1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the field of portable, rotary vane vacuum pumps and more particularly to the field of such pumps for use in servicing air conditioning and refrigeration systems.
2. Discussion of the Background
Portable, rotary vane vacuum pumps are widely used in the servicing of air conditioning and refrigerant systems to draw down a relatively deep vacuum before the system is recharged. In a typical servicing procedure, the refrigerant of the system is first recovered and the unit opened to atmosphere for repairs. Thereafter and prior to recharging it, the air and any residual moisture must be pulled out of the system otherwise its performance will be adversely affected. More specifically, any air and moisture left in the system will interfere with the refrigerant's thermal cycle causing erratic and inefficient performance. Additionally, any residual air and moisture can cause undesirable chemical reactions within the system components and form ice crystals within the system contributing to accelerated component failures.
Most such vacuum pumps are submerged or at least partially submerged in a surrounding sump of oil. The oil sump provides a supply of oil for lubricating and sealing the rotating vanes inside the pump allowing the pump to draw a deep vacuum. The exterior oil sump about the operating pump also serves to cool it. Such arrangements typically feed the oil from the sump into the interior of the pump along a path or paths adjacent one or more of the pump bearings. The oil is then redistributed by rotational forces to the vanes and inner perimeter of the pump cylinder thereby providing lubrication and seals for the rotating parts. The oil level in these submerged sump designs must be kept above the inlet of the oil path to the pump's interior otherwise the pump will not receive a fresh and continuous supply of oil and the pump will not operate properly to pull a deep vacuum.
Such submerged or partially submerged designs are subject to oil being undesirably drawn or sucked from the sump back through the pump into the system being evacuated when the pump is shut off. This is the case whether the pump is intentionally turned off (e.g., by the operator) or unintentionally shut down (e.g., someone trips over the power cord to the pump or a circuit breaker is tripped). In such cases and if the air conditioning or refrigeration system being evacuated is not isolated from the pump, the vacuum in the system as indicated above will draw or suck oil from the sump backwards through the pump and into the system until there is finally a break to atmosphere somewhere. At this point, oil is undesirably in the air conditioning or refrigeration system and the system should be cleaned of this oil before proceeding, involving additional time and expense. The pump is also undesirably filled with incompressible oil which can result in damage to the pump parts and their alignment upon restarting. Further, the hoses connecting the pump and system being evacuated are usually filled with oil and disconnecting them typically creates a messy flow of oil in the immediate service area.
To address these draw or suck back problems, many pump manufacturers install a ball or other check valve arrangement on the input line to the pump from the system being evacuated. However, the ball or similar structure is an obstruction to the flow and can significantly reduce the flow rate from the system increasing the time and expense of the evacuation process. Further, as the evacuation becomes deeper and if the ball or similar member is spring biased toward its closed position, the spring force may overcome any small pressure differential on either side of the ball and prematurely close the check valve before the desired vacuum is drawn.
Many pump manufacturers employ a relatively effective way to address the draw back problem of oil into the system being evacuated by providing a manually operated isolation valve between the system and the pump. However, this relies on the operator remembering to close the valve once the desired vacuum has been drawn. More importantly, this approach does not prevent the draw back problem if the pump is unintentionally shut down (e.g., by someone tripping over the power cord to the pump or a circuit breaker is tripped). Further, neither this manual valve approach nor the check valve one discussed above prevents oil from being drawn in and undesirably filling the pump. To address the pump problem, some manufacturers provide a manually operated venting valve to be activated once the pump has been isolated from the evacuated system. However, this again relies on the operator remembering to open the valve and does not prevent the draw back problem if the pump is unintentionally shut down.
With these and other problems in mind, the present invention was developed. In it, a pump design is provided that is not submerged in the sump oil and additionally has an automatic arrangement to safely break the vacuum in the pump and in the system being evacuated should the pump be intentionally or unintentionally shut down.
This invention involves a portable, rotary vane vacuum pump with an automatic vacuum breaking arrangement. The automatic arrangement vents the vane pump to atmosphere whenever the drive motor ceases to rotate the vane pump. The arrangement prevents lubricating oil in any substantial amount from being undesirably drawn or sucked into the evacuated pump when the drive motor is shut off either intentionally or unintentionally. If the system being evacuated is also still connected to the pump, the automatic vacuum breaking arrangement will additionally vent it and greatly limit any amount of oil that may be undesirably sucked back into it.
The pump has a lubricating oil system that includes an oil inlet arrangement with a primary oil container, a secondary oil container, and a small pump mechanism between the two containers. The primary and secondary oil containers are both continuously open to atmosphere and at ambient pressure. The pump mechanism moves oil from the primary container to the much smaller secondary container. In doing so, oil is drawn into the housing bore of the evacuated vane pump via a first path downstream of the pump mechanism. The first oil path is in fluid communication with the secondary container which as indicated above is open to the atmosphere and at ambient pressure. Upon the motor ceasing to rotate the vane pump, the evacuated housing bore is immediately vented to atmosphere from the secondary container through the first oil path.
The secondary container holds only a small volume fraction (e.g., 1/10 or less) of the oil in the primary or sump container. Consequently and during the venting process, only a relatively small amount of oil in the secondary oil container and the first oil path may be sucked into the housing bore with the incoming, venting air. Some of this oil may also be sucked from the housing bore into the system being evacuated if it still connected to the vane pump. However, the amount of oil that may be drawn in and as compared to current designs is so small as not to create a problem in the vane pump or the system being evacuated. The system is then not unduly contaminated with oil. Additionally, the vane pump is not undesirably filled with oil to the extent it cannot be safely restarted without having to be first drained of excess oil.
The lubricating oil system also includes an oil return arrangement to deliver the oil from the operating vane pump and secondary container back to the primary container while the containers still remain open to the atmosphere and at ambient pressure. The primary oil container or sump essentially holds all of the oil for the system and is preferably made of clear, rigid plastic wherein the condition of the oil in the system can be visually monitored. The primary or sump container is additionally removable from the main body of the pump and can be quickly and easily replaced with another container of fresh oil even while the vane pump is still operating.
As illustrated in
In operation, the motor 5 of
The housing 7 of
The pump 1 of the present invention as schematically shown in
More specifically, the oil inlet arrangement of the system 2 as illustrated in
The oil inlet arrangement supplies oil from the primary container 4 downstream of the pump mechanism 8 through the illustrated path 10,10′,10″ (see
The oil return arrangement of the lubricating oil system 2 as indicated above delivers the oil back from the vane pump 3 and secondary oil container 6 to the primary oil container 4. In this regard, the oil in the bore of the housing 7 of the vane pump 3 supplied through the path 10,10′,10″,19 as previously discussed exits the vane pump 3 (
Upon the motor 5 being shut down and the rotor 13 ceasing to be driven, the vacuum in the bore of the housing 7 (e.g., less than ambient and as deep as 500 or even 20 microns of Mercury) is automatically broken and vented to atmosphere. The venting is done from the secondary container 6 (
The vane pump 3 of the present invention can be a single or multiple stage pump. In a multiple stage design as in
The automatic vacuum breaking arrangement of the present invention can then serve to safely vent single or multiple stage pumps. In doing so, the primary oil reservoir container 4 and secondary oil reservoir container 6 can at all time be open to atmosphere and at ambient pressure.
The primary oil reservoir container 4 is preferably connected at 26 in
In the preferred embodiment, the primary oil reservoir 4 is essentially the entire sump (e.g., 8 ounces) for the oil of the system and can easily be removed from the main body of the pump 1. The remainder of the system then contains only a relatively small fraction of oil compared to the primary container 4. The secondary container 6, for example, may contain about 1/10 or less (e.g., 1/16 or 0.5 fluid ounces) of the volume of oil in the primary container 4. The residual oil in the rest of the system may be even less. Because the pump is not submerged in the sump oil, the various parts of the main body including the vane pump 3 and motor 5 can be air cooled (e.g., by the fan 30 of
The above disclosure sets forth a number of embodiments of the present invention described in detail with respect to the accompanying drawings. Those skilled in this art will appreciate that various changes, modifications, other structural arrangements, and other embodiments could be practiced under the teachings of the present invention without departing from the scope of this invention as set forth in the following claims. In particular, it is noted that the word substantially is utilized herein to represent the inherent degree of uncertainty that may be attributed to any quantitative comparison, value, measurement or other representation. This term is also utilized herein to represent the degree by which a quantitative representation may vary from a stated reference without resulting in a change in the basic function of the subject matter involved.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/146,557 filed Jan. 22, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
235905 | Schultz | Dec 1880 | A |
2476041 | Happe et al. | Jul 1949 | A |
2491351 | Zeitlin | Dec 1949 | A |
2940260 | Mylcraine | Jun 1960 | A |
3008631 | Paugh | Nov 1961 | A |
3067624 | Norton et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
3191503 | Fuehrer | Jun 1965 | A |
3451276 | Wadlow et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
3670190 | Goebel | Jun 1972 | A |
3744942 | Mount | Jul 1973 | A |
3820924 | Cassidy | Jun 1974 | A |
3834840 | Hartley | Sep 1974 | A |
3837764 | Fritch et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3952709 | Riddel | Apr 1976 | A |
3990819 | Ritchie | Nov 1976 | A |
4032270 | Sheth et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4283167 | Bassan et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4299097 | Shank et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4408968 | Inagaki et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4447196 | Nagasaku et al. | May 1984 | A |
4523897 | Lower et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4525129 | Berges et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4559838 | Neuenschwander | Dec 1985 | A |
4608002 | Hayase et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4631006 | Murray | Dec 1986 | A |
4737090 | Sakai et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4921071 | Lonnborg et al. | May 1990 | A |
5017108 | Murayama et al. | May 1991 | A |
5078017 | Zornes | Jan 1992 | A |
5092185 | Zornes et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5127239 | Manz et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5310326 | Gui et al. | May 1994 | A |
5678657 | Lee | Oct 1997 | A |
5846059 | Mizuno et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6092994 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099259 | Monk et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6126410 | Kung et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
D474209 | Seymour et al. | May 2003 | S |
D482373 | Seymour et al. | Nov 2003 | S |
7353650 | Takada et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7674096 | Sundheim | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20060073033 | Sundheim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080041664 | Visintainer et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080107554 | Shulver et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080159896 | Kishi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Once Through Oil Sealed System [online]. Beach-Russ [retrieved on Nov. 16, 2007]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.beach-russ.com/oilsealed.htm>. |
SHARK Vacuum Pump, 2002, 2 pages, INFICON, East Syracuse, New York. |
Stinger 2000—Universal Refrigerant Recovery System, 2000, pp. 4-5 and 16, United Kingdom. |
OZ Refrigerant Recovery System—Powermax, 2003, 2 pages, ThermoFlo, Springfield, Massachusetts. |
Welch Direct Drive Vacuum Pumps, 2003, 6 pages, Labconco Corporation, Kansas City, Missouri. |
CPS 2003—Professional Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Products, 2003, p. 14, CPS Products, Inc., Hialeah, Florida. |
Promax Robinair, ATP 2004 HVAC/R Catalog, 2004, pp. 22-23, Advanced Test Products, Miramar, Florida. |
Greg Sundheim, Helpful Hints for Refrigerant Recovery, Contracting Business, Feb. 1997, 4 pages, Penton Publishing Inc., Cleveland, Ohio. |
Refrigerant Recovery, 1998, 4 pages, Promax/Amprobe, Englewood, Colorado. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100183467 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61146557 | Jan 2009 | US |