. Of those properties, the slidability and abrasion resistance of the thermoplastic resin or the resin composition are higher than those of polyacetal and polyamide which are known as a sliding materials. Further, other properties of the resin or resin composition are equal or superior to those of an ABS resin which is known to have balanced properties.
Since the thermoplastic resin or the thermoplastic resin composition of this invention has the excellent properties as described above, the resin or the resin composition can be applied to new fields such as sliding parts, parts for cold district, outdoor parts, etc., and the industrial significance thereof is very large.

This invention is described more practically by the following examples. In addition, all percents, parts, ratios and the like are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
Various measurement items in the examples were obtained by the following manners.
That is, the graft ratio and the graft efficiency were determined by the following method.
A definite amount (x) of the graft polymerization product was added to acetone, followed by shaking by a shaker for 2 hours to dissolve the free copolymer, and the mixture was subjected to a centrifugal separation using a centrifugal separator at a rotation rate of 23,000 r.p.m. for 30 minutes to obtain insoluble matters. The insoluble product was dried for 1 hour at 120.degree. C. using a vacuum dryer to provide an amount (y) of the insoluble product, and the graft ratio and the graft efficiency were calculated by the following equations. ##EQU1##
Evaluations of the properties of the thermoplastic resin (composition) was made according to the following evaluation method (a) or (b).
______________________________________Evaluation Method (a)Property Unit Test Method Test Condition______________________________________Tensile Strength kgf/cm.sup.2 ASTM-D638 Tensile rate 50 mm/min.Bending Strength kgf/cm.sup.2 ASTM-D790 Bending rate 15 mm/min.Bending Elasti- kgf/cm.sup.2 ASTM-D790 Bending ratecity 15 mm/min.Break Elongation % ASTM-D638 Tensile rate 50 mm/min.Izod Impact kgf .multidot. ASTM-D256 1/4", 23.degree. C.Strength (notched) cm/cm 1/4", -30.degree. C.Heat Distortion .degree.C. ASTM-D648 Load 18.6 kgf/Temperature cm.sup.2 no annealSpecific Gravity -- ASTM-D792 23.degree. C./23.degree. C.Combustibility -- UL 94 --Gloss % ASTM-D523 45.degree.Melt Flow Rate g/10 min. JIS-K7210 220.degree. C. 10 kgRockwell Hardness R Scale ASTM-D785 --______________________________________
Evaluation Method (b)
Falling Weight Impact Strength
An impact rod having a top curvature R of 1/2 was let fall from a height of 50 cm using an impact tester made by Du Pont and the falling weight impact strength of each molded product having a thickness of 3.2 mm was measured. The unit was kgf.multidot.cm.
Sliding Character
A friction rubbing test was made using a Suzuki type slide tester, and as a material to be rubbed with the product, the same material as the product of steel (S45C) was used. A test piece was a hollow cylindrical piece having an outer diameter of 25.6 mm and an inner diameter of 20.0 mm, and the form of the material to be rubbed with the test piece was the same as the test piece.
The kinetic friction coefficient was measured in an atmosphere at 23.degree. C. and 50% RH under a load of 5 kg and a running speed of 3.75 cm/sec.
The kinetic friction coefficient was calculated by the following equation. ##EQU2##
In the above equation, .mu. represents a kinetic friction coefficient, F represents a force given to the load cell, P represents a load, R represents an arm length upto the load cell, r.sub.1 represents an inner diameter, and r.sub.2 represents an outer diameter.
The friction coefficient was measured in an atmosphere of 23.degree. C. and 50% RH; at a load of 5 kg, a running speed of 3.75 cm/sec., and 12,600 rounds (running distance 0.24 km) in the case of using the same material as the sample as the material to be rubbed with the sample, and at a load of 10 kg, a running speed of 15 cm/sec., and 80,000 rounds (running distance 6 km) in the case of using steel as the material to be rubbed with the sample.
The friction coefficient was calculated by the following equation: ##EQU3## wherein A represents a friction coefficient, .DELTA.W is a weight change of a sample, P is a load, .lambda. is a running distance, and .alpha. is the density of a sample.
Weather Resistance Test Method
After exposing each sample for 200 hours using a sun shine weather meter (Type WE-USN-HC, made by Toyo Rika K.K.) (exposure conditions: 63.degree. C., sometimes rain), Izod impact strength was measured.
EXAMPLE 1
After mixing 1.5 parts of p-vinylphenylmethyldimethoxysilane and 98.5 parts of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, the mixture was added to 300 parts of distilled water having dissolved therein 2.0 parts of dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid and dispersed by emulsification by stirring for 3 minutes using a homomixer.
The mixture was placed in a separable flask equipped with a condenser, a nitrogen gas inlet and a stirrer, and heated to 90.degree. C. for 6 hours with stirring, followed by cooling for 24 hours at 5.degree. C. to complete the condensation.
The degree of condensation of the octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane in the modified polyorganosiloxane (III) obtained was 92.8%.
The modified polyorganosiloxane latex was neutralized to pH 7 with an aqueous sodium carbonate solution.
35 Parts of the modified polyorganosiloxane latex as a solids content was mixed with 0.5 part of sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate and 140 parts of distilled water, the mixture was placed in a separable flask equipped with a dropping bottle, a condenser, a nitrogen gas inlet and a stirrer. After adding thereto 15.81 parts of styrene corresponding to 34% of the whole styrene amount, 6.29 parts of acrylonitrile corresponding to 34% of the whole acrylonitrile amount, 0.2 part of sodium pyrophosphate, 0.25 part of grape sugar, 0.004 part of ferrous sulfate and 0.074 part of cumene hydroperoxide, the temperature of the resultant mixture was raised to 70.degree. C. while flowing a nitrogen gas. After conducting the polymerization for 1 hour, a mixed liquid composed of 30.69 parts of remaining styrene, 12.21 parts of remaining acrylonitrile, 1.084 parts of sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, 42 parts of distilled water, 0.12 part of cumene hydroperoxide, and 0.06 part of t-dodecylmercaptan was added thereto using the dropping bottle over a period of 3 hours. The polymerization reaction was then further conducted for 1 hour and the reaction product was cooled.
The graft copolymer latex thus obtained was poured into warm water having dissolved therein 2 parts of calcium chloride dihydrate to conduct salting out coagulation and a thermoplastic resin containing the graft copolymer was separated. The thermoplastic resin was washed well with water and then dried for 16 hours at 80.degree. C. to finish the purification.
57% of the resulting thermoplastic resin powder was mixed with 43% of a copolymer (AS resin) obtained by emulsion polymerizing styrene and acrylonitrile at a monomer compounding ratio of 75:25 to provide a thermoplastic resin composition. The thermoplastic resin composition was extrusion molded using a twin screw extruder at a cylinder temperature of 230.degree. C. to provide pellets.
The thermoplastic resin composition obtained had excellent cold resistance, weather resistance, sliding property, impact resistance, and appearance. The evaluation results thereof are shown in Table 1 below.
EXAMPLES 2 and 3 and COMPARISON EXAMPLES 1 and 2
By following the same procedure as in Example 1 except that the compounding ratio of the polyorganosiloxane (I) and the graft crosslinking agent (II) was changed as shown in Table 1 below, the modified polyorganosiloxane latex and the thermoplastic resin containing the graft copolymer were prepared. Using the thermoplastic resin, a thermoplastic resin composition was prepared by the same manner as in Example 1.
The evaluation results on these samples are also shown in Table 1.
In Comparison Example 1, the amount of the graft crosslinking agent was 0.1%. Therefore, the graft ratio was reduced and a sufficient impact strength was not obtained. In Comparison Example 2, the amount of the graft crosslinking agent was 15%. Therefore, the molecular weight of the vinyl monomer grafted to the modified polyorganosiloxane and the vinyl monomer not grafted was reduced and a sufficient impact strength was not obtained.
COMPARISON EXAMPLES 3 to 5
By following the same procedure as in Example 1 except that 1.5 parts of vinylmethyldimethoxysilane, .gamma.-mercaptopropylmethyldimethoxysilane or .gamma.-methacryloxypropylmethyldimethoxysilane was used in place of p-vinylphenylmethyldimethoxysilane at the preparation of the modified polyorganosiloxane (III), a modified polyorganosiloxane latex, a thermoplastic resin containing a graft copolymer (V) and a thermoplastic resin composition were prepared.
Results of the evaluation on these thermoplastic resins in the same manner as in Example 1 are shown in Table 1 below.
In Comparison Examples 3 and 4, a high graft ratio was not obtained and a sufficient impact strength was not obtained.
In Comparison Example 5, almost the same impact strength as the product in Example 1 was obtained, but the appearance was poor and sufficient gloss was not obtained.
EXAMPLES 4 to 6
By following the same procedure as Example 1 except that the vinyl monomer (IV) grafted to the modified polyorganosiloxane (III) was changed as shown in Table 1 below and the resin blended with a thermoplastic resin obtained was changed as shown in Table 1, each thermoplastic resin composition was prepared. The evaluation results of these resin compositions are shown in Table 1.
As is clear from the results shown in Table 1, the graft copolymers (V) had a high graft ratio and thermoplastic resin compositions having a high impact strength and good appearance were obtained.
EXAMPLES 7 and 8
By following the same procedure as Example 1 except that the graft crosslinking agent was changed as shown in Table 1, each thermoplastic resin and thermoplastic resin composition were prepared and evaluated. The results are shown in Table 1.
As is clear from Table 1, the graft copolymers (V) had a high graft ratio and thermoplastic resin compositions having a high impact strength and a good appearance were obtained.
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________ Example Example Example Example Example Example Example Example 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8__________________________________________________________________________Blending Composition (part) at Preparationof Component (III)Component (I)Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane 98.5 99.25 97.0 98.5 98.5 98.5 98.5 98.5Component (II)p-Vinylphenylmethyldimethoxysilane 1.5 0.75 3.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 -- --2-(p-vinylphenyl)ethylmethyldimethoxysilane -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.5 --3-(p-Vinlybenzoyloxy)propylmethyldimethoxy- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.5silaneVinylmethyldimethoxysilane -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --.gamma.-Mercaptopropylmethyldimethoxysilane -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --.gamma.-Methacryloxypropylmethyldimethoxysilane -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Blending Composition (part) at Preparationof Component (IV)Component (III) Latex (solid conversion) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35Styrene 46.5 46.5 46.5 65 -- 45.5 46.5 46.5Acrylonitrile 18.5 18.5 18.5 -- -- -- 18.5 18.5Methyl Methacylate -- -- -- -- 65 19.5 -- --Composition (%) of Thermoplastic ResinCompositionThermoplastic Resin of the Invention 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57AS Resin [ST/AN = 75/25(%)] 43 43 43 -- -- -- 43 43Polystyrene Resin -- -- -- 43 -- -- -- --Polymethylmethacrylate Resin -- -- -- -- 43 -- -- --Styrene/MMA Copolymer Resin -- -- -- -- -- 43 -- --[ST/MMA = 70/30(%)]EvaluationGraft ratio (%) of Component (V) 101 96 117 112 137 125 100 99Graft Efficiency (%) of Component (V) 54 51 63 60 74 67 54 53Property of Thermoplastic Resin Composition:Izod Impact Strength (23.degree. C., kgf .multidot. cm/cm) 32.3 23.0 31.5 23.1 20.1 21.1 32.2 32.1Gloss (%) 85 81 83 77 78 77 81 82__________________________________________________________________________ Comparison Comparison Comparison Comparison Comparison Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example__________________________________________________________________________ 5Blending Composition (part) at Preparationof Component (III)Component (I)Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane 99.9 85 98.5 98.5 98.5Component (II)p-Vinylphenylmethyldimethoxysilane 0.1 15 -- -- --2-(p-vinylphenyl)ethylmethyldimethoxysilane -- -- -- -- --3-(p-Vinlybenzoyloxy)propylmethyldimethoxy- -- -- -- -- --silaneVinylmethyldimethoxysilane -- -- 1.5 -- --.gamma.-Mercaptopropylmethyldimethoxysilane -- -- -- 1.5 --.gamma.-Methacryloxypropylmethyldimethoxysilane -- -- -- -- 1.5Blending Composition (part) at Preparationof Component (IV)Component (III) Latex (solid conversion) 35 35 35 35 35Styrene 46.5 46.5 46.5 46.5 46.5Acrylonitrile 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5Methyl Methacylate -- -- -- -- --Composition (%) of Thermoplastic ResinCompositionThermoplastic Resin of the Invention 57 57 57 57 57AS Resin [ST/AN = 75/25(%)] 43 43 43 43 43Polystyrene Resin -- -- -- -- --Polymethylmethacrylate Resin -- -- -- -- --Styrene/MMA Copolymer Resin -- -- -- -- --[ST/MMA = 70/30(%)] EvaluationGraft ratio (%) of Component (V) 15 130 25 17 100Graft Efficiency (%) of Component (V) 8 70 13 9 53Property of Thermoplastic Resin Composition:Izod Impact Strength (23.degree. C., kgf .multidot. cm/cm) 3.0 5.0 4.0 5.7 25.0Gloss (%) 31.0 79.0 43 48 84__________________________________________________________________________
For examining the differences between the product in Example 1 and the product in Comparison Example 5, the following comparison tests were prepared.
(1) The change of the graft ratio in the case of molding each product under the temperature condition shown in Table 2 is shown in Table 2 below.
In Example 1, the graft ratio at the end of the polymerization is almost the same as the graft ratio after molding at 280.degree. C., which shows the graft point is thermally stable.
On the other hand, in Comparison Example 5, the graft ratio at the end of the polymerization is reduced when the product is molded at 230.degree. C., which shows that the graft point is thermally unstable.
TABLE 2______________________________________ End of Polymeri- zation 230.degree. C. 260.degree. C. 280.degree. C. 300.degree. C.______________________________________Graft Ratio 101 100 100 99 92in Example 1Graft Ratio 100 96 85 76 66in ComparisonExample 5______________________________________
In Table 2, the temperature is molding temperature.
(2) The falling weight impact strength in the case of molding each product under the temperature condition shown in Table 3 is shown in Table 3 below.
It is considered that the reduction of the graft ratio clarified in above Test (1) gives an influence on the falling weight impact strength.
In Example 1, the reduction of the strength is small in molding at 280.degree. C., while in Comparison Example 5, the strength is greatly reduced in molding at 280.degree. C. or higher as compared with molding at 260.degree. C.
TABLE 3______________________________________ 260.degree. C. 280.degree. C. 300.degree. C. Molding Molding Molding______________________________________Falling Weight Impact 330 320 250Strength in Example 1Falling Weight Impact 325 260 100Strength in ComparisonExample 5______________________________________
(3) For observing the retention heat stability in a molding machine, the reduction of gloss from the 1st shot to the 5th shot and the recovering property thereof in continuous molding in the case of conducting injection molding by repeating at a cycle of 60 seconds and in the case of once stopping the molding machine and after retaining the product therein for 15 minutes, conducting injection molding at a cycle of 60 seconds were examined.
The evaluation is made at a molding temperature of 260.degree. C. and 280.degree. C.
The results are showing in Table 4 below.
In Example 1, the change of gloss is small and the recovering property thereof is good. On the other hand, in Comparison Example 5, the change of gloss is observed at a molding temperature of 260.degree. C. and when molding is conducted at 280.degree. C, the gloss is extremely reduced.
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________ Molding Gloss (%) temperature Continuous (.degree.C.) molding 1st shot* 2nd shot 3rd shot 4th shot 5th shot__________________________________________________________________________Example 1 260 84.0 83.5 83.0 81.0 82.5 84.0 280 83.5 81.0 80.5 76.5 79.5 81.5Comparison 260 84.0 80.0 80.0 75.0 77.0 81.0Example 5 280 82.0 66.5 63.0 55.0 66.0 76.0__________________________________________________________________________ *After retention of 5 minutes
EXAMPLE 9 and COMPARISON EXAMPLE 6
In Example 9, a thermoplastic resin composition composed of 51% of the thermoplastic resin obtained in Example 1 and 49% of the AS resin as used in Example 1 was molded by the same method as in Example 1.
The content of the modified polyorganosiloxane (III) in the thermoplastic resin composition of Example 9 was 17.85%.
On the other hand, the resin in Comparison Example 6 was an ABS resin (JSR ABS12, trade name, made by Japan Synthetic Rubber Co., Ltd.) and the content of butadiene rubber in the resin was 17.8%.
On these resins, the properties were compared according to the evaluation methods (a) and (b). The results obtained are shown in Table 5 below.
It can be seen that the thermoplastic resin of this invention has particularly excellent cold resistance, weather resistance and sliding property as compared with the commercially available ABS resin, and also other properties of the thermoplastic resin of this invention are same as or higher than those of the ABS resin.
Furthermore, 100 parts of each of the resins in Example 9 and Comparison Example 6 was blended with 10 parts of tetrabromobisphenol A, 3 parts of antimony trioxide and 0.0001 part of chloroplatinic acid, and a flame retardant test was made on each blend according to UL-94.
The results are shown in Table 5 below.
It can be seen that the thermoplastic resin of this invention shows an excellent flame retardance by the addition of a small amount of flame retarder, which gives the merits of inhibiting the reduction of general properties, reducing the toxicity, and also reducing the volume cost, and hence an excellent flame retardant resin is obtained.
TABLE 5______________________________________ Comparison Example 9 Example 6______________________________________Izod Impact Strength (23.degree. C.) 32.3 37.2Falling Weight Impact Strength 338 430Heat Distortion Temperature 95 91Rockwell Hardness 102.1 106.0Melt Flow Rate 4.2 13.5Tensile Strength 430 490Break Elongation 34 36Bending Strength 720 790Bending Elasticity 24,500 26,700Gloss 81 78Izod Impact Strength (-30.degree. C.) 14.1 11.5Izod Impact Strength After Weather 28.8 25.1Resistance TestKinetic Friction Coefficient 0.09 0.29with the Same Material as theTest SampleKinetic Friction Coefficient 0.09 0.46with SteelWear Coefficient with the Same 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 498 .times. 10.sup.-3Material as the Test SampleWear Coefficient with Steel 19 .times. 10.sup.-3 621 .times. 10.sup.-3Combustibility HB passed HB passedSpecific Gravity 1.055 1.021Flame RetardabilityHB Test passed passedV-2 Test passed FailedV-1 Test passed FailedV-0 Test passed Failed______________________________________
EXAMPLES 10 and 11
In these examples, the thermoplastic resins were molded without blending with other resin, and evaluated. The polymerization condition, the molding condition and the evaluation condition were same as those in Example 1. The results are shown in Table 6.
TABLE 6______________________________________ Example Example 10 11______________________________________Blending Composition (part)at Preparation of Component(III)Octamethylcyclotetra- 98.5 98.5siloxanep-Vinylphenylmethyl- 1.5 1.5dimethoxysilaneBlending Composition (part)at Preparation of Component(IV)Latex of Component (III) 20 20(solids content)Styrene 60 --Acrylonitrile 20 --Methyl Methacrylate -- 100EvaluationGraft ratio (%) of 140 120Component (IV)Graft Efficiency (%) of 35 30Component (IV)Property of ThermoplasticResin:Izod Impact Strength 28.0 19.6(23.degree. C., kgf .multidot. cm/cm)Gloss 80 82______________________________________
EXAMPLE 12
After mixing 20 parts (solids content) of the modified polyorganosiloxane latex obtained in Example 1, 0.5 part of sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate and 140 parts of distilled water, the mixture was placed in a separable flask equipped with a condenser, a nitrogen gas inlet and a stirrer. After adding thereto 34 parts of styrene, 46 parts of N-phenylmaleimide, 0.1 part of sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate, 0.003 part of ferrous sulfate and 0.1 part of diisopropyl benzene hydroperoxide, the temperature of the resultant mixture was raised to 70.degree. C. while flowing a nitrogen gas, followed by conducting polymerization for 1 hour. Thereafter, the reaction mixture was cooled.
2 Parts of the graft copolymer latex thus obtained was added to pressurized warm water at 130.degree. C. having dissolved therein calcium chloride dihydrate to conduct salting out and coagulation, and a thermoplastic resin containing the graft copolymer was separated.
The thermoplastic resin was washed well with water and then dried at 80.degree. C. for 16 hours for the purification, and the product was molded into pellets by an extruder having a cylinder temperature of 280.degree. C.
The graft ratio of the thermoplastic resin obtained was 120%, and the thermoplastic resin had a heat distortion temperature of 160.degree. C., an Izod impact strength of 8 kgf.multidot.cm/cm and a melt flow rate at 280.degree. C. of 10 g/10 min.
EXAMPLE 13
After mixing 1.5 parts of p-vinylphenyldimethoxysilane and 98.5 parts of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, the mixture was added to 300 parts of distilled water having dissolved therein 2.0 parts of dodecylbenzene sulfonate. After roughly emulsifying the mixture by stirring for 5 minutes using a homomixer, 3.0 parts of a 50% methanol solution of 4-(3-triethoxysilylpropoxy)-2-hydroxybenzophenone was added hereto, followed by stirring for 5 minutes. The mixture was then dispersed by emulsification using a press homogenizer.
The mixture was placed in a separable flask equipped with a condenser, a nitrogen gas inlet and a stirrer, heated to 85.degree. C. for 5 hours with stirring, and then allowed to stand for 12 hours at room temperature to complete the polycondensation.
The product was neutralized to pH 7 with a 10% aqueous solution of sodium carbonate. The degree of condensation of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane in the modified polyorganosiloxane was 92.3%, the average degree of polymerization of the product was 5,200 as a silicon atom number, the content of the p-vinylphenyl group in the organic groups in the polymer was 0.27%, and the content of the UV absorbing group was 0.13%.
Using the modified polyorganosiloxane latex thus obtained, styrene and acrylonitrile were graft polymerized thereto by the same manner as in Example 1.
A thermoplastic resin composition was prepared by blending the polysiloxane-modified thermoplastic resin obtained by the above method with other organic polymer.
That is, the resin composition was prepared by mixing 57% of the powder of the polyorganosiloxane-modified thermoplastic resin obtained and 43% of a copolymer (AS resin) obtained by emulsion polymerizing stryene and acrylonitrile in a monomer blending ratio of 75:25 by weight ratio. The combination of the above components is shown in Table 7 below.
The thermoplastic resin composition was extruded into pellets using a twin screw extruder at a cylinder temperature of 230.degree. C.
On the thermoplastic resin composition thus obtained, the impact resistance, sliding property, weather resistance and gloss were measured.
In addition, the weather resistance test was conducted as follows. That is, after exposing the sample for 1500 hours (83.degree. C., no rain) using a sun shine weather meter (Type WE-USN-HC, made by Toyo Rika K.K.), the discolored degree Lab (L: brightness, a: redness, b: yellowness) was measured by a colorimeter of Type AU-SCH-2, made by Suga Shikenki K.K., and the tone changed value E was calculated by the following equation. ##EQU4## wherein L.sub.1, a.sub.1 and b.sub.1 are tone before the weather resistance test, and L.sub.2, a.sub.2 and b.sub.2 are tone after the weather resistance test.
In the above equation, the lower value of E shows that the change of color is small, that is, the resin composition has excellent weather resistance.
EXAMPLE 14
By following the same procedure as in Example 13 except that 1.5 parts of .gamma.-methacryloxypropylmethyldimethoxysilane was used in place of p-vinylphenylmethyldimethoxysilane and 3.0 parts of a 50% methanol solution of 4-(3-methyldiethoxysilylpropoxy)-2-hydroxybenzophenone was used in place of the 50% methanol solution of 4-(3-triethoxysilylpropoxy)-2-hydroxybenzophenone, a polyorganosiloxane-modified thermoplastic resin was prepared.
The average degree of polymerization of polyorganosiloxane was 3,900 as a silicon atom number, the content of the reactive unsaturated group in the organic groups of the polymer was 0.24%, and the content of the UV absorbing group was 0.15%.
Furthermore, a thermoplastic resin composition was prepared by blending the polyorganosiloxane-modified thermoplastic resin and the AS resin under the same condition as in Example 13. The combination of the above components is shown in Table 7 below.
On the thermoplastic resin composition thus obtained, the impact resistance, sliding property, weather resistance and gloss were measured in the same manner as in Example 13.
The results are shown in Table 7 below.
EXAMPLE 15
By following the same procedure as in Example 13 except that 1.0part of methylvinyldimethoxysilane was used in place of p-vinylphenylmethyldimethoxysilane and 2.0 parts of laurylsulfuric acid was used in place of dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid, a polyorganosiloxane-modified thermoplastic resin was prepared.
The average degree of polymerization of the polyorganosiloxane was 5,400 as a silicon atom number, the content of the reactive unsaturated group in the organic groups in the polymer was 0.28%, and the content of the UV absorbing group was 0.14%.
Furthermore, a thermoplastic resin composition was prepared by blending the polyorganosiloxane-modified thermoplastic resin and the AS resin under the same condition as in Example 13.
On the thermoplastic resin composition obtained, the impact resistance, sliding property, weather resistance and gloss were measured. The results are shown in Table 7 below.
EXAMPLES 16 to 18 and REFERENCE EXAMPLE 1
The same procedure as Example 13 was followed using the components shown in Table 7 below. The evaluation results of these products are shown in Table 7.
It can be seen from the results shown in Table 7 that the thermoplastic resin composition containing the graft copolymer having the UV absorbing group has excellent weather resistance.
TABLE 7__________________________________________________________________________ Reference Example Example Example Example Example Example Example 13 14 15 16 17 18 1__________________________________________________________________________Polyorganosiloxane-ModifiedThermoplastic Resin:Component (A) (part)(a) Octamethylcyclotetrsiloxane 98.5 98.5 98.5 98.5 98.5 98.5 98.5(b) p-Vinylphenylmethyldimethoxysilane 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5.gamma.-Methacryloxypropylmethyldimethoxysilane 1.5Methylvinyldimethoxysilane 1.5(c) 50% Methanol Solution of 4-(3-triethoxy- 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0silylpropoxy)-2-hydroxybenzophenone50% Methanol Solution of 4-(3-methlydiethoxy- 3.0silylpropoxy)-2-hydroxybenzophenoneComponent (B) (part)Blending Composition for Graft CopolymerPolyorganosiloxane of Component (A) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35Styrene 46.5 46.5 46.5 65 45.5 46.5Acrylonitrile 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5Methyl Methacrylate 65 19.5Thermoplastic Resin Composition and EvaluationThereof:Composition (%)Blend Resin:Polyorganosiloxane-modified Thermoplastic 57 57 57 57 57 57 57ResinAS Resin 43 43 43 43Polystyrene Resin 43Polymethyl Methacrylate Resin 43Styrene/MMA Copolymer Resin 43Evaluation:Graft Ratio (%) of Graft Copolymer 101 99 53 100 97 100 102Graft Efficiency (%) of Graft Copolymer 54 53 29 54 52 54 55Izod Impact Strength (23.degree. C.) 32 31 20 19 16 23 32 (-30.degree. C.) 14 13 9 9 8 10 14Kinetic Friction Coefficient with the same 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09Material as the SampleRelative Worn Amount with the same Material 16 16 16 16 16 16 16(.times. 10.sup.-3)Izod Impact Strength After Weather 29 28 17 16 13 20 29Resistance Test (kgf .multidot. cm/cm)Appearance Change After Weather Resistance 3.1 3.2 3.1 4.5 2.6 1.5 10.8Test (.DELTA.E)Gloss (%) 85 84 72 82 83 85 85__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLES 19 to 34 and COMPARISON EXAMPLES 7 to 9
By following the same procedure as Example 13 using the components shown in Table 8 below, each of polyorganosiloxane series polymers R-1, R-2, and R-3 were prepared.
TABLE 8______________________________________ R-1 R-2 R-3______________________________________p-Vinylphenylmethyldi- 1.5 0.05 55methoxysilane (part)Octamethylcyclotetra- 98.5 99.95 45siloxane (part)Polymerization 98.0 97.5 98.5Conversion (%)______________________________________
By following the same procedure as in Example 13 according to the compositions shown in Table 9 below using the polyorganosiloxane series polymers prepared in the above step, graft copolymers G-1 to G-8 were prepared.
TABLE 9__________________________________________________________________________Polymer: G-1 G-2 G-3 G-4 G-5 G-6 G-7 G-8__________________________________________________________________________Batch Blending Composition (part)Polyorganosiloxane Series PolymerR-1 60 -- -- 60 60 60 60 60R-2 -- 60 -- -- -- -- -- --R-3 -- -- 60 -- -- -- -- --Styrene 15 15 15 -- -- 10 15 15.alpha.-Methylstyrene -- -- -- 15 -- -- -- --Methyl Methacrylate -- -- -- -- 15 -- -- --Acrylonitrile -- -- -- -- -- 2 -- --Glycidyl Acrylate -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 --Glycidyl Methacrylate 2 2 2 2 2 2 -- --Blending Composition (part)Styrene 20 20 20 -- -- 20 20 20.alpha.-Methylstyrene -- -- -- 20 -- -- -- --Methyl Methacrylate -- -- -- -- 20 -- -- --Acrylonitrile -- -- -- -- -- 3 -- --Glycidyl Acrylate -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 --Glycidyl Methacrylate 3 3 3 3 3 3 -- --Polymerization Conversion (%) 97 96 98 97 96 97 97 98Polymer Composition (%)Polyorganosiloxane Series Polymer 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60Styrene 35 35 35 -- -- 30 35 40.alpha.-Methylstyrene -- -- -- 35 -- -- -- --Methyl Methacrylate -- -- -- -- 35 -- -- --Acrylonitrile -- -- -- -- -- 5 -- --Glycidyl Acrylate -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 --Glycidyl Methacrylate 5 5 5 5 5 5 -- --Graft ratio (%) 30 5 35 28 25 30 29 31__________________________________________________________________________
Each composition shown in Table 9 below was melt-kneaded by an extruder having an inner diameter of 40 mm at a temperature range of from 280.degree. to 320.degree. C. to provide pellets.
The pellets were molded using a 5 oz injection molding machine (1S-80A, made by Toshiba Corporation) at the temperature range of from 280.degree. to 320.degree. C. to provide each test piece, and the properties of each sample were evaluated. The results are shown in Table 9 below.
In addition, the heat distortion temperature was measured under conditions of a load of 18.6 kgf/cm.sup.2 and no anneal according to ASTM D648.
The chemical resistance was evaluated by applying a definite strain of 1% in strain ratio to each test piece (1/8".times.1/2".times.5"), coating a brake fluid composed of dioctyl phthalate (DOP) on the strained portion, and after allowing to stand the test piece at 23.degree. C. and measuring the time until the test piece was ruptured, the time was employed as the index of the chemical resistance.
In the above evaluation, o shows the case of causing neither crack nor rupture over 100 hours.
The weld strength retentivity was obtained as follows.
That is, the tensile strength (Tw) of the test piece was measured on the molded test piece using a mold appearing a weld line at the center of ASTM No. 1 Dumbbell, the tensile strength (To) of the test piece was measured on the test piece molded using a mold of not giving the weld line, and the weld strength retensitivity of Tw/To.times.100% was determined.
The molding property was evaluated by the presence or absence of the occurence of gellation or the rupture of moldings in the step of granulating the product by an extruding machine and obtaining the moldings by a molding machine.
The appearance of the moldings was evaluated by the presence or absence of the occurence of a flow mark silver on the surface of the moldings.
In addition, in the examples and the comparison examples, the following materials were used as the composition (A).
PPS (polyphenylene sulfide series resin): Toprene T-4, made by Toprene K.K.
Nylon 6: Amilan CM 1017, made by Toray Industries, Co., Ltd.
Nylon 4,6: Stanyl KS300, made by DSM Co.
PBT (polybutylene terephthalate): Duranex XD499 made by Polyplastic Co.
PC (polycarbonate): A-2200, made by Idemitsu Sekiyu-Kagaku K.K.)
PVC (polyvinyl chloride): Aron TS700, made by Toagosei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.)
MPP (maleic anhydride-modified polypropylene), MODIC P-10B, made by Mitsubishi Peterochemical Comapany, Ltd.
POM (polyoxymethylene): Duracon M90, made by Polyplastic K.K.
Polyarylate: U Polymer U-8000, made by Unitika Ltd.
PPE (polyphenylene ether) was prepared by the following method.
(1) Production of PPE-1 (polyphenylene ether)
Polymerization reaction of 2,6-xylenol was carried out in a toluene solution while blowing oxygen into the solution at 30.degree. C. using cupric bromide and di-n-butyleneamine as a catalyst and the polymerized product was purified to provide PPE-1.
[.eta.] of the polymer PPE-1 measured at 30.degree. C. using chloroform as solvent was 0.40 dl/g.
(2) Production of PPE-2 (maleic anhydride modified polyphenylene ether)
After dry-blending 100 parts by weight of the polymer PPE-1 with 2 parts of maleic anhydride and 1 part of 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butyleneperoxy)hexane at room temperature, the blend was melt kneaded using a same direction rotary system twin screw extruder equipped with vent at a cylinder temperature of 300.degree. C. and a screw rotation number of 150 r.p.m. to form pellets of the polymer, i.e., maleic anhydride-modified polypheneylene ether (PPE-2).
TABLE 10-A__________________________________________________________________________ Example Example Example Example Example Example 19 20 21 22 23 24__________________________________________________________________________Blending Composition (part) of Composition:Component (A)PPS 70 70 70 70 70 70Component (B)G-1 30 -- -- -- -- 30G-2 -- -- -- -- -- --G-3 -- -- -- -- -- --G-4 -- 30 -- -- -- --G-5 -- -- 30 -- -- --G-6 -- -- -- -- 30 --G-7 -- -- -- -- 30 --G-8 -- -- -- -- -- --Glass Fibers -- -- -- -- -- 30Amount (%) of Polyorganosiloxane in Composition 18 18 18 18 18 18Amount (%) of Epoxy Group-Having Vinyl 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5Monomer in CompositionEvaluation Result:Izod Impact Strength (23.degree. C.) (kgf .multidot. cm/cm) 10 9 10 14 10 6MFR (g/10 min., 300.degree. C.) 36 34 37 37 36 25Chemical Resistance:DOP .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle.Brake Fluid .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle.Gloss (%) 78 75 80 80 78 51Weld Strength Retentivity (%) 92 90 92 93 92 75Heat Distortion Temperature (.degree.C.) 99 103 100 99 99 250Kinetic Friction Coefficient (with same material) 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09Relative Worn Amount (with same material) 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3Izod Impact Strength After Weather Resistance 9 8 9 13 9 6Test (kgf .multidot. cm/cm)Moldability good good good good good goodAppearance of Moldings good good good good good good__________________________________________________________________________ Com- Com- Re- Re- Re- Com- parison parison ference ference ference parison Example Example Example Example Example Example 7 8 2 3 4 9__________________________________________________________________________Blending Composition (part) of Composition:Component (A)PPS 70 70 70 95 5 100Component (B)G-1 -- -- -- 5 95 --G-2 30 -- -- -- -- --G-3 -- 30 -- -- -- --G-4 -- 30 -- -- -- --G-5 -- -- -- -- -- --G-6 -- -- -- -- -- --G-7 -- -- -- -- -- --G-8 -- -- 30 -- -- --Glass Fibers -- -- -- -- -- --Amount (%) of Polyorganosiloxane in Composition 18 18 18 3 57 --Amount (%) of Epoxy Group-Having Vinyl 1.5 1.5 -- 0.25 4.75 --Monomer in CompositionEvaluation Result:Izod Impact Strength (23.degree. C.) (kgf .multidot. cm/cm) 3 3 1 2 3 2MFR (g/10 min., 300.degree. C.) 32 33 34 210 11 258Chemical Resistance:DOP .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. 10 hr. .largecircle.Brake Fluid .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. 8 hr. .largecircle.Gloss (%) 70 77 40 74 30 75Weld Strength Retentivity (%) 40 42 5 35 80 30Heat Distortion Temperature (.degree.C.) 98 99 95 105 70 110Kinetic Friction Coefficient (with same material) 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.20Relative Worn Amount (with same material) 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 200 .times. 10.sup.-3Izod Impact Strength After Weather Resistance 1 1 9 1 2 1Test (kgf .multidot. cm/cm)Moldability good good no good good no good goodAppearance of Moldings good good no good good no good good__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 10-B__________________________________________________________________________ Example Example Example Example Example 25 26 27 28 29__________________________________________________________________________Blending Composition (part)of Composition:Component (A)Nylon 6 70 -- -- -- --Nylon 4, 6 -- 70 -- -- --PBT -- -- 70 -- --PC -- -- -- 70 --PVC -- -- -- -- 70MPP -- -- -- -- --POM -- -- -- -- --Polyarylate -- -- -- -- --PPE1 -- -- -- -- --PPE2 -- -- -- -- --Component (B)G-1 30 30 30 30 30Amount (%) of Polyorganosiloxane 18 18 18 18 18in CompositionAmount (%) of Epoxy Group-Having 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5Vinyl Monomer in CompositionEvaluation Result:Izod Impact Strength (23.degree. C.) (kgf .multidot. cm/cm) 18 15 27 31 18MFR (g/10 min.) (Temp.) 36 (240) 55 (300) 43 (240) 25 (240) 12 (200)Chemical Resistance:DOP .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. 1.0 hr. 1.2 hr.Brake Fluid .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. 1.1 hr. 1.2 hr.Gloss (%) 87 86 85 88 75Weld Strength Retentivity (%) 88 89 92 89 81Heat Distortion Temperature (.degree.C.) 70 90 80 90 60Kinetic Friction Coefficient 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09(with same material)Relative Worn Amount 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 20 .times. 10.sup.-3(with same material)Izod Impact Strength After 17 14 26 30 17Weather ResistanceTest (kgf .multidot. cm/cm)Moldability good good good good goodAppearance of Moldings good good good good good__________________________________________________________________________ Example Example Example Example Example 30 31 32 33 34__________________________________________________________________________Blending Composition (part)of Composition:Component (A)Nylon 6 -- -- -- -- --Nylon 4, 6 -- -- -- -- --PBT -- -- -- -- --PC -- -- -- -- --PVC -- -- -- -- --MPP 70 -- -- -- --POM -- 70 -- -- --Polyarylate -- -- 70 -- --PPE1 -- -- -- 70 --PPE2 -- -- -- -- 70Component (B)G-1 30 30 30 30 30Amount (%) of Polyorganosiloxane 18 18 18 18 18in CompositionAmount (%) of Epoxy Group-Having 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5Vinyl Monomer in CompositionEvaluation Result:Izod Impact Strength (23.degree. C.) (kgf .multidot. cm/cm) 24 18 25 23 30MFR (g/10 min.) (Temp.) 33 (220) 36 (200) 30 (300) 34 (260) 32 (260)Chemical Resistance:DOP .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle.Brake Fluid .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle.Gloss (%) 85 76 75 78 83Weld Strength Retentivity (%) 85 82 81 82 85Heat Distortion Temperature (.degree.C.) 60 80 105 100 100Kinetic Friction Coefficient 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09(with same material)Relative Worn Amount 18 .times. 10.sup.-3 13 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3(with same material)Izod Impact Strength After 23 17 24 22 29Weather ResistanceTest (kgf .multidot. cm/cm)Moldability good good good good goodAppearance of Moldings good good good good good__________________________________________________________________________
It can be seen from the results shown in Tables 10A and 10B that in Examples 19 to 34, thermoplastic resin compositions desired in this invention are obtained. On the other hand, in Comparison Examples 7 to 9, the desired effects of this invention cannot be obtained. That is, in Comparison Examples 7 and 8, the amount of the graft crosslinking agent in each polyorganosiloxane series copolymer is outside the range defined in this invention and as a result, each product is inferior in Izod impact strength.
Reference Example 2 is an example of a composition outside the range of this invention, which was prepared using a graft copolymer without using an epoxy group containing monomer. The impact strength, gloss, weld strength retentivity, moldability and the sppearance of the molding are inferior. Reference Example 3 is an example wherein the graft copolymer is less than the range of this invention and the product is inferior in impact resistance and weld strength retentivity. Reference Example 4 is an example wherein the graft copolymer is over the range defined in this invention and the product is inferior in heat distortion temperature.
Comparison Example 9 shows the properties of PPS (polyphenylene sulfide series resin).
EXAMPLES 35 to 60
By following the same procedure as in Example 1 using the components shown in Table 11 below, a polyorganosiloxane series copolymer R-1, R-2 and R-3 were obtained.
TABLE 11______________________________________ R-1 R-2 R-3______________________________________p-Vinylphenylmethyldi- 1.5 0.05 55methoxysilane (part)Octamethylcyclotetra- 98.5 99.95 45siloxane (part)Polymerization 98.0 97.5 98.5Conversion (%)______________________________________
By following the same procedure as in Example 13 using the above polyorganosiloxane series polymer according to the compositions shown in Tables 12 and 13 below, graft copolymers A-1 to A-8, B-1 to B-8 and C-1 to C-3 shown in Table 12 and Table 13 were obtained.
TABLE 12______________________________________Polymer A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4______________________________________Batch Blending Composition (part)Polyorganosiloxane Series PolymerR-1 40 40 40 40Styrene 14.3 11.3 14.3 19.0Acrylonitrile 4.7 4.3 4.7 --.alpha.-Methylstyrene -- 3.3 -- --Methacrylic acid 1 1 -- 1Acrylic acid -- -- 1 --Blending Composition (part)Styrene 28.7 22.7 28.7 38.0Acrylonitrile 9.3 8.7 9.3 --.alpha.-Methylstyrene -- 6.7 -- --Methacrylic acid 2 2 -- 2Acrylic acid -- -- 2 --Polymerization (%) 98.5 98.3 98.5 98.9Polymer Composition (%)Polyorganosiloxane Series Polymer 40 40 40 40Styrene 43 34 43 57Acrylonitrile 14 13 14 --.alpha.-Methylstyrene -- 10 -- --Methacrylic acid 3 3 -- 3Acrylic acid -- -- 3 --Graft ratio (%) 95 87 94 98Limiting Viscosity [.eta.] (dl/g) 0.50 0.48 0.51 0.50______________________________________
TABLE 13__________________________________________________________________________Polymer B-1 B-2 B-3 C-1 C-2 C-3__________________________________________________________________________Batch Blending Composition (part)Polyorganosiloxane Series PolymerR-1 40 -- 40 -- -- --R-2 -- -- -- -- -- --R-3 -- 40 -- -- -- --Styrene 15 15 12.5 75 67.5 100Acrylonitrile 5 5 4.2 25 22.5 --.alpha.-Methylstyrene -- -- 3.3 -- 10 --Methacrylic acid -- -- -- -- -- --Acrylic acid -- -- -- -- -- --Blending Composition (part)Styrene 30 30 25 -- -- --Acrylonitrile 10 10 8.3 -- -- --.alpha.-Methylstyrene -- -- 6.7 -- -- --Methacrylic acid -- -- -- -- -- --Acrylic acid -- -- -- -- -- --Polymerization (%) 98.7 98.8 98.4 99.5 99.8 99.7Polymer Composition (%)Polyorganosiloxane Series Polymer 40 40 40 -- -- --Styrene 45 45 37.5 75 67.5 100Acrylonitrile 15 15 12.5 25 22.5 --.alpha.-Methylstyrene -- -- 10 -- 10 --Methacrylic acid -- -- -- -- -- --Graft ratio (%) 96 102 88 -- -- --Limiting Viscosity [.eta.] (dl/g) 0.51 0.21 0.47 0.60 0.55 0.51__________________________________________________________________________
The components (A) to (D) shown in Table 14 below were melt-kneaded by an extruder having an inner diameter of 40 mm at the temperature range of from 250 to 320.degree. C. to provide pellets.
The pellets were molded using a 5 oz injection molding machine (IS-80A, made by Toshiba Corporation at a molding temperature of from 260.degree. to 300.degree. C. to provide each test piece and the properties of the test piece were evaluated. The results are shown in Table 14 below.
In addition, in the above examples and comparison examples, the component (D) used was the same as in Examples 19 to 34 described above.
As is clear from Table 14, in Examples 35 to 60, the desired thermoplastic resin compositions of this invention are obtained.
TABLE 14__________________________________________________________________________ Example Example Example Example Example Example 35 36 37 38 39 40__________________________________________________________________________Blending Composition (part) of Composition:Component (A)A-1 10 10 10 -- -- 30A-2 -- -- -- -- 10 --A-3 -- -- -- 10 -- --A-4 -- -- -- -- -- --Component (B)B-1 30 40 9 30 -- 10B-2 -- -- -- -- 30 --B-3 -- -- -- -- -- --Component (C)C-1 10 30 1 10 -- 10C-2 -- -- -- -- 10 --C-3 -- -- -- -- -- --Component (D)Nylon 6 50 20 80 50 50 50Nylon 4, 6 -- -- -- -- -- --PBT -- -- -- -- -- --PC -- -- -- -- -- --PVC -- -- -- -- -- --MPP -- -- -- -- -- --POM -- -- -- -- -- --PPS -- -- -- -- -- --Polyarylate -- -- -- -- -- --PPE1 -- -- -- -- -- --PPE2 -- -- -- -- -- --Amount (%) of Polyorganosiloxane in Composition 16 20 7.6 16 16 16Amount (%) of carboxyl Group-Having Vinyl 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.9Monomer in CompositionEvaluation Result:Izod Impact Strength; 23.degree. C. 18 20 10 17 15 20(kgf .multidot. cm/cm) -30.degree. C. 11 12 6 10 9 12MFR (g/10 min.) (Temp.) 36 (240) 20 (240) 33 (240) 45 (240) 41 (240) 43 (240)Chemical Resistance:DOP .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle.Brake Fluid .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle.Gloss (%) 88 87 85 86 86 88Weld Strength Retentivity (%) 88 90 87 92 90 91Kinetic Friction Coefficient (with same material) 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09Relative Worn Amount (with same material) 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3Izod Impact Strength After Weather Resistance 17 19 10 16 14 19Test (kgf .multidot. cm/cm)__________________________________________________________________________ Example Example Example Example Example Example Example 41 42 43 44 45 46 47__________________________________________________________________________Blending Composition (part)of Composition:Component (A)A-1 -- -- -- 10 10 10 10A-2 -- -- -- -- -- -- --A-3 -- -- -- -- -- -- --A-4 10 10 10 -- -- -- --Component (B)B-1 -- -- -- 30 40 9 30B-2 -- -- -- -- -- -- --B-3 30 40 9 -- -- -- --Component (C)C-1 -- -- -- 10 30 1 10C-2 -- -- -- -- -- -- --C-3 10 30 1 -- -- -- --Component (D)Nylon 6 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Nylon 4, 6 50 20 80 -- -- -- --PBT -- -- -- 50 20 80 --PC -- -- -- -- -- -- 50PVC -- -- -- -- -- -- --MPP -- -- -- -- -- -- --POM -- -- -- -- -- -- --PPS -- -- -- -- -- -- --Polyarylate -- -- -- -- -- -- --PPE1 -- -- -- -- -- -- --PPE2 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Amount (%) of Polyorganosiloxane 16 20 7.6 16 20 7.6 16in CompositionAmount (%) of carboxyl Group-Having 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3Vinyl Monomer in CompositionEvaluation Result:Izod Impact Strength; 23.degree. C. 15 19 11 27 21 26 31(kgf .multidot. cm/cm) -30.degree. C. 9 11 7 16 13 16 19MFR (g/10 min.) (Temp.) 55 (300) 45 (300) 72 (300) 43 (240) 34 (240) 60 (240) 25 (240)Chemical Resistance:DOP .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. 1.0Brake Fluid .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. 1.1Gloss (%) 86 87 85 85 87 88 88Weld Strength Retentivity (%) 89 90 90 92 90 89 89Kinetic Friction Coefficient 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09(with same material)Relative Worn Amount 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup. 16 .times. 10.sup.-3(with same material)Izod Impact Strength After 14 18 11 26 20 25 30Weather ResistanceTest (kgf .multidot. cm/cm)__________________________________________________________________________ Example Example Example Example Example Example 48 49 50 51 52 53__________________________________________________________________________Blending Composition (part) of Composition:Component (A)A-1 10 10 10 10 10 30A-2 -- -- -- -- -- --A-3 -- -- -- -- -- --A-4 -- -- -- -- -- --Component (B)B-1 40 9 30 30 30 --B-2 -- -- -- -- -- --B-3 -- -- -- -- -- --Component (C)C-1 30 1 10 10 10 --C-2 -- -- -- -- -- --C-3 -- -- -- -- -- --Component (D)Nylon 6 -- -- 25 -- 25 50Nylon 4, 6 -- -- -- -- -- --PBT -- -- -- 25 25 --PC 20 80 25 25 -- --PVC -- -- -- -- -- --MPP -- -- -- -- -- --POM -- -- -- -- -- --PPS -- -- -- -- -- --Polyarylate -- -- -- -- -- --PPE1 -- -- -- -- -- --PPE2 -- -- -- -- -- --Amount (%) of Polyorganosiloxane in Composition 20 7.6 16 16 16 20Amount (%) of carboxyl Group-Having Vinyl 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.5Monomer in CompositionEvaluation Result:Izod Impact Strength; 23.degree. C. 28 25 22 21 20 15(kgf .multidot. cm/cm) -30.degree. C. 17 15 13 13 12 9MFR (g/10 min.) (Temp.) 21 (240) 22 (240) 29 (240) 18 (240) 42 (240) 23 (240)Chemical Resistance:DOP 1.0 1.2 .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle.Brake Fluid 1.0 1.2 .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle.Gloss (%) 88 86 86 86 88 82Weld Strength Retentivity (%) 92 93 88 89 89 85Kinetic Friction Coefficient (with same material) 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09Relative Worn Amount (with same material) 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3Izod Impact Strength After Weather Resistance 27 24 21 20 19 14Test (kgf .multidot. cm/cm)__________________________________________________________________________ Example Example Example Example Example Example Example 54 55 56 57 58 59 60__________________________________________________________________________Blending Composition (part)of Composition:Component (A)A-1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10A-2 -- -- -- -- -- -- --A-3 -- -- -- -- -- -- --A-4 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Component (B)B-1 30 30 30 30 30 30 30B-2 -- -- -- -- -- -- --B-3 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Component (C)C-1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10C-2 -- -- -- -- -- -- --C-3 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Component (D)Nylon 6 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Nylon 4, 6 -- -- -- -- -- -- --PBT -- -- -- -- -- -- --PC -- -- -- -- -- -- --PVC 50 -- -- -- -- -- --MPP -- 50 -- -- -- -- --POM -- -- 50 -- -- -- --PPS -- -- -- 50 -- -- --Polyarylate -- -- -- -- 50 -- --PPE1 -- -- -- -- -- 50 --PPE2 -- -- -- -- -- -- 50Amount (%) of Polyorganosiloxane 16 16 16 16 16 16 16in CompositionAmount (%) of carboxyl Group-Having 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3Vinyl Monomer in CompositionEvaluation Result:Izod Impact Strength; 23.degree. C. 18 24 18 20 25 23 30(kgf .multidot. cm/cm) -30.degree. C. 9 11 10 11 12 11 14MFR (g/10 min.) (Temp.) 12 (200) 33 (220) 36 (200) 32 (300) 30 (300) 34 (260) 32 (260)Chemical Resistance:DOP 1.2 .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle.Brake Fluid 1.2 .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle. .largecircle.Gloss (%) 75 85 76 78 75 78 83Weld Strength Retentivity (%) 81 83 82 84 81 82 85Kinetic Friction Coefficient 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09(with same material)Relative Worn Amount 20 .times. 10.sup.-3 18 .times. 10.sup.- 3 13 .times. 10.sup.-3 15 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3 16 .times. 10.sup.-3(with same material)Izod Impact Strength After 17 23 17 19 24 22 29Weather ResistanceTest (kgf .multidot. cm/cm)__________________________________________________________________________
While the invention has been described in detail and with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.

Number	Date	Country
63-274727	Oct 1988	JPX
63-274728	Oct 1988	JPX
63-281603	Nov 1988	JPX
63-290128	Nov 1988	JPX

Number	Name	Date
4373060	Ching	Feb 1983
4868251	Reich et al.	Sep 1989
4873298	Ryntz	Oct 1989
4877831	Hongo et al.	Oct 1989
4902742	Yamamoto et al.	Feb 1990
4927884	Iwasai et al.	May 1990

Number	Date	Country
250093	Dec 1987	EPX
3838330	Jun 1989	DEX
1228366	Apr 1960	FRX
61-235462	Oct 1984	JPX
61-209247	Sep 1986	JPX

Polyorganosiloxane series thermoplastic resin and composition thereof

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (4)

Parent Case Info

US Referenced Citations (6)

Foreign Referenced Citations (5)

Divisions (1)