The invention relates to the field of implant prosthodontics and specifically removable prostheses, and further relates to accurate alignment during the conversion prosthesis technique. The invention even further relates to improvements in computer-aided design of digital denture fabrications. The invention even further relates to implant-supported prostheses, and techniques for creating digital dentures to prevent errors in aligning upper and lower arches of a dental patient receiving prosthetic dental solutions.
Digital denture technology has provided numerous benefits to dentists and patients undergoing both conventional denture treatment and implant supported prostheses. Well-designed digital denture solutions bring the precision, speed, and profitability of digital process automation to removable dentistry, using computer aided engineering. Computer-aided engineering in conjunction with computer-aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) improved on traditional CAE/CAD/CAM fabrication by using sophisticated, scientific algorithms to aid and control the bulk of design and manufacturing tasks. The technology has dynamically changed the trajectory of removable prosthetics from a labor-intensive, inconsistent process to a consistent, algorithmically driven complete mouth rehabilitation process.
Traditionally, a denture for an immediate loading protocol would be processed using individual denture teeth. The denture would then become the conversion prosthesis. The conversion prosthesis would have three separate components, or areas of interest required to make the conversion occur: 1) An upper, or maxillary portion, 2) a lower, or mandibular portion, and 3) an articulation, a bite registration or other structure to allow the upper and lower portion to be affixed in a preferred occlusion.
On the labial aspect of the denture teeth, a heavy gauge wire would be secured with orthodontic resin at mid-tooth position. The wire served as a handle to be able to maneuver and position the prosthesis into the proper orientation with a needle holder when establishing the occlusal relationship with the opposing arch. This procedure has been clinically utilized for at least three decades.
The process described in the prior art could be time consuming and costly. Further, the need for reinforcement of denture teeth with heavy gauge wire, filament or other materials proved helpful, but labor intensive as it included an extra step. See the journal article, “A New Protocol for Immediately Loading of Dental Implants” by Balshi and Wolfinger, specifically FIG. 15 in that publication. The wire was intended to create grip to hold denture with pliers. In other words, the prior art solution was to use a manually mounted wire and outside implements to ideally position the denture.
A need exists for a better way to align the occlusion of the upper and lower portion of the conversion denture. A need further exists to align the occlusion intra-orally, rather than in a lab or other setting outside the mouth. A need further exists for a more stable approach for the upper and lower portions denture to be properly aligned without building a separate structure like a splint between them. A need even further exists to streamline the entire procedure of treating a mandibular and maxillary arch whereas the solution requires determining and setting proper occlusion of the upper and lower denture.
The present invention provides in a first embodiment a dental prosthesis comprising an upper portion of the dental prosthesis; a lower portion of the dental prosthesis; a lock for securing an upper or lower portion of the dental prosthesis to an opposite portion of the prosthesis; a posterior area of the dental prosthesis; an anterior area of the dental prosthesis; a male portion located towards the posterior area of a first portion of the dental prosthesis, the male portion projecting away from first portion of the prosthesis and towards the second portion of the prosthesis, the second portion being an opposing arch of the first portion; a female portion located towards the posterior area of the second portion of the prosthesis distally of the tooth area, the female portion having a complementary structure to receive the male portion thereby joining the first portion and the second portion to achieve a desired tooth alignment and occlusion; and wherein the male portion and female portion of the prosthesis may be located distally of the tooth area of the prosthesis and wherein the male portions may be located in a base portion of the prosthesis, and wherein the male portion may located on at least one tooth of the male portion and the female portion of the prosthesis is located on at least one tooth of the male portion, and wherein the male portion may be a projection from the first portion of the prosthesis and the female portion is an existing tooth in the second portion, and wherein the male portion is located in a base portion of the prosthesis; and may further comprise a handle located towards the anterior side, the handle being milled as part of the prosthesis the handle having a top side and a bottom side and extending distally in an anterior direction from the prosthesis; and the prosthesis may be milled from a digital denture design.
A second embodiment of the invention may include an upper and lower set of full dentures for a dental patient comprising a first arch of the denture, a second arch of the denture being in occlusal opposition to the first arch; a locking portion securing a first arch of the denture to the second arch of the denture, the locking portion projecting from a first arch to a receiving portion of the second arch, whereby a dentist may align the first arch and second arch to set an occlusion of the dental patient, the receiving portion being at least one tooth on the second arch, the locking portion projecting into the receiving portion that approximates a positive mold at least one tooth on the second arch; locking portion emanating from at least one tooth towards an anterior side of the first arch, the locking portion forming a slight compression on the receiving portion, the locking portion having a frictional fit into the receiving portion, the locking portion comprising a first side, a second side, and a third side above the occlusal plane which work together to apply a slight compression against the receiving portion; wherein the dentures may be milled from a digital denture design that is customized to the intra-oral anatomy of the dental patient, wherein the dentures may comprise a handle located towards the anterior side of a first and/or second arch, the handle being milled as part of the prosthesis, the handle having a top side and a bottom side and extending distally in an anterior direction from the first and/or second arch.
Another embodiment of the present invention comprises the upper or lower denture base having a female portion distal of the tooth position, and further comprises the lower or upper denture base having a male portion distal of the tooth position that mates with the female portion of the opposing upper denture base, whereby the upper denture base may be affixed to the lower denture base at an alignment that approximates the proper occlusion. Additional embodiments may place vertical struts or projections more anteriorly, creating vertical extensions of the buccal or lingual cusps of the denture teeth to interdigitate with a fixed element of the opposing dentition or prosthesis.
These and other features of the present invention will be evident from the ensuing detailed description of preferred embodiments, from the claims and from the drawings.
a-b shows the right and left perspective views of the inventive denture base with upper and lower portions mated, while
The present invention provides a structure for facilitating precise alignment of removeable prosthesis during such procedures as “Teeth-in-a-Day.” The structure provides many advantages over the prior art. The occlusal locks, which are generally applied to the posterior areas of the prosthesis, give the clinician the ability to bring the entire dentition into maximum interocclusal relationship using the positioning handle to aid in moving the conversion denture into optimal position. This significantly reduces time required for occlusal adjustments. The occlusal locks tend to reduce the need for additional wax evaluations and new interim implant-supported prosthesis, which often are needed because of inadequate alignment of the conversion prosthesis at the initial construction intra-orally. Stabilizing prosthesis with occlusal locks between the upper and lower dentures or natural teeth creates a static occlusal relationship so that the prosthesis is static and thus non-functional from normal use of mastication. Thus, the structure may further provide error prevention to the process of aligning an upper and/or lower prosthetic to an opposing arch.
According to embodiments of the invention shown in
Occlusal locks may be positioned distally of the tooth portion of the denture base so that tooth occlusion and alignment is unaffected by the locks, as seen in
For example, in
Occlusal locks may comprise a mating system 200 as shown in
In still another embodiment shown in
In another embodiment not depicted, the female and male portions may be switched in opposition so that the male portion is on the upper denture base and the female portion on the lower denture base. This embodiment may apply to any of the above embodiments that disclose a male and female portion.
In another embodiments not depicted, the mating system between the upper and lower denture bases may comprise alternative modes of connection. The male and female portions may have greater lateral profiles than depicted. They may include snap-fit mating structures, a gear-fit structure, or other geometric configurations known the arts to removably stabilize two objects. Stabilizing the two objects of the upper and lower dentures or natural teeth creates a static relationship so that the prosthesis is static and thus non-functional from normal use of mastication.
Technique for Utilizing Inventive Occlusal Locks into a Teeth-In-A-Day® Procedure
The following technique describes an exemplary utilization of the inventive occlusal locks in a popular, rapid tooth replacement procedure on a dental patient. Though other prosthetic devices such as crowns and partial dentures, or even double arch dentures are available for use with the inventive occlusal lock and positioning handle structures, a full arch denture for the maxilla arch of a dental patient is described as follows:
1. Make definitive impressions, physical or digital, and provide them to the dental laboratory with a prescription for the digital denture that will become the conversion or temporary denture.
2. In the dental laboratory, optically scan the impressions or pour stone casts made from the impressions and create a virtual articulation. Then, a digital tooth arrangement is designed.
3. Design the positioning handle and incorporate it into the production file for milling a monolithic denture 100, as depicted in
4. Design the occlusal locks and incorporate them into the production file for milling the monolithic denture 100 (See
5. After the pick-up of the implant component parts is complete, trim the positioning handle 150 and the occlusal locks with a standard acrylic laboratory bur. This step may be accomplished as part of the finishing process and significantly reduces clinical production time during the conversion prosthesis procedure. In certain cases, the denture may be used as a temporary or even ongoing denture, as the occlusion is set ideally.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
200445 | Fahnstock | Feb 1878 | A |
321847 | Pelroe et al. | Jul 1885 | A |
452653 | Stedman | May 1891 | A |
474104 | Stedman | May 1892 | A |
711324 | Lacy | Oct 1902 | A |
830887 | Robert | Sep 1906 | A |
1223450 | Van Allen | Apr 1917 | A |
1293627 | Bowers | Feb 1919 | A |
1585348 | Hick et al. | May 1926 | A |
1652910 | Psayla | Dec 1927 | A |
1714185 | Hugh | May 1929 | A |
1863591 | Crowell | Jun 1932 | A |
1914606 | Kinna et al. | Jun 1933 | A |
2036678 | White | Apr 1936 | A |
2107181 | Guyton | Feb 1938 | A |
2398671 | Saffir | Apr 1946 | A |
2418833 | Harris et al. | Apr 1947 | A |
2472492 | Saffir | Jun 1949 | A |
2577769 | Kane | Dec 1951 | A |
2591678 | Cleman | Apr 1952 | A |
2598998 | Kaplan | Jun 1952 | A |
2602997 | Clawson | Jul 1952 | A |
2641835 | Greenmum | Jun 1953 | A |
2770881 | Lodi | Nov 1956 | A |
2985961 | Schwartz | May 1961 | A |
2994957 | Mcleod | Aug 1961 | A |
3043005 | Morris | Jul 1962 | A |
3083459 | McMurry et al. | Apr 1963 | A |
3241238 | Kersten | Mar 1966 | A |
3335495 | Theodore | Aug 1967 | A |
3456347 | Spinella | Jul 1969 | A |
3458936 | Tuccillo et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
3470614 | Kelly | Oct 1969 | A |
3517443 | Holley | Jun 1970 | A |
3518761 | Susman et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
3644996 | Wenkle | Feb 1972 | A |
3667123 | Huey | Jun 1972 | A |
3702027 | Marshall et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3727309 | Huey | Apr 1973 | A |
3744702 | Ellison | Jul 1973 | A |
3748739 | Thibert | Jul 1973 | A |
3813777 | VanHandel et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3846911 | Wichner | Nov 1974 | A |
3908272 | Arnold | Sep 1975 | A |
3937773 | Huffman | Feb 1976 | A |
4029632 | Gross et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4227877 | Turead et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4247287 | Gigante | Jan 1981 | A |
4299573 | Ricci | Nov 1981 | A |
4398884 | Huffman | Aug 1983 | A |
4533325 | Blair | Aug 1985 | A |
4575340 | Lustig | Mar 1986 | A |
4591341 | Andrews | May 1986 | A |
4634377 | Behrend | Jan 1987 | A |
4780082 | Schwartz | Oct 1988 | A |
4784608 | Mays | Nov 1988 | A |
4931016 | Sillard | Jun 1990 | A |
5030102 | Lang | Jul 1991 | A |
5098296 | Cullen | Mar 1992 | A |
5151044 | Rotsaert | Sep 1992 | A |
5169309 | Staubli et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5188529 | Luth | Feb 1993 | A |
5234339 | Grigereit | Aug 1993 | A |
5286198 | Barnes | Feb 1994 | A |
5427906 | Hanson | Jun 1995 | A |
5672305 | Kogure | Sep 1997 | A |
5711668 | Huestis | Jan 1998 | A |
5716214 | Lund | Feb 1998 | A |
5718584 | Wong | Feb 1998 | A |
5775899 | Huffman | Jul 1998 | A |
5833461 | Wong | Nov 1998 | A |
5839900 | Billet et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5885078 | Cagna et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5934906 | Phimmasone | Aug 1999 | A |
5951289 | Kura | Sep 1999 | A |
6030218 | Robinson | Feb 2000 | A |
6056547 | Names | May 2000 | A |
6116070 | Oshida | Sep 2000 | A |
6126445 | Willoughby | Oct 2000 | A |
6139322 | Liu | Oct 2000 | A |
6149427 | Van Handel | Nov 2000 | A |
6224372 | Ibsen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6227851 | Chisti | May 2001 | B1 |
6257895 | Oestriech | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6384107 | Liu | May 2002 | B2 |
6422864 | Glatt | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6488503 | Ichkus et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6616444 | Andreido et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6788986 | Traber et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6814575 | Poirier | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6851949 | Sachdeva | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7021934 | Aravena | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7153135 | Thomas | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7234940 | Weissman | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7433810 | Pavloskaia et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7474932 | Geng | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7530810 | Clement | May 2009 | B2 |
7653455 | Cinader, Jr. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7704076 | Mullaly | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7758345 | Christensen | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7758346 | Letcher | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7806691 | Berger | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7901209 | Saliger et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7909607 | Yau et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7950924 | Brajnovic | May 2011 | B2 |
8043091 | Schmitt | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8348669 | Schmitt | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8567408 | Roettger | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8641938 | Howe | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8801431 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8875398 | Balshi et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9055993 | Grobbee et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9155599 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9213784 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9364302 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9402698 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9411010 | Goyal et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9717572 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20020015934 | Rubert et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020180760 | Rubert et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030108845 | Giovannone | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030162147 | Monkmayer | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030211444 | Andrews | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040005530 | Mullaly | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029068 | Sachdeva et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040163291 | Pena | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040185422 | Orth et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040219490 | Gartner et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050175957 | Haje et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186539 | McLean | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050284489 | Ambis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060040232 | Shoup | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040236 | Schmitt | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060063135 | Mehl | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060172254 | Shindo | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210945 | Savic et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060286507 | Dequeker | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070154868 | Scharlack et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070190492 | Schmitt | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070231774 | Massad | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080085489 | Schmitt | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080090207 | Rubbert | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080127698 | Luckey et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080206710 | Kruth et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206714 | Schmitt | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209974 | Ewolski et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080300716 | Kopelman | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090081618 | Lamar | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090143609 | Araya | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148813 | Sun et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162813 | Glor | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090181346 | Orth | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090287332 | Adusumilli et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090291407 | Kuo | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090325125 | Diangelo et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100015572 | Dirkes et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100062394 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100086186 | Zug et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094446 | Balock et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105011 | Karkar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100324875 | Kalili | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110045442 | Adusimilli | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110112804 | Chishti et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110129796 | Riggio | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110236856 | Kanazawa et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244417 | Hilsen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120058449 | Sklarski et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120094253 | Berger | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095732 | Fisker et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120100500 | Gao | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120178045 | Massad | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179281 | Steingart et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120258426 | Boe | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120285019 | Schechner et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120308954 | Dunne | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329008 | Fishman et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130101962 | Howe | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130108988 | Simoncic | May 2013 | A1 |
20130167380 | Balshi | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130209962 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130216978 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218532 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130221554 | Jung | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130249132 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130280672 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130316302 | Fisker | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130337412 | Kwon | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140045967 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140099600 | Harrison | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140272796 | Grobbee et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150010885 | Balshi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150037760 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150064653 | Grobbee et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150134094 | Thompson et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150223969 | Smith | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150230891 | Grobbee et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245891 | Grobbee | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150245892 | Grobbee | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160262849 | Hultgren | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160374778 | Grobbee | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170012599 | Iwanaga | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170252133 | Heffelfinger | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170273766 | Fisker | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2505892 | May 2004 | CA |
1750797 | Mar 2006 | CN |
1062916 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1252867 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2035133 | Dec 1970 | FR |
10277059 | Oct 1998 | JP |
2008307281 | Dec 2008 | JP |
WO2001032096 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO2003024352 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO2004060197 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2009105661 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO2009105700 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO2010022479 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO2012030493 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO2012041329 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO2012061652 | May 2012 | WO |
WO2012061659 | May 2012 | WO |
WO2012061660 | May 2012 | WO |
WO2012064655 | May 2012 | WO |
WO2014130536 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO2014159436 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO2015063062 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO-2015089676 | Jun 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
A New Protocol for Immediate Functional Loading of Dental Implants, Dentristy Today, by Thomas J. Balshi and Glenn J. Wolfinger, Sep. 2001 vol. 20, No. 9. |
“Positioning handle and Occlusal locks for the Teeth-in-Day protocol”, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2016, Thomas J. Balshi, Glenn J. Wolfinger and Stephen F. Balshi, p. 274-278. |
European Application EP14840991.5—EPO Search Report dated Apr. 19, 2017. |
PCT Application PCTUS2014051008—ISRWO dated Nov. 20, 2014. |
PCT Application PCTUS2014051008—Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 1, 2016. |
Positioning handle and occlusal locks for the Teeth-in-a-Day protocol:, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2016, Balshi et al., p. 274-278. |
“A New Protocol for Immediate Functional Loading of Dental Implants”, Dentistry Today, Balshi et al., 2001, Sept vol. 20, No. 9. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,566—Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 16, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,566—Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 26, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,295—Non-Final Official Action dated Dec. 19, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,295—Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,036—Non-Final Official Action dated May 19, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,036—Final Official Action dated Nov. 6, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,036—Final Official Action dated Jun. 7, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/698,649—Non-Final Official Action dated Sep. 26, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/181,032—Non-Final Official Action dated Jul. 6, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/191,868—Non-Final Official Action dated Jun. 16, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/390,330—Non-Final Official Action dated Jun. 1, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190201172 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62352552 | Jun 2016 | US |