1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates in general to target systems and, specifically, to marksmanship and target-identification training system using moving targets.
2. Description of Related Art
The target systems being used to train law enforcement and military shooters today are predominantly one of the following enumerated types.
A first prior art target system places a threat target image in front of the shooter and is stationary and visible at all times. Such a system has the disadvantage of allowing the shooter to constantly see the target image as a threat. There is no real-time, decisional requirement as to the threat status of the target and no dynamic indication is given to the shooter regarding their accuracy of shot placement other than by physical examination. Lastly, the target does not mimic the motions a real human person would take if they were actually shooting back.
A second prior art target system places the target image on a hanger that is moved by a driven cable. This system moves the target image at various positions toward and away from the shooter, which allows the system to decrease or increase the difficulty in hitting the target image by altering the relative size of the target. This system has the same disadvantages of the first target system described above.
A third prior art target system keeps the target image stationary but also rotates the image toward or away from the shooter. First, the target image is hidden from view (e.g., at 0 degrees of rotation). Then, the target image is rotated to face the shooter (e.g., 90 degrees). This system has a disadvantage in that the shooter knows before the target image is rotated that when presented it will be a threat target. This system has the same disadvantages of the first target system described above.
A fourth prior art system moves a target on a rail system using a steel cable driven by a high-voltage mains power source. These systems have the same disadvantages described with respect to the first system above.
A fifth prior art system moves the steel target across the ground utilizing a motor drive and steel cable assembly. This system does not offer the instructor the ability to present (at their discretion) a target that at one moment is a threat and the next moment is a no-threat; the steel target is always a threat. Because the mechanical assembly design is heavy and has a high coefficient of friction when moving across the ground, this system requires a high current mains supply and is not portable. Additionally, it is accepted that the steel target is randomly being positioned into and out of the shooters field of view relative to the condition of the terrain over which the sled is being pulled; but it cannot be accurately controlled by the operator. Lastly, the system does not afford the ability to position reactive no-threat targets adjacent to, in front of, or behind the threat target. This capability is important when training shooters so as to hone their skills not only in accuracy when using a weapon but additionally to train in target threat identification and engagement by being exposed to a system that selectively presents both threat and no-threat targets.
A sixth prior art system uses a self powered tractor to pull a trailer carrying a fixed target around a fixed course. A buried guide wire determines the path of travel of the tractor and trailer. The target is incapable of any movement other than that provided by being towed.”
It would be desirable to provide a system that overcomes the disadvantages of the aforementioned systems.
The present invention is a small arms training target system. The system includes a carriage having at least one drive wheel and at least two stabilizing wheels. The drive and stabilizing wheels ride on drive and stabilizing rails, respectively. The training system is controlled through a control electronics unit carried by the carriage. A drive system for the drive wheel is carried by the carriage and controlled through the control electronics unit. A target for training is carried by the carriage.
The drive system for the drive wheel includes a battery and drive motor carried by the carriage and controlled by the control electronics unit. The carriage may have a top cover plate that carries a target mount. The target may be attached to this mount. If desired, a vibration isolation device may be positioned between the target and the mount to reduce vibration when the target is hit.
The system may include a sensor mounted on the target to signal the control electronics unit when the target is hit. The sensor providing a signal of a hit can cause an indicator light to be illuminated to allow a user to know that the target has been hit. The system may further include a rotational target motor mounted on the carriage and a target mount arm carried by the target motor. The target motor is controlled by the control electronics unit and may rotate in either direction. The target in the system may be mounted on the target mount arm. This allows movement of the target into and out of the vision of the user of the system through rotation of the target motor.
When a target is mounted on the target mount carried by the top plate, an indicia my be placed on the target as an indicator that the target is a threat and should be shot. The target mount arm may carry an obscuring medium in this case. The target motor may be activated to move the obscuring medium from a position covering the indicia to a position allowing the indicia to be seen. Thus, a threat/non-threat condition may be simulated for training purposes.
The system provides a method of small arms target training that positions a self contained internally powered carriage before a user. Then, a target is exposed to the user while moving the carriage under the control of an electronic control unit. Hits on the target are sensed and a signal given to the user that hits have been made.
Objects, advantages, novel features, and further scope of particularity of the present invention will be set forth in part in the detailed description to follow, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized or attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated by reference and form a part of the specification, illustrate one or more embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. The drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating one or more preferred embodiments of the invention and are not to be construed as limiting the invention. In the drawings:
In
Control electronics unit or electronics control unit (22) and associated remote RF antenna (24) are located within and carried by carriage frame (10). Power battery (26) is carried by carriage frame (10). Battery (26) is connected to and controlled by control electronics (22). Battery (26) provides power to all of the system components, including motor (14). Rotational target motor (28) is connected to rotational target mount arm (30) and rotates arm (30) in either direction when energized. Rotational motor (28) is controlled by control electronics (22). An angled rear target mount (32) may be included as shown in
In
In
In
In
In
It is desirable for target (42) to move from a raised position (shown in
The invention has a number of distinct advantages over prior art target systems. First, by mounting the target to the rear target mount the operator is able to have the target to remain within the shooter's field of view while the carriage moves, thus providing one level of multiple levels of training for the shooter. The invention can next be configured with the target image mounted to the rotational motor assembly which has as part of its design a rotational movement arm. By energizing the rotational motor system and rotational movement arm in random directions (left and right) and random amounts of rotation (varying degrees) and varying speeds (slow, medium and fast) the target will mimic human movements, further increasing challenge and the level of shooter training. It is evident that the operator selectable parameters of these unique movements permit a wide variation of challenge levels. Simple, slow movements can be used for new shooters. More difficult, random and speedier movements can be used for advanced shooters, Further, the system can quickly change the status of the target from threat to no-threat or vice-versa; changes that occur in real life situations. This changeability requires the shooter to constantly be aware of the target's status, improving their threat recognition skills. Additionally, the system is configured to require the shooter to accurately engage single or multiple moving targets. With an ability to present two targets at one time, one in front of the other, the shooter is given the opportunity to practice engaging a threat target while avoiding the no-threat target. The targets can be arranged with the no-threat target in front and the threat target behind or vice-versa. The system can even make each target a threat target, requiring the shooter to rapidly engage both
Although the invention has been described in detail with particular reference to these preferred embodiments, other embodiments can achieve the same results. Variations and modifications of the present invention will be obvious to those skilled in the art, and it is intended to cover in the appended claims all such modifications and equivalents. The entire disclosures of all references, applications, patents, and publications cited, if any, are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
879670 | Petry | Feb 1908 | A |
2726870 | Auger | Dec 1955 | A |
3128096 | Hammond et al. | Apr 1964 | A |
3586331 | Tickell, Jr. | Jun 1971 | A |
3844561 | Renault | Oct 1974 | A |
3865373 | Knight | Feb 1975 | A |
4029318 | Boss | Jun 1977 | A |
4614345 | Doughty | Sep 1986 | A |
4625973 | Dallaire | Dec 1986 | A |
4657511 | Allard et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4691925 | Scholem | Sep 1987 | A |
4743032 | Summers et al. | May 1988 | A |
5163689 | Bateman | Nov 1992 | A |
5242172 | Bateman | Sep 1993 | A |
5248150 | Koma | Sep 1993 | A |
5280919 | Graham | Jan 1994 | A |
5310192 | Miyake | May 1994 | A |
5320358 | Jones | Jun 1994 | A |
5350180 | Acock | Sep 1994 | A |
5427380 | Hazard et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5533732 | Leinen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5568927 | Badorrek | Oct 1996 | A |
5688196 | O'Neil | Nov 1997 | A |
5775698 | Jones et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5823779 | Muehle et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5868396 | Theissen | Feb 1999 | A |
5967522 | Corcoran et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980254 | Muehle et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6162057 | Westphal et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6217027 | Amrein et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6325376 | Elliott et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6435512 | Beckwith, Sr. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6478301 | Witmeyer | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491303 | Huston | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502820 | Slifko | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6575753 | Rosa | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6604064 | Wolff et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6808177 | Dehart | Oct 2004 | B2 |
20060255543 | Sovine et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060290063 | Hagar | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060290064 | Hagar | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080150235 | Bliehall | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61009646 | Dec 2007 | US |