In the drawings, numeral 1 designates an electrolyte membrane, 2 designates a catalyst layer, 3 designates a gas diffusion layer, 4 designates a membrane-electrode assembly (MEA), 10 designates a solid polymer electrolyte, 20 designates a solid polymer electrolyte dissolved in a solvent, 30 designates a solid polymer electrolyte existing in the solvent in the form of a colloid, and 40 designates a powder catalytic material obtained by drying.
The invention will be hereafter described by way of examples thereof.
Ink A was prepared with the mixture ratio (% by weight) shown in Table 1 in the following order. First, a liquid mixture of a catalyst carrier conductive material (60 wt % Pt/C), a solid polymer electrolyte, water (dielectric constant 78.5), and propylene glycol (good solvent; dielectric constant 32.0) was prepared (a conceptual chart is shown in
The prepared powder catalytic material was applied to both sides of the electrolyte membrane to 0.20 mg/cm2 and 0.50 mg/cm2 by spray coating. The material was then fixed by a roll press machine under conditions of 160° C. and 30 kgf/cm, thereby preparing a solid polymer fuel cell electrode.
Using this solid polymer fuel cell electrode, a fuel cell was made, and its cell performance was evaluated in terms of the relationship between current density and voltage. The result is shown in
An ink was prepared in the same way as in Example 1 with the exception that the order of preparation was such as follows. Namely, a liquid mixture of catalyst carrier conductive material (60 wt % Pt/C), water, propylene glycol (good solvent), and cyclohexanol (poor solvent) was prepared, to which a solid polymer electrolyte solution was added while stirring. The mixture was then stirred for 30 minutes, whereby an ink in the form of colloid was obtained.
Thereafter, the ink was dried in the same way as in Example 1 so as to prepare a powder catalytic material. Using the thus prepared powder catalytic material in a solid polymer fuel cell electrode, a fuel battery cell was made. Its battery performance was then evaluated in terms of the relationship between current density and voltage. The result of the evaluation is shown in
An ink was prepared in the same way as in Example 1 with the exception that no cyclohexanol (poor solvent) was added. The ink was then allowed to stand for 30 minutes, whereupon no colloidalization of the electrolyte was observed.
The ink was then dried with a spray dryer under the conditions consisting of a solution delivery rate of 10 cc/min, spray pressure of 0.1 MPa, and drying temperature of 80° C., thereby preparing a powder catalytic material. Thereafter, a fuel battery cell was prepared using the powder catalytic material in a solid polymer fuel cell electrode in the same way as in Example 1. Its battery performance was evaluated in terms of the relationship between current density and voltage. The result is shown in
The graph in
Inks C, D, and E were prepared with the mixture ratios (% by weight) shown in Table 2 in the same order as in Example 1. By stirring each ink for approximately 30 minutes, an ink in which part of the electrolyte was colloidalized was obtained. Each of the inks was dried with a spray dryer in the same way as in Example 1, thereby making a powder catalytic material.
The prepared powder catalytic material was applied to both sides of the electrolyte membrane to 0.20 mg/cm2 and 0.50 mg/cm2 by spray coating. The material was then fixed by a roll press machine under the same conditions as in Example 1, thereby preparing a solid polymer fuel cell electrode.
Using this solid polymer fuel cell electrode, a fuel cell was made, and its cell performance was evaluated in terms of the relationship between current density and voltage. The result is shown in
The graph in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2004-115510 | Apr 2004 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP05/06575 | 3/29/2005 | WO | 00 | 10/5/2006 |