Polyp removal device and method of use

Abstract
A device and system for removing tissue such as polyps is provided and includes a tubular member having proximal and distal ends, a snare portion operably extending from within the distal end of the tubular member and including first and second electrodes configured to treat tissue therebetween, the snare portion further including a cutting member for severing the treated tissue. The tissue removal device may further include a handle portion operatively extending from within the proximal end of the tubular member. The handle portion may be configured for operable engagement by a user and the cutting member may extend between distal ends of the first and second electrodes.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field


The present disclosure relates to devices and methods for the removal of internal tissue and, more particularly, to snare-type devices including a pair of electrodes for treating tissue prior to excision.


2. Background of Related Art


A polyp is an abnormal growth of tissue projecting from a mucous membrane. A polyp that is attached to the surface of the mucous membrane by a narrow elongated stalk is said to be pedunculated. If no stalk is present, the polyp is said to be sessile. Polyps are commonly found in the colon, stomach, nose, urinary bladder and uterus. Polyps may also form elsewhere in the body where mucous membranes exist, for example, the cervix and small intestine.


The surgical procedure for removing a polyp is generally referred to as a “polypectomy”. Polypectomys are generally endoscopic or laparoscopic procedures performed through the oral or anal cavities. When the location of the polyp permits, the polypectomy may be performed as an open procedure. Conventional polypectomys are completed using various apparatus and techniques known in the art.


As noted above, there are two forms of polyps, sessile and pedunculated. The stalkless or sessile polyps are generally removed using electrical forceps. For example, the excess tissue projecting from the mucous membrane is cauterized and torn from the tissue wall. Pedunculated polyps, or those with stalks, tend to be larger with a greater blood supply. The size and shape of pedunculated polyps typically do not lend themselves to being removed using traditional forceps. Unlike sessile polyps, polyps with a stalk cannot simply be grasped in the jaw members of an electrosurgical forceps and be torn from the tissue wall. Instead, the polypectomy is performed using a surgical snare device.


Conventional snare devices are configured with a snare for looping over the distal end of a hanging polyp and tightening securely around the stalk of the polyp. By constricting the snare, and selectively applying energy to the snare, the device may cauterize or seal the polyp at the stalk as the polyp is severed from the tissue wall. Conventional snare devices may be configured for monopolar or bipolar use. Excising a polyp using a conventional snare device typically involves cutting or otherwise separating the polyp from the tissue wall as the snare device is activated and constricted about the stalk of the polyp. In this manner, the polyp is cauterized as the snare passes through the tissue.


SUMMARY

Disclosed is a device configured for removing polyps. In one embodiment, the polyp removal device includes a tubular member having proximal and distal ends, a snare portion operably extending from within the distal end of the tubular member and including first and second electrodes configured to seal tissue therebetween, the snare portion further including a cutting member for severing the sealed tissue. The polyp removal device may further include a handle portion operatively extending from within the proximal end of the tubular member. The handle portion may be configured for operable engagement by a user. The cutting member may extend between distal ends of the first and second electrodes.


The polyp removal device may be configured to grasp the stalk of a polyp between the first and second electrodes. The first and second electrodes may be hingedly attached to the cutting member. The snare portion may be configured to be retracted within the tubular member. The snare portion may be retracted within the tubular member upon retraction of the handle portion relative to the base portion.


A system including the polyp removal device may further include an electrosurgical generator. The electrodes may be electrically connected to the electrosurgical generator. The distal end of the tubular member may include a spacer member for preventing the first and second electrodes from contacting one another. Alternatively, at least one of the first and second electrodes may include a spacer mounted thereon for preventing contact between the first and second electrodes.


Also provided is a polyp removal device including a tubular member having proximal and distal ends, a handle portion operatively extending from the proximal end of the tubular member, and a snare portion slidably supported within the lumen of the tubular member and operably extending from the distal end of the tubular member, the snare portion including first and second electrodes operably mounted thereto for sealing tissue therebetween, wherein at least one of the first and second electrodes includes at least one spacer mounted thereon for preventing contact between the first and second electrodes. The snare portion of the polyp removal device may be retractable with the tubular member.


Additionally provided is a method of removing a polyp. The method includes the steps of providing a polyp removal device including, a tubular member having proximal and distal ends, a snare portion slidably supported within the lumen of the tubular member and operably extending from the distal end of the tubular member, the snare portion including first and second electrodes operably mounted thereto for sealing tissue therebetween, wherein at least one of the first and second electrodes includes at least one spacer mounted thereon for preventing contact between the first and second electrodes, extending the snare portion relative to the tubular member, looping the snare portion about a portion of a polyp, retracting the snare portion relative to the tubular member to capture the portion of the polyp between the first and second electrodes, and activating the first and second electrodes.


The method may further include the steps of partially advancing the snare portion relative to the tubular member, retracting the tubular member and the snare portion relative to the polyp and severing the polyp from surrounding tissue.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the present disclosure and, together with the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.



FIG. 1 is a partial cross-sectional, top plan view of a polyp removal device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, shown in a first or extended position;



FIG. 2 is a partial cross-sectional top plan view of the polyp removal device of FIG. 1, shown in a partially retracted position;



FIG. 3 is a partial cross-sectional top plan view of the polyp removal device of FIG. 1, shown in a retracted position;



FIG. 4 is a cross-section end view of the polyp removal device of FIGS. 1-3 taken along line 4-4 of FIG. 3;



FIG. 5 is a partial cross-section top plan view of an alternative embodiment of a polyp removal device according to the present disclosure in a completely retracted position;



FIG. 6 is a partial top plan view of the distal end of the polyp removal device of FIGS. 1-4, in a first or extending position about a polyp;



FIG. 7 is a partial top plan view of the distal end of the polyp removal device of FIG. 6, in a retracted position about a polyp; and



FIG. 8 is a partial top plan view of the distal end of the polyp removal device of FIGS. 6 and 7, in a partially advanced position about a polyp;



FIG. 9 is a partial top plan view of the distal end of the polyp removal device of FIGS. 6-8, as the stalk of the polyp is being severed; and



FIG. 10 is a partial top plan view of another illustrative embodiment of a polyp removal device of the present disclosure, in a retracted position about a polyp.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended figures. For the purpose of illustrating the present disclosure, various embodiments are shown. It is understood, however, that the present disclosure is not limited to the precise arrangement and instrumentalities shown.


As shown in the drawings and described throughout the following description, as is traditional when referring to relative positioning on an object, the term “proximal” refers to the end of the apparatus that is closer to the user and the term “distal” refers to the end of the apparatus that is further from the user.


Referring to FIGS. 1-4, an embodiment of the presently disclosed polyp removal device is shown therein and is generally designated as polyp removal device 100. Polyp removal device 100 includes an elongated tubular member 110, a handle portion 120 extending proximally from tubular member 110, and a snare portion or assembly 130 operably engaged with handle portion 120 and extending distally from within elongated tube 110. Polyp removal device 100 may be any suitable length and size for accessing various locations throughout the body. Device 100 may be configured for removal of suitable types of polyps of any size, or may be configured for general mucosal resection or removal of any suitable tissue mass. Preferably, polyp removal device 100 is configured for endoscopic, laparoscopic or transluminal insertion.


Referring initially to FIGS. 1-3, elongated tubular member 110 includes proximal and distal ends 110a, 110b. Proximal end 110a of tubular member 110 is operably coupled to handle portion 120. As will be described in further detail below, handle portion 120 may be integrally formed with tubular member 110. Alternatively, handle portion 120 may be releasably secured to tubular member 110, or may instead be securely affixed to tubular member 110. Tubular member 110 may be flexible, semi-rigid, or rigid and may be constructed of metal, alloy, plastic, polymers, or any other suitable material. Distal end 110b of tubular member 110 is configured to slidingly receive a proximal end of snare portion 130.


Although the following description of the polyp removal device 100 will be described in the form of a snare-type device, the aspects of the present disclosure may be modified for used with alternative handle configurations, including a pistol grip style device, mechanically and/or remotely actuated handles, other suitable types of devices or handle arrangements. As one example, polyp removal device 100 may be incorporated as a pistol grip style laparoscopic device like some of the LigaSure™ tissue fusion devices sold by Valleylab of Boulder, Colo.


Still referring to FIGS. 1-3, handle portion 120 of polyp removal device 100 includes a base 122 coupled to proximal end 110a of tubular member 110, a connector shaft 124 extending through base 122, and a handle 126 operably coupled to a proximal end 124a of connector shaft 124. In one embodiment, base 122 of handle portion 120 may be securely affixed to proximal end 110a of tubular member 110 using adhesive, bonding, mechanical fasteners, welding or other suitable methods. Alternatively, base 122 may be releasably connected to tubular member 110 using mechanical fasteners, threaded engagement, friction fitting, bayonet connections, or the like. In this manner, snare portion 130 may be removed and replaced through proximal end 110a of tubular member 110. Base 122 of handle portion 120 may instead be integrally formed with proximal end 110a of tubular member 110. Handle 126 is configured for operable engagement by a user. Handle 126 may be knurled or may include a coating for facilitating engagement by a user.


Base 122 of handle portion 120 is further configured for operable engagement with a generator 10. Base 122 defines a connection port 122a for receiving an electrical cord 10a extending from generator 10. Electrical cord 10a extends from connection port 122a through base 122 and is operably coupled to first and second electrodes 134, 136 of snare portion 130. Electrical cord 10a may be directly coupled to first and second electrodes 134, 136. Alternatively, electrical cord 10a may couple with a coupling member 123 mounted to shaft 124. In this manner, coupling member 123 electrically couples generator 10 with first and second electrodes 134, 136 along shaft 124. Generator 10 may include any suitable generator configured to selectively provide energy to electrodes 134, 136. For example, radiofrequency energy, either monopolar or bipolar may be provided to electrodes 134, 136. In other embodiments, ultrasonic, microwave, or laser energy may be provided. Depending on the energy modality utilized, snare 130 and/or electrodes 134, 136 may have to be reconfigured in order the handle the different types of energy.


In an embodiment where radiofrequency energy is utilized, to increase safety, bipolar radiofrequency energy is preferred because the energy will travel between first and second electrodes 134, 136 instead of between the snare 130 and some remote return pad. In one particular embodiment, generator 10 takes the form of a battery-powered generator that is integral with, or releasably coupled to, polyp removal device 100. In this example, electrical cord 10a is not needed. Generator 10 may also be configured to monitor the electrical properties of the tissue maintained between first and second electrodes 134, 136 and signal to the clinician when conditions have been met that are suitable for sealing of tissue.


Still referring to FIGS. 1-3, connector shaft 124 includes an elongated tubular shaft including proximal and distal ends 124a, 124b. Proximal end 124a is configured for operable engagement with handle 126. Handle 126 may be securely affixed, releasable coupled, or integrally formed with proximal end 124a of connector shaft 124. Handle portion 120 may further include a stop member 128 positioned about connector shaft 124 between base 122 and handle 126. Stop member 128 prevents complete retraction of connector shaft 124 past base 122. Proximal end 124a may be configured to securely retain stop member 128, or instead, may include grooves or indents 128a for selectively positioning stop member 128 thereabout. In this manner, adjustment of stop member 128 reduces or increases the amount of extension of snare portion 130. Alternatively, stop member 128 may be configured to selectively engage distal end 124a of connector shaft 124 through the incorporation of a mechanical fastener or the like (not shown). Distal end 124b of connector shaft 124 is operably coupled to snare portion 130. Distal end 124b may be permanently coupled, releasably coupled or integrally formed with snare portion 130.


Snare portion 130 includes a snare 132 formed of a loop of rigid or semi-rigid wire or flexible band. Snare 132 may be constructed of metal, polymer or other suitable material. In the illustrated embodiment, snare 132 is non-conductive; however, snare 132 may be conductive or partially conductive. Coupled to snare 132 in any suitable manner near a distal end 130b of snare portion 130 are first and second electrodes 134, 136. As discussed above, first and second electrodes 134, 136 are electrically coupled to generator 10 to receive electrosurgical energy therefrom. First and second electrodes 134, 136, which may be of any suitable construction, each include at least a tissue contacting surface 134c, 136c. In some embodiments, first and second electrodes 134, 136 are each formed from a tissue contacting surface 134c, 136c and an insulative body portion. Tissue contacting surfaces 134c, 136c may include any configuration suitable for treating tissue, including hatching, grooves and detents (not shown). In one embodiment, generator 10, first and second electrodes 134, 136, and tissue contacting surfaces 134c, 136c, are all configured for sealing tissue.


Positioned between first and second electrodes 134, 136 is a connection member 133. Distal ends 134b, 136b of first and second electrodes 134, 136, respectively, are coupled to connection member 133. First and second electrodes 134, 136 and connection member 133 are configured such that in a first or extended position, proximal ends 134a, 136a of first and second electrodes 134, 136, respectively, are substantially spaced from one another. As will be discussed in further detail below, this configuration opens snare 132 to facilitate the looping of snare 132 over a polyp “P” (FIG. 6) and the positioning of first and second electrodes 134, 136 about stalk “S” of polyp “P”.


First and second electrodes 134, 136 and connection member 133 are further configured such that as proximal end 130a of snare portion 130 is retracted within distal end 110b of tubular member 110, proximal ends 134a, 136a of first and second electrodes 134, 136, respectively, are approximated towards each other, in the direction of arrows “A” (FIG. 1). In this manner, first and second electrodes 134, 136 and connection member 133 act like a jaw assembly, thereby compressing stalk “S” of polyp “P” between first and second electrodes 134, 136. To prevent first and second electrodes 134, 136 from contacting one another, distal end 110b of tubular member 110 may include a spacer member 138 through which snare 132 may extend. Spacer member 138 spans distal end 110b of tubular member 110 and includes a pair of apertures 138a through which snare 132 is received. Apertures 138a are spaced such that upon retraction of proximal end 130a of snare portion 130 within tubular member 110, proximal end 134a, 136a of first and second electrodes 134, 136 are approximated towards one another. Apertures 138a are further configured to prevent first and second electrodes 134, 136 contacting one another. Release of proximal end 130a of snare portion 130 from within distal end 110b of tubular member 100 permits proximal ends 134a, 136a of first and second electrodes 134, 136 to approximate away from one another and eventual return to their initial position.


In an alternative embodiment, one or both of first and second electrodes 134, 136 may include one or more spacers 134d, 136d (FIG. 5) formed on respective proximal ends 134a, 136a. Spacers 134d, 136d are configured to prevent contact between first and second electrodes 134, 136.


Connection member 133 extends between first and second electrodes 134, 136 and is configured to maintain distal ends 134b, 136b of first and second electrodes 134, 136, in a spaced relationship throughout the tissue excising procedure. As described above, in a first or extended position, proximal ends 134a, 136a of first and second electrodes 134, 136 are maintained in a substantially spaced apart relationship. This configuration facilitates positioning of snare 132, and first and second electrodes 134, 136 in particular, about stalk “S” of a polyp “P” (FIG. 6). Distal ends 134b, 136b of first and second electrodes 134, 136 are coupled to connection member 133 in a manner that permits pivoting, hinging, or flexing of first and second electrodes 134, 136 relative to connection member 133 as snare 132 is constricted about stalk “S” of polyp “P”. First and second electrodes 134, 136 and/or connection member 133 may be formed of flexible material, or may instead include a hinge mechanism or any other suitable configuration capable of permitting first and second electrodes 134, 136 to pivot, hinge, or flex relative to connection member 133. In the event that proximal ends 134a, 136a of first and second electrodes 134, 136 are approximated away from one another by the configuration of connection member 133, snare 132 may provide the spring force to maintain proximal ends 134a, 136a substantially spaced apart when polyp removal device 100 is in a first or extended position.


Connection member 133 further includes at least a first sharpened surface 133a. First sharpened surface 133a is formed between distal ends 134b, 136b of first and second electrodes 134, 136 and may be configured to severe stalk “S” of polyp “P” after proper sealing of the tissue. In addition, or alternatively, the outer surface of connection member 133 may be sharpened to facilitate excising of polyp “P”.


Referring now to FIGS. 1-3 and 6-8, one embodiment of the operation of polyp removal device 100 will be described. Initially, distal end 110b of tubular member 110 is inserted into a patient. As discussed above, introduction of polyp removal device 100 may be accomplished through an endoscopic or laparoscopic port, or may be inserted transluminally through the mouth or anus. To facilitate insertion of tubular member 110 into the body, in one embodiment (FIG. 5), snare portion 130a is completely retracted within tubular member 110.


Once distal end 110b of tubular member 110 is positioned near a polyp “P” to be removed, snare portion 130 is extended distally by advancing handle 126 of handle portion 120 relative to base 122. The spring-like configuration between first and second electrodes 134, 136 and connection member 133 results in proximal ends 134a, 136a of first and second electrodes 134, 136 approximating away from each other as handle 126 is advanced and proximal end 130a of snare portion 130 is released from tubular member 110. The separating of proximal ends 134a, 136a of first and second electrodes 134, 136 opens snare 132 and facilitates positioning of snare 132 about stalk “S” of polyp “P”. Once snare 132 positioned such that stalk “S” is received between first and second electrodes 134, 136, handle 126 may be retracted or, in the alternative, tubular member 110 may be advanced to constrict snare 132 about stalk “S”. As proximal end 130a of snare portion 130 is received within distal end 110b of tubular member 110 through spacer member 138, proximal ends 134a, 136a of first and second electrodes 134, 136 are approximated towards one another, thereby capturing stalk “S” of polyp “P” therebetween. Other methods of approximating first and second electrodes 134, 136 towards one another are contemplated by the present invention. For example, another instrument separate from polyp removal device 100 may be utilized.


Continued retraction of snare portion 130 within tubular member 110 causes first and second electrodes 134, 136 to compress stalk “S” of polyp “P”. Once the clinician is satisfied stalk “S” is sufficiently received between first and second electrodes 134, 136, generator 10 may be activated to treat the tissue between first and second electrodes 134, 136. Alternatively, and as discussed above, generator 10 may include a system for monitoring the electrical properties of the tissue between first and second electrodes 134, 136. Once a predetermined condition has been satisfied, preferably, a condition suitable to promote tissue sealing, generator 10 signals to the clinician that the tissue is ready to be sealed, at which point, generator 10 may automatically provide electrosurgical energy to tissue contacting surfaces 134c, 136c, or the clinician may activate generator 10 to provide the energy to seal the tissue. Electrosurgical energy is provided to tissue contacting surfaces 134c, 136c until the tissue of stalk “S” is properly sealed. Electrosurgical energy may be provided at a range of frequencies, over a variable duration, and may be continuous or intermittent, depending of the type of tissue being treated and the thickness of the tissue. Furthermore, the monitoring function may include for a signal to denote that the sealing is finished and that severing of the polyp “P” may take place.


In some embodiments, in order to effectively seal larger vessels (or tissue) two predominant mechanical parameters should be accurately controlled—the pressure applied to the vessel (tissue) and the gap distance between the electrodes—both of which are affected by the thickness of the sealed vessel. More particularly, accurate application of pressure may be important to oppose the walls of the vessel; to reduce the tissue impedance to a low enough value that allows enough electrosurgical energy through the tissue; to overcome the forces of expansion during tissue heating; and to contribute to the end tissue thickness, which is an indication of a good seal. It has been determined that a typical fused vessel wall is preferably between 0.001 and 0.006 inches. Below this range, the seal may shred or tear and above this range the lumens may not be properly or effectively sealed.


With respect to smaller vessels, the pressure applied to the tissue tends to become less relevant, whereas the gap distance between the electrically conductive surfaces becomes more significant for effective sealing. In other words, the chances of the two electrically conductive surfaces touching during activation increases as vessels become smaller.


As mentioned above, at least one electrode, e.g., 134, may include a stop member 134d that limits the movement of the two opposing electrodes 134, 136 relative to one another. Stop member 134d may extend from the tissue contacting surface 134c a predetermined distance according to the specific material properties (e.g., compressive strength, thermal expansion, etc.) to yield a consistent and accurate gap distance “G” during sealing (FIG. 5). In one embodiment, the gap distance between opposing tissue contacting surfaces 134c, 136c during sealing ranges from about 0.001 inches to about 0.006 inches and, preferably, between about 0.002 and about 0.003 inches. The non-conductive stop members 134d, 136d may be molded onto electrodes 134, 136 (e.g., over-molding, injection molding, etc.), stamped onto electrodes 134, 136 or deposited (e.g., deposition) onto electrodes 134, 136. For example, one technique involves thermally spraying a ceramic material onto the surface of the electrodes 134, 136 to form the stop members 134d, 136d, respectively. Several thermal spraying techniques are contemplated that involve depositing a broad range of heat resistant and insulative materials on various surfaces to create stop members 134d, 136d for controlling the gap distance between electrically conductive surfaces 134c, 136c.


It has also been found that the pressure range for assuring a consistent and effective seal may be between about 3 kg/cm2 to about 16 kg/cm2 and, preferably, within a working range of 7 kg/cm2 to 13 kg/cm2. Manufacturing an instrument that is capable of providing a closure pressure within this working range has been shown, in some embodiments, to be effective for sealing arteries, tissues and other vascular bundles.


As can be appreciated, controlling the compressive force between with first and second electrodes 134, 136 as snare portion 130 is retracted may facilitate and assure consistent, uniform and accurate closure pressure about the tissue within the desired working pressure range of about 3 kg/cm2 to about 16 kg/cm2 and, preferably, about 7 kg/cm2 to about 13 kg/cm2. By controlling the intensity, frequency and duration of the electrosurgical energy applied to the tissue, the user can either cauterize, coagulate/desiccate, seal and/or simply reduce or slow bleeding.


In one embodiment, by controlling the force applied to handle 126, the resulting tension in snare portion 130 may be adjusted, which, in turn, regulates the overall pressure between electrodes 134, 136 to within the above-identified desired sealing range. A sensor 125 may be employed to accomplish this purpose and may be mechanically coupled to handle portion 120 and/or snare portion 130. A visual or audible indicator (not shown) may be operably coupled to handle portion 120, snare portion 130 and/or sensor 125 to provide visual, audible or tactile feed back to the user to assure that the clamping pressure is within the desired range prior to activation of the instrument.


Alternatively, handle portion 120 may incorporate a spring mechanism 125a configured to prevent excessive force being applied to snare portion 130, thereby preventing overcompression of the tissue between first and second electrodes 134, 136. Spring mechanism 125a may include a compression spring (not shown) that deforms once the force applied to handle 126 exceeds the force necessary to accomplish effective sealing between first and second electrodes 134, 136. In an alternative embodiment, snare portion 130 may instead be advanced and retracted through the rotation of handle 126. In this manner, handle portion 120 may include a torque mechanism, e.g., torque wrench or the like, (not shown) which is precisely set to measure the torque (rotational force) applied to snare portion 130 so the closure pressure between electrodes 134, 136 will fall within the desired pressure range.


Once the tissue of stalk “S” is sealed, handle 126 is partially advanced to extend a length of snare portion 130 from tubular member 110, thereby approximating proximal ends 134a, 136a of first and second electrodes, respectively, away from each other and exposing sealed stalk “S” to first sharpened surface 133a of connection member 133. While maintaining snare portion 130 relative to tubular member 110, tubular member 110 is retracted relative to polyp “P”, thereby causing the engagement of stalk “S” with first sharpened surface 133a of connection member 133. Continued retraction of tubular member 110 causes the complete severing of stalk “S” (see FIG. 9).


When using polyp removal device 110, the likelihood of excessive bleeding is greatly reduced because the tissue is completely sealed prior to being cut. Using polyp removal device 110 further reduces the likelihood of creating an open wound that is susceptible to infection. In addition, the utilization of bipolar energy to seal a polyp or other tissue is safer than monopolar, e.g., because of less thermal and energy spread, thereby reducing the likelihood of perforations.


With reference now to FIG. 10, an alternative embodiment of the present disclosure is shown generally as polyp removal device 200. Polyp removal device 200 is substantially similar to polyp removal device 100 and will, therefore, only be described as relates to the differences therebetween. Snare portion 230 includes first and second electrodes 234, 236 and a connection member 233. Extending between first and second electrodes 234, 236 and connection member 233 are extension members 235, 237, respectively. Extension member 235, 237 permit first and second electrodes 234, 236 to be spaced further apart from one another in a second or sealing condition. In this manner, polyp removal device 200 may be used to excise larger polyps having a larger stalk.


Various changes in form, detail and operation of the polyp removal devices of the present disclosure may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A tissue removal system comprising: a tubular member having proximal and distal ends, the tubular member defining a longitudinal axis between the proximal and distal ends thereof; and a snare portion operably extending from the distal end of the tubular member and including first and second electrodes configured to treat tissue therebetween, the snare portion further including a cutting member having a sharpened surface positioned between the first and second electrodes for severing the treated tissue, the sharpened surface elongated in a direction transverse to the longitudinal axis of the tubular member, the first and second electrodes hingedly attached to the cutting member.
  • 2. The tissue removal system of claim 1, further comprising a handle portion operatively coupled to the proximal end of the tubular member.
  • 3. The tissue removal system of claim 2, wherein the handle portion is configured for operable engagement by a user.
  • 4. The tissue removal system of claim 1, wherein the cutting member is configured to only cut when pulled in a proximal direction.
  • 5. The tissue removal system of claim 1, wherein the tissue is a polyp and the first and second electrodes are configured to grasp a stalk of a polyp.
  • 6. The tissue removal system of claim 2, wherein the first and second electrodes are hingedly attached to the cutting member.
  • 7. The tissue removal system of claim 1, wherein the snare portion is configured to be retracted within the tubular member.
  • 8. The tissue removal system of claim 1, wherein the first and second electrodes are each formed from a tissue contacting surface and an insulative body portion.
  • 9. The tissue removal system of claim 1, further including an electrosurgical generator.
  • 10. The tissue removal system of claim 9, wherein the first and second electrodes are electrically coupled to the electrosurgical generator and the generator is configured to deliver energy to the first and second electrodes in a bipolar manner.
  • 11. The tissue removal system of claim 1, wherein the distal end of the tubular member includes a spacer member for preventing the first and second electrodes from contacting one another.
  • 12. The tissue removal system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first and second electrodes includesfurther including a spacer member mounted thereonon at least one of the first and second electrodes for preventing contact between the first and second electrodes.
  • 13. A tissue removal system comprising: a generator configured to generate and deliver energy to a tissue removal device, the tissue removal device comprising:a tubular member having proximal and distal ends;a handle portion operatively extending from the proximal end of the tubular member; anda snare portion slidably supported within the tubular member and configured to extend from the distal end of the tubular member, the snare portion including first and second electrodes operably mounted thereto for receiving energy from the generator for treating tissue therebetween;a cutting member having a sharpened surface positioned between the first and second electrodes and configured to sever the treated tissue, the first and second electrodes hingedly attached to the cutting member; andwherein at least one of the first and second electrodes includes at least one spacer mounted thereonsecured to a proximal portion of at least one of the first and second electrodes for preventing contact between the first and second electrodes.
  • 14. The tissue removal device of claim 13, wherein the snare portion is formed from a non-conductive material.
  • 15. The tissue removal system of claim 13, wherein the energy is selected from the group consisting of radiofrequency, ultrasonic, microwave, and laser.
  • 16. The tissue removal system of claim 1, further including a spacer member disposed within, and secured to, the distal end of the tubular member to prevent the first and second electrodes from contacting one another.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/063,158, titled “Endoscopic flexible loop for gastrointestinal polypectomy and mucosal resection using LigaSure™ sealing technology”, by Wexner et al., filed Jan. 31, 2008, which is incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (149)
Number Name Date Kind
749689 Houghton Jan 1904 A
1952617 Wappler Mar 1934 A
1963636 Wappler Jun 1934 A
1987015 Wappler Jul 1934 A
2002559 Wappler May 1935 A
2008525 Wappler Jul 1935 A
2054149 Charles Sep 1936 A
2442966 Wallace Jun 1948 A
2532043 Wallace Nov 1950 A
3149633 Zingale Sep 1964 A
3752159 Wappler Aug 1973 A
3856015 Iglesias Dec 1974 A
4011872 Komiya Mar 1977 A
4024869 Bonnet May 1977 A
4060087 Hiltebrandt et al. Nov 1977 A
4068667 Iglesias Jan 1978 A
4116198 Roos Sep 1978 A
4134406 Iglesias Jan 1979 A
4202338 Bitrolf May 1980 A
4294254 Chamness Oct 1981 A
4311143 Komiya Jan 1982 A
4493320 Treat Jan 1985 A
4503855 Maslanka Mar 1985 A
4718419 Okada Jan 1988 A
4733662 DeSatnick et al. Mar 1988 A
4905691 Rydell Mar 1990 A
5026371 Rydell et al. Jun 1991 A
5066295 Kozak et al. Nov 1991 A
5078716 Doll Jan 1992 A
5192280 Parins Mar 1993 A
5197964 Parins Mar 1993 A
5207686 Dolgin May 1993 A
5290284 Adair Mar 1994 A
5318564 Eggers Jun 1994 A
5417697 Wilk et al. May 1995 A
5460629 Shlain et al. Oct 1995 A
5462553 Dolgin Oct 1995 A
5597107 Knodel et al. Jan 1997 A
5817093 Williamson, IV et al. Oct 1998 A
5971994 Fritzsch Oct 1999 A
6015415 Avellanet Jan 2000 A
6050995 Durgin Apr 2000 A
6071283 Nardella et al. Jun 2000 A
6152922 Ouchi Nov 2000 A
6235026 Smith May 2001 B1
6440138 Reiley et al. Aug 2002 B1
6517539 Smith et al. Feb 2003 B1
6730097 Dennis May 2004 B2
6743228 Lee et al. Jun 2004 B2
6773432 Clayman et al. Aug 2004 B1
6827717 Brommersma et al. Dec 2004 B2
6852108 Barry et al. Feb 2005 B2
6852111 Lieber Feb 2005 B1
6860848 Wosnitza et al. Mar 2005 B2
6972017 Smith et al. Dec 2005 B2
7008420 Okada Mar 2006 B2
7037307 Dennis May 2006 B2
7104990 Jenkins et al. Sep 2006 B2
7150097 Sremcich et al. Dec 2006 B2
7887536 Johnson et al. Feb 2011 B2
8016827 Chojin Sep 2011 B2
8114122 Nau, Jr. Feb 2012 B2
8133254 Dumbauld et al. Mar 2012 B2
8142473 Cunningham Mar 2012 B2
8162965 Reschke et al. Apr 2012 B2
8162973 Cunningham Apr 2012 B2
8197479 Olson et al. Jun 2012 B2
8226650 Kerr Jul 2012 B2
8251994 McKenna et al. Aug 2012 B2
8257387 Cunningham Sep 2012 B2
8277446 Heard Oct 2012 B2
8282634 Cunningham et al. Oct 2012 B2
8287536 Mueller et al. Oct 2012 B2
8303582 Cunningham Nov 2012 B2
8317787 Hanna Nov 2012 B2
8328803 Regadas Dec 2012 B2
8343150 Artale Jan 2013 B2
8357159 Romero Jan 2013 B2
8430876 Kappus et al. Apr 2013 B2
8439911 Mueller May 2013 B2
8469956 McKenna et al. Jun 2013 B2
8469957 Roy Jun 2013 B2
8486107 Hinton Jul 2013 B2
8535312 Horner Sep 2013 B2
8568412 Brandt et al. Oct 2013 B2
8623017 Moses et al. Jan 2014 B2
8632539 Twomey et al. Jan 2014 B2
8632564 Cunningham Jan 2014 B2
8636761 Cunningham et al. Jan 2014 B2
8679115 Reschke Mar 2014 B2
8795274 Hanna Aug 2014 B2
20010009985 Durgin et al. Jul 2001 A1
20020013583 Camran et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020072739 Lee et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020151889 Swanson et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165540 Bales et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030009166 Moutafis et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030040744 Latterell et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030109870 Lee et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030114850 McClurken et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030125731 Smith et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030144661 Brommersma et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030153909 Levinson Aug 2003 A1
20030176859 Levinson Sep 2003 A1
20030181906 Boebel et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030204188 Morrison et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212389 Durgin et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030216731 Dennis Nov 2003 A1
20040064139 Yossepowitch Apr 2004 A1
20040106920 Jenkins et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040153059 Okada Aug 2004 A1
20040199159 Lee et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040220564 Ho et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050070889 Nobis et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050085808 Nakao Apr 2005 A1
20050096650 Ouchi May 2005 A1
20050119652 Vetter et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131402 Ciarrocca et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131403 Chang Jun 2005 A1
20050137591 Barry et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050171531 Eliachar et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050171532 Ciarrocca Aug 2005 A1
20050209590 Terakura Sep 2005 A1
20050222568 O'Sullivan et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251134 Woloszko et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050283150 Moutafis et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060009759 Christian et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060030846 Buehlmann et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036234 Durgin et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060052774 Garrison et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060178670 Woloszko et al. Aug 2006 A1
20070198011 Sugita Aug 2007 A1
20070270796 Girard et al. Nov 2007 A2
20080221587 Schwartz Sep 2008 A1
20100042143 Cunningham Feb 2010 A1
20100049187 Carlton et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057081 Hanna Mar 2010 A1
20100063500 Muszala Mar 2010 A1
20100069903 Allen, IV et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069953 Cunningham et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076427 Heard Mar 2010 A1
20100076430 Romero Mar 2010 A1
20100076431 Allen, IV Mar 2010 A1
20100249769 Nau, Jr. et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100280511 Rachlin et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110034918 Reschke Feb 2011 A1
20110054468 Dycus Mar 2011 A1
20110054471 Gerhardt et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110060335 Harper et al. Mar 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (84)
Number Date Country
2415263 Oct 1975 DE
2415263 Oct 1975 DE
25 14 501 Oct 1976 DE
2514501 Oct 1976 DE
02514501 Oct 1976 DE
2627679 Jan 1977 DE
2627679 Jan 1977 DE
3423356 Jun 1986 DE
03423356 Jun 1986 DE
3612646 Apr 1987 DE
03612646 Apr 1987 DE
8712328 Feb 1988 DE
8712328 Mar 1988 DE
4303882 Aug 1994 DE
04303882 Feb 1995 DE
4403252 Aug 1995 DE
04403252 Aug 1995 DE
19515914 Jul 1996 DE
19515914 Jul 1996 DE
29616210 Nov 1996 DE
29616210 Jan 1997 DE
19608716 Apr 1997 DE
19608716 Apr 1997 DE
19751106 May 1998 DE
19751106 May 1998 DE
19751108 May 1999 DE
19751108 May 1999 DE
10045375 Oct 2002 DE
10045375 Oct 2002 DE
19738457 Jan 2009 DE
19738457 Jan 2009 DE
0 467 501 Jan 1992 EP
0467501 Jan 1992 EP
1 159 926 Dec 2001 EP
1159926 Dec 2001 EP
1301135 Apr 2003 EP
1645240 Apr 2006 EP
1829494 Sep 2007 EP
1490585 Nov 1977 GB
1 490 585 Nov 1997 GB
61-501068 Sep 1984 JP
65-502328 Mar 1992 JP
5-5106 Jan 1993 JP
5-40112 Feb 1993 JP
05-40112 Feb 1993 JP
06343644 Dec 1994 JP
06343644 Dec 1994 JP
07265328 Oct 1995 JP
07265328 Oct 1995 JP
08056955 Mar 1996 JP
08056955 Mar 1996 JP
08252263 Oct 1996 JP
08252263 Oct 1996 JP
09010223 Jan 1997 JP
09010223 Jan 1997 JP
10-014922 Jan 1998 JP
11-070124 May 1998 JP
2000-102545 Sep 1998 JP
11-070124 Mar 1999 JP
11244298 Sep 1999 JP
11244298 Sep 1999 JP
2000-102545 Apr 2000 JP
2000-342599 Dec 2000 JP
2000-350732 Dec 2000 JP
2000342599 Dec 2000 JP
2000350732 Dec 2000 JP
2001-008944 Jan 2001 JP
2001008944 Jan 2001 JP
2001-029356 Feb 2001 JP
2001029356 Feb 2001 JP
2001-128990 May 2001 JP
2001128990 May 2001 JP
401367 Oct 1973 SU
401367 Nov 1974 SU
9321845 Nov 1993 WO
WO 9321845 Nov 1993 WO
WO 0036986 Jun 2000 WO
0036986 Aug 2000 WO
0154604 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0154604 Aug 2001 WO
2004073753 Sep 2004 WO
2004103156 Dec 2004 WO
20051110264 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2005110264 Nov 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (190)
Entry
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-146277 dated Feb. 2, 2015.
Michael Choti. “Abdominoperineal Resection with the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System and LigaSure Atlas 20 cm Open Instrument”; Innovations That Work, Jun. 2003.
E. David Crawford “Evaluation of a New Vessel Sealing Device in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 2000.
Strasberg et al. “A Phase | Study of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hepatic Surgery” Section of HPB Surger, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, Presented at AHPBA, Feb. 2001.
E. David Crawford “Use of a Novel Vessel Sealing Technology in Management of the Dorsal Veinous Complex” Sales/Product Literature 2000.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Jun. 16, 2009 issued by the European Patent Office incounterpart International Application No. PCT/US2009/032690 filed Jan. 30, 2009.
Paul G. Horgan, “A Novel Technique for Parenchymal Division During Hepatectomy” the American Journal of Surgery, vol. 181, No. 3, Apr. 2001 pp. 236-237.
European Search Report for EP 06006716.2 dated Aug. 16, 2006.
European Search Report for EP 07 014016 dated Feb. 12, 2008.
European Search Report for European Application No. EP 13184543.0 dated Nov. 7, 2013.
Canadian Office Action corresponding to Canadian Appln. No. 2,713,898 dated Oct. 26, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Jun. 16, 2009 issued by the European Patent Office in counterpart International Application No. PCT/US2009/032690 filed Jan. 30, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,679, filed Jul. 21, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,170, filed Aug. 15, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,189, filed Aug. 15, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,243, filed Aug. 15, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/195,624, filed Aug. 21, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,154, filed Aug. 28, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,246, filed Aug. 28, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,396, filed Aug. 28, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,526, filed Aug. 28, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/204,976, filed Sep. 5, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/210,598, filed Sep. 15, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/211,205, filed Sep. 16, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,157, filed Sep. 18, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/236,666, filed Sep. 24, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/237,515, filed Sep. 25, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/237,556, filed Sep. 25, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/237,582, filed Sep. 25, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/244,873, filed Oct. 3, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/246,553, filed Oct. 7, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/248,104, filed Oct. 9, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/248,115, filed Oct. 9, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/254,123, filed Oct. 20, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/331,643, filed Dec. 10, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,970, filed Dec. 17, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/352,942, filed Jan. 13, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/353,466, filed Jan. 14, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/353,470, filed Jan. 14, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/353,474, filed Jan. 14, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/353,086, filed Jan. 30, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,195, filed Mar. 24, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/411,542, filed Mar. 26, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/419,729, filed Apr. 7, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/429,533, filed Apr. 24, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/434,382, filed May 1, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,256, filed Jul. 15, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/508,052, filed Jul. 23, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/535,869, filed Aug. 5, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/543,831, filed Aug. 19, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/543,969, filed Aug. 19, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,031, filed Aug. 26, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,534, filed Aug. 27, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/548,566, filed Aug. 27, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/551,944, filed Sep. 1, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/553,509, filed Sep. 3, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/556,025, filed Sep. 9, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/556,407, filed Sep. 9, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/556,427, filed Sep. 9, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/556,796, filed Sep. 10, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/562,281, filed Sep. 18, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/565,281, filed Sep. 23, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/568,199, filed Sep. 28, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/568,282, filed Sep. 28, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/569,395, filed Sep. 29, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/569,710, filed Sep. 29, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/574,001, filed Oct. 6, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/574,292, filed Oct. 6, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/576,380, filed Oct. 9, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/607,191, filed Oct. 28, 2009.
Chung et al., “Clinical Experience of Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum vol. 46, No. Jan. 1, 2003.
Carbonell et al., “Comparison of theGyrus PlasmaKinetic Sealer and the Valleylab LigaSure Device in the Hemostasis of Small, Medium, and Large-Sized Arteries” Carolinas Laparoscopic and Advanced Surgery Program, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC; Date: Aug. 2003.
Peterson et al. “Comparison of Healing Process Following Ligation with Sutures and Bipolar Vessel Sealing” Surgical Technology International (2001).
“Electrosurgery: A Historical Overview” Innovations in Electrosurgery; Sales/Product Literature; Dec. 31, 2000.
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealing Device in Hemorrhoidectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004.
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hemorrhoidectormy” American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinicla Congress Poster (2000).
Muller et al., “Extended Left Hemicolectomy Using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System” Innovations That Work, Sep. 1999.
Kennedy et al. “High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing” Surgical Endoscopy (1998) 12: 876-878.
Carus et al., “Initial Experience With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Abdominal Surgery” Innovations That Work, Jun. 2002.
Heniford et al. “Initial Research and Clinical Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Oct. 1999.
Heniford et al. “Initial Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Surgical Endoscopy (2000) 15:799-801.
Herman et al., “Laparoscopic Intestinal Resection With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: A Case Report”; Innovations That Work, Feb. 2002.
Koyle et al., “Laparoscopic Palomo Varicocele Ligation in Children and Adolescents” Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques, vol. 6, No. 1, 2002.
W. Scott Helton, “LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: Revolutionary Hemostasis Product for General Surgery”; Sales/Product Literature 1999.
LigaSure Vessel Sealing System, the Seal of Confidence in General, Gynecologic, Urologic, and Laparaoscopic Surgery; Sales/Product Literature; Apr. 2002.
Joseph Ortenberg “LigaSure System Used in Laparoscopic 1st and 2nd Stage Orchiopexy” Innovations That Work, Nov. 2002.
Sigel et al. “The Mechanism of Blood Vessel Closure by High Frequency Electrocoagulation” Surgery Gynecology & Obstetrics, Oct. 1965 pp. 823-831.
Sampayan et al, “Multilayer Ultra-High Gradient Insulator Technology” Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, 1998. Netherlands Aug. 17-21, 1998; vol. 2, pp. 740-743.
Paul G. Horgan, “A Noval Technoque for Parenchymal Division During Hepatectomy” The America Journal of Surgery, vol. 181, No. 3, Apr. 2001 pp. 236-237.
Olsson et al. “Radical Cystectomy in Females” Current Surgical Techniques in Urology, vol. 14, Issue 3, 2001.
Palazzo et al. “Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy” British Journal of Surgery 2002, 89, 154-157.
Levy et al. “Randomized Trial of Suture Versus Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 102, No. 1, Jul. 2003.
“Reducing Needlestick Injuries in the Operating Room” Sales/Product Literature 2001.
Bergdahl et al. “Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator” J. Neurosurg, vol. 75, Jul. 1991, pp. 148-151.
Sayfan et al. “Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy: A New Technique” Annals of Surgery vol. 234 No. 1 Jul. 2001; pp. 21-24.
Levy et al., “Update on Hysterectomy—New Technologies and Techniques” OBG Management, Feb. 2003.
Dulemba et al. “Use of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealer in Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004.
Strasberg et al., “Use of a Bipolar Vessel-Sealing Device for Parenchymal Transection During Liver Surgery” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 6, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2002 pp. 569-574.
Sengupta et al., “Use of a Computer-Controlled Bipolar Diathermy System in Radical Prostatectomies and Other Open Urological Surgery” ANZ Journal of Surgery (2001) 71.9 pp. 538-540.
Rothenberg et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children” Int'l Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) 2000.
Crawford et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Grand Rounds in Urology 1999 vol. 1 Issue 4 pp. 10-17.
Craig Johnson, “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Bloodless Hemorrhoidectomy” Innovations That Work, Mar. 2000.
Levy et al. “Use of a New Energy-based Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) World Congress 1999.
Barbara Levy, “Use of a New Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” FIGO 2000, Washington, D.C.
E. David Literature “Use of a Novel Vessel Sealing Technology in Management of the Dorsal Veinous Complex” Sales/Product Literature 2000.
Jarrett et al., “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System for Peri-Hilar Vessels in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy” Sales/Product Literature 2000.
Crouch et al. “A Velocity-Dependent Model for Needle Insertion in Soft Tissue” MICCAI 2005; LNCS 3750 pp. 624-632, Dated: 2005.
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Pelvic Surgery” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics FIGO World Congress 2000, Washington, D.C.
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Gynecologic Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 1999.
Int'l Search Report EP 98944778.4 dated Oct. 31, 2000.
Int'l Search Report EP 98957771 dated Aug. 9, 2001.
Int'l Search Report EP 98958575.7 dated Sep. 20, 2002.
Int'l Search Report EP 04013772.1 dated Apr. 1, 2005.
Int'l Search Report EP 04027314.6 dated Mar. 10, 2005.
Int'l Search Report EP 04027479.7 dated Mar. 8, 2005.
Int'l Search Report EP 04027705.5 dated Feb. 3, 2005.
Int'l Search Report EP 04752343.6 dated Jul. 20, 2007.
Int'l Search Report EP 05002671.5 dated Dec. 22, 2008.
Int'l Search Report EP 05002674.9 dated Jan. 16, 2009.
Int'l Search Report EP 05013463.4 dated Oct. 7, 2005.
Int'l Search Report EP 05013895.7 dated Oct. 21, 2005.
Int'l Search Report EP 05016399.7 dated Jan. 13, 2006.
Int'l Search Report EP 05017281.6 dated Nov. 24, 2005.
Int'l Search Report EP 05019130.3 dated Oct. 27, 2005.
Int'l Search Report EP 05019429.9 dated May 6, 2008.
Int'l Search Report EP 05020665.5 dated Feb. 27, 2006.
Int'l Search Report EP 05020666.3 dated Feb. 27, 2006.
Int'l Search Report EP 05021197.8 dated Feb. 20, 2006.
Int'l Search Report EP 05021779.3 dated Feb. 2, 2006.
Int'l Search Report EP 05021780.1 dated Feb. 23, 2006.
Int'l Search Report EP 05021937.7 dated Jan. 23, 2006.
Int'l Search Report--extended--EP 05021937.7 dated Mar. 15, 2006.
Int'l Search Report EP 05023017.6 dated Feb. 24, 2006.
Int'l Search Report EP 06002279.5 dated Mar. 30, 2006.
Int'l Search Report EP 06005185.1 dated May 10, 2006.
Int'l Search Report EP 06008716.2 dated Aug. 4, 2006.
Int'l Search Report EP 06008515.6 dated Jan. 8, 2009.
Int'l Search Report EP 06008779.8 dated Jul. 13, 2006.
Int'l Search Report EP 06014461.5 dated Oct. 31, 2006.
Int'l Search Report EP 06020574.7 dated Oct. 2, 2007.
Int'l Search Report EP 06020583.8 dated Feb. 7, 2007.
Int'l Search Report EP 06020584.6 dated Feb. 1, 2007.
Int'l Search Report EP 06020756.0 dated Feb. 16, 2007.
Int'l Search Report EP 06 024122.1 dated Apr. 16, 2007.
Int'l Search Report EP 06024123.9 dated Mar. 6, 2007.
Int'l Search Report EP 07 001480.8 dated Apr. 19, 2007.
Int'l Search Report EP 07 001488.1 dated Jun. 5, 2007.
Int'l Search Report EP 07 009026.1 dated Oct. 8, 2007.
Int'l Search Report Extended--EP 07 009029.5 dated Jul. 20, 2007.
Int'l Search Report EP 07 009321.6 dated Aug. 28, 2007.
Int'l Search Report EP 07 010672.9 dated Oct. 16, 2007.
Int'l Search Report EP 07 013779.9 dated Oct. 26, 2007.
Int'l Search Report EP 07 014016 dated Jan. 28, 2008.
Int'l Search Report EP 07 015191.5 dated Jan. 23, 2008.
Int'l Search Report EP 07 015601.3 dated Jan. 4, 2008.
Int'l Search Report EP 07 020283.3 dated Feb. 5, 2008.
Int'l Search Report EP 07 021646.0 dated Mar. 20, 2008.
Int'l Search Report EP 07 021646.0 dated Jul. 9, 2008.
Int'l Search Report EP 07 021647.8 dated May 2, 2008.
Int'l Search Report EP 08 002692.5 dated Dec. 12, 2008.
Int'l Search Report EP 08 004655.0 dated Jun. 24, 2008.
Int'l Search Report Ep 08 006732.5 dated Jul. 29, 2008.
Int'l Search Report Ep 08 006917.2 dated Jul. 3, 2008.
Int'l Search Report EP 08 016539.2 dated Jan. 8, 2009.
Int'l Search Report EP 09 003813.4 dated Aug. 3, 2009.
Int'l Search Report EP 09 004491.8 dated Sep. 9, 2009.
Int'l Search Report EP 09 005575.7 dated Sep. 9, 2009.
Int'l Search Report EP 09 152267.2 dated Jun. 15, 2009.
Int'l Search Report EP 09 152898.4 dated Jun. 10, 2009.
Int'l Search Report EP 09 154850.3 dated Jul. 20, 2009.
Int'l Search Report EP 09 160476.9 dated Aug. 4, 2009.
Int'l Search Report EP 09 164903.8 dated Aug. 21, 2009.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US98/18640 dated Jan. 29, 1999.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US98/23950 dated Jan. 14, 1999.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US98/24281 dated Feb. 22, 1999.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US99/24869 dated Feb. 3, 2000.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US01/11218 dated Aug. 14, 2001.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US01/11224 dated Nov. 13, 2001.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US01/11340 dated Aug. 16, 2001.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US01/11420 dated Oct. 16, 2001.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US02/01890 dated Jul. 25, 2002.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US02/11100 dated Jul. 16, 2002.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US03/28534 dated Dec. 19, 2003.
Int'l Search Report PCT/USO4/03436 dated Mar. 3, 2005.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US04/13273 dated Dec. 15, 2004.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US04/15311 dated Jan. 12, 2005.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US07/021438 dated Apr. 1, 2008.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US07/021440 dated Apr. 8, 2008.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US08/61498 dated Sep. 22, 2008.
Int'l Search Report PCT/US09/032690 dated Jun. 16, 2009.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61063158 Jan 2008 US
Reissues (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12363086 Jan 2009 US
Child 14561461 US