This invention relates to carrying cases for portable electronic devices, such as cell phones, cameras, MP3 players, and PDAs. More particularly, the invention relates to cases having corner protectors. Further, the invention relates to a case for a clamshell type cellular phone. The invention also relates to methods for producing the case using a co-molding process.
Cell phones, pagers, PDA's, MP3 players, and other portable electronic devices have become increasingly popular. Users of the devices like to keep the devices readily accessible on their person. Due to their portable nature, the devices are also subject to being dropped and otherwise roughly handled, which can result in damage to the electronics inside, or to the plastic housing of the device. To address the above concerns, cases have been developed to both carry and protect the portable electronic devices. These cases often include a clip or other retaining structure to allow the case to be removably attached to the user's clothing, such as a belt.
The clips or retainers commonly used are removeably attached to the case by fastening to a plastic post, which itself is attached to the case. The plastic post can be an integral part of the case, being formed of the same material as the case. In other prior art embodiments, the post is a separate piece, sewn into or otherwise permanently attached to the case. While this provides a secure attachment post for the clip, the post becomes a cumbersome and unwanted protrusion when the clip is removed. The case disclosed herein is provided with a detachable post, thereby providing a case unburdened with unnecessary protrusions. The case disclosed herein also provides an attachment point for other accessories such as a light, velcro, keychain or magnets.
The portable electronic cases of the prior art are generally constructed of leather, nylon, or other material provided in sheets. The material is cut to predetermine sizes to form panels, which are then sewn or otherwise attached to form a pocket for holding the portable electronic device. With this type of construction, if one desires parts of a panel to have different physical properties, such as elasticity, texture, color or clarity, different pieces of material must be physically joined to one another to create a panel having the desired characteristics. Typically, the materials are joined by stitching, heat weld, or adhesive. The seams created at the joints add unwanted bulk and add to the cost of construction. It is therefore desirable to produce a case that includes different physical properties, but does not require pieces to be mechanically joined. To that end, the case disclosed herein is constructed of a co-molded material.
For cases designed for clamshell devices, such as cellular phones, the prior art teaches cases having two detachable pocket sections. Each pocket section fits over a section of the clamshell phone and are then connected by a snap, zipper, or velcro. Because of the nature of the case materials, if the pocket sections were not detachable, there would be no way to place the case on the phone, as leather and nylon do not stretch sufficiently to allow one pocket to be placed on the phone and then have the other pocket placed on the phone. By use of the co-molded material described herein, sufficient elasticity may be incorporated into the case to allow the case to be constructed as a single unit. In other words, the two pockets do not have to be separable. Further, the elasticity of the material allows the case to give and fit the contours of the phone in a superior fashions when compared to the prior art.
The invention disclosed herein is an improvement for cases typically used with cell phones and portable electronic devices. Some of the cases described include cut out areas or apertures or areas without material at corners of the device. The apertures allow for reduced thickness and bulk where the case would normally cover the corners of the device. This aperture or open area allows the cell phone case to be constructed without the need to notch or dart the case material to allow the material to fit the curve of the corner of the cell phone or other portable device.
However, the resulting apertures are not without their problems. The apertures leave the corners of the cell phone exposed and unprotected. If the cell phone or other portable electronic device is dropped, the exposed corner of the device may be subject to impact with the ground, possibly resulting in damage of breakage of the device. Thus, it is object of the invention to provide protection to the cell phone or electronic device, while still providing a construction that eliminates or reduces the issues associated with sowing or otherwise bonding materials to fit a curved surface.
The disclosure describes an improved portable electronics case and a method of constructing the same. The cell phone case is formed of a co-molded material produced by pouring a first liquid plastic into a mold, and then pouring a second liquid plastic into the mold, the second plastic having physical characteristics different from the first. Once set, the material is removed from the mold and sewn to form pockets for the electronic device.
If the case is to be used for a clamshell type cellular phone, two pockets are formed, the pockets sharing a common or continuous panel Further, the disclosure describes a unitary case for clamshell phones, allowing for both donning and removal of the case onto the phone as a unit.
Further, the disclosure describes a case including a removable post or attachment point for a clip. The retainer used to hold the removable post, may be used to house other devices, such as a light, keychain, velcro, magnets, or other useful items.
Shown herein as the preferred embodiment is a case for a clamshell cellular phone. One skilled in the art will recognize the construction, materials, and methods can be applied to other cases for portable electronic devices, and need not be limited to the clamshell design shown in the figures. With reference to the figures, the case 10 includes a first pocket 15 and a second pocket 20 for receiving a portion of the cell phone 11. The case 10 includes a backbone panel 25. The backbone panel 25 forms part of both the first pocket 15 and the second pocket 20. The first pocket 15 includes a face sheet 30, made of a clear material allowing a user to see the display 31 of the cell phone 1, when the cell phone 11 is inserted into the first pocket 15. The face sheet 30 is attached to the backbone panel 25 about part of its perimeter to form the first pocket 15. In an alternate embodiment, intermediate side panels 35 and 36 (as used on the second pocket 20) are used to attach the backbone panel 25 to the face sheet 30. The various components forming the first pocket 15 are attached to one another using heat welding, adhesive, stitching 21, or any other construction method to join two materials known in the art. One skilled in the art will recognize that the pockets of the case 10 can be formed of any number of panels, so as to suit the shape of the phone 11 or other portable device.
As shown in
The backbone panel 25 can include a window 48 to allow a user to see the outside display of the cell phone 11. The window 48 is formed of a clear material. The window 45 is joined to the backbone panel 25 by heat welding, adhesive, or stitching 21, or any other construction know in the art. With a judicious selection of materials, the window 35 may be co-molded into the backbone panel 25 during the manufacture of the backbone panel 25, as described herein for other structures.
The second pocket 20 is formed in a similar fashion, by attaching the backbone panel 25 to a front panel 37 about portions of its perimeter. As shown in the drawings, the second pocket 20 includes side panels 35 and 36. One skilled in the art will recognize that many different configurations, panels, and places to attach the pieces together may be used to produce the first pocket 15 and second pocket 20.
The first pocket 15 and second pocket 20 are to be joined by a continuous piece of material; that is the first 15 and second 20 pocket are not attached by velcro, snaps, buttons, zippers, or any other structure which allows easy detachment and reattachment from and to one another. With the single or continuous panel forming part of both pockets, a backbone panel 25 is formed linking the two pockets.
In use, the case 10 is placed onto the phone 11 by inserting part of the opened phone into one or the other of the first pocket 15 or the second pocket 20. Since the face sheet 30 is typically longer than the front panel 37, thereby creating a first pocket 15 that is deeper than the pocket formed by the front panel 37, when donning, it is preferable to insert the phone 11 into the first pocket 15 before inserting the phone into the second pocket 20, as shown in
Although the backbone panel 25 forms part of both the first 15 and second 20 pockets, and is one continuous piece, it need not be a uniform or homogenous piece. In other words, the backbone panel 25 may be formed of a plurality of pieces or materials attached to each other by stitching, heat welding, adhesive, or other permanent attachment. For instance, the center portion 45 can be formed of an elastic material, while the portions forming the pockets 15, 20 can be of a less elastic material.
In the preferred embodiment, the backbone panel 25 is formed by co-molding. Other parts of the case may also be formed by this process. Co-molding allows the part or panel being manufactured to easily incorporate different properties, colors, textures, shapes or other characteristics, while allowing for efficient construction. To construct the backbone panel or other part, a mold 100 is constructed. As shown in
As shown in
For instance, the first substance 120 is placed in the mold 100 only in the area for piping 111, as shown in
In the instance of the first substance 120 being EPE, the liquid EPE is placed in the desired area of the mold 100 at room temperature. The EPE is then spread out and forced into the desired areas, such as piping 111 or textured area 101, where air voids are likely. The mold 100 containing the EPE is then heated, and then cooled to room temperature.
The second material 140 is then poured. The second material 140 may have different properties than the first material 120. For instance, the second material 140 may be of a different color or texture. In some embodiments, the area of the mold 100 into which the second material 140 is poured may have a surface treatment or texture 101 to produce a surface texture on the finished product.
In a similar fashion, other pours may be made of either the same material, or different ones, until the panel having the desired characteristics is complete.
Shown in
With reference to the mold shown in
Once the desired materials are poured and cured, the co-molded panel is removed from the mold and sewn or otherwise attached to other panels to produce the case.
In other embodiments, the co-molding process allows other structures to be placed or integrated into the panel. For instance, once the first substance 120 is poured, additional materials can be placed into the mold, to create a panel having areas with different characteristics. The materials may be the same substance, or include a second substance 140 for co-molding, or may include other materials or structures, such as scrims, reinforcements, or windows, judiciously placed within the mold to create areas having particular structural characteristics.
For instance, a scrim 130 or other woven or non-woven reinforcement may be placed in areas where there will be stitching during the assembly of the case. Such scrims are placed where the panel will be stitched to lesson the likelihood of the stitching pulling through the case material. Similarly, a scrim can be placed in the area of the aperture for the clip post, thereby reinforcing that area. In other embodiments, the window 48 is placed in the mold prior to the second material pour, thereby eliminating the need to stitch the window 48 in place, as the window will be co-molded between the first material and the second material, and thereby retained. In another example shown in
In other embodiments, and as a direct result of co-molding process, portions of a panel can be thicker or thinner than other sections. For instance, areas where the finished product will include stitching can easily be made thicker to prevent pull through. Other areas, such as the textured area of the mold in
In additional to the layers shown in the figures, a final lining material such as rayon, may be applied either by spraying or laminating, onto the last poured layer. The lining material allows the cellular phone, or other portable device, to easily slide into and out of the case.
With reference to
As shown in
Areas 17c and 17d include strips of material 2a-d, which divide the open areas 17c and 17d and provide some material over the otherwise exposed corners of the cell phone 11. Defined another way, open areas 17a and d include strips of material 2a-d, thereby defining a plurality of apertures 5a-f. One skilled in the art will recognize the number of apertures can be varied. For example, the open areas 17c and d could include netting, or strips of material placed in different directions.
As shown in
For example, a co-molding process, such as described previously herein, could be used to place protective structures, such as strips, molded corner protectors, netting, or other structures, at the corners of the case. These structures can be thicker than the sheets of material 8 and 9 forming the walls of the case 10, to allow for more protection to the corners. For instance, with reference to
Is an alternate embodiment, reinforcement members or other preformed structures, that is structures molded to the contours of the case, are placed within the open areas and secured to the material or panels of the cell phone case 10 to provide protection at the corners of the electronic device or cell phone 11. Because the structures are molded or formed, they can be made of a specific thickness that is different than the panels forming the case 10.
The case 10, no matter how produced, can include a detachable clip 200. With reference to
The post 210 is removably attached to the case 10. The case 10 includes an aperture 216 sized to allow the lug 214 to fit through yet is not large enough to allow the base 212 to pass. The post 210 is positioned so that the lug 214 extends outwardly away from the case 10, and the base 212 remains in the case 10, the base 212 being too large to fit through the aperture 216. The base 212 is retained in position by a retainer 220, the retainer 220 limiting movement and securing the base 212 when engaged. When disengaged, the retainer 220 allows the post 210 to be removed from the case 10.
In the preferred embodiment, the base 212 is a generally thin, flat member, having a perimeter including two parallel straight portions 222 and two curved portions 230. The retainer 220 is slightly thicker than the base 212, and includes a recess 225 to receive the base 212. The recess 225 may go entirely through the retainer 220 as an aperture. The perimeter of the recess 225 is generally concentric with the perimeter of the base 212. The retainer 220 includes tabs 226 which extend over the base 212, to keep the base 212 from moving in a direction perpendicular to the base 212. In the preferred embodiment, the tabs 226 are located to extend over the curved portions 230 of the base 212. The retainer 220 is attached to the inside of the case 10 so that it is located about the aperture 216. The retainer 220 is attached to the case by any means known in the art, including stitching, heat weld, and adhesive. The retainer 220 could also be co-molded into the case 10, or formed as part of the case.
In use, the post 210 is attached to the case 10 by inserting the lug 214 into the aperture 216 from the inside of the case. The retainer 220 is convexly flexed to allow the curved portion 230 of the base 212 to be inserted under a tab 226. Once positioned, the retainer 220 is unflexed and the opposite curved portion 223 is allowed to snap under the remaining tab 226, thereby securing the base 212 between the case 10 material and the tabs 226.
To remove the post, the retainer 220 is again convexly flexed to snap base 212 over the tab 226, allowing the base to be disengaged from the retainer 220 and the lug 214 to be pushed through the aperture 216, thereby removing the post 210 from the case 10. In such a fashion, the post 210 may be selectively attached to the case, or removed, as desired by the user.
One skilled in the art will recognize other structures could be used to connect a post to a retaining structure on the case. An example of such an embodiment includes a retainer 240 and base 250 that include mating structures that allow the base 250 to be separated and reconnected to the retainer 240.
In the embodiment shown in
The retainer 240 includes an aperture 280 sized to allow the lug 270 to pass through. As shown in
The base 250 can also include separation recesses 320 and 321 at its perimeter. The separation recesses are areas exposed to the perimeter that are of reduced thickness. When the base 250 and retainer 240 are mated, the separation recesses allow space between the two structures to allow a fingernail or other object to lever the two structures apart.
The retainer 240 includes a plurality of receivers 290, 291 for receiving and engaging the shafts 260 and 261. In the embodiment shown in
In an alternate embodiment shown in
As shown in
One skilled in the art will recognize that other types of constructions may be utilized in attaching the post to the case. One such constructive is a bayonet mount, as shown in
In use, the post 500 is inserted into aperture base end 540 first, such that projections 525 a-d are inserted into notches 522 a-d. Adjacent notches 525 a-d are flanges 535 a-d. The flanges are generally arcuate in shape and form part of the aperture 520 perimeter, thus restraining the post 500 from side to side movement. The flanges 535 a-d are of a thickness less than the thickness of the base 510, so as to accommodate the projections 525 a-d when the post 500. The base 510 also includes stops 545 a-b on the flanges 535 a-b so that rotation of the post is stopped, preventing over rotation of the post 500.
The embodiments disclosed herein are illustrative of the invention and are not meant to limit the scope of the invention.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/756,157 filed on Jan. 4, 2006. The Application is also a continuation in part of U.S. Non-provisional application Ser. No. 11/275,443 filed on Jan. 3, 2006, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/641,204, filed Jan. 3, 2005, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3081672 | Anderson | Mar 1963 | A |
4071065 | Halbich | Jan 1978 | A |
4512095 | Seely | Apr 1985 | A |
4536979 | Parkinson | Aug 1985 | A |
4775083 | Burger et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4858798 | Siddoway et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4896787 | Delamour et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4901852 | King | Feb 1990 | A |
4993866 | Sugihara | Feb 1991 | A |
5025921 | Gasparaitis et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5253292 | Fluder et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5265720 | Meliconi | Nov 1993 | A |
5292060 | Focke | Mar 1994 | A |
5360108 | Alagia | Nov 1994 | A |
5380119 | Hadden | Jan 1995 | A |
5620120 | Tien | Apr 1997 | A |
5762304 | Hyatt | Jun 1998 | A |
5768370 | Maatta et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5816459 | Armistead | Oct 1998 | A |
D401055 | Jayez | Nov 1998 | S |
5833100 | Kim | Nov 1998 | A |
5850954 | Dong-Joo | Dec 1998 | A |
5906031 | Jensen | May 1999 | A |
5908114 | Althouse et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5988577 | Phillips et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6029871 | Park | Feb 2000 | A |
6079563 | Katchmazenski | Jun 2000 | A |
6081595 | Picaud | Jun 2000 | A |
6082535 | Mitchell | Jul 2000 | A |
6109434 | Howard, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6130945 | Shin | Oct 2000 | A |
6138935 | Zwayer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141417 | Lopez et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6179122 | Moncrief et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
D438536 | Willison et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
6233788 | Choy | May 2001 | B1 |
6273252 | Mitchell | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6305588 | Michel | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315255 | Chan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325189 | King et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341217 | Wong | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6405910 | Infanti | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6454146 | Alis | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6471056 | Tzeng | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6513201 | Beune | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6594472 | Curtis et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614722 | Polany et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6665174 | Derr et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665544 | Michel et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665909 | Collins | Dec 2003 | B2 |
D484874 | Chang et al. | Jan 2004 | S |
6685067 | French | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6701159 | Powell | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719381 | Cleereman | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6752299 | Shetler et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6785566 | Irizarry | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6839432 | Martin | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6914774 | Albertini et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6926856 | Hus et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6953110 | Santy et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959806 | Barker | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980777 | Shepherd et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981589 | Sanders, Jr. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7050712 | Shimamura | May 2006 | B2 |
7050841 | Onda | May 2006 | B1 |
7079879 | Sylvester et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7191898 | Williams | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7203467 | Siddiqui | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7236588 | Gartrell | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7248904 | Gartrell et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7343184 | Rostami | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360707 | Barkan et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7399136 | Petrie et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7428427 | Brunstrom | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7435921 | Rae | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7495895 | Carnevali | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7523970 | Konchan | Apr 2009 | B2 |
D593319 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2009 | S |
D593746 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2009 | S |
7551949 | Schworm | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555325 | Goros | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7609512 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7623898 | Holmberg | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7647082 | Holmberg | Jan 2010 | B2 |
D617784 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
7813712 | Yasuoka et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7907394 | Johnson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7933122 | Richardson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7938260 | Lin | May 2011 | B2 |
8073131 | Bodkin et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8204561 | Mongan et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8223488 | Peter | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8244320 | Lee | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8245842 | Bau | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8295043 | Tai | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20010002003 | Kuzdak et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20020076512 | Kreider | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030036362 | Buesseler et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030068035 | Pirila et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070959 | Maresh et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083094 | Hsu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103624 | Hu | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030111366 | Enners | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030141329 | Huang | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040014506 | Kemppinen | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050035164 | Badillo | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050139498 | Goros | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050153757 | Maenpaa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050174727 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050279661 | Hodges | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060040550 | Slauson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060091222 | Leung et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060164800 | McEwan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060175370 | Arney et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060289030 | Pho | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070085358 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070225031 | Bodkin et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090111543 | Tai et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100096284 | Bau | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20120031788 | Morgan et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1306700 | Aug 2001 | CN |
1096759 | May 2001 | EP |
2463712 | Mar 2010 | GB |
8018637 | Jan 1996 | JP |
2000139537 | May 2000 | JP |
2002027076 | Jan 2002 | JP |
200407284 | Jan 2006 | KR |
10-2008-0050555 | Jun 2008 | KR |
WO 9428565 | Dec 1994 | WO |
1999067889 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0211161 | Feb 2002 | WO |
2008032891 | Mar 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Shock protection of portable electronic products: Shock response spectrum, damage boundary approach, and beyond Goyal, S. (Reprint); Papadopoulos, JM; Sullivan, PA AT&T Bell Labs, Lucent Technol, Wireless Res Lab, 600 Mt Ave, Rm 1b-212, Murray Hill, NJ. |
Improving impact tolerance of portable electronic products: Case study of cellular phones S. Goyal, S. Upasani and D.M. Patel Experimental Mechanics Cover Date: Mar. 18, 1999 Publisher: Springer Boston ISSN: 0014-4851 Subject: Engineering Start p. 43 End p. 52 vol. |
Role of shock response spectrum in electronic product suspension design Goyal, S., Elko, Gary W., Buratynski, Edward K. The International Journal of Microcircuits and Electronic Packaging. vol. 23, No. 2, Second Quarter, 2000, pp. 182-190 ISSN: 1063-1674 Source:. |
Designing best-in-class impact-tolerant cellular phones and other portable products Goyal, S., Upasani, Sanjay S., Patel, Dhiren M. Bell Labs Technical Journal. vol. 3, No. 3, 1998, pp. 159-174 DOI: 10.1002/bltj.2123 Source: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bltj.2123, 24 pp. |
www.theclip.com/Innopocket-tab-with-Ultra-Clip-p-16261.html. Innopocket tab with Ultra Clip, publication date unknown (4 pages). |
www.alternativewireless.com/horizontal.sub.--cell.sub.--phone.sub.--cases/-krusell-multidapt-system.html. Krusell Multidapt Cell Phone Belt Clip System, publication date unknown (5 pages). |
www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2005Feb/bpd20050301028039.htm, Geek.com Geen News—Mini-Review: RhinoSkin Dell Axim X50 Aluminum Hardcase, publication date unknown (12 pages). |
Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2013 of Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201080006846.6 with translation (14 pages). |
Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent 8,204,561 dated Sep. 23, 2013 (Paper 16) of Case No. IPR2013-00197 (13 pages). |
Deposition of David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D., Aug. 14, 2013, 138 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 33-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Deposition of Tim Osswald, Ph.D., Aug. 21, 2013, 229 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 33-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Deposition of Curtis E. Peterson, Aug. 16, 2013, 138 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 33-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Deposition of James Shelton, Aug. 13, 2013, 131 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 33-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Expert Report of David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D., Regarding Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 8,204,561 (including exhibits), Jul. 22, 2013, 348 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 33-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Rebuttal Report of Tim Osswald, Ph.D., Regarding Validity of U.S. Patent No. 8,204,561 (including exhibits), Aug. 5, 2013, 120 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 33-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Initial Expert Report of Curtis E. Peterson Part 1 (Report and Exhibits A-G), Jul. 19, 2013, 174 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 33-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated) [see also cite 20]. |
Supplemental Expert Report of Curtis E. Peterson (including exhibits), Jul. 19, 2013, 177 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 33-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Expert Report of James Shelton Regarding Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 8,204,561 (including exhibits), Jul. 22, 2013, 66 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 33-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Witness Statement of David O. Kazmer, P.E., Sep. 10, 2013, 149 pages, ITC Investigation Nos: 33-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Direct Witness Statemnent of Curtis E. Peterson, Sep. 10, 2013, 68 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 33-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Witness Statement of James Shelton, Sep. 10, 2013, 64 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 33-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review Under 37 C.F.R. 42.100 by Superior Communications, Inc. filed Sep. 25, 2013 (including exhibit list and supporting non-patent literature exhibit not ready of record) of Case No. IPR2013-00626 (63 pages). |
Declaration of Andrew S. Flior dated Sep. 25, 2013 (4 pages) [Exh. 1006 to cite 14]. |
Exhibit List for Petition for Inter Partes Review dated Sep. 25, 2013 [cite 14] (3 pages). |
Amazon.com web print-outs referring to a black iPhone case provided by “Cozip” retrieved from the Wayback Machine (http://archive.org/web/web.php)(Cozip) [Exh. 1003 to cite 14]. |
Amazon.com web print-outs referring to a white iPhone case provided by “Cozip” retrieved from the Wayback Machine (http://archive.org/web/web.php)(Cozip) [Exh. 1009 to cite 14]. |
modmyi.com web print-out: http://modmyi.com/forums/accessory-review/143151-mini-review-cozip-iphone-case-pics. html [Exh. 1010 to cite 14]. |
Initial Expert Report of Curtis E. Peterson Part 2 (Exhibits H-R), Jul. 19, 2013, 103 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 33-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated) [see cite 8]. |
Bernie Stritzke, Excerpts of Custom Molding of Thermoset Elastomers (2009). |
Cambridge Dictionary of American English, Cambridge Univ Press, p. 631 (1999). |
Order re Claim Construction, Foremost in Packaging Systems v. Cold Chain Technologies, et al., U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. SACV05-24-JVS(MLGx), Docket No. 2 (Nov. 21, 2005), 2005, 30 pages. |
Claim Construction Order, Solannex, Inc. v. Miasole, Inc., U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, 5:11-cv-00171-PSG, filed Apr. 10, 2013, 2 pages. |
Collins Dictionaries, Definition of permanently, pp. 1-3 (Apr. 4, 2013). |
Commission Investigative Staff's Initial Markman Brief, pp. 1-31 (Apr. 24, 2013), ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Commission Investigative Staff's Markman Reply Brief, May 8, 2013, 26 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Commission Investigative Staff's Submission Regarding the Level of Skill of One of Ordinary Skill in the Art, May 29, 2013, 4 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Complainant Speculative Produce Design, LLC's Ground Rule 834 Reply Claim Construction Brief, May 8, 2013, 49 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Complainant Speculative Product Design, LLC's Disclosure of the Level of Ordinary Skill in the Art for the '561 Patent, May 29, 2013, 7 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Complainant Speculative Product Design, LLC's Ground Rule 8.4 Initial Claim Construction Brief, Apr. 24, 2013, 34 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Decision to Vacate and Remand, State of California Dept. of Transportation v. Tycor Walls, Inc., 106 Fed. Appx. 709 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 15, 2004), 5 pages. |
Declaration of Bryan Hynecek and Exhibit, May 7, 2013, 20 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Declaration of Curtis E. Peterson and Exhibit, Apr. 24, 2013, 12 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Declaration of Curtis E. Peterson, May 29, 2013, 2 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Declaration of David O. Kazmer P.E., Ph.D. on Defining One of Ordinary Skill with Respect to US Patent No. 8,204,561, May 29, 2013, 7 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Declaration of David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. in Support of Superior Communications, Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief, 23 pages (Apr. 23, 2013), ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Declaration of David O. Kazmer, P.E., Ph.D. in Support of Superior Communications, Inc.'s Responsive Claim Construction Brief, May 8, 2013, 14 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Declaration of Dr. David O. Kazmer in Rebuttal to the Expert Declaration of Dr. Tim Osswald, May 17, 2013, 12 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Declaration of Dr. Tim Osswald in Reply to Declaration of Dr. Curtis E. Peterson, May 22, 2013, 8 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Declaration of Dr. Tim Osswald in Reply to Declaration of Dr. David Kazmer, May 22, 2013, 7 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Declaration of Dr. Tim Osswald in Support of Complainant Speculative Product Design, LLC's Ground Rule 8.4 Reply Claim Construction Brief, May 7, 2013, 15 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Declaration of Jennifer Bennett in Support of Complainant Speculative Product Design LLC's Ground Rule 8.4 Initial Claim Construction Brief, Apr. 24, 2013, 2 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Declaration of Philip J. Gaves in Support of Superior Communications, Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief, pp. 1-3 (Apr. 24, 2013), (Exhibit E of Commission Investigative Staff Initial Markman Brief [Ref. 6]), ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Declaration of Philip J. Graves in Support of Superior Communications, Inc's Reply Claim Construction Brief, May 8, 2013, 2 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Email from J. Bennett of Dentons dated Apr. 22, 2013, “Follow-up to Apr. 22, 2013 call re: Markman”, 1 pages (Exhibit E, Commission Investigative Staff's Initial Markman Brief [Cite 6]). |
Ground Rule 8.3 Joint Claim Construction Chart, pp. 1-15 (Apr. 12, 2013), ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
http://web.archive org/web/20081225012114/http://www.switcheasy.com/products/Rebel/Rebel.Php, pp. 1-3 (Oct. 17, 2011). |
http://web.archive.org/web/20051031111323/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Injection—molding (Oct. 31, 2005). |
http://web.archive.org/web/20070902012735/http://www.manufacturelink.com.au/processes/plasticmoulding-overmoulding.aspx (Sep. 2, 2007). |
http://modmyi.com/forums/accessory-review/143151-mini-review-cozip-iphone-case-pics.html (May 2, 2008). |
http://web.archive.org/web/20091013221721/http://terpconnect.umd.edu/˜skgupta/M3T/MMMP.html. |
http://web.archive.org/web/20071107144725/http://www.amazon.com/Apple-iPhone-Polycarbonate-Black-Cozip/dp/B000WHK3V2, Nov. 7, 2007. |
http://web.archive.org/web/20080401100404/http://www.amazon.com/Apple-iPhone-Polycarbonate-Silver-Cozip/dp/B00104U134, Apr. 1, 2008. |
http://web.archive.org/web/20081222050045/http://www.switcheasy.com/products/Neo/Neo.php, pp. 1-4 (Oct. 17, 2011). |
http://www.cavtc.net/hkxy/jpkc/mjyy/jxzy/ckzI/200909/W020090917626295465463.swf (Sep. 2009). |
http://www.glstpes.com/pdf/literature/Overmold%20Design%20Guide.pdf (Aug. 27, 2004). |
http://www.glstpes.com/pdf/papers/Overmolding%20of%20Thermoplastic%20Elastomers%20Engineered%20solutions%20for%20consumer%20product%20differentiation.pdf (Jul. 14, 2007). |
http://www.mierriam-webster.com/dictionary/one-piece (Apr. 2013). |
http://www.mobiletechreview.com/iPod/iPhone-cases-review.htm, pp. 1-8 (Oct. 17, 2011). |
http://www.theworldsbestever.com/2007/12/20/the-worlds-best-iphone-accessory/, Dec. 20, 2007. |
http://www.tooling-press-release.com/Global/News/Articles/2005/Inclosia%20Signs%20EXO%20Technology%20Licensing%20Agreement%20with%20Mosen.htm (Jun. 24, 2005). |
Order 13: Construing Terms of the Asserted Patent (Jul. 8, 2013), ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Osswad, et al., Injection Molding Handbook, p. 69, (2002), 2 pages. |
Osswald, et al., International Plastics Handbook, The Resource for Engineers, (2006), pp. 124-125, 313-326, 341-343. |
Kaysun Corporation Overmolding Whitepaper, available at http://www.kaysun.com/capabilities/overmolding/overmolding-white-paper?gclid=CPD96PGMirkCFQya4AodSH8AEg, 5 pages. |
Kazmer, David O., Injection Mold Design Engineering, pp. 358-359, 362-363 (2007). |
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 6th Ed., McGraw-Hill Publishers, pp. 818-819, 956, 1137 & 1816 (2003). |
Memorandum and Order, Oki America, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 2006 WL 3290577 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2006), 14 pages. |
Memorandum Opinion and Order Construing Certain Claims of U.S. Patents No. 4,279,947 (Goldman), No. 4,446,194 (Candaleria), No. 5,026,667 (Roberts), No. 5,479,084 (Yallup), and No. 5,040,144 (Pelley), Motorola, Inc. v. Analog Devices, Inc., 2004 WL 5633734 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2004), 19 pages. |
Order Construing Claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,928,734 and 7,032,314, Trent West v. Quality Gold, Inc., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, 5:10-cv-03124-JF (HRL), E-filed Sep. 16, 2011, 19 pages. |
Order Granting in Part and Denying Part Defendants' Motion for Symmary Jusgment of Non-Infringement; Denying as Moot Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Declaration of Steven Velinsky; Denying n Part as Moot and in Part as Premature Motion in Limine and Motion to Strike Proferred Testimony of Nelson Urdaneta; Dismissing in Part Counterclaims as Moot; Vacating Hearing, Celerity, Inc. v. Ultra Clean Technology Systems and Service, Inc., 2007 WL 1202240 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2007), 11 pages. |
Oxford Latin Dictionary, pp. 358 (1969). |
Rebuttal Declaration of Curtis E. Peterson, May 16, 2013, 8 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Respondents Fellowes, Inc. and Body Glove International, LLC's Opening Brief on Claim Construction, pp. 1-28 (Apr. 24, 2013), ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Respondents Fellowes, Inc. and Body Glove International, LLC's Reply Brief on Claim Construction, May 8, 2013, 22 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Respondents' Submission Regarding Ordinary Skill in the Art, May 29, 2013, 13 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Rosato's Plastics Encyclopedia and Dictionary, Hanser Publishers, pp. 303 & 351 (1993). |
S. Goyal et al., “Improving Impact Tolerance of Portable Electronic Products: Case Study of Cellular Phones”, Experimental Mechanics, vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 43-52 (1999). |
S. Goyal, et al., “Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond,” vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 169-191 (1977). |
S. Goyal, et al., “Role of Shock Spectrum in Electronic Product Suspension Design,” Outstanding paper of the International Conference and Exhibition on High Density Interconnect and Systems Packaging, The Intl. J. of Microcircuits and Electronic Packaging, vol. 23, No. 2, 2d Quarter, pp. 183-190. |
S. Goyal, et al., “Designing Best-in-Class Impact-Tolerant Cellular Phones and Other Portable Products”, Bell Labs Technical Journal, pp. 159-174 (Jul.-Sep. 1998). |
Special Master's Report on Claim Construction Under Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., Instituform Technologies, Inc. v. Amerik Supplies, et al. v. Cosmic-Sondermaschinenbau GmbH, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, 1:08-cv-0333-TCB (Consolidated with Civil Action File No. 1:08-cv-0320), Oct. 8, 2009, 39 pages. |
Superior Communications, Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief, Apr. 24, 2013, 68 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
Superior Communications, Inc.'s Reply Claim Construction Brief, May 8, 2013, 42 pages, ITC Investigation Nos. 337-TA-861 and 867 (consolidated). |
The Random House Dictionary of the English Language, 2d Ed., pp. 717-718, and 726 (1987). |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Technology Classification for “Co-molding plural fluent materials and uniting to preform”, 2 pages. |
Webster's II, New Riverside University Dictionary, pp. 477-478, 820-821 & 874-875 (1984). |
Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (1984). |
Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged, pp. 849-850, 860, 1576 & 1683 (1961). |
www.theclip.com/Innopocket-tab-with-Ultra-Clip-p-16261.html. |
Innopocket tab with Ultra Clip, publication date unknown (4 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60756187 | Jan 2006 | US | |
60641204 | Jan 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11275443 | Jan 2006 | US |
Child | 11619920 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11619920 | Jan 2007 | US |
Child | 13843310 | US |