Patent Application
20160136914
The present invention relates generally to polyparaxylylene, and more specifically to porous articles containing polyparaxylylene polymers where the articles have a node and fibril structure. A process for the formation of porous articles from polyparaxylylene polymers is also provided.
Polyparaxylylene (PPX) and its derivatives are well known in the art. Articles made from PPX possess physical properties such as resistance to chemical attack, resistance to gamma radiation, thermo-oxidative stability at elevated temperatures, biocompatibility, high dielectric strength, high mechanical strength, and excellent barrier properties. Because of the favorable attributes associated with it, PPX has been utilized as a monolithic coating or film in a variety of applications including thin film dielectrics, electrical insulation, chemical resistance, and barrier coatings.
Unfortunately, PPX polymers cannot be made into useful forms by conventional processing routes such as compression molding, extrusion, solvent casting, gel spinning, or sintering because there is no melt state or solution state. However, porous PPX articles have been made through the addition of porogens, by coating a porous scaffold composed of another polymer, and by thermal exposure that causes degradation of the PPX polymer introducing localized holes. These approaches to creating porous microstructures limit the possible microstructures and/or degrade the physical properties of the porous PPX material.
Thus, there exists a need in the art for a process for making a PPX article and a PPX article that is porous and maintains the excellent physical properties of PPX.
One embodiment relates to a process for forming a porous polyparaxylylene article that includes (1) depositing a polyparaxylylene (PPX) polymer film on a first side and a second side of a substrate to form a PPX composite structure and (2) expanding the PPX composite structure to form a first porous PPX polymer article on the first side of the substrate and a second porous PPX polymer article on the second side of the substrate. Each of the porous PPX polymer articles have a node and fibril structure. In one embodiment, the process further includes removing at least one of the porous PPX polymer articles from the substrate. The PPX polymer films have a thickness less than about 50 microns. The PPX composite structure may be expanded at a temperature from about 80° C. to about 450° C., or from 220° C. to about 450° C. Polymer chains in the fibrils are oriented along a fibril axis. In at least one embodiment, PPX is deposited onto the first and second sides of the substrate by vapor deposition. The substrate is a substrate that is capable of substantial deformation.
A second embodiment relates to a porous polyparaxylylene (PPX) polymer article that includes (1) a substrate having a first side and a second side, (2) a first expanded PPX polymer film on the first side of the substrate, and (3) a second expanded PPX polymer film on the second side of the substrate. The porous PPX polymer article includes nodes and fibrils. The fibrils include polymer chains oriented along a fibril axis. In addition, the substrate may be an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membrane, a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape, a PTFE membrane, an expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) tape, polyimide, polyamide-imide, silicon, glass, or zinc.
A third embodiment relates to a process for forming a porous polyparaxylylene article that includes (1) forming a polyparaxylylene (PPX) composite article and (2) expanding the PPX composite article to form a porous PPX polymer article having a node and fibril structure. The composite article is formed by (1) depositing a first PPX polymer film on a first side of a substrate and (2) forming a second PPX polymer film on the second side of the substrate. The PPX polymer films have a thickness less than about 50 microns. In some embodiments, the first PPX polymer film has a microstructure that is different from the microstructure of the second PPX polymer film. In other embodiments, the microstructures of the first and second PPX polymer films are the same or substantially the same.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the disclosure and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
As used herein, the term “PPX” refers to polyparaxylylene.
As used herein, the term “PPX polymer” is meant to include all forms of PPX, including PPX-N, PPX-AF4, PPX-VT4, and combinations thereof.
The term “PPX polymer film” as used herein is meant to denote unexpanded PPX polymer, either free-standing or on a substrate.
The term “PPX polymer membrane” as used herein is meant to denote a PPX polymer film that has been expanded in one or more directions.
The term “PPX composite structure” as used herein is meant to describe a PPX polymer film that has been formed on one or both sides of a substrate.
As used herein, a porous PPX polymer article is meant to denote an expanded PPX polymer film (e.g., PPX polymer membrane), either free-standing or as a co-expanded PPX polymer film/substrate or a co-expanded PPX polymer film/substrate/PPX polymer film.
As used herein, the term “lubricant” is meant to describe a processing aid that includes, and in some embodiments, consists of, an incompressible fluid that is not a solvent for the polymer at processing conditions. The fluid-polymer surface interactions are such that it is possible to create a homogenous mixture.
As used herein, the term “extension ratio” is meant to define strain as the final length divided by the original length.
As used herein, the term “node” is meant to describe the connection point of at least two fibrils.
As used herein, the term “thin” is meant to describe a thickness of less than about 50 microns.
As used herein, the term “fibril axis” is meant to describe direction parallel to the long dimension of the fibril.
As used herein, the term “substantial deformation” is meant to describe a substrate that is capable of elongating in one or more direction without breaking.
Persons skilled in the art will readily appreciate that various aspects of the present disclosure can be realized by any number of methods and apparatus configured to perform the intended functions. It should also be noted that the accompanying drawing figures referred to herein are not necessarily drawn to scale, but may be exaggerated to illustrate various aspects of the present disclosure, and in that regard, the drawing figures should not be construed as limiting.
The present invention relates to polyparaxylylene (PPX) polymers that can be expanded into porous articles that have a node and fibril microstructure. In at least one embodiment, the fibrils contain PPX polymer chains oriented with the fibril axis. Optionally, the PPX polymer may contain one or more comonomer. As used herein, the term “PPX polymer” is meant to include all forms of PPX, including PPX-N, PPX-AF4, PPX-VT4, and combinations thereof.
In forming a porous PPX polymer article, PPX may be applied to one or both sides of a substrate, such as by any conventional vapor deposition method. The substrate is not particularly limiting so long as the substrate is dimensionally stable and the PPX polymer film formed thereon can be removed from the substrate, if desired. Non-limiting examples of suitable substrates include a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape or membrane, an expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) tape or membrane, polyimide, polyamide-imide, silicon, glass, zinc, or any substrate that can withstand expansion temperatures above about 220° C. In exemplary embodiments, the substrate is capable of substantial deformation in one or more directions, such as a PTFE film or membrane.
The PPX polymer film, either free-standing or formed on a substrate, may have a nominal thickness less than about 50 microns. In exemplary embodiments, the PPX polymer film has a thickness from about 0.1 microns to about 50 microns, from about 0.1 microns to about 40 microns, from about 0.1 microns to about 30 microns, from about 0.1 microns to about 20 microns, from about 0.1 microns to about 10 microns, from about 0.1 microns to about 5 microns, from about 0.1 microns to about 2 microns, or from about 0.1 microns to about 1 micron.
The ability to apply a thin PPX polymer film on one side of a substrate, for example a PTFE substrate, enables the formation of a composite structure containing two different polymer layers with two different microstructures. Applying a PPX polymer film to both sides of a substrate, such as a PTFE substrate, enables the formation of a composite structure containing three polymer layers (e.g., a PPX polymer film on either side of the substrate) and potentially three different microstructures. It is to be appreciated that the PPX polymer film on one side of the substrate may or may not have the same microstructure as the PPX polymer film on the opposing side of the substrate. If the PPX polymer films have different microstructures, the composite structure contains three different microstructures. If the PPX polymer films have the same microstructure (or substantially the same microstructure such that the microstructures cannot be distinguished from each other), the composite structure contains two different microstructures. The difference between the first microstructure, the second microstructure, and the third microstructure can be measured by, for example, a difference in pore size (porosity), a difference in node and/or fibril geometry or size, and/or a difference in density. It is to be appreciated that the composite structure may include additional PPX polymer film(s) and/or substrate(s) and may therefore have more than three microstructures within the composite structure.
The PPX polymer film(s) may be removed from the substrate to form a free-standing PPX polymer film(s). The free-standing PPX polymer film may be stretched or expanded in one or more directions to form a porous PPX membrane. Alternatively, a PPX composite structure (e.g., the PPX polymer film(s) on a substrate) may be co-expanded in one or more directions to form a porous PPX polymer article (e.g., co-expanded PTFE/PPX membrane or co-expanded PPX polymer film/PTFE/PPX polymer film). It is to be appreciated that even though the substrate and the PPX polymer film(s) are expanded together, the expanded PPX polymer may be removed from the expanded substrate to form a free standing expanded PPX polymer membrane(s). The expanded PPX polymer membrane may be referred to herein as a porous PPX polymer article. It is to be noted that the expanded composite structure (e.g., the expanded PPX polymer film/expanded substrate or expanded PPX polymer film/expanded substrate/expanded PPX polymer film) may remain as a single unit in some embodiments. In other embodiments, a PPX polymer film is deposited on one or both sides of a substrate and co-expanded into a PPX composite structure, after which one or both of the expanded PPX polymer films is removed.
In an alternate embodiment, a PPX polymer film(s) may be deposited onto a partially expanded substrate, such as a partially expanded PTFE tape or membrane. The PPX polymer film(s) and the partially expanded substrate may then be co-expanded. The expanded PPX polymer film(s) may be removed from the expanded substrate to become a free-standing PPX expanded polymer membrane or porous PPX article.
The PPX polymer film (with or without an expandable substrate) may be cut into suitable sizes for expansion. Expansion of the free-standing PPX polymer film(s) occur at a temperature from about 80° C. to about 220° C. or from about 220° C. to about 290° C. or from about 290° C. to about 450° C. Expansion of a composite structure of a PPX polymer film/PTFE substrate or PPX polymer film/PTFE substrate/PPX polymer film may occur at temperatures from about 80° C. to about 220° C., from about 220° C. to about 340° C., or from about 290° C. to about 340° C. (i.e., below the melt temperature of the PTFE substrate). It is to be noted that the maximum temperature for expanding any composite structure described herein is the temperature at which the substrate degrades or melts. Expansion may be conducted at engineering strain rates (ESR) up to 10,000%/second, or from 1% to 10,000%/second or from 10% to 5000%/second to form an expanded, porous PPX article.
The expanded PPX membrane has a microstructure of nodes interconnected by fibrils, optionally with regions of unexpanded PPX, such as may be seen in
Looking at
Additionally, the expanded PPX articles are porous, and may have a percent porosity of at least about 5%, at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 55%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, or up to (and including) 90%. In exemplary embodiments, the expanded PPX articles may have a percent porosity from about 5% to about 75%, from about 10% to about 50%, or from about 10% to about 25%.
In an alternate embodiment, a porous PPX article may be formed from a crystalline PPX polymer in the form of a powder. In at least one embodiment, PPX polymer and a lubricant are mixed so as to uniformly or substantially uniformly distribute the lubricant in the mixture. It is to be appreciated that the term “lubricant”, as used herein, is meant to describe a processing aid that is an incompressible fluid that is not a solvent for the polymer at the process conditions. The fluid-polymer surface interactions are such that it is possible to create a homogenous mixture. It is also to be noted that that choice of lubricant is not particularly limiting and the selection of lubricant is largely a matter of safety and convenience. Non-limiting examples of lubricants for use herein include light mineral oil, aliphatic hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, halogenated hydrocarbons, and the like, and may be selected according to flammability, evaporation rate, and economic considerations.
It is to be appreciated that various times and mixing methods may be used to distribute the PPX polymer in the mixture. For example, for PPX-AF4, the lubricated PPX polymer is heated to a temperature about 80° C. to about 220° C. or from about 220° C. to about 290° C. or from about 290° C. to about 450° C. For those PPX variants that are subject to thermal decomposition and oxidation, such as PPX-N and PPX-VT4, the lubricated PPX polymer is heated to at a temperature from about 220° C. and below the temperature at which the polymer would decompose during processing, and in exemplary embodiments, from about 220° C. to about 250° C. (in an inert atmosphere). Along with the heating of the PPX polymer, sufficient pressure and shear is applied so as to form inter-particle connections and create a solid form. Non-limiting examples of methods of applying pressure and shear include ram extrusion (e.g., typically called paste extrusion or paste processing when lubricant is present) and calendering.
In one exemplary embodiment, the lubricated PPX polymer is calendered or ram extruded to produce a cohesive sheet that may be used as a preform. As used herein, the term “cohesive” is meant to describe a sheet that is sufficiently strong for further processing. For PPX-AF4, the calendering or ram extrusion occurs at a temperature about 80° C. to about 220° C. or from about 220° C. to about 290° C. or from about 290° C. to about 450° C. For PPX-N and PPX-VT4, the calendering or ram extrusion occurs from about 220° C. and below the temperature at which the polymer would decompose during processing, and in exemplary embodiments, from about 220° C. to about 250° C. (in an inert atmosphere). In at least one other embodiment, the lubricated PPX polymer may be ram extruded to produce a cohesive sheet, tube, or cylinder preform. In either calendering or ram extruding, the PPX polymer preform may be subsequently expanded as described above to form a porous PPX polymer article.
It should be understood that although certain methods and equipment are described below, other methods or equipment determined suitable by one of ordinary skill in the art may be alternatively utilized.
SEM Sample Preparation Method
SEM images were collected using an Hitachi SU8000 FE Ultra High Resolution Scanning Electron Microscope with Dual SE detectors. Cross-sectioned samples were prepared using a Cooled straight-razor blade method. Surface and cross-sectioned samples were mounted onto a 25 mm diameter metal stub with a 25 mm carbon double sided adhesive. The mounted samples were sputter coated with platinum.
Wide Angle X-Ray Diffraction (WAXD)
Diffraction patterns from as-deposited and expanded films were collected using a Molecular Metrology instrument configured for 2-D WAXD observations. The X-Ray source was a Rigaku MicroMax Sealed Micro Source CuKα element with a wavelength of 0.1542 nm running at 45 kV/66 mA. To collect two-dimensional diffraction information at wide angles a 20 cm×20 cm Fujifilm BAS SR2040 imaging plate was placed in the instrument vacuum chamber perpendicular to the X-Ray beam line at a camera length of 146 mm. Camera length was calibrated by collecting a WAXD pattern from a tricosane standard and calculating the camera length from the 110 reflection at q of 15.197 nm−1 or d=0.4134 nm. Films approximately 10 μm thick were placed on a motorized stage and aligned perpendicular to the beam line. The vacuum chamber was then sealed and evacuated to 500 mTorr below atmospheric pressure and the beam shutter opened. Diffraction patterns were collected at ambient temperature for a period of 1-6 hours depending on the thickness and scattering intensity of the film sample. The diffraction data were collected from the Fujifilm BAS SR2040 image plates using a General Electric Typhoon FLA7000 image plate reader. Diffraction pattern images were saved as grayscale TIFF files and subsequently analyzed using POLAR analysis software.
Powder X-Ray Diffraction
Diffraction patterns from calendered PPX powder were collected using a Bruker Discovery D-8 instrument. The X-Ray source was CuKα element with a wavelength of 0.1542 nm running at 40 kV/60 mA. The instrument was configured in a Brentano-Bragg geometry. Diffraction intensity was measured using a OD scintillation counter rotating at 0.02 degree 2-theta increments for a one second duration. The range of 2-theta was 10 degrees to 45 degrees. The instrument was calibrated using a polycrystalline silicon and an automated internal calibration algorithm. A PPX polymer was placed on the Bruker Discovery D-8 stage and aligned with the beam line.
Gurley Flow
The Gurley air flow test measures the time in seconds for 100 cm3 of air to flow through a 6.45 cm2 aperture at 12.4 cm of water pressure. If the sample size was smaller than 6.45 cm2 an aperture of 0.645 cm2 was used and the time observed divided by a factor of 10 to normalize observations made with both apertures. The samples were measured in a Gurley Densometer Model 4110 Automatic Densometer equipped with a Gurley Model 4320 automated digital timer. The reported results are the average of multiple (3-5) measurements.
DSC Measurements
DSC data were collected using a TA Instruments Q2000 DSC between 0° C. and 425° C. using a heating and a cooling rate of 10° C./min. The expanded porous membrane samples and the solid film samples were prepared by punching out 4 mm disks. The 4 mm disk was placed flat in the pan and the lid was crimped to sandwich the disk between the pan and lid.
A film of PPX-AF4 having a nominal thickness of 10 μm was deposited onto a blended, extruded, and dried PTFE tape made generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566 to Gore by a commercially available vapor deposition process (Specialty Coating Systems, 7645 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Ind. 46278).
The coated article was then cut to dimensions of 200 mm×200 mm and placed in the grips of a pantograph type biaxial batch expander equipped with a convection oven. The coated tape was heat soaked at a constant temperature of 350° C. for 300 seconds. The heat treated article was allowed to cool to room temperature under restraint of the pantograph biaxial expander grips. After cooling, the article was removed from the expander grips, the PPX-AF4 film was removed from the melted PTFE carrier tape to yield a free-standing, non-expanded, non-porous film of PPX-AF4.
A scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of the surface and cross-section of the non-expanded, non-porous PPX-AF4 film are shown in
A film of PPX-AF4 having a nominal thickness of 10 μm was deposited onto a blended, extruded, and dried PTFE tape made generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566 to Gore by a commercially available vapor deposition process (Specialty Coating Systems, 7645 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Ind. 46278).
The coated article was then cut to dimensions of 200 mm×200 mm and placed in the grips of a pantograph type biaxial batch expander equipped with a convection oven. The coated tape was heat soaked at a constant temperature of 350° C. for 300 seconds. The coated tape was then simultaneously stretched at an engineering strain rate (ESR) of 100 percent/second to an extension ratio in the tape machine direction of 1:1 and 4:1 in the tape transverse direction. The expanded article was allowed to cool to room temperature under restraint of the pantograph biaxial expander grips. After cooling, the article was removed from the expander grips and a film of porous PPX-AF4 was removed from the melted PTFE tape to yield a free-standing porous membrane of PPX-AF4.
Scanning electron micrographs (SEMs) of the surface and the cross-section of the expanded porous PPX-AF4 membrane are shown in
A film of PPX-AF4 having a nominal thickness of 5 μm was deposited onto a blended, extruded, and dried polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape made generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566 to Gore by a commercially available vapor deposition process (Specialty Coating Systems, 7645 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Ind. 46278).
The coated article was then cut to dimensions of 200 mm×200 mm and placed in the grips of a pantograph type biaxial batch expander equipped with a convection oven. The coated tape was heat soaked at a constant temperature of 300° C. for 300 seconds. The coated tape was then simultaneously stretched at an engineering strain rate (ESR) of 7 percent/second to an extension ratio in the extrudate machine direction of 4:1 and 4:1 in the extrudate transverse direction. The expanded PPX-AF4 article was removed from the oven, and allowed to cool to room temperature under restraint of the biaxial batch expander grips. After cooling the expanded PPX-AF4 article (i.e., co-expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 membrane) was removed from the grips. A Gurley number of the expanded PPX-AF4 article was determined to be 68.38 and is reported in Table 1.
A film of PPX-AF4 having a nominal thickness of 5 μm was deposited onto a blended, extruded, and dried polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape made generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566 to Gore by a commercially available vapor deposition process (Specialty Coating Systems, 7645 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Ind. 46278). The coated article was then cut to dimensions of 200 mm×200 mm and placed in the grips of a pantograph type biaxial batch expander equipped with a convection oven. The coated tape was heat soaked at a constant temperature of 300° C. for 300 seconds. The coated tape was then simultaneously stretched at an engineering strain rate (ESR) of 70 percent/second to an extension ratio in the extrudate machine direction of 4:1 and 4:1 in the extrudate transverse direction. The expanded PPX-AF4 article was removed from the oven and allowed to cool to room temperature under restraint of the biaxial batch expander grips. After cooling, the expanded PPX-AF4 article (i.e., co-expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 membrane) was removed from the grips.
A scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of the surface of the expanded PPX-AF4 membrane taken at 20,000× magnification is shown in
A film of PPX-AF4 having a nominal thickness of 5 μm was deposited onto a blended, extruded, and dried polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape made generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566 to Gore by a commercially available vapor deposition process (Specialty Coating Systems, 7645 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Ind. 46278).
The coated article was then cut to dimensions of 200 mm×200 mm and placed in the grips of a pantograph type biaxial batch expander equipped with a convection oven. The coated tape was heat soaked at a constant temperature of 300° C. for 300 seconds. The coated tape was then simultaneously stretched at an engineering strain rate (ESR) of 700 percent/second to an extension ratio in the extrudate machine direction of 4:1 and 4:1 in the tape transverse direction. The expanded PPX-AF4 article was removed from the oven and allowed to cool to room temperature under restraint of the biaxial batch expander grips. After cooling, the expanded PPX-AF4 article (i.e., co-expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 membrane) was removed from the grips. A Gurley number of the expanded PPX-AF4 article was determined to be 111.7 seconds and is reported in Table 1.
A film of PPX-AF4 having a nominal thickness of 5 μm was deposited onto a blended, extruded, and dried polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape made generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566 to Gore by a commercially available vapor deposition process (Specialty Coating Systems, 7645 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Ind. 46278).
The coated article was then cut to dimensions of 200 mm×200 mm and placed in the grips of a pantograph type biaxial batch expander equipped with a convection oven. The coated tape was heat soaked at a constant temperature of 300° C. for 300 seconds. The coated tape was then simultaneously stretched at an engineering strain rate (ESR) of 7 percent/second to an extension ratio in the extrudate machine direction of 6:1 and 6:1 in the tape transverse direction. The expanded PPX-AF4 article was removed from the oven and allowed to cool to room temperature under restraint of the pantograph biaxial expander grips. After cooling, the expanded PPX-AF4 article (i.e., co-expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 membrane) was removed from the expander grips. A Gurley number of the expanded PPX-AF4 article was determined to be 60.92 seconds and is reported in Table 1.
A film of PPX-AF4 having a nominal thickness of 5 μm was deposited onto blended, extruded, and dried polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape made generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566 to Gore by a commercially available vapor deposition process (Specialty Coating Systems, 7645 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Ind. 46278).
The coated article was then cut to dimensions of 200 mm×200 mm and placed in the grips of a pantograph type biaxial batch expander equipped with a convection oven. The coated tape was heat soaked at a constant temperature of 300° C. for 300 seconds. The coated tape was then simultaneously stretched at an engineering strain rate (ESR) of 70 percent/second to an extension ratio in the tape machine direction of 6:1 and 6:1 in the tape transverse direction. The expanded PPX-AF4 article was removed from the oven and allowed to cool to room temperature under restraint of the biaxial batch expander grips. After cooling, the expanded PPX-AF4 article (i.e., co-expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 membrane) was removed from the grips. A Gurley number of the expanded PPX-AF4 article was determined to be 54.36 seconds and is reported in Table 1.
A film of PPX-AF4 having a nominal thickness of 5 μm was deposited onto a blended, extruded, and dried polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape made generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566 to Gore by a commercially available vapor deposition process (Specialty Coating Systems, 7645 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Ind. 46278).
The coated article was then cut to dimensions of 200 mm×200 mm and placed in the grips of a pantograph type biaxial batch expander equipped with a convection oven. The coated tape was heat soaked at a constant temperature of 300° C. for 300 seconds. The coated tape was then simultaneously stretched at an engineering strain rate (ESR) of 700 percent/second to an extension ratio in the extrudate tape machine direction of 6:1 and 6:1 in the tape transverse direction. The expanded PPX-AF4 article was removed from the oven and allowed to cool to room temperature under restraint of the biaxial batch expander grips. After cooling, the expanded PPX-AF4 article (i.e., co-expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 membrane) was removed from the grips. A Gurley number of the expanded PPX-AF4 article was determined to be 65.06 and is reported in Table 1.
A film of PPX-AF4 having a nominal thickness of 5 μm was deposited onto blended, extruded, and dried polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape made generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566 to Gore by a commercially available vapor deposition process (Specialty Coating Systems, 7645 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Ind. 46278).
The coated article was then cut to dimensions of 200 mm×200 mm and placed in the grips of a pantograph type biaxial batch expander equipped with a convection oven. The coated tape was heat soaked at a constant temperature of 250° C. for 300 seconds. The coated tape was then simultaneously stretched at an engineering strain rate (ESR) of 7 percent/second to an extension ratio in the tape machine direction of 4:1 and 4:1 in the tape transverse direction. The expanded PPX-AF4 article was removed from the oven and allowed to cool to room temperature under restraint of the biaxial batch expander grips. After cooling, the expanded PPX-AF4 article (i.e., co-expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 membrane) was removed from the grips. A Gurley number of the expanded PPX-AF4 article was determined to be 109.0 seconds and is reported in Table 1.
A film of PPX-AF4 having a nominal thickness of 5 μm was deposited onto a blended, extruded, and dried polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape made generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566 to Gore by a commercially available vapor deposition process (Specialty Coating Systems, 7645 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Ind. 46278).
The coated article was then cut to dimensions of 200 mm×200 mm and placed in the grips of a pantograph type biaxial batch expander equipped with a convection oven. The coated tape was heat soaked at a constant temperature of 250° C. for 300 seconds. The coated tape was then simultaneously stretched at an engineering strain rate (ESR) of 70 percent/second to an extension ratio in the tape machine direction of 6:1 and 6:1 in the tape transverse direction. The expanded PPX-AF4 article was removed from the oven and allowed to cool to room temperature under restraint of the biaxial batch expander grips. After cooling, the expanded PPX-AF4 article (i.e., co-expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 membrane) was removed from the grips.
A film of PPX-AF4 having a nominal thickness of 5 μm was deposited onto a blended, extruded, and dried polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape made generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566 to Gore by a commercially available vapor deposition process (Specialty Coating Systems, 7645 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Ind., 46278).
The coated article was then cut to dimensions of 200 mm×200 mm and placed in the grips of a pantograph type biaxial batch expander equipped with a convection oven. The coated tape was heat soaked at a constant temperature of 250° C. for 300 seconds. The coated tape was then simultaneously stretched at an engineering strain rate (ESR) of 700 percent/second to an extension ratio in the tape machine direction of 6:1 and 6:1 in the tape transverse direction. The expanded PPX-AF4 article was removed from the oven and allowed to cool to room temperature under restraint of the biaxial batch expander grips. After cooling, the expanded PPX-AF4 article (i.e., co-expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 membrane) was removed from the grips. A Gurley number of the expanded PPX-AF4 article was determined to be 119.3 seconds and is reported in Table 1.
A film of PPX-N having a nominal thickness of 10 μm was deposited onto a blended, extruded, and dried polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape made generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566 to Gore by a commercially available vapor deposition process (Specialty Coating Systems, 7645 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Ind. 46278).
The coated article was then cut into a 35 mm×13 mm rectangle with the samples long dimension aligned with the Example 1 tape machine direction (MD) direction. The rectangular sample was drawn to an extension ratio of 2.2 at an engineering strain rate (ESR) of 50 percent per second in a RSA 3 Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (DMA), the gauge length was 10 mm, TA Instruments, Newcastle, Del. using the standard TA film grips. The atmosphere in the DMA oven was a continuous purge of nitrogen gas. Oven temperature was set to 290° C. and the film sample was heat soaked for 300 seconds. A scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of the surface of the PPX-N membrane taken at 20,000× magnification is shown in
Approximately 1000 grams of anhydrous p-xylene was charged into 2 liter round bottom flask with a magnetic stirrer at room temperature. Approximately 16 grams of potassium t-butoxide was added to the reaction flask. The flask was heated to 90° C. When all of the potassium t-butoxide was dissolved, 15 grams of alpha-chloro p-xylene was added the flask. The mixture immediately turned yellow. The reaction mixture was then heated to reflux at approximately 135° C. After 30 minutes, 5.7 grams of the alpha chloro p-xylene dissolved in approximately 87 grams of p-xylene was added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 40 minutes. The reaction mixture was allowed to stir for approximately 16 hours. The solution was a cloudy suspension. The solution was cooled and then vacuum filtered to remove the xylene. The resulting product was dispersed into 2 liters of a 50/50 IPA/water mixture and filtered again. This was done two times. The product was allowed to dry overnight. The dried product was then mixed into an IPA/water mixture, boiled, and filtered 2 more times. The product was allowed to dry in a hood overnight. Final drying was done at 120° C. for 4 hours in a vacuum oven. The final product was a PPX-N powder.
The PPX-N powder of Example 12 was lubricated with mineral oil and calendered at 150° C. to form a thin PPX-N sheet about 0.5 mm thick.
A film of PPX-AF4 having a nominal thickness of 10 μm was deposited onto a blended, extruded, and dried polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape made generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566 to Gore by a commercially available vapor deposition process (Specialty Coating Systems, 7645 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Ind. 46278).
The coated article was then cut to dimensions of 200 mm×200 mm and placed in the grips of a pantograph type biaxial batch expander equipped with a convection oven. The coated article was heat soaked at a constant temperature of 300° C. for 300 seconds. The coated article was then simultaneously stretched at an engineering strain rate (ESR) of 100 percent/second to an extension ratio of 2:1 in both the extrudate machine and transverse directions. The expanded PPX-AF4 article was removed from the oven, and allowed to cool to room temperature under restraint of the biaxial batch expander grips. After cooling, the co-expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 membrane was removed from the grips. A scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of a surface of the above co-expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 membrane taken at 40,000× magnification is shown in
A film of PPX-AF4 having a nominal thickness of 5 μm was deposited onto the external surfaces of a blended, extruded, and dried polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape made generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,566 to Gore by a commercially available vapor deposition process (Specialty Coating Systems, 7645 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Ind. 46278.
The coated article was then cut to dimensions of 200 mm×200 mm and placed in the grips of a pantograph type biaxial batch expander equipped with a convection oven. The coated tape was heat soaked at a constant temperature of 335° C. for 300 seconds. The coated tape was then simultaneously stretched at an engineering strain rate (ESR) of 10 percent/second to an extension ratio in the extrudate machine direction of 2:1 and 2:1 in the extrudate transverse direction. The article was then heat soaked at a constant temperature of 380° C. for 30 seconds. The expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 composite article was formed of a first layer of expanded PPX-AF4, a layer of expanded PTFE, and a second layer of expanded PPX-AF4. The expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 composite article was removed from the oven and allowed to cool to room temperature under restraint of the biaxial batch expander grips. After cooling, the expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 composite article (i.e., co-expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 film) was removed from the grips.
A layer of PPX-AF4 was removed from one side of the co-expanded PPX-AF4 article of Example 15 to form an expanded PTFE/PPX-AF4 composite article formed of a layer of expanded PPX-AF4 and a layer of expanded PTFE (having a tight/open microstructure).
The invention of this application has been described above both generically and with regard to specific embodiments. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the embodiments without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Thus, it is intended that the embodiments cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62030419 | Jul 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14810999 | Jul 2015 | US |
| Child | 15007319 | US |
