The invention relates generally to power-driven conveyors and more particularly to spiral conveyors in which a conveyor belt is positively driven in a helical path around a rotating drive tower.
Conveyor belts are often used to convey articles, such as food stuffs and other materials, through cooled or heated environments. Spiral conveyors, in which a conveyor belt follows a helical path winding around a central tower, drum, or cage, are used in freezers and ovens to provide a long conveying path with a small footprint.
Some helical conveyors are constructed with a helical track supported on a central non-rotating tower. The conveyor belt is driven around the helical track by drive sprockets at a single location outside the helical path. The maximum tension in the belt, which occurs just ahead of its engagement with the drive sprockets, can be quite high for such a long belt. To reduce the maximum belt tension, overdrive spiral conveyor systems are used. In these overdrive systems, the conveyor belt is driven by frictional contact between the inside edge of the belt and the faster-rotating outer surface of the rotating drum about which the belt is helically wrapped. Because the belt is driven along the entire helical path, the maximum belt tension is decreased. But some tension is still needed for effective frictional engagement between the drum and the belt edge. Furthermore, the frictional engagement causes wear in the belt edge and the outer drum surfaces. Because a large portion of the rotational energy required to drive the drum is lost to friction, the motor and power requirements can be quite high. And, because overdrive systems are sensitive to friction between the outside of the drum and the inside edge of the belt, the proper settings of tension and overdrive vary from installation to installation.
Positively driven spiral systems, in which drive structure on the outside of a rotating cage engages structure on the inside of a conveyor belt, have been used to overcome some of the shortcomings of overdrive systems. Because there is positive engagement between regularly spaced drive structure on the cage and regularly spaced edge structure on the inside edge of the belt, there is no slip as in overdrive systems. No additional tensioning is needed, and frictional losses are less. But one problem with positively driven spiral systems is in cleanly engaging the belt with and disengaging it from the drive structure on the cage.
One version of a spiral conveyor embodying features of the invention comprises a drive tower that is rotatable about a vertical axis and that extends from a bottom to a top with a belt entrance portion of the drive tower at or near the bottom for an upgoing spiral or at or near the top for a downgoing spiral. The drive tower has parallel ridges that project radially outward and extend in length between the bottom and the top of the drive tower at its periphery. The parallel ridges taper outwardly away from the vertical axis toward the bottom for an upgoing spiral or toward the top for a downgoing spiral in at least a portion of the belt entrance portion. A conveyor belt is positively driven without slip in a helical path around the drive tower by the parallel ridges engaging an inside edge of the conveyor belt.
Another version of a spiral conveyor comprises a drive tower that is rotatable about a vertical axis and has an outer periphery that extends from a bottom to a top. A belt entrance is at or near the bottom for an upgoing spiral or at or near the top for a downgoing spiral. Parallel outwardly projecting ridges on the drive tower extend in length from top ends to bottom ends at the periphery of the drive tower between the top and the bottom. A first portion of the ridges is a constant first distance from the vertical axis, and a second portion of the ridges closer to the belt entrance tapers radially outwardly away from the vertical axis toward the belt entrance to a greater second distance. A conveyor belt advances up or down in a conveying direction along a helical conveying path around the outer periphery of the rotating cylindrical drive tower. The conveyor belt includes a plurality of rows of belt modules having a top side and a bottom side and hingedly linked together between consecutive rows along hinge joints defining hinge axes extending perpendicular to the conveying direction from a first side edge of the rows to an opposite second side edge of the rows. The hinge joints have play in the conveying direction to allow the rows to collapse together at the first side edge when the first side edge is at the inside of the helical conveying path. The first side edge of at least some of the rows includes a tooth that extends outwardly to a distal end and has a non-rotatable guide surface parallel to one of the hinge axes of the row. The guide surface is oriented to guide the bottom ends of the ridges in an upgoing spiral or the top ends of the ridges in a downgoing spiral into driving contact with the tooth to drive the conveyor belt in the conveying direction along the helical conveying path without slip.
According to another aspect, a conveyor belt embodying features of the invention comprises a series of rows of belt modules having a top side and a bottom side and hingedly linked together between consecutive rows along hinge joints defining hinge axes extending perpendicular to a conveying direction from a first side edge of the rows to an opposite second side edge of the rows. The hinge joints have play in the conveying direction to allow the rows to collapse together at the first side edge when the first side edge is at the inside of a turn in a conveying path. The first side edge of at least some of the rows includes a tooth that projects radially outward to a distal end and has a non-rotatable guide surface parallel to one of the hinge axes of the row. The guide surface is oriented to guide a top or bottom end of an external drive member into driving contact with the tooth to drive the conveyor belt in the conveying direction without slip.
These features of the invention, as well as its advantages, are better understood by referring to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings, in which:
A spiral conveyor is shown schematically in
Each of the drive members 14 comprises a generally vertical rail 26, which is affixed at the bottom 18 to a lower ring 27 of the drive tower 10, and a ridge 28 that protrudes outward of the rail, as shown in
In a lower segment 38 of each drive member, the ridge 28 includes a constant-height region 40 and a tapered region 42. A constant-height region begins at the bottom of the rail and extends upward to the tapered region. The height of the ridge 28 increases from a height h2 in the constant-height region to a maximum height h1 at the upper end of the tapered region. In other words, the distance of the ridge 28 from the vertical axis 12 (
The off-vertical orientation and the low height h2 of the ridge in the bottom portion of the lower segment of the drive tower facilitate the entry of the conveyor belt 20 onto the rotating tower, as shown in
The ridge 28 extends out to the maximum height h1 in an intermediate segment 52 of each drive member 14. In the intermediate segment, the distance of the ridge from the vertical axis 12 (
Thus, the spiral conveyor of
An edge belt module 60 shown in
Another version of a tooth extending from the inside edge of a belt module is shown in
A portion of a conveyor belt 90 made of modules having an inside edge as in
A spiral drive tower 104 is shown in
As shown in
The engagement of the conveyor belt with an upgoing spiral is shown in
In a downgoing spiral, the operation is analogous. The belt entry level is above the top ends of the ridges at the top of the tower. The ridges are indented below the entry level by a vertical distance sufficient to allow the inside edge of the belt to collapse against the periphery of the tower. The teeth for a belt in a downgoing spiral extend downward from the bottom side of the belt to engage the top ends of the ridges. A conveyor belt constructed of modules as in
Even though the drive members on the peripheries of the drive tower shown in
Two other versions of drive towers are shown in
Thus, the spiral conveyors of
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/559,757, filed Sep. 4, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,766,705, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/259,577, filed Jan. 28, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,501,265, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/011,031, filed Jun. 18, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,189,645, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/337,147, filed Oct. 28, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,023,388, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/805,608, filed Jan. 18, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,481,523, which is a 371 of PCT/US11/43352, filed Jul. 8, 2011, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/479,620, filed Apr. 27, 2011, and which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/834,314, filed Jul. 12, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,181,771. The disclosures of those applications are incorporated into this application by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3315492 | Dreksler | Apr 1967 | A |
3348659 | Roinestad | Oct 1967 | A |
3664487 | Ballenger | May 1972 | A |
4036352 | White | Jul 1977 | A |
4118181 | Onodera | Oct 1978 | A |
4450953 | LeCann et al. | May 1984 | A |
4741430 | Roinestad | May 1988 | A |
4852720 | Roinestad | Aug 1989 | A |
4858750 | Cawley | Aug 1989 | A |
4944162 | Lang et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4981208 | Jones | Jan 1991 | A |
5069330 | Palmaer et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5133449 | Spangler | Jul 1992 | A |
5139135 | Irwin et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5310045 | Palmaer et al. | May 1994 | A |
5375695 | Daringer et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
6062375 | Pupp | May 2000 | A |
6234322 | Paladin | May 2001 | B1 |
6484379 | Palmaer | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6564930 | Golding-Kristensen | May 2003 | B1 |
7258226 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7347316 | Heber | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7878321 | Van Faassen | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8302764 | Johnson | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8453827 | Corley et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
9016467 | Bettati | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9884723 | Neely et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10155627 | Chang | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10189645 | Talsma et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
20090038916 | Van Faassen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20110056806 | Johnson | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120006654 | Talsma | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120125742 | Corley et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130213773 | Talsma et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140299450 | Tassy, Sr. et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20190389663 | Talsma et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190389664 | Dale | Dec 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
419323 | Mar 1991 | EP |
1281641 | Feb 2003 | EP |
2011028918 | Mar 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Defendant Ashworth Bros., Inc's Answer to Complaint and Counterclaims, C.A. No. 19-1130-LPS, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, filed Sep. 4, 2019, pp. 25-36. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,189,645 filed by Ashworth Bros. Inc., filed Feb. 24, 2020. |
Declaration of Philip J. O'Keefe, P.E. in Support of Petitioner Ashworth Bros. Inc.'s Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,189,645, filed Feb. 24, 2020, pp. 1-146, 163-211. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,023,388 filed by Ashworth Bros. Inc., filed Feb. 24, 2020. |
Declaration of Philip J. O'Keefe, P.E. in Support of Petitioner Ashworth Bros. Inc.'s Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,023,388, filed Feb. 24, 2020, pp. 1-119, 136-175. |
Supplemental Declaration of Philip J. O'Keefe, P.E., in Response to Patent Owner's Objections to Exhibits Cited in Petitioner's Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,023,388, filed Sep. 29, 2020. |
Supplemental Declaration of Philip J. O'Keefe, P.E., in Response to Patent Owner's Objections to Exhibits Cited in Petitioner's Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,189,645, filed Sep. 29, 2020. |
Final Written Decision, Ashworth Bros., Inc. v. Laitram, L.L.C., IPR2020-00593, U.S. Pat. No. 10,023,388 B2, dated Aug. 23, 2021, PTAB. |
Final Written Decision, Ashworth Bros. Inc. v. Laitram, L.L.C., IPR2020-00594, U.S. Pat. No. 10,189,645 B2, dated Aug. 23, 2021, PTAB. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200399067 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61479620 | Apr 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13805608 | US | |
Child | 15337147 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16559757 | Sep 2019 | US |
Child | 17012197 | US | |
Parent | 16259577 | Jan 2019 | US |
Child | 16559757 | US | |
Parent | 16011031 | Jun 2018 | US |
Child | 16259577 | US | |
Parent | 15337147 | Oct 2016 | US |
Child | 16011031 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12834314 | Jul 2010 | US |
Child | 13805608 | US |