Porous carbon materials for CO2 separation in natural gas

BACKGROUND

Current methods and materials for capturing CO₂and H₂S from an environment suffer from numerous limitations, including low selectivity, limited sorption capacity, high sorbent costs, and stringent reaction conditions. The present disclosure addresses these limitations.

SUMMARY

In some embodiments, the present disclosure pertains to methods of capturing a gas from an environment. In some embodiments, the methods include a step of associating the environment with a porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the associating results in sorption of gas components to the porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the sorbed gas components include at least one of CO₂, H₂S, and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the environment in which gas capture occurs is a pressurized environment. In some embodiments, the environment includes, without limitation, industrial gas streams, natural gas streams, natural gas wells, industrial gas wells, oil and gas fields, and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the sorbed gas components include CO₂. In some embodiments, the sorption of the CO₂to the porous carbon material occurs selectively over hydrocarbons in the environment. In some embodiments, the CO₂is converted to poly (CO₂) or a matrix of CO₂(e.g., a matrix of ordered CO₂) within the pores of the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the porous carbon material has a CO₂sorption capacity of about 50 wt % to about 200 wt % of the porous carbon material weight when measured in absolute uptake values.

In some embodiments, the sorbed gas components include H₂S. In some embodiments, the H₂S is converted within the pores of the porous carbon materials to at least one of elemental sulfur (S), sulfur dioxide (SO₂), sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄), and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the formed elemental sulfur becomes impregnated with the porous carbon material. In some embodiments, captured H₂S remains intact within the porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the porous carbon material has a H₂S sorption capacity of about 50 wt % to about 300 wt % of the porous carbon material weight.

In some embodiments, the sorbed gas components include CO₂and H₂S. In some embodiments, the sorption of H₂S and CO₂to the porous carbon material occurs at the same time. In some embodiments, the sorption of CO₂to the porous carbon material occurs before the sorption of H₂S to the porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the sorption of H₂S to the porous carbon material occurs before the sorption of CO₂to the porous carbon material.

In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure also include a step of releasing captured gas components from the porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the releasing occurs by decreasing the pressure of the environment or heating the environment. In some embodiments, the releasing of sorbed CO₂occurs by decreasing the pressure of the environment or placing the porous carbon material in a second environment that has a lower pressure than the environment where CO₂capture occurred. In some embodiments, the releasing of sorbed H₂S occurs by heating the porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the releasing of the CO₂occurs before the releasing of the H₂S.

In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure also include a step of disposing the released gas. In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure also include a step of reusing the porous carbon material after the releasing to capture additional gas components from an environment.

In some embodiments, the porous carbon material utilized for gas capture includes a plurality of pores. In some embodiments, the porous carbon material includes, without limitation, protein-derived porous carbon materials, carbohydrate-derived porous carbon materials, cotton-derived porous carbon materials, fat-derived porous carbon materials, waste-derived porous carbon materials, asphalt-derived porous carbon materials, coal-derived porous carbon materials, coke-derived porous carbon materials, asphaltene-derived porous carbon materials, oil product-derived porous carbon materials, bitumen-derived porous carbon materials, tar-derived porous carbon materials, pitch-derived porous carbon materials, anthracite-derived porous carbon materials, melamine-derived porous carbon materials, biochar-derived porous carbon, wood-derived porous carbon and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the porous carbon material includes asphalt-derived porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the porous carbon material is carbonized. In some embodiments, the porous carbon material is reduced. In some embodiments, the porous carbon material is vulcanized. In some embodiments, the porous carbon material includes a plurality of nucleophilic moieties. In some embodiments, the nucleophilic moieties include, without limitation, oxygen-containing moieties, sulfur-containing moieties, metal-containing moieties, metal oxide-containing moieties, metal sulfide-containing moieties, nitrogen-containing moieties, phosphorous-containing moieties, and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials may be derived from at least one of biochars, hydrochars, charcoals, coal, activated carbon, and combinations thereof. These sources may be favorable when other sources (such as asphalt) are prohibitively expensive for a particular application. The cost of synthetic polymers may be seen as high compared with industrial waste or agriculture waste. Furthermore, in order to reach higher CO₂uptake capacity, A-PC has to be N-doped by NH₃followed by H₂reduction at 700° C., which may not be favored by all industries. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure are biochar-derived porous carbon materials (B-PC). In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure are biochar-derived and nitrogen-containing porous carbon materials (B-NPC). In some embodiments, the biochar source is a carbon-rich material produced by pyrolysis of waste organic feedstock that has been used as a sustainable means to sequester atmospheric carbon, improve soil fertility, waste management and to reduce CO₂emissions. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a 1.50 g of CO₂uptake capacity per gram of sorbent, which is ˜5 times higher than that in Zeolite 5A and 3 times higher than that in ZIF-8 measured under the pressure of 30 bar at 23° C. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure (e.g., B-PC and B-NPC) can be spontaneously regenerated when the pressure returns to ambient pressure with the same CO₂uptake performance—a pressure swing capture process. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure (e.g., B-PC and B-NPC) can also be used as metal-free catalysts as well as sorbents for low-temperature oxidation of H₂S to elemental sulfur. In some embodiments, the biochars of the present disclosure (e.g., sulfur-rich B-PC and sulfur-rich B-NPC) can be potentially used as cathode materials in lithium-sulfur batteries.

In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials have surface areas ranging from about 2,500 m²/g to about 4,500 m²/g. Surface areas greater than about 3,000 m²/g may imply that the sorbent stacks into multilayers within the pore structures and along the surfaces. In some embodiments, the plurality of pores in the porous carbon material comprises diameters ranging from about 1 nm to about 10 nm, and volumes ranging from about 1 cm³/g to about 3 cm³/g. In some embodiments, the porous carbon material has a density ranging from about 0.3 g/cm³to about 4 g/cm³.

Additional embodiments of the present disclosure pertain to the porous carbon materials used for gas capture or gas separation or combinations thereof. Further embodiments of the present disclosure pertain to methods of making the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure.

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 shows a scheme of a method of utilizing porous carbon materials to capture gas (e.g., carbon dioxide (CO₂) or hydrogen sulfide (H₂S)) from an environment (FIG. 1).

FIG. 2 shows schemes of CO₂capture from materials relating to the formation of chemisorbed oxygen species on porous carbon materials as a result of their reaction with H₂S and O₂. The porous carbon material was first reacted with H₂S and air, and then thermalized with or without ammonia, and finally used for reversible CO₂capture.

FIG. 3 shows synthetic schemes and micrographic images of various porous carbon materials. FIG. 3A provides a scheme for the synthesis of sulfur-containing porous carbon (SPC) or nitrogen containing porous carbon (NPC) by treating poly[(2-hydroxymethyl)thiophene] or poly(acrylonitrile) with KOH at 600° C. and then washing with dilute HCl and water until the extracts are neutral. The NPC is further reduced using 10% H₂at 600° C. to form reduced NPC (R-NPC). The synthetic details are described in Example 1. FIG. 3B shows a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of NPCs at a scale bar of 100 μm. FIG. 3C shows an SEM image of SPCs at a scale bar of 500 nm. FIG. 3D shows a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the SPCs in FIG. 3B at a scale bar of 25 nm.

FIG. 4 shows x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of SPCs (left panel) and NPCs (right panel). The XPS indicates 13.3 atomic % of S in the SPC precursor and 22.4 atomic % of N in the NPC precursor. The resulting SPC and NPC then had 8.1 atomic % of S content and 6.2 atomic % of N content, respectively. The S2p and N1, XPS peaks were taken from the SPC and NPC. The S2p core splits into two main peaks of 163.7 (2p312) and 164.8 eV (2p112), which correspond to thiophenic sulfur atoms incorporated into the porous carbon framework via the formation of C—S—C bond. The N1 reflects two different chemical environments: pyridinic nitrogen (N-6) and pyrrolic nitrogen (N-5) atoms.

FIG. 5 shows data relating to CO₂uptake measurements for SPCs. FIG. 5A shows volumetric and gravimetric uptake of CO₂on SPC at different temperatures and pressures. Data designated with (*) were recorded volumetrically. Data designated with (§) were performed volumetrically. Data designated with (+) were measured gravimetrically at NIST. All gravimetric measurements were corrected for buoyancy. FIGS. 5B-D show three consecutive CO₂sorption-desorption cycles on the SPC over a pressure range from 0 to 30 bar at 30° C. All solid circles indicate CO₂sorption, while the open circles designate the desorption process. FIG. 5E show volumetric SPC CO₂sorption isotherms at 23° C. and 50° C. over a pressure range from 0 to 1 bar.

FIG. 6 shows pictorial descriptions of excess and absolute CO₂uptake. FIG. 6A is adapted from Chem. Sci. 5, 32-51 (2014). The dashed line indicates the Gibbs dividing surface. It divides the free volume into two regions in which gas molecules are either in an adsorbed or bulk state. FIG. 6B shows a depiction of total uptake, which can be used as an approximation for absolute uptake for microporous materials with negligible external surface areas.

FIG. 7 shows CO₂uptake on the SPC. Comparison of absolute uptake and excess uptake at 22° C. and 50° C. exemplifies the small differences over this pressure and temperature range.

FIG. 8 shows spectral changes before and after sorption-desorption at 23° C. and the proposed polymerization mechanism. Attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR) (FIGS. 8A-B), Raman spectroscopy (FIG. 8C) and 50.3 MHz ¹³C MAS NMR spectra (FIG. 8D) are shown before and after CO₂sorption at 10 bar and room temperature. All spectra were recorded at the elapsed times indicated on the graphs after the SPC sorbent was returned to ambient pressure. In the NMR experiments, the rotor containing the SPC was tightly capped during the analyses. For the third NMR experiment (top), the same material was left under ambient conditions for 19 h before being repacked in the rotor to obtain the final spectrum. Each NMR spectrum took 80 min to record. Example 1 shows more details. FIGS. 8E-F show proposed mechanisms that illustrate the poly (CO₂) formation in SPC or NPC, respectively, in a higher pressure CO₂environment. With the assistance of the nucleophile, such as S or N, the CO₂polymerization reaction is initiated under pressure, and the polymer is further likely stabilized by the van der Waals interactions with the carbon surfaces in the pores.

FIG. 9 shows ATR-IR (FIG. 9A) and Raman (FIG. 9B) spectra for the ZIF-8 before and after CO₂sorption at 10 bar. All spectra were recorded 3 and 20 minutes after the ZIF-8 sorbent was returned to ambient pressure at room temperature.

FIG. 10 shows ATR-IR (FIG. 10A) and Raman (FIG. 10B) spectra for the activated carbon before and after CO₂sorption at 10 bar. Spectra were taken 3 min and 20 min after the activated carbon was returned to ambient pressure at room temperature.

FIG. 11 shows volumetric gas uptake data. FIG. 11A shows data relating to volumetric CO₂uptake performance at 30° C. of SPC, NPC, R-NPC and the following traditional sorbents: activated carbon, ZIF-8, and zeolite 5A. Aluminum foil was used as a reference to ensure no CO₂condensation was occurring in the system at this temperature and pressure. Volumetric CO₂and CH₄uptake tests at 23° C. on SPC (FIG. 11B), activated carbon (FIG. 11C) and ZIF-8 sorbents (FIG. 11D) are also shown.

FIG. 12 shows various mass spectrometry (MS) data. FIG. 12A shows MS data that was taken while the system was being pressurized with a premixed gas of CO₂in natural gas during the uptake process. FIG. 12B shows MS data that was recorded while the premixed gas-filled SPC was desorbing from 30 bar. The mixed gas was purchased from Applied Gas Inc.

FIG. 13 shows comparative data relating to the CO₂uptake capacities of various carbon sources.

FIG. 14 shows scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (FIG. 14A) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (FIG. 14B) images of A-PCs.

FIG. 15 shows nitrogen sorption isotherms for A-PC, A-NPC and A-rNPC.

FIG. 16 shows schematic illustrations of the preparation of asphalt-derived porous carbon materials (A-PCs). FIG. 16A shows a scheme of a method of preparing nitrogen-doped A-PCs (A-NPCs) and reduced A-NPCs (A-rNPC). FIG. 16B shows more detailed schemes of methods of preparing A-rNPCs, sulfur-doped APCs (A-SPC), and nitrogen-doped and sulfur doped APCs (A-NSPCs).

FIG. 17 shows a comparison of room temperature volumetric CO₂uptake of A-PC, A-NPC and A-rNPC with the other porous carbon sorbents and the starting asphalt.

FIG. 18 shows data relating to the volumetric uptake of CO₂on A-rNPC as a function of temperature at pressures that range from about 0-30 bar (FIG. 18A) and about 0-1 bar (FIG. 18B).

FIG. 19 shows data relating to the volumetric CO₂and CH₄uptake of A-rNPC (squares) and A-SPC (circles) at 23° C.

FIG. 20 shows the gravimetric measurement of CO₂and CH₄uptake of uGil-600, 700, 800, and 900 at 25° C. The uGil-T sorbents exhibit high CO₂capacity (up to 1.50 g CO₂/g adsorbent at 54 bar) under high pressure environment, which is 9 times higher than Zeolite 5A, and 4 times higher than ZIF-8 at the same conditions.

FIG. 21 shows the results of TEM EDS elemental mapping of A-rNPCs after H₂S uptake under air treatment. FIG. 21A shows a TEM image of A-rNPC after H₂S uptake. FIG. 21B shows carbon element mapping of A-rNPCs after H₂S uptake. FIG. 21C shows sulfur elemental mapping of A-rNPCs after H₂S uptake.

FIG. 22 shows a thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curve of A-rNPCs after H₂S uptake with exposure to air.

FIG. 23 shows a summary of the H₂S uptake capacity of A-rNPC under different conditions, and its comparison to the H₂S uptake capacity of Maxsorb®, a commercial high surface area carbonized material.

FIG. 24 shows comparative data relating to the CO₂uptake capacities of A-rNPCs and A-NPCs.

FIG. 25 shows comparative data relating to the CO₂uptake capacities of A-NSPCs and A-SPCs.

FIG. 26 shows an SEM image of B-NPC (FIG. 26A), a TEM image of B-NPC (FIG. 26B), a BET isotherm curve of B-NPC, indicating B-NPC is a microporous material with a surface area of 2988 m²/g (FIG. 26C), and a DFT size distribution of B-NPC, showing that the pore size is from 0.5-5 nm (FIG. 26D).

FIG. 27 shows CO₂uptake performances of different sorbents, B-NPC and C-NPC (charcoal derived N-containing porous carbon) at 25° C.

FIG. 28 shows CO₂uptake performances of different B-PC prepared by different bases.

FIG. 29 shows CO₂uptake performances of different B-NPC prepared from different precursors using KOH as base.

FIG. 30 shows the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of B-NPC and C-NPC after H₂S capture.

FIG. 31 shows TGA curves of asphalts from different sources and the removal of volatile oils between 400° C. and 500° C.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are illustrative and explanatory, and are not restrictive of the subject matter, as claimed. In this application, the use of the singular includes the plural, the word “a” or “an” means “at least one”, and the use of “or” means “and/or”, unless specifically stated otherwise. Furthermore, the use of the term “including”, as well as other forms, such as “includes” and “included”, is not limiting. Also, terms such as “element” or “component” respectively encompass both elements or components comprising one unit and elements or components that comprise more than one unit unless specifically stated otherwise.

The section headings used herein are for organizational purposes and are not to be construed as limiting the subject matter described. All documents, or portions of documents, cited in this application, including, but not limited to, patents, patent applications, articles, books, and treatises, are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for any purpose. In the event that one or more of the incorporated literature and similar materials defines a term in a manner that contradicts the definition of that term in this application, this application controls.

Environmental and health concerns have been linked to carbon dioxide (CO₂) and hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) emission sources, such as industrial power plants, refineries and natural gas wells. Therefore, efficient CO₂and H₂S capture from flue gases or other high pressure natural gas wells has been a primary approach in mitigating environmental and health risks. For instance, aqueous amine solvents and membrane technologies have been utilized for CO₂capture. In addition, solid sorbents such as activated carbon, zeolites and metal organic frameworks have been utilized as alternative materials for capturing CO₂.

However, many of the aforementioned technologies suffer from numerous limitations. For instance, many CO₂and H₂S capture technologies that utilize aqueous amine solutions are highly energy inefficient due to the high energy requirements for regeneration (e.g., 120° C.-140° C.).

Furthermore, aqueous amines are prone to foaming and are corrosive in nature; often components and piping require stainless steel for construction. They also form non-regenerative, degradative compounds in the system that need to be periodically removed. Moreover, with adsorber columns, regenerative columns, flash tanks, reboilers, and water treatment systems, amine systems have a large equipment footprint and are typically not modular in design, making these acid gas removal systems costly and unsuitable for many gas capture applications, such as offshore use.

Solid CO₂sorbents have shown many advantages over conventional separation technologies that utilize aqueous amine solvents. For instance, solid CO₂sorbents have been shown to capture CO₂under high pressure. Moreover, many solid CO₂sorbents have lower regeneration energy requirements, higher CO₂uptake capacities, selectivity over hydrocarbons, and ease of handling. Moreover, solid CO₂sorbents have shown lower heat capacities, faster kinetics of sorption and desorption, and high mechanical strength. In addition, solid CO₂sorbents have been utilized to capture and release CO₂without significant pressure and temperature swings.

However, a limitation of many solid CO₂sorbents is the cost of production. Many solid CO₂sorbents are also unable to compress and separate CO₂from the sorbents in an efficient manner. Moreover, the H₂S sorption capacities of many solid CO₂sorbents have not been ascertained. Therefore, a need exists for the development of more effective and affordable CO₂and H₂S sorbents. A need also exists for more effective methods of utilizing such sorbents to capture CO₂and H₂S from various environments.

In some embodiments such as illustrated in FIG. 1, the present disclosure pertains to methods of capturing a gas from an environment. In some embodiments, the method includes associating the environment with a porous carbon material (step 10) to result in sorption of gas components (e.g., CO₂, H₂S, and combinations thereof) to the porous carbon material (step 12). In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure also include a step of releasing the gas components from the porous carbon material (step 14). In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure also include a step of reusing the porous carbon material after the release of the gas components (step 16). In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure also include a step of disposing the released gas components (step 18). In some embodiments, the porous carbon material includes asphalt derived porous carbon materials.

As set forth in more detail herein, the gas capture methods and porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have numerous embodiments. For instance, various methods may be utilized to associate various types of porous carbon materials with various environments to result in the capture of various gas components from the environment. Moreover, the captured gas components may be released from the porous carbon materials in various manners.

Environments

The methods of the present disclosure may be utilized to capture gas from various environments. In some embodiments, the environment includes, without limitation, industrial gas streams, natural gas streams, natural gas wells, industrial gas wells, oil and gas fields, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the environment is a subsurface oil and gas field. In more specific embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure may be utilized to capture gas from an environment that contains natural gas, such as an oil well.

In some embodiments, the environment is a pressurized environment. For instance, in some embodiments, the environment has a total pressure higher than atmospheric pressure.

In some embodiments, the environment has a total pressure of about 0.1 bar to about 500 bar. In some embodiments, the environment has a total pressure of about 2.5 bar to about 100 bar. In some embodiments, the environment has a total pressure of about 5 bar to about 100 bar. In some embodiments, the environment has a total pressure of about 25 bar to about 30 bar. In some embodiments, the environment has a total pressure of about 100 bar to about 200 bar. In some embodiments, the environment has a total pressure of about 200 bar to about 300 bar.

Gas Components

The methods of the present disclosure may be utilized to capture various gas components from an environment. For instance, in some embodiments, the captured gas component includes, without limitation, CO₂, H₂S, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the captured gas component includes CO₂. In some embodiments, the captured gas component includes H₂S. In some embodiments, the captured gas component includes CO₂and H₂S.

Association of Porous Carbon Materials with an Environment

Various methods may be utilized to associate porous carbon materials of the present disclosure with an environment. In some embodiments, the association occurs by incubating the porous carbon materials with the environment (e.g., a pressurized environment). In some embodiments, the association of porous carbon materials with an environment occurs by flowing the environment through a structure that contains the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the structure may be a column or a sheet that contains immobilized porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the structure may be a floating bed that contains porous carbon materials.

In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials are suspended in a solvent while being associated with an environment. In some embodiments, the solvent may include water or alcohol. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials are associated with an environment in pelletized form. In some embodiments, the pelletization can be used to assist flow of the gas component through the porous carbon materials.

In some embodiments, the associating occurs by placing the porous carbon material at or near the environment. In some embodiments, such placement occurs by various methods that include, without limitation, adhesion, immobilization, clamping, and embedding. Additional methods by which to associate porous carbon materials with an environment can also be envisioned.

Gas Sorption to Porous Carbon Materials

The sorption of gas components (e.g., CO₂, H₂S, and combinations thereof) to porous carbon materials of the present disclosure can occur at various environmental pressures. For instance, in some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs above atmospheric pressure. In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs at total pressures ranging from about 0.1 bar to about 500 bar. In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs at total pressures ranging from about 5 bar to about 500 bar. In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs at total pressures ranging from about 5 bar to about 100 bar. In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs at total pressures ranging from about 25 bar to about 30 bar. In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs at total pressures ranging from about 100 bar to about 500 bar. In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs at total pressures ranging from about 100 bar to about 300 bar. In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs at total pressures ranging from about 100 bar to about 200 bar. In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs at between atmospheric pressure and about 100 bar of total or partial pressure.

The sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials can also occur at various temperatures. For instance, in some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs at temperatures that range from about 0° C. (e.g., a sea floor temperature where a wellhead may reside) to about 100° C. (e.g., a temperature where machinery may reside). In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs at ambient temperature (e.g., temperatures ranging from about 20-25° C., such as 23° C.). In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs below ambient temperature. In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs above ambient temperature. In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs without the heating of the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs without the heating of the porous carbon materials or the environment.

Without being bound by theory, it is envisioned that the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs by various molecular interactions between gas components (e.g., CO₂or H₂S) and the porous carbon materials. For instance, in some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs by at least one of absorption, adsorption, ionic interactions, physisorption, chemisorption, covalent bonding, non-covalent bonding, hydrogen bonding, van der Waals interactions, acid-base interactions, and combinations of such mechanisms. In some embodiments, the sorption includes an absorption interaction between gas components (e.g., CO₂or H₂S) in an environment and the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sorption includes an ionic interaction between the gas components in an environment and the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sorption includes an adsorption interaction between the gas components in an environment and the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sorption includes a physisorption interaction between the gas components in an environment and the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sorption includes a chemisorption interaction between the gas components in an environment and the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sorption includes a covalent bonding interaction between the gas components in an environment and the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sorption includes a non-covalent bonding interaction between the gas components in an environment and the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sorption includes a hydrogen bonding interaction between the gas components in an environment and the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sorption includes a van der Waals interaction between the gas components in an environment and the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sorption includes an acid-base interaction between the gas components in an environment and the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials occurs by adsorption and absorption.

CO₂Sorption

In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials includes the sorption of CO₂to the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sorption of CO₂to porous carbon materials occurs at a partial CO₂pressure of about 0.1 bar to about 100 bar. In some embodiments, the sorption of CO₂to porous carbon materials occurs at a partial CO₂pressure of about 5 bar to about 30 bar. In some embodiments, the sorption of CO₂to porous carbon materials occurs at a partial CO₂pressure of about 30 bar.

Without being bound by theory, it is envisioned that CO₂sorption may be facilitated by various chemical reactions. For instance, in some embodiments, the sorbed CO₂is converted to poly (CO₂) within the pores of the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the poly (CO₂) comprises the following formula: —(O—C(═O))_n—, where n is equal to or greater than 2. In some embodiments, n is between 2 to 10,000. In some embodiments, the formed poly(CO₂) may be further stabilized by van der Waals interactions with the carbon surfaces in the pores of the carbon materials. In some embodiments, the formed poly(CO₂) may be in solid form. In some embodiments, the poly(CO₂) matrix can be formed in a layered structure where there is a stacked layering of the CO₂where the CO₂molecules have restricted tumbling and rotations due to an ordered stacked arrangement on the surface.

In some embodiments, the sorbed CO₂may be converted to a matrix of CO₂within the pores of the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the matrix of CO₂may be in the form of a matrix of ordered CO₂.

In some embodiments, the sorption of CO₂to the porous carbon materials occurs selectively. For instance, in some embodiments, the sorption of CO₂to the porous carbon materials occurs selectively over hydrocarbons in the environment (e.g., ethane, propane, butane, pentane, methane, and combinations thereof). In further embodiments, the molecular ratio of sorbed CO₂to sorbed hydrocarbons in the porous carbon materials is greater than about 2. In additional embodiments, the molecular ratio of sorbed CO₂to sorbed hydrocarbons in the porous carbon materials ranges from about 2 to about 10. In additional embodiments, the molecular ratio of sorbed CO₂to sorbed hydrocarbons in the porous carbon materials is about 8.

In more specific embodiments, the sorption of CO₂to porous carbon materials occurs selectively over the CH₄in the environment. In further embodiments, the molecular ratio of sorbed CO₂to sorbed CH₄(nCO₂/nCH₄) in the porous carbon materials is greater than about 2. In additional embodiments, nCO_2/nCH₄in the porous carbon materials ranges from about 2 to about 20. In some embodiments, nCO_2/nCH₄in the porous carbon materials ranges from about 2 to about 10. In more specific embodiments, nCO_2/nCH₄in the porous carbon materials is about 20 at 30 bar.

In some embodiments, sorption of CO₂to porous carbon materials occurs selectively through poly(CO₂) formation within the pores of the porous carbon materials. Without being bound by theory, it is envisioned that poly(CO₂) formation within the pores of the porous carbon materials can displace other gas components associated with the porous carbon materials, including any physisorbed gas components and hydrocarbons (e.g., methane, propane, and butane). Without being bound by further theory, it is also envisioned that the displacement of other gas components from the porous carbon materials creates a continual CO₂selectivity that far exceeds various CO₂selectively ranges, including the CO₂selectivity ranges noted above.

In some embodiments, the covalent or stacked dipolar nature of poly(CO₂) within the pores of the porous carbon materials can be 100 times stronger than that of other physisorbed entities, including physisorbed gas components within the pores of the porous carbon materials. Therefore, such strong covalent bonds or dipolar bonds can contribute to the displacement of the physisorbed gas components (e.g., methane, propane and butane). The dipolar bonds are arranged such that the oxygen of one CO₂is donating into a lone pair electron density in the carbon atom of a neighboring CO₂. This pattern can repeat itself in a 1-dimensional, 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional arrangement.

H₂S Sorption

In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials includes the sorption of H₂S to the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sorption of H₂S to porous carbon materials occurs at a partial H₂S pressure of about 0.1 bar to about 100 bar. In some embodiments, the sorption of H₂S to porous carbon materials occurs at a partial H₂S pressure of about 5 bar to about 30 bar. In some embodiments, the sorption of H₂S to porous carbon materials occurs at a partial H₂S pressure of about 30 bar.

Without being bound by theory, it is envisioned that H₂S sorption may be facilitated by various chemical reactions. For instance, in some embodiments, sorbed H₂S may be converted within the pores of the porous carbon materials to at least one of elemental sulfur (S), sulfur dioxide (SO₂), sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄), hydridosulfide (HS⁻), sulfide (S²⁻) and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the aforementioned conversion can be facilitated by the presence of oxygen. For instance, in some embodiments, the introduction of small amounts of oxygen into a system containing porous carbon materials can facilitate the conversion of H₂S to elemental sulfur. In some embodiments, the oxygen can be introduced either continuously or periodically. In some embodiments, the oxygen can be introduced from air.

In some embodiments, the captured H₂S is converted by catalytic oxidation to elemental sulfur at ambient temperature. Thereafter, further oxidation to SO₂and H₂SO₄occurs at higher temperatures.

In some embodiments, nitrogen groups of porous carbon materials may facilitate the conversion of H₂S to elemental sulfur. For instance, in some embodiments illustrated in the schemes in FIG. 2, nitrogen functional groups on porous carbon materials may facilitate the dissociation of H₂S to HS⁻. In some embodiments, the nitrogen functional groups may also facilitate the formation of chemisorbed oxygen species (Seredych, M.; Bandosz, T. J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 4704-4711).

In some embodiments, the porous carbon material becomes impregnated with the sulfur derived from captured H₂S to form sulfur-impregnated porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the formation of sulfur-impregnated porous carbon materials may be facilitated by heating. In some embodiments, the heating occurs at temperatures higher than H₂S capture temperatures. In some embodiments, the heating occurs in the absence of oxygen. In some embodiments, the sulfur impregnated porous carbon material can be used to efficiently capture CO₂by the aforementioned methods.

In some embodiments, the sorption of H₂S to porous carbon materials occurs in intact form. In some embodiments, the sorption of H₂S to porous carbon materials in intact form occurs in the absence of oxygen.

CO₂and H₂S Sorption

In some embodiments, the sorption of gas components to porous carbon materials includes the sorption of both H₂S and CO₂to the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sorption of H₂S and CO₂to the porous carbon material occurs at the same time.

In some embodiments, the sorption of CO₂to the porous carbon material occurs before the sorption of H₂S to the porous carbon material. For instance, in some embodiments, a gas containing CO₂and H₂S flows through a structure that contains porous carbon materials (e.g., trapping cartridges). CO₂is first captured from the gas as the gas flows through the structure. Thereafter, H₂S is captured from the gas as the gas continues to flow through the structure.

In some embodiments, the sorption of H₂S to the porous carbon material occurs before the sorption of CO₂to the porous carbon material. For instance, in some embodiments, a gas containing CO₂and H₂S flows through a structure that contains porous carbon materials (e.g., trapping cartridges). H₂S is first captured from the gas as the gas flows through the structure. Thereafter, CO₂is captured from the gas as the gas continues to flow through the structure.

In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials that capture H₂S from the gas include nitrogen-containing porous carbon materials, as described in more detail herein. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials that capture CO₂from the gas include sulfur-containing porous carbon materials that are also described in more detail herein.

Release of Captured Gas

In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure also include a step of releasing captured gas components from porous carbon materials. Various methods may be utilized to release captured gas components from porous carbon materials. For instance, in some embodiments, the releasing occurs by decreasing the pressure of the environment. In some embodiments, the pressure of the environment is reduced to atmospheric pressure or below atmospheric pressure. In some embodiments, the releasing occurs by placing the porous carbon material in a second environment that has a lower pressure than the environment where gas capture occurred. In some embodiments, the second environment may be at or below atmospheric pressure. In some embodiments, the releasing occurs spontaneously as the environmental pressure decreases. This is often referred to as pressure swing sorption or a pressure swing separation process.

The release of captured gas components from porous carbon materials can occur at various pressures. For instance, in some embodiments, the release occurs at or below atmospheric pressure. In some embodiments, the release occurs at total pressures ranging from about 0 bar to about 100 bar. In some embodiments, the release occurs at total pressures ranging from about 0.1 bar to about 50 bar. In some embodiments, the release occurs at total pressures ranging from about 0.1 bar to about 30 bar. In some embodiments, the release occurs at total pressures ranging from about 0.1 bar to about 10 bar. In some embodiments, the release occurs at total pressures ranging from about 0.1 bar to about atmospheric pressure.

The release of captured gas components from porous carbon materials can also occur at various temperatures. In some embodiments, the releasing occurs at ambient temperature. In some embodiments, the releasing occurs at the same temperature at which gas sorption occurred. In some embodiments, the releasing occurs without heating the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the releasing occurs without heating the porous carbon materials or the environment. Therefore, in some embodiments, a temperature swing is not required to release captured gas components from porous carbon materials.

In some embodiments, the releasing occurs at temperatures ranging from about 30° C. to about 200° C. In some embodiments, the releasing is facilitated by also lowering the pressure.

In some embodiments, the releasing occurs by heating the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the releasing is enhanced by the addition of heat to the porous carbon material or to the environment. For instance, in some embodiments, the releasing occurs by heating the porous carbon materials to temperatures between about 50° C. to about 200° C. In some embodiments, the releasing occurs by heating the porous carbon materials to temperatures between about 75° C. to about 125° C. In some embodiments, the releasing occurs by heating the porous carbon materials to temperatures ranging from about 50° C. to about 100° C. In some embodiments, the releasing occurs by heating the porous carbon materials to a temperature of about 90° C.

In some embodiments, heat for release of gas components from porous carbon materials can be supplied from various sources. For instance, in some embodiments, the heat for the release of gas components from a porous carbon material-containing vessel can be provided by an adjacent vessel whose heat is being generated during a gas sorption step.

In some embodiments, the release of captured gas components from an environment includes the release of captured CO₂from porous carbon materials. Without being bound by theory, it is envisioned that the release of captured CO₂from porous carbon materials can occur by various mechanisms. For instance, in some embodiments, the release of captured CO₂can occur through a depolymerization of the formed poly(CO₂) within the pores of the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the depolymerization can be facilitated by a decrease in environmental pressure. In some embodiments, the releasing of the CO₂occurs by decreasing the pressure of the environment or placing the porous carbon material in a second environment that has a lower pressure than the environment where CO₂capture occurred.

In some embodiments, the release of captured gas components from an environment includes the release of captured H₂S from porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the captured H₂S is released in intact form.

In some embodiments, H₂S is released from porous carbon materials by heating the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, H₂S is released from porous carbon materials by heating the porous carbon materials to temperatures that range from about 50° C. to about 200° C. In some embodiments, H₂S is released from the porous carbon materials by heating the porous carbon materials to temperatures between about 75° C. to about 125° C. In some embodiments, H₂S is released from the porous carbon materials by heating the porous carbon materials to temperatures between about 50° C. to about 100° C. In some embodiments, H₂S is released from the porous carbon materials by heating the porous carbon materials to a temperature of about 90° C.

In some embodiments, the release of captured H₂S can occur through conversion of H₂S to at least one of elemental sulfur (S), sulfur dioxide (SO₂), sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄), hydridosulfide (HS⁻), sulfide (S²⁻) and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, elemental sulfur is retained on the porous carbon material to form sulfur-impregnated porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the sulfur-containing porous carbon material can be discarded through incineration or burial. In some embodiments, the sulfur-impregnated porous carbon material can be used for the reversible capture of CO₂. In some embodiments, the sulfur-impregnated porous carbon material can be heated to high temperature of 400-900° C. to make a sulfur-impregnated porous carbon used for the reversible capture of CO₂.

In some embodiments, the release of captured gas components can occur in a sequential manner. For instance, in some embodiments where the sorbed gas components include both CO₂and H₂S, the releasing of the CO₂occurs by decreasing the pressure of the environment or placing the porous carbon material in a second environment that has a lower pressure than the environment where CO₂capture occurred. In some embodiments, the releasing of the H₂S occurs by heating the porous carbon material (e.g., at temperatures ranging from about 50° C. to about 100° C.). In some embodiments, the releasing of the CO₂occurs before the releasing of the H₂S. In some embodiments, the releasing of the H₂S occurs before the releasing of the CO₂. In some embodiments, the releasing of H₂S occurs in an environment that lacks oxygen.

Disposal of the Released Gas

In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure also include a step of disposing the released gas components. For instance, in some embodiments, the released gas components can be off-loaded into a container. In some embodiments, the released gas components can be pumped downhole for long-term storage. In some embodiments, the released gas components can be vented to the atmosphere. In some embodiments, the released gas components include, without limitation, CO₂, H₂S, SO₂, and combinations thereof.

Reuse of the Porous Carbon Material

In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure also include a step of reusing the porous carbon materials after gas component release to capture more gas components from an environment. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may be reused over 100 times without substantially affecting their gas sorption capacities. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may be reused over 1000 times without substantially affecting their gas sorption capacities. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may be reused over 10,000 times without substantially affecting their gas sorption capacities.

In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may retain 100 wt % of their CO₂or H₂S sorption capacities after being used multiple times (e.g., 100 times, 1,000 times or 10,000 times). In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may retain at least 98 wt % of their CO₂or H₂S sorption capacities after being used multiple times (e.g., 100 times, 1,000 times or 10,000 times). In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may retain at least 95 wt % of their CO₂or H₂S sorption capacities after being used multiple times (e.g., 100 times, 1,000 times or 10,000 times). In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may retain at least 90 wt % of their CO₂or H₂S sorption capacities after being used multiple times (e.g., 100 times, 1,000 times or 10,000 times). In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may retain at least 80 wt % of their CO₂or H₂S sorption capacities after being used multiple times (e.g., 100 times, 1,000 times or 10,000 times).

Porous Carbon Materials

Various porous carbon materials may be utilized to capture gas from an environment. In some embodiments, the present disclosure pertains to the porous carbon materials that are utilized to capture gas from an environment.

Carbon Sources

The porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may be derived from various carbon sources. For instance, in some embodiments, the porous carbon material includes, without limitation, protein-derived porous carbon materials, carbohydrate-derived porous carbon materials, cotton-derived porous carbon materials, fat-derived porous carbon materials, waste-derived porous carbon materials, asphalt-derived porous carbon materials, coal-derived porous carbon materials, coke-derived porous carbon materials, asphaltene-derived porous carbon materials, oil product-derived porous carbon materials, bitumen-derived porous carbon materials, tar-derived porous carbon materials, pitch-derived porous carbon materials, anthracite-derived porous carbon materials, melamine-derived porous carbon materials, biochar-derived porous carbon, wood-derived porous carbon and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure include asphalt-derived porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure include coal-derived porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the coal source includes, without limitation, bituminous coal, anthracitic coal, brown coal, and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure include protein-derived porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the protein source includes, without limitation, whey protein, rice protein, animal protein, plant protein, and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure include oil product-derived porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the oil products include, without limitation, petroleum oil, plant oil, and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure include waste derived porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the waste can include, without limitation, human waste, animal waste, waste derived from municipality sources, and combinations thereof.

The porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may also be in various states. For instance, in some embodiments, the porous carbon material is carbonized. In some embodiments, the porous carbon material is reduced. In some embodiments, the porous carbon material is vulcanized.

Nucleophilic Moieties

In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure include a plurality of nucleophilic moieties. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may contain various arrangements of nucleophilic moieties. In some embodiments, the nucleophilic moieties are part of the porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the nucleophilic moieties are embedded within the porous carbon materials. In some embodiments, the nucleophilic moieties are homogenously distributed throughout the porous carbon material framework. In some embodiments, the nucleophilic moieties are embedded within the plurality of the pores of the porous carbon materials.

In some embodiments, the nucleophilic moieties include, without limitation, primary nucleophiles, secondary nucleophiles, tertiary nucleophiles and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the nucleophilic moieties include, without limitation, oxygen-containing moieties, sulfur-containing moieties, metal-containing moieties, metal oxide-containing moieties, metal sulfide-containing moieties, nitrogen-containing moieties, phosphorous-containing moieties, and combinations thereof.

In more specific embodiments, the nucleophilic moieties include phosphorous-containing moieties. In some embodiments, the phosphorous containing moieties include, without limitation, phosphines, phosphites, phosphine oxides, and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the nucleophilic moieties include nitrogen-containing moieties. In some embodiments, the nitrogen-containing moieties include, without limitation, primary amines, secondary amines, tertiary amines, nitrogen oxides, pyridinic nitrogens, pyrrolic nitrogens, graphitic nitrogens, and combinations thereof. In more specific embodiments, the nitrogen containing moieties include nitrogen oxides, such as N-oxides.

In some embodiments, the nitrogen-containing moieties include from about 1 wt % to about 15 wt % by weight of the porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the nitrogen-containing moieties include from about 2 wt % to about 11 wt % by weight of the porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the nitrogen-containing moieties include from about 5 wt % to about 9 wt % by weight of the porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the nitrogen-containing moieties include from about 8 wt % to about 11 wt % by weight of the porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the nitrogen-containing moieties include about 9 wt % by weight of the porous carbon material.

In some embodiments, the nucleophilic moieties include sulfur-containing moieties. In some embodiments, the sulfur-containing moieties include, without limitation, primary sulfurs, secondary sulfurs, sulfur oxides, and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the nucleophilic moieties include nitrogen-containing moieties and sulfur-containing moieties. In some embodiments, the nitrogen-containing moieties and sulfur-containing moieties induce CO₂capture by poly(CO₂) formation. In some embodiments, the nitrogen-containing moieties induce H₂S capture by facilitating oxidation of H₂S.

Surface Areas

The porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may have various surface areas. For instance, in some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have surface areas that range from about 1,000 m²/g to about 4,500 m²/g. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have surface areas that range from about 2,500 m²/g to about 4,500 m²/g. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have surface areas that range from about 2,500 m²/g to about 4,200 m²/g. In more specific embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have surface areas that include at least one of 2,200 m²g⁻¹, 2,300 m²/g, 2,600 m²/g, 2,800 m²/g, 2,900 m²g⁻¹or 4,200 m²g⁻¹.

Porosities

In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure include a plurality of pores. In addition, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may have various porosities. For instance, in some embodiments, the pores in the porous carbon materials include diameters between about 1 nanometer to about 5 micrometers. In some embodiments, the pores include macropores with diameters of at least about 50 nm. In some embodiments, the pores include macropores with diameters between about 50 nanometers to about 3 micrometers. In some embodiments, the pores include macropores with diameters between about 500 nanometers to about 2 micrometers. In some embodiments, the pores include mesopores with diameters of less than 50 nm and larger than about 2 nm. In some embodiments, the pores include micropores with diameters of less than about 2 nm.

In some embodiments, the pores include diameters that range from about 1 nm to about 10 nm. In some embodiments, the pores include diameters that range from about 1 nm to about 3 nm. In some embodiments, the pores include diameters that range from about 5 nm to about 100 nm. In some embodiments, the pores include diameters that are about 3 nm or less. In some embodiments, the majority of the pores in the porous carbon material include diameters that are about 3 nm or less.

In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials have a uniform distribution of pore sizes. In some embodiments, the uniform pore sizes are about 1.3 nm in diameter.

The pores of the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may also have various volumes. For instance, in some embodiments, the pores in the porous carbon materials have volumes ranging from about 1 cm³/g to about 10 cm³/g. In some embodiments, the pores in the porous carbon materials have volumes ranging from about 1 cm³/g to about 3 cm³/g. In some embodiments, the pores in the porous carbon materials have volumes ranging from about 1 cm³/g to about 1.5 cm³/g. In more specific embodiments, the plurality of pores in the porous carbon materials have volumes of about 1.1 cm³/g, about 1.2 cm³/g, or about 1.4 cm³/g.

Densities

The porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may also have various densities. For instance, in some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have densities that range from about 0.3 g/cm³to about 10 g/cm³. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have densities that range from about 0.3 g/cm³to about 4 g/cm³. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have densities that range from about 1 g/cm³to about 3 g/cm³. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have densities that range from about 1 g/cm³to about 2.5 g/cm³. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have densities that range from about 2 g/cm³to about 3 g/cm³. In more specific embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have densities of 1.8 g/cm³, 2 g/cm³, or 2.2 g/cm³.

CO₂Sorption Capacities

The porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may also have various sorption capacities. For instance, in some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a CO₂sorption capacity (also referred to as CO₂uptake) that ranges from about 10 wt % to about 150 wt % of the porous carbon material weight. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a CO₂sorption capacity of about 50 wt % to about 150 wt % of the porous carbon material weight. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a CO₂sorption capacity of about 50 wt % to about 100 wt % of the porous carbon material weight. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a CO₂sorption capacity of about 50 wt % to about 200 wt % of the porous carbon material weight. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a CO₂sorption capacity of about 100 wt % to about 150 wt % of the porous carbon material weight. In more specific embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a CO₂sorption capacity of about 120 wt % to about 130 wt % of the porous carbon material weight.

In further embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a CO₂sorption capacity of about 0.5 g to about 2 g of CO₂per 1 g of porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a CO₂sorption capacity of about 1 g to about 2 g of CO₂per 1 g of porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a CO₂sorption capacity of about 1.2 g to about 1.3 g of CO₂per 1 g of porous carbon material.

In further embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a CO₂sorption capacity of about 0.6 g to about 2.0 g of CO₂per 1 g of porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a CO₂sorption capacity of about 1 g to about 1.2 g of CO₂per 1 g of porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a CO₂sorption capacity of about 1.2 g of CO₂per 1 g of porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a CO₂sorption capacity of about 0.92 g of CO₂per 1 g of porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a CO₂sorption capacity of about 0.92 g of CO₂per 1 g of porous carbon material at a CO₂pressure or partial pressure of about 30 bar.

H₂S Sorption Capacities

The porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may also have various H₂S sorption capacities. For instance, in some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a H₂S sorption capacity that ranges from about 10 wt % to about 300 wt % of the porous carbon material weight. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a H₂S sorption capacity of about 50 wt % to about 300 wt % of the porous carbon material weight. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a H₂S sorption capacity of about 50 wt % to about 250 wt % of the porous carbon material weight. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a H₂S sorption capacity of about 100 wt % to about 250 wt % of the porous carbon material weight. In more specific embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a H₂S sorption capacity of about 100 wt % to about 150 wt % of the porous carbon material weight. In some embodiments, Applicant has been able to achieve uptake of 205 wt % H₂S sorption capacity using the asphalt doped porous carbon materials of the present disclosure.

In further embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a H₂S sorption capacity of about 0.5 g to about 3 g of sulfur from H₂S per 1 g of porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a H₂S sorption capacity of about 0.5 g to about 2.5 g of sulfur from H₂S per 1 g of porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a H₂S sorption capacity of about 1 g to about 2.5 g of sulfur from H₂S per 1 g of porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure have a H₂S sorption capacity of about 1 g to about 1.5 g of sulfur from H₂S per 1 g of porous carbon material.

Physical States

The porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may be in various states. For instance, in some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may be in a solid state. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may be in a gaseous state. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may be in a liquid state.

Methods of Forming Porous Carbon Materials

In some embodiments, the present disclosure pertains to methods of forming the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure. In some embodiments, methods include carbonizing a carbon source to form porous carbon materials and may also include a step of doping the carbon source. In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure also include a step of vulcanizing the carbon source. In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure also include a step of reducing the formed porous carbon material. In some embodiments, by pre-treating the carbon source prior to carbonization, no further treatment of the porous carbon is necessary.

As set forth in more detail herein, various methods may be utilized to carbonize various types of carbon sources. In addition, various methods may be utilized to dope and vulcanize the carbon sources. Likewise, various methods may be utilized to reduce the formed porous carbon materials.

Carbon Sources

Various carbon sources may be utilized to form porous carbon materials. Suitable carbon sources were described previously. In some embodiments, the carbon sources include, without limitation, protein, carbohydrates, cotton, fat, waste, asphalt, coal, coke, asphaltene, oil products, bitumen, tar, pitch, anthracite, melamine, and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the carbon source includes asphalt. In some embodiments, the carbon source includes coal. In some embodiments, the coal source includes, without limitation, bituminous coal, anthracitic coal, brown coal, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the carbon source includes protein. In some embodiments, the protein source includes, without limitation, whey protein, rice protein, animal protein, plant protein, and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the carbon source includes oil products. In some embodiments, the oil products include, without limitation, petroleum oil, plant oil, and combinations thereof.

Carbonizing

In the present disclosure, carbonization generally refers to processes or treatments that convert a carbon source (e.g., a non-porous carbon source) to a porous carbon material. Various methods and conditions may be utilized to carbonize carbon sources.

For instance, in some embodiments, the carbonizing occurs in the absence of a solvent. In some embodiments, the carbonizing occurs in the presence of a solvent.

In some embodiments, the carbonizing occurs by exposing the carbon source to a carbonizing agent. In some embodiments, the carbonizing agent includes metal hydroxides or metal oxides. In some embodiments, the carbonizing agent includes, without limitation, potassium hydroxide (KOH), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), lithium hydroxide (LiOH), cesium hydroxide (CsOH), magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)₂), calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂), and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the carbonizing agent includes potassium hydroxide (KOH). In some embodiments, the carbonizing agent can be a metal oxide. In some embodiments, the metal oxide includes, without limitation, calcium oxide (CaO), magnesium oxide (MgO), and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the weight ratio of the carbon source to the carbonizing agent varies from about 1:1 to about 1:5. In some embodiments, the weight ratio of the carbon source to the carbonizing agent is about 1:4.

In some embodiments, the carbonizing occurs by grinding the carbon source in the presence of a carbonizing agent. In some embodiments, the grinding occurs in a mortar. In some embodiments, the grinding includes ball milling. In some embodiments, the grinding results in the formation of a homogenous solid powder.

In some embodiments, the carbon source and the carbonizing agent can be mixed in a solvent. In some embodiments, the solvent is evaporated after mixing. In some embodiments, the evaporation is followed by the carbonization of the carbon source at elevated temperature. In some embodiments, the carbon source is the solvent, and the carbonizing agent is added prior to carbonization at elevated temperatures.

In some embodiments, the carbonizing occurs by heating the carbon source at temperatures ranging from about 200° C. to about 1000° C. In some embodiments, the heating occurs at temperatures greater than 500° C. In some embodiments, the heating occurs at temperatures of about 500° C. to about 1000° C. In some embodiments, the heating occurs at temperatures of about 600° C. to about 900° C. In some embodiments, the carbon source is pre-treated at a temperature between 300° C. to 400° C. to remove volatile oils from the carbon source. For instance, FIG. 31 shows the successful removal of volatile oils by pre-treatment, as measured using TGA.

In some embodiments, it is also possible to separate these oils from the carbon source at lower temperatures using a reduced pressure atmosphere. After the removal of volatiles, the carbon source can subsequently be homogenized with potassium hydroxide and then heated to temperatures greater than 600° C. For example, by pre-treating asphalt at 400° C. prior to carbonizing with KOH, the resultant porous carbon has very high CO₂uptake, matching or exceeding the performance of A-NPC and A-rNPC. Furthermore, pre-treated asphalt-derived porous carbons show an increase in CO₂selectivity. No additives are required to achieve the aforementioned increased CO₂uptake and selectivity.

In some embodiments, the carbonizing occurs in an inert atmosphere. In some embodiments, the inert atmosphere includes a steady flow of an inert gas, such as argon.

Doping

In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure also include a step of doping a carbon source with a dopant. In some embodiments, the dopant includes, without limitation, nitrogen-containing dopants, sulfur-containing dopants, heteroatom-containing dopants, oxygen-containing dopants, sulfur-containing dopants, metal-containing dopants, metal oxide-containing dopants, metal sulfide-containing dopants, phosphorous-containing dopants, and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the dopant includes nitrogen-containing dopants. In some embodiments, the nitrogen-containing dopants include, without limitation, primary amines, secondary amines, tertiary amines, nitrogen oxides, pyridinic nitrogens, pyrrolic nitrogens, graphitic nitrogens, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the nitrogen-containing dopant includes NH₃.

In some embodiments, the dopant includes sulfur-containing dopants. In some embodiments, the sulfur-containing dopants include, without limitation, primary sulfurs, secondary sulfurs, sulfur oxides, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the sulfur-containing dopants include H₂S.

In some embodiments, the dopants include monomers, such as nitrogen-containing monomers. In some embodiments, the monomers are subsequently polymerized.

Doping can occur at various temperatures. For instance, in some embodiments, the doping occurs at temperatures ranging from about 200° C. to about 800° C. In some embodiments, the doping occurs at temperatures ranging from about 600° C. to about 700° C. In some embodiments, the doping occurs at about 650° C. to about 700° C.

Various amounts of dopants may be utilized. For instance, in some embodiments, the weight ratio of the dopant to the carbon source varies from about 0.2:1 to about 1:1. In some embodiments, the weight ratio of the dopant to the carbon source is about 1:1.

Vulcanization

In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure also include a step of vulcanizing the carbon source. In some embodiments, the vulcanizing includes exposing the carbon source to a vulcanizing agent. In some embodiments, the vulcanizing agent includes, without limitation, sulfur-based agents, peroxides, urethane cross-linkers, metallic oxides, acetoxysilane, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the vulcanizing agent includes, without limitation, tetramethyldithiuram, 2,2′-dithiobis(benzothiazole), and combinations thereof.

Various amounts of vulcanizing agents may be utilized. For instance, in some embodiments, the weight ratio of the vulcanization agent to the carbon source varies from about 5 wt % to about 200 wt % relative to the carbon source.

Reduction

In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure include a step of reducing the formed porous carbon material. In some embodiments, the reducing occurs by exposing the formed porous carbon material to a reducing agent. In some embodiments, the reducing agent includes, without limitation, H₂, NaBH₄, hydrazine, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the reducing agent includes H₂.

The methods of the present disclosure may be utilized to make bulk quantities of porous carbon materials. For instance, in some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure can be utilized to make porous carbon materials in quantities greater than about 1 g. In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure can be utilized to make porous carbon materials in quantities greater than about 1 kg. In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure can be utilized to make porous carbon materials in quantities greater than about 1000 kg.

In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure are produced from a high fixed carbon content precursor that includes, without limitation, biochar, hydrochar, coal, lignite, biomass, organic substances containing heteroatoms such as nitrogen or sulfur, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the precursor is heated at temperatures greater than 600° C. In some embodiments, CO₂selectivity and CO₂capacity of the porous carbon material is enhanced by functionalization of the porous carbon material surface during such heating. In some embodiments, the precursor is activated at a temperature between about 650° C. and about 1000° C. in the presence of an amount of activating agent in order to create and maintain micropores within the porous carbon material.

Advantages

The gas capture methods and the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure provide numerous advantages over prior gas sorbents. For instance, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure provide significantly higher CO₂and H₂S sorption capacities than prior sorbents. Moreover, due to the availability and affordability of the starting materials, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure can be made in a facile and economical manner in bulk quantities. Furthermore, unlike traditional gas sorbents, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure can selectively capture and release CO₂and H₂S at ambient temperature without requiring a temperature swing. As such, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure can avoid substantial thermal degradation and be used effectively over successive cycles without losing their original CO₂and H₂S sorption capacities.

Accordingly, the gas capture methods and the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure can find numerous applications. For instance, in some embodiments, the gas capture methods and the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure can be utilized for the capture of CO₂and H₂S from subsurface oil and gas fields. In more specific embodiments, the process may take advantage of differential pressures commonly found in natural gas collection and processing streams as a driving force during CO₂and H₂S capture. For instance, in some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure may utilize a natural gas-well pressure (e.g., a natural gas well pressure of 200 to 300 bar) as a driving force during CO₂and H₂S capture. Thereafter, by lowering the pressure back to ambient conditions after CO₂and H₂S uptake, the captured gas can be off-loaded or pumped back downhole into the structures that had held it for geological timeframes. Moreover, the gas capture methods and the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure can allow for the capture and reinjection of CO₂and H₂S at the natural gas sites, thereby leading to greatly reduced CO₂and H₂S emissions from natural gas streams.

In some embodiments, the methods of the present disclosure can be utilized for the selective release of captured CO₂and H₂S. For instance, in some embodiments where a porous carbon material has captured both CO₂and H₂S, the lowering of environmental pressure can result in the release of CO₂from the porous carbon material and the retainment of the captured H₂S from the porous carbon material. Thereafter, the captured H₂S may be released from the porous carbon material by heating the porous carbon material (e.g., at temperatures between about 50° C. to about 100° C.). In additional embodiments where a porous carbon material has captured both CO₂and H₂S, the heating of the porous carbon material (e.g., at temperatures between about 50° C. to about 100° C.) can result in the release of the captured H₂S and the retainment of the captured CO₂. Thereafter, the lowering of environmental pressure can result in the release of CO₂from the porous carbon.

Reference will now be made to more specific embodiments of the present disclosure and experimental results that provide support for such embodiments. However, Applicants note that the disclosure below is for illustrative purposes only and is not intended to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter in any way.

Example 1. Capture of CO₂by Sulfur- and Nitrogen-Containing Porous Carbons

In this Example, nucleophilic porous carbons are synthesized from simple and inexpensive carbon-sulfur and carbon-nitrogen precursors. Infrared, Raman and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance signatures substantiate CO₂fixation by polymerization in the carbon channels to form poly(CO₂) under much lower pressures than previously required. This growing chemisorbed sulfur- or nitrogen-atom-initiated poly(CO₂) chain further displaces physisorbed hydrocarbon, providing a continuous CO₂selectivity. Once returned to ambient conditions, the poly(CO₂) spontaneously depolymerizes, leading to a sorbent that can be easily regenerated without the thermal energy input that is required for traditional sorbents.

More specifically, Applicants show in this Example that the new carbon materials can be used to separate CO₂from various environments (e.g., natural gas), where 0.82 g of CO₂per g of sorbent (82 wt %) can be captured at 30 bar. A mechanism is described where CO₂is polymerized in the channels of the porous carbon materials, as initiated by the sulfur or nitrogen atoms that are part of the carbon framework. Moreover, no temperature swing is needed. The reaction proceeds at ambient temperature. Without being bound by theory, it is envisioned that heat transfer between cylinders during the exothermic sorption and endothermic desorption can provide the requisite thermodynamic exchanges.

In some instances, the process can use the natural gas-well pressure of 200 to 300 bar as a driving force during the polymerization. By lowering the pressure back to ambient conditions after CO₂uptake, the poly(CO₂) is then depolymerized, where it can be off-loaded or pumped back downhole into the structures that had held it for geological timeframes.

Example 1.1 Synthesis and Characterization of Porous Carbons

Sulfur- and nitrogen-containing porous carbons (SPC and NPC, respectively) were prepared by treating bulk precursor polymers with potassium hydroxide (KOH) at 600° C., as described previously (Carbon 44, 2816-2821 (2006); Carbon 50, 5543-5553 (2012)).

As shown in FIG. 3A, the resulting products were solid porous carbon materials with homogeneously distributed sulfur or nitrogen atoms incorporated into the carbon framework. They exhibited pores and channel structures as well as high surface areas of 2500 and 1490 m²/g (N₂, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller) for the SPC and the NPC, respectively, with pore volumes of 1.01 cm 3 g⁻¹and 1.40 cm³g, respectively. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images are shown in FIGS. 3B-D, and the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses are shown in FIG. 4.

Example 1.2 CO₂Uptake Measurements

For CO₂uptake measurements, samples were analyzed using volumetric analysis instruments. The measurements were further confirmed with gravimetric measurements.

FIG. 5 shows the pressure-dependent CO₂excess uptake for the SPC sorbent at different temperatures peaking at 18.6 mmol CO₂g⁻¹of sorbent (82 wt %) when at 22° C. and 30 bar. The sorption results measured by volumetric and gravimetric analyses were comparable, as were those measurements on the two volumetric instruments.

Applicants chose 30 bar as the upper pressure limit in experiments because a 300 bar well-head pressure at 10 mol % CO₂concentration would have a CO₂partial pressure of 30 bar. FIGS. 5B-D show three consecutive CO₂sorption-desorption cycles on SPC over a pressure range from 0 to 30 bar, which indicates that the SPC could be regenerated using a pressure swing process while retaining its original CO₂sorption capacity.

In the case of microporous materials with negligible external surface area, total uptake is often used as an approximation for absolute uptake, and the two values here are within 10% of each other. For example, the absolute CO₂uptake of the SPC was 20.1 and 13.9 mmol/g under 30 bar at 22° and 50° C., respectively. See FIGS. 6-7 and Example 1.8.

Similarly, although absolute adsorption isotherms can be used to determine the heat of sorption, excess adsorption isotherms are more often used to calculate the heat of CO₂sorption (QCO₂) before the critical point of the gas. Thus, the excess CO₂sorption isotherms measured at two different temperatures, 23° C. and 50° C. (FIG. 5E), were input into the Clausius-Clapeyron equation. At lower surface coverage (≦1 bar), which could be expected to be more indicative of the sorbate-sorbent interaction, the SPC exhibits a heat of CO₂sorption of 57.8 kJ/mol⁻¹. Likewise, the maximum QCO₂values for nucleophile-free porous materials, such as activated carbon, Zeolite 5A and zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8, a class of the MOF) were measured to be 28.4, and 31.2, 25.6 kJ/mol, respectively, at low surface coverage (see Example 1.9). Based on this data, the SPC possesses the highest CO₂sorption enthalpy among these complementary sorbents measured at low surface coverage.

In order to better assess the sorption mechanism during the CO₂uptake, attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR) was used to characterize the properties of the sorbents before and after the CO₂uptake. A sample vial with ˜100 mg of the SPC was loaded into a 0.8 L stainless steel autoclave equipped with a pressure gauge and valves. Before the autoclave was sealed, the chamber was flushed with CO₂(99.99%) to remove residual air, and the system was pressurized to 10 bar (line pressure limitation). The sorbent was therefore isobarically exposed to CO₂in the closed system at 23° C. After 15 min, the system was vented to nitrogen at ambient pressure and the sorbent vial was immediately removed from the chamber and the sorbent underwent ATR-IR and Raman analyses in air.

FIGS. 8A-B show the ATR-IR spectra of the SPC before (black line) and after exposure to 10 bar of CO₂, followed by ambient conditions for the indicated times. The two regions that appear in the ATR-IR spectra (outlined by the dashed-line boxes) after the CO₂sorption are of interest. The first IR peak, located at 2345 cm⁻¹, is assigned to the anti-symmetric CO₂stretch, confirming that CO₂was physisorbed and evolving from the SPC sorbent. The other IR band, centered at 1730 cm⁻¹, is attributed to the C═O symmetric stretch from the poly(CO₂) on the SPC. Interestingly, this carbonyl peak is only observed with the porous heteroatom-doped carbon, such as the SPC and NPC. Other porous sorbents without nucleophilic species, such as ZIF-8 and activated carbon, only showed the physisorbed or evolving CO₂peak (2345 cm⁻¹) (FIGS. 9-10). Once the CO₂-filled SPC returned to ambient pressure, the key IR peaks attenuated over time and disappeared after 20 min. Based on this data, the ATR-IR study confirmed the poly(CO₂) formation. Raman spectroscopy was further used to probe individual chemical bond vibrations, as shown in FIG. 8C. The carbonaceous graphitic G-band and defect-derived diamonoid D-band were at 1590 and 1350 cm⁻¹. The peak at 798 cm⁻¹can be attributed to the symmetric stretch of the C—O—C bonds, which was not observed for the other nucleophile-free porous materials, suggesting that the poly(CO₂), with the —(O—C(═O))n-moiety, was formed.

Without being bound by theory, it is envisioned that the monothiocarbonate and carbamate anions within the channels of the SPC and NPC, respectively, were the likely initiation points for the CO₂polymerization since no poly(CO₂) was seen in activated carbon (FIG. 10). Furthermore, 13C NMR also confirms the presence of the poly(CO₂) formation. The sorbent gives a broad signal characteristic of aromatic carbon (FIG. 8D, bottom).

After exposure to CO₂, a relatively sharp signal on top of the broad sorbent signal appears at 130.6 ppm, which can be assigned to the CO₂that is evolving from the support. A sharp signal also appears at 166.5 ppm (FIG. 8D, middle) that is characteristic of the carbonyl resonance for poly(CO₂). Both of these signals are gone 19 h later (FIG. 8D, top). These assignments are further discussed in detail in Example 1.10.

Compared to secondary amine-based CO₂sorbents where maximum capture efficiency is 0.5 mol CO₂per mol N (₂RNH₂+CO₂→RNH₂+—O₂CNHR), the SPC and NPC demonstrate a unique mechanism during the CO₂uptake process resulting in their remarkably higher CO₂capacities versus S or N content (8.1 atomic % of S and 6.2 atomic % of N in the SPC and NPC, respectively, by XPS analysis).

FIGS. 8E and 8F show illustrations of the aforementioned CO₂-fixation by polymerization. Dimeric CO₂uptake has been crystallographically observed in metal complexes, and polymeric CO₂has been detected previously but only at extremely high pressures of ˜15,000 bar. The spectroscopic determination here confirms poly(CO₂) formation at much lower pressures than formerly observed.

A series of porous materials with and without the nucleophilic heteroatoms were tested to compare their CO₂capture performance up to 30 bar at 30° C. (FIG. 10A). The SPC had the highest CO₂capacity. The NPC, activated carbon, zeolite 5A and ZIF-8 had lower capacities. Although NPC had lower CO₂capacity than SPC, its uptake performance could be improved by 21 wt % after H₂reduction at 600° C., producing reduced-NPC (R-NPC) with secondary amine groups (FIG. 3A).

Even though the surface area of R-NPC (1450 m²g) is only slightly greater than that of the activated carbon (1430 m²g), the presence of the amine groups induces the formation of the poly(CO2) under pressure, promoting the CO₂sorption efficiency of the R-NPC. The pore volume of R-NPC is 1.43 cm³g.

Purification of natural gas from wells relies upon a highly CO₂-selective sorbent, especially in a CH₄-rich environment. Thus, CH₄uptake experiments were carried out on three different types of porous materials, SPC, activated carbon and ZIF-8. FIGS. 11B-D compare CO₂and CH₄sorption over a pressure range from 0 to 30 bar at 23° C. In contrast to the CO₂sorption, the CH₄isotherms for these three sorbents reached equilibrium while the system pressure was approaching 30 bar. The order of the CH₄uptake capacities was correlated to the surface area of the sorbents. Comparing these sorbents, the observed molecular ratio of sorbed CO₂to CH₄(nCO2/nCH4) for the SPC (2.6) was greater than that for the activated carbon (1.5) and ZIF-8 (1.9). In addition, the density of the SPC calculated using volumetric analysis is nearly 6-fold higher than in the ZIF-8 (2.21 vs. 0.35 g/cm³) and 3-fold higher than the zeolite 5A (2.21 vs. 0.67 g/cm³). The high CO₂capacity and high density observed for SPC greatly increase the volume efficiency, which would reduce the volume of the sorption material for a given CO₂uptake production rate.

In order to mimic a gas well environment and further characterize the SPC's selectivity to CO₂, a premixed gas (85 mol % CH₄, 10 mol % CO₂, 3 mol % C₂H₆and 2 mol % C₃H₈) was used with quadropole mass spectrometry (MS) detection. The MS inlet was connected to the gas uptake system so that it could monitor the gas effluent from the SPC throughout the sorption-desorption experiment. FIG. 12 shows the mass spectrum recorded during the sorption process. The peaks at 15 and 16 amu correspond to fragment and molecular ions from CH₄, while the peaks at 28 and 44 amu are from CO₂in the premixed gas. Other minor peaks can be assigned to fragment ions from C₂H₆and C₃H₈. Although the peak at 44 amu can also come from C₃H₈ions, the contribution is negligible because of the lower C₃H₈concentration in the mixed gas, and it is distinguishable by the fragmentation ratios in the MS [C₃H₈: m/z=29 (100), 44 (30); CO₂: m/z=44(100), 28(11)]. The observed intensity ratio of two peaks at 16 and 44 amu (116/144=9.1) indicates the abundance of CH₄vs. CO₂during the sorption and also reflects the relative amount of CH₄and CO₂in the premixed gas. Once the sorption reached equilibrium under 30 bar, the desorption process was induced by slowly venting into the MS system. The 116/144 ratio reduced to ˜0.7. The SPC has been shown to have 2.6-fold higher CO₂than CH₄affinity at 30 bar when using pure CO₂and CH₄as feed gases (FIG. 11B).

If the binding energy of CH₄and CO₂were assumed to be similar, and the partial pressure of CH₄vs. CO₂in the premixed gas is considered (PCH₄/PCO₂=8.5), then it is envisioned that the number of sorbed CH₄should be about 3.3 times more than that of the sorbed CO₂. It is also envisioned that CO₂-selective materials have selective sites and once the CO₂occupies those sites, the selectivity significantly decreases and the materials behave as physisorbents with lower selectivities at larger pressures. On the contrary, here the SPC demonstrates much higher CO₂selectivity than expected since the chemisorbed sulfur-initiated poly(CO₂) chain displaces physisorbed gas.

Under the mechanism described here for CO₂polymerization in the channels of inexpensive nucleophilic porous carbons, these new materials have continuous selectivity toward CO₂, limited only by the available pore space and pressure.

Example 1.3 Instrumentations

An automated Sieverts instrument (Setaram PCTPro) was adopted to measure gas (CO₂, CH₄or premixed gas) sorption properties of materials. Typically, a ˜70 mg of sorbent was packed into a ˜1.3 mL of stainless steel sample cell. The sample was pretreated under vacuum (˜3 mm Hg) at 130° C. for 6 h and the sample volume was further determined by helium before the uptake experiment. At each step of the measurement, testing gas was expanded from the reference reservoir into the sample cell until the system pressure reached equilibrium. A quadropole mass spectrometer (Setaram RGA200) was connected to the Sieverts instrument so that it could monitor the gas effluent from the sorbent throughout the entire sorption-desorption experiment. With the assistance of a hybrid turbomolecular drag pump, the background pressure of the MS can be controlled lower than 5×10−8 Torr. All material densities were determined using volumetric analysis on this same instrument.

XPS was performed using a PHI Quantera SXM Scanning X-ray Microprobe with a base pressure of 5×10⁻⁹Torr. Survey spectra were recorded in 0.5 eV step size and a pass energy of 140 eV. Elemental spectra were recorded in 0.1 eV step size and a pass energy of 26 eV. All spectra were standardized using C1s peak (284.5 eV) as a reference.

The ATR-IR experiment was conducted using a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Nicolet Nexus 670) equipped with an attenuated total reflectance system (Nicolet, Smart Golden Gate) and a MCT-A detector. Raman spectra were measured using a Renishaw in Via Raman Microscope with a 514 nm excitation argon laser.

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were taken at 15 KeV using a JEOL-6500F field emission microscope. High-resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM) images were obtained with a JEOL 2100F field emission gun TEM.

An automated BET surface analyzer (Quantachrome Autosorb-3b) was used for measurements of sorbents' surface areas and pore volumes based on N₂adsorption-desorption. Typically, a ˜100 mg of sample was loaded into a quartz tube and pretreated at 130° C. under vacuum (˜5 mm Hg) in order to remove sorbates before the measurement.

MAS NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III 4.7 T spectrometer with a standard MAS probe for 4 mm outer diameter rotors.

Example 1.4 Volumetric CO₂Sorption Experiments (NIST)

CO₂sorption measurements were carried out on computer-controlled custom-built volumetric sorption equipment previously described in detail (J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 16131-16137 (2007)) with an estimated reproducibility within 0.5% and isotherm data error bar of less than 2% compared to other commercial instruments. An amount of ˜79 mg of sample was used for the experiments. Sample degassing, prior to the CO₂sorption experiment, was done at 130° C. under vacuum for 12 h.

Example 1.5 Gravimetric CO₂Sorption Experiments

CO₂sorption measurements were performed on a high pressure thermal gravimetric equipment (Model: TGA-HP50) from TA Instruments. An amount of ˜15 mg of sample was used for the experiments. Sample degassing, prior to CO₂sorption experiment, was done at 130° C. under vacuum for 12 h.

Example 1.6 Synthesis of S-Containing Porous Carbon (SPC)

Poly[(2-hydroxymethyl)thiophene] (PTh) (Sigma-Aldrich) was prepared using FeCl3 Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 158, 318-323 (2012). In a typical synthesis, 2-thiophenemethanol (1.5 g, 13.1 mmol) in CH3CN (10 mL) was slowly added under vigorous stirring to a slurry of FeCl₃(14.5 g, 89.4 mmol) in CH₃CN (50 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The polymer (PTh) was separated by filtration over a sintered glass funnel, washed with distilled water (˜1 L) and then with acetone (˜200 mL). The polymer was dried at 100° C. for 12 h to afford (1.21 g, 96% yield) of the desired compound.

The PTh was activated by grinding PTh (500 mg) with KOH (1 g, 17.8 mmol) with a mortar and pestle and then heated under Ar at 600° C. in a tube furnace for 1 h. The Ar flow rate was 500 sccm. After cooling, the activated sample was thoroughly washed 3× with 1.2 M HCl (1 L) and then with distilled water until the filtrate was pH 7. The SPC sample was dried in an oven at 100 C. to afford 240 mg of the black solid SPC. The BET surface area and pore volume were 2500 m²/g and 1.01 cm³/g, respectively.

Example 1.7 Synthesis of N-Containing Porous Carbon (NPC)

Commercial polyacrylonitrile (PAN, 500 mg, average Mw 150,000, Sigma-Aldrich) powder and KOH (1500 mg, 26.8 mmol) were ground to a homogeneous mixture in a mortar. The mixture was subsequently carbonized by heating to 600° C. under Ar (500 sccm) in a tube furnace for 1 h. The carbonized material was washed 3 times with 1.2 M HCl (1 L) and then with distilled water until the filtrate was pH 7. Finally, the carbon sample was dried in an oven at 100° C. to afford 340 mg of the solid black NPC.

To produce R-NPC, the activated material (270 mg) was further reduced by 10% H₂(H₂:Ar=50:450 sccm) at 600° C. for 1 h to provide 255 mg of the final material. The BET surface area and pore volume were 1450 m²g and 1.43 cm³g, respectively.

Example 1.8 Conversion of Excess Uptake to Absolute Uptake

Total uptake includes all gas molecules in the adsorbed state, which is the sum of the experimentally measured excess uptake and the bulk gas molecules within the pore volume (FIG. 6). For microporous materials with negligible external surface area, the total uptake is often used as an approximation for absolute uptake and could be represented in the following equation:

N_total≈N_abs=Nex.+Vpρbulk(P,T)

In the above equation, Vp is the pore volume of porous material and ρ bulk is the density of gas in the bulk phase at given pressure and temperature. In the case of SPC, the pore volume was determined to be 1.01 cm³g by N₂adsorption isotherm at 77 K (BET analysis). The CO₂density changes from 0.00180 to 0.06537 g/cm⁻³in the pressure range between 1 and 30 bar at 22° C. and 0.00164 to 0.05603 g/cm³at 50 C.

Example 1.9 Determination of the Heat of CO₂Sorption (Q)

The Clausius-Clapeyron equation (Adsorption 175, 133-137 (1995)) was used to determine the heat of CO₂sorption.

${(\frac{\partial \ln P}{\partial T})}_{θ} = \frac{Q}{{RT}^{2}}$

In the above equation, θ is the fraction of the adsorbed sites at a pressure P and temperature T, and R is the universal constant. The equation can be further derived as the following expression for transitions between a gas and a condense phase:

$\ln P_{2} - \ln P_{1} = \frac{Q}{R} (\frac{1}{T_{1}} - \frac{1}{T_{2}})$

Table 1 below compares the heat of CO₂sorption to values in the literature.

TABLE 1

Heat of CO₂sorption determined in

Example 1 versus literature values.

Q_CO2
Comparison with

(kJ mol⁻¹)
reference

SPC
57.8
59.0¹

Activated carbon
28.4
28.9²

Zeolite 5A
31.2
33.7³

ZIF-8
25.6
27.0⁴

Ref. ¹Carbon 50, 5543-5553 (2012).

Ref. ²J. Natural Gas Chem. 15, 223-229 (2006).

Ref. ³Handbook of Zeolite Science and Technology, Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York (2003).

Ref. ⁴AIChE J. 59, 2195-2206 (2013).

Example 1.10 Evaluation of the 13C NMR Assignments

The three NMR spectra in FIG. 8D were obtained under identical conditions: 12 kHz MAS, 2.5-μs 90° 13C pulse, 41-ms FID, 10-s relaxation delay; 480 scans; and 50 Hz of line broadening applied to the FID.

Numerous MAS NMR investigations of CO₂have reported a signal at 125±1 ppm, regardless of the physical environment for the CO₂(e.g., free gas, physisorbed on various materials, in a metal organic framework, in a clathrate, dissolved in a glass, etc.) Accordingly, attributing the signal at 130.6 ppm to CO₂physisorbed on the sorbent seems reasonable, although the reason for the additional deshielding may not be apparent. It is envisioned that this 5-ppm difference does not result from the use of different chemical shift references, as the various reports indicate that either the signal from Si(CH3)₄(TMS) serves as the chemical shift reference (0 ppm) or that the signal from a solid such as adamantane or glycine (this work) relative to TMS at 0 ppm serves as the chemical shift reference. Applicants note that the sorbent is somewhat conductive in that it has a noticeable effect on the tuning and matching of the 13C and 1H channels of the NMR probe (relative to the tuning and matching for glycine). However, spinning is unaffected. Without being bound by theory, it is envisioned that the conductive nature of the sorbent results in the 5-ppm deshielding effect observed for physisorbed CO₂.

A chemical shift of 166.5 ppm is rational for poly(CO₂) in light of various reports of bicarbonate and carbonate species giving signals from 162 to 170 ppm relative to TMS or to [(CH₃)3Si]4Si, which is 3.5 ppm relative to TMS at 0 ppm. The carbonyl chemical shift of CH₃O—CO—O—CO—OCH₃is extremely sensitive to its environment (the reported shift is 147.9 ppm as a neat liquid at 37° C. and 157 ppm in CDCl₃, both relative to TMS). Applicants are not aware of any reports of chemical shift data for poly(CO₂) and are hereby reporting the first such example of that chemical shift at 166.5 ppm when entrapped in this carbon matrix.

Example 2. CO₂Absorption Capacities of Different Carbon Materials

In this example, the CO₂uptake capacities of SPC, R-NPC, rice protein, ZIF-8 and Zeolite 5A were compared. The CO₂uptake measurements were conducted at 30° C. and 30 bar.

As shown in FIG. 13, the CO₂uptake capacities of SPC and R-NPC were significantly higher than the CO₂uptake capacities of ZIF-8, rice protein, and Zeolite 5A.

Example 3. Asphalt-Derived Porous Carbons for CO₂Capture

In this Example, Applicants report the preparation and CO₂uptake capacity of microporous carbon materials synthesized from asphalt. Carbonization of asphalt with potassium hydroxide (KOH) at high temperatures (>873 K) yields asphalt-derived porous carbons (A-PC) with Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface areas of up to 2800 mg and CO₂uptake capacities of up to 25 mmol/g at 30 bar and 298 K. Further nitrogen doping of the A-PCs yields active N-doped A-PCs (also referred to as A-NPCs) containing up to 9.3 wt % nitrogen. The A-NPCs have enhanced BET surface areas of up to 2900 m²g⁻¹and CO₂uptake capacities of up to 1.2 g at 30 bar and 298 K. Asphalt derived porous carbon with pre-treatment at 400° C. had measured BET surface areas of 4200 m²/g and CO₂uptake capacities of up to 1.3 g at 30 bar and 298 K. To the best of Applicants' knowledge, such results represent the highest reported CO₂uptake capacities among the family of activated porous carbon materials. Thus, the porous carbon materials derived from asphalt demonstrate the required properties for capturing CO₂at a well-head during the extraction of natural gas under high pressure.

Example 3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Asphalt-Derived Porous Carbon Materials

Asphalt-derived porous carbons (A-PCs) were prepared by carbonization of a molded mixture of asphalt and potassium hydroxide (KOH) at higher temperatures under inert atmosphere (Ar). The treatment of asphalt with KOH was conducted at various temperatures (200-800° C.) and asphalt/KOH weight ratios (varied from 1/1 to 1/5). In addition, the reaction conditions were adjusted and tuned by the CO₂uptake performance of the final porous carbon materials.

In a more specific example, A-PC was synthesized at 700° C. at an asphalt:KOH weight ratio of 1:4. As shown in FIG. 14, the produced A-PC has a steep nitrogen uptake at low pressures (0-0.3 P/P_o), indicative of the large amount of microporous structures with uniform distribution of pore sizes ˜1.3 nm (see FIG. 15 inset). The BET surface area (2779 m²/g) and the pore volume (1.17 cm³/g) were calculated from the nitrogen isotherms (see Table 2). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the A-PC showed C 1s and O 1s signals with ˜10 wt % of oxygen content, which are assigned to C—O and C═O functional groups (data not shown).

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the A-PCs show porous materials with uniform distribution of the micropores (FIG. 14A). Uniform distribution of the micropores are further indicated by the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images (FIG. 14B) that show pore diameters of about 1.5 nm, which is very close to the number extracted from nitrogen absorption isotherms.

Treatment of A-PCs with NH3 at elevated temperatures resulted in N-doped porous carbon materials (A-NPC) (FIG. 16A). The nitrogen content and the surface area increased considerably after treatment of A-PCs with NH3 at higher temperatures, as shown in Tables 2 and 3. This leads to the formation of A-NPCs with a nitrogen concentration of up to 9.3 wt %.

TABLE 2

Properties and CO₂uptake capacities of various porous carbons.

Properties and CO₂uptake capacities of various porous carbons.

Pore

CO₂uptake

S_BET
volume
Density
capacity at 30 bar

Samples
(m²/g)^a
(cm³/g)^a
(g/cm³)
(g/g)^b

A-PC
2779
1.17
2
0.96

A-NPC
2858
1.20
2
1.10

A-rNPC
2583
1.09
2
1.19

SPC
2500
1.01
2.21
0.74

NPC
1490
1.40
1.8
0.60

rNPC
1450
1.43
1.8
0.67

^aEstimated from N₂absorption isotherms at 77 K, where samples were dried at 200° C. for 20 h prior to the measurements.

^bCO₂uptake capacity at 23° C.

TABLE 3

Elemental composition and CO₂uptake capacities of activated porous carbons.

Elemental composition and CO₂uptake capacities

of activated porous carbons.

CO₂

uptake

XPS
capacity

Pyridinic
Pyrrolic
Graphitic
at 30 bar

Samples
C %
O %
N %
N %
N %
N %
(g/g)^a

A-NPC(500)
91.1
6.1
2.7
29.7
63.3
7.0
1.02

A-NPC(600)
90.6
6.4
3.0
33.1
52.6
14.3
1.04

A-NPC(700)
91.1
4.2
4.7
53.2
41.4
5.4
1.06

A-NPC(800)
81.0
9.7
9.3
52.3
45.4
2.3
0.93

A-rNPC
88.0
7.5
4.5
55.1
40.3
4.6
1.19

^aCO₂uptake capacity at 23° C.

The surface N-bonding configurations reveal three main nitrogen functional groups in the surface of the carbon framework. As shown in FIG. 14A, the N 1s spectra at variable doping temperatures deconvoluted into three peaks with binding energies of about 399, 400.7±4, and about 401.7. These binding energies are in the range of typical binding energies corresponding to pyridinic N, pyrollic N and graphitic N, respectively. The new peak at the binding energy of about 396 was observed at 800° C., which was assigned to the N—Si binding energy. Without being bound by theory, it is envisioned that, at high pyrolysis temperatures, NH₃-doping of silica from the quartz reaction tube starts to interfere with the doping process.

Further H₂treatment of A-NPCs at 700° C. resulted in formation of reduced A-NPCs (A-rNPC). The elemental composition and the surface area of the A-rNPCs were investigated using XPS (see FIG. 14B and Table 3). The XPS spectrum of the produced A-rNPCs (FIG. 14B) is similar to the XPS spectrum of A-NPCs (FIG. 14A). A schematic representation of the synthetic route for the production of A-rNPCs is shown in FIG. 16A.

Applicants also observed that, as reaction temperatures increased, the relative trend of the pyrrolic nitrogens in A-NPCs increased. However, the opposite was observed for pyridinic nitrogens. These results indicate that pyrolysis temperature during NH₃treatment plays a significant factor in determining the CO₂uptake performance of A-NPCs.

Example 3.2. CO₂Uptake Capacity of the Asphalt Derived Porous Carbon Materials

The CO₂uptake capacities of A-PC, A-NPC, and A-rNPC were compared to the CO₂uptake capacities of prior porous carbon materials, including nitrogen containing nucleophilic porous carbons derived from poly(acrylonitrile) (NPCs), sulfur containing porous carbons derived from poly[(2-hydroxymethyl)thiophene (SPCs), commercial activated carbon, and asphalt (the NPCs and SPCs were described previously in PCT/US2014/044315 and Nat Commun., 2014 Jun. 3, 5:3961, doi: 10.1038/ncomms4961). The CO₂uptake capacities were measured by a volumetric method at room temperature over the pressure range of 0-30 bar. The results are shown in FIG. 17.

Applicants also observed that volumetric CO₂uptake by A-PC, A-NPC and A-rNPC do not show any hysteresis (data not shown). Such observations suggest that the asphalt-derived porous carbon materials uptake CO₂in a reversible manner. The CO₂uptake capacities at a pressure of 30 bar are summarized in Tables 2 and 3.

A-rNPC has the highest CO₂uptake performance at 30 bar, although the highest surface is obtained for A-NPC. As Applicants increased the N-doping temperature (from 500° to 800° C.), pyrollic nitrogen starts to decrease in intensity, which is linearly proportional to the CO₂uptake performance of the A-NPCs (see Table 3). Thus, without being bound by theory, Applicants envision that pyrrolic nitrogens play a more significant role in CO₂uptake performance than the bulk nitrogen content of the porous carbon material.

FIG. 18 shows the high and low pressure CO₂uptake capacity of A-rNPC as temperature increases. As in other solid physisorbents such as activated carbons, zeolites and MOFs, the CO₂uptake capacity decreases with increasing temperature. However, when compared with commercial activated carbon and SPC, the decrease in CO₂uptake at higher temperature is lower. This suggests the higher and uniform microporosity of A-rNPCs, or the efficacy of poly(CO₂) formation.

Another key property of the activated carbon materials is the CO₂/CH4 selectivity. In order to evaluate the CO₂/CH₄selectivity of A-PC, A-NPC and A-rNPCs, Applicants compared CH₄uptake performances with SPC, activated carbon, and ZIF-8 sorbents over the 0-30 bar pressure range at 23° C. FIG. 19 shows the comparison of the CO₂and CH₄sorption capacities of A-rNPC and SPC. A-rNPCs have higher CH₄(8.6 mmol/g) uptake relative to SPC (7.7 mmol/g) at 30 bar, which is in agreement with the higher surface area for A-rNPC (2583 m²/g) than the SPC (2500 m²/g).

The molar ratios of sorbed CO₂and CH₄(nCO2/nCH4) were estimated as the ratios of the amount of absorbed gases at 30 bar. The measured nCO₂/nCH₄for A-rNPC was found to be about 3.5. This value was compared to values for SPC (2.6), activated carbon (1.5) and ZIF-8 (1.9).

In addition, the isosteric heat of absorption of CO₂and CH₄on the surfaces of A-PC, A-NPC and A-rNPC were calculated using low pressure CO₂sorption isotherms at 23° C. and 80° C. The measured value was found to be about 27 kJ/mol.

Example 3.3. CO₂Uptake Capacity of Asphalt Derived Porous Carbon with Pre-Treatment

Similar to example 3.1, asphalt-derived porous carbons were prepared by carbonization of a molded mixture of asphalt and potassium hydroxide (KOH) at higher temperatures under inert atmosphere (Ar). The treatment of asphalt with KOH was conducted at various temperatures (200-800° C.) and asphalt/KOH weight ratios (varied from 1/1 to 1/5). An additional pre-treatment step of heating the asphalt prior to mixing with KOH for carbonization was done to remove volatile oils found within the asphalt source (FIG. 31). In this specific example, untreated Gilsonite (uGil) was heated specifically at 400° C., then mixed with KOH, and subsequently reacted at temperatures 600° C. and greater to tune the CO₂uptake performance of the final porous carbon materials. Table 4 summarized the high surface area and even higher CO₂uptake capacity achievable with pre-treatment and increasing reaction temperature.

FIG. 20 shows the gravimetric CO₂uptake and CH₄uptake of various porous carbon samples made from Gilsonite and measured under high pressure. The molar ratios of sorbed CO₂and CH₄(nCO2/nCH4) were estimated as the ratios of the amount of absorbed gases at 30 bar. The measured nCO₂/nCH₄for uGil-800 and uGil-900 were found to be approximately 8 (results not shown). This value can be compared to values for A-rNPC (3.5), SPC (2.6), activated carbon (1.5) and ZIF-8 (1.9). Such CO₂uptake capacities (i.e., up to 30 mmol/g) are the highest reported CO₂uptake capacities among the activated carbons. Such CO₂uptake capacities are also comparable to the highest CO₂uptake capacities of synthetic metal-organic frameworks (MOFs).

TABLE 4

Properties and CO₂uptake performances of activated porous carbons

made from Untreated Gilsonite.

CO₂uptake

Total pore

capacity

S_BET
volume
D_pore
XPS
at 30 bar^d

Samples
(m²/g)^a
(cm³/g)^b
(nm)^c
C %
O %
mmol/g
wt %

uGil-600
2300
1.31
2.13
84.9
15.1
18.6
82

uGil-700
3800
2.11
2.21
88.7
11.3
23.8
105

uGil-800
3900
2.22
2.25
91.5
8.5
25.7
113

uGil-900
4200
2.41
2.30
92.1
7.9
29.1
128

^aSurface area estimated from N₂absorption isotherms at 77 K; samples dried at 240° C. for 20 h prior to the measurements.

^bTotal (micro- and meso-) pore volume obtained at P/P₀= 0.994.

^cAverage pore diameter (D_pore).

^dCO₂uptake at 23° C.

Example 4. Asphalt-Derived Porous Carbons for CO₂and H₂S Capture

This Example pertains to the further production and characterization of A-NPCs, A-SPCs, A-rNPCs, and A-NSPCs. In addition, this Example pertains to the use of the aforementioned carbon materials for the capture of both CO₂and H₂S.

Example 4.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Asphalt-Derived Porous Carbon Materials

Asphalt carbon sources were ground with KOH in a mortar. The weight ratio of KOH to the asphalt carbon source was from about 1:3 to about 1:4. The homogeneous powder was heated at 500-800° C. under Ar atmosphere for 1 hour. This was followed by filtration and washing with 10 wt % HCl_(aq)and copious amounts of DI water until the extracts were neutral. The filtered sample was then dried at 110° C. until a constant weight was obtained. The above steps produced A-PC.

A-NPC was prepared by annealing the A-PC at 700° C. for 1 hour under an NH₃-containing atmosphere. A-rNPC was prepared by further reduction of A-NPC with 10 wt % H₂at 700° C. for 1 h. A-SPC was prepared by exposing the A-PC to a sulfur source and annealing the sulfur impregnated A-PC at 650° C. for 1 h. A-NSPC was prepared by annealing the produced A-SPC for 1 hour under an NH₃-containing atmosphere to yield A-NSPC.

Next, the produced porous carbon materials were characterized and tested for uptake of CO₂and H₂S. The results are summarized in Table 5.

TABLE 5

The properties and gas uptake capacities of various asphalt-derived porous

carbon materials. Asphalt-Versatrol HT Gilstonite, a naturally occurring

asphalt from MI SWACO, was used as a control. The H₂S uptake

capacities of the porous carbon materials were measured as a

function of the amount of sulfur retained on the porous carbon material.

CO₂

Textural

H₂S
Uptake

Properties
Chemical Composition
Uptake
Capacity

SBET
(atomic %)
Capacity
at 30 bar

Sample
(m2/g)
N
C
O
S
(g/g)
(g/g)

Asphalt*
0.6
—
—
—
—
—
0.05

A-PC
2,613
0.5
91.4
8.1
—
1.06
0.92

A-NPC
2,300
5.7
91.0
3.3
—
1.50
1.01

A-rNPC
2,200
3.6
92.7
3.7
—
2.05
1.12

A-SPC
2,497
—
90.3
7.1
2.7
—
1.16

A-NSPC
2,510
1.6
86.7
11.0
0.7
—
1.32

In order to characterize the H₂S uptake capacities of the porous carbon materials, the porous carbon materials were first dried at 120° C. for 1 hour under vacuum (0.05 Torr). Next, the porous carbon material was treated with H₂S under an air flow for 1 hour. The amount of sulfur retained on the porous carbon material was measured by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA).

After H₂S uptake and air oxidation to S, A-rNPC was further characterized by TEM EDS elemental mapping. As shown in FIG. 21, sulfur is uniformly distributed within the pores of A-rNPCs. In addition, the TGA curve of the A-rNPCs after H₂S uptake and conversion to sulfur is shown in FIG. 21.

The H₂S uptake of A-rNPC was also measured under different conditions, including inert or oxidative conditions. The results are summarized in FIG. 23. The results show that A-rNPC can capture H₂S effectively in the presence of O₂from air. When CO₂was present, A-rNPC also showed H₂S capture behavior. The air conditions can mimic H₂S capture by porous carbon materials during natural gas flow from a wellhead, injection of a slug of air to convert the sorbed H₂S to S, and the continuation of H₂S capture from the natural gas source.

Without being bound by theory, it is envisioned that, as a result of the basic functional groups on the surface of A-NPCs and A-rNPCs, and as a result of the pH values of A-NPCs (pH=7.2) and A-rNPCs (pH=7.5), the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure can capture H2S by an acid-base reaction, where an amine group on the porous carbon abstracts a proton from H2S to yield the ammonium salts and hydrogen monosulfide anions according to the following scheme:

R₃N (where R is the carbon scaffold or a proton)+H₂S→R₃NH⁺ or R₂SH⁺+HS⁻

In this case, the equilibrium constant (k_eq) is ˜1000 based on the pKa values of the starting materials (H₂S) and products (ammonium species). As a result of the reaction of HS ions with O₂from air introduced in the carbon support, the captured H₂S produces sulfur products such as S, SO₂and H₂SO4. The catalytic oxidation of H₂S on A-NPC, A-rNPC and A-PC can proceed at room temperature by air oxidation.

Applicants also observed that nitrogen doping doubles the H₂S capturing capacity of the porous carbon materials (FIGS. 22-23 and Table 5). Without being bound by theory, it is envisioned that the extent of oxidation appears to be driven by the distribution of the catalytic centers, such as nitrogen-containing basic functional groups. Additionally, Applicants observed that the oxidative capturing of H₂S by A-PCs can form sulfur-impregnated A-PCs (A-SPCs) upon heating at 650° C. (FIG. 16B).

The CO₂uptake capacities of the porous carbon materials were also evaluated. As shown in FIG. 24, the CO₂uptake capacities of A-NPCs and A-rNPCs were evaluated from 0 bar to 30 bar at 23° C. A-rNPC exhibits high CO₂uptake capacity (1.12 g CO₂/g ArNPC) under a higher pressure environment, which is 5 times higher than Zeolite 5A, and 3 times higher than ZIF-8 under the same conditions. Such CO₂uptake capacities also exceed about 72 wt % of the CO₂uptake capacities observed on nitrogen-containing porous carbon (NPC) that were reported in Applicants' pervious patent application (PCT/US2014/044315).

As shown in FIG. 25, the CO₂uptake capacities of A-SPCs and A-NSPC were also evaluated from 0 to 30 bar at 23° C. The A-NSPCs had been made according to the scheme illustrated in FIG. 16B, where it already completed its life as an H₂S capture material, with air oxidation to a sulfur-rich carbon, then thermalization to form A-SPC, or further exposure to NH3 to form the A-NSPC. These latter two materials are shown in FIG. 25 to be used for reversible capture of CO₂. This underscores the utility life of these porous carbon materials—first for irreversible capture of H₂S as sulfur in over 200 wt % uptake, and then conversion to A-SPC or A-NSPC for reversible capture of CO₂in over 100 wt % uptake. A-SPCs exhibited high CO₂uptake capacities (in excess of 1.10 g CO₂/g A-SPCs) under pressure environment, which is 5 times higher in uptake of CO₂than Zeolite 5A, and 3 times higher in uptake of CO₂than ZIF-8 under the same conditions. Such CO₂uptake capacities also exceed about 89 wt % of the CO₂uptake capacities observed on sulfur-containing porous carbons (SPC) reported in Applicants' pervious patent application (PCT/US2014/044315).

Example 5. Synthesis of Porous Carbon Materials

In this Example, Applicants provide exemplary schemes for the synthesis of porous carbon materials.

Example 5.1. Scheme A

Carbon sources suitable for use in the present disclosure are mixed with a vulcanization agent and heated to 180° C. for 12 hours in accordance with the following scheme:

Carbon source+vulcanization agent→porous carbon material

The weight ratio of the vulcanization agent to the carbon source varied from 5 wt % to 200 wt % relative to the carbon source. The vulcanized carbon source obtained was then treated with KOH, as described in Example 2.1.

Example 5.2. Scheme B

Carbon sources suitable for use in the present disclosure are mixed with a vulcanization agent and elemental sulfur and heated to about 180° C. for 12 h in accordance with the following scheme:

Carbon source+vulcanization agent+elemental sulfur→porous carbon material

The weight ratio of the vulcanization agent to the carbon source varied from 5 wt % to 200 wt % relative to the carbon source. The obtained vulcanized carbon source was then treated with KOH as described in Example 2.1.

Example 5.3. Scheme C

Carbon sources suitable for use in the present disclosure are mixed with a vulcanization agent, elemental sulfur, and KOH in accordance with the following scheme:

Carbon source+vulcanization agent+KOH→porous carbon material

The homogeneous powder is then heated at 600˜800° C. under Ar atmosphere for 1 hour. This is followed by filtration with 10 wt % HCl_(aq)and copious amounts of DI water. The weight ratio of the vulcanization agent was chosen from 5 wt % to 200 wt % additive relative to the carbon source. The weight ratio of KOH to the carbon source varied from 1 to 3.

Example 5.4. Scheme D

The homogeneous powder is then heated at 600-800° C. under Ar atmosphere for 1 h. This is followed by filtration with 10 wt % HCl_(aq)and copious amounts of DI water. The weight ratio of the elemental sulfur to the carbon source varied from 0.2 to 1. The weight ratio of the vulcanization agent to the carbon source varied from 5 wt % to 200 wt % relative to the carbon source. The weight ratio of KOH to the carbon source was chosen from 1 to 3.

In summary, Applicants have demonstrated in Examples 1-3 the first successful synthesis of microporous active carbons with uniform distribution of pores sizes from asphalt. Applicants subsequently activated the asphalt derived porous carbon materials with nitrogen functional groups. By changing the reaction conditions, the porous carbon materials can possess variable surface areas and nitrogen contents. The CO₂and H₂S uptake capacities of the asphalt-derived porous carbon materials are higher than other porous carbon materials. Additionally, many of the porous carbon materials derived from asphalt exhibit greater CO₂:CH₄selectivity than other porous carbon materials. Furthermore, as summarized in Table 6, the carbon sources of the present disclosure are much more affordable than the carbon sources utilized to make other porous carbon materials.

TABLE 6

A comparison of the costs of various carbon sources.

Carbon Source
Cost

2-thiophene methanol (to make traditional SPC)
$150/100 g (Aldrich)

Polyacrylonitrile (to make traditional NPC)
$180/100 g (Aldrich)

Whey Protein
$11/lb

Rice Protein
$9/lb

Coal
$70-150/ton

Asphalt
$70-750/ton

Example 5.5 Scheme E

Carbon sources suitable for use in the present disclosure are initially heated at 400° C. This allows for the removal of volatile oils that are present in the carbon source (FIG. 31). This is termed the pre-treatment step in the synthesis of porous carbon. The pre-treated carbon source is thoroughly mixed with KOH in accordance with the following scheme:

embedded image

The homogeneous powder is then heated at 600˜900° C. under Ar atmosphere for 1 hour. This is followed by filtration with 10 wt % HCl_(aq)and copious amounts of DI water. The weight ratio of KOH to the carbon source was chosen from 1 to 4.

Example 6. Synthesis of Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass

In some embodiments, additional low cost raw materials may be used to prepare the porous carbon materials of the invention. For example, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure may be derived from at least one of biochars hydrochars, charcoals, wood waste, activated carbon, and combinations thereof. The embodiments (e.g., B-PC and B-NPC materials) may be produced in a one-step synthesis method which is simple, inexpensive and easy to scale up. In some embodiments, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure can be easily prepared from low-cost or negative-cost biomass by pyrolysis in the presence of little or no oxygen at temperatures of 200-900° C. In some embodiments, the biomass includes agricultural crops, crops residues, plantations, grass, wood, animal litter, dairy manure, solid waste, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the biomass utilized to make the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure is abundant (in fact, people have to pay money to get rid of biomass waste).

In some embodiments, hydrochar, charcoal and other carbon-containing materials can be utilized for the manufacture of the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure. Hydrochar is similar to biochar and it is produced by hydrothermal carbonization of biomass under pressure in the presence of water at high temperature (typically 150-300° C.). Charcoal is also similar to biochar, although it is often used for fuel and energy generation.

Therefore, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure can be prepared by simple and economical synthesis procedures from abundant and inexpensive precursors to make solids for the capture of CO₂and H₂S. Moreover, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure are environmentally attractive. For example, trees and plants, when alive, capture CO₂and convert it to oxygen and carbon. Here, Applicants show that trees and plants, when dead, can continue to trap CO₂. And since the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure (e.g., B-PC and B-NPC) are reusable many times, the CO₂capture efficacy of a “dead” tree or plant can exceed that of the living tree or plant. Moreover, the porous carbon materials of the present disclosure (e.g., B-PC and B-NPC) can be manufactured on industrial scales.

In some embodiments, the porous carbons of the present disclosure can be made by the following steps:

embedded image

Carbon sources can include, without limitation, biochar (e.g., biochar from mesquite, applewood, corncobs and corn stover, straw from wheat, bagasse, lignin, urban tree cutting, bull, dairy, hazelnut, oak, pine, food, paper, cool terra, waste, etc); charcoal (e.g., charcoal from wood, saw dust, other wood waste, etc); activated carbon from various sources, and combinations thereof. Melamine resin can also be replaced by melamine. Sulfur-containing organics, such as those used in crosslinking rubber, can be used to make the sulfur analogs, B-SPC, which can likewise capture CO₂and H₂S.

Synthesis of porous carbon materials, B-PC and B-NPC. (a) Synthesis of biochar derived porous carbon (B-PC). The carbon sources listed above were mixed with KOH in a mortar. The weight ratio of KOH to carbon sources was chosen from 2 to 6 and the carbonization temperature was chosen in the range of 600° C. to 900° C. The product was filtered and washed with DI water until the effluent was neutral, followed by drying at 110° C. in the oven for 12 h. (b) Synthesis of biochar derived nitrogen-containing porous carbon (B-NPC). The carbon sources and melamine resin were mixed with KOH in a mortar. The ratio of KOH to carbon sources was chosen from 2 to 6, the ratio of melamine to carbon source was chosen from 0 to 1, and the carbonization temperature was chosen from 600° C. to 900° C. The product was purified and dried in the same way as B-PC.

FIG. 26. (a) SEM image of B-NPC and, (b) TEM image of B-NPC, (c) BET isotherm curve of B-NPC, indicating B-NPC is microporous material with surface area of 2988 m²/g, (d) DFT size distribution of B-NPC and the pore size is from 0.5-5 nm.

TABLE 7

Physical and chemical properties and CO₂uptake and H₂S uptake of

biochar derived porous carbon. The weight ratio of KOH to biochar is 5

and the carbonization temperature is 800° C. (Biochar was Mesquite

biochar pyrolyzed at 450° C.

Textural
Chemical

properties
composition

CO₂

S_BET
(atomic %)
H₂S uptake
uptake capacity

Sample
(m²/g)
N
C
O
Capacity (g/g)
at 30 bar (g/g)

Biochar
9.9
1.6
83.5
14.9
—
0.14

B-PC
2,988
—
93.0
7.0
—
1.13

B-NPC
2,908
0.6
91.4
9.0
0.41
1.14

TABLE 8

Physical properties and CO₂uptake of different biochar derived porous carbons.

(Biochar was Mesquite biochar pyrolyzed at 450° C.

Weight of reactants (g)
Textural

CO₂

Melamine

properties

uptake capacity

Sample
Biochar
resin
KOH
S_BET(m²/g)
Yield (wt %)
at 30 bar (g/g)

B-PC (1)
0.50
0
2.50
2988
40
1.13

B-PC (2)
0.50
0
3.00
2755
28
1.15

B-NPC (1)
0.50
0.25
2.50
2908
45
1.14

B-NPC (2)
0.50
0.25
3.00
3133
41
1.20

B-NPC (3)
0.50
0.25
3.50
2273
20
1.05

C-NPC
0.50*
0.25
2.50
3469
28
1.26

*Activated charcoal from Sigma Aldrich (CAS C3345, Lot # 051M0151M xxxx) is used as precursor.

FIG. 27. CO₂uptake performances of different sorbents, B-NPC and C-NPC (charcoal derived N-containing porous carbon) at 25° C. B-NPC derived from mesquite exhibits high CO₂capacity (1.14 g/g) at 30 bar, which is 5 times higher than Zeolite 5A, 3 times higher than ZIF-8 under the same conditions. C-NPC derived from charcoal exhibits high CO₂capacity (1.26 g/g) at 30 bar, which is 5.7 times higher than Zeolite 5A, 3.4 times higher than ZIF-8 at the same conditions. Both of them show much better CO₂uptake amount than their own precursor. B-PC shows similar or better CO₂uptake amount compared with asphalt derived porous carbon or polymer (polyacrylonitrile or poly[(2-hydroxymethyl)thiophene]) derived porous carbon (NPC or SPC) as reported in prior applications.

FIG. 28. CO₂uptake performances of different B-PC prepared by different bases. KOH treated B-PC exhibits 1.13 g/g CO₂uptake at 30 bar, which is better than NaOH or LiOH treated B-PC, which is 0.98 g/g or 0.55 g/g, respectively.

FIG. 29. CO₂uptake performances of different B-NPC prepared from different precursors using KOH as base. The CO₂uptake amounts of B-PC from mesquite (450° C.), applewood (450° C.), CoolTerra™, mesquite (700° C.), and waste (450° C.) are 1.14 g/g, 1.07 g/g, 0.87 g/g, 0.41 g/g, and 0.39 g/g, respectively.

FIG. 30. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of B-NPC and C-NPC after H2S capture. The weight loss of sulfur rich B-NPC and C-NPC is 41% and 6.8%, respectively. By calculation, the H₂S capture capacity of B-NPC and C-NPC is 0.74 g/g and 0.07 g/g.

Without further elaboration, it is believed that one skilled in the art can, using the description herein, utilize the present disclosure to its fullest extent. The embodiments described herein are to be construed as illustrative and not as constraining the remainder of the disclosure in any way whatsoever. Although the embodiments have been shown and described, many variations and modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and teachings of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited by the description set out above, but is only limited by the claims, including all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims. The disclosures of all patents, patent applications and publications cited herein are hereby incorporated herein by reference, to the extent that they provide procedural or other details consistent with and supplementary to those set forth herein.

Number	Name	Date	Kind
4082694	Wennerberg et al.	Apr 1978	A
4504287	Atlani et al.	Mar 1985	A
5972834	Ohsaki et al.	Oct 1999	A
6547854	Gray et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6585948	Ryoo et al.	Jul 2003	B1
6592764	Stucky et al.	Jul 2003	B1
6908497	Sirwardane	Jun 2005	B1
8114372	Pak et al.	Feb 2012	B2
8133305	Lackner et al.	Mar 2012	B2
8277767	Ariya-Far	Oct 2012	B2
8636830	Barron et al.	Jan 2014	B2
9034085	Barron et al.	May 2015	B2
20030221555	Golden et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20040045434	Golden et al.	Mar 2004	A1
20080210901	Giannantonio et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20080264254	Song et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080276804	Sayari et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20090038632	Cashmore et al.	Feb 2009	A1
20090169452	Constantz et al.	Jul 2009	A1
20100029466	Woodhouse	Feb 2010	A1
20100061904	Lund et al.	Mar 2010	A1
20100062926	Woodhouse et al.	Mar 2010	A1
20100139536	Woodhouse et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100154636	Liu et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100155335	Taboada-Serrano et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100212495	Gadkaree et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20110005390	Haugan	Jan 2011	A1
20110005392	Pirngruber	Jan 2011	A1
20110059000	Constantz et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110088553	Woodhouse et al.	Apr 2011	A1
20110150730	Baugh et al.	Jun 2011	A1
20110172084	Jang et al.	Jul 2011	A1
20110172412	Serre et al.	Jul 2011	A1
20110174507	Burnham et al.	Jul 2011	A1
20110179948	Choi et al.	Jul 2011	A1
20110230334	Goldberg et al.	Sep 2011	A1
20110308389	Graff et al.	Dec 2011	A1
20120024153	Barron et al.	Feb 2012	A1
20120048111	Nakao et al.	Mar 2012	A1
20120125196	Woodhouse et al.	May 2012	A1
20120308456	Leta et al.	Dec 2012	A1
20140076158	Tour et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140103255	Barron et al.	Apr 2014	A1
20150024931	Tour et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150056116	Tour et al.	Feb 2015	A1
20150111018	Tour et al.	Apr 2015	A1
20150111024	Tour et al.	Apr 2015	A1
20150258487	Hornbostel	Sep 2015	A1

Number	Date	Country
WO-2012026755	Mar 2012	WO
WO-2012158194	Nov 2012	WO
WO-2013106712	Jul 2013	WO
WO-2014210295	Feb 2015	WO

Number	Date	Country
62079437	Nov 2014	US
62001552	May 2014	US
61865323	Aug 2013	US
61585510	Jan 2012	US
61839567	Jun 2013	US

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	14458802	Aug 2014	US
Child	14833248		US
Parent	14391791		US
Child	14458802		US
Parent	14833248	Aug 2015	US
Child	14458802		US
Parent	14315920	Jun 2014	US
Child	14833248		US

Porous carbon materials for CO2 separation in natural gas

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

CPC

International Classifications

Disclaimer

Abstract

Description

Claims

RELATED APPLICATIONS

US Referenced Citations (48)

Foreign Referenced Citations (4)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (67)

Related Publications (1)

Provisional Applications (5)

Continuation in Parts (4)

Entry
Zhang et al., “Enhancement of CO2 adsorption on high surface area activated carbon modified by N2, H2, and ammonia,” Chemical Engineering Journal 160 (2010) 571-577.
Alvarez et al., Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6435-6440 (2012).
Puxty et al. Carbon dioxide postcombustion capture: a novel screening study of the carbon dioxide absorption performance of 76 amines. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6427-6433 (2009).
Siriwardane et al., Adsorption of CO2 on molecular sieves and activated carbon. Energy Fuels 15, 279-284 (2001).
Li et al., Porous materials with pre-designed single-molecule traps for CO2 selective adsorption. Nat. Commun. 4, 1538-1545 (2013).
Guo et al., Adsorption of carbon dioxide on activated carbon. J. Natural Gas Chem. 15, 223-229 (2006).
D'Alessandro et al., Carbon dioxide capture: Prospects for new materials, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 6058-602 (2010).
Y. Wan, “Host Guest” Chemistry in the Synthesis of Ordered Nonsiliceous Mesoporous Materials, Acc. Chem. Res., 2006, 39, 423.
Rivera-Utrilla et al., Activated carbon modifications to enhance its water treatment applications, An overview, J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 187, 1-23.
Shen et al., Nitrogen-containing porous carbons: synthesis and application, J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 999.
Hwang et al., In situ Synthesis of Polymer-Modified Mesoporous Carbon CMK-3 Composites for CO2 Sequestration, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 4782.
Golombok et al., Assessing contaminated gas, Hart's E & P Mag. Jun. 2008: 73-75.
Yong et al., Adsorption of carbon dioxide on chemically modified high surface area carbon-based adsorbents at high temperature. Adsorption 7, 41-50 (2001).
Xie et al., Capture and conversion of CO2 at ambient conditions by a conjugated microporous polymer. Nat. Commun. 4, 1960-1966 (2013).
Xia et al., Preparation of sulfur-doped microporous carbons for the storage of hydrogen and carbon dioxide. Carbon 50, 5543-5553 (2012).
Sankaran et al., The role of heteroatoms in carbon nanotubes for hydrogen storage. Carbon 44, 2816-2821 (2006).
Qajar et al., High pressure hydrogen adsorption apparatus: Design and error analysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 9123-9136 (2012).
Espinal et al., Measurement, standards, and data needs for CO2 capture materials: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 11960-11975 (2013).
Wang et al., Increasing selective CO2 adsorption on amine-grafted SBA-15 by increasing silanol density. J. Phys. Chem. 115, 21264-21272 (2011).
I et al., Comparative study of the excess versus absolute adsorption of CO2 on superactivated carbon for the near-critical region. Langmuir 19, 2683-2690 (2003).
Langer et al. Reversible CO2 fixation by iridium(I) complexes containing Me2PhP as ligand. Organometallics 29, 1642-1651 (2010).
Sevilla et al., Highly porous S-doped carbons. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 158, 318-323 (2012).
Zhang et al., Enhancement of CO2 adsorption and CO2/N2 selectivity on ZIF-8 via postsynthetic modification. AIChE J. 59, 2195-2206 (2013).
Lee et al., Preferential Occupation of CO2 Molecules in Hydroquinone Clathrates Formed from CO2/N2 Gas Mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 22647-22651 (2011).
Loring et al., In Situ Molecular Spectroscopic Evidence for CO2 Intercalation into Montmorillonite in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Langmuir 28, 7125-7128 (2012).
Comotti et al., Porous dipeptide crystals as selective CO2 adsorbents: experimental isotherms vs. grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations and MAS NMR spectroscopy. CrystEngComm 15, 1503-1507 (2013).
Bowers et al., In Situ 13C and 23Na Magic Angle Spinning NMR Investigation of Supercritical CO2 Incorporation in Smectite-Natural Organic Matter Composites. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 3564-3573 (2014).
Heuchel et al., “Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide and Methane and Their Mixtures on an Activated Carbon: Simulation and Experiment”, Langmuir, 1999,15, 8695-8705.
Fryxell et al., “Design and Synthesis of Selective Mesoporous Anion Traps”, Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 2148-2154.
Yoshitake et al.,“Adsorption of Chromate and Arsenate by Amino-Functionalized MCM-41 and SBA-1” Chem. Mater. 2002,14,4603-4610.
Xu et al., “Preparation and characterization of novel CO2 ‘molecular basket’ adsorbents based on polymer-modified mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-41”, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2003, 62, 29-45.
Caskey et al., “Dramatic Tuning of Carbon Dioxide Uptake via Metal Substitution in a Coordination Polymer with Cylindrical Pores”, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,130, 10870-10871.
McDonald et al., “Enhanced carbon dioxide capture upon incorporation of N,N-dimethylethylenediamine in the metal-organic framework CuBTTri” Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 2022-2028.
Lee et al., “Synthesis of new nanoporous carbon materials using nanostructured silica materials as templates”, J. Mater. Chem. 2004, 14, 478-486.
Ryoo et al., “Ordered Mesoporous Carbons”, Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 677-681.
Kyotani et al., “Control of pore structure in carbon”, Carbon 2000, 38, 269-286.
Choi et al., “Ordered nanoporous polymer-carbon composites”, Nature Mater. 2003, 2, 473-476.
Zhao et al., “Triblock Copolymer Syntheses of Mesoporous Silica with Periodic 50 to 300 Angstrom Pores”, Science 1998, 279, 548-552.
Joo et al., “Ordered nanoporous arrays of carbon supporting high dispersions of platinum nanoparticles”, Nature 2001, 412, 169-172.
Mello et al., “Amine-modified MCM-41 mesoporous silica for carbon dioxide capture” Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 2011, 143, 174-179.