Post collision restraints control module

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7158870
  • Patent Number
    7,158,870
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, January 24, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 2, 2007
    17 years ago
Abstract
A restraints control module (RCM) for a vehicle is provided including a memory device. The memory device stores a deployment time of a deployment event. A controller is electrically coupled to the memory device and deploys a restraint in response to a collision signal and stores the deployment time in the memory device. A method of time stamping and indicating a deployment event within an automotive vehicle, having a RCM, is also provided.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present invention is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/683,604 entitled “Impact Sensor Post Collision Notification System” filed simultaneously herewith and incorporated by reference herein.


BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to automotive vehicle safety systems, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for time-stamping and indicating restraint deployment events within an automotive vehicle.


Currently, many vehicles have a restraints control module (RCM), which controls of the safety-related restraint systems in a vehicle. The RCM receives collision signals from various impact sensors, during a collision, and determines whether to activate a restraint to decrease the potential of an operator injury during the collision. The restraint may be an air bag, a pretensioner, or other restraint known in the art. The RCM also stores the number of times the vehicle has been in a collision.


RCM systems record fault information that is present when a deployment event occurs, which can be cleared by a technician. Clearing the information prevents existence of any historical data on vehicle impact sensors and the RCM itself. Historical data on the impact sensors and the RCM can provide information as to the status and condition of these devices and allows a determination to be made as to whether the devices should be serviced or replaced. RCM systems are incapable of permanently maintaining a relationship between time of deployment and any faults that may have been present during time of deployment.


Historical data on the impact sensors and the RCM may also aid in discovering sustained damage to these devices that may otherwise be undetectable. Although, the impact sensors and the RCM may be capable of surviving a collision multiple times, undetectable damage may cause them to not operate as originally designed.


It would therefore be desirable to develop an improved RCM that stores time and fault information during a deployment. This information may allow a trained technician or an owner of a vehicle to better understand the status of the impact sensors and the RCM of a vehicle so as to determine whether service or replacement is necessary, thereby providing a safer vehicle.


SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The foregoing and advantages thereof are provided by a method and apparatus for indicating and storing time stamp information of deployment events. A restraints control module (RCM) for a vehicle is provided including a memory device. The memory device stores a deployment time of a deployment event. A controller is electrically coupled to the memory device and deploys a restraint in response to a collision signal and stores the deployment time in the memory device. A method of time stamping and indicating a deployment event within an automotive vehicle, having a RCM, is also provided.


One of several advantages of the present invention is that it provides an apparatus for indicating when an RCM has been on a vehicle that has been in a collision. This allows an operator or technician to determine whether the RCM should be serviced or replaced.


Another advantage of the present invention is that it stores deployment time and fault time information. Deployment time and fault time may then be analyzed to determine whether an impact sensor, a restraint, or the RCM needs to be serviced or replaced.


Furthermore the stored information can not be erased, reset, or overwritten. Therefore, when the RCM is installed into a second vehicle the operator or technician of the second vehicle is able to determine the history of the RCM.


Moreover, the present invention promotes increased safety by decreasing the use of impact sensors, restraints, and RCMs that need servicing or replacement.


The present invention itself, together with attendant advantages, will be best understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of this invention reference should now be had to the embodiments illustrated in greater detail in the accompanying figures and described below by way of examples of the invention wherein.



FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a restraints control module system for a vehicle in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a logic flow diagram illustrating a method of time stamping and indicating deployment events for a vehicle in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

While the present invention is described with respect to an apparatus and method for time stamping and indicating deployment events within an automotive vehicle the following apparatus and method is capable of being adapted for various purposes and is not limited to the following applications: automotive vehicles, restraint systems, restraint control modules (RCMs), impact sensors, or other sensor applications.


In the following description, various operating parameters and components are described for one constructed embodiment. These specific parameters and components are included as examples and are not meant to be limiting.


Referring now to FIG. 1, a schematic block diagram of an RCM system 10 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is shown. The system 10 is shown within an automotive vehicle 12. The system 10 includes a RCM 14, impact sensors 16, an indicator 18, and deployable restraints 20.


RCM 14 may be a microprocessor based controller such as a computer having a central processing unit, a memory device (RAM and/or ROM) 22, and associated inputs and outputs operating in cooperation with a communications bus. RCM 14 may be a portion of a main control unit, such as a main vehicle controller, or be a stand-alone controller. The RCM 14 stores deployment information as to when electrical current is supplied to any deployable device within the automotive vehicle as well as the duration of the deployment event. RCM 14 may have logic to determine whether the impact sensors 16 are functioning properly and determine whether to allow the sensors to continue to function or not. The RCM 14 also stores fault times when the system 10 is not fully functional. The RCM 14 may contain a comparator 24 for comparing deployment times with fault times.


The RCM 14 permanently records a time stamp of its lifetime operating minutes and sets a permanent fault when there is a collision event that results in a deployment of a deployable device. The time stamp includes information about when the deployment energy was supplied to a deployable device and allows a comparison to be performed between the time stamp and other time stamps corresponding to faults within the system 10. The comparison provides a vehicle occupant or a technician information as to when a fault is present at the time of a deployment. The permanent fault causes the indicator 18 to indicate indefinitely that the RCM 14 was at some point in time in a vehicle that has been involved in a collision. Although, the RCM 14 may function after a collision as long as it is not broken, the indicator signals a vehicle occupant that the RCM 14 should be removed from the vehicle 12 and replaced according to a vehicle service manual.


The impact sensors 16 and the deployable restraints 20 may be of various type and style. Impact sensors 16 may include front, side, rear, and oblique impact sensors or other impact sensors known in the art. The deployable restraints 20 may include air bags, pretensioners, seat systems, or other safety restraint devices.


The indicator 18 may be a pulsating indicator, a light bulb, an LED, a fluorescent light, an audible signal, a visual signal, a 7-segment display, an analog gage, a digital meter, a video display, a hazard light, or various other indicators known in the art. Indicator 18 may indicate various information including: whether the RCM has been serviced, a fault when the RCM is malfunctioning, the location of an impact sensor, status of an impact sensor, a fault when an impact sensor is malfunctioning, or various other related information. When the indicator 18 is indicating a fault the RCM 14 continues functioning unless it is not capable of doing so.


Referring now to FIG. 2, a logic flow diagram illustrating a method of time stamping and indicating deployment events for the vehicle 12 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is shown. A deployment event refers to the length of time during which a deployable restraint is operating. Through-out the described method the RCM 14 may signal the indicator 18 of any faults detected.


In step 50, during a collision involving the vehicle 12 at least one impact sensor of impact sensors 16 is activated.


In step 52, the impact sensor generates a collision signal in response to the sensed collision. The collision signal is then transferred to the RCM 14.


In step 54, the RCM 14 determines, in response to the collision signal, if the magnitude of the collision signal is above a predetermined value and, if so, activates a deployable restraint. The RCM may store the power draw from the activated deployable restraint throughout the deployment event. The stored data of the power draw may be later used in evaluating collision data and determining status of the components in system 10. The RCM 14 then proceeds to steps 56 and 58.


In step 56, the deployment time is stored in memory 22. The deployment time includes the start time of the deployment event and the duration of the deployment. The deployment time may also include other times such as the deployment end time.


In step 58, the RCM 14 determines that a fault has occurred and stores the fault time.


In step 60, the RCM 14 compares the deployment time with the fault time. When the deployment time and the fault time correspond the RCM determines that a deployable restraint may have been prevented from functioning properly and indicates a fault on indicator 18. When an air bag is deployed the RCM 14 automatically indicates a fault on the indicator 18 until the RCM is serviced or replaced.


In step 62, the RCM indicates the deployment time corresponding with the fault time.


The present invention provides a method and device for assuring that historical data stored in a RCM memory is not undesirably erased, reset, or overwritten as to prevent unknowing use of these devices under an assumption that they are virgin devices. The historical data includes information related to impact sensors, the RCM, and deployable restraints that have been on a vehicle that has been involved in a collision.


The present invention in so doing, further provides increased vehicle safety by promoting the use of properly functioning restraint system devices. The present invention therefore, also informs an operator that a restraint system device may need servicing and potentially that the operated vehicle, assuming it has all original factory devices, has been involved in a collision. The operator may upon gathering this information choose to have the vehicle and/or devices serviced or replaced and use the information with discretion when purchasing the vehicle.


The above-described method, to one skilled in the art, is capable of being adapted for various purposes and is not limited to the following applications: automotive vehicles, restraint systems, restraint control modules (RCMs), impact sensors, or other sensor applications. The above-described invention may also be varied without deviating from the true scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A restraints control module (RCM) for a vehicle that has at least one impact sensor comprising: a memory device for storing a deployment time of a deployment event;a comparator comparing said deployment time with a fault time and determining whether said fault time corresponds with said deployment time; anda controller electrically coupled to said memory device and said comparator, said controller determining when to deploy a restraint, storing said deployment time, and storing in said memory device a fault time corresponding to said deployment time, said fault time indicative of said fault within a component selected from at least one of the RCM and the at least one impact sensor; andan indicator electrically coupled to said controller and indicating when said deployment time corresponds with said fault time.
  • 2. A module as in claim 1 wherein said indicator comprises at least one of: a pulsating indicator, a light bulb, an LED, a fluorescent light, an audible signal, a visual signal, a 7-segment display, an analog gage, a digital meter, a video system, and a hazard light.
  • 3. A module as in claim 1 wherein said controller stores said fault time when said fault time corresponds to said deployment time.
  • 4. A restraints control module (RCM) for a vehicle that has at least one impact sensor comprising: an indicator;a memory device for storing a deployment start time of a deployment event; anda controller electrically coupled to said indicator and said memory device, said controller determining when to deploy a restraint and storing said deployment start time and duration in said memory device;said controller storing a fault time in said memory device and signaling said indicator when said fault time corresponds to said deployment start time and duration, said fault time indicative of a fault within a component selected from at least one of the RCM and the at least one impact sensor.
  • 5. A module as in claim 4 wherein said indicator continuously indicating that the RCM has been on a vehicle that has been involved in a collision.
  • 6. A module as in claim 4 further comprising a comparator electrically coupled to said controller, said comparator comparing said deployment time with a fault time and determining whether said fault time corresponds with said deployment time.
  • 7. A module as in claim 4 wherein information stored in said memory device is uneraseable, unresettable, and unoverwritable.
US Referenced Citations (135)
Number Name Date Kind
3514610 Huston et al. May 1970 A
3921463 Robbins Nov 1975 A
3964016 Yamada et al. Jun 1976 A
4257703 Goodrich Mar 1981 A
4381829 Montaron May 1983 A
4623966 O'Sullivan Nov 1986 A
4638289 Zottnik Jan 1987 A
4673937 Davis Jun 1987 A
4833469 David May 1989 A
4851705 Musser et al. Jul 1989 A
4916450 Davis Apr 1990 A
4933570 Swart et al. Jun 1990 A
4969103 Maekawa Nov 1990 A
4992943 McCracken Feb 1991 A
4994972 Diller Feb 1991 A
4999775 Muraoka Mar 1991 A
5040118 Diller Aug 1991 A
5063603 Burt Nov 1991 A
5091726 Shyu Feb 1992 A
5162794 Seith Nov 1992 A
5166881 Akasu Nov 1992 A
5173859 Deering Dec 1992 A
5182459 Okano et al. Jan 1993 A
5230400 Kakinami et al. Jul 1993 A
5234071 Kajiwara Aug 1993 A
5249157 Taylor Sep 1993 A
5307136 Saniyoshi Apr 1994 A
5314037 Shaw et al. May 1994 A
5430432 Camhi et al. Jul 1995 A
5432385 Kincaid et al. Jul 1995 A
5467283 Butsuen et al. Nov 1995 A
5479173 Yoshioka et al. Dec 1995 A
5502432 Ohmamyuda et al. Mar 1996 A
5521580 Kaneko et al. May 1996 A
5526269 Ishibashi et al. Jun 1996 A
5534870 Avignon et al. Jul 1996 A
5541590 Nishio Jul 1996 A
5552986 Omura et al. Sep 1996 A
5572428 Ishida et al. Nov 1996 A
5574463 Shirai et al. Nov 1996 A
5594414 Namngani Jan 1997 A
5602760 Chacon et al. Feb 1997 A
5604683 Roecker Feb 1997 A
5629847 Shirakawa et al. May 1997 A
5635922 Cho et al. Jun 1997 A
5646612 Byon Jul 1997 A
5680097 Uemura et al. Oct 1997 A
5684474 Gilon et al. Nov 1997 A
5689264 Ishikawa et al. Nov 1997 A
5699040 Matsuda Dec 1997 A
5699057 Ikeda et al. Dec 1997 A
5710565 Shirai et al. Jan 1998 A
5745870 Yamamoto et al. Apr 1998 A
5748477 Katoh May 1998 A
5749426 Gilling May 1998 A
5751211 Shirai et al. May 1998 A
5751836 Wildes et al. May 1998 A
5754099 Nishimura et al. May 1998 A
5771481 Gilling Jun 1998 A
5779264 Demesseman et al. Jul 1998 A
5808561 Kinoshita et al. Sep 1998 A
5815093 Kikinis Sep 1998 A
5835007 Kosiak Nov 1998 A
5835873 Darby et al. Nov 1998 A
5838228 Clark Nov 1998 A
5847472 Byon Dec 1998 A
5847755 Wixson et al. Dec 1998 A
5850085 Rosenbluth Dec 1998 A
5872536 Lyons et al. Feb 1999 A
5905457 Rashid May 1999 A
5906393 Mazur et al. May 1999 A
5920345 Sauer Jul 1999 A
5926126 Engelman Jul 1999 A
5936549 Tsuchiya Aug 1999 A
5938714 Satonaka Aug 1999 A
5948026 Beemer, II et al. Sep 1999 A
5949366 Herrman Sep 1999 A
5949918 McCaffrey Sep 1999 A
5955967 Yamada Sep 1999 A
5959552 Cho Sep 1999 A
5963272 Wixson Oct 1999 A
5964822 Alland et al. Oct 1999 A
5983161 Lemelson et al. Nov 1999 A
5995037 Matsuda et al. Nov 1999 A
5999117 Engel Dec 1999 A
5999874 Winner et al. Dec 1999 A
6002983 Alland et al. Dec 1999 A
6018308 Shirai Jan 2000 A
6025797 Kawai et al. Feb 2000 A
6026340 Corrado et al. Feb 2000 A
6031484 Bullinger et al. Feb 2000 A
6037860 Zander et al. Mar 2000 A
6044166 Bassman et al. Mar 2000 A
6044321 Nakamura et al. Mar 2000 A
6049619 Anandan et al. Apr 2000 A
6061015 Sugimoto May 2000 A
6076028 Donnelly et al. Jun 2000 A
6084508 Mai et al. Jul 2000 A
6085151 Farmer et al. Jul 2000 A
6087928 Kleinberg et al. Jul 2000 A
6088639 Fayyad et al. Jul 2000 A
6094159 Osterfeld et al. Jul 2000 A
6097332 Crosby, II Aug 2000 A
6114951 Knioshita et al. Sep 2000 A
6121896 Rahman Sep 2000 A
6148943 Kodaka et al. Nov 2000 A
6151539 Bergholz et al. Nov 2000 A
6157892 Hada et al. Dec 2000 A
6161074 Sielagoski et al. Dec 2000 A
6168198 Breed et al. Jan 2001 B1
6169479 Boran et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175794 Muraoka Jan 2001 B1
6177866 O'Connell Jan 2001 B1
6185490 Ferguson Feb 2001 B1
6186539 Foo et al. Feb 2001 B1
6188316 Matsuno et al. Feb 2001 B1
6191704 Takenaga et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198999 Ando Mar 2001 B1
6204756 Senyk et al. Mar 2001 B1
6209909 Breed Apr 2001 B1
6218960 Ishikawa et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219606 Wessels et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223125 Hall Apr 2001 B1
6225918 Kam May 2001 B1
6226389 Lemelson et al. May 2001 B1
6229438 Kutlucinar et al. May 2001 B1
6231075 Otsu May 2001 B1
6246961 Sasaki et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249738 Higashimata et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256584 Kodaka et al. Jul 2001 B1
6259992 Urai et al. Jul 2001 B1
6462649 Kimura Oct 2002 B1
20020091474 Okada Jul 2002 A1
20020158805 Turnbull et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020184062 Diaz Dec 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
0720928 Oct 1996 EP
54-65934 May 1979 JP
54065934 May 1979 JP
WO 9837435 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9858274 Dec 1998 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20030139864 A1 Jul 2003 US