Polyoxometalates (POMs) are a class of inorganics having well-defined structures with redox activity that makes them attractive for a variety of applications involving concurrent multiple electron transfers, including electrocatalytic and photocatalytic energy conversion or storage systems. The high-valent metal oxide complexes have numerous reductive processes stable in both aqueous and non-aqueous media coinciding with interesting electrochromic properties. One- or two-electron reduction of the normally transparent POM can produce an intense “heteropoly blue” color. Their interesting homogeneous properties have been the subject of a large number of fundamental and applied studies; however, for a number of applications for which POMs find use, it is desirable to have the POM attached to an electrode surface.
The attachment of POMs to electrodes has been used for oxidative and reductive photocatalysis, photochemical applications, energy conversion and storage, sensors, molecular nanosciences, and even for the environmental treatment of nuclear waste. POM surface attachment techniques include Langmuir-Blodgett films, electrodeposition, layer-by-layer self-assembly, and covalent strategies. While most of these attachments require the use of a linker to connect the surface to the POM a more desirable attachment strategy is to achieve attachment by simply dip-coating the POM onto a surface, where the free energy of the surface decreases through covalent interactions. Spontaneous attachment of POMs to surfaces has been described for a number of carbon surfaces such as graphite, glassy carbon, and reduced graphene oxide. Mesoporous silica has been suggested for POM attachment via electrostatic interactions. Nevertheless, attaching POMs to high surface area and transparent electrodes remains problematic.
Conductive mesoporous metal-oxide electrodes are an attractive option as they provide large scale surface area, rapid electron transfer (ET) kinetics, and a transparent surface. Electrodes of this type have been used extensively in electrochemical water oxidation and photochemical applications (see, for example, Alibabaei, et al. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 3255, Chen et al. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 6950, and Hoertz et al. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 8179). Attachment to metal oxide electrodes are typically accomplished using acidic anchoring groups; for example, carboxylic and phosphonic acid functional groups (see, for example, Ambrosio et al. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 1531 and Zhang et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 3427. To this end, the attachment of POMs to a transparent electrode surface is desirable.
An embodiment of the invention is directed to a porous transparent electrode having a film comprising of semiconducting nanoparticles to which polyoxometalates (POMs) are bonded to their surfaces. The semiconducting nanoparticles can be any transparent metal oxide, including, but not limited to, tin-doped indium oxide (ITO), fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO), or titanium dioxide (TiO2). The POM can be of, but not limited to, the anion structure: [SiW12O40]4−; [α-P2W18O62]6−; or [α2-P2W17O61]10−. The semiconducting nanoparticles bond to the POM through a combination of electrostatic interactions and hydrogen-bonding between surface metal-oxygen atoms, and POM oxygen atoms. The porous transparent electrode can be in a protonated form or ion-paired with alkali metal cations or tetraalkylammonium cations.
Another embodiment of the invention is directed to a method of preparing the porous transparent electrode where a substrate comprising a film of semiconducting nanoparticles is soaked or otherwise contacted with a solution of the POM for a sufficient period or time such that the POM is bonded to the semiconductor surface and residual solution is removed from the porous transparent electrode. The solution can be an aqueous acid solution or an organic solvent solution.
Another embodiment of the invention is an electrocatalytic device including the porous transparent electrode. The device can be a sensor. Exemplarity electrocatalytic processes include, but are not limited to, the reduction of nitrous acid and the preparation of high-valence metal ions.
Another embodiment of the invention is a photoanode device including the porous transparent electrode. The device can be used with sunlight for smog abatement, including the decomposition of a variety of organic pollutants.
Embodiments of the invention are directed to porous transparent conductive metal oxide electrodes with surfaces modified with polyoxometalates (POMs). These modified electrode surfaces can be used to perform electrocatalytic functions such as sensing and other electrochemical functions. The POM modified electrodes can be used in nuclear fuel recycling, for renewable energy devices, and as catalysis, such as electrocatalysts, and photochemical processing. The electrocatalytic application can range from the electrocatalytic reduction of nitrous acid to nitrous oxide (NO) to the preparation of high-valence metal ions including, but not limited to Am(IV), Am(V), Am(VI), Ce(IV), Bk(IV), Cf(IV) Cm(IV) or Tb(IV). In exemplary embodiments of the invention, a Keggin structured polyoxometalate (POM) silicotungstic acid, H4[α-SiW12O40] (1) that is attached as a nanoparticle film of Sn-doped indium oxide (nanoITO) through one or more of its four W(IV)-OH bonds. The complex, [α-SiW12O40]4−, has a well-studied electrochemistry. A monolayer of H4[α-SiW12O40] is formed at the surface to form a nanoITO-H4[α-SiW12O40] (nanoITO-1). In other embodiments of the invention, a Wells-Dawson structures, [α-P2W18O62]6− (2) and [α2-P2W17O61]10− (3), are surface attached. Three POMs for exemplary embodiments are shown in
The electrode materials are metal oxides, such as, but not limited to, tin-doped indium oxide (ITO), of the exemplary embodiments, fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO), and titanium dioxide (TiO2). Other metal oxides can be prepared and employed as high aspect ratio films, which allow visible light to pass and allow photochemical applications of the POM electrodes.
In an embodiment of the invention, these POM bound electrodes are electrocatalyts, for example, but not limited to, the electrocatalytic reduction of nitrous acid to NO, which is a vasodilator used in erectile dysfunction and angina. The electrocatalysts can be used for the preparation of high-valent metal ions, including hexavalent americium. Selective removal of Am from nuclear fuel can dramatically reduce the repository size, and reduce the time required for the radioactivity within the repository to fall below that of natural uranium. Polyoxometalates have electron acceptor properties, however, unlike methyl viologen or other common electron acceptors, POMs are robust, and, have the rate of electron transfers at metal oxide surfaces can be much greater than previously possible. The POM bound electrodes, according to embodiments of the invention can be used to observe protein dynamics, due to the rapidity of electron transfer with metal oxide-POM electrodes.
Thin porous films comprised of semiconducting nanoparticles, such as nanoITO, have effective surface areas that are thousands of times greater than those of planar electrodes and are suitable for high current applications and for enhancement of the film's spectral absorption; as these films absorb in the ultraviolet (UV) but are transparent in the visible. The high porosity allows the internal diffusion of solvent and electrolytes such that the films can effectively mimic the electrochemistry of planar electrodes. A scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of a mesoporous nanoITO film is shown in
The surface binding of 1 was examined using solvent solutions in an acid functional group anchoring strategy where 5 mM 1 solutions in methanol and pH 1 (0.1 M perchloric acid) solutions were prepared and used to soak electrodes for 24 hours. Deposition was monitored by comparison of the redox couples of the POM with those of the electroactive complex, [Ru(4,4′-PO3H2-bpy)(bpy)2]2+ (RuP2+), which has a well-defined Ru(III/II) couple and a known surface coverage. These electrodes were removed from the solutions, rinsed, air-dried, and prepared for electrochemical analysis.
[α-SiW12O40]4−+e−→[α-SiW12O40]5− pH≥1 (1)
[α-SiW12O40]5−+e−→[α-SiW12O40]6− pH≥1 (2)
[α-SiW12O40]4−+2e−+2H+→H2[α-SiW12O40]4− pH<1 (3)
H2[α-SiW12O40]4−+2e−+2H+→H4[α-SiW12O40]4− pH<1 (4)
Further confirmation of surface-bound 1 is obtained by Energy Dispersive Spectra measurements as shown in
Electrochemical analysis of the surface waves provides additional evidence. Important differences are observed between diffusion-controlled homogeneous redox couples and surface-confined redox active species. A first difference is that peak currents are proportional to the square root of scan rate in solution according to Fick 2nd law of diffusion while at the surface redox couples are direct proportional to the scan rate (ip α v).
The surface coverage and surface binding constant is readily evaluated for the deposition of 1 on nanoITO. Various concentrations of 1 in methanol (1×10−7 to 1×10−3 M) were tested for maximum surface coverage following 24 h of electrode soaking. Loading from pH 1 in methanol gave identical surface coverage in contrast to loading from an approximately 5 mM of the sodium salt, Na4[α-SiW12O40], in methanol where no surface peaks occur, which confirms the effective acid anchoring method, according to an embodiment of the invention. No increase in surface coverage occurred upon increasing the concentration to a 5 mM methanol solution of 1, indicating maximum surface coverage is possible from the more dilute solution. The maximum surface coverage obtained was 4.7×10−9 mol/cm2. The surface coverage (Γ) was evaluated according to equation 5, below, and benchmarked against the known value for RuP2+ (8.5×10−9 mol/cm2) determined under similar conditions. The difference in molecular sizes between 1 and RuP2+ suggests a well-packed monolayer of 1, similar to RuP2+, is formed at the surface. Evaluation of the surface coverage from the different loading solution concentrations of 1 and applying equation 6, below, provides the Langmuir Isotherm plotted in
Γ=Q/(nFA) (5)
Γ=ΓMAX((K[1])/(1+K[1])) (6)
where Q is the total charge passed under the first reduction wave of 1, n is the number of electrons passed (1), F is Faraday's constant, and A is the area (cm2).
The stability of the POM surface binding was evaluated at different pHs, upon continuous CV cycling, and after long-term soaking. In acidic solutions from pH 1-2, the nanoITO-1 bond is strongest. Below pH 1 and with added buffer base, 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 2 or 0.1 M acetate buffer at pH 3.6, 1 readily desorbs from the surface prior to electrochemical analysis. The CV cycling stability of 1 at pH 1 on nanoITO is indicated by CV cycling, where there is little to no loss of electroactive material over 10 scans lasting 20 minutes. Prolonged scanning leads to a loss in material. A possible absorption mechanism and structure for 1 on nanoITO is shown in
Evidence for the nature of the interaction between 1 and the surface is evident in XPS spectra of nanoITO and nanoITO-1, as shown in
POMs display an intense blue color upon reduction. Due to the transparency of the nanoITO films in the visible spectrum concomitant monitoring of the film during electrochemical analysis is possible. Spectral monitoring of a nanoITO-1 was performed during CV scanning of the 1st and 2nd reduction peaks to monitor changes in UV-visible absorption.
Wells-Dawson POMs, [α-P2W18O62]6−, and lacunary (mono-vacant), [α2-P2W17O61]10−, form nanoITO-2 and nanoITO-3. A 5 mM solution of 2 is prepared in pH 1 by soaking a nanoITO slide for 24 h. For [α2-P2W17O61]10−, because of the instability of 3 at low pH, where it is rapidly conversion into 2, a pH 4.8, 0.1M acetate buffer loading solution allows a slide to be soaked for 24 h and tested at pH 4.8 The stability of 3 at high pH, in contrast to 1, highlights important differences in the surface binding affinities for different POMs. Electrodes prepared with 3 were stable indefinitely at higher pHs. The spectral absorptions obtained during the CVs in
The surface coverages of 2 and 3 on nanoITO are 0.61 and 1.85×10−9 mol/cm2, respectively. The E1/2 values for nanoITO-2 are 0.08, −0.09, and −0.44 V vs Ag/AgCl.
[P2W18O62]6−+e−→[P2W18O62]7− (7)
[P2W18O62]7−+e−→[P2W18O62]8− (8)
[P2W18O62]8−+2e−+2H+→H2[P2W18O62]8− (9)
The E1/2 values for nanoITO-3 are −0.45 and −0.64 V vs Ag/AgCl, for the redox couples described in equations 10 & 11, below. Both POM on transparent electrodes display observed potentials that are slightly more positive than for their homogeneous values, in the manner observed for nanoITO-1 and 1 in solution. Not to be bound by a mechanism, this is consistent with a greater degree of positive charge for WVI centers close to the surface that is imparted by the WVI-O-M covalent bond, for M=In3+ or Sn2+, which is suggested by other acid anchoring strategies, such as that disclosed in Zhang, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 3427.
[P2W17O61]10−+2e−+2H+→H2[P2W17O61]10− (10)
H2[P2W17O61]10−+2e−+2H+→H4[P2W17O61]10− (11)
The electrochemistry of the electrodes containing POMs 1, 2, and 3 in non-aqueous solvents with the three complexes bound to the surfaces through acidic W—OH bonds. However, the presence of H+ plays an important role in the redox behavior of the POM in non-aqueous solvents. Substitution of Na+, or tetrabutylammonium, [nBu4N]+, for the proton results in dramatic shifts in the electrochemistry. For complex 1 in MeCN and 0.1 M, a ˜610 mV shift to more negative potentials is observed with Na+ or [nBu4N]+. For nanoITO-1 at the surface and observed in MeCN with either Na+ or [nBu4N]+ electrolyte cations present, the first redox wave appears at −0.84 V versus Ferrocene which is in between the potential for H4-1 (−0.50 V vs Ferrocene) and Na4-1 or [nBu4N]4-1 ca. −1.1 V suggesting 1 at the surface under these conditions acidic W—OH groups are partially displaced with electrolyte cations. A potential shift at the second redox wave, which is sensitive to Na+ or [nBu4N]+, shifts more positive in the presence of Na+ in excellent agreement with the solution electrochemistry of Na4-1 compared to [nBu4N]4-1. Similar behavior is observed for complexes 2 and 3 at the surface. Other alkali metal cations, for example, K+, Li+, or Cs+, and other tetraalkylammonium cations can be ion paired with the POMs.
The utility of the nanoITO-POM electrodes for catalytic nitrite reduction at pH 1 is illustrated in
where iCAT is the peak catalyst current, iBkg is the current contribution from the redox couple and nanoITO background, n is the number of electrons involved in catalysis (1), Γ is the surface coverage (mol/cm2), A is the area (cm2), and F is Faraday's constant.
POM derivatized electrodes allows the electrochemical oxidation of Ce(III) to Ce(IV) in solution, where the oxidation of Ce(III) to Ce(IV) occurs with an anodic potential of 1.3 V vs. SCE in pH 4.8 acetate buffer, with a kinetically hindered reduction of Ce(IV) to Ce(III) at −0.2 V, as shown in
By first adsorbing the POM on the surface of the nanoITO, the formation of only a 1:1 complex with Ce is possible. A single reversible surface redox event at 0.78 V vs. SCE is observed with a nanoITO-3 electrode in the presence of 10 mM Ce(III) in pH 4.8 acetate buffer, as shown in
Generation of high oxidation state Am ions can be formed from redox couples where the Am is coordinated in different POM environments. Somewhat analogous to formation of Ce(IV), oxidation of Am(III) to Am(IV) can be carried out. The oxidation of Am(III) to Am(IV) is possible at nanoITO-3 electrodes in 0.1 M HNO3, as shown in
The complex H4[α-SiW12O40] was purchased from Sigma and used as received. The complexes [α-P2W18O62]6− and [α2-P2W17O61]10− were prepared according to literature procedures. The comparative complex, [Ru(4,4′-PO3H2-bpy)(bpy)2]2+ (RUP2+), where bpy is 2,2′-bipyridine, was synthesized according to a literature preparation. All solvents and electrolytes were purchased from Sigma or Fisher Scientific and used as received. Electrochemistry was performed using a CH Instruments CHI650B or CHI733E potentiostat in solutions purged with argon. In aqueous media, Ag/AgCl electrode immersed in saturated KCl and separated from the solution by a fine glass frit was used as a reference electrode and a graphite rod was used as the counter electrode. In nonaqueous solutions, Ag/AgCl quasi-reference electrode was used and potentials were referenced to an internal standard of either nanoITO-RuP2+ or ferrocene and a graphite rod was used as the counter electrode. Spectroelectrochemistry was performed using an Agilent HP8454 UV-visible spectrometer, and data analyzed by singular value decomposition. The nanoITO electrodes were prepared according to a literature method, where a suspension of Sn-doped indium oxide nanoparticles (TC8 DE, Evonik Industries) was doctor-bladed onto a planar FTO substrates (Hartford Glass, 15 Ω/cm2). The slides were sintered at 500° C. to afford the nanoITO electrodes. Scanning Electron Microscope images were collected on a Hitachi S-4700 SEM. Energy Dispersive Spectra were collected using the same Hitachi S-4700 SEM, which is equipped with an INCA PentaFET-x3 EDS from Oxford Instruments.
All patents, patent applications, provisional applications, and publications referred to or cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety, including all figures and tables, to the extent they are not inconsistent with the explicit teachings of this specification.
It should be understood that the examples and embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only and that various modifications or changes in light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled in the art and are to be included within the spirit and purview of this application.
This invention was made with government support under DE-NE0008539 awarded by the Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7531710 | Carson | May 2009 | B2 |
20110212259 | Keita | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20170253981 | Tamura | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2570672 | Aug 2019 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Lauinger et al. High Stability of Immobilized Polyoxometalates on TiO2 Nanoparticles and Nanoporous Films for Robust, Light-Induced Water Oxidation. ACS Publication. Chemistry of Materials, 2015, 27, pp. 5886-5891. (Year: 2015). |
Sun et al (“Two New Armtype Polyoxometalates Grafted on Titanium Dioxide Films: Towards Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Performance”, ChemSusChem, 2016, 9, pp. 1125-1133). (Year: 2016). |
Boglio et al (“Lanthanide Complexes of the Monovacant Dawson Polyoxotungstate [α1-P2W17O61]10—as Selective and Recoverable Lewis Acid Catalysts”, Angewandte Chemie, vol. 118, Issue 20, 2006, pp. 3402-3405) (Year: 2006). |
Ammam (“Polyoxometalates: formation, structures, principal properties, main deposition methods and application in sensing”, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2013, 1, pp. 6291-6312) (Year: 2013). |
Sun et al (“Two New Armtype Polyoxometalates Grafted on Titanium Dioxide Films: Towards Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Performance”, ChemSusChem, 2016, 9, pp. 1125-113). (Year: 2016) (Year: 2016). |
Gao et al (“Porous structures constructed from [SiMo12O40] and [SiW12O40] Keggin units”, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 80, 2005, pp. 139-145). (Year: 2005) (Year: 2005). |
He et al (“Keggin and Dawson polyoxometalates as electrodes for flexible and transparent piezoelectric nanogenerators to efficiently utilize mechanical energy in the environment”, Science Bulletin, 65, Sep. 2019, pp. 35-44) (Year: 2019) (Year: 2019). |
Lumen (“Catalysis”, 2017) (Year: 2017). |
Chen et al (“Photocatalysis by Titanium Dioxide and Polyoxometalate/TiO2 Cocatalysts. Intermediates and Mechanistic Study”, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 329-337) (Year: 2004). |
Sun et al (“Enhanced photocoductivity of a polyoxometalate—TiO2 composite for gas sensing applications”, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2015, 3, 6153) (Year: 2015). |
Sun et al (“A comparative study on photoelectrochemical performance of TiO2 photoanodes enhanced by different polyoxometalates”, Electrochemistry Communications, 30, 2013, pp. 38-41) (Year: 2013). |
Carriazo et al (“Tungstophosphoric acid supported on polycrystalline TiO2 for the photodegradation of 4-nitrophenol in aqueous solution and propan-2-ol in vapour phase”, Applied Catalysis A: General, 356 (2009) 172-179). (Year: 2009). |
Noack et al (“The Chemistry of Redox-Flow Batteries”, Angewandte Reviews, 54, 2015, pp. 9776-9809). (Year: 2015). |
Gelis et al (“Use of Ozone for Dissolving High-Level Plutonium Dioxide in Nitric Acid in the Presence of Am(V,VI) Ions”, Radiochemistry, 2011, vol. 53, No. 6, 2011, pp. 612-618). (Year: 2011). |
Sumliner et al (“Polyoxometalate Multi-Electron-Transfer Catalytic Systems for Water Splitting”, Special Issue: Water Oxidation Chemistry (Cluster Issue), vol. 2014, Issue 4, 2014). (Year: 2014). |
Alibabaei, L. et al. “Atomic Layer Deposition of TiO2 on Mesoporous nanoITO: Conductive Core-Shell Photoanodes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells,” Nano Lett., 2014, pp. 3255-3261, vol. 14. |
Ambrosio, F. et al. “What is the Best Anchoring Group for a Dye in a Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell?,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2012, pp. 1531-1535, vol. 3. |
Chen, Z. et al. “Catalytic water oxidation on derivatizei nanoITO,” Dalton Trans., 2010, 6950-6952, vol. 39. |
Hoertz, P.G. et al. “Application of High Surface Area Tin-Doped Indium Oxide Nanoparticle Films as Transparent Conducting Electrode,” Inorg. Chem., 2010, pp. 8179-8181, vol. 49. |
Zhang, L. et al. “Anchoring Groups for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, pp. 3427-3455, vol. 7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210108319 A1 | Apr 2021 | US |