The invention relates generally to metering of postage value and, more particularly, to providing an accumulated postage feature with respect to metering of postage value.
Devices or “meters” used in the metering of postage value, such as for printing postage indicia used in posting mail pieces, typically include a vault mechanism having at least a descending register and an ascending register. Such a vault mechanism originated as an electromechanical device and has more recently been implemented as a secure electronic memory, often referred to as a postage security device (PSD).
The descending register provides a balance of prepaid postage value and is generally affected by two meter operations. A postage value download (PVD) meter operation increments the descending register in the amount of a postage value prepayment. For example, if a user purchases $10 of postage, the postage value stored in the descending register is incremented by $10 to increase the postage value available using the meter. Postal authorities, such as the United States Postal Service (USPS), often establish limits on the amount of postage value that may be downloaded in a postage value download operation and/or the maximum amount of postage value that may be held by a descending register in order to prevent fraud or misuse. A postage value decrementing operation is performed with respect to the descending register each time the meter is used to generate a postage indicium. For example, if a user operates the meter to generate a $0.39 postage indicium to apply to a first class mail piece, the aforementioned $10 of postage value stored by the descending register will be decremented by $0.39 to leave a postage value balance of $9.61. The descending register is never permitted to have a balance of less than $0, and is often not permitted to descend below some non-zero threshold amount (e.g., $1).
The ascending register provides a total of all postage value dispensed or metered by the meter. That is, the ascending register is incremented each time the meter is used to generate a postage indicium. For example, if a user operates a meter previously used in generating a total of $5.00 in postage indicia to generate a $0.39 postage indicium, the ascending register will be incremented by $0.39 to result in an ascending register total of $5.39. The ascending register is typically used in meter reconciliation operations, such as at the time of postage value download, in order to detect fraud or operational anomalies. A meter's service life is often dictated by a maximum allowable ascending register amount (e.g., $10,000) in order to limit the propensity for fraud.
Although the foregoing meter configuration provides an adequate postage metering solution for many metering applications, it is not without disadvantage. For example, from the above, it is clear that payment must be made (e.g., money deposited) prior to generating postage indicium. This prepayment model has historically been required by postal authorities in order to avoid losses associated with nonpayment for postage indicia. Moreover, the prepayment model has typically been acceptable to meter users as such meters have traditionally been used by a single entity (e.g., business entity or person) which has the ability to forecast postage needs and thus can relatively accurately plan and prepay for postage needs. Despite accurate forecasting and proper planning, however, problems can arise in acquiring postage value for metering operations. For example, electronic meters are often funded using credit cards or other electronic forms of payment which may experience problems (e.g., due to credit card clearing house problems) causing delays in obtaining postage value download and thus delaying the ability to generate desired postage indicia. Moreover, mailing tasks requiring large amounts of postage (e.g., monthly billings, mass promotional mailings, etcetera) may necessitate close monitoring of available postage value and repeated postage value download in order to generate a total amount of postage indicia desired in light of postage value download and/or descending register maximum limits.
Moreover, in arriving at the present invention, the inventors hereof have discovered that the use of the prepayment model with its descending register as set forth above is disadvantageous with respect to a relatively new type of postage meter user. Specifically, users that provide postage metering services to their clients or customers (the users providing the services referred to herein as providers and their clients or customers referred to herein as end users) experience difficulty in the prepayment model. For example, such providers may be providing postage metering services to a large number of end users, and thus be unable to forecast and plan for the needed postage value. Moreover, limits set by the postal authority with respect to postage value download and/or descending register maximum amounts may be insufficient to serve end user demands for a desired period, thereby necessitating close monitoring of available postage value and repeated postage value download. Delays in processing postage value download, such as due to credit card clearing house problems or delays, may result in a large number of end users being dissatisfied with the providers' service.
The present invention is directed to systems and methods which provide metering of postage value using accumulated postage information. Embodiments of the present invention implement an accumulated postage register in a postage security device (PSD) which is incremented each time a postage indicium is generated and which is reset (e.g., zeroed or decremented by an amount of payment) when a postage value settlement (PVS) operation is performed. The accumulated postage register of embodiments maintains a balance of postage value used that is paid or settled after generation of postage indicia having value associated with the accumulated postage register balance. Postage value settlement operations according to embodiments of the invention facilitates periodic payment for an exact amount of postage value used.
Accumulated postage may be paid for using various accounts according to embodiments of the invention. For example, rather than having a single descending register from which to draw postage value, a number of accounts may be used for payment of accumulated postage during a postage value settlement operation. Such accounts may include pre-funded or pre-paid accounts, credit accounts, debit accounts, billing accounts, etcetera. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention may be used with respect to a post-paid metering model (e.g., payment for postage value is not made by a user until after postage indicia has been generated), a pre-paid metering model (e.g., payment for postage value may be made into an account separate from a postage security device prior to generation of postage indicia), and combinations thereof (e.g., payment for some postage value may be made into an account separate from a postage security device prior to generation of postage indicia while payment for additional postage value is not made until after postage indicia has been generated).
Embodiments of the present invention are particularly well suited for use by users (providers) that provide postage metering services to their clients or customers (end users). According to one embodiment, such providers (e.g., an online retailer such as Amazon.com, Inc. or online auctioneer such as eBay Inc. facilitating sales of items by end users to other end users whereby postage metering services are provided for use in shipping such items) may provide postage metering services for a large number of end users having significant total postage value. Using one or more accounts (whether pre-paid or post-paid) separate from the postage security device or devices used in generating postage indicia for the foregoing end users frees the provider from having to closely monitor postage value and perform postage value download operations timed to avoid delays in postage indicia generation. Moreover, the provider's forecasting of postage value associated with such postage indicia generation becomes less critical because, although the provider may desire to predict postage value use, operations and end user satisfaction will not be degraded where forecasts are lower than the actual amounts of postage value used.
Embodiments of the present invention are further suited for use by users which generate large volumes of postage indicia in high speed processes. For example, by incrementing an accumulated postage register, rather than the more traditional decrementing a descending register wherein a check of the descending register amount is performed prior to the decrementing step in order to assure sufficient postage value is available for the operation, postage metering operations may be streamlined to facilitate higher speed postage indicia generation.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are implemented in such a way as to minimize impact upon a postal authority, such as the USPS, participating in the use of accumulated postage metering. For example, a schedule of postage value settlement operations may be established whereby the postal authority perceives no delay with respect to payment for accumulated postage as compared to a more traditional pre-paid model. According to embodiments of the invention, a postage value settlement operation is performed at least daily (assuming postage indicia generation operations have also been performed daily) in order to provide for payment of accumulated postage within a period in which more traditional pre-payment settlements received through credit card clearinghouses would be received by the postal authority.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention, both as to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages will be better understood from the following description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that each of the figures is provided for the purpose of illustration and description only and is not intended as a definition of the limits of the present invention.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which:
To aid in understanding the concepts of the present invention, a prior art system configured for providing postage indicia generation over a network will be briefly described.
Postage server 110 may comprise a computer based server (e.g., web server) operable under control of postage control application 119 and having a secure memory (e.g., cryptographic memory module) configured to provide operation as postal security device (PSD) 111. PSD 111 includes ascending register 112 and descending register 113 utilized in providing postage metering operations. Database 114 includes various information used in providing postage metering services. For example, database 114 may include information for identifying and authenticating a user and/or postage generation client for postage metering operations. Moreover, database 114 may store postage information for configuring PSD 111 for use with respect to different users. For example, database 114 may store ascending register values, descending register values, etcetera for each of a plurality of users (e.g., in cryptographic form, perhaps also in clear text), facilitating operation of postage server 110 to configure PSD 111 to temporarily provide a postage meter unique to a particular user. Thus a plurality of different user terminals may interact with postage server 110 to generate postage indicia from different meter accounts. Postage server 110 may additionally include a transaction log (not shown) for storing information with respect to individual transactions conducted using postage server 110, perhaps including details such as user identification, postage meter identification, account information, transaction type, transaction amount, time and/or date information, etcetera.
User terminal 120 may comprise a computer based user terminal operable under control of postage generation client application 121 for interacting with postage server 110 in providing postage metering operations. For example, a user may interact with user terminal 120 to cause a credit card account to be debited, transfer the debited value to postage server 110, and perform a postage value download operation resulting in descending register 113 being incremented. Similarly, a user may interact with user terminal 120 to select a desired amount of postage, request generation of a postage indicium by postage server 110 resulting id descending register 113 being decremented and ascending register 112 being incremented, and printing the generated postage indicium at a printer (not shown) local to user terminal 120.
Network 150 may comprise a network suitable for providing data communication between postage server 110 and postage generation client 120. For example, network 150 may comprise the Internet.
Metering system 100 provides an excellent solution for many typical postage metering applications. For example, traditional postage metering operations for an entity, such as a business or individual, wherein postage needs may be readily forecast and wherein drawing postage value from a single account associated with the entity is desirable may be adequately served by metering system 100.
Directing attention to
User terminals 220a-220c are coupled to postage metering services provider system 210 via network 251 and postage metering services provider system 210 is coupled to postage server 110 via network 252. Networks 251 and 252 may comprise a local area network (LAN), metropolitan area network (MAN), wide area network (WAN), intranet, extranet, the Internet, the public switched telephone network (PSTN), and/or other network suitable for data communication between user terminals 220a-220c, postage metering service provider system 210, and postage server 110. Postage generation client applications 221a-221c may interact with postage metering services application 211 to request a desired amount of postage and provide payment therefore (e.g., using electronic funds transfer, such as to debit a credit card account). Thereafter, postage metering services application 211 may request generation of a postage indicium by postage server 110 resulting id descending register 113 being decremented and ascending register 112 being incremented. The generated postage indicium may be provided to a requesting one of postage generation client applications 221a-221c for printing at a printer (not shown) local to a respective one of user terminals 220a-220c.
Postage metering services provider system 210 may additionally interact with postage server 210 to perform a postage value download operation with respect to PSD 111. For example, postage metering services application 211 may periodically (e.g., upon detecting a value available in descending register 113 falling below a predetermined threshold, upon user terminals 220a-220c obtaining a predetermined amount of postage value, etcetera) cause an account (e.g., a credit card account, a debit account, etcetera) to be debited, transfer the debited value to postage server 110, and perform a postage value download operation resulting in descending register 113 being incremented. Such postage value may thus be available for generation of postage indicia for any of user terminals 220a-220c.
Although metering system 200 of
Directing attention to
It can be appreciated from the above that PSD 311 of metering system 300 includes adaptation to provide accumulated postage register 315. Accumulated postage register 315 of embodiments of the invention is incremented each time a postage indicium is generated and is set to zero or decremented by an amount of payment when a postage value settlement (PVS) operation is performed. Accordingly, accumulated postage register 315 of embodiments maintains a balance of postage value used that is paid or settled after generation of postage indicia having value associated with the accumulated postage register balance. Postage value settlement operations according to embodiments of the invention facilitates periodic payment for an exact amount of postage value used.
Embodiments of the invention may include adaptation to provide confidence with respect to the accuracy of financial and/or other information. As discussed above, information for configuring PSD 311 for operation as a particular user's postage meter may be stored in database 314. Although such information may include cryptographic or other security measures to protect or obscure some or all of the data stored in database 314, embodiments of the invention may implement features to detect an out-of-date database entry (e.g., resulting from a system crash and subsequent restoring of backup records, a “replay” attack wherein an out-of-date, although previously valid, database record is inserted into the database, etcetera) or to otherwise determine if database 314 is out of sync with PSD 311. Embodiments of the invention may additionally or alternatively implement features to detect that a transaction log is out-of-sync with PSD 311. For example, embodiments of the invention store information with respect to all financial transactions (e.g., postage value credit transactions, postage value debit transactions, postage value reconciliation transactions, etcetera) in PSD 311, database 314, and a transaction log, whereby some or all of this information may be utilized to detect an out-of-sync status between any of the foregoing.
According one embodiment of the invention, PSD 311 stores a running total of all postage printed using PSD 311, a running total of all postage reset through PSD 311, and all postage returned through PSD 311. The foregoing information is preferably stored in registers of PSD 311 which remain unaffected by the loading and unloading of postage meter information from database 314 in configuring PSD 311 to operate as a postage meter for a particular user. Accordingly, the foregoing running totals remain stored within PSD 311 irrespective of the status of various meter configuration information. The running totals stored by PSD 311 may be compared to various totals derived from the information stored in database 314 (e.g., totals derived from separate postage meter records for meter configurations which use PSD 311 in operation) to determine an out-of-sync state between PSD 311 and database 314. Similarly, the running totals stored by PSD 311 may be compared to various totals derived from the information stored in a transaction log (not shown) to determine an out-of-sync state between PSD 311 and the transaction log.
In providing detection of out-of-sync or out-of-date information with respect to accumulated postage, embodiments of the present invention additionally or alternatively store a running total of postage printed using accumulating balance registers and a running total of postage reconciled with respect to accumulating balance registers. That is, each time any meter configuration using PSD 311 generates a postage indicium for which the value is accounted for using an accumulating balance register, the foregoing running total of postage printed using accumulating balance registers will be incremented by an appropriate amount. Similarly, each time accumulated postage value which was accumulated using PSD 311 is reconciled or paid (e.g., a postage value settlement operation is performed), the foregoing running total of postage reconciled will be incremented by an appropriate amount. As with the running totals discussed above, the running totals stored in PSD 311 with respect to accumulated postage is preferably stored in registers of PSD 311 which remain unaffected by the loading and unloading of postage meter information from database 314 in configuring PSD 311 to operate as a postage meter for a particular user.
The foregoing running totals may be utilized to ensure that the postal authority is properly recompensed even in the situation that database 314 and/or an associated transaction log are unavailable, such as due to a system failure or other disaster. For example, although perhaps not reflecting detail with respect to which individual users are responsible for payment, a comparison of the running total of postage printed using accumulating balance registers and the running total of postage reconciled with respect to accumulating balance registers may be utilized to determine an amount owed to the postal authority in association with the use of accumulated postage registers of embodiments of the invention.
Directing attention to
Assuming the request has been properly validated, postage metering services application 211 requests generation of a postage indicium by postage server 310 via network 252 at block 403 of the illustrated embodiment. If, however, the request fails validation (e.g., the end user, user terminal, and/or postage generation client application are not authorized to request postage indicia, payment has not properly been provided for the postage indicium, the requested postage value would cause the accumulated postage value to exceed a predetermined maximum value, etcetera), generation of the requested postage indicium is preferably prevented by postage metering services application 211 of embodiments.
At block 404, postage control application 319 causes the requested postage indicium to be generated. According to embodiments of the invention, postage control application 319 interacts with database 314 and PSD 311 to generate the postage indicium. For example, postage control application 319 may interact with database 314 to retrieve PSD configuration information associated with a postage metering services provider operating postage metering services provider system 210. The retrieved PSD configuration information may include information such as ascending register value and accumulated postage register value for uniquely configuring PSD 311 as the postage metering services provider's meter vault. This PSD configuration information may be provided to PSD 311 by postage control application 319. PSD 311 may thereafter decrypt or otherwise access the PSD configuration information and configure itself for metering operations with respect to the postage metering services provider. PSD 311, as configured using the PSD configuration information, then operates to generate the postage indicium data. PSD 311 and postage control application 319 preferably cooperate to create the requested postage indicium using the aforementioned postage indicium data. Various information, such as PSD identification information, ascending register value, accumulated postage register value, end user identification, postage generation client application identification information, sender address information, recipient address information, etcetera, and/or portions thereof, may be included in the generated postage indicium. Details with respect to operation of postage control applications and postage security devices in generating postage indicia are provided in the above referenced patent applications entitled “System and Method for Printing Multiple Postage Indicia” and “Virtual Security Device.”
In generating the postage indicium according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, PSD 311 increments both ascending register 312 and accumulated postage register 315 by the amount of postage value represented by the postage indicium. Embodiments of the present invention do not utilize descending register 313 where PSD 311 is configured to utilize accumulated postage register 315. Accordingly, descending register 313 may remain with a zero or other value throughout the postage indicium generation operation. In such embodiments where accumulated postage register 315 is used, descending register 313 may be omitted, if desired. In alternative embodiments, both descending register 313 and accumulated postage register 315 may be used in generation of postage indicia. For example, a pre-paid value represented by descending register 313 may be decremented until such value is depleted (or reaches a predetermined threshold) and thereafter accumulated postage register 315 incremented in association with the generation of one or more postage indicia.
Embodiments of the invention operate to store transaction information associated with the generation of the postage indicium in database 314 for later use in reconciliation of the PSD values. For example, a history of postage value deductions since a last reconciliation, such as may have occurred at a last postage value settlement operation, may be stored by postage control application 319 in database 314 and associated with the meter configuration used by PSD 311 for those particular transactions.
At block 405 of the illustrated embodiment, postage control application 319 returns postage indicium information to postage metering services application 211. Postage metering services application 211 likewise returns the postage indicium information to the requesting one of postage generation client applications 221a-221c. The postage indicium information preferably provides sufficient information for the receiving one of postage generation client applications 221a-221c to cause the desired postage indicium to be printed by an associated one of user terminals 220a-220c. For example, the postage indicium information may comprise a digitized graphical representation of the postage indicium. Alternatively, the postage indicium information may comprise information from which the postage generation client application can produce a postage indicium. In some embodiments of the invention, the postage indicium information comprises a locator (e.g., a uniform resources locator (URL)) for a location from which the generated postage indicium may be obtained.
Directing attention to
At block 502 of the illustrated embodiment, postage control application 319 obtains the accumulated postage value for one or more meter configurations associated with PSD 311 from database 314 (e.g., clear text information showing the value of accumulated postage corresponding to an amount securely stored in data for a particular meter configuration which, when loaded into PSD 311, has a corresponding value in accumulated postage register 315). At block 503, the accumulated postage amount retrieved from the database is compared to an amount stored in a corresponding accumulated postage register. For example, postage server 310 may obtain information from database 314 regarding ascending register values, descending register values, accumulated postage registers, etcetera for temporarily configuring PSD 311 as a postage meter unique to a particular user or entity for which a postage value settlement operation is being performed. The accumulated postage register value (the value of accumulated postage register 315 when PSD 311 is configured as the appropriate postage meter) may be compared to the accumulated postage value retrieved from database 314 at block 501.
If it is determined that the accumulated postage register value does not match the retrieved accumulated postage value at block 504, processing according to the illustrated embodiment proceeds to block 505 wherein an error process is initiated. For example, embodiments of the invention use the obtained accumulated postage value both to obtain payment for postage value used and to reconcile metering operations (e.g., to detect fraud and/or misuse). In reconciling the meter operations, postage control application 319 may obtain historical transaction information stored in database 314 and/or a value of ascending register 312. This information may be utilized to determine an amount of postage value provided by PSD when configured as a meter for those transactions and compare this amount to the accumulated postage register value. If there is a difference, perhaps allowing for minor variation, fraud or misuse may be indicated. If fraud or misuse is indicated, embodiments of the present invention operate to prevent further postage value debiting using the associated meter configuration. Accordingly, PSD 311 may be prevented from implementing a meter configuration using ascending register 312 and accumulated postage register 315 to generate postage indicia at block 505. This meter configuration may be allowed to resume postage value debit operation (e.g., generation of postage indicia) after further processing, such as a manual reconciliation process, which concludes fraud or misuse has not occurred.
If it is determined that the accumulated postage register value does match the retrieved accumulated postage value at block 504, processing according to the illustrated embodiment proceeds to block 506 wherein the value of accumulated postage register 315 (assuming PSD 311 is configured as the appropriate postage meter) is adjusted. For example, if the balance of accumulated postage is being paid in full, accumulated postage register 315 is preferably zeroed. Alternatively, if some amount less than the balance of accumulated postage is being paid, accumulated postage register 315 is decremented by an appropriate amount.
At block 507, a record associated with a meter configuration or configurations for which the postage settlement operation is being performed is updated to reflect the amount to be paid to one or more postal authority. Actual payment processing is initiated at block 508 of the illustrated embodiment. Such payment processing my invoke various payment systems, such as to perform electronic funds transfer, etcetera. It should be appreciated that accumulated postage may be paid for using various accounts according to embodiments of the invention. For example, a number of accounts may be used for payment of accumulated postage during the postage value settlement operation. Such accounts may include pre-funded or pre-paid accounts (e.g., pre-paid credit of the postage metering service provider stored in database 314 or elsewhere, for example by a third party service such as provided by PayPal, Inc.), credit accounts (e.g., credit card accounts, lines of credit, etcetera), debit accounts (e.g., debit card accounts, electronic funds transfer, check conversion, etcetera), billing accounts (e.g., post-paid account, etcetera), and/or the like. It should be appreciated that payment for some postage value may be made into an account separate from a postage security device prior to generation of postage indicia while payment for additional postage value is not made until after postage indicia has been generated through accessing these accounts during the postage value settlement operation. Accordingly, payment for some or all the postage value is not made by a user until after postage indicia has been generated according to embodiments of the invention. Additionally or alternatively, payment for some or all the postage value may be made prior to generation of postage indicia according to embodiments of the invention.
Although embodiments of the invention allow partial payment of the accumulated postage in a postage value settlement operation, other embodiments require full payment of the accumulated postage or operate to prevent further postage value debiting using the associated meter configuration. Embodiments of the present invention facilitate over-payment of the postage value to thereby obtain a pre-payment amount to be used with respect to generation of postage indicia in the future. An amount of over-payment may be stored in an account separate from any registers of the PSD or may be stored by a register of the PSD (e.g., descending register 313).
After payment processing has successfully resulted in payment being made to the postal authority or postal authorities, block 509 of the illustrated embodiment updates a record associated with the meter configuration or configurations for which the postage settlement operation is being performed to reflect payment having been made. Additionally, embodiments of the invention operate to update a transaction log with information regarding the settlement operation.
It should be appreciated that the illustrated embodiment implements several steps in completing a settlement operation. In order to assure the accuracy of financial information, it may be desirable to perform various ones of such settlement operation steps atomically. That is, in an atomic transaction, some number of steps may be required to all complete successfully or a previous state be reset. The various processes represented by blocks 506-509 are preferably performed as atomic transaction 510. Detail with respect to performing various atomic transactions are shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,199,055 entitled “System and Method for Providing Fault Tolerant Transactions Over an Unsecured Communication Channel,” the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
In order to aid in understanding the operation of an accumulated postage register according to embodiments of the present invention, a state table showing the states of ascending register 312, descending register 313, and accumulated postage register 315 of an embodiment of metering system 300 in association with various operations is provided below. The state table further shows the states of ascending register 112 and descending register 113 of metering system 100 in association with the various operations for comparison.
Although embodiments of the invention have been described herein as incrementing an accumulated postage register as postage value is dispensed by a postal security device, alternative embodiments operate differently. For example, an alternative embodiment of the present invention includes adaptation of a descending register, such as descending register 313, to allow for balances less than zero (i.e., negative balances). In such an embodiment, the descending register may be decremented by an appropriate amount of postage value. In contrast, during a postage value settlement operation, the descending register may be incremented by an amount of payment.
From the above, it should be appreciated that embodiments of the present invention may be operated to provide a post-paid metering model (e.g., payment for postage value is not made by a user until after postage indicia has been generated). Such a post-paid metering model generally presents some risk with respect to obtaining payment for the postage value. However, such a model is particularly useful with respect to postage metering service providers who provide postage metering services to a large number of users and/or a high volume of postage metering. Such providers tend to be large, institutional entities. Accordingly, the risk of obtaining payment for the postage value may be considered to be acceptable for such entities. Moreover, using controls for initiating postage value settlement operations, such as the aforementioned periodic and maximum amount triggers, risks with respect to obtaining payment for the postage value may be further mitigated. Additionally, implementing post-paid metering with respect to any particular entity may be provided only after an approval process, such as may include approval by the postal authority. As yet another mitigating factor with respect to risk of payment, it is envisioned that the operator of the postage server will also be approved by the postal authority, and thus present a reliable secondary source for payment should the postage metering services provider fail to properly pay for postage value.
Although the post-paid metering model may not be implemented with respect to all users for business or other reasons, embodiments of the present invention may still be utilized with respect to users other than those qualifying for operation according to a post-paid model. From the above, it should be appreciated that embodiments of the present invention may be operated to provided a pre-paid metering model (e.g., payment for postage value may be made into an account separate from a postage security device prior to generation of postage indicia). Accordingly, various users may deposit funds with a trusted source (e.g., the postage metering services provider, the postage server provider, the postal authority, etcetera) for debiting during a postage value settlement operation according to embodiments of the invention. Such pre-paid accounts may be verified with respect to a postage generation request, such as in the aforementioned validation operation, to ensure sufficient pre-paid funds are present to service the request.
Additionally or alternatively, a more restricted version of a post-paid metering model may be implemented with respect to users other than those qualifying for operation according to a more robust post-paid model. For example, a maximum accumulated postage amount for such users may be set very low to provide a kind of “overdraft” protection feature, thereby allowing such users to complete a postage indicium generation operation where their pre-paid funds are only slightly insufficient to fund the requested postage value.
It should be appreciated that, although embodiments of the present invention have been described with reference to adapting a PSD to include an accumulated postage register, embodiments of the invention my be adapted to provide for accumulated postage without an accumulated postage register having been provided in a PSD. For example, an embodiment of the invention operates to generate a postage indicium acceptable to a postal authority for delivery services without performing a metering operation, wherein a metering operation to fully validate the generated postage indicium, along with providing payment for the indicium, is performed subsequently.
According to one embodiment, the postage indicium generated without a metering operation includes a reduced set of information. For example, the postage indicium generated without a metering operation may include information for use in delivery of a postal item (e.g., delivery zip code, amount of postage, postal class, etcetera), but may omit validation information (e.g., a digital signature) provided through a metering operation. Such postage indicium preferably includes information for linking the postage indicium to validation information (e.g., a pointer to a datapacket, such as another indicium, generated from a metering operation). An example of a postage indicium generated without a metering operation which includes information for linking the postage indicium to validation information is a “light” information based indicia, examples of which are shown and described in the above referenced patent applications entitled “Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Customization Security,” “System and Method for Automatically Processing Mail,” “System and Method for Printing an Application of Dynamically Valued Stamps,” and “Systems and Methods for Single Pass Printing Postage Indicia.”
In operation according to embodiments using the foregoing light indicia, database entries and/or transaction logs are updated to reflect the generation of such light indicia. Each such light indicia may include a unique number or other information for use in subsequently associating the indicium with a validating datapacket. Thereafter, perhaps in a batch operation, a metering operation may be performed to account for monies owed to a postal authority and to generate the appropriate datapackets for validating the light indicia. For example, postage server 310 may operate under control of postage control 319 to debit appropriate amounts from descending register 313. In response to such operation, PSD 311 may generate “full” information based indicia corresponding to the light indicia. The full indicia preferably includes security information, such as a digital signature, suitable for verifying the validity of the indicium. Such full indicia may be uniquely associated with a corresponding light indicium through the use of the above mentioned linking information. The full indicia may be provided to, or otherwise made available to, the postal authority for use in validating the light indicia. Such an embodiment may utilize more typical meter funding operations with respect to the full indicia, albeit allowing for purchasing postage value after the light postage indicia have been generated. Accordingly, such an embodiment provides for the use of accumulated postage without adapting the PSD, or other secure meter component, to include an accumulated postage register.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
The present application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/616,569 entitled “Postage Metering With Accumulated Postage,” filed Dec. 27, 2006, and is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/353,690 entitled “System and Method for Validating Postage,” filed Feb. 14, 2006, Ser. No. 09/491,949 entitled “System and Method for Printing Multiple Postage Indicia,” filed Jan. 26, 2000, Ser. No. 10/862,058 entitled “Virtual Security Device,” filed Jun. 4, 2004, Ser. No. 10/994,768, entitled “Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Customization Security,” filed Nov. 22, 2004, Ser. No. 10/606,579, entitled “System and Method for Automatically Processing Mail,” filed Jun. 26, 2003, Ser. No. 10/696,221, entitled “System and Method for Printing an Application of Dynamically Valued Stamps,” filed Oct. 29, 2003, and Ser. No. 11/323,463 entitled “Systems and Methods for Single Pass Printing Postage Indicia,” filed Dec. 20, 2005, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2964232 | Levyn | Dec 1960 | A |
3221980 | Mercur | Dec 1965 | A |
3584696 | Eblowitz | Jun 1971 | A |
3594727 | Braun | Jul 1971 | A |
3691726 | Stephens et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3978457 | Check, Jr. et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4119194 | Freeman et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4253158 | McFiggans | Feb 1981 | A |
4271481 | Check, Jr. et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4307293 | Lazzarotti et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4308299 | Check, Jr. et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4310720 | Check, Jr. | Jan 1982 | A |
4376299 | Rivest | Mar 1983 | A |
4511793 | Racanelli | Apr 1985 | A |
4629871 | Scribner et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4641347 | Clark et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4649266 | Eckert | Mar 1987 | A |
4661001 | Takai et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4739343 | Dolan | Apr 1988 | A |
4725718 | Sansone et al. | May 1988 | A |
4743747 | Fougere et al. | May 1988 | A |
4744554 | Kulpa et al. | May 1988 | A |
4757537 | Edelmann et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4760532 | Sansone et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4763271 | Field | Aug 1988 | A |
4775246 | Edelmann et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4796181 | Wiedemer | Jan 1989 | A |
4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4800506 | Axelrod et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4802218 | Wright et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4809185 | Talmadge | Feb 1989 | A |
4812994 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4821195 | Baer et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4831554 | Storace et al. | May 1989 | A |
4831555 | Sansone et al. | May 1989 | A |
4837701 | Sansone et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4853865 | Sansone et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4858138 | Talmadge | Aug 1989 | A |
4862386 | Axelrod et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4864618 | Wright et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4868757 | Gil | Sep 1989 | A |
4873645 | Hunter et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4876000 | Mikhail | Oct 1989 | A |
4893249 | Silverberg | Jan 1990 | A |
4900903 | Wright et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4900904 | Wright et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4900941 | Barton et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4901241 | Schneck | Feb 1990 | A |
4908770 | Breault et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4910686 | Chang et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4933849 | Connell et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4934846 | Gilham et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4941091 | Breault et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4947333 | Sansone et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4949381 | Pastor | Aug 1990 | A |
4992940 | Dworkin | Feb 1991 | A |
4998204 | Sansone et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5025141 | Bolan | Jun 1991 | A |
5047928 | Wiedemer | Sep 1991 | A |
5058008 | Schumacher | Oct 1991 | A |
5065000 | Pusic et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5067088 | Schneiderhan | Nov 1991 | A |
5075862 | Doeberl et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5077792 | Herring | Dec 1991 | A |
5079714 | Manduley et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5085470 | Peach et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5091771 | Bolan et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5094554 | Hurd et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5111030 | Brasington et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119306 | Metelits et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5136647 | Haber et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142482 | Sansone | Aug 1992 | A |
5150407 | Chan | Sep 1992 | A |
5156467 | Kitahara et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5200903 | Gilham et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5202834 | Gilham et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5222018 | Shame et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5233657 | Gunther et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5237506 | Horbal et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239168 | Durst, Jr. et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5289540 | Jones | Feb 1994 | A |
5319562 | Whitehouse | Jun 1994 | A |
5323323 | Gilham et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5323465 | Avarne | Jun 1994 | A |
5326181 | Eisner et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5341505 | Whitehouse | Aug 1994 | A |
5388049 | Sansone et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5410642 | Hakamatsuka et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5423573 | de Passille | Jun 1995 | A |
5425586 | Berson | Jun 1995 | A |
5437441 | Tuhro et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5449200 | Andric et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5454038 | Cordery et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5468945 | Huggett et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471925 | Heinrich et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476420 | Manning | Dec 1995 | A |
5483445 | Pickering | Jan 1996 | A |
5485369 | Nicholls et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5490077 | Freytag et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5510992 | Kara | Apr 1996 | A |
5524995 | Brookner et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5573277 | Petkovsek | Nov 1996 | A |
5583779 | Naclerio et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5600562 | Guenther | Feb 1997 | A |
5602742 | Solondz et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5602743 | Freytag | Feb 1997 | A |
5606507 | Kara | Feb 1997 | A |
5606613 | Lee et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5612541 | Hoffmann et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5612889 | Pintsov et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615123 | Davidson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5617519 | Herbert | Apr 1997 | A |
5619571 | Sandstrom et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623546 | Hardy et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
D380007 | Kara | Jun 1997 | S |
5649118 | Carlisle et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650934 | Manduley | Jul 1997 | A |
5655023 | Cordery et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5663547 | Ziarno | Sep 1997 | A |
5666284 | Kara | Sep 1997 | A |
5682318 | Kara | Oct 1997 | A |
5696829 | Cordery et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706502 | Foley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708422 | Blonder et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717596 | Bernard et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717597 | Kara | Feb 1998 | A |
5717980 | Oka et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5726897 | Tammi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729459 | Brandien et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729460 | Plett et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729674 | Rosewarne et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742683 | Lee et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745887 | Gargiulo et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5758327 | Gardner et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758328 | Giovannoli | May 1998 | A |
D395333 | Kara | Jun 1998 | S |
5768132 | Cordery et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774554 | Gilham | Jun 1998 | A |
5774886 | Kara | Jun 1998 | A |
5778076 | Kara et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781438 | Lee et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5793867 | Cordery | Aug 1998 | A |
5796834 | Whitney et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799290 | Dolan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801364 | Kara et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5801944 | Kara | Sep 1998 | A |
5812991 | Kara | Sep 1998 | A |
5819240 | Kara | Oct 1998 | A |
5822739 | Kara | Oct 1998 | A |
5825893 | Kara | Oct 1998 | A |
5836617 | Beaudoin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842178 | Giovannoli | Nov 1998 | A |
5860068 | Cook | Jan 1999 | A |
5871288 | Ryan, Jr. et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884277 | Khosla | Mar 1999 | A |
5902439 | Pike et al. | May 1999 | A |
5923406 | Brasington et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923885 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929415 | Berson | Jul 1999 | A |
5930796 | Pierce et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5912682 | Parkos | Aug 1999 | A |
5936885 | Morita et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946671 | Herring et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960418 | Kelly et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5983209 | Kara | Nov 1999 | A |
5987441 | Lee et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005945 | Whitehouse | Dec 1999 | A |
6010069 | Debois | Jan 2000 | A |
6010156 | Block | Jan 2000 | A |
6026385 | Harvey et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6047273 | Vaghi | Apr 2000 | A |
6050486 | French et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061670 | Brand | May 2000 | A |
6061671 | Baker et al. | May 2000 | A |
6079327 | Sarada | Jun 2000 | A |
6175825 | Fruechtel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175826 | Malandra, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199055 | Kara | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208980 | Kara | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6233565 | Lewis et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233568 | Kara | May 2001 | B1 |
6249777 | Kara et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256616 | Brookner | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6327042 | Krasuski et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349292 | Sutherland et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6385504 | Pintsov et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6385731 | Ananda | May 2002 | B2 |
6424954 | Leon | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430543 | Lee et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6470327 | Carroll et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6502912 | Bernard et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6520342 | Dumke et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523014 | Pauschinger | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526391 | Cordery et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532452 | Pintsov et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6594374 | Beckstrom et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595412 | Manduley | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6609117 | Sutherland et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6671813 | Ananda | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6834273 | Sansone et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6853990 | Thiel | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6865557 | Cordery et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6939062 | Ogg et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7043053 | Patton et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7056410 | Kuller et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7127434 | Burningham | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7149726 | Lingle et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7182259 | Lubow et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7225170 | Ryan, Jr. | May 2007 | B1 |
7226494 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7266531 | Pintsov et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7337152 | Gawler | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7343357 | Kara | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7458612 | Bennett | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7509291 | McBride et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7548612 | Weissman et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7711650 | Kara | May 2010 | B1 |
7778924 | Ananda | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7784090 | Lord et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7831518 | Montgomery et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7831824 | Abdulhayoglu | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840492 | Leung et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7954709 | Leon et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7963437 | McBride et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8078548 | Ogg | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8100324 | Leon | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8155976 | Rendich et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8204835 | Ogg | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8240579 | Bennett | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8250000 | Ogg | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8612361 | Bussell et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8626673 | Bennett | Jan 2014 | B1 |
9208620 | Bortnak et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
20010007086 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010020234 | Shah et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010022060 | Robertson et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010024228 | Klinefelter et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010037320 | Allport et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010042052 | Leon | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043350 | Kasai et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002544 | Leon et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020032573 | Williams et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032668 | Kohler et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032784 | Darago et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020040333 | Fuwa | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020040353 | Brown et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046182 | Bator et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052841 | Guthrie et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065577 | Teraura et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073039 | Ogg et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073050 | Gusler et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073052 | Katikaneni et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082935 | Moore et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083020 | Leon | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095347 | Cummiskey | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099652 | Herzen et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116318 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127040 | Davies et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143431 | Sansone | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143714 | Allport et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149196 | Fabel | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020190117 | Manduley | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004900 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014376 | DeWitt et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030024745 | Huitt et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030029914 | Hortman et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037008 | Raju et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065739 | Shnier | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074324 | Kresina et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080182 | Gunther | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101143 | Montgomery et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101148 | Montgomery et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115162 | Konick | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130963 | Stickler et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030138345 | Schwabe | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140017 | Patton et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144972 | Cordery et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167241 | Gilham | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182155 | Nitzan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187666 | Leon | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030193530 | Blackman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204477 | McNett | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217018 | Groff et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233276 | Pearlman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236709 | Hendra et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001133 | Critelli et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040002926 | Coffy et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040048503 | Mills et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064422 | Leon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083179 | Sesek et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083189 | Leon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040089482 | Ramsden et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122776 | Sansone | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122777 | Sansone | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122779 | Stickler et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128264 | Leung et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040185827 | Parks | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040185882 | Gecht et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186811 | Gullo et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040211844 | Marshall | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212833 | Taskett et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215581 | Lord et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215583 | Elliott | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220935 | McGraw et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230544 | Herbert | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236938 | Callaghan | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254808 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254898 | Parker et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050065892 | Ryan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065896 | Kummer et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065897 | Ryan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071244 | Phillips et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075991 | Ogg | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050077346 | Dutta et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080751 | Burningham | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050114222 | Mundy | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116047 | Lu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050119786 | Kadaba | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050171791 | Chimenti et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171869 | Minnocci | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192899 | Reardon | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192911 | Mattern | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050237203 | Burman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050256811 | Pagel et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278266 | Ogg et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000648 | Galtier | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020505 | Whitehouse | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036557 | Mattern | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060116971 | Beckstrom et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122947 | Poulin | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173700 | Fenelon | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173796 | Kara | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060220298 | Fairweather et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060238334 | Mangan et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259390 | Rosenberger | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282271 | Anada et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060283943 | Ostrowski et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287096 | O'Kelley, II et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070033110 | Philipp et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070067248 | Fabien | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073587 | Walker et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078795 | Chatte | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070080228 | Knowles et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070174213 | Whitehouse et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174215 | Morel | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070253350 | Tung et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255664 | Blumberg et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080046384 | Braun et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080154781 | Kumar | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080281719 | Hall et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090164392 | Raju et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100169241 | Schoonmaker et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100235267 | Brookner et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100298662 | Yu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312627 | Khechef et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015935 | Montgomery et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022544 | Kim et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029429 | Whitehouse | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110071944 | Heiden et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110145107 | Greco | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110225180 | Liao et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242554 | Ferry et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110295646 | Barros | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120008766 | Robertson et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120159603 | Queck | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120233252 | Vats et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240204 | Bhatnagar et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130066794 | Hill et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130254132 | Srinath et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140019517 | Fawcett | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140067665 | Paletz et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140265300 | Jena | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140324633 | Pollak et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2470371 | May 2003 | CA |
2912696 | Oct 1979 | DE |
3903718 | Aug 1989 | DE |
4409386 | Sep 1995 | DE |
0137737 | Apr 1985 | EP |
153816 | Sep 1985 | EP |
0282359 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0507562 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0571259 | Nov 1993 | EP |
0596706 | May 1994 | EP |
0658861 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0927958 | Jul 1999 | EP |
0927963 | Jul 1999 | EP |
2580844 | Oct 1986 | FR |
2246929 | Feb 1992 | GB |
2251210 | Jul 1992 | GB |
2271452 | Apr 1994 | GB |
63147673 | Jun 1988 | JP |
05-132049 | May 1993 | JP |
11-249205 | Sep 1999 | JP |
02000105845 | Apr 2000 | JP |
04284558 | Jun 2009 | JP |
WO-8801818 | Mar 1988 | WO |
WO-9427258-AI | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO-199519016 | Jul 1995 | WO |
WO-9714117 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO-9740472 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO-9740472 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO-9814907 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-9814909 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO-9857302 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-9857460 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-9948054 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO-02063517 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO-02093498 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-03039051 | May 2003 | WO |
WO-03083784 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Davis Brad L.; “Printing System for Preventing Injustice by Delivering Print Data from Postal Charge Meter to Printer,” Jan. 2001. |
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 12/103,496 to Bortnak et al., filed Apr. 15, 2008 and entitled “Systems and Methods for Activation of Postage Indicia at Point of Sale.” |
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,309 to Leon, filed Aug. 24, 2006 and entitled “Invisible Fluorescent Ink Mark.” |
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,739 to McBride et al., filed Feb. 13, 2008 and entitled “Systems and Methods for Distributed Activation of Postage.” |
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,463 to Leon et al., filed Dec. 30, 2005 and entitled “Systems and Methods for Single Pass Printing Postage Indicia.” |
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,579 to Ogg, filed Jun. 26, 2003 and entitled “System and Method for Automatically Processing Mail.” |
International Search Report issued for PCT/US95/00237, dated May 29, 1995, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/616,546, Bussell et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/616,569, Tsuie et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,739, McBride et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/103,496, Bortnak et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/553,824, Bortnak et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/729,148, Stamps.com. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/316,240. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,309, J. P. Leon. |
Ford, Colleen, “Frequent Flyer Programs,” Australian Accountant, 63,1, Feb. 1993, pp. 52-58. |
Alexander, Keith L., “U.S. Stamps Pay Tribute to Starry-Eyed Jurors”, Final Edition, Calgary Herald, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Sep. 14, 2007, 2 pgs. |
Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/353,690 dated Aug. 3, 2009, 19 pgs. |
“Domestic Mail Manual Section 604”, Aug. 31, 2005. |
“Mobile Postage stamps via text message announced”, http://telecoms.cytalk.com/2011/03/mobile-postage-stamps-via-text-messages-announced/, CY.TALK Telecoms News Blog, Mar. 14, 2011 in Telecoms, Texting, pp. 1-9. |
Mobile Postage Stamps Via Text Messages Announced, Phone Reviews, Mobile Phones, News, Mar. 11, 2011, pp. 1-3. |
Anonymous, “Automated Indicia Detection System From Parascript Protects Postage Revenue for Postal Operators, Cracks Down on Fraud:—Parascript StampVerify Simplifies Complex Task of Automatically Locating and Verifying Different Types of Indicia on Envelope Images -,” PR Newswire, New York, Sep. 18, 2007. |
“Information-Based Indicia Program (IBIP) Performance Criteria for Information-Based Indicia and Security Architecture for Open IBI Postage Evidencing Systems,” Feb. 23, 2000, The United States Postal Service (USPS), 79 pages. |
Tygar, J.D.et al., “Cryptography: It's Not Just for Electronic Mail Anymore,” School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA, Mar. 1, 1993, 23 pages. |
Pintsov, L. et al. “Postal Revenue Collection in the Digital Age,” Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Financial Cryptography, Jan. 1, 2001, 3 pages. |
“Miniature, Coin-Shaped Chip is Read or Written with a Touch,” News Release, Dallas Semiconductor, Jul. 1991, 9 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US96/16366, dated Jun. 13, 1997, 9 pages. |
Terrell, K, “Licking Stamps: A PC and a Printer Will End Trips to the Post Office,” U.S. News & World Report, Sep. 28, 1998, vol. 125, No. 12, 4 pages. |
Computergram International, “U.S. Postal Service to Introduce PC Postage Plans Today,” Aug. 9, 1999, No. 3720, 1 page. |
Stamps: Beyond Elvis, May 15, 1994, New York Times Archives, 2 pages. |
Minnick, R. “Postage Imprinting Apparatus and Methods for Use With a Computer Printer,” Apr. 27, 1995, 71 pages. |
“Royal Mail Posts Out New Look Stamp Books Created by CDT Design,” Design Week, Jul. 4, 2002, 2 pages. |
Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2007 for JP 515,253/97; with English language translation (4 pages). |
Brief English Translation of Office Action Issued for DE 195 49 613.2 and copy of German Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2007, 6 pages. |
English Translation of Office Action issued for DE 195 49 613.2 and German Office Action, dated Mar. 29, 2001, 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/114,964 to Clem et al., filed Apr. 25, 2005, and entitled “Quality Assurance of Image-Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 122 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,914 to McBride et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Customized Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Quality Assurance,” 131 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,728 to Huebner et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Printing of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 122 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,698 to Leon et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Image Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 126 pages. |
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 10/643,745 to Ogg et al., filed Aug. 19, 2003 and entitled “System and Method for Dynamically Partitioning a Postage Evidencing System,” 20 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140229369 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11616569 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 14252449 | US |