This invention relates to a positive locking fitting assembly for interconnecting two adjacent structures. More particularly, the positive locking fitting assembly relates to a fitting assembly especially adapted for interconnecting modular constructed aircraft to create a leak proof pathway for transfer of fluids between a pair of adjacent modular structures, and further wherein the fitting assembly will not become inadvertently uncoupled due to vibration or other factors experienced through operation of the aircraft.
Aircraft fuel and hydraulic systems include a large number of couplings or fittings which interconnect various components within the fuel and hydraulic systems. The couplings must be easy to connect and must provide a locking arrangement to prevent inadvertent uncoupling. It is advantageous to provide couplings or fittings which are of minimum weight, simple in construction, and are also easily serviced for routine maintenance and repair.
The owner of the current invention is also the owner of a number of previous patents for positive lock couplings which are used to interconnect confronting ends of fluid carrying conduits in an aircraft. These patents include the U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,871,239; 6,050,609; and 6,073,973. Each of these patents are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Characteristics common to each of the inventions disclosed in these patents are coupling devices which include a plurality of threaded members which are rotatable in a locking direction, and rotatable in an opposite unlocking direction. Positive locking of the couplings is achieved by positive locking features in the form of locking tabs which are received in corresponding notches/reliefs. A resilient member is provided to ensure that the couplings remain in a locked position when the coupling is tightened to a predetermined extent during rotation in a locking direction. Visual indicia is provided to indicate when the couplings have been placed into locking engagement.
Nadsady U.S. Pat. No. 3,669,472; Gale et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,808,117 and Gale et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,928,202 each disclose a coupling device in which the tightening of the coupling parts is readily accomplished, but accidental loosening is restrained by spring fingers carried by one of the coupling parts which engage indentations or notches on the other coupling part in such a manner as to favor relative rotation of the coupling parts in the tightening direction, while restraining with greater force the rotation of the coupling parts in the opposite unlocking direction.
Cannon U.S. Pat. No. 3,999,825; Filippi U.S. Pat. No. 4,008,937; Mahoff U.S. Pat. No. 4,249,786 and Gale U.S. Pat. No. 4,346,428 each disclose a coupling with one or more toggle latches which snap into a positive locking position.
Spinner U.S. Pat. No. 4,285,564 discloses a coaxial plug connector wherein a first ring of axially pointed teeth is provided around the circumference of a cap ring. A first connector has a ring with teeth for engaging the teeth on the cap ring. The cap ring is withdrawn axially against the force of a biasing spring when the coupling is rotated to a different position. The cap ring is released and the spring urges it into locking engagement with the tooth ring. Thus, accidental rotation of the cap ring relative to the first connector is prevented.
Runkles et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,881,760 discloses a coupling with locking tines having visible indicia for determining whether or not the tines are in locked position.
Runkles et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,900,070 discloses a coupling with spring biased rotatable locking tines.
Although each of the prior art references may be suitable for their intended purposes, there are a number of additional objectives which are met by the present invention based upon the particular structure in which the fitting assembly is incorporated.
More particularly, the present invention provides a solution for interconnecting two adjacent modular structures. For example, one method that can be used in the construction of an aircraft is the use of separate modular structures which are assembled to form the finished aircraft. Different manufacturing entities may be responsible for producing various modular assemblies or components. Because each of the assemblies or components may be manufactured at remote locations, in order to minimize the efforts required to assemble the components for the finished aircraft, the various components must be designed so that there is minimal construction effort required to mate the components.
One particularly challenging problem arises for interconnection of fluid carrying members between the various modular components of the aircraft. For example, a fuel tank may span between both the fuselage and wing of an aircraft. In such a case, the mating of the modular components, that is, the wing and the fuselage, must be adapted so that a leak proof connection is provided between the modular components. Additionally, because of the various specified manufacturing tolerances of the aircraft components, the fluid connection must also take into account these tolerances so that the connection can remain leak proof despite misaligned modular components.
Another consideration in providing a leak proof connection between the modular components is that the hardware used to span between the modular components must accommodate both parallel match mate and perpendicular or guillotine type match mate assembly methods. A parallel match mate assembly involves two modular components of the aircraft which are joined to one another by movement of the modular components toward one another in a substantially common plane until the abutting ends of the components are aligned. A perpendicular or guillotine type match mate assembly method involves movement of the modular components with respect to one another in a perpendicular or transverse fashion until the abutting ends of the components are aligned.
Yet another consideration in joining a pair of modular components is the need to minimize or eliminate satellite holes placed in the modular component themselves to assist in stabilizing or attaching the hardware for connecting the modular components. In other words, it is desirable to eliminate additional holes or other structural modifications to the modular components which may otherwise alter certain strength characteristics of the modular components, or may introduce vibrational concerns or other structural issues.
Yet another consideration in providing a connection between the modular components is to create redundant sealing at all leak paths, thereby further enhancing the connection's ability to provide a leak proof path during all types of operating conditions.
Yet other considerations include ensuring that the hardware is positively locked to the modular components, and to ensure electrical conductivity through the entire fitting assembly to prevent static buildup across the connection.
With the fitting assembly of the present invention, each of the requirements and considerations set forth above are addressed with a fitting assembly that is structurally simple, can be installed and maintained with minimal effort, and has numerous other advantages as set forth below with respect to the drawings and the description of the invention.
In accordance with the present invention, a positive locking fitting assembly is provided to interconnect two adjacent structures, such as two modular components of an aircraft in order to provide a leak proof pathway or connection between the modular components. It shall be understood that although the present invention has particular utility with respect to modular constructed aircraft, the invention also has utility with respect to any other type of vehicle or device in which it is necessary to span a gap between two adjacent structures through use of a fitting assembly which provides a leak proof path between the two adjacent structures.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the positive locking fitting assembly includes a pair of couplers which attach to the respective modular components of the aircraft, and a transfer tube that joins the couplers, thereby providing a leak proof path between the modular components. Each of the couplers are also adaptable to receive adjacent tubes or other structures which may lengthen the leak proof path beyond the length of the transfer tube.
In another aspect of the present invention, the positive locking fitting assembly can be described in terms of an improvement to an aircraft wherein the positive locking fitting assembly is incorporated for providing a leak proof path between a pair of modular components which correspond to various sections of the aircraft. Therefore, the present invention can also be defined as a combination of the fitting assembly and modular components of the aircraft.
The couplers are each of identical construction and include three primary subcomponents, namely, a jam nut, a lock nut group, and a modular fitting. Each modular fitting is positioned through a corresponding bore or opening formed in a modular component of the aircraft. Each modular fitting has a first end or portion which resides on one side of its corresponding modular component, and has a second portion or side which resides on the opposite side of the corresponding modular component. The jam nut for each coupler is threaded over a first set of threads on the modular fitting. In order to accommodate the positive locking features of the present invention, opposite thread patterns may be provided for the jam nut and the lock nut group. That is, positive locking of the fitting assembly of the present invention is further enhanced by providing an opposite threading pattern which is further discussed below. As shown in the preferred embodiment, left-handed threads are incorporated for the jam nut. The lock nut group of each coupler is also threadably received over a second set of threads formed on each of the modular fittings. As shown also in the preferred embodiment, the second set of threads on the modular fittings and the lock nut groups incorporate a right-handed thread pattern.
Another aspect of the positive locking features includes the use of a pair of locking tabs on each jam nut, and a corresponding pair of notches/reliefs formed on each lock nut group whereby a predetermined amount of rotation of the lock nut group with respect to the jam nut results in positive engagement of the locking tabs with the corresponding notches/reliefs. Both visual and audio indicators are provided to confirm positive engagement. The visual indicator includes the use of an indicator stripe placed on a shoulder of the jam nut which allows the user to observe whether the lock nut group has been fully installed over the jam nut. The indicator stripe will essentially be hidden once the lock nut group is fully screwed over the jam nut. For the audible indicator engagement of the locking tabs within the corresponding notches/reliefs result in a distinct clicking sound due to the biased arrangement of the lock nut group whereby the nut body and the lock ring of the lock nut group are biased with respect to one another. A biasing member in the form of a wave spring maintains the lock nut group in positive engagement with the jam nut. The lock nut group can be removed by overcoming the force of the biasing member, and rotating the lock nut group in an opposite unlocking direction.
The transfer tube interconnecting the pair of couplers may be installed after both of the modular fittings have been installed with respect to the pair of modular components. The transfer tube is simply inserted through the opening in one of the modular fittings, and is slid across to its position spanning the gap between the pair of modular fittings. The transfer tube is held in place by a pair of wave springs which are trapped between the ends of the transfer tube and the interior ends of the adjacent tubes. The transfer tube includes a plurality of o-ring seals which ensures a leak proof connection between the modular fittings.
The lock nut group includes a number of subcomponents, to include a split retainer, a lock ring, the wave spring mentioned above, and a nut body. The split retainer is retained within the lock ring by an annular slot or shoulder. The wave spring resides within a specified axial area between the lock ring and nut body. The split retainer captures the wave spring on one edge or side of the wave spring. The other side or edge of the wave spring is captured against an interior shoulder of the nut body. Additionally, a plurality of keys or projections are formed on the interior surface of the lock ring which are placed in mating engagement with a corresponding plurality of notches/reliefs formed on the outer surface of the nut body. When the lock nut group is assembled, the lock ring is axially or longitudinally displaceable with respect to the nut body to the extent that the wave spring can be compressed and decompressed within a fixed space or gap between the lock ring and nut body. This displacement allows the locking tabs of the lock nut group to positively lock within the notches of the jam nut, and also allows unlocking by moving the lock ring with respect to the nut body resulting in the notches being disengaged from the locking tabs on the jam nut.
The fitting assembly of the present invention also maintains electrical conductivity through the entire fitting assembly to ensure that there is no static buildup across the connection between the modular components. The inherent construction of the fitting assembly ensures this electrical conductivity by the use of the plurality of springs and other elements of the fitting assembly which maintain contact with one another when assembled. An additional method to ensure electrical conductivity is to provide the various elements of the fitting assembly with conductive coatings. Conductive coating which may be used to ensure electrical conductivity may include coatings such as electroless nickel or nickel teflon coatings. Selected ones of each of the elements as necessary can be provided with the conductive coating.
The present invention also ensures that a leak proof path is provided between the modular components even when there is some misalignment between the bores of the modular components. This misalignment can be due to a number of factors to include manufacturing tolerances for the modular components of the aircraft as well as simple misalignment of the modular components during the mating of the modular components. For differences in the gap between the modular components, the transfer tube can be shortened or lengthened as necessary to accommodate any particular gap. For transverse or perpendicular misalignment between the modular components, the o-ring seals on the transfer tube are expandable and contractible to account for this type of misalignment, thereby providing a sealed pathway between the modular components. The o-rings on the transfer tube can be chosen to accommodate predicted transverse misalignment between the modular components.
In terms of the type of materials which can be used for the various elements of the fitting assembly of the present invention, a number of materials can be chosen depending on a particular application. Typically, the elements can be made of titanium based alloys, aluminum alloys, or even stainless steel alloys. Of course, the most lightweight and high strength alloys are of particular utility with regard to aircraft applications.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, the positive locking fitting assembly can be described in terms of a useful sub-combination wherein there is only a need for one coupler to provide a connection across a single walled component. In such a case, there would only be a need for a single set of sealing members to seal the transfer tube to the single coupler. Accordingly, the transfer tube might include a pair of o-rings which are positioned across the center area of the transfer tube as opposed to on the ends of the transfer tube.
Also in accordance with the present invention, a method is provided for interconnecting a pair of modular components, such as those incorporated within an aircraft. The method includes providing a pair of couplers, placing a transfer tube between the pair of couplers, and then ensuring a positive locking arrangement between the pair of couplers and the corresponding pair of modular components. Preferably within the method, the couplers each include a pair of modular fittings which are first installed through bores or openings in the pair of modular components. One of the couplers may then be fully assembled with respect to a corresponding modular component. The transfer tube may then be inserted through the opening in the modular fitting corresponding to the other coupler not yet assembled. The transfer tube is centered to span the gap between the pair of abutting modular fittings. Finally, the other coupler may be assembled thereby completing the sealed pathway or interconnection between the pair of modular components. Additional advantages and features of this invention will become apparent from the detailed description which follows, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
A plurality of seals in the form of o-rings are positioned at various locations between the elements to provide a leak proof path through the modular components 12. As further discussed below, the plurality of seals provide a redundant sealing arrangement so that leakage is minimized, if not eliminated.
As shown in the Figures, the respective modular components 12 have a plurality of connection interfaces 24 which create a separation or gap g between the respective interior surfaces 13 of the respective modular components 12. The connection interfaces simply represent those areas where the different sections or components of the aircraft are joined as by welding, threaded connections, or others. The area within the gap g is also referred to herein as the “dry zone” in that the sealed transfer tube 20 does not allow leakage of fluid into the gap g, nor is the dry zone intended by design to retain any fluid. The areas surrounding and adjacent to, as well as the area through the transfer tube and adjacent tubes, can be referred to as the “wet zones” because each of these areas may be designed for storing fluid or for transferring fluid. The transfer tube 20 along with the pair of adjacent tubes 18 are, of course, especially adapted for carrying fluid between the different modular components of the aircraft; According to the view of
Referring now to
Now referring to
The lock ring 62 further includes a plurality of keys or projections 74 which extend radially inward. These keys 74 are spaced to match keyways or slots 76 formed on the outer rim 84 of the nut body 66. This key/keyway arrangement ensures that rotation or force imparted upon the lock ring 62 is transferred to the nut body 66. The nut body 66 further includes an annular extension 82 which is positioned in concentric arrangement with respect to the surface 70, thereby also defining the space in which the spring 64 resides.
To assemble the lock nut group 16, the wave spring 64 is first placed in the space defined by surface 70. The nut body 66 is aligned with the lock ring 62, and the nut body 66 is slid into engagement so that the nut body 66 is placed within the lock ring 62 thereby positioning the spring 64 between surface 70 and annular extension 82. Keys 74 reside in slots 76. The split retainer 60 is emplaced by joining the free ends of the split retainer 60 thereby reducing the circumference small enough so that the split retainer may be placed within the annular slot 68. The ends of the split retainer are released and the split retainer 60 is firmly seated within the annular slot 68. The wave spring 64 is trapped between the nut body and the lock ring to bias the two elements with respect to one another. Because of the cross-sectioning shown in
Referring to
In terms of the construction of the adjacent tube 18, it includes a tube body with one or more tube extensions 96 which may be joined by an appropriate weld 97. The flanges 94 define an annular recess for receiving the o-ring 98. Again referring to
The emplacement of the transfer tube 20 according to the present invention is quite simple. Once one coupler of the fitting assembly has been assembled, such as the left side coupler shown in
Referring to
As also shown on
Another feature associated with the present invention which ensures that the fitting assembly remains locked is the thread arrangement on the jam nut versus the thread arrangement on the lock nut. When the fitting assembly is installed, the lock nut group as well as the jam nut are locked onto one larger component, namely, the modular component of the aircraft which has attached thereto the modular fitting. Based upon the inherent characteristics of the tolerance damper, it is extremely unlikely that even under the most adverse operating conditions that a modular fitting, jam nut and lock nut group of a coupler would rotate as a single unit; rather, the more likely scenario is that the jam nut will loosen up due to vibrational loads combined with the spring force of the compressed tolerance damper o-ring. As the jam nut loosens, there would be a rotation in a clockwise manner (the jam nut being a left handed threaded arrangement). Referring back to
By the design of the fitting assembly of the present invention, it can also be seen that any path through the various elements of the fitting assembly from any wet zone to the dry zone requires passage through at least two seals. Assuming fluid was stored within the space adjacent to and bounded by surfaces 15 of the modular components 12, any fluid which would leak through this wet zone to the dry zone located between the modular components would have to pass through at least two seals. For example, any leak path around the ends of the modular components would require the fluid to pass through not only tolerance dampers 32, but also through the seals 26. Therefore, there are two seals in that potential leak path. Another example would be fluid which would potentially travel around the jam nut 14, through the threaded connection between the modular fitting 28 and the jam nut 14, around the edge of the modular component 12 and into the dry zone. For this potential leak path, the fluid would have to overcome o-rings 30 as well as seals 26. For any leak path through the fitting assembly from a wet zone to another wet zone, there is at least one sealing member. For example, if a first wet zone was located adjacent the outer surface 15 of one of the modular components, and another wet zone was located through the transfer tube 20 and adjacent tubes 18, there would be a minimum of one sealing member which would prevent leakage between the wet zones. The first wet zone might retain fuel, while the second wet zone through the transfer tube may be transferring other fluids such as hydraulic fluid. In such a case, it would be damaging to have any leaking hydraulic fluid or fuel.
The advantages of the present invention as discussed above are quite apparent. The fitting assembly of the present invention provides a structurally simple yet reliable assembly for interconnecting two adjacent modular components and further provides redundant sealing at all potential leak paths to prevent undesirable migration of fluid around or through the fitting assembly.
The fitting assembly of the present invention is easily maintained because it may be disassembled down to each and every element of the fitting assembly. The manner in which the fitting assembly is installed accommodates both parallel and guillotine/perpendicular type mating methods for the modular components of the aircraft. The positive locking feature of the invention as well as the left handed and right handed threading arrangements ensures that the positive locking fitting assembly cannot become inadvertently uncoupled during operation.
Because of the use of the transfer tube which has multiple dynamic o-ring seals, the fitting assembly may accommodate manufacturing tolerances as well as other misalignments which may occur in assembly of the modular components. Not only is transverse misalignment addressed by the present invention, but also any differential gap between the modular components is also addressed by simply adjusting the length of the transfer tube as necessary.
There is reliable electrical continuity between each of the elements in the fitting assembly which will prevent undesirable static build up at any one or group of elements.
Because the modular components themselves have no satellite holes or other modifications, there are no additional design considerations which must be considered in installing the fitting assembly.
The present invention has been described with respect to a preferred embodiment; however, other changes and modifications can be made within the spirit and scope of the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 477819 | Pforr | Jun 1892 | A |
| 756246 | Lee | Apr 1904 | A |
| 804590 | Ervin et al. | Nov 1905 | A |
| 891783 | Parkinson | Jun 1908 | A |
| 1131961 | Rogers | Mar 1915 | A |
| 2112352 | Vetrano | Mar 1938 | A |
| 2344698 | Howe | Mar 1944 | A |
| 2511495 | Crot | Jun 1950 | A |
| 2890434 | Ray et al. | Jun 1959 | A |
| 3154328 | Masse | Oct 1964 | A |
| 3167835 | Bengtsson | Feb 1965 | A |
| 3181189 | Leyden | May 1965 | A |
| 3201149 | Bragg | Aug 1965 | A |
| 3334926 | Faccou | Aug 1967 | A |
| 3361450 | Franck | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3430306 | Tareau | Mar 1969 | A |
| 3605210 | Lohr | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3625552 | Mahoff et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3669472 | Nadsady | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3709526 | Cromie | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3749424 | Greene | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3753205 | Tuger | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3776579 | Gale | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3891246 | Hopper | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3891290 | Marshall | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3891291 | Nadsady et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3999825 | Cannon | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4008937 | Filippi | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4150464 | Tracy | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4249786 | Mahoff | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4285564 | Spinner | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4318548 | Oberle et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4332404 | Huffman | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4346428 | Gale | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4353580 | Houck | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4395049 | Schertler | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4408375 | Skobel | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4427218 | Duvet et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4438959 | Valentine | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4478439 | Arnold | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4487462 | Gale et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4522433 | Valentine et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4534090 | Skobel | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4559679 | Downey | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4569106 | Lovato | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4577377 | Kasai | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4600220 | Agnelli | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4618170 | Fishburne | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4621393 | Ambal | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4621840 | Foster | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4631787 | Kasai | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4639982 | Kasai | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4655482 | Myers et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4658326 | Clark et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4662040 | Terrell et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4672725 | Kasai | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4688337 | Dillner et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4696494 | Schmitz et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4699403 | Wong | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4712280 | Fildan | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4713865 | Geldwerth | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4747622 | Weinhold | May 1988 | A |
| 4757593 | Pallini, Jr. et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4779901 | Halling | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4785858 | Valentini et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4786757 | Owensby et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4793637 | Laipply et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4795197 | Kaminski et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4808117 | Gale et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4852917 | Viall, Jr. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4881760 | Runkles et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4900070 | Runkles et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4928202 | Gale et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 5016920 | Anderson | May 1991 | A |
| 5160176 | Gale | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5188398 | Parimore, Jr. et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5188400 | Riley et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5215336 | Worthing | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5348349 | Sloane | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5350200 | Peterson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5586790 | Bynum | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5620210 | Eyster et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5704656 | Rowe | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5746454 | Webb | May 1998 | A |
| 5848501 | Taipale et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5851035 | Marc et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5871239 | Boscaljon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5975464 | Rutan | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5992896 | Davey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6050609 | Boscaljon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6073973 | Boscaljon et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2321508 | Nov 1999 | CA |
| 28 34 223 | Feb 1980 | DE |
| 0 099 293 | Jan 1984 | EP |
| 0 412 677 | Feb 1991 | EP |
| 0 447 453 | Sep 1991 | EP |
| 0 535 867 | Apr 1993 | EP |
| 0 853 740 | Jul 1998 | EP |
| 0 934 484 | Aug 1999 | EP |
| 1 092 905 | Apr 2003 | EP |
| 692.067 | Oct 1930 | FR |
| 1.221.842 | Jun 1960 | FR |
| 1046601 | Oct 1966 | GB |
| 1156882 | Jul 1969 | GB |
| 2066399 | Jul 1981 | GB |
| 2167508 | May 1986 | GB |
| 684533 | Mar 1965 | IT |
| 1266390 | Oct 1989 | JP |
| WO 9509317 | Apr 1995 | WO |
| WO 9715778 | May 1997 | WO |
| WO 9819095 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO 9957476 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| WO 9957477 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040140667 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |