It is known in the state of the art that “any microorganism, including viruses, can pass into the air. Contaminated material can be aerosolized in many different ways, from the wind to human and animal activities such as sneezing, mechanical processes, etc. If the aerodynamic size of an infectious particle is appropriate, it can remain in the air, come into contact with humans or animals, and potentially cause an infection. The probability that a particle loaded with microorganisms in the air will cause an infection depends on its infectious potential and its ability to resist aerosolization stress” (Verreault D., Moineau S. and Duchaine C. (2008). Methods for Sampling of Airborne Viruses. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, p. 413-444.)
Not all microorganisms cause diseases, however, the so-called pathogens would be responsible for various human diseases such as: hepatitis, HIV, salmonella, flu to acute respiratory diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and now the new coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2 that causes the disease called COVID-19 identified by first time in December 2019 in Wuhan, China.
The main difference between them lies in the environment in which they live, such as the mode, medium and speed of contagion.
The transmission potential of microorganisms can vary according to their morphological characteristics, as well as their ability to survive certain temperatures and contact surfaces. An “analysis of 22 studies reveals that human coronaviruses such as the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) coronavirus, the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS) or endemic human coronaviruses (HCoV) can persist on inanimate surfaces such as metal, glass or plastic for up to 9 days” (Kampf G., Todt D., Pfaender S., Steinmann E. (2020). Journal of Hospital Infection, 105(3): pp 587).
On the other hand, “a virus can only multiply within a host cell. Infected cells can spread viruses directly into the surrounding air (primary aerosolization) or onto fluids and surfaces, which can become sources of airborne transmission (secondary aerosolization). Secondary aerosolization can occur for any virus, predominantly when air displacements or movements around contaminated surfaces or fluids disperse viruses into the air. It can also occur from liquid splashes, which can aerosolize viruses in liquids or on surfaces. In fact, almost any type of disturbance of infected organisms or materials, even the bursting of bubbles in seawater, can produce virus-laden airborne particles” (Verreault D., Moineau S. and Duchaine C. (2008). Methods for Sampling of Airborne Viruses. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, p. 413-444.).
Airborne microorganisms can represent important risks to human health, animals and the economy of populations, however, with the recent pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19), studies have been carried out whose results would indicate that the level of air pollution and type of particles present, would facilitate and increase the severity of respiratory infections of the viral type and their adverse effects especially for humans (Science of the Total Environment 727 (2020) 138704).
Currently, in the state of the art, various specialized air sampling equipment for the collection and detection of microorganisms present in controlled environments, such as the hospital, industrial and pharmaceutical sectors, as well as other detection equipment used in office's air conditioning and ventilation duct systems are known.
It is also known in the state of the art that this equipment requires specialized knowledge to be used, preventing its application in uncontrolled environments, but highly susceptible and sensitive to infectious factors such as nurseries, schools, homes, private residences, hotels, or public venues, among others.
In the current state of the art, it is known the existence of patented products for commercial and industrial use of continuous use, which require installation, manipulation and specialized supervision. Ref. US 20050260569 A1 to House M. & Grenier M. issued on Nov. 24, 2005.
Or in contrast to this, the existence of equipment that are not specialized in collecting environmental samples, since it considers other functionalities not associated with the collection or measurement of pathogenic microorganisms present in the environment. Ref: U.S. Pat. No. 6,192,767 B1 to Fiorina A. issued on Feb. 27, 2001.
In the state of the art there are commercial devices aimed at specialized food, pharmaceutical, hospital and controlled environments industries which require specialized handling and supervision, not suitable for uncontrolled environments and users without sampling and laboratory technical knowledge, such as:
The solubility of the gelatin membrane filter allows other applications (eg. rapid microbiology, virus sampling, and sampling of high bacterial concentrations).
None of the previously described background features the functionalities and advantages that characterize the present invention. Thus, none of the commercial devices mentioned have features such as portability due to their low weight, use in uncontrolled environments, simplicity in their operation and sterilization, and the possibility of detecting the presence of viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. These features provide the claimed device with advantages over known devices, such as, it allows a large volume of sampling with respect to its size, simplicity in its handling, intuitive use, portable, safe in its handling and reliable in its application, therefore It does not require specific technical knowledge for its manipulation.
An embodiment of the present invention is illustrated by way of example in the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention refers to a compact and portable sampling device for detecting microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, viruses, including SARS-CoV-2 in the air, by means of a filtering system in uncontrolled environments.
In
In
In
In
In
This sampling device is intuitive and simple to use, allowing it to be used by personnel without laboratory and sampling techniques knowledge.
It has a sequence of use, operation, handling of the device and samples oriented to reliable sampling results.
The basic principle of its operation is due to the suction of a flow of air from the environment, which enters the device through the upper part of the head (2P2), perpendicular to the support area, by means of a fan (2i2) whose flow passes through an inlet filter (2i1) that retains microorganisms present in the environment, for later use in diagnostic laboratories.
After the air flow passes through the inlet filter, it is conducted through an internal hose (2i11) to avoid dispersion of the flow on the operating electronic components. The hose directs the flow to a chamber in the lower part of the device, in which there is an outlet filter (2i8).
The chamber at the bottom is designed so that the air flow circulates to the outside, passing through the positioning lines of the outlet filter (2i8), and escapes through the slits located radially in the cover of access (2P6).
In its design, this sampling device is made up of 8 pieces made of resin or similar by means of 3D printing or of polymers such as polypropylene (PP), polycarbonate (PC) or ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) or similar by injection indistinctly. It has two main parts, separating on one side the head (2P2) and the casing (2P4) that contains the rest of the internal components. This provides two technical-production improvements: facilitating the assembly of internal components and reducing the margin of loss of parts in the production system.
The head (2P2) has a pivoting and snap-fit cover (1P1), which keeps the sampling filter (2i1) firmly attached to the head surface at all times. The cover is attached to the head by means of a hinge (2P7) in order to ensure that parts of the device are not removed or lost, thus simplifying its sequence of use and minimizing the possibility of contamination of parts when resting on various surfaces. Similarly, the device does not have accessory parts that could add elements that could be removed or lost.
The sampling filter is contained by a support (2C1) throughout the sampling process, facilitating its handling, and is removed when the filter is stored in the sampling bag. The filter support gives structure to the filter (2i1), holds it and at the same time occupies the least amount of filter surface. This support is made of plastic material, of minimum thickness and of simple manufacture, by means of punching or similar, that the user acquires as a consumable together with the filter within the same sterilized bag.
The set comprised of the head cover (2P1), the sampling filter support (2C1) and its support surface on the head, have been designed and defined millimetrically, so that there is no contact between the filter and any surface of the device.
The sampling filter (2i1) are replaceable commercial filters, made of nitrocellulose, cellulose or similar, with pore sizes between 1-8 microns for the retention of microorganisms and between 1-5 microns for the retention of viruses, including SARS—CoV-2, present in the environment, which can be used later in diagnostic laboratories.
The fan (2i2) to generate the air flow, is a centrifugal fan according to the requirements of air volume and sampling times with a balanced consumption in relation to the suction power and the size of the device with a diameter of between 40 and 60 mm, with a static pressure of between 2 and 7 Kpa, flow volume of between 100 and 150 L/min of, consumption of between 15 and 24 W, and VDC of 12 or 24.
The fan support (2P3) fixes it to the casing (2P4), in such a way that in this action the fan inlet can be wedged into the cavity that connects it to the air flow inlet. The fan is easily placed in the support thanks to the slots that position it in place, to be screwed later. Next, the support is fixed to the head (2P2), thus being secured to the device. It also allows comfortable access to the fan in case of service.
The lower support (2P5) has in the upper part an inlet for the silicone hose (2i11) that conducts the air towards the outlet filtering chamber (2i8), and some battery positioning partitions. In the lower part it has circular and concentric partitions, designed so that there is no dragging of the filter when the lower cover is activated. A perimeter partition near the edge of the outlet filter, makes it fit against the lower cover, thus sealing the chamber.
At the base it has an outlet filter support (2P6) to let the air flow out of the device. It is activated by twisting to open or close it. The outlet filter (2i8) is secured between the lower support (2P5) and the filter access cover (2P6). When closing this screw cover, pressure is applied upwards, sealing it. In this way, the outlet filter (2i8) is positioned in isolation from the rest of the internal volume of the device. The purpose of this filter is to prevent possible internal contamination of the device from being spread in the same or another uncontaminated environment.
The technological features of operation proposed in the device are minimal, in order to minimize internal electronic mechanisms and at the same time simplify the use of the device as much as possible.
It has usage indicators such as two led lights (1P2 and 1P3) that provide information on the status of the battery, a switch with a built-in graph indicating on and off (1P1), and a battery charger (2i14) (switched source) with charging indicator light.
Its sequence of use consists of:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
38805 | Jul 2020 | UY | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3295359 | Peck | Jan 1967 | A |
5500369 | Kiplinger | Mar 1996 | A |
6192767 | Fiorina | Feb 2001 | B1 |
7267017 | Bodnar | Sep 2007 | B1 |
10859473 | Wu | Dec 2020 | B2 |
20030005761 | Spurrell | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030008341 | Spurrell | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050068040 | Mitchell | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050136507 | Sullivan | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050260569 | Houde et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20220026318 | Maccio | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220397494 | Packingham | Dec 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
112461615 | Mar 2021 | CN |
2016525688 | Aug 2016 | JP |
WO-03081212 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-2005030272 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO-2015138695 | Sep 2015 | WO |
WO-2017044536 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO-2017044536 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO-2019194890 | Oct 2019 | WO |
WO-2022101510 | May 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion, PCT/EP2021/081885, Nov. 12, 2020, 12 pg(s) (Year: 2020). |
Angelo Robotto et al., SARS-CoV-2 and indoor/outdoor air samples: a methodological approach to have consistent and comparable results, Environmental Research 195, Elsevier, Feb. 2021, 7 pg(s) (Year: 2017). |
Pan et al., Efficient collection of viable virus aerosol through laminar-flow, water-based condensational particle growth, Journal of Applied Microbiology 120, 805-815, 2016 (Year: 2016). |
Pan et al., Collection, particle sizing and detection of airborne viruses, Journal of Applied Microbiology 127, 1596-1611, 2019 (Year: 2019). |
C.W. Haig et al., Bioaerosol sampling: sampling mechanisms, bioefficiency and field studies, Journal of Hospital Infection 93, 2016, pp. 242-255 (Year: 2016). |
Burton et al., Physical collection efficiency of filter materials for bacteria and viruses, Ann. Occup. Hyg., vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 143-151, 2007 (Year: 2007). |
João Tito Borges et al. 2021 SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Springer, 2021, 14 pg(s) (Year: 2021). |
Angelo Robotto et al., SARS-CoV-2 and indoor/outdoor air samples: a methodological approach to have consistent and comparable results, Environmental Research 195, Elsevier, Feb. 2021, 7 pg(s) (Year: 2021). |
Verreault et al., Methods for Sampling of Airborne Viruses, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 72, No. 3, Sep. 2008, p. 413-444 (Year: 2008). |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion, PCT/EP2021/081885, Nov. 12, 2020, 2020, 12 pg(s) (Year: 2020). |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, PCT/EP2021/081885, Nov. 16, 2020, 5 pg(s) (Year: 2020). |
Abbas Mohammadi et al., SARS-CoV-2 detection in different respiratory sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis, EBioMedicine 59, Elsevier, 2020, pp. 2352-3964 (Year: 2020). |
Verreault D., Moineau S. and Duchaine C., Methods for Sampling of Airborne Viruses. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 2008, p. 413-444. |
Kampf G., Todt D., Pfaender S., Steinmann E., Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents, 2020, 246-251. |
Yongjian Z., Jingui X., Fengming H., Liqing C., Association between short-term exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 infection: Evidence from China, 2020, 138704. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220026318 A1 | Jan 2022 | US |