Not applicable
Not applicable
1. Field of the Invention
The apparatus of the present invention relates to fabric bulk bags and more particularly into an improvement in a bulk bag having a floor portion which includes a pair of spaced apart pockets for receiving a rigid member to define a channel through which tines of a forklift may enter.
2. General Background and Description of the Invention
The improvement of the present invention relates to the redefining the shape of the sleeves and the attachment between the sleeves and the pot belly portion into which the rigid channels are placed so that while making it easier to insert the channels into the sleeves, the pot belly portion, when filled with product is less likely to become misshaped and provide a more flat, stable base to the bag.
For a further understanding of the nature, objects, and advantages of the present invention, reference should be had to the following detailed description, read in conjunction with the following drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements and wherein:
Additionally, applicant is aware of the Liftsystems patent that requires an elastic material to hold the tubes in place as well as several design channels which address the pressure that the channel must withstand. The basic form of the bag design that was witnessed by applicant will not require elastic to hold the channels in place. However, the tube described in that bag fails to take into account the tremendous pressures that are applied against them whenever the bag is suspended by its loops. The Liftsystems patent, on the other hand, described a much more robust channel.
As illustrated in
It should be noted that a standard bulk bag starts out as a 36″×36″ bag made in a square configuration as shown in
In the improved bag of the present invention, applicant is configuring the channel sleeves and the pot belly portion, as seen in
The bag which was witnessed by applicant, had envisioned putting two sleeves inside the bag and product area forming a space for the channels. This method is difficult to achieve and wasteful of materials. Further, it provides for the bag body fabric to be unbroken between the bag and the pot belly portion. The result of this design is a stress point at the upper inside corners of the channel. In
With applicant's new design, elastic will not be needed to maintain the position of the channels. Once the bag is filled, the outward force of the product applies great pressure to the channels and holds them in place for most applications. However, applicant believes that the addition of small protrusions from the channels will increase the hold between the channels and the sleeves and prevent the channels from being ejected in even very severe applications. As illustrated in
Furthermore, there has been difficulty with intermittent instability of the bag when being carried by the channels. After months of work and looking back on past efforts, the cause has been found.
The entire idea of carrying a bag in a stable position above the channels in a flexible bag revolves around preventing movement of product inside the bag.
The pot belly allows product to fill in the void between the fork channels under controlled conditions rather than having the product moving into the void during the bags first lift after filling.
It is critical to stability that product movement be restricted or prevented during transportation of the bag while the bag is supported on the pallet channels.
In the past, one has had to oversize the channel pockets or sleeves to allow easy insertion of the channels. This over sizing of the pockets has reduced the outward pressure of the product between the channels by increasing the distance from the pot belly side wall and the channel. With very mobile or slippery products, this extra space translated into the pot belly drooping downward when the bag was being lifted by the fork lift channels from beneath.
Once the bag is transported, and downward slump represents product that will be pushed up from the bottom when the bag is set down on the floor.
As the product that has drooped down is pushed up by setting in on a flat floor, it momentarily destabilizes the bag and it can take a sudden lean in any direction.
This lean becomes worse each time the bag is picked up as the product moves down in to the drooping area and then is pushed back up into the bag whenever it is set down. The uncontrolled product above moves in unpredictable ways each time this happens.
Therefore, it is desirable to prevent the drooping during lift and it is desirable to have easy channel insertion.
As illustrated in
By doing so, as can be seen in the attached drawing, the bottom corner 22 of the pot belly 24 can be temporarily moved away from the channel sleeve 20 for easy entry of the channel 28. This modification does allow us to size the pocket or sleeve 20 exactly to the channel 28 that will be inserted into sleeve 20, yet allow it to open for easy insertion. By sizing exactly to the channel 28, we create the tightest possible relationship between pot belly 24, channels 28 and pockets or sleeves 20. This then gives us the flattest possible bottom even when the product is very mobile.
The new point of attachment 40 is past the corner 22 of the pot belly by two to three inches. This provides a flexible area 41 the approximate size of the dotted line 43 because the lower right hand corner of the pot belly can now be pushed out of the way for easy channel insertion.
Previous point of attachment was the bottom corner of the pot belly. The size of the pocket had to be larger than the channel to allow easy insertion of the channel.
All measurements disclosed herein are at standard temperature and pressure, at sea level on Earth, unless indicated otherwise.
The foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only; the scope of the present invention is to be limited only by the following claims.
Priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/737,257, filed Nov. 15, 2005, incorporated herein by reference, is hereby claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2698696 | Strong | Jan 1955 | A |
4364424 | Nattrass | Dec 1982 | A |
RE32308 | Nattrass | Dec 1986 | E |
4830191 | Dijksman | May 1989 | A |
5465865 | Coombes | Nov 1995 | A |
5507237 | Barrow et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5613447 | Trickett | Mar 1997 | A |
5785175 | Cholsaipant | Jul 1998 | A |
6213305 | Baker et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6390675 | Jardine | May 2002 | B1 |
6467625 | Baker et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
D492835 | Michaels et al. | Jul 2004 | S |
6926144 | Schnaars, Jr. et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6935500 | Schnaars | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7207443 | Von Merveldt | Apr 2007 | B2 |
20050092638 | Michaels et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070119857 A1 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60737257 | Nov 2005 | US |