The present application is a U.S. National Phase Application of International Patent Application No. PCT/AU2014/050217, filed on Sep. 8, 2014, which claims priority from Australian Patent Application No. 2013234430, filed on Sep. 30, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated in entirety by reference.
The present invention relates to a post assembly for a barrier system particularly but not exclusively a car park guardrail system.
Traditional base plated posts used in a guardrail system are manufactured from relatively strong rigid materials such as steel. Despite the posts being relatively strong in their own right the strength of the system is typically relatively weak as its capacity is limited by the pullout resistance of anchor bolts that secure the base plated posts to the underlying ground/concrete slab. Rigid post systems absorb the full force of the impact with little deflection resulting in a high peak load being transferred to the anchor bolts.
To maximize load carrying capacity, a rigid post system would require a base plate with a large footprint effectively enabling the anchor bolts to be positioned as far as possible from the base of the post on the impact side of the post. The further the bolts are distanced from the base of the post the lower the pullout force experienced by the anchor bolts during collision with the system.
However, larger plates may be difficult to accommodate in a car park environment. Moreover, despite a design that may position the anchor bolts at a reasonable distance from the bottom of the post, rigid post systems typically require numerous anchor bolts in order to have sufficient capacity to resist the impacting vehicle on the system.
The material costs of large base plates can be prohibitive and holes drilled for multiple fastening bolts may compromise the structural integrity of an underlying concrete slab, which could be of particular concern if the slab forms an elevated floor in a multi-level car park.
The present invention seeks to provide an alternative post assembly.
In accordance with the invention, there is provided a post assembly for absorbing impact from a vehicle including a post, a footing and a lever arm connecting the post to the footing at a hinge region, wherein: the footing, lever arm and hinge region are formed from a common base plate, with the footing and lever arm being separated by an elongate slot that extends in a direction away from an impact side of the plate and terminates at the hinge region, located toward a rear side of the plate; and the footing includes at least one aperture located toward the impact side of the plate, to receive a corresponding fastener to anchor the post assembly to a support surface; whereby under an impact load, the hinge region plastically deforms and the lever arm and post deflect about the footing, away from the impact side of the plate.
Preferably, the at least one aperture is located remote from the hinge region to reduce pullout forces on the associated fastener when the post pivots relative to the footing.
Preferably, the footing and lever arm are formed from a common plate to be substantially co-planar.
Preferably, the lever arm extends parallel to and adjacent the footing.
Preferably, the post includes a side member attached to and aligned with lever arm.
Preferably, the post includes two opposed side members connected to the lever arm.
Preferably, the footing includes two base pads positioned either side of the lever arm, the base pads being separated from the lever arm by associated slots.
Preferably, a second lever arm is provided on an opposite side of the footing, the second lever arm being separated from the footing by an associated slot and the post includes a second side member attached to the second lever arm.
Preferably, the footing includes a single base pad positioned between the lever arms.
Preferably, the post assembly includes a stop device to restrict deflection of the post beyond a pre-determined position.
Preferably, the stop device includes a notch in the post that closes as the post pivots under plastic deformation of the hinge region.
Preferably, the notch is formed at a base of the post, to provide clearance between the post and the hinge region, so that the lever arm is free to pivot around the hinge region during deflection of the post away from the footing, until the notch closes against the hinge region.
Preferably, the post is adapted to support a rail element in a position forwardly of the hinge region, with respect to a direction of impact of a vehicle or the like whereby pivotal movement of the post about the footing during impact causes the rail element to be lifted or maintained in height in order to contain and arrest movement of the vehicle.
In another aspect, there is provided a barrier system including multiple post assemblies, as described above, and a rail element supported between respective posts of the assemblies.
Preferably, the rail element is mounted to the posts in a position forwardly of the associated hinge region, with respect to a direction of impact of a vehicle, whereby pivotal movement of the posts about the footing during impact causes the rail element to be lifted or maintained in height in order to contain the vehicle.
The invention is described, by way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the drawings, in which:
Throughout the specification and drawings, like parts will be denoted with like reference numerals.
Referring firstly to
The footing 3 includes a base pad 4 connected to first and second lever arms 5 via a hinge region 7. The lever arms 5 are positioned on opposed sides of the base pad 4 and are separated from the base pad 4 by elongate slots 8 in order to be free to pivot about the hinge region 7.
The lever arms 5 and the footing 3 are formed as a single base plate 10, so that the lever arms 5 and footing 3 are substantially co-planar. The slots 8 are preferably machined into the plate 10 to extend from a front side 11 of the plate 10, toward a rear side 12 of the plate 10. However, the slots 8 terminate short of the rear side 12 in order to define the hinge region 7 that connects the base pad 4 and lever arms 5, 6.
The post 2 is formed of two opposed side members 13 arranged in a parallel front to back orientation. A connecting brace 14 extends between the side members 13. Fastener holes 15 are provided in the brace 14. A lower end 16 of each side member 13 is attached to a respective lever arm 5, such as by welding, so that the entire assembly 1 is formed as an integral structure.
The post assembly 1 is designed to receive and absorb forces from an impact side 17 of the post 2, which will cause the post 2 to deflect about the footing 3. More particularly, the post 2 will lift and pivot the lever arms 5 about the hinge region 7, as impact force is absorbed. To restrict pivotal movement of the post 2, a notch 18 is provided at the base 19 of the post 2, at the lower end 16 of each side member 13. The notch 18 is positioned immediately above the hinge region 7 and serves as a stop device 21 to resist pivotal movement of the post 2 past a pre-determined position, by closing against the hinge region 7 when the post 2 pivots about the footing 3.
Plastic deformation of the post 2 away from the footing 3 will absorb a considerable amount of impact force. However, the footing 3 still needs to be securely fastened to an underlying support surface in a manner that will minimize pullout forces. For that purpose, the base pad 4 is provided with an aperture 22 that is positioned remote from the hinge region 7, at a location toward the front side 11 of the plate 10. In use, the aperture 22 receives a fastener or anchor bolt (not shown) to anchor the post assembly 1 to the support surface.
Turning now to
In
As may be appreciated from the above, advantages of the present invention are realized through the design of the base plate 10 of the post assembly 1. The base plate 10 is designed to absorb the energy of an impact over time and to regulate the peak pull out force applied to the anchor bolt(s) 33.
The design of the base plate 10 substantially increases the amount of energy that the post 2 and/or barrier system 30 can absorb compared to a rigid base plated post system that has a similar base plate size/footprint. Moreover the barrier system 30 will absorb the energy of impact from a colliding vehicle with fewer anchor bolts than that required in a system comprising rigid base plated posts.
As described above, the base plate 10 is preferably designed with two elongated slots 8 that run from the front 11 of the plate 10 toward the back 12 of the plate 10 but stop short of running the full length of the plate 10. This essentially forms the plate 10 into a central base pad 4 and two lever arms 5. Alternatively, the base plate 10 may be formed with a central lever arm 5 and two base pads 4. Other configurations may also be adopted, as required.
Upon impact with the barrier system 30 load is transferred by the longitudinal rail elements 31 to the posts 2. The posts 2 are then designed to absorb the energy of the impact by first elastic deformation resulting from the lever arms 5 bending backwards followed by plastic deformation from further bending of the lever arms 5.
The plastic deformation of the system 30 reduces and regulates the peak pull out load transferred to the anchor bolt(s) 33. The capacity of the lever arms 5 and hinge region 7 to plastically deform under load and absorb impact forces can be regulated by, for example:
the length of the slots 8;
the width of the lever arms 5;
the thickness of the base plate 10;
the termination point of the post relative to the terminal ends 25 of the slots 8 (this can regulate the length of the plastic hinge region 7 established in the base plate 10 and therefore the amount of material that is yielding and therefore absorbing energy); and
the type of material that the post 2 is manufactured from.
The post 2 may be any type or form. It can be flat plate, hollow section or open section. The rail element 31 can also be of any suitable form. The rail element can be a W-beam guardrail, a triple corrugated guardrail, a hollow section, an open section, an I-beam, etc.
Apart from regulating the transferred load to the anchor bolts 33 the plastic hinge region 7 allows the post 2 to maintain a relatively constant optimal design load during the course of an impact as the lever arms 5 bend backwards. The option to provide a notch 18 in the post 2 enables a rear side of the post to be aligned over the back 12 of the base plate 10. This means the post 2 can be positioned toward a back of the plate 10, which minimizes the amount of car park space taken up by the post assembly 1. As a possible alternative, the footing 3 of the base plate 10 might be attached to a side edge of a slab flooring, which would mean no car park space at all is taken up by the post assembly 1. In either case, as is apparent from the above, the post assembly design has the capability to not only absorb impact forces but to also provide a second purpose whereby it adds a step up in the load capacity of the post 2 when the lever arms 5 have bent back so far such that the notch 18 between the plate 10 and the back of the post 2 effectively closes. This results in the rear of the post 2 bearing down on the base plate 10 to maximise the stopping power of the assembly 1.
Another feature of the barrier system of the invention is that the rail element is positioned forwardly of the hinge region 7 and the lever arms 5 pivot upwardly around the hinge region 7 during impact. This has the advantage of lifting or maintaining the height of the rail element during initial impact. With a conventional rigid base plated post, the rail element would be knocked down if the post is pulled out of the ground or concrete slab on impact. The invention, on the other hand, maintains or increases the rail element height for a duration of the impact which improves the ability of the barrier system to better contain and arrest movement of vehicles.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2013234430 | Sep 2013 | AU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU2014/050217 | 9/8/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/042656 | 4/2/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3351322 | Mueller | Nov 1967 | A |
5657966 | Cicinnati | Aug 1997 | A |
5664905 | Thompson | Sep 1997 | A |
8235359 | Dyke | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20040262588 | Bronstad | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20100293870 | Amengual Pericas | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
EP 1857594 | Nov 2007 | AT |
0677615 | Oct 1995 | EP |
1650351 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1857594 | Nov 2007 | EP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/AU2014/050217 dated Dec. 15, 2014 (9 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160237633 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |