The invention relates to sensors, and more particularly to inductive sensors using field altering bodies.
Patent Application No. 2003/1031724A1, entitled “Cylinder With Optical Position Sensing Device And Method,” is directed to a fluid-pressure actuated piston/cylinder assembly having an optical sensor capable of reading indicia markings on a piston rod. The publication discloses various ways for providing optically readable scales upon a piston rod. Other coding scales are also disclosed, such as a bar code for determining the position of a movable member. Several methods for marking a rod with a scale are disclosed, including the use of a laser to create discolorations in a rod.
Sensing systems utilizing optical marks with an optical pickup present various problems. For example, the ability of an optical sensing head to read indicia depends upon the clarity of such indicia. In hostile environments, such as the environments typical for fluid actuated cylinders, the indicia marks are exposed to the environment, and consequently, are prone to degradation. Additionally, the piston rod requires specialized fabrication techniques for imparting the indicia on the rods, and a specialized sealing arrangement must be used for the optical sensing head.
Furthermore, an optical sensor solution relying upon quadrature measuring techniques has the same limitation as various inductive devices utilizing quadrature measuring techniques. Such inductive measuring devices rely upon a ferrous target having square ridges or teeth and a quadrature scheme for measuring relative position of the target with respect to a fixed sensing head. Resolution is therefore limited by the distances between the increments. In an optical system, resolution is limited by the distance between indicia marks. In many applications, higher resolution is required.
A sensing device according to the principles of the invention includes an inductive sensor head and a body moveable relative to the sensor. The body is made of a material capable of altering a magnetic field and has a substantially out of square profile in a direction of relative travel between the body and the inductive sensor. In one embodiment, the sensor uses one or more Hall-effect sensors, and the body moves in dependence with an object to be sensed. As the body moves relative to the Hall-effect sensors, the signal output of the sensor alters in accordance with the profile of the body.
In one exemplary sensor arrangement, the body includes at least one, and preferably a plurality, of conical sections which appear as saw-tooth in profile when viewed from a side. A magnetic field is disposed to the body and to the sensors. The rod's travel relative to the sensor causes a variation in the magnitude of the magnetic field such that the field has a saw-tooth profile when plotted against time. In other embodiments, other profiles can be generated.
Sensors according to the principles of the invention have application to, for example, pneumatic or hydraulic cylinders. The body is enclosed in a piston rod fabricated to accommodate the body, and the enclosure is magnetically permeable or transparent. In the mechanical respect, the rod and body can function as an ordinary piston rod. The body, however, acts on the magnetic field of the sensing head sensors. In one embodiment, Hall-effect sensors are disposed such that the sensed magnetic field is altered by the rod travel. The body can have a saw-tooth profile, or other profiles, such as square waves or sinusoids, can be generated.
In the figures:
The rod may be formed of a carbon steel alloy that is magnetic, such as common “12L14” steel. The profile may be formed by a turning operation, or by cold-forming on a roller. The tube into which the target rod is inserted is formed of a material that is non-magnetic, or has a reasonable degree of magnetic permeability such as “300” series stainless steels. The tube provides a protective case for the target rod and facilitates the use of linear motion components in the construction of a linear sensing system. The sensing head which includes the inductive sensors, and, optionally, magnets and circuitry 3 are placed close to the outside of the tube. The sensing head may be mounted anywhere along the rod and tube assembly, and at any azimuth with respect to the linear measurement axis. The rod and tube assembly, or the sensing head, may be affixed to the elements to be sensed.
With respect to deployment of the magnetic field, other configurations, such as pull through or back biased, can be used to create the magnetic field. All that is required is a magnetic field that can be influenced by the target body 18. The sensors 16 and 17 may be any sensors that can sense the deviation of a magnetic field, and in this example are Hall-effect sensors. Although two sensors are shown in the example of
Exemplary operation is like this. The rod 20 travels in relation to the sensors 16 and 17. As the target body 18 moves through the magnetic field with reference to the sensors, the in-field cross-section of the target body varies in accordance with the outer profile of the body 18. The magnetic field varies according to the influence of the target body 18 upon the magnetic field. These variations are sensed by the sensing head and are the basis of the measurand. Because the target profile is known, a particular change in signal relates to a particular linear distance traveled by that profile, and hence the target body. In turn, the sensors provide an output in correspondence with the magnetic field. The output can be a voltage or current.
Referring again to
As multiple segments pass, the sensors alternately sense the linear distance of passing sections. The signal processing circuitry 3 and processor 2 alternately select the appropriate sensor for linear sensing, or segment transition sensing, as the target body passes. In this way, the individual linear segment measurements are “strung together” to form a long linear measurement of arbitrary length. Whether a segment is added or subtracted is determined by the direction of travel, which, in turn, can be determined by the sign of the slope of the measurand profile at any point along the traveling rod. In other words, as the slope is rising, the rod is traveling in one direction. If the slope is falling, the travel is in the opposite direction.
To maintain limits on the diameter of the rod, multiple repeating profiles are employed. In this exemplary embodiment, the linear range of the sensing system may be configured for any length with the use of an appropriate number of target sections. The segments may employ a reference, or homing indicia. The system outputs can be conditioned for the practical requirements of the intended application, and outputs can take any form (voltage, current, analog, digital, etc.) as applications may dictate. The processor 2 can be an ordinary microprocessor, microcontroller, application specific integrated circuit, discrete logic or any combination of hardware, software or firmware that can carry out instructions. In the exemplary embodiment of
The Initialization function takes place during start-up of the system 10. Start-up can be the result of a transition from power-off to power-on, or can be resumption of rod travel after an idle period, or any state for which it would be beneficial to either “home” the device or determine a current position. At a transition from power-off to power-on, or after an idle period, the system 10 initializes to a reference position to which subsequent increments or decrements are added. The processor 2 can cause the device to zero by putting the rod in a home position corresponding to zero travel. Alternatively, the processor 2 can access data relative to the last known position of the rod and the rod's direction of travel and use this data as the starting point for subsequent measurement.
The functions of Sensor Assign and Sensor Hand-off refer to the assignation of the particular sensor element function in a multiple sensor element system such as in
The function of Determine Rod Position includes the sub-functions of calculating sectional distance, counting, and multiplication of counted segments. Calculating sectional distance refers to determining the rod position within a particular linear segment, and this value can be calculated by relating the known length of the segment to the voltage output of the appropriate sensor, i.e., there is a correspondence between output voltage and position. This value can be determined by multiplying a value derivative of the voltage representing a height along the slope by the inverse of the slope value of the segment. Alternatively, a look-up table can be maintained and updated relating voltage outputs to distances. Counting refers to incrementing or decrementing a count in dependence upon direction of travel. Direction can be determined by slope value, as previously explained. Thus, position is determined by multiplying the count by the known length of the segments and adding the calculated sectional distance.
Calibration refers to the function of offsetting the change in the “magnetic circuit” due to time, temperature, or outside influences. The length of each segment is predetermined during design and manufacture, therefore it is known that a determined distance has passed every time the transition occurs between segments. The sensing system relies upon a pre-calibrated slope value to determine the linear distance traveled for a given measurand signal within a given target segment. Changes in the magnetic circuit may, as described above, require changes in the sensor slope value to maintain a desired level of accuracy. The slope value may be checked when there is a transition from one target segment to the next. When a complete segment has been passed, the expected (known) value of the segment may be compared to the measured value. If the measured value differs from the known value the signal processing elements 2 and 3 of the system may update the slope value to be used in the next successive segment. Additionally, since the scale of such errors would likely be relatively small, this system may perform running corrections with the passage of each segment, adding or subtracting minute amounts when a segment is passed, thus maintaining a high degree of absolute accuracy over arbitrarily long translations.
The system 10 would provide a robust linear position sensing system that is resistant to wash down, dirt, shock, and other industrial environments. The sensing head can contain no moving parts and may be encapsulated. The rod and tube assemblies for such a system may be mass-produced in sections. Systems of this type may be scaled to fit particular applications. On very large machinery the rod and tube assemblies might be appropriately large, and conversely for small systems.
The system 10 may also relieve the manufacturing process of the requirement for very high precision in the production of system components. The requirement for precision is confined, in the exemplary case of a saw-tooth, to the small area of the conic profile for a given segment, and more precisely as only a requirement regarding the segment length, an easy parameter to achieve in automated production systems. Long-range accuracy is a function of maintaining uniform spacing between segments. Errors in any given segment are compartmentalized, and are not propagated or piston-cylinder 52 includes through the larger system.
Referring now to
Another exemplary embodiment includes a target rod, a tube, into which the target rod is inserted, a sensing head and linear motion components, such as linear bearings, supports, and slides which comprise a linear motion system with integral position sensing.
The above described stainless steel tubing with embedded target rod may be used as sliding elements in a machine system in place of ordinary steel guide rods. In this case the linear position sensing function would be added to many machines with little change in design or appearance. The system would provide double duty in the form of linear motion guide and linear position sensor.
The principles of the invention can be applied to a rotary sensor 40 as shown in
The above described embodiments and functions are merely exemplary. The inventions can include additional embodiments of, for example, profile shape, material of manufacture, instructions, and the like. Further, the invention is not limited to the particular combinations of structure and function described herein, but includes the individual structures and functions, and sub-combinations thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2498799 | Erickson | Feb 1950 | A |
3403365 | Richards | Sep 1968 | A |
3777273 | Baba et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3988710 | Sidor et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4005396 | Fujiwara et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4057904 | Vrable et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4121504 | Nowak | Oct 1978 | A |
4214180 | Kuwako et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4231700 | Studebaker | Nov 1980 | A |
4286386 | Long | Sep 1981 | A |
4288196 | Sutton, II | Sep 1981 | A |
4319864 | Kaufeldt | Mar 1982 | A |
4342884 | Ban et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4356557 | Bell et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4367998 | Causer | Jan 1983 | A |
4386552 | Foxwell | Jun 1983 | A |
4413245 | Bartholomaus et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4425557 | Nakamura | Jan 1984 | A |
4480151 | Dozier | Oct 1984 | A |
4488014 | Daniel et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4497375 | Mucheyer et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4653190 | Spain, Jr. | Mar 1987 | A |
4737698 | McMullin et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4914389 | Juds | Apr 1990 | A |
4945221 | Nielsen et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4989329 | Pullen | Feb 1991 | A |
4999579 | Winfried | Mar 1991 | A |
5024250 | Nakamura | Jun 1991 | A |
5046243 | Walker | Sep 1991 | A |
5156242 | Ditzig | Oct 1992 | A |
5200747 | Betz et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5203723 | Ritter | Apr 1993 | A |
5233293 | Huang et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5341724 | Vatel | Aug 1994 | A |
5364043 | Linderoth | Nov 1994 | A |
5389876 | Hedengren et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5404661 | Sahm et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5444369 | Luetzow | Aug 1995 | A |
5467938 | Redman | Nov 1995 | A |
5659248 | Hedengren et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5681006 | Herd et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5693935 | Hassler, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5694042 | Eaton et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701793 | Gardner et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5752811 | Petro | May 1998 | A |
5757179 | McCurley et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768946 | Fromer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5789917 | Oudet et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5841274 | Masreliez et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5894678 | Masreliez et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5901458 | Andermo | May 1999 | A |
5936399 | Andermo et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5955881 | White et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5973494 | Masreliez et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6160395 | Goetz et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6220158 | Hartmann et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6234061 | Glasson | May 2001 | B1 |
6246232 | Okumura | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253460 | Schmitz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259249 | Miyata et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279248 | Walters | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6335618 | Nahum | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353314 | Moerbe | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360449 | Steentjes | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381863 | Steinich | May 2002 | B1 |
6443385 | Grandauer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450048 | Samuelson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6487787 | Nahum et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499225 | Steinich | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501264 | Shiraishi et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6522129 | Miyata | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6543152 | Steinich | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6545461 | Miyata | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6588313 | Brown et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6611138 | Vasiloiu | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6636035 | Kiriyama et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6646434 | Miyata et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6669135 | Hartley | Dec 2003 | B1 |
20030131724 | Neumann | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040263159 | Herbert et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2635614 | Feb 1978 | DE |
3835782 | Apr 1990 | DE |
4038674 | Jun 1992 | DE |
19814758 | Oct 1999 | DE |
19908036 | Aug 2000 | DE |
20015895 | Dec 2000 | DE |
0325787 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0505297 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0896855 | Feb 1999 | EP |
2794236 | Dec 2000 | FR |
11211410 | Aug 1999 | JP |
WO-9955613 | Nov 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060017431 A1 | Jan 2006 | US |