1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates generally to shelters and, more particularly, to shelters including collapsible frames.
2. Description of the Related Art
Over the years, a seemingly endless variety of tents and other shelters having collapsible frames have been introduced into the market. Such structures are commonly used to provide shelter during camping trips, picnics, parties, military operations and other outdoor activities. Because their frames are collapsible, relatively large shelters may be folded into a compact configuration for storage and transport.
The inventors herein have discovered that there are a number of shortcomings associated with the collapsible shelters that have been introduced heretofore. More specifically, the inventors herein have discovered that the frames associated with prior collapsible shelters tend to be difficult to fold and unfold, unstable, and somewhat large when folded. Some prior shelter frames also allow the canopy to sag and form unsightly pockets where water can accumulate, reduce tent headroom and/or ultimately produce an unsightly shelter.
For example, a prior open-type collapsible tent is shown in
The shelter frame shown in
Another example of a conventional shelter frame is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,607,656 (“the '656 patent”) the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. The frame disclosed in the '656 patent is a marginal improvement over the frame illustrated in
Another example of a shelter frame is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,035,877 (“the '877 patent”) the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. The frame of the '877 patent represents an improvement over previous designs by providing a modified canopy frame design that eliminates a central support member, providing additional usable room beneath the portable shelter.
Despite these improvements, shelter frame designs remain difficult to expand and contract, especially for a single user. Nearly all previous shelter frame joints use a single bolt to fasten multiple members together while attempting to allow for rotational movement relative to each other. This arrangement creates friction between members which in turn makes expansion or contraction of the joint more difficult. Consequently, portable shelter manufacturers are caught between two equally undesirable alternatives: tighten the bolts of these joints very tightly or leave the bolts relatively loose. If the joint bolts are significantly tightened, the shelter frame will be more structurally secure at the cost of considerable increased friction. On the other hand, leaving the bolts relatively loose reduces the above mentioned joint friction but increases the “play” in the joints, greatly reducing shelter frame structural integrity, increasing joint wear, and decreasing the lifespan of the shelter.
What is needed is an improved shelter frame design that provides maximum usable room within the shelter, structural integrity, and minimal force to expand or contract.
A general object of the present invention is to provide a collapsible shelter that is superior to those presently known in the art. In particular, one object of the present invention is to provide a shelter frame that is relatively easy to fold and unfold, stable, and still compact when folded. Another object of the present invention is to provide a shelter frame that is less likely to allow the canopy to sag, will not reduce tent headroom and will ultimately produce an attractive shelter. A further object of the present invention is to provide an easily expanded shelter frame. Yet a further object of the present invention is to provide a shelter frame that can be expanded by a single person.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, these and other objectives are accomplished by providing a shelter frame having at least two poles connected by a linking assembly having first and second scissors-type cross joints and a linking device. The scissors-type cross joints include first structural members pivotally coupled to respective second structural members, having a rolling element bearing positioned between both member. The linking device is adapted to pivotally secure a predetermined portion of the second structural member in the first scissors-type linkage to the second scissors-type linkage at a point on the second scissors-type linkage vertically spaced from the predetermined portion of the second structural member in the first scissors-type linkage and to also pivotally secure a predetermined portion of the second structural member in the second scissors-type linkage to the first scissors-type linkage at a point on the first scissors-type linkage vertically spaced from the predetermined portion of the second structural member in the second scissors-type linkage.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, other objectives are accomplished by providing a shelter frame with a canopy support including a head connector and at least first and second canopy support rods. Each canopy support rod includes a first rod member pivotally secured to a second rod member by way of a rolling element bearing joint. The first rod members are also pivotally secured to a respective pole and the second rod members are also pivotally secured to the head connector. As a result, the canopy support provides a greater support area than many prior canopy supports, which results in an aesthetically pleasing shelter canopy that is less likely to sag. The shelter frame may also include linking rods that are pivotally secured to sliding connectors on the poles and to the canopy support rods. The linking rods help drive the canopy support to its unfolded orientation as the frame poles are pulled apart. As a result, the canopy support need not be manually pushed to its unfolded orientation.
In accordance with still another aspect of the present invention, each joint of the portable shelter contains a rolling element bearing to allow joint movement with less applied force. In this respect, the shelter frame may be expanded or contracted with less effort from the user.
Many other features and attendant advantages of the present invention will become apparent as the invention becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The following is a detailed description of the best presently known mode of carrying out the invention. This description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the invention. The scope of the invention is defined solely by the appended claims.
As shown by way of example in
The fixed connectors 106 act to pivotally mount two side rails 108 and a canopy support rod 112, as best seen in
The canopy support rod 112 is shown in
The poles 102 may include a locking assembly which locks the sliding connector 109 in place when it reaches the location shown in
Turning to the canopy support 103 shown in
As noted above, one end of each canopy support rod 112 is secured to a fixed linkage 106 and the other end is secured to the head 107. The preferred head 107 includes four head connectors, each of which consists of a pair of parallel walls that mate with the three parallel walls on the rod member 112 ends. The connectors are secured to the rod member 112 ends by a nut and bolt.
As illustrated in
Best seen in
The rail end joints 113 function similarly to the previously described cross joints 105, but instead are located at the end of side rails 108, as best seen in
As seen in the preferred embodiment of
Typically, rolling element bearings with a contact angle of less than 45 degrees have a much greater radial load capacity and are classed as radial bearings, whereas bearings which have a contact angle of over 45 degrees have a greater axial load capacity and are classed as thrust bearings. When the loading characteristics of both radial and thrust bearings are combine, they are often classed as complex bearings.
Most rolling element bearings consist of rings with an inner ring and an outer ring (a raceway), rolling elements, and a cage (rolling element retainer). The retainer separates the rolling elements at regular intervals and holds them in place within the inner and outer raceways, allowing them to rotate freely.
The above mentioned rolling elements are generally ball-shaped or roller shaped. The rollers are found in a few typical styles, including cylindrical, tapered, needle and spherical. Other classification methods include the number of rolling rows (single, multiple, or 4 row), separable and non-separable (inner or outer ring can be detached), and thrust bearing that carry axial load in one or two directions. Balls geometrically contact the raceway surfaces of the inner and outer rings at points, while the roller's surface provides a line of contact.
Generally, ball bearings exhibit a lower frictional resistance and lower face run-out in rotation than roller bearings. This makes them more suitable for use in applications which require high speed, high precision, low torque and low vibration. Roller bearings, however, have a larger load applications requiring long life and endurance for heavy loads and shock loads. A cut-away view of a typical roller bearing can be seen in
Thrust bearings are designed for pure thrust loads, and can handle little or no radial load. The rolling elements in a thrust bearing can be a ball, needle or roller, depending on its use.
Since the joints of shelter frame 100 will typically encounter some axial loading during use, it is preferable that the rolling element bearings 114 support at least some axial load. In this respect, roller bearings and thrust bearings provide the most benefit in regards to their above mentioned characteristics. However, it should be understood that other rolling element bearings may be used with the present invention to provide improved functionality over the prior art, so long as the rolling element bearing is capable of rotating and of supporting the loads associated with the joints of shelter frame 100.
In addition to the benefits of friction reduction, these rolling element bearings act to reinforce the bolt holes in the cross bars, increasing the overall strength of the shelter frame 100. Such reinforcement also serves to increase the product lifespan and overall durability of the shelter frame 100, providing superior performance when compared to prior art designs.
Although the invention has been described in terms of particular embodiments and applications, one of ordinary skill in the art, in light of this teaching, can generate additional embodiments and modifications without departing from the spirit of or exceeding the scope of the claimed invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the drawings and descriptions herein are proffered by way of example to facilitate comprehension of the invention and should not be construed to limit the scope thereof.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/482,503, entitled Portable Shelter Framework, filed Jun. 24, 2003, and U.S. Provisional Application 60/449,124 entitled Shade Structure With Roller Bearings, filed Feb. 21, 2003, both of the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
684130 | Taubert | Oct 1901 | A |
1007322 | Barnes | Oct 1911 | A |
1326006 | Sterhardt | Dec 1919 | A |
1449894 | Dial | Mar 1923 | A |
1493915 | Baker | May 1924 | A |
1499395 | Muehleisen et al. | Jul 1924 | A |
1502898 | Berg | Jul 1924 | A |
1504889 | Hansen | Aug 1924 | A |
1712826 | Hvid | May 1929 | A |
1728356 | Morgan | Sep 1929 | A |
2243190 | Capaldo | May 1941 | A |
2284686 | Rupright | Jun 1942 | A |
2454483 | Rysick | Nov 1948 | A |
2752213 | Swart et al. | Jun 1956 | A |
2889838 | Aviezer et al. | Jun 1959 | A |
3126815 | May et al. | Mar 1964 | A |
3174397 | Sanborn | Mar 1965 | A |
3199518 | Glidewell | Aug 1965 | A |
3335815 | Oakes | Aug 1967 | A |
3375624 | Mikulin | Apr 1968 | A |
3496687 | Greenberg et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3526066 | Hagar et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3844663 | Prette | Oct 1974 | A |
3909055 | Koppel | Sep 1975 | A |
4025208 | Donahue | May 1977 | A |
4026313 | Zeigler | May 1977 | A |
4077418 | Cohen | Mar 1978 | A |
4156433 | Beaulieu | May 1979 | A |
4243339 | Dickerson | Jan 1981 | A |
4262460 | Bertin | Apr 1981 | A |
4431331 | Brody | Feb 1984 | A |
4465392 | Lang | Aug 1984 | A |
4472075 | Forni | Sep 1984 | A |
4548125 | Hüther | Oct 1985 | A |
4607656 | Carter | Aug 1986 | A |
4615402 | Eisenloeffel | Oct 1986 | A |
4667577 | Rösch | May 1987 | A |
4684280 | Dirkin et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4689932 | Zeigler | Sep 1987 | A |
4766980 | Engle | Aug 1988 | A |
4779635 | Lynch | Oct 1988 | A |
4808023 | Arnold et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4844109 | Navarro | Jul 1989 | A |
4846204 | Sok Kyu | Jul 1989 | A |
4872361 | Muller | Oct 1989 | A |
4885891 | Lynch | Dec 1989 | A |
4924896 | Carter | May 1990 | A |
4929113 | Sheu | May 1990 | A |
4947884 | Lynch | Aug 1990 | A |
5035253 | Bortles | Jul 1991 | A |
5244001 | Lynch | Sep 1993 | A |
5274980 | Zeigler | Jan 1994 | A |
5275188 | Tsai | Jan 1994 | A |
5351701 | Hsiao | Oct 1994 | A |
5361794 | Brady | Nov 1994 | A |
5387048 | Kuo | Feb 1995 | A |
5421356 | Lynch | Jun 1995 | A |
5423341 | Brady | Jun 1995 | A |
5444946 | Zeigler | Aug 1995 | A |
5485863 | Carter | Jan 1996 | A |
5490532 | Mallookis et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5490533 | Carter | Feb 1996 | A |
5511572 | Carter | Apr 1996 | A |
5632293 | Carter | May 1997 | A |
5638853 | Tsai | Jun 1997 | A |
6035877 | Losi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6076770 | Nygren et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6095319 | Noniewicz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6206020 | Lynch | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6382224 | Carter | May 2002 | B1 |
6470902 | Carter | Oct 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1434526 | Dec 1968 | DE |
1186733 | Sep 2001 | EP |
198803 | Jun 1923 | GB |
672815 | May 1952 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040211455 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60482503 | Jun 2003 | US | |
60449124 | Feb 2003 | US |