The disclosure herein relates to pool cover anchors, and more particularly to an improved anchoring system for securing a pool cover to the surrounding deck boards, which, anchoring system all but eliminates anchors being pulled out of the deck, leaves the deck, surface undamaged and safe when the cover and associated anchoring units are removed, and also applies the load from the pool cover between two adjacent boards.
Draining and refilling a pool with water every season, whether and in-ground pool or an above-ground pool, is not per se an expensive proposition, but it is a time-consuming task, and one that is cautioned against for many reasons. Many pool experts instead, recommend only lowering the water level in the pool to be just below the skimmer level and below the jets, to ensure that all of the plumbing lines are tree of water, in order to prevent expansion and bursting during the cold winter months. It is also recommended to leave as much water in the pool as possible, to otherwise prevent rips and tears to a liner, which could dry out, shrink, and/or crack.
Although it is possible to leave the pool uncovered during the winter, it creates additional pool maintenance unless the water is frozen. For example, the fallen leaves in the pool water use up algaecide, and can leave stains, so in the dead of winter the pool owner would otherwise have to continue to clean the pool. For that reason, nearly all pool owners north of the Sunbelt cover their pool in the winter months.
Many in-ground pools, and even some above-ground pools are surrounded by wood or composite decking. Various forms of pool covers are available for in-ground pools including the popular spring-loaded safety covers which are manufactured by Loop-Loc, Ltd., of Hauppauge, N.Y., Meyco Product, Inc., Merlin Industries, Inc. along with several other manufacturers. Virtually all of these spring-loaded covers are secured to the decking via anchors that are drilled and screwed into the decks. This form of anchor has limitations including that, they must be permanently installed in the deck in the exact right position, can and often partially or completely pull out of the decking, places all of the force caused by the tension and weight of the cover (including additional weight such as snow) on a very small area of one board and associated screws and can cause a safety risk when left in the ‘up’ position. The pool cover anchor disclosed herein solves this problem.
It is an object of the invention to provide an anchor for supporting a pool cover with respect to decking that surrounds the pool.
It is another object of the invention to provide a quick and easily installable anchor for supporting a pool coyer with respect to the surrounding deck boards of a pool.
It is a further object of the invention to provide an anchor for supporting a pool cover with respect to surrounding decking that does not permanently attach to the wood/composite/metal decking.
Further objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description and claims, and from the accompanying drawings.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
In accordance with at least one embodiment, a pool cover anchor may broadly include a multi-part mechanical fastener. The fastener allows a particular type of pool cover, including one brand sold under the trademarked name of loop-Loc® (and certain other covers sold for example by Meyco, and Merlin), to be installed with respect to a standard wooden (or metal or composite) deck, without any penetrations being made into the deck, surface, such as by drilling holes and screwing anchors into the decking.
The first part of the anchor is a piece of flat metal with several holes drilled at specific locations that are used, to secure the additional parts of the anchoring system, to the decking. Attached to the first part of the anchor is a round metal “post” component with a small lip on the top of the post. The post bottom is securely attached to the top of the flat metal, where the “top” is the surface portion of the metal away from the deck surface.
The additional parts of the anchor are small diameter round metal stock made in such a fashion as to slide through the holes in part one, slide between adjacent deck boards, are turned so they clip under the boards and then are locked to part one via a ‘U’ shaped clamp or a wing nut that is tightened against the top of part one.
Once the anchor is in place, the “straps of the pool cover, which have metal loops on the end of each strap, can then be secured over the anchor post of the first part.
With the part two clamps secured, the lateral and vertical pressures exerted when the cover is installed, is be distributed between two boards as opposed to only one board, which may be characteristic of some traditional deck anchor systems that are screwed into a single board.
The quantity of required anchors may depend on the number of straps and associated strap loops on the pool cover.
The description of the various example embodiments is explained in conjunction with appended drawings, in which:
As used throughout this specification, the word “may” is used in a permissive sense (i.e., meaning having the potential to), rather than a mandatory sense (i.e., meaning must), as more than one embodiment of the invention may be disclosed herein. Similarly, the words “Include”, “including”, and “includes” mean including but not limited to.
The phrases “at least one”, “one or more”, and “and/or” may be open-ended expressions that are both conjunctive and disjunctive in operation. For example, each of the expressions “at least one of A, B and C”, “one or more of A, B. and C”, and “A, B, and/or C” herein means all of the following possible combinations: A alone; or B alone; or C alone; or A and B together; or A and C together; or B and C together; or A, B and C together.
Also, the disclosures of all patents, published patent applications, and non-patent literature cited within this document are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference. However, it is noted that citing herein of any patents, published patent applications, and non-patent literature is not an admission as to any of those references constituting prior art with respect to the disclosed apparatus.
Furthermore, the described features, advantages, and characteristics of any particular embodiment disclosed herein, may be combined in any suitable manner with any of the other embodiments disclosed herein.
Additionally, any approximating language, as used herein throughout the specification and claims, may be applied to modify any quantitative or qualitative representation that could permissibly vary without resulting in a change in the basic function to which it is related. Accordingly, a value modified by a term such as “about” is not to be limited to the precise value specified, and may include values that differ from the specified value in accordance with applicable case law. Also, in at least some instances, a numerical difference provided by the approximating language may correspond to the precision of an instrument that may be used for measuring the value. A numerical, difference provided by the approximating language may also correspond to a manufacturing tolerance associated with production of the aspect/feature being quantified. Furthermore, a numerical difference provided by the approximating language may also correspond to an overall tolerance for the aspect/feature that may be derived from variations resulting from a stack up (i.e., the sum) of multiple individual tolerances.
Any use of a friction fit (i.e., an interface fit) between two mating parts described herein may be a slight interference in one embodiment in the range of 0.0001 inches to 0.0003 inches, or an interference of 0.0003 inches to 0.0007 inches in another embodiment, or an interference of 0.0007 inches to 0.0010 inches in yet another embodiment, or a combination of such ranges. Other values for the interference may also be used in different configurations (see e.g., “Press Fit Engineering and Design Calculator,” available at: www.engineersedge.com/calculators/machine-design/press-fit/press-fit-calculator.htm).
Any described use of a clearance fit indicates that the opening (e.g., a hole) is larger than the part received therein (e.g., a shaft), enabling the two parts to move (e.g. to slide and/or rotate) when assembled, where the gap between the opening and the part may depend upon the size of the part and the type of clearance fit (e.g., for a 0.1250 inch shaft diameter the opening may be 0.1285 inches for a close fit and may be 0.1360 inches for a tree (running) fit; and for a 0.5000 inch diameter shaft size the opening may be 0.5156 inches for a close clearance fit and may be 0.5312 inches for a free clearance fit). Other clearance amounts may also be used.
Many pools today are surrounded by a deck made of standard deck boards, i.e., 5/4×6 deck boards (which actually measure 1 inch by 5.5 inches). Most installers of such, deck boards usually temporarily position a nail between the adjacent boards as a spacer, prior to securely fastening the subsequent deck board to the underlying structure (i.e., to the joists). Those deck installer typically place an 8D to a 16D nail between the deck boards. The 8D nail has a nominal shank diameter of 0.134 inches, and the 16D nail has a nominal shank diameter of 0.165 inches, which usually results in the deck boards being spaced roughly 5/32″ to 3/16″ apart. When hidden or side board fastening systems are used for wood or composite decks, it results in a board-to-board spacing of approximately a ¼″ or less.
Various embodiments disclosed herein are particularly configured to utilize such a very narrow spacing/gap between deck boards to thereby support an anchor for the aforementioned pool covers.
A pool cover anchor bracket system 100, as seen in
The first part 110 may be formed of a first generally flat plate portion 111 and a second generally flat portion 112. In one embodiment, the second portion 112 may be at an angle of roughly 90 degrees with respect to the first portion 111. In another embodiment, the second portion 112 may be at an angle of roughly 95 degrees with respect to the first portion 111, as shown in
In one embodiment the first portion 111 and the second portion 112 may be flanges of a single bent-up sheet metal first part 110. In another embodiment, the first, portion 111 and the second portion 112 may be formed as separate sheet metal parts that may be welded, together to form the first part 110, or may be formed as a casting or machining, or by any other suitable manufacturing process. It is also noted that any other suitable geometric shapes may also be used instead of the noted flanges.
The second portion 112 may have a height H1 from the vertex, which may vary, depending upon the particular dimensions of the decking that the anchor system 100 is to be used with, and upon the particular angle θ that is utilized. In one embodiment, where the angle θ is roughly 95 degrees (i.e., within ordinary manufacturing tolerances for a nominal 95 degree angle e.g., plus or minus 3 degrees), and where standard 5/4×6 deck boards surround the pool (i.e., 1 inch by 5.5 inch deck boards), the height H1 of the second portion 112 may be greater than one inch (i.e., greater than the thickness of the deck board) and may in one embodiment be roughly 1.75 inches. The length L1 of the first portion 111 may be greater than six inches (i.e., greater than the width of the deck board) and may be roughly 6.5 inches in one embodiment (i.e., it may sufficiently greater than the length of the deck board to permit coupling of the second part thereto and prevent tear-out or other failure of the second part due to loads applied by the pool cover), and the width W may be roughly 1.25 inches in one embodiment. Other dimensions for the parts may also be used in other embodiments.
An anchor member, which may be in the form of post 113, may be fixedly secured to the top of the first portion 111, and may have an overhanging flange 114 to prevent the hook of the pool cover from sliding off, as discussed hereinafter. The post 113 may be fixedly secured to the top of the first portion 111 using mechanical fasteners, or by being welded thereto, or by any other suitable means known in the art. Alternatively, the post may be integrally formed with the first portion 111. In one embodiment, the post may be cylindrical, and the overhanging flange may be a concentric cylinder or annular member, etc. A post with an oval cross-sectional shape, or a rectangular cross-sectional shape, or a square cross-sectional shape, or an octagonal cross-sectional shape may be used. Other geometric shapes may alternatively be used (i.e., a flange with a hole into which the hook of the pool cover may be hooked, rather than being hooked around the anchor member itself). The side of the post nearest to the vertex may be positioned a distance L2 away from the vertex, as shown in
The first portion 111 may also have an opening formed therein. The opening may take one of many different forms. In one embodiment, an opening 115 may be a slotted hole that may have a diameter D, and a length L4 that may begin a distance L3 from the vertex, as shown in
The second part 120 may be formed to be substantially channel-shaped or U-shaped, as seen in
Installation of the anchor system 100, as seen initially in
The second part 120 may then be pivoted roughly 90 degrees with respect to the first part 110 to be perpendicular to the direction of the deck boards and be lacing towards the flanged cylindrical post 113, as shown in
When the hook 51 of the pool cover 50 is stretched and secured upon the flanged post 113, as shown in
With this arrangement, each anchor bracket system 100 is bearing against two different deck boards (e.g., boards 92 and 93) simultaneously, and is distributing both the lateral and vertical loads applied by the pool cover between those boards, instead, of only loading a single deck board. For this reason, and because of the configuration of the anchor bracket system 100, there is less of a tendency towards pulling out the deck boards away from the joists to which they are nailed or otherwise attached. (Note that this arrangement may also be achieved by initially using an angle θ of 90 degrees).
The parts that may be used to form a second anchor bracket system 200 are shown in
The part 210B may be formed similar to the second part 120 of the first bracket system 100, except that it may be L-shaped, where the second leg 210Bii is at the angle α to the first leg 210Bi. In one embodiment of part 210B, the length X3 of the first leg 210Bi may be roughly 2 inches, and the length Y3 of the second leg 210Bii may be 3 inches.
Installation of the second anchor bracket system 200 is shown in
However, in an alternative embodiment of the second anchor bracket system 200 the part 220 may nonetheless be formed the same as part 210B in
An anchor bracket system 300 is shown installed in
The parts that may be used, to form a fourth anchor bracket, system 400 are shown in
A second part 410B for the anchor bracket system 400 is shown in
The fourth anchor bracket system 400 is shown installed with respect to deck boards 91/92/93 in
A variation of the fourth anchor bracket system 400 may utilize the first part 410A′ that is shown in
The material used for the parts described herein may be selected for strength considerations and for good corrosion resistance properties. Therefore, in one embodiment, certain aluminum alloys may be used, including, but not limited to 6061 aluminum, and in other embodiments stainless steel may be used, including, but not limited to, 316 stainless steel. Certain plastic and/or composite and/or wood materials may also be used for certain other embodiments.
While illustrative implementations of one or more embodiments are provided hereinabove, those skilled in the art and having the benefit of the present disclosure will appreciate that further embodiments may be implemented with various changes within the scope of the disclosures made herein. Other modifications, substitutions, omissions and changes may be made in the design, size, materials used or proportions, operating conditions, assembly sequence, or arrangement or positioning of elements and members of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the spirit of this invention.
Accordingly, the breadth and scope of the present disclosure should not be limited by any of the above-described example embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
This application claims priority on U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/591,312 filed on Nov. 28, 2017, the disclosures of which are incorporated, herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2465621 | Wheeler | Mar 1949 | A |
2815809 | Jacobs | Dec 1957 | A |
2958872 | Meyer | Nov 1960 | A |
3229309 | Knodel | Jan 1966 | A |
3264656 | Clay | Aug 1966 | A |
3373464 | Ausnit | Mar 1968 | A |
3523308 | Bradley | Aug 1970 | A |
3533110 | Gisondi | Oct 1970 | A |
3534412 | Crook | Oct 1970 | A |
3608099 | Wall | Sep 1971 | A |
4297963 | Beacom | Nov 1981 | A |
4344378 | Martin | Aug 1982 | A |
4459711 | Sartain | Jul 1984 | A |
4757854 | Rippberger | Jul 1988 | A |
4790037 | Philips | Dec 1988 | A |
4939798 | Last | Jul 1990 | A |
5065461 | Shehan | Nov 1991 | A |
5259078 | Crandall | Jan 1993 | A |
5184377 | Ragsdale | Feb 1993 | A |
5371907 | Horvath | Dec 1994 | A |
5542367 | DuBois, III | Aug 1996 | A |
5800089 | Donaton | Sep 1998 | A |
5967075 | Johansen | Oct 1999 | A |
6026522 | Last | Feb 2000 | A |
6442773 | Kopyar | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6647911 | Solterbeck | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6793189 | McKay | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6893073 | Wheatley | May 2005 | B2 |
7144004 | Conversa | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7789033 | Doig | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8327575 | Zalewski | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8713899 | Buttner | May 2014 | B2 |
20050246997 | Bishop | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070292229 | Andrew | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 885 630 | Nov 2006 | FR |
WO 2012088040 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Press Fit Engineering & Design Calculator, Machinery's Handbook, 29th Ed., available at: www.engineersedge.com/calculators/machine-design/press-fit/press-fit-calculator.htm, Nov. 20, 2018 (Year: 2018). |
Press Fit Engineering St Design Calculator, Machinery's Handbook, 29th Ed., available at: www.engineersedge.com/calculators/machine-design/press-fit/press-fit-calculator.htm. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190161987 A1 | May 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62591312 | Nov 2017 | US |