Polyphasic multi-coil electric device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8614529
  • Patent Number
    8,614,529
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, June 5, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 24, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A polyphasic multi-coil generator includes a drive shaft, at least first and second rotors rigidly mounted on the drive shaft so as to simultaneously synchronously rotate with rotation of the drive shaft, and at least one stator sandwiched between the first and second rotors. A stator array on the stator has an array of electrically conductive coils mounted to the stator in a first angular orientation about the drive shaft. The rotors each have an array of magnets which are circumferentially equally spaced around the rotor and located at the same radially spacing with respect to the centre of the rotor and the drive shaft at a first angular orientation relative to the drive shaft. The arrays of magnets on adjacent rotors are off-set by an angular offset relative to one another.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of generators, and more particularly, it relates to a generator having polyphasic multiple coils in staged staggered arrays.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Conventional electric motors employ magnetic forces to produce either rotational or linear motion. Electric motors operate on the principle that when a conductor, which carries a current, is located in the magnetic field, a magnetic force is exerted upon the conductor resulting in movement. Conventional generators operate through the movement of magnetic fields thereby producing a current in a conductor situated within the magnetic fields. As a result of the relationship between conventional motors and generators, conventional generator technologies have focused mainly on modifying electric motor designs, for example, by reversing the operation of an electric motor.


In a conventional design for an electric motor, adding an electrical current to the coils of an induction system creates a force through the interaction of the magnetic fields and the conducting wire. The force rotates a shaft. Conventional electric generator design is the opposite. By rotating the shaft, an electric current is created in the conductor coils. However the electric current will continue to oppose the force rotating the shaft. This resistance will continue to grow as the speed of the shaft is increased, thus reducing the efficiency of the generator. In a generator where a wire is coiled around a soft iron core (ferromagnetic), a magnet may be drawn by the coil and a current will be produced in the coil wire. However, the system would not create an efficient generator due to the physical reality that it takes more energy to pull the magnet away from the soft iron core of the coil than would be created in the form of electricity by the passing of the magnet.


As a result, there is a need for a generator wherein the magnetic drag may be substantially reduced such that there is little resistance while the magnets are being drawn away from the coils. Furthermore, there is a need for a generator that minimizes the impact of the magnetic drag produced on the generator. In the prior art, Applicant is aware of U.S. Pat. No. 4,879,484 which issued to Huss on Nov. 7, 1989 for an Alternating Current Generator and Method of Angularly Adjusting the Relative Positions of Rotors Thereof. Huss describes an actuator for angularly adjusting a pair of rotors relative to each other about a common axis, the invention being described as solving a problem with voltage control as generator load varies where the output voltage of a dual permanent magnet generator is described as being controlled by shifting the two rotors in and out of phase.


Applicant also is aware of U.S. Pat. No. 4,535,263 which issued Aug. 13, 1985 to Avery for Electric D.C. Motors with a Plurality of Units, Each Including a Permanent Magnet Field Device and a Wound Armature for Producing Poles. In that reference, Avery discloses an electric motor having spaced stators enclosing respective rotors on a common shaft wherein circumferential, spaced permanent magnets are mounted on the rotors and the stator windings are angularly offset with respect to adjacent stators slots so that cogging that occurs as the magnets pass a stator slot are out of phase and thus substantially cancelled out.


Applicant is also aware of U.S. Pat. No. 4,477,745 which issued to Lux on Oct. 16, 1984 for a Disc Rotor Permanent Magnet Generator. Lux discloses mounting an array of magnets on a rotor so as to pass the magnets between inner and outer stator coils. The inner and outer stators each have a plurality of coils so that for each revolution of the rotor more magnets pass by more coils than in what are described as standard prior art generators having only an outer coil-carrying stator with fewer, more spaced apart magnets.


Applicant is also aware of U.S. Pat. No. 4,305,031 which issued to Wharton on Dec. 8, 1981 for a Rotary Electrical Machine. Wharton purports to address the problem wherein a generator's use of permanent magnet rotors gives rise to difficulties in regulating output voltage under varying external load and shaft speed and so describes a servo control of the relative positions of the permanent magnets by providing a rotor having a plurality of first circumferentially spaced permanent magnet pole pieces and a plurality of second circumferentially spaced permanent magnet pole pieces, where the servo causes relative movement between the first and second pole pieces, a stator winding surrounding the rotor.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In summary, the polyphasic multi-coil generator includes a drive shaft, at least first and second rotors rigidly mounted on the drive shaft so as to simultaneously synchronously rotate with rotation of the drive shaft, and at least one stator sandwiched between the first and second rotors. The stator has an aperture through which the drive shaft is rotatably journalled. A stator array on the stator has an array of electrically conductive coils mounted to the stator in a first angular orientation about the drive shaft. The coils on the stator array are circumferentially spaced around the stator and located at the same radial spacing with respect to the centre of the stator and the drive shaft and may, without intending to be limiting, be equally circumferentially spaced apart. The rotors and the stator lie in substantially parallel planes. The first and second rotors have, respectively, first and second rotor arrays. The first rotor array has a first rotor array of magnets which are circumferentially equally spaced around the first rotor and located at the same radial spacing with respect to the centre of the rotor and the drive shaft at a first angular orientation relative to the drive shaft. The second rotor array has a second array of magnets which are circumferentially equally spaced around the second rotor and located at the same radial spacing with respect to the axial centre of the second rotor at a second angular orientation relative to the drive shaft. Without intending to be limiting, the rotor arrays may be equally radially spaced apart. The first and second angular orientations are offset by an angular offset so that the first and second rotor arrays are offset relative to one another. The radially spaced apart stator and rotor arrays may be constructed without the symmetry of their being equally radially spaced apart and still function.


The angular offset is such that, as the drive shaft and the rotors are rotated in a direction of rotation of the rotors so as to rotate relative to the stator, an attractive magnetic force of the magnets of the first rotor array attracts the magnets of the first rotor array towards corresponding next adjacent coils in the stator array which lie in the direction of rotation of the rotors so as to substantially balance with and provide a withdrawing force applied to the magnets of the second rotor array to draw the magnets of the second rotor array away from corresponding past adjacent coils in the stator array as the magnets of the second rotor array are withdrawn in the direction of rotation of the rotors away from the past adjacent coils. Similarly, as the drive shaft and the rotors are rotated in the direction of rotation of the rotors, an attractive magnetic force of the magnets of the second rotor array attracts the magnets of the second rotor array towards corresponding next adjacent coils in the stator array which lie in the direction of rotation of the rotors so as to substantially balance with and provide a withdrawing force applied to the magnets of the first rotor array to draw the magnets of the first rotor array away from corresponding past adjacent coils in the stator array as the magnets of the first rotor array are withdrawn in the direction of rotation of the rotors away from the past adjacent coils.


In one embodiment, a further stator is mounted on the drive shaft, so that the drive shaft is rotatably journalled through a drive shaft aperture in the further stator. A further stator array is mounted on the further stator. The further stator array has an angular orientation about the drive shaft which, while not intending to be limiting, may be substantially the same angular orientation as the first angular orientation of the stator array of the first stator. A third rotor is mounted on the drive shaft so as to simultaneously synchronously rotate with rotation of the first and second rotors. A third rotor array is mounted on the third rotor. The third rotor array has a third array of magnets which are circumferentially equally spaced around the third rotor and located at the same radial spacing with respect to the centre of the rotor and the drive shaft at a third angular orientation relative to the drive shaft. The third angular orientation is angularly offset for example, by the angular offset of the first and second rotor arrays so that the third rotor array is offset relative to the second rotor array by the same angular offset as between the first and second rotor arrays. The further stator and the third rotor lay in planes substantially parallel to the substantially parallel planes of the first stator and the first and second rotors. Advantageously the third rotor array is both offset by the same angular offset as between the first and second rotor arrays from the second rotor array and by twice the angular offset as between the first and second rotor arrays, that is, their angular offset multiplied by two, from the first rotor array. Thus the first, second and third rotor arrays are sequentially angularly staggered about the drive shaft.


The sequentially angularly staggered first, second and third rotors, the first stator and the further stators may be referred to as together forming a first generator stage. A plurality of such stages, that is, substantially the same as the first generator stage, may be mounted on the drive shaft. Further stages may or may not be aligned with the first stage depending upon the desired application.


The magnets in the rotor arrays may be pairs of magnets, each pair of magnets may advantageously be arranged with one magnet of the pair radially inner relative to the drive shaft and the other magnet of the pair radially outer relative to the drive shaft. This arrangement of the magnets, and depending on the relative position of the corresponding coils on the corresponding stator, provides either radial flux rotors or axial flux rotors. For example, each pair of magnets may be aligned along a common radial axis, that is, one common axis for each pair of magnets, where each radial axis extends radially outwardly of the drive shaft, and each coil in the stator array may be aligned so that the each coil is wrapped substantially symmetrically around corresponding radial axes. Thus, advantageously, the magnetic flux of the pair of magnets is orthogonally end-coupled, that is, coupled at ninety degrees to the corresponding coil as each pair of magnets are rotated past the corresponding coil.


In one embodiment not intended to be limiting, the first rotor array is at least in part co-planar with the corresponding stator array as the first rotor array is rotated past the stator array, and the second rotor array is at least in part co-planar with the corresponding stator array as the second rotor is rotated past the stator array.


The rotors may include rotor plates wherein the rotor arrays are mounted to the rotor plates, and wherein the rotor plates are mounted orthogonally onto the drive shaft. The stators may include stator plates and the stator arrays are mounted to the stator plates, and wherein the stator plates are orthogonal to the drive shaft.


The rotors may be mounted on the drive shaft by mounting means which may include clutches mounted between each of the first and second rotors and the drive shaft. In such an embodiment, the drive shaft includes means for selectively engaging each clutch in sequence along the drive shaft by selective longitudinal translation of the drive shaft by selective translation means. The clutches may be centrifugal clutches adapted for mating engagement with the drive shaft when the drive shaft is longitudinally translated by the selective translation means into a first position for mating engagement with, firstly, a first clutch for example, although not necessarily, on the first rotor and, secondly sequentially into a second position for mating engagement with also a second clutch for example on the second rotor and so on to sequentially add load to the drive shaft, for example during start-up. Thus in a three rotor stage, some or all of the rotors may have clutches between the rotors and the drive shaft. As described above, the stages may be repeated along the drive shaft.


In an alternative embodiment, the mounting means may be a rigid mounting mounted between the third rotor, each of the first and second rotors and the drive shaft. Instead of the use of clutches, the electrical windings on the rotor arrays in successive stages may be selectively electrically energized, that is, between open and closed circuits for selective windings wherein rotational resistance for rotating the drive shaft is reduced when the circuits are open and increased when the circuits are closed. Staging of the closing of the circuits for successive stator arrays, that is, in successive stages, provides for the selective gradual loading of the generator.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various other objects, features and attendant advantages of the present invention will become fully appreciated as the same becomes better understood when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters designate the same or similar parts throughout the several views, and wherein:



FIG. 1
a is, in partially cut away perspective view, one embodiment of the polyphasic multi-coil generator showing a single stator sandwiched between opposed facing rotors.



FIG. 1 is, in front perspective view, a further embodiment of the polyphasic multi-coil generator according to the present invention illustrating by way of example nine rotor and stator pairs wherein the nine pairs are grouped into three stages having three rotor and stator pairs within each stage, the radially spaced arrays of magnets on each successive rotor within a single stage staggered so as to be angularly offset with respect to each other.



FIG. 2 is, in front perspective exploded view, the generator of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is the generator of FIG. 2 in rear perspective exploded view.



FIG. 4 is a partially exploded view of the generator of FIG. 1 illustrating the grouping of the rotor and stator pairs into three pairs per stage.



FIG. 4
a is, in front elevation view, the generator of FIG. 1 with the front rotor plate removed so as to show the radially spaced apart magnet and coil arrangement.



FIG. 5 is, in perspective view, the generator of FIG. 1 within a housing.



FIG. 6 is a sectional view along line 6-6 in FIG. 1.



FIG. 7 is, in front perspective exploded view, a single rotor and stator pair of the generator of FIG. 1.



FIG. 8 is the rotor and stator pair of FIG. 7 in rear perspective exploded view.



FIG. 9 is, in cross-sectional view, an alternative embodiment of a single rotor and stator pair illustrating the use of a centrifugal clutch between the rotor and the drive shaft.



FIG. 9
a is a cross-sectional view through an exploded front perspective view of the rotor and stator pair of FIG. 9.



FIG. 10 is, in partially cut away front elevation view, an alternative embodiment of the present invention illustrating an alternative radially spaced apart arrangement of rotor and stator arrays.



FIG. 11
a is, in side elevation, a further alternative embodiment of the generator according to the present invention wherein the stator coils are parallel to the drive shaft on a single stage.



FIG. 11
b is, in side elevation, two stages according to the design of FIG. 11a.



FIG. 11
c is, in side elevation, three stages of a further alternative embodiment wherein the stator coils are inclined relative to the drive shaft.



FIGS. 12
a and 12b are schematic side elevation views of first and second device stages having different diameters.



FIG. 13 is a cross-section view of an air coil embodiment of the induction coils in FIG. 9a.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION

I incorporate herein by reference in its entirety my U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/600,723 filed Aug. 12, 2004 entitled Polyphasic Stationary Multi-Coil Generator. Where any inconsistency exists between that document and this specification, for example in the definition of terms, this specification is to govern.


In FIG. 1a, wherein like reference numerals denote corresponding parts in each view, a single stage 10 of the polyphasic multi-coil generator according to the present invention includes a pair of rotors 12 and 14 lying in parallel planes and sandwiching therebetween so as to be interleaved in a plane parallel and lying between the planes of the rotors, a stator 16. Rotors 12 and 14 are rigidly mounted to a drive shaft 18 so that when drive shaft 18 is rotated by a prime mover (not shown) for example in direction A, rotors 12 and 14 rotate simultaneously at the same rate about axis of rotation B. Feet 32 are provided to mount stator 16 down onto a base or floor surface. Rotors 12 and 14 each have a central hub 19 and mounted thereon extending in an array which is circumferentially equally spaced around the rotors and located at the same spacing with respect to the centre of the rotors and drive shaft 18 are pairs of magnets 22a and 22b. Although only one pair of magnets, that is, only two separate magnets are illustrated, with a keeper shown between to increase flux, a single magnet with the polarities of either end inducing the coils may be used with substantially equal results. Each pair of magnets is mounted on a corresponding rigid arm 24 extended cantilevered radially outwardly from hub 19. Each pair of magnets 22a and 22b are spaced apart along the length of their corresponding arm 24 so as to define a passage or channel 26 between the pair of magnets.


Electrically conductive wire coils 28 are wrapped around iron-ferrite cores 30. Cores 30 and coils 28 are mounted so as to protrude from both sides 16a and 16b of stator 16. Coils 28 are sized so as to pass snugly between the distal ends 22a and 22b of magnets 22, that is, through channel 26 so as to end couple the magnetic flux of the magnets with the ends of the coils. In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1a, again which is not intended to be limiting, eight coils 28 and corresponding cores 30 are mounted equally radially spaced apart around stator 16, so that an equal number of coils and cores extend from the opposite sides of stator 16 aligned so that each coil and core portion on side 16a has a corresponding coil and core immediately behind it on the opposite side of stator 16, that is, on side 16b. It is to be understood that although this embodiment employs an eight coil array, however, any number of coils with corresponding magnet assemblies may be employed. For example, in one embodiment, this design uses sixteen coils and two sets of armatures (that is rotors) with twelve sets of magnets each. This embodiment is not intended to suggest that a single stage may be employed. Any number of stages may be utilized on the same drive shaft.


Rotor 14 is a mirror image of rotor 12. Rotors 12 and 14 are mounted in opposed facing relation on opposite sides of stator 16. The angular orientation of rotors 12 and 14 about drive shaft 18 differs between the two rotors. That is, the magnets 22 on rotor 14 are angularly offset about axis of rotation B relative to the magnets mounted on rotor 12. For example, each of the pairs of magnets on rotor 14 may be angularly offset by, for example, and offset angle α (better defined below) of five degrees or ten degrees or fifteen degrees relative to the angular orientation of the pairs of magnets on rotor 12. Thus, as rotors 12 and 14 are simultaneously being driven by rotation of shaft 18, as a magnet 22 on rotor 12 is being magnetically attracted towards a next adjacent core 30 portion on side 16a of the stator, the attractive force is assisting in pushing or drawing the corresponding magnet on rotor 14 past and away from the corresponding core portion on side 16b of stator 16. Thus the attractive force of incoming magnets (incoming relative to the coil) on one rotor substantially balances the force required to push the corresponding magnets on the other rotor away from the coil/core. Consequently, any one magnet on either of the rotors is not rotated past a core merely by the force of the rotation applied to drive shaft 18, and the amount of force required to rotate the rotors relative to the stator is reduced. The efficiency of the generator is thus increased by the angular offsetting of the magnet pairs on opposite sides of the stator acting to balance or effectively cancel out the effects of the drawing of the magnets past the cores.


Further stages may be mounted onto drive shaft 18 for example further opposed facing pairs of rotors 12 and 14 having a stator 16 interleaved therebetween. In such an embodiment, further efficiency of the generator may be obtained by progressive angular offsetting of the magnets so as to angularly stagger each successive rotors' array of magnets relative to the angular orientation of the magnets on adjacent rotors. Thus, with sufficient number of stages, the magnetic forces may be relatively seamlessly balanced so that at any point during rotation of drive shaft 18, the attractive force of the magnet approaching the next adjacent cores in the direction of rotation balances the force required to push or draw the magnet pairs on other rotors away from that core thus reducing the force required to rotate drive shaft 18.


A further embodiment of the invention is illustrated in FIGS. 1-9, again wherein similar characters of reference denote corresponding parts in each view. In the illustrated embodiment nine banks of rotors 34 each have magnet pairs 36a and 36b which are circumferentially equally spaced around the rotors and located at the same radial spacing with respect to the centre of the rotors wherein the arrays are angularly displaced or staggered relative to adjacent arrays on adjacent rotors. Thus each magnet pair 36a and 36b in the equally radially spaced array of magnet pairs 36a and 36b, radially spaced about axis of rotation B are angularly offset by the same offset angle α, for example, five degrees, ten degrees or fifteen degrees, between adjacent rotors. Thus the successive banks of rotors are cumulatively staggered by the same angular displacement between each successive rotor so as to achieve a more seamlessly magnetically balanced rotation of the rotors relative to the stators 38 and in particular relative to the coils 40 and cores 42 mounted on stators 38.


Magnets 36a and 36b are mounted onto a carrier plate 44. The carrier plate 44 for each rotor 34 is rigidly mounted onto drive shaft 18. Coils 40 and their corresponding cores 42 are mounted onto a stator plate 48. Stator plate 48 is rigidly mounted to housing 56, which itself may be mounted down onto a base or floor by means of rigid supports (not shown).


In one alternative embodiment not intending to be limiting, a small motor 54, which is in addition to the prime mover (not shown), may be employed to engage additional stages or banks having further progressively angularly displaced or staggered stages or banks of magnet pairs in radially spaced array on successive rotors. For example motor 54 may selectively drive a shifter rod so as to sequentially engage centrifugal clutch mechanisms on each rotor as described below.


A housing 56 may be provided to enclose stators 38 and the armatures or rotors 34. Housing 56 may be mounted on a supporting frame (not shown), and both may be made of non-magnetic and non-conductive materials to eliminate eddy currents. In one embodiment of the invention, not intended to be limiting, a single stage 58 of the generator includes three stators 38 interleaved with three rotors 34. The generator may include multiple stages 58 along the drive shaft to reduce the magnetic drag by offsetting any resistances created within the generator.


Stators 38 may include a plurality of induction coils 40 made of electrically conducting materials, such as copper wire. Each induction coil 40 may be wrapped around a highly ferromagnetic core such as a soft iron core 42. Alternatively, induction coils 40 may be air coils (that is, not wrapped around any core, for example, where coil 40 is wrapped around a solid non-ferromagnetic structure or a hollow non-ferromagnetic frame 132 in which core 42 is replaced with air space 130 as shown in FIG. 13) for applications where less output current is required or where less mechanical force is available to be applied to rotors 38. In the illustrated embodiment of the invention, the stators are disk shaped. The embodiment of FIG. 1a includes eight induction coils 28 mounted equidistant and equally radially spaced apart from each other on a plate or disk made of non-magnetic and non-conductive materials. In the embodiment of the remaining figures, stators 38 include sixteen induction coils 40 on each stator disk or plate 48. The number of induction coils 40 may vary depending on the application of the generator, and may be only limited by the physical space available on the stator plate.


The induction coils 40 may be configured such that a first set of induction coils 40 produce a first independent phase signal and a second set of induction coils 40 produce a second independent phase signal with opposing wave signals. The induction coils 40 are alternately orientated such that an induction coil 40 producing the first independent phase signal is positioned in between induction coils 40 producing the second independent phase signal. In such dual phase design, the two independent phases are exact reciprocals of each other wherein one independent phase may be inverted to combine the potential current of the two into one phase with a synchronous wave pattern. Preferably, each of the first set and second set of induction coils 40 have an equal number of induction coils 40 wrapped around their cores 42 in a first direction and an equal number of induction coils 40 wrapped around their cores 42 in an opposite second direction to align the currents of the two phases. For example, in the embodiment wherein the stators 38 include sixteen, that is, two sets of eight induction coils 40 (alternate phases), each of the first set of eight induction coils 40 will produce a first independent phase signal and the second set of eight induction coils 40 will produce a second independent phase signal.


Rotors 34 may have magnets 36 of any magnetic materials such as neodymium magnets. Rotors 34 each include an array of equally spaced apart pairs of magnets 36a and 36b which are mounted on rotor plates made of non-magnetic and non-conductive materials so as to discourage straying flux lines or eddy currents. In the embodiment having sixteen induction coils 40 on each stator, the rotor array of magnets (the “rotor array”) includes eight “U”-shaped opposed facing pairs of magnets 36 on each rotor 34. Each end of each “U”-shaped magnet 36, sixteen ends in all on the radially outer ring and sixteen on the inner ring, are paired to the corresponding sixteen coils as the ends of the magnets are rotated closely past the opposite ends of the coils.


In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 1 the rotor arrays between successive rotors 34 in stage 58 are angularly offset about the axis of rotation B of the drive shaft by an offset angle α of for example fifteen degrees. It is understood that an offset of fifteen degrees is merely one preferred offset, but it may be any number of degrees of offset. Offset angle α is seen best in FIG. 4a as the angle between the radial axes 60 and 60′ of magnets 36a and 36a′ of successive rotors 34.


As the rotors are driven to rotate about the drive shaft by an outside motive force, such as for example wind or water or other prime movers, the magnets 36 travel towards induction coils 40 by attraction of the magnets to the cores 42. AC pulse is created in all the induction coils on the stators as the induction coils are designed to draw the magnetic flux from the magnets 36. In the embodiment of FIG. 1a, which is illustrative, the opposing polarity of the magnets between each rotor and the angularly offset alignment of the rotor array relative to each other permits the magnets to be drawn away from one core and towards the next core. For example, the north, south (N,S) polarity configuration of the magnets on the first rotor 12 is drawn by the opposing south, north (S,N) polarity configuration of the magnets on the second rotor 14, where the first rotor array is offset by fifteen degrees relative to the second rotor array such that the magnetic attraction between the magnets on the first rotor and the magnets on the second rotor draws the magnets away from the core. The balancing of magnetic forces between magnets on the rotors reduces the work required from the drive shaft to draw magnets off the induction coils, thereby increasing the efficiency of the generator.


The rotating magnetic fields created by the configuration of the magnets with alternating magnetic orientation between rotors and the alternating multi-phase configuration of the induction coils create multiple reciprocal AC phase signals. As the induction coils are stationary, AC power may be harnessed directly from the induction coils without brushes. The regulation and attenuation of these currents may be achieved by methods known in the art. As the magnets pass the induction coils, they induce a current that alternates in direction. Magnets may be configured such that for example an equal number of magnets influence the first set of induction coils by a N,S magnetic polarity as the number of magnets influencing the second set of induction coils by a S,N magnetic polarity. The configuration of the rotors create an alternating current in each of the two phases of the single stage embodiment of FIG. 1a. The configuration of magnetic forces allows for a balancing of the resistances within the generator.


In an alternative embodiment, such as seen in FIGS. 1-9, there is a significant advantage to the addition of multiple stages on the drive shaft. The work required to rotate the drive shaft may be even further reduced through the addition of multiple stages 58. The alignment of the multiple stages may be offset such that additional stages further reduce resistance in the generator by accomplishing even greater balancing of forces than can be done with a single stage design. Alignment of stator arrays of coils (“stator arrays”) may be offset or alternatively, the alignment of the rotor arrays may be offset to reduce resistance. Consequently, adding additional stages may increase electrical output without proportionally increasing resistance within the generator. While additional induction coils will increase magnetic drag, the greater balancing of forces achieved by the orientation of the stator arrays and rotor arrays of the additional stages offsets the increase in drag and further increases the overall efficiency of the generator. Additional stages may be engaged so as to rotate the additional rotors by any number of mechanisms, such as current driven sensors that use solenoids, or clutches such as the centrifugal driven clutch mechanisms of FIGS. 7-9, 9a which may be used to engage the next stage when the rotor of a subsequent stage achieves a predetermined speed. An example of a clutch is illustrated. Clutch 62 is mounted within the hub of each of rotors 34. Rotation of a clutch arm 64, once the clutch is engaged by the splines on the splined portion 18b of drive shaft 18 engaging matching splines within the arm hub 66, drives the arm against stops 68. This drives the clutch shoes 70 radially outwardly so as to engage the periphery of the shoes against the interior surface of the rotor carrier plate hub 44a. A linear actuator, for example such as motor 54, actuates shifter rod 72 in direction D so as to engage splined portion 18b with firstly, the splines within the arm hub 66. Then, once the clutch engages and the rotor comes up to nearly match the rotational speed of the drive shaft, the splined portion is further translated so as to engage the splines 74a within the rotor hub 74. Subsequent rotor/stator pairs or subsequent stages, such as stages 58, may be added, by further translation of the shifter rod into the splines of subsequent clutches and their corresponding rotor hubs. In a reversal of this process, stages are removed by withdrawing the shifter rod. Rotor hubs are supported by needle bearings 76 within stator hub 38a. In the further alternative, linear motor driven mechanisms or spline and spring mechanisms may be used. FIG. 10 is a further alternative embodiment wherein the coils are offset in a concentric circle around the drive shaft to achieve the magnetic balancing. The coils are aligned end to end in a concentric circle around the drive shaft in the further alternative embodiment seen in FIGS. 11a-11c. The induction coils 40 are mounted parallel, or slightly inclined as in FIG. 11c, relative to the drive shaft to reduce the draw of magnetic flux from between the rotors due to the close proximity and the strength of the magnets. A further advantage of positioning the induction coils parallel to the drive shaft is that drawing magnets directly past the end of each induction coil rather than from the side may be more efficient in inducing current in the induction coils. A horizontal orientation of the induction coils may also permit doubling the number of induction coils in the generator, resulting in greater output. In the embodiment of FIG. 11b, the two stator arrays 80 and 80′ have an angular offset relative to each other that is one half of the desired total angular offset, that is, the alignment that provides for optimum balance. The next successive stator array may then have the same angular offset as between stator arrays 80 and 80′. As in the other embodiments the angular offset may be appropriately offset for any number of stages. This embodiment shows that the coils may be offset while leaving the magnet arrays in the armatures/rotors in alignment, that is without an angular offset between successive rotor arrays, and still accomplish the balancing effect.


As stated above, multiple stages reduce resistance as each stage is added. For example, within a stage having three rotor/stator pairs, rather than a single induction coil being induced by the passing of two magnets with opposing magnetic poles, such an embodiment allows two induction coils to effectively align between the magnetic influences of the rotor arrays. In addition to increasing the number of induction coils, the rotor arrays are much further apart, thus significantly reducing the incidence of straying magnetic flux across the space between the rotors.


To appropriately orientate additional stages for a staging application, the rotor arrays may be appropriately angularly offset as described above. Alternatively as seen in FIG. 11c, the induction coils may be angled such that the rotor arrays are not perfectly aligned in parallel to each other. As induction coils 40 and their corresponding cores 42 are on a slight angle, magnets (not shown) on rotors 78 on either side of the stator arrays 80 are preferably misaligned too as the magnetic influence from the magnets should induce each of the induction coils from both ends simultaneously for optimum function. In an embodiment of the invention, the misalignment of rotor arrays is increasingly smaller, becoming negligible as more stages are added. As additional stages are added, the less of an angular offset exists between the subsequent rotor arrays with the stages. Any number of stages may be added to the drive shaft and additional stages may be aligned or misaligned with other stages within the generator, depending on the desired function.


The optimum number of stages may be determined by the degrees of offset of each stage relative to the previous stage. The number of induction coils in the stator arrays need not depend on the corresponding number of magnets in the rotor arrays. The stator arrays may include any number of induction coils and they may or may not be symmetrical in their placement about the stators.


There are many applications for a generator according to the present invention. For example, rather than having a wind turbine that requires significant energy to start rotating drive shaft 18 and which may be overloaded when too much wind is applied, the generator may be reconfigured to allow the maximum current to be produced regardless of how much wind is driving the generator. This may be accomplished by engaging a greater number of stages, such as stages 58, for example as the wind increases and decreasing the engagement of stages to reduce the number of engaged stages when the wind decreases. Furthermore, the first stage of the generator may include air coils such that very little wind energy is required to start rotating the drive shaft, and subsequent stages may include induction coils having iron cores such that greater currents may be generated when there is greater wind energy. Further, additional stages may increase in size and diameter (e.g., as illustrated by stage 120 without air coils and stage 122 with air coils in FIGS. 12a and 12b) so as to create greater physical resistance when greater wind energy is present but as well to create more electrical output from the system when input energy is high. When wind energy is minimal, the generator may thus still allow for rotor 30 to rotate as it will engage only one, that is the first stage of the generator. As the wind energy increases, the generator may engage additional stages, thus increasing the output current. As wind energy continues to increase, more stages may be added or engaged to allow for the maximum current to be drawn off the generator. As wind energy decreases in intensity, the generator may disengage the additional stages and thus reduce mechanical resistance, allowing the blades of the wind turbine or other wind driven mechanism to continue to turn regardless of how much wind is present above a low threshold. This generator configuration allows for maximized energy collection.


Applications for such a variable load generator are numerous as the generator is not only able to adapt to variable source energies, such as wind, but can be adapted to service specific power needs when source energy can be controlled. One example would be a hydro powered generator that, rather than turning off at night, and needing to warm up again to service greater power needs in the day, may simply vary its output to suit the night cycle and thus use less source energy to function during that time.


In an alternative design, all of the rotors in all of the stages are rigidly mounted to the drive shaft, so that all of the rotors are rotating simultaneously. Instead of clutches, the windings circuits are left open on, at least initially, many or most of the stages to reduce turning resistance, and only those windings on the stages to be engaged are closed, that is energized. This allows for reduced resistance on the drive shaft overall when a lesser number of stages are electrically engaged. As additional circuits are closed and more windings thus added to the system, this will result in increasing the load of the generator and thus it will increase resistance on the drive shaft. By not requiring clutching mechanisms, the generator may be less expensive to construct and maintain as there are no maintenance issues regarding any clutch mechanisms. This “electrical” staging system may be applied to the magnetically balanced generator design according to the present invention or any other conventional design applicable for the staging application.


It should also be noted that the staging application, mechanical with clutches, or electrical by engaging and disengaging coil array circuitry, may be applied to existing generator designs that are appropriately constructed into short, stout sections so as to accommodate the staging application.


As will be apparent to those skilled in the art in the light of the foregoing disclosure, many alterations and modifications are possible in the practice of this invention without departing from the spirit or scope thereof. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is to be construed in accordance with the substance defined by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A polyphasic multi-coil electric device comprising: a drive shaft;a first rotor having a first aperture for receiving said drive shaft, said first rotor having a first array of magnets circumferentially spaced on said first rotor;a second rotor having a second aperture for receiving said drive shaft, said second rotor having a second array of magnets circumferentially spaced on said second rotor, angular rotation of said first rotor being fixed relative to said second rotor and said first array of magnets being angularly offset in a drive shaft rotation direction from said second array of magnets;first and second stators interleaved with said first rotor and said second rotor, each of said first and second stators having an aperture for receiving said drive shaft and a stator array including electrically conductive coils mounted circumferentially on said first and second stators, said first and second rotors and said first and second stators being provided in substantially parallel planes;mechanisms for selectively coupling said first rotor and said second rotor to said drive shaft to rotate said first rotor and said second rotor relative to said first and second stators, rotation of said first rotor and said second rotor relative to said first and second stators for inducing a current in said electrically conductive coils of said first and second stators;wherein a drive shaft input force required to rotate said first rotor and said second rotor relative to said first and second stators is reduced by attractive magnetic forces that rotate said first array of magnets and said second array of magnets toward next electrically conductive coils in said drive shaft rotation direction.
  • 2. A polyphasic multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said mechanisms are current driven sensors including at least one solenoid.
  • 3. A polyphasic multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said mechanisms are clutches mounted within hubs of said first rotor and said second rotor, said clutches being selectively engageable by a splined portion of said drive shaft.
  • 4. A polyphasic multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 3, wherein said clutches include clutch splines, a clutch arm and clutch shoes, said clutch arm being rotatable relative to said clutch shoes to force said clutch shoes into engagement with said hubs and said clutch arm being rotatable with said clutch shoes to bring a rotational speed of said hubs into alignment with a rotational speed of said drive shaft.
  • 5. A polyphasic multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 4, wherein said hubs include splines for receiving said splined portion of said drive shaft, said splined portion of said drive shaft being moved into engagement with said splines of said hubs when said rotational speed of said hubs matches said rotational speed of said drive shaft.
  • 6. A polyphasic multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 3, wherein said splined portion of said drive shaft is axially movable by a shifter rod to engage clutches of successive rotors of said polyphasic multi-coil electric device, said subsequent rotors being interleaved with successive stators.
  • 7. A polyphasic multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 1, wherein each of said first array of magnets and said second array of magnets include pairs of magnets, each of said pairs of magnets including one magnet radially inner relative to said drive shaft and the other magnet radially outer relative to said drive shaft.
  • 8. A polyphasic multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 7, wherein each of said pairs of magnets are aligned along a common radial axis extending radially outwardly of said drive shaft.
  • 9. A polyphasic multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 1, wherein each of said electrically conductive coils is wrapped around a radial axis extending radially outward of said drive shaft.
  • 10. A polyphasic multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said electrically conductive coils are aligned end to end in a concentric circle around said drive shaft.
  • 11. A polyphasic multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said electrically conductive coils are mounted parallel relative to said drive shaft.
  • 12. A polyphasic multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said electrically conductive coils are mounted slightly inclined from parallel relative to said drive shaft.
  • 13. A polyphasic multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said first array of magnets is at least in part co-planar with said stator array of said first stator and said second array of magnets is at least in part co-planar with said stator array of said second stator.
  • 14. A polyphasic multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a plurality of successive stators interleaved with a plurality of successive rotors, wherein said electrically conductive coils of said plurality of successive stators are selectively electrically energized between open and closed circuits, rotational resistance for rotating said drive shaft being reduced when circuits are open and increased when the circuits are closed.
  • 15. A multi-coil electric device comprising: a drive shaft;a first rotor having a first array of magnets mounted thereon, said first rotor rotatable by said drive shaft;a first stator having a first array of electrically conductive coils mounted thereon, rotation of said first rotor relative to said first stator inducing a current in said first array of electrically conductive coils;wherein said electrically conductive coils are selectively electrically energized between open and closed circuits, rotational resistance for rotating said drive shaft being reduced when circuits are open and increased when the circuits are closed.
  • 16. A multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 15, further comprising: a second rotor having a second array of magnets mounted thereon, said second rotor also rotatable by said drive shaft;a second stator having a second array of electrically conductive coils mounted thereon, rotation of said second rotor relative to said second stator inducing a current in said second array of electrically conductive coils;wherein said first and second arrays of electrically conductive coils are each selectively electrically energized between open and closed circuits, for adjusting the rotational resistance of said drive shaft.
  • 17. A multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 16 wherein said first and second stators are interleaved with said first and second rotors.
  • 18. A multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 15, wherein individual coils in said first array of electrically conductive coils are selectively electrically energized between open and closed circuits for adjusting the rotational resistance of said drive shaft.
  • 19. A multi-coil electric device as claimed in claim 15, wherein said electric device is a generator.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/545,027 filed Aug. 20, 2009; now U.S. Pat. No. 8,212,445 which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/477,493 filed Jun. 30, 2006 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,595,574 issued Sep. 29, 2009); which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/036,052 filed Jan. 18, 2005 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,081,696 issued Jul. 25, 2006); which is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/976,778 filed Nov. 1, 2004 (now abandoned), which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/600,723 filed Aug. 12, 2004.

US Referenced Citations (507)
Number Name Date Kind
908097 Herz Dec 1908 A
1980808 Leibing Nov 1934 A
2091190 Tognola Aug 1937 A
2189524 Randolph et al. Feb 1940 A
2407883 Jackson Sep 1946 A
2432117 Morton Dec 1947 A
2488729 Kooyman Nov 1949 A
2504681 Hall Apr 1950 A
2516114 Green Jul 1950 A
2601517 Hammes Jun 1952 A
2680822 Brainard Jun 1954 A
2719931 Kober Oct 1955 A
3083311 Krasnow Mar 1963 A
3149256 Kohlhagen Sep 1964 A
3153157 Rabe Oct 1964 A
3169203 Lavin et al. Feb 1965 A
3223865 Gladstone Dec 1965 A
3237034 Krasnow Feb 1966 A
3293470 Polgreen Dec 1966 A
3411027 Rosenberg Nov 1968 A
3482156 Porath Dec 1969 A
3549925 Johnson Dec 1970 A
3621370 Vandervort Nov 1971 A
3713015 Frister Jan 1973 A
3801844 Steele Apr 1974 A
3809936 Klein May 1974 A
3903863 Katsumata Sep 1975 A
3942913 Bokelman Mar 1976 A
3944855 Le Van Mar 1976 A
3965669 Larson et al. Jun 1976 A
3973137 Drobina Aug 1976 A
3973501 Briggs Aug 1976 A
3992641 Heinrich et al. Nov 1976 A
4001887 Platt et al. Jan 1977 A
4004426 Laing Jan 1977 A
4013937 Pelly et al. Mar 1977 A
4015174 Cotton de Bennetot Mar 1977 A
4020369 Shoupp et al. Apr 1977 A
4023751 Richard May 1977 A
4039848 Winderl Aug 1977 A
4050295 Harvey Sep 1977 A
4051402 Gruber Sep 1977 A
4074159 Robison Feb 1978 A
4074180 Sharpe et al. Feb 1978 A
4081726 Brimer et al. Mar 1978 A
4095922 Farr Jun 1978 A
4100743 Trumbull et al. Jul 1978 A
4107987 Robbins et al. Aug 1978 A
4126933 Anderson et al. Nov 1978 A
4141331 Mallory, Jr. Feb 1979 A
4142696 Nottingham Mar 1979 A
4151051 Evans Apr 1979 A
4155252 Morrill May 1979 A
4168459 Roesel, Jr. Sep 1979 A
4179633 Kelly Dec 1979 A
4181468 Kent et al. Jan 1980 A
4187441 Oney Feb 1980 A
4191893 Grana et al. Mar 1980 A
4196572 Hunt Apr 1980 A
4203710 Farr May 1980 A
4211945 Tawse Jul 1980 A
4215426 Klatt Jul 1980 A
4237391 Schur et al. Dec 1980 A
4245601 Crowder Jan 1981 A
4246490 Keramati et al. Jan 1981 A
4247785 Apgar Jan 1981 A
4253031 Frister Feb 1981 A
4254344 Fancy et al. Mar 1981 A
4260901 Woodbridge Apr 1981 A
4261312 Hart Apr 1981 A
4261562 Flavell Apr 1981 A
4276481 Parker Jun 1981 A
4286581 Atkinson, Jr. Sep 1981 A
4289970 Deibert Sep 1981 A
4291235 Bergey, Jr. et al. Sep 1981 A
4297604 Tawse Oct 1981 A
4302683 Burton Nov 1981 A
4305031 Wharton Dec 1981 A
4308479 Richter Dec 1981 A
4316096 Syverson Feb 1982 A
4317437 Lindgren Mar 1982 A
4322667 Ohba Mar 1982 A
4329138 Riordan May 1982 A
4339704 McSparran et al. Jul 1982 A
4340822 Gregg Jul 1982 A
4355276 Vittay Oct 1982 A
4358693 Palmer et al. Nov 1982 A
4364005 Kohzai et al. Dec 1982 A
4373488 Neuhalfen Feb 1983 A
4385246 Schur et al. May 1983 A
4402524 D'Antonio et al. Sep 1983 A
4406950 Roesel, Jr. Sep 1983 A
4412170 Roesel, Jr. Oct 1983 A
4419617 Reitz Dec 1983 A
4433280 Lindgren Feb 1984 A
4433355 Chew et al. Feb 1984 A
4434617 Walsh Mar 1984 A
4444444 Benedetti et al. Apr 1984 A
4446377 Kure-Jensen et al. May 1984 A
4454865 Tammen Jun 1984 A
4456858 Loven Jun 1984 A
4458489 Walsh Jul 1984 A
4459536 Wirtz Jul 1984 A
4473751 Rombach et al. Sep 1984 A
4477745 Lux Oct 1984 A
4503368 Sakamoto Mar 1985 A
4511805 Boy-Marcotte et al. Apr 1985 A
4513576 Dibrell et al. Apr 1985 A
RE31947 Farr Jul 1985 E
4532431 Iliev et al. Jul 1985 A
4532460 Gale et al. Jul 1985 A
4535263 Avery Aug 1985 A
4536668 Boyer Aug 1985 A
4536672 Kanayama et al. Aug 1985 A
4539485 Neuenschwander Sep 1985 A
4549121 Gale Oct 1985 A
4575671 Lee et al. Mar 1986 A
4578609 McCarty Mar 1986 A
4581999 Campagnuolo et al. Apr 1986 A
4591746 Kamiyama May 1986 A
4598240 Gale et al. Jul 1986 A
4599551 Wheatley et al. Jul 1986 A
4601354 Campbell et al. Jul 1986 A
4605874 Whiteley Aug 1986 A
4628219 Troscinski Dec 1986 A
4630817 Buckley Dec 1986 A
4638224 Gritter Jan 1987 A
4641080 Glennon et al. Feb 1987 A
4642031 Farr Feb 1987 A
4642988 Benson Feb 1987 A
4644233 Suzuki Feb 1987 A
4654066 Garcia et al. Mar 1987 A
4654537 Gaspard Mar 1987 A
4656379 McCarty Apr 1987 A
4658166 Oudet Apr 1987 A
4658346 Templeton Apr 1987 A
4664685 Young May 1987 A
4668885 Scheller May 1987 A
4674199 Lakic Jun 1987 A
4678954 Takeda et al. Jul 1987 A
4682067 Oudet Jul 1987 A
4687945 Ebeling Aug 1987 A
4692675 Falk Sep 1987 A
4698538 Yoshida Oct 1987 A
4698562 Gale et al. Oct 1987 A
4710667 Whiteley Dec 1987 A
4713569 Schwartz Dec 1987 A
4729218 Haselbauer et al. Mar 1988 A
4737070 Horiuchi et al. Apr 1988 A
4739203 Miyao et al. Apr 1988 A
4783028 Olson Nov 1988 A
4783038 Gilbert et al. Nov 1988 A
4785228 Goddard Nov 1988 A
4806812 Masterman Feb 1989 A
4809510 Gaspard et al. Mar 1989 A
4811091 Morrison et al. Mar 1989 A
4814651 Elris et al. Mar 1989 A
4819361 Boharski Apr 1989 A
4831300 Lindgren May 1989 A
4835433 Brown May 1989 A
4839039 Parsons et al. Jun 1989 A
4843270 Dijken Jun 1989 A
4845749 Brickell et al. Jul 1989 A
4851703 Means Jul 1989 A
4862021 LaRocca Aug 1989 A
4864151 Wyczalek et al. Sep 1989 A
4866321 Blanchard et al. Sep 1989 A
4872805 Horiuchi et al. Oct 1989 A
4874346 Wachspress Oct 1989 A
4876991 Galitello, Jr. Oct 1989 A
4879045 Eggerichs Nov 1989 A
4879484 Huss Nov 1989 A
4879501 Haner Nov 1989 A
4884953 Golben Dec 1989 A
4885526 Szabo Dec 1989 A
4893040 Turner et al. Jan 1990 A
4904926 Pasichinskyj Feb 1990 A
4906877 Ciaio Mar 1990 A
4914412 Engdahl et al. Apr 1990 A
4927329 Kliman et al. May 1990 A
4933609 Clark Jun 1990 A
4950973 Kouba Aug 1990 A
4953052 Cartlidge et al. Aug 1990 A
4959605 Vaidya et al. Sep 1990 A
4963780 Hochstrasser Oct 1990 A
4973868 Wust Nov 1990 A
4977529 Gregg et al. Dec 1990 A
4980595 Arora Dec 1990 A
4985875 Mitchell Jan 1991 A
4994700 Bansal et al. Feb 1991 A
5002020 Kos Mar 1991 A
5003209 Huss et al. Mar 1991 A
5003517 Greer, Jr. Mar 1991 A
5021698 Pullen et al. Jun 1991 A
5030867 Yamada et al. Jul 1991 A
5043592 Hochstrasser Aug 1991 A
5043911 Rashid Aug 1991 A
5047680 Torok Sep 1991 A
5053662 Richter Oct 1991 A
5057726 Mole et al. Oct 1991 A
5057731 Hancock Oct 1991 A
5058833 Carmouche Oct 1991 A
5072145 Davis et al. Dec 1991 A
5117142 von Zweygbergk May 1992 A
5120332 Wells Jun 1992 A
5130595 Arora Jul 1992 A
5155375 Holley Oct 1992 A
5164826 Dailey Nov 1992 A
5174109 Lampe Dec 1992 A
5184040 Lim Feb 1993 A
5184458 Lampe et al. Feb 1993 A
5191256 Reiter, Jr. et al. Mar 1993 A
5208498 Hamajima May 1993 A
5220223 Mehnert Jun 1993 A
5220232 Rigney, II et al. Jun 1993 A
5225712 Erdman Jul 1993 A
5227702 Nahirney Jul 1993 A
5237815 McArthur Aug 1993 A
5237817 Bornemisza et al. Aug 1993 A
5258697 Ford et al. Nov 1993 A
5267129 Anderson Nov 1993 A
5281094 McCarty et al. Jan 1994 A
5283488 Ponnappan et al. Feb 1994 A
5289041 Holley Feb 1994 A
5289072 Lange Feb 1994 A
5317498 Dhyandchand et al. May 1994 A
5336933 Ernster Aug 1994 A
5346370 Krohn Sep 1994 A
5355044 Uchida et al. Oct 1994 A
5369324 Saether Nov 1994 A
5370112 Perkins Dec 1994 A
5371426 Nagate et al. Dec 1994 A
5397922 Paul et al. Mar 1995 A
5400596 Shlien Mar 1995 A
5406186 Fair Apr 1995 A
5409435 Daniels Apr 1995 A
5413010 Nakanishi et al. May 1995 A
5427194 Miller Jun 1995 A
5433175 Hughes et al. Jul 1995 A
5448123 Nilson et al. Sep 1995 A
5468378 de la Torre Barreiro Nov 1995 A
5469045 Dove et al. Nov 1995 A
5473205 Haaland Dec 1995 A
5481146 Davey Jan 1996 A
5484120 Blakeley et al. Jan 1996 A
5489290 Furnish Feb 1996 A
5489810 Ferreira et al. Feb 1996 A
5496238 Taylor Mar 1996 A
5504382 Douglass et al. Apr 1996 A
5512811 Latos et al. Apr 1996 A
5517822 Haws et al. May 1996 A
5523635 Ferreira et al. Jun 1996 A
5523637 Miller Jun 1996 A
5530307 Horst Jun 1996 A
5568005 Davidson Oct 1996 A
5594289 Minato Jan 1997 A
5614773 Fabris Mar 1997 A
5619423 Scrantz Apr 1997 A
5625241 Ewing et al. Apr 1997 A
5626103 Haws et al. May 1997 A
5637934 Fabris Jun 1997 A
5637935 Haaland Jun 1997 A
5641276 Heidelberg et al. Jun 1997 A
5650679 Boggs, III et al. Jul 1997 A
5653135 Miller et al. Aug 1997 A
5659300 Dresselhuys et al. Aug 1997 A
5682073 Mizuno Oct 1997 A
5689165 Jones et al. Nov 1997 A
5689175 Hanson et al. Nov 1997 A
5690209 Kofoed Nov 1997 A
5696413 Woodbridge et al. Dec 1997 A
5696419 Rakestraw et al. Dec 1997 A
5708314 Law Jan 1998 A
5709103 Williams Jan 1998 A
5710474 Mulgrave Jan 1998 A
5715716 Miller et al. Feb 1998 A
5717316 Kawai Feb 1998 A
5719458 Kawai Feb 1998 A
5720194 Miller et al. Feb 1998 A
5726517 Gueraud et al. Mar 1998 A
5731649 Caamano Mar 1998 A
5735123 Ehrig Apr 1998 A
5736838 Dove et al. Apr 1998 A
5744896 Kessinger, Jr. et al. Apr 1998 A
5753989 Syverson et al. May 1998 A
5760507 Miller et al. Jun 1998 A
5762584 Daniels Jun 1998 A
5773910 Lange Jun 1998 A
5775229 Folk et al. Jul 1998 A
5777413 Nagata et al. Jul 1998 A
5784267 Koenig et al. Jul 1998 A
5785137 Reuyl Jul 1998 A
5793137 Smith Aug 1998 A
5799484 Nims Sep 1998 A
5801454 Leininger Sep 1998 A
5806959 Adams et al. Sep 1998 A
5833211 Berling Nov 1998 A
5833440 Berling Nov 1998 A
5838085 Roesel et al. Nov 1998 A
5838138 Henty Nov 1998 A
5839508 Tubel et al. Nov 1998 A
5844342 Miyatani et al. Dec 1998 A
5844385 Jones et al. Dec 1998 A
5850111 Haaland Dec 1998 A
5850138 Adams et al. Dec 1998 A
5850732 Willis et al. Dec 1998 A
5867004 Drager et al. Feb 1999 A
5874797 Pinkerton Feb 1999 A
5886450 Kuehnle Mar 1999 A
5889348 Muhlberger et al. Mar 1999 A
5892311 Hayasaka Apr 1999 A
5893343 Rigazzi Apr 1999 A
5903113 Yamada et al. May 1999 A
5923111 Eno et al. Jul 1999 A
5939813 Schob Aug 1999 A
5942829 Huynh Aug 1999 A
5945766 Kim et al. Aug 1999 A
5952756 Hsu et al. Sep 1999 A
5968680 Wolfe et al. Oct 1999 A
5973436 Mitcham Oct 1999 A
5982070 Caamano Nov 1999 A
5982074 Smith et al. Nov 1999 A
5990590 Roesel, Jr. et al. Nov 1999 A
5997252 Miller Dec 1999 A
5998902 Sleder, Sr. et al. Dec 1999 A
6002192 Krivospitski et al. Dec 1999 A
6014015 Thorne et al. Jan 2000 A
6020711 Rubertus et al. Feb 2000 A
6027429 Daniels Feb 2000 A
6032459 Skowronski Mar 2000 A
6034463 Hansson Mar 2000 A
6037672 Grewe Mar 2000 A
6037696 Sromin et al. Mar 2000 A
6043579 Hill Mar 2000 A
6047104 Cheng Apr 2000 A
6055163 Wagner et al. Apr 2000 A
6057622 Hsu May 2000 A
6062016 Edelman May 2000 A
6064122 McConnell May 2000 A
6065281 Shekleton et al. May 2000 A
6066898 Jensen May 2000 A
6066906 Kalsi May 2000 A
6081053 Maegawa et al. Jun 2000 A
6082112 Shekleton Jul 2000 A
6086250 Rouhet et al. Jul 2000 A
6087750 Raad Jul 2000 A
6093293 Haag et al. Jul 2000 A
6093986 Windhorn Jul 2000 A
6097104 Russell Aug 2000 A
6100809 Novoselsky et al. Aug 2000 A
6104097 Lehoczky et al. Aug 2000 A
6104115 Offringa et al. Aug 2000 A
6105630 Braun et al. Aug 2000 A
6109222 Glezer et al. Aug 2000 A
6125625 Lipinski et al. Oct 2000 A
6127758 Murry et al. Oct 2000 A
6149410 Cooper Nov 2000 A
6157107 Aoshima et al. Dec 2000 A
6158953 Lamont Dec 2000 A
6166473 Hayasaka Dec 2000 A
6169332 Taylor et al. Jan 2001 B1
6170251 Skowronski et al. Jan 2001 B1
6172429 Russell Jan 2001 B1
6172440 Sasaki et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175210 Schwartz et al. Jan 2001 B1
6177735 Chapman et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178751 Shekleton et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181235 Smith Jan 2001 B1
6189621 Vail, III Feb 2001 B1
6191561 Bartel Feb 2001 B1
6194802 Rao Feb 2001 B1
6195869 Pullen et al. Mar 2001 B1
6198174 Nims et al. Mar 2001 B1
6199381 Unger et al. Mar 2001 B1
6199519 Van Blarigan Mar 2001 B1
6211633 Jones et al. Apr 2001 B1
6215206 Chitayat Apr 2001 B1
6218760 Sakuragi et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226990 Conrad May 2001 B1
6242827 Wolf et al. Jun 2001 B1
6242840 Denk et al. Jun 2001 B1
6244034 Taylor et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246138 Nims Jun 2001 B1
6255743 Pinkerton et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269639 Conrad Aug 2001 B1
6269640 Conrad Aug 2001 B1
6274945 Gilbreth et al. Aug 2001 B1
6274960 Sakai et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275012 Jabaji Aug 2001 B1
6276124 Soh et al. Aug 2001 B1
6279318 Conrad Aug 2001 B1
6279319 Conrad Aug 2001 B1
6284106 Haag et al. Sep 2001 B1
6286310 Conrad Sep 2001 B1
6288467 Lange et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291901 Cefo Sep 2001 B1
6293101 Conrad Sep 2001 B1
6294842 Skowronski Sep 2001 B1
6297977 Huggett et al. Oct 2001 B1
6300689 Smalser Oct 2001 B1
6307278 Nims et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307717 Jeong Oct 2001 B1
6309268 Mabru Oct 2001 B1
6311490 Conrad Nov 2001 B1
6311491 Conrad Nov 2001 B1
6314773 Miller et al. Nov 2001 B1
6332319 Conrad Dec 2001 B1
6336326 Conrad Jan 2002 B1
6339271 Noble et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345666 Conrad Feb 2002 B1
6348683 Verghese et al. Feb 2002 B1
6362718 Patrick et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363706 Meister et al. Apr 2002 B1
6370928 Chies et al. Apr 2002 B1
6373162 Liang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6373230 Jabaji Apr 2002 B2
6380648 Hsu Apr 2002 B1
6384564 Pollock May 2002 B1
6397946 Vail, III Jun 2002 B1
6405522 Pont et al. Jun 2002 B1
6407465 Peltz et al. Jun 2002 B1
6411003 Sasaki et al. Jun 2002 B1
6435925 Mabru Aug 2002 B1
6438937 Pont et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445105 Kliman et al. Sep 2002 B1
6453658 Willis et al. Sep 2002 B1
6454920 Haag et al. Sep 2002 B1
6455964 Nims Sep 2002 B1
6455970 Shafer et al. Sep 2002 B1
6463730 Keller et al. Oct 2002 B1
6467725 Coles et al. Oct 2002 B1
6470933 Volpi Oct 2002 B1
6479534 Bentley et al. Nov 2002 B1
6483222 Pelrine et al. Nov 2002 B2
6486640 Adams Nov 2002 B2
6503056 Eccles et al. Jan 2003 B2
6504281 Smith et al. Jan 2003 B1
6512305 Pinkerton et al. Jan 2003 B1
6518680 McDavid, Jr. Feb 2003 B2
6526757 MacKay Mar 2003 B2
6531799 Miller Mar 2003 B1
6538358 Krefta et al. Mar 2003 B1
6545373 Andres et al. Apr 2003 B1
6546769 Dawson et al. Apr 2003 B2
6548925 Noble et al. Apr 2003 B2
6565243 Cheung May 2003 B1
6566764 Rebsdorf et al. May 2003 B2
6579137 Mabru Jun 2003 B2
6590298 Du Plessis Jul 2003 B1
6606864 MacKay Aug 2003 B2
6622487 Jones Sep 2003 B2
6631080 Trimble et al. Oct 2003 B2
6634176 Rouse et al. Oct 2003 B2
6644027 Kelly Nov 2003 B1
6647716 Boyd Nov 2003 B2
6655341 Westerbeke, Jr. Dec 2003 B2
6657348 Qin et al. Dec 2003 B2
6664688 Naito et al. Dec 2003 B2
6666027 Cardenas, Jr. Dec 2003 B1
6669416 Klement Dec 2003 B2
6672413 Moore et al. Jan 2004 B2
6675583 Willis et al. Jan 2004 B2
6677685 Pfleger et al. Jan 2004 B2
6679977 Haag et al. Jan 2004 B2
6684642 Willis et al. Feb 2004 B2
6700217 North et al. Mar 2004 B1
6700248 Long Mar 2004 B2
6702404 Anwar et al. Mar 2004 B2
6703719 McConnell Mar 2004 B1
6710469 McDavid, Jr. Mar 2004 B2
6710491 Wu et al. Mar 2004 B2
6710492 Minagawa Mar 2004 B2
6710502 Maslov et al. Mar 2004 B2
6713936 Lee Mar 2004 B2
6717313 Bae Apr 2004 B1
6720688 Schiller Apr 2004 B1
6724115 Kusase Apr 2004 B2
6727632 Kusase Apr 2004 B2
6732531 Dickey May 2004 B2
6735953 Wolfe et al. May 2004 B1
6737829 Sastry May 2004 B2
6741010 Wilkin May 2004 B2
6756719 Chiu Jun 2004 B1
6759775 Grimm Jul 2004 B2
6765307 Gerber et al. Jul 2004 B2
6766647 Hartzheim Jul 2004 B2
6771000 Kim et al. Aug 2004 B2
6803696 Chen Oct 2004 B2
6894455 Cai et al. May 2005 B2
6897595 Chiarenza May 2005 B1
7002259 Howes et al. Feb 2006 B2
7081696 Ritchey Jul 2006 B2
7102248 Wobben Sep 2006 B2
7250702 Abou Akar et al. Jul 2007 B2
7400077 Caroon Jul 2008 B2
7514834 Takeuchi Apr 2009 B2
7595574 Ritchey Sep 2009 B2
8106563 Ritchey Jan 2012 B2
8212445 Ritchey Jul 2012 B2
20020047418 Seguchi et al. Apr 2002 A1
20040232796 Weissensteiner Nov 2004 A1
20040251761 Hirzel Dec 2004 A1
20050280264 Nagy Dec 2005 A1
20070182273 Burt Aug 2007 A1
20080088200 Ritchey Apr 2008 A1
20100019593 Ritchey Jan 2010 A1
20100090553 Ritchey Apr 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
1038918 Sep 1978 CA
2 459 126 Apr 2003 CA
54-159641 Dec 1979 JP
57-98015 Jun 1982 JP
2001-161098 Jun 2001 JP
20081091035 Jul 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Canadian Office Action, for Canadian Application No. 2,487,668, dated Oct. 6, 2011, 4 pages.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/CA2007/001040, mailed Sep. 28, 2007, 2 pages.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, for International Application No. PCT/CA2007/001040, mailed Sep. 28, 2007, 6 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120306302 A1 Dec 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60600723 Aug 2004 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 12545027 Aug 2009 US
Child 13489326 US
Parent 11477493 Jun 2006 US
Child 12545027 US
Parent 11036052 Jan 2005 US
Child 11477493 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10976778 Nov 2004 US
Child 11036052 US