The present invention relates generally to a lounge chair where the chair supports the full body length of the user to support the user in the seated or prone position, and more particularly to a chair which provide orthopedic support for the spine while lying prone.
Lounge chairs used to support a person while lying prone or seated and which have a back section that is hinged to allow angle adjustment are known. In one configuration, these chairs, which are often used as recreational furniture around homes, pools, beaches or the like, generally include a lightweight hinged frame that is horizontal to the ground supported by legs, where fabric or vinyl strips span the frame. At least one of the hinged sections is generally about one third of the way from the head so that the head section can be angled relative to the seat section. This adjustment allows the user to adjust the seatback from a relatively flat position to a nearly perpendicular seated position. The hinged section typically allows the chair to be folded flat and compact for portability and storage. Actuation and attainment of a preset angle between the seat section and the back section is typically effected by the engagement of a toothed rack with a substantially linear bar or pin. With such mechanism, the user must get out of the chair (or at least sit forward enough to avoid biasing the back section toward a horizontal position) and, while holding the back section in one hand, attempt to secure the rack into the bar or pin at the desired position. Only upon reclining does the user discover whether the back section is at the proper angle, and if not, the user must repeat the process again. Moreover, there is chance of injury, as the user can get fingers caught between the rack and bar or pin. Additional features, such as a fixed face opening to allow the user to lie prone while the head is supported by the opening, and lumbar support, are also known.
With an emphasis on lightweight, inexpensive features, the construction of lounge chairs and related furniture is such that it is not compatible with long-term use. In addition, the simplistic construction, which is often geared to low-cost devices, doesn't readily lend itself to user comfort over extended periods of use, as features commensurate with comfort-enhancement require additional support and functionality, neither of which are in keeping with conventional lounge chairs and related devices. When a user is lying prone on the chair with the head turned to one side (full lateral), the cervical upper thoracic portion of the spine necessarily must curve (torque) to accommodate the head position. This stresses the uncovertebral joints, which can initiate neck pain or aggravate arthritis. Similarly, lumbar and related support is not possible unless cumbersome pads to alter the surface contour are placed on either or both the seat and back sections. Furthermore, even with chairs that do possess user-comfort features, such as a face opening placed in the surface of the back section, the inability to accommodate users of different heights severely limits the chair's utility.
Moreover, discriminating buyers who are striving to maximize the aesthetic features of a pool, patio or related recreational area might think a vinyl-clad, aluminum frame chair inconsistent with these goals, especially after the chair has been exposed for prolonged periods to the sun, rain and other environmental conditions. For this segment of the market, other more robust lounge chair configurations have been created to overcome the shortcomings of the first variant. In this second variant, relatively sturdy wooden construction is in evidence, with emphasis on rigid, relatively stationary pieces that more resemble furniture than their vinyl-clad, aluminum-framed counterparts. As with the first configuration, accommodation of users of differing size and concomitant orthopedic needs are not addressed, where, for example, the relationship between the face opening and the remainder of the chair remain fixed. Similarly, where the angle adjustment mechanism of such upscale chairs requires two-handed operation, no operability improvements are realized over their low-cost counterparts.
Accordingly, there exists a need for a lounge chair that can accommodate users of different sizes such that the user can lay prone while minimizing discomfort. There also exists a need for a lounge chair that is easy to operate, retains portability and user convenience features, and maintains its aesthetically pleasing attributes over prolonged exposure to harsh environments.
The present invention satisfies these needs by providing an orthopedic lounge chair which is very rugged and durable in its construction, yet easy to operate. According to a first aspect of the present invention, a lounge chair includes a frame, seat section, back section and hinge section to pivotally couple the back and seat sections. The back and seat sections define upper surfaces for engaging a user, where the seat section defines an orthopedic upper surface. In the present context, a surface is considered orthopedic if it includes contouring or shaping that provides enhanced support to a body portion, such as ventral or dorsal regions in the torso. The hinge section includes an actuator responsive to user input, an angle adjustment mechanism responsive to the actuator, and a biasing member to promote the selective engagement of the angle adjustment member to at least one of the back and frame sections. The biasing member maintains the aforementioned engagement until overcome by deployment of said actuator, which forces disengagement of the cooperative components. During this disengaged period, a plurality of angular positions between the back and seat sections is possible.
Optionally, the orthopedic upper surface of the seat section chair has a fixed convex (upwardly bowed) arch to provide the enhanced support. For example, additional lumbar support is available to a user lying prone on the chair. In this configuration, the arch support gently pushes upward on the hips of the user, straightening out the natural curvature of the lumbar section of the spine. This position relaxes the lumbar and avoids the uncomfortable hyperextension experienced by conventional lounge chairs. In another option, the chair is constructed predominantly from rigid materials, such as wood, where the wood is preferably hardwood, such as ipe, teak or oak. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other materials, such as high quality plastic resin, stainless steel, or the like could be used. In the present context, construction of a component that is “predominantly” from a particular material does not necessitate that the entirety of the component be made from that material, just that a majority of it be so. In such case, ancillary materials, such as metal or plastic for connectors, fasteners or particular portions of the component, can be used to facilitate proper functioning or assembly of the component. In addition, the rigid nature of the construction enables the orthopedic upper surface to be integrally formed into the seat section.
In another option, the head aperture formed into the back section is adjustable to allow different size users to maintain optimum orthopedic positioning. The head aperture eliminates the need of the user to rotate the neck while lying prone, thus eliminating the undue stress to the upper neck and back, and allows the upper cervical spine to maintain alignment, avoiding uncomfortable hyperextension or lateral rotational stress in the upper back and neck. Since the upper surface of the back section is rigid, the aperture (which can be formed by a plurality of discreet slats that are each slidably mounted to longitudinal support members in the back section) can be varied by moving one or more of the slats up or down the back section support members. In one form, the back section support members may define a plurality of rails that can be slotted to engage complementary surfaces in the slats making up the head aperture. In the present context, the longitudinal dimension of the chair is the one along the chair's generally elongate (i.e., head-to-foot) direction. Moreover, the numerous slats making up the aperture can be coupled together so that they move in unison.
In addition, at least the seat section can be tapered across the narrow (side-to-side) dimension to provide rigid support rather than the scoop or concavity experienced in the seat and back sections of conventional lounge chairs. Such a taper would allow the lateral (side) edges of the seat section to be lower than the central portion of the seat section. By being formed of the aforementioned rigid materials (such as wood or the like) and not relying on straps or fabric that stretch further downward under the applied weight of a user, the chair is easy to get into and out of.
In another option, the biasing member is a spring-loaded mechanism that allows the user to adjust the seatback to the desired angle without having to reach under the seat to set adjust the member (also referred to as the catch) on the frame or back section that engages the angle adjustment mechanism, which can be in the form of a generally semicircular wheel with splines formed therein. These splines can be made to selectively engage a complementary catch that is rigidly affixed to the frame by operating the actuator. In one form, the actuator is a release handle placed in such a location as to be easily graspable by the user. For example, the actuator is disposed on the back section and is responsive to single-hand input such that the angular position between the seat and back sections can be adjusted while the user is on the lounge chair by having the user grasp the actuator and the back section simultaneously. This allows the user to then lower the back section with one hand while seated, not having to reach under the back section to adjust the angle adjustment mechanism that selectively engages the catch. The tight tolerance between the frame of the chair and the back section minimizes the risk of pinching the user's hand when the back section is fully reclined to substantially flat position. In the present context, the term “substantially” is utilized to represent the inherent degree of uncertainty that may be attributed to any quantitative comparison, value, measurement, or other representation. As such, it refers to an arrangement of elements or features that, while in theory would be expected to exhibit exact correspondence or behavior, may in practice embody something slightly less than exact. The term also represents the degree by which a quantitative representation may vary from a stated reference without resulting in a change in the basic function of the subject matter at issue. The spring-loaded nature of the biasing member assures the catch is fully engaged with the angle adjustment mechanism, thereby promoting safety by preventing a partially engaged angle adjustment member from slipping off the catch and causing collapse of the back section. By being spring-loaded, the user only needs to simply pull up on the seatback to the desired angle and the notched catch will automatically engage. To lower the back section, the user simply squeezes the handle which releases the angle adjustment member from the catch, thereby allowing the user to lower the back section to the desired position. This one-handed operation is possessive of an inherit safety element, where the user is simultaneously grasping the seatback and the release handle, causing the user to hold on to the seatback, not allowing it to inadvertently collapse down onto the frame.
Other options include a fold-down magazine rack situated below the head aperture, thus allowing the user to read while lying prone and maintaining optimum orthopedic positioning. One or more additional pull-out trays may be built into the frame for beverages, books and related personal possessions. Wheels can be incorporated into some or all of the legs to allow the user easy means to relocate the chair by simply lifting one end and wheeling the chair to a new location. Attachable cushions with a matching face opening can be strapped over the seat and back sections, and can be tied together or fastened with velcro or the like.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a lounge chair is disclosed. The lounge chair includes a frame, a seat section defining a substantially rigid orthopedic upper surface, a back section defining a substantially rigid upper surface and a hinge section disposed between the seat and back sections to facilitate pivotal movement between them. The seat and back sections are couple to the frame, while the back section includes an adjustable head aperture integrally formed therein.
Optionally, the substantially rigid upper surfaces of the seat and back sections are constructed predominantly of wood. As with the previous aspect, the hinge section comprises an actuator responsive to user input, a biasing member and an angle adjustment mechanism responsive to the actuator, where the angle adjustment mechanism is configured to allow a plurality of angular positions between the back section and the seat section. The biasing member promotes engagement of the angle adjustment mechanism and a corresponding member (such as the aforementioned catch) that is coupled to the back section, frame or both. In addition, the chair further comprises a plurality of longitudinally-spaced slats coupled to the back and seat sections to define the respective upper surfaces. As discussed previously, these slats are preferably made from a rigid material, such as wood. Furthermore, the head aperture is defined by cut-outs in at least a portion of the slats, and wherein at least the slats that define the head aperture are slidably coupled (either individually or together) to the back section to facilitate adjustability of the head aperture.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, a method of using a lounge chair is disclosed. The method includes configuring the chair according to at least one of the previously described aspects. In addition, the method includes positioning a user on the chair such that at least one of the user's ventral or dorsal region is supported by the orthopedic upper surface such that the ventral or dorsal region substantially conforms with the orthopedic upper surface. In addition, the user adjusts the position of the head aperture within the back section, and then places a portion of his or her head in the head aperture. Optionally, the method includes configuring the hinge section in a manner similar to that previously described.
The following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention can be best understood when read in conjunction with the following drawings, where like structure is indicated with like reference numerals and in which:
Referring first to
Referring with particularity to
Referring with particularity to
Referring next to
Referring next to
Referring with particularity to
Referring next to
Having described the invention in detail and by reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of the invention defined in the appended claims. More specifically, although some aspects of the present invention are identified herein as preferred or particularly advantageous, it is contemplated that the present invention is not necessarily limited to these preferred aspects of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/454,913, filed Mar. 14, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
336387 | Child | Feb 1886 | A |
880206 | Eyles | Feb 1908 | A |
988600 | Simpson | Apr 1911 | A |
3484878 | Nielsen | Dec 1969 | A |
3747916 | Benson | Jul 1973 | A |
3897102 | Lemaire | Jul 1975 | A |
3954195 | Deuchar | May 1976 | A |
4083068 | Bohme | Apr 1978 | A |
4207635 | Leroy | Jun 1980 | A |
4264102 | Sroub | Apr 1981 | A |
D278392 | Bayly | Apr 1985 | S |
4606086 | Rowland | Aug 1986 | A |
4616370 | Keenan et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4684170 | Colby | Aug 1987 | A |
4891854 | Finkelstein | Jan 1990 | A |
4941222 | Prager | Jul 1990 | A |
5121969 | Schroeder | Jun 1992 | A |
5222779 | Johnson | Jun 1993 | A |
5237713 | Prager | Aug 1993 | A |
5251956 | Hofmeyer | Oct 1993 | A |
5275463 | Rocha | Jan 1994 | A |
5297850 | Guleserian | Mar 1994 | A |
D352635 | Yoder | Nov 1994 | S |
5466039 | Umbrianna | Nov 1995 | A |
5524957 | Gibriano | Jun 1996 | A |
5624157 | Kostuk | Apr 1997 | A |
5829080 | Robillard et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5926871 | Howard | Jul 1999 | A |
5946749 | Sewell | Sep 1999 | A |
5950259 | Boggs | Sep 1999 | A |
6042184 | Kofoed | Mar 2000 | A |
6059365 | Diamond | May 2000 | A |
6068342 | Mariani et al. | May 2000 | A |
6109685 | Lindsey et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
D450942 | Jones | Nov 2001 | S |
20020079731 | Sisti | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040108757 | Jackson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60454913 | Mar 2003 | US |