The present invention relates to a device that prevents the opening of inwardly swinging doors so that intruders cannot access a room. More specifically, the invention relates to a portable device which has the capability of leveraging the forces applied against it to increase its resistance and prevent a breach.
In an emergency, there is little time, if any, to ascertain the nature of a threat. For example, when hostile parties forcefully attempt to gain entry to a room, protecting those at risk becomes a top priority. As a security measure, those at risk should shut doors to prevent potential threats from entry. However, due to ensuing panic, unfamiliarity of surroundings, or because those stranded in rooms seek cover, the opportunity to properly seal an entrance may not exist. Even correctly shut doors may not have locking mechanisms to remain closed. Further, intruders can access a locked door with keys or by forced entry. Violent open-and-close movements, repeated ramming forces, and swift, powerful strikes are all ways threatening parties can gain access to a room with an inwardly swinging door regardless of its locking mechanisms.
The stronger the force used to breach a room, the likelier a typical anti-breach tool will fail. Most tools known in the art become less effective as the force applied against them increases. Conventional ways of preventing a door from inwardly opening involve cumbersome tools and devices that often snap, break, slip, and/or slide when a sufficient force is applied against them. Usually anchored underneath a doorknob, these tools extend to the ground at some point in front of the door. Constant back-and-forth jerking motions can easily jostle them loose. Without proper anchoring into the door the tool has a greater chance to freely slide away and fall off the door.
Fixing the tool to the door by welding or with hardware may circumvent these problems. However, these tools are impractical for a number of reasons, as they: are not transportable; are not cost effective; permanently leave holes and other structural flaws in doors; and if they have not yet been installed at the time of an emergency, they cannot be easily or quickly attached.
Other anti-breach devices known in the art contain complex mechanical assemblies involving gears and/or chains. If one part in the assembly fails then the entire device becomes useless. A threatening party who violently and repeatedly pushes against a door can easily loosen a chain or dislodge a gear. Additional devices in the art utilize sophisticated electronic components. Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that electronic anti-breach devices will have the necessary electricity to operate in an emergency. Threatening parties can easily cut power sources to rooms, and, for various reasons, emergency responders may need to cut power, thus inadvertently enabling breach conditions.
If those at risk need to evacuate, permanently fixed tools must stay behind, leaving subsequently encountered doors unprotected. Effective anti-breach tools must travel with those at risk to guard against the possibility of unlocked doors. Prohibitively heavy or cumbersome tools cannot travel with those at risk even if they do not require permanent anchoring. Many of the known tools in the art having numerous parts may weigh too much to easily be carried from room to room in an emergency.
Therefore, there is a need in the art for a portable access prevention device that does not snap, break, slip, and/or slide when a force is applied against it, becomes more resistant to an opposing force as that opposing force increases, is easily transportable, is cost effective, and does not require electricity or intricate mechanical assemblies.
In order to solve the need in the art for a portable access prevention device that does not snap, break, slip, and/or slide when a force is applied against it, becomes more resistant to an opposing force as that opposing force increases, is easily transportable, is cost effective, and does not require electricity or intricate mechanical assemblies, the present invention has been devised.
The present invention is a portable access prevention device for use in preventing the opening of inwardly swinging doors. The present device functions by leveraging the force used to open a door back against the door. The device does not require electronics or complicated mechanical assemblies to operate. Whereas many devices known in the art fail when faced with a powerful enough force, the present device's effectiveness (i.e. resistance) increases as the force against the door becomes stronger. This serves as an object of the invention: the present invention leverages the force used to open the door as the means of preventing entry. Since the device leverages opening force, the greater the force applied against the door to open the door, the more resistant the device becomes.
The device includes a series of interrelated structural elements, all composed of durable materials adapted to resist strong mechanical stresses, strains, and forces. These elements are substantially hollow to reduce the overall weight of the device without compromising strength. The base of the device is a wedge element having a tapered toe at its front and a heel at its back. A sloped top starts at the top of the wedge and terminates at the toe. This shape helps drive the wedge element under the door when the device is in use. Each time an intruder attempts to force the door open the device leverages that force to drive the wedge further under the door. Therefore, the wedge provides resistance by jamming the bottom of the door into the sloped surface more and more as the intruder's force increases. If the wedge can travel no further under the door, the device rocks backwardly with the motion of the force, and anchoring elements located under the wedge dig into the ground.
Another object of the invention is to provide fast and easy installation. When users involved in an emergency need to quickly seal entrances, the present invention simply needs to be placed against the door, have the toe of the base wedge element inserted under the door, and have its contact means rotated into place against the door. In some embodiments, users can kick the kickplate located on top of the wedge to facilitate installation. The device requires no hardware or tools for installation. The user need not worry about charging batteries or finding a power source to engage the device. The contact means may include the faceplate and support brace configuration shown in
Yet another object of the invention is its capability for easy transport and storage. The device takes up little space, especially when not in use, as the contact means folds when disengaged from the door. The device fits in small crawl spaces, underneath furniture, and in closets. Users can pick up the device whenever they need it and easily transport it from storage to the door. If users exit a room and need to take the device with them, they simply disengage the contact means, pull the toe out from under the door, and carry it with them. Since the device does not require permanent anchoring, and the generally hollow structural components are not prohibitively heavy, the present invention is easily portable. Further, when facing a crisis, users can easily grasp the device, place it in front of the door, and engage it without having to drag an unwieldy tool across the room.
The following description best describes the present invention's functionality: a user inside a room places the device on the ground and facing an inwardly swinging door. In this context, “facing” the door means having the tapered toe of the wedge element pointed toward the door. Also, in this context and throughout all embodiments of the invention, “ground” refers to exterior and interior surfaces, including floors, as well as any surface below the path of an inwardly swinging door. Preferably, the user inserts the wedge element toe first into the gap between the underside of the door and ground as far as possible. However, the device may still function if the toe is substantially close to the bottom of the door and not yet underneath it, provided the base of the door catches the sloped surface of the wedge element.
The user then swings the contact means about its pivotal attachment with the leverage shaft such that the contact means abuts the door. Once the contact means abuts the door, the device is engaged and ready to prohibit entry. The contact means may either be the free end of the leverage arm or a faceplate permanently fixed to the leverage arm. The faceplate has a surface area of greater dimension than the cross-sectional shape of the free end of the leverage arm. In the preferred embodiment, the faceplate is convex and covered in rubber treads to increase frictional contact. A similar material that increases friction covers the sloped top surface of the wedge element.
When an intruder attempts to open the door to gain entry, the applied force used to open the door exerts against the device. The force transfers to the contact means and leverage arm, thus pushing them in the direction of the force. The top end of the leverage shaft, coupled to the contact means by pivotal attachment, also travels in the direction of the force. The bottom end of the leverage shaft, in rigid connection with the wedge element, thrusts forwardly towards the door and downwardly into the ground.
As the leverage shaft moves forwardly, it drives the wedge element further under the door. As the force applied against the door increases, the base of the door advances further up the sloped top surface of the wedge element. When the door can travel no further up the wedge element, applied forces may urge the device to rock backwardly. The rounded, angled, or curved heel of the wedge element is adapted to rock backwardly forcing the sloped surface near the toe end up against the door, thus preventing the device from slipping or sliding out from the door.
Anchoring cleats on the underside of the heel of the wedge element provide added stability by digging in to the ground. Some embodiments include grasping teeth longitudinally disposed along the bottom and protruding from the bottom right and left edges of the of the wedge element to further increase the resistance. As the force against the door increases, so does the resistance offered by the device. Furthermore, since the leverage shaft thrusts the wedge element downwardly, the resistance provided by the anchoring cleats, grasping teeth, and other protrusions extending from the bottom and heel of the wedge element increases with stronger force applied against the device from a would-be intruder.
As such, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception, upon which this disclosure is based, may readily be utilized as a basis for the designing of other structures, methods, and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the present invention. It is important, therefore, that the claims be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention. These and other constructions will become obvious to those skilled in the art from the following drawings and detailed description of the preferred embodiment.
The following detailed description and corresponding drawings are of the best currently contemplated modes of carrying out exemplary embodiments of the invention. The description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the invention.
Right side 5, complete with right toe point 7 and right bottom point 27, are shown. The segment extending between right toe point 7 and right bottom point 27, i.e. the segment formed where bottom 12 meets right side 5, is right edge 30.
Top attachment means 41 pivotally couples top end 44 to contact means 100, and bottom attachment means 43 rigidly connects bottom end 42 to wedge element 1. In the preferred embodiments, attachment means 41 utilizes a bolt 36 or other hardware capable of providing pivotal movement. In alternate embodiments, the attachment means 41 provides hinged attachment between top end 44 and the contact means 100.
Top attachment means 41 utilizes holes drilled through the top end 44 and adapted to accept a bolt 36 or other hardware capable of providing pivotal movement. Similarly, bottom attachment means 43 utilizes holes drilled through the bottom end 42 and adapted to accept a pin 37, or other hardware capable of providing rigid connection, such as a friction pin or cotter pin. The invention does not require that both attachment means 41 and 43 utilize the same size and dimension of hardware and holes.
The kick plate 90 still performs its function when in communication with the heel 4. For instance, alternate embodiments for the kick plate 90 to extend from shelf 38 or near the edge of bottom leverage shaft end 42.
Like other structural components of the device 10, leverage arm 50 is preferably made of 0.75 inch steel tubing, but may be made of other materials able to withstand mechanical stresses, strains, and forces, including, but not limited to: polymer, polypropylene fiber mix, fiberglass, carbon fiber, aluminum, wood, or a combination thereof. Further, in the preferred embodiment, leverage arm 50 has a substantially rectangular shape, but alternate embodiments utilize the various shapes, including a substantially cylindrical beam, a substantially square beam, or substantially triangular beam. Usually, the leverage arm 50 has a slender, elongate body, similar to the leverage shaft 40, albeit not as long. The leverage arm 50 typically has a cross-sectional area of generally small dimensions relative to the size of the door. As the cross-sectional area of the first end 52 increases, so does the overall stability, resistance, and effectiveness of the device 10, as greater area is capable of distributing a stronger force.
When the device 10 is in use, first end 52 abuts the door. In this position, the device is said to “engage” the door. To engage the door, a user swings the leverage arm 50 about the pivotal attachment means 41 until first end 52 abuts the door (as shown in
Referring now to
Referring again to
As seen in
Support brace 60 has a first end 62 and a second end 64. First support brace end 62 is fixed to back surface 72 in a similar fashion to the permanent bonding of first leverage arm end 52 to back faceplate surface 72. However, first support brace end 62 meets back faceplate surface 72 at upper connection point 65 located at a higher longitudinal point than where the first leverage arm end 52 connects to back faceplate surface 72 at lower connection point 71. Similarly, second support beam end 64 is permanently bonded to leverage arm 50.
With both support brace ends 62 and 64 permanently fixed to back faceplate surface 72 and leverage arm 50, respectively, support brace 60 acts as a handle for the device. As shown in
Similarly,
As the force F applied against the door increases, the base of the door incrementally advances further up sloped surface 24 of the wedge element 1, therefore providing more resistance with every additional push. Sloped surfaces 24 covered in frictional materials 11, as shown in
When heel 4 rocks backwardly, the anchoring elements that protrude from heel 4 and bottom 12 such as anchoring cleats 35 and grasping teeth 33 dig into the ground for added resistance. The close-up bubble in
As shown in
It should be understood, of course, that the foregoing relates to exemplary embodiments of the invention and that modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.
Therefore, the foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Further, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described, and accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to, falling within the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
171807 | Hoffman | Jan 1876 | A |
182883 | Ball | Oct 1876 | A |
308823 | Bitter | Dec 1884 | A |
349688 | Buckingham | Sep 1886 | A |
377927 | Campbell | Feb 1888 | A |
776378 | Bellamy | Nov 1904 | A |
804585 | Depue | Nov 1905 | A |
947805 | Dumont | Feb 1910 | A |
971717 | Bates | Oct 1910 | A |
1246707 | Boynton | Nov 1917 | A |
1297189 | Lawler | Mar 1919 | A |
1332473 | Shirley | Mar 1920 | A |
1599595 | Sponsel | Sep 1926 | A |
1681834 | Arends | Aug 1928 | A |
2331150 | Whiting, Jr. | Oct 1943 | A |
2376117 | Bright et al. | May 1945 | A |
2409007 | Young | Oct 1946 | A |
2459070 | Gard | Jan 1949 | A |
2626826 | Dritz | Jan 1953 | A |
2756527 | Mease | Jul 1956 | A |
2798755 | Zapotocny | Jul 1957 | A |
2898140 | Gislason | Aug 1959 | A |
3124382 | Strother | Mar 1964 | A |
3328065 | Arenson | Jun 1967 | A |
3642251 | Niederholtmeyer | Feb 1972 | A |
3706112 | Newell | Dec 1972 | A |
3731341 | Woodruff | May 1973 | A |
4070049 | Brewer | Jan 1978 | A |
4136899 | Frasher | Jan 1979 | A |
4139227 | Spurr | Feb 1979 | A |
4141192 | Augustine | Feb 1979 | A |
4142752 | Chilton | Mar 1979 | A |
4163574 | Chezem | Aug 1979 | A |
4421348 | Kahn | Dec 1983 | A |
4438640 | Willis | Mar 1984 | A |
4478168 | Wimmer | Oct 1984 | A |
4563027 | Chechovsky et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
D284738 | Stone | Jul 1986 | S |
4638596 | Gallardo | Jan 1987 | A |
4641869 | Johnson | Feb 1987 | A |
4666195 | Thomas, III | May 1987 | A |
4805948 | Renzi | Feb 1989 | A |
4819296 | Wilkins | Apr 1989 | A |
4883297 | Smith | Nov 1989 | A |
4958869 | Bisher | Sep 1990 | A |
5011200 | Glancy et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5011203 | Tackett | Apr 1991 | A |
5040835 | Barker | Aug 1991 | A |
5131701 | Stepniewski | Jul 1992 | A |
5207464 | Reeves, Jr. | May 1993 | A |
5217269 | Wiltberger | Jun 1993 | A |
5218341 | Marik | Jun 1993 | A |
D339282 | Malonson | Sep 1993 | S |
D344014 | Marshall | Feb 1994 | S |
5392026 | Marik | Feb 1995 | A |
D365019 | Rich | Dec 1995 | S |
5490304 | Winner, Jr. et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5544386 | Cobb | Aug 1996 | A |
5581844 | Raheb et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590928 | Voiculescu | Jan 1997 | A |
5618072 | Pitchford | Apr 1997 | A |
5692787 | Young | Dec 1997 | A |
5725263 | Rodriguez | Mar 1998 | A |
5771533 | Kuang-Pin | Jun 1998 | A |
5951071 | Elliott | Sep 1999 | A |
6041473 | Johnson | Mar 2000 | A |
6513778 | Hefley et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6557915 | Duff | May 2003 | B1 |
7030758 | Markegard et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7195294 | White | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7976080 | Duff | Jul 2011 | B1 |
20080309100 | Ollinger | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20130318882 | Booker et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
379273 | Aug 1923 | DE |
390291 | Feb 1924 | DE |
29913711 | Dec 1999 | DE |
736252 | Nov 1932 | FR |
309682 | Apr 1929 | GB |
581634 | Oct 1946 | GB |
2478366 | Aug 2014 | GB |
WO 8902509 | Mar 1989 | WO |
WO 0136769 | May 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150054296 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |