This application claims the filing date of provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/269,923 filed Dec. 18, 2015 by the present inventors.
The following table indicates prior art that appears to be relevant to the invention disclosed:
The commercial trucking industry's profit margin is heavily dependent on the cost of fuel and tires. These two consumables can both be conserved by reducing rolling resistance of the truck and trailer wheels. The simplest way to reduce rolling resistance is to maintain alignment of the axles which are prone to becoming misaligned under heavy loading.
Many commercial trucking businesses are not equipped with alignment tools necessary to maintain their fleet of trucks and trailers. Instead they routinely send their vehicles to alignment shops that use complex and expensive alignment systems such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,401,236. The high cost associated with this type of alignment system, coupled with rising fuel and tire prices, has led to the development of simple, inexpensive, and portable alignment systems such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,913,404. However this type of alignment system is more prone to measurement error due to its dependence on less reliable measurement references and constraints.
The commercial trucking industry needs an axle alignment system that is simple, inexpensive, portable, and less susceptible to measurement error than alignment systems currently offered by the market. An alignment system that achieves these objectives will be disclosed.
The present invention is an axle alignment system for aligning truck drive axles and trailer axles. The system includes a laser emitter, truck laser targets, a trailer laser target, a king pin centering tool, and mounting bracketry. When aligning a truck axle the trailer target apparatus is not necessary. When aligning a trailer axle the truck target apparatus is not necessary. The laser emitter is mounted to a wheel such that the laser beam is projected perpendicular to the axis of the axle in question. A measurement is taken off the corresponding target(s) from both ends of the axle in question. A comparison of the measurements from either end of the axle is used to determine the angle of the axle and a phone application is used to determine what the measurements should be when the axle is aligned.
The primary advantage of this axle alignment system is that it only requires one laser emitter. Since the same laser emitter is used to take measurements on both ends of the axle in question, any error in parallelism within the laser emitter assembly is negated when the laser is flipped 180 degrees to measure the opposite end of the axle. The laser emitter error would be repeated in opposite directions to create a net zero error. Therefore, laser emitter calibration discrepancies produce little impact on the measurement accuracy. Additionally, a system that utilizes a single laser emitter is less costly than a system which relies on multiple lasers.
Another advantage of this axle alignment system is the large distance between the laser emitter and the laser target. The further the laser beam travels the more sensitive the measurement scale is to angular deviation of the axle. For a trailer alignment, a laser beam length of 500″ produces ±0.0036 degrees of angular precision when the target scale demarcations are at 1/16″ increments. For a truck alignment, a laser beam length of 215″ produces ±0.0083 degrees of angular precision when the target scale demarcations are at 1/16″ increments. This allows the user to align the axle with greater precision than if the beam was projected a shorter distance.
Yet another advantage of this axle alignment system is that the laser emitter and targets are constrained using reliable constraints. Precisely machined surfaces on the laser emitter and targets are mated with precisely machined surfaces on the truck or trailer reference features. All degrees of freedom between the alignment apparatus and vehicle are completely constrained with tight clearances between mating features. These reliable references and constraints produce measurements that are both accurate and repeatable.
The preferred embodiment of the laser emitter assembly is illustrated by
The preferred embodiment of the truck laser target assembly is illustrated by
The preferred embodiments of the trailer laser target assembly and king pin centering tool assembly are illustrated by
To align a truck axle, one must (1) adjust the lateral offset of the axle relative to the truck frame according to manufacturer specifications, (2) constrain the laser emitter to a drive axle wheel as illustrated in
To align a trailer axle, one must (1) adjust the lateral offset of the axle relative to the trailer frame according to manufacturer specifications, (2) constrain the laser emitter to a wheel as illustrated in
The preceding disclosures of preferred embodiments are in no way intended to limit the listed claims. The devices described in these claims may be manufactured using various materials, may take on forms other than the illustrated embodiments, and may be used for aligning axles of various types.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3691642 | Nolte | Sep 1972 | A |
4347668 | Johnston | Sep 1982 | A |
4942667 | Fournier | Jul 1990 | A |
5056231 | Alusick | Oct 1991 | A |
5157838 | Sims | Oct 1992 | A |
5367778 | O'Hara | Nov 1994 | A |
5675408 | Samuelsson | Oct 1997 | A |
5852241 | Fagerdahl | Dec 1998 | A |
6082011 | Phillips, III | Jul 2000 | A |
6282799 | Warkotsch | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6522400 | Horn | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6718646 | Corghi | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6799376 | Voeller | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7913404 | Smith | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7941935 | Khan | May 2011 | B2 |
8401236 | Kassouf | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20050115088 | Paulsen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20130239420 | Kroll | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20150048225 | Liu | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20170158241 | Prusinowski | Jun 2017 | A1 |