Particulate matter (PM) emissions from turbocharged direct injection spark ignition engines using gasoline and gasoline-ethanol blends are an increasing concern. A key factor that produces this problem is poor mixing from directly injected fuel (fuel that is directly introduced into the engine cylinder as liquid). The particulate emissions problem is increased in turbocharged engines due to increase in the absolute pressure in the cylinder. The concern about particulate emissions relates to both the total mass of the particulates and the number of particulates. Meeting anticipated European requirements for reducing the number of particulates appears to be especially demanding.
Port and direct injection have complimentary advantages. Due to better mixing, reduced wall wetting and improved evaporation of the fuel, both particulate mass/km and number of particulates/km emissions from port injection, where the fuel is introduced in a region outside the cylinders, are typically less than one tenth those from direct injection (when the fuel is introduced as a liquid into the cylinder). On the other hand, direct injection provides better knock resistance due to greater evaporative cooling of in cylinder charge and thus allows operation at higher levels of torque for a given engine displacement and/or compression ratio. Direct injection can also be used to provide better control of fueling and to further increase efficiency by use of stratified operation to enable lean operation at low loads.
The present invention describes a fuel-management system for minimizing particulate emissions. The system optimizes the use of port fuel injection (PFI) in combination with direct injection (DI), particularly in cold start and other transient conditions.
An important aspect of using the combination of port and direct injection to reduce particulate emissions is the employment of control systems, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,146,568, to minimize the fraction of the fuel that is directly injected into the engine while also preventing knock as the torque is increased. Both closed loop control with a knock detector and open loop control with a look up table can be employed. These control systems can provide better mixing throughout a drive cycle with essentially no compromise in engine efficiency and performance. The engine can be operated with port fuel injection alone, direct injection alone or a combination of port and direct injection. The fraction of fuel that is port fuel injected can be controlled to prevent knock as a function of both torque and engine speed since the engine speed also affects the onset of knock.
In the present invention, the use of these control systems together with other control systems for increasing the effectiveness of port fuel injector use and for reducing particulate emissions from turbocharged direct injection engines is described. Particular attention is given to reducing particulate emissions that occur during cold start and transient conditions since a substantial fraction of the particulate emissions during a drive cycle occur at these times. Further optimization of the fuel management system for these conditions is important for reducing drive cycle emissions.
As described above, the present invention uses an engine control system to monitor and regulate the operation of the engine to both maximize engine performance and efficiency, and to minimize particulate emission. The engine control system may affect the fraction of fuel that is introduced using PFI and DI, based on engine conditions, particulate emissions and other factors.
Closed loop control, open loop control or a combination of open and closed loop may be used to optimize particulate emissions reduction while providing the desired amount of knock control. Various embodiments of these control systems are shown in the accompanying figures.
Using these inputs, the engine control unit 40 may regulate the ratio of the fuel that is injected through the port fuel injector 10 as compared to that directly injected into the cylinder 30, and other injection characteristics. For example, the engine control unit 40 may also adjust the start of injection, the end of injection, the injection rate. In the case of the direct injector 20, injection rate may be adjusted through management of the fuel rail pressure, for example, or through control of the pulse width for a system that uses pulse-width modulation. The engine control unit 40 may also control the valve timing, allowing for the injection of port fuel injection through an open inlet valve, where the PFI fuel is introduced into the cylinder as liquid droplets, instead of as a gas vaporized by the hot valves. All of these various actions may be referred to as “injector operation”.
These figures show the sensors 50, 60 can be employed to monitor engine conditions and/or engine performance. One or more of these types of sensors can be used in an embodiment. Additionally, these figures show various compensation techniques that are used to allow the use of an amount of port injected fuel that would otherwise cause knock. These compensation techniques include, but are not limited to valve timing, injector timing, upstream injectors, and spark timing. Although each figure shows the use of only one of these compensation techniques, it is noted that more than one compensation technique may be used in a single embodiment. For example, spark timing and valve timing may both be employed in some configurations. Therefore, the figures should not be construed as limiting the disclosure to those particular configurations. Rather, these figures simply show various components that may be used.
The above description discloses various compensation techniques, such as spark timing, and variable valve timing. However, other compensation techniques may also be used.
In addition to the use of variable valve timing, the use of on-demand cylinder deactivation can also be used in combination with two injectors. During transients at relatively low load, some of the cylinders can be deactivated. If the exhaust valves are not opened or only open partially or during a short time, during the following cycle, the high pressure, hot gases in the cylinder can be used to help vaporize the port fuel injected fuel in that same cylinder. When the inlet valve opens following the cycle with exhaust restricted, high pressure, heated air enters the manifold and helps vaporize the gasoline in the manifold and on the valves. The process can be repeated in the same cylinder, and the process can be arranged so that it occurs also, in a staggered manner, at other cylinders.
In the same manner, it would be possible to have a cycle with restricted inlet valve opening, with limited ingestion of port fuel, that goes through compression, power stroke and exhaust cycle without firing the spark and without opening inlet or exhaust valves. In the next intake valve opening, the air leaving the cylinder is hot and can vaporize the fuel in the valve or the manifold. If done in all cylinders, the engine actually fires only on about half the cycles. Alternatively, in the following cycle, direct injection can be used to inject into a hot cylinder charge, facilitating droplet evaporation and minimizing potential wall wetting and production of particulate matter.
Another compensation technique that may be used is as follows. It may be possible to adjust the pressure of the direct injected fuel, such as by adjusting the pressure in the common fuel rail. This serves to minimize the impingement on the combustion chamber walls (cylinder walls, piston and valves), especially at transient conditions or at cold start. If the pressure is difficult to manage, a strategy that can be used to avoid the injection of very high speed droplets that will wet the wall is to use PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) of the direct injector. Injectors have transients during turning on and turning off that can be used to modify the conditions of injection of the fuel, even at constant rail fuel pressure. Through short pulses allowed by PWM fuel control, it would be possible to inject short sprays of fuel that modify the jets interaction with the gas in the cylinder, for example, by preventing them from reaching the far wall. Although atomization may not be as good, the production of particulate matter could be reduced by the use of multiple pulses, and in particular, short pulses that are dominated by transient behavior of the injector. Because of the short duration of the times where PM is produced, the injectors can be prevented from overheating due to the large number of pulses required that heat the solenoid valve, the piezoelectric components or other components from the direct fuel injector.
Another compensation technique includes open-valve port fuel injection. The fueling system may use port fuel injection, when the intake valve is open, as an additional means for reducing particulates. Port fuel injection with the intake valve open enables some of the fuel to enter the cylinder in the liquid form and provide some vaporization cooling. This would provide knock suppression from charge cooling that could replace that which is typically provided by direct injection. Although less knock suppression by charge cooling is obtained for a given amount of fuel, the net result could be less particulate formation, especially during transients. The same port fuel injector could be used for both conventional port fueling injection with the intake valve closed and for open-valve port fuel injection where increased knock resistance could be provided.
In addition to information that is used to determine how much port fuel injection can be used without encountering knock, the fuel management system may also employ additional information and requirements to control the relative amounts of fuel that are port and directly injected. This may include information related to cold start, such as engine temperature, and information that determines when stratified injection would be used. Additional information for controlling of the ratio of directly injected fuel to port injected fuel could be provided by sensors that determine particulate mass and number, as described above.
The control system uses some or all of this information in conjunction with the requirement to avoid knock to determine the ratio of port fuel injection to direct injection that is used at a given value of torque and speed. The ratios may be different depending on whether the primary objective is reduction of engine particulate mass or engine particulate number. It would also be possible to trade-off particulate matter and hydrocarbon emissions. In addition to the combustion information, information on the nature of the fuel can be used to adjust the ratio of the direct injected and port injected fuels. If the fuel has substantial content of saturated hydrocarbons or oxygenates (alcohols), the ratio of direct injected to port fuel injected fuel can be adjusted to provide best emissions. The nature of the fuel can be determined by the past history of the vehicle. For example, when the fuel contains a substantial fraction of alcohols, direct injection of the fuel can be used to decrease simultaneously hydrocarbon emissions and particulate emissions, compared to the case with port fuel injection of the same fuel, which produces little particulate matter but substantial hydrocarbon vapor during cold start and warm restart.
In addition, as described above, closed loop control using measurements of particulate mass and number can be employed. The fuel management system can control the fraction of fuel that is introduced by port fuel injection so to minimize particulate mass or number or some combination of the two.
The parameters that are inputs to the control system can include engine temperature; time after ignition; rate of change of engine fueling; rate of change of engine speed; rate of change of torque, engine speed and engine torque; fuel composition. The control system could also take into account the use or non-use of stratified direct injection.
These various embodiments, such as shown in
For example, when the engine is operated during cold start at a value of torque where a substantial amount of directly injected fuel would otherwise be needed to prevent knock, one or more compensation techniques may be introduced to reduce the relative amount of directly injected fuel without resulting in knock.
One such compensation technique is spark retard. Increased spark retard results in decreased efficiency. However, operation with reduced fuel efficiency during cold start and other transients, for most driving cycles, does not substantially affect the overall fuel efficiency. Moreover, the lower efficiency of engine operation during the short cold start transient can have the beneficial effect of increasing the rate of warm-up of engine and aftertreatment components.
During cold start, particulate control can be achieved through similar means used to minimize the production of hydrocarbons that would result in fast engine and catalyst warm-up. Thus, spark retard beyond what is required to control knock, valve timing adjustment to maximize pressure in the cylinder and residuals, and possible injection of a small fraction of the fuel through the direct injector can be used to minimize the formation of particulates during the cold start. Either the timing of the inlet valve, the exhaust valve or both can be adjusted by the operating system in order to minimize the production of particulates. The effect can be adjustment modification of the pressure, composition or flow dynamics in the cylinders. In the case of the flow dynamics, the flow can be modified from that during steady state conditions (either tumble or swirl or quiescent) so that the resulting flow during the transient minimizes wall wetting and production of particulates. In the case of multiple inlet valves or multiple exhaust valves, the timing of each valve may be adjusted independently in order to modify the flow in cylinder.
Another control feature for reducing particulate emissions during cold start is to reduce the amount of direct injection that is used in order to minimize hydrocarbon vapor emissions. The fueling of the engine at the earliest time in the cold start period could be by direct injection alone or mainly by direct injection and the relative amount of fueling by port fuel injection could increased as a function of time as the engine and catalyst warm up. Information on the fuel composition (mostly alcohol content) can be used to adjust the amount of directly injected fuel.
The increased role of port injection as a function of time would be determined by the tradeoff between the benefit of using direct injection for better fuel control through precise injection of the amount of the fuel that is needed for near stoichiometric combustion and the detriment of the greater larger inhomogeneity of the air fuel mixture. Port fuel injection results in improved mixture uniformity while at the same time less precise control of the fuel injection, as the fuel transport occurs through the film established near the inlet valve or valves. The relative amounts of port fuel and direct fuel injection would be optimized as a function of time after the fuel has been ignited so as to minimize particulate emissions. This optimization could be facilitated by allowing a greater relative amount of port fuel injection, when needed, by increasing spark retard.
The use of multiple points and forms of fuel introduction into the cylinder is useful during these times. For example, during cold start operation, the control system could call for direct injection for a few cycles during the startup, for precise metering of the fuel, followed by increased use of port fuel that could reduce the particulate emissions. Multiple injections from the direct injectors could be used to minimize the production of particulates.
Employment of an optimized combination of port fuel injection and direct injection during engine shutdown could also be employed. Operation for the few cycles after engine shutdown without use of port injection could reduce the film at the valves and reduces the amount of fuel in the puddle near the inlet valves for the subsequent start.
The control approach described above could also be applied to certain transient conditions during the rest of the drive cycle.
This strategy can also be used for transient operation in vehicles with directly injected spark ignition engines that use engine shutdown and restart for improved efficiency; this stop-start operation is used during vehicle deceleration and idle to improve efficiency by not using the engine when it operates very inefficiently. The strategy can also be used for vehicles with full hybrid powertrains.
In addition to use at cold start and engine shutdown, the optimized port fuel injection—direct injection system discussed above can be useful for operation with certain transients where there is rapid variation in engine speed or torque. This can be especially important at high engine speeds. At high engine speeds, there are issues with mixture formation because of the shortened times, although there is increased turbulence in the cylinders. Direct injection should be minimized because mixture formation issues resulting in particulate emissions. However, since operation at high speed usually is associated with increased temperatures, this need could be reduced by increased particulate matter oxidation occur under these conditions.
While direct injection may be useful for controlling hydrocarbon vapor emissions during cold start and other transients, these emissions can be controlled with conventional means. In contrast, particulate emissions, if not sufficiently reduced by fuel management, could require use of a gasoline particulate filter (GPF), which can result in significant additional complexity and cost. Thus, it may be attractive for the control systems to change the relative amounts of port and direct injected fuel so as to reduce particulate emissions at the expense of more hydrocarbon emissions.
Progress in fueling system technology can make it possible to control the fuel injected in each cylinder. Thus, instead of commanding all the injectors to introduce the same amount of fuel, and same injector timing and other conditions, the fuel injection conditions for each cylinder could be controlled separately. It is known that there are variations of performance of different cylinders, and the computers can now control each cylinder separately. It may be possible, for example, to run some cylinders at different stoichiometries than others, with an overall correct stoichiometry of the air/fuel mixture. It may also be possible during transients, such as cold start or hard acceleration, to change temporarily the overall stoichiometry.
Another option is to use different fuels during cold startup and transients, if available on board. Fuels that can be easily evaporated (fuels that have high vapor pressure, such as alcohols, low heat of evaporation or fuels with low evaporation temperature, or fuels with mostly saturated carbon bonds) can be used to minimize particulate production. The fuel that can be easily evaporated or fuel that have low propensity for making soot (such as methanol or ethanol) can be used during these conditions to minimize particulate matter. Although methanol and ethanol have relatively high heat of vaporization, they have relatively low propensity for making soot, and they have high vapor pressure. The fuels that can be easily evaporated, or the fuel that has low propensity for making soot can be either provided through external means to a separate container (i.e., external fill) or can be separated on-board from a single fuel that is a mixture of gasoline and alcohol and stored in a separate container. Since only a small amount of fuel is required, the size of the tank and/or the capacity of the onboard separating system can be relatively small.
The ratio of the amount of fuel that is port fuel injected to the fuel that is directly injected can be varied according to the amount of alcohol (ethanol or methanol), if any, that is mixed in with the gasoline. The use of alcohol can reduce particulate mass and number and thus reduce the relative amount of port fuel injection that is needed to reduce particulate emissions. The relative amount of port fuel injection can be decreased when alcohol is mixed with gasoline or the relative amount of alcohol in a mixture with gasoline is increased.
The embodiments that have been described can also be utilized with a supercharged engine or with a direct injection engine that does not use pressure boosting. They can also be used with engines that are operated with a substantially stoichiometric fuel air ratio with or without EGR; and with engines operated with either rich or lean fuel air mixtures.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/774,620 filed Jan. 28, 2020, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/959,341 filed Apr. 23, 2018 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,683,816 issued Jun. 16, 2020), which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/214,533 filed Jul. 20, 2016 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,976,496 issued May 22, 2018), which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/391,906 filed Oct. 10, 2014 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,435,288 issued Sep. 6, 2016), which is a 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2013/073334 filed Dec. 5, 2013, which claims priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/734,438, filed Dec. 7, 2012, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5927238 | Watson | Jul 1999 | A |
5960755 | Diggs et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6305169 | Mallof | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6453664 | Ishii et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6637386 | Murata et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6805095 | Sun et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7089908 | Fujieda et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7225787 | Bromberg et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7303144 | Alyanak | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7370610 | Ashford et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7444987 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7546834 | Ulrey et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7640914 | Lewis et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7640915 | Cohn et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7647916 | Leone et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7690341 | Abe et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7726289 | Murase et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740004 | Cohn et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7762233 | Cohn et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765053 | Gwidt et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7770560 | Ulrey et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7841316 | Inoue | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841325 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7890241 | Russell | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7933713 | Leone | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7957888 | Leone et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7971572 | Cohn et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8037850 | Pursifull et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8069839 | Cohn et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8099949 | Leone et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8100107 | Bidner et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8146568 | Cohn et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165780 | Russell | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8171915 | Cohn et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8206470 | Jacobson | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8267074 | Leone et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8275538 | Sumilla et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8276565 | Cohn et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8302580 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8316809 | Patterson et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8353269 | Kasseris et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8397701 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8417436 | Russell | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8459007 | Maier et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8468983 | Cohn et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8522746 | Cohn et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8578913 | Yoshioka et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8707913 | Cohn et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8733321 | Cohn et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8763367 | Leone et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8857410 | Cohn et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8875680 | Yoshioka | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8944026 | Tobergte et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9255519 | Cohn et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9382857 | Glugla et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9435288 | Cohn et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9441570 | Cohn et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9512798 | Zeng et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9556784 | Leone | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9631573 | Sumilla et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9695784 | Cohn et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9708965 | Bromberg et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9739213 | Kemmerling et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9810166 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9840980 | Cohn et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9874168 | Thomas et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9945297 | Tsuyuki et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9976496 | Cohn et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10138826 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10221783 | Bromberg et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10227945 | Bromberg et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10288005 | Cohn et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10344689 | Cohn et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10683816 | Cohn et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10774759 | Cohn et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
20010003280 | Yang | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20040154583 | Maemura | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163379 | Pott et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050166891 | Fukasawa | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060180121 | Wickman et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070012295 | Maemura et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070023012 | Maemura et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070068485 | Hilditch | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070089697 | Hara et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080022958 | Sunki et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090088945 | Yi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090282810 | Leone et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299607 | Bauer | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100049420 | Smith et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100251996 | Akimoto | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110023467 | Kong et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110162620 | Bidner et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110203258 | Makartchouk et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110265758 | Glugla et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301827 | Toyohara et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320108 | Morinaga et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120024262 | Leone | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120102925 | Leone et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120107203 | Arnold et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20140100760 | Yi et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140172275 | Sumilla et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140297162 | Sumilla et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140331653 | Irisawa | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150046068 | Hosaka et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150167576 | Glugla et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150240737 | Sumilla et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150285179 | Cohn et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150337744 | Matsuda et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150369162 | Cohn et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150377175 | Mano et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160115876 | Hoshi | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160115884 | VanDerWege et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160237943 | Zhang | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160319764 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160326971 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160356228 | Liu et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170145944 | Moreno | May 2017 | A1 |
20170145946 | Korenaga | May 2017 | A1 |
20170211501 | Tachibana et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170234257 | Sellnau et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170363035 | Cohn et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180016996 | Bernhard et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180023500 | Hollar et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180058364 | Kassai et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180066598 | Dusa et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180128145 | Uhrich et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180230928 | Kitazume et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180238245 | Cohn et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180306106 | Glugla | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180328307 | Kurtz et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190136790 | Bromberg et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190145341 | Cohn et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190153968 | Bromberg et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190309697 | Cohn et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200003135 | Nagasaki et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200158035 | Cohn et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101228342 | Jul 2008 | CN |
102345532 | Feb 2012 | CN |
102400802 | Apr 2012 | CN |
104968913 | Oct 2015 | CN |
102015201191 | Jul 2016 | DE |
2006-250058 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2009-299538 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2010-255507 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2012021990 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2013080371 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2014089304 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 16, 2014 in corresponding PCT application No. PCT/US2013/073334. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 4, 2015 in co-pending PCT application No. PCT/US2015/047857. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 11, 2017 in co-pending PCT application No. PCT/US2017/053179. |
Chinese communication, with English translation, dated Feb. 4, 2017 in corresponding Chinese patent application No. 201380072556.5. |
Chinese communication, with English translation, dated Sep. 30, 2018 in co-pending Chinese patent application No. 201580059544.8. |
European communication dated Apr. 9, 2018 in co-pending European patent application No. 15838005.5. |
European communication dated Sep. 12, 2019 in co-pending European patent application No. 15838005.5. |
Office action dated Nov. 20, 2019 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/242,185. |
Office action dated Jan. 9, 2020 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/241,161. |
Heiduk et al., “The New 1.8L TFSI Engine from Audi Part 2: Mixture Formation, Combustion Method and Turbocharging”, Industry Gasoline Engines, vol. 72, pp. 58-64, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200370483 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61734438 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16774620 | Jan 2020 | US |
Child | 16988917 | US | |
Parent | 15959341 | Apr 2018 | US |
Child | 16774620 | US | |
Parent | 15214533 | Jul 2016 | US |
Child | 15959341 | US | |
Parent | 14391906 | US | |
Child | 15214533 | US |