This application relates to an implementation of multiple software components for executing business processes, and in certain embodiments to methods and systems of implementation of multiple software components using a portal.
An industry is typically comprised of business entities that interact with other business entities. The business entities may include market participants who may use software tools to exchange information with other participants. The market participants in an industry may use many business processes to interact with other market participants. Business processes may include activities to achieve a specific business result, such as customer relationship management, which enables a business to provide support for its customers during points of the product life-cycle. The market participants may belong to the same or different business entities.
Where multiple market participants sharing a common business goal interact electronically, they may collaborate, creating value-generating business processes that extend beyond the boundaries of an enterprise. Alternatively, the business processes may be intra-enterprise processes. Such collaboration may occur in traditional businesses such as the chemical, automotive, or other non-electronic commerce based businesses.
Software components exist that may provide enterprises and business entities with supply chain management and customer relationship management services, for example. By tailoring multiple software components, which may assist business entities in ordering, shipping, product tracking, inventory control, etc., for a specific scenario in which business entities are collaborating and by coordinating deployment of these multiple software components for the specific scenario, increased efficiencies and synergies can result.
In one aspect, a method is disclosed of receiving data related to a user's system landscape. The data indicates one or more software components included in the landscape. The method also includes receiving a user's selection of a software component to be managed or customized, accessing the software component in response to the user's selection, receiving a user's input relating to an alteration to be made to a feature or setting of the software component and modifying one or more files associated with the software component to reflect the alteration. In an embodiment, the aforesaid method may include displaying a profile of the system landscape and a software component. In another embodiment, the aforesaid method may include displaying a feature or setting associated with the software component. In another embodiment, the aforesaid method may include receiving a user's input to modify a business process or business document reflected in the system landscape. In another embodiment, the aforesaid method may include receiving a user's selection of a test protocol for verification of the software components associated with the system landscape and executing the selected test protocol.
A second aspect is an article comprising a computer-readable medium or propagated signal having embodied thereon a computer program configured to generate a user interface for customizing a computer system, such that the medium comprises code segments configured to perform the method disclosed above.
In a third aspect, a system for customizing a computer system is provided that includes a processor connected to a storage device and one or more input/output devices, such that the processor is configured to perform the method disclosed above.
In various implementations, the above techniques may provide one or more of the following advantages. A user is provided with a central point of access to configure user roles, navigate through various system landscapes, configure multiple software components and store project documentation. A user is also provided with an integrated solution for configuring and implementing software components from various companies. A user is provided with a speedy and safe implementation of multiple software components using pre-packaged business expertise.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
Companies are confronted with a challenge of implementing processes, such as business processes. The processes may be internal processes that describe and support collaboration between departments, such as sales and production, for example. Companies also may need to implement processes that support collaboration with another business entity. Companies may want to support their key business functions using software. The present method and system provides a portal for the implementation of multiple software components. The multiple software components may support inter-enterprise and intra-enterprise business processes. Referring to
Referring to
A solution map may be derived from the information of a collaborative business map. Solution maps provide a blueprint of an industry's application landscape. Solution maps also provide a map and overview of business processes within an industry whereas collaborative business maps provide a description of collaborative end-to-end business processes that involve multiple participants within or outside the organization. For example, an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) in the automotive industry may create a solution map of the major processes in the automotive industry and a collaborative business map of the collaborative business processes between the OEM and other market participants in the industry, such as piece-part suppliers. These business maps can be modified according to the needs of the user or the industry being analyzed. The tool solution map 252 may identify information technology (IT) dependent tasks performed within the collaborative business systems, and determine an array of potential implementations to facilitate those tasks. The software processes identified in a solution map may be performed by various software components.
After a company has defined business processes it needs to support, they face the challenge of implementing these processes, which were illustrated using solution and collaborative business maps, on multiple software components.
The tool 204 may be executed in at least two modes. In an online mode, the tool 204 can be distributed and executed on one or more servers 202 and accessed by a user using a client node 206, 208. Alternatively, in an offline mode, the user can download the tool 204 onto the client node 206, 208 from the server 204 and execute the tool on the computer device. The tool may also be obtained through distribution channels including diskettes, CD-ROM or other such media. The network 218 may include a plurality of devices such as servers, routers and switching circuits connected in an intranet, extranet or Internet configuration.
A user may use a client node 206, 208 to access the server 202 over a network 210. The client node may include a personal computer (PC), personal digital assistant (PDA) or other device using wireless or wired communication protocols to access the server 202. The client node 206, 208 may be coupled to I/O devices (not shown) that may include a keyboard in combination with a pointing device such as a mouse to input data into the computer, a computer display screen and/or a printer to produce output from the computer, a storage resource such as a hard disk drive for storing and retrieving data for the computer, and/or other I/O devices. The client node 206, 208 also may include a database (not shown) to store and retrieve data related to the execution of the tool 204.
The solution architect tool 204 may provide a user interface on the display of the client node 206, 208 that accesses and customizes various system programs and components used by one or more market participants. The tool 204 uses the portal to integrate content (e.g., best practices), tools (e.g., software tools for project administration, blueprint definition, project configuration, project consistency checking, conducting tests, etc.), and methodologies (e.g., accelerated implementation methodologies) that allow the tool 204 to access and customize multiple programs or components which may be utilized by market participants and then implement the software components.
The solution architect tool 204 may be used to create a solution for implementing multiple software components for market participants, document business scenarios and processes for which new transactions and programs have been developed, and also may assign transactions, implementation software, and test cases to be used by specific business processes. The solution architect tool 204 may be used by a business partner to create its own support materials for its customers (e.g., a single site project), larger companies who want to roll out a global template of customizing to their subsidiaries (e.g., a reusable e-business solution project), and internally by a company to document new business scenarios and to prepare the scenarios for validation by the production department.
Referring to
Referring to
The project administration activities 320 provide the user with access to functions to add, view or modify general data related to the project 322, maintain a list of team members assigned to a project 324, define the project's system landscape 326, and provide standards for documentation 327. The project information activities may also provide a user with access links to other software tools 328 that may be used to evaluate programs or components which may be utilized by market participants. The user may also use the project administration activities to configure the project such that a user's access to tool activities and functions depends on his role in the project 329. For example, a project manager's role may be defined such that the project manager may only perform the tasks of project administration, defining a business blueprint, performing project configuration, and testing. The role of an application consultant may be defined such that the application consultant may only install best practices, define a business blueprint, perform project configuration, check consistency, and perform project testing. Similarly, the role of a technical consultant may be configured, such that the technical consultant may only define a system landscape, install best practices, set up system landscapes and perform a data transfer. For example, an SAP-specific role, such as that of a basis consultant, may be configured such that the basis consultant may only define a business blueprint, perform authorization, carry out development, perform testing, perform a data transfer. The role of a read only user is configured such that the read only user may not use the tool to perform any project activity, but may use the tool only to display information related to the solution project. A master role may also be provided that authorizes a user to use all tool activities and functions.
The reporting activity 330 provides the user with access to functions that provide status reports for all major project phases 332 and allows the status reports to be downloaded 334. The general project reporting information activity 340 provides the user an overview of the project status 342. The user may choose to display an overview of the project status information in different ways to a project manager and a project member.
Best practices refers to business content which includes proven methodology along with practices and extensive documentation. Best practices may include information about business scenarios, business blueprints, configuration settings, user roles (e.g., a “strategic purchaser” has duties that include creating vehicles in a vehicle pool, searching for vehicle, and maintaining vehicle status) and training materials related to programs or components which may be utilized by market participants. A user who is creating a solution by accessing and customizing multiple programs or components which may be utilized by market participants may then use the tool to access information about the best methodologies and practices to use in business scenarios related to customer relationship management, such as Internet sales or mobile sales. For example, a user may use the best practices information available from the solution architect tool during the configuration stage of a solution that creates solution maps. Best practices will make information available to the user about business-to-business selling, which lets a business customers buy products from its website by logging in using a user name and password. The user name and password information allows the business to automatically identify the company that the customer works for. Best practices may also make information available to a user about business-to-consumer selling, which contains information about how to set up a web shop and offer the businesses products directly to consumers. While creating a solution related to Internet selling, the user may use the best practices information made available by the solution architect to learn about the techniques of cross-selling and up-selling by automatically offering higher value alternatives and related products to increase sales volume and revenues.
In another example, the solution architect tool 204 may make best practices information available about mobile sales business scenarios. The tool may provide the user with access to information about how to perform customer visits with order entry. This scenario describes the typical activities that a field sales representative may have to perform when visiting clients and taking orders. The tool may also provide the user, who is creating a solution for accessing, customizing, and implementing multiple programs or components that may be utilized by market participants, with access to information about how to perform campaign management, such as information about supporting a sales manager's promotions, product launches and marketing campaigns or provide the user access to information about opportunity management, such as information about cross-selling analysis and handling customer contact from the time of initial contact through conclusion of the project.
A user who is creating the solution may also use the tool to access information about the best methodologies and practices to use in business scenarios related to supply chain management, such as supply chain planning, vendor managed inventory, collaborative planning forecasting and replenishment and collaborative order promising. Alternatively, a user may use the tool to access information about the best methodologies and practices to use in business scenarios related to enterprise buyer procurement, such as procurement of indirect materials, procurement of direct materials, component planning, content management and local procurement.
The user may also use the tool 204 to check consistency of the customizing 620 during the realization phase 600. The user may use the tool 204 to access another customizing program 622 (e.g., SAP's Customizing Scout software module) which can compare the customizing settings with those of different clients 624, identify any conflicts between the systems/clients and adapt configuration of the components to resolve conflicts 628.
Another realization phase activity is set up authorization 630. Using set up authorization, a user may access configuration software 632 to tailor best practices to project-specific needs 634. The user may also use the configuration software (e.g., SAP's Access Profile Generator software module) to copy or create new roles for the end users 636. A user may use the “Carry Out Developments” activity 640 to develop interfaces, reports or forms 642 and to document developments about new releases 644. Additionally, a user may use the solution architect tool 204 to load master data by importing data from the development systems/clients 652 and to use the imported data to create the same system in quality assurance and production systems 654.
Additionally, during the realization project phase, a user may set up a quality assurance and/or training system landscape 660 by activating software (e.g., SAP's BCSets) to set up middleware components and to set up connectivity between the quality assurance system and/or the testing system and related systems 662. The user may also access documentation related to setting up the quality assurance system landscape 664. The user also may input information about the parameters required to set up the quality assurance and/or training systems 666. The user may also use the user interface to organize testing 670 during the realization phase of the project solution. The user may define sequence tests to be executed on a project, perform sequence 672 and integration tests 674 and view information about the test status, such as the percentage of tests that resulted in errors.
Referring to
Those skilled in the art will appreciate from the foregoing description that the methods and systems identified herein may be advantageously modified in an almost limitless number of ways. For instance, one or more of the foregoing techniques may be advantageously performed in isolation or in any desired combination or order. The software may be configured to be executed on any variety of platforms, such as intranets, wireless networks, and local hard disks by way of non-limiting example. The software may be executed on one or more computers, servers or distributed servers. The systems and techniques described herein may be implemented in environments without software, including as “paper and pencil” versions. Any amount of proprietary content may be incorporated into this system, such as propriety business models, industry trends, and market forces. Any aspect of the business strategy evaluation, value calculations, etc. may be implemented at a finer granularity by use of more detailed information, models, inputs and/or algorithms, for example. None of the particular techniques need be performed in the order indicated unless specifically stated. To the contrary, the techniques may be freely modified by substituting and/or reordering steps as suitable for particular implementations. Any output from the system described herein may be presented in any manner suitable for a particular user, and may include any aspect of the business strategies, industry trends, and market forces described herein.
Various features of the system may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. For example, some aspects of the system may be implemented in computer programs executing on multiple programmable computers. Each program may be implemented in a high level procedural or object-oriented programming language to communicate with servers.
Furthermore, each such computer program may be stored on a storage medium, such as read-only-memory (ROM), readable by a machine, such as a general or special purpose programmable computer, for configuring and operating the machine when the storage medium is read by the machine to perform the functions described above.
This application is a continuation of Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/343,161, filed Dec. 28, 2001, which is incorporated herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4674042 | Hernandez et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 5838918 | Prager et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5884287 | Edesess | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5913218 | Carney et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 6005571 | Pachauri | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6026336 | Sakurai et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6047279 | Barrack et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6119149 | Notani | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6151707 | Hecksel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6222533 | Notani et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6230309 | Turner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6256676 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266666 | Ireland et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6311144 | Abu El Ata | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6345239 | Bowman-Amuah | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6473794 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6633923 | Kukura et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6708172 | Wong et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6721740 | Skinner et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6748569 | Brooke et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6757899 | Zhdankin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6772216 | Ankireddipally et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6792462 | Bernhardt et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6868427 | Herzog et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6904449 | Quinones | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 7000219 | Barrett et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7051036 | Rosnow et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7089279 | Sakaguchi | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7188158 | Stanton et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7280973 | Hack et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7290147 | Bittner et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7337195 | Hrle et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7346893 | Deimel et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7392236 | Rusch et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 20020010781 | Tuatini | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020038336 | Abileah et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042751 | Sarno | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042849 | Ho et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046294 | Brodsky et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049573 | El Ata | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052769 | Navani et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020056012 | Abileah et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065696 | Hack et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020073396 | Crupi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020078010 | Ehrman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107920 | Hotti | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174097 | Rusch et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030046681 | Barturen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030106039 | Rosnow et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144892 | Cowan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187763 | Jordan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030188290 | Corral | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212690 | Surma et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030222903 | Herzog et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040249482 | Abu El Ata et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050021348 | Chan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2-277126 | Nov 1990 | JP |
| 11-338682 | Dec 1999 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030126050 A1 | Jul 2003 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60343161 | Dec 2001 | US |