Port router

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6324613
  • Patent Number
    6,324,613
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 4, 2000
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 27, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
An apparatus and method which provide increased data flow through a compute platform by optimizing data flow between an external device and the internal circuitry without the need for user intervention. A port router is provided which includes a controller switch, a port switch, and one or more connections between the controller switch and the port switch. The controller switch, the port switch and the one or more connections are adapted to provide dynamic re-routing of connections between the port switch inputs and the controller switch outputs. A method is also provided for dynamically routing ports to internal circuitry of a compute platform. The method includes providing a configurable switching circuit, querying the configurable switching circuit to determine a default topology, computing an optimized topology upon the occurrence of a change of the data flow through the configurable switching circuit, suspending operation and effecting re-routing between the interface ports and the internal circuitry based on the optimized topology, and resuming IO operations through the configurable switching circuit. The method and apparatus may be applied to personal computer systems, information appliances, set-top boxes, cable modems, game consoles, smart appliances, handheld computers, palm-sized computers, embedded control systems, workstations, servers and the like.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to semi-conductor devices and, more particularly, to port routers.




Existing compute platforms feature mechanisms for attaching devices to the computer and performing input/output (IO) between the compute platform and the ports where an external device would be connections between ports and an IO controller resident inside the computer platform. This technique of providing a routing mechanism that is fixed limits the ability for a system to adapt to changing requirements such as the addition of new devices or the introduction of devices of devices which require the full capacity of a single IO controller.




There are increasing circumstances in which multiple IO controllers will be available within a single device or system. Platforms such as information appliances, set-top boxes, cable modems, game consoles, smart appliances, handheld computers, palm-sized computers, embedded control systems, workstations and servers, etc., will contain multiple IO controllers. Currently available techniques do not include any mechanism for the dynamic re-routing between ports and IO controllers. It is therefore desirable to be able to dynamically change the routing when new devices are added or when devices requiring the full capacity of a single IO controller are introduced. A need exists for a mechanism for the dynamic connection of the physical connections (ports) to the IO controller(s) resident inside the compute platform.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In one aspect of the invention a port router is provided comprising a controller switch, a port switch, and one or more connections between the controller switch and the port switch. The controller switch, the port switch and the one or more connections are adapted to provide dynamic re-routing of connections between the port switch inputs and the controller switch outputs.




In another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for dynamically routing ports to internal circuitry of a computer platform. The method comprises providing a configurable switching circuit, querying the configurable switching circuit to determine a default topology, computing an optimized topology upon the occurrence of a change of the data flow through the configurable switching circuit, suspending operation and effecting re-routing between the interface ports and the internal circuitry based on the optimized topology, and resuming IO operations through the configurable switching circuit.




The invention may be used in a personal computer system, but can also be applied to other types of computer platforms, including but not limited to information appliances, set-top boxes, cable modems, game consoled, smart appliances, handheld, computers, palm-sized computers, embedded control system, workstations, servers and the like.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a block diagram of one embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 2

is a block diagram of another embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 3

is a block diagram of another embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 4

is a block diagram of another embodiment of the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The invention provides a configurable switching circuit to permit the dynamic formation and re-routing of the connection(s) between a port and internal circuitry. In one embodiment, the invention provides an apparatus for the dynamic routing between an individual or group of physical connections (ports) to one or more of the IO controllers resident inside the compute platform. One advantage of the invention is the ability to adapt to a change in the number or requirements of IO devices (which cause a change in the optimal data flow topology), by re-routing ports to permit a new topology to be established. This ability to provide adaptive routing enables a system or device to dedicate bandwidth resources for devices that cannot operate in a contentious environment. Another advantage of the invention includes the ability to use the port router as a blocking mechanism to permit the isolation of a particular IO port from the system. This is particularly useful where a device is misbehaving or causing the system to malfunction.




IO controllers provide the mechanism for system software to transmit and receive data. Ports provide the attachment mechanism for devices to be connected to a compute system. Next generation computer platforms will be available with multiple IO controllers within a single device or system. Conventional hard wired routings mechanisms limit the ability of a system to adapt to changing requirements of the system. The present invention provides a routing mechanism that avoids these limitations, and allows the dynamic routing and re-routing when new devices are added to the system or when devices requiring the full capacity of a single IO controller are introduced. The invention further provides a mechanism for dynamic load balancing of the data, to and from devices, among multiple IO controllers that may be present in a compute platform.




The invention may be used in a personal computer system, but can also be applied to other types of computer platforms, including but limited to information appliances, set-top boxes, cable modems, game consoles, smart appliances, handheld computers, palm-sized computers, embedded control systems, workstations, servers and the like.




The representations of

FIGS. 1-4

are for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the possible implementations of the invention. In the illustrative examples of selected embodiments of the invention,

FIGS. 1-4

, the port router


100


is shown supporting four ports and up to four IO controllers. The number of ports and IO controllers present in a particular system or application may vary based on system requirements. In addition, it should be understood that the “inputs” and “outputs” described herein all refer to connections which can handle bi-directional data flow (commonly referred to as “input/outputs”).





FIG. 1

is a block diagram illustrating one embodiments of the invention. The port router


100


comprises a controller switch


120


, a port switch


140


and connection(s)


200


comprises a hud element


201


. Port router


100


connects port A-D to a single controller, Controller A. The controller switch


120


, the port switch


140


and the connection(s)


200


each have specific input and output capabilities. The port switch


140


has fixed inputs,


141


-


144


, each connected to an interface port. The port switch


140


has a total number of outputs to for Hub element


201


. The Hub element(s) preferably comply with the requirements of the IO interface for a given application. Each Hub element combines its inputs and provides a single output that is input in the controller switch


120


. Some IO interfaces refers to the Hub Element


201


as a brigde, a concentrator or a physical interface. Multiple Hub elements may be used to connect the port switch


140


to the controller switch


120


.




The controller switch


120


preferably has one input for each connection to a Hub element and one input for each direct connection (shown in

FIGS. 2-4

) to the port switch


140


. The outputs from the controller switch


120


are fixed to match the number of controllers that are necessary or available in a given application. A shown in

FIG. 1

, the controller switch has one input


121


connected to Hub element


201


, and one output


127


connected to Controller A.





FIG. 2

illustrates the addition of a new device to Port D, where the bandwidth capacity for Controller A reaches a threshold. Controller B is added to the system and the connection of Port D through Hub element


201


is removed and a direct connection


202


is added. Upon insertion of a device into Port D, the device is detected and it's capacity requirements are reported. This capacity is calculated to be larger than the effective capacity of Controller A. A new controller B is added to the system, and the port router


100


is reconfigured to effect the connection of Ports A, B and C to Controller A and Port D only to Controller B. The connection for Port D to the hub element


201


is removed and a new direct connection


202


is created between the port switch


140


and the controller switch


120


. The connection to Controller B is created from controller switch output


128


. All data flow to and from Port D and the new device flows through this new connection from the port switch output


149


to the controller switch input


122


. All data flow from Ports A, B and C continues to have the same routing from port switch outputs


145


,


146


and


147


to hub element


201


. In this configuration the data flow from Ports A, B and C are combined and delivered to the controller switch input


121


.





FIG. 3

illustrates the addition of another device connected to interface Port C, the addition of Controller C, the removal of a Hub element


201


connection and the addition of another direct connection


203


. Upon insertion of a device into Port C, the device is detected and it's capacity requirements are reported. The capacity is calculated to require a dedicated controller. Controller C is created and added to the system. The port router


100


is reconfigured to effect the connection of Port A and Port B to Controller A, Port C to Controller C and Port D to Controller B. The connection for Port C to the hub element


201


is removed and a new direct connection


203


is created between the port switch


140


and the controller switch


120


. The connection to Controller C is created from controller switch output


129


. All data flow to and from Port C and the newest device flows through this new connection from the port switch output


150


to the controller switch input


123


. Data flows from Ports A and B continue to have the same routing from port switch outputs


145


and


146


to the hub element


201


. The data flow from Port D continues from Port switch output


150


through connection


203


to controller switch input


123


to Controller B through controller switch output


128


. In this configuration data flow from ports A and B are combined in hub element


201


and delivered to the controller switch input


121


.





FIG. 4

illustrates the total number of connections for a Four port and Four controller port router configuration. All the potential connections are shown but as illustrated in

FIGS. 1-3

, only certain connections are active depending on the desired topology. The topology is preferably optimized for efficient data flow. The port switch


140


will preferably have a single input for each Port that is present (i.e. 4 ports require 4 inputs, 5 ports would require 5 inputs, etc.). The port switch


140


has four output connection


149


-


152


, one for each port, for direct connections to the controller switch


120


, these are represented as connections


202


,


203


,


204


and


205


. The number of hub elements may vary, in the illustration in

FIG. 4

there are 2. In the illustrative example of

FIG. 4

, each hub element has exactly one output and one input for each port. Hub element


201


is connected to the port switch outputs


145148


and to controller switch input


121


. Hub element


206


is connected to the port switch outputs


153


-


156


and controller port input


126


. The controller switch will have one output for each controller that may be present in the system. The number of controllers in the system may vary. Preferably, the number of controllers is not more than the number of Ports supported, in our illustration


4


. Controller switch outputs


127


-


130


are connected to the inputs for each controller A-D.




In operation, the port switch


100


will preferably start in a default state with certain port inputs connected to a desired Controller. The example of

FIG. 1

shows a system having a default state with four Ports, two devices connected to Ports A and B, one Hub Element


201


, and one Controller A. Through a set of hardware registers (not shown) preferably resident in the port router


100


, software operating in the system can query the port router


100


and discover the default topology. The system software can effect a change in routing of signals between any combination of Ports and Controllers by programming values in the hardware registers. During operation an event occurs. An event may be a new device being removed or inserted into a Port. This event triggers the software to examine the requirements of the new device. These requirements may include the device's data capacity requirements (bandwidth and latency) and its data style (asynchronous, isochronous, burst, stream). The new requirements are combined with the current set of requirements from devices already installed, and a new preferably optimized topology for routing the ports is computed. Preferably, the system software causes operations to suspend and effect the re-routing between the Ports and IO Controller(s). The system software then resumes IO operations and the optimized routing becomes the new routing until a new event occurs.




In another embodiment of the invention the port router


100


preferably contains embedded software which allows routing and re-routing to be effected internally without requiring the intervention of system software. This provides the ability for self-monitoring and dynamic load balancing based on the flow of data through the port router


100


.




Thus, the port router according to one embodiment of the invention comprises a controller switch


120


having one or more inputs and one or more outputs, a port switch


140


having one or more inputs and one or more outputs, and one or more connections


200


between the controller switch


120


and the port switch


140


. The controller switch


120


, the port switch


140


and the one or more connections


200


are adapted to provide dynamic re-routing of connections between the port switch inputs and the controller switch outputs.




The controller switch


120


, the port switch


140


and the one or more connections


200


may be dynamically configured to provide dynamic load balancing based on variable load requirements. The one or more connections


200


preferably comprise one or more hub elements


201


,


206


and optionally one or more direct connections between the controller switch


120


and the port switch


140


. The one or more hub elements


201


,


206


are preferably adapted to receive one or more of the outputs from the port switch


140


and provide one input to the controller switch


120


. The port switch inputs are preferably each connected to an interface port, and the port switch


140


is preferably adapted to route one or more interface ports to one or more of the port switch outputs. The controller switch


120


may further comprise one input for each direct connection to the port switch


140


and one input for each connection to the one or more hub elements


201


,


206


. Each of the one or more outputs from the controller switch


120


is preferably connected to a corresponding controller. The controller switch


120


and the port switch


140


each preferably comprise a crossbar switch.




In another aspect, the invention is an integrated circuit comprising a port switch


140


having one or more inputs each connected to one or more corresponding interface ports, a controller switch


120


, and one or more connections


200


between the port switch


140


and the controller switch


120


. The controller switch


120


, the port switch


140


and the one or more connections


200


cooperatively provide a configurable switch adapted to dynamically re-route connections between the one or more interface ports and internal circuitry of a compute device.




The one or more connections


200


preferably comprise one or more hub elements and optionally one or more direct connections between the controller switch


120


and the port switch


140


.




In another aspect, the invention is a method for dynamically routing ports to internal circuitry of a compute platform comprising, providing a configurable switching circuit, querying the configurable switching circuit to determine a default topology, computing an optimized topology upon the occurrence of a change of the data flow through the configurable switching circuit, suspending operation and effecting re-routing between the interface ports and the internal circuitry based on the optimized topology, and resuming IO operations through the configurable switching circuit.




The optimized topology preferably provides dynamic load balancing based on the flow of data through the configurable switching circuit. The change of the data flow through said configurable switching circuit may include a device being operatively connected to or disconnected from the port switch inputs or interface Port.




Although the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments and accompanying drawings, it can be readily understood that the invention is not restricted to such embodiments and that various changes and modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A port router comprising:a dynamic controller switch having one or more inputs and one or more outputs; a static port switch having one or more inputs and one or more outputs; and one or more connections between said controller switch and said port switch; wherein said controller switch, said port switch and said one or more connections are adapted to provide dynamic re-routing of connections between said port switch inputs and said controller switch outputs.
  • 2. The port router of claim 1, wherein said controller switch, said port switch and said one or more connections may be dynamically configured to provide dynamic load balancing based on variable load requirements.
  • 3. The port router of claim 1, wherein said one or more connections comprise one or more hub elements and optionally one or more direct connections between said controller switch and said port switch.
  • 4. The port router of claim 3, wherein said one or more hub elements are adapted to receive one or more of said outputs from said port switch and provide one input to said controller switch.
  • 5. The port router of claim 1, wherein said port switch inputs are each connected to an interface port, and wherein said port switch is adapted to route one or more interface ports to one or more of said port switch outputs.
  • 6. The port router of claim 3, wherein said controller switch further comprises one input for each direct connection to said port switch and one input for each connection to said one or more hub elements.
  • 7. The port router of claim 1, wherein each of said one or more outputs from said controller switch is connected to a corresponding controller.
  • 8. The port router of claim 1, wherein said controller switch and said port switch each comprise a crossbar switch.
  • 9. An integrated circuit comprising:a static port switch having one or more inputs each connected to one or more corresponding interface ports; a dynamic controller switch; and one or more connections between said port switch and said controller switch; wherein said controller switch, said port switch and said one or more connections cooperatively provide a configurable switch adapted to dynamically re-route connections between said one or more interface ports and internal circuitry of a compute device.
  • 10. The integrated circuit of claim 9, wherein said one or more connections comprise one or more hub elements and optionally one or more direct connections between said controller switch and said port switch.
Parent Case Info

This application is related to pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/447/591 for “APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY RECONFIGURING AN IO DEVICE” by Aguilar et. al. filed Jan. 4, 2000, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 60/114,771 filed Jan. 5, 1999, Ser. No. 60/114,772 filed Jan. 5, 1999 and Ser. No. 60/114,767, filed Jan. 6, 1999 which are also incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (10)
Number Name Date Kind
3581286 Beausoleil May 1971
5107489 Brown et al. Apr 1992
5423006 Brown et al. Jun 1995
5436893 Barnett Jul 1995
5495475 Franaszek et al. Feb 1996
5530813 Paulsen et al. Jun 1996
5553287 Bailey et al. Sep 1996
5581709 Ito et al. Dec 1996
6035366 Teich Mar 2000
6128750 Espy et al. Oct 2000
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
A11175453 Dec 1997 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Kumar V.P. et al: “Augmented Shuffle-Exchange Multistate Interconnection Networks” Computer, US, IEEE Computer Society, Long Beach CA US, vol.20, No. 6, Jun. 1, 1987, pp. 30-40.
Rana D et al: “An Easily Reconfigurable, Circuit Switched Connection Network” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, US, New York, IEEE, vol. Conf. 21 Jun. 7, 1988, pp. 237-250.
Sying-Jyan Wang: “Load-Balancing in Multstage Interconnection Networks Under Multiple-Pass Routing” Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, US, Academic Press, Duluth, MN, vol. 36, No. 2, Aug. 1, 1996, pp. 189-194.
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
60/114771 Jan 1999 US
60/114772 Jan 1999 US
60/114767 Jan 1999 US