Postage metering with accumulated postage

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9965903
  • Patent Number
    9,965,903
  • Date Filed
    Monday, April 14, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 8, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
Systems and methods which provide metering of postage value using accumulated postage information are shown. Embodiments implement an accumulated postage register in a postage security device which is incremented each time a postage indicium is generated and which is reset when a postage value settlement operation is performed. Accumulated postage may be paid for using various accounts, including pre-funded or pre-paid accounts, credit accounts, debit accounts, and billing accounts. Accordingly, embodiments may be used with respect to a post-paid metering model, a pre-paid metering model, and combinations thereof.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates generally to metering of postage value and, more particularly, to providing an accumulated postage feature with respect to metering of postage value.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Devices or “meters” used in the metering of postage value, such as for printing postage indicia used in posting mail pieces, typically include a vault mechanism having at least a descending register and an ascending register. Such a vault mechanism originated as an electromechanical device and has more recently been implemented as a secure electronic memory, often referred to as a postage security device (PSD).


The descending register provides a balance of prepaid postage value and is generally affected by two meter operations. A postage value download (PVD) meter operation increments the descending register in the amount of a postage value prepayment. For example, if a user purchases $10 of postage, the postage value stored in the descending register is incremented by $10 to increase the postage value available using the meter. Postal authorities, such as the United States Postal Service (USPS), often establish limits on the amount of postage value that may be downloaded in a postage value download operation and/or the maximum amount of postage value that may be held by a descending register in order to prevent fraud or misuse. A postage value decrementing operation is performed with respect to the descending register each time the meter is used to generate a postage indicium. For example, if a user operates the meter to generate a $0.39 postage indicium to apply to a first class mail piece, the aforementioned $10 of postage value stored by the descending register will be decremented by $0.39 to leave a postage value balance of $9.61. The descending register is never permitted to have a balance of less than $0, and is often not permitted to descend below some non-zero threshold amount (e.g., $1).


The ascending register provides a total of all postage value dispensed or metered by the meter. That is, the ascending register is incremented each time the meter is used to generate a postage indicium. For example, if a user operates a meter previously used in generating a total of $5.00 in postage indicia to generate a $0.39 postage indicium, the ascending register will be incremented by $0.39 to result in an ascending register total of $5.39. The ascending register is typically used in meter reconciliation operations, such as at the time of postage value download, in order to detect fraud or operational anomalies. A meter's service life is often dictated by a maximum allowable ascending register amount (e.g., $10,000) in order to limit the propensity for fraud.


Although the foregoing meter configuration provides an adequate postage metering solution for many metering applications, it is not without disadvantage. For example, from the above, it is clear that payment must be made (e.g., money deposited) prior to generating postage indicium. This prepayment model has historically been required by postal authorities in order to avoid losses associated with nonpayment for postage indicia. Moreover, the prepayment model has typically been acceptable to meter users as such meters have traditionally been used by a single entity (e.g., business entity or person) which has the ability to forecast postage needs and thus can relatively accurately plan and prepay for postage needs. Despite accurate forecasting and proper planning, however, problems can arise in acquiring postage value for metering operations. For example, electronic meters are often funded using credit cards or other electronic forms of payment which may experience problems (e.g., due to credit card clearing house problems) causing delays in obtaining postage value download and thus delaying the ability to generate desired postage indicia. Moreover, mailing tasks requiring large amounts of postage (e.g., monthly billings, mass promotional mailings, etcetera) may necessitate close monitoring of available postage value and repeated postage value download in order to generate a total amount of postage indicia desired in light of postage value download and/or descending register maximum limits.


Moreover, in arriving at the present invention, the inventors hereof have discovered that the use of the prepayment model with its descending register as set forth above is disadvantageous with respect to a relatively new type of postage meter user. Specifically, users that provide postage metering services to their clients or customers (the users providing the services referred to herein as providers and their clients or customers referred to herein as end users) experience difficulty in the prepayment model. For example, such providers may be providing postage metering services to a large number of end users, and thus be unable to forecast and plan for the needed postage value. Moreover, limits set by the postal authority with respect to postage value download and/or descending register maximum amounts may be insufficient to serve end user demands for a desired period, thereby necessitating close monitoring of available postage value and repeated postage value download. Delays in processing postage value download, such as due to credit card clearing house problems or delays, may result in a large number of end users being dissatisfied with the providers' service.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to systems and methods which provide metering of postage value using accumulated postage information. Embodiments of the present invention implement an accumulated postage register in a postage security device (PSD) which is incremented each time a postage indicium is generated and which is reset (e.g., zeroed or decremented by an amount of payment) when a postage value settlement (PVS) operation is performed. The accumulated postage register of embodiments maintains a balance of postage value used that is paid or settled after generation of postage indicia having value associated with the accumulated postage register balance. Postage value settlement operations according to embodiments of the invention facilitates periodic payment for an exact amount of postage value used.


Accumulated postage may be paid for using various accounts according to embodiments of the invention. For example, rather than having a single descending register from which to draw postage value, a number of accounts may be used for payment of accumulated postage during a postage value settlement operation. Such accounts may include pre-funded or pre-paid accounts, credit accounts, debit accounts, billing accounts, etcetera. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention may be used with respect to a post-paid metering model (e.g., payment for postage value is not made by a user until after postage indicia has been generated), a pre-paid metering model (e.g., payment for postage value may be made into an account separate from a postage security device prior to generation of postage indicia), and combinations thereof (e.g., payment for some postage value may be made into an account separate from a postage security device prior to generation of postage indicia while payment for additional postage value is not made until after postage indicia has been generated).


Embodiments of the present invention are particularly well suited for use by users (providers) that provide postage metering services to their clients or customers (end users). According to one embodiment, such providers (e.g., an online retailer such as Amazon.com, Inc. or online auctioneer such as eBay Inc. facilitating sales of items by end users to other end users whereby postage metering services are provided for use in shipping such items) may provide postage metering services for a large number of end users having significant total postage value. Using one or more accounts (whether pre-paid or post-paid) separate from the postage security device or devices used in generating postage indicia for the foregoing end users frees the provider from having to closely monitor postage value and perform postage value download operations timed to avoid delays in postage indicia generation. Moreover, the provider's forecasting of postage value associated with such postage indicia generation becomes less critical because, although the provider may desire to predict postage value use, operations and end user satisfaction will not be degraded where forecasts are lower than the actual amounts of postage value used.


Embodiments of the present invention are further suited for use by users which generate large volumes of postage indicia in high speed processes. For example, by incrementing an accumulated postage register, rather than the more traditional decrementing a descending register wherein a check of the descending register amount is performed prior to the decrementing step in order to assure sufficient postage value is available for the operation, postage metering operations may be streamlined to facilitate higher speed postage indicia generation.


Preferred embodiments of the invention are implemented in such a way as to minimize impact upon a postal authority, such as the USPS, participating in the use of accumulated postage metering. For example, a schedule of postage value settlement operations may be established whereby the postal authority perceives no delay with respect to payment for accumulated postage as compared to a more traditional pre-paid model. According to embodiments of the invention, a postage value settlement operation is performed at least daily (assuming postage indicia generation operations have also been performed daily) in order to provide for payment of accumulated postage within a period in which more traditional pre-payment settlements received through credit card clearinghouses would be received by the postal authority.


The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention, both as to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages will be better understood from the following description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that each of the figures is provided for the purpose of illustration and description only and is not intended as a definition of the limits of the present invention.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which:



FIG. 1 shows a prior art metering system configuration;



FIG. 2 shows a metering system configuration adapted for a postage metering services provider to provide postage metering services to a plurality of end users;



FIG. 3 shows a metering system configured according to an embodiment of the invention to include an accumulated postage feature;



FIG. 4 shows a process for obtaining postage value from the metering system of FIG. 3; and



FIG. 5 shows a process for settlement of accumulated postage value using the metering system of FIG. 3.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

To aid in understanding the concepts of the present invention, a prior art system configured for providing postage indicia generation over a network will be briefly described. FIG. 1 shows metering system 100 in which postage server 110 and user terminal 120 interact via network 150 for performing various postage metering functions.


Postage server 110 may comprise a computer based server (e.g., web server) operable under control of postage control application 119 and having a secure memory (e.g., cryptographic memory module) configured to provide operation as postal security device (PSD) 111. PSD 111 includes ascending register 112 and descending register 113 utilized in providing postage metering operations. Database 114 includes various information used in providing postage metering services. For example, database 114 may include information for identifying and authenticating a user and/or postage generation client for postage metering operations. Moreover, database 114 may store postage information for configuring PSD 111 for use with respect to different users. For example, database 114 may store ascending register values, descending register values, etcetera for each of a plurality of users (e.g., in cryptographic form, perhaps also in clear text), facilitating operation of postage server 110 to configure PSD 111 to temporarily provide a postage meter unique to a particular user. Thus a plurality of different user terminals may interact with postage server 110 to generate postage indicia from different meter accounts. Postage server 110 may additionally include a transaction log (not shown) for storing information with respect to individual transactions conducted using postage server 110, perhaps including details such as user identification, postage meter identification, account information, transaction type, transaction amount, time and/or date information, etcetera.


User terminal 120 may comprise a computer based user terminal operable under control of postage generation client application 121 for interacting with postage server 110 in providing postage metering operations. For example, a user may interact with user terminal 120 to cause a credit card account to be debited, transfer the debited value to postage server 110, and perform a postage value download operation resulting in descending register 113 being incremented. Similarly, a user may interact with user terminal 120 to select a desired amount of postage, request generation of a postage indicium by postage server 110 resulting id descending register 113 being decremented and ascending register 112 being incremented, and printing the generated postage indicium at a printer (not shown) local to user terminal 120.


Network 150 may comprise a network suitable for providing data communication between postage server 110 and postage generation client 120. For example, network 150 may comprise the Internet.


Metering system 100 provides an excellent solution for many typical postage metering applications. For example, traditional postage metering operations for an entity, such as a business or individual, wherein postage needs may be readily forecast and wherein drawing postage value from a single account associated with the entity is desirable may be adequately served by metering system 100.


Directing attention to FIG. 2, metering system 200 adapted to provide postage metering with respect to a postage metering services provider providing postage metering services to end users is shown. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, postage metering services provider system 210 is disposed between a plurality of end users, using user terminals 220a-220c, and postage server 110. Postage metering services provider system 210 may comprise a computer based system operable to provide various services to end users. For example, postage metering services provider system 210 may provide online retail services (e.g., Amazon.com, Inc.) or online auction services (e.g., eBay Inc.) facilitating sales of items by and between end users. To facilitate such sales of items, postage metering services provider system 210 may further provide postage metering services, whereby end users may purchase and print postage indicia, for use in shipping the items. However, rather than having a meter or PSD uniquely associated with the end user, the end user will be provided postage indicia from a meter or PSD associated with the postage metering services provider.


User terminals 220a-220c are coupled to postage metering services provider system 210 via network 251 and postage metering services provider system 210 is coupled to postage server 110 via network 252. Networks 251 and 252 may comprise a local area network (LAN), metropolitan area network (MAN), wide area network (WAN), intranet, extranet, the Internet, the public switched telephone network (PSTN), and/or other network suitable for data communication between user terminals 220a-220c, postage metering service provider system 210, and postage server 110. Postage generation client applications 221a-221c may interact with postage metering services application 211 to request a desired amount of postage and provide payment therefore (e.g., using electronic funds transfer, such as to debit a credit card account). Thereafter, postage metering services application 211 may request generation of a postage indicium by postage server 110 resulting id descending register 113 being decremented and ascending register 112 being incremented. The generated postage indicium may be provided to a requesting one of postage generation client applications 221a-221c for printing at a printer (not shown) local to a respective one of user terminals 220a-220c.


Postage metering services provider system 210 may additionally interact with postage server 210 to perform a postage value download operation with respect to PSD 111. For example, postage metering services application 211 may periodically (e.g., upon detecting a value available in descending register 113 falling below a predetermined threshold, upon user terminals 220a-220c obtaining a predetermined amount of postage value, etcetera) cause an account (e.g., a credit card account, a debit account, etcetera) to be debited, transfer the debited value to postage server 110, and perform a postage value download operation resulting in descending register 113 being incremented. Such postage value may thus be available for generation of postage indicia for any of user terminals 220a-220c.


Although metering system 200 of FIG. 2 may operate to allow a provider to provide postage metering services to a plurality of end users, the illustrated configuration is not without disadvantages. For example, the postage metering services provider is unlikely to be able to forecast and plan for the postage value needed to provide postage services to the plurality of end users and the configuration of FIG. 2 utilizes pre-paid postage value in the generation of postage indicia. Moreover, limits set by the postal authority with respect to postage value download and/or descending register maximum amounts may be insufficient to serve end user demands for a desired period, thereby necessitating close monitoring of available postage value and repeated postage value download. Delays in processing postage value download, such as due to credit card clearing house problems or delays, may result in a large number of end users being dissatisfied with the providers' service.


Directing attention to FIG. 3, a preferred embodiment configuration is illustrated in which metering system 300 is adapted to provide postage metering using accumulated postage information. In the embodiment of FIG. 3, postage server 310 comprise a computer based server (e.g., web server) operable under control of postage control application 319 and having a secure memory (e.g., cryptographic memory module) configured to provide operation as postal security device (PSD) 311. PSD 311 of the illustrated embodiment includes ascending register 312, descending register 313, and accumulated postage register 315 utilized in providing postage metering operations. Database 314 includes various information used in providing postage metering services. For example, database 314 may include information for identifying and authenticating a user and/or postage generation application for postage metering operations. Moreover, database 314 may store postage information for configuring PSD 311 for use with respect to different users. For example, database 314 may store ascending register values, descending register values, accumulated postage registers, etcetera for each of a plurality of users (e.g., in cryptographic form, perhaps also in clear text), facilitating operation of postage server 310 to configure PSD 311 to temporarily provide a postage meter unique to a particular user or entity. Postage server 310 may additionally include a transaction log (not shown) for storing information with respect to individual transactions conducted using postage server 110, perhaps including details such as user identification, postage meter identification, account information, transaction type, transaction amount, time and/or date information, etcetera. Details with respect to computer based postage metering systems which may be adapted according to embodiments of the present invention are shown and described in the above referenced patent applications entitled “System and Method for Validating Postage,” “System and Method for Printing Multiple Postage Indicia,” and “Virtual Security Device.”


It can be appreciated from the above that PSD 311 of metering system 300 includes adaptation to provide accumulated postage register 315. Accumulated postage register 315 of embodiments of the invention is incremented each time a postage indicium is generated and is set to zero or decremented by an amount of payment when a postage value settlement (PVS) operation is performed. Accordingly, accumulated postage register 315 of embodiments maintains a balance of postage value used that is paid or settled after generation of postage indicia having value associated with the accumulated postage register balance. Postage value settlement operations according to embodiments of the invention facilitates periodic payment for an exact amount of postage value used.


Embodiments of the invention may include adaptation to provide confidence with respect to the accuracy of financial and/or other information. As discussed above, information for configuring PSD 311 for operation as a particular user's postage meter may be stored in database 314. Although such information may include cryptographic or other security measures to protect or obscure some or all of the data stored in database 314, embodiments of the invention may implement features to detect an out-of-date database entry (e.g., resulting from a system crash and subsequent restoring of backup records, a “replay” attack wherein an out-of-date, although previously valid, database record is inserted into the database, etcetera) or to otherwise determine if database 314 is out of sync with PSD 311. Embodiments of the invention may additionally or alternatively implement features to detect that a transaction log is out-of-sync with PSD 311. For example, embodiments of the invention store information with respect to all financial transactions (e.g., postage value credit transactions, postage value debit transactions, postage value reconciliation transactions, etcetera) in PSD 311, database 314, and a transaction log, whereby some or all of this information may be utilized to detect an out-of-sync status between any of the foregoing.


According one embodiment of the invention, PSD 311 stores a running total of all postage printed using PSD 311, a running total of all postage reset through PSD 311, and all postage returned through PSD 311. The foregoing information is preferably stored in registers of PSD 311 which remain unaffected by the loading and unloading of postage meter information from database 314 in configuring PSD 311 to operate as a postage meter for a particular user. Accordingly, the foregoing running totals remain stored within PSD 311 irrespective of the status of various meter configuration information. The running totals stored by PSD 311 may be compared to various totals derived from the information stored in database 314 (e.g., totals derived from separate postage meter records for meter configurations which use PSD 311 in operation) to determine an out-of-sync state between PSD 311 and database 314. Similarly, the running totals stored by PSD 311 may be compared to various totals derived from the information stored in a transaction log (not shown) to determine an out-of-sync state between PSD 311 and the transaction log.


In providing detection of out-of-sync or out-of-date information with respect to accumulated postage, embodiments of the present invention additionally or alternatively store a running total of postage printed using accumulating balance registers and a running total of postage reconciled with respect to accumulating balance registers. That is, each time any meter configuration using PSD 311 generates a postage indicium for which the value is accounted for using an accumulating balance register, the foregoing running total of postage printed using accumulating balance registers will be incremented by an appropriate amount. Similarly, each time accumulated postage value which was accumulated using PSD 311 is reconciled or paid (e.g., a postage value settlement operation is performed), the foregoing running total of postage reconciled will be incremented by an appropriate amount. As with the running totals discussed above, the running totals stored in PSD 311 with respect to accumulated postage is preferably stored in registers of PSD 311 which remain unaffected by the loading and unloading of postage meter information from database 314 in configuring PSD 311 to operate as a postage meter for a particular user.


The foregoing running totals may be utilized to ensure that the postal authority is properly recompensed even in the situation that database 314 and/or an associated transaction log are unavailable, such as due to a system failure or other disaster. For example, although perhaps not reflecting detail with respect to which individual users are responsible for payment, a comparison of the running total of postage printed using accumulating balance registers and the running total of postage reconciled with respect to accumulating balance registers may be utilized to determine an amount owed to the postal authority in association with the use of accumulated postage registers of embodiments of the invention.


Directing attention to FIG. 4, a process for generation of postage indicia according to one embodiment using metering system 300 of FIG. 3 is shown. At block 401 of the illustrated embodiment, one of postage generation client applications 221a-221c transmits a request for a postage indicium via network 251 to postage metering services provider system 210. Postage metering services application 211 validates the postage indicium request at block 402. For example, one or more digital signatures or other information (e.g., personal identification number (PIN), biometric information, password, cryptographic string, machine authentication code (MAC), etcetera) may be used to verify that the end user, user terminal, and/or postage generation client application are authorized to obtain postage indicia. In addition to or in the alternative to validation information, a postage indicium request issued according to embodiments of the invention may include information with respect to payment for the requested postage indicium. For example, account information, such as credit card information, debit account information, pre-paid account information, etcetera, may be provided to facilitate payment from an end user of one of user terminals 220a-220c requesting the postage indicium to a provider associated with postage metering services provider system 210. It should be appreciated, however, that the provider may not require an end user to provide such payment information in or with a postage indicium request, such as where the provider implements a model in which the end user is periodically billed for postage metering services or where the provider holds a pre-paid account on behalf of the end user.


Assuming the request has been properly validated, postage metering services application 211 requests generation of a postage indicium by postage server 310 via network 252 at block 403 of the illustrated embodiment. If, however, the request fails validation (e.g., the end user, user terminal, and/or postage generation client application are not authorized to request postage indicia, payment has not properly been provided for the postage indicium, the requested postage value would cause the accumulated postage value to exceed a predetermined maximum value, etcetera), generation of the requested postage indicium is preferably prevented by postage metering services application 211 of embodiments.


At block 404, postage control application 319 causes the requested postage indicium to be generated. According to embodiments of the invention, postage control application 319 interacts with database 314 and PSD 311 to generate the postage indicium. For example, postage control application 319 may interact with database 314 to retrieve PSD configuration information associated with a postage metering services provider operating postage metering services provider system 210. The retrieved PSD configuration information may include information such as ascending register value and accumulated postage register value for uniquely configuring PSD 311 as the postage metering services provider's meter vault. This PSD configuration information may be provided to PSD 311 by postage control application 319. PSD 311 may thereafter decrypt or otherwise access the PSD configuration information and configure itself for metering operations with respect to the postage metering services provider. PSD 311, as configured using the PSD configuration information, then operates to generate the postage indicium data. PSD 311 and postage control application 319 preferably cooperate to create the requested postage indicium using the aforementioned postage indicium data. Various information, such as PSD identification information, ascending register value, accumulated postage register value, end user identification, postage generation client application identification information, sender address information, recipient address information, etcetera, and/or portions thereof, may be included in the generated postage indicium. Details with respect to operation of postage control applications and postage security devices in generating postage indicia are provided in the above referenced patent applications entitled “System and Method for Printing Multiple Postage Indicia” and “Virtual Security Device.”


In generating the postage indicium according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, PSD 311 increments both ascending register 312 and accumulated postage register 315 by the amount of postage value represented by the postage indicium. Embodiments of the present invention do not utilize descending register 313 where PSD 311 is configured to utilize accumulated postage register 315. Accordingly, descending register 313 may remain with a zero or other value throughout the postage indicium generation operation. In such embodiments where accumulated postage register 315 is used, descending register 313 may be omitted, if desired. In alternative embodiments, both descending register 313 and accumulated postage register 315 may be used in generation of postage indicia. For example, a pre-paid value represented by descending register 313 may be decremented until such value is depleted (or reaches a predetermined threshold) and thereafter accumulated postage register 315 incremented in association with the generation of one or more postage indicia.


Embodiments of the invention operate to store transaction information associated with the generation of the postage indicium in database 314 for later use in reconciliation of the PSD values. For example, a history of postage value deductions since a last reconciliation, such as may have occurred at a last postage value settlement operation, may be stored by postage control application 319 in database 314 and associated with the meter configuration used by PSD 311 for those particular transactions.


At block 405 of the illustrated embodiment, postage control application 319 returns postage indicium information to postage metering services application 211. Postage metering services application 211 likewise returns the postage indicium information to the requesting one of postage generation client applications 221a-221c. The postage indicium information preferably provides sufficient information for the receiving one of postage generation client applications 221a-221c to cause the desired postage indicium to be printed by an associated one of user terminals 220a-220c. For example, the postage indicium information may comprise a digitized graphical representation of the postage indicium. Alternatively, the postage indicium information may comprise information from which the postage generation client application can produce a postage indicium. In some embodiments of the invention, the postage indicium information comprises a locator (e.g., a uniform resources locator (URL)) for a location from which the generated postage indicium may be obtained.


Directing attention to FIG. 5, a process for a postage value settlement operation according to one embodiment using metering system 300 of FIG. 3 is shown. At block 501 of the illustrated embodiment, a postage value settlement operation is initiated. The postage value settlement operation may be initiated by the postage metering services provider, the postage server provider, the postal authority, or other interested party, and may be initiated periodically, automatically, upon the occurrence of an event, etcetera. For example, postage control application 319 may periodically (e.g., twice daily, daily, weekly, monthly, etcetera) initiate a postage value settlement operation. Such periodic postage value settlement operations may, for example, establish a schedule of postage value settlement operations whereby the postal authority perceives no delay with respect to payment for accumulated postage as compared to a more traditional pre-paid model. Accordingly, embodiments of the invention perform a postage value settlement operation at least daily (assuming postage indicia generation operations have also been performed daily) in order to provide for payment of accumulated postage within a period in which more traditional pre-payment settlements received through credit card clearinghouses would be received by the postal authority. Additionally or alternatively, embodiments of the invention perform a postage value settlement operation when the value of the accumulated postage register reaches or exceeds a predetermined maximum threshold value (e.g., the accumulated postage value reaches $1,000) to thereby limit the risk of non-payment for postage.


At block 502 of the illustrated embodiment, postage control application 319 obtains the accumulated postage value for one or more meter configurations associated with PSD 311 from database 314 (e.g., clear text information showing the value of accumulated postage corresponding to an amount securely stored in data for a particular meter configuration which, when loaded into PSD 311, has a corresponding value in accumulated postage register 315). At block 503, the accumulated postage amount retrieved from the database is compared to an amount stored in a corresponding accumulated postage register. For example, postage server 310 may obtain information from database 314 regarding ascending register values, descending register values, accumulated postage registers, etcetera for temporarily configuring PSD 311 as a postage meter unique to a particular user or entity for which a postage value settlement operation is being performed. The accumulated postage register value (the value of accumulated postage register 315 when PSD 311 is configured as the appropriate postage meter) may be compared to the accumulated postage value retrieved from database 314 at block 501.


If it is determined that the accumulated postage register value does not match the retrieved accumulated postage value at block 504, processing according to the illustrated embodiment proceeds to block 505 wherein an error process is initiated. For example, embodiments of the invention use the obtained accumulated postage value both to obtain payment for postage value used and to reconcile metering operations (e.g., to detect fraud and/or misuse). In reconciling the meter operations, postage control application 319 may obtain historical transaction information stored in database 314 and/or a value of ascending register 312. This information may be utilized to determine an amount of postage value provided by PSD when configured as a meter for those transactions and compare this amount to the accumulated postage register value. If there is a difference, perhaps allowing for minor variation, fraud or misuse may be indicated. If fraud or misuse is indicated, embodiments of the present invention operate to prevent further postage value debiting using the associated meter configuration. Accordingly, PSD 311 may be prevented from implementing a meter configuration using ascending register 312 and accumulated postage register 315 to generate postage indicia at block 505. This meter configuration may be allowed to resume postage value debit operation (e.g., generation of postage indicia) after further processing, such as a manual reconciliation process, which concludes fraud or misuse has not occurred.


If it is determined that the accumulated postage register value does match the retrieved accumulated postage value at block 504, processing according to the illustrated embodiment proceeds to block 506 wherein the value of accumulated postage register 315 (assuming PSD 311 is configured as the appropriate postage meter) is adjusted. For example, if the balance of accumulated postage is being paid in full, accumulated postage register 315 is preferably zeroed. Alternatively, if some amount less than the balance of accumulated postage is being paid, accumulated postage register 315 is decremented by an appropriate amount.


At block 507, a record associated with a meter configuration or configurations for which the postage settlement operation is being performed is updated to reflect the amount to be paid to one or more postal authority. Actual payment processing is initiated at block 508 of the illustrated embodiment. Such payment processing my invoke various payment systems, such as to perform electronic funds transfer, etcetera. It should be appreciated that accumulated postage may be paid for using various accounts according to embodiments of the invention. For example, a number of accounts may be used for payment of accumulated postage during the postage value settlement operation. Such accounts may include pre-funded or pre-paid accounts (e.g., pre-paid credit of the postage metering service provider stored in database 314 or elsewhere, for example by a third party service such as provided by PayPal, Inc.), credit accounts (e.g., credit card accounts, lines of credit, etcetera), debit accounts (e.g., debit card accounts, electronic funds transfer, check conversion, etcetera), billing accounts (e.g., post-paid account, etcetera), and/or the like. It should be appreciated that payment for some postage value may be made into an account separate from a postage security device prior to generation of postage indicia while payment for additional postage value is not made until after postage indicia has been generated through accessing these accounts during the postage value settlement operation. Accordingly, payment for some or all the postage value is not made by a user until after postage indicia has been generated according to embodiments of the invention. Additionally or alternatively, payment for some or all the postage value may be made prior to generation of postage indicia according to embodiments of the invention.


Although embodiments of the invention allow partial payment of the accumulated postage in a postage value settlement operation, other embodiments require full payment of the accumulated postage or operate to prevent further postage value debiting using the associated meter configuration. Embodiments of the present invention facilitate over-payment of the postage value to thereby obtain a pre-payment amount to be used with respect to generation of postage indicia in the future. An amount of over-payment may be stored in an account separate from any registers of the PSD or may be stored by a register of the PSD (e.g., descending register 313).


After payment processing has successfully resulted in payment being made to the postal authority or postal authorities, block 509 of the illustrated embodiment updates a record associated with the meter configuration or configurations for which the postage settlement operation is being performed to reflect payment having been made. Additionally, embodiments of the invention operate to update a transaction log with information regarding the settlement operation.


It should be appreciated that the illustrated embodiment implements several steps in completing a settlement operation. In order to assure the accuracy of financial information, it may be desirable to perform various ones of such settlement operation steps atomically. That is, in an atomic transaction, some number of steps may be required to all complete successfully or a previous state be reset. The various processes represented by blocks 506-509 are preferably performed as atomic transaction 510. Detail with respect to performing various atomic transactions are shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,199,055 entitled “System and Method for Providing Fault Tolerant Transactions Over an Unsecured Communication Channel,” the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.


In order to aid in understanding the operation of an accumulated postage register according to embodiments of the present invention, a state table showing the states of ascending register 312, descending register 313, and accumulated postage register 315 of an embodiment of metering system 300 in association with various operations is provided below. The state table further shows the states of ascending register 112 and descending register 113 of metering system 100 in association with the various operations for comparison.















Metering System 100
Metering System 300













Ascending
Descending

Descending
Accumulated



Register
Register
Ascending
Register
Postage



112
113
Register 312
313
Register 315















Start
0
0
0
0
0


Buy $5 Postage
0
5
N/A
N/A
N/A


Print 0.39 cents
0.39
4.61
N/A
N/A
N/A


Print .39 cents
N/A
N/A
.39
0
.39


using negative







balance meter







Reconcile
N/A
N/A
.39
0
0









Although embodiments of the invention have been described herein as incrementing an accumulated postage register as postage value is dispensed by a postal security device, alternative embodiments operate differently. For example, an alternative embodiment of the present invention includes adaptation of a descending register, such as descending register 313, to allow for balances less than zero (i.e., negative balances). In such an embodiment, the descending register may be decremented by an appropriate amount of postage value. In contrast, during a postage value settlement operation, the descending register may be incremented by an amount of payment.


From the above, it should be appreciated that embodiments of the present invention may be operated to provide a post-paid metering model (e.g., payment for postage value is not made by a user until after postage indicia has been generated). Such a post-paid metering model generally presents some risk with respect to obtaining payment for the postage value. However, such a model is particularly useful with respect to postage metering service providers who provide postage metering services to a large number of users and/or a high volume of postage metering. Such providers tend to be large, institutional entities. Accordingly, the risk of obtaining payment for the postage value may be considered to be acceptable for such entities. Moreover, using controls for initiating postage value settlement operations, such as the aforementioned periodic and maximum amount triggers, risks with respect to obtaining payment for the postage value may be further mitigated. Additionally, implementing post-paid metering with respect to any particular entity may be provided only after an approval process, such as may include approval by the postal authority. As yet another mitigating factor with respect to risk of payment, it is envisioned that the operator of the postage server will also be approved by the postal authority, and thus present a reliable secondary source for payment should the postage metering services provider fail to properly pay for postage value.


Although the post-paid metering model may not be implemented with respect to all users for business or other reasons, embodiments of the present invention may still be utilized with respect to users other than those qualifying for operation according to a post-paid model. From the above, it should be appreciated that embodiments of the present invention may be operated to provided a pre-paid metering model (e.g., payment for postage value may be made into an account separate from a postage security device prior to generation of postage indicia). Accordingly, various users may deposit funds with a trusted source (e.g., the postage metering services provider, the postage server provider, the postal authority, etcetera) for debiting during a postage value settlement operation according to embodiments of the invention. Such pre-paid accounts may be verified with respect to a postage generation request, such as in the aforementioned validation operation, to ensure sufficient pre-paid funds are present to service the request.


Additionally or alternatively, a more restricted version of a post-paid metering model may be implemented with respect to users other than those qualifying for operation according to a more robust post-paid model. For example, a maximum accumulated postage amount for such users may be set very low to provide a kind of “overdraft” protection feature, thereby allowing such users to complete a postage indicium generation operation where their pre-paid funds are only slightly insufficient to fund the requested postage value.


It should be appreciated that, although embodiments of the present invention have been described with reference to adapting a PSD to include an accumulated postage register, embodiments of the invention my be adapted to provide for accumulated postage without an accumulated postage register having been provided in a PSD. For example, an embodiment of the invention operates to generate a postage indicium acceptable to a postal authority for delivery services without performing a metering operation, wherein a metering operation to fully validate the generated postage indicium, along with providing payment for the indicium, is performed subsequently.


According to one embodiment, the postage indicium generated without a metering operation includes a reduced set of information. For example, the postage indicium generated without a metering operation may include information for use in delivery of a postal item (e.g., delivery zip code, amount of postage, postal class, etcetera), but may omit validation information (e.g., a digital signature) provided through a metering operation. Such postage indicium preferably includes information for linking the postage indicium to validation information (e.g., a pointer to a datapacket, such as another indicium, generated from a metering operation). An example of a postage indicium generated without a metering operation which includes information for linking the postage indicium to validation information is a “light” information based indicia, examples of which are shown and described in the above referenced patent applications entitled “Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Customization Security,” “System and Method for Automatically Processing Mail,” “System and Method for Printing an Application of Dynamically Valued Stamps,” and “Systems and Methods for Single Pass Printing Postage Indicia.”


In operation according to embodiments using the foregoing light indicia, database entries and/or transaction logs are updated to reflect the generation of such light indicia. Each such light indicia may include a unique number or other information for use in subsequently associating the indicium with a validating datapacket. Thereafter, perhaps in a batch operation, a metering operation may be performed to account for monies owed to a postal authority and to generate the appropriate datapackets for validating the light indicia. For example, postage server 310 may operate under control of postage control 319 to debit appropriate amounts from descending register 313. In response to such operation, PSD 311 may generate “full” information based indicia corresponding to the light indicia. The full indicia preferably includes security information, such as a digital signature, suitable for verifying the validity of the indicium. Such full indicia may be uniquely associated with a corresponding light indicium through the use of the above mentioned linking information. The full indicia may be provided to, or otherwise made available to, the postal authority for use in validating the light indicia. Such an embodiment may utilize more typical meter funding operations with respect to the full indicia, albeit allowing for purchasing postage value after the light postage indicia have been generated. Accordingly, such an embodiment provides for the use of accumulated postage without adapting the PSD, or other secure meter component, to include an accumulated postage register.


Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.

Claims
  • 1. A method for metering postage value in an Internet metering system, the method comprising: receiving, by a postage server of the Internet metering system, a request for postage value from a postage metering services provider system of the Internet metering system, wherein the postage metering services provider system provides online services facilitating sales of items by a plurality of users;generating, by the postage server, at least one postage indicium in response to the request for postage value prior to receiving full payment for the postage value, wherein the generating the at least one postage indicium adjusts an accumulated postage register in an amount of a portion of the postage value for which payment for the postage value has not been received and an ascending register in a full amount of the postage value, wherein the accumulated postage register and the ascending register are each registers of a postal security device; andprocessing, by the postage server in accordance with an established postage value settlement schedule, payment for at least a portion of an amount of the accumulated postage register including the portion of the postage value after outputting the generated at least one postage indicium, wherein the processing the payment adjusts the accumulated postage register in the payment amount of the portion of the amount of the accumulated postage register including the portion of the postage value.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the generating the at least one postage indicium adjusts the accumulated postage register to accumulate an amount of postage value advanced on behalf of a user as a result of at least the generating at least one postage indicium.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein the amount of postage value accumulated is backed-up on at least one other computer processor.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 further comprising: determining that the amount of postage value accumulated is unavailable; andrestoring the amount of postage value accumulated based at least on the backed-up amount of postage value accumulated.
  • 5. The method of claim 4 wherein the amount of postage value accumulated is unavailable due to a system failure.
  • 6. The method of claim 3 further comprising: determining whether the amount of postage value accumulated is out-of-sync or out-of-date based at least on the backed-up accumulating amount of postage value.
  • 7. The method of claim 2 wherein the processing payment for at least a portion of the amount of the accumulated postage register including the portion of the postage value automatically occurs after a threshold amount of postage value has been accumulated.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the processing payment for at least a portion of the amount of the accumulated postage register including the portion of the postage value automatically occurs after the accumulated postage register is adjusted past a threshold value.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 further comprising: determining that a descending register has reached a threshold minimum; andperforming the generating prior to receiving payment in response to the determining.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 further comprising: determining, based on the request, that a user desires the at least one postage indicium be generated prior to remitting full payment for the postage value; andperforming the generating prior to receiving payment in response to the determining.
  • 11. The method of claim 1 wherein the postage metering services provider system is disposed in the Internet metering system between the plurality of users and the postage server.
  • 12. A system for metering postage value in an Internet metering system, the system comprising: means for receiving, at a postage server of the Internet metering system, a request for postage value from a postage metering services provider system of the Internet metering system, wherein the postage metering services provider system provides online services facilitating sales of items by a plurality of users;means for generating, at the postage server, at least one postage indicium in response to the request for postage value prior to receiving full payment for the postage value, wherein the means for generating the at least one postage indicium adjusts an accumulated postage register in an amount of a portion of the postage value for which payment for the postage value has not been received and an ascending register in a full amount of the postage value, wherein the accumulated postage register and the ascending register are each registers of a postal security device; andmeans for processing, at the postage server in accordance with an established postage value settlement schedule, payment for at least a portion of an amount of the accumulated postage register including the portion of the postage value after outputting the generated at least one postage indicium, wherein the means for processing the payment adjusts the accumulated postage register in the payment amount of the portion of the amount of the accumulated postage register including the portion of the postage value.
  • 13. The system of claim 12 wherein the means for generating the at least one postage indicium adjusts the accumulated postage register to accumulate an amount of postage value advanced on behalf of a user as a result of at least generating at least one postage indicium by the means for generating.
  • 14. The system of claim 13 wherein the accumulating amount of postage value is backed-up on at least a computer processor.
  • 15. The system of claim 14 further comprising: means for determining that the accumulating amount of postage value is unavailable; andmeans for restoring the accumulating amount of postage value based at least on the backed-up accumulating amount of postage value.
  • 16. The system of claim 15 wherein the accumulating amount of postage value is unavailable due to a system failure.
  • 17. The system of claim 14 further comprising: means for determining whether the accumulating amount of postage value is out-of-sync or out-of-date based at least on the backed-up accumulating amount of postage value.
  • 18. The system of claim 13 wherein processing payment for at least a portion of the amount of the accumulated postage register including the portion of the postage value by the means for processing payment automatically occurs after a threshold amount of postage value has been accumulated.
  • 19. The system of claim 12 wherein processing payment for at least a portion of the amount of the accumulated postage register including the portion of the postage value by the means for processing payment automatically occurs after the accumulated postage register is adjusted past a threshold value.
  • 20. The system of claim 12 further comprising: means for determining that a descending register has reached a threshold minimum; andmeans for performing the generating prior to receiving full payment in response to the determining.
  • 21. The system of claim 12 further comprising: means for determining, based on the request, that a user desires the at least one postage indicium be generated prior to remitting full payment for the postage value; andmeans for performing the generating prior to receiving full payment in response to the determining.
  • 22. The system of claim 12 wherein the postage metering services provider system is disposed in the Internet metering system between the plurality of users and the postage server.
  • 23. A system for metering postage value in an Internet metering system, the system comprising: a postage security device of a postage server of the Internet metering system configured to generate at least one postage indicium in response to a request for postage value prior to receiving full payment for the postage value, wherein the request is received at the postage server from a postage metering services provider system providing online services facilitating sales of items by a plurality of users, wherein the generating the at least one postage indicium adjusts and accumulated postage register in an amount of a portion of the postage value for which payment for the postage value has not been received and an ascending register in a full amount of the postage value, wherein said postage security device is further configured to process payment for at least a portion of an amount of the accumulated postage register including the portion of the postage value after outputting the generated at least one postage indicium in accordance with an established postage value settlement schedule, wherein the processing the payment adjusts the accumulated postage register in the payment amount of the portion of the amount of the accumulated postage register including the portion of the postage value.
  • 24. The system of claim 23 wherein the generating the at least one postage indicium adjusts the accumulated postage register to accumulate an amount of postage value advanced on behalf of a user as a result of said generation of said at least one postage indicium prior to receiving full payment for the postage value.
  • 25. The system of claim 24 wherein said accumulation register is backed-up on least a computer processor.
  • 26. The system of claim 25 further comprising: means for determining that said accumulation register is unavailable; andmeans for restoring said accumulation register based at least on the backed-up accumulating amount of postage value.
  • 27. The system of claim 26 wherein said accumulation register is unavailable due to a system failure.
  • 28. The system of claim 25 further comprising: means for determining whether the accumulating amount of postage value is out-of-sync or out-of-date based at least on the backed-up accumulating amount of postage value.
  • 29. The system of claim 24 wherein the received payment for at least a portion of the postage value automatically occurs after a threshold amount of postage value has been accumulated.
  • 30. The system of claim 23 wherein the processing the payment is performed automatically after the accumulated postage register is adjusted past a threshold value.
  • 31. The system of claim 23 further comprising: a descending register operable to store postage value of a user sending the request, wherein said postage security device is operable to determine that said descending register has reached a threshold minimum, and wherein said postage security device is further operable to generate the least one postage indicium prior to receiving full payment, in response to the determination.
  • 32. The system of claim 23 wherein said postage security device is further configured to determine, based on the request, that a user desires the at least one postage indicium be generated prior to remitting full payment for the postage value, and wherein said postage security device is further operable to generate the least one postage indicium prior to receiving full payment, in response to the determination.
  • 33. The system of claim 23 wherein the postage metering services provider system is disposed in the Internet metering system between the plurality of users and the postage server.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/616,569 entitled “Postage Metering With Accumulated Postage,” filed Dec. 27, 2006, and is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/353,690 entitled “System and Method for Validating Postage,” filed Feb. 14, 2006, Ser. No. 09/491,949 entitled “System and Method for Printing Multiple Postage Indicia,” filed Jan. 26, 2000, Ser. No. 10/862,058 entitled “Virtual Security Device,” filed Jun. 4, 2004, Ser. No. 10/994,768, entitled “Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Customization Security,” filed Nov. 22, 2004, Ser. No. 10/606,579, entitled “System and Method for Automatically Processing Mail,” filed Jun. 26, 2003, Ser. No. 10/696,221, entitled “System and Method for Printing an Application of Dynamically Valued Stamps,” filed Oct. 29, 2003, and Ser. No. 11/323,463 entitled “Systems and Methods for Single Pass Printing Postage Indicia,” filed Dec. 20, 2005, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (374)
Number Name Date Kind
2964232 Levyn Dec 1960 A
3221980 Mercur Dec 1965 A
3584696 Eblowitz Jun 1971 A
3594727 Braun Jul 1971 A
3691726 Stephens et al. Sep 1972 A
3978457 Check, Jr. et al. Aug 1976 A
4119194 Freeman et al. Oct 1978 A
4253158 McFiggans Feb 1981 A
4271481 Check, Jr. et al. Jun 1981 A
4307293 Lazzarotti et al. Dec 1981 A
4308299 Check, Jr. et al. Dec 1981 A
4310720 Check, Jr. Jan 1982 A
4376299 Rivest Mar 1983 A
4511793 Racanelli Apr 1985 A
4629871 Scribner et al. Dec 1986 A
4641347 Clark et al. Feb 1987 A
4649266 Eckert Mar 1987 A
4661001 Takai et al. Apr 1987 A
4739343 Dolan Apr 1988 A
4725718 Sansone et al. May 1988 A
4743747 Fougere et al. May 1988 A
4744554 Kulpa et al. May 1988 A
4757537 Edelmann et al. Jul 1988 A
4760532 Sansone et al. Jul 1988 A
4763271 Field Aug 1988 A
4775246 Edelmann et al. Oct 1988 A
4796181 Wiedemer Jan 1989 A
4799156 Shavit et al. Jan 1989 A
4800506 Axelrod et al. Jan 1989 A
4802218 Wright et al. Jan 1989 A
4809185 Talmadge Feb 1989 A
4812994 Taylor et al. Mar 1989 A
4821195 Baer et al. Apr 1989 A
4831554 Storace et al. May 1989 A
4831555 Sansone et al. May 1989 A
4837701 Sansone et al. Jun 1989 A
4853865 Sansone et al. Aug 1989 A
4858138 Talmadge Aug 1989 A
4862386 Axelrod et al. Aug 1989 A
4864618 Wright et al. Sep 1989 A
4868757 Gil Sep 1989 A
4873645 Hunter et al. Oct 1989 A
4876000 Mikhail Oct 1989 A
4893249 Silverberg Jan 1990 A
4900903 Wright et al. Feb 1990 A
4900904 Wright et al. Feb 1990 A
4900941 Barton et al. Feb 1990 A
4901241 Schneck Feb 1990 A
4908770 Breault et al. Mar 1990 A
4910686 Chang et al. Mar 1990 A
4933849 Connell et al. Jun 1990 A
4934846 Gilham et al. Jun 1990 A
4941091 Breault et al. Jul 1990 A
4947333 Sansone et al. Aug 1990 A
4949381 Pastor Aug 1990 A
4992940 Dworkin Feb 1991 A
4998204 Sansone et al. Mar 1991 A
5025141 Bolan Jun 1991 A
5047928 Wiedemer Sep 1991 A
5058008 Schumacher Oct 1991 A
5065000 Pusic et al. Nov 1991 A
5067088 Schneiderhan Nov 1991 A
5075862 Doeberl et al. Dec 1991 A
5077792 Herring Dec 1991 A
5079714 Manduley et al. Jan 1992 A
5085470 Peach et al. Feb 1992 A
5091771 Bolan et al. Feb 1992 A
5094554 Hurd et al. Mar 1992 A
5111030 Brasington et al. May 1992 A
5119306 Metelits et al. Jun 1992 A
5136647 Haber et al. Aug 1992 A
5142482 Sansone Aug 1992 A
5150407 Chan Sep 1992 A
5156467 Kitahara et al. Oct 1992 A
5200903 Gilham et al. Apr 1993 A
5202834 Gilham et al. Apr 1993 A
5222018 Shame et al. Jun 1993 A
5233657 Gunther et al. Aug 1993 A
5237506 Horbal et al. Aug 1993 A
5239168 Durst, Jr. et al. Aug 1993 A
5289540 Jones Feb 1994 A
5319562 Whitehouse Jun 1994 A
5323323 Gilham et al. Jun 1994 A
5323465 Avarne Jun 1994 A
5326181 Eisner et al. Jul 1994 A
5341505 Whitehouse Aug 1994 A
5388049 Sansone et al. Feb 1995 A
5410642 Hakamatsuka et al. Apr 1995 A
5423573 de Passille Jun 1995 A
5425586 Berson Jun 1995 A
5437441 Tuhro et al. Aug 1995 A
5449200 Andric et al. Sep 1995 A
5454038 Cordery et al. Sep 1995 A
5468945 Huggett et al. Nov 1995 A
5471925 Heinrich et al. Dec 1995 A
5476420 Manning Dec 1995 A
5483445 Pickering Jan 1996 A
5485369 Nicholls et al. Jan 1996 A
5490077 Freytag et al. Feb 1996 A
5510992 Kara Apr 1996 A
5524995 Brookner et al. Jun 1996 A
5573277 Petkovsek Nov 1996 A
5583779 Naclerio et al. Dec 1996 A
5600562 Guenther Feb 1997 A
5602742 Solondz et al. Feb 1997 A
5602743 Freytag Feb 1997 A
5606507 Kara Feb 1997 A
5606613 Lee et al. Feb 1997 A
5612541 Hoffmann et al. Mar 1997 A
5612889 Pintsov et al. Mar 1997 A
5615123 Davidson et al. Mar 1997 A
5617519 Herbert Apr 1997 A
5619571 Sandstrom et al. Apr 1997 A
5623546 Hardy et al. Apr 1997 A
D380007 Kara Jun 1997 S
5649118 Carlisle et al. Jul 1997 A
5650934 Manduley Jul 1997 A
5655023 Cordery et al. Aug 1997 A
5663547 Ziarno Sep 1997 A
5666284 Kara Sep 1997 A
5682318 Kara Oct 1997 A
5696829 Cordery et al. Dec 1997 A
5706502 Foley et al. Jan 1998 A
5708422 Blonder et al. Jan 1998 A
5715314 Payne et al. Feb 1998 A
5717596 Bernard et al. Feb 1998 A
5717597 Kara Feb 1998 A
5717980 Oka et al. Feb 1998 A
5726897 Tammi et al. Mar 1998 A
5729459 Brandien et al. Mar 1998 A
5729460 Plett et al. Mar 1998 A
5729674 Rosewarne et al. Mar 1998 A
5742683 Lee et al. Apr 1998 A
5745887 Gargiulo et al. Apr 1998 A
5758327 Gardner et al. May 1998 A
5758328 Giovannoli May 1998 A
D395333 Kara Jun 1998 S
5768132 Cordery et al. Jun 1998 A
5774554 Gilham Jun 1998 A
5774886 Kara Jun 1998 A
5778076 Kara et al. Jul 1998 A
5781438 Lee et al. Jul 1998 A
5793867 Cordery Aug 1998 A
5796834 Whitney et al. Aug 1998 A
5799290 Dolan et al. Aug 1998 A
5801364 Kara et al. Sep 1998 A
5801944 Kara Sep 1998 A
5812991 Kara Sep 1998 A
5819240 Kara Oct 1998 A
5822739 Kara Oct 1998 A
5825893 Kara Oct 1998 A
5836617 Beaudoin et al. Nov 1998 A
5842178 Giovannoli Nov 1998 A
5860068 Cook Jan 1999 A
5871288 Ryan, Jr. et al. Feb 1999 A
5884277 Khosla Mar 1999 A
5902439 Pike et al. May 1999 A
5923406 Brasington et al. Jul 1999 A
5923885 Johnson et al. Jul 1999 A
5929415 Berson Jul 1999 A
5930796 Pierce et al. Jul 1999 A
5912682 Parkos Aug 1999 A
5936885 Morita et al. Aug 1999 A
5946671 Herring et al. Aug 1999 A
5960418 Kelly et al. Sep 1999 A
5983209 Kara Nov 1999 A
5987441 Lee et al. Nov 1999 A
6005945 Whitehouse Dec 1999 A
6010069 Debois Jan 2000 A
6010156 Block Jan 2000 A
6026385 Harvey et al. Feb 2000 A
6047273 Vaghi Apr 2000 A
6050486 French et al. Apr 2000 A
6061670 Brand May 2000 A
6061671 Baker et al. May 2000 A
6079327 Sarada Jun 2000 A
6175825 Fruechtel Jan 2001 B1
6175826 Malandra, Jr. et al. Jan 2001 B1
6199055 Kara Mar 2001 B1
6208980 Kara Mar 2001 B1
6233565 Lewis et al. May 2001 B1
6233568 Kara May 2001 B1
6249777 Kara et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256616 Brookner Jul 2001 B1
6327042 Krasuski et al. Dec 2001 B1
6349292 Sutherland et al. Feb 2002 B1
6385504 Pintsov et al. May 2002 B1
6385731 Ananda May 2002 B2
6424954 Leon Jul 2002 B1
6430543 Lee et al. Aug 2002 B1
6470327 Carroll et al. Oct 2002 B1
6502912 Bernard et al. Jan 2003 B1
6520342 Dumke et al. Feb 2003 B1
6523014 Pauschinger Feb 2003 B1
6526391 Cordery et al. Feb 2003 B1
6532452 Pintsov et al. Mar 2003 B1
6594374 Beckstrom et al. Jul 2003 B1
6595412 Manduley Jul 2003 B2
6609117 Sutherland et al. Aug 2003 B2
6671813 Ananda Dec 2003 B2
6834273 Sansone et al. Dec 2004 B1
6853990 Thiel Feb 2005 B1
6865557 Cordery et al. Mar 2005 B1
6939062 Ogg et al. Sep 2005 B2
7043053 Patton et al. May 2006 B1
7056410 Kuller et al. Jun 2006 B2
7127434 Burningham Oct 2006 B2
7149726 Lingle et al. Dec 2006 B1
7182259 Lubow et al. Feb 2007 B2
7225170 Ryan, Jr. May 2007 B1
7226494 Schwartz et al. Jun 2007 B1
7266531 Pintsov et al. Sep 2007 B2
7337152 Gawler Feb 2008 B1
7343357 Kara Mar 2008 B1
7458612 Bennett Dec 2008 B1
7509291 McBride et al. Mar 2009 B2
7548612 Weissman et al. Jun 2009 B2
7711650 Kara May 2010 B1
7778924 Ananda Aug 2010 B1
7784090 Lord et al. Aug 2010 B2
7831518 Montgomery et al. Nov 2010 B2
7831824 Abdulhayoglu Nov 2010 B2
7840492 Leung et al. Nov 2010 B2
7954709 Leon et al. Jun 2011 B1
7963437 McBride et al. Jun 2011 B1
8078548 Ogg Dec 2011 B1
8100324 Leon Jan 2012 B1
8155976 Rendich et al. Apr 2012 B1
8204835 Ogg Jun 2012 B1
8240579 Bennett Aug 2012 B1
8250000 Ogg Aug 2012 B2
8612361 Bussell et al. Dec 2013 B1
8626673 Bennett Jan 2014 B1
9208620 Bortnak et al. Dec 2015 B1
20010007086 Rogers et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010020234 Shah et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010022060 Robertson et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010024228 Klinefelter et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010037320 Allport et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010042052 Leon Nov 2001 A1
20010043350 Kasai et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020002544 Leon et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020032573 Williams et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032668 Kohler et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032784 Darago et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020040333 Fuwa Apr 2002 A1
20020040353 Brown et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020046182 Bator et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020052841 Guthrie et al. May 2002 A1
20020065577 Teraura et al. May 2002 A1
20020073039 Ogg et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020073050 Gusler et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020073052 Katikaneni et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082935 Moore et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083020 Leon Jun 2002 A1
20020095347 Cummiskey Jul 2002 A1
20020099652 Herzen et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020116318 Thomas et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020127040 Davies et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143431 Sansone Oct 2002 A1
20020143714 Allport et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020149196 Fabel Oct 2002 A1
20020190117 Manduley Dec 2002 A1
20030004900 Schwartz et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030014376 DeWitt et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030024745 Huitt et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030029914 Hortman et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037008 Raju et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030065739 Shnier Apr 2003 A1
20030074324 Kresina et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030080182 Gunther May 2003 A1
20030101143 Montgomery et al. May 2003 A1
20030101148 Montgomery et al. May 2003 A1
20030115162 Konick Jun 2003 A1
20030130963 Stickler et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030138345 Schwabe Jul 2003 A1
20030140017 Patton et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030144972 Cordery et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030167241 Gilham Sep 2003 A1
20030182155 Nitzan et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187666 Leon Oct 2003 A1
20030193530 Blackman et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204477 McNett Oct 2003 A1
20030217018 Groff et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030233276 Pearlman et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236709 Hendra et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040001133 Critelli et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040002926 Coffy et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040048503 Mills et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064422 Leon Apr 2004 A1
20040083179 Sesek et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083189 Leon Apr 2004 A1
20040089482 Ramsden et al. May 2004 A1
20040122776 Sansone Jun 2004 A1
20040122777 Sansone Jun 2004 A1
20040122779 Stickler et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128264 Leung et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040185827 Parks Sep 2004 A1
20040185882 Gecht et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186811 Gullo et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040211844 Marshall Oct 2004 A1
20040212833 Taskett et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215581 Lord et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215583 Elliott Oct 2004 A1
20040220935 McGraw et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230544 Herbert Nov 2004 A1
20040236938 Callaghan Nov 2004 A1
20040254808 Bennett et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254898 Parker et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050065892 Ryan et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065896 Kummer et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065897 Ryan et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071244 Phillips et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075991 Ogg Apr 2005 A1
20050077346 Dutta et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050080751 Burningham Apr 2005 A1
20050114222 Mundy May 2005 A1
20050116047 Lu et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050119786 Kadaba Jun 2005 A1
20050171791 Chimenti et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050171869 Minnocci Aug 2005 A1
20050192899 Reardon Sep 2005 A1
20050192911 Mattern Sep 2005 A1
20050237203 Burman et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050256811 Pagel et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050278266 Ogg et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060000648 Galtier Jan 2006 A1
20060020505 Whitehouse Jan 2006 A1
20060036557 Mattern Feb 2006 A1
20060116971 Beckstrom et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060122947 Poulin Jun 2006 A1
20060173700 Fenelon Aug 2006 A1
20060173796 Kara Aug 2006 A1
20060220298 Fairweather et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060238334 Mangan et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060259390 Rosenberger Nov 2006 A1
20060282271 Anada et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060283943 Ostrowski et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060287096 O'Kelley, II et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070033110 Philipp et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070067248 Fabien Mar 2007 A1
20070073587 Walker et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070078795 Chatte Apr 2007 A1
20070080228 Knowles et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070174213 Whitehouse et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174215 Morel Jul 2007 A1
20070253350 Tung et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070255664 Blumberg et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080046384 Braun et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080154781 Kumar Jun 2008 A1
20080281719 Hall et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090164392 Raju et al. Jun 2009 A1
20100169241 Schoonmaker et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100235267 Brookner et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100298662 Yu et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100312627 Khechef et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110015935 Montgomery et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110022544 Kim et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110029429 Whitehouse Feb 2011 A1
20110071944 Heiden et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110145107 Greco Jun 2011 A1
20110225180 Liao et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110242554 Ferry et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110295646 Barros Dec 2011 A1
20120008766 Robertson et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120159603 Queck Jun 2012 A1
20120233252 Vats et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120240204 Bhatnagar et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130066794 Hill et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130254132 Srinath et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140019517 Fawcett Jan 2014 A1
20140067665 Paletz et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140265300 Jena Sep 2014 A1
20140324633 Pollak et al. Oct 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (37)
Number Date Country
2470371 May 2003 CA
2912696 Oct 1979 DE
3903718 Aug 1989 DE
4409386 Sep 1995 DE
0137737 Apr 1985 EP
153816 Sep 1985 EP
0282359 Sep 1988 EP
0507562 Oct 1992 EP
0571259 Nov 1993 EP
0596706 May 1994 EP
0658861 Jun 1995 EP
0927958 Jul 1999 EP
0927963 Jul 1999 EP
2580844 Oct 1986 FR
2246929 Feb 1992 GB
2251210 Jul 1992 GB
2271452 Apr 1994 GB
63147673 Jun 1988 JP
05-132049 May 1993 JP
11-249205 Sep 1999 JP
02000105845 Apr 2000 JP
04284558 Jun 2009 JP
WO-8801818 Mar 1988 WO
WO-9427258-AI Nov 1994 WO
WO-199519016 Jul 1995 WO
WO-9714117 Apr 1997 WO
WO-9740472 Oct 1997 WO
WO-9740472 Oct 1997 WO
WO-9814907 Apr 1998 WO
WO-9814909 Apr 1998 WO
WO-9857302 Dec 1998 WO
WO-9857460 Dec 1998 WO
WO-9948054 Sep 1999 WO
WO-02063517 Aug 2002 WO
WO-02093498 Nov 2002 WO
WO-03039051 May 2003 WO
WO-03083784 Oct 2003 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (40)
Entry
Davis Brad L.; “Printing System for Preventing Injustice by Delivering Print Data from Postal Charge Meter to Printer,” Jan. 2001.
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 12/103,496 to Bortnak et al., filed Apr. 15, 2008 and entitled “Systems and Methods for Activation of Postage Indicia at Point of Sale.”
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,309 to Leon, filed Aug. 24, 2006 and entitled “Invisible Fluorescent Ink Mark.”
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,739 to McBride et al., filed Feb. 13, 2008 and entitled “Systems and Methods for Distributed Activation of Postage.”
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,463 to Leon et al., filed Dec. 30, 2005 and entitled “Systems and Methods for Single Pass Printing Postage Indicia.”
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,579 to Ogg, filed Jun. 26, 2003 and entitled “System and Method for Automatically Processing Mail.”
International Search Report issued for PCT/US95/00237, dated May 29, 1995, 4 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/616,546, Bussell et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/616,569, Tsuie et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/030,739, McBride et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/103,496, Bortnak et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/553,824, Bortnak et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/729,148, Stamps.com.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/316,240.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,309, J. P. Leon.
Ford, Colleen, “Frequent Flyer Programs,” Australian Accountant, 63,1, Feb. 1993, pp. 52-58.
Alexander, Keith L., “U.S. Stamps Pay Tribute to Starry-Eyed Jurors”, Final Edition, Calgary Herald, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Sep. 14, 2007, 2 pgs.
Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/353,690 dated Aug. 3, 2009, 19 pgs.
“Domestic Mail Manual Section 604”, Aug. 31, 2005.
“Mobile Postage stamps via text message announced”, http://telecoms.cytalk.com/2011/03/mobile-postage-stamps-via-text-messages-announced/, CY.TALK Telecoms News Blog, Mar. 14, 2011 in Telecoms, Texting, pp. 1-9.
Mobile Postage Stamps Via Text Messages Announced, Phone Reviews, Mobile Phones, News, Mar. 11, 2011, pp. 1-3.
Anonymous, “Automated Indicia Detection System From Parascript Protects Postage Revenue for Postal Operators, Cracks Down on Fraud:—Parascript StampVerify Simplifies Complex Task of Automatically Locating and Verifying Different Types of Indicia on Envelope Images -,” PR Newswire, New York, Sep. 18, 2007.
“Information-Based Indicia Program (IBIP) Performance Criteria for Information-Based Indicia and Security Architecture for Open IBI Postage Evidencing Systems,” Feb. 23, 2000, The United States Postal Service (USPS), 79 pages.
Tygar, J.D.et al., “Cryptography: It's Not Just for Electronic Mail Anymore,” School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA, Mar. 1, 1993, 23 pages.
Pintsov, L. et al. “Postal Revenue Collection in the Digital Age,” Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Financial Cryptography, Jan. 1, 2001, 3 pages.
“Miniature, Coin-Shaped Chip is Read or Written with a Touch,” News Release, Dallas Semiconductor, Jul. 1991, 9 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US96/16366, dated Jun. 13, 1997, 9 pages.
Terrell, K, “Licking Stamps: A PC and a Printer Will End Trips to the Post Office,” U.S. News & World Report, Sep. 28, 1998, vol. 125, No. 12, 4 pages.
Computergram International, “U.S. Postal Service to Introduce PC Postage Plans Today,” Aug. 9, 1999, No. 3720, 1 page.
Stamps: Beyond Elvis, May 15, 1994, New York Times Archives, 2 pages.
Minnick, R. “Postage Imprinting Apparatus and Methods for Use With a Computer Printer,” Apr. 27, 1995, 71 pages.
“Royal Mail Posts Out New Look Stamp Books Created by CDT Design,” Design Week, Jul. 4, 2002, 2 pages.
Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2007 for JP 515,253/97; with English language translation (4 pages).
Brief English Translation of Office Action Issued for DE 195 49 613.2 and copy of German Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2007, 6 pages.
English Translation of Office Action issued for DE 195 49 613.2 and German Office Action, dated Mar. 29, 2001, 10 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/114,964 to Clem et al., filed Apr. 25, 2005, and entitled “Quality Assurance of Image-Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 122 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,914 to McBride et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Customized Computer-Based Value-Bearing Item Quality Assurance,” 131 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,728 to Huebner et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Printing of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 122 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/994,698 to Leon et al., filed Nov. 22, 2004, and entitled “Image Customization of Computer-Based Value-Bearing Items,” 126 pages.
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 10/643,745 to Ogg et al., filed Aug. 19, 2003 and entitled “System and Method for Dynamically Partitioning a Postage Evidencing System,” 20 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140229369 A1 Aug 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11616569 Dec 2006 US
Child 14252449 US