The present invention is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/683,604 entitled “Impact Sensor Post Collision Notification System” filed simultaneously herewith and incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention relates generally to automotive vehicle safety systems, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for time-stamping and indicating restraint deployment events within an automotive vehicle.
Currently, many vehicles have a restraints control module (RCM), which controls of the safety-related restraint systems in a vehicle. The RCM receives collision signals from various impact sensors, during a collision, and determines whether to activate a restraint to decrease the potential of an operator injury during the collision. The restraint may be an air bag, a pretensioner, or other restraint known in the art. The RCM also stores the number of times the vehicle has been in a collision.
RCM systems record fault information that is present when a deployment event occurs, which can be cleared by a technician. Clearing the information prevents existence of any historical data on vehicle impact sensors and the RCM itself. Historical data on the impact sensors and the RCM can provide information as to the status and condition of these devices and allows a determination to be made as to whether the devices should be serviced or replaced. RCM systems are incapable of permanently maintaining a relationship between time of deployment and any faults that may have been present during time of deployment.
Historical data on the impact sensors and the RCM may also aid in discovering sustained damage to these devices that may otherwise be undetectable. Although, the impact sensors and the RCM may be capable of surviving a collision multiple times, undetectable damage may cause them to not operate as originally designed.
It would therefore be desirable to develop an improved RCM that stores time and fault information during a deployment. This information may allow a trained technician or an owner of a vehicle to better understand the status of the impact sensors and the RCM of a vehicle so as to determine whether service or replacement is necessary, thereby providing a safer vehicle.
The foregoing and advantages thereof are provided by a method and apparatus for indicating and storing time stamp information of deployment events. A restraints control module (RCM) for a vehicle is provided including a memory device. The memory device stores a deployment time of a deployment event. A controller is electrically coupled to the memory device and deploys a restraint in response to a collision signal and stores the deployment time in the memory device. A method of time stamping and indicating a deployment event within an automotive vehicle, having a RCM, is also provided.
One of several advantages of the present invention is that it provides an apparatus for indicating when an RCM has been on a vehicle that has been in a collision. This allows an operator or technician to determine whether the RCM should be serviced or replaced.
Another advantage of the present invention is that it stores deployment time and fault time information. Deployment time and fault time may then be analyzed to determine whether an impact sensor, a restraint, or the RCM needs to be serviced or replaced.
Furthermore the stored information can not be erased, reset, or overwritten. Therefore, when the RCM is installed into a second vehicle the operator or technician of the second vehicle is able to determine the history of the RCM.
Moreover, the present invention promotes increased safety by decreasing the use of impact sensors, restraints, and RCMs that need servicing or replacement.
The present invention itself, together with attendant advantages, will be best understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
For a more complete understanding of this invention reference should now be had to the embodiments illustrated in greater detail in the accompanying figures and described below by way of examples of the invention wherein.
While the present invention is described with respect to an apparatus and method for time stamping and indicating deployment events within an automotive vehicle the following apparatus and method is capable of being adapted for various purposes and is not limited to the following applications: automotive vehicles, restraint systems, restraint control modules (RCMs), impact sensors, or other sensor applications.
In the following description, various operating parameters and components are described for one constructed embodiment. These specific parameters and components are included as examples and are not meant to be limiting.
Referring now to
RCM 14 may be a microprocessor based controller such as a computer having a central processing unit, a memory device (RAM and/or ROM) 22, and associated inputs and outputs operating in cooperation with a communications bus. RCM 14 may be a portion of a main control unit, such as a main vehicle controller, or be a stand-alone controller. The RCM 14 stores deployment information as to when electrical current is supplied to any deployable device within the automotive vehicle as well as the duration of the deployment event. RCM 14 may have logic to determine whether the impact sensors 16 are functioning properly and determine whether to allow the sensors to continue to function or not. The RCM 14 also stores fault times when the system 10 is not fully functional. The RCM 14 may contain a comparator 24 for comparing deployment times with fault times.
The RCM 14 permanently records a time stamp of its lifetime operating minutes and sets a permanent fault when there is a collision event that results in a deployment of a deployable device. The time stamp includes information about when the deployment energy was supplied to a deployable device and allows a comparison to be performed between the time stamp and other time stamps corresponding to faults within the system 10. The comparison provides a vehicle occupant or a technician information as to when a fault is present at the time of a deployment. The permanent fault causes the indicator 18 to indicate indefinitely that the RCM 14 was at some point in time in a vehicle that has been involved in a collision. Although, the RCM 14 may function after a collision as long as it is not broken, the indicator signals a vehicle occupant that the RCM 14 should be removed from the vehicle 12 and replaced according to a vehicle service manual.
The impact sensors 16 and the deployable restraints 20 may be of various type and style. Impact sensors 16 may include front, side, rear, and oblique impact sensors or other impact sensors known in the art. The deployable restraints 20 may include air bags, pretensioners, seat systems, or other safety restraint devices.
The indicator 18 may be a pulsating indicator, a light bulb, an LED, a fluorescent light, an audible signal, a visual signal, a 7-segment display, an analog gage, a digital meter, a video display, a hazard light, or various other indicators known in the art. Indicator 18 may indicate various information including: whether the RCM has been serviced, a fault when the RCM is malfunctioning, the location of an impact sensor, status of an impact sensor, a fault when an impact sensor is malfunctioning, or various other related information. When the indicator 18 is indicating a fault the RCM 14 continues functioning unless it is not capable of doing so.
Referring now to
In step 50, during a collision involving the vehicle 12 at least one impact sensor of impact sensors 16 is activated.
In step 52, the impact sensor generates a collision signal in response to the sensed collision. The collision signal is then transferred to the RCM 14.
In step 54, the RCM 14 determines, in response to the collision signal, if the magnitude of the collision signal is above a predetermined value and, if so, activates a deployable restraint. The RCM may store the power draw from the activated deployable restraint throughout the deployment event. The stored data of the power draw may be later used in evaluating collision data and determining status of the components in system 10. The RCM 14 then proceeds to steps 56 and 58.
In step 56, the deployment time is stored in memory 22. The deployment time includes the start time of the deployment event and the duration of the deployment. The deployment time may also include other times such as the deployment end time.
In step 58, the RCM 14 determines that a fault has occurred and stores the fault time.
In step 60, the RCM 14 compares the deployment time with the fault time. When the deployment time and the fault time correspond the RCM determines that a deployable restraint may have been prevented from functioning properly and indicates a fault on indicator 18. When an air bag is deployed the RCM 14 automatically indicates a fault on the indicator 18 until the RCM is serviced or replaced.
In step 62, the RCM indicates the deployment time corresponding with the fault time.
The present invention provides a method and device for assuring that historical data stored in a RCM memory is not undesirably erased, reset, or overwritten as to prevent unknowing use of these devices under an assumption that they are virgin devices. The historical data includes information related to impact sensors, the RCM, and deployable restraints that have been on a vehicle that has been involved in a collision.
The present invention in so doing, further provides increased vehicle safety by promoting the use of properly functioning restraint system devices. The present invention therefore, also informs an operator that a restraint system device may need servicing and potentially that the operated vehicle, assuming it has all original factory devices, has been involved in a collision. The operator may upon gathering this information choose to have the vehicle and/or devices serviced or replaced and use the information with discretion when purchasing the vehicle.
The above-described method, to one skilled in the art, is capable of being adapted for various purposes and is not limited to the following applications: automotive vehicles, restraint systems, restraint control modules (RCMs), impact sensors, or other sensor applications. The above-described invention may also be varied without deviating from the true scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3514610 | Huston et al. | May 1970 | A |
3921463 | Robbins | Nov 1975 | A |
3964016 | Yamada et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4257703 | Goodrich | Mar 1981 | A |
4381829 | Montaron | May 1983 | A |
4623966 | O'Sullivan | Nov 1986 | A |
4638289 | Zottnik | Jan 1987 | A |
4673937 | Davis | Jun 1987 | A |
4833469 | David | May 1989 | A |
4851705 | Musser et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4916450 | Davis | Apr 1990 | A |
4933570 | Swart et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4969103 | Maekawa | Nov 1990 | A |
4992943 | McCracken | Feb 1991 | A |
4994972 | Diller | Feb 1991 | A |
4999775 | Muraoka | Mar 1991 | A |
5040118 | Diller | Aug 1991 | A |
5063603 | Burt | Nov 1991 | A |
5091726 | Shyu | Feb 1992 | A |
5162794 | Seith | Nov 1992 | A |
5166881 | Akasu | Nov 1992 | A |
5173859 | Deering | Dec 1992 | A |
5182459 | Okano et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5230400 | Kakinami et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5234071 | Kajiwara | Aug 1993 | A |
5249157 | Taylor | Sep 1993 | A |
5307136 | Saniyoshi | Apr 1994 | A |
5314037 | Shaw et al. | May 1994 | A |
5430432 | Camhi et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432385 | Kincaid et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5467283 | Butsuen et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5479173 | Yoshioka et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5502432 | Ohmamyuda et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5521580 | Kaneko et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526269 | Ishibashi et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534870 | Avignon et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541590 | Nishio | Jul 1996 | A |
5552986 | Omura et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5572428 | Ishida et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5574463 | Shirai et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5594414 | Namngani | Jan 1997 | A |
5602760 | Chacon et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5604683 | Roecker | Feb 1997 | A |
5629847 | Shirakawa et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635922 | Cho et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646612 | Byon | Jul 1997 | A |
5680097 | Uemura et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684474 | Gilon et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689264 | Ishikawa et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5699040 | Matsuda | Dec 1997 | A |
5699057 | Ikeda et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710565 | Shirai et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5745870 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748477 | Katoh | May 1998 | A |
5749426 | Gilling | May 1998 | A |
5751211 | Shirai et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751836 | Wildes et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754099 | Nishimura et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771481 | Gilling | Jun 1998 | A |
5779264 | Demesseman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5808561 | Kinoshita et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815093 | Kikinis | Sep 1998 | A |
5835007 | Kosiak | Nov 1998 | A |
5835873 | Darby et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838228 | Clark | Nov 1998 | A |
5847472 | Byon | Dec 1998 | A |
5847755 | Wixson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850085 | Rosenbluth | Dec 1998 | A |
5872536 | Lyons et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5905457 | Rashid | May 1999 | A |
5906393 | Mazur et al. | May 1999 | A |
5920345 | Sauer | Jul 1999 | A |
5926126 | Engelman | Jul 1999 | A |
5936549 | Tsuchiya | Aug 1999 | A |
5938714 | Satonaka | Aug 1999 | A |
5948026 | Beemer, II et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5949366 | Herrman | Sep 1999 | A |
5949918 | McCaffrey | Sep 1999 | A |
5955967 | Yamada | Sep 1999 | A |
5959552 | Cho | Sep 1999 | A |
5963272 | Wixson | Oct 1999 | A |
5964822 | Alland et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983161 | Lemelson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995037 | Matsuda et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999117 | Engel | Dec 1999 | A |
5999874 | Winner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002983 | Alland et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6018308 | Shirai | Jan 2000 | A |
6025797 | Kawai et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026340 | Corrado et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031484 | Bullinger et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037860 | Zander et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044166 | Bassman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044321 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049619 | Anandan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061015 | Sugimoto | May 2000 | A |
6076028 | Donnelly et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084508 | Mai et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6085151 | Farmer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6087928 | Kleinberg et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088639 | Fayyad et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094159 | Osterfeld et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097332 | Crosby, II | Aug 2000 | A |
6114951 | Knioshita et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121896 | Rahman | Sep 2000 | A |
6148943 | Kodaka et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151539 | Bergholz et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157892 | Hada et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161074 | Sielagoski et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168198 | Breed et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6169479 | Boran et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175794 | Muraoka | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177866 | O'Connell | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185490 | Ferguson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6186539 | Foo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188316 | Matsuno et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191704 | Takenaga et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198999 | Ando | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204756 | Senyk et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209909 | Breed | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218960 | Ishikawa et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219606 | Wessels et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223125 | Hall | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225918 | Kam | May 2001 | B1 |
6226389 | Lemelson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6229438 | Kutlucinar et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6231075 | Otsu | May 2001 | B1 |
6246961 | Sasaki et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249738 | Higashimata et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256584 | Kodaka et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259992 | Urai et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6462649 | Kimura | Oct 2002 | B1 |
20020091474 | Okada | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020158805 | Turnbull et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020184062 | Diaz | Dec 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0720928 | Oct 1996 | EP |
54-65934 | May 1979 | JP |
54065934 | May 1979 | JP |
WO 9837435 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9858274 | Dec 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030139864 A1 | Jul 2003 | US |